EEZY PLC | REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2025 23
analysis phase of the process using established, science-based, sector-specific sustainability standards as well as by a review
of sustainability data from peer companies.
Identifying impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability issues
Based on the initial sustainability themes identified in the context analysis, a review of the main features of the Eezy value chain
was carried out. In this way, a set of negative and positive impacts, risks and opportunities related to people and the
environment, in which Eezy is potentially involved through its activities or business relationships, were identified and grouped
according to the sustainability themes of the ESRS (ESRS 1, AR 16). The identification phase considered the links between the
identified impacts and dependencies and the risks and opportunities.
The process of identifying significant impacts, risks and opportunities did not include screening for pollution, water and marine
resources, biodiversity and ecosystems, or resource inflows, resource outflows and waste at the Eezy site locations. The
identification was based on the background analysis carried out in the previous phase and the expertise of the project team. No
significant impacts, risks or opportunities were identified from the environmental data for E2, E3 and E4. In relation to climate
change E1, two negative impacts were identified in relation to emissions and energy consumption, and two transition risks were
identified in relation to regulatory changes and energy availability and price volatility. In relation to the circular economy E5, two
negative impacts were identified in relation to material consumption and waste, and one risk of potential material availability
disruption.
Topic E2 Pollution was therefore already identified as irrelevant at the identification stage, as Eezy's operative control does not
extend to customer premises and, for example, chemical spills or other pollution effects occurring there. E3 Water and marine
resources was identified as irrelevant, as Eezy's own water consumption is minimal, and even small-scale purchases do not
come from water-intensive sectors.
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems is also irrelevant to Eezy's operations, as potential negative impacts on biodiversity from
customer activities are not within Eezy's operational control. In addition, Eezy's upstream procurement does not include
products or equipment that contribute to, for example, forest or species loss. However, no separate biodiversity impact
assessment was carried out in the double materiality analysis. The analysis did not identify any dependencies on biodiversity
and ecosystems and their services, nor did it identify transitional, physical or systemic risks. The analysis did not include
consultation with affected communities on other potential environmental impacts.
Given the nature of Eezy's business, particularly in relation to social data, several potentially material impacts, risks and
opportunities were identified in topics S1, S2, S3 and S4. Relevant criteria for identifying material impacts, risks and
opportunities related to G1 The conduct of the business, included Eezy's location in Finland and its activities in two different
business areas: Staffing Services and Professional Services.
Assessing impacts, risks and opportunities related to sustainability issues
The materiality of the identified impacts, risks and opportunities was assessed in accordance with the principles of the standards
(ESRS 1, Chapter 3). Eezy’s sustainability consultant company first carried out an independent assessment of the sustainability
impacts. A draft assessment was reviewed and approved by Eezy's key working group and subsequently considered by a larger
working group of Eezy experts and management. The ex-ante evaluation was iterated based on a joint discussion and expert
opinion and finally validated. The working group then moved on to an individual economic impact assessment of sustainability
risks and opportunities.
The severity of the negative and positive impacts (scale, scope and, for negative impacts, irreversibility), the magnitude of the
economic impacts of the risks and opportunities, and the likelihood of each of these occurring was each assessed on a scale of
1 to 5. In 2024, the assessment of sustainability risks and opportunities was carried out as a separate entity from Eezy's other
risk assessment processes in a dual risk assessment process, but the scale of the assessments is consistent. In addition, the
most significant sustainability risks were brought into Eezy's enterprise-level risk assessment process, where they were treated
at the same scales as other strategic and operational risks. Eezy's sustainability and other risks will be assessed in parallel
processes in the future. In the absence of significant changes in Eezy's operations or operating environment, the assessment of
sustainability impacts, opportunities and risks will be carried out on a light review basis compared to the previous year's
analysis. Eezy does not have a separate due diligence process.
The materiality of impacts was the product of the average of separate severity and probability assessments (the economic
materiality of risks and opportunities, and the magnitude and probability of the associated economic impacts). These
assessments resulted in a ranking of all identified impacts, risks and opportunities in order of materiality values, with the
calculated median serving as a quantitative threshold for materiality. Finally, the results were also assessed qualitatively,
leading to some clarifications and revisions by consensus in cases where the quantitative weighting of the issues assessed was
considered unrealistic in relation to the overall resilience profile of Eezy.
The sustainability issues relevant for reporting were determined based on the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities
grouped under them. In the assessment, E1, E5, S2 and S4 were identified not material, based on quantitative and qualitative
criteria. Eezy's material issues relate to the following sustainability issues:
S1 Own workforce - Working conditions, Equal treatment and equal opportunities for all, other employment-related rights
S3 Affected communities - Entity-specific data: employment
G1 Business conduct- Business culture, Corruption and bribery, Political interaction
More detailed impacts, risks and opportunities can be found in section SBM-3. For Eezy, the assessment was carried out at
company level, considering the whole business and value chain, i.e. the analysis did not exclude, for example, specific activities