iso4217:EURiso4217:EURxbrli:shares743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-01-012025-12-31743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-01-012024-12-31743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31san:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31san:HybridCapitalMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032023-12-31743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31san:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31san:HybridCapitalMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032024-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31san:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31san:HybridCapitalMember743700XJC24THUPK0S032025-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember
Annual Report 2025
1
Sanoma_kansi.svg
Report of the
Board of Directors
and Financial
Statements 2025
Financial Statements 2025
2
Financials and
sustainability
Financial Statements 2025
3
Report of the
Board of Directors
Financial Statements 2025
4
Strategic review
In 2025, Sanoma continued to build on the long-term competitive strengths of both Learning and Media Finland and made
solid progress on its 2024–2026 strategic focus areas of increasing the profitability of Learning and Media Finland and
deleveraging the Group’s balance sheet.
Across its operating markets, Sanoma Learning continued to focus on, and invest in developing best-in-class, inclusive and
personalised K12 learning content and solutions. This work is being enhanced by AI, always with a strong emphasis on its
responsible use and human oversight. In January 2025, Sanoma acquired secondary education learning materials from
Finnish Edita. The strategic choice not to participate in multi-year distribution tenders in the Dutch market was announced in
October, resulting in the reduction of net sales of the Dutch distribution business by approx. EUR 40 million. In 2025, learning
content represented approx. 85% (2024: 79%) of Learning’s net sales.
The implementation of Learning’s process and efficiency Program Solar was successfully completed during the year, creating
significant operating leverage. Together with the increased scale and growth outlook of the business, as well as the lower net
sales of the Dutch distribution business, Learning’s adjusted operating profit margin is expected to improve to clearly above
23% in 2026 as announced in October 2025. Costs related to program Solar remained within the originally estimated level and
amounted to EUR 43 million in total during 2023–2025.
In Media Finland, enhancing and investing in successful digital transformation both in news media and entertainment, largely
supported by AI, remained a strategic focus area. Attributable to the accelerating shift of media consumption towards digital
channels and the successful implementation of its digital subscription strategy, Sanoma made a decision to close down the
printing plant in Tampere with effect from the end of 2025. In B2B, Media Finland started to prepare for the opening of the
gambling market in Finland in July 2027.
Media Finland had a reasonably balanced business portfolio in 2025, with 59% (2024: 55%) of net sales attributable to the
relatively stable B2C business, mainly subscriptions, and 41% (2024: 45%) to the B2B business. Within B2B, print advertising
represented only 15% (2024: 15%) of net sales. During the year, Media Finland successfully continued to implement its well-
established cost conscious way of working.
AI is an incremental element in enhancing growth and Sanoma continued to move forward with numerous AI initiatives in both
Learning and Media Finland. Several new services empowered by AI were launched during the year, with a strong emphasis
on its responsible use and human oversight.
In November, Sanoma updated its financial targets to reflect the Group’s accelerated net sales and earnings growth outlook in
2026–2030. The accelerated growth outlook of both Learning and Media Finland is expected to deliver high single-digit growth
in the Group’s adjusted operating profit (measured by 3-year CAGR). More information is available under Events during the
reporting period.
Creating a culture in which all employees can thrive is a crucial success factor during Sanoma’s accelerated growth path for
2026–2030. Sanoma’s people strategy is based on its commitment to foster a work environment in which employees feel
valued, supported, encouraged to learn and empowered to succeed. Employee perspectives are gathered through the annual
Employee Engagement Survey, in which the latest engagement score was 62%, close to the European benchmark of 65%.
Sustainability is deeply rooted in the purpose of Sanoma’s learning and media businesses, which have a positive impact on
the lives of millions of people every day. During the year, Sanoma’s sustainability work included further reducing its carbon
footprint as well as developing diversity, equality and inclusion (DE&I), leadership, ethical use of AI and suppliers’ sustainability
practices across the Group. Sanoma’s climate work was awarded by a status on the CDP Climate A list in December 2025, as
the only learning company globally, emphasising ambitious climate targets as well as robust actions and climate risk
management. More information on the sustainability performance is available in the Sustainability Statement.
As a result of the successful implementation of the strategy in 2025, Sanoma’s balance sheet strengthened remarkedly and
the key ratios were within updated long-term target levels at the end of the year. Supported by the refinancing conducted in
December 2025, Sanoma is financially in a good position to balance shareholder returns, deleverage the balance sheet and
invest in future growth.
Financial Statements 2025
5
Financial review FY 2025
Net sales decreased in both businesses and the Group’s net sales amounted to EUR 1,302.5 million (2024: 1,344.8). In
Learning, growth in learning content sales partially mitigated the impact of the planned discontinuation of low-value distribution
contracts in the Netherlands. In Media Finland, lower advertising sales were partially offset by growth in digital subscriptions.
The Group’s comparable net sales development was -3% (2024: -2%), amounting to -3% in Learning and -4% in Media
Finland.
Adjusted operating profit improved to EUR 188.2 million (2024: 180.0). In Learning, earnings improved driven by the higher
share of learning content sales as well as a more digital sales mix and consequently lower paper and printing costs. In Media
Finland, growth in digital subscription sales and lower costs supported earnings, while advertising sales had an adverse
impact. Lower costs in Other operations were mainly attributable to ICT expenses and differences in incentive provisions
between years.
Operating profit decreased to EUR 48.6 million (2024: 81.8) as the IACs amounted to EUR -106.3 million (2024: -61.5). The
IACs included higher impairments in both businesses, booked in Q3 2025. In Learning, the decision to not participate in multi-
year distribution tenders in the Dutch market led to a EUR 48 million impairment in intangible assets. In Media Finland,
impairments and restructuring expenses related to the closure of the printing plant in Tampere amounted to EUR 32 million.
The Group’s restructuring expenses also included other strategic development and technology transformation costs across
operations. PPAs amounted to EUR 33.3 million (2024: 36.7).
Net financial items increased to EUR -24.4 million (2024: -33.4) as a result of lower interest rates of external loans and a lower
amount of external debt. The average interest rate of external loans was 3.7% (2024: 4.8%).
The result before taxes amounted to EUR 24.3 million (2024: 48.4). Income taxes amounted to EUR -4.5 million (2024: -7.8).
The result for the period was EUR 19.9 million (2024: 40.6).
Adjusted earnings per share amounted to EUR 0.57 (2024: 0.46) and earnings per share to EUR 0.06 (2024: 0.19).
IACs, PPAs and reconciliation of adjusted operating profit
EUR million
2025
2024
Operating profit
48.6
81.8
Items affecting comparability (IACs)
Restructuring expenses
-34.2
-37.6
Of which related to Program Solar
-4.3
-17.0
Impairments
-74.7
-29.0
Capital gains/losses
2.6
5.2
IACs total
-106.3
-61.5
Purchase price allocation adjustments and amortisations (PPAs)
-33.3
-36.7
Adjusted operating profit
188.2
180.0
A detailed reconciliation on SBU level is presented under Reconciliation of certain key figures.
Financial position
At the end of December 2025, net debt amounted to EUR 486.1 million (2024: 568.5). Net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio
improved to 1.8 (2024: 2.2), being within the updated target of below 2.5. Supported by the good cash flow development
during the year and in line with the seasonality of the learning business, the Group's net debt decreased, not only compared to
the previous year, but also compared to the end of September 2025. Repayment of the EUR 119 million term loan in
December 2025, with a new EUR 220 million syndicated term loan maturing in March 2029 (more information on p. 166)
extended the maturity of external debt. The Group’s EUR 300 million committed Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) was fully
unused.
At the end of December 2025, the Group’s equity totalled EUR 730.9 million (2024: 771.7) and the consolidated balance sheet
amounted to EUR 1,729.4 million (2024: 1,879.1). The equity ratio was 47.1% (2024: 45.0%).
Financial Statements 2025
6
Cash flow
The Group’s free cash flow improved to EUR 159.7 million (2024: 145.3) or EUR 0.98 per share (2024: 0.89). The improvement
was driven by working capital movements, lower financial expenses and higher earnings. Investments in prepublication assets
and TV programme rights were stable. Taxes paid increased, which was partially due to phasing between years.
Capital expenditure included in the Group’s free cash flow amounted to EUR 39.1 million (2024: 37.7) and mainly consisted of
growth investments in digital platforms in Learning, as well as property, technology and other maintenance investments in
Media Finland.
Progress in Program Solar in Learning
On 26 October 2023, Sanoma announced that Sanoma Learning’s adjusted operating profit margin (earlier operational EBIT
margin excl. PPA) is expected to reach its long-term target level of 23% in 2026 (2025: 20.4%; 2024: 19.2%; 2023: 18.7%),
supported by Solar, the process and efficiency improvement programme. Furthermore, Sanoma announced in its Q3 2025
Interim Report, that the margin is expected to improve to clearly above 23% in 2026 as a result of the expected EUR 40 million
reduction of the Dutch distribution sales. Annual operational efficiencies from Program Solar will be approx. EUR 55 million
from 2026 onwards. At the end of 2025, the impacts of Program Solar initiatives were visible in the free cash flow and cost
base. The programme is substantially completed and will not be covered separately in 2026 financial reporting.
The costs related to the programme amounted to EUR 43 million in total and were mainly related to restructuring expenses.
The costs of the programme were treated as IACs and were booked in Learning’s result. The majority of Solar-related costs
occurred during 2023–2024 (EUR 17 million in 2024 and EUR 22 million in 2023). In 2025, the costs of the programme,
treated as IACs, amounted to EUR 4 million and were relatively evenly split between quarters.
Acquisitions and divestments
On 20 January 2025, Sanoma announced that it has acquired secondary education learning materials from Finnish Edita
Oppiminen Oy, a subsidiary of Edita Group. In 2024, pro forma net sales of the acquired portfolio amounted to approx. EUR 4
million. No employees will be transferring from the seller to Sanoma with the transaction.
Information on acquisitions and divestments conducted in 2024 and earlier is available on Sanoma’s website.
Events during the reporting period
On 5 December 2025, Sanoma signed a EUR 220 million syndicated term loan facility with a group of nine relationship banks.
The maturity date of the loan is 16 March 2029, and it includes two one-year extension options. Part of the term loan was used
to prepay a EUR 119 million term loan in December 2025, and the rest will be used to refinance a EUR 150 million hybrid bond
on the reset date on 16 March 2026. Part of the total repayments will be financed with the Group’s improved operating cash
flow.
On 25 November 2025, Sanoma updated its financial targets and selected Alternative Performance Measures. With the updated
targets, Sanoma aims to deliver high single-digit growth in the Groups adjusted operating profit in 2026–2030 (measured annually
using a 3-year CAGR). The updated financial targets for Learning, Media Finland and the Group are presented in the tables below.
Growth at Learning
%
Comparable net sales
Mid single-digit
Adjusted operating profit
High single-digit
Growth at Media Finland
%
Comparable net sales
Stable
Adjusted operating profit
Low single-digit
Separate considerations, in addition to the financial targets outlined above, are:
In Learning, the Dutch distribution sales are expected to be around EUR 40 million lower in 2026, thus expected to
improve Learning’s adjusted operating profit margin clearly above 23% in 2026.
In Media Finland, substantial net sales (above EUR 20 million p.a.) and earnings growth are expected from the opening of
the gambling market from 2027.
Sanoma Group
Net debt / Adj. EBITDA
Below 2.5
Dividend policy *
Increasing dividend, 40–60% of
annual free cash flow
* When proposing a dividend to the AGM, the Board of Directors will look at the general macro-economic environment, Sanoma’s current and target
capital structure, Sanoma’s future business plans and investment needs as well as both previous year’s cash flows and expected future cash flows
affecting capital structure.
The target for the equity ratio was discontinued.
On 9 June 2025, Sanoma announced the composition of its Shareholders’ Nomination Committee. The four largest
shareholders have appointed the following members to the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee: Juhani Mäkinen (Vice Chair
of the Board, Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation), Antti Herlin (Chair of the Board, Holding Manutas), Robin Langenskiöld (3rd
largest shareholder in Sanoma) and Rafaela Seppälä (4th largest shareholder in Sanoma). At its meeting on 9 June 2025, the
Committee elected Juhani Mäkinen as Chair of the Committee and invited Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Chair of Sanoma’s Board of
Directors, to serve as an expert on the Committee.
Strategic business units
In 2025, Sanoma Group included two strategic business units (SBU), Learning and Media Finland.
Financial Statements 2025
7
Learning
Sanoma Learning is Europe's leading K12 learning company, serving about 25 million students across Europe. Our learning
products and services enable teachers to develop the talents of every child to reach their potential. We offer printed and digital
learning materials as well as digital learning and teaching platforms for K12, i.e. primary, secondary and vocational education,
and we aim to continue to grow our business in Europe and beyond. We develop our methodologies based on deep teacher
and student insight and truly understanding their individual needs. By combining our educational technologies and
pedagogical expertise, we create learning products and services with the highest learning impact.
Key indicators
EUR million
2025
2024
Change
Net sales
745.8
764.2
-2%
Adjusted EBITDA 1
247.8
241.5
3%
Adjusted operating profit2
151.9
146.9
3%
Margin 2
          20.4%
          19.2%
Operating profit
60.8
59.1
3%
Capital expenditure
27.6
30.3
-9%
Average number of employees (FTE)
2,486
2,612
-5%
1Excluding IACs
2Excluding IACs of EUR -62.9 million in 2025 (2024: -57.4) as well as PPA adjustments and amortisations of EUR 28.2 million in 2025 (2024: 30.4).
Full reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted operating profit is presented in a separate table under Reconciliation of certain key figures.
Net sales by country
EUR million
2025
2024
Change
The Netherlands
214.8
220.8
-3%
Poland
139.5
139.2
0%
Spain
125.1
135.6
-8%
Italy
101.4
105.5
-4%
Finland
64.3
59.4
8%
Belgium
63.2
64.1
-1%
Other countries and eliminations 1
37.5
39.6
-5%
Net sales total
745.8
764.2
-2%
1Other countries include Sweden, Norway, Germany, Denmark and the UK.
Net sales of Learning decreased to EUR 745.8 million (2024: 764.2). Driven by new product launches and market share gains,
learning content sales grew in the Netherlands and partially mitigated the planned discontinuation of low-value distribution
contracts. In Poland, digital platform sales grew, mitigating the impact of the lower learning content cycle. Net sales were lower
in Spain ahead of the curriculum renewal upcoming in 2026. The acquisition of Edita supported net sales in Finland.
Comparable net sales development was -3% (2024: -2%).
Adjusted operating profit increased to EUR 151.9 million (2024: 146.9), while the corresponding margin improved to 20.4%
(2024: 19.2%). The improvement was driven by the higher share of learning content sales vs. low-value distribution. Earnings
were further supported by a more digital sales mix and consequently lower paper and printing costs.
Operating profit amounted to EUR 60.8 million (2024: 59.1). IACs increased to EUR -62.9 million (2024: -57.4) and included a
EUR 48 million impairment in intangible assets related to the decision to not participate in multi-year distribution tenders in the
Dutch market recognised in Q3. PPAs were EUR 28.2 million (2024: 30.4).
Capital expenditure amounted to EUR 27.6 million (2024: 30.3) and mainly consisted of growth investments in digital
platforms.
Financial Statements 2025
8
Media Finland
Sanoma Media Finland is the leading cross-media company in Finland, reaching 96% of all Finns weekly. We provide
information, experiences, inspiration and entertainment through multiple media platforms: newspapers, TV, radio, events,
magazines, online and mobile channels. We have leading brands and services, such as Helsingin Sanomat, Ilta-Sanomat,
Aamulehti, Me Naiset, Aku Ankka, Nelonen, Ruutu, Supla and Radio Suomipop. For advertisers, we are a trusted partner with
insight, impact and reach.
Key indicators
EUR million
2025
2024
Change
Net sales
556.9
580.9
-4%
Adjusted EBITDA 1
129.8
132.5
-2%
Adjusted operating profit2
49.0
47.5
3%
Margin 2
8.8%
8.2%
Operating profit
7.5
38.2
-80%
Capital expenditure
9.3
7.2
29%
Average number of employees (FTE)
2,055
2,109
-3%
1Excluding IACs.
2Excluding IACs of EUR -36.3 million in 2025 (2024: -3.0) as well as PPA adjustments and amortisations of EUR 5.1 million in 2025 (2024: 6.3).
Full reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted operating profit is presented in a separate table under Reconciliation of certain key figures.
Net sales by category
EUR million
2025
2024
Change
Print
236.4
251.1
-6%
Non-print
320.6
329.9
-3%
Net sales total
556.9
580.9
-4%
EUR million
2025
2024
Change
Advertising sales
189.4
214.8
-12%
Subscription sales
263.7
254.3
4%
Single copy sales
35.6
37.0
-4%
Other
68.3
74.8
-9%
Net sales total
556.9
580.9
-4%
Other sales mainly include festivals and events, marketing services, event marketing, film distribution and printing services.
Net sales of Media Finland declined to EUR 556.9 million (2024: 580.9). Advertising sales declined driven mainly by lower TV
and newsprint advertising. The majority of the TV advertising decline was attributable to ending the reselling of certain third-
party TV channel advertising at the beginning of the year. Subscription sales grew throughout the year driven by good
development in digital subscriptions, in particular the SVOD service Ruutu+. Other sales declined mainly due to lower external
printing volumes. Comparable net sales development was -4% (2024: -1%).
According to the Finnish Advertising Trends survey for December 2025 by Kantar, the advertising market in Finland declined
by 3% year-on-year on a net basis in 2025. Advertising declined by 14% in magazines, 9% in newspapers, 5% in TV, 1% in
radio and 1% in online excluding search and social media (grew by 2% including search and social media).
Adjusted operating profit amounted to EUR 49.0 million (2024: 47.5) and the corresponding margin improved to 8.8% (2024:
8.2%). The adverse earnings impact of lower advertising sales was more than offset by positive impact from growing digital
subscription sales and lower paper, printing and distribution as well as TV programming costs.
Operating profit decreased to EUR 7.5 million (2024: 38.2) mainly due to the EUR 32 million impairments and restructuring
expenses related to the closure of the printing plant in Tampere, booked in Q3. Consequently, the IACs increased to EUR
-36.3 million (2024: -3.0). PPAs were EUR 5.1 million (2024: 6.3).
Capital expenditure amounted to EUR 9.3 million (2024: 7.2) and included property, technology and other maintenance
investments.
Financial Statements 2025
9
Personnel
In January–December 2025, the average number of employees in full-time equivalents (FTE) was 4,645 (2024: 4,820). The
average number of employees (FTE) per SBU was as follows: Learning 2,486 (2024: 2,612), Media Finland 2,055 (2024:
2,109) and Other operations 104 (2024: 100).
At the end of December 2025, the number of employees (FTE) of the Group amounted to 4,554 (2024: 4,648).
During the year, the number of employees declined due to the impact of Program Solar in Learning and reorganising of
operations and a minor divestment in Media Finland.
Employee benefit expenses amounted to EUR 386.5 million (2024: 395.0).
Risks and risk management
Sanoma is exposed to numerous risks and opportunities, which may arise from its own operations or the changing operating
environment in the short or long term. Sanoma divides its key risks into four main categories: strategic, operational, non-
financial and financial risks.
The most significant risks that could have a negative impact on Sanoma’s business, performance or financial status are
described below. Under the different categories, the most material risks are presented first. In addition to the risks presented in
this review, currently unknown or immaterial risks may arise or become material in the future. Significant near-term risks and
uncertainties are reported on a continuous basis in each Interim Report.
Sanoma’s Enterprise Risk Management Policy defines the Group-wide risk management principles, objectives, roles,
responsibilities and procedures also covering sustainability-related risks. The President and CEO, supported by the Executive
Management Team, is responsible for defining risk management strategies, procedures and setting risk management
priorities. SBUs are responsible for identifying, measuring, reporting and managing risks. The updated risk assessment
results, with related ongoing or planned mitigation actions, are reported to the Audit Committee and, further to the Board of
Directors twice a year. Risk management and internal control policies, processes, roles and responsibilities are presented in
more detail in the Corporate Governance Statement and in the Sustainability Statement sections of this Annual Report.
Sustainability-related risks are also further described in the Sustainability Statement.
Strategic risks
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
Sanoma’s strategic aim is to grow through acquisitions primarily in Learning, where Sanoma is looking for growth opportunities
in the K12 learning services business. However, Sanoma may not be able to identify suitable M&A opportunities or suitable
targets may not be available at the right valuation. Even if suitable M&A opportunities were identified and feasible, there are
several risks related to M&A transactions. M&A risks may relate to unidentified liabilities of the target companies or their
assets, changes in the market conditions, the inability to ensure the right valuation and effective integration of acquisitions or
that the anticipated economies of scale or synergies do not materialise. Future M&A transactions may also be financed with
debt, increasing Sanoma’s overall indebtedness, which may, in turn, adversely affect the availability, costs or other terms of
future financing. Regulation of M&A activity by competition authorities may, among other things, also restrict or delay the
Group’s ability to engage in M&A transactions.
In 2025, Sanoma acquired a portfolio of secondary and vocational education learning materials from the Finnish publisher
Edita. To focus its operations on areas where it holds clear competitive advantages, the Group divested Rauman Suorajakelu
Oy, an early‑morning delivery company, as well as a small business specialising in website planning and implementation.
Information on key acquisitions and divestments conducted in 2025 and earlier is available on Sanoma’s website. The
success of the recent acquisitions largely depends on the timely and efficient integration of the business operations, processes
and ways of working. The process of integrating the acquired businesses into Sanoma’s existing businesses involves
uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that Sanoma will be able to integrate the businesses in the manner or within the
timeframe anticipated and achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions.
Sanoma is mitigating these risks by actively maintaining its industry networks, proactively seeking potential targets, working
with well-known parties in transaction processes and following its internal policies and procedures in the decision-making,
organisation and follow-up concerning M&A transactions. Despite this, there can be no assurance that the acquisitions will be
successful and that Sanoma will achieve its strategic aim of acquisition-based growth.
Changes in customer preferences, technology and industry trends
In Learning, digital and blended (combined print and digital) learning materials, methods and platforms have gradually been
gaining ground. Blended learning materials are seen to optimally support learning outcomes, and the usage of digital learning
tools has continued to increase across most markets. This trend and/or its acceleration or slow-down, together with the
demographic development in Learning’s operating countries, may have an effect on the operational performance, financial
performance and/or financial position of Learning. In addition, Learning is, by nature, subject to seasonal fluctuation, with most
of the sales and earnings accrued during the second and third quarters when the new school year starts, which further
increases the pressure to be able to respond to changes in a timely manner.
On top of the key trends and market fluctuations over the last years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has been introduced
to the market, providing Learning both opportunities and uncertainties. AI applications may bring efficiency gains in core
processes related to, for example, method creation and software development. In learning content, AI provides opportunities
for personalisation, underpinning the value of curated, high-quality content published and owned by Sanoma, albeit potentially
adding competitive pressure. Sanoma’s success in keeping its personalised learning offering up-to-date and relevant to its
customers is dependent on applying new technologies, which are being developed and penetrating the market at an uncertain
and unpredictable speed and scale.
With the continued development of alternative forms of media, particularly free or paid digital media, the Group’s media
businesses and the strength of its media brands depend on its continued ability to identify and respond to constantly shifting
consumer preferences and industry trends, as well as its ability to develop new and appealing products and services in a
timely manner. Ongoing digitalisation is the driving force behind many of these changes, and adaption of new technologies is
changing the way people consume media. Print news media consumption is transforming to digital channels and viewing time
Financial Statements 2025
10
of free-to-air (FTA) television is decreasing while online video-on-demand (VOD) consumption is increasing. The demand for
advertising derived from printed media has also been in decline in recent years as advertisers shift to digital channels, and this
trend is expected to continue. However, even the digital advertising ecosystem is changing. For example, advertisers’
preference for performance-based advertising or the deprecation of third-party cookies may result in changes in business
models related to the sales of digital advertising.
In Media Finland, AI may provide opportunities for productivity improvements and possibilities to accelerate technology
development, support journalism in reaching more audiences and enhance customer communication and experience. Risks
with AI include misuse of the Group’s data and content. AI advancements also pose risks to media brand trust by creating
seemingly credible content or increasing the volume of AI-generated content that starts to compete with curated content.
To mitigate these risks, Sanoma is continuously developing digital and hybrid learning and media products and services. In
addition, Sanoma maintains close and long-term relationships with schools, teachers and governing bodies and typically sells
digital solutions and printed materials together. The wide cross-media offering provides Sanoma a base to constantly develop
its offering to advertisers. However, there can be no assurance that Sanoma will be able to adjust to, and meet the changes of
consumer preferences, industry trends and technological developments in the future. Failure to respond to market changes by
developing and/or adopting new products and services, through both established and new platforms, on a competitive and
profitable basis may result in the Group losing market share in its established businesses to competitors. To capture potential
upsides and mitigate potential risks related to AI, Sanoma focuses on having up-to-date AI principles and employee
instructions and the right technology in place upfront, and on following the market developments closely.
Competitive environment and threat of new entrants
The learning and media markets in which the Group operates are highly competitive and include many regional, national and
international companies. In media, competition is affected by the level of consolidation within the Group’s markets as well as
by the development of alternative distribution channels, especially for digital products and services offered by the Group.
Competition may arise from large international media companies entering new geographic markets or expanding the
distribution of their products and services to new distribution channels. Risks may arise if competitors are faster than the
Group to adopt new technologies, such as AI and alternative forms of media or digital destinations, catering to both consumer
and advertiser needs. Additionally, consolidation within relevant markets may increase existing competition or give rise to new
entrants in the market. In Learning, there is a similar risk stemming from large international media companies, digital entrants,
educational technology companies, open educational resources, user-generated content or digital tools. Furthermore,
Learning is exposed to competition also from traditional publishers in different countries.
To mitigate these risks, the Group’s ability to compete effectively will require continuous efforts by the Group in, among other
things, sales and marketing, cost innovation and investment in technology to respond to changes in the markets. Although the
Group currently holds solid positions in its key markets, there can be no assurance that it will be able to maintain these
positions or that these positions will enable the Group to compete effectively in the future.
Changes in applicable laws, regulations or the political environment
The Group’s operations are subject to various laws and regulations in relation to matters including, for example, intellectual
property, health and safety, consumer protection and marketing, environment and climate, sustainability, employment,
competition, securities markets and company law, compliance, data protection, AI, international trade and taxation, in the
countries in which the Group operates. Changes in such laws and regulations could have a material effect on Sanoma’s ability
to conduct its business effectively.
In Learning, changes in e.g. the regulation related to education, digital platforms or AI could have a material effect on
Sanoma’s commercial propositions, technology or content investment needs, or financial performance. Although legislation
related to learning is typically country specific, which limits the magnitude of said risk at the Group level, Sanoma faces an
increased legislative risk in Poland and Spain, both of which are large markets and where broad or abrupt education-related
legislative changes could have a material effect on Learning. The introduction or delay, pace, scope and timing of changes in
education-related legislation, or their reflections in public educational spending, in the markets in which Sanoma operates –
most notably in Poland or Spain, but potentially also other markets – may also influence the performance of Learning as a
whole. In media, any adverse developments affecting the freedom of the press or source protection could have an adverse
effect on the performance of Media Finland.
Changes in taxation as well as in the interpretation of tax laws and practices may have an effect on the operations of the
Group or on its financial performance (e.g., value-added tax, VAT, applicable to Sanoma’s printed, digital and hybrid products).
Tightening of consumer protection-related laws may necessitate the amendment of some consumer media sales business
models, imposing additional costs on Sanoma and having an adverse effect on its profitability. Furthermore, the deterioration
of publishers’ and broadcasters’ copyright protection or increase in legal obligations (such as reporting or monetary
obligations) towards original authors of copyright protected works affects the Group’s ability to provide its customers with new
products and services and may increase costs or impact the valuation of balance sheet items related to acquiring and
managing copyrights.
Data is an increasingly essential part of Sanoma’s business, putting privacy and consumer trust at the core of the Group’s
daily operations. Regulatory changes and new guidance by authorities or regulatory enforcement actions regarding the use of
consumer or cookie data, or the development or use of AI, could, therefore, have an adverse effect on Sanoma’s ability to
utilise data in its business.
The Group may also be faced with the risk of overregulation on the European or national levels, or different, potentially tighter
national interpretations on the European Union (EU) regulation in its operating countries. In particular, this risk is seen to relate
to sustainability, compliance, intellectual property rights (IPR), data protection, digital transformation, consumer protection,
accessibility and AI. The EU’s AI Act entered into force in all 27 EU member states on 1 August 2024. The enforcement of the
majority of its provisions will commence on 2 August 2026, and could potentially have some impacts on certain products of
Learning.
To mitigate these risks, Sanoma aims to anticipate any changes by closely monitoring the regulatory developments and
adapting its business models accordingly. However, implementing changes to its business models in order to adapt to new
Financial Statements 2025
11
regulations is likely to impose additional costs and may take time. Violations of any applicable laws or regulations could also
result in penalties and fines.
General economic and market conditions
The general economic and political conditions in Sanoma’s operating countries, overall industry trends as well as the global
political and geopolitical situation, including the unrest and wars in the Middle East, could influence Sanoma’s business
activities and operational and financial performance. Further, these include the uncertainty related to trade tariffs, international
cooperation and their impact on global economic development, which could have a potential indirect impact on Sanoma’s
operational or financial performance through, for example, inflation, interest rates, consumer confidence and spending, public
spending, advertising demand and/or disrupted trade flows. Further changes in the geopolitical situation globally could have
an impact on the demand for the Group’s products and services and the availability and price of the key supplies used by the
Group. In addition, the fluctuating costs and supply of global commodities, such as energy, and overall inflation, as well as
general economic conditions may be affected by various additional events that are beyond Sanoma’s control, such as natural
disasters or pandemics. Although Sanoma’s diversified and balanced business portfolio to a certain extent mitigates this type
of risk, it may cause disruption to Sanoma, its employees, markets, suppliers and customers, which could have a material
adverse effect on Sanoma’s business, operating model, financial condition and/or results of operations.
In general, long- and mid-term cyclicality associated with the performance of Learning relate to the development of public and
private education spending especially during curriculum renewals, and may affect the demand of Learning content year-on-
year. Moreover, changes in the overall economic environment can affect Learning’s cost base, particularly the cost and
availability of paper and printing, as well as of personnel. Such changes could also affect demand in segments where the
parents or students themselves (rather than the government or schools) pay for learning materials, e.g., by increasing the
demand for second-hand books. Such segments constitute a minority of Learning’s business.
In Media Finland, risks associated with business and financial performance typically relate to advertising demand (B2B) and
consumer spending (B2C). A significant proportion of the Group’s net sales is derived from advertising in digital media, printed
newspapers and magazines, television and radio, and from subscriptions and single copies sold to consumers. Both of these
sources of income are sensitive to changes in the general economic environment and consumer confidence, with advertising
sales being historically somewhat more sensitive to economic downturns than consumer sales, particularly subscription sales.
The market development related to the opening of the gambling market in Finland in July 2027 may be unpredictable and may
not materialise as expected. This uncertainty could have an impact on the gambling advertising demand, and thus on Media
Finland’s net sales and earnings. However, as a result of its multi-channel offering, Media Finland should be well-positioned to
capture the demand once the market opens. Moreover, changes in the overall economic environment can affect Media
Finland’s cost base, particularly the cost and availability of paper and printing, as well as of personnel and distribution costs. In
addition to increasing Media Finland’s direct operating costs, higher cost inflation may have an adverse indirect impact in the
demand of its products and services. Changes in the geopolitical situation could have an indirect impact in the business
operations and financial performance of Sanoma’s businesses particularly in Finland.
Sanoma’s diverse business portfolio and actions to manage the risks and costs related to prevailing and expected economic
conditions, partially mitigate these risks. In 2025, approx. 57% (2024: 57%) of Sanoma’s net sales was derived from learning,
approx. 23% (2024: 22%) from single copy or subscription sales, approx. 3% (2024: 3%) from print advertising, approx. 12%
(2024: 13%) from non-print advertising and approx. 5% (2024: 6%) from other sales.
Operational risks
Changes in economic conditions
Changes in general economic conditions may be reflected in Sanoma’s operational and financial performance. Cost inflation
may continue to have some impact on Sanoma’s operating costs. Weakened confidence among Finnish consumers, impacted
by the inflation and increased interest rates, may have an adverse impact on the demand for Media Finland’s products and
services. In addition, the weakening of the euro against main currencies, including the US dollar, may increase the cost of the
goods and services Sanoma buys in currencies other than euro (e.g., hosting and TV content) and poses a risk to Sanoma’s
financial performance, albeit part of the currency transaction risk is hedged with forward contracts. Sanoma can partly mitigate
these impacts on its financial performance through, for example, costs management actions, such as the Learning’s process
and efficiency improvement Program Solar, which was completed during 2025.
In Learning, Sanoma’s growth strategy in the coming years is based on upcoming curriculum renewals, in particular in Spain
and Poland, the introduction of new personalised learning products and services to the markets and leveraging its increased
benefits of scale. In Media Finland, growth is expected from continuing digital transformation and advertising opportunities
from the opening of the gambling market in July 2027. In both SBUs, Sanoma is aiming to harness the benefits of AI in new
offerings to the customers and in increasing internal productivity, while emphasising trust and human oversight. Success in
implementing its strategic initiatives may have an impact on Sanoma’s financial and operational performance.
Data and privacy
Data is an increasingly essential part of Sanoma’s products and services in both Learning and Media Finland. The Group
holds large volumes of personal data, including that of employees, customers and, in its digital learning businesses, students
and teachers. Sanoma is subject to the General Data Protection Regulation ((EU) 2016/679, “the GDPR”), which sets strict
requirements for implementing data subject rights, and for companies to demonstrate their accountability for complying with
the regulation. Non-compliance with the GDPR in Sanoma’s business and operations, or potential inadequacy of the data
protection processes and practices may cause problems, difficulties or additional costs to Sanoma. Any infringement of the
GDPR could adversely affect Sanoma’s reputation. Furthermore, under the GDPR, a national data protection authority is
vested with the power to impose corrective actions, such as temporary or definitive bans on processing, and to impose
administrative fines for breaches of the GDPR up to EUR 20 million or 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of a
company. The Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications 2002/58/EC also imposes requirements for online data
collection and use. There have been various authority enforcement actions across the EU since 2021 regarding consent
practices for the use of cookies and similar identifiers. In addition, the upcoming EU Digital Omnibus is expected to introduce
further changes to cookie-related rules. While these may benefit the media and advertising industry in the long term by
creating a level playing field for small media players, in the short term they could also have a negative impact on media
through additional costs. Although Sanoma runs a privacy programme that monitors development and enforcement of privacy
regulations, there can be no assurance that such measures will be successful in ensuring compliance with privacy laws, which
could lead to penalties, significant remediation costs and reputational damage to Sanoma.
Financial Statements 2025
12
In addition, Sanoma is exposed to potential cyberattacks or data breaches resulting from unauthorised or accidental loss of, or
access to personal data managed by Sanoma or by third parties processing data on Sanoma’s behalf. For example, Sanoma’s
or its third-party suppliers’ systems could be vulnerable to unauthorised access, misuse, breaches due to employee error or
malfeasance, computer viruses, attacks by hackers or other similar threats. Data is key in the development of Sanoma’s
products and services, as it enables content and learning services to be better tailored to the needs of customers, such as by
providing individualised learning paths and even more compelling media content. Continuing the use of data in the future is
dependent on maintaining the trust of customers, and potential data breaches could significantly undermine this trust.
To mitigate these risks, Sanoma’s key privacy implementation processes include conducting privacy impact assessments, data
lifecycle management, negotiating data processing agreements with third parties, information security measures to protect
data, data breach management procedures and implementation of data subject rights. However, there can be no assurance
that data breaches will not occur despite these efforts to prevent such breaches or, in the event that breaches occur, that
Sanoma will be able to mitigate the effects of such a breach. This could lead to reputational damage which could ultimately
lead to Sanoma’s inability to effectively compete for future business and to potential cancellations of existing contracts.
Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
Functioning and reliable information and communication technology systems are integral to the Group’s businesses and
operations. The systems include online services, digital learning platforms, VOD platforms, newspaper and magazine
subscriptions, advertising and delivery systems, as well as various internal systems for production control, customer relations
management and supporting functions. Information and communication technology security risks may relate to confidentiality,
integrity and/or availability of information, as well as to reliability and compliance of data processing. The risks can be divided into
physical risks, such as fire, sabotage and equipment breakdown, and logical risks, such as information security risks, including
the increasing threat of malware and cyberattacks, hacking of personal data or other sensitive data assets, and employee or
software failure. Additionally, fragmentation of the data landscape and legacy systems or failure in meeting customer needs or
local requirements when developing or harmonising the digital offering could cause a delay or hinder the Group’s digitalisation.
To mitigate these risks, Sanoma has continuity and disaster recovery plans in place for its critical systems and clear
responsibilities regarding information and communication technology security. Information security controls include the use of
threat intelligence capabilities, cyber security incident detection capabilities, identity and access management solutions, log
management capabilities and the use of external information security audits. Sanoma’s insurance programme provides partial
coverage for insurable information security risks. Although Sanoma has several information security control measures in place,
there can be no assurance that such measures will be adequate to prevent failures of one or more of the Group’s essential
information and communication technology systems, which could cause disruptions to its business and reputational damage
resulting from possible data breaches.
Third parties
A broad network of third parties in a wide variety of countries plays an integral role in Sanoma’s daily operations. Third-party
suppliers in Sanoma’s value chain include, among others, technology solution and service providers, paper, print and logistics
suppliers as well as content providers both for Learning and Media Finland. Therefore, risks relating to the availability, price,
quality, security and delivery schedules of third-party suppliers are material for Sanoma’s operations. During recent years,
these include the increased use of external cloud-based services, the functioning of which is strongly dependent on usability
and accessibility of global internet connections.
The expanding global supply chain risks that are a combination of, for example, geopolitics, the post-pandemic situation,
economic environment, high inflation, growing sustainability requirements and production factors, may result in much tighter
supply market conditions, cost and availability concerns. The current global geopolitical and economic situation may also
cause delivery delays and cost overruns. To mitigate the risks inherent in its supply chain, Sanoma has diversified its supplier
base with a targeted selection of regional and local suppliers and developed response strategies should disruption materialise.
Close cooperation with the suppliers helps Sanoma to assess and understand which suppliers are most at risk under different
circumstances.
Sanoma uses freelancers to support its own editorial staff in content creation. The status of freelancers and related copyright
legislation development may vary by authority and country, but no individual case is estimated to become material unless it
escalates to concern a large group of freelancers working for Sanoma. The development in the status of freelancers or the
related regulation may, however, also increase the related costs.
In addition, certain advertising and marketing efforts are executed with the help of third parties. The advertising technology
ecosystem consists of players, such as Google and Facebook, that have dominant market power, which may lead to an
imbalance in their agreements entered into with Sanoma. Sanoma is currently participating in a class action by European
publishers against Google regarding the abuse of Google’s dominant position in the advertising technology ecosystem.
Sanoma’s daily business is dependent on its ability to identify sources of supply that meet Sanoma’s standards and identified
business, technology and sustainability requirements, although Sanoma is not dependent on any individual suppliers. To
mitigate third-party-related risks, Sanoma follows the guiding principles of supplier risk management set in the Group’s
Procurement Policy, Supplier Code of Conduct and legal framework. The most significant suppliers are selected through
competitive bidding and qualification processes. Suppliers and other third parties are subject to a Know Your Counterparty
(KYC) process to identify any risks related to anti-bribery, sanctions regulations and other issues.
With suppliers most relevant for Sanoma’s business continuity, Sanoma has set up steering practices and supplier
engagement to jointly mitigate the identified risks, for example, by increasing the paper inventory and agreeing on steps to
avoid problems with newspaper delivery. If any of the key suppliers had to be replaced abruptly, it could cause temporary
business interruptions and/or increase costs.
Despite the processes and risk mitigation activities that Sanoma has in place, Sanoma may not be able to ensure that its
suppliers or other third parties comply with all relevant regulations and its internal policies and standards, which could, for
example, lead to legal processes and/or reputational damage. In addition, cooperation with third parties may expose Sanoma
to certain data-related risks.
Financial Statements 2025
13
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
The Group’s products and services largely consist of intellectual property delivered through a variety of media. Key IPR related
to Sanoma’s products and services are copyrights including rights to make the copyright protected works available to the
public, trademarks, business names, domains and know-how owned and licensed by the Group. In addition, the Group
conducts business in certain countries where the extent of effective legal protection and enforcement of IPR may differ and,
therefore, cause uncertainty. Moreover, despite trademark and copyright protection, third parties may copy, commercially
exploit, infringe on or otherwise profit from the Group’s proprietary rights without authorisation. These unauthorised activities
may be more easily facilitated by the internet and AI tools. The scarcity of internet and AI-specific legislation relating to
trademark and copyright protection or enforcement of rights, as well as effective and concrete means to intervene with online
IPR infringements, create an additional challenge for the Group in protecting its proprietary rights, and failure to protect its
proprietary rights or IPR could result in the loss or diminution in value of these rights. Sanoma also uses a high volume of
third-party IPR in its operations, which exposes it to possible infringement claims from third parties. Such claims could result in
burdensome litigations and additional costs as well as adversely affect Sanoma’s reputation, which could, in turn, have a
negative impact on Sanoma’s operations.
To mitigate these risks, the Group relies on copyright, trademark and other intellectual property laws as well as its Group-wide
IPR Policy and procedures to establish and protect its proprietary rights in these products. However, there can be no
assurance that the Group’s proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented, infringed or commercially
exploited by third parties.
Business interruption, health and safety and physical climate-related hazards
Operational disruption to the Group’s business may be caused by a major disaster and/or external threat that could restrict its
ability to supply products and services to its customers, including potential disruptions, such as the availability of internet or energy
in the Group’s main operating countries. The Group is exposed to various health and safety and environmental risks, such as
natural disasters and hazards following physical risks of climate change that are beyond Sanoma’s control and that could cause
business interruption and result in costs. External threats including, but not limited to pandemics, terrorist attacks, strikes and
weather conditions, could affect the Group’s businesses and employees, disrupting daily business activities. Also, any failure to
maintain high levels of safety management could result in physical injury, sickness or liability to Sanoma’s employees, which could,
in turn, result in the impairment of Sanoma’s reputation or inability to attract and retain skilled employees.
Despite Sanoma’s operational policies, efficient and accurate process management and contingency planning, there can be
no assurance that these will be sufficient in preventing any of the above-mentioned risks, or recovering from such risks. To
mitigate potential risks, Sanoma has continuity and disaster recovery plans in place for its critical systems and operations, but
there can be, however, no assurance that these will be sufficient in preventing such risks impacting Sanoma negatively.
Sanoma’s insurance programme provides coverage for insurable hazard risks, subject to insurance terms and conditions, but
there can be no assurance that Sanoma’s insurance coverage would adequately cover all or any of such costs, if such an
incident were to occur, which could result in significant costs. Further details of Sanoma’s material risks related to climate
change adaptation are available in the Sustainability Statement, section E1 Climate Change.
Non-financial risks
Talent attraction and retention
The Group’s success depends on having competent, skilled and engaged management and employees, and on their
competencies and skills in developing appealing products and services in accordance with customer needs in a changing
environment. Recruiting and retaining skilled and motivated personnel may become increasingly difficult as a result of various
factors, including a shortage of skills in the labour market and intensifying competition for talent. With the critical capabilities
needed in the future, for example related to AI, there may be even more competition for talent. In addition, Sanoma’s
involvement in M&A transactions generally exposes it to the risk of employees, including senior management and other key
employees, leaving before such projects are completed or the acquired businesses are integrated to Sanoma’s existing
business. Also, cultural differences and resistance to change may hinder the Group’s performance or transformation. Should
the Group fail to attract, retain, develop, train and motivate qualified, engaged and diverse employees at all levels, it could
have an adverse effect on the Group’s profitability and value creation, competitiveness and development of its business
operations in the long term.
To mitigate these risks, Sanoma aims to enhance a corporate culture that supports learning, innovation, creativity, diversity,
managing continuous change, as well as ethical and efficient ways of working, for which the framework is set in Sanoma’s
Code of Conduct and People Policy. Critical capabilities, such as AI, are identified and specific training is offered for different
cohorts across the company. Sanoma measures employee engagement on an annual basis, and the results are also linked to
executive and senior management remuneration. Further details of Sanoma’s material impacts related to its own workforce
are available in the Sustainability Statement, section S1 Own workforce.
Human rights, anti-corruption and bribery
Sanoma operates across Europe and both of its business segments use a wide network and variety of business partners that
provide products and services. These business partners range from individual third-party content providers to international
paper and print producers and cloud-service providers (more information on risks related to third parties is available above
under Third parties). Sanoma is committed to conducting business in a legal and ethical manner in compliance with local and
international laws and regulations applicable to its business, as well as its Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct.
Nevertheless, there is a risk that Sanoma’s employees or business partners may act in a way that potentially impacts or
violates human rights or anti-corruption and bribery laws and regulations or they may act unethically.
To mitigate these risks, all Sanoma employees, for example, must comply with Sanoma’s Code of Conduct, which supports
the international standards on human rights and labour conditions and clearly prohibits all corruption and bribery. The
requirements of the Code of Conduct are extended to Sanoma’s suppliers through the Supplier Code of Conduct. Sanoma
aims to ensure compliance with measures such as a mandatory e-learning course on the Code of Conduct to all employees;
however, there can be no assurance that Sanoma’s internal control measures will detect and prevent misbehaviour by
individual employees or third-party suppliers. Breaches of applicable laws and regulations or corporate policies by Sanoma’s
employees or business partners may lead to legal processes, sanctions and fines, as well as reputational damage affecting
Sanoma’s operations, which could have a material adverse effect on Sanoma’s business, financial condition or results of
operations. Further details of Sanoma’s material impacts and risks related to human rights, anti-corruption and bribery as well
Financial Statements 2025
14
as related management approaches are available in the Sustainability Statement, sections S1 Own workforce, S2 Workers
in the value chain, S4 Customers and End-users and G1 Business conduct.
Environment and climate
Sanoma’s most significant climate and biodiversity impacts derive from greenhouse gas emissions caused by resources, i.e.,
energy and materials, used in its value chain. As Sanoma’s business is not highly carbon intensive, no significant climate risks
are expected to arise in the short term. However, increased regulatory requirements on climate action in the short and medium
term are expected to elevate transition‑related exposure. In the medium to long term, Sanoma has identified low to medium
climate and biodiversity-related transition risks related to regulatory changes as well as brand and changing customer
behaviour. Lack of active and transparent climate action in the medium to long term may affect stakeholder trust and increase
reputational risks. The expected growth in Learning may increase printing‑related emissions if mitigation measures are not
successfully implemented, which may pose a risk to achieving Sanoma’s emission reduction targets. The current lack of
standardisation and lack of clarity in the calculation of AI‑related emissions further adds to this uncertainty. Physical climate-
related risks include the increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events such as flooding. Through its resource
use, the availability and price of certified paper and renewable energy pose some risk for Sanoma and changes in them may
potentially have an adverse impact on the Group’s business and financial performance. The effects of climate change are
wide-ranging and may, in the long term, bring, for example, considerable social uncertainty, which may in turn cause risks that
are currently unidentified.
Sanoma mitigates climate-related risks through its ambitious climate strategy and by developing sustainability together with its
stakeholders. Sanoma works alongside its suppliers to improve their sustainability performance by monitoring and collecting
relevant data and using this to compare suppliers. To identify and control environmental and climate-related risks and
opportunities, Sanoma evaluates them as part of its annual risk-assessment process. Further details of Sanom’s material
impacts and risks related to environmental topics are available in the Sustainability Statement, sections E1 Climate change,
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems and E5 Resource use and circular economy.
Financial risks
Funding and liquidity
Under all circumstances, the Group seeks to maintain adequate liquidity, which depends on a number of factors. The Group’s
liquidity risk relates to servicing debt, financing investments and retaining adequate working capital. Sanoma aims to minimise
its liquidity risks by ensuring sufficient revenues, maintaining adequate committed credit limits, using several financing
institutions and forms of financing, and spreading loan repayment programmes over a number of calendar years. The Group’s
Treasury Policy sets minimum requirements for liquidity reserves.
There can be no assurance that the Group will be able to maintain a sufficient level of liquidity or that the Group will be able to
obtain, on a timely basis or at all, sufficient funds on acceptable terms to provide adequate liquidity in the event that cash flows
from operations, unused committed credit line and cash reserves prove to be insufficient. Negative changes in economic
environment could affect the Group’s profitability and cash flow in a manner that could adversely impact the Group’s ability to
comply with financial covenants in loan agreements. Failure to comply with the financial covenants could lead to the
acceleration of loans. Failure to generate additional funds, whether from operations or additional debt or equity financings,
may, for example, require the Group to delay or abandon some or all of its strategy initiatives, including its strategic aim of
acquisition-based growth, which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition or results of
operations. In addition, any future adverse developments, such as a deterioration in the financial markets and a worsening of
general economic conditions, may adversely affect Sanoma’s ability to borrow additional funds as well as the cost and other
terms of the funding. For example, global financial markets have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant
volatility and liquidity disruption, for example, due to unrest or wars, or geopolitical risks like trade wars and tariffs, which may
adversely affect Sanoma’s funding costs and access to funding and ultimately affect Sanoma’s ability to finance its operations.
A more detailed description of the funding and liquidity risks and their management is available in the Consolidated Financial
Statements, Note 5.2.
Interest rate
The Group’s interest rate risk is mainly related to changes in the reference rates and loan margins of floating rate loans in the
Group’s loan portfolio. The Group manages its exposure to interest rate risk by ensuring that the interest duration of the gross
debt of the Group is within a certain time range approved by the Board of Directors as part of the Group’s Treasury Policy. The
Group may also manage its exposure to interest rate risk by using a mix of fixed rate and floating rate loans or by utilising
interest rate derivatives.
The total amount of external interest-bearing debt (excl. IFRS 16 liabilities) declined during the year and amounted to EUR
400 million as of 31 December 2025 (2024: 456). The share of fixed rate loans was 38%, amounting to EUR 150 million. As at
31 December 2025, the Group did not have any interest rate derivatives. As a result of the floating rate loans, a significant rise
in interest rates would lead to an increase in financial expenses limiting, for example, the Group’s ability to pay dividends. For
example, one percentage point increase in interest rates for the loan portfolio as at 31 December 2025 would cause a EUR
2.1 million (2024: 2.6) increase in Sanoma’s net financing costs. A failure to manage interest rate risk may have an adverse
effect on the Group’s financial condition.
A more detailed description of the interest rate risks and their management is available in the Consolidated Financial
Statements, Note 5.2.
Currency
The majority of the Group’s cash flow from operations is denominated in euros. However, the Group is exposed to some
transaction risk resulting from cash flows generated from sales and expenses denominated in other currencies. Group
companies are responsible for monitoring and hedging material transaction risks related to their business operations in
accordance with the Group’s Treasury Policy. The Group’s transaction risks are not material. In 2025, the majority of them
were related to internal loans and procurement of IT services in US dollars, while purchases of TV programming rights in US
dollars have materially reduced. The Group has selectively entered into forward contracts as a means of hedging against
significant transaction risks.
Internal funding transactions within the Group are mainly carried out in the functional currency of the subsidiary. Group
Treasury is responsible for monitoring and hedging the currency risks related to intra-group loans. Derivative instruments are
Financial Statements 2025
15
used to hedge future cash flows, hence changes in their value will offset changes in the value of cash flows at the time they
are paid or received. The materialisation of any of these risks could have an adverse effect on the Group’s earnings and cash
flow directly, and there can be no assurance that the hedging of these risks is sufficient. As at 31 December 2025, the Group
had hedged intra-group loans and purchases of TV programming rights in US Dollars totalling EUR 20.7 million (2024: 16.6). If
the hedged currencies weakened by 10% against the euro at the year-end date 31 December 2025, the change in the value of
forward contracts would have decreased financial expenses for 2025 by EUR 2.1 million (2024: 1.7). If the currencies
strengthened by 10% against the euro, financial expenses would have increased by EUR 2.1 million (2024: 1.7).
The Group is also exposed to translation risk resulting from converting the income statement and balance sheet items of
foreign subsidiaries into euros. A significant change in exchange rates may have an effect on the value of the businesses in
Poland, Norway and Sweden. For the year ended 31 December 2025, business operations outside the euro area accounted
for 13.6% (2023: 13.1%) of consolidated net sales and mainly consisted of revenues in Polish złoty, Norwegian krone and
Swedish krona. The Group did not hedge against translation risk in 2025, in accordance with the Group’s Treasury Policy
approved by the Board of Directors.
A more detailed description of the currency risks and their management is available in the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Credit
The Group’s credit risks are related to its business operations, that is, the risk of the Group not being able to collect the
payments for its receivables. Possible weakening of the economy, for example due to geopolitical risks or high inflation, may
increase the Group’s credit risk, although potential concentrations of credit risk are offset by the Group’s diversified operations
and the fact that no individual customer or group of customers is material to the Group. As part of the quarterly reporting,
Sanoma reviews the potential changes on the expected credit losses and adjusts provisions accordingly if needed. In
Learning, the credit risk of certain customers with a high-risk profile is partially covered by credit insurance. The Group’s
operational units are responsible for managing credit risks related to their businesses.
Agreements Sanoma has entered into with financial institutions contain an element of risk of the counterparties being unable
to meet their obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on Sanoma’s business and financial condition. The
Group’s Treasury Policy specifies that financing, deposits and derivative transactions are carried out with counterparties of
good credit standing and divided between a sufficient number of counterparties in order to protect financial assets. The Group
has spread its credit risks efficiently by dealing with several financing institutions. Sanoma’s ability to manage its financial
counterparty-related risks depends on a number of factors, including market conditions affecting its financial counterparties,
and there can be no assurance that Sanoma’s measures will be successful in preventing the realisation of financial
counterparty-related risks, which could have a material adverse effect on Sanoma’s business and financial condition.
A more detailed description of the credit risks and their management is available in the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Impairment of goodwill, immaterial rights and other intangible assets
At the end of December 2025, Sanoma’s consolidated balance sheet included EUR 1,367.8 million (2024: 1,455.9) of goodwill,
immaterial rights and other intangible assets. The majority of these are related to the Learning business. In accordance with
IFRS, instead of goodwill being amortised regularly, it is tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if there is
any indication of impairment. Changes in business fundamentals could lead to further impairment, thus impacting Sanoma’s
result, equity and equity-related ratios. Furthermore, as Sanoma’s strategic aim is to grow through acquisitions, material
amounts of goodwill, immaterial rights and other intangible assets might be recorded on Sanoma’s balance sheet in
connection with the completions of acquisitions and may be impaired in the future. In 2025, impairments of other intangible
assets amounted to EUR 50.0 million (2024: 28.8) and mainly related to the decision not to participate in new, multi-year
distribution tenders in the Dutch market. The impairment losses on goodwill, immaterial rights and other intangible assets for
the year ended 31 December 2025, totalled EUR 53.4 million (2024: 32.9).
Seasonal fluctuation
The Group’s businesses are exposed to seasonal fluctuation. For example, the Group’s Learning business has, by its nature,
an annual cycle with strong seasonality. Most net sales and earnings are accrued during the second and third quarters, while
the first and fourth quarters are typically loss-making. Shifts of single orders between quarters may have a material impact
when comparing quarterly net sales and earnings on a year-on-year basis, and thus year-to-date figures typically provide a
more comprehensive picture of Learning’s business performance and development.
In the Media business, net sales and earnings are particularly affected by the development of advertising. Advertising sales
are influenced, for example, by the number of newspaper and magazine issues published each quarter, which varies annually.
TV advertising in Finland is usually strongest in the second and fourth quarters. The events business in Finland is typically
focused on the second and third quarters.
Such seasonal fluctuations influence the Group’s net sales, operating profit and free cash flow and, thus, could have a
material adverse effect on Sanoma’s business, financial condition or results of operations and impact the comparability of the
quarterly financial information of the Group.
Changes to tax laws or their application, or tax audits
Sanoma’s tax burden depends on tax laws and regulations and their application and interpretation. Changes in them may
increase Sanoma’s tax costs to a significant degree, which could have an adverse effect on Sanoma’s financial condition and/
or results of operations. In addition, Sanoma may, at times, be subject to tax audits conducted by national tax authorities. Tax
audits or other auditing measures carried out by tax or other authorities could result in an imposition of additional taxes (such
as income taxes, VAT and withholding taxes), which could lead to an increase in Sanoma’s tax liability.
Changes in taxation, as well as in the interpretation of tax laws and practices applicable to Sanoma’s products and services or
their distribution, e.g. VAT, may have an effect on the Group’s operations or its financial performance. In 2023, Sanoma
booked a total net amount of EUR 31 million of VAT claims for the years 2015−2018 and 2019−2021 concerning the treatment
of VAT on certain magazines that were printed in multiple locations in Europe, and processed in and distributed through a
centralised logistics centre in Norway, as IACs in Media Finland’s result. In August 2024, the Supreme Administrative Court
rejected Sanoma’s application for permission to appeal the decision regarding the years 2015−2018. Sanoma had appealed
Financial Statements 2025
16
the VAT decisions for the years 2019−2021 to the Tax Adjustment Board, which rejected the appeal in September 2025. The
VAT regulations have changed as of 1 July 2021 and, thus, further claims related to the matter are not expected.
A more detailed description of the Group’s financial risks and their management is available in the Consolidated Financial
Statements, Note 5.2.
Financial Statements 2025
17
Outlook for 2026
In 2026, Sanoma expects that the Group’s net sales will be EUR 1.29‒1.34 billion (2025: 1.30) and the Group’s adjusted
operating profit will be EUR 205−225 million (2025: 188).
The outlook is based on the following assumptions:
Demand for learning content will increase, driven by curriculum renewals in some of the Groups operating markets.
The advertising market in Finland will be relatively stable.
Annual General Meeting 2026
The Annual General Meeting 2026 will be held on Thursday, 7 May 2026, in Helsinki. The shareholders of the Company and
their proxy representatives can also exercise the shareholder’s rights by voting in advance as well as by submitting
counterproposals and asking questions in advance in accordance with the instructions set out in the Notice to the Annual
General Meeting of the Company published on 25 March 2026. More information is available on Sanoma’s website.
Dividend proposal
On 31 December 2025, Sanoma Corporation’s distributable funds were EUR 309 million, of which profit for the year made up
EUR 36 million. Including the fund for non-restricted equity of EUR 210 million, the distributable funds amounted to EUR 519
million.
The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting that a dividend of EUR 0.42 per share shall be paid for the
year 2025 in three equal instalments:
The first instalment of EUR 0.14 per share shall be paid to a shareholder who is registered in the shareholders’ register of
the Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd on the dividend record date 11 May 2026. The payment date for this
instalment is 19 May 2026.
The second instalment of EUR 0.14 per share shall be paid to a shareholder who is registered in the shareholders’ register
of the Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd on the dividend record date 15 September 2026. The payment date
for this instalment is 22 September 2026.
The third instalment of EUR 0.14 per share shall be paid to a shareholder who is registered in the shareholders’ register of
the Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd on the dividend record date 3 November 2026. The payment date for
this instalment is 10 November 2026.
The amount left in equity shall be EUR 450 million.
According to its dividend policy, Sanoma aims to pay an increasing dividend, equal to 40–60% of the annual free cash flow.
When proposing a dividend to the AGM, the Board of Directors looks at the general macro-economic environment, Sanoma’s
current and target capital structure, Sanoma’s future business plans and investment needs, as well as both the previous year’s
cash flows and expected future cash flows affecting capital structure.
Shares and shareholders
Sanoma has one series of shares, with all shares producing equal voting rights and other shareholder rights. The shares have
no redemption and consent clauses, nor any other transfer restrictions. Sanoma share has no nominal value or book value.
Share capital
At the end of December 2025, Sanoma’s registered share capital was EUR 71.3 million (2024: 71.3), and the total number of
shares was 163,565,663 (2024: 163,565,663), including 792,677 (2024: 349,690) of its own shares. Sanoma’s own shares
represented 0.5% (2024: 0.2%) of all shares and votes. The number of outstanding shares excluding Sanoma’s own shares
was 162,772,986 (2024: 163,215,973).
In March 2025, Sanoma delivered a total of 10,814 (2024: 214,554) of its own shares (without consideration and after taxes)
as part of its long-term share-based incentive plans
Acquisition of the Company’s own shares
Sanoma repurchased its own shares from 1 November 2024 until 5 June 2025. During that time, Sanoma acquired a total of
720,000 of its own shares for an average price of EUR 8.1433 per share. The shares were acquired in public trading on
Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. at the market price prevailing at the time of purchase. The repurchased shares were acquired on the
basis of the authorisations given by the Annual General Meetings on 17 April 2024 and 29 April 2025 and shall be used as part
of the Company’s incentive programme.
Share trading and performance
At the end of December 2025, Sanoma’s market capitalisation was EUR 1,546.3 million (2024: 1,251.9) with Sanoma’s share
closing at EUR 9.50 (2024: 7.67). In January–December 2025, the volume-weighted average price of Sanoma’s share on
Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. was EUR 9.47 (2024: 6.90), with a low of EUR 7.67 (2024: 6.27) and a high of EUR 11.18 (2024: 7.80).
In January–December 2025, the cumulative value of Sanoma’s share turnover on Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. was EUR 110 million
(2024: 80). The trading volume of 12 million shares (2024: 12) equalled an average daily turnover of 46,500 shares (2024:
46,400). The traded shares accounted for some 7% (2024: 7%) of the average number of shares. Sanoma’s share turnover,
including alternative trading venues, like CBOE DXE, Turquoise and Frankfurt, was 27 million shares (2024: 22). Nasdaq
Helsinki represented 42% (2024: 52%) of the share turnover. (Source: Nasdaq and Modular Finance)
Financial Statements 2025
18
Ownership structure and shareholders
The Board of Directors is not aware of any effective agreements related to holdings in Sanoma shares and the exercise of
voting rights.
Sanoma had 25,322 (2024: 24,315) registered shareholders at the end of December 2025.
On 31 December 2025, the combined holdings in the Company’s shares of the members of the Board of Directors, the
President and CEO, and the bodies they control (as referred to in Chapter 2, Section 4 of the Finnish Securities Market Act)
accounted for 0.5% (2024: 0.5%) of all shares and votes. More information on management shareholding and remuneration is
available in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6.3.
Major shareholders 31 December 2025
Shareholder
Shares
% of shares
1
Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
39,820,286
24.3
2
Holding Manutas Oy
21,870,000
13.4
3
Langenskiöld Lars Robin Eljas
12,273,371
7.5
4
Seppälä Rafaela
7,654,746
4.7
5
Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company
5,538,352
3.4
6
Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company
4,810,000
2.9
7
Helsingin Sanomat Foundation
4,701,570
2.9
8
Noyer Alex
3,213,277
2.0
9
Elo Mutual Pension Insurance Company
2,528,000
1.5
10
Bernardin-Aubouin Lorna
1,852,470
1.1
11
Evli Finnish Small Cap Fund
1,784,991
1.1
12
The State Pension Fund
1,760,000
1.1
13
Foundation for Actors’ Old-Age Home
1,500,000
0.9
14
OP-Finland
1,485,461
0.9
15
Säästöpankki Kotimaa Mutual Fund
1,055,032
0.6
16
Sanoma Corporation
792,677
0.5
17
Samfundet Folkhälsan i Svenska Finland
764,389
0.5
18
Oy Overseas Cattle Company Ltd.
700,000
0.4
19
OP-Finland Small Firms Fund
687,292
0.4
20
Langenskiöld Lars Christoffer Robin
645,996
0.4
20 largest shareholders total
115,437,910
70.6
Nominee registered
13,472,325
8.2
Other shares
34,655,428
21.2
Total
163,565,663
100.0
Financial Statements 2025
19
Shareholders by number of shares held 31 December 2025
Number of shares
Number of shareholders
%
Number of shares
%
1–100
9,940
39.3
429,506
0.3
101–500
8,816
34.8
2,395,896
1.5
501–1,000
2,891
11.4
2,248,044
1.4
1,001–5,000
2,896
11.4
6,293,637
3.8
5,001–10,000
384
1.5
2,745,835
1.7
10,001–50,000
281
1.1
5,362,888
3.3
50,001–100,000
45
0.2
3,242,353
2.0
100,001–500,000
39
0.2
7,838,516
4.8
500,001 +
30
0.1
132,929,539
81.3
Total
25,322
100.0
163,486,214
100.0
In the joint book-entry account
79,449
Number of shares issued
163,565,663
100.0
Holdings by sector 31 December 2025
Sector
Shareholders
Shares and votes
Number
%
Number
%
Private companies
788
3.1
6,358,734
3.9
Financial and insurance institutions
53
0.2
29,542,974
18.1
Public sector organisations
25
0.1
15,259,949
9.3
Households
24,010
94.8
43,228,464
26.4
Non-profit organisations
292
1.2
50,292,930
30.7
Foreigners
154
0.6
18,803,163
11.5
Total
25,322
100.0
163,565,663
100.0
In the joint book-entry account
79,449
Number of shares issued
163,565,663
100.0
Events after the reporting period
On 10 march 2026, Sanoma announced that it has acquired Mr. Chadd, a Dutch tutoring platform, from its founder and other
shareholders. Mr. Chadd extends Sanoma’s personalised learning offering to schools beyond core printed and digital learning
materials by providing integrated digital learning support, closely aligned with the local K12 curriculum in the Netherlands. Mr.
Chadd’s platform combines AI-based guidance with academically trained coaches and enables a stronger connection between
homework support and classroom practice. In 2025, net sales of Mr. Chadd amounted to approx. EUR 1 million. It has already
been used by more than 140,000 secondary and vocational education students. The founder of Mr. Chadd will continue to
work for Sanoma Learning after the acquisition.
On 13 March 2026, the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee proposed to the Annual General Meeting 2026, that the number
of the members of the Board of Directors is set at eight. The Nomination Committee also proposed that Klaus Cawén, Julian
Drinkall, Jannica Fagerholm, Rolf Grisebach, Timo Lappalainen, Sebastian Langenskiöld and Eugenie van Wiechen are re-
elected as members of the Board of Directors and Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko is elected as new member of the Board. Current Chair
of the Board Pekka Ala-Pietilä and Board member Anna Herlin have informed that they do not stand for re-election to the
Board. In addition, the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee proposed that Timo Lappalainen is elected as the Chair and
Klaus Cawén as the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors. The proposed Board members have all given their consent to being
elected. The term of all the Board members ends at the end of the Annual General Meeting 2027. The Shareholders’
Nomination Committee proposed that the annual remuneration payable to the members of the Board of Directors will be
increased after remaining unchanged since the AGM 2020. The meeting fees for the Board and Committee meetings are
proposed to remain unchanged, while the fee practices between members living in different countries will be unified. The
proposed remuneration is as follows:
The annual remuneration: EUR 160,000 for the Chair of the Board (earlier EUR 144,000), EUR 100,000 for the Vice Chair
of the Board (earlier EUR 84,000), and EUR 80,000 for the members of the Board (earlier EUR 72,000)
Board members who travel to a meeting outside of their country of residence: EUR 1,000 / Board meeting where member
was present
Chairs of Board Committees: EUR 4,500 / Committee meeting participated
Members of Committees who travel to a meeting outside of their country of residence: EUR 3,000 / Committee meeting
where the member was present, and EUR 2,000 / Committee meeting participated
Members of Committees not travelling to a meeting outside of their country of residence: EUR 2,000 / Committee meeting
participated
Essential biographical information on all Board member candidates is available on Sanoma’s website.
