
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
We assessed whether the Group’s accounting
policies are in accordance with IFRS. We
selected a sample of development projects in
progress and considered whether the criteria’s in
IAS 38 were met as basis for capitalization. We
tested on a sample basis recognized salary costs
to timesheets and salary information. We
evaluated on a sample basis the accuracy of
capitalized costs and that the recognized costs
were directly attributable to development
projects. We evaluated Management’s
assessment of impairment indicators of
completed development projects based on the
commercial prospects of the projects. We
discussed with management the value-in-use
calculations of development projects in progress
and used professional skepticism to evaluate key
assumptions applied in the impairment test. As
part of our evaluation, we compared the applied
budgets in the impairment test with the strategy
plan approved by management and assessed the
key assumptions in the impairment test based on
discussions with management related to
strategic initiatives.
Statement on the Management’s review
Management is responsible for the Management’s
review.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not
cover the Management’s review, and we do not
express any assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial
statements, our responsibility is to read the
Management’s review and, in doing so, consider
whether the Management’s review is materially
inconsistent with the financial statements, or our
knowledge obtained during the audit, or
otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
Moreover, it is our responsibility to consider
whether the Management’s review provides the
information required by relevant law and
regulations.
Based on our procedures, we conclude that the
Management’s review is in accordance with the
financial statements and has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of relevant law
and regulations. We did not identify any material
misstatement of the Management’s review.
Management’s responsibilities for
the financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation
of consolidated financial statements that give a
true and fair view in accordance with IFRS
Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU
and additional requirements of the Danish
Financial Statements Act and for the
preparation of parent company financial
statements that give a true and fair view in
accordance with the Danish Financial
Statements Act.
Moreover, Management is responsible for such
internal control as Management determines is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements,
Management is responsible for assessing the
Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as
applicable, matters related to going concern
and using the going concern basis of
accounting in preparing the financial
statements unless Management either intends
to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or
to cease operations, or has no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the
audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable
assurance as to whether the financial
statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,
and to issue an auditor’s report that includes
our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high
level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and
additional requirements applicable in Denmark
will always detect a material misstatement when
it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or
error and are considered material if, individually
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of the financial
statements.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance
with ISAs and additional requirements
applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional
judgement and maintain professional skepticism
throughout the audit. We also:
Identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, design and
perform audit procedures responsive to those
risks and obtain audit evidence that is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement resulting from fraud is
higher than for one resulting from error, as
fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations or
the override of internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control
relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Group’s and the Parent Company’s
internal control.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related disclosures
made by Management.
Conclude on the appropriateness of
Management’s use of the going concern basis
of accounting in preparing the financial
statements and, based on the audit evidence
obtained, whether a material uncertainty
exists related to events or conditions that may
cast significant doubt on the Group’s and the
Parent Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. If we conclude that a material
uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our auditor’s report to the related
disclosures in the financial statements or, if
such disclosures are inadequate, to modify
our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the
audit evidence obtained up to the date of our
auditor’s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause the Group and the
Parent Company to cease to continue as a
going concern.
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure
and contents of the financial statements,
including the note disclosures, and whether
5404 GovernanceAquaporin Annual Report 2024