Act, and for such internal control as Management
determines is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free
from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements,
Management is responsible for assessing the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern and using the going concern basis of
accounting in preparing the financial statements
unless Management either intends to liquidate
the Company or to cease operations, or has no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the
Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial
statements are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor’s report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in
accordance with ISAs and the additional
requirements applicable in Denmark will always
detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and
are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to
influence the economic decisions of users taken
on the basis of these financial statements.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with
ISAs and the additional requirements applicable
in Denmark, we exercise professional judgment
and maintain professional skepticism throughout
the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or
error, design and perform audit
procedures responsive to those risks,
and obtain audit evidence that is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our opinion. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement
resulting from fraud is higher than for
one resulting from error as fraud may
involve collusion, forgery, intentional
omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal
control relevant to the audit to design
audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of
accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates
and related disclosures made by
Management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of
Management’s use of the going concern
basis of accounting in preparing the
financial statements and, based on the
audit evidence obtained, whether a
material uncertainty exists related to
events or conditions that may cast
significant doubt on the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. If
we conclude that material uncertainty
exists, we are required to draw attention
in our auditor’s report to the related
disclosures in the financial statements
or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to
modify our opinion. Our conclusions are
based on the audit evidence obtained up
to the date of our auditor’s report.
However, future events or conditions
may cause the Company to cease to
continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation,
structure, and contents of the financial
statements, including the disclosures,
and whether the financial statements
represent the underlying transactions
and events in a manner that gives a true
and fair view.