Financial Statements 2025
20
Corporate Governance
Statement
Sanoma Corporation complies with the Finnish Corporate Governance Code 2025, issued by the Securities Market
Association in December 2024. This Corporate Governance Statement has been prepared in accordance with the Code,
which is available on the Securities Market Association’s website.
The statement has been reviewed by Sanoma’s Audit Committee. The statutory auditors of Sanoma have checked that
the statement has been issued and that its description of the main features of internal control and risk management
systems related to the financial reporting process complies with the financial statements of the Company. This statement
is presented as a part of the Report of the Board of Directors.
More information on the remuneration principles of the Board of Directors, the President and CEO and the Executive
Management Team is available in a separate Remuneration Report, prepared in accordance with the Code.
During the course of the year, information on Sanoma’s governance is updated on Sanoma’s website.
Financial Statements 2025
21
Corporate governance structure
In its operations and governance, Sanoma follows the laws and regulations applicable in its operating countries, the ethical
guidelines set by the Sanoma Code of Conduct, as well as the Group’s internal policies and standards.
Sanoma’s administrative bodies are the General Meeting of Shareholders, the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee, the
Board of Directors and its committees, the President and CEO and the Executive Management Team (EMT).
Audit
General Meeting of Shareholders
The General Meeting is Sanoma’s highest decision-making
body, convening at least once a year.
Shareholders’ Nomination Committee
The Shareholders’ Nomination Committee prepares the
proposals on the number, composition and remuneration of
the members of the Board of Directors to the Annual
General Meeting.
Internal
audit
Board of Directors
The Chair, Vice Chair and members of the Board are elected
by the General Meeting. The Board is responsible for the
management of the Company and its business operations.
Audit
Committee
Executive
Committee
Human
Resources
Committee
The Board may appoint committees, executive committees
and other permanent or fixed-term bodies to focus on certain
duties assigned by the Board. The committees are neither
decision-making nor executive bodies, but the Board can, if it
so decides, delegate certain decision-making authority to the
Committees or the President and CEO.
The Board has an Executive Committee that prepares for
matters to be decided or noted by the Board. In addition, the
Board has an Audit Committee and Human Resources
Committee.
President and CEO
The President and CEO assumes independent responsibility
for the Group’s daily operations.
Executive Management Team
The EMT supports the President and CEO in his or her duties
in coordinating the Group’s management and preparing
matters to be discussed at Board meetings.
Decisions of the Annual General Meeting 2025
Sanoma Corporation’s Annual General Meeting (AGM) was held on 29 April 2025 in Helsinki. The meeting adopted the
Financial Statements for the year 2024 and discharged the members of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO
from liability for the financial year 2024. In addition, the meeting made an advisory decision on the adoption of the
Remuneration Report of the governing bodies.
The AGM resolved that a dividend of EUR 0.39 per share shall be paid. The dividend shall be paid in three equal instalments.
The first instalment of EUR 0.13 per share was paid to a shareholder who was registered in the shareholder register of the
Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Oy on the dividend record date 2 May 2025. The payment date was 9 May 2025.
The second instalment of EUR 0.13 per share was paid to a shareholder who was registered in the shareholder register of the
Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Oy on the dividend record date 16 September 2025. The payment date was 23
September 2025.
The third instalment of EUR 0.13 per share was paid to a shareholder who was registered in the shareholder register of the
Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Oy on the dividend record date 4 November 2025. The payment date was 11
November 2025.
The AGM resolved that the number of the members of the Board of Directors shall be set at nine. Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Klaus
Cawén, Julian Drinkall, Rolf Grisebach, Anna Herlin, Sebastian Langenskiöld and Eugenie van Wiechen were re-elected as
members, and Jannica Fagerholm and Timo Lappalainen were elected as new members of the Board of Directors. Pekka Ala-
Pietilä was elected as the Chair of the Board and Klaus Cawén as the Vice Chair. The term of all Board members ends at the
end of the AGM 2026.
The AGM resolved that the monthly remuneration and meeting fees payable to the members of the Board of Directors remain
unchanged, while the meeting fees of the members of the Board Committees are to be increased by EUR 1,000 / meeting for
the Committee chairs and by EUR 500 / meeting for the Committee members. The monthly remunerations are EUR 12,000 for
the Chair of the Board of Directors, EUR 7,000 for the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors, and EUR 6,000 for the members of
the Board of Directors.
The meeting fees of the Board of Directors are:
For Board members who reside outside Finland: EUR 1,000 / Board meeting where the member was present;
For members of the Board of Directors who reside in Finland: No separate fee is paid for attending Board meetings
For the Chairs of Board of Directors’ Committees: EUR 4,500 / Committee meeting participated in;
For Committee members who reside outside Finland: EUR 3,000 / Committee meeting where the member was present
and EUR 2,000 / Committee meeting participated in; and
Financial Statements 2025
22
For Committee members who reside in Finland: EUR 2,000 / Committee meeting participated.
The meeting fees of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee remain unchanged and are:
For the Chair of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee: EUR 3,500 / Committee meeting participated in;
For members of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee who reside outside Finland: EUR 2,500 / Committee meeting
where the member was present and EUR 1,500 / Committee meeting participated in; and
For members of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee who reside in Finland: EUR 1,500 / Committee meeting
participated in.
The AGM appointed audit firm PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy as the Auditor and the Sustainability Auditor of the Company with
Tiina Puukkoniemi, Authorised Public Accountant, Authorised Sustainability Auditor (ASA), as the Auditor with principal
responsibility and responsible Sustainability Auditor. The Auditor and Sustainability Auditor shall be reimbursed against an
invoice approved by the Company.
Board authorisations
The AGM authorised the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase of a maximum of 16,000,000 of the Company’s own
shares (approx. 9.8% of all shares of the Company) in one or several instalments. The shares shall be repurchased with funds
from the Company's unrestricted shareholders’ equity, and the repurchases shall reduce funds available for distribution of
profits. The authorisation will be valid until 30 June 2026 and it terminates the corresponding authorisation granted by the
AGM 2024. The shares shall be repurchased to develop the Company’s capital structure, to carry out or finance potential
corporate acquisitions or other business arrangements or agreements, to be used as a part of the Company’s incentive
programme or to be otherwise conveyed further, retained as treasury shares, or cancelled.
The AGM authorised the Board of Directors to decide on the issuance of new shares and the conveyance of the Company's
own shares held by the Company (treasury shares) and the issuance of option rights and other special rights entitling to
shares as specified in Chapter 10, Section 1 of the Finnish Companies Act. Option rights and other special rights entitling to
shares as specified in Chapter 10, Section 1 of the Finnish Companies Act may not be granted as part of the Company’s
incentive programme. The Board will be entitled to decide on the issuance of a maximum of 16,000,000 new shares (approx.
9.8% of all shares of the Company) as well as conveyance of a maximum of 21,000,000 treasury shares held by the Company
in one or several instalments. The issuance of shares, the conveyance of treasury shares and the granting of option rights and
other special rights entitling to shares may be done in deviation from the shareholders’ pre-emptive right (directed issue). The
authorisation will be valid until 30 June 2026 and it will replace the corresponding authorisation granted by the AGM 2024.
Shareholders’ Nomination Committee
The purpose of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee of Sanoma is to prepare the proposals on the number, composition
and remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors to the Annual General Meeting (AGM). However, any shareholder
of the Company may also make a proposal directly to the AGM in accordance with the Finnish Companies Act.
The Shareholders’ Nomination Committee consists of up to four members who represent Sanoma’s four largest shareholders
on 31 May preceding the next year’s AGM. The Chair of the Company’s Board of Directors may be invited to serve as an
expert in the Nomination Committee without being a member and without having a vote or being counted in the quorum of the
Nomination Committee. The Nomination Committee shall elect a Chair from among its members at the first meeting. The term
of office of the members of the Nomination Committee starts after the AGM following the appointment, and expires annually
upon the appointment of the next Shareholders’ Nomination Committee.
Remuneration
The remuneration for the members of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee for their duties on the Nomination Committee
was resolved by the AGM 2025. The meeting fees of the members of the Nomination Committee during this term are:
for the Chair of the Nomination Committee: EUR 3,500 / Committee meeting participated
for members of the Nomination Committee who reside outside Finland: EUR 2,500 / Committee meeting where the
member was present and EUR 1,500 / Committee meeting participated
for members of the Nomination Committee who reside in Finland: EUR 1,500 / Committee meeting where the member was
present.
The Company shall bear all reasonable costs of the Nomination Committee. The travel expenses of the members of the
Nomination Committee will be compensated against receipt according to the Sanoma Travel Policy.
Tasks and duties
The tasks and duties of the Nomination Committee are defined in its Charter that is available on Sanoma’s website.
In accordance with its Charter, the duties of the Nomination Committee include, among other responsibilities:
preparing and presenting to the AGM the proposals for:
the remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors as well as Board Committees
the number of the members of the Board of Directors
the election of the Board of Directors, the Chair and Vice Chair
seeking prospective successors for the members of the Board of Directors
Financial Statements 2025
23
participating in the development of the principles concerning the diversity of the Board of Directors and reporting on the
diversity objectives.
Procedures applied in the preparation of the proposal on the Board composition
In accordance with the Nomination Committee Charter, the Board of Directors of Sanoma shall have a sufficient level of
versatile competencies, mutually complementing experience, and knowledge of the industry for the needs of the Company
expressed in its strategy at any given time.
For example, the Board of Directors shall collectively have sufficient knowledge of and competence in:
the learning and media business with current and potential future geographical reach
the management of a public company of corresponding size, good corporate governance, corporate and financial
administration and internal control and risk management
strategic work as well as mergers and acquisitions
technology, including digitalisation and the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI) in consumer and publishing products
sustainability, including environmental, social and governance aspects.
In preparation for 2026, during the year the Nomination Committee conducted a thorough review of the Board’s competence
assessment results, evaluated the skill sets of individual Board members, and assessed the collective expertise and
capabilities of the current Board. The Committee considered extensive screenings of various Board member candidates and
incorporated evaluations from previous years, including insights from past Shareholders’ Nomination Committees to support a
long-term perspective. Additionally, findings from the Board’s self-evaluation survey were reviewed to determine the optimal
Board composition for Sanoma in 2026. Feedback from operative management was also taken into account. Furthermore, the
Committee plans the Board’s structure for future years by considering the Company’s strategy, ongoing development, and
both individual and overall competency requirements of the Board members.
In addition to competency, experience and knowledge, the most important nomination criteria for the Board candidates
individually, are personal qualities and integrity. Equally, the Nomination Committee shall take into account the specific
diversity aspects, such as industry, business, finance and sustainability experience, international experience, nationality, age,
education and gender, when preparing its proposal.
Additionally, the independence and other requirements under applicable laws and regulations (including the rules of Nasdaq
Helsinki Ltd and the Finnish Corporate Governance Code), as well as the results of the annual performance evaluation of the
Company’s Board of Directors, conducted in accordance with the Finnish Corporate Governance Code, are taken into
consideration.
The Nomination Committee employs the services of outside consultants in the quest for suitable candidates.
Composition
The Shareholders’ Nomination Committee appointed in 2025, comprised Juhani Mäkinen (Vice Chair of the Board, Jane and
Aatos Erkko Foundation), Antti Herlin (Chair of the Board, Holding Manutas), Robin Langenskiöld (3rd largest shareholder in
Sanoma) and Rafaela Seppälä (4th largest shareholder in Sanoma). In its meeting on 9 June 2025, the Committee elected
Juhani Mäkinen as Chair of the Committee and invited Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Chair of Sanoma’s Board of Directors, to serve as an
expert in the Committee.
In 2025, the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee appointed in 2025, convened two times and the Shareholders’ Nomination
Committee appointed in 2024, convened once. The attendance rate was 92%. 25% of the Committee members appointed in
2025 were women, and 75% were men.
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has a Charter to govern its work. In addition to the Charter, the Board complies
with the Articles of Association of the Company, Sanoma Corporate Governance Framework and the related charters and
policies, as well as laws and regulations applicable at any given time. The basis for the duties of the Board of Directors is set
forth in the Finnish Companies Act.
Election and term
The Shareholders’ Nomination Committee shall prepare a proposal concerning the composition of the Board to be presented
to the AGM. In accordance with the Articles of Association of Sanoma, the Board shall be composed of five to eleven members
elected by the General Meeting. The General Meeting also elects the Chair and the Vice Chair of the Board.
The term of a member of the Board begins at the end of the AGM in which he or she has been elected and expires at the end
of the AGM following the election.
Composition, diversity and independence
The members of the Board shall have the qualifications and experience necessary to perform their duties, as well as the
possibility to devote sufficient time for the Board work. They shall also meet the independence and other requirements
applicable to publicly listed companies in Finland and both genders shall be represented on the Board.
Matters related to the diversity of the Board are defined in the Charter of the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee and
referred to on a general level in the Charter of the Board of Directors and the Company’s People Policy. In order to ensure that
the Board has sufficient and versatile competencies, mutually complementing experience and knowledge of the industry for
the needs of Sanoma expressed in the strategy at any given time, the Shareholders’ Nomination Committee considers various
diversity aspects and the annual performance assessment of the Board as described above under the paragraph
Shareholders’ Nomination Committee when preparing its proposal of the composition of the Board to the AGM.
Financial Statements 2025
24
With regards to other factors relevant to Board diversity, the Board has set a measurable objective regarding the
representation of both genders on the Board. The objective is that the representation of both genders on the Board is
balanced, with the share of under-represented gender being at least 40%. The Shareholders’ Nomination Committee annually
evaluates the progress of the specific diversity objectives set for the Board.
At the end of 2025, 33% (2024: 25%) of the Board members were women and 67% (2024: 75%) were men. During 2013–
2024, the share of women on the Board has varied between 20–50%. Sanoma has Board members with versatile business
experience and backgrounds in several of the Company’s operating countries. The ages of the Board members vary between
43 and 68, the average age being 59.
Seven members were re-elected to the Board of Directors at the 2025 AGM: Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Klaus Cawén, Julian Drinkall,
Rolf Grisebach, Anna Herlin, Sebastian Langenskiöld and Eugenie van Wiechen. Jannica Fagerholm and Timo Lappalainen
were elected as new members of the Board of Directors. The term of all elected Board members ends at the 2026 AGM. Mika
Ihamuotila had informed that he was not available for re-election to the Board.
According to the Board’s annual evaluation, all members of the Board are non-executive and independent of the Company.
Eight out of nine members are also independent of major shareholders. One member, Anna Herlin is non-independent of
major shareholders as she is in an employment relationship and Board membership in a company, Security Trading Oy, that
exercises indirect control in a significant shareholder (Holding Manutas Oy).
Diversity of the Board and its Committees
Board member
Position
Committee
membership
Age
Gender
Nationality
Education
Pekka Ala-Pietilä
Chair
Exec
68
male
Finnish
M.Sc. (Econ.), D.Sc. (Tech.) h.c., D.Sc.
(Econ.) h.c.
Klaus Cawén
Vice Chair
Exec, Audit
68
male
Finnish
LL.M.
Julian Drinkall
member
HR
61
male
British
Master (Public Administration), MBA and
M.A. (PPE)
Jannica Fagerholm
member
Audit
64
female
Finnish
M.Sc. (Economics)
Rolf Grisebach
member
Audit
64
male
German
Ph.D. (Business Law), Master
(Business and Law)
Anna Herlin
member
HR
43
female
Finnish
Master (Social Sciences) and M.A.
Sebastian Langenskiöld
member
Audit, HR
43
male
Finnish
M.Sc. (International Business), Master
(International Management)
Timo Lappalainen
member
HR
63
male
Finnish
M.Sc. (Industrial engineering and
management)
Eugenie van Wiechen
member
Audit
56
female
Dutch
MBA, M.Sc. (drs. Chemical
Engineering)
Sanoma shares owned by the members of the Board
Shareholding1
Board member
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Chair
15,000
15,000
Klaus Cawén, Vice Chair
6,200
6,200
Julian Drinkall
0
0
Jannica Fagerholm (as of 29 April 2025)
4,000
Rolf Grisebach
12,000
0
Anna Herlin
1,000
1,000
Sebastian Langenskiöld
645,963
645,963
Timo Lappalainen (as of 29 April 2025)
0
Eugenie van Wiechen
0
0
Mika Ihamuotila (until 29 April 2025)
150,000
1Shares owned by the Board members and the corporations over which the member exercises control.
Financial Statements 2025
25
Members of the Board of Directors
Pekka Ala-Pietilä (Chair)
Pekka_Ala-Pietila_color1.png
Born 1957, Finnish citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Chair of the Board since 2016
Board member since 2014
Chair of the Executive Committee
Education: M.Sc. (Econ.), D.Sc. (Tech.) h.c., D.Sc.
(Econ.) h.c.
Main occupation: Chair of the Board at Sanoma
Primary work experience: Blyk Services Oy, co-
founder and CEO 2006–2012; Nokia Corporation,
various positions 1984–2005, e.g. President 1999–
2005, Nokia Mobile Phones, President, 1992–1998 and
Group Executive Board Member 1992–2005
Key board memberships: SAP (Chair, Supervisory
Board), Here Technologies (HERE Global B.V.) (Chair,
Supervisory Board), Sitra (Chair)
Klaus Cawén (Vice Chair)
klaus-cawen-color2.png
Born 1957, Finnish citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Vice Chair of the Board since 2024
Board member since 2024
Member of the Audit Committee and Executive
Committee
Education: LL.M.
Main occupation: Kone Corporation, Executive Advisor
Primary work experience: Kone Corporation, various
positions 1983– e.g. EVP and Executive Board Member
1991–2021; EVP, Mergers and Acquisitions, Strategic
Alliances, Russia and Legal 2006–2021; EVP, Legal,
Acquisitions & Toshiba Alliance 2000–2005; EVP,
General Counsel and Acquisitions, 1991–2000
Key board memberships: Metso Corporation (Vice
Chair), A. Ahlström Corporation (Vice Chair), Toshiba
Elevator & Building Systems Corporation
Other positions of trust: DevCo Partners Ltd, Senior
Advisor
Julian Drinkall
Julian_Drinkall_color.png
Born 1964, British citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Board member since 2020
Chair of the Human Resources Committee
Education: Master (Public Administration), Master
(Business Administration) and M.A. (PPE)
Primary work experience: GLF Schools, CEO 2023–
2025; Aga Khan Schools, General Manager 2021–2022,
Academies Enterprise Trust (AET), CEO 2016–2021;
Alpha Plus Holding, CEO 2014–2016; Cengage
Learning, President and CEO of EMEA and India 2012–
2014; OC&C Strategy Consultants, Operating Partner
2010–2012; Macmillan Education, CEO 2007–2010 and
Chief Operating Officer 2006–2007; Boots Company,
Director of Strategy and Mergers & Acquisitions 2003–
2005; IPC Media, Group Strategy Director 2001–2003;
BBC, Head of Financial and Commercial Strategy
1998– 2001
Key board memberships: Atypical AI Corp, NMITE
(New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering)
Financial Statements 2025
26
Jannica Fagerholm
image.png
Born 1961, Finnish citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Board member since 2025
Education: M.Sc. (Econ)
Main occupation: Signe and Ane Gyllenberg
Foundation, Managing Director
Primary work experience: SEB Gyllenberg Private
Bank, Managing Director 2006–2010, Gyllenberg
Private Bank, Managing Director 2001–2006;
Gyllenberg Wealth Management, Director, Private
Clients 1999–2001. Prior to SEB Gyllenberg, several
leadership positions in Handelsbanken, Finland 1998–
1999 and Sampo Group 1990–1998
Key board memberships: Mandatum Plc (Vice Chair
and Chair of the Remuneration Committee), Solidium
Oy, Kesko Corporation (Chair of the Audit Committee)
Rolf Grisebach
Rolf_Grisebach_color2.png
Born 1961, German citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Board member since 2020
Chair of the Audit Committee
Education: Ph.D. (Business Law), Master
(Business and Law)
Main occupation: Stella Partners, Partner
Primary work experience: Future Group, CEO (DACH)
2023–2024; Edition Peters, Executive Chair 2020-2023;
Thames & Hudson Ltd, CEO 2013–2019; Pearson,
President of German, Swiss and Austrian operations
2010–2013; Deutscher Fachverlag (DFV), CEO 2005–
2010; Holtzbrinck Group, Member of the Executive
Board 2001–2004, Business CEO for Education, STM
and digital division (New York) 1998–2001, Vice
President Corporate Development 1995–1998; Boston
Consulting Group (Munich and London), Manager
1988–1995
Key board memberships: DeutschAkademie
Weiterbildungs GmbH (Chair)
Anna Herlin
Anna_Herlin_color2.png
Born 1982, Finnish citizen
Independent of the Company, non-independent of major
shareholders: an employment relationship and board
membership in a company, Security Trading Oy, that
exercises indirect control in a significant shareholder
(Holding Manutas Oy)
Board member since 2021
Member of the Human Resources Committee
Education: Master (Social Sciences) and M.A.
Primary work experience: John Nurminen Foundation,
Project Manager 2013–2018; Finnish Academy of Fine
Arts, Planning Officer 2008–2009
Key board memberships: Tiina and Antti Herlin
Foundation, Security Trading Oy (Vice Chair)
Financial Statements 2025
27
Sebastian Langenskiöld
Sebastian_Langenskiöld_color2.png
Born 1982, Finnish citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Board member since 2019
Member of the Audit Committee and Human Resources
Committee
Education: M.Sc. (International Business), Master
(International Management)
Main occupation: In Parallel Oy, Head of Partnerships
Primary work experience: Salesforce, EMEA ISV GTM
Principal Partner Account Manager 2017–2023;
Fingertip Ltd., Founding Partner 2012–2017; Cargotec
Corporation, M&A Coordinator 2011; Hansaprint Ltd.,
Key Account Manager 2006–2009
Timo Lappalainen
image.png
Born 1962, Finnish citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Board member since 2025
Education: M.Sc. (Industrial Engineering and
management)
Primary work experience: Several leadership positions
at Orion Corporation as of 1999 incl. President & CEO
2008–2022; Senior Vice President, Proprietary Products
and Animal Health 2005–2007 and member of the
Group management team 2006–2007; Orion Pharma,
Executive Vice President 2003–2005 and Senior Vice
President, Business Development 1999–2005. Prior to
Orion, several leadership positions at Leiras Ltd. 1994–
1999 and Finvest Ltd. 1989–1993 and as a consultant
at Arthur Andersen & Co in Chicago, USA 1987–1988.
Key board memberships and positions of trust:
Professor of Practise (Pharmaceutical Industry,
University of Turku), The Finnish Fair Foundation
(Chair), Kemira Oyj, Finnish Foundation for
Cardiovascular Research
Eugenie van Wiechen
Eugenie_van_Wiechen_color2.png
Born 1969, Dutch citizen
Independent of the Company and major shareholders
Board member since 2023
Member of the Audit Committee
Education: MBA, M.Sc. (drs. Chemical Engineering)
Main occupation: FD Mediagroep, CEO and Publishing
Director
Primary work experience: LinkedIn Corporation,
Managing Director, the Netherlands 2009–2011; eBay,
Managing Director, Marktplaats, 2008–2009; Sanoma
Uitgevers B.V. various positions 2003–2008, e.g.
Publisher 2003–2008; McKinsey & Company, various
positions 1995–2003, e.g. Engagement Manager 1999–
2003
Key board memberships: Artis (Supervisory Board)
Financial Statements 2025
28
Duties of the Board of Directors
The duties of the Board are set forth in the Finnish Companies Act and other applicable legislation. The Board is responsible
for the management of the Company and its business operations. In addition, the Board is responsible for the appropriate
arrangement of the control of the Company’s bookkeeping and financial administration.
The operating principles and main duties of the Board have been defined in the Charter of the Board of Directors. The Board,
amongst other duties:
decides on the long-term goals and business strategy of the Group for achieving those long-term goals
approves the Group’s reporting structure
decides on acquisitions and divestments, financial matters and investments, which have a value exceeding EUR 5.0
million, or are otherwise strategically significant, or involve significant risks, or relate to divestment, lay-off or termination of
employment of 100 employees or more (currently, the Board has delegated its decision-making authority to the President
and CEO on acquisitions and divestments, financial matters and investments which have a value exceeding EUR 0.5
million but less than EUR 5.0 million)
ensures the adequacy of planning, internal control and risk management systems and reporting procedures
reviews and monitors the operations and performance of the Group companies
approves the Interim Reports, the Half-Year Report, the Financial Statements and the Report of the Board of Directors as
well as the Corporate Governance Statement and the Remuneration Report of the Company
appoints, dismisses and decides on the remuneration of
the President and CEO,
his or her deputy,
the CEOs of the Strategic Business Units (SBUs), members of the EMT and certain executive positions as determined
by the Board
confirms the Group’s values
approves the Sanoma Governance Framework and Group’s key policies.
In 2025, alongside its regular duties and oversight, the Board guided Sanoma by approving strategic objectives for both the
Learning and Media Finland businesses, approving the Sanoma Governance Framework and by monitoring their
implementation through regular reviews and assessments. It also supervised internal control, risk management, and received
updates regarding privacy, compliance, and ethics from the Compliance function.
The Board continued to monitor Sanoma’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting under the Corporate
Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) as well as reviewed and approved the double materiality assessment in line with the
CSRD European Sustainability Reporting Standard (ESRS), including alignment of the findings with Sanoma’s Sustainability
Strategy.
Throughout the year, the Board assessed the Group’s financial standing, performance and outlook, including continued
progress on deleveraging the balance sheet and tracked the realisation rate of the three-year process and efficiency
improvement Program Solar initiated in Learning in 2023, and completed during 2025.
A key focus in 2025 was the strategic intention and application of artificial intelligence (AI) within Learning and Media Finland.
The Board oversaw digitalisation, harmonisation and efficiency initiatives, conducted deep dives on AI and related solutions for
both the Learning and Media business, explored growth opportunities, and reviewed Sanoma’s AI governance processes and
policies.
Additionally, the Board updated Sanoma’s financial targets to reflect the Group’s accelerated net sales and earnings growth
outlook in 2026–2030. The 2026–2030 growth paths of Learning and Media Finland were further elaborated by the executive
management at the Capital Markets Day in November, also outlining the opportunities provided by AI and Sanoma’s increased
scale.
Attention was also given to the Employee Engagement Survey results, follow-up action plans, HR strategy, leadership
development programmes and the status of implementing the Pay Transparency Directive.
In order to develop its performance, the Board conducts an evaluation of its operations and working methods on an annual
basis. The purpose of the evaluation is also to assess the composition of the Board and define qualifications for possible new
Board members. The evaluation may be done as an internal self-assessment or by using an external evaluator. In 2025, the
Board carried out an internal self-assessment while having an external evaluator conduct interviews to maintain consistency
and measure performance against benchmarks. The Board also received updates and training on governance and securities
market compliance issues.
Financial Statements 2025
29
Board meetings
During 2025, the Board convened 11 times with an attendance rate of 96%.
Members’ attendance at Board meetings
Board member
Number of meetings attended
Attendance rate, %
Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Chair
11
100
Klaus Cawén, Vice Chair
11
100
Julian Drinkall
11
100
Jannica Fagerholm (as of 29 April 2025)
8
100
Rolf Grisebach
11
100
Anna Herlin
11
100
Sebastian Langenskiöld
11
100
Timo Lappalainen (as of 29 April 2025)
8
100
Eugenie van Wiechen
10
91
Mika Ihamuotila (until 29 April 2025)
2
67
Board’s committees
The Board may appoint committees, executive committees and other permanent or fixed-term bodies to focus on certain
duties assigned by the Board. The Board confirms the Charter of these committees and provides the policies given to other
bodies appointed by the Board. The committees report regularly to the Board.
The Board has an Executive Committee that prepares proposals for matters to be decided or noted by the Board. In addition,
the Board has an Audit Committee and a Human Resources Committee.
The members of the committees are appointed among the members of the Board in accordance with the Charter of the
respective committee. The committees are neither decision-making nor executive bodies, but the Board can, if it so decides,
delegate certain decision-making authority to the Committees or the President and CEO.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee prepares matters to be considered at the Board meetings. The Executive Committee consists of the
Chair and Vice Chair of the Board, the President and CEO and, at the Chair’s invitation, one or several members of the Board.
From the date of the 2025 AGM, the Executive Committee comprised Pekka Ala-Pietilä (Chair), Klaus Cawén and Rob
Kolkman. The Executive Committee did not convene in 2025.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for matters pertaining to financial and
sustainability reporting and control, risk management, external audit and internal audit, in accordance with the Charter
approved by the Board, the Finnish Corporate Governance Code as well as applicable laws and regulations.
The Audit Committee, for example, reviews the Financial Statement Release, the Half-Year Report and the Interim Reports,
discusses enterprise risk analyses including identified risks and mitigation plans, monitors the principles concerning the
monitoring and assessment of related party transactions, prepares the appointment, monitors and evaluates the independence
of the Company’s auditor, and approves the internal audit plan including a follow up of its progress. The Audit Committee also
reviews the Group’s Sustainability Statement and Corporate Governance Statement.
In 2025, the Audit Committee focused on the following key areas beyond its regular duties and recurring agenda items.
Committee reviewed recommendations for simplification of various policies to streamline governance frameworks and
enhance clarity. In addition, the Committee noted the completion of the Social Bond allocation process, confirming that all
proceeds from the EUR 150 million Social Bond issued in September 2024 have been fully allocated, with the allocation report
published in early November 2025.
In addition to the members of the Audit Committee, the Group’s President and CEO, CFO and people responsible for topics on
the Audit Committee’s agenda, participate in the meetings presenting their corresponding agenda items to the Committee.
Also, the Internal Auditor participates in the Audit Committee meetings. The Auditor in Charge and Sustainability Auditor is also
present at the meetings and gives updates on auditing work conducted in between the meetings.
In accordance with its Charter, the Audit Committee consists of the Chair of the Committee and at least two, and at most four
members, appointed annually by the Board among its members. Members of the Committee shall be independent of the
Company, and at least one member shall also be independent of significant shareholders. As required by law, at least one
member of the Audit Committee must have expertise in accounting or auditing. The Committee meets at least four times a
year.
From the date of the 2025 AGM, the Audit Committee comprised Rolf Grisebach (Chair), Klaus Cawén, Jannica Fagerholm,
Sebastian Langenskiöld and Eugenie van Wiechen. All members of the Committee are independent of the Company and of
significant shareholders of the Company. The majority of the members are financial experts based on their educational or
occupational backgrounds. In addition, there is sustainability competence represented in the Committee. The Audit Committee
convened six times in 2025, with an average attendance rate of 94%.
Financial Statements 2025
30
Members’ attendance at Audit Committee meetings
Member
Number of meetings attended
Attendance rate, %
Rolf Grisebach, Chair
6
100
Klaus Cawén
6
100
Jannica Fagerholm (as of 29 April 2025)
3
100
Sebastian Langenskiöld
6
100
Eugenie van Wiechen (as of 29 April 2025)
3
100
Mika Ihamuotila (until 29 April 2025)
2
67
Human Resources Committee
The Human Resources Committee is responsible for preparing human resources matters related to the compensation of the
President and CEO and key executives, evaluation of the performance of the President and CEO and key executives, Group
compensation policies, Human Resources policies and practices, development and succession plans for the President and
CEO, as well as key executives and other preparatory tasks as may be assigned to it from time to time by the Board and/or
the Chair of the Board. In addition, the Committee discusses the composition and succession of the Board as well as prepares
the Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Report.
In 2025, in addition to key remuneration aspects, the HR Committee discussed relevant topics, like the implementation of the
People Policy in connection with the HR Strategy and the action plan following the annual Employee Engagement Survey.
Special focus was paid on Sanoma’s culture, which is key in supporting the business strategy. Sanoma’s cultural strengths lie
in a clear purpose and impact on people, and the efforts are aimed at building an inclusive and people-centric culture to
enable future growth, emphasising collaboration, simplification, and investing in talent and skills. The HR Committee also
emphasised the alignment of leadership and behavioural competencies with the ways of working.
In addition to members of the Human Resources Committee, the Company’s President and CEO, CHRO, HRO of Media
Finland and other people responsible for HR participated in the meetings, presenting respective agenda items to the
Committee.
The Human Resources Committee comprises at least three and at most five members, who are appointed annually by the
Board. The majority of the members shall be independent of the Company. The Committee meets at least twice a year.
From the date of the 2025 AGM, the Human Resources Committee comprised Julian Drinkall (Chair), Anna Herlin, Timo
Lappalainen and Sebastian Langenskiöld. All members of the Committee are independent of the Company and three
members (Julian Drinkall, Timo Lappalainen and Sebastian Langenskiöld) are independent of significant shareholders of the
Company. There is sustainability competence represented in the Committee. The Human Resources Committee convened
four times in 2025.
Members’ attendance at Human Resources Committee meetings
Member
Number of meetings attended
Attendance rate, %
Julian Drinkall, Chair
4
100
Anna Herlin
4
100
Sebastian Langenskiöld
4
100
Timo Lappalainen (as of 29 April 2025)
2
100
President and CEO
The duties of the President and CEO of Sanoma are governed primarily by the Finnish Companies Act. The President and
CEO assumes independent responsibility for the Group’s daily operations, in line with the following duties, for example:
ensuring the Company’s accounts comply with the law and its financial affairs have been arranged in a reliable manner,
managing the Group’s daily operations in line with the long-term goals and business strategy of the Group approved by the
Board and in accordance with the general policies adopted by the Board and other applicable guidelines and decisions,
deciding on acquisitions and divestments, as well as financial matters and investments, which have a value exceeding
EUR 0.5 million but below EUR 5.0 million, or relate to the divestment, lay-off or termination of employment of more than
50 but fewer than 100 employees,
preparing decision proposals and matters for information for the meetings of the Board (together with the Chair of the
Board and/or the Executive Committee) and presenting these matters and the agenda to the Board and its Committees,
approving Group-level policies and standards in accordance with the Sanoma Governance Framework, and
chairing the EMT.
The President and CEO may take extraordinary or wide-ranging actions only under separate authorisation from the Board, or
when the time delay involved in waiting for a decision from the Board would cause substantial losses to Sanoma.
Rob Kolkman has acted as the President and CEO of Sanoma Corporation as of 1 January 2024.
Financial Statements 2025
31
Executive Management Team (EMT)
The EMT supports the President and CEO in their duties in coordinating the Group’s management and preparing matters to be
discussed at Board meetings. The matters include, for example:
the long-term goals of the Group and its business strategy for achieving them,
acquisitions and divestments,
organisational and management issues,
development projects,
internal control, and
risk management systems.
The EMT is chaired by the President and CEO. In 2025, in addition to the Chair, the EMT comprised the Chief Financial Officer
of Sanoma Group and the CEO of Media Finland. 33% (2024: 33%) of the EMT members were women, and 67% (2024: 67%)
were men.
Sanoma shares owned by the President and CEO and the members of EMT
Shareholding
EMT member
31 December
2025
31 December
2024
Rob Kolkman, Chair
87,059
87,059
Alex Green
19,696
19,696
Pia Kalsta
37,410
47,410
Diversity of the EMT
EMT member
Position
Age
Gender
Nationality
Education
Rob Kolkman
President & CEO
53
male
Dutch
MBA, Master (Econ., Accountancy)
Alex Green
CFO
55
male
British
B.Sc. (Hons) Mathematics, Chartered
Accountant (ACA)
Pia Kalsta
CEO, Media Finland
55
female
Finnish
M.Sc. (Econ.)
Financial Statements 2025
32
Members of the Executive Management Team
Rob Kolkman, President and CEO
Rob Kolkman color1.png
Born 1972, Dutch citizen
Chair of the EMT since 2024, member of the EMT since
2019
Member of the Boards Executive Committee since 2024
Education: MBA, Master (Econ., Accountancy)
Work experience: Sanoma Group, CEO Sanoma
Learning 2020–2023, CEO Sanoma Media Netherlands
2019; Reed Business Information (part of RELX Group),
Group Managing Director 2017–2018, Managing
Director of ICIS 2016–2017, CEO Netherlands 2014–
2016; Elsevier (part of RELX Group), Managing Director
Australia and New Zealand 2008–2014; Reed Business
Netherlands (part of RELX Group), Associate Director
2006–2008, Publishing Director (Finance and tax)
2004–2006, Director of Elsevier Baard 2003–2004; BPP
Professional Education (Netherlands), various positions
1992–2003
Alex Green, CFO
Alex Green color1.png
Born 1970, British citizen
Member of the EMT since 2022
Education: B.Sc. (Hons) Mathematics, Chartered
Accountant (ACA)
Work experience: eBay Classifieds Group (eCG), CFO
2013–2022; eBay Group, several managerial and
leadership positions 2006–2013; Factiva (a Dow Jones/
Reuters company at the time), European Head of
Finance 2001–2005; ExxonMobil, various finance
positions 1996–2001; Coopers & Lybrand (now PwC),
various positions 1992–1996
Pia Kalsta, CEO, Media Finland
Pia Kalsta color4.png
Born 1970, Finnish citizen
Member of the EMT since 2015
Education: M.Sc. (Econ.)
Work experience: Nelonen Media (part of Sanoma
Group), e.g. President 2014–2015, President, acting
2013–2014, Senior Vice President, Head of Consumer
Business, Marketing & Business Development 2012–
2013, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
2008–2012, Vice President, Sales 2006–2008,
Marketing Manager 2001– 2006; SCA Hygiene Products
(Finland) 1996–2001, various positions e.g. Key
Account Manager, Product Manager and Marketing
Manager
Key board memberships: Ilmarinen, Confederation of
Finnish Industries (Elinkeinoelämän keskusliitto EK),
Finnmedia (Chair), INMA (International News Media
Association)
Financial Statements 2025
33
Risk management and internal control
The management of Sanoma Group and its businesses is based on a clear organisational structure, well-defined areas of
authority and responsibility, common planning, and reporting systems as well as policies and guidelines. The roles and
responsibilities of different administrative bodies in risk management and internal control are explained in the table below.
Risk management
Internal control
Board of Directors
Approval of Risk Management Policy
Overseeing the effectiveness of risk
management
Aligning the strategic objectives and risk
appetite of the Company
Approval of Internal Controls Policy
Audit Committee
Reviews and monitors the implementation of
the policy and the risk management process
Reviews the reliability, effectiveness and
compliance with Sanoma’s Corporate
Governance Framework of internal control
systems
Monitors matters related to statutory audit and
internal audit
President and CEO
Defining risk management strategies and
procedures
Setting priorities for risk management
Sets the ground for the internal control
environment by executing policies and standards
The EMT supports the President and CEO in their
oversight role and in assuring compliance
Audit and
Assurance
function
Coordinates the risk management process
Produces risk reports
Evaluates and provides recommendations for
improvement on risk management
Supports the President and CEO in ensuring the
compliance of financial reporting with Group
requirements by, for example, evaluating and
providing recommendations for improvement on
internal control
Finance and
control function
Compiles reports on internal control to the Board
of Directors, Audit Committee and/or the
President and CEO and the EMT
Strategic Business
Units (SBU)
Aligning the risk management guidelines,
procedures and strategies with the Group
Identifying, measuring, reporting and
managing risk
Ensuring that Sanoma policies and standards are
implemented and followed in their business
Reflecting possible local requirements in the
implementation
Risk management
The main objective of the risk management of Sanoma is to identify and manage essential risks related to the execution of the
Group’s strategy and operations. The Risk Management Policy defines Group-wide risk management principles, objectives
and responsibilities.
Risk management is integrated in Sanoma’s management, strategic planning and internal control system, and covers all risk
categories at Group, Strategic Business Units (SBU) and entity levels. The risk management process includes the following
phases:
1. Setting strategic, operational, reporting and compliance objectives on the Group, SBU and business levels
2. Identification and assessment of risks affecting the achievement of objectives by using a risk framework
3. Defining risk management activities for key risks
4. Implementation of risk management activities (e.g. asset allocation, control activities, insuring, hedging or divestitures)
5. Monitoring the performance and efficiency of the risk management
6. Continuous improvement of the risk management processes, performance, and capabilities
7. Reporting of updated risk assessment results with related ongoing or planned mitigation actions to the Audit Committee and
further to the Board of Directors twice a year. The reporting includes identification and assessment of key risks and
summary of risk management activities for each SBU, business, and selected subsidiaries. The reporting shall be linked as
much as possible to the quarterly reporting and strategic planning processes. The results of the risk assessment are also
utilised in the double materiality assessment.
More information on the most significant risks that could have a negative impact on Sanoma’s business, performance, or
financial status is described in the Report of the Board of Directors.
Internal controls
Sanoma’s Internal Control Policy defines the internal control process applied in the Group. Internal controls are in line with the
Corporate Governance Framework and aim to assure that all Group policies and standards are up to date, communicated and
implemented.
Internal control is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the
following categories:
effectiveness and efficiency of operations
reliability of financial reporting
compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Financial Statements 2025
34
The process includes objective setting, control design and implementation, operating effectiveness testing, monitoring and
continuous improvement, and reporting.
Internal controls consist of entity-level, process-level and IT controls. Entity-level controls are applied on all levels of Sanoma
(i.e. Group, SBU and entity) and can relate to more than one process. The Code of Conduct, Group policies and guidelines
and their active implementation are examples of entity-level control activities.
Process-level control activities are designed to mitigate risks relating to certain key processes. Purchase-to-pay and payroll
processes are examples of process-level controls. Automated or manual reconciliations and approvals of transactions are
typical process-level controls.
IT controls are embedded within IT processes that provide a reliable operating environment and support the effective operation
of application controls. Controls that prevent inappropriate and unauthorised use of the system and controls over the effective
acquisition are examples of IT controls.
The operation of controls is monitored to ensure that they are implemented as designed, and that they operate effectively. The
monitoring is performed as a management self-assessment, assessment of an independent party or internal audit, or a
combination of these.
Monitoring of financial reporting process
The financial reporting process is based on the Group Reporting Manual. Combined with the other Group reporting guidelines
and additional instructions, it defines Sanoma Group’s accounting principles and policies.
The Group Finance and Control function is part of the Parent Company and prepares control point guidelines for transactions
and periodic controls for the SBUs. The guidelines are approved by the President and CEO. Periodic controls are linked to
monthly and annual reporting processes and include reconciliations and analyses to ensure the accuracy of financial reporting.
The control activities seek to ensure that potential deviations and errors are prevented, discovered and corrected, both at the
Parent Company and the SBU level. Internal control systems cover the whole financial reporting process.
The Group’s financial performance is monitored on a monthly basis, using a Group-wide financial planning and reporting
system, which includes actualised income statements, balance sheets, cash flow statements and key performance indicators,
as well as estimates for the current financial year.
Furthermore, business reviews between Group and SBU management are held at least quarterly. In addition to the SBUs’
financial performance, e.g. the operating environment, future expectations, and business development are discussed in the
reviews. The business reviews also have a role in the process of ensuring the functioning of the continuous risk assessment
and internal control systems.
Other information
Internal audit
Sanoma’s internal audit is steered by the Corporate Governance Framework as well as Group Policies on Internal Audit,
Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management. The Audit and Assurance function, reporting to the CFO and directly to the
Audit Committee, is responsible for the internal audit at Sanoma.
The scope of Audit and Assurance covers examination and evaluation of internal control systems, risk management
processes, compliance processes, information security and governance framework as well as monitoring of Internal Control
process on all organisational levels and businesses. The Audit and Assurance function supports the development of the
organisation and provides additional assurance with a risk-based approach.
Related party transactions
Sanoma has a Related Party Policy, under which members of the Board of Directors, the Executive Management Team and
the SBU management teams are under obligation to submit certain related party transactions, as defined in the Policy, for a
prior approval. In addition, the Board Charter includes instructions for Board members’ conduct in related party transactions
and other conflict of interest situations. Sanoma reports related party transactions in accordance with IFRS. More information
on transactions with related parties is available in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6.1.
Insider administration
Sanoma’s Insider Policy complies with the Guidelines for Insiders issued by Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. and other relevant
legislation, such as Market Abuse Regulation.
According to the Insider Policy, a person who has gained inside information may not use the information by acquiring or
disposing of Sanoma’s financial instruments (either on his own or on a third-party’s behalf, directly or indirectly), or give either
direct or indirect advice on trading.
Sanoma has a standardised process for assessing inside information, delaying disclosure and establishing of insider lists.
People who have access to all inside information, due to the nature of their position at Sanoma, are listed as permanent
insiders. Currently, there are no permanent insiders at Sanoma.
Deal-specific or event-based insider lists are established based on a case-by-case evaluation when inside information
related to an event or deal is identified and a decision on delayed disclosure is made. Those who have been entered onto
a deal-specific (or event-based) insider list are not allowed to trade Sanoma’s financial instruments until the project has
been publicly disclosed or otherwise terminated.
Financial Statements 2025
35
Sanoma applies a closed period, which is a thirty (30) calendar day period, before the announcement of the Financial
Statements Release, the Half-Year Report and the Interim Reports. During the closed period, the members of the Board and
the President and CEO shall not conduct any transactions in Sanoma’s financial instruments on their own account, or on the
account of a third party, whether they possess inside information or not. Additionally, transactions are not allowed during the
entire publication day. Sanoma also recommends that the EMT members and persons engaged in financial reporting do not
trade in Sanoma’s financial instruments during the closed period or the publication day.
Members of the Board and EMT shall always check beforehand the appropriateness of trading with the Company secretary.
Members of the Board and EMT may also issue an explicit, documented trading programme, which must comply with Nasdaq
Helsinki Ltd. rules and regulations on trading programmes. Sanoma may publish such trading programmes on its website.
There were no trading programmes in place on 31 December 2025.
The Board members, the President and CEO and persons closely associated with them, must notify Sanoma and the Finnish
Financial Supervisory Authority of their transactions with Sanoma’s financial instruments (the so-called Manager’s
Transactions). The notification must be done within two days of the transaction. Sanoma shall publish such a notification as a
stock exchange release within two days after receiving the notification.
Audit
The main function of the statutory audit is to verify that the financial statements provide a true and fair view of the Group’s
financial performance and financial position for the financial year. Sanoma’s financial year is the calendar year.
The auditor’s responsibility is to audit the Group’s and the Parent Company’s financial statements and administration in the
respective financial year and to provide an auditors’ opinion to the AGM. The auditor reports to the Board at least once a year.
The Auditor shall be an auditing firm approved by the Patent and Registration Office. The term of office of the auditor expires
at the end of the next AGM following the election.
The 2025 AGM elected the Authorised Public Accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy as the Auditor and the
Sustainability Auditor of the Company with Tiina Puukkoniemi, Authorised Public Accountant, Authorised Sustainability Auditor
(ASA), as the Auditor with principal responsibility and responsible Sustainability Auditor.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy has acted as the statutory auditor of the Company since the 2017 AGM. Tiina Puukkoniemi is
acting as the Auditor with principal responsibility and responsible Sustainability Auditor of the Company since the 2024 AGM.
The Auditor and Sustainability Auditor shall be reimbursed against an invoice approved by the Company.
Fees paid to the Company’s auditors
Group
Parent Company
EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Fees paid for audit services
1.3
1.3
0.3
0.3
Fees paid for non-audit services
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
Financial Statements 2025
36
Sustainability Statement
Financial Statements 2025
37
General information
ESRS 2 General Disclosures
BP-1
General basis for preparation of the Sustainability Statement
BP-2
Disclosures in relations to specific circumstances
GOV-1
The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
GOV-2
Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative,
management and supervisory bodies
GOV-3
Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
GOV-4
Statement on due diligence
GOV-5
Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
SBM-1
Strategy, business model and value chain
SBM-2
Interests and views of stakeholders
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
IRO-1
Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
IRO-2
Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s Sustainability Statement
Basis for preparation
BP-1 General basis for preparation of the Sustainability Statement
Sanoma’s Sustainability Statement (“Sustainability Report” as per the Finnish Accounting Act) has been prepared in
accordance with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (EU) 2022/2464 and the European Sustainability Reporting
Standards (ESRS) defined in the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 as well as the Commission Delegated
Act 2025/1416, the requirements of Chapter 7 of the Finnish Accounting Act on sustainability reporting, and the EU Taxonomy
legislation (2020/852).
The Sustainability Statement has been prepared on a consolidated basis and comprises Sanoma Corporation and its
subsidiaries. The scope of consolidation is the same as for the Consolidated Financial Statements. For Scope 3 category 15
Investments, Sanoma includes information from associated companies and joint ventures that Sanoma has no control over
and which are consolidated according to the equity method in the financial statements. This applies even for joint ventures or
associated companies where Sanoma owns 50% or more but has no control over the company, as Sanoma uses the GHG
Protocol to calculate emissions.
The reported topics are based on Sanoma’s updated double materiality assessment (DMA) conducted in 2025. The identified
material impacts, risks and opportunities cover Sanoma’s own operations as well as the upstream and downstream value
chain. For the upstream value chain, the statement covers information on Sanoma’s tier 1 suppliers. In addition, Sanoma
traces and monitors the origin of its purchased materials further in the supply chain to tier 2 suppliers. For the downstream
value chain, the statement covers information extending to consumers and end-users.
No information corresponding to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovation has been omitted from the
Sustainability Statement. Sanoma has not either omitted from disclosure of any impending developments or matters that are
currently in the course of negotiation.
BP-2 Disclosures in relations to specific circumstances
Sanoma’s Sustainability Statement fulfils the characteristics of specific circumstances for the disclosures described below.
Time horizons
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) recommends to adopt the following time horizons: short-term time
horizon being the reporting period in the financial statements, medium-term time horizon being from 1–5 years and long-term
time horizon being more than 5 years. In its double materiality assessment for 2025, Sanoma aligned its definitions of
medium- and long-term time horizons with the ESRS, as in the previous years the Company had used in its reporting the
same time horizons as in its Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process.
Value chain estimation
Sanoma’s reporting includes data mainly from own operations, and the reporting is based on Sanoma’s policies and standards
as well as actions and targets related to their implementation. The emissions data for Scope 3 related to categories 1, 4, 5 and
7, is partially estimated using indirect sources. A total of 38% of Sanoma’s Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are
calculated using non-primary data. The methodology is described in more detail in section E1-6. Sanoma evaluates the
accuracy level of the data to be sufficient. Methods of collecting GHG emission data from suppliers are continuously improved
by cooperating with suppliers and developing standardised methods for data collection.
Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty
No monetary amounts or quantitative metrics in Sanoma’s reporting are subject to a high level of measurement uncertainty.
Changes in preparation or presentation of sustainability information
In 2025, Sanoma revised its Scope 1 emissions for 2021–2025 by removing emissions from rechargeable cars and
reclassifying them under Scope 2. Sanoma also updated its E1–5 energy consumption figures to include the energy use of
company cars, ensuring alignment with the reporting boundaries applied in E1–6 Scope 1 and 2. A minor restatement was
Financial Statements 2025
38
made to 2024 Scope 3 category 1 emissions to exclude a data-transmission-related row that is already accounted for under
category 11 Use of sold products. A minor restatement was made to 2024 Scope 3 category 3 and 7 to correct a small error in
the calculation formula and to ensure comparability. Scope 3 category 15 emissions were restated to include associate
company Jakeluyhtiö Suomi Oy in 2024-2025.
In section S1-8, the share of employees covered by workers representatives in 2024 have been restated. The restatement
concerned the figures for Finland, Spain and the Netherlands, for which the information was reflecting the number of workers
representatives instead of the number of employees covered by workers representatives. The restated figures are available in
section S1-8.
In section S1-14, the assessment criteria for work-related accidents were refined in 2025. As a result, the 2024 comparative
data was reassessed based on the updated criteria, and the reported figures were adjusted accordingly. The restated figures
are available in section S1-14.
In section S1 Entity-specific metric, Sanoma enhanced its employee engagement measurement with standardised,
benchmark-enabled questions in 2025, establishing a new baseline for future comparison and strengthening the quality of
insight. The previous Employee Experience Index was replaced by Employee Engagement Score that is based on five
science-based and market-comparable questions. Due to this change, the metrics are not comparable year-on-year.
Disclosures stemming from other legislation or generally accepted sustainability reporting pronouncements
Sanoma uses the GHG Protocol for emissions calculations, and its climate targets are validated by the Science Based Targets
initiative (SBTi). Entity-specific metrics are partially based on the 2016 or newer version of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
Standards for the following topical standards: S4 Customers and end-users (GRI 417-3 Marketing and labelling, GRI 418-1
Customer Privacy). For S4 Customers and end-users, the Company has utilised the Sustainability Accounting Standard
Board’s (SASB) Media & Entertainment, Advertising & Marketing (Media Pluralism, Journalistic Integrity & Sponsorship
Identification, Intellectual Property Protection & Media Piracy, Data Privacy, Advertising Integrity) and Education (Data
Security, Quality of Education & Gainful Employment) sectors’ Sustainability Accounting Standards as inspiration.
Use of phase-in provisions in accordance with Appendix C of ESRS 1
Sanoma applies phase-in provisions for the following data requirements:
ESRS 2 SBM-1 40 (b) (breakdown of total revenue by significant ESRS sector) and (c) (list of additional significant ESRS
sectors)
ESRS 2 SBM-3 48 (e) (anticipated financial effects)
ESRS E1-9 Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related
opportunities
ESRS E4-6 Anticipated financial effects from biodiversity and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities
ESRS S1-7 Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce
ESRS S1-14 Health and safety data points on cases of work-related ill health and on number of days lost to injuries,
accidents, fatalities and work-related ill health as well as health and safety data related to non-employees.
Minimum disclosure requirement MDR-M 77b
No metrics presented in this report have been validated by an external body other than the assurance provider. The only
exception to this is the entity-specific metric related to the Employee Engagement Survey under S1, which is carried out
entirely by a third-party service provider. In addition, Sanoma’s climate targets have been third-party validated by the Science
Based Targets initiative.
In September 2025, Sanoma announced plans to centralise Media Finland’s news media printing operations to the printing
house in Vantaa and to close the printing house in Tampere, Finland. After negotiations, the printing house was closed at the
year-end. The closing has no impact on the 2025 reported figures.
Financial Statements 2025
39
Sustainability governance
GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
The composition, diversity and expertise of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
Information on the composition of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies of the undertaking and the diversity
of their members at 31 December 2025:
Number of executive and non-executive Board members
2025
2024
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Executive members
0
0%
0
0%
Non-executive Board members
9
100%
8
100%
Total
9
100%
8
100%
The numbers presented above include the Audit Committee as its members are also members of the Board of Directors.
Sanoma does not have representation of employees and other workers in its administrative, management and supervisory
bodies.
Gender distribution of the members of the Board of Directors
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
Total
2025
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Members of the Board
3
33%
6
67%
0
0%
0
0%
9
100%
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
Total
2024
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Members of the Board
2
25%
6
75%
0
0%
0
0%
8
100%
Other information on the members of the Board of Directors
2025
2024
Board's gender ratio
0.5
0.3
Share of independent Board members
89%
88%
The Board’s gender ratio is calculated by dividing the number of female Board members by the number of male Board members.
All Board members were independent of the Company, but one member is non-independent of a major shareholder. For the
Audit Committee, the share of independent members was 100% and the gender ratio was 0.67.
The competences, experience and knowledge required for the Board composition is set out in the Charter of the Shareholders’
Nomination Committee. Together with the Board Charter, it establishes that diversity aspects are taken into account. The
Finnish Corporate Governance Code also has requirements related to Board composition and diversity.
According to Sanoma’s Corporate Governance Statement, the Board of Directors must collectively have sufficient knowledge
of and competence in:
the learning and media business with current and potential future geographical reach
the management of a public company of corresponding size, good corporate governance, corporate and financial
administration and internal control and risk management
strategic work as well as mergers and acquisitions
technology, including digitalisation and the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI) in consumer and publishing products, and
sustainability, including environmental, social and governance aspects.
In order to ensure that the Board has sufficient and versatile competencies, mutually complementing experience and
knowledge of the industry for the needs of Sanoma expressed in the strategy at any given time, the Shareholders’ Nomination
Committee considers a range of diversity aspects, such as business experience, international experience, nationality, age,
education and gender, when preparing its proposal of the composition of the Board to the Annual General Meeting (AGM).
Until 29 April 2025, the members of the Board of Directors were Pekka Ala-Pietilä (Chair), Klaus Cawén (Vice Chair), Julian
Drinkall, Rolf Grisebach, Anna Herlin, Mika Ihamuotila, Sebastian Langenskiöld and Eugenie van Wiechen.
On 29 April 2025, the AGM elected the following members to the Board of Directors: Pekka Ala-Pietilä (Chair), Klaus Cawén
(Vice Chair), Julian Drinkall, Jannica Fagerholm, Rolf Grisebach, Anna Herlin, Sebastian Langenskiöld, Timo Lappalainen and
Eugenie van Wiechen. In its organisation meeting held after the AGM, the Board of Directors decided to appoint from among
its members Rolf Grisebach (Chair), Klaus Cawén, Jannica Fagerholm, Sebastian Langenskiöld and Eugenie van Wiechen to
its Audit Committee.
Gender distribution of Executive Management Team (EMT)
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
Total
2025
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Members of the EMT
1
33%
2
67%
0
0%
0
0%
3
100%
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
Total
2024
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Members of the EMT
1
33%
2
67%
0
0%
0
0%
3
100%
Financial Statements 2025
40
Other information on the members of the Executive Management Team
2025
2024
EMT's gender ratio
0.5
0.5
The EMT’s gender ratio is calculated by dividing the number of female EMT members by the number of male EMT members.
The Executive Management Team (EMT) remained unchanged during the reporting period and included Rob Kolkman
(President and CEO, Chair of the EMT), Alexander Green (CFO) and Pia Kalsta (CEO, Media Finland).
The roles and responsibilities of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
In its operations and governance, Sanoma follows the laws and regulations applicable in its operating countries, the ethical
guidelines set by the Sanoma Code of Conduct as well as the Group’s internal policies and standards. Sustainability topics are
embedded into Sanoma’s governance, strategy and business model. The sustainability governance and management model
is defined in Sanoma’s Sustainability and Human Rights Policy. From the sustainability governance perspective, Sanoma’s
administrative body is the Board of Directors, the management body the President and CEO supported by the EMT, and the
supervisory body the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee. In addition, the Board of Directors’ Human Resources Committee
supports the Board in human resources-related tasks, such as the compensation and performance evaluation of the President
and CEO and key executives, Group compensation and human resources policies and practices, as well as the target setting
for short- (STI) and long-term incentives (LTI).
Board of Directors
Audit Committee
(acting as Sustainability Committee)
President and CEO
Executive Management Team
Sustainability and Ethics Working Group
Board of Directors
Sanoma’s Board of Directors is responsible for the management of the Company and its business operations. The Board of
Directors of Sanoma Corporation has a Charter to govern its work. The basis for the duties of the Board of Directors is set
forth in the Finnish Limited Liability Companies Act. In addition to being the ultimate decision-maker on the long-term goals
and business strategy of the Group, Sanoma’s Board of Directors is responsible for:
the approval of the strategic sustainability guidelines and sustainability management model
the appropriate arrangement of the control of the sustainability reporting and its assurance
the oversight of sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities
the approval of the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy, which is supported by internal policies, standards and manuals
the approval of the statutory Sustainability Statement
the review of the double materiality assessment process and the approval of its outcomes.
In 2025, the Board of Directors established a new Sanoma Policy Framework. The Framework consists of Group-wide policies
and key standards that form the foundation of Sanoma’s approach to governance, risk management and compliance. The
Board approves the Framework annually. In the Framework, Sanoma’s policies are divided into two categories: Corporate
Governance-related policies setting governance structures and controls, and Code of Conduct-related policies setting ethical
and behavioural requirements. In both of these categories there are policies that require Board approval and more operative
policies and standards that are approved by the President and CEO.
Audit Committee
The Board of Directors’ Audit Committee acts as Sanoma’s Sustainability Committee and supports the Board in overseeing
sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities. The Audit Committee reviews Sanoma’s sustainability progress and
monitors the implementation of the Sustainability Strategy through regular updates it receives from the management.
President and CEO and the Executive Management Team
The President and CEO is responsible for the implementation of the strategic sustainability guidelines. The EMT supports the
President and CEO in assessing and validating sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities and outlining Sanoma’s
strategic approach to sustainability, managing sustainability development, and monitoring regularly how sustainability is
reflected in the business units. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO), who is a member of the EMT, is responsible for
sustainability on the management level.
The President and CEO and the Executive Management Team (EMT) are ultimately responsible for ensuring that Sanoma
employees are aware of and comply with the Group policies.
The EMT supports the President and CEO in duties related to coordinating the Group’s management and preparing
sustainability-related matters to be discussed at the Audit Committee meetings. The Board receives a summary of the Audit
Committee meetings, and can address the topics in its meetings if relevant.
Financial Statements 2025
41
The Board of Directors, the Human Resources Committee and the EMT approve the annual short-term incentive targets and
performance outcomes that also include targets related to Sanoma’s material impacts, risks and opportunities. The
sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes are presented in more detail in section ESRS 2 GOV-3. In addition,
the long-term sustainability targets that are part of Sanoma’s sustainability scorecard are monitored annually as part of the
review of the Annual Report. The sustainability scorecard includes targets related to material impacts, risks and opportunities.
Sanoma monitors sustainability progress both on the Group and strategic business unit (SBU) levels and identifies
sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities as part of the Group-wide double materiality assessment and annual
Enterprise Risk Management process. Sanoma hosts internal sustainability‑related working groups, such as the Inclusive
Learning, Sustainable Media, Supply Chain Sustainability, and Environmental working groups, as well as the Privacy Board, to
support the implementation of the strategic sustainability guidelines, where relevant. The Group Sustainability team supports
the Group and SBUs in target achievement, project implementation and communications. Controls and procedures related to
the management of impacts, risks and opportunities are defined in relevant functions. Group-level controls and procedures are
applied to the Sustainability Statement reporting process. In 2025, Sanoma continued to develop the control environment
related to sustainability information.
Members of Sanoma’s Board of Directors, including the Audit Committee, were trained on sustainability matters related to the
European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) in 2024. In addition, some Board members have experience from
sustainability topics, for example related to their role in an environmental organisation.
The EMT is responsible for allocating the appropriate skills and expertise related to sustainability matters at the Group and
SBU levels. The EMT consults internal experts, such as the members of Sanoma’s Sustainability and Ethics Working Group,
on material sustainability topics and related impacts, risks and opportunities.
The Sustainability and Ethics Working Group consists of selected members across the Group representing all material
sustainability topics. It evaluates sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities, monitors the implementation of the
Sustainability Strategy and coordinates related development work and actions as well as ethics and compliance.
Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 G1 GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory
bodies
The policies related to business conduct are presented in section G1-1. According to the Charter of the Shareholders’
Nomination Committee, the Board of Directors must collectively have sufficient knowledge of, and competence in the
management of a public company of corresponding size, good corporate governance, corporate and financial administration
and internal control and risk management.
GOV-2 Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative,
management and supervisory bodies
The Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and the EMT regularly discuss matters related to Sanoma’s material
sustainability topics. The Board of Directors approves Sanoma’s double materiality assessment and Sustainability Statement.
In 2025, the Audit Committee received six (2024: five) updates on material sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities, and
the Board of Directors received eight (2024: eight) updates. The Board receives a summary of the Audit Committee meetings,
and can address the topics in its meetings, if relevant. As sustainability is embedded into Sanoma’s operations, it is also
included in the operative and business updates of the Board. These updates are given by the CFO or the Head of Investor
Relations and Sustainability, who reports to the CFO. In addition, as described in section GOV-1, the Board’s Human
Resources Committee addressed human resources-related matters in each of their meetings, and these were summarised to
the Board.
Sanoma’s sustainability performance is regularly discussed with the President and CEO and the EMT, prior to discussions with
the Audit Committee and communication to stakeholders. In 2025, the EMT received seven (2024: eight) updates on material
sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities, mainly from the members of the Sustainability and Ethics Working Group. The
Sustainability and Ethics Working Group provides information on material sustainability topics and reviews the policies and
standards before they are reviewed and approved by the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.
The assessment of the effectiveness of the sustainability-related policies, actions, metrics and targets are integrated into the
sustainability scorecard that is monitored annually by the Board of Directors, Audit Committee and the EMT as part of the
review of the Annual Report. In addition, the Ethics and Compliance Programme, monitoring corporate culture, corruption and
bribery-related risks, is reviewed by the Audit Committee twice a year.
Sanoma aims to identify, prevent and mitigate potential and actual negative impacts on people and the environment. These
include social and environmental impacts connected with Sanoma’s own operations, as well as its upstream and downstream
value chain through its products, services or business relationships. Sanoma’s sustainability due diligence process, defined in
the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy, is guided by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Sanoma’s Procurement team regularly conducts due diligence as part of its
supplier assessment process.
Sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities, as well as potential trade-offs are considered by Sanoma’s
administrative, management and supervisory bodies when overseeing strategy or related to major transactions. When
overseeing the strategy, the impacts, risks and opportunities are taken into account in decision-making to ensure that they
support the strategy. In major transactions, the M&A due diligence process is led by Sanoma’s M&A team, and the EMT and
Board consider its outcomes, as well as related impacts, risks and opportunities in its decision-making. The frequency of this
process is case-dependent. Where there is a gap, an integration plan is initiated to align with Sanoma’s operations.
Sustainability-related risks are assessed in Sanoma’s double materiality assessment, and as part of Sanoma’s Enterprise Risk
Management processes. The EMT reviews the ERM risk map and risk management process, and the Audit Committee
approves them. These bodies ensure that the risk map includes relevant sustainability-related risks and that the risk
management process supports the mitigation of these risks. In addition, the administrative, management and supervisory
Financial Statements 2025
42
bodies participate in the double materiality assessment process that includes reviewing, validating and approving material
sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities for Sanoma. Sanoma’s management of sustainability and human rights
impacts is based on targeted measures on areas with the highest risks. If Sanoma cannot address the impacts immediately,
the due diligence process allows for actions to be prioritised based on the severity and likelihood of the impacts.
The following sustainability-related topics covering material impacts, risks and opportunities were discussed during the
reporting year:
The Board of Directors and Audit Committee:
Materiality assessment: approval of the double materiality assessment1
Policy approval: Code of Conduct update2
Performance monitoring: Ethics and Compliance Programme3, Privacy Programme4 and sustainability-related STIs
(people, climate and privacy topics)
Sustainable finance development: review of the Social Bond Report and monitoring of ESG ratings.
The President and CEO and the Executive Management Team:
Materiality assessment: approval of the double materiality assessment1
Policy review: Code of Conduct update2
Performance monitoring: Ethics and Compliance Programme3, Privacy Programme4 and sustainability-related STIs
(people, climate and privacy topics)
Sustainable finance development: review of the Social Bond Report and ESG ratings monitoring
Regulatory monitoring related to sustainability reporting, due diligence, deforestation, artificial intelligence, privacy and
accessibility regulation, EU Pay Transparency Directive.
1The double materiality assessment includes sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities. The list of material IROs are presented in SBM-3.
2The Code of Conduct is an overarching policy that includes material impacts related to all topical standards. The list of IROs are presented in SBM-3.
3The Ethics and Compliance Programme includes corporate culture and corruption and bribery-related risks.
4The Privacy Programme includes the development of the responsible use of personal data and artificial intelligence. Privacy is incorporated into
Sanoma’s product and business development through a ‘Privacy and Security by Design’ process.
Financial Statements 2025
43
GOV-3 and GOV-3 E1 Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
Sanoma has performance-based incentive schemes that cover the Company’s management bodies and personnel.
Sustainability targets are embedded into the short-term incentives of the executive management. In 2025, alongside financial
metrics, sustainability targets constituted 20% of the total annual short-term incentives for the members of the EMT at the
target level. A total of 10% out of the overall targets were linked to the Employee Engagement Survey (EES), 5% to internal
data and privacy targets and 5% to the climate targets.
The EES is a key component of the sustainability metrics, reflecting Sanoma’s focus on employee well-being. Privacy-related
metrics covered the standardisation of processes for managing privacy and ethical use of AI as well as conducting Privacy Impact
Assessments for new products. Climate targets were linked to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), which drives ambitious
climate action in the private sector. In practice, the EMT members’ incentives were linked to Sanoma’s SBTi emissions reduction
targets for Scope 1, 2 and 3. These targets have been described in detail under E1-4. The Board of Directors’ Human Resources
Committee reviews and approves the incentive schemes, including the sustainability targets, annually. Sanoma’s sustainability
administrative and supervisory bodies, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors, do not have performance-based incentives
related to sustainability.
GOV-4 Statement on due diligence
Due diligence is the process by which Sanoma identifies, prevents, mitigates and accounts for how it addresses potential and
actual negative impacts on people and the environment. This process is defined in the international instruments of the UN
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Sanoma’s due
diligence process is defined in the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy and included in the relevant operating policies.
Locations of core elements of due diligence disclosures in the Sustainability Statement
Core elements of due diligence
Paragraphs in the Sustainability Statement
a) Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business
model
b) Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due
diligence
Core elements of due diligence
Paragraphs in the Sustainability Statement
c) Identifying and assessing adverse impacts
d) Taking actions to address those adverse impacts
e) Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating
GOV-5 Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
Sanoma has defined the roles and responsibilities related to sustainability reporting and management in its Sustainability and
Human Rights Policy. The Board of Directors of Sanoma is responsible for the appropriate arrangement of the risk
management and controls of sustainability reporting and its verification, the oversight of sustainability-related impacts, risks
and opportunities, the approval of the statutory Sustainability Statement, the review of the double materiality assessment
process and the approval of its outcomes. Sustainability-related risks are also reviewed as part of Sanoma’s Enterprise Risk
Management process, which also contributed to Sanoma’s double materiality assessment update during 2025. Risks related
to sustainability reporting are managed through developing internal controls and processes.
Sanoma’s governance, management, processes and operations, including sustainability-related topics, are subject to internal
audits. Sanoma’s internal audit is steered by the Corporate Governance Framework as well as Sanoma’s policies on Internal
Audit, Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management. The Internal Audit function, reporting to the CFO and directly to the
Audit Committee, is responsible for the internal audit at Sanoma. Internal audits are based on annual plans and the results of
the audits and the follow-up of any findings are reported to the Audit Committee. Internal audit reports include a description of
the audit, findings and recommendations, and follow the Global Internal Audit Standards. Each auditee, representing relevant
internal functions, provides comments, corrective actions and responsible persons for the recommended actions. In 2025,
internal audits on data governance and lifecycle management in Learning and Media Finland were performed.
Financial Statements 2025
44
Sustainability strategy
Sanoma_Strategia_EN.jpg
SBM-1 Strategy, business model and value chain
Strategy and sustainability-related goals
Trustworthy data
We use the data you
trust us with to make
learning and media better
Sanoma’s strategy aims for sustainable, profitable growth through providing printed and digital learning products and services
as well as journalistic media, entertainment and advertising.
In the learning business, significant groups of products and services offered include a portfolio of printed and digital learning
SDG_icons_EN_9.svg
products and services. Significant markets and customer groups served include primary, secondary and vocational education
(K12) i.e., 6–18 year-old students. Primary customers are teachers and schools. Sanoma has learning businesses in the
Netherlands, Spain, Poland, Italy, Belgium, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany and the UK.
In the media business, significant groups of products and services offered for consumers include media products in multiple
forms: printed and digital journalism including newspapers, magazines and digital platforms as well as entertainment through
TV, video-on-demand (VOD), radio, audio-on-demand and events. For B2B customers, Sanoma’s reach and consumer
insights provide marketing opportunities. Significant markets and customer groups served include Finnish consumers, as
Sanoma reaches almost all Finns every week (according to Kantar Media Finland’s Mind consumer survey, carried out in the
Kantar Forum panel on a continuous basis). In addition to consumers, the primary customers of Sanoma’s media business
Responsible
business
practices
We are committed
to responsible
business practices
include B2B customers.
At the end of 2025, Sanoma employed 5,065 professionals in total. The headcount is presented as a breakdown per country in
section S1-6 Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees. No significant changes in products and services offered or
markets and customer groups served took place during the reporting period.
The elements of Sanoma’s strategy, business model and value chain that relate to, or impact sustainability matters, are
compiled into Sanoma’s Sustainability Strategy, which focuses on environmental, social and governance topics and includes
sustainability-related commitments to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the UN Global Compact Ten Principles, for
example. The key elements of Sanoma’s business model, strategy and value chain, exposing and enabling Sanoma’s
sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities, are summarised on the right using the structure of the six key topics of
Sanoma’s Sustainability Strategy. Sanoma’s sustainability-related goals in terms of significant groups of products and
services, customer categories, geographical areas and relationships with stakeholders, including an assessment of current
products and services, challenges and critical projects, are also summarised on the next page.
Valued people
We promote equality and
provide an inspiring
workplace with excellent
opportunities to develop
SDG_icons_EN_5.svg
Inclusive learning
Empowering learning of
about 25 million students
SDG_icons_EN_10.svg
SDG_icons_EN_4.svg
SDG_icons_EN_16.svg
Sustainable media
Trusted journalism and
inspiring entertainment
for all Finns
Vital environment
We act to protect
the climate and
build awareness of
sustainability issues
SDG_icons_EN_12.svg
SDG_icons_EN_13.svg
Financial Statements 2025
45
Inclusive learning: Within its learning business, Sanoma has a positive impact on its customers’ and end-users’ access to
quality learning materials and education through printed and digital learning content, as well as digital learning and
teaching platforms for primary, secondary and vocational education. Sanoma aims to co-create high-quality and motivating
learning materials with teachers, to develop inclusive learning solutions that support diversity, accessibility and
differentiation and to promote equal access to education. Critical projects include continuous development of the quality,
inclusiveness and accessibility of its content and products. Sanoma also aims to grow its learning business, and thus
impact, organically and through acquisitions. These goals apply to the entire Learning SBU operating across Europe.
Sustainable media: Within its media business, Sanoma has a positive impact on freedom of expression by providing
independent journalism, which promotes an open democratic society. To ensure journalistic ethics, Sanoma’s key projects
include the monitoring and development of practices concerning aspects of news articles as defined in the Guidelines for
Journalists by The Council of Mass Media. Through its cross-media business model, Sanoma offers tailored marketing
solutions for business partners, which requires Sanoma to consider advertising-related ethics and impacts carefully. Sanoma
aims to ensure compliance with the Advertising and Marketing Communications Code of the International Chamber of
Commerce, with key projects and challenges related to the monitoring of the reliability of sustainability and green claims
within its platforms containing advertising. These goals apply to the entire Media Finland SBU, which operates in Finland.
Valued people: Sanoma’s success depends on having competent, skilled and engaged management and employees, and
on their competencies and skills in developing appealing products and services in accordance with customer needs in a
changing environment. This exposes Sanoma’s business model and strategy to dependencies related to its own
workforce, as recruiting and retaining skilled and motivated personnel may become increasingly difficult as a result of
various factors, including shortage of skills in the labour market and intensifying competition for talent. Sanoma aims to
promote equality and provide an inspiring workplace with excellent opportunities to develop. Key projects include
continuous development of corporate culture, for example through Sanoma’s DE&I programme and through monitoring of
employee engagement on an annual basis, with results also linked to executive and senior management remuneration.
These goals and actions apply to all Sanoma’s operations across Europe.
Trustworthy data: Data is an increasingly essential part of Sanoma’s business model, products and services in both
businesses. Sanoma holds large volumes of personal data, including the data of its own workforce as well as customers
and end-users, such as media consumers, and students and teachers in Learning. This exposes Sanoma to privacy risks
and requires it to consider carefully its processes for implementing data subject rights and demonstrating accountability for
compliance with the GDPR. Sanoma is also exposed to potential data breaches resulting from unauthorised or accidental
loss of, or access to personal data managed by Sanoma or by third parties processing data on Sanoma’s behalf. At
Sanoma, artificial intelligence (AI) is also used for, among other things, providing journalistic recommendations,
personalised features in entertainment, and adaptive learning solutions. Applications of generative AI may bring
opportunities related to efficiency, personalisation and support in delivering quality products, with risks including the
misuse of the data and content. To mitigate data and privacy risks, Sanoma continuously develops the trustworthy use of
the learning and media customers’ data. Key projects include implementing Sanoma’s Privacy Programme and Privacy
and Security by Design process to ensure that privacy and data protection is built into Sanoma’s products. To mitigate AI-
related risks, Sanoma continuously develops its digital and hybrid learning and media products and services with key
projects including up-to-date ethical AI principles and employee instructions as well as having the right technology in place
upfront. These goals and actions apply to all Sanoma’s operations across Europe.
Vital environment: Following its business model, Sanoma produces printed and digital learning and media products.
Sanoma’s printed products are produced either in its own operations, i.e., newspaper printing houses in Finland, or by
upstream printing suppliers used for books and magazines. This exposes Sanoma to environmental impacts through the
use of resources. Key environmental impacts include the generation of GHG emissions as well as biodiversity impacts
especially through the use of paper. The use of resources, especially paper, also generates dependencies and causes
transition risks such as the availability of certified paper, availability of renewable energy and regulatory and customer
demand risks. In addition, risks include physical risks related to climate change hazards, such as flooding. Sanoma aims to
protect the climate and environment through its climate transition plan and biodiversity actions, with key projects focusing
on reducing its impacts and cooperating with suppliers especially in the upstream value chain. These goals and actions
apply to all Sanoma’s operations across Europe.
Responsible business practices: Good governance and ethics play a key role in Sanoma’s business model and value
chain in many ways. Third-party suppliers in Sanoma’s value chain include, among others, technology solution and service
providers, paper, print and logistics suppliers as well as content providers for both Learning and Media Finland. Sanoma’s
daily business is dependent on its ability to identify sources of supply that meet its standards, although Sanoma is not
dependent on any individual suppliers. Sanoma aims to follow strong business ethics, supply chain integrity and ethical
partnerships both within its own operations and throughout the supply chain. Key projects include the Ethics and
compliance programme as well as supplier risk management. Suppliers and other third parties are subject to a Know Your
Counterparty (KYC) process to identify risks related to anti-bribery, sanctions regulations and other issues. These goals
and actions apply to all Sanoma’s operations across Europe.
Sanoma has assessed that its products and services as well as significant market and customer groups are aligned with its
sustainability-related goals. All impacts, risks and opportunities including Sanoma’s exposure, activities and goals to manage
them are further described under ESRS 2 IRO-1, ESRS 2 SBM-3 and topic-specific disclosures under E1 Climate change, E4
Biodiversity and ecosystems, E5 Resource use and circular economy, S1 Own workforce, S2 Workers in the value chain, S4
Customers and end-users and G1 Business conduct.
Financial Statements 2025
46
Business model and value chain
Sanoma_Wdesk_pohjat_03.svg
Main services:
Content creation 
Technology and digital suppliers
Logistics partners
Marketing and sales agencies
Production and resources:
Printing
Materials, e.g. paper
Energy
Own employees
Owned and leased office properties and warehouses
Waste and GHG emissions generated
Distributors for deliveries
Third parties for data processes
Investors
Learning business
Printed and digital
learning products and
services
Netherlands, Spain, Poland, Italy,
Belgium, Finland, Sweden,
Norway, Denmark,
Germany and the UK
Media business
Digital and printed
journalism
Entertainment: TV,
audio and events
Advertising
Finland
Learning business
Schools and teachers
Students as end-users
Media business
Finnish consumers
B2B customers
Financial Statements 2025
47
Upstream value chain
The actors in Sanoma’s upstream value chain include individuals and companies that supply Sanoma with the necessary
inputs to produce products and services for consumers and end-users. Sanoma’s Procurement team is responsible for the
management of the Company’s supply chain.
Sanoma’s main procurement categories are: content, paper & print, logistics, technology, facilities, HR & professional services,
marketing & sales as well as travel. To gather and secure inputs, the Procurement team actively cooperates with suppliers,
maintaining sustainable supplier relationships.
Content creation is needed for both learning and media businesses. In addition to in-house content creation, Sanoma buys
content creation from external resources, such as freelancers, to generate media and learning content. Content can be text,
illustrations or photographs, for example.
In its operations, Sanoma uses resources, particularly paper, for its printed products in both the learning and media
businesses. Logistics partners are used to transfer the materials to warehouses. Paper, print and logistics procurement are
categories with the most significant environmental impacts.
Sanoma collaborates with various technology and digital suppliers as content use is increasingly shifting to digital platforms.
Data centres provide the infrastructure needed to support the Company’s digital platforms, ensuring the availability, security,
and performance of its online services.
To promote its products and services, Sanoma also buys marketing and sales-related inputs from external agencies. In
addition, Sanoma buys HR-related services to support the well-being of its employees through, for example, occupational
healthcare services.
Own operations
With the support of the inputs from the upstream value chain, Sanoma’s employees create and develop products and services
for its customers and end-users.
For its employees, Sanoma aims to create a working environment and culture that inspires employees, values their diversity,
embraces their views and respects their individual rights.
Sanoma’s operations use energy, generate greenhouse gas emissions and impact biodiversity through materials use, and the
target is to minimise the environmental and climate impact across the value chain.
Downstream value chain
Downstream actors in the value chain acquire products and services from Sanoma. In addition, Sanoma uses distributors to
deliver its products to its customers, and third parties to process data on its behalf.
For schools and teachers, Sanoma provides printed and digital learning materials that support learning outcomes and
contribute to equal access to education.
For Finnish consumers, Sanoma delivers independent journalism that supports freedom of expression and increases people’s
awareness. Sanoma offers entertainment through TV and video, radio and audio as well as live events. For B2B customers,
Sanoma offers marketing solutions that contribute to economic growth.
For investors, Sanoma aims to offer opportunities for sustainable equity and debt investments. Issuance of the Social Bond
Framework and EUR 150 million Social Bond in September 2024, further validated Sanoma’s strong impact on the UN
Sustainable Development Goals, especially Goal 4 Quality Education. In 2025, Sanoma released a Social Bond Report that
explained the allocation and social impacts of the EUR 150 million Social Bond. The proceeds of Sanoma’s EUR 150 million
social bond have been fully allocated so no further reporting will follow.
Financial Statements 2025
48
SBM-2, S1 SBM-2, S2 SBM-2 and S4 SBM-2 Interests and views of stakeholders
At Sanoma, stakeholder engagement is a continuous process both on the strategic and local levels. Understanding the views
and expectations of stakeholders is key to the success of the business and the implementation of the Sustainability Strategy.
Sanoma’s key stakeholders as well as the purpose and methods of the engagement are described in the table “Summary of
interests and views of stakeholders”.
Sanoma’s Sustainability Strategy has been created to manage impacts, risks and opportunities related to environmental,
social and governance topics, which arise from the interests and views of the stakeholders. Detailed information on Sanoma’s
Sustainability Strategy is available in ESRS 2 SBM-1. The results of the stakeholder engagement, including engagement
related to the respect of employees, workers in the value chain and consumers’ and end-users’ human rights, have been used
as background information in the Sustainability Strategy target setting. The views of Sanoma’s own workforce are reflected in
the Valued People theme, the views of workers in the value chain in the Responsible business practices theme and the views
of customers and end-users in the Inclusive learning, Sustainable media, Trustworthy data, Vital environment and Responsible
business practices themes of the Sustainability Strategy.
The interests and views of stakeholders are analysed as a part of the sustainability due diligence process, as this process
assesses sustainability and human rights impacts especially related to key stakeholders. Further details of Sanoma’s due
diligence process can be found under topic-specific disclosures.
In the double materiality assessment, the interests and views of Sanoma’s stakeholders were considered indirectly. Instead of
engaging stakeholders through a formal process, information about their perspectives were gathered from informal, ongoing
discussions that Sanoma’s topic owners have with stakeholders as part of regular business activities. As a result,
stakeholders’ views were reflected through the knowledge topic owners had obtained in these informal interactions. Relevant
interests and the views of stakeholders have been communicated to Sanoma’s administrative, management and supervisory
bodies as part of the approval process of the double materiality assessment (DMA). The DMA has been reviewed and
approved by the EMT, Audit Committee and the Board, following Sanoma’s sustainability management model.
Summary of interests and views of stakeholders
Stakeholder
category
Purpose and method of stakeholder engagement
Material sustainability topics for stakeholder group
Learning
customers and
end-users
(schools,
teachers and
students)
Purpose
Co-creation and development of learning materials with
teachers and students and providing inclusive learning
materials
Method
Engaging with teachers through local face-to-face and
online meetings, newsletters and marketing
Arranging and participating in customer webinars and
events
Gathering insight and managing customer satisfaction
through surveys
High-quality, diverse and inclusive learning content and
personalisation
Reliable and accessible digital learning platforms
Ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI)
Data privacy and security of customer data
Environmental impacts of printed books and digital
services
Media Finland
end-users,
consumers and
customers
Purpose
Supporting freedom of expression and responsible
marketing practices
Method
Consumers:
Gathering insight and managing customer satisfaction
through surveys
Receiving proactive feedback from media consumers
through different channels
B2B customers:
Engaging with customers through face-to-face and online
meetings, newsletters, marketing and sustainability-related
training sessions
Arranging and participating in customer webinars and
events
Gathering insight and managing customer satisfaction
through surveys
Freedom of expression
Independent journalism
Pluralism and diverse and high-quality media content
Media literacy and literacy in society
Responsible marketing and advertising practices
Respecting children’s rights in advertising
Responsible entertainment
Ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI)
Data privacy and security of customer data
Environmental impacts of printed newspapers and
magazines, TV productions and digital services
Accuracy of green and sustainability claims in
advertising
Financial Statements 2025
49
Stakeholder
category
Purpose and method of stakeholder engagement
Material sustainability topics for stakeholder group
Own workforce,
employees and
non-employees
Purpose
Creating a working environment and culture that inspires
employees, values their diversity, embraces their views and
respects their individual rights
Method
Performance management and people development
Employee engagement through several measures, e.g.,
employee feedback through Pulse and annual Employee
Engagement surveys, team and individual discussions,
town hall meetings
Internal events and personnel info sessions in different
compositions
Active communication, dialogue and cooperation with
internal stakeholders, including employees, line managers,
employee representatives
Mental and physical health and safety, well-being,
work-life balance, working time
Diversity, inclusion and equal opportunities as well as
equal pay
Training and skills development
Business ethics, speak up culture and human rights,
e.g., Code of Conduct
Investors
Purpose
Information sharing on ESG, sustainable finance and
impact investment opportunities
Method
Conference calls, roadshows, individual and group
meetings, investor events
Sustainable Finance-related engagement e.g., Social Bond
Annual General Meeting and Capital Markets Day
Analyst and investor perception studies
Development of ESG ratings and reporting
Sustainable finance opportunities
Positive impact of the learning and media businesses
on society
Climate strategy
Supply chain
partners and
workers in the
value chain
Purpose
Collaboration with suppliers to ensure sustainability and
quality
Method
Engagement with paper and print suppliers through
Supplier Days
Collecting climate-related and materials data annually in
specific procurement categories
Conducting internal audits on supplier sustainability
Helping partners to perform corrective actions in cases of
non-compliance
Business ethics and human rights following the
Supplier Code of Conduct requirements
Climate and energy strategy implementation and GHG
emissions reductions
Regulation-related compliance cooperation e.g.,
regulation on deforestation-free product (EUDR)
Stakeholder
category
Purpose and method of stakeholder engagement
Material sustainability topics for stakeholder group
Governmental
organisations,
policymakers
and legislators
Purpose
Regulatory and governmental monitoring
Method
Sharing views on policies, laws and regulations with
officials and legislators through public consultations,
meetings, as well as part of a larger stakeholder dialogue
with policymakers
Replying to public consultations and providing insights and
analysis to government officials and politicians
Participating in the work of industry associations
Policy and legislation topics related to the learning
business
Policy and legislation topics related to the media
business
Business ethics and human rights
Non-
governmental
organisations
and industry
associations
Purpose
Dialogue with NGOs on relevant sustainability topics and
cooperation to develop literacy and media literacy
Development of industry practices
Dialogue with stakeholders, such as NGOs, related to the
role of media and learning in society as well as the role of
literacy and media literacy
Method
Cooperation through initiatives and projects to develop
media and learning industry practices
Topics related to the learning business (see row
Learning customers)
Topics related to the media business (see row Media
Finland consumers and customers)
Local
communities,
universities and
research
organisations
Purpose
Monitoring of the curriculum changes
Science-based development of sustainability topics
Method
Regulatory and governmental monitoring of the curriculum
changes
Engaging and meeting with authorities and local city
representatives, especially related to the learning business
Cooperation with universities and research organisations to
develop sustainability
Topics related to the learning business (see row
Learning customers)
Topics related to the media business (see row Media
Finland consumers and customers)
Financial Statements 2025
50
SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Sanoma’s material impacts, risks and opportunities originate from its learning and media businesses, its strategy and business
model. Sanoma’s own workforce plays a key role in ensuring the Company’s ability to deliver its products to customers.
Environmental impacts occur during the production and delivery of physical and digital products. The production of physical
and digital products can also have an impact on the workers in the value chain. Impacts on the consumers and end-users
mainly occur during the use-phase of the products, either via privacy and security or through ensuring the quality, reliability
and ethics of the products and solutions.
Sanoma has assessed its material sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities as identified in the double materiality
assessment, and did not identify any significant current financial effects related to them. Sanoma has not identified any
material sustainability risks that would pose a significant risk for its financial position, performance, cash flows, or a risk of a
material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities reported in the related financial statements within the next
annual reporting period.
During its double materiality assessment (DMA), Sanoma has qualitatively assessed that its current strategy and business
model are in general resilient in regards to its capacity to address the material topics identified. In its climate and biodiversity
risk assessment, Sanoma has analysed its ability to manage and mitigate these risks. Sanoma’s emission reduction plans are
aligned with the 1.5-degree scenario and during the SBTi target setting, Sanoma used modelling to ensure its ability to meet
the targets. Sanoma analyses its resilience in other environmental, social and governance topics by assessing the coverage of
its Sustainability Strategy in relation to the identified impacts, risks and opportunities. Sanoma has measures in place to
manage material impacts, risks and opportunities and all these material topics are covered in Sanoma’s Sustainability
Strategy. Resilience was assessed until 2030, as that is the current time horizon of Sanoma’s strategy. As the management of
impacts, risks and opportunities is embedded into the current strategy and business model, Sanoma does not identify
significant needs, originating from the identified sustainability-related impacts, risks or opportunities, to adapt its current
strategy or business model.
Environmental impacts, risks and opportunities
To produce its learning and media products and services, Sanoma and its suppliers use resources, such as materials which
cause climate and biodiversity impacts, generate GHG emissions, consume energy and generate waste. The use of
resources, especially paper, also generates dependencies and causes transition risks such as the availability of certified
paper, availability of renewable energy and regulatory and customer demand risks. In addition, risks include physical risks
related to climate change hazards, such as flooding.
The table on page 52 describes Sanoma’s material impacts, risks and opportunities related to environmental topics as they
result from the DMA, including their location in the value chain and their expected time horizons. Changes in the list of material
IROs for 2025 compared to 2024 were:
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems: The risk related associated with EUDR was deemed non-material, as in late 2025 printed
products were determined by the EU to be out of the scope of the regulation.
E1 Climate change, E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems and E5 Resource use and circular economy: The descriptions of
multiple IROs were updated to better convey the impact, risk or opportunity in question.
All environmental IROs are covered with ESRS Disclosure Requirements. Further information of material impacts, risks and
opportunities, plans to respond to them, connection to Sanoma’s strategy and business model as well as policies, actions and
targets are disclosed under the topical standards ESRS E1, E4 and E5.
Social impacts, risks and opportunities
Employees are at the centre of Sanoma’s strategy and operations and Sanoma’s strategic growth ambition requires
excellence and alignment from the employees. Sanoma also impacts consumers and end-users such as teachers and
students by delivering high-quality, inclusive and accessible learning products and services. Through its media business,
Sanoma promotes freedom of expression by delivering reliable information through multiple media platforms and following
journalistic ethics. Sanoma’s media business generates potential negative impacts through advertising, which are managed
through robust practices. Data, especially personal data, is an essential part of Sanoma’s business model and strategy putting
privacy and security impacts at the core of its daily work. To manage privacy impact and risks, Sanoma is committed to
protecting privacy, advancing data security as well as ensuring the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The tables on pages 53-55 describe Sanoma’s material impacts, risks and opportunities related to social topics as they result
from the DMA, including their location in the value chain and their expected time horizons. Changes in the list of material IROs
for 2025 compared to 2024 were:
S1 Own workforce: The negative impact related to working time of own workforce was deemed non-material as managers
have good visibility into the employees’ working time, and no actual or potential cases have been identified.
S1 Own workforce: The potential negative impacts related to freedom of association, collective bargaining and social
dialogue were combined into one IRO in 2025 instead of being individual IROs. The impact was also changed into an
actual positive impact as Sanoma’s employees have the right to freedom of association, collective bargaining, and social
dialogue.
S1 Own workforce: The potential impacts related to gender equality and diversity were combined into one IRO in 2025
instead of being individual IROs. The impact was changed into only a positive impact as Sanoma actively promotes
diversity and gender equality.
S1 Own workforce: Impacts related to employment security, work-life balance and harassment were changed into actual
impacts instead of potential impacts.
S2 Workers in the value chain: The negative impact on the diversity and equality for workers in the value chain as well as
the negative impact related to trainings for workers in the value chain were deemed non-material as no actual or potential
cases have been identified.
S2 Workers in the value chain: The potential negative impacts related to freedom of association, collective bargaining and
social dialogue were combined into one IRO in 2025 instead of being individual IROs.
Financial Statements 2025
51
S4 Consumers and end-users: With the increased use of AI, the potential positive use of AI was identified as a new
material impact.
S4 Consumers and end-users: As Media Finland also develops the digital accessibility of its products, the IRO related to
access to products and services was revised to also cover Media Finland.
S1 Own workforce, S2 Workers in the value chain and S4 Consumers and end-users: The descriptions of multiple IROs
were updated to better convey the impact, risk or opportunity in question.
All social IROs are covered by ESRS Disclosure Requirements, However, additional information is provided through entity-
specific metrics related to diversity presented in S1-9 and to the Employee Engagement Survey at the end of the S1 section,
as well as entity-specific metrics related to privacy, freedom of expression and responsible marketing practices presented in
S4-5. Further information on material impacts, risks and opportunities, plans to respond to them, connection to Sanoma’s
strategy and business model as well as policies, actions and targets are disclosed under the topical standards ESRS S1, S2
and S4.
Governance impacts, risks and opportunities
Throughout its business, Sanoma is committed to responsible business conduct, including managing risks related to IPR
rights, generative AI, as well as anti-bribery and corruption. As a part of responsible business conduct, Sanoma supports an
ethical corporate culture, ensures the protection of whistleblowers and monitors its potential impacts to political engagement
and lobbying activities to ensure reliability. As a part of continuous cooperation with key suppliers, Sanoma manages risks of
supplier non-compliance with sustainability and human rights requirements as well as aims to identify impacts on workers in
the value chain.
The table on page 56 describes Sanoma’s material impacts, risks and opportunities related to the governance topic, as they
result from the DMA, including their location in the value chain and their expected time horizons. Changes in the list of material
IROs for 2025 compared to 2024 were:
G1 Business conduct: The potential negative impact on suppliers through payment practices was deemed as non-material
as Sanoma’s payments are well aligned with the payment terms as the 2024 report showed.
G1 Business conduct: The risk related to regulatory landscape was deemed as non-material, as it primarily concerns the
EUDR, which was addressed in the assessment of E4 risks.
G1 Business conduct: The risk related to the corporate culture was changed into a potential positive impact as the
fostering of corporate culture actually reduces risks.
G1 Business conduct: The potential negative impact on whistleblowers was changed into actual positive impact as
Sanoma has a robust whistleblower protection in place.
G1 Business conduct: The descriptions of multiple IROs were updated to better convey the impact, risk or opportunity in
question.
All governance IROs are covered with ESRS Disclosure Requirements. However, additional information is provided through
entity-specific metrics related to corporate culture in G1-1. Further information on material impacts, risks and opportunities,
plans to respond to them, connection to Sanoma’s strategy and business model as well as policies, actions and targets are
disclosed under the topical standards ESRS G1.
Financial Statements 2025
52
ESRS Topic
ESRS Sub-topic
Impact, risk or opportunity
Description of material impacts, risks and/or opportunities (IROs)
Location in value chain
Expected time horizon
Upstream
Own
operations
Downstream
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
E1 Climate
change
Climate change
adaptation
Opportunity
Availability of cost-efficient financing due to Sanoma’s ambitious climate targets and
positive sustainability performance
Opportunity
Offering products and services that take climate change into account and are aligned
with shifting consumer preferences
Opportunity
Adoption of renewable energy solutions and energy-efficiency measures provide
Sanoma an opportunity to reduce costs related to energy usage
Risk
Increased regulation towards companies’ climate action and reporting can lead to
increased operating costs both in own operations but also indirectly through the supply
chain
Risk
Lack of active and transparent climate action could adversely impact Sanoma’s
reputation and lead to decreased trust in Sanoma and decreased demand for its
products
Risk
Climate-related extreme weather patterns, flooding in particular, can pose risks to
Sanoma’s facilities e.g., through power cut-offs
Climate change
mitigation
Actual negative impact
Sanoma annually generates GHG emissions related to Scope 1, 2 and 3
Energy
Actual negative impact
Sanoma uses energy in its printing houses, facilities and warehouses. In addition,
Sanoma uses energy to produce and distribute its learning and media content digitally
E4
Biodiversity
and
ecosystems
Direct impact drivers of
biodiversity loss
Actual negative impact
The use of paper in Sanoma’s newspaper, magazine and book production can result in
forest degradation and loss of biodiversity
Risk
The scarcity of certified paper could result in increased commodity prices for Sanoma
E5 Resource
use and
circular
economy
Resources inflows,
including resource use
Actual negative impact
Sanoma uses resources (paper, printing plates, inks etc.) in Media Finland printing
houses to produce its newspapers and buys paper for the production of its magazines
and books by printing suppliers
Waste
Actual negative impact
Sanoma’s printing houses as well as facilities and warehouses generate waste
Financial Statements 2025
53
ESRS Topic
ESRS Sub-topic
Impact, risk or opportunity
Description of material impacts, risks and/or opportunities (IROs)
Location in value chain
Expected time horizon
Upstream
Own
operations
Downstream
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
S1 Own
workforce
Working conditions
Actual positive impact
Sanoma’s employees are paid adequate wages in all countries where it has operations
providing financial security and improved quality of life for employees
Actual positive impact
Sanoma offers employment opportunities to over 5,000 professionals, which supports
the stability and wellbeing of its employees
Actual positive impact
Sanoma’s employees have the right to freedom of association, collective bargaining,
and social dialogue
Actual negative impact
Despite Sanoma’s actions to support work-life balance, its own workforce may
experience imbalance between work and private life, which can lead to for example
stress, burnout and lower job satisfaction
Actual negative impact
Despite preventive health and safety initiatives, own workforce may experience mental
health challenges, and occupational safety incidents may occur particularly at
Sanoma’s printing houses and warehouses
Equal treatment and
opportunities for all
Actual positive impact
Through the training opportunities that Sanoma provides, employees can develop
professionally and advance in their careers
Potential positive impact
Sanoma promotes diversity and gender equality to create a culture of inclusion, where
all employees can feel involved, accepted, and valued regardless of their differences
and social identity
Actual negative impact
Despite preventive measures, some incidents of discrimination, including harassment,
have been reported
Other work-related
rights
Actual negative impact
Despite preventive measures breach in employee data handling may occur
Financial Statements 2025
54
ESRS Topic
ESRS Sub-topic
Impact, risk or opportunity
Description of material impacts, risks and/or opportunities (IROs)
Location in value chain
Expected time horizon
Upstream
Own
operations
Downstream
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
S2 Workers
in the value
chain
Working conditions
Actual negative impact
Although Sanoma requires its suppliers to comply with ILO standards, working hour
regulations might not always be followed, which can lead to excessive workloads and
insufficient rest for workers in the supply chain
Potential negative impact
Despite Sanoma requiring its suppliers to adhere to ILO standards, there is a possibility
that some suppliers may not fully comply and may fail to provide adequate wages to all
workers across the value chain leading to economic insecurity and mental distress
Potential negative impact
Although Sanoma requires its suppliers to commit to ILO standards, particularly in
countries and industries with non-standard forms of employment, workers in the supply
chain may face challenges related to secure employment leading to for example
financial instability
S2 Workers
in the value
chain
Working conditions
Potential negative impact
Although Sanoma requires its suppliers to comply with ILO standards, workers in the
value chain may face limitations in exercising work-related rights, such as freedom of
association, collective bargaining, and participation in social dialogue
Potential negative impact
Despite Sanoma’s Supplier Code of Conduct requiring suppliers to support work-life
balance, workers in the value chain may experience imbalance between work and
private life, which can lead to, for example, stress, burnout and lower job satisfaction
Potential negative impact
Despite Sanoma’s requirements, workers in the value chain may be negatively
impacted by occupational health and safety hazards
Financial Statements 2025
55
ESRS Topic
ESRS Sub-topic
Impact, risk or opportunity
Description of material impacts, risks and/or opportunities (IROs)
Location in value chain
Expected time horizon
Upstream
Own
operations
Downstream
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
S4
Consumers
and end-
users
Information-related
impacts: Privacy and
data protection
Risk
Risk that cybersecurity and data protection measures implemented internally or by third
parties prove insufficient and ineffective, exposing Sanoma to breaches, fines, and
reputational damage
Actual negative impact
Despite Sanoma’s preventive measures, the use of personal data in its products and
services may affect data subjects, for example through insufficient transparency, limited
control over data usage, or due to information security incidents
Information-related
impacts
Potential positive impact
AI used in Sanoma’s products and services enables improved user experience for both
Learning’s and Media Finland’s customers and end-users
Information-related
impacts: Freedom of
expression
Actual positive impact
Through its media business, Sanoma promotes freedom of expression by delivering
consumers reliable information through multiple media platforms and following
journalistic ethics
Information-related
impacts: Access to
(quality) information
Actual positive impact
Through its learning business, Sanoma promotes access to education by co-creating
inclusive and diverse learning materials to students and teachers
Social inclusion:
Access to products and
services
Potential negative impact
Sanoma’s digital products and content may not be fully accessible to all consumers, for
example due to limitations in design, language options, or compatibility with assistive
technologies, which can restrict equal access and inclusive user experience
Social inclusion:
Responsible marketing
practices
Potential negative impact
Consumers may be exposed to advertisements in Sanoma’s media that are non-
compliant with responsible advertising practices and green claims regulation
Financial Statements 2025
56
ESRS Topic
ESRS Sub-topic
Impact, risk or opportunity
Description of material impacts, risks and/or opportunities (IROs)
Location in value chain
Expected time horizon
Upstream
Own
operations
Downstream
Short-term
Medium-term
Long-term
G1 Business
conduct
Corporate culture
Risk
Risk of inadequate oversight and governance of AI in creating Media and Learning
content and digital solutions could lead to IP exposure, regulatory non-compliance, loss
of market differentiation reflected in the loss of trust of Sanoma’s customers,
reputational damage and loss of revenue
Risk
The risk that Sanoma mismanages its intellectual property rights (including trademarks,
copyrights, and licensing agreements) by failing to protect or enforce its own IP or by
infringing third-party rights, resulting in financial losses due to litigation costs, fines, lost
royalty income, or loss of sales revenue, or weakened market position
Potential positive impact
Sanoma fosters an ethical corporate culture that is reflected in the diversity and
creativity of employees, further strengthening customer trust while minimising
regulatory compliance risks
Protection of whistle-
blowers
Actual positive impact
Sanoma’s commitment to robust whistleblower protection and transparent reporting
and investigation practices significantly enhances its corporate culture where
employees feel safe and empowered to report unethical behaviour without fear of
retaliation
Political engagement
and lobbying activities
Potential negative impact
Sanoma’s political engagement and lobbying activities may be perceived as prioritising
business interests over societal or environmental considerations, potentially affecting
trust and stakeholder perceptions
Management of
relationships with
suppliers including
payment practices
Risk
The risk that suppliers not complying with Sanoma’s Supplier Code of Conduct may
lead to compliance costs such as regulatory fines and penalties and have an adverse
impact on Sanoma’s reputation
Corruption and bribery
Risk
The risk of unethical behaviour or non-compliance by employees related to anti-
competitive practices (such as predatory pricing, collusion through industry
associations, or abuse of market dominance) and resulting in legal penalties,
reputational damage, erosion of trust and decreased demand
Financial Statements 2025
57
Impact, risk and opportunity management
IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
The aim of the double materiality assessment (DMA), is to identify actual and potential sustainability-related impacts, risks and
opportunities relevant for the Company. Sanoma carried out its first DMA during 2023–2024 to identify material impacts, risks
and opportunities, and updated the DMA during 2025. This section primarily describes the 2025 DMA process, and any
significant differences with the previous year’s process are explained where relevant. The DMA covers Sanoma’s own
operations as well as the upstream and downstream value chain. The process follows the European Sustainability Reporting
Standards’ requirements as well as the principles of Sanoma’s Enterprise Risk Management process. The responsibilities of
the administrative and supervisory bodies related to the DMA are determined in Sanoma’s sustainability management model.
The results of the assessment were reviewed by the Executive Management Team and approved by the Board of Directors in
2025. The DMA process was hosted by Sanoma’s Sustainability team, in close cooperation with the Compliance team.
Members of Sanoma’s Sustainability and Ethics Working Group participated in the DMA, in addition to other key internal
stakeholders, such as the Managing Directors of all Learning operating companies. The DMA considers Sanoma’s impacts
through its own operations and as a result of its business relationships. It focuses on Sanoma’s business activities related to
its learning and media businesses, and covers all of Sanoma’s operating countries. Business relationships have been
especially assessed for tier 1 suppliers, extending the assessment to tier 2 suppliers within categories of higher risk, such as
the paper and print suppliers.
Sanoma’s DMA included two phases. In the first phase, the Sustainability and Compliance teams reviewed all 2024 impacts,
risks and opportunities and updated the descriptions of multiple IROs to better convey the impact, risk or opportunity in
question. During this review, a few IROs’ perspectives were also changed from risk into impact or from negative to positive
impact. In addition, to reduce the assessment workload, IROs that had very similar themes were combined. Based on current
focus areas in the businesses and feedback from the previous year, some new IROs were also added to the assessment
process. Insights utilised in this first phase included the results of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process, climate
and biodiversity risks assessment, a previously conducted Human Rights Impact Assessment, Employee Engagement Survey,
DE&I survey, as well as a review of misconduct cases reported via Sanoma’s Whistleblowing channel.
During the second phase, all actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities were prioritised by performing impact and
financial assessments in workshops with internal experts and topic owners. These internal stakeholders included
Procurement, HR, Compliance, Legal, Privacy, Security and Strategy representatives as well as owners of key business
areas. Topic owners used available sources and their overall expertise and judgment to assess each impact, risk and
opportunity related to their area of expertise. In addition to subject matter expertise, topic owners also represented insights of
other relevant stakeholders such as own workforce, value chain workers, customers and end-users as well as investors to
ensure that stakeholders’ views would also be included in the assessment. Instead of engaging stakeholders through a formal
process, information about their perspectives was gathered from informal, ongoing discussions that Sanoma’s topic owners
have with stakeholders as part of regular business activities. As a result, stakeholders’ views were reflected through the
knowledge topic owners had obtained in these informal interactions. For this, insights and reports from credible proxies were
also used.
Sanoma’s DMA process is aligned with the double materiality concept described in ESRS 1. Each impact was assessed for:
Severity of negative impacts (scale, scope and irremediability) and significance of positive impacts (scale and scope)
Likelihood of potential impacts on a scale of very unlikely (10%), unlikely (30%), uncertain (50%), likely (70%) or very likely
(90%)
Location of the impact in the value chain (upstream, own operations, downstream)
Time horizon of the impact: short term (0–1 years), medium term (1–5 years) or long term (beyond 5 years)
With regard to potential negative human rights impacts, it was noted that the severity of the impact takes precedence over
likelihood.
Financial materiality of each sustainability risk and opportunity was assessed as follows:
Financial significance of risk or opportunity on a scale of not significant (EUR 0–1 million), low (EUR 1–5 million), average
(EUR 5–20 million), high (EUR 20–40 million) or very high (EUR 40+ million)
Likelihood of risk or opportunity on a scale of very unlikely (10%), unlikely (30%), uncertain (50%), likely (70%) or very
likely (90%)
Location of the risk or opportunity in the value chain (upstream, own operations, downstream)
Time horizon of impact on short term (0–1 years), medium term (1–5 years) or long term (beyond 5 years)
Financial risks and opportunities assessment followed the same scale as used in Sanoma’s ERM process.
After the topic owners had completed their assessments, the impacts, risks, and opportunities were prioritised based on their
respective scores. The score was determined by calculating the average of the assessed attributes. Separate thresholds were
set for impacts as well as risks and opportunities. Impacts, risks and opportunities that were above the threshold were
considered as material and below the threshold non-material. Sanoma recognises that the IRO scoring method utilised in the
DMA process tends to assign lower scores to actual impacts compared to potential impacts with high likelihood. This is why
final scores were reviewed by the Sustainability and Compliance teams together with an ERM representative. In this review
some impacts, risks and opportunities were deemed material despite being below the set threshold and similarly some
impacts, risks and opportunities were deemed as non-material from a Group perspective despite being above the threshold.
Sanoma’s Executive Management Team also reviewed and approved the list of material impacts, risks and opportunities.
During the DMA, Sanoma assessed risks related to sustainability separately from the ERM process and re-assessed
sustainability risks identified within the ERM process. All potential risks identified in Sanoma’s double materiality assessment
fall into the category of low risk in Sanoma’s ERM process.
Financial Statements 2025
58
The double materiality process defines the priorities for sustainability topics. The identification, assessment, and management
of impacts, risks and opportunities are embedded in Sanoma’s sustainability management model. This model ensures that
Sanoma annually identifies and evaluates material impacts, risks, and opportunities, and determines actions to address them.
For topics of priority, Sanoma has defined specific KPIs to measure performance. These metrics and targets are disclosed in
this Sustainability Statement. Sanoma’s management of sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities is based on focusing on
areas where the impact or risks are the highest. If Sanoma cannot address all impacts or risks at once, the due diligence
process allows for actions to be prioritised based on the severity or financial significance and likelihood of impacts.
There is certain inherent uncertainty related to the DMA as practices of the assessment evolve. Sanoma reviews the need to
update its DMA annually. Sanoma has assessed sustainability-related dependencies during both its ERM risk assessment as
well as the DMA process. Identified dependencies include e.g., availability of key staff, availability of certified paper to produce
its printed products and dependency of customer data to develop its digital products. No external consultations were
conducted in regards to climate, pollution, water, biodiversity or resource-use impacts.
E1 IRO-1 Climate change
Sanoma assesses its impacts on climate change by annually calculating its GHG emissions according the GHG Protocol, as
described under E1-6. To capture emerging sources of emissions, Sanoma reviews potential future GHG emission sources by
comparing business development and strategy to GHG Protocol standards as a part of annual GHG emission calculations.
This review covers potential GHG emission sources in both own, as well as value chain activities, such as the increasing use
of AI.
Sanoma evaluates climate- and biodiversity-related physical and transition risks annually and in 2025, they were assessed as
part of the double materiality assessment. Physical and transition risks were analysed over short (0–1 years), medium (1–5
years), and long-term (beyond five years) horizons. These timeframes are used for strategic and financial planning. The
assessment covers both own operations as well as the upstream and downstream value chain.
Three climate-related risks and opportunities were identified in the DMA and scenario analysis. Sanoma identifies certain
climate-related physical risks which may impact the business on a short- to long-term timeframe. Acute physical hazards like
flooding, driven by increased severity of extreme weather events, may pose a risk to Sanoma’s facilities and warehouses. The
risk is particularly related to damages to facilities due to floods and heavy rain in flooding risk locations. To manage and
mitigate the risk of damage, Sanoma develops comprehensive response plans and acquires insurances.
In addition to physical risks, Sanoma identifies transition risks which may impact the business on a short- to long-term
timeframe. Sanoma identifies a risk of increasing complexity and cost associated with compliance with enhanced emissions
reporting obligations and regulations. Enforced and planned regulations, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting
Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), require extensive data collection, data
management, and reporting infrastructure. Regulatory compliance can lead to increased operational costs, both directly within
Sanoma’s operations and indirectly through the supply chain, as suppliers also face stricter regulations. Additionally, non-
compliance with these regulations could result in financial penalties and reputational damage. On the other hand, Sanoma
identifies an opportunity to enhance brand value and increase demand by actively promoting and developing robust and
transparent climate and biodiversity actions. However, not meeting customers’ expectations related to sustainability
requirements can also pose a risk. Sanoma addresses transition risks and opportunities by monitoring and complying with
regulations, managing reputational risks related to stakeholder demands for climate action and working with suppliers to
reduce emissions and transition to lower-carbon products.
Sanoma’s scenario analysis for transition and physical risks includes assessing the impacts of current and future regulations
on operations and supply chain, evaluating changes in customer behaviour and market demand for sustainable products as
well as identifying opportunities for adopting new technologies to reduce emissions. In its assessment, Sanoma has used
climate scenarios, including scenarios in line with limiting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot and high-
climate scenarios, such as RCP 1.9, RCP 4.5, RCP 8.5 and IEA SDS to understand potential alternative futures and to
develop strategies to mitigate identified risks based on scenario outcomes. These scenarios are based on best available
scientific evidence, such as the IPCC assessments. As Sanoma’s assets are mostly intangible, no assets or business activities
that are sensitive to significant physical hazards or transition risks or incompatible with the transition to a climate-neutral
economy have been identified. Sanoma continuously monitors and develops its ability to assess climate-related risks. Climate-
related risks and opportunities are factored into Sanoma’s financial statements, where relevant, using assumptions based on
the climate scenarios. These risks may affect business operations and require management’s judgment.
E2 IRO-1 Pollution
Sanoma’s DMA process deemed pollution as a non-material topic due to the Company’s minimal pollution impacts, with no
substances of concern found in comparison to the ECHA Candidate List. Media Finland’s printing houses report small VOC
(volatile organic compounds) emissions. The Group’s plastic use is minor and continuously minimised, with no significant
microplastics identified. Sanoma has not conducted specific consultations with communities potentially affected by the topic.
E3 IRO-1 Water and marine resources
Sanoma’s DMA deemed water and marine resources as non-material topics due to minimal impacts, with no significant water
or marine resource impacts identified. Sanoma has not conducted specific consultations with communities potentially affected
by the topic.
E4 IRO-1 Biodiversity and ecosystems
Sanoma evaluates climate- and biodiversity-related physical and transition risks annually. In 2025, they were assessed as a
part of the DMA, as described above under E1 IRO-1 Climate change. Sanoma identified one transitional risk related to
biodiversity and ecosystems in its assessment: the availability of certified paper. All in all, the biodiversity and ecosystems-
related risks were assessed as low, with no physical or systemic risks identified. Sanoma continuously monitors and develops
its ability to assess these risks.
In Sanoma’s DMA, no significant biodiversity impacts were identified in the Company’s own operations. However, impacts
were recognised in the upstream value chain, particularly related to paper production and sourcing, which can lead to
biodiversity loss, ecosystem disruption, and pollution. Sanoma has assessed its dependencies on biodiversity and
ecosystems, particularly related to forest commodities, focusing on the availability of certified and low-carbon paper from
paper suppliers. Sanoma has not conducted specific consultations with communities potentially affected by the topic. Sanoma
does not have sites near biodiversity-sensitive areas and therefore no needs to implement biodiversity mitigation measures in
own sites were identified. Sanoma has not used biodiversity and ecosystems scenario analysis to inform the identification and
Financial Statements 2025
59
assessment of material risks and opportunities over short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. Sanoma continuously
monitors and develops its ability to assess biodiversity-related risks.
E5 IRO-1 Resource use and circular economy
During the DMA Sanoma identified actual impacts in its upstream value chain and own operations related to the use of
materials like paper, printing plates, inks and solvents. Waste generated in facilities, warehouses and printing houses was
identified as an impact in own operations. There were no significant risks or opportunities identified outside of those reported
under E4. No significant impacts on Sanoma’s assets, that are mostly intangible, were identified. Sanoma has not conducted
specific consultations with communities potentially affected by the topic.
G1 IRO-1 Business conduct
The double materiality process in relation to business conduct matters included sector-specific analysis of business activities,
operations, functions, transactions as well as geographical areas where the business operates in relation to risk locations and
where its impacts are most significant. As a result, procurement, as well as the sales teams in Poland and in countries where
the sales happens through agents, such as Spain and Italy, have been identified as functions that are most at risk in respect of
corruption and bribery.
Financial Statements 2025
60
IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s Sustainability Statement
Sanoma has determined the material information to be disclosed by conducting a comprehensive double materiality
assessment process, as outlined in ESRS 1 section 3.2 and described in ESRS 2 IRO-1. The assessment considers both the
financial materiality, which focuses on sustainability impacts, risks and opportunities related to the Company's financial
performance, and the impact materiality, which addresses Sanoma’s impacts on the environment and society. To implement
the criteria in ESRS 1 section 3.2, Sanoma has gathered information about the perspectives of its stakeholders on what
constitutes material information. Sanoma has set quantitative thresholds to prioritise the most significant impacts, risks, and
opportunities. The quantitative thresholds were set slightly below the median score for both the impact and financial
assessments. In addition, qualitative judgment was used to deem some impacts, risks and opportunities material or non-
material despite their score. The results of the DMA have been integrated into Sanoma’s sustainability reporting, ensuring that
the disclosed information is relevant, reliable, and aligned with stakeholder expectations. This approach not only enhances
transparency but also supports Sanoma’s commitment to sustainable business practices and long-term value creation.
Content index: Disclosure Requirements complied with in preparing the Sustainability Statement
Standard
Disclosure
requirement (DR)
Sustainability Statement section
ESRS 2
General
disclosures
ESRS 2 BP-1
ESRS 2 BP-2
ESRS 2 GOV-1
ESRS 2 G1 GOV-1
ESRS 2 GOV 2
ESRS 2 GOV 3
ESRS 2 E1 GOV-3
ESRS 2 GOV 4
ESRS 2 GOV 5
ESRS 2 SBM-1
ESRS 2 SBM-2
ESRS 2 S1 SBM-2
ESRS 2 S2 SBM-2
ESRS 2 S4 SBM-2
ESRS 2 SBM-3
ESRS 2 IRO-1
ESRS 2 E1 IRO-1
ESRS 2 E4 IRO-1
ESRS 2 E5 IRO-1
ESRS 2 E2 IRO-1
ESRS 2 E3 IRO-1
ESRS 2 G1 IRO-1
ESRS 2 IRO-2
Standard
Disclosure
requirement (DR)
Sustainability Statement section
E1 Climate
change
EU Taxonomy
ESRS E1-SBM 3
ESRS E1-1
ESRS E1-2
ESRS E1-3
ESRS E1-4
ESRS E1-5
ESRS E1-6
ESRS E1-7
E4 Biodiversity
and ecosystems
ESRS E4-1
ESRS E4-SBM 3
ESRS E4-2
ESRS E4-3
ESRS E4-4
E5 Resource
use and circular
economy
ESRS E5-1
ESRS E5-2
ESRS E5-3
ESRS E5-4
ESRS E5-5
Financial Statements 2025
61
Standard
Disclosure
requirement (DR)
Sustainability Statement section
S1 Own
workforce
ESRS S1-SBM 3
ESRS S1-1
ESRS S1-2
ESRS S1-3
ESRS S1-4
ESRS S1-5
ESRS S1-6
ESRS S1-8
ESRS S1-9
ESRS S1-10
ESRS S1-11
ESRS S1-13
ESRS S1-14
ESRS S1-15
ESRS S1-16
ESRS S1-17
S2 Workers in
the value chain
ESRS S2-SBM 3
ESRS S2-1
ESRS S2-2
ESRS S2-3
ESRS S2-4
ESRS S2-5
Financial Statements 2025
62
List of data points in cross-cutting and topical standards that derive from EU legislation
Disclosure Requirements and Data Point complied with in
preparing the Sustainability Statement
SFDR reference
Pillar 3 reference
Benchmark Regulation reference
EU Climate Law reference
Location in the
Sustainability Statement /
Not material
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's gender diversity paragraph 21 (d)
Indicator number 13 of Table #1 of
Annex 1
Commission Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816 (27), Annex II
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Percentage of board members who are
independent paragraph 21 (e)
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
ESRS 2 GOV-4 Statement on due diligence paragraph 30
Indicator number 10 Table #3 of Annex 1
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities
paragraph 40 (d) i
Indicators number 4 Table #1 of Annex 1
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Table 1: Qualitative
information on Environmental risk and Table 2: Qualitative
information on Social risk
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Not material
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to chemical
production paragraph 40 (d) ii
Indicator number 9 Table #2 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Not material
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to controversial
weapons paragraph 40 (d) iii
Indicator number 14 Table #1 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12(1)
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Not material
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to cultivation and
production of tobacco paragraph 40 (d) iv
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12(1)
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Not material
ESRS E1-1 Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050
paragraph 14
Regulation (EU) 2021/1119,
Article 2(1)
ESRS E1-1 Undertakings excluded from Paris-aligned Benchmarks
paragraph 16 (g)
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking
book – Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of
exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12.1
(d) to (g), and Article 12.2
ESRS E1-4 GHG emission reduction targets paragraph 34
Indicator number 4 Table #2 of Annex 1
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking
book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 6
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated
by sources (only high climate impact sectors) paragraph 38
Indicator number 5 Table #1 and
Indicator n. 5 Table #2 of Annex 1
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix paragraph 37
Indicator number 5 Table #1 of Annex 1
ESRS E1-5 Energy intensity associated with activities in high
climate impact sectors paragraphs 40 to 43
Indicator number 6 Table #1 of Annex 1
ESRS E1-6 Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
paragraph 44
Indicators number 1 and 2 Table #1 of
Annex 1
Article 449a; Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking
book – Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of
exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 5(1),
6 and 8(1)
ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG emissions intensity paragraphs 53 to 55
Indicators number 3 Table #1 of Annex 1
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking
book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 8(1)
ESRS E1-7 GHG removals and carbon credits paragraph 56
Regulation (EU) 2021/1119,
Article 2(1)
ESRS E1-9 Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related
physical risks paragraph 66
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Phase-in used
Financial Statements 2025
63
Disclosure Requirements and Data Point complied with in
preparing the Sustainability Statement
SFDR reference
Pillar 3 reference
Benchmark Regulation reference
EU Climate Law reference
Location in the
Sustainability Statement /
Not material
ESRS E1-9 Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and
chronic physical risk paragraph 66 (a)
ESRS E1-9 Location of significant assets at material physical risk
paragraph 66 (c)
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraphs 46
and 47; Template 5: Banking book – Climate change physical
risk: Exposures subject to physical risk.
Phase-in used
ESRS E1-9 Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets
by energy-efficiency classes paragraph 67 (c)
Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraph
34;Template 2:Banking book – Climate change transition risk:
Loans collateralised by immovable property – Energy efficiency
of the collateral
Phase-in used
ESRS E1-9 Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related
opportunities paragraph 69
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II
Phase-in used
ESRS E2-4 Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the
E-PRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer
Register) emitted to air, water and soil, paragraph 28
Indicator number 8 Table #1 of Annex 1
Indicator number 2 Table #2 of Annex 1
Indicator number 1 Table #2 of Annex 1
Indicator number 3 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E3-1 Water and marine resources paragraph 9
Indicator number 7 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy paragraph 13
Indicator number 8 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas paragraph 14
Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E3-4 Total water recycled and reused paragraph 28 (c)
Indicator number 6.2 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E3-4 Total water consumption in m3 per net revenue on own
operations paragraph 29
Indicator number 6.1 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS 2- SBM 3 - E4 paragraph 16 (a) i
Indicator number 7 Table #1 of Annex 1
ESRS 2- SBM 3 - E4 paragraph 16 (b)
Indicator number 10 Table #2 of Annex 1
ESRS 2- SBM 3 - E4 paragraph 16 (c)
Indicator number 14 Table #2 of Annex 1
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies
paragraph 24 (b)
Indicator number 11 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies
paragraph 24 (c)
Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1
Not material
ESRS E4-2 Policies to address deforestation paragraph 24 (d)
Indicator number 15 Table #2 of Annex 1
ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled waste paragraph 37 (d)
Indicator number 13 Table #2 of Annex 1
ESRS E5-5 Hazardous waste and radioactive waste paragraph 39
Indicator number 9 Table #1 of Annex 1
Financial Statements 2025
64
Disclosure Requirements and Data Point complied with in
preparing the Sustainability Statement
SFDR reference
Pillar 3 reference
Benchmark Regulation reference
EU Climate Law reference
Location in the
Sustainability Statement /
Not material
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of forced labour paragraph 14
(f)
Indicator number 13 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of child labour paragraph 14
(g)
Indicator number 12 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S1-1 Human rights policy commitments paragraph 20
Indicator number 9 Table #3 and
Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex I
ESRS S1-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the
fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8,
paragraph 21
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
ESRS S1-1 Processes and measures for preventing trafficking in
human beings paragraph 22
Indicator number 11 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S1-1 Workplace accident prevention policy or management
system paragraph 23
Indicator number 1 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S1-3 Grievance/complaints handling mechanisms paragraph
32 (c)
Indicator number 5 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S1-14 Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-
related accidents paragraph 88 (b) and (c)
Indicator number 2 Table #3 of Annex I
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
ESRS S1-14 Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or
illness paragraph 88 (e)
Indicator number 3 Table #3 of Annex I
Phase-in used
ESRS S1-16 Unadjusted gender pay gap paragraph 97 (a)
Indicator number 12 Table #1 of Annex I
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
ESRS S1-16 Excessive CEO pay ratio paragraph 97 (b)
Indicator number 8 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S1-17 Incidents of discrimination paragraph 103 (a)
Indicator number 7 Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S1-17 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights
and OECD Guidelines paragraph 104 (a)
Indicator number 10 Table #1 and
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex I
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 Art 12 (1)
ESRS 2- SBM3 – S2 Significant risk of child labour or forced labour
in the value chain paragraph 11 (b)
Indicators number 12 and number 13
Table #3 of Annex I
ESRS S2-1 Human rights policy commitments paragraph 17
Indicator number 9 Table #3 and
Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1
ESRS S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers paragraph 18
Indicator number 11 and number 4 Table
#3 of Annex 1
ESRS S2-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights
principles and OECD guidelines paragraph 19
Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1)
ESRS S2-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the
fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8,
paragraph 19
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
ESRS S2-4 Human rights issues and incidents connected to its
upstream and downstream value chain paragraph 36
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1
ESRS S3-1 Human rights policy commitments paragraph 16
Indicator number 9 Table #3 of Annex 1
and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of
Annex 1
Not material
ESRS S3-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights,
ILO principles or OECD guidelines paragraph 17
Indicator number 10 Table #1 Annex 1
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1)
Not material
ESRS S3-4 Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 36
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1
Not material
Financial Statements 2025
65
Disclosure Requirements and Data Point complied with in
preparing the Sustainability Statement
SFDR reference
Pillar 3 reference
Benchmark Regulation reference
EU Climate Law reference
Location in the
Sustainability Statement /
Not material
ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users paragraph
16
Indicator number 9 Table #3 and
Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1
ESRS S4-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights
and OECD guidelines paragraph 17
Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1)
ESRS S4-4 Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 35
Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1
ESRS G1-1 United Nations Convention against Corruption
paragraph 10 (b)
Indicator number 15 Table #3 of Annex 1
ESRS G1-1 Protection of whistleblowers paragraph 10 (d)
Indicator number 6 Table #3 of Annex 1
ESRS G1-4 Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws
paragraph 24 (a)
Indicator number 17 Table #3 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II
ESRS G1-4 Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery paragraph
24 (b)
Indicator number 16 Table #3 of Annex 1
Financial Statements 2025
66
Environmental information
EU Taxonomy disclosure
Disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation)
The EU’s Sustainable Finance Classification System (‘Taxonomy’) is a system for defining environmentally sustainable
economic activities. According to the Taxonomy, an economic activity is classified as environmentally sustainable if it
contributes substantially to one or more of the six environmental objectives, fulfils the 'do no significant harm' (DNSH) criteria
to the other environmental objectives (i.e., complies with DNSH technical screening criteria in the delegated acts
supplementing the Taxonomy Regulation) and complies with Minimum Safeguards related to the OECD MNE Guidelines, the
UNGPs, the Declaration of the International Labour Organization on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the
International Bill of Human Rights. The six environmental objectives defined by the EU are:
1. climate change mitigation,
2. climate change adaptation,
3. sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources,
4. transition to a circular economy,
5. pollution prevention and control and
6. protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems.
For 2025, the eligibility of all six environmental objectives, with three KPIs, Turnover, CapEx and OpEx, is reported following
Sanoma’s Taxonomy Accounting Policy.
The Taxonomy currently focuses on the most carbon-intensive industries, green energy and innovations. Sanoma’s
environmental footprint is not significant, and as a learning and media Company, only a few of its businesses are defined as
Taxonomy-eligible activities, while none are Taxonomy-aligned. Sanoma’s Taxonomy disclosure is based on an annual
assessment of Taxonomy-eligibility and Taxonomy-alignment. The assessment model was developed in internal workshops
with representatives from the businesses, sustainability and finance operations.
According to Sanoma’s assessment, the following economic activities are identified as eligible under the objective 2) climate
change adaptation: 8.2 Computer programming, consultancy and related activities (digital learning businesses) and 8.3
Programming and broadcasting activities (TV and radio broadcasting business in Finland). Economic activities 13.1 Creative,
arts and entertainment activities (live events business in Finland) and 13.3 Motion picture, video and television programme
production, sound recording and music publishing activities (music publishing business in Finland) were also found to be
potentially eligible for Sanoma, but to avoid double counting, Sanoma reports all eligible Turnover, CapEx and OpEx related to
Nelonen Media and these activities under economic activity 8.3. According to Sanoma’s assessment, the Taxonomy’s
economic activity 11 Education, only refers to the organising of public and private education, and thus does not cover
Sanoma’s Learning business. The Taxonomy’s list of potentially eligible activities does not include any news media-related
economic activities and therefore Sanoma’s news media business is not considered as an eligible economic activity.
Sanoma’s eligible activities only include potential substantial contribution to objective 2) climate change adaptation. None of
Sanoma’s eligible activities were identified to substantially contribute to 2) climate change adaptation and therefore none of
Sanoma’s activities are Taxonomy-aligned. None of Sanoma’s eligible activities include any DNSH criteria. Sanoma has
reviewed the Minimum Safeguards criteria related to the Taxonomy and complies with respect to human rights, bribery and
corruption, taxation and fair competition.
Taxonomy accounting policy
In Sanoma’s reporting, Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned Turnover, CapEx and OpEx are only accounted once,
although some Taxonomy-eligible businesses would be eligible under several economic activities.
Taxonomy-eligible and aligned turnover: Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible economic activities is reported in relation to the
Group’s total net sales (Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2.2), which means the Turnover of products and services
associated with Taxonomy-eligible economic activities is divided with the Group’s consolidated net sales. The Taxonomy-
eligible Turnover includes net sales of activity 8.3. Net sales of economic activity 8.2. is not included in the Taxonomy-eligible
net sales, because this activity is not an enabling activity. Enabling economic activities are a sub-category of environmentally
sustainable economic activities under the Taxonomy Regulation, which do not substantially contribute to climate change
mitigation through their own performance. Taxonomy-aligned Turnover would be calculated following the same formula as
eligible activities, if the activity-specific substantial contribution criteria would be met.
Taxonomy-eligible and aligned capital expenditure: CapEx of Taxonomy-eligible activities is reported in relation to the
Group’s total CapEx (Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 3.2 and Note 3.3). The Taxonomy-eligible CapEx deviates from
the Group’s total CapEx. Total CapEx includes additions in the Group’s tangible and intangible assets during the year. The
Taxonomy-eligible CapEx includes additions in the tangible and intangible assets of all Taxonomy-eligible activities. According
to the Taxonomy Regulation, the total acquisition value of TV programming rights is considered as Taxonomy-eligible CapEx
under the activity 8.3 forming a major part of Sanoma’s taxonomy-eligible CapEx. In Sanoma’s financial reporting, the
acquisition of TV programming rights is excluded from the cash-based CapEx. Taxonomy-aligned CapEx would be calculated
following the same formula as eligible activities, if the activity-specific substantial contribution criteria would be met.
Taxonomy-eligible and aligned operating expenses: OpEx of Taxonomy-eligible activities is reported in relation to net
OpEx. Net OpEx deviates from the Group’s operating expenditure and includes direct non-capitalised costs related to the use
of Sanoma’s Taxonomy-eligible economic activities’ assets. The direct non-capitalised costs are related to TV broadcasting,
digital production, purchased digital traffic, research and development (incl. related employee benefit expenses), ICT
development and short-term leasing payments. OpEx of Taxonomy-eligible activity 8.2 includes non-capitalised R&D costs
(incl. employee benefit expenses). OpEx of Taxonomy-eligible activity 8.3 includes distribution expenses and direct employee
expenses of broadcasting activities. Taxonomy-aligned OpEx would be calculated following the same formula as eligible
activities, if the activity specific substantial contribution criteria would be met.
Financial Statements 2025
67
Nuclear and fossil gas related activities
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of
innovative electricity generation Facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from
the fuel cycle.
NO
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear
installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial
processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
NO
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that
produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as
hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
NO
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilities
that produce electricity using fossil gas fuels.
NO
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined
heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gas fuels.
NO
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat
generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gas fuels.
NO
Financial Statements 2025
68
Proportion of turnover from products or services associated with Taxonomy-aligned economic activities – disclosure covering the year 2025
Financial year 2025
2025
Substantial Contribution Criteria
DNSH criteria
('Does Not Significantly Harm')(h)
Economic Activities (1)
Code (a) (2)
Turnover (3)
Proportion of
Turnover, year 2025
(4)
Climate Change
Mitigation (5)
Climate Change
Adaptation (6)
Water (7)
Pollution (8)
Circular Economy
(9)
Biodiversity (10)
Climate Change
Mitigation (11)
Climate Change
Adaptation (12)
Water (13)
Pollution (14)
Circular Economy
(15)
Biodiversity (16)
Minimum
Safeguards (17)
Proportion of
Taxonomy-aligned
(a.1.) or eligible
(A.2.) Turnover,
year 2024 (18)
Category enabling
activity (19)
Category
transitional activity
(20)
MEUR
%
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
%
E
T
A. TAXONOMY-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)
8.2. Computer programming,
consultancy and related activities
CCA 8.2
0
0%
N/EL
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
8.3 Programming and
broadcasting activities
CCA 8.3
0
0%
N/EL
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
E
Turnover of environmentally
sustainable activities
(Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1)
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
Of which Enabling
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
E
Of which Transitional
0
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
T
A.2 Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (g)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
8.3 Programming and
broadcasting activities
CCA 8.3
175.6
13%
N/EL
EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
14%
Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible
but not environmentally
sustainable activities (not
Taxonomy-aligned activities)
(A.2)
175.6
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
A. Turnover of Taxonomy-
eligible activities (A.1 + A.2)
175.6
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Turnover of Taxonomy-non-
eligible activities
1,126.9
87%
Total
1,302.5
100%
Financial Statements 2025
69
Proportion of CapEx from products or services associated with Taxonomy-aligned economic activities – disclosure covering the year 2025
Financial year 2025
2025
Substantial Contribution Criteria
DNSH criteria
('Does Not Significantly Harm')(h)
Economic Activities (1)
Code (a) (2)
CapEx (3)
Proportion of
CapEx, year 2025
(4)
Climate Change
Mitigation (5)
Climate Change
Adaptation (6)
Water (7)
Pollution (8)
Circular Economy
(9)
Biodiversity (10)
Climate Change
Mitigation (11)
Climate Change
Adaptation (12)
Water (13)
Pollution (14)
Circular Economy
(15)
Biodiversity (16)
Minimum
Safeguards (17)
Proportion of
Taxonomy-aligned
(a.1.) or eligible
(A.2.) CapEx, year
2024 (18)
Category enabling
activity (19)
Category
transitional activity
(20)
MEUR
%
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
%
E
T
A. TAXONOMY-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)
8.2. Computer programming,
consultancy and related activities
CCA 8.2
0
0%
N/EL
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
8.3 Programming and
broadcasting activities
CCA 8.3
0
0%
N/EL
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
E
CapEx of environmentally
sustainable activities
(Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1)
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
Of which Enabling
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
E
Of which Transitional
0
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
T
A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (g)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
8.2. Computer programming,
consultancy and related activities
CCA 8.2
6.6
4%
N/EL
EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
4%
8.3 Programming and
broadcasting activities
CCA 8.3
53.8
36%
N/EL
EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
35%
CapEx of Taxonomy-eligible
but not environmentally
sustainable activities (not
Taxonomy-aligned activities)
(A.2)
60.5
40%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
39%
A. CapEx of Taxonomy-eligible
activities (A.1 + A.2)
60.5
40%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
39%
B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
CapEx of Taxonomy-non-
eligible activities
90.8
60%
Total
151.2
100%
Financial Statements 2025
70
Proportion of OpEx from products or services associated with Taxonomy-aligned economic activities – disclosure covering the year 2025
Financial year 2025
2025
Substantial Contribution Criteria
DNSH criteria
('Does Not Significantly Harm')(h)
Economic Activities (1)
Code (a) (2)
OpEx (3)
Proportion of OpEx,
year 2025 (4)
Climate Change
Mitigation (5)
Climate Change
Adaptation (6)
Water (7)
Pollution (8)
Circular Economy
(9)
Biodiversity (10)
Climate Change
Mitigation (11)
Climate Change
Adaptation (12)
Water (13)
Pollution (14)
Circular Economy
(15)
Biodiversity (16)
Minimum
Safeguards (17)
Proportion of
Taxonomy-aligned
(a.1.) or eligible
(A.2.) OpEx, year
2024 (18)
Category enabling
activity (19)
Category
transitional activity
(20)
MEUR
%
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y; N; N/EL
(b) (c)
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
%
E
T
A. TAXONOMY-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)
8.2. Computer programming,
consultancy and related activities
CCA 8.2
0
0%
N/EL
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
8.3 Programming and
broadcasting activities
CCA 8.3
0
0%
N/EL
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
E
OpEx of environmentally
sustainable activities
(Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1)
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
Of which Enabling
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
E
Of which Transitional
0
0%
0%
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0%
T
A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (g)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
EL; N/EL (f)
8.2. Computer programming,
consultancy and related activities
CCA 8.2
19.3
48%
N/EL
EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
47%
8.3 Programming and
broadcasting activities
CCA 8.3
12.5
31%
N/EL
EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
27%
OpEx of Taxonomy-eligible but
not environmentally
sustainable activities (not
Taxonomy-aligned activities)
(A.2)
31.8
79%
0%
79%
0%
0%
0%
0%
74%
A. OpEx of Taxonomy-eligible
activities (A.1 + A.2)
31.8
79%
0%
79%
0%
0%
0%
0%
74%
B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
OpEx of Taxonomy-non-eligible
activities
8.6
21%
Total
40.4
100%
Financial Statements 2025
71
ESRS E1 Climate change
SANOMA_pallot-01.svg
E1-1
Transition plan for climate change mitigation
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
E1-2
Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
E1-3
Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
E1-4
Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
E1-5
Energy consumption and mix
E1-6
Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
E1-7
GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
Strategy
E1-1 Transition plan for climate change mitigation
Sanoma’s transition plan related to climate change mitigation focuses on minimising its climate impacts. The Science Based
Targets initiative (SBTi) has approved Sanoma’s near-term 2030 science-based emission reduction targets for its own
operations (Scope 1 and 2) and value chain (Scope 3). This validation confirms that Sanoma’s climate strategy and business
model are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy and the limiting of global warming to 1.5 degrees in line
with the Paris Agreement.
Sanoma’s validated SBTi target for its own operations is to reduce combined absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 42%
by 2030, from the 2021 base year. A majority of Sanoma’s greenhouse gas emissions originate from indirect Scope 3
emissions. Sanoma aims to reduce Scope 3 emissions by 38% by 2030, from the 2021 base year. This Scope 3 target applies
to Sanoma’s GHG emissions under categories 1 Purchased goods and services, 3 Fuel and energy-related activities and 4
Upstream transportation and distribution, which together accounted for about 76% of Sanoma’s value chain emissions in
2025. Methodologies and assumptions used for these targets include using the SBTi guidelines as well as the cross-sector
(ACA) reduction pathways. Further details are available under E1-4.
Sanoma has not identified significant capital expenditure and operational expenses which would currently be required to
implement its climate transition plan. To ensure compatibility with the transition to a sustainable economy, and with limiting the
global warming in line with the Paris Agreement, Sanoma aims to adjust its business through decarbonisation levers such as
GHG emissions reductions. This includes improving energy efficiency, reducing energy consumption and using fossil-free
energy in Scope 2 as well as by cooperating with suppliers, improving efficiency and the emissions intensity of materials and
reducing energy consumption in Scope 3. Key actions planned to reduce direct own operations’ Scope 1 emissions include the
continuous transition to rechargeable and hybrid cars where possible while taking into consideration country-specific
availability of the electricity charging grid. Key actions planned to reduce own operations’ indirect Scope 2 emissions include
switching the energy formats to fossil-free and renewable sources as well as purchasing Guarantees of Origin for renewable
and fossil-free energy. Key actions planned to reduce Scope 3 emissions focus on cooperating with suppliers to reduce GHG
emissions related to materials production and transport. During the upcoming curriculum renewals in Sanoma Learning,
Sanoma aims to reduce GHG emissions by transitioning to lower-carbon paper, optimising paper emission intensity, adopting
low-carbon printing processes, and utilising low-carbon logistics. Sanoma measures the performance of its suppliers by
collecting GHG emissions data from them and encourages suppliers to develop product carbon footprint information, set
science-based climate targets and transition to renewable energy.
The digitalisation of the media business is expected to reduce the GHG emissions associated with print media. As Sanoma
continues its transition from print to digital, emissions related to print products, such as paper, materials and logistics - are
expected to decrease. In its learning business, Sanoma continues to offer digital and blended (combined print and digital)
products, with digitalisation gradually gaining ground. Additionally, Sanoma is increasingly using AI to improve work efficiency
and develop its media and learning solutions. Key actions planned to reduce GHG emissions related to digital products and
services include transitioning to fossil-free energy and minimising energy consumption in digital delivery through the efficient
use of data and optimisation of cloud infrastructure.
Sanoma’s climate transition plan is embedded in the Group’s overall strategy through linking the climate-related targets to
funding and executive management’s short-term incentives. Sanoma has linked its SBTi climate targets as sustainability KPIs
to its EUR 300 million Syndicated Revolving Credit Facility. Sanoma’s executive management’s short-term incentives for 2025
included metrics related to Sanoma’s science-based emission reduction targets. These incentives are described in more detail
under ESRS 2 GOV-3.
Sanoma’s sustainability management governance ensures that the transition plan is taken into account in business decision-
making and financial planning. The transition plan was approved in 2021 by Sanoma’s EMT, AC and Board. During 2021–
2025, Sanoma has made progress in implementing its climate transition plan by reducing its absolute combined Scope 1 and
2 emissions by 59% and Scope 3 emissions in categories 1, 3 and 4 by 46%. Progress and actions in 2025 are described
under E1-3.
Although the EU Taxonomy’s list of potentially eligible activities does not include Sanoma’s main business activities in learning
or news media, Sanoma does disclose Taxonomy-eligible revenue, CapEx and OpEx related to Complementary Climate
Adaptation (CCA) activities 8.2 and 8.3. These activities represent a minor share of Sanoma’s operations and do not change
the fact that the core business activities are currently outside the scope of the EU Taxonomy. Therefore, Sanoma does not
have plans in place to align its overall economic activities (revenues, CapEx, OpEx) with the criteria established in the EU
Commission Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 (29).
Sanoma is not excluded from the EU Paris-Aligned Benchmarks. Sanoma does not identify any significant locked-in GHG
emissions e.g., future GHG emissions that are likely to be caused by key assets or products sold within their operating lifetime.
Financial Statements 2025
72
SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Sanoma’s climate strategy is an important part of its 2030 business strategy, ensuring the business meets the requirements of
a low-carbon economy, aligned with the Paris Agreement 1.5-degree goal.
To identify and control environmental risks and opportunities, Sanoma evaluates climate- and biodiversity-related physical and
transition risks annually as part of its double materiality assessment. This resilience analysis includes identifying and
assessing risks and opportunities, defining risk management activities as well as reporting of risks and opportunities to the
EMT, AC and Board, where relevant. The assessment is qualitative and quantitative and performed annually by the
Sustainability and Procurement teams as a part of the double materiality assessment process. Information from other relevant
functions is also collected. Details about the methodology of the double materiality assessment, including time horizons used,
financial thresholds and likelihood scale, are available under ESRS 2 SBM-3 and IRO-1. Time horizons vary from the ones
used in setting Sanoma’s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, where the long-term time horizon extends to 2030.
Sanoma’s resilience analysis covers direct operations as well as the upstream and downstream value chain. Tier 1 suppliers
were analysed in particular, but for example, when analysing the printing houses’ ability to reduce emissions, data from tier 2
paper suppliers was also reviewed.
Sanoma uses scenario analysis to identify these risks and opportunities and to enrich its resilience analysis and to improve its
understanding of transition and physical risks. In its assessment, Sanoma has used climate scenarios, including scenarios in
line with limiting the global warming to 1.5 degrees with no or limited overshoot and high-climate scenarios, such as RCP 1.9,
RCP 4.5, RCP 8.5 and IEA SDS to understand potential alternative futures and to develop strategies to mitigate identified risks
based on scenario outcomes. This includes assessing the impacts of current and future regulations on own operations and
supply chains, evaluating changes in customer behaviour and market demand for sustainable products as well as identifying
opportunities for adopting new technologies to reduce emissions. Relevant risks are managed through operational policies and
the implementation of Sanoma’s Sustainability Strategy.
Sanoma identifies certain climate-related physical risks that may impact the business in the short-, medium- and long-term.
Acute physical risks like flooding, driven by increased severity of extreme weather conditions, may pose a risk to Sanoma’s
printing houses, facilities and warehouses. In particular, the risk relates to damages caused to facilities due to floods and
heavy rain in high flooding risk locations. To manage and mitigate this risk, Sanoma develops comprehensive response plans
and acquires insurances.
Sanoma also identifies certain transition risks which may impact the business in the short-, medium- and long-term. One of
these risks is related to increased complexity and costs due to compliance with enhanced emissions- and sustainability-
reporting obligations and regulations. Regulations, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), require extensive data collection, data management and reporting
infrastructure. This can lead to increased operational costs, both directly within Sanoma’s operations and indirectly through the
supply chain, as suppliers also face stricter emissions regulations. Additionally, non-compliance with these regulations could
result in financial penalties and reputational damage, impacting business operations and financial performance. Lack of active
and transparent climate action can also be a risk and impact customer expectations, lead to adverse impacts on reputation
and ultimately decreased demand. Sanoma addresses transition risks by monitoring and preparing to comply with regulations
such as the CSRD and CSDDD, advancing its climate transition plan and cooperating with suppliers to reduce emissions and
transition to lower-carbon products.
Sanoma also identifies certain opportunities related to the implementation of its climate transition plan. Transparent climate
action may offer the opportunity to enhance brand value and increase the demand for its products. Sanoma also identifies a
number of opportunities related to the adoption of renewable energy solutions and energy-efficiency measures, which may
reduce costs related to energy usage. For example, AI optimisation of heating in facilities and the transitioning to renewable
heating in Finland have already led to energy savings. In addition, Sanoma’s ambitious climate targets and positive
sustainability performance enable the availability of cost-efficient financing. By aligning its climate strategy with the Science
Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and incorporating these KPIs into its financing, Sanoma can benefit from reduced interest costs
when meeting its emission reduction targets.
Sanoma has not identified any reasons that would require significant adjustments to its strategy or business model as a result
of the climate-related resilience analysis. Sanoma evaluates that adaptation to climate change in the short-, medium- and
long-term does not pose a significant threat to securing ongoing access to finance. The shift to digital is expected to continue
especially in the media business, which will support Sanoma’s climate transition. Accelerated digitalisation is expected to also
increase energy consumption and, consequently, the demand for fossil-free energy. Sanoma’s resilience analysis includes
uncertainties, which relate to the length of the time horizons used in the analysis and the severity types of the scenarios used.
Sanoma aims to further develop its scenario analysis going forward. Sanoma’s ability to adjust or adapt its strategy and
business model to climate change depends on and includes transitioning to renewable and fossil-free energy sources,
engaging and cooperating with suppliers to reduce GHG emissions, setting and achieving ambitious science-based targets for
GHG emissions reductions as well as regularly updating the Sustainability Strategy and risk management processes to
address emerging risks and opportunities.
Financial Statements 2025
73
Impact, risk and opportunity management
E1-2 Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage impacts, risks and opportunities related to
climate change. The key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the policies are presented in
the table ‘Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to climate change’. Climate change and energy-
related topics are directly addressed in the Environmental standard and the Supplier Code of Conduct (SCoC) whereas the
Code of Conduct (CoC) and Sustainability and Human Rights Policy outline Sanoma’s environmental commitments and the
governance of sustainability-related topics. Relevant parts from each policy are embedded into Sanoma’s annual Code of
Conduct refresher training which is mandatory for all employees. Sanoma also engages with its suppliers, such as paper and
print suppliers, to ensure the implementation of its climate transition plan.
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to climate change
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Code of Conduct
(CoC)
Key content described in G1-1. From an environmental perspective, the
COC emphasises the commitment to minimising negative environmental
impacts through efficient operations, responsible supply chain management,
and increasing environmental awareness. The policy commits to ensuring
compliance with all relevant environmental legislative, regulatory, and
operating standards.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Legal for
implementation.
Board of Directors
approve the policy.
The Ten principles of the UN Global Compact, the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises
and ILO’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles
and Rights at Work
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Publicly available on
company website
All E1-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Sustainability and
Human Rights Policy
Key content described in S1-1. The policy outlines sustainability-related
principles, core commitments, and the sustainability due diligence process.
Emphasises protecting the environment, climate, and biodiversity, raising
awareness, and integrating sustainability into business practices. The policy
outlines measures to identify, prevent, and mitigate negative environmental
impacts across operations and the value chain. It also highlights stakeholder
engagement and monitoring the effectiveness of environmental
management.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Sustainability for
implementation. Board of
Directors approve the
policy.
The UN Global Compact (UNGC), The UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights, The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), The
International Labour Organization’s (ILO)
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
Work, The OECD Guidelines for Multinational
Enterprises, The Rio Declaration on Environment
and Development
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
in both policy setting by
analysing insights
received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees.
Publicly available on
company website
All E1-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Supplier Code of
Conduct (SCoC)
Key content described in S2-1. From an environmental perspective, the
SCoC outlines Sanoma’s environmental principles and requirements towards
all Sanoma suppliers and addresses climate change, energy efficiency, use
of renewable energy, use of plastics, deforestation or forest degradation
impacts, waste management, circularity and pollution prevention.
All upstream and
downstream suppliers
and workers in the value
chain
Procurement for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the standard.
The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact, the
UDHR, the International Bill of Human Rights, the
UNGPS, the ILO declaration and supporting ILO
standards
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
in both standard setting
by analysing insights
received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees.
Publicly available on
company website
All E1-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Environmental
Standard
The standard sets principles for managing environmental impacts, including
climate change adaptation and mitigation, energy efficiency, fossil-free
energy, plastics use, biodiversity, waste, circularity, and pollution prevention.
It applies to all Sanoma operations and supports SDGs on Responsible
Consumption (11), Climate Action (13), and Partnerships (17). Sanoma
complies with local, national, and international laws and supports the
European Climate Pact under the EU Green Deal for climate neutrality by
2050. Implementation respects third-party standards such as ISO 14001.
All own operations
Procurement for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the standard.
UN Global Compact, UN Ten Principles, Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development,
European Climate Pact, Task-Force on Climate-
Related Disclosure (TCFD), Science Based Targets
initiative (SBTi), FSC and PEFC certifications, the
ISO 14001 environmental management system for
own printing houses
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
in both standard setting
by analysing insights
received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees
Publicly available on
company website
All E1-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Financial Statements 2025
74
E1-3 Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
Sanoma’s climate change mitigation focuses on reducing GHG emissions in both its own operations (Scope 1 and 2) and
value chain (Scope 3). Sanoma’s targets, approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), ensure that the ambition of
Sanoma’s climate strategy is compatible with limiting the global warming in line with the Paris Agreement. Sanoma’s key
actions taken in 2025, and planned for the future, are aligned with its SBTi targets and actions related to both climate change
mitigation and adaptation are to be completed by 2030. As continuous actions, Sanoma has allocated resources to the
implementation of its climate transition plan, including e.g., investments in supplier cooperation, renewable and fossil-free
energy, energy efficiency and AI optimisation. Sustainability and Procurement teams cooperate with both own production and
suppliers’ production teams to reduce emissions. Sanoma hosts internal environmental working groups in both SBUs to
ensure progress in emission reduction initiatives. In 2025, Sanoma advanced its science-based emission reduction targets by
implementing projects that focused on lowering Scope 3 emissions through optimising paper-related processes, transitioning
to lower-carbon paper, reducing logistics emissions, and introducing supplier sustainability segmentation. These actions
included cooperation with external printing houses, adoption of low-carbon paper options, and development of digital climate
solutions to monitor and communicate advertising ecosystem emissions. Additionally, Nelonen Media implemented a climate
plan for TV productions, including emission analysis of AV productions.
Minor financial resources have been earmarked for the implementation of the climate transition plan, and these are integrated
into Sanoma’s overall financial plan. In general, these investments are expected to remain immaterial in terms of financial
significance. No significant monetary amounts of capital expenditure (CapEx) or operational expenses (OpEx) are currently
required to implement the actions taken or planned. Sanoma does not expect that its ability to implement its climate transition
plan depends significantly on the availability or allocation of financial and operational resources. In own operations (Scope 1
and 2), limited investments are required for renewable and fossil-free energy adoption and energy efficiency improvements. In
Scope 3, the success of actions is mainly dependent on the cooperation and commitment of suppliers and partners to reduce
emissions and transition to a low-carbon economy.
Energy
To reduce the impacts of energy use, Sanoma invests in energy efficiency initiatives, own solar energy production and the use
of fossil-free and renewable energy sources. The scope of these actions is Sanoma’s own operations, more specifically
printing houses in Finland and facilities and warehouses throughout Europe. In 2025, Sanoma renewed its energy efficiency
agreement in Finland, which is a voluntary agreement model between the state and companies from various industries. The
new agreement period will run from 2026 to 2035, during which Sanoma continues to invest in energy efficiency and to further
improve the energy efficiency of its operations. In 2025, all facilities and printing houses in Finland used fossil-free electricity
and renewable district heating. Also office facilities in Sweden, Poland, Belgium and Spain, and some facilities in the
Netherlands and Italy, used fossil‑free or renewable electricity. In 2025, Sanoma carried out office restructuring projects and
discontinued unnecessary office facilities in Finland, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Germany. As a result of these
projects, the consumption of electricity, district heating and cooling in both owned and leased properties controlled by Sanoma
declined. As a continuous action to reduce the heating consumption, Sanoma uses AI to optimise heating use in Sanoma’s
headquarters in Helsinki and in both printing houses in Finland. In Sanoma’s printing houses and facilities in Finland, Poland,
Netherlands, Italy and Norway, international standards, such as ISO 14001 and BREEAM certification, create a foundation for
energy management.
Climate change mitigation in Scope 1 and 2 own operations
Sanoma has reduced its combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 59% (2024: 44%) by the end of 2025 from the 2021 baseline.
The scope of actions related to Scope 1 and 2 emissions reductions is Sanoma’s own operations, more specifically printing
houses in Finland and facilities and warehouses throughout Europe. In Scope 2, emission reductions are driven by Sanoma’s
shift to renewable and fossil‑free electricity and heating, along with office space restructuring which improves energy efficiency
and lower consumption across SBUs. Intermediate targets involve using fossil-free electricity (with 98% reached) and
transitioning to fossil-free energy by 2030 (with 89% reached) in Sanoma’s offices, warehouses and printing facility. In Scope
1, Sanoma reduced emissions from company cars by renewing its car policy in Italy to support the transition to rechargeable
and hybrid vehicles. These efforts cover Sanoma’s own operations, including printing houses, offices, and warehouses in all
operating countries.
Climate change mitigation in the Scope 3 value chain
Sanoma’s most significant climate impacts derive from the indirect emissions of its supply chain. Sanoma has reduced Scope
3 emissions by 46% (2024: 39%) in categories 1, 3 and 4 by the end of 2025 from the 2021 base year, reaching its SBTi target
already ahead of 2030. Categories 1, 3 and 4 represented 76% of Sanoma’s Scope 3 emissions in 2025.
To reduce value chain Scope 3 emissions, key actions during 2025 included partnering with suppliers, as most Scope 3
emissions originate from purchases of materials, logistics and production. The scope of actions related to Scope 3 emission
reductions covers Sanoma’s upstream value chain in all sourcing countries. During 2025, Sanoma continued its cooperation
with paper suppliers to use lower‑carbon paper and with printing suppliers to ensure ambitious target setting and reliable
carbon accounting. Sanoma annually collects supplier‑specific emissions data from paper, printing and logistics suppliers and
follows up on key suppliers’ climate targets. Cooperation with paper and print suppliers was further enhanced by sharing
know‑how on product‑level emission calculations, EUDR, CSRD, CSDDD and other regulatory developments. In addition to
supplier cooperation, the transition from print to digital continued in the media business, and as a result, the amount of
print‑related (paper, materials, logistics) GHG emissions declined. As other purchased services - such as IT equipment,
consulting, marketing, cloud services and TV productions - also generate a portion of Sanoma’s GHG emissions, Sanoma
continuously develops its calculation models and cooperation with these suppliers to ensure further reductions.
Looking ahead, Sanoma aims to continue reducing paper‑related emissions through more extensive use of low‑carbon paper
qualities and, in cooperation with logistics suppliers, to reduce GHG emissions through the increased use of low‑carbon
transport options. Further emissions reductions are expected especially from the digitalisation of media. In the learning
business, upcoming curriculum renewals may increase emissions. Sanoma aims to mitigate this impact in advance by, for
example, shifting paper use towards low‑carbon profile options and optimising paper weights in its products.
Climate change adaptation
Sanoma adapts to transition risks related to its customers and stakeholders expectations through its climate transition plan, which is
described in the Climate change mitigation chapter. Sanoma will continue to develop compliance by ensuring adequate resources
and cooperating with suppliers to ensure data quality and availability. Sanoma adapts to physical risks related to climate change
through its operational policies, contingency planning and insurances. To prepare for and manage potential physical risks, Sanoma
has continuity and disaster recovery plans in place for its critical systems and operations. Sanoma’s insurance programme provides
Financial Statements 2025
75
coverage for insurable hazard risks, subject to insurance terms and conditions. The scope of actions related to physical risks is
Sanoma’s own operations, more specifically printing houses in Finland and facilities and warehouses throughout Europe.
Metrics and targets
E1-4 Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
Energy
Sanoma’s target is to transition to fossil-free energy (electricity, heating, cooling and reserve power) by 2030. In addition,
Sanoma aims to use only fossil-free or renewable electricity in its’s offices, warehouses and printing facilities. Both targets
were established in 2021. As Sanoma’s energy-related targets are continuous, no base year or values are disclosed. Energy
targets have been established with input from internal stakeholders. Both targets cover all facilities, warehouses and printing
houses operated by Sanoma. The target is in line with Sanoma’s Environmental Standard and supports in the achievement of
Scope 1 and 2 emission reduction targets.
In 2025, 89% (2024: 92%) of energy used offices, warehouses and printing facilities was fossil-free. The share of fossil-free
renewable and nuclear electricity was 98% (2024: 97%). Sanoma uses fossil-free electricity in its facilities in Finland, Sweden,
Norway, Belgium, Poland and Spain and certain facilities in the Netherlands and Italy.
Climate change mitigation
Sanoma measures and evaluates its performance related to mitigating its climate and GHG emission impacts through its
emission reduction targets described under E1-1. The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has approved Sanoma’s near-
term science-based emission reduction targets for own operations (Scope 1 and 2) and value chain (Scope 3). This validates
that Sanoma’s GHG emission reduction targets are compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5-degrees. The SBTi targets
are based on IPCC reports and projections. The effectiveness of these metrics is evaluated by analysing Sanoma’s
performance related to emission reductions.
Sanoma’s target is to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% and Scope 3 emissions by 38% by 2030, compared to the
2021 baseline. Methodologies and assumptions used for these targets include using the SBTi guidelines as well as the cross-
sector (ACA) reduction pathways. Sanoma’s GHG emission reduction targets are gross targets, meaning that no GHG
removals, carbon credits or avoided emissions as means of achieving the GHG emission reduction targets have been
included. Internal stakeholders were involved in Sanoma’s climate target setting project through workshops. Customers,
employees and suppliers views were considered in target setting through Sanoma’s materiality assessment conducted for the
Sustainability Strategy in 2021.
As critical assumptions for setting GHG emission reduction targets, Sanoma has considered future developments, such as
changes in paper volumes and print production, shifts in customer demand especially related to the pace of digitalisation in
both businesses as well as regulatory changes and the general transition pace towards fossil-free energy formats. All
developments considered have the capacity to reduce Sanoma’s emissions. Increases in paper volumes and print production
following curriculum renewals in particular, may also increase emissions, which Sanoma aims to prevent in advance by, for
example, changing paper use towards low-carbon options and optimising paper weights. Sanoma’s key decarbonisation levers
include reducing GHG emissions by improving energy efficiency, reducing energy consumption and using fossil-free energy in
Scope 2 as well as by cooperating with suppliers, improving efficiency and the emissions intensity of materials and reducing
energy consumption in Scope 3. In addition, following the digitalisation in the media business, the decline of printed media will
reduce Scope 3 emissions. To review opportunities to meet its targets and to identify potential decarbonisation levers, Sanoma
has considered climate scenarios. The scenarios used have been described under E1 SBM-3 and E1-1. Sanoma is currently
not planning to adopt new technologies to achieve GHG emission reduction targets.
By 2025, Sanoma’s own operations’ emissions (Scope 1 and 2) have declined by 59% (2024: 44%) compared to the 2021
base year. Sanoma achieved significant reductions in Scope 2 emissions mainly due to continued transition to renewable
heating in addition to the use of fossil-free electricity. By 2025, Sanoma’s value chain emissions (Scope 3) have declined by
46% (2024: 39%) in categories 1, 3 and 4 compared to the 2021 base year. These categories represented more than 76%
(2024: 75%) of Sanoma’s Scope 3 emissions and are covered by Sanoma’s SBTi target.
Sanoma’s baseline year for emissions reductions is 2021, providing a reference point for measuring progress. It includes all
relevant emissions from owned and controlled operations as well as value chain emissions. The baseline is representative of
Sanoma’s activities and considers external factors such as market trends and regulatory changes. Sanoma has, for example,
reviewed the baseline calculations for potential anomalities in a certain year by comparing both the data used and emission
factors used, to the previous years’ data and factors. Sanoma evaluates annually the need to restate the previous years’
emissions figures to ensure comparability reflecting potential changes in the business. Sanoma’s targets are set for 2030, and
progress is tracked annually. Sanoma ensures the consistency of GHG emission reduction targets with GHG inventory
boundaries by using the GHG Protocol for emissions calculations and including all operations under financial control. Sanoma’s
emission reduction targets cover all relevant Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions categories. Inventory boundaries and GHG’s included
have been further described under E1-6.
Climate change adaptation
Sanoma tracks the effectiveness of its climate change adaptation actions related to the physical risks of climate change
through, for example, regular continuity and disaster recovery planning as well as insurance coverage reviews in its facilities.
To review the effectiveness of its measures related to transition risks, Sanoma conducts internal audits. In addition, Sanoma
tracks its stakeholders views related to its climate action.
Decarbonisation levers
Sanoma’s key decarbonisation levers include transitioning to fossil-free energy in own operations and supply chain, improving
energy and material efficiency, optimising the use of materials and cooperating with suppliers. The transition to fossil-free
energy reduces both own operations Scope 2 emissions and Scope 3 value chain emissions. Energy efficiency improvements
and the use of AI to optimise energy consumption can lead to further reductions in energy consumption in owned and leased
properties. Supplier engagement is also one of Sanoma’s decarbonisation levers. Encouraging suppliers to measure and
reduce their GHG emissions, particularly in the categories of purchased goods and services and transportation, enhances the
ability to reduce Sanoma’s Scope 3 emissions. In addition to supplier cooperation, Sanoma minimises material consumption,
analyses the carbon profiles of its materials usage and changes materials to reduce its emissions. Digitalisation will also
reduce Sanoma’s materials-related emissions.
Financial Statements 2025
76
E1-4-34 and AR 31 Science Based Targets initiative validated GHG emission reduction targets
Base year 2021,
tCO2-eq
Emissions in
reporting year 2025,
tCO 2-eq
Emissions
reduction in
reporting year
compared to 2021,
%
Emission reduction
2030 target, %
1.5 degree-aligned
pathway value 2030,
tCO 2 -eq
Scope 1 and Scope 2
market-based GHG
emissions
8,974
3,724
-59%
-42%
5,205
Scope 3 GHG emissions,
categories 1, 3 and 4
123,126
66,728
-46%
-38%
76,338
E1-4 AR 28 Cross-sector reduction pathway used to model targets
2030
2050
Cross-sector (ACA) reductions pathway based on the year 2020 as the reference year
-42%
-90%
Source: Based on Pathways to Net-zero – SBTi Technical Summary (Version 1.0, October 2021)
E1-4 MDR-T 80 Absolute value of GHG emission reductions
Absolute value of Greenhouse gas emissions reduction as of emissions of base year 2021
2025
2024
Total
-61,888
-45,015
Scope 1, own operations direct GHG emissions
-729
107
Scope 2, own operations market-based energy indirect GHG emissions
-4,522
-4,043
Scope 2, own operations location-based energy indirect GHG emissions
-5,818
-4,529
Scope 3, other indirect GHG emissions, all categories
-56,638
-41,079
E1-4 MDR-T 80 GHG emission reductions as %
% of Greenhouse gas emissions reduction as of emissions of base year 2021
2025
2024
Total
-38%
-30%
Scope 1, own operations direct GHG emissions
-20%
3%
Scope 2, own operations market-based energy indirect GHG emissions
-85%
-76%
Scope 2, own operations location-based energy indirect GHG emissions
-68%
-53%
Scope 3, other indirect GHG emissions, all categories
-37%
-29%
E1-5 Energy consumption and mix
Sanoma’s total energy consumption in 2025 was 39,586 MWh. The share of fossil-free energy in the overall energy mix was
70% (2024: 67%). The energy figures include the energy consumption of Sanoma’s owned, leased and employee‑benefit cars,
as well as the energy consumption of Sanoma’s owned and leased properties in operating countries. Sanoma’s energy data
has been collected from energy management systems and landlords. Cars energy use is estimated based on vehicle mileage.
Around 24% of energy and fuel consumption figures are based on estimates. Energy is classified as renewable or nuclear if
the origin of the purchased energy is either defined in contractual instruments or Guarantees of Origin are available to prove
the source. If the origin is unknown, the source is classified as fossil. Data related to self-generated solar energy has been
collected from energy management systems of Sanoma’s headquarters in Helsinki and printing house in Tampere with no
significant assumptions to disclose which would impact data coverage. Reported figures for energy production include the
energy that Sanoma has produced and consumed.
E1-5 AR 34 Energy and fuel consumption2
Energy consumption and mix
2025
2024
(1) Fuel consumption from coal and coal products (MWh)
0
0
(2) Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products (MWh)
9,402
12,264
(3) Fuel consumption from natural gas (MWh)
0
0
(4) Fuel consumption from other fossil sources (MWh)
0
0
(5) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from fossil sources (MWh)
2,548
3,232
(6) Total fossil energy consumption (MWh) (calculated as the sum of lines 1 to 5)
11,950
15,496
Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption (%)
30%
33%
(7) Consumption from nuclear sources (MWh)
16,722
18,482
Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption (%)
42%
39%
(8) Fuel consumption for renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste
of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) (MWh)
0
0
(9) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources (MWh)
10,403
13,318
(10) The consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy (MWh)
511
238
(11) Total renewable energy consumption (MWh) (calculated as the sum of lines 8 to 10)
10,914
13,556
Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption (%)
28%
29%
Total energy consumption (MWh) (calculated as the sum of lines 6, and 11)
39,586
47,534
E1-5-39 Renewable energy production
511
238
E1-5-39 Non-renewable energy production
0
40
Total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors (MWh)1
16,346
18,891
Energy intensity (total energy consumption per net revenue, MWh / EUR million) from activities in high climate
impact sectors1
69
75
1To determine energy intensity, Sanoma has reviewed the high climate impact sectors list of the EU Commissions Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288. Sanoma
had in 2025 two printing houses in Finland, which are classified under C18.1.1 Printing of newspapers. The net revenue from printing houses is disclosed under
Media Finland net sales category for print, which amounted EUR 236.4 million in 2025. For further details on the reconciliation, see section Report of the Board of
Directors, Media Finland.
2Reporting covers Sanoma‑owned, leased and employee free‑car benefit cars for 2024–2025.
Financial Statements 2025
77
E1-6 Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
Sanoma’s operations generate greenhouse gas emissions in our own operations (Scope 1 and 2) and value chain (Scope 3).
In 2025, Sanoma’s total market-based GHG emissions were 91,799 tCO2e. Sanoma’s own operations’ Scope 1 and 2 GHG
emissions represented 4% of our total GHG emissions in 2025. Value chain (Scope 3) emissions are the most significant
source of GHG emissions for Sanoma. In 2025, 96% of Sanoma’s total GHG emissions resulted from the value chain. In
Scope 1, no GHG emissions originate from regulated emission trading schemes.
E1-6 AR 48 Gross GHG emissions by categories
Gross GHG emissions categories
Retrospective
Milestones and target years1
Base year 2021
2024
2025
Change
2024-2025, %
2025
2030
(2050)
Annual %
Target / Base
year
Scope 1 GHG Emissions
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions (tCO2-eq)
3,658
3,765
2,917
-23%
2,975
2,122
n/a
4.6%
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (%)
0%
0%
0%
0%
Scope 2 GHG Emissions
Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2-eq)
8,547
4,018
2,741
-32%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2 -eq)
5,316
1,273
806
-37%
4,324
3,083
n/a
4.6%
Significant Scope 3 GHG emissions
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO2-eq)
139,463
98,384
88,075
-10%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1 Purchased goods and services
99,350
55,891
51,627
-8%
82,571
61,597
n/a
4.2%
2 Capital goods
3,438
4,539
3,763
-17%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3 Fuel and energy-related Activities (not included in Scope1 or Scope 2)
2,549
2,656
2,211
-17%
2,119
1,580
n/a
4.2%
4 Upstream transportation and distribution
21,227
16,188
12,890
-20%
17,642
13,161
n/a
4.2%
5 Waste generated in operations
183
317
259
-18%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
6 Business travel
1,009
1,266
1,195
-6%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
7 Employee commuting
1,287
4,266
4,313
1%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
11 Use of sold products
3,435
6,662
4,673
-30%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
12 End-of-life treatment of sold products
1,699
458
261
-43%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
15 Investments
5,286
6,143
6,884
12%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total GHG emissions
Total GHG emissions (location-based) (tCO2-eq)
151,668
106,168
93,734
-12%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total GHG emissions (market-based) (tCO2 -eq)
148,437
103,422
91,799
-11%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1 Milestones and targets have been derived from Sanoma’s absolute science-based targets for Scope 1 and 2 combined and Scope 3 categories 1, 3 and 4. The targets have been reported in the table as illustrative absolute emission targets for 2030. Sanoma has not set targets that extend to 2050.
Financial Statements 2025
78
E1-6 AR 54 GHG intensity based on net revenue
GHG intensity per net revenue
2025
2024
Baseline year
2021
Change
2024-2025, %
Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue
(CO2-eq/EUR million net sales1 )
72
79
121
-10%
Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue
(CO2 -eq/EUR million net sales 1)
70
77
119
-9%
1Sanoma uses net sales as the denominator in the calculation of the GHG intensity.
GHG emissions accounting principles
Sanoma reports greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol provided by the World
Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and World Resources Institute (WRI). Relevant GHG emissions
have been included in Sanoma’s calculations. Exclusions to Sanoma’s Scope 3 GHG emission categories follow the GHG
Protocol guidance and have been estimated using the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Evaluator tool. Following the GHG Protocol
requirements, greenhouse gases (GHGs) included into Sanoma’s inventory, if relevant, are carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane
(CH₄), nitrous oxide (N₂O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF₆) and nitrogen
trifluoride (NF₃). Following the GHG Protocol, these gases are required to be reported using their 100-year Global Warming
Potential (GWP) values.
During 2025, no significant changes were made to the scope of Sanoma’s GHG emissions reporting, which would impact year-
on-year comparability. Figures are reported as tCO2 equivalents. Sanoma calculates GHG emissions using an organisational
control of financial control. This means that Sanoma includes into the GHG inventory all operations that it has the ability to direct
via financial and operational policies with a view of gaining economic benefit. All companies in Sanoma Group with majority
ownership (over 50%) have been considered in the calculations. In addition, associated companies’ and joint ventures’ Scope 1
and 2 emissions have been reported under category 15.
Sanoma’s emission calculation model has been developed in cooperation with external partners. Sanoma uses the Workiva
tool to calculate its Scope 1, 2 and Scope 3, category 2, 3, 5 and 15 emissions. For Scope 3 categories 1, 4, 6, 7, 11 and 12
Sanoma uses a tool built using the Excel spreadsheets. Tools, emission factors and methods of collecting data are chosen to
ensure the best available and reliable sources. Methods of collecting GHG emission data both from Sanoma’s systems and
from suppliers are continuously improved. Sanoma’s disclosure and methodology aim to minimise assumptions and
limitations; however, certain estimates are applied where primary data is unavailable, in line with GHG protocol practices.
From Sanoma’s GHG inventory, an estimated 38% of Scope 3 is calculated using various estimation methods. Sanoma aims
to improve its data quality continuously in cooperation with suppliers. Sanoma uses FY 2021 as a base year for emission
reduction comparisons.
Own operations direct Scope 1 emissions:
Own operations direct (Scope 1) emissions include the use of owned and leased cars as well as reserve power mainly
used in printing houses. Data on fuel consumption for vehicles has been estimated based on vehicle mileage. Emission
sources include fuel consumption from owned and controlled vehicles and generators used for reserve power. Emissions
from rechargeable vehicles are reported under Scope 2 energy use. Sanoma has restated its Scope 1 emissions for the
years 2021–2025 to exclude rechargeable cars emissions from Scope 1. Emission factors used include road transport
emission factors from Defra GHG Conversion Factors and fuel emission factors from Statistics Finland. The Scope 1
calculation includes relevant greenhouse gases: CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, SF₆, HFCs and PFCs.
Own operations’ indirect Scope 2 emissions (location- and market-based):
Sanoma reports Scope 2 GHG emissions using both the location-based and market-based methods. The location-based
method quantifies Scope 2 GHG emissions based on average energy generation emission factors for defined locations,
including local, subnational, or national boundaries. The market-based method quantifies Scope 2 GHG emissions based
on GHG emissions emitted by the generators from which the reporting entity purchases Energy Attribute Certificates
(EACs).
Sanoma’s indirect own operations’ emissions result from energy used in printing houses, offices and warehouses, and
electric vehicles. Sanoma’s energy data has been collected from energy management systems and landlords, and data on
cars electricity use has been estimated based on vehicle mileage. Sanoma does not sell energy. The market-based
method accounts for the purchase of renewable energy certificates and other contractual instruments that attribute the use
of renewable energy to Sanoma’s operations. Sanoma uses EACs to claim the use of renewable or fossil-free energy.
Also, in some facilities agreements are made with utility providers to purchase electricity that is bundled with renewable
energy attributes. During 2025, Sanoma used contractual instruments for all of the purchase of fossil-free energy.
Emission factors used for Sanoma’s Scope 2 calculations include country-specific electricity averages and market-based
electricity emission factors. International heat and cooling emission factors are from country or supplier-specific databases.
Residual mix is used only in the market-based method. Sanoma follows the market-based method in its Scope 2
reductions. Location-based figures have been calculated using average country-specific emission factors.
Value chain indirect Scope 3 emissions:
Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions include the material-based greenhouse gas emissions of magazines
and textbooks printed in Sanoma’s own printing facilities and by printing partners, as well as the transport of paper from
the forest to the paper mill. The category also includes the energy and material consumption from suppliers’ magazine and
book production. The energy consumption of Sanoma’s own printing facilities is reported under scope 2. The category
further covers data use from cloud-based services, various services (consulting, marketing, freelancers, TV programme
production), as well as emissions from IT equipment. A data transfer–related line was removed from the 2024 emissions,
as it is already included in category 11. The category’s calculation is based on a hybrid method using supplier-specific
emission factors, Defra conversion factors, ecoinvent material-based emission factors, and Exiobase spend-based and
inflation-adjusted emission factors.
Category 2: Capital goods includes capital goods bought by the organisation (classified as CapEx in accounting):
properties renovations, equipment and new vehicles. Emission factors are spend-based emission factors from Exiobase.
Financial Statements 2025
79
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2) include upstream emissions of purchased
fuels, electricity and heating, and transmission and distribution (T&D) losses. Emission factors for upstream district heating
and fuel use are Well-to-tank (WTT) Defra GHG Conversion Factors. T&D losses for electricity is calculated using the
European Environmental Agency factors. For T&D losses of heating, EU averages have been used.
Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution includes all purchased transportation-related emissions. This
category includes emissions from vehicles and ships distributing materials to both owned printing houses and to printing
suppliers. This category also includes delivering products to customers in both businesses: in Learning, from printing
supplier to warehouse and warehouse to customers, and in Media Finland, newspapers from owned printing houses to
customers and magazines from printing supplier to warehouse and from warehouse to customer. The calculation method
is a mix of tonne-kilometre and distance-based method. Road and sea transport emission factors are supplier-specific or
from Defra GHG Conversion Factors.
Category 5: Waste generated in operations includes emissions from waste generated in own and controlled operations,
referring to Sanoma’s printing houses and owned and leased office properties and warehouses. The calculation method is
the waste-type specific method. Waste treatment emission factors are from Defra GHG Conversion Factors. For facilities
and warehouses with missing data, waste data has been evaluated based on amount of employees of floorspace used.
For waste emission calculations all estimated waste is categorised as mixed waste. The share of estimated data is 48%.
Category 6: Business travel includes emissions from travelling reported using data from travel claims and travel agency
data. The calculation method is a combination of the distance- and spend-based methods. Distance-based emission
factors are from Defra GHG Conversion Factors database and spend-based emission factors from Exiobase. There is a
minor below 3% exclusion in business travel emission calculation due to missing data.
Category 7: Employee commuting includes emissions calculated from employee travel patterns evaluated using headcount
data from each operating country. Emissions for working from home have not been included in the calculation, as
according to the GHG protocol guidance they are optional to calculate. Employee commuting emission factors are from
Defra GHG Conversion Factor.
Category 8: Upstream leased assets category is not relevant for Sanoma since it does not have relevant leased assets
that have not been reported under other categories. All leased facilities’ energy use is included in Scope 2 and leased
vehicles are calculated in Scope 1.
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution category is not relevant for Sanoma as all purchased
transportation emissions have been reported under category 4. Sanoma’s products and services do not create
transportation and distribution emissions after the point of sales.
Category 10: Processing of sold products. This category is not relevant since Sanoma does not sell intermediate products
that would require processing. The main products sold are books, newspapers, magazines and digital products.
Category 11: Use of sold products includes emissions from the digital use of products. Emissions are generated from the
transmissions of data, network use and consumer device use during the use phase of digital products (TV, radio, websites,
software applications). Emissions from data centre use are reported under category 1. Emissions from distribution of
broadcast television content are excluded from category 11. The total sum of this exclusion is estimated to account for
approx. 1% of Scope 3 emissions. Emission factors for upstream network use are from the Energy Agency (IEA) and
estimated data transfer from Traficom.
Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products includes emissions from the waste treatment of sold products:
newspapers, magazines, books and purchased packaging. The calculation method is a waste-type specific method. Waste
treatment emission factors are from Defra GHG Conversion Factors.
Category 13: Downstream leased assets category is not relevant since Sanoma does not have downstream leased assets.
Category 14: Franchises category is not relevant as Sanoma has no franchises.
Category 15: Investments include Scope 1 and 2 emissions of Sanoma’s associated companies and joint ventures.
Companies have been listed in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6.4. In 2025, the emission calculation was
restated to include the associate company Jakeluyhtiö Suomi Oy for 2024–2025. Emission factors are Exiobase spend-
based factors.
Biogenic emissions:
Scope 1 biogenic emissions include CO2 emissions from the biogenic share of fuels used in cars owned or leased by
Sanoma. Emissions have been estimated using the average share of biofuels in the regular mix of diesel and petrol. In
2025, the estimated biogenic emissions related to Scope 1 were 94 (2024: 133) tCO2-eq.
Scope 2 biogenic emissions are indirect emissions from the purchase of electricity, heat, or cooling derived from biomass
and biofuels. Emissions have been estimated using the average location-based energy production mix data in owned and
leased properties controlled by Sanoma. In 2025, the estimated biogenic emissions related to Scope 2 were 2,702 (2024:
3,032) tCO2-eq.
In Scope 3, categories 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 include estimated biogenic emissions related to biomass and biofuels. In 2025, the
estimated biogenic emissions related to Scope 3 were estimated to be 3,075 (2024: 3,309) tCO2-eq.
Biogenic emissions have been reported separately from fossil GHG emissions and include emissions only from biogenic
CO2. Emission factors for biogenic emissions calculations are from Defra GHG Conversion Factors, Association of Issuing
Bodies (AIB), National Statistic Finland used for the biogenic emissions calculations.
GHG intensity based on net revenue:
GHG emission intensity has been calculated based on Sanoma’s net sales which amounted to EUR 1,302.5 million in
2025, as reconciliated in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2.2.
E1-7 GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
In addition to the science-based emission reduction targets, Sanoma aims to be carbon neutral in all operations by 2030. This
means that in 2030, Sanoma’s aim is to compensate emissions that cannot be avoided or reduced.
Financial Statements 2025
80
ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems
SANOMA_pallot-02.svg
E4-1
Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
E4-2
Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems
E4-3
Actions and resources in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems
E4-4
Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Strategy
E4-1 Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model
Sanoma’s biodiversity actions focus on three angles: minimising the biodiversity impacts of paper procurement through the
use of certified paper and/or paper made of the certified fibre, managing biodiversity and paper-related risks, and, as climate
change is a significant driver of biodiversity, through Sanoma’s climate transition plan described under E1-1.
Sanoma evaluates its current business model to be resilient in regards to impacts and risks related to biodiversity. As a sizeable
paper purchaser, Sanoma is responsible for protecting biodiversity and promoting the responsible use of forest resources. As
paper production can lead to biodiversity loss due to deforestation, Sanoma prefers the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or
the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) certified paper in its sourcing to guarantee the certified,
transparent and legal origin of the paper used. Risks related to biodiversity and paper sourcing include the availability of
certified paper and the potential financial impacts caused by increased commodity prices. Sanoma has several measures in
place to mitigate the biodiversity-related risks. Sanoma updates its procurement strategy on an annual basis and evaluates the
potential impacts of costs and availability of paper on the market. Potential risks are also followed and mitigated through annual
negotiations with suppliers conducted by the Procurement team. The risk of potentially rising paper prices is mitigated by
diversifying the paper supply. The risk is closely monitored, in particular for newsprint paper, as Media Finland is dependent on
certain suppliers. To mitigate the dependency on paper, Sanoma has invested in the transition to digital.
Sanoma’s analysis of the resilience of its business in relation to biodiversity covers the identification and assessment of
impacts, risks and opportunities, as well as the definition, implementation and monitoring of related risk‑management
activities. To manage environmental impacts, risks and opportunities, Sanoma annually evaluates climate‑ and
biodiversity‑related impacts, risks and opportunities. During 2025, the evaluation was conducted as part of the double
materiality assessment process. It covered direct operations as well as the upstream and downstream value chain and
assumed that Sanoma’s business areas and targets remain unchanged. The evaluation focused on upstream tier 1 suppliers,
but when analysing for example the suppliers’ ability to reduce emissions, tier 2 suppliers were also reviewed. The evaluation
was performed by the Sustainability and Procurement teams and included both qualitative and quantitative aspects, and input
from other internal teams was also collected.
In its resilience analysis, Sanoma has applied the same financial thresholds and time horizons as in its double materiality
process as described under ESRS 2 BP-2. Further details about the double materiality assessment are found under ESRS 2
SBM-3. The reporting of potential risks and opportunities follows Sanoma’s sustainability management model described under
ESRS 2 GOV-2. Sanoma’s resilience analysis did not include systemic or physical biodiversity risks or ecosystem risks. Going
forward, Sanoma aims to expand its risks assessment. During 2025, Sanoma cooperated with several stakeholders in regards
to biodiversity topics. These included paper and print suppliers, NGOs, FSC and PEFC certification collaborators as well as
local authorities responsible for the implementation of the regulation.
SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
No own direct impacts from operative operations or material sites from a biodiversity point of view were identified, and
therefore there were no material sites with impacts on threatened species. As a result, there were no significant negative
impacts from own operations to land degradation, desertification or soil sealing. Upstream value chain impacts have been
identified by analysing typical impacts of paper production and sourcing. These impacts have been disclosed under E5
Resource use and circular economy.
Financial Statements 2025
81
Impact, risk and opportunity management
E4-2 Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems
In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage its impacts and risks related to biodiversity
and ecosystems. The key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the policies are presented in
the table ‘Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to biodiversity and ecosystems’. In general,
Sanoma’s environmental commitments and policies are described under E1-2, and resource-use in more detail under E5-1.
Sanoma’s Environmental Standard addresses the contribution to impact drivers on biodiversity loss, such as climate change
and pollution. Sanoma does not have own sites near biodiversity sensitive areas or relevant own operations in regards to
direct exploitation, land-use change, sea-use change, invasive alien species, freshwater-use, agriculture, sustainable oceans
or seas practices. With the exception of land-use change, Sanoma has not adopted policies to manage these topics.
Based on Sanoma’s procurement rules embedded into the SCoC, including commitments to deforestation-free products, the
violations or concerns of non-compliance with Sanoma’s policies and standards are advised to be reported to Sanoma through
anonymous grievance channels. Sanoma’s Whistleblowing channel is available in several languages relevant for Sanoma’s
operations. Sanoma reserves the right to cancel orders, suspend orders and/or terminate its contract with a supplier in the
event of a material breach of the SCoC and withhold payment for non-confirmatory products or services.
Sanoma has identified certain dependencies, which relate to the availability of paper and certified paper, posing a risk to
Sanoma’s operations. Sanoma’s Environmental Standard and Paper Procurement Standard prefer the use of certified paper
and /or certified fibre, impacting this dependency. At the same time, these policies support in reducing biodiversity-related
impacts and risks, such as weakening customer demand due to non-sustainable products.
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Environmental
Standard
Key content described in E1-2. From a biodiversity perspective, it addresses climate
change through science-based emission reduction pathways and minimising pollution
with environmental management standards, such as ISO 14001. It aims to mitigate
land-use change by promoting sustainable material use and responsible procurement.
Additionally, it supports biodiversity and protects species populations by reducing
environmental impacts. Sanoma supports ecosystem conditions through the efficient
use of materials and responsible procurement, acknowledging dependencies on
ecosystem services and aiming to mitigate negative impacts. Through the standard,
Sanoma commits to protecting biodiversity, promoting the responsible use of forest
resources, and aims to ensure its products are deforestation-free and do not cause
forest degradation, aligned with relevant EU regulation. Sanoma aim’s to use only paper
produced responsibly and originating from traceable, legal and verified sources. Paper
certification schemes, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the
Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), provide standards and
guidelines for sustainable forest management, promote traceability and help verify that
the wood used in paper production comes from certified and legal sources, reducing the
risk of illegal logging and associated deforestation. These certifications encourage
responsible practices that prioritise biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation,
and the rights of indigenous communities. Paper certification involves audits and
assessments to ensure compliance with sustainable management practices.
All own
operations
Procurement for
implementation.
President and
CEO approves
the standard.
UN Global Compact, UN Ten Principles, Rio Declaration on
Environment and Development, European Climate Pact, Task-
Force on Climate-Related Disclosure (TCFD), Science Based
Targets initiative (SBTi), FSC and PEFC certifications, the ISO
14001 environmental management system for own printing
houses
Stakeholders’ views were taken
into consideration in both
standard setting by analysing
insights received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees
Publicly available on
company website
All E4-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Paper
Procurement
Standard
The Paper Procurement Standard is a part of Sanoma’s paper supplier agreements and
supports in managing biodiversity-related impacts and risks. It sets requirements
towards paper suppliers on the use of certified paper and certified fibre. In-line with the
standard, forest-related risks are evaluated and mitigated as part of annual negotiations
with the suppliers by the Procurement team. In this evaluation, short-, medium- and
long-term forest-related risks are evaluated, and suppliers report on their FSC or PEFC
certifications and other sustainability efforts.
A standard
part of
Sanoma’s
paper
supplier
agreements
Procurement for
implementation
and approval
UN Global Compact, UN Ten Principles, Rio Declaration on
Environment and Development, European Climate Pact, Task-
Force on Climate-Related Disclosure (TCFD), Science Based
Targets initiative (SBTi), FSC and PEFC certifications, the ISO
14001 environmental management system for own printing
houses
Views of suppliers, customers
and employees were taken into
consideration when establishing
the Paper Procurement
Standard
Internally available
and also made
available to
potentially affected
stakeholders, such
as suppliers, through
their contracts
All E4-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Financial Statements 2025
82
E4-3 Actions and resources in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems
Sanoma’s key actions to mitigate its biodiversity impacts related to the use of paper are continuous and include implementing
sourcing requirements, improving data collection and traceability related to paper sourcing and cooperating with the suppliers.
In its newspapers, magazines and books, Sanoma prefers paper originating from certified and sustainably managed forests,
i.e., from traceable, verified and legal sources. As part of the annual negotiations with the suppliers, information on the
certification of the paper is evaluated. Sanoma collects information on the certification of paper from its suppliers via its
purchase order system. Sanoma also checks supplier information via national tools and databases, research institutes and the
FSC and PEFC registries. Sanoma currently traces and monitors the certification of the purchased paper from its tier 1 and 2
suppliers. All described actions related to paper sourcing increase traceability.
Sanoma’s key actions to mitigate risks related to paper use and biodiversity are also continuous. Sanoma updates its
Procurement strategy on an annual basis and evaluates potential market risks related to the costs and availability of paper.
Potential risks are followed and mitigated through the negotiations with suppliers. The risk of potentially rising paper prices is
mitigated by diversifying paper supply. The risk is closely followed, in particular, for newsprint paper, as Media Finland is
dependent on certain suppliers. To mitigate the dependency on paper, Sanoma has invested in the transition to digital media.
Sanoma continuously develops its due diligence systems to ensure tracing of the origin of the paper-fibre used in its products.
The scope of actions related to biodiversity covers Sanoma’s own operations and upstream value chain, with the actions
applying to all paper and print suppliers in all sourcing countries. As actions are considered to be continuous, there are no time
horizons to disclose. Sanoma does not use offsets or compensation in relation to its biodiversity impacts. PEFC and FSC
paper use includes ensuring that local and indigenous knowledge is respected and taken into consideration, but no direct
engagement or knowledge integration has taken place. No nature-based solutions are incorporated into Sanoma’s actions.
Metrics and targets
E4-4 Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Sanoma has not set ESRS-aligned measurable time-bound outcome-oriented biodiversity-related targets, and therefore targets
are not aligned with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and EU biodiversity strategy for 2030. Sanoma aims
to further develop its biodiversity targets going forward. Sanoma tracks the effectiveness of its biodiversity-related policy
implementation through monitoring of paper-related GHG emissions, as disclosed under E1-4, and of paper usage and share of
paper certification, as disclosed under E5-3 and E5-4. These can be allocated to the mitigation layers of avoidance and
minimisation in the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy. As Sanoma’s impacts occur through the upstream value chain, no ecological
thresholds and allocation of impacts to the undertaking have been applied in the monitoring of the effectiveness of the policy
implementation. Biodiversity offsets were not used in the target setting. External stakeholders were not involved in the target
setting.
Financial Statements 2025
83
ESRS E5 Resource use and circular economy
SANOMA_pallot-03.svg
E5-1
Policies related to resource use and circular economy
E5-2
Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy
E5-3
Targets related to resource use and circular economy
E5-4
Resource inflows
E5-5
Resource outflows
Impact, risk and opportunity management
E5-1 Policies related to resource use and circular economy
Sanoma’s environmental commitments and policies in general are described under E1-2, including the scope of the
Environmental Standard. In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage its impacts related
to resource use and circular economy. The key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the
policies are presented in the table ‘Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to resource use and
circular economy’.
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to resource use and circular economy
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Availability
Related IRO
Environmental
Standard
Key content described in E1-2. From a resource use perspective, it outlines
Sanoma’s commitment to using natural resources efficiently. It addresses the
transitioning away from the use of virgin resources, sustainable sourcing by
promoting the use of recycled materials and renewable sources and taking
environmental aspects into consideration throughout the life-cycle of the
product. The objectives are achieved through responsible procurement
practices, efficient operations and product development. Sanoma commits to
optimising the consumption of materials, such as paper, printing inks and
printing plates, to recycling the materials used and to measuring and
minimising waste generated in its printing houses, facilities and warehouses.
According to the standard, Sanoma aims to minimise the use of plastics in its
products. In products, where plastics are used, Sanoma aims to use recyclable
plastics, which do not originate from virgin sources. Sanoma also commits to
pollution prevention and identifying and managing chemicals and other
materials posing a hazard if released to the environment by ensuring their safe
handling, movement, storage, recycling or reuse, and disposal. In addition to
SCoC, the Environmental Standard specifies requirements for sustainable
sourcing, such as the use of certified paper.
All own
operations
Procurement for implementation.
President and CEO approves the
standard.
UN Global Compact, UN Ten Principles, Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development,
European Climate Pact, Task-Force on Climate-
Related Disclosure (TCFD), Science Based Targets
initiative (SBTi), FSC and PEFC certifications, the
ISO 14001 environmental management system for
own printing houses
Publicly available on company
website
All E5-related IROs presented in the table
in section ESRS 2 SBM-3
Financial Statements 2025
84
E5-2 Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy
Resource inflows
Sanoma’s key actions to manage resource use-related impacts relate to the use of paper in Sanoma’s products. The scope of
these actions is Sanoma’s upstream value chain and most of the actions are continuous. Sanoma engages with its paper and
print suppliers to ensure the use of certified paper and/or fibre. These actions are described under E4-3, as paper or fibre
certification is closely connected to the management of Sanoma’s biodiversity impacts. In addition to the management of
impacts related to the use of certified materials, Sanoma is committed to using natural resources efficiently and aims to
optimise resource use, for example by minimising paper weights in its products. This is done by systematic monitoring and
forecasting of paper consumption in products printed by printing suppliers to avoid unnecessary paper consumption. During
the printing process in its own newspaper printing houses, Sanoma optimises the consumption of materials, such as paper,
inks and printing plates, and recycles the materials used. The share of paper waste during the printing process is monitored
closely and is linked to the short-term incentives for the printing house employees.
Resource outflows, Waste
Key actions to manage waste-related impacts in Sanoma’s printing houses, facilities and warehouses include continuously
minimising the waste generated by monitoring waste generation, ensuring with waste treatment partners that waste is recycled
or reused as well as training employees on waste treatment topics. In Sanoma’s facilities and warehouses, waste minimisation
is part of the ongoing environmental work and several of the facilities that Sanoma leases have a certification for
environmental management systems. In Sanoma’s printing houses, environmental management is certified with the ISO
14001 management system. Sanoma’s headquarters in Finland, and the offices in Norway and Poland are Breeam-certified.
Facilities used in the Netherlands (Iddink) and Italy (Sanoma Italy) also hold ISO 14001 certifications.
Metrics and targets
E5-3 Targets related to resource use and circular economy
Sanoma tracks the effectiveness of the policy implementation and measures taken related to resource use, paper or fibre
certification and waste management as described below. Sanoma does not have ESRS-aligned measurable time-bound or
outcome-oriented targets related to resource use, and does not have plans to implement such targets.
Resource inflows
To measure the effectiveness of its policies and action plans, Sanoma monitors and measures the share of certified paper or
fibre used in its newspapers, magazines and books. Sanoma’s aim is to use only wood fibre that is produced responsibly and
originating from traceable, legal and verified FSC and/or PEFC sources. In 2025, the share of certified fibre in paper used in
Sanoma’s products was 100%. In addition, to measure the effectiveness of its policies and action plans to manage both
biodiversity impacts as well as resource use impacts, Sanoma monitors the amount of materials, such as paper bought and
used. Sanoma is committed to using natural resources efficiently and thus minimises the use of primary raw materials.
Resource outflows, Waste
With efficient waste management, Sanoma aims to minimise waste generated in its printing houses, facilities and warehouses.
E5-4 Resource inflows
Sanoma’s resource inflows cover its printed products, such as newspapers, magazines and books. The key materials are the
paper, printing inks, printing plates, wetting additives and washing solvents used in the production, which Sanoma reports for
its own operations, i.e., for the two printing houses it owns in Finland. In addition, Sanoma purchases paper, which is delivered
to upstream value chain printing partners, who then produce Sanoma’s books and magazines. In 2025, Sanoma purchased
37,504 tonnes of paper for its newspapers, magazines and books. Monitoring the volume of paper helps to decrease not only
the resource use impacts, but also biodiversity and climate-related impacts associated with paper consumption. Throughout its
own operations and the upstream value chain, Sanoma aims to use paper fibre which originates from trusted, PEFC or FSC
certified sources. Sanoma monitors the share of certified paper and fibre used in its own operations for newspapers and
bought for magazines and books printed by printing suppliers. During 2025, the share of certified fibre in paper was 100%.
E5-4-30 Paper bought and used for products and share of certified paper fibre
Metric used to evaluate progress
2025
2024
Overall total weight of paper used by Sanoma for own printing houses (newspapers) and for printed
products production (magazines and books), tonnes
37,504
43,430
Share of certified paper fibre in paper bought %
100%
98%
Reporting follows Sanoma’s financial accounting rules. Data covers paper purchased and used by Sanoma, based on suppliers’ direct measurements
with no significant assumptions. Certified fibre data comes from suppliers. 3% is estimated using a weighted average. The share of certified paper is
calculated against the total paper weight used in the period.
E5-4-31 Materials used in own operations
Metric used to evaluate progress
2025
2024
Overall total weight of materials used by Sanoma in own operations
Paper, tonnes
19,882
24,644
Printing plates, tonnes
151
148
Printing inks, tonnes
392
557
Wetting additive, tonnes
39
50
Washing solvents, tonnes
24
28
Percentage of biological materials used that are sustainably sourced by Sanoma in own operations
Share of certified paper used in own operations %
100%
100%
Recycled and reused materials used by Sanoma in own operations
Total weight of recycled and reused materials used, tonnes
0
0
Share of recycled and reused materials used %
0%
0%
The reporting follows Sanoma’s financial accounting rules. Materials consumption data originates from Sanoma’s newspaper printing houses’ production
systems. Certification data originates from paper suppliers as part of invoicing. The denominator for the share of certified paper used is the overall total
weight of paper used in own printing houses during the reporting period. Paper is the only biological material used by Sanoma. No technical materials are
used in Sanoma’s own operations. No significant assumptions are used for the metric.
Financial Statements 2025
85
E5-5 Resource outflows
Waste
Sanoma’s printing houses, facilities and warehouses generated 5,211 tonnes of waste in 2025. Recycled and reused waste
accounts for 70% (2024: 72%) of Sanoma’s waste. Sanoma’s own printing houses in Finland produce newspapers. Relevant
waste streams and materials presented as waste include paper waste generated from the production of newspapers, metal
waste from printing plates (used in the printing process and reused by partners after use), inks and solvents as residuals from
the printing process as well as general office and warehouse waste. Sanoma monitors closely the amount of waste types in its
printing houses where the majority of waste is generated. Sanoma’s printing houses use the ISO 14001 for environmental
management, including waste management. In addition to printing houses, Sanoma leases facilities and warehouses, in which
mainly general office and packaging waste is generated. Waste management is part of each facility’s environmental
management system. In Finland, Sanoma’s headquarters and facilities in Norway and Poland are Breeam-certified. Facilities
in the Netherlands (Iddink) and Italy (Sanoma Italy) hold ISO 14001 certifications.
Sanoma evaluates waste impacts by reporting waste generated in its facilities, warehouses and two owned printing houses in
Finland, with no material identified risks or opportunities related to waste. Sanoma uses a combination of direct measurement
and estimation methods (48% of data based on estimates) to calculate waste data. This includes weighing waste in printing
houses, using data provided by waste management suppliers and estimating waste quantities based on floor space and the
number of employees using the facility. Waste data estimations include estimating the amount of waste by using Statistics
Finland data and estimations on waste treatment type as based on Eurostat Waste Statistics. No radioactive waste is
generated in Sanoma’s printing houses, facilities or warehouses.
E5-5 37 a–d Waste by type and disposal method
Waste by type and disposal method, tonnes
2025
2024
Total amount of waste generated
5,211
6,579
Total amount of waste directed to disposal
1,212
1,460
Total amount of waste diverted from disposal
3,999
5,119
Non-hazardous waste, Directed to disposal
1,017
1,377
by incineration
21
17
by landfilling
798
1,084
by other disposal operations
197
276
Non-hazardous waste, Diverted from disposal
3,940
4,901
due to preparation for reuse
157
220
due to recycling
3,615
4,655
due to other recovery operations
168
26
Total - Non-hazardous waste
4,957
6,278
Hazardous waste, Directed to disposal
196
83
by incineration
6
9
by landfilling
24
34
by other disposal operations
165
39
Hazardous waste, Diverted from disposal
58
218
due to preparation for reuse
0
24
due to recycling
49
110
due to other recovery operations
10
84
Total - Hazardous waste
254
301
Non-recycled waste
1,547
1,815
Percentage of non-recycled waste %
30%
28%
Financial Statements 2025
86
Social information
ESRS S1 Own workforce
SANOMA_pallot-04.svg
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model
S1-1
Policies related to own workforce
S1-2
Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers’ representatives about impacts
S1-3
Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns
S1-4
Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and
pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
S1-5
Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing
material risks and opportunities
S1-6
Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees
S1-8
Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
S1-9
Diversity metrics
S1-10
Adequate wages
S1-11
Social protection
S1-13
Trainings and performance development metrics
S1-14
Health and safety metrics
S1-15
Work-life balance metrics
S1-16
Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)
S1-17
Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impact
Strategy
SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model
Sanoma’s actual and potential impacts to its own workforce originate from the Company’s business model and strategy. In its
double materiality assessment, Sanoma identified actual or potential positive impacts on its employees through providing
secure employment, paying adequate wages, providing trainings and skills development, promoting gender equality and
diversity as well as supporting the rights to freedom of association, collective bargaining and social dialogue. Sanoma
acknowledges that the successful implementation of its strategy and business model depends on having and retaining skilled
and engaged management and employees, and on their competencies in developing appealing products and services in
accordance with customer needs. Sanoma is committed in investing in the development of people’s talent and skills,
cultivating a collaborative culture, and keeping Sanoma values as an integral part of the way-of-working. Through actions that
focus on fostering an inclusive and people-centric culture, Sanoma aims to ensure continuous improvement in employee
engagement and satisfaction.
In addition, Sanoma identified actual or potential negative impacts related to work-life balance, health and safety, harassment
as well as privacy and security of employee data. Impacts are not considered to be systemic, but rather individual matters.
Sanoma continuously develops the working conditions, wellbeing and employee data privacy related to its own workforce.
These impacts apply to Sanoma’s own operations, and cover all employees and employment arrangements in all operating
countries. Sanoma does not have own operations which are at significant risk of forced labour or child labour. The actual and
potential impacts related to own workforce are taken into account in Sanoma’s strategic development. Sanoma utilises the
annual Employee Engagement Survey and other surveys to identify trends and issues impacting its own workforce, and the
results serve as the base for action planning. Sanoma gains insight into the perspectives of potentially vulnerable or
marginalised groups within its workforce particularly through the Diversity and Inclusion Survey.
Impact, risk and opportunity management
S1-1 Policies related to own workforce
In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage its impacts related to its own workforce. The
key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the policies are presented in the table ‘Policies
adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to own workforce’. Relevant parts from each policy are embedded
into Sanoma’s annual Code of Conduct refresher training which is mandatory for all employees.
Financial Statements 2025
87
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to own workforce
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Code of
Conduct
Key content described in G1-1. From an own workforce perspective, the
policy emphasises Sanoma’s commitment to fostering a people-centric and
inclusive culture ensuring equal opportunities for all employees, irrespective
of personal circumstances, and the zero tolerance for discrimination,
harassment, or bullying. The policy highlights the importance of employee
wellbeing, health, and safety, and respects employees’ data privacy and their
rights to collective bargaining.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Legal for
implementation. Board of
Directors approve the
policy.
The Ten principles of the UN Global
Compact, the UN Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights, the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
the OECD Guidelines on Multinational
Enterprises and ILO’s Declaration on
Fundamental Principles and Rights at
Work
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Publicly available on
company website
All S1-related IROs presented in the
table in section ESRS 2 SBM-3,
except for training and skills
development
Sustainability
and Human
Rights Policy
Outlines Sanoma’s sustainability-related principles and summarises the core
commitments and sustainability due diligence process. From an own
workforce perspective, it emphasises Sanoma’s commitment to promoting
equality, diversity, and inclusion within its workforce. The policy outlines a
zero-tolerance stance on harassment and highlights the importance of
providing an inspiring workplace with opportunities for employee
development. Additionally, it underscores the significance of wellbeing and
ethical standards in human resources practices. The policy also includes a
due diligence process to identify, prevent, and mitigate negative impacts on
people and the environment, ensuring that employees are aware of and
comply with these principles.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Sustainability for
implementation. Board of
Directors approve the
policy.
The UN Global Compact (UNGC), The
UN Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights, The Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (UDHR), The
International Labour Organization’s (ILO)
Declaration on Fundamental Principles
and Rights at Work, The OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises,
The Rio Declaration on Environment and
Development
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
in both policy setting by
analysing insights
received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees
Publicly available on
company website
All S1-related IROs presented in the
table in section ESRS 2 SBM-3,
except for training and skills
development
People Policy
Outlines Sanoma’s commitment to creating an inclusive and respectful
working environment for all employees. It encompasses the guidelines that
serve as the basis for people management at Sanoma, in alignment with the
CoC, the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy commitments and
corporate values. It emphasises the importance of diversity, equal
opportunities, and adherence to human rights and international labour
standards. The policy covers people priorities, human rights, diversity and
inclusion, occupational health and safety and wellbeing, rewards and
recognition, recruitment and career opportunities, professional development,
performance management, employee engagement as well as disciplinary
practices. It also sets the framework for a well-organised management of
occupational health and safety, equal treatment, non-discrimination and
mental and physical wellbeing of its own employees.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
HR for implementation.
Board of Directors
approve the policy.
Core conventions of the International
Labour Organization (ILO) and is a
signatory of the UN Global Compact
(UNGC), UN Guiding Principles
The policy considers,
among others,
sustainability, legal and
HR perspectives. The
perspective of
employees is considered
via the channels
established for
engagement with its own
workforce and described
in S1-2.
Publicly available on
company website
All S1-related IROs presented in the
table in section ESRS 2 SBM-3. The
impacts on employment security,
social dialogue and privacy of own
workforce are covered indirectly
through the human rights-related
commitments of the policy.
Diversity and
Inclusion Policy
Sets the ambition for a diverse and inclusive workplace with fair treatment
and equal opportunities, non-discrimination, equal pay for equal roles, and
gender-neutral experience. The content of the policy has been embedded
into the People Policy.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
HR for implementation.
President and CEO
approves the standard.
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Publicly available on
company website
Sanoma promotes diversity and
gender equality to create a culture of
inclusion, where all employees can
feel involved, accepted, and valued
regardless of their differences and
social identity
Anti-
Harassment
Standard
Aims to ensure a safe and respectful working environment by prohibiting all
forms of harassment, including sexual harassment, bullying, and
discrimination. It outlines the process for reporting and investigating
harassment cases, emphasising confidentiality and non-retaliation.
All Sanoma employees,
Board members,
freelancers, consultants,
and suppliers
HR for implementation.
President and CEO
approves the standard.
Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Internally available to all
Sanoma employees
Despite preventive measures, some
incidents of discrimination, including
harassment, have been reported
Financial Statements 2025
88
Human rights policy commitments
As a signatory of the UN Global Compact (UNGC), Sanoma recognises the importance of the Agenda 2030 and UN
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and adheres to the UN Guiding Principles. In relation to impacts on its own
workforce, Sanoma commits to the Ten Principles related to fundamental responsibilities in human rights, labour, environment
and anti-corruption. The Sustainability and Human Rights Policy is aligned with internationally recognised instruments, such as
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental
Principles and Rights at Work and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Human trafficking, forced labour,
compulsory labour and child labour are addressed in these commitments.
Sanoma aims to identify, prevent and mitigate potential and actual negative impacts on people. These include social impacts
connected with Sanoma’s own operations as well as its upstream and downstream value chain through its products, services
or business relationships. The due diligence process is defined in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
The right to effective remedy is a fundamental element of the international human rights system. Following its human rights
commitments, Sanoma implements a remediation process to address adverse human rights impacts its operations cause or
contribute to. Further details are available under S1-3.
Sanoma’s People Policy aims to provide a common understanding of people guiding principles. However, there may be
country-specific rules based on applicable country legislation, collective agreements and practices. In addition, Sanoma has
local Occupational Health & Safety (OH&S) management systems that help identify and mitigate workplace risks.
Elimination of discrimination and promoting equal opportunities
All policies related to its own workforce are aimed at preventing discrimination, promoting diversity, and fostering an inclusive
workplace.
Sanoma is committed to creating a working environment and culture that inspires employees, values their diversity, embraces
their views and respects their individual rights. In its People Policy, Sanoma outlines that it has zero tolerance for any form of
discrimination, harassment (including sexual harassment) or bullying in the workplace. Sanoma is committed to ensure equal
opportunities for all, valuing diversity and creating a culture of inclusion. Diversity is found in any social identity, such as
gender identity, sex, age, national extraction, race, ethnicity, colour, physical and mental abilities or disabilities, religion,
political opinions, sexual orientation, social origin and other attributes covered by the EU and national regulations. Sanoma
does not tolerate discrimination based on any attributes. In its Diversity and Inclusion Policy, and People Policy, Sanoma
outlines that it aims to recognise people from groups at particular risk of vulnerability in its own workforce, and take positive
action to enhance the inclusion of these groups. Equal treatment of all individuals and the promotion of equity in working life is
an integral part of sustainability at Sanoma.
In addition to the policies being included in the annual trainings and made available through internal channels, Sanoma
monitors the implementation of its policies through surveys, such as the annual Employee Engagement Survey and Diversity
and Inclusion Survey that was last carried out in 2024. Sanoma has also updated its recruitment process to ensure diversity,
equity and inclusion. In internal communications, employees are reminded of the policies in the relevant context, such as zero
tolerance regarding harassment and reporting channels.
Sanoma has clear procedures for addressing grievances. Employees are encouraged to report incidents through multiple
channels, including a Whistleblowing channel, hosted by a third party ensuring a confidential process and protection against
retaliation. All reported incidents are documented, investigated, and overseen by the Audit Committee to ensure accountability. In
addition, Sanoma monitors the incidents and addresses potential trends proactively to maintain a safe and supportive work
culture.
S1-2 Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers’ representatives about impacts
Sanoma is committed to creating an environment where its employees feel valued, motivated and committed to contributing
towards shared goals. Sanoma seeks feedback from its employees regularly to understand their needs and preferences, using
this information to manage the impacts related to its own workforce.
In general, Sanoma’s due diligence process follows the definitions in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and is described in the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy.
From the own workforce point of view, due diligence is embedded into governance, strategy and the business model through
the policies described in S1-1.
To engage with its own workforce, Sanoma has regular and structured communications channels in place, such as internal
communications channels and quarterly updates. In addition, both strategic business units (SBUs) have their own established
channels for direct engagement with employees. Engagement types are diverse and vary in frequency, ranging from
continuous communications to annual or quarterly organised events. This structured, multifaceted approach allows Sanoma to
maintain a dynamic and responsive engagement framework. Annual performance and development reviews are also utilised
for engagement with employees.
Learning organises annually the Share Views Week, an online event providing employees an opportunity to connect and
exchange ideas in interactive sessions across the SBU and to hear the latest updates on the Company’s strategy. In addition,
in 2025 invitations to the monthly SL Connects online events were extended to all Learning employees. If needed, Learning
also forms topic-specific working groups.
Media Finland organises annually a strategy communications session and quarterly status updates to all employees with the
opportunity to interact. Employees can also ask questions from the CEO of Media Finland in “Three questions” interviews that
are regularly broadcast to the entire personnel. In addition, a monthly communications package is offered to managers to help
them engage with their teams, and weekly newsletters are sent to all employees.
Regular Employee Engagement Surveys (EES) are key tools to identify and assess potential and actual impacts, risks and
opportunities as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of engagement related to Sanoma’s own workforce. The survey results
are analysed on unit and SBU levels. In addition, Sanoma utilises unit or topic-specific pulse surveys to gain more detailed
insights and trends. Sanoma also has targets related to gender balance and progress against those targets is also monitored
annually. The results of these surveys are used to plan actions to address actual and potential negative impacts. Actions are
described in S1-4, and the latest results are available in the S1-Entity specific metric related to the EES survey at the end of
the S1 section.
Financial Statements 2025
89
The effectiveness of actions are tracked through the above mentioned surveys as well as through regular performance and
development reviews. Sanoma has implemented procedures to ensure that complaints and grievances are handled in a
neutral way. Employees are encouraged to report their concerns in confidentiality through Sanoma’s reporting channels such
as directly to their managers, Human Resources, or through the anonymous Whistleblowing channel. Incidents are reported
internally quarterly, and externally annually.
Sanoma respects its employees’ right to join trade unions. Freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to
collective bargaining are included in the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and
Rights at Work, which Sanoma commits to. Both SBUs conduct regular, quarterly meetings with the personnel representatives.
Personnel representatives are informed in advance of any relevant change initiatives and negotiated with, if needed. In
addition, there are established forums to ensure personnel representation: Media Finland’s employee advisory board,
European Working Council for the whole of Sanoma and administrative representation in unit management teams.
The most senior role that has operational responsibility for the engagement with Sanoma’s own workforce is the Chief Human
Resources Officer, and the functions with operational responsibility are Human Resources and Communications in both SBUs.
Gaining insights into perspectives of people in its own workforce who may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/
or marginalised
Sanoma has established practices to gain insights into the perspectives of potentially vulnerable or marginalised groups within
its workforce. Sanoma carried out a Group-wide DE&I survey in 2024 to better understand minority groups’ perspectives, and
those results were used to plan actions in 2025. In addition, sexual and gender minorities’ experiences were separately
highlighted on the International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia (IDAHOT) and during Pride season.
Sanoma has encouraged personnel to establish minority personnel representative groups. In Learning, the work around the
five pillars of DE&I, Culture & Heritage, Disability & Neurodiversity, Gender, Generations, and LGBTQ+, continued.
In addition, Sanoma utilises the annual EES survey to identify trends and issues impacting specific vulnerable or marginalised
groups. Other practices that may provide insights are exit interviews that may reveal unique challenges or barriers faced by
employees and thus help to understand what aspects of the work environment may disproportionately impact marginalised
employees and where further support or improvements are needed.
S1-3 Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns
Aligned with Sanoma’s Sustainability and Human Rights Policy, the right to effective remedy is a fundamental element of the
international human rights system. Sanoma has a remediation process to address adverse human rights impacts its
operations cause or contribute to. Sanoma’s Whistleblowing channel enables employees, customers and business partners to
report suspicions of misconduct related to sustainability or human rights issues confidentially and anonymously. In addition,
Sanoma’s People Policy states alignment with the Group’s guidelines (including ILO commitment on collective bargaining),
and commits to collective bargaining agreements. In addition to having processes and channels in place to remediate negative
impacts, Sanoma has not separately assessed the effectiveness of the provided remedy of a potential case.
Sanoma’s Whistleblowing channel is available in several languages relevant for Sanoma’s operations. The channel is
established by third-party mechanisms, and it is available on Sanoma’s internal channels and website. In addition, internal
communication campaigns about raising concerns are rolled out annually.
Sanoma has implemented procedures to ensure that complaints and grievances are dealt with in a neutral way. Employees
are encouraged to report their concerns as described in S1-2.
Cases reported through the reporting channels are processed in a manner that ensures impartiality. According to its Code of
Conduct (CoC), Sanoma does not tolerate retaliation against individuals who make reports in good faith, or against any third
persons, facilitators or legal entities connected to the reporting individual. Sanoma investigates reported cases, reviews
incidents, leverages learnings to influence both internal and external processes and reports the number and types of these
cases annually. Internal Audit investigates misconduct cases separately from the chain of management involved, and it
informs the Audit Committee about all identified and investigated misconduct cases.
To increase awareness, raising concerns is part of the annual mandatory CoC e-learnings. Completion rates of these courses
are reported in G1-1. Additionally, Sanoma runs an annual awareness campaign on speaking up, and tracks the number of
reports submitted and investigated through different channels. Trust on the available channels is difficult to measure, since an
increase in the number of reports may indicate growing trust, though it could also reflect an increase in identified issues.
S1-4 Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and
pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
As described in section S1-2, the actions needed to manage material impacts on Sanoma’s own workforce are identified
during engagement with personnel. Analysis of the annual EES and other surveys act as valuable input for planning the
actions to a particular actual or potential negative impact. If needed, there are dedicated focus groups established to define
the actions needed. Topic and unit specific surveys often take place several times a year. The scope of the actions is
Sanoma’s own workforce in its own operations. Most of the development is continuous or reactive. All of these actions also
support the objectives of the People Policy.
Actions to prevent, mitigate and remediate negative impacts
Work-life balance
Sanoma has several continuous actions to mitigate the negative impacts on work-life balance. To help employees manage
their personal and professional responsibilities, Sanoma provides, where possible, flexible working arrangements, including
flexible hours, hybrid work and leave policies. The annual EES survey that is targeted to all Sanoma employees is used in
both SBUs to track employee experience and to plan actions targeted to improve the work-life balance. For the 2025 EES
survey, specific questions were added regarding wellbeing and work-life balance. In addition, the regular 1:1 discussions that
managers have with employees are used to plan actions to balance employees' workload.
Health and safety
In order to ensure a safe workplace and to promote health and wellbeing, both SBUs provide several mental and physical
health initiatives to all employees on a continuous basis.
In Media Finland, communication about low-threshold mental health care is targeted to employees, and managers are
continuously trained on the available health and safety services. In addition, trainings on self-leadership, change skills and
resilience elements are included in managers’ trainings and offered also to employees. In 2025, Media Finland carried out a
Financial Statements 2025
90
wellbeing survey to all team leads, and initiated a strategic wellbeing development plan that aims to focus on mental well-
being in 2026.
In 2025, Learning launched Nadia, a personal AI-powered Coach available for all employees. Nadia is a confidential coaching
tool designed to help employees navigate workplace challenges and enhance their skills. It can be also used to prevent
mental-health issues by supporting in managing workload and stressful situations. Nadia is available on all devices 24/h and it
supports over 100 languages.
Sanoma focuses on improving recreation and sense of community throughout the organisation on a continuous basis. In
Media Finland, employees are brought together through Sanomain Kerho (Sanoma Club) with both sports and culture-related
activities. In addition, Sanoma arranges activities, like walking challenges or charity work, to improve engagement and
increase meaningfulness.
Anti-harassment
On the Group level, Sanoma has implemented procedures to ensure that complaints and grievances are dealt with in a neutral
way. The Anti-Harassment Standard describes the process of handling the potential harassment cases. Employees are
encouraged to report their concerns in confidence through one of Sanoma’s reporting channels such as directly to their
managers, Human Resources, or through the anonymous Whistleblowing channel. For harassment cases, HR is responsible
for the investigation, and each case is investigated as promptly as possible, in a fair and objective manner. In 2025, in those
operating countries where legislation requires local processes to be in place (Spain, Netherlands and Poland), Sanoma
established separate subsidiary-specific channels that were included in the Group’s whistleblowing tool.
Privacy and security of employee data
Sanoma has continuous Group-level processes in place to manage the potential negative impact on privacy and security of
employee data. Data privacy and security practices were part of the annual Code of Conduct training also in 2025. In addition,
Sanoma has Privacy and Security Champions in HR teams, who follow up and support initiatives regarding the use of
employee data. There is also a process in place to review and fix all reported data breaches. Employee data as a category of
personal data, is handled through the same Privacy, Security and AI by Design process as is used for customer data.
Sanoma did not take actions to provide or enable remedy in relation to actual material impacts as there were no actual cases.
Additional actions or initiatives with the primary purpose of delivering positive impacts for its workforce
Sanoma has in place and plans actions and initiatives with the primary purpose of delivering positive impacts for its workforce.
Below are the key actions carried out in 2025.
Gender equality and diversity
Sanoma carried out actions to promote gender equality and diversity in both SBUs to create a culture of inclusion, involving,
accepting, and valuing all people in the workplace regardless of their differences and social identity.
In Learning, the work around five pillars of DE&I, Culture & Heritage, Disability & Neurodiversity, Gender, Generations and
LGBTQ+, continued, with engaging ambassadors and senior sponsors around DE&I pillars. These pillars represent the DE&I
focus areas for Learning. Through these actions Sanoma improves the understanding of the obstacles and challenges faced
by people identifying themselves as any minority. In addition, the gamified DE&I training, that allows employees to practice
conversation simulations, was promoted to employees. DE&I awareness was also increased by publishing internally articles
aligned to the international DE&I Calendar, highlighting special days such as the International Women’s Day, International Day
of Transgender Visibility and Pride.
In Media Finland, DE&I awareness was increased throughout the organisation through internal communications by, for
example, interviewing minority group members in 2025, for example, related to neurodiversity, in internal news stories, and
asking and sharing their experiences in topic-specific surveys. In addition, a webinar open to all personnel was held to raise
awareness about menopause.
Sanoma actively recruits from diverse employees to foster an inclusive and varied workforce. In 2025, Media Finland trained
managers on applicant-centred recruitment, targeting to remind managers about addressing diversity during the process.
Sanoma is also preparing for the pay transparency directive. Both Media Finland and Learning continued work on job
architecture in 2025. The job architecture establishes a consistent framework that objectively defines roles, levels and jobs,
enabling fair comparisons among roles across the organisation. The framework also provides the structured data needed for
gender pay‑gap reporting. It sets the basis to advance equal pay through greater transparency, better data and systematic
structures.
In addition, gender equality and diversity were part of the annual Code of Conduct (CoC) e-learning also in 2025. The training
is mandatory for all Sanoma employees and more information about the training can be found in G1-1. Sanoma runs an
annual awareness campaign to all employees on speaking up and tracks the number of cases submitted and investigated
through different channels.
Training and skills development
Learning and development is part of Sanoma’s culture and continuous actions to ensure that Sanoma’s employees can
develop professionally and gain the skills that are critical for the future growth and execution of Sanoma’s strategy. Learning
happens mostly on-the-job, but is complemented with formal training and learning from/with others. Annual performance and
development discussions are utilised in both SBUs to create individual development plans and to encourage continuous
learning at work. In both SBUs, leadership competency framework is defined based on the Sanoma business strategy and
values. This framework serves as the basis for different development programmes aiming to help with critical capabilities
enhancement.
Both in Media Finland and Learning, the HR system Workday provides an online training platform that covers topics such as
DE&I, leadership, wellbeing and self-development on a continuous basis. In addition, and for Learning, in 2025 a Leadership
Competencies cascade training was organised for approximately 80 leaders with both inspirational speakers and EADA
business school training. Learning also piloted a new Talent Programme called ’Out of Comfort, Out of Context’ for 15
employees. In all trainings, a focus was placed on developing critical capabilities, particularly Innovation and AI. Targeted
training sessions for both leaders and all employees were organised. To put AI and Innovation into practice within HR, in late
2025, Learning introduced an AI Coaching tool, Nadia, for all employees, with ongoing training on how to use it effectively. In
Learning’s Operations and Technology department, a comprehensive skills mapping was conducted and, using the 70/20/10
Financial Statements 2025
91
model, targeted training plans to close identified gaps are being implemented. Specific training on AI for employees have
been, and continue to be organised.
In Media Finland, trainings are provided through Sanoma Academy and they cover topics such as leadership skills, coaching,
self-leadership, journalistic skills and mentoring. In 2025, Media Finland arranged a new full year leadership development
program for about 50 leaders, focusing on digital growth. In addition, a new SBU-wide training programme, Future Skills, was
launched in 2025, focusing on meta-skills and human competences that are increasingly important in the era of technology
and AI. In addition, there are unit or competence based trainings to more targeted groups. Media Finland also continued to
arrange annual Sanoma Summit, event that offers a platform for knowledge sharing and learning from others.
No specific actions targeted to adequate wages, employment security, social dialogue, freedom of association and collective
bargaining were conducted in 2025. The commitments to these impacts are stated in the policies and no further need for
action was identified in 2025.
Tracking and assessing the effectiveness of actions related to own workforce
In addition to monitoring the completion level of the actions, Sanoma utilises the annual EES results to track and assess the
effectiveness of actions. The EES includes questions related to, for example, engagement, enablement, inclusion, equality,
work-life balance and trainings, and the previous year’s survey is set as the baseline to be improved.
The HR team is responsible for monitoring actions related to its own workforce. The insight and trends from surveys are
followed up by HR as well as SBU and unit management. The Compliance team together with HR arranges mandatory
trainings to all. The HR team is responsible for the documentation of guidelines and practices and training them to managers.
Sanoma aims to ensure that no material negative impacts arise from practices through the implementation of the CoC, and
related annual mandatory trainings to all employees. In addition, guidelines and practices are documented and trained to
managers, and insight and trends from pulse surveys regularly followed up.
Metrics and targets
S1-5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing
material risks and opportunities
Sanoma has not set any ESRS-aligned measurable time-bound outcome-oriented targets related to its own workforce, and
does not have plans to implement such targets. Sanoma assesses the effectiveness of its own workforce-related policies and
actions through targets related to the Employee Engagement Survey (EES) and by monitoring the gender distributions at
managerial levels. These targets originate from the Sustainability Strategy. Given the nature of Sanoma’s business, material
issues do not change annually, and therefore the Sustainability Strategy and targets are set for the long term.
Stakeholders were involved when the targets were set in 2021, when launching the Sustainability Strategy, by participating in
surveys and workshops. The progress of the targets is tracked annually, and updated as required, with the entire Group in
scope. Sanoma’s targets related to its own workforce are the following:
Sanoma is committed to maintaining a highly engaged workforce, aiming for the Employee Engagement Score between
70% and 75% in 2025
Employees feel that Sanoma provides equal opportunities, and the Equal Opportunities Score is above 77%
Sanoma continuously seeks to develop the Company as a great place to work, and aims to reach an Employee Net
Promoter Score (eNPS) >10
Sanoma promotes diversity and gender neutrality throughout the business and aims for a 50/50 gender balance in
managerial positions by 2030
The objective is that both genders are represented at the Board of Directors with the share of under-represented gender
being at least 40%
In 2025, Sanoma enhanced its employee engagement measurement with standardised, benchmark-enabled questions,
establishing a new baseline for future comparison and strengthening the quality of insight. The previous Employee Experience
Index was replaced by Employee Engagement Score that is based on five science-based and market-comparable questions.
The score is based on the percentage of employees who respond favourably to the questions that drive engagement.
The EES survey results are analysed and action plans created in teams as well as on unit, SBU and Group levels. Plans serve
as input to unit and SBU-specific people plans as well as to a statutory development plan for the work community that is being
created together with personnel representatives. Team-specific plans are followed up in the teams. The performance against
set targets in 2025 for the gender distribution in managerial positions can be found in section S1-9 and the results and
methodology of the EES survey in the S1 Entity-specific metric: Employee engagement survey.
Based on the updated, standardised employee engagement measurement, Sanoma’s Employee Engagement Score in 2025
was 62%, which was below the target level of 70-75% but close to the European benchmark level of 65%. The Equal
opportunities rating was 75% being slightly below the target level of 77%. Employees perceived fairness in topics concerning
career development, opportunities and inclusivity. This reflects Sanoma’s commitment to DE&I initiatives and a culture that
supports all employees regardless of background. Also topics related to sustainability such as the social responsibility
commitment, compliance and ethics, and the possibility to report inappropriate behaviour received high scores.
Sanoma’s eNPS score improved to 5 (2024: -5) (scale -100 - +100). Within Learning, there were variations across countries,
particularly in those experiencing significant changes. Sanoma’s HR Strategy focuses on fostering an inclusive and people-
centric culture, ensuring continuous improvement in employee engagement and satisfaction, which also supports in achieving
the eNPS target of >10.
In 2025, the share of women in Directors and Senior managers declined slightly to 46% (2024: 48%) whereas the share of
women in Managers with subordinates increased to 52% (2024: 50%). Sanoma continues to focus on gender balance, and
remains committed to strengthening its talent strategies to drive further progress.
Financial Statements 2025
92
S1-6 Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees
The number of employees are reported as headcount at the end of the reporting period. All employees are included in the total
number of employees. Due to the nature of the business, Sanoma’s number of employees does not fluctuate significantly
during the year. In its Financial Statements, Sanoma reports the number of employees at the end of the period utilising the full-
time equivalent metric instead of headcount.
Financial Statements 2025
93
S1-6 AR 55 I Gender distribution of employees, number of employees
Gender
2025
2024
Male
2,174
2,292
Female
2,876
2,965
Other
5
2
Not reported
10
8
Total employees
5,065
5,267
S1-6 AR 55 II Number of employees in countries representing at least 10% of employees
Country
2025
2024
Finland
2,708
2,854
Spain
550
586
Poland
659
644
Netherlands
616
640
S1-6 AR 55 III Employees by contract type broken down by gender
2025
Female
Male
Other
Not disclosed
Total
Number of employees (headcount)
2,876
2,174
5
10
5,065
Number of permanent employees (headcount)
2,557
2,020
2
8
4,587
Number of temporary employees (headcount)
319
154
3
2
478
Number of non-guaranteed hours employees
(headcount)
243
122
2
1
368
Number of full-time employees (headcount)
2,244
1,888
0
9
4,141
Number of part-time employees (headcount)
389
164
3
0
556
2024
Female
Male
Other
Not disclosed
Total
Number of employees (headcount)
2,965
2,292
2
8
5,267
Number of permanent employees (headcount)
2,642
2,124
2
4
4,772
Number of temporary employees (headcount)
323
168
0
4
495
Number of non-guaranteed hours employees
(headcount)
285
134
0
1
420
Number of full-time employees (headcount)
2,257
1,970
0
7
4,234
Number of part-time employees (headcount)
423
188
2
0
613
S1-6 AR 55 IV Employees by contract type broken down by country
2025
Finland
Netherlands
Belgium
Poland
Sweden
Spain
Norway
Germany
Denmark
United
Kingdom
Italy
Total
Number of employees (headcount)
2,708
616
175
659
100
550
61
14
5
9
168
5,065
Number of permanent employees (headcount)
2,339
558
169
628
95
547
58
12
5
9
167
4,587
Number of temporary employees (headcount)
369
58
6
31
5
3
3
2
0
0
1
478
Number of non-guaranteed hours employees (headcount)
368
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
368
Number of full-time employees (headcount)
2,168
332
132
647
97
529
57
13
5
9
152
4,141
Number of part-time employees (headcount)
172
284
43
12
3
21
4
1
0
0
16
556
2024
Finland
Netherlands
Belgium
Poland
Sweden
Spain
Norway
Germany
Denmark
United
Kingdom
Italy
Total
Number of employees (headcount)
2,854
640
185
644
96
586
67
12
6
9
168
5,267
Number of permanent employees (headcount)
2,474
568
176
623
92
583
63
10
6
9
168
4,772
Number of temporary employees (headcount)
380
72
9
21
4
3
4
2
0
0
0
495
Number of non-guaranteed hours employees (headcount)
420
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
420
Number of full-time employees (headcount)
2,210
356
139
633
93
561
64
11
5
9
153
4,234
Number of part-time employees (headcount)
224
284
46
11
3
25
3
1
1
0
15
613
Financial Statements 2025
94
S1-6-50 c Employee turnover
Employee turnover
2025
2024
Number of employees who have left
715
852
Turnover %
14%
16%
The number of employees who left the Company is reported for January–December. The number of employees who left the
Company includes the impact of certain restructuring actions and minor divestments in Finland and Spain, in particular. The
turnover has been calculated by dividing the number of employees who left the Company voluntarily or due to dismissal,
retirement or death in service by the total number of employees at the end of the period.
S1-8 Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
Number of employees are reported as headcount at the end of the reporting period.
S1-8 AR 70 Collective bargaining coverage
2025
Collective Bargaining Coverage
Social dialogue
Coverage rate
Employees – EEA (for countries
with >50 empl. representing
>10% total empl.)
Employees – Non-EEA (estimate
for regions with >50 empl.
representing >10% total empl.)
Workplace representation (EEA
only) (for countries with >50 empl.
representing >10% total empl.)
0–19%
Poland
Poland
20–39%
40–59%
60–79%
Finland, Netherlands
Finland, Netherlands
80–100%
Spain
Spain
2024
Collective Bargaining Coverage
Social dialogue
Coverage rate
Employees – EEA (for countries
with >50 empl. representing
>10% total empl.)
Employees – Non-EEA (estimate
for regions with >50 empl.
representing >10% total empl.)
Workplace representation (EEA
only) (for countries with >50 empl.
representing >10% total empl.)
0–19%
Poland
Poland
20–39%
40–59%
60–79%
Finland, Netherlands
Finland, Netherlands
80–100%
Spain
Spain
Sanoma has more than one collective bargaining agreement in place in the EEA. The information regarding collective
bargaining agreements is available from Sanoma’s HR systems. Sanoma has an agreement with its employees for
representation by the European Works Council (EWC).
The share of employees covered by workers representatives in 2024 have been restated. The restatement concerned the
figures for Finland, Spain and the Netherlands, for which the information was reflecting the number of workers representatives
instead of the number of employees covered by workers representatives. All employees who are covered by collective
bargaining agreements are also covered by workers representatives. The restatement resulted in the number of employees
covered by workers representatives to increase from 0-19% to 60-79% in Finland and the Netherlands and from 0-19% to
80-100% in Spain.
S1-8 Collective bargaining coverage
2025
2024
Percentage of total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements
67%
69%
The working conditions and terms of employment for employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements are on par
or partly determined based on collective bargaining agreements that cover other employees.
S1-9 Diversity metrics
Number of employees are reported as headcount at the end of the reporting period.
S1-9-66 a Gender distribution of top management
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
2025
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Executive Management Team
1
33%
2
67%
0
0%
0
0%
Management teams
8
44%
10
56%
0
0%
0
0%
Top management, total
9
43%
12
57%
0
0%
0
0%
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
2024
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Executive Management Team
1
33%
2
67%
0
0%
0
0%
Management teams
10
53%
9
47%
0
0%
0
0%
Top management, total
11
50%
11
50%
0
0%
0
0%
The Executive Management Team includes the members of Sanoma Group’s EMT. Management teams include the SBUs’
management teams, excluding the EMT members.
Financial Statements 2025
95
S1-9-66 b Age distribution
2025
2024
Age distribution of employees
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Under 30 years old
451
9%
488
9%
Between 30 and 50 years old
2,991
59%
3,170
60%
Over 50 years old
1,623
32%
1,609
31%
Age distribution is compiled by utilising the employees’ birth year as the base for the calculations.
S1-9 Entity-specific metric: Gender distribution of management
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
2025
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Directors and Senior managers
61
46%
73
54%
0
0%
0
0%
Managers with subordinates
330
52%
308
48%
0
0%
0
0%
Female
Male
Others
Not Disclosed
2024
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Headcount
%
Directors and Senior managers
73
48%
79
52%
0
0%
0
0%
Managers with subordinates
314
50%
309
50%
0
0%
0
0%
The Directors and Senior managers include subordinates to the EMT and management team members. Managers with
subordinates include all managers that are not part of the Directors and Senior managers or top management definitions.
S1-10 Adequate wages
All Sanoma employees are paid an adequate wage applicable to benchmarks. The assessment of adequate wages is based
on national legislation, collective labour agreements and their wage tables, official and statistical sources, as well as internal
Company calculations.
S1-11 Social protection
All Sanoma employees are covered by social protection.
S1-13 Trainings and performance development metrics
% of performance reviews by gender
2025
Female
76%
Male
74%
Other
40%
Not Reported
90%
Total
76%
In Learning, performance reviews are conducted through a three-part process; for reporting purposes, the completion rate of
the goal-setting phase has been used.
The percentage of completed performance reviews for Media Finland is subject to some uncertainty, as the Workday platform
was implemented in the SBU after the performance review process had been completed. This required supervisors to
manually input data on completed reviews retrospectively.
Average number of training hours by gender
2025
Female
1.2
Male
1.1
Other
0.5
Not Reported
0.4
Total
1.2
Training hours only include formal online trainings that are completed in the Workday platform. Employee-initiated training
hours are excluded. Sanoma’s approach to trainings is based on the 70-20-10 model, where 70% of learning happens on the
job by doing, 20% happens in the social context from others, coaching and feedback and 10% through the formal training
methods such as online trainings and lectures.
The duration of the trainings is determined by the default completion time of the training not the actual completion time for
each individual.
The non-guaranteed hours employees in Learning are excluded from the S1-13 reporting as they do not use the Workday
platform.
Financial Statements 2025
96
S1-14 Health and safety metrics
S1-14-88 a Coverage of health and safety management system
All Sanoma employees are covered by local health and safety management systems.
2025
2024
Percentage of workforce covered by health and safety management system, %
100%
100%
S1-14-88 b Work-related fatalities
2025
2024
Own workforce
Other workers
working on the
undertaking’s
sites
Own workforce
Other workers
working on the
undertaking’s
sites
Number of fatalities as result of work-related injuries
0
0
0
0
Number of fatalities as result of work-related ill health
0
0
0
0
Total
0
0
0
0
S1-14-88 c Work-related accidents
2025
2024
Number of recordable work-related accidents
35
31
Rate of recordable work-related accidents
4.5
3.6
The number of work-related fatalities and accidents has been collected from all operating countries. The number of accidents
are based on reports received from the insurance companies.  Approximately one third of the reported occupational accidents
were attributable to operations in printing facilities. The majority of all work-related accidents were attributable to slips and
falls.
The rate of recordable work-related accidents has been calculated by using the following formula: (total number of accidents /
total working hours) x 1,000,000. In countries, where the actual working hours have not been available from a system, they
have been estimated using the following formula: (number of weekly working hours defined in agreements or legislation x
number of working weeks excl. annual leave defined in agreements or legislation) x FTE. The share of estimates represented
31% of the working hours.
In 2025, the assessment criteria for work-related accidents were refined. As a result, the 2024 comparative data was
reassessed based on the updated criteria, and the reported figures were adjusted accordingly. Following the adjustment, the
number of work-related accidents increased by four cases, which also raised the rate of recordable work-related accidents
from 3.1 to 3.6.
S1-15 Work-life balance metrics
All Sanoma employees are entitled to take family-related leave. The percentage of employees who took family-related leave
was partially collected manually, as the same classification of absences is not used in all operating countries. Family-related
leaves include maternity, paternity and parental leaves as well as child care leaves.
S1-15-93 b Family-related leaves
2025
Female
Male
Other
Not Reported
Total
Percentage of Sanoma's employees entitled to
family-related leave
100%
% of employees entitled to family-related leave,
who took leave during reporting year
7%
5%
0%
%
6%
2024
Female
Male
Other
Not Reported
Total
Percentage of Sanoma's employees entitled to
family-related leave
100%
% of employees entitled to family-related leave,
who took leave during reporting year
9%
6%
0%
13%
8%
S1-16 Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)
The remuneration metrics includes all employees. Calculations are based on actual data with the exception of non-guaranteed
hours employees in Learning, for which the hourly rate has been estimated based on average rate.
The gender pay gap is defined as the difference of average gross hourly pay between female and male employees. Estimates
are used for working hours using the following formula: (number of weekly working hours defined in agreements or legislation
x number working weeks) x FTE.
The annual total remuneration is defined as the ratio of the highest paid individual to the median annual total remuneration for
all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual).
S1-16 Gender pay gap and remuneration ratio
Compensation indicators
2025
2024
Gender pay gap
16%
17%
Annual total remuneration ratio
22
25
Financial Statements 2025
97
S1-17 Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts
S1-17-103 a Incidents of discrimination
2025
2024
Number of incidents of discrimination, including harassment
8
7
Number of complaints filed through channels for people in own workforce to raise concerns
13
15
Number of complaints filed to National Contact Points for OECD Multinational Enterprises
0
0
Amount of fines, penalties, and compensation for damages as result of incidents of discrimination,
including harassment and complaints filed, EUR
0
0
The number of incidents are reported through Sanoma’s internal channels and the Whistleblowing channel that allows
anonymous reporting. The number of incidents is collected by the Compliance function in Legal. Three of the investigated
incidents of discrimination, including harassment, were found true during the investigation. For some cases, no investigation
was initiated due to insufficient information and a lack of whistleblower’s response to additional information request.
No severe human rights issues or incidents connected to Sanoma’s own workforce occurred during the reporting period.
S1 Entity-specific metric: Employee engagement survey
Employee Engagement Survey results
2025
Employee Engagement Score
62%
Equal opportunities in my company rating
75%
Employee Net Promoter Score
5.0
2024
Employee Experience Index
7.4
Equal opportunities in my company rating
8.0
Employee Net Promoter Score
-5.0
The Employee Engagement Score is based on five science-based and market-comparable questions. The score is based on
the percentage of employees who respond favourably to the questions that drive engagement. The Engagement Score
measures the levels of enthusiasm, advocacy, pride and connection employees have with their organisation. It measures how
motivated people are to put in extra effort for their work, and reflects the level of employee commitment.
The Equal opportunities rating is part of the survey’s inclusion factor that measures the feeling of belonging, being authentic
self at work and equal opportunities regardless of background. Inclusion focuses specifically on day‑to‑day lived experience:
how people are treated, listened to, and valued, rather than representation alone.
The Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) is a single‑question indicator of employees’ willingness to recommend the
organization as a great place to work. The scale varies from -100 to +100.
The questions were answered on a 5-point scale, ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”, with “agree” or “strongly
agree” translating into favourable answers. The scope of the Employee Engagement Survey includes all employees that are
present during the time of the survey, expect for the Tutorhouse entity which is not in the scope of the survey. The progress
against targets is commented in section S1-5.
As the scale of the scoring as well as the questions contributing to the ratings have changed in 2025 as explained in S1-5, the
results for the Employee Engagement Score and Equal opportunities rating are not comparable year-on-year. In 2024, the
Employee Experience Index (EEI) was a 10-item index that measured how employees felt about the work environment, how
engaged they were, how committed they were to the organisation, and how likely they were to promote Sanoma’s organisation
externally. To align the scale with Sanoma’s target levels in 2024, the responses were extrapolated manually. For the EEI that
comprised of ten questions, the results were calculated as average by employee and by organisation.
The Employee Engagement Survey was conducted and the results validated by Culture Amp.
Financial Statements 2025
98
ESRS S2 Workers in the value chain
SANOMA_pallot-05.svg
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model
S2-1
Policies related to value chain workers
S2-2
Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts
S2-3
Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns
S2-4
Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks
and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions
S2-5
Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing
material risks and opportunities
Strategy
SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Sanoma’s suppliers range from small local content providers to large, global corporations. Actual and potential impacts related
to suppliers’ workforce originate from Sanoma’s business model and strategy, with suppliers and their workers in the value
chain supporting Sanoma in producing and delivering its printed and digital products and services in both the learning and
media businesses. The impacts have not led to adaptations in the business model or strategy. Sanoma continuously identifies
and assesses potential and actual adverse impacts related to human rights and defines preventive and mitigating actions
accordingly.
Sanoma’s disclosure under ESRS 2 covers value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by Sanoma. The
types of value chain workers who could be impacted include especially workers working for entities in Sanoma’s upstream
value chain. Sanoma identifies some inherent risk of actual impacts occurring especially with its global supplier network,
particularly in paper and print product manufacturing, various types of hiring of personnel for content creation, event and TV
productions as well as suppliers for business technology services. Generally, the risk of actual human rights impacts occurring
is also related to countries, where the legislation or ratification of international human rights agreements and their
implementation and monitoring are insufficient.
Sanoma’s actual and potential indirect negative impacts on workers in the value chain include impacts related to working
conditions. Some actual negative impacts related to exceeding working time labour standards among Sanoma’s printing
suppliers have been identified. Potential impacts include compromised occupational health and safety as well as the potential
for violations of freedom of association, ability to exercise collective bargaining, social dialogue, employment security
(protection of workers against fluctuations) and adequate wages. Sanoma does not identify impacts to be of a systemic or
widespread nature, and monitors the implementation of corrective actions taken by and required from suppliers.
No material risks or opportunities related to workers in the value chain were identified in the double materiality assessment,
described under ESRS 2. Sanoma has not identified any geographies, at country or other levels, or commodities for which
there is a significant risk of child, forced or compulsory labour among workers in the value chain. Based on Sanoma’s internal
assessment, Sanoma has not identified particularly vulnerable groups of workers in the value chain, who would have a higher
risk for negative impacts due to their inherent characteristics. No significant changes to Sanoma’s procurement or business
model have taken place after the assessment.
Financial Statements 2025
99
Impact, risk and opportunity management
S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers
In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage its impacts related to workers in the value
chain. The key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the policies are presented in the table
‘Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to workers in the value chain’.
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to workers in the value chain
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Sustainability
and Human
Rights Policy
Key content described in S1-1. Outlines Sanoma’s sustainability-related
principles and summarises the core commitments and sustainability due
diligence process. From a workers in the value chain perspective, it does not
directly cover Sanoma’s actual and potential impacts on workers in the value
chain, but it defines Sanoma’s sustainability due diligence process in
general, including identification, assessment, management and remediation
of sustainability-related impacts. It also outlines Sanoma’s sustainability
management model as well as the responsibilities to identify impact, risks
and opportunities though the double materiality assessment process.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Sustainability for
implementation. Board of
Directors approve the
policy.
The UN Global Compact (UNGC), The UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights, The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), The International
Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental
Principles and Rights at Work, The OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises, The Rio Declaration on
Environment and Development
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
in both policy setting by
analysing insights
received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees
Publicly available on
company website
All S2-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Supplier Code
of Conduct
(SCoC)
Outlines the ethical standards and responsible business principles that
Sanoma expects its suppliers to comply with. It emphasises the importance
of respecting human rights, ethical conduct, and transparency throughout the
supply chain. The policy is aligned with internationally recognised
instruments relevant to value chain workers such as the UN Global
Compact, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the ILO’s
Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work. It includes
provisions addressing working time, work-life balance, occupational health
and safety, freedom of association, collective bargaining, employment
security, adequate wages and social dialogue. It also requires the suppliers
to eliminate any harassment or discrimination related to gender, to ensure
equal pay and to offer training and skills development opportunities to their
workers. In addition, the policy includes specific requirements for responsible
business practices, and environmental compliance.
All upstream and
downstream suppliers
and workers in the value
chain
Procurement for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the standard.
The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact, the UDHR,
the International Bill of Human Rights, the UNGPS, the ILO
declaration and supporting ILO standards
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
by analysing views of the
suppliers’ workforce
Publicly available on
company website
All S2-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3. The impacts
related to the
precarious work of
workers in the value
chain are covered
indirectly through the
ILO commitments of
the standard.
Procurement
Policy
Outlines the roles and responsibilities related to procurement as well as
defines key processes related to supplier selection and purchasing, including
defining the process of managing impacts related to workers in the value
chain. It aims to provide clarity about roles and responsibilities, apply
consistency in procurement activities, select the right suppliers to support
Sanoma’s businesses objectives, manage Sanoma’s supply base as well as
to ensure visibility. Adherence to the policy is validated through a defined set
of Procurement Control Points and internal audits on the procurement
processes and guidelines.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Procurement for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the policy.
Know Your Counterparty framework
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
by analysing views of the
suppliers’ workforce
Internally available to all
Sanoma employees
All S2-related IROs
presented in the table
in section ESRS 2
SBM-3
Financial Statements 2025
100
Human rights policy commitments
The Sustainability and Human Rights Policy is aligned with internationally recognised instruments, such as the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles
and Rights at Work (ILO declaration) and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. As a signatory of the UN Global
Compact (UNGC), Sanoma commits to the Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact (the Ten Principles), the UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPS) as well as Agenda 2030, including the UN Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs).
Sanoma’s key standard related to material actual and potential impacts on workers in the value chain is the SCoC. Through
the SCoC, Sanoma’s suppliers and service providers are expected to commit to and respect the Ten Principles, the UDHR, the
International Bill of Human Rights, the UNGPS, the ILO declaration and supporting ILO standards. Provisions are aligned with
the ILO standards. The SCoC requires suppliers to respect the ILO standards in relation to human trafficking and forced,
compulsory and child labour.
Based on the SCoC, the suppliers are required to implement a systematic process to identify, monitor and control health and
safety, labour and other impacts associated with their operations. The suppliers are required to offer mechanisms to raise
complaints or concerns, monitor complaints, protect individuals from retaliation, engage with relevant stakeholders and
implement remediation processes to address any adverse human rights impacts, maintain on site all documentation that may
be needed to demonstrate compliance, implement improvements to achieve compliance in the event of any infringement and
submit to Sanoma a report specifying the actions taken and progress made in achieving compliance. Sanoma or a third party
is also permitted to audit the suppliers’ compliance with the SCoC.
By the end of 2025, Sanoma had not become aware of any severe cases of human rights incidents related to the UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve value chain workers. Sanoma monitors cases through internal audits,
grievance mechanisms and third-party supplier audits, which include aspects such as labour rights and occupational health
and safety. Following its human rights commitments, Sanoma is committed to remediation if its activities have caused or
contributed to adverse human rights impacts and requires its suppliers to implement remediation as well. If remediation needs
occur, engagement with relevant stakeholders and details of the case determine the appropriate remediation measures.
Sanoma has identified actual negative impacts concerning labour standards related to working time, adequate wages and
health and safety. During 2025, Sanoma engaged with its suppliers requesting to deliver plans for preventive and corrective
actions to enable effective remedy. Progress of these action plans to ensure preventive and corrective measures is ongoing
and improvements on working hours have been made. For example, book printing suppliers have recruited more employees
and invested in automation equipment to reduce the overtime of their workers. Further details are available under S2-4.
S2-2 Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts
Sanoma has not adopted a general process to engage with workers in the value chain. Sanoma seeks to identify and prevent
human rights impacts in its supply chain through the Know Your Counterparty (KYC) process and by collecting certifications
and audit reports from external information sources as described under S2-4. In addition, Sanoma uses information from
credible proxies to assess and identify potential impacts related to its procurement categories. Sanoma does not directly
engage with value chain workers or their legitimate representatives outside visits to the suppliers’ premises and collection of
third-party audit reports. The Procurement team is responsible for ensuring that engagement happens and the results inform
Sanoma’s approach, with the most senior role being the Head of Procurement in the SBUs.
S2-3 Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns
As a part of its procurement process, Sanoma continuously assesses potential and actual adverse human rights impacts and
defines preventive and mitigation actions, where relevant. Sanoma is committed to remediation if its activities have caused or
contributed to adverse human rights impacts. The approach to remediation is case-specific, taking into account the context
and details of the impact. The evaluation of effectiveness is therefore per case, implementing corrective actions with the aim to
prevent similar cases from arising in the future.
Sanoma’s third-party hosted anonymous Whistleblowing channel enables employees, customers, business partners and
suppliers’ workforce to report suspicions of misconduct related to sustainability or human rights issues, confidentially and
anonymously. Sanoma does not tolerate retaliation against anyone who raises a concern or participates in an investigation.
Sanoma investigates reported cases, reviews incidents, leverages learnings to influence both internal and external processes
and reports the number and types of these cases annually. Material issues are reported to the Audit Committee, EMT as well
as the Sustainability and Ethics Working Group. The effectiveness of the grievance channel is assessed by monitoring the
number of cases reported as well as tracking the cases investigated and solved annually. Sanoma is subject to the
requirements of the EU Whistleblowing Directive as well as national whistleblowing legislation in its operating countries.
Sanoma’s Whistleblowing channel is available in several languages relevant for Sanoma’s operations and value chain.
Sanoma’s Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct include the commitment to protection against retaliation of
individuals using grievance channels.
All new suppliers go through Sanoma’s supplier screening and due diligence process, which aims to incorporate the SCoC as
a mandatory step for successful selection. Following the SCoC, Sanoma’s suppliers are required to ensure that a grievance
mechanism is available for workers to raise complaints. In case impacts are identified, Sanoma requires the supplier to rectify
impacts without undue delay and report back to Sanoma on a regular basis on the actions taken. In case the deficiencies are
not rectified within a reasonable time period or the deficiencies are determined to be material or irreparable, or another
material breach of the SCoC is detected, the contract or order can be terminated.
The effectiveness of corrective actions and remedy is currently evaluated case-by-case by analysing whether corrective
actions rectify the impact. Sanoma lacks a systematic monitoring process to assess the effectiveness of the grievance
channels and is unable to evaluate whether value chain workers are aware of and trust the structures or processes to raise
concerns.
S2-4 Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks
and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions
Sanoma prevents and mitigates actual and potential negative material impacts on value chain workers through its purchasing
practices on a continuous basis. Sanoma’s Procurement team is responsible for the management of material impacts,
including setting supplier requirements, identifying and monitoring impacts as well as tracking preventive and corrective
measures. As part of the annual planning process, the Procurement team identifies what kind of actions are needed and
appropriate in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact. As most of the impacts on workers in the value
Financial Statements 2025
101
chain are potential, Sanoma focuses on preventing the impacts of actually occurring. No severe human rights issues or
incidents connected to Sanoma’s upstream value chain occurred during the reporting period.
Actions to prevent, mitigate and remediate negative impacts
Supplier selection
The supplier selection for new suppliers follows Sanoma’s strategic sourcing process, which incorporates the SCoC or
equivalent as a mandatory requirement. Sanoma aims that all new suppliers confirm the SCoC. To evaluate the effectiveness
of this measure, Sanoma follows the number of new key suppliers that have confirmed the SCoC.
Supplier assessment and engagement
Sanoma’s Know Your Counterparty (KYC) process identifies possible risks of impacts and non-compliance of doing business
with third parties on a continuous basis. The KYC tool is used to screen Sanoma’s suppliers, and it identifies potential third-
party non-compliance, including human rights, anti-bribery, corruption, sanctions and performs regulations and due diligence
checks. Based on the screening, Sanoma may restrict or discontinue business activity involving, directly or indirectly, countries
or persons subject to selective or targeted sanctions programmes and other higher risk matters of concern. In cases of
medium or high risk, the tool refers the employees to consult the Procurement and Legal teams.
In 2025, Sanoma advanced its supplier due diligence by introducing a two-step supplier segmentation and ESG screening
process: first, procurement categories are screened for environmental and human rights impacts and risks, then suppliers in
higher-risk categories are assessed at the supplier level. This model defines targeted management actions to minimise and
prevent material impacts and risks. Ongoing development will continue in 2026 with a dedicated working group to further refine
and implement these processes.
Sanoma engages with especially its paper and print suppliers, as this procurement category has been identified as a higher
risk procurement category due to its nature of producing actual products. Sanoma annually performs a supplier assessment
on all of its print suppliers, collecting SEDEX, BSCI or SMETA third-party audit reports from its suppliers in addition to
environmental data. In relation to capacity-building and engagement with entities in the value chain, Sanoma organises
Supplier Day events for its paper and print suppliers.
Follow up on non-compliance
In relation to the identified impacts on print suppliers’ workers related to actual working time (exceeding working time
agreements), adequate wages and health and safety, during 2025, Sanoma has engaged with the suppliers requesting them
to deliver plans for preventive and corrective actions to enable effective remedy. The process of these action plans to ensure
preventive and corrective measures is ongoing. Sanoma tracks and assesses the effectiveness of these actions in cooperation
with its suppliers as well as through the annual collection of audit reports, where these cases are expected to be resolved.
Processes to provide or enable remedy in the event of material negative impacts are available and assessed to be effective,
as described under S2-3. Sanoma has taken actions to enable remedy for actual negative impacts identified, such as those
related to working time, by engaging with suppliers and requesting preventive and corrective action plans. These measures
are being monitored for effectiveness and are expected to resolve the identified cases.
Metrics and targets
S2-5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing
material risks and opportunities
Sanoma does not have ESRS-aligned measurable time-bound targets for managing workers in the value chain-related
impacts, as most impacts are potential and actual impacts are always handled in a topic-specific manner. Sanoma tracks the
effectiveness of its policies and actions in relation to the material actual and potential impacts as described under S2-3 and
S2-4. Sanoma aims that all suppliers agree on its SCoC or equivalent. All new suppliers go through Sanoma’s supplier due
diligence process, which aims to incorporate the Supplier Code as a mandatory step for successful selection. To evaluate the
effectiveness of its measures, Sanoma internally follows the share of new suppliers that have agreed on the SCoC annually.
Financial Statements 2025
102
ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users
SANOMA_pallot-06.svg
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model
S4-1
Policies related to consumers and end-users
S4-2
Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
S4-3
Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise
concerns
S4-4
Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing
material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and
effectiveness of those actions
S4-5
Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing
material risks and opportunities
Strategy
SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model
Sanoma’s actual and potential impacts on consumers and end-users originate from its strategy and business model. Through
its learning and media businesses, Sanoma impacts the lives of millions of people every day. The impacts on consumers and
end-users inform and contribute to Sanoma’s strategy and business model.
Privacy
Data, especially personal data, is an essential part of Sanoma’s business. The impacts of privacy and information security on
media customers and on teachers and students using learning platforms are taken into account in digital product development.
In Learning, data helps teachers enhance learning outcomes, engagement and workflows, and supports students in optimising
their individual learning paths. In Learning, Sanoma processes personal data mostly as a ‘data processor’ on behalf of
customers, i.e., schools and municipalities. In Media Finland, Sanoma uses data to improve its journalistic content, deliver
personalised recommendations in media, drive customer-centric marketing, and improve customer experience of digital
applications. In Media Finland, Sanoma mostly acts as a ‘data controller’ when handling personal data of customers and end-
users. Journalistic content recommendations are based on editorial decisions and algorithms. Personal data is also used in
digital advertising, offering the ability to target customers by segments. Media Finland communicates transparently about its
advertising practices and third parties involved, leveraging EU-level advertisement-related standards that aim to continuously
improve market practices.
Sanoma is committed to protecting privacy, implementing security and ensuring the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI).
Privacy impacts on data subjects can be, for example, identity theft, damage to reputation, or loss of sense of trust. This
pertains especially to some of the learning businesses, which process sensitive personal data of children. In addition, the
accelerating use of AI can increase the risk of how personal data is used to automate digital platforms and make decisions
affecting individuals. Privacy risks are related to potential non-compliance with GDPR, especially personal data breaches,
which could occur in systems built by Sanoma or delivered by third parties. A breach of security could impact customer privacy
materially. The potential negative impacts related to data and privacy are not considered to be systemic, but rather related to
individual incidents.
Inclusive learning: Access to quality information and education
Through its learning business, Sanoma advances access to education by co-creating – with teachers – learning materials that
follow the local curriculum. Impacts of access to high-quality and inclusive learning products and services as well as impacts of
digital accessibility on customers, especially students and teachers, are taken into account in Learning’s method creation
process and included in its inclusive learning strategy. Sanoma impacts consumers and end-users, such as teachers and
students, by delivering learning products and services. Sanoma’s learning methods support diversity, personalisation and
equal access to education.
By assisting in creation of high-quality, engaging materials and providing real-time feedback, Sanoma’s AI tools can help both
teachers and students achieve better educational outcomes. Teachers can focus on creative and interactive teaching, while
students benefit from instant guidance and clarification of complex concepts. Sanoma aims to provide secure educational AI
environments for teachers and schools.
Accessibility: Access to products and services
Inclusion is an umbrella term that also encompasses accessibility. Learning offers schools learning materials that include a
variety of digital learning assets to increase learning impact among all students and address barriers to learning through
traditional formats. For example, for some students the barriers of text-based materials can be overcome by an application
providing audio learning content. In order to develop its understanding of students’ needs regarding accessibility of learning
materials, and thus to mitigate the potential negative impact on end-users, Sanoma organises local meetings and peer review
groups with teachers as well as discussions with third-party experts in the field of disabilities.
Media Finland promotes accessibility in its audiovisual content services, such as Ruutu.fi, Ruutu mobile applications and
Supla, as well as on its online sites to enhance usability for all consumers and end-users. Consumers and end-users have the
opportunity to provide feedback to help improve digital accessibility. The potential negative impacts related to accessibility are
not considered to be systemic, but rather related to individual products.
Sustainable media: Freedom of expression and media ethics
Through its media business, Sanoma promotes freedom of expression by delivering reliable information through multiple
media platforms and following journalistic ethics. Consumers have access to independent and reliable journalism and are free
to form their own opinions and participate in public discussion. As a media company, the impact of journalistic ethics and
operations on freedom of expression are always considered when developing Sanoma’s news media.
Journalists also use AI, for example, for drafting article summaries, transcribing interviews and searching large datasets. For
consumers this means timely news and articles tailored to the readers’ individual interests and preferences. AI automation
frees up journalists to focus on creative storytelling and investigative work, which leads to richer content for readers. AI-
Financial Statements 2025
103
powered tools can also improve the accessibility to news. Humans remain responsible for the final content, and the use of AI is
openly disclosed to readers.
Responsible marketing practices
For its B2B customers, Sanoma offers marketing opportunities to reach Finnish consumers. The Finnish National Audiovisual
Institute (KAVI) gives guidance for age-limits and protection of vulnerable audiences. Sanoma follows these instructions when
posting material that may harm vulnerable audiences, such as children and young people. The impact of responsible
advertising practices and compliance with green claims regulation are embedded into the B2B processes to ensure alignment
with advertising ethics. The potential negative impacts related to sustainable marketing practices are not considered to be
systemic, but rather related to individual cases.
Impact, risk and opportunity management
S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users
In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage impacts and risks related to consumers and
end-users. In addition to the overarching Code of Conduct ( CoC) and Sustainability and Human Rights Policy, Sanoma has
topic-specific policies. The key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the policies are
presented in the table ‘Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to consumers and end-users’.
Human rights policy commitments
The Sanoma Code of Conduct acts as an umbrella for all policies and standards within Sanoma. The CoC encompasses the
Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact on human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption.
The Sustainability and Human Rights Policy outlines Sanoma’s sustainability-related principles and summarises its core
commitments in its own operations. As a signatory of the UN Global Compact (UNGC), Sanoma recognises the importance of
the Agenda 2030 and UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and adheres to the UN Guiding Principles. In relation to
impacts on consumers and end-users, Sanoma commits to the Ten Principles related to fundamental responsibilities in human
rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption. The Sustainability and Human Rights Policy is aligned with internationally
recognised instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Labour Organization’s
(ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
Sanoma’s privacy-related policies are aligned with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 12 related to Privacy. In
addition, security controls are selected and implemented based on the industry’s leading standards (ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC
27701) and their code of practices. Some of the learning businesses are also ISO certified (Clickedu, itslearning, Bureau Ice,
and Iddink Digital). Safeguards for processing children’ data is one of the ten principles in Sanoma’s Data Protection and
Privacy Policy, as children are users of the products and services of Sanoma’s media, and especially learning business.
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to consumers and end-users
General policies
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Code of
Conduct (CoC)
Key content described in G1-1. From a consumer and end-user perspective,
the policy outlines that Sanoma prioritises customer trust by delivering
products and solutions that inform, inspire, educate, and entertain, while
ensuring transparent advertising, fair data privacy practices, and ethical use
of AI. In addition, Sanoma is committed to maintaining integrity in its
operations and fostering customer relationships through responsible and
trustworthy business practices.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Legal for
implementation. Board of
Directors approve the
policy.
The Ten principles of the UN Global Compact, the UN
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the OECD
Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises and ILO’s
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Publicly available on
company website
All S4-related IROs
presented as
presented in ESRS 2
SBM-3
Sustainability
and Human
Rights Policy
Key content described in S1-1. Outlines Sanoma’s sustainability-related
principles and summarises its core commitments in its own operations. It
defines Sanoma’s sustainability due diligence process, including
identification, assessment, management and remediation of sustainability-
related impacts. This policy also outlines Sanoma’s sustainability
management model as well as the responsibilities to identify impacts, risks
and opportunities though the double materiality assessment process.
All Sanoma employees in
all operating countries
Group Sustainability for
implementation. Board of
Directors approve the
policy.
The UN Global Compact (UNGC), The UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights, The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), The International
Labour Organization’s (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental
Principles and Rights at Work, The OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises, The Rio Declaration on
Environment and Development
Stakeholders’ views were
taken into consideration
in both policy setting by
analysing insights
received from the
suppliers, customers and
employees
Publicly available on
company website
All S4-related IROs
presented as
presented in ESRS 2
SBM-3
Financial Statements 2025
104
Privacy
Sanoma is committed to protecting privacy, advancing data security as well as ensuring the ethical use of artificial intelligence
(AI). Sanoma has adopted several policies to manage and prevent any negative impact or realisation of a risk related to
privacy and information security regarding its learning and media customers and end-users.
The Chief Legal Officer is accountable for ensuring that the principles, guidelines and processes comply with the relevant
privacy laws. The Director, Privacy and Compliance leads a Privacy Programme to provide privacy advice, monitor compliance
of processes for privacy implementation and report on privacy compliance. The Data Protection Officers in Learning and
Media together with the Director, Privacy and Compliance, report on compliance with the Privacy and Data Protection Policy to
the management and Audit Committee. The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is responsible for facilitating the delivery
of high-quality security services. The CISO reports on compliance with the Information Security Policy and security incidents to
the management.
The Supplier Code of Conduct are referred to during the negotiation process with the suppliers. Privacy, security and
responsible buying are included in the mandatory Code of Conduct trainings for all employees. In addition, there are specific
guidelines in place on how to implement privacy and security into operations. Sanoma communicates to its customers and
end-users about privacy in its Privacy Policy statements provided through the digital interfaces where its digital products are
available.
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Privacy and
Data Protection
Policy
Describes the ten principles that guide the implementation
of privacy laws into Sanoma’s operations. The Privacy
Programme undergoes internal audits to verify adherence
to the Privacy and Data Protection Policy.
Safeguards for processing children’s data is one of the ten
principles in Sanoma’s Data Protection and Privacy Policy,
as children are users of the products and services of
Sanoma’s media, and especially learning business.
All Sanoma employees in all
operating countries
The Director, Privacy and Compliance owns the policy.
President and CEO approves the policy.
The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, Article 12
related to Privacy
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Internally available to all
Sanoma employees
Despite Sanoma’s
preventive measures, the
use of personal data in
its products and services
may affect data subjects,
for example through
insufficient transparency,
limited control over data
usage, or due to
information security
incidents
Risk that cybersecurity
and data protection
measures implemented
internally or by third
parties prove as
insufficient and
ineffective, exposing
Sanoma to breaches,
fines, and reputational
damage
Principles of
Ethical Use of
AI
When using AI, Sanoma applies privacy and personal data
protection principles and practices defined in its Privacy
and Data Protection Policy and in the Principles of Ethical
Use of AI. The Principles include Fairness with an aim for
positive impact, Accountability by humans, Explainability,
Transparency, Risk and impact assessment and Oversight
to monitor the implementation of AI.
All Sanoma employees in all
operating countries
The Group Legal and Compliance team.
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Internally available to all
Sanoma employees
Information
Security Policy
Determines the organisational, people, technical and
physical controls in ensuring the confidentiality, integrity
and availability of Sanoma’s business operations and how
to deal with cybersecurity risks.
All Sanoma employees in all
operating countries
The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) owns the
policy and is responsible for delivering related standards
and guidelines. President and CEO approves the policy.
The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, Article 12
related to Privacy, ISO/IEC
27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/
IEC 27002, ISO/IEC 27018
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Publicly available on
company website
Supplier Code
of Conduct
(SCoC)
Key content described in S2-1. The SCoC sets the privacy
and security requirements for suppliers that process
personal data of consumers, customers or employees, on
Sanoma’s behalf.
All upstream and
downstream suppliers and
workers in the value chain
Procurement for implementation. President and CEO
approves the standard.
The Ten Principles of the UN
Global Compact, the UDHR,
the International Bill of
Human Rights, the UNGPS,
the ILO declaration and
supporting ILO standards
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Publicly available on
company website
Financial Statements 2025
105
Inclusive learning: Access to quality information and education
Sanoma has Learning-wide practices to manage the impact of its learning materials on teachers and students. To develop its
guidelines according to teachers’ and students’ needs, Sanoma utilises the feedback from the stakeholders gained through, for
example, the annually conducted European Teacher Survey and focus groups. Sanoma also conducts external audits on the
inclusion of learning materials on a regular basis. To ensure that the guidelines are adopted by the entire Learning
organisation, they are regularly communicated internally. Sanoma also uses feedback processes to evaluate and ensure the
effectiveness of the policies.
In addition, the internal Inclusive Learning Toolkit serves as a central repository for Inclusive Learning projects across the
areas of differentiation, DEI & SDG-related content, accessibility, and special social projects with external partners. The toolkit
supports the development of and advances Inclusive learning across Learning.
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Editorial
guidelines
Defines Sanoma’s commitments and approach to editorial ethics and
inclusive content. The four guiding principles are: “We create high-quality
learning materials”, “We support diversity and inclusiveness”, “We ensure
equal access” and “We are committed the United Nations Sustainable
Development Goals”. In addition to the SBU-wide process, operating
companies have their own defined editorial guidelines, respecting the local
legal and ethical regulations and norms. Sanoma follows local curriculum
requirements in its content creation.
Learning SBU
Guidelines are approved by the President
and CEO. The Learning Strategy team is
responsible for implementing the
guidelines.
UN SDGs
Sanoma utilises feedback from the
stakeholders gained through, for example,
the annual European Teacher Survey and
focus groups to develop its Editorial
guidelines according to teachers’ and
students’ needs
Learning-wide editorial
guidelines are publicly
available on Sanoma’s
website, and local
editorial guidelines are
available in internal
channels
Through its learning
business, Sanoma
promotes access to
education by co-
creating inclusive and
diverse learning
materials to students
and teachers
Accessibility: Access to products and services
In Learning, Sanoma launched in 2025 SBU-wide guidelines to manage the accessibility-related impact its learning materials
have on teachers and students. The guidelines are presented in the table below.
Media Finland does not have SBU-level policies to manage the impact related to digital accessibility. Media Finland ensures
that its audiovisual services and sites comply with the European Accessibility Act and Finland’s Act on the Provision of Digital
Services, meeting standards for perceivable and understandable content. Accessibility statements are published for
audiovisual content services and its online stores to provide transparency on compliance status, user feedback mechanisms,
and continuous improvement measures, while Traficom oversees reporting on action plans and progress for audiovisual
accessibility. Accessibility development is managed by separate teams: one is responsible for Media Finland’s audiovisual
content services and another one for online stores. Media Finland promotes accessibility in its audiovisual content services
(Ruutu.fi, Ruutu mobile applications and Supla) and its online stores (Oma.Sanoma.fi, Tilaa.Sanoma).
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Accessibility
guidelines
(launched in
2025)
The guidelines represent Learning’s commitment to ensuring that digital
learning products are usable for every student. In line with the guidelines, the
design of learning methods and digital products must ensure compliance
with WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards, incorporate accessible components
from the Sanoma Learning Design System, present content in a clear and
well-structured manner, and maintain full compatibility with assistive
technologies. The guidelines also align with the European Accessibility Act,
emphasising the integration of accessibility throughout design, creation and
development processes, supported by regular reviews and training.
Learning SBU
Approved by the President
and CEO. The Learning
Strategy Team is responsible
for  implementing  the
guidelines.
WCAG 2.1 Level AA
standards, European
Accessibility Act
Sanoma utilises feedback from
the stakeholders gained
through, for example, the
annual European Teacher
Survey and focus groups to
develop its guidelines
Internally available to all
Learning employees
Sanoma’s digital products
and content may not be
fully accessible to all
consumers, for example
due to limitations in design,
language options, or
compatibility with assistive
technologies, which can
restrict equal access and
inclusive user experience
Financial Statements 2025
106
Sustainable media: Freedom of expression and media ethics
When publishing content, Sanoma complies with the legislation on freedom of speech and expression, and the legislation
concerning media. In addition, Media Finland follows the Council of Mass Media’s (CMM) Journalist’s Guidelines and has
media-specific guidelines that complement them. Sanoma’s commitment to freedom of speech and the CMM’s Journalist’s
Guidelines are stated in the CoC and in the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy. Sanoma is a member of the CMM, and
the Journalist’s Guidelines are the main guiding principles of the journalistic work at Media Finland.
According to the Freedom of Speech Act, the task of the Editor-in-Chief (responsible editor) is to lead and supervise the
editorial work, decide on the content and take care of, for example, the realisation of the right to rectification and
compensation. The Editors-in-Chief and Sanoma’s Forum for the Editors-in-Chief develop the editorial culture at Sanoma,
provide guidance, follow reader surveys and customer feedback and take part in public discussion on editorial independence,
ethics and journalism. Sanoma’s Board of Directors appoints and dismisses the respective Editors-in-Chief of Helsingin
Sanomat, Ilta-Sanomat, Aamulehti and Satakunnan Kansa. Annually, the Board receives reporting on the general conditions of
editorial freedom and how each of the news brands performs against the key metrics presented in their respective strategic
plans.
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Consideration of
stakeholders
Availability
Related IRO
Media-specific
journalists’
instructions
Sanoma is a member of the Council of Mass Media’s (CMM), and the
Journalist's Guidelines are the main guiding principles of the journalistic work
at Media Finland. Helsingin Sanomat, Aamulehti, Satakunnan Kansa and
Ilta-Sanomat, have their own journalists’ instructions that complement the
CMM’s Journalist’s Guidelines and guide ethical news work daily. Helsingin
Sanomat’s principles for example explain why the work is done and how
published information is verified. Aamulehti has an online article with
questions and answers about journalism, as well as ethical issues.
Satakunnan Kansa continuously updates an online article that explains their
principles. The aim of the guidelines is to support the responsible use of
freedom of speech and define good journalistic practice in Finland.
Media Finland’s journalistic
work
Sanoma’s Editors-in-Chief and
supervisors of the editorial
teams
The Council of Mass Media’s
(CMM) Journalist’s Guidelines,
the Freedom of Speech Act
No direct stakeholder
involvement
Helsingin Sanomat’s,
Satakunnan Kansa’s and
Aamulehti’s principles public
are available on the media’s
website. Ilta-Sanomat’s own
ethical guidelines are available
internally
Through its media
business, Sanoma
promotes freedom of
expression by delivering
consumers reliable
information through
multiple media platforms
and following journalistic
ethics
Responsible marketing practices
Sanoma’s commitment to maintain high ethical standards and truthfulness of advertising practices, protect vulnerable
audiences, and comply with the International Chamber of Commerce Advertising and Marketing Communications Code, is
included in the Sustainability and Human Rights Policy.
In its advertising practices, Sanoma complies with the ICC Advertising and Marketing Communications Code, the EU
Framework for Online Behavioural Advertising self-regulation principles issued by IAB Europe and the marketing self-
regulation guidelines of the Data & Marketing Association of Finland. Sanoma reviews the advertisements it publishes to
ensure compliance with the good practice referred to in the ICC Advertising and Marketing Communications Code.
In addition, Sanoma follows guidelines on advertising ethics set by Finnish institutions such as the Council of Mass Media,
National Audiovisual Institute (KAVI) and the Council of Ethics in Advertising. Sanoma keeps advertising and journalistic
content separate, and does not provide advertisers with digital advertising target groups including children. When it comes to
television, materials that could potentially harm vulnerable audiences, such as children and youth, are published by Sanoma
according to the KAVI guidelines.
In Finland, ethics in advertising is supervised by The Council of Ethics in Advertising. The Council issues statements on
whether an advertisement or advertising practice is ethically acceptable. The Council deals with issues like discrimination,
decency and social responsibility. Sanoma tracks and responds to the notifications received through The Council of Ethics in
Advertising, and reports the number of notifications annually.
Sanoma regularly updates the expertise of the team responsible for monitoring the advertising traffic regarding advertising
ethics. This includes both changes in regulations as well as Sanoma’s own guidelines. For example, Sanoma continuously
develops the age classification process and related staff are trained by KAVI. Sanoma has clear practices and processes in
place to ensure that advertising is ethically acceptable as part of the everyday work. In unclear cases, advertisements are
discussed with Editors-in-Chiefs to align views.
The policies cover the IRO: Consumers may be exposed to advertisements in Sanoma’s media that are non-compliant with
responsible advertising practices and green claims regulation. The policies apply to all Media Finland’s advertising business,
and the CEO of Media Finland, who is a member of the EMT, is ultimately responsible for the implementation of the policies.
Financial Statements 2025
107
S4-2 Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
Sanoma engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with consumers and end-users directly or through credible
proxies, about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them.
Sanoma gains insight into the perspectives of consumers and/or end-users that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts,
such as children, through guidelines provided by data protection authorities authorised to enforce the protection of data
subject rights, guidelines set by third parties as presented in section S4-1 or when regarding education, through engagement
with teachers.
Privacy
GDPR outlines Sanoma’s obligations in fulfilling data subject rights. Sanoma engages with consumers and end-users to meet
these rights. Sanoma does not engage with customers and end-users to gain their perspectives on privacy-related matters so
that they would be considered in Sanoma’s decision-making in a manner that is aligned with the ESRS reporting requirements.
However, Sanoma communicates about its data processing through Privacy Policy Statements available on its websites and
digital products. These Privacy Policy Statements include instructions for data subjects to exercise their rights (e.g. make
requests for data access, deletion and portability), and the means to reach out to Sanoma’s Data Protection Officers for
privacy-related inquiries. Consumer and end-user privacy inquiries are addressed internally on a case-by-case basis. When in
the role of data processor, Sanoma supports the data controllers in fulfilling these obligations. The data subjects can also
contact the local data protection authority to express their privacy concerns.
In the event of a personal data breach that negatively impacts the data subjects’ privacy, Sanoma evaluates the incident on a
case-by-case basis according to its personal data breach management process. As required by GDPR, Sanoma will inform
affected individuals at high risk about the breach, how their data was affected and what measures they can take to protect
their privacy. Sanoma assesses the effectiveness of its engagement with consumers and end-users related to privacy through
tracking that all data subjects are responded to and within the time required by the law. Sanoma’s Data Protection Officers are
responsible for engagement with consumers and end-users regarding privacy-related inquiries and data breaches.
Inclusive learning: Access to quality information and education
On a continuing basis, Sanoma engages directly with teachers when co-creating and developing the learning materials. To
follow up on Sanoma’s impact and to better understand the use of various learning materials and tools in each operating
country, Sanoma annually conducts a European Teacher Survey (ETS). In addition, feedback from teachers is gained through
working groups during the process of reviewing the survey results. Sanoma does not directly engage with students, as their
perspective is gained through engaging with teachers. Learning’s Strategy team is responsible for the ETS survey. Local
operating companies have the operational responsibility for engagement with teachers. ETS survey is also used to assess the
effectiveness of the engagement with teachers.
Accessibility: Access to products and services
In Learning, Sanoma regularly organises local meetings and peer review groups with teachers, and the topic of accessibility of
Sanoma’s products and related development needs is also discussed in these forums. In addition, in some countries,
discussions with third-party experts in the field of disabilities are organised. Accessibility is also addressed in the ETS survey
described in the previous section, and thus also used to assess the effectiveness of the engagement. Local operating
companies have the operational responsibility for engagement with teachers.
In Media Finland, the accessibility statements for the services providing access to audiovisual content (Ruutu.fi, Ruutu mobile
applications and Supla) and online stores (Oma.Sanoma.fi, Tilaa.Sanoma) are publicly available online. Consumers and end-
users have the opportunity to give feedback regarding accessibility directly to Sanoma online, and this feedback is handled by
the dedicated accessibility coordination teams for audiovisual services and online stores.
Sustainable media: Freedom of expression and media ethics
Consumers and end-users can send feedback directly to Sanoma’s media through publicly available contact information or by
leaving comments to the articles available online. Feedback is read by the editorial teams, and can be used to develop the
decision-making in the journalistic process. If the feedback is related to incorrect information, Journalist’s Guidelines require
that the information is corrected as soon as possible after it comes to the attention of the editorial staff and in such a way that
it will reach the public as widely as possible. Sanoma’s news media each have their own ways to inform the public how to
report errors or how to contact the Editor-in-Chief.
In addition to sending feedback directly to Sanoma, consumers can submit a complaint concerning a breach of good
journalistic practice to the CMM. The matter does not need to concern the complainant personally, but the consent of the
injured party must be included in order for the case to be processed. In the event that the Council considers that any of Media
Finland’s media has violated the Journalist’s Guidelines, Sanoma is committed to publishing the Council’s condemnatory
decision within a short time span. If the media that has received the notice does not publish it, the notice will be otherwise
made public. Sanoma closely follows the decisions of the CMM, and engages in discussion about the decisions that guide
journalistic work. All Media Finland’s news media have published their own editorial principles. Sanoma tracks and reports the
CMM cases related to its operations externally on an annual basis to further develop professional ethics.
Sanoma assesses the effectiveness of the engagement with consumers and end-users through product-specific surveys
targeted to readers as well as by conducting surveys to people ending their subscriptions. The Editors-in-Chief in each media
are responsible for the engagement with the consumers and end-users.
Responsible marketing practices
Sanoma does not directly engage with consumers regarding advertising. A consumer can request a statement from the
Council of Ethics in Advertising on whether an advertisement or other procedure in commercial marketing is contrary to good
practice or recognisable as marketing, taking into account the ICC marketing rules. There is no time limit for requesting the
statement. Sanoma is not responsible for the content published by the Council, but it tracks and responds to the notifications
received through the Council. The statements from the Council of Ethics in Advertising are reviewed by the Media Finland
Legal team, and internal guidelines are updated accordingly if needed. Sanoma reports the number of notifications externally
on an annual basis. Sanoma does not assess the effectiveness of its engagement with consumers and end-users related to
responsible marketing practices.
Financial Statements 2025
108
S4-3 Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns
Sanoma implements a remediation process to prevent and address material impacts related to consumers and end-users.
Sanoma has identified both actual and potential negative impacts related to privacy, access to products and services as well
as responsible marketing practices. These impacts have been described under S4 SBM-3.
General processes
Sanoma’s third-party hosted Whistleblowing channel enables anyone, including customers and end-users, to report suspicions
of misconduct related to sustainability or human rights issues confidentially and anonymously. According to its CoC, Sanoma
does not tolerate retaliation against anyone who raises a concern or participates in an investigation. Sanoma investigates
reported cases, reviews incidents, leverages learnings to influence both internal and external processes and reports the
number and types of these cases annually. Material issues are reported to the Audit Committee as well as the Sustainability
and Ethics Working Group.
The effectiveness of this grievance channel is assessed by monitoring the number of cases reported as well as tracking the
cases investigated and solved annually. Sanoma is subject to the requirements of the EU Whistleblowing Directive as well as
national whistleblowing legislation in its operating countries. Sanoma’s Whistleblowing channel is available in several
languages relevant for Sanoma’s operations and value chain. Sanoma is unable to evaluate whether customers and end-
users are aware of and trust the structures or processes to raise their concerns.
Additional privacy-specific processes
More specifically for privacy, Sanoma addresses the negative impacts of security incidents affecting personal data on a case-
by-case basis through its data breach management process.
According to Sanoma’s personal data breach management process, each personal data breach case is evaluated separately,
taking into account the potential impacts to data subjects. As required by GDPR, Sanoma informs affected individuals, who are
likely to be at high risk, about the data breach, how their data has been affected and what measures they can take to protect
their privacy. These measures may vary, depending on the nature of the case.
Consumers and end-users can reach out to Sanoma’s Data Protection Officers for any privacy inquiries and to raise privacy-
related concerns.
To monitor the effectiveness of addressing personal data breaches, the number of actual and potential personal data breach
cases is reviewed on a quarterly basis in both Media Finland and Learning. Sanoma reviews the main causes and reasons
behind personal data breaches annually, and plans additional measures to prevent them from happening. In 2025, Sanoma
addressed all detected personal data breaches in accordance with its personal data breach management process.
S4-4 Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks
and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions
The chapters below describe the key actions that are implemented and planned to prevent and mitigate negative impacts
related to privacy, access to products and services and responsible marketing practices. In addition, actions with the purpose
of positively contributing to improved social outcomes for consumers and/or end-users related to access to quality information
and freedom of expression are described below.
As described in section S4-2, the actions needed to manage actual or potential negative impacts on consumers and end-users
either come from authorities or third parties and/or are identified during engagement. Sanoma prevents and mitigates potential
negative impacts to its customers and end-users mainly through continuous processes.
The processes to provide remedy have been reported in section S4-3. In 2025, Sanoma did not take actions to provide or
enable remedy, as no need for such actions was identified. During the reporting period, there were no severe human rights
issues or incidents linked to Sanoma’s customers or end-users.
Privacy
Sanoma’s Privacy, Security and AI by Design process is a continuous process that helps identify actions to prevent potential
material privacy impacts to customers and end-users. Through this process, Sanoma’s product development, sales,
marketing, and advertising teams conduct privacy impact assessments (PIAs), security reviews and AI risk assessments when
planning new ways to process personal data or when creating new AI systems. In the event of a personal data breach that
negatively impacts the privacy of data subjects, Sanoma follows its data breach management process as described in section
S4-3. Potential and actual data breaches are reviewed quarterly to evaluate process effectiveness and identify the need for
additional controls. Sanoma sets annual targets to enhance the management of material privacy risks, aligning plans with the
company strategy and regulatory trends. These targets are utilised to plan the right actions. The key actions in 2025 related to
Privacy were:
Trainings to product managers and developers
In 2025, Sanoma offered training to product managers and developers in both SBUs to help them follow and implement the
Privacy, Security and AI by Design process, with special focus on learning how to classify AI systems in accordance with the
EU AI Act.
Data mapping tool
In 2025, Sanoma completed the implementation of a Group-wide data mapping tool that is used to manage the records of
processing activities, improving the efficiency of privacy impacts assessments and risks and data lifecycle management.
AI Governance measures
In 2025, Sanoma trained product teams on AI and how to assess potential risks that AI use may bring to customers and end-
users. These trainings were related to the Group-wide AI Governance measures that Sanoma defined in 2024 to support AI
use and prepare for the EU AI Act. The measures included creating an inventory of AI use cases and incorporating Ethical AI
Principles and the EU AI Act requirements into the Privacy, Security and AI by Design process.
Financial Statements 2025
109
Sanoma measures the effectiveness of privacy risk management processes by monitoring the completion of privacy
assessments before launching new products or features. The maturity of product teams in implementing secure development
standards is also measured. Trends in data subject requests are monitored to provide an indication of potential issues.
The number of authority information requests and enforcement actions is also an indication of the effectiveness of managing
potential negative privacy impacts and risks. There was one substantiated formal warning and advice from the Dutch authority
to adjust the cookie banner in a Learning website in the Netherlands, which was rectified. In 2024, Media Finland appealed to
the Supreme Administrative court regarding a decision from the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom)
made in 2023, which found Media Finland’s cookie practices non-compliant, particularly in classifying cookies for journalistic
content as strictly necessary and in cookie rejection. At the end of 2025, resolution to the case is pending.
Inclusive learning: Access to quality information and education
Sanoma continuously reviews its learning methods to identify development needs and implement actions that make them
more inclusive, ensuring better learning outcomes for students. The engagement with teachers is continuous, as described in
section S4-2. The effectiveness of the actions is assessed through European Teacher Survey (ETS). In addition, results from
the ETS are reviewed collaboratively with teachers in dedicated working groups to ensure that feedback informs continuous
improvement.
Updating Editorial Guidelines
Learning initiated an update of its Editorial Guidelines in 2025 and plans to release a revised version in 2026. The aim of the
update is to align the guidelines with the Inclusive Learning strategy. The update also includes revising the local guidelines for
each operating company. This work is being carried out within the Inclusive Learning working group, that was established in
2025. The working group consists of representatives from all operating companies to ensure that the updated guidelines
reflect a shared vision and consistent standards across the organisation.
Method creation process development
The standardised, Learning-wide method creation process provides a consistent framework for developing educational content
covering aspects such as pedagogical integrity, inclusiveness, accessibility, and alignment with curriculum standards. To
maintain relevance and effectiveness, this method creation process is regularly reviewed and updated based on feedback
from educators, students, and internal stakeholders, as well as changes in educational standards.
AI tools to support teachers and students
In Learning, Sanoma develops AI tools that automate tasks like lesson planning, grading, and administration to save teachers
time and enable them to focus on creative, personalised teaching. AI enables tailored instructions, allowing teachers to
address individual student needs and learning styles. This supports more equitable learning outcomes and helps identify
students who require additional support, fostering inclusion and reducing educational disparities. The AI tools boost efficiency,
but the final product is always human-made. Authors take full editorial responsibility for the final output. Sanoma follows strict
ethical guidelines to ensure integrity and transparency.
As an expected outcome students benefit from AI tutoring that supports their learning. AI tutors are designed to help students
through exercises, explain concepts, and encourage independent study. One example is a speech coach that helps practice
pronunciation in a new language.
Accessibility: Access to products and services
The actions Sanoma takes to develop accessibility of its products and content are targeted to prevent potential negative
impacts of lack of accessibility on end-users. The goal of these actions is to enhance accessibility for users across all
communication needs, including speech, hearing, visual, motor, and cognitive functions. Developing digital and content
accessibility is an ongoing process that is continuously monitored in line with Learning’s Accessibility Guidelines. In Media
Finland, Sanoma continuously develops the accessibility of its digital solutions. The effectiveness of all Sanoma’s accessibility-
related actions is tracked through monitoring the completion of accessibility-related development plans and by performing
audits.
Launch of Learning Accessibility guidelines
In 2025, Sanoma launched Learning-wide Accessibility Guidelines as a commitment to ensure that all its digital learning
products are usable for every student. The guidelines emphasise integrating accessibility throughout design, creation and
development processes, supported by regular reviews and training. The guidelines are presented in more detail in section
S4-1.
Accessibility requirements for content creators
In 2025, Learning initiated the introduction of the accessibility requirements for content creators. These requirements apply to
external suppliers, such as writers and providers of images, maps, tables, and video, and are designed to ensure that all
materials are accessible. The requirements was initiated by the 2025 established Accessibility working group that consists of
experts in accessible content across the SBU.
Learning SL Design System accessibility audit
Sanoma conducts accessibility audits on its digital products with the help of third parties. In 2025, an audit was conducted by
an external party confirming a 96% compliance of the SL Design System against the WCAG Guideline AA-level requirements.
The SL Design System is a framework-agnostic, open-source collection of reusable components and guidelines that enables
development teams to build consistent, accessible, and high-quality user interfaces across products efficiently. Sanoma will
continue to develop the system towards full compliancy.
Media Finland accessibility audits
Media Finland continuously develops accessibility in its services that provide audiovisual content. During 2025, Media Finland
carried out accessibility audits for its systems, including Oma.Sanoma.fi, Tilaa.Sanoma, the news service online store,
Ruutu.fi, the Ruutu mobile applications, and Supla. Accessibility enhancements were implemented as part of regular service
development in accordance with the transition periods set by the Act on the Provision of Digital Services (306/2019). Media
Finland’s audits have been conducted against the European Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) accessibility
standard.
Financial Statements 2025
110
Sustainable media: Freedom of expression and media ethics
Sanoma carries out actions to positively contribute to freedom of expression and media ethics throughout society.
Use of AI in the media
As use of AI increases, in 2025 several of Sanoma’s media, such as Helsingin Sanomat, Aamulehti, Satakunnan Kansa and
Ilta-Sanomat, published their principles on how AI is used in the journalistic work. Journalists mainly use AI for drafting article
summaries, transcribing interviews, searching large datasets, recommendation systems, and suggesting keywords.
Additionally, AI can support in text-to-speech, illustration creation, and drafting article outlines. Ultimately, humans remain
responsible for the final content, and the use of AI is openly disclosed to readers. These principles are publicly available on the
media’s websites. They all comply with the statement of the Council for Mass Media regarding the labelling of personalisation
and news automation, which means that the media openly disclose the use of AI in journalistic work.
As an expected outcome, the use of AI enables media organisations to improve personalisation and deliver news and articles
for consumers that are tailored to individual reader interests and preferences. As AI can automate routine and repetitive tasks,
journalists can focus on in-depth reporting and ensure readers receive timely, accurate updates on current events. In addition,
journalists’ time is freed up to focus on creative storytelling and investigative work, which leads to richer content for readers.
AI-powered tools can also convert articles into audio, improving accessibility of news. The effectiveness of these actions is
assessed by collecting feedback through product-specific reader surveys.
Supporting media literacy and reading skills
One of the most significant ways to strengthen media literacy is to support the relationship of children and young people with
media and reading. To inspire reading enthusiasm among 13–25-year-olds, Media Finland supported Lukuboost campaign
launched in October 2024 and concluded in January 2025. According to the Lukuboost campaign survey results more than 6,000
young people participated in the campaign with more than 50,000 reading sessions.
In 2025, Sanoma also participated in the News Week, a joint media education theme week for schools and news media. The
aim of the week is to encourage children and young people to engage with news media and raise the importance of critical
media literacy. Supporting media education and ensuring access to reliable information is an important part of Sanoma’s
sustainability work to support open democracy and freedom of expression. During the News Week, positive news stories were
highlighted, and Ilta-Sanomat published videos on a wide range of topics. In addition, Helsingin Sanomat Kids News and
Satakunnan Kansa organised special events and competitions for young people.
Responsible marketing practices
As part of its daily operations, Sanoma has established processes to identify any potential non-compliance with the ICC
marketing rules. To prevent negative impact, Sanoma continuously updates the know-how of its B2B teams related to good
marketing practices. If there is uncertainty whether the advertisement follows good marketing practices, cases are reviewed
together with the Editors-in-Chief of the respective newspapers and magazines. The B2B organisation is responsible for the
updating and maintaining processes. The effectiveness of actions is assessed through tracking the notifications received from
the Council of Ethics in Advertising. Internal guidelines are updated based on the notifications if needed.
Metrics and targets
S4-5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing
material risks and opportunities
Sanoma has not set any ESRS-aligned measurable time-bound outcome-oriented targets related to consumers and end-
users, and does not have plans to implement such targets. Sanoma tracks the effectiveness of consumers and end-users-
related policies and actions through entity-specific metrics described below. These targets originate from the Sustainability
Strategy. Given the nature of Sanoma’s business, material issues do not change annually, and therefore the Sustainability
Strategy and targets are set for the long term.
Privacy
Sanoma’s target is to ensure an effective Privacy, Security and AI by Design process, which helps identify actions to protect
data subject rights and prevent and manage negative impacts and material risks.
The controls that are implemented for potential threats identified during the Privacy, Security and AI -by-Design process aim to
prevent negative impacts related to personal data breaches. Monitoring the number and type of data breaches helps evaluate
the effectiveness of the measures taken to prevent these breaches. Also, the way in which each potential or actual personal
data breach is handled can impact the consequences for data subjects. The causes for personal data breaches can also
reveal potential gaps in compliance for handling personal data, lead to increased data subjects requesting to exercise their
rights, and can lead to authority information requests and enforcement actions. Most of the data breach cases occurred mainly
in the media business’ B2C sales domain, and typically were related to a single customer’s data. A slight increase in data
breaches was observed during the reporting period, primarily linked to changes in the media sales processes. The incidents
mainly resulted from human error and were promptly addressed through targeted training within the sales organisation.
Consumers and end-users are not directly engaged in setting privacy targets or tracking performance against those targets
nor are they engaged in identifying lessons or improvements as a result of the performance. However, Sanoma’s Legal
Compliance and Privacy Team, including the Data Protection Officers, and the CISO team have established targets based on
continuous improvement of maturity and on monitoring operational metrics for privacy and information security. These teams
annually evaluate the outcomes of actions and use those as input for annual planning. Sanoma’s internal Privacy champion
network, as a first line of support, are also part of this discussion.
The KPIs to track the effectiveness of its policies are reviewed on a quarterly basis in Sanoma’s privacy board in respective
business units. In addition, data-related sustainability targets are set annually to increase the maturity of the implementation of
privacy in Sanoma, and they have been also part of the Executive Management Team’s short-term incentives.
S4-5 Entity-specific disclosure: Customer privacy
Metric used to evaluate progress
2025
2024
Total number of identified personal data breaches
236
178
Substantiated complaints from regulatory bodies concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of
customer data
1
1
Financial Statements 2025
111
Inclusive learning: Access to quality information and education
Sanoma’s targets are to co-create high-quality and motivating learning materials with teachers, fitting the local curriculum, to
develop inclusive learning solutions that support diversity, accessibility and differentiation and to promote equal access to
education.
The effectiveness of Sanoma’s development work in relation to high-quality, motivating and inclusive materials is tracked via
Sanoma’s annual European Teacher Survey (ETS). The survey is conducted by asking teachers opinions on several matters
of which ’Use of methods’and thus access to quality information, is the main subject. In the survey, the impacts of learning
materials are evaluated by teachers from three aspects: student engagement, learning outcomes, and teacher efficiency.
Sanoma has not set any quantitative targets for the metrics. The survey results are reviewed throughout the Learning
organisation as well as together with teachers, and used to identify areas for improvement for learning materials.
Accessibility: Access to products and services
In Learning, the target has been that common components used in Learning’s core digital products are accessible and
compliant with the AA-level of the WCAG Guidelines (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) from 2025 onwards. In 2025, an
audit was conducted by an external party confirming a 96% compliance of the SL Design System against the WCAG Guideline
AA-level requirements. Sanoma will continue to develop the system towards full compliancy. In addition, for 2025 the target
was to launch new Accessibility guidelines to support the implementation, which was achieved.
In Media Finland, Sanoma’s target is to continuously develop the accessibility of its digital solutions. In addition, more specific
targets are set annually. In 2025, the target was to conduct an external party review verifying accessibility of digital solutions
against WCAG AA standards, which was successfully completed.
The effectiveness of the accessibility-related actions is tracked through monitoring of the completion of accessibility-related
development plans, also linked to Sanoma’s loan agreement, and by performing audits. A minor part of the pricing of
Sanoma’s EUR 300 million Syndicated Revolving Credit Facility is linked to developing inclusive learning solutions, more
specifically the accessibility of digital learning content and platforms, and this progress is monitored regularly. The outcomes of
the audits are taken to the technical teams. Depending on the outcomes, recommendations or deficiencies are put on
roadmaps and addressed or resolved.
For Learning, accessibility is also addressed in the European Teacher Survey described in the previous section. In addition,
local meetings and peer review groups with teachers are organised regularly, and the intended actions and set targets are
discussed in these forums. In some countries also discussions with third-party experts in the field of disabilities are utilised
when setting the targets.
Sustainable media: Freedom of expression and media ethics
Sanoma’s target is to promote an open democratic society and freedom of speech through its independent media, and to
increase awareness, empathy and tolerance with its journalism. Consumers and end-users do not participate in setting or
tracking performance against the targets, nor are they engaged in identifying lessons or improvements as result of Sanoma’s
performance.
Sanoma continuously monitors the number of notifications of violations concerning aspects of news articles as defined in the
Journalist’s Guidelines by The Council of Mass Media, but does not have any target level for the number of notifications as it
cannot impact the number of complaints. If, in the Council’s opinion, a media outlet has violated good journalistic practice, the
media in question will be given a warning which must be published within a short period of time.
Sanoma closely follows the decisions of the CMM and the interpretation of the instructions. In 2025, Sanoma received 6
liberating and 6 condemnatory decisions from the CMM. The media learns from the complaints and develops its processes
accordingly.
S4-5 Entity-specific disclosure: Resolutions concerning responsible journalism practices as defined in the
Journalist’s Guidelines by the Council of Mass Media, number of resolutions
Metric used to evaluate progress
2025
2024
Liberating decisions
6
17
Condemnatory decisions
6
5
Responsible marketing practices
Sanoma’s target is to enable companies to thrive through its sustainable marketing solutions that are aligned with responsible
marketing practices. Consumers and end-users do not participate in setting or tracking performance against the targets, nor
are they engaged in identifying lessons or improvements as a result of Sanoma’s performance.
Sanoma continuously monitors the cases of non-compliance against the Advertising and Marketing Communications Code of
the International Chamber of Commerce, but does not have any target level for the number of incidents as it cannot impact the
number of statement requests to the Council of Ethics in Advertising. The Council of Ethics in Advertising delivers its response
to the statement request directly to the consumer who requested it. The statements from the Council of Ethics in Advertising
are also public. The statements from the Council of Ethics in Advertising are reviewed by the Media Finland Legal team, and
internal guidelines are updated accordingly if needed.
In 2025, Sanoma had 0 incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes according to the Council of Ethics in Advertising.
S4-5 Entity-specific disclosure: Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications, number of
cases
Metric used to evaluate progress
2025
2024
Incidents of non-compliance with voluntary codes (the Advertising and Marketing Communications Code)
0
2
Financial Statements 2025
112
Governance information
ESRS G1 Business conduct
SANOMA_pallot-07.svg
G1-1
Business conduct policies and corporate culture
G1-2
Management of relationships with suppliers
G1-3
Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
G1-4
Incidents of corruption or bribery
G1-5
Political influence and lobbying activities
Impact, risk and opportunity management
G1-1 Business conduct policies and corporate culture
Policies related to business conduct
In this section, Sanoma describes the policies and principles adopted to manage its impacts and risks related to business
conduct. The key contents, scope, accountability, third-party standards and availability of the policies are presented in the
table ‘Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to business conduct’. No stakeholders were involved
in setting the policies.
ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters related to business conduct
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Availability
Related IRO
Code of
Conduct (CoC)
Outlines Sanoma’s commitment to ethical and responsible business
practices. The policy emphasises the importance of public trust and sets out
principles for business conduct across Sanoma. It covers areas such as
human rights, anti-corruption, fair competition, and environmental
responsibility, and applies to all employees and business partners.
Compliance with the Code is mandatory, and any breaches may lead to
disciplinary action.
All Sanoma employees
in all operating
countries
Group Legal for
driving
implementation. Board
of Directors approve
the policy.
The Ten principles of the UN
Global Compact, the UN
Guiding Principles on Business
and Human Rights (UNGPS),
the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (UDHR), the
OECD Guidelines on
Multinational Enterprises and
ILO’s Declaration on
Fundamental Principles and
Rights at Work
Publicly available on
company website
All G1-related IROs presented in ESRS 2 SBM-3
Anti-Bribery and
Corruption
Policy
Establishes Sanoma’s zero tolerance to bribery and corruption of any kind,
whether involving public officials or private sector entities, and commitment
to acting with integrity in all Sanoma’s business dealings and relationships.
In addition to the prohibition of corruption and bribery, it covers topics such
as the facilitation of payments, rules for gifts and entertainment, rules on
travel and accommodation, barter and exchange agreements, donations,
conflicts of interest, record keeping provisions, and money laundering.
All Sanoma employees
in all operating
countries
Group Legal for
driving
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the policy.
UN Convention against
Corruption
Internally available to
all Sanoma employees
Sanoma fosters an ethical corporate culture that is reflected in the diversity and
creativity of employees, further strengthening customer trust while minimising
regulatory compliance risks
The risk of unethical behaviour or non-compliance by employees related to anti-
competitive practices (such as predatory pricing, collusion through industry
associations, or abuse of market dominance) and resulting in legal penalties,
reputational damage, erosion of trust and decreased demand
Financial Statements 2025
113
Policy
Key contents
Scope
Accountability
Third-party standards
Availability
Related IRO
Fair
Competition
Policy
Outlines Sanoma's commitment to fair and professional competition in
compliance with applicable laws. It covers rules and principles for Sanoma
Group entities and employees to follow, addressing anti-competitive
agreements, cartels, information exchange, and abuse of dominance. The
policy also details procedures for handling investigations by competition
authorities and merger control requirements.
All Sanoma employees
in all operating
countries
Group Legal for
driving
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the policy.
Internally available to
all Sanoma employees
The risk of unethical behaviour or non-compliance by employees related to anti-
competitive practices (such as predatory pricing, collusion through industry
associations, or abuse of market dominance) and resulting in legal penalties,
reputational damage, erosion of trust and decreased demand
Donations and
Sponsorships
Policy
Defines Sanoma’s principles, decision-making process and criteria that are
applied to donations and sponsorships.
All Sanoma employees
in all operating
countries
Group Legal for
driving
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the policy.
Internally available to
all Sanoma employees
Sanoma’s political engagement and lobbying activities may be perceived as
prioritising business interests over societal or environmental considerations,
potentially affecting trust and stakeholder perceptions
Intellectual
Property Rights
(IPR) Policy
Defines the principles of creation, acquisition, protection, maintenance,
defence and licensing of IPR at Sanoma. More specifically regarding AI, the
policy advises on performing risk assessments in using third-party
generative AI solutions to avoid leakage or infringements of Sanoma’s IPR,
and to ensure there is no risk of infringement of third-party rights.
All Sanoma employees
in all operating
countries
Group Legal for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the policy.
Internally available to
all Sanoma employees
Risk of inadequate oversight and governance of AI in creating learning and media
content and digital solutions could lead to IP exposure, regulatory non-compliance,
loss of market differentiation reflected in the loss of trust of Sanoma's customers,
reputational damage and loss of revenue
The risk that Sanoma mismanages its intellectual property rights (including
trademarks, copyrights, and licensing agreements) by failing to protect or enforce
its own IP or by infringing third-party rights, resulting in financial losses due to
litigation costs, fines, lost royalty income, or loss of sales revenue, or weakened
market position
Anti-
Harassment
Standard
Aims to ensure a safe and respectful working environment by prohibiting all
forms of harassment, including sexual harassment, bullying, and
discrimination. It outlines the process for reporting and investigating
harassment cases, emphasising confidentiality and non-retaliation.
All Sanoma
employees, Board
members, freelancers,
consultants, and
suppliers
HR for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the
standard.
The Ten principles of the UN
Global Compact
Internally available to
all Sanoma employees
Sanoma fosters an ethical corporate culture that is reflected in the diversity and
creativity of employees, further strengthening customer trust while minimising
regulatory compliance risks
Sanoma’s commitment to robust whistleblower protection and transparent reporting
and investigation practices significantly enhances its corporate culture where
employees feel safe and empowered to report unethical behaviour without fear of
retaliation
Supplier Code
of Conduct
(SCoC)
Key content described in S2-1. Outlines the ethical standards and
responsible business principles that Sanoma expects its suppliers to comply
with. It emphasises the importance of respecting human rights, ethical
conduct, and transparency throughout the supply chain. The policy also
includes specific requirements for responsible business practices,
environmental compliance, labour conditions, and health and safety
standards.
All upstream and
downstream suppliers
and workers in the
value chain
Procurement for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the
standard.
The Ten Principles of the UN
Global Compact, UDHR, the
International Bill of Human
Rights, the UNGPS, the ILO
declaration and supporting ILO
standards
Publicly available on
company website
The risk that suppliers not complying with SCoC may lead to compliance costs
such as regulatory fines and penalties and have an adverse impact on Sanoma's
reputation
Procurement
Policy
Outlines the roles and responsibilities related to procurement as well as
defines key processes related to supplier selection and purchasing, including
defining the process of managing impacts related to workers in the value
chain. It aims to provide clarity about roles and responsibilities, apply
consistency in procurement activities, select the right suppliers to support
objectives of Sanoma’s businesses, manage Sanoma’s supply base as well
as to ensure visibility. Adherence to the policy is validated through a defined
set of Procurement Control Points and internal audits on the procurement
processes and guidelines.
All Sanoma employees
in all operating
countries
Procurement for
implementation.
President and CEO
approves the policy.
Know Your Counterparty
framework
Internally available to
all Sanoma employees
Financial Statements 2025
114
Promoting corporate culture
Sanoma’s President and CEO, in accordance with the Finnish Companies Act, manages Sanoma’s daily operations in line
with the long-term goals and business strategy of the Group approved by the Board of Directors, and in accordance with the
general policies adopted by the Board of Directors as well as other applicable guidelines and decisions. Sanoma establishes
its corporate culture through training and awareness-building efforts of its policies.
Code of Conduct (CoC) and related trainings
All Sanoma employees are required to apply the CoC in their day-to-day conduct and business decisions. Sanoma provides
trainings and e-learning, and uses different control mechanisms to ensure compliance with the CoC and other policies.
Sanoma has a mandatory CoC training which is an annually updated CoC refresher e-learning for all employees. It includes
dedicated questions on general ethics, anti-bribery and corruption rules, competition law, privacy, security, AI, and compliance
with supplier relationship management. In addition, new employees must take a CoC e-learning as part of their induction
process. The CoC and the corresponding mandatory trainings were available in English, Finnish, Dutch, Spanish, Italian,
Polish and French in 2025. Completion rates of the Code of Conduct trainings are tracked to ensure full coverage.
Sanoma has also identified business areas where employee groups need to be trained regarding specific policies. Therefore,
to complement the CoC training, various role-based compliance trainings are implemented within the areas of privacy,
information security, AI, competition law and anti-bribery and corruption.
Procurement, as well as the sales teams in Poland and in countries where the sales happens through agents, such as Spain
and Italy, have been identified as functions that are most at risk in respect of corruption and bribery. A more in-depth training
on anti-bribery and corruption targeted to these employees in Spain and Italy was rolled out during 2025.
Awareness building campaigns
Sanoma runs annual awareness building campaigns in internal channels to promote relevant areas of business conduct, such
as speaking up about misconduct, diversity and inclusion, gifts and hospitality rules as well as privacy, AI and security. The
awareness building campaigns are targeted to all Sanoma employees.
Reporting channels for misconduct
Sanoma aims to build a culture where people feel at ease to identify and bring up any form of misconduct. Violations of the
CoC, or any related policy or law, are encouraged to be reported through various reporting channels, such as Human
Resources, managers, local Compliance Officers or local compliance committees e.g., Controlling Board in Italy, Group
Compliance team, local trade union representatives or Internal Audit.
In addition, Sanoma has a whistleblowing tool that is an externally hosted channel that enables employees, customers and
business partners to report suspicions of misconduct confidentially and anonymously. With this early warning system, Sanoma
fosters high business ethics, maintains customer and public trust, and reduces risks for misconduct. The Whistleblowing
channel and other reporting channels are promoted internally and the whistleblowing tool is also available on Sanoma’s
website. Only Sanoma’s Chief Legal Officer and Head of Internal Audit, or specifically dedicated Local compliance officers in
countries where required, are able to access the reports under strict confidentiality obligations. Sanoma’s CoC states a zero
tolerance policy for retaliation against whistleblowers. The zero tolerance policy for retaliation against whistleblowers is also
communicated through speak-up awareness campaigns. It is also addressed in Sanoma’s internal Workplace Anti-
Harassment Standard, which highlights to employees the types of behaviour that are deemed unacceptable, and promotes
how to address such unwarranted behaviour without fear of retaliation. No specific training is provided for those handling the
reports internally.
All misconduct cases pertaining to business conduct, including incidents of corruption and bribery, regardless of the channel
through which they are reported, are promptly and independently investigated by Internal Audit in collaboration with policy
owners. For harassment cases, HR is responsible for the investigation. If found true, the case leads to disciplinary, legal, or
other actions. Internal Audit report to the Audit Committee about all identified and investigated misconduct cases.
Sanoma is subject to the requirements of the EU Whistleblowing Directive as well as national whistleblowing legislation in its
operating countries. Sanoma implemented separate subsidiary-specific channels that complement the Group’s whistleblowing
tool during 2025 in countries such as Spain, Poland.
Tracking effectiveness
To track the effectiveness of policy implementation and measures taken to enhance and promote its corporate culture,
Sanoma, for example, asks about employees’ ability to speak up about ethics and compliance concerns in the annual
Employee Engagement Survey. In addition, the CoC trainings’ completion rate is monitored annually and the number of gifts
and hospitality requests are reported to the Sustainability and Ethics Working Group. The number of investigated misconduct
cases is reported to the Sustainability and Ethics Working Group and Board of Directors’ Audit Committee. Trends in reported
misconduct help assess the effectiveness of measures taken to raise awareness.
Compliance risks are assessed as part of Sanoma’s double materiality assessment. Regular evaluation of the risks, in addition
to monitoring trends in types of misconducts reported, helps Sanoma evaluate the need to further develop its compliance
culture. For example in 2025, to manage potential AI risks and in preparation for the AI Act, Sanoma continued to implement AI
Governance measures, such as AI trainings, inventory management and risk assessments, in both SBUs.
Minimum Disclosure Requirement MDR-T
Sanoma has not set any ESRS-aligned measurable time-bound outcome-oriented targets related to business conduct, and
does not have plans to implement such targets. However, it tracks the effectiveness of business conduct-related policies and
actions through monitoring the completion rate of the Code of Conduct trainings.
Entity-specific metric: Completion of Code of Conduct trainings
Metric used to evaluate progress
2025
2024
Annual Code of Conduct reminder e-learning completion rate, percentage of employees
99%
97%
New employee introduction to Code of Conduct e-learning completion rate, percentage of new
employees during the year
88%
78%
The scope of the annual Code of Conduct reminder training includes all employees present during the period of the training. All Sanoma employees who
had started employment before August 2025, needed to take the Code of Conduct reminder e-learning course in 2025.
Financial Statements 2025
115
G1-2 Management of relationships with suppliers
Approach to relationship with suppliers
Sanoma is committed to responsible business practices and ethics throughout its supply chain. Sanoma’s key standard
related to relationships with suppliers is the Supplier Code of Conduct (SCoC) described in G1-1 and in S2-1 in more detail.
The SCoC sets out the ethical standards and responsible business principles, which suppliers are required to comply with.
The standard also includes sustainability-related requirements. The SCoC is aligned with internationally recognised
instruments relevant to value chain workers. The suppliers shall apply these standards and principles throughout the supply
chain, including their affiliates and sub-contractors.
In addition to the SCoC, Sanoma requires suppliers using data on Sanoma’s behalf to comply with the data protection and
information security requirements. The paper and print supplier agreements include Sanoma’s Paper Procurement standard
that sets environmental criteria related to the use of certified paper as well as recommendations to apply environmental and
quality management systems. The Paper Procurement standard is further described under E4-2.
As the majority of Sanoma’s supply chain emissions is generated in paper and print production, Sanoma focuses its emission
reduction initiatives on these procurement categories. Thus, when selecting paper suppliers, emissions are taken into account
in decision-making. In the print category, Sanoma is currently building an analysis of the suppliers’ sustainability approach,
which will be implemented in the supplier evaluation process.
Sanoma utilises a Know Your Counterparty (KYC) process to identify risks of doing business with third parties by looking at
their ownership, activities and role. KYC background checks are performed on new suppliers as part of the supplier selection
process. The KYC tool identifies possible third-party non-compliance and includes human rights, anti-bribery, corruption, and
sanctions checks. In cases of medium or high risk, Sanoma’s Procurement team follows escalation principles and consults
Group Legal. Procurement applies a risk-based approach to determine appropriate procurement channels and activities,
acting as the first point of support for business and escalating to Legal and Privacy teams when necessary.
In addition, Sanoma carries out monitoring and risk assessments during supplier cooperation within the risk categories and
areas. In key categories, such as paper and print production, Sanoma collects more detailed info about the suppliers’ maturity
in sustainability topics through, for example, audit reports, certificates and energy and material usage data.
Policy to prevent late payments
Goods and services are mainly purchased in accordance with Sanoma’s General Procurement Terms and Conditions as well
as Sanoma’s internal Procurement Policy. These documents include Sanoma’s payment terms and apply to all supplier
categories, including SMEs, unless separately agreed otherwise together with the supplier. Sanoma’s standard payment term
is 45 days. However, payment terms can be negotiated depending on category-specific requirements. For example, Sanoma
uses a 14-day payment term for self-employed suppliers and natural persons. Sanoma provides internal trainings on invoice
handling, communicates about payment practices to suppliers and has a defined process for any exceptions in invoices to
ensure fair practices. Sanoma’s Finance teams controls the invoice flow, and sends reminders in case invoices are not
handled close to due dates.
G1-3 Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
Sanoma has established procedures to prevent, detect, and address allegations or incidents of corruption and bribery.
Training and awareness building are seen as a key preventive measure. Sanoma’s CoC trainings, as described in G1-1, cover
the topics of anti-corruption and bribery as well as raising concerns. The trainings are mandatory for all Sanoma employees,
including the Executive Management Team, and the completion rate is monitored The Board of Directors or the Audit
Committee are not in the scope of the trainings.
Sanoma also carries out annual awareness campaigns on the gifts and hospitality reporting practices. The reporting of gifts
and hospitality fosters an ethical culture by helping employees understand the importance of integrity and accountability, and
helps monitor that gifts and hospitality remain within acceptable limits and do not influence business decision-making. The gift
and hospitality tool is available for employees in internal channels. The Supplier KYC process identifies flags related to
suspected, investigated and confirmed instances of bribery and corruption among potential and actual suppliers. In Italy,
criminal records for specific roles, such as agents used for promotional purposes, may be checked.
Employees are actively encouraged to speak-up if they detect any form of misconduct, including incidents of corruption and
bribery. Sanoma runs an annual awareness campaign for all employees to increase awareness about different types of
misconduct and encourage speaking up. All the same channels that Sanoma has in place to report about misconduct in
business conduct can also be used for incidents concerning corruption and bribery, as reported in G1-1. Sanoma tracks the
number of cases submitted and investigated through different channels.
All misconduct cases pertaining to incidents of corruption and bribery, regardless of the channel through which they are
reported, are promptly and independently investigated by Internal Audit separately from the chain of management involved.
Italy also has in place an independent local compliance committee called “Controlling Board” for investigation purposes, which
includes an external member of the Controlling Board to ensure independence of the body. Internal Audit informs the Audit
Committee about all identified and investigated misconduct cases. Sanoma’s CoC states a zero tolerance for retaliation
against whistleblowers.
60% of the functions-at-risk, as described in G1-1, were specifically trained for anti-corruption and bribery in 2025 (2024: 0%).
The training was rolled out to the employees in Spain and Italy in late 2025, and for Procurement and Poland the training is
planned to be rolled out in 2026. These topics were also covered in the mandatory Code of Conduct trainings for all
employees.
Financial Statements 2025
116
Metrics and targets
G1-4 Incidents of corruption or bribery
G1-4 Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery
Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery
2025
2024
Number of convictions for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws
0
0
Amount of fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, EUR
0
0
Number of confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery
0
0
Number of confirmed incidents in which own workers were dismissed or disciplined for corruption or bribery-
related incidents
0
0
Number of confirmed incidents relating to contracts with business partners that were terminated or not
renewed due to violations related to corruption or bribery
0
0
No actions were taken to address breaches in procedures and standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery as no reported
incidents occurred. Sanoma did not have any public legal cases regarding corruption or bribery during the reporting period.
G1-5 Political influence and lobbying activities
Sanoma’s President and CEO is responsible for the oversight of political influence and lobbying activities. Sanoma’s
Donations and Sponsorship Policy prohibits Sanoma from making any donations for political purposes. In 2025, Sanoma did
not have any financial or in-kind political contributions (2024: EUR 0).
Sanoma’s key topics for lobbying activities and its main positions are:
Improving learning outcomes (related to IRO Impact of access to high-quality and inclusive learning products and
services): Sanoma promotes using (only) professionally produced education materials in education, increasing education
investments per student as well as having strong copyright protection for using education materials in training AI.
Supporting the media’s operating conditions (related to IRO Impact of journalistic ethics and operations as a media
company to freedom of expression): Sanoma promotes levelling the playing field with global platform giants, protecting its
content with strong copyright, preventing unfair competition by national public service broadcaster and maintaining a
lowered tax rate for media.
Copyright (related to IRO Risk related to management of IPR rights): Sanoma promotes strong copyright protection for its
content, fair terms for using (Audiovisual) content and direct licensing as a primary form of copyright licensing.
Reforming the Finnish gambling legislation (related to IRO Impact of responsible advertising practices and compliance with
green claims regulation): Sanoma promotes responsible advertising related to the opening up of gambling advertising in
Finnish media.
Sanoma Media Finland Ltd (440600622097-82) is registered in the EU Transparency Register. Sanoma Corporation
(712395115155-72) is not directly registered in the EU Transparency Register.
One member of Sanoma’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies has held a comparable position in public
administration in the two years preceding such appointment in the reporting period.
Financial Statements 2025
117
Alternative performance measures
Sanoma presents certain financial performance measures on a non-IFRS basis as alternative performance measures (APMs).
Sanoma considers that these alternative performance measures provide useful and relevant supplemental information to the
management and investors on Sanoma’s financial performance, financial position or cash flows. Some APMs exclude certain
non-operational or non-cash valuation items affecting comparability (IACs) and are provided to reflect the underlying business
performance and to enhance comparability between reporting periods. The APMs should not be considered as a substitute for
performance measures in accordance with IFRS.
On 25 November 2025, Sanoma announced that it will change the wording of selected APMs related to profitability, with no
change to their definitions, as follows:
Operational EBIT excl. PPA is reworded as Adjusted operating profit,
Operational EBITDA as Adjusted EBITDA,
Operational EPS as Adjusted EPS.
To unify the terminology in the financial reporting, the IFRS-based subtotal EBIT has been changed to operating profit with no
change in the definition. The updated terminology is already in use in this report.
Definitions of key IFRS indicators and APMs are available on p. 119. Reconciliations are available on p. 120 .
Key indicators and share indicators
Key indicators
EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Net sales1
1,302.5
1,344.8
1,392.9
1,298.3
1,251.6
Adjusted EBITDA 1
366.1
360.8
358.3
355.4
361.0
% of net sales1
28.1
26.8
25.7
27.4
28.8
Adjusted operating profit1
188.2
180.0
175.4
189.3
197.2
% of net sales1
14.4
13.4
12.6
14.6
15.8
Items affecting comparability in operating profit 1
-106.3
-61.5
-82.3
-37.9
-15.8
Purchase price allocation adjustments and amortisations (PPAs) 1
33.3
36.7
41.3
39.3
39.0
Operating profit1
48.6
81.8
51.7
112.0
142.4
% of net sales1
3.7
6.1
3.7
8.6
11.4
Result before taxes1
24.3
48.4
20.6
99.2
133.8
% of net sales1
1.9
3.6
1.5
7.6
10.7
Result for the period from continuing operations1
19.9
40.6
4.1
77.0
101.4
% of net sales1
1.5
3.0
0.3
5.9
8.1
Result for the period
19.9
40.6
4.1
77.0
101.2
% of net sales
1.5
3.0
0.3
5.9
8.1
Balance sheet total
1,729.4
1,879.1
2,036.6
2,103.6
1,932.5
Capital expenditure
39.1
37.7
43.1
52.9
41.7
% of net sales
3.0
2.8
3.1
4.1
3.3
Free cash flow
159.7
145.3
105.1
111.7
139.7
Return on equity (ROE), %
2.7
5.3
0.5
11.2
14.7
Return on investment (ROI), %
3.9
5.8
3.5
7.7
10.2
Equity ratio, %
47.1
45.0
42.5
35.8
40.6
Net gearing, %
66.5
73.7
80.0
117.3
85.5
Interest-bearing liabilities
505.8
589.6
705.6
864.4
668.8
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
492.8
517.8
531.6
537.1
542.8
Net debt
486.1
568.5
639.7
823.4
616.4
Net debt / Adj. EBITDA3
1.8
2.2
2.8
3.2
2.4
Average number of employees (FTE)1
4,645
4,820
5,119
5,018
4,885
Number of employees at the end of the period (FTE)1
4,554
4,648
5,017
5,079
4,822
1 Figures contain only continuing operations.
2 Advances received included in the formula of equity ratio were EUR 178.5 million in 2025 ( 2024: 162.5).
3 The adjusted EBITDA used in this ratio is the12-month rolling adjusted EBITDA, where acquired operations are included and divested operations excluded, and
where programming rights and prepublication rights have been raised above EBITDA on the basis of cash flow.
Financial Statements 2025
118
Share indicators
EUR
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Earnings/share, continuing operations 1
0.06
0.19
-0.03
0.47
0.62
Earnings/share
0.06
0.19
-0.03
0.47
0.61
Earnings/share, diluted, continuing operations 1
0.06
0.19
-0.03
0.47
0.61
Earnings/share, diluted
0.06
0.19
-0.03
0.47
0.61
Adjusted earnings/share, continuing operations1
0.57
0.46
0.39
0.65
0.69
Adjusted earnings/share
0.57
0.46
0.39
0.65
0.69
Free cash flow per share
0.98
0.89
0.64
0.68
0.86
Equity/share
4.48
4.72
4.88
4.26
4.38
Dividend/share2
0.42
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.54
Dividend payout ratio, %2
664.5
206.5
neg.
79.2
87.9
Adjusted dividend payout ratio, %2
74.1
84.1
93.8
56.8
77.9
Market capitalisation, EUR million3
1,546.3
1,251.9
1,134.7
1,602.4
2,218.5
Effective dividend yield, %2
4.4
5.1
5.3
3.8
4.0
P/E ratio
150.3
40.6
neg.
21.0
22.2
Adjusted number of shares at the end of the period3
162,772,986
163,215,973
163,267,618
163,177,768
162,886,049
Adjusted average number of shares3
162,833,212
163,413,155
163,253,094
163,130,613
163,165,194
Lowest share price
7.67
6.27
5.91
9.48
12.80
Highest share price
11.18
7.80
10.30
14.78
17.12
Average share price
9.47
6.90
7.58
12.56
14.54
Share price at the end of the period
9.50
7.67
6.95
9.82
13.62
Trading volumes, shares
11,612,592
11,643,942
21,898,627
12,404,976
16,289,472
% of shares
7.1
7.1
13.4
7.6
10.0
1 Figures contain only continuing operations.
2 Year 2025 proposal of the Board of Directors.
3 The number of shares does not include treasury shares.
Financial Statements 2025
119
Definitions of key indicators
KPI
Definition
Reason to use
Comparable (or
organic) net sales
(growth)
=
Net sales (growth) adjusted for the impact of acquisitions
and divestments
Complements reported net sales by
reflecting the underlying business
performance and enhancing comparability
between reporting periods
Items affecting
comparability (IACs)
=
Gains/losses on sale, acquisition-related transaction and
integration costs or impairments that exceed EUR 0.5 million
as well as restructuring and reorganisation expenses.
Used to reflect the underlying business
performance and enhances comparability
between reporting periods
Adjusted EBITDA
=
Operating profit + depreciation, amortisation
and impairments - IACs
Measures the profitability before non-cash-
based depreciation and amortisation,
reflects the underlying business
performance and enhances comparability
between reporting periods
Purchase price
allocation adjustments
and amortisations
(PPAs)
=
Purchase price allocation amortisations and cost impact of
the inventory fair value adjustments
A component used in the calculation of
KPIs (incl. adjusted operating profit)
Adjusted operating
profit
=
Operating profit - IACs - Purchase price allocation
adjustments and amortisations (PPAs)
Measures the profitability excl. acquisition-
related PPA adjustments and
amortisations, reflects the underlying
business performance and enhances
comparability between reporting periods
Equity ratio, %
=
Equity total
x 100
One of Sanoma’s long-term financial
targets, measures the relative proportion of
equity to total assets
Balance sheet total - advances received
Free cash flow
=
Cash flow from operations - capital expenditure
Basis for Sanoma’s dividend policy
Free cash flow / share
=
Free cash flow
Basis for Sanoma’s dividend policy
Weighted average number of shares on the market
Net debt
=
Interest-bearing liabilities (short or long-term liabilities which
have separately determined interest cost) - cash and cash
equivalents
Measures Sanoma’s net debt position
Net debt / Adj.
EBITDA
=
The adjusted EBITDA used in this ratio is the 12-month
rolling adjusted EBITDA, where acquired operations are
included and divested operations excluded, and where
programming rights and prepublication rights have been
raised above EBITDA on the basis of cash flow
One of Sanoma’s long-term financial
targets, provides investors information on
Sanoma’s ability to service its debt
Net financial items
=
Financial income - financial expenses
Measures Sanoma’s net financing cost
EPS
=
Result for the period attributable to the equity holders of the
Parent Company - tax adjusted interest on hybrid loan
Measures Sanoma’s result for the period
per share
Weighted average number of shares on the market
KPI
Definition
Reason to use
Adjusted EPS
=
Result for the period attributable to the equity holders of the
Parent Company - tax adjusted interest on hybrid loan -
IACs - tax effect of IACs - non-controlling interests’ share of
IACs
In addition to EPS, reflects the underlying
business performance and enhances
comparability between reporting periods
Weighted average number of shares on the market
Net gearing, %
=
Interest-bearing liabilities (short- or long-term liabilities which
have separately determined interest cost) - cash and cash
equivalents
x 100
Measures how much debt in relation to
equity Sanoma is using to finance its
assets
Equity total
Return on equity
(ROE), %
=
Result for the period
x 100
Measures the company’s relative
profitability, i.e., the profit received for the
equity employed
Equity total (average of monthly balances)
Return on investment
(ROI), %
=
Result before taxes + interest and other financial expenses
x 100
Measures the company’s relative
profitability, i.e., the profit and interest
received for net assets employed
Balance sheet total - non-interest-bearing liabilities (average
of monthly balances)
Non-interest-bearing
liabilities
=
Non-interest-bearing liabilities include trade and other
payables, contract liabilities, deferred and income tax
liabilities, provisions and pension liabilities
Equity/share
=
Equity attributable to the equity holders of the Parent
Company
Adjusted number of shares on the market at the balance
sheet date
Dividend payout ratio,
%
=
Dividend/share
x 100
Result/share
Adjusted dividend
payout ratio,%
=
Dividend/share
x 100
Adjusted EPS
Effective dividend
yield, %
=
Dividend/share
x 100
Share price on the last trading day of the year
P/E ratio
=
Share price on the last trading day of the year
x 100
Result/share
Market capitalisation
=
Number of shares on the market at the balance sheet date x
share price on the last trading day of the year
Financial Statements 2025
120
Reconciliation of certain key figures
Reconciliation of adjusted operating profit
EUR million
2025
2024
Operating profit
48.6
81.8
Items affecting comparability (IACs) and PPA adjustments and amortisations1
Learning
Impairments
-50.0
-28.6
Capital gains/losses
-0.4
Restructuring expenses
-12.9
-28.3
PPA adjustments and amortisations
-28.2
-30.4
Media Finland
Impairments
-24.6
Capital gains/losses
0.8
5.6
Restructuring expenses
-12.6
-8.6
PPA adjustments and amortisations
-5.1
-6.3
Other operations
Impairments
-0.1
-0.4
Capital gains/losses
1.8
Restructuring expenses
-8.8
-0.7
Items affecting comparability (IACs) and PPA adjustments and amortisations total
-139.6
-98.2
Adjusted operating profit
188.2
180.0
Depreciations of buildings and structures
-24.0
-26.4
Depreciation of rental books
-3.7
-3.9
Amortisation of film and TV programming rights
-51.9
-55.2
Amortisation of prepublication rights
-48.1
-46.4
Other depreciations, amortisations and impairments
-124.9
-79.0
Items affecting comparability in depreciation, amortisation and impairments
74.8
30.1
Adjusted EBITDA
366.1
360.8
1 Items affecting comparability and PPA adjustments and amortisations are unaudited
Reconciliation of adjusted EPS
EUR million
2025
2024
Result for the period attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company
19.9
40.5
Current year interest on the hybrid bond net of tax
-9.6
-9.6
Items affecting comparability
106.3
61.5
Tax effect of items affecting comparability
-24.2
-16.5
Non-controlling interests' share of items affecting comparability
-0.2
-0.1
Adjusted result for the period attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company
92.3
75.8
Weighted average number of shares on the market
162,833,212
163,413,155
Adjusted EPS
0.57
0.46
Reconciliation of net debt
EUR million
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
Non-current financial liabilities
359.6
367.8
Current financial liabilities
40.0
88.0
Non-current lease liabilities
78.0
104.1
Current lease liabilities
28.2
29.7
Cash and cash equivalents
-19.7
-21.1
Net debt
486.1
568.5
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA
EUR million
2025
2024
12-month rolling adjusted EBITDA
366.1
360.8
Impact of acquired and divested operations
-0.3
0.0
Impact of programming rights
-53.6
-53.2
Impact of prepublication rights
-44.5
-46.1
Impact of rental books
-3.0
-3.7
Adjusted EBITDA
264.6
257.9
Financial Statements 2025
121
Reconciliation of comparable net sales growth
EUR million
2025
2024
Group
Net sales
1,302.5
1,344.8
Impact of acquired and divested operations
-5.3
-1.8
Comparable net sales
1,297.2
1,343.1
Comparable net sales growth, %
-3
-2
Learning
Net sales
745.8
764.2
Impact of acquired and divested operations
-5.3
Comparable net sales
740.5
764.2
Comparable net sales growth, %
-3
-2
Media Finland
Net sales
556.9
580.9
Impact of acquired and divested operations
-1.8
Comparable net sales
556.9
579.1
Comparable net sales growth, %
-4
-1
Reconciliation of return on equity (ROE), %
EUR million
2025
2024
Result for the period
19.9
40.6
Equity total (average of monthly balances)
738.6
771.7
Return on equity, %
2.7
5.3
Reconciliation of return on investments (ROI), %
EUR million
2025
2024
Result before taxes
24.3
48.4
Interest and other financial items
28.6
37.7
Result before taxes excl. interests and other financial items
52.9
86.1
Balance sheet total (average of monthly balances)
1,921.1
2,059.4
Non-interest-bearing liabilities (average of monthly balances)
-562.5
-581.7
Balance sheet total - non-interest-bearing liabilities (average of monthly balances)
1,358.6
1,477.8
Return on investment, %
3.9
5.8
Financial Statements 2025
122
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated income statement
EUR million
Note
2025
2024
NET SALES
1,302.5
1,344.8
Other operating income
25.0
28.3
Materials and services
-391.8
-434.3
Employee benefit expenses
-386.5
-395.0
Other operating expenses
-215.6
-215.4
Share of results in joint ventures
0.9
0.9
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
2.6, 3.2 , 3.3, 4.6
-286.0
-247.6
OPERATING PROFIT
48.6
81.8
Share of results in associated companies
0.1
0.0
Financial income
5.9
6.8
Financial expenses
-30.3
-40.3
RESULT BEFORE TAXES
24.3
48.4
Income taxes
-4.5
-7.8
RESULT FOR THE PERIOD
19.9
40.6
Result attributable to:
Equity holders of the Parent Company
19.9
40.5
Non-controlling interests
0.0
0.1
Earnings per share for result attributable to the equity holders of the Parent
Company:
Earnings per share, EUR
0.06
0.19
Diluted earnings per share, EUR
0.06
0.19
Statement of comprehensive income
EUR million
2025
2024
Result for the period
19.9
40.6
Other comprehensive income:
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
Change in translation differences
1.4
-0.4
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss
Defined benefit plans
14.3
4.8
Income tax related to defined benefit plans
-2.9
-1.0
Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax
12.8
3.5
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE PERIOD
32.7
44.1
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Equity holders of the Parent Company
32.7
44.0
Non-controlling interests
0.0
0.1
Financial Statements 2025
123
Consolidated balance sheet
EUR million
Note
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
37.0
37.4
Right-of-use assets
71.3
123.1
Investment property
2.0
2.9
Goodwill
810.0
809.8
Other intangible assets
557.8
646.1
Equity-accounted investees
3.7
3.5
Other investments
2.9
2.9
Deferred tax assets
3.7
3.8
Non-current receivables
42.7
32.6
NON-CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL
1,531.2
1,662.2
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories
38.3
45.0
Income tax receivables
12.5
8.2
Contract assets
0.6
0.9
Trade and other receivables
127.2
141.7
Cash and cash equivalents
19.7
21.1
CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL
198.2
216.9
ASSETS, TOTAL
1,729.4
1,879.1
EUR million
Note
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Share capital
71.3
71.3
Treasury shares
-6.8
-3.0
Fund for invested unrestricted equity
209.8
209.8
Translation differences
-14.6
-16.0
Retained earnings
321.3
359.4
Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company
580.8
621.4
Hybrid bond
149.1
149.1
Non-controlling interests
1.0
1.1
EQUITY, TOTAL
730.9
771.7
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Deferred tax liabilities
77.3
100.1
Pension obligations
2.3
2.7
Provisions
7.0
4.5
Financial liabilities
359.6
367.8
Lease liabilities
78.0
104.1
Contract liabilities
0.8
1.1
Trade and other payables
2.3
2.7
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES, TOTAL
527.3
583.0
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Provisions
4.9
5.7
Financial liabilities
40.0
88.0
Lease liabilities
28.2
29.7
Income tax liabilities
1.5
1.2
Contract liabilities
177.1
160.4
Trade and other payables
219.5
239.4
CURRENT LIABILITIES, TOTAL
471.3
524.4
LIABILITIES, TOTAL
998.5
1,107.4
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES, TOTAL
1,729.4
1,879.1
Financial Statements 2025
124
Changes in consolidated equity
Equity attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company
EUR million
Note
Share capital
Treasury
shares
Fund for
invested
unrestricted
equity
Translation
differences
Retained
earnings
Total
Hybrid bond
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
Equity at 1 Jan 2024
71.3
-4.1
209.8
-15.7
386.5
647.7
149.1
2.6
799.4
Result for the period
40.5
40.5
0.1
40.6
Other comprehensive income
-0.4
3.9
3.5
3.5
Total comprehensive income
-0.4
44.3
44.0
0.1
44.1
Purchase of treasury shares
-1.9
-1.9
-1.9
Share-based compensation
1.7
1.7
1.7
Shares delivered
3.0
-3.0
Dividends paid
-60.5
-60.5
-60.5
Total transactions with owners of the Company
1.1
-61.8
-60.7
-60.7
Acquisitions and other changes in non-controlling interest
-1.5
-1.5
Total change in ownership interest
-1.5
-1.5
Interest on hybrid bond
-9.6
-9.6
-9.6
Equity at 31 Dec 2024
71.3
-3.0
209.8
-16.0
359.4
621.4
149.1
1.1
771.7
Equity at 1 Jan 2025
71.3
-3.0
209.8
-16.0
359.4
621.4
149.1
1.1
771.7
Result for the period
19.9
19.9
0.0
19.9
Other comprehensive income
1.4
11.5
12.8
12.8
Total comprehensive income
1.4
31.4
32.7
0.0
32.7
Purchase of treasury shares
-4.0
-4.0
-4.0
Share-based compensation
3.8
3.8
3.8
Shares delivered
0.1
-0.1
Dividends paid
-63.5
-63.5
-0.2
-63.6
Total transactions with owners of the Company
-3.9
-59.8
-63.7
-0.2
-63.8
Acquisitions and other changes in non-controlling interest
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total change in ownership interest
0.0
0.0
0.0
Interest on hybrid bond
-9.6
-9.6
-9.6
Equity at 31 Dec 2025
71.3
-6.8
209.8
-14.6
321.3
580.8
149.1
1.0
730.9
Financial Statements 2025
125
Consolidated cash flow statement
EUR million
Note
2025
2024
OPERATIONS
Result for the period
19.9
40.6
Adjustments
Income taxes
4.5
7.8
Financial expenses
30.3
40.3
Financial income
-5.9
-6.8
Share of results in equity-accounted investees
-1.0
-0.9
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
286.0
247.6
Gains/losses on sales of non-current assets
-3.3
-6.6
Other adjustments
3.7
6.0
Adjustments total
314.2
287.3
Change in working capital
Change in trade and other receivables
12.3
-6.8
Change in inventories
6.6
7.5
Change in trade and other payables, and provisions
2.3
7.5
Acquisitions of programming rights, prepublication costs and rental books
-101.2
-102.9
Dividends received
1.1
1.0
Interest paid
-25.1
-35.0
Other financial items
0.4
-2.1
Taxes paid
-31.6
-14.1
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS
198.8
183.0
INVESTMENTS
Capital expenditure
-39.1
-37.7
Operations acquired
-1.3
-0.8
Proceeds from sale of tangible and intangible assets
5.2
3.0
EUR million
Note
2025
2024
Operations sold
1.0
5.6
Sales of other investments
0.0
Loans granted
-0.2
0.0
Repayments of loan receivables
0.4
Interest received
1.5
2.1
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTS
-32.5
-27.8
CASH FLOW BEFORE FINANCING
166.4
155.2
FINANCING
Purchase of treasury shares
-4.0
-1.9
Change in loans with short maturity
2.5
37.4
Drawings of other loans
110.0
249.2
Repayments of other loans
-168.9
-380.3
Payment of lease liabilities
-31.1
-31.9
Interest paid on hybrid bond
-12.0
-12.0
Dividends paid
-63.6
-60.5
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING
-167.2
-199.9
Change in cash and cash equivalents according to cash flow statement
-0.8
-44.7
Effect of exchange rate differences on cash and cash equivalents
0.0
0.0
Net increase(+)/decrease(-) in cash and cash equivalents
-0.8
-44.7
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 Jan
20.5
65.1
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 Dec
19.7
20.5
Financial Statements 2025
126
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements 2025
127
1. Accounting policies for Consolidated Financial Statements
1.1 Corporate information
Sanoma is a learning and media company. In 2025, Sanoma Group included two operating segments which are its two
strategic business units (SBU), Sanoma Learning and Sanoma Media Finland. This is aligned with the way Sanoma manages
the businesses. Sanoma Learning is Europe’s leading K12 learning company, serving about 25 million students across
Europe. Its learning products and services enable teachers to develop the talents of every child to reach their potential.
Sanoma Learning offers printed and digital learning materials as well as digital learning and teaching platforms for K12, i.e.
primary, secondary and vocational education, and it aims to grow the business in Europe and beyond. Sanoma Learning
develops its methodologies based on deep teacher and student insight and truly understanding their individual needs. By
combining educational technologies and pedagogical expertise, Sanoma Learning creates learning products and services with
the highest learning impact. Sanoma Media Finland is the leading cross-media company in Finland, reaching 96% of all Finns
weekly. It provides information, experiences, inspiration and entertainment through multiple media platforms: newspapers, TV,
radio, events, magazines, online and mobile channels. Sanoma Media Finland publishes leading brands and services, such as
Helsingin Sanomat, Ilta-Sanomat, Aamulehti, Me Naiset, Aku Ankka, Nelonen, Ruutu, Supla and Radio Suomipop. For
advertisers, it is a trusted partner with insight, impact and reach.
Sanoma Corporation , the Parent of Sanoma Group, is a public limited company and its share is listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki.
The Parent Company is domiciled in Helsinki, Finland and its registered office is Töölönlahdenkatu 2, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.
On 24 March 2025, Sanoma’s Board of Directors approved these financial statements to be disclosed.
Copies of the Consolidated Financial Statements are available on Sanoma’s website or from the Parent Company’s head
office.
1.2 Basis of preparation of financial statements
Sanoma has prepared its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with the IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted
by the European Union while adhering to related IAS and IFRS standards, effective at 31 December 2025, as well as SIC and
IFRIC interpretations. IFRS refers to the approved standards and their interpretations applicable within the EU under the
Finnish Accounting Act and its regulations in accordance with European Union Regulation No. 1606/2002. The notes to the
consolidated financial statements are in accordance with Finnish Accounting Standards and the Finnish Limited Liability
Companies Act.
Financial statements are presented in millions of euros, based on historical cost conventions unless otherwise stated in the
accounting policies. All figures have been rounded and consequently the sum of individual figures can deviate from the
presented sum figure. Key figures have been calculated using exact figures.
1.3 Accounting policies
Management judgement in applying the most significant accounting policies and
other key sources of estimation uncertainty
Preparing the financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. During the preparation of the
financial statements, such estimates were used when making calculations for impairment testing of goodwill, allocating the
acquisition cost of acquired businesses and determining the estimated useful lives and depreciation methods for property,
plant and equipment and amortisation methods for broadcasting rights, prepublication rights and other intangible assets. In
addition, management judgement is used when determining the valuation of deferred taxes, defined benefit pension assets
and pension obligations and provisions. The assumptions are derived from external sources wherever available. In case of
high dependency on assumptions, sensitivity analyses are performed to determine the impact on carrying amounts. Although
these estimates are based on the management’s best knowledge of current events and actions, actual results may ultimately
differ from these estimates.
Impairment testing is discussed later in the accounting policies and notes to the financial statements. Other uncertainties
related to management judgement are presented, as applicable, in the relevant notes.
Consolidation principles
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared by consolidating the Parent Company’s and its subsidiaries’ income
statements, comprehensive income statements, balance sheets, cash flow statements and notes to the financial statements.
Prior to consolidation, the Group companies’ financial statements are adjusted, if necessary, to ensure consistency with the
Group’s accounting policies.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the Parent Company, Sanoma Corporation, and companies in which the
Parent Company has control. Control means that the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its
involvement with the Company and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the Company. Intra-group
shareholdings are eliminated using the acquisition method. In cases where the Group has an obligation to increase ownership
in a subsidiary and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the Group due to this obligation, the consolidation
has taken the ownership into account in accordance with the obligation.
Companies acquired during the financial year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which
control was transferred to the Group, and divested subsidiaries are consolidated until the date on which said control ceased.
Intra-group transactions, receivables and liabilities, intra-group margins and distribution of profits within the Group are
eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Sanoma uses the acquisition method when accounting for business combinations.
Financial Statements 2025
128
On the date of acquisition, the cost is allocated to the assets and liabilities of the acquired business by recognising them at
their fair value. In business combinations achieved in stages, the interest in the acquired company that was held by the
acquirer before the control was acquired shall be measured at fair value at the date of acquiring control. This value has an
impact on calculating the goodwill from this acquisition and it is presented as a loss or gain in the income statement.
The consideration transferred and the identifiable assets and the liabilities assumed in the business combination are
measured at fair value on the date of acquisition. The acquisition-related costs are expensed excluding the costs to issue debt
or equity securities. The potential contingent purchase price is the consideration paid to the seller after the original
consolidation of the acquired business or the share of paid consideration that the previous owners return to the buyers.
Whether any consideration shall be paid or returned is usually dependent on the performance of the acquired business after
the acquisition. The contingent consideration shall be classified as a liability or as equity. The contingent consideration
classified as a liability is measured at fair value on the acquisition date and subsequently on each balance sheet date.
Changes in the fair value are presented in income statement.
Sanoma Group’s equity-accounted investees include joint ventures and associated companies, which are accounted for using
the equity method. The Group’s share of the strategically important joint ventures’ and associated companies’ result is
disclosed separately in the Group’s operating profit. The Group’s share of the result of other equity-accounted investees is
reported below operating profit. The carrying amount of equity-accounted investees is presented on one line in the balance
sheet and it includes the goodwill originating from those acquisitions. The investments are initially recognised at cost and
adjusted thereafter to recognise the Group’s share of the post-acquisition profits or losses and movements in other
comprehensive income of the investee. Dividends received or receivable from associates and joint ventures are recognised as
a reduction in the carrying amount of the investment.
Joint ventures are entities that are controlled jointly based on a contractual agreement by the Group and one or several other
owners.
Associated companies are entities in which the Group has significant influence. Significant influence is assumed to exist when
the Group holds over 20% of the voting rights or when the Group has otherwise obtained significant influence but not control
or joint control over the entity. If Sanoma’s share of the losses from an associated company exceeds the carrying value of the
investment, the investment in the associated company will be recognised at zero value on the balance sheet. Losses
exceeding the carrying amount of investments will not be consolidated unless the Group has been committed to fulfil the
obligations of the associated company.
Profit or loss for the period attributable to equity holders of the Parent Company and to the holders of non-controlling interests
is presented in the income statement. The statement of comprehensive income shows the total comprehensive income
attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company and to the holders of non-controlling interests. The amount of equity
attributable to holders of non-controlling interests is presented as a separate item on the balance sheet within equity.
Foreign currency items
Items reported in the financial statements of each Group company are recognised using the currency that best reflects the
economic substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to that company (the functional currency). The
Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in euros, which is the Parent Company’s functional and presentation
currency.
Foreign currency transactions of the Group entities are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate quoted on
the transaction date. The monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies on the balance sheet are
translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing on the balance sheet date.
The gains and losses resulting from the foreign currency transactions and translating the monetary items are recognised in the
income statement. The exchange rate gains and losses are reported in financial income and expenses.
The income and expense items in the income statement and in the statement of comprehensive income of the non-euro Group
entities (subsidiaries, associated companies and joint ventures) are translated into euros using the monthly average exchange
rates and balance sheets using the exchange rate quoted on the balance sheet date. The profit for the period being translated
into euros by different currency rates in the comprehensive income statement and balance sheet results in a translation
difference in equity. The change in translation difference is recognised in other comprehensive income.
Exchange rate differences resulting from the translation of foreign subsidiaries’ and equity accounted investees’ balance
sheets are recognised under shareholders’ equity. When a foreign entity is disposed of, in whole or in part, cumulative
translation differences are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on disposal.
During the reporting year or preceding financial year, the Group did not have subsidiaries in hyperinflationary countries.
Government grants
Grants from the government or other similar public entities that become receivable as compensation for expenses already
incurred are recognised in the income statement on the period on which the Company complies with the attached conditions.
These government grants are reported in other operating income in income statement. Government grants related to the
purchase of property, plant and equipment or intangible assets are recognised as a reduction of the asset’s book value and
credited to the income statement over the asset’s useful life.
Assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount is recovered principally through a sale rather than through
continuing use and a sale is considered highly probable. Such assets are stated at the lower of carrying amount and fair value
less cost of disposal. Non-current assets held for sale are no longer depreciated. When equity-accounted investees meet the
criteria to be classified as held for sale, equity accounting ceases at the time of reclassification.
Operations are classified as discontinued operations in case a component of an entity has either been disposed of, or is
classified as held for sale, and:
Financial Statements 2025
129
it represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations
is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations
is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
A component of an entity is defined as operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for
financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity.
The result for the period of discontinued operations is presented as a separate item in the consolidated income statement.
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Acquired subsidiaries are consolidated using the acquisition method, whereby the cost is allocated to the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed at their fair value on the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the fair value of
the acquired company’s net assets. Goodwill reflects e.g. expected future synergies resulting from acquisitions.
Goodwill is not amortised but it is tested for impairment annually or if there are some triggering events.
The identifiable intangible assets are recognised separately from goodwill if the assets fulfil the related recognition criteria –
i.e. they are identifiable, or based on contractual or other legal rights, and if their fair value can be reliably measured.
Intangible assets are initially measured at cost and amortised over their expected useful lives. In Sanoma, expected useful
lives can be determined for intangible rights. With regard to the acquisition of new assets, the Group assesses the expected
useful life of the intangible right, for example, in light of historical data and market position, and determines the useful life on
the basis of the best knowledge available on the assessment date.
The Group recognises the cost of broadcasting rights to TV programmes under intangible assets and their cost is amortised
based on broadcasting runs. The prepublication costs of learning materials and solutions are recognised in intangible assets
and amortised over the useful lives. In cash flow, acquisitions of broadcasting rights and prepublication costs are part of cash
flow from operations.
The known or estimated amortisation periods for intangible assets with finite useful lives are:
Publishing rights2–20 years
Software licenses  2–10 years
Copy- and trademark rights 2–20 years
Customer relationships 3–20 years
Software projects3–10 years
Online sites 3–10 years
Prepublication costs 3–8 years
Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line method. Recognising amortisation is discontinued when an intangible asset is
classified as held for sale.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are described in more detail in Note 3.2.
Impairment testing
The carrying amounts of assets are reviewed whenever there is any indication of impairment. A cash-generating unit (CGU) is
the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows from other
assets or groups of assets. Those CGUs for which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment at least once a year.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are also tested at least annually.
The test assesses the asset’s recoverable amount, which is the higher of either the asset’s fair value less cost of disposal or
value in use based on future cash flows. In Sanoma Group, impairment tests are principally carried out on a cash flow basis by
determining the present value of estimated future cash flows of each CGU. If the carrying amount of the CGU exceeds its
recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recorded in the income statement. Primarily, the impairment loss is deducted from
the goodwill of the cash-generating unit and after that it is deducted proportionally from other non-current assets of the cash-
generating unit. The useful life of the asset is re-estimated when an impairment loss is recognised.
If the recoverable amount of an intangible asset has changed due to a change in the key expectations, previously recognised
impairment losses are reversed. However, impairment losses are not reversed beyond the amount the asset had before
recognising impairment losses. Impairment losses recognised for goodwill are not reversed under any circumstances.
Impairment testing is described in more detail in Note 3.2.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment (PPE) are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. The
cost includes any costs directly attributable to acquiring the item of PPE. Any subsequent costs are included in the carrying
value of the item of PPE only if it is probable that it will generate future benefits for the Group and that the cost of the asset
can be measured reliably. Lease premises’ renovation expenses are treated as other tangible assets in the consolidated
balance sheet. Ordinary repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
The depreciation periods of PPE are based on the estimated useful lives and are:
Buildings and structures  5–50 years
Machinery and equipment 2–20 years
Rental books2–5 years
Other tangible assets 3–10 years
Financial Statements 2025
130
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method. Land areas are not depreciated. Recognising depreciation is
discontinued when the PPE is classified as held for sale.
The residual value and the useful life of an asset are reviewed at least at the end of each financial year and if necessary, they
are adjusted to reflect the changes in expectations of financial benefits.
Gains and losses from disposing or selling items of PPE are recognised in the income statement and they are reported in
other operating income or expenses.
Investment property
A property is classified as investment property if the Group mainly holds the property to earn rental yields or for capital
appreciation. Investment property is initially measured at cost and presented as a separate item on the balance sheet.
Investment properties include buildings, land and investments in shares of property and housing companies not in Sanoma’s
own use. Based on their nature, such shareholdings are divided into land or buildings.
The fair value of investment properties is presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Fair values are
determined by using the yield value method or using the information on equal real estate business transactions in the market.
Also, an outside surveyor has been used when determining the fair value. The risk of the yield value method takes into
account, among others, the term of the lease period, other conditions of the lease, the location of the premises and the nature
of releasability as well as the development of environment and area planning.
Leases
At inception of a contract, an entity assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if
the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the Group is the lessee, are recognised as assets and liabilities for the lease
term. The cost of right-of-use asset comprises the amount of initial measurement of the lease liability, any lease payments
made at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives and any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee. The
asset is depreciated during the lease term or, if shorter, during its useful life.
In leases of premises there are extension and termination options. The entity considers all relevant facts and circumstances
that create an economic incentive for the lessee to exercise, or not to exercise the option, including any expected changes in
facts and circumstances from the commencement date until the exercise date of the option. A lease term is reassessed if
there’s a significant event or change in circumstances that is within the control of the lessee and affects whether the lessee is
reasonably certain to exercise the option not previously included in the lease term or not to exercise an option previously
included in the lease term.
The lease liability is valued at the present value of the unpaid rents at the valuation date (commencement date of the lease).
Rental costs include fixed rents and variable rents that depend on changes in the index or price level specified in the
agreement. Sanoma applies the practical expedient and will not separate non-lease components from lease components and
will instead account for each lease component and any associated non-lease components as a single lease component. Other
variable rents included in the lease are treated as an expense for the period. Rents are discounted at the internal rate of the
lease. If the internal rate is not readily determinable, the company’s additional credit interest rate is used.
In income statement, leasing costs are classified as depreciation and interest. Lease payments are apportioned between the
interest expenses and the repayment of lease liabilities. The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so
as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. In cash flow
statement, the cash payments for the interest portion of the lease liability are presented in cash flow from operations. Cash
payments for the principal portion of the lease liability are shown in cash flow from financing. The right-of-use assets and lease
liabilities are presented separately in the balance sheet. The cash payments for the principal portion of the lease liability, which
are paid in the next 12 months, are shown in current lease liabilities in balance sheet.
Sanoma applies the exemption for short-term leases (lease term 12 months or shorter than 12 months) and for leases for
which the underlying asset is of low value and continues to recognise those leases on a straight-line basis as an expense. In
cash flow statement, short-term lease payments and payments for leases of low-value assets are included in cash flow from
operations.
The lease payments received for operating leases are shown under other operating income. The Group has no leases
classified as finance leases in which it is a lessor.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value, using the average cost method. The cost of finished goods
and work in progress includes the purchase price, direct production wages, other direct production costs and fixed production
overheads to their substantial extent. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price, received as part of the normal course
of business, less estimated costs necessary to complete the product and make the sale.
Financial assets
The Group’s financial assets are classified as subsequently measured at amortised cost and at fair value through profit or loss.
The classification of financial assets is based on the business model in which a financial asset is managed and its contractual
cash flow characteristics. Sanoma has only one business model for debt instruments which is a business model whose
objective is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows. Financial assets are not reclassified subsequently to their
initial recognition unless the Group changes its business model for managing financial assets. All equity instruments are
measured at fair value.
Transaction costs are included in the initial carrying value of the financial assets if the item is not classified as a financial asset
at fair value through profit or loss. Derecognition of financial assets takes place when Sanoma has lost the contractual right to
the cash flows from the asset or it has transferred the essential risks and benefits to third parties.
Assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows where those cash flows represent solely payments of principal and
interest are measured at amortised cost. In Sanoma Group, financial assets measured at amortised cost include loan
receivables, trade receivables and cash. According to IFRS 9, an entity shall recognise a loss allowance for expected credit
losses on a financial asset measured at amortised cost. Sanoma has adopted the general expected credit loss model for debt
Financial Statements 2025
131
instruments carried at amortised cost. For trade receivables, Sanoma applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9,
which requires expected lifetime credit losses to be recognised from initial recognition of the receivable. Sanoma uses a
provision matrix as a practical expedient for measuring expected credit losses for trade receivables. Loss rates are defined
separately for different geographic regions, type of business and types of customers (B2B and B2C). Loss rates are based on
past information on actual credit loss experience, adjusted by current information and future expectations on economic
conditions where deemed necessary.
Assets that do not meet the criteria for amortised cost are measured at fair value through profit or loss. A gain or loss on an
investment that is subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the financial items in the income
statement. In Sanoma Group, financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss include other equity investments
and derivatives.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include bank accounts and short-term deposits with a maturity of less than three months. Bank
overdrafts are shown under current financial liabilities on the balance sheet.
Financial liabilities
Sanoma’s financial liabilities are classified either as financial liabilities at amortised cost or as financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss. Financial liabilities are classified as short-term liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to
postpone the settling of the liability at least with 12 months from the end of the reporting period. The right to postpone the
settlement must have substance and exist at the end of the reporting period and the classification of the liability must be
unaffected by the likelihood that the company will exercise that right. If the Group is required to comply with covenants on or
before the end of the reporting period, these covenants will affect whether such a right exists at the end of the reporting period.
Such a covenant affects whether the right exists at the end of the reporting period even if compliance with the covenant is
assessed only after the reporting period.
The financial liability or a part of it can be derecognised only when the liability has ceased to exist, meaning that the
obligations identified by the agreement have been fulfilled, abolished or expired. If the Group issues a new debt instrument
and uses the received reserves to repurchase an earlier issued debt instrument (whole or part) with not substantially different
terms, any costs or fees incurred adjust the carrying amount of the new liability and are amortised over the remaining term of
the issued instrument. A gain or loss arising from the difference in contractual cash flows is recognised in the income
statement at the time of the modification.
The financial debt of Sanoma Group is classified as financial liabilities at amortised cost which are initially recognised at fair
value including the transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial liability. Subsequently, these
financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
In Sanoma Group, financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include derivatives that do not comply with the
conditions for hedge accounting. Both the unrealised and realised gains and losses arising from the changes in fair values of
the derivatives are recognised in the financial items in the income statement on the period the changes arise.
Hybrid bond
A hybrid bond is a bond that is subordinated to the Group’s other debt obligations and treated as equity in Sanoma’s
Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with the IFRS. Paying the interest on the hybrid bond is at the
discretion of the Company, however an obligation to pay the interest arises if the Company decides to distribute dividends.
Unpaid interest accumulates. A hybrid bond does not confer to its holders the rights of a shareholder and does not dilute the
holdings of the current shareholders.
Derivatives
Sanoma Group may use derivative instruments, such as forward foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swaps, in order
to hedge against fluctuations in foreign exchange or interest rates. The Group does not apply hedge accounting.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date of entering to a hedging agreement and they are subsequently
measured at their fair value on each balance sheet date. The fair value of foreign exchange contracts is based on the contract
forward rates in effect on the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are shown in other current receivables and liabilities on
the balance sheet. Both the unrealised and realised gains and losses arising from changes in fair values of the derivatives are
recognised in the financial items in the income statement on the period the changes arise.
Risk management principles of financial risks are presented in more detail in Note 5.2.
Fair value hierarchy
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are divided into three levels in the fair value hierarchy. In level 1, fair
values are based on quoted prices in active markets. In level 2, fair values are based on valuation models for which all inputs
are observable, either directly or indirectly. For assets and liabilities in level 3, the fair values are based on input data that is
not based on observable market data.
Income taxes and other taxes
The income tax charge presented in the income statement is based on taxable profit for the financial period, adjustments for
taxes from previous periods and changes in deferred taxes. Tax on taxable profit for the period is based on the tax rate and
legislation effective in each country. Income taxes related to transactions impacting the profit or loss for the period are
recognised in the income statement. Tax related to transactions or other items recognised in other comprehensive income or
directly in equity, are recognised accordingly in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded principally on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their carrying amounts, using tax rates effective on the balance sheet date. Changes in the applicable tax
rate are recorded as changes in deferred tax in the income statement. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it
appears probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised.
No deferred tax liability on undistributed retained earnings of subsidiaries has been recognised in that respect, as such
distribution is not probable within the foreseeable future. The most significant temporary differences relate to depreciation
Financial Statements 2025
132
differences, defined benefit pension plans, subsidiaries’ tax losses carried forward and the fair value measurement of assets
acquired in business combinations.
The amount of current and deferred tax payable or receivable is the best estimate of the tax amount expected to be paid or
received that reflects uncertainty related to income taxes, if any. The recorded receivable and payable amounts are adjusted
where it is not considered probable that a tax authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment used by the Group in an income
tax filing. The amounts recorded are based on the most likely amount or the expected value, depending on which method the
Group expects to better predict the resolution of the uncertainty.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset in the balance sheet if there is a legal right to set off current tax
assets against liabilities and they relate to the same tax authority.
If Sanoma has been the subject of tax adjustment claims which it considers unjustified, it considers a possible payment
relating to claims to be deposits with the tax authority if they give the Company a right to obtain future economic benefits,
either by receiving a cash refund or by using the payment to settle the tax liability. Consequently, items paid in relation to these
claims are reported as receivables in the balance sheet during the period when the legal proceedings are ongoing and the
case has not been finally settled.
Sanoma applies the temporary exception to the recognition and disclosure of deferred taxes arising from the jurisdictional
implementation of the GloBE (Global Anti-Base Erosion) rules. For this reason, the entity does not recognise or disclose
deferred taxes arising from Pillar Two rules. The Group’s exposure to Pillar Two regulations and income taxes arising from that
legislation are however presented on the Group’s financial statements.
Provisions
A provision is recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events and it is
probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of this
obligation can be made.
A restructuring provision is recognised when the Group has prepared a detailed restructuring plan and started to implement
that plan or announced the matter.
Share-based payments
The share-based incentive plans introduced at Sanoma offer the Group’s management an opportunity to receive Sanoma
shares after a vesting period of two to three years, provided that the conditions set for receiving the shares are met. Shares in
the Restricted Share Plans are delivered to the participants provided that their employment with Sanoma continues
uninterrupted throughout the duration of the plan until the shares are delivered. In addition to the continuous employment
condition, vesting of the Performance Shares is subject to meeting (partially or fully) the Group’s performance targets set by
the Board for annually commencing new plans.
The possible reward is paid as a combination of shares and cash. The cash component is dedicated to cover reward-related
taxes and tax-related costs.
Share-based payments that are settled net in shares after withholding taxes are accounted for in full as equity-settled
arrangements despite the fact that the employer pays in cash the taxes related to the rewards on behalf of the participants.
The fair value for the equity settled portion has been determined at grant using the fair value of Sanoma share as of the grant
date less the expected dividends paid before possible share delivery. The fair value for the cash settled portion is remeasured
at each reporting date until the possible reward payment. The fair value of the liability will thus change in accordance with
Sanoma’s share price. Liabilities arising from share-based payments represent an estimate of the employers’ social costs
relating to the payable rewards. The fair value is charged to personnel expenses until vesting.
A more detailed description of the share-based payments is provided in Note 6.2.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer and excludes the amounts collected
on behalf of third parties. The Group recognises revenue when it transfers control over a product or service to a customer.
Revenue recognition is described in more detail in Note 2.2.
Research and development expenditure
Research expenditure is expensed as incurred.
Development expenditure refers to costs that an entity incurs with the aim of developing new products or services for sale, or
fundamentally improving the features of its existing products or services, as well as extending its business. Development
expenses are mainly incurred before the entity begins to make use of the new product/service for commercial or profitable
purposes. Development expenditure is either expensed as incurred or recorded as other intangible asset if it meets the
recognition criteria.
Pensions
The Group’s pension schemes in different countries are arranged in accordance with local requirements and legislation.
Pension schemes are classified into two categories: defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. The Group has both
defined contribution and defined benefit plans and the related pension cover is managed by both pension funds and insurance
companies.
Contributions under defined contribution plans are expensed as incurred, and once they are paid to insurance companies the
Group has no obligation to pay further contributions. All other post-employment benefit plans are regarded as defined benefit
plans.
The present value of Sanoma Group’s obligation of defined benefit plans is determined separately for each scheme using the
projected unit credit method. Within the defined benefit plan, pension obligations or pension assets represent the present
value of future pension payments less the fair value of the plan assets and potential past service cost. The present value of
the defined benefit obligation is determined by using discount interest rates that are based on high-quality corporate bonds or
government bonds whose duration essentially corresponds with the duration of the pension obligation. Pension expenses
Financial Statements 2025
133
under the defined benefit plan are recognised as expenses for the remaining working lives of the employees within the plan
based on the calculations of authorised actuaries.
Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability are recognised immediately in other comprehensive income.
1.4 Adoption of new and amended IFRS standards and IFRIC
interpretations
The Group has applied the same accounting policies as in the Financial Statements 2024 . The IFRS standards and
amendments that took effect in 2025 did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
IASB and IFRIC have issued certain new standards and interpretations, which are not yet effective, and the Group has not
applied these requirements before the effective date:
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements. IFRS 18 sets out requirements for the presentation and
disclosure of information in financial statements and it will replace IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. IFRS 18 is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027, with earlier application permitted.
IFRS 18 introduces the following new requirements:
the classification of all income and expenses within the statement of profit or loss to five categories: operating, investing,
financing, income tax and discontinued operations
two new subtotals in the statement of profit or loss - operating profit and profit or loss before financing and income taxes
a new requirement to disclose management-defined performance measures in a single note in the financial statements
an improvement in the principles related to the aggregation and disaggregation of information in the financial statements
and notes.
The Group is currently working to identify all impacts the standard will have on the Group’s financial statements and notes to
the financial statements.
The initial expected impacts on Group’s statement of profit or loss are not material. The Group will classify foreign exchange
differences within the same category as related income or expenses. Share of profit from associated companies and joint
ventures, and interests on cash and cash equivalents will be classified as investment category.
The Group will apply the requirement of IFRS 18 to use operating profit as the starting point for reporting cash flow from
operations. IFRS 18 requires dividends and interest paid to be included in the financing cash flow and dividends and interests
received in the investing cash flow. The classification of interest paid from the operating to financing category will have a
material impact between cash flows with no aggregate impact. Other changes are not expected to be significant.
The Group will add new disclosure for management-defined performance measures in the notes of the financial statements.
Sanoma will apply the new standard from its mandatory effective date January 1, 2027 with retrospective application. The
comparative information for the financial year ending December 2026 will therefore be restated in accordance with IFRS 18.
Financial Statements 2025
134
2. Financial performance
2.1 Operating segments
In 2025, Sanoma Group included two operating segments which are its two strategic business units, Sanoma Learning and
Sanoma Media Finland. This is aligned with the way Sanoma manages the businesses.
Learning
Sanoma Learning is Europe’s leading K12 learning company, serving about 25 million students across Europe. Our learning
products and services enable teachers to develop the talents of every child to reach their potential. We offer printed and digital
learning materials as well as digital learning and teaching platforms for K12. i.e. primary, secondary and vocational education,
and we aim to continue to grow our business in Europe and beyond. We develop our methodologies based on deep teacher
and student insight and truly understanding their individual needs. By combining our educational technologies and
pedagogical expertise, we create learning products and services with the highest learning impact.
Media Finland
Sanoma Media Finland is the leading cross-media company in Finland, reaching 96% of all Finns weekly. We provide
information, experiences, inspiration and entertainment through multiple media platforms: newspapers, TV, radio, events,
magazines, online and mobile channels. We publish and produce multiple leading brands and services, such as Helsingin
Sanomat, Ilta-Sanomat, Aamulehti, Me Naiset, Aku Ankka, Nelonen, Ruutu, Supla and Radio Suomipop. For advertisers, we
are a trusted partner with insight, impact and reach.
Other operations/eliminations
In addition to the Group eliminations, the column other operations/eliminations includes non-core operations, head office
functions and items not allocated to segments.
Financial Statements 2025
135
Segments 2025
EUR million
Learning
Media Finland
Other
operations/
eliminations
Total
External net sales
745.8
556.7
1,302.5
Internal net sales
0.0
0.2
-0.2
NET SALES
745.8
556.9
-0.2
1,302.5
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
-174.3
-110.5
-1.2
-286.0
OPERATING PROFIT
60.8
7.5
-19.7
48.6
ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT1
151.9
49.0
-12.6
188.2
Share of results in associated companies
0.1
0.1
Financial income
5.9
5.9
Financial expenses
-30.3
-30.3
RESULT BEFORE TAXES
24.3
Income taxes
-4.5
RESULT FOR THE PERIOD
19.9
Capital expenditure
27.6
9.3
2.3
39.1
Goodwill 2
868.6
109.1
-167.7
810.0
Equity-accounted investees
3.7
3.7
Segment assets
1,547.4
284.6
-138.6
1,693.5
Other assets
35.9
TOTAL ASSETS
1,729.4
Segment liabilities
250.5
189.7
-26.3
414.0
Other liabilities
584.6
TOTAL LIABILITIES
998.5
Free cash flow1
113.0
62.3
-15.6
159.7
Average number of employees (full-time equivalents)
2,486
2,055
104
4,645
1Non-audited
2Other operations/eliminations column includes adjustment of goodwill related to legal restructuring of Learning.
Adjusted operating profit is adjusted by items affecting comparability.
Financial Statements 2025
136
Segments 2024
EUR million
Learning
Media Finland
Other
operations/
eliminations
Total
External net sales
764.2
580.7
1,344.8
Internal net sales
0.2
-0.2
NET SALES
764.2
580.9
-0.2
1,344.8
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
-154.7
-91.3
-1.5
-247.6
OPERATING PROFIT
59.1
38.2
-15.4
81.8
ADJUSTED OPERATING PROFIT1
146.9
47.5
-14.4
180.0
Share of results in associated companies
0.0
0.0
Financial income
6.8
6.8
Financial expenses
-40.3
-40.3
RESULT BEFORE TAXES
48.4
Income taxes
-7.8
RESULT FOR THE PERIOD
40.6
Capital expenditure
30.3
7.2
0.2
37.7
Goodwill 2
868.2
109.3
-167.7
809.8
Equity-accounted investees
3.5
3.5
Segment assets
1,659.7
338.9
-152.5
1,846.0
Other assets
33.1
TOTAL ASSETS
1,879.1
Segment liabilities
257.1
177.6
-18.2
416.5
Other liabilities
690.9
TOTAL LIABILITIES
1,107.4
Free cash flow1
67.4
71.0
7.0
145.3
Average number of employees (full-time equivalents)
2,612
2,109
100
4,820
1Non-audited
2Other operations/eliminations column includes adjustment of goodwill related to legal restructuring of Learning.
Adjusted operating profit is adjusted by items affecting comparability.
Financial Statements 2025
137
The accounting policies for segment reporting do not differ from the accounting policies for the Consolidated Financial
Statements. The decisions concerning assessing the performance of operating segments and allocating resources to the
segments are based on segments’ operating profit and adjusted operating profit. Sanoma’s President and CEO acts as the
chief operating decision-maker. Segment assets do not include cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing receivables, tax
receivables and deferred tax receivables. Segment liabilities do not include financial liabilities, tax liabilities and deferred tax
liabilities. Capital expenditure includes investments in tangible and intangible assets. Transactions between segments are
based on market prices.
Information about geographical areas 2025
EUR million
Finland
The
Netherlands
Other EU
countries
Other
countries
Total
External net sales
620.3
214.7
458.0
9.5
1,302.5
Non-current assets
383.6
422.7
668.2
10.3
1,484.8
Information about geographical areas 2024
EUR million
Finland
The
Netherlands
Other EU
countries
Other
countries
Total
External net sales
639.8
220.8
472.2
12.0
1,344.8
Non-current assets
432.3
484.4
698.0
11.9
1,626.6
External net sales and non-current assets are reported based on where the company is domiciled. Non-current assets do not
include financial instruments, deferred tax receivables and assets related to defined benefit plans.
The Group’s revenues from transactions with any single external customer do not amount to 10% or more of the Group’s net
sales.
Financial Statements 2025
138
2.2 Net sales
Nature of goods and services
The following is a description of principal activities, separated by operating segments, from which the Group generates its
revenue. Sanoma Group includes two operating segments, which are its strategic business units, Sanoma Learning and
Sanoma Media Finland. For more detailed information about operating segments, see Note 2.1.
Learning segment
Sanoma Learning is Europe’s leading K12 learning company, serving about 25 million students across Europe. Our learning
products and services enable teachers to develop the talents of every child to reach their potential. We offer printed and digital
learning materials as well as digital learning and teaching platforms for K12, i.e. primary, secondary and vocational education,
and we aim to continue to grow our business in Europe and beyond. We develop our methodologies based on deep teacher
and student insight and truly understanding their individual needs. By combining our educational technologies and
pedagogical expertise, we create learning products and services with the highest learning impact.
Sales are primarily generated through the sale of educational books and granting access to online learning platforms. In most
cases, customer contracts include a combination of books and access to platforms. In these cases, educational books and the
access to the online platform are considered distinct and therefore identified as separate performance obligations. The
consideration is allocated between the separate performance obligations based on their stand-alone selling prices. The stand-
alone selling prices are determined based on the list prices at which the Group sells the identifiable products and services. For
items that are not sold separately by the Group, the stand-alone selling prices are either estimated using the adjusted market
assessment approach or by using an expected cost plus a margin approach.
Products and services
Nature of products and services, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant
payment terms
Educational books
Educational books include revenue from publishing books for primary, secondary and vocational education.
Revenue is recognised when the books are delivered to the customer (point-in-time). Revenue from books with
a right of return is presented after deducting the estimated returns. Books are usually billed upon delivery and
paid according to the payment terms on the invoices.
Access to online learning
platforms
Access to online learning platforms can either be sold separately or in combination with educational books.
Revenue of access to online learning platforms is recognised over the period (over-time) the customer has
access to the platform (usually during a school year). Access services are usually paid in advance in monthly,
quarterly or annual instalments.
Access to online teacher
solutions and school
management systems
Access to online teacher solutions and school management systems includes revenue of access to online
platforms and applications for which revenue is recognised over the period (over-time) that the customer has
access to the platform.
Other
Other sales mainly include the physical distribution of learning materials. For learning materials sold, the
revenue is recognised when they are delivered to the customer. For rental learning books, revenue is
recognised over the period (over-time) that the customer rents the book. Other sales also include consultancy
services in testing and assessment activities. This is considered a separate performance obligation which is
recognised in revenue over time when the service is delivered. Testing and assessment services are billed and
paid on a monthly basis.
Financial Statements 2025
139
Media Finland segment
Sanoma Media Finland is the leading cross-media company in Finland, reaching 96% of all Finns weekly. We provide
information, experiences, inspiration and entertainment through multiple media platforms: newspapers, TV, radio, events,
magazines, online and mobile channels. We publish and produce multiple leading brands and services, such as Helsingin
Sanomat, Ilta-Sanomat, Aamulehti, Me Naiset, Aku Ankka, Nelonen, Ruutu, Supla and Radio Suomipop. For advertisers, we
are a trusted partner with insight, impact and reach.
Sanoma Media Finland principally generates consumer revenue from providing consumer magazines, newspapers, events,
online services and SVOD (Subscription video on demand) and AOD (Audio on demand). Through combining media content
and customer data, advertising revenue is generated by providing successful marketing solutions for our clients. The typical
length of customer contracts is 12 months or less.
Print sales are generated primarily from circulation sales, both subscriptions and single copy sales. In addition, print sales
include advertising sales. Non-print sales are generated from subscriptions for online news, SVOD and AOD as well as
advertising sales generated through TV, VOD, radio, online and mobile channels. Also revenue generated from events (both
consumer income and other B2B revenue) is included in non-print sales.
For each customer contract, the Group accounts for individual performance obligations separately if they are distinct. A
product or service is considered distinct if it is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract and if a customer can
benefit from it on its own. The consideration is allocated between separate performance obligations based on their stand-alone
selling prices. The stand-alone selling prices are determined based on the list prices at which the Group sells the identifiable
products and services. For items that are not sold separately by the Group, the stand-alone selling prices are estimated using
the adjusted market assessment approach.
Products and services
Nature of products and services, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant
payment terms
Advertising
Print advertising is generated through classical pages, classified ads (small advertisements categorised by
topic) or plus propositions and inserts (flyers, cards, etc.). Revenue recognition is at issue date (point-in-time) of
the magazine/newspaper. Revenue is the net price; discounts are subtracted. Discounts can be agency
discounts, generic discounts or volume discounts. Advertising services are usually billed and paid on a weekly
or monthly basis.
TV and radio advertising mainly relates to spot advertising for both free-to-air (FTA) channels and video-on-
demand (VOD) generated mainly from contracts with media agencies. Revenue is recognised when the
commercial is broadcasted (point-in-time). Advertising services are usually billed and paid on a weekly or
monthly basis.
Online and mobile advertising is generated through display sales (e.g. banners and buttons) and non-display
sales, which is primarily branded content. Both display and non-display sales are recognised over-time, during
the running time of the advertising campaign. Performance-based revenue is generated based on number of
clicks and/or fee for leads generated through the Group’s websites (affiliate sales). Performance-based revenue
is recognised at a point-in-time. Advertising services are usually billed and paid on a weekly or monthly basis.
Subscription
Magazine and newspaper subscriptions include subscriptions to magazine and newspaper content in print,
digital and bundle format. The subscription terms vary from a few months up to more than 12 months. A part of
the subscriptions are continuous, and end only when the customer ends them. Revenue is recognised based
on publication dates over the contract term (over-time). Contracts are ended after the contract term and
renewals are agreed at regular prices, therefore treated as new contracts. New subscriptions are offered at full
price or at a discount. Revenue is presented net of the granted discount. When a new subscription is made, the
customer may be offered a free premium article. The article is considered a separate performance obligation for
which the stand-alone selling price is recognised when the control of the product is transferred to the customer
(point-in-time). For subscription bundles (combination of print, online and/or event), the separate products are
identified as separate performance obligations. Revenue is recognised based on the issue dates of respective
products during the contract term (over-time). Print subscriptions are usually paid in advance in monthly,
quarterly or annual instalments.
Video and audio subscriptions include consumer subscriptions to video-on-demand and audio-on-demand.
Revenue is recognised over the length of the subscription term (over-time). Video and audio subscriptions are
usually paid in advance in monthly instalments.
Single copy
Single copy sales relate to magazines and newspapers sold in kiosks, supermarkets and other retail channels.
Retailers have a right of return for unsold copies. Revenue is recognised at the moment the products are
delivered to the retailer (point-in-time), taking into account a provision for estimated returns. Single copy sales
are usually billed and paid on a weekly or monthly basis.
Other B2C sales
Other B2C sales consist of product sales, income from events (consumer part), newspaper consumer
announcements and other consumer income. Revenue is recognised at a point-in-time. Other B2C sales are
usually billed and paid on a monthly basis.
Other B2B sales
Other B2B sales include printing sales, income from events (B2B part), film distribution, music sales, licensing,
gift cards, service sales, commission sales and distribution sales. Based on the nature of the performance
obligations, other B2B sales are recognised both at a point-in-time and over-time. Other B2B are usually billed
and paid on a monthly basis.
Financial Statements 2025
140
Disaggregation of revenue
In the following table, revenue is disaggregated by primary geographical market, major products/services lines and timing of
revenue recognition. The table also includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue by the Group’s two operating
segments. Information on operating segments is presented in Note 2.1.
Disaggregation of revenue 2025
EUR million
Learning
Media
Finland
Other
operations/
eliminations
Total
Finland
64.3
556.9
-0.2
621.0
The Netherlands
214.8
214.8
Poland
139.5
139.5
Spain
125.1
125.1
Italy
101.4
101.4
Belgium
63.2
63.2
Other companies and eliminations
37.5
37.5
Primary geographical markets
745.8
556.9
-0.2
1,302.5
Learning solutions
647.2
0.0
647.2
Advertising
189.4
-0.1
189.2
Subscription
263.7
0.0
263.7
Single copy
35.6
35.6
Other
98.6
68.3
0.0
166.8
Major product lines/services
745.8
556.9
-0.2
1,302.5
Recognition at a point-in-time
578.3
138.2
-0.2
716.3
Recognition over-time
167.5
418.7
586.2
Timing of revenue recognition
745.8
556.9
-0.2
1,302.5
The revenue per country is based on the location of the entity that generates the revenue.
Disaggregation of revenue 2024
EUR million
Learning
Media
Finland
Other
operations/
eliminations
Total
Finland
59.4
580.9
-0.2
640.1
The Netherlands
220.8
220.8
Poland
139.2
139.2
Spain
135.6
135.6
Italy
105.5
105.5
Belgium
64.1
64.1
Other companies and eliminations
39.6
39.6
Primary geographical markets
764.2
580.9
-0.2
1,344.8
Learning solutions
634.2
634.2
Advertising
214.8
-0.2
214.6
Subscription
254.3
0.0
254.3
Single copy
37.0
37.0
Other
130.0
74.8
-0.1
204.7
Major product lines/services
764.2
580.9
-0.2
1,344.8
Recognition at a point-in-time
608.3
149.9
-0.2
758.0
Recognition over-time
155.8
431.0
586.8
Timing of revenue recognition
764.2
580.9
-0.2
1,344.8
Financial Statements 2025
141
Contract balances
The following table provides information about contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers.
2025
2024
EUR million
Contract
assets
Contract
liabilities
Contract
assets
Contract
liabilities
1 Jan
0.9
161.5
0.5
152.7
Revenue recognised that was included in the contract liability at the
beginning of the period
-160.4
-151.9
Increases due to cash received, excluding amounts recognised as
revenue during the period
176.8
160.6
Transfers from contract assets recognised at the beginning of the
period to receivables
-0.9
-0.5
Increase in contract assets due to fulfilled performance obligations
not yet invoiced
0.6
0.9
31 Dec
0.6
177.9
0.9
161.5
The contract assets primarily relate to performance obligations that have been fulfilled, but for which invoicing has not yet
taken place. The contract assets are transferred to receivables upon invoicing and therefore becoming unconditional. The
contract liabilities primarily relate to advance considerations received from customers and for which revenue is recognised at
the moment of fulfilling the performance obligation. Contract assets and liabilities relate to customer contracts that are
generally settled within 12 months after inception of the contract, with the exception of customer contracts for digital products
in Sanoma Learning, which are settled between six months to a maximum eight years after inception of the contract.
Information on trade receivables is further disclosed in Notes 4.2 and 4.3, and Note 5.2.
Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations
The following table includes revenue expected to be recognised in the future related to performance obligations that are
unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) at the reporting date.
Unsatisfied performance obligations
EUR million
2026
> 2026
Total
Learning
98.2
0.8
99.0
Media Finland
78.9
78.9
Total
177.1
0.8
177.9
Distribution of net sales between goods and services
EUR million
2025
2024
Sale of goods
721.8
787.2
Rendering of services
580.7
557.7
Total
1,302.5
1,344.8
The sale of goods includes sales of books, magazines and newspapers as well as the sale of other physical items.
Rendering of services consists of advertising sales in magazines, newspapers, TV, radio and online as well as the sales of
online marketplaces. In addition, sales of services include income from user fees for e-learning solutions and databases as
well as renting learning books.
Financial Statements 2025
142
2.3 Other operating income
Other operating income
EUR million
2025
2024
Gains on sale of property, plant and equipment
0.7
1.1
Gains on sale of Group companies and operations
0.9
5.6
Gains on sale of investment property
1.8
Rental income from investment property
0.1
0.1
Other rental income
4.5
5.0
Government grants
0.1
0.3
Other
16.9
16.3
Total
25.0
28.3
The Group’s other rental income is mostly related to sub-leases.
Other operating income includes EUR 4.2 million ( 2024: 3.7) reprography fee income and EUR 2.2 million ( 2024: 2.5) income
related to alternative payment methods.
More information on investment property can be found in Note 4.6.
2.4 Employee benefit expenses
Employee benefit expenses
EUR million
2025
2024
Wages, salaries and fees
-311.6
-323.7
Equity-settled share-based payments
-3.9
-2.5
Pension costs, defined contribution plans
-39.9
-38.8
Pension costs, defined benefit plans
-0.9
-0.8
Other social expenses
-30.1
-29.2
Total
-386.5
-395.0
Wages, salaries and other compensations for key management are presented in Note 6.3 and share-based payments are
described in Note 6.2. Post employment benefits are described in Note 4.9.
Financial Statements 2025
143
2.5 Materials and services and other operating expenses
Materials and services
EUR million
2025
2024
Paper costs
-28.8
-35.4
Raw materials and supplies
-73.4
-92.2
Purchased transport and distribution service
-87.5
-91.8
Purchased printing
-58.3
-61.4
Sales and commission costs
-18.6
-18.4
Editorial subcontracting
-11.6
-11.8
Royalties
-45.9
-46.0
Other purchased services
-34.6
-45.9
Other
-33.1
-31.5
Total
-391.8
-434.3
Other operating expenses
EUR million
2025
2024
Losses on sales of Group companies and operations
-0.1
-0.4
Operating costs of premises
-13.5
-10.3
Rents
-2.8
-3.8
Advertising and marketing
-52.0
-55.4
Office and ICT expenses
-120.8
-116.6
Professional fees
-29.7
-30.1
Travel expenses
-6.6
-7.2
Other
10.0
8.4
Total
-215.6
-215.4
The Group had no material research and development expenditure recognised as an expense during the financial year or
during the comparative year.
Other operating expenses include cost adjustments related to the capitalisation in PPE and intangible assets.
Other operating expenses include the following expenses related to lease contracts.
EUR million
2025
2024
Expense relating to short-term leases
-4.5
-4.0
Expense relating to leases of low-value assets
0.0
0.0
Expense relating to variable lease payments not included in lease liabilities
-0.6
-1.1
Audit fees
EUR million
2025
2024
Statutory audit
-1.3
-1.2
Audit-related services
-0.3
-0.1
Tax services
0.0
0.0
Other non-audit services
-0.1
-0.4
Total
-1.6
-1.7
In 2025, PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy, a firm of Authorised Public Accountants, acted as Sanoma’s auditor.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy has provided non-audit services to entities of Sanoma Group in total EUR 0.1 million (2024: 0.4)
during the financial year 2025 . The services for the year 2025 included auditor’s statements, sustainability reporting
assurance, tax services and other services. The sustainability reporting assurance is presented in the audit-related services
category in 2025, while it was presented in the other non-audit services category in 2024.
Financial Statements 2025
144
2.6 Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
EUR million
2025
2024
Amortisation of intangible assets
Purchase price allocation amortisation
-33.3
-36.7
Other amortisation of intangible assets
Prepublication rights of learning materials
-48.1
-46.4
Film and TV programming rights
-51.9
-55.2
Other intangible assets
-34.1
-32.2
Total
-167.4
-170.6
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Rental books
-3.7
-3.9
Other depreciation
-6.2
-6.4
Total
-9.9
-10.3
Depreciation of right of use assets
Buildings
-24.0
-26.3
Machinery and vehicles
-5.7
-5.6
Total
-29.8
-31.9
Impairment losses
-78.9
-34.8
Total
-286.0
-247.6
More information on impairment losses can be found in Note 3.2 and Note 3.3.
2.7 Financial items
Financial items
EUR million
2025
2024
Dividend income
0.2
0.2
Interest income from financial assets measured at amortised cost
1.5
2.1
Exchange rate gains
4.1
3.9
Other financial income
0.0
0.7
Financial income total
5.9
6.8
Interest expenses from financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
-19.8
-28.4
Interest expenses on leases
-4.8
-6.0
Forward currency exchange contracts, no hedge accounting, change in fair value
0.0
0.0
Fair value losses
0.0
Exchange rate losses
-3.7
-3.7
Other financial expenses
-2.0
-2.2
Financial expenses total
-30.3
-40.3
Total
-24.4
-33.4
Financial Statements 2025
145
2.8 Income taxes and deferred taxes
Income taxes
EUR million
2025
2024
Income taxes on operational income
-28.8
-23.1
Income taxes from previous periods
-0.6
0.2
Other taxes
-0.6
0.0
Change in deferred tax
25.6
15.0
Tax expense in the income statement
-4.5
-7.8
Income tax reconciliation against local tax rates
EUR million
2025
2024
Result before taxes
24.3
48.4
Tax calculated at (Finnish) statutory rate 20%
-4.9
-9.7
Effect of different tax rates in the operating countries
-0.1
0.4
Non-taxable income
5.5
3.7
Non-deductible expenses
-4.2
-1.6
Tax relating to previous accounting periods
-0.4
-0.8
Effect of joint ventures and associated companies
0.2
0.2
Write down or non-recognition of deferred tax assets from losses
-0.3
0.5
Other items
-0.2
-0.4
Income taxes in the income statement
-4.5
-7.8
Effective tax rate, %
18.3
16.1
Financial Statements 2025
146
Deferred tax receivables and liabilities 2025
EUR million
At 1 Jan
Recorded in
the income
statement
Operations
acquired/ sold
Recorded in other
comprehensive
income
Translation
differences and
reclassifications
At 31 Dec
Deferred tax assets
Tax losses carried forward and unused credits
0.7
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.8
PPE and intangible assets
42.7
-11.7
0.0
31.1
Inventories
0.6
0.2
0.0
0.8
Trade and other receivables
0.5
-0.2
0.3
Provisions
6.7
6.0
0.1
-0.1
12.7
Pension obligations, defined benefit plans
0.3
0.1
-0.1
0.3
Other items
2.6
0.1
0.0
2.7
Total
54.1
-5.5
0.0
-0.1
0.0
48.6
Offsetting of deferred tax assets and liabilities
-50.4
-44.9
Total
3.8
3.7
Deferred tax liabilities
PPE and intangible assets
141.7
-30.6
0.0
0.1
111.2
Inventories
0.2
-0.2
Pension assets, defined benefit plans
6.7
-0.4
2.8
9.0
Other items
1.9
0.2
-0.1
2.0
Total
150.5
-31.0
0.0
2.8
0.0
122.2
Offsetting of deferred tax assets and liabilities
-50.4
-44.9
Total
100.1
77.3
Financial Statements 2025
147
Deferred tax receivables and liabilities 2024
EUR million
At 1 Jan
Recorded in
the income
statement
Operations
acquired/ sold
Recorded in other
comprehensive
income
Translation
differences and
reclassifications
At 31 Dec
Deferred tax assets
Tax losses carried forward and unused credits
2.1
-1.5
0.0
0.2
0.7
PPE and intangible assets
47.4
-4.5
0.0
-0.1
42.7
Inventories
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.6
Trade and other receivables
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.5
Provisions
5.0
1.6
0.0
6.7
Pension obligations, defined benefit plans
1.2
0.0
-0.4
-0.5
0.3
Other items
2.5
0.2
-0.2
2.6
Total
58.5
-3.6
0.0
-0.4
-0.4
54.1
Offsetting of deferred tax assets and liabilities
-53.0
-50.4
Total
5.5
3.8
Deferred tax liabilities
PPE and intangible assets
161.0
-17.4
0.0
-1.9
141.7
Inventories
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
Pension assets, defined benefit plans
6.0
0.5
0.6
-0.5
6.7
Other items
1.9
-1.6
1.6
1.9
Total
169.0
-18.6
0.0
0.6
-0.5
150.5
Offsetting of deferred tax assets and liabilities
-53.0
-50.4
Total
116.0
100.1
Tax losses
Tax losses carried forward
Recognised
deferred tax asset
Unrecognised
deferred tax asset
EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Expiry within five years
1.7
0.5
0.0
0.3
0.1
Expiry after five years
2.9
1.5
0.0
0.2
0.3
No expiry
36.3
33.9
0.3
0.6
7.7
6.9
Total
41.0
36.0
0.3
0.6
8.2
7.3
Financial Statements 2025
148
The recognition of the deferred tax assets is supported by offsetting deferred tax liabilities and where applicable by the
Group’s estimations of future taxable profits based on the approved business plans and budgets of the subsidiary. The Group
continually evaluates the assessments in respect of the utilisation of the deferred tax assets.
Due to the unlikely use of tax benefits in the coming years, deferred tax receivables of EUR 8.2 million (2024: 7.3) have not
been recorded in the consolidated balance sheet based on the management’s judgement. These unrecognised receivables
relate mainly to tax losses carried forward of subsidiaries.
Pillar 2
Sanoma is within the scope of the OECD Pillar 2 global minimum tax model rules. The rules are effective from the financial
year beginning 1 January 2024.
Under the Pillar 2 legislation, Sanoma might be liable to pay a top-up tax for the difference between its effective tax rate per
jurisdiction calculated using Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules and the 15% minimum rate. Based on the analysis of its
2025 financial data, Sanoma has determined that the transitional Pillar 2 safe harbours apply except for Poland. The
assessment of the applicability of the safe harbours is based on the most recent country-by-country reporting and IFRS
financial data of the jurisdictions. The calculation of top-up tax is based on GloBE rules. The accounted top-up tax is not
material and has no significant current tax impact for the year 2025.
Financial Statements 2025
149
2.9 Earnings per share
Undiluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the result for the period attributable to the equity holders of the Parent
Company, adjusted by the tax-adjusted interest on the hybrid bond, by the weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Earnings per share
2025
2024
Result attributable to the equity holders of the Parent Company, EUR million
19.9
40.5
Accrued interest on the hybrid bond
-12.0
-12.0
Tax effect
2.4
2.4
Net effect
-9.6
-9.6
Weighted average number of shares on the market, thousands
162,833
163,413
Earnings per share, EUR
0.06
0.19
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares so that share plans are taken
into account.
Diluted earnings per share
2025
2024
Profit used to determine diluted earnings per share, EUR million
19.9
40.5
Accrued interest on the hybrid bond
-12.0
-12.0
Tax effect
2.4
2.4
Net effect
-9.6
-9.6
Weighted average number of shares on the market, thousands
162,833
163,413
Effect of share plans, thousands
692
227
Diluted average number of shares, thousands
163,525
163,641
Diluted earnings per share, EUR
0.06
0.19
Information on share plans is presented in Note 6.2. For more information on shares and shareholders, see Report of the
Board of Directors section Ownership structure and shareholders.
Financial Statements 2025
150
3. Acquisitions and capital expenditure
3.1 Acquisitions and divestments
Acquisitions in 2025
On 20 January 2025, Sanoma acquired a portfolio of learning materials for secondary and vocational education from Finnish
publisher Edita Oppiminen Oy, a subsidiary of Edita Group, which has made a decision to discontinue its learning material
publishing business. The acquired product offering complements Sanoma’s current product portfolio for secondary and
vocational education in Finland. The acquisition is in line with Sanoma’s strategy to grow its K12 learning business in the
current operating countries for example by widening its product offering.
In 2024, pro forma net sales of the acquired portfolio amounted to approx. EUR 4 million. No employees were transferred from
the seller to Sanoma with the transaction.
Impact of business acquisitions on Group’s assets and liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Intangible assets
4.0
Inventories
0.3
Assets, total
4.2
Current liabilities
-3.9
Liabilities, total
-3.9
Fair value of acquired net assets
0.3
Acquisition cost
1.3
Fair value of acquired net assets
-0.3
Goodwill from the acquisitions
1.0
Cash paid to obtain control, net of cash acquired
EUR million
2025
2024
Acquisition cost
1.3
Decrease (+) / increase (-) in acquisition liabilities
0.0
0.8
Cash paid to obtain control, net of cash acquired
1.3
0.8
Acquisitions in 2024
No acquisitions were conducted during 2024.
Financial Statements 2025
151
Divestments in 2025
On 28 February 2025, Sanoma divested its B2B website services business aimed at small and medium-sized enterprises to
Tagomo Digital Oy. As a result of the divestment, eight employees were transferred to the buyer.
On 2 January 2025, Sanoma divested Rauman Suorajakelu Oy to PPP Finland Oy, a Belgian distribution company already
operating in the Ostrobothnia and Uusimaa regions of Finland. Rauman Suorajakelu is responsible for early-morning delivery
in the Rauma area.
Impact of divestments on Group’s assets and liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Property, plant and equipment
0.0
0.0
Goodwill
0.2
2.3
Other intangible assets
0.9
Inventories
0.2
Trade and other receivables
0.2
2.7
Cash and cash equivalents
0.0
6.6
Assets, total
0.5
12.8
Deferred tax liabilities
0.0
Financial liabilities
0.0
-0.4
Trade and other payables
-0.2
-4.5
Liabilities, total
-0.2
-5.0
Derecognised non-controlling interest
-1.5
Net assets
0.3
6.3
Sales price
1.1
12.2
Transaction fees paid
-0.1
-0.7
Net result from sale of operations
0.8
5.2
Cash flow from sale of operations
EUR million
2025
2024
Sales price
1.1
12.2
Cash and cash equivalents of divested operations
0.0
-6.6
Decrease (+) / increase (-) in receivables from divestment
-0.1
Cash flow from sale of operations
1.0
5.6
Divestments in 2024
On 2 April 2024, Sanoma divested Valopilkku to Fonecta Group. Valopilkku is one of Finland’s best-known taxi booking
applications with users all over Finland.
On 31 January 2024, Sanoma divested its majority holding in Netwheels Oy to Alma Media. Netwheels Oy offers car sales
software as a service (SaaS) to a large corporate customer base in the automotive industry in Finland. Sanoma Media Finland
Oy held a total of 55.8% in Netwheels. In 2023, net sales of Netwheels Oy were approx. EUR 8 million and it employed 29
people, who were transferred to the buyer with the divestment.
On 2 January 2024, Sanoma divested Stark, an exam preparation business in Germany, which it acquired with the Italian K12
learning content business from Pearson in August 2022. The buyer was the original founder of the business, Mr. Stark. In
2023, Stark’s net sales were approx. EUR 14 million and the company employed 56 people, who were transferred to the buyer
with the divestment.
Financial Statements 2025
152
3.2 Intangible assets
Intangible assets 2025
EUR million
Goodwill
Immaterial
rights
Prepublication
rights
Other
intangible
assets
Advance
payments
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
811.9
543.4
570.4
708.5
34.9
2,669.1
Increases
53.6
44.5
20.3
9.4
127.8
Acquisitions of operations
1.0
4.0
5.0
Decreases
-58.3
-198.9
-51.4
-308.7
Disposal of operations
-0.2
-0.2
Reclassifications
-6.9
-0.4
19.8
-12.8
-0.3
Exchange rate differences
-0.5
0.3
2.0
0.5
0.1
2.2
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
812.1
532.1
417.5
701.6
31.5
2,494.9
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-2.1
-384.4
-434.1
-392.5
-0.1
-1,213.2
Decreases, disposals and acquisitions
0.0
58.3
198.9
51.4
308.6
Amortisation for the period
-67.4
-48.1
-51.9
-167.4
Impairment losses for the period
-11.6
-0.7
-41.0
-53.4
Reclassifications
7.3
-7.2
0.0
0.1
Exchange rate differences
-0.2
-1.3
-0.3
-1.8
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
-2.1
-398.0
-285.4
-441.5
-0.1
-1,127.1
Carrying amount at 31 Dec
810.0
134.1
132.2
260.1
31.4
1,367.8
Financial Statements 2025
153
Intangible assets 2024
EUR million
Goodwill
Immaterial
rights
Prepublication
rights
Other
intangible
assets
Advance
payments
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
860.0
529.4
541.2
682.7
45.4
2,658.6
Increases
53.9
46.1
23.9
6.2
130.0
Decreases
-46.5
-16.1
-2.9
-65.6
Disposal of operations
-48.0
-1.9
-0.6
-3.0
-53.5
Reclassifications
8.5
8.2
-16.7
0.0
Exchange rate differences
-0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.3
0.0
-0.4
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
811.9
543.4
570.4
708.5
34.9
2,669.1
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-47.8
-360.0
-402.8
-315.3
-1,125.8
Decreases, disposals and acquisitions
45.6
48.5
16.6
5.1
115.9
Amortisation for the period
-70.4
-46.4
-53.7
-170.6
Impairment losses for the period
-2.5
-1.6
-28.8
-32.9
Reclassifications
0.1
-0.1
0.0
Exchange rate differences
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
-2.1
-384.4
-434.1
-392.5
-0.1
-1,213.2
Carrying amount at 31 Dec
809.8
159.0
136.2
316.0
34.8
1,455.9
Financial Statements 2025
154
Immaterial rights include purchase price allocations total 122.5 million (2024 : 143.5 ) e.g. allocations to trade marks. The
prepublication rights of learning materials and solutions are internally generated intangible assets. Other intangible assets
include mainly assets identified in acquisition accounting total 183.4 million (2024: 241.6), e.g. purchase price allocated to
customer relationships.
Excluding goodwill the Group has no intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at the end of the financial year.
Impairment losses recognised from immaterial rights and other intangibles assets
Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortised using the straight-line method, except for the immaterial rights where
the diminishing method is used for broadcasting rights and the straight-line method for other immaterial rights. At each
reporting date it is assessed whether there is any indication that these intangible assets may be impaired. If any such
indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated by determining the present value of future cash flows of the
asset.
Impairment losses totalling EUR 53.4 million (2024: 32.9) were recognised from intangible assets with definite useful lives, of
which EUR 50.6 million related to Sanoma Learning strategic business unit (SBU) (2024: 30.0), EUR 2.5 million related to the
Sanoma Media Finland SBU (2024: 2.5) and EUR 0.2 million related to corporate intangible assets (2024: 0.4).
In Sanoma Media Finland SBU, the impairment related mainly to TV programme rights. The impairments in the Sanoma
Learning SBU mainly related to the decision to not participate in multi-year distribution tenders in the Dutch market, and some
minor impairments related to learning solutions and ICT systems.
Allocation of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful life
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill has been allocated to two CGUs which are operating segments/SBUs. The
allocation of goodwill is as presented in the following table.
Carrying amounts of goodwill in the CGUs
EUR million
2025
2024
Sanoma Learning
700.9
700.4
Sanoma Media Finland
109.1
109.3
CGUs, total
810.0
809.8
Impairment losses recognised from goodwill
There were no impairment losses recognised from goodwill in the financial year (2024: 0.0).
Methodology and assumptions used in impairment testing
Impairment testing of assets is principally carried out on a cash flow basis whereby the Value in Use is used as the
recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is determined based on the present value of future cash flows of the Group’s
CGUs, using a post-tax WACC. Deferred and current income tax assets and liabilities (including deferred tax liabilities related
to previous purchase price allocations) have been included in the carrying amount.
Calculations of the recoverable amount are based on a five-year forecast period. Cash flow estimates are based on
management approved strategic plans at the time of testing, including assumptions on the development of the business
environment. Actual cash flows may differ from estimated cash flows if the key assumptions do not realise as estimated.
The key assumptions in the calculations include profitability level, discount rate, long-term growth rate, as well as market
positions. Assumptions are based on medium-term strategic plans and forecasts made annually in each business unit and
approved by the Sanoma Executive Management Team (EMT) and the Board in a separate process. Market position and
profitability level assumptions are based on past experience, the assessment of the SBU and Group management of the
development of the competitive environment and competitive position of each CGU, as well as the impact of Sanoma’s
transformation strategy and cost savings initiatives.
The terminal growth rate used in the calculations is based on management’s assessment of long-term growth. The growth rate
is estimated by taking into account growth projections by market that are available from external sources of information, as
well as the characteristics of each CGU. The terminal growth rates used for the CGUs in the reporting and comparable period
were as follows:
The average terminal growth rate used in calculation of the recoverable amount, %
2025
2024
Sanoma Learning
2.5
2.5
Sanoma Media Finland
-1.1
-1.1
Following the Finnish market changes in combination with the changes in the Sanoma Media Finland CGU portfolio (the
transformation of traditional media to digital), the terminal growth rate is expected to be at the same level as last year. The
terminal growth rate for the Sanoma Learning CGU is expected to be at the same level as last year based on review and
projections of the various curriculum cycles across its footprint markets and due to inflation development. Management has
also estimated the expected effects of new reforms and potential industry developments.
The average discount rate used in calculation of the recoverable amount, %
2025
2024
Sanoma Learning
8.1
7.4
Sanoma Media Finland
8.2
8.5
The CGU-specific discount rates represent the blended average cost of capital of each CGU. On an annual basis Sanoma re-
assesses the WACC calculation based on updated market parameters and updates the WACC accordingly. In impairment test
calculations, capital expenditure is assumed to comprise normal replacement investments, and foreign exchange rates are
based on euro rates at the time of testing.
The recoverable amounts of Sanoma Learning and Sanoma Media Finland clearly exceed their carrying amounts. Any
reasonably expected changes in key assumptions would not result in impairment.
Financial Statements 2025
155
3.3 Property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets
Property, plant and equipment 2025
EUR million
Land and
water
Buildings and
structures
Machinery and
equipment
Rental books
Other tangible
assets
Advance
payments
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
0.4
6.6
139.2
54.4
29.4
3.1
233.2
Increases
3.7
3.0
2.9
2.1
11.8
Decreases
0.0
-4.8
-3.5
-0.1
-8.3
Disposal of operations
0.0
0.0
Reclassifications
1.2
2.4
-3.2
0.4
Exchange rate differences
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
0.4
6.6
139.4
54.0
34.7
2.0
237.1
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-0.1
-1.4
-130.1
-45.4
-18.7
-195.8
Decreases, disposals and acquisitions
0.0
4.0
2.4
0.1
6.5
Depreciation for the period
0.0
-3.5
-3.7
-2.6
-9.9
Impairment losses for the period
-0.3
-0.7
0.0
-1.0
Reclassifications
0.1
0.1
Exchange rate differences
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
-0.1
-1.4
-130.0
-47.4
-21.2
-200.1
Carrying amount at 31 Dec 2025
0.3
5.1
9.4
6.6
13.5
2.0
37.0
Financial Statements 2025
156
Property, plant and equipment 2024
EUR million
Land and
water
Buildings and
structures
Machinery and
equipment
Rental books
Other tangible
assets
Advance
payments
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
0.4
6.6
141.4
54.5
28.8
0.3
232.0
Increases
3.0
3.7
0.8
3.2
10.6
Decreases
-3.9
-3.7
-0.3
-7.9
Disposal of operations
-1.6
-0.1
-1.7
Reclassifications
0.3
0.2
-0.4
0.1
Exchange rate differences
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
0.4
6.6
139.2
54.4
29.4
3.1
233.2
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-0.1
-1.3
-131.1
-42.6
-16.5
-191.7
Decreases, disposals and acquisitions
5.0
1.9
0.3
7.2
Depreciation for the period
0.0
-4.0
-3.9
-2.4
-10.3
Impairment losses for the period
0.0
-0.9
-0.9
Reclassifications
0.0
0.0
-0.1
Exchange rate differences
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
-0.1
-1.4
-130.1
-45.4
-18.7
-195.8
Carrying amount at 31 Dec 2024
0.3
5.2
9.1
9.0
10.7
3.1
37.4
Financial Statements 2025
157
Right-of-use assets
Depreciation of right-of-use assets
EUR million
2025
2024
Depreciation for the period
Buildings
-24.0
-26.3
Machinery
-2.1
-2.2
Vehicles
-3.7
-3.4
Total
-29.8
-31.9
Carrying amount of right-of-use assets
EUR million
2025
2024
Carrying amount
Buildings
63.9
98.3
Machinery
0.0
17.3
Vehicles
7.3
7.5
Total
71.3
123.1
Additions to the right-of-use assets during the 2025 financial year were EUR 7.7 million (2024: 14.1).
Carrying amount of right-of-use assets has increased by EUR 0.0 million (2024: 0.0) due to acquisitions.
The Group’s leasing activities
The Group leases buildings for its office space. Rental contracts are typically made for fixed periods of 5–15 years. Some
leases include an option to extend the lease for an additional period after the end of the contract term or terminate the contract
during the lease term. The Group assesses at the lease commencement whether it is reasonably certain to exercise the
extension option or termination option. During the lease term the Group reassesses whether it is reasonably certain to
exercise the option if there is a significant event or significant change in circumstances within its control. The most significant
lease contracts are related to properties of Sanomala and Sanoma House.
The Group leases also cars which have lease terms of 3–5 years. Machinery includes some IT equipment. Most leased IT
equipment and machinery are leases of low-value items and the Group has elected not to recognise right-of-use assets and
lease liabilities for these leases. Also, short-term leases are reported as expense in income statement. In 2024, machinery
also included a printing press, which has been impaired in 2025 due to the closure of the printing plant in Tampere. In relation
to the closure, the leased building was also impaired.
Lease liabilities are presented in Note 5.1.
Financial Statements 2025
158
4. Working capital and other balance sheet items
4.1 Inventories
EUR million
2025
2024
Materials and supplies
5.3
5.9
Work in progress
0.2
0.1
Finished products/goods
31.6
37.1
Other
1.2
1.9
Total
38.3
45.0
EUR 2.6 million (2024: 1.4 ) was recognised as impairment in the financial year. The carrying amount of inventories was written
down to reflect their net realisable value.
4.2 Other receivables, non-current
EUR million
2025
2024
Financial assets at amortised cost
Other receivables
0.4
1.1
Advance payments
0.8
Net defined benefit pension assets1
42.4
30.6
Total
42.7
32.6
1Net defined benefit pension assets, see Note 4.9
The fair values of receivables do not significantly differ from the carrying amounts of receivables.
4.3 Trade and other receivables, current
EUR million
2025
2024
Financial assets at amortised cost
Trade receivables1
90.5
108.5
Other receivables
2.1
2.9
Financial assets at fair value
Derivatives2
0.0
0.1
Accrued income
13.9
13.3
Advance payments
12.4
9.2
Other receivables
8.4
7.8
Total
127.2
141.7
1Trade receivables, see Note 5.2
2Derivatives, see Note 5.2
The Group has recognised a total of EUR 0.5 million ( 2024: 1.4 ) in credit losses and change in impairment allowances on
trade receivables. Information on how impairment allowance for trade receivables has been defined is included in Note 5.2.
The fair values of receivables do not significantly differ from the carrying amounts of receivables.
Accrued income
The most significant items under accrued income relate to normal business activities and include e.g. accruals for delivered
newspapers and magazines.
Financial Statements 2025
159
4.4 Provisions
Changes in provisions
EUR million
Restructuring
provisions
Other
provisions
Total
At 1 Jan 2025
6.9
3.3
10.2
Exchange rate differences
0.0
0.0
0.0
Increases
2.4
6.9
9.3
Amounts used
-2.5
-3.6
-6.1
Unused amounts reversed
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
At 31 Dec 2025
6.2
5.7
11.9
Carrying amounts of provisions
EUR million
2025
2024
Non-current
7.0
4.5
Current
4.9
5.7
Total
11.9
10.2
Provisions are based on best estimates on the balance sheet date. Restructuring provisions mainly relate to Program Solar
and to the closure of the printing plant in Tampere. Other provisions include provisions related to contracts with customers and
other smaller provisions.
4.5 Trade and other payables
EUR million
2025
2024
Non-current
Accrued expenses
0.5
0.4
Advances received
0.4
0.5
Other financial liabilities at amortised cost
1.3
1.8
Total
2.3
2.7
Current
Trade payables
36.5
57.3
Other liabilities
45.3
39.6
Derivatives1
0.0
Accrued expenses
137.5
142.0
Advances received
0.2
0.6
Total
219.5
239.4
Total
221.8
242.1
1Derivatives, see Note 5.2
Accrued expenses
Accrued expenses mainly consisted of accrued personnel expenses, royalty liabilities and accruals related to common
business activities.
Financial Statements 2025
160
4.6 Investment property
Investment property 2025
EUR million
Land and
water
Buildings and
structures
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
2.8
0.2
3.0
Decreases
-0.9
-0.9
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
1.9
0.2
2.1
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
0.0
0.0
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
0.0
0.0
Carrying amount at 31 Dec 2025
1.9
0.2
2.0
Fair values at 31 Dec 2025
6.7
0.2
6.9
Investment property 2024
EUR million
Land and
water
Buildings and
structures
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
2.8
0.2
3.0
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
2.8
0.2
3.0
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
0.0
0.0
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
0.0
0.0
Carrying amount at 31 Dec 2024
2.8
0.2
2.9
Fair values at 31 Dec 2024
8.5
0.2
8.8
The fair values of investment property have been determined by using either the yield value method or using the information
on equal real estate business transactions in the market. Also, an outside surveyor has been used when determining the fair
value. In yield method calculations, investor’s return requirement range is 5–30%. Investment properties are classified at fair
value hierarchy level 3.
The investment property includes land areas in the City of Vantaa, village of Keimola (Finland). In 2025, Sanoma sold parcels
of land from the area.
The investment property also includes land areas in the City of Vantaa, village of Vantaankoski, which are partly unplanned
raw land and partly lots and parcels of land.
Operating expenses of investment property
EUR million
2025
2024
Investment property, no rental income
0.0
0.0
Rental income of investment property
EUR million
2025
2024
Rental income of investment property
0.1
0.1
4.7 Equity-accounted investees
Interests in joint ventures and associated companies
EUR million
2025
2024
Interests in joint ventures
1.9
1.9
Interests in associated companies
1.8
1.7
Total
3.7
3.5
Joint ventures
The Group had no material joint ventures in the financial year or previous year. The information on the Group’s joint ventures
has been presented as aggregated in the table below.
Interests in joint ventures
EUR million
2025
2024
Carrying amount at 1 Jan
1.9
1.8
Share of total comprehensive income
0.9
0.9
Dividends received
-0.8
-0.8
Carrying amount at 31 Dec
1.9
1.9
Associated companies
The Group had no material associated companies in the financial year or previous year. The information on the Group’s
associated companies has been presented as aggregated in the table below.
Financial Statements 2025
161
Interests in associated companies
EUR million
2025
2024
Carrying amount at 1 Jan
1.7
1.8
Share of total comprehensive income
0.1
0.0
Other changes
-0.1
Carrying amount at 31 Dec
1.8
1.7
List of associated companies and joint ventures, see Note 6.4 .
4.8 Other investments
EUR million
2025
2024
Other investments, non-current
2.9
2.9
Other investments mainly include investments in shares, and the Group does not intend to sell these assets. Other
investments are measured at fair value and are classified at fair value hierarchy level 3.
4.9 Post-employment benefits
Sanoma Group has various schemes for its personnel’s pension cover that comprise both defined contribution and defined
benefit pension plans. Pension schemes are arranged in accordance with local requirements and legislation. The majority of
the pension plans are of a defined contribution structure, where the employer contribution and resulting income charge is fixed
at a set level or is set at a percentage of employee’s pay. Contributions made to defined contribution pension plans and
charged to the income statement totalled EUR 39.9 million (2024: 38.8).
Defined benefit pension plans in Sanoma are mainly related to Finland.
In Finland, the Group has a pension fund responsible for the statutory pension cover for certain Group company, as well as for
supplementary pension schemes. The pension schemes arranged by a pension fund are classified as defined benefit plans. In
addition to the pension fund in Finland, the Group also has other supplementary defined benefit pension schemes which are
managed by insurance companies.
The supplementary pension schemes are final average pay plans, and the benefits comprise old-age, disability and surviving
dependent pensions. The supplementary pension schemes entitle a retired employee to receive a monthly pension payment
based on the employee’s final average salary.
The Finnish defined benefit plans are administered by a pension fund that is legally separated from the Group. The pension
fund is governed by a board, which is composed of employee and employer representatives. The board appoints the
managing director for the pension fund, who is also a member of the board.
The Board of the Finnish pension fund sets out on an annual basis the strategic investment policy and plan. The Investment
Committee of Sanoma Group assists the Board and managing director of the pension fund. The pension fund is entitled to use
an external asset manager who is authorised to do investments in accordance with the investment policy. The investments are
allocated mainly to instruments, which have quoted prices in active markets, like listed shares, bonds and investment funds.
Finnish voluntary defined benefit pension plans are fully and statutory pension plans partially funded.
The risks in Finnish pension plans are mainly related to the adequacy of the pension liability and investment operations. The
pension liability may prove insufficient if the related insurance portfolio essentially differs from that of other pension institutions,
the returns of investments remain below the average return of the pension system or the average lifetime exceeds the
calculated assumption. A pension expense development forecast has been prepared for the pension fund in aid of risk
management. The actuary of the pension fund is responsible for the solvency of the pension liability. The extremely favourable
structure of the pension fund’s insurance portfolio and good solvency give the pension fund the possibility to consider taking
more deviation risk in its investment strategy by investing its assets in deviation from the average allocation of occupational
pension companies. The pension fund’s key risks in investment operations include the interest rate risk, stock market risk,
credit risk, currency risk and liquidity risk. Risks related to various asset classes are managed through the effective distribution
of investments between asset classes. Liquidity risks are managed by making investments that can be converted into cash
very rapidly.
The actuarial calculations for the Group’s defined benefit pension plans have been prepared by external actuaries. In addition
to pension plans, Sanoma Group has no other defined benefit plans.
Sanoma Group recognised total defined benefit costs related to all pension plans as follows:
Pension costs recognised in the income statement
EUR million
2025
2024
Current service costs
-1.6
-1.5
Net interest
0.9
0.8
Administration costs
-0.2
-0.2
Total
-0.9
-0.8
Financial Statements 2025
162
Per year-end the net pension liability can be specified as follows:
Net defined benefit pension liabilities (assets) in the balance sheet
EUR million
2025
2024
Net defined benefit pension liabilities
2.3
2.7
Net defined benefit pension assets
42.4
30.6
Net defined benefit pension liability (asset) total
-40.0
-27.9
The reconciliation from the opening balances to the closing balances for the net defined benefit pension liability (asset) and its
components is presented in the following table.
EUR million
Defined benefit
obligation
Fair value of
plan assets
Total
1 Jan 2025
138.8
-166.7
-27.9
Current year service cost
1.6
1.6
Interest cost/income
4.4
-5.3
-0.9
Effect of settlements
-1.3
1.3
Administration cost
0.2
0.2
Total recognised in the result for the period
4.7
-3.8
0.9
Remeasurement of the net defined benefit liability:
Gains/losses arising from financial assumptions
-3.6
-3.6
Experience adjustments
-0.5
-0.5
Return on plan assets excluding interest income
-10.2
-10.2
Total recognised in other comprehensive income
-4.1
-10.2
-14.3
Contributions by the employer
1.3
1.3
Contributions by plan participants
0.7
-0.7
Benefits paid from funds
-8.6
8.6
31 Dec 2025
131.5
-171.5
-40.0
EUR million
Defined benefit
obligation
Fair value of
plan assets
Total
1 Jan 2024
136.7
-161.7
-25.1
Current year service cost
1.5
1.5
Interest cost/income
4.4
-5.3
-0.8
Effect of settlements
-0.1
0.1
Administration cost
0.2
0.2
Total recognised in the result for the period
5.8
-5.0
0.8
Remeasurement of the net defined benefit liability:
Gains/losses arising from financial assumptions
7.8
7.8
Experience adjustments
-2.7
-2.7
Return on plan assets excluding interest income
-10.0
-10.0
Total recognised in other comprehensive income
5.2
-10.0
-4.8
Contributions by the employer
1.1
1.1
Contributions by plan participants
0.3
-0.3
Benefits paid from funds
-9.2
9.2
31 Dec 2024
138.8
-166.7
-27.9
A breakdown of net defined benefit liability and the split between countries is shown below.
Net defined benefit pension liabilities (assets) in the balance sheet 2025
EUR million
Finland
Belgium
Total
Present value of funded obligations
121.6
9.9
131.5
Fair value of plan assets
-163.9
-7.6
-171.5
Total
-42.3
2.2
-40.0
Net defined benefit pension liabilities (assets) in the balance sheet 2024
EUR million
Finland
Belgium
Total
Present value of funded obligations
128.8
10.0
138.8
Fair value of plan assets
-159.4
-7.4
-166.7
Total
-30.6
2.6
-27.9
The Sanoma Group’s estimated contributions to the defined benefit plans for 2026 are about EUR -1.9 million.
Financial Statements 2025
163
Plan assets by major categories
%
2025
2024
Equity instruments
53.0
52.3
Bonds and debentures
34.0
32.3
Other items
11.5
14.3
Cash
1.4
1.0
Total
100.0
100.0
The fair value of plan assets included investments in Sanoma shares totalling EUR 2.7 million (2024: 2.2).
Equity instruments consist mainly of investment funds and have quoted prices in active markets.
Principal actuarial assumptions at 31 Dec1
%
2025
2024
Discount rate
3.8
3.3
Expected future salary increase
3.0
3.0
Expected future pension increases
2.8
2.5
1Expressed as weighted averages.
Assumptions regarding future mortality have been based on published statistics and mortality tables. The current longevities
underlying the values of the defined benefit obligations at the reporting date were as follows:
Longevities at 31 Dec
Year
2025
2024
Longevity at age 65 for current pensioners
Males
22.9
21.4
Females
27.2
25.4
Longevity at age 65 for current members aged 45
Males
25.4
23.7
Females
29.8
28.1
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation at 31 December 2025 was 12.5 years (2024: 12.8).
Reasonably possible changes at the reporting date to one of the relevant actuarial assumptions, holding other assumptions
constant, would have affected the defined benefit obligation by the percentages shown below.
Sensitivity analysis at 31 Dec
%
2025
2024
Increase
Decrease
Increase
Decrease
Discount rate (0.5% movement)
-5.5
6.2
-5.6
6.3
Expected future salary increase (0.5% movement)
0.5
-0.5
0.6
-0.5
Expected future pension increases (0.5% movement)
5.9
-5.5
6.0
-5.6
Future mortality (1 year movement)
3.8
-3.7
3.8
-3.7
Financial Statements 2025
164
5. Capital structure and financial items
5.1 Financial liabilities and lease liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Non-current financial liabilities at amortised cost
Loans from financial institutions
210.0
218.5
Bonds
149.5
149.2
Lease liabilities
78.0
104.1
Non-current financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Other liabilities
0.0
0.0
Total
437.6
471.9
Current financial liabilities at amortised cost
Loans from financial institutions
50.6
Commercial papers
39.9
37.4
Lease liabilities
28.2
29.7
Current financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Other liabilities
0.0
0.0
Total
68.2
117.7
Total
505.8
589.6
Fair values of loans from financial institutions and other liabilities are close to their carrying values. The fair value of the bond
was EUR 149.5 million on 31 December 2025 (2024: 149.2).
Reconciliation of movement of liabilities to cash flow arising from financial activities
EUR million
Non-current
financial
liabilities
Current
financial
liabilities
Lease
liabilities
Total
Non-current
other liabilities
Total
1 Jan 2025
367.8
88.0
133.9
589.6
3.7
593.4
Cash flows
110.0
-166.2
-31.1
-87.3
-0.2
-87.5
Disposal of operations
0.0
0.0
0.0
Exchange rate differences
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.2
Other non-cash movements1
-118.2
118.2
3.3
3.3
-0.5
2.7
At 31 Dec 2025
359.6
40.0
106.2
505.8
3.0
508.8
1 Jan 2024
249.4
301.4
154.9
705.6
3.3
709.0
Cash flows
169.0
-263.2
-31.9
-126.1
0.6
-125.6
Disposal of operations
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
Exchange rate differences
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
Other non-cash movements1
-50.6
49.8
11.3
10.5
-0.1
10.3
At 31 Dec 2024
367.8
88.0
133.9
589.6
3.7
593.4
1Other non-cash movements mainly include classifications between non-current and current financial liabilities.
Total cash flow for leases was EUR -41.0 million in 2025 (2024: -43.0 ). For more information on the Group’s lease activities,
Loans from financial institutions
In 2025, the Group’s loans from financial institutions consisted of two term loans: EUR 100 million term loan and EUR 110
million term loan, which are both booked in non-current liabilities. Loans are valued at amortised cost. For more information,
The average interest rate for loans (including bond and excluding leases) during the financial year was 3.7% (2024: 4.8%).
The interest rates of all loans are tied to Euribor. The interest rate of the bond is fixed.
Financial Statements 2025
165
Bonds
In September 2024, Sanoma issued a EUR 150 million three-year Senior Unsecured Social bond for institutional investors.
The bond pays a fixed coupon of 4.000% and had an issue price of 99.872%. The arrangement fees and expenses relating to
the issue were capitalised and will be amortised over the life of the bond, thus raising the effective interest rate to 4.2%. The
maturity date of the bond is 13 September 2027. The net proceeds of the notes shall be used in accordance with Sanoma’s
Social Bond Framework which are available on Sanoma’s website.
Commercial papers
Sanoma has domestic and foreign commercial paper programmes which are used for short-term liquidity needs. Commercial
papers are valued at amortised cost, and transaction costs are recognised directly as expenses due to their immaterial value.
In accordance with Group Treasury Policy, outstanding commercial papers are fully backed up with a committed syndicated
credit facility of EUR 300 million provided by banks in case of possible market disruptions. There were EUR 39.9 million
commercial papers outstanding at the end of 2025 (2024: 37.4).
5.2 Financial risk management
Sanoma’s treasury operations are managed centrally by the Group Treasury. Operating as a counterparty to the Group’s
operational units, Group Treasury is responsible for the Group’s external financing, liquidity management and hedging
operations. Centralised treasury operations focus on securing financing on flexible and competitive terms, optimising liquidity
management, ensuring cost-efficient operations, and managing financial risks effectively. Sanoma is exposed to interest rate,
currency, liquidity and credit risks. Risk management aims to hedge the Group against material risks. The Sanoma Board of
Directors has approved the guidelines in the Group Treasury Policy.
In the long term, to ensure financial flexibility and access to various forms of funding, Sanoma’s goal is to have a capital
structure where net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio is below 2.5.
Financial risks can be mitigated with various financial instruments and derivatives whose use, effects and fair values are
clearly verifiable. The Group used currency forward contracts to hedge against FX risks during the year. The Group does not
apply hedge accounting.
Interest rate risks
The Group’s interest rate risk is mainly related to changes in the reference rates and loan margins of floating rate loans in the
Group’s loan portfolio. In 2025, all loans were denominated in euros. The Group manages its exposure to interest rate risk by
ensuring that the interest duration of the gross debt of the Group is within a certain time range approved by the Sanoma Board
of Directors as part of the Treasury Policy. According to the Treasury Policy, interest rate derivatives may also be utilised.
Loan portfolio by interest rate as at year end
EUR million
2025
2024
Floating-rate loans
249.9
306.5
Fixed-rate loans
149.5
149.2
Total
399.5
455.7
Average duration, years
0.8
1.0
Average interest rate, %
3.7
4.3
Interest sensitivity, EUR million1
2.1
2.6
¹Interest rate sensitivity is calculated by assuming a one percentage point increase in interest rates. The sensitivity represents the effect on profit before taxes.
Currency risks
The majority of the Group cash flow from operations is denominated in euros. However, the Group is exposed to some
transaction risk resulting from cash flows related to revenue and expenditure in different currencies. Group companies are
responsible for monitoring and hedging material transaction risks related to their business operations in accordance with the
Group Treasury Policy. The majority of the transaction risk in 2025 was related to the internal loans and procurement of IT
services in USD, while purchases of TV programming rights in USD for Nelonen Media have materially reduced. The Group
has adopted forward contracts as means of hedging against most significant currency exposures. Internal funding transactions
within the Group are mainly carried out in the functional currency of the subsidiary. Group Treasury is responsible for
monitoring and hedging the currency risks related to intra-group loans.
The hedged currencies were USD, NOK and SEK. All other transactions in foreign currencies were not material. If the hedged
currencies weakened by 10% against the euro at the year-end date, the change in the value of forward contracts would
decrease financial expenses by EUR 2.1 million (2024: 1.7 decrease). If the currencies strengthened by 10% against the euro,
financial expense would increase by EUR 2.1 million (2024: 1.7 increase). Derivative instruments are used to hedge future
cash flows, hence changes in their value will offset changes in the value of cash flows.
The Group is also exposed to translation risk resulting from converting the income statement and balance sheet items of
foreign subsidiaries into euros. Business operations outside the euro area (countries in which the currency is not pegged to
the euro) account for about 13.6% (2024: 13.1%) of consolidated net sales and mainly consist of revenues in Polish złoty,
Norwegian krone and Swedish krona. If all reporting currencies had been 10% weaker against the euro during the year, the
Group net sales would have decreased by EUR 16.1 million (2024: 16.1). If all reporting currencies had been 10% stronger
against the euro, the Group net sales would have increased by EUR 19.6 million (2024: 19.6). A significant change in
exchange rates may also have an effect on the value of the businesses in Poland, Norway and Sweden. The Group did not
hedge against translation risk in 2025, in accordance with the Treasury Policy approved by the Board.
Financial Statements 2025
166
Derivatives
Nominal values of derivative instruments
The nominal value of derivative instruments is EUR 20.7 million (2024: 16.6). The nominal value includes gross nominal
values of all active agreements. The outstanding nominal value is not necessarily a measure or indicator of market risks.
Fair values of derivative instruments
EUR million
2025
2024
Forward currency exchange contracts
Positive fair values
0.1
Negative fair values
-0.1
Total
-0.1
0.1
Derivative instruments have been classified in level 2 of the IFRS fair value hierarchy. This means that fair values are based
on valuation models for which all inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Sanoma has entered into netting agreements with all of its derivative instrument counterparties. Including netting agreements,
financial liability to banks amounted to EUR -0.1 million (2024: 0.1 receivable).
Liquidity risks
Liquidity risk relates to servicing debt, financing investments and retaining adequate working capital. Sanoma aims to minimise
its liquidity risk by ensuring sufficient revenues, maintaining adequate committed credit limits, using several financing
institutions and forms of financing, and spreading loan repayments over a number of calendar years. The Group’s committed
funding must be sufficient to cover all of the obligations and funding needed for the normal business operations during the
following 12 months, and any outstanding commercial paper commitments. The undrawn committed credit facility was EUR
300 million at year end. Liquidity risk is monitored daily based on a two-week forecast, and longer term based on the calendar
year. In addition, the Sanoma Group Treasury Policy sets minimum requirements for liquidity reserves. The geopolitical
situation like new tariffs and the war in Ukraine did not have any material impact on the funding sources or general availability
of liquid funds for Sanoma in 2025.
The Group’s financing facilities in 2025
EUR million
Amount of
limits
Unused credit
lines
Syndicated RCF
300.0
300.0
Syndicated and bilateral term loans
320.0
110.0
Bond
150.0
Commercial paper programmes
1,100.0
1,060.1
Current account limits
42.8
42.8
The EUR 300 million Revolving Credit Facility was signed in November 2022 and has a maturity of three years with two one-
year extension options. Sanoma has requested the first extension option in 2023 and the second extension option in 2024.
The maturity of the RCF is in November 2027. The RCF was fully unused at the end of 2025. In February 2023, Sanoma
signed a Sustainability Side Letter to add sustainability-linked KPIs to the EUR 300 million Revolving Credit Facility. With the
addition, a minor part of the pricing of the loan will be linked to Sanoma’s sustainability performance in reducing greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions in line with Sanoma’s commitment to Science Based Targets and developing inclusive learning
solutions, more specifically accessibility of digital learning content and platforms. The KPIs will be measured annually and the
progress will be reported in Sanoma’s annual Sustainability Statement and also directly to the lenders.
In 2023, Sanoma signed a bilateral loan of EUR 100 million with OP. The loan was drawn in March 2024. It was used for the
repayment of the old EUR 200 million bond. The rest of the bond was refinanced with the cash flow and existing facilities. The
loan had initially a maturity of 12 months from the drawdown and one extension option at the discretion of Sanoma. Sanoma
signed an amendment agreement with OP during 2024. In the agreement the maturity was extended to three years. The loan
expires in September 2027.
In December 2025, Sanoma signed a EUR 220 million syndicated term loan. EUR 110 million of the term loan was withdrawn
in December 2025 and proceeds were used to prepay remaining EUR 119 million of the term loan related to the acquisition of
Pearson Italy and Germany. The remaining EUR 110 million will be withdrawn in March 2026 and proceeds will be used to
refinance EUR 150 million hybrid bond on its reset date on 16 March 2026. The loan has a maturity of 3 years and 3 months
until March 2029, with two one-year extension options.
Sanoma’s existing financing facilities and forecasted operating cash flows are sufficient to cover funding needs in the coming
year.
The Group’s loans from financial institutions include customary covenants related to factors such as the use of pledges and
mortgages, disposals of assets and key financial ratios. In all long-term loans from financial institutions, Sanoma has financial
covenants relating to the following ratios: consolidated equity to consolidated total assets and consolidated total net debt to
consolidated EBITDA. Ratios are measured quarterly. The Group has complied with the financial covenants throughout the
reporting period. In March 2025, Sanoma amended the equity ratio covenant limit in the loan agreements to better reflect the
seasonality of the business within a year, bringing it in line with the approach for the leverage ratio covenant.
There are no indications that the Group may have difficulties complying with the financial covenants during the next 12 months
at interim reporting dates. If Sanoma’s performance and profitability would develop unfavourably, it might increase the risk of
breaching the financial covenants. This could lead to an early expiry of the loans and make the refinancing difficult in a
situation where an agreement with the banks would not have been achieved. The covenants could also be impacted by
material changes in capital structure due to possible acquisitions or disposals. In that case, covenant levels would be re-
negotiated before the closing of any such transaction. The carrying amount of the loans, which include financial covenants,
was EUR 210 million at the end of 2025. Sanoma’s senior and hybrid bonds do not include any financial covenants.
Financial Statements 2025
167
Financial liabilities
2025
2024
EUR million
Carrying
amount
Cash flow1
Undrawn from
limits
Total
Carrying
amount
Cash flow1
Undrawn from
limits
Total
Loans from financial institutions
210.0
227.5
410.0
637.5
269.1
291.1
300.0
591.1
Bonds
149.5
162.0
162.0
149.2
168.0
168.0
Commercial paper programmes
39.9
40.0
40.0
37.4
37.5
37.5
Lease liabilities
106.2
113.1
113.1
133.9
133.9
133.9
Other interest-bearing liabilities
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
Trade payables and other liabilities2
83.0
83.0
83.0
99.6
99.6
99.6
Derivatives
Inflow (-)
-20.6
-20.6
0.0
-16.7
-16.7
Outflow (+)
-0.1
20.7
20.7
0.0
16.6
16.6
Total
588.7
625.8
410.0
1,035.8
689.2
730.0
300.0
1,030.0
1The estimate of the interest liability is based on the interest level at the balance sheet date.
2Trade payables and other liabilities do not include accrued expenses and advances received.
Financial Statements 2025
168
Maturity of financial liabilities 2025
EUR million
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031−
Total
Loans from financial institutions
6.9
106.2
3.5
110.9
227.5
Bonds
6.0
156.0
162.0
Commercial paper programmes
40.0
40.0
Lease liabilities
31.6
30.1
34.4
6.6
3.8
6.5
113.1
Other interest-bearing liabilities
0.1
0.1
Trade payables and other liabilities1
83.0
83.0
Derivatives
Inflow (-)
-20.6
-20.6
Outflow (+)
20.7
20.7
Total
167.7
292.3
37.9
117.6
3.8
6.5
625.8
1 Trade payables and other liabilities do not include accrued expenses and advances received.
Maturity of financial liabilities 2024
EUR million
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030−
Total
Loans from financial institutions
60.9
126.9
103.2
291.1
Bonds
6.0
6.0
156.0
168.0
Commercial paper programmes
37.5
37.5
Lease liabilities
28.7
26.8
26.2
35.8
6.6
9.8
133.9
Other interest-bearing liabilities
0.0
0.0
Trade payables and other liabilities1
99.6
99.6
Derivatives
Inflow (-)
-16.7
-16.7
Outflow (+)
16.6
16.6
Total
232.6
159.7
285.4
35.8
6.6
9.8
730.0
1Trade payables and other liabilities do not include accrued expenses and advances received.
Credit risks
Sanoma’s credit risks are related to its business operations. Sanoma Group’s diversified operations significantly mitigate credit
risk concentration, and no individual customer or group of customers is material to the Group. The Group’s operational units
are responsible for managing credit risks related to their businesses.
Sanoma applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9 Financial Instruments for trade receivables, which requires
expected lifetime losses to be recognised from initial recognition of the receivables. Sanoma uses a provision matrix to
measure expected credit losses of trade receivables. Loss rates are defined separately for different geographic regions, type
of business and types of customers (B2B and B2C). Loss rates are based on past information on actual credit loss experience.
These rates are adjusted by current information and future expectations on economic conditions where deemed necessary.
As Sanoma has no business in Ukraine, Russia or Middle East, the ongoing wars have a limited direct impact on Sanoma’s
business.
Sanoma’s other receivables include small items and risk involved to individual items is not considered material. Thus, no
impairment allowance has been recognised for these receivables.
The carrying amounts of trade receivables and other receivables best indicate the amount that will be collected. The ageing of
trade receivables is presented in the following table.
Financial Statements 2025
169
Aging of trade receivables
2025
2024
EUR million
Gross
Weighted
average loss
rate (%)
Impairment
Net
Gross
Weighted
average loss
rate (%)
Impairment
Net
Not due
74.1
0.9
-0.7
73.4
77.7
0.6
-0.5
77.2
Past due 1–30 days
7.7
1.0
-0.1
7.6
12.4
0.5
-0.1
12.4
Past due 31–120 days
9.4
2.5
-0.2
9.2
18.3
2.7
-0.5
17.8
Past due 121–180 days
0.5
48.3
-0.3
0.3
1.4
31.0
-0.4
1.0
Past due 181–360 days
0.5
49.0
-0.3
0.3
0.7
37.1
-0.3
0.5
Past due more than 1 year
1.3
124.1
-1.6
-0.3
2.9
110.2
-3.2
-0.3
Total
93.5
-3.1
90.5
113.5
-5.0
108.5
Trade receivables and other receivables are presented in Notes 4.2 and 4.3.
The credit risk relating to financing transactions is low. The Group’s Treasury Policy specifies that financing and derivative
transactions are carried out with counterparties who have good credit standing, and divided between a sufficient number of
counterparties in order to protect financial assets. The Group has spread its credit risks efficiently by dealing with several
financing institutions.
Capital risk management
The Group has set the long-term financial targets that consist of a net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio below 2.5 and dividend
policy, which targets to increasing dividend between 40% to 60% of annual free cash flow. The net debt/adjusted EBITDA
target was earlier below 3.0. The new lower target level indicates more solid credit standing in the future. The net debt/
adjusted EBITDA target has been communicated publicly and is monitored and reported quarterly.
When calculating the net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio, the following adjustments are made to the reported EBITDA: items
affecting comparability are removed, the effects of acquisitions are added and the effects of divestments are deducted, and
the effects of the investments in programming and prepublication rights are deducted for the reporting period.
To strengthen the capital structure, the Group issued a hybrid bond of EUR 150 million in March 2023. The hybrid bond is
subordinated to the Group’s other debt obligations, but has priority over other equity items. The hybrid bonds bears a fixed
coupon interest of 8.000% per annum until 16 March 2026, which is payable annually if decided so by the management, and,
thereafter a floating interest rate as defined in the terms and conditions of the hybrid bond. The hybrid bond does not have a
specified maturity date, but Sanoma is entitled to redeem the hybrid bond at their nominal amount on 16 March 2026, and
subsequently, on each interest payment date thereafter. The interest from the hybrid bond must be paid to the investors if the
Group pays dividends. If dividends are not paid, the Group will make a separate decision regarding interest payment on the
hybrid bond. Unpaid interest is accrued and paid if dividend is decided to be distributed or management makes a decision on
interest payment. The holders of the hybrid bond do not have the right to exercise control or vote at Annual General Meetings.
Sanoma signed a EUR 220 million syndicated term loan facility in December 2025. EUR 110 million of this facility will be used
for the prepayment of the hybrid bond on reset date 16 March 2026.
In 2025, the Group’s equity ratio was 47.1% (2024: 45.0%) and net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio was 1.8 (2024: 2.2).
Net debt
EUR million
2025
2024
Interest-bearing liabilities
505.8
589.6
Cash and cash equivalents
19.7
21.1
Total
486.1
568.5
Items that are regarded as interest-bearing liabilities are such short- or long-term liabilities which have separately determined
interest cost.
Sanoma Group does not have an official credit rating.
Financial Statements 2025
170
5.3 Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet
EUR million
2025
2024
Cash in hand and at bank
17.7
12.3
Deposits
2.0
8.8
Total
19.7
21.1
Deposits may include overnight deposits and money market deposits with maturities less than three months. These are cash
equivalents which are held to meet short-term payment obligations. Average maturity is very short and the fair values do not
differ significantly from the carrying amounts.
Cash and cash equivalents in the cash flow statement
EUR million
2025
2024
Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet
19.7
21.1
Bank overdrafts
-0.6
Total
19.7
20.5
Cash and cash equivalents in the cash flow statement include cash and cash equivalents less bank overdrafts.
5.4 Equity
Number of shares
Share capital and funds, EUR million
All shares
Treasury
shares
Total
Share capital
Treasury
shares
Fund for
invested
unrestricted
equity
Hybrid bond
Total
At 1 Jan 2024
163,565,663
-298,045
163,267,618
71.3
-4.1
209.8
149.1
426.1
Purchase of treasury shares
-266,199
-266,199
-1.9
-1.9
Shares delivered
214,554
214,554
3.0
3.0
At 31 Dec 2024
163,565,663
-349,690
163,215,973
71.3
-3.0
209.8
149.1
427.2
Purchase of treasury shares
-453,801
-453,801
-4.0
-4.0
Shares delivered
10,814
10,814
0.1
0.1
At 31 Dec 2025
163,565,663
-792,677
162,772,986
71.3
-6.8
209.8
149.1
423.3
The maximum amount of share capital cannot exceed EUR 300.0 million (2024 : 300.0). The share has no nominal value and no accountable par is in use. The shares have been fully paid.
Financial Statements 2025
171
Treasury shares
In 2025, the Group purchased 453,801 (2024: 266,199) shares from the stock exchange. The cost of the purchased treasury
shares was EUR 4.0 million and it was recognised as a deduction from equity.
In 2025, Sanoma delivered a total of 10,814 own shares (without consideration and after taxes) to four employees of the
Group based on the Restricted Share Plan 2022–2024. In 2024, Sanoma delivered a total of 214,554 own shares (without
consideration and after taxes) to 184 employees of the Group based on the Performance Share Plan 2021–2023 and
Restricted Share Plan 2021–2023. At the end of the financial year, the Company held a total of 792,677 (2024: 349,690) own
shares.
Fund for invested unrestricted equity
The fund for invested unrestricted equity includes other equity-related investments and that part of the share subscription price
which is not recognised in share capital according to a specific decision.
Hybrid loan
To strengthen the capital structure, the Group issued a hybrid bond of EUR 150 million in March 2023. The hybrid bond is
subordinated to the Group’s other debt obligations, but has priority over other equity items. The hybrid bonds bears a fixed
coupon interest of 8.000% per annum until 16 March 2026, which is payable annually if decided so by the management, and,
thereafter a floating interest rate as defined in the terms and conditions of the hybrid bond. The hybrid bond does not have a
specified maturity date, but Sanoma is entitled to redeem the hybrid bond at their nominal amount on 16 March 2026, and
subsequently, on each interest payment date thereafter. The interest from the hybrid bond must be paid to the investors if the
Group pays dividends. If dividends are not paid, the Group will make a separate decision regarding interest payment on the
hybrid bond. Unpaid interest is accrued and paid if dividend is distributed or management makes a decision on interest
payment. The holders of the hybrid bond do not have the right to exercise control or vote at Annual General Meetings. The
transaction costs have been deducted from the capital.
The current interest period of EUR 12 million has been booked as a liability as of 31 December 2025, as the obligation to pay
the interest for the full interest cycle (12 months) arose when the AGM on 29 April 2025 decided to distribute dividends.
Translation differences
Translation differences include those items that have arisen in converting the financial statements of foreign group companies
from their operational currencies into euros.
Information on the capital risk management is presented in Note 5.2.
Dividends
The dividends paid in 2025 were EUR 0.39 per share, amounting to a total of EUR 63.5 million (2024: EUR 0.37 per share,
amounting to a total of EUR 60.5 million). The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General meeting that a dividend of
EUR 0.42 per share, amounting approximately to EUR 68.4 million, is paid for the financial year 2025.
Financial Statements 2025
172
5.5 Contingent liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Contingencies for own commitments
Pledges
0.3
0.8
Other items
34.3
24.3
Total
34.6
25.1
Other commitments
Royalties
0.4
0.5
Commitments for acquisitions of intangible assets (film and TV programming rights included)
46.6
46.0
Other items
78.5
97.5
Total
125.6
143.9
Total
160.1
169.0
Non-cancellable minimum lease payments to be received by maturity
EUR million
2025
2024
Not later than 1 year
3.2
3.5
1–5 years
6.1
3.3
Total
9.3
6.8
Most of the non-cancellable minimum lease payments to be received are related to subleases. The Group sub-leases parts of
its office buildings. The Group has classified these leases as operating leases, because they do not transfer substantially all of
the risks and rewards incidental to the head lease.
Disputes and litigations
Sanoma has had a tax dispute concerning the treatment of value added tax (VAT) of certain magazines that were printed in
multiple locations in Europe and processed in and distributed through a centralised logistics centre in Norway. The case
concerns the tax years 2015–2018 and 2019–2021. In August 2024, the Supreme Administrative Court rejected Sanoma’s
application for permission to appeal the Administrative Court’s decision regarding the 2015–2018 VAT payment decisions.
Sanoma has appealed the VAT decisions for the years 2019–2021 to the Tax Adjustment Board, which rejected the appeal in
September 2025. For further details, please refer to the 2024 Annual Report.
Financial Statements 2025
173
6. Other notes
6.1 Related party transactions
Sanoma Group’s related parties include subsidiaries, associated companies, joint ventures, members of the Board, President
and CEO and persons closely associated with them, as well as entities controlled by management personnel. Remuneration
for key management is presented in Note 6.3. Transactions with joint ventures, associated companies and entities controlled
by management personnel are presented below. Transactions with subsidiaries are not presented as related party transactions
because they are eliminated in the consolidated figures. The transactions of the other shareholders of joint ventures are not
presented as related party transactions because those shareholders are not considered to be related parties on the basis of
the joint control agreement. Subsidiaries are presented in Note 6.4. In addition, the Sanoma Group’s related parties include
pension fund and employees’ profit-sharing funds. Besides pension fund, transactions with those parties are not material.
Pension funds are described in more detail in accounting policies and pension calculations in Note 4.9.
The Sanoma Group had no other significant related parties, which indicate related party definitions or with which significant
related party transactions exist during the financial year.
Transactions and outstanding balances with associated companies, joint ventures and entities controlled by management
personnel are presented in the following table.
Transactions with related parties
Transaction values for the year
Balance as at 31 December
EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Sale of goods and services
Entities controlled by management personnel
0.7
0.0
Joint ventures
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
Associates
0.6
0.8
0.0
Total
1.4
0.9
0.0
0.0
Purchase of goods and services
Entities controlled by management personnel
0.0
Associates
0.0
0.1
0.0
Total
0.0
0.1
0.0
The sale of goods and services to related parties are based on the Group’s effective market prices.
Financial Statements 2025
174
6.2 Share-based payments
Performance share plan and restricted share plan
The Performance Share Plan and the Restricted Share Plan form the long-term part of the remuneration and commitment
programme for the executives and other selected key employees of Sanoma and its subsidiaries. The purpose of the
Performance Share Plan and the Restricted Share Plan is to align the interests of the Participants with those of the Company´s
shareholders by creating a long-term equity interest for the Participants, thus, aiming at increasing the Company´s shareholder
value in the long term.
Performance Share Plan
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has on 7 February 2013, approved a share-based long-term incentive
programme (Performance Share Plan, PSP) to be offered to executives and managers of Sanoma Corporation and its
subsidiaries. The conditions and the issuance of the Performance Shares are decided on by the Sanoma Board of Directors in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. In general, Performance Shares vest over 3-year period and
vesting is subject to meeting Group performance targets set by the Board of Directors for annually commencing new plans.
The possible reward is paid as a combination of shares and cash. The reward’s cash component is dedicated to cover taxes
and tax-related costs.
Shares conditionally granted to the President and CEO and EMT members under the Performance Share Plan are subject to a
share ownership requirement that is determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Human Resources
Committee’s proposal. Until the required share holding is achieved, the President and the CEO and EMT members are
required to hold (and not sell) at least 50% of performance shares received.
The performance measures for the performance period 2021–2023 are based on adjusted earnings per share and
adjusted free cash flow targets in 2021.
The performance measures for the performance period 2022–2024 are based on adjusted earnings per share and
adjusted free cash flow targets in 2022–2023.
The performance measures for the performance period 2023–2025 are based on adjusted earnings per share and
adjusted free cash flow targets in 2023.
The performance measures for the performance period 2024–2026 are based on adjusted earnings per share and
adjusted free cash flow targets in 2024.
The performance measures for the performance period 2025–2027 are based on adjusted earnings per share and
adjusted free cash flow targets in 2025, 2026 and 2027.
The President and CEO and EMT members are part of Sanoma’s Performance Share Plan.
In 2025, no shares were delivered under the Performance Share Plan.
Restricted Share Plan
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has on 9 February 2021, approved a share-based long-term incentive
programme 2021–2023 (Restricted Share Plan, RSP) to be offered to executives and managers of Sanoma Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The conditions and the issuance of the Restricted Shares are decided on by the Sanoma Board of Directors in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Restricted Shares vest over 3-year period in 2021–2023 and
vesting is subject to meeting service condition.
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has on 10 February 2022, approved a share-based long-term incentive
programme 2022–2024 (Restricted Share Plan, RSP) to be offered to executives and managers of Sanoma Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The conditions and the issuance of the Restricted Shares are decided on by the Sanoma Board of Directors in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Restricted Shares vest over 3-year period in 2022–2024 and
vesting is subject to meeting service condition.
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has on 10 February 2023, approved a share-based long-term incentive
programme 2023–2025 (Restricted Share Plan, RSP) to be offered to executives and managers of Sanoma Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The conditions and the issuance of the Restricted Shares are decided on by the Sanoma Board of Directors in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Restricted Shares vest over 3-year period in 2023–2025 and
vesting is subject to meeting service condition.
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has on 7 February 2024, approved a share-based long-term incentive
programme 2024–2026 (Restricted Share Plan, RSP) to be offered to executives and managers of Sanoma Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The conditions and the issuance of the Restricted Shares are decided on by the Sanoma Board of Directors in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Restricted Shares vest over 3-year period in 2024–2026 and
vesting is subject to meeting service condition.
The Board of Directors of Sanoma Corporation has on 10 February 2025, approved a share-based long-term incentive
programme 2025–2027 (Restricted Share Plan, RSP) to be offered to executives and managers of Sanoma Corporation and
its subsidiaries. The conditions and the issuance of the Restricted Shares are decided on by the Sanoma Board of Directors in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Restricted Shares vest over 3-year period in 2025–2027 and
vesting is subject to meeting service condition.
The possible rewards are paid net in shares.
Shares conditionally granted to the President and CEO and EMT members under the Restricted Share Plan are subject to
share ownership requirement that is determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Human Resources
Committee’s proposal. Until the required share holding is achieved, the President and the CEO and EMT members are
required to hold (and not sell) at least 50% of performance shares received.
In 2025, Sanoma delivered 10,814 Sanoma shares held by the Company to four employees based on the Restricted Share
Plan 2022–2024 (without consideration and after taxes).
Financial Statements 2025
175
More specific information on the performance and restricted share plan grants are presented in the following tables.
Information on the management ownership is presented in Note 6.3.
Basic information
Plan
Performance Share Plan
Restricted Share Plan
Instrument
Performance
Share Plan
2021−2023
Performance
Share Plan
2022−2024
Performance
Share Plan
2023−2025
Performance
Share Plan
2024−2026
Performance
Share Plan
2025−2027
Restricted
Share Plan
2021−2023
Restricted
Share Plan
2022−2024
Restricted
Share Plan
2023−2025
Restricted
Share Plan
2024−2026
Restricted
Share Plan
2025−2027
Total / Average
Initial amount, gross pcs (includes share and cash portions)
495,000
540,000
750,000
964,500
922,500
25,000
20,000
41,000
40,000
38,000
3,836,000
Initial allocation date
9.2.2021
13.4.2022
19.4.2023
18.4.2024
14.4.2025
9.2.2021
13.4.2022
19.4.2023
18.4.2024
14.4.2025
Vesting date / reward payment at the latest
30.4.2024
30.4.2025
30.4.2026
30.4.2027
30.4.2028
30.4.2024
30.4.2025
30.4.2026
30.4.2027
30.4.2028
Maximum contractual life, yrs
3.2
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Remaining contractual life, yrs
Expired
Expired
0.3
1.3
2.3
Expired
Expired
0.3
1.3
2.3
1.4
Number of persons at the end of the reporting year
234
227
209
5
3
1
Payment method
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Equity and cash
Financial Statements 2025
176
Changes
Performance Share Plan
Restricted Share Plan
Performance
Share Plan
2021−2023
Performance
Share Plan
2022−2024
Performance
Share Plan
2023−2025
Performance
Share Plan
2024−2026
Performance
Share Plan
2025−2027
Restricted
Share Plan
2021−2023
Restricted
Share Plan
2022−2024
Restricted
Share Plan
2023−2025
Restricted
Share Plan
2024−2026
Restricted
Share Plan
2025−2027
Total
1 Jan 2024
Outstanding at the beginning of the reporting period
387,277
514,344
696,864
16,000
10,875
41,000
1,666,360
Changes during the period
Granted
940,800
9,000
32,500
982,300
Forfeited
5,093
514,344
99,201
3,412
622,050
Exercised
382,184
16,000
398,184
31 Dec 2024
Outstanding at the end of the period
0
0
597,663
937,388
0
0
19,875
41,000
32,500
0
1,628,426
1 Jan 2025
Outstanding at the beginning of the reporting period
0
0
597,663
937,388
0
0
19,875
41,000
32,500
0
1,628,426
Changes during the period
Granted
906,075
7,500
12,500
926,075
Forfeited
6,500
76,476
1,500
84,476
Exercised
19,875
19,875
31 Dec 2025
Outstanding at the end of the period
0
0
591,163
860,912
904,575
0
0
41,000
40,000
12,500
2,450,150
Financial Statements 2025
177
Fair value determination
Assumptions made in determining the fair value of share rewards in the performance and restricted share plan:
Liabilities arising from share-based payments at the end of the period represent the amount booked until the end of the
reporting period of the employers social costs relating to the payable rewards. The fair value of the liability is remeasured
at each reporting date until the possible reward payment. The fair value of the liability will thus change in accordance with
the Sanoma share price.
The fair value for the equity settled portion has been determined at grant using the fair value of Sanoma share as of the
grant date less the expected dividends paid before possible share delivery.
The fair value is expensed until vesting.
Valuation parameters for instruments granted during period
EUR
2025
2024
Share price at grant
9.59
6.94
Share price at the end of the reporting period
9.50
7.67
Expected dividends pa.
0.39
0.34
Fair value of the equity-settled portion at grant
8.47
5.58
Effect of share-based incentives on the result and financial position during the period
EUR million
2025
2024
Expenses for the financial year
4.2
3.1
of which equity-settled
3.9
2.9
Liabilities arising from share-based payments at the end of the period
0.5
0.2
At the end of the period the estimated future cash payment to be paid to the tax authorities from share-based payments is
EUR 8.7 million (2024: 4.9).
Financial Statements 2025
178
6.3 Management compensation, benefits and ownership
Management remuneration and ownership, 2025
Number of performance shares
and restricted shares
Remuneration
(EUR 1,000)
Number of shares
on 31 Dec 2025
Performance
and restricted
share plan costs
(EUR 1,000)
Performance
Share Plan
2023−20251
Performance
Share Plan
2024−20261
Performance
Share Plan
2025−20271
Restricted Share
Plan 2023−2025 1
Restricted Share
Plan 2024−2026 1
Board of Directors
Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Chair
147
15,000
Klaus Cawén, Vice Chair
95
6,200
Julian Drinkall
93
Rolf Grisebach
101
12,000
Anna Herlin
79
1,000
Sebastian Langenskiöld
90
645,963
Eugenie van Wiechen
84
Jannica Fagerholm
54
4,000
Timo Lappalainen
52
Mika Ihamuotila (until 29 April 2025)
26
Total
821
684,163
President and CEO
Rob Kolkman
1,107
87,059
722
78,000
171,622
117,600
Total
1,107
87,059
722
78,000
171,622
117,600
Executive Management Team
Alexander Green
19,696
75,010
127,112
87,200
10,000
20,000
Pia Kalsta
37,410
20,020
55,114
45,300
Total
1,316
57,106
869
95,030
182,226
132,500
10,000
20,000
1Sanoma Performance Share Plan was adopted in 2013. Sanoma Restricted Share Plan was adopted in 2014. Number of Sanoma performance shares in the Performance Share Plan 2025–2027 to the President and CEO and EMT members is presented on target level. Should the maximum level of performance measures be reached
the earned share reward is 150% of the shares at target level. Performance period for PSP 2023−2025 is a one-year period (2023); for Performance Share Plan 2024−2026 is a one-year period (2024), and for Performance Share Plan 2025−2027, a three-year period (2025, 2026 and 2027). Shares conditionally granted to the President
and CEO and EMT members under the Performance Share and Restricted Share Plan are subject to share ownership requirement that is determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Until the required shareholding is achieved, the President and the CEO and EMT members are
required to hold (and not sell) at least 50% of performance and restricted shares received.
Figures include the remuneration (meeting fees, base salaries, fringe benefits, short- and long-term incentives) that has been paid for assignments handled by those persons during the period (pension costs not included). EMT members do not receive
separate remuneration for their Board memberships in the Group companies. Performance and restricted share plan costs include costs during membership. The Group has no outstanding receivables or loans from the management. Remuneration does not
include pension costs. The pension cost of the President and CEO and EMT is presented in paragraph ’Other benefits of the management’.
Financial Statements 2025
179
Management remuneration and ownership, 2024
Number of performance shares
and restricted shares
Remuneration
(EUR 1,000)
Number of shares
on 31 Dec 2024
Performance
and restricted
share plan costs
(EUR 1,000)
Performance
Share Plan
2022−20241
Performance
Share Plan
2023−20251
Performance
Share Plan
2024−20261
Restricted Share
Plan 2023−2025 1
Restricted Share
Plan 2024−2026 1
Board of Directors
Pekka Ala-Pietilä, Chair
150
15,000
Klaus Cawén, Vice Chair (as of 17 April 2024)
64
6,200
Julian Drinkall
92
Rolf Grisebach
98
Anna Herlin
78
1,000
Mika Ihamuotila
80
150,000
Sebastian Langenskiöld
89
645,963
Eugenie van Wiechen
77
Nils Ittonen, Vice Chair (until 17 April 2024)
33
Denise Koopmans (until 17 April 2024)
33
Total
792
818,163
President and CEO
Rob Kolkman
1,227
87,059
454
78,000
123,000
Total
1,227
87,059
454
78,000
123,000
Executive Management Team
Alexander Green
19,696
75,010
91,100
10,000
20,000
Pia Kalsta
47,410
20,020
39,500
Total
1,492
67,106
521
95,030
130,600
10,000
20,000
1Sanoma Performance Share Plan was adopted in 2013. Sanoma Restricted Share Plan was adopted in 2014. Number of Sanoma performance shares in the Performance Share Plan 2024–2026 to the President and CEO and EMT members is presented on target level. Should the maximum level of performance measures be reached
the earned share reward is 150% of the shares at target level. Performance period for PSP 2022−2024 is a two-year period (2022–2023); for Performance Share Plan 2023−2025 is a one-year period (2023), and for Performance Share Plan 2024−2026, a one-year period (2024). Shares conditionally granted to the President and CEO and
EMT members under the Performance Share and Restricted Share Plan are subject to share ownership requirement that is determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. Until the required shareholding is achieved, the President and the CEO and EMT members are required to hold
(and not sell) at least 50% of performance and restricted shares received.
Figures include the remuneration (meeting fees, base salaries, fringe benefits, short- and long-term incentives) that has been paid for assignments handled by those persons during the period (pension cost not included). EMT members do not receive separate
remuneration for their Board memberships in the Group companies. Performance and restricted share plan costs include costs during membership. The Group has no outstanding receivables or loans from the management. Remuneration does not include
pension costs. The pension cost of the President and CEO and EMT is presented in paragraph ’Other benefits of the management’.
Financial Statements 2025
180
All remuneration decisions for the President and CEO were made within the framework of the Remuneration Policy presented
to Sanoma Corporation’s Annual General Meeting 2023, held on 19 April 2023, in Helsinki. The remuneration and benefits
payable to the President and CEO and Executive Management Team (EMT) members are approved by the Board of Directors
of Sanoma, in accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal. In addition, the President and CEO and EMT
members receive bonuses according to the short-term incentive plan approved each year by the Board of Directors. The
performance criteria set at the beginning of the year in the 2025 short-term incentive plan of EMT members were based on
achieving financial targets of adjusted operating profit, and adjusted free cash flow as well as sustainability targets linked to
Employee Engagement Survey results and certain climate, data and AI targets. For the year 2025, the short-term incentive
earning opportunity for the President and CEO was set at 66.7% of his annual salary at target level and 100% at maximum
level. For other EMT members, the short-term incentive earning opportunity set at the beginning of the year 2025, is 50% of
salary at target level and 75% at maximum level.
The President and CEO and EMT members are part of Sanoma’s long-term incentive schemes. The long-term incentives are
part of the Group’s incentive and commitment programme and are distributed by the Sanoma Board of Directors, in
accordance with the Human Resources Committee’s proposal.
Notifications of the President and CEO’s transactions are announced on Sanoma’s website as of 3 July 2016. More details on
remuneration is available in the Remuneration Report 2025 and on Sanoma’s website.
Other benefits of the management
The President and CEO Rob Kolkman’s period of notice is six months either from the President and CEO’s or the Company’s
part. If the executive contract is terminated by the Company, a severance payment equalling to six month’s salary in addition
to the salary for the notice period will be paid to the President and CEO. The severance pay is accompanied by a fixed-term
non-competition clause.
The additional pension benefits of the President and CEO and other EMT members are based on defined contribution. The
President and CEO is entitled to an additional pension benefit contribution, which amounts to 15% of his salary (excl. holiday
allowance). The President and CEO’s and the EMT members’ retirement age is the usual retirement age in their home country.
For the President and CEO Rob Kolkman, the additional pension contribution cost was EUR 90,038 for the year 2025 (2024:
90,038), and the statutory pension cost for the year 2025 was EUR 153,106 (2024: 137,553). The pension costs of EMT
members were EUR 251,038 in 2025 (Including both statutory and voluntary) (2024: 222,543).
Financial Statements 2025
181
6.4 Subsidiaries, associated companies and joint ventures
Subsidiaries at 31 Dec 2025
Parent
Company
holding,
%
Sub-group’s
Parent
Company
holding, %
Group
holding,
%
Book value
in Parent
Company,
EUR million
Subsidiaries of Parent Company
Sanoma Media Finland Ltd, Finland1
100.0
100.0
170.4
Sanoma Pro Ltd, Finland1
100.0
100.0
670.5
Subsidiaries of Sanoma Learning B.V.
Bureau ICE B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
L.C.G. Malmberg B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
Uitgeverij Van In N.V., Belgium
100.0
Iddink Group B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
Gelukskoffer Scholen B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
Subsidiaries of Sanoma Media Finland Ltd
Sanomala Oy, Finland
100.0
100.0
Sanoma Tekniikkajulkaisut Oy, Finland
60.0
60.0
Oy Suomen Tietotoimisto - Finska Notisbyrån Ab, Finland
75.4
75.4
Kaiku Entertainment Oy, Finland
100.0
100.0
Sanoma Manu Oy, Finland
100.0
100.0
Subsidiaries of Sanoma Pro Ltd
Nowa Era Sp. z.o.o., Poland
100.0
100.0
Sanoma Learning B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
100.0
Sanoma Utbildning AB, Sweden
100.0
100.0
Tutorhouse Oy, Finland
100.0
100.0
itslearning AS, Norway
100.0
100.0
Sanoma Educación, S.L., Spain
100.0
100.0
Ítaca, S.L., Spain
100.0
100.0
Sanoma Italia S.p.A, Italy
100.0
100.0
Subsidiaries of Sanoma Educación S.L.
Grup Promotor D´Ensenyement i Difusió en Catalá, S.L., Spain
100.0
Edicions Voramar, S.A., Spain
100.0
Ediciones Grazalema, S.L., Spain
100.0
Parent
Company
holding,
%
Sub-group’s
Parent
Company
holding, %
Group
holding,
%
Book value
in Parent
Company,
EUR million
Edicions Obradoiro, S.L., Spain
100.0
Zubia Editoriala, S.L., Spain
100.0
Clickart, Taller De Comunicacio, S.L., Spain
100.0
Subsidiaries of itslearning AS
itslearning UK Ltd, United Kingdom
100.0
itslearning AB, Sweden
100.0
itslearning GmbH, Germany
100.0
itslearning A/S, Denmark
100.0
itslearning München GmbH, Germany
100.0
Subsidiary of Nowa Era Sp. z.o.o.
Vulcan Sp. z.o.o., Poland
100.0
Subsidiaries of Iddink Group B.V.
Sanoma SchooLogica B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
Iddink Learning Materials B.V., The Netherlands
100.0
Iddink Spain S.L.U, Spain
100.0
Subsidiaries of Oy Suomen Tietotoimisto - Finska
Notisbyrån Ab
STT Bureau Australia PTY Limited, Australia
100.0
840.9
1Parent Company of sub-group
In 2025 , Sanoma did not have subsidiaries with material non-controlling interests. Total non-controlling interest reported in the
balance sheet 31 Dec 2025 is EUR 1.0 million ( 2024 : 1.1).
Financial Statements 2025
182
Associated companies and joint ventures at 31 Dec 2025
Parent
Company
holding, %
Sub-group’s
Parent
company
holding, %
Group
holding, %
Book value
in Parent
Company,
EUR million
Sanoma Corporation
Valkeakosken Yhteistalo Oy, Finland
21.9
21.9
0.2
Sanoma Media Finland Ltd
Story House Egmont Oy Ab, Finland
50.0
50.0
Platco Oy, Finland
33.3
33.3
Beely Oy, Finland
30.6
30.6
Suomen Nettikirpputorit Oy, Finland
0.0
0.0
Jakeluyhtiö Suomi Oy, Finland
33.3
33.3
Oy Suomen Tietotoimisto - Finska Notisbyrån Ab
Retriever Suomi Oy, Finland
49.0
L.C.G. Malmberg B.V.
Methodeonderzoek V.O.F., The Netherlands
25.0
A.S.S.U. Adressenbestand Samenwerkende Schoolboeken Uitgevers
V.O.F, The Netherlands
50.0
0.2
6.5 Events after the balance sheet date
On 6 March 2026, Sanoma acquired Mr. Chadd, a Dutch tutoring platform. Mr. Chadd extends Sanoma’s personalised
learning offering to schools beyond core printed and digital learning materials by providing integrated digital learning support,
closely aligned with the local K12 curriculum in the Netherlands.
On 16 March 2026, Sanoma redeemed its outstanding hybrid bond (EUR 150 million) on its reset date.
Financial Statements 2025
183
Parent Company Financial Statements
Parent Company income statement, FAS
EUR million
Note
2025
2024
Net sales
63.2
63.9
Other operating income
2.0
0.3
Personnel expenses
-16.3
-16.3
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
-1.2
-1.5
Other operating expenses
-62.5
-60.3
OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS)
-14.7
-13.9
Financial income and expenses
15.5
-5.9
RESULT BEFORE APPROPRIATIONS AND TAXES
0.9
-19.8
Appropriations
37.7
19.2
Income taxes
-3.1
-0.1
RESULT FOR THE YEAR
35.5
-0.7
Financial Statements 2025
184
Parent Company balance sheet, FAS
Assets
EUR million
Note
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Intangible assets
9.0
2.8
Tangible assets
3.9
4.7
Investments
1,377.7
1,383.3
Long-term receivables
0.8
NON-CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL
1,390.7
1,391.6
CURRENT ASSETS
Income Tax receivables
0.7
0.1
Short-term receivables
80.4
71.1
Cash and cash equivalents
8.8
11.8
CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL
89.9
82.9
ASSETS, TOTAL
1,480.6
1,474.5
Equity and liabilities
EUR million
Note
31 Dec 2025
31 Dec 2024
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share capital
71.3
71.3
Treasury shares
-6.8
-3.0
Fund for invested unrestricted equity
209.8
209.8
Retained earnings
280.2
341.9
Result for the year
35.5
-0.7
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY, TOTAL
589.9
619.3
APPROPRIATIONS
0.7
0.9
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
358.6
518.3
Current liabilities
531.4
336.0
LIABILITIES, TOTAL
890.0
854.3
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES, TOTAL
1,480.6
1,474.5
Financial Statements 2025
185
Parent Company cash flow statement, FAS
EUR million
2025
2024
OPERATIONS
Result for the period
35.5
-0.7
Adjustments
Income taxes
3.1
0.1
Appropriations
-37.7
-19.2
Financial income and expenses
-15.5
5.9
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment losses
1.2
1.5
Gains / losses on sale of non-current assets
-1.8
0.0
Other adjustments
3.4
3.6
Change in working capital
Change in trade and other receivables
-2.9
2.7
Change in trade and other payables, and provisions
2.1
5.1
Dividends received
25.0
Interest paid
-36.5
-47.2
Other financial items
-0.8
-3.0
Taxes paid
-3.8
-0.3
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS
-28.8
-51.6
EUR million
2025
2024
INVESTMENTS
Acquisition of tangible and intangible assets
-7.6
-0.9
Investments in Group companies
-39.0
-180.0
Sales of tangible and intangible assets
2.9
0.1
Loans granted
-1.0
-17.2
Repayments of loan receivables
55.0
260.2
Interest received
30.7
43.6
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTS
41.0
105.7
CASH FLOW BEFORE FINANCING
12.2
54.2
FINANCING
Purchase of treasury shares
-4.0
-1.9
Change in loans with short maturity
1.9
37.2
Drawings of other loans
234.0
325.8
Repayments of other loans
-202.8
-397.4
Dividends paid
-63.5
-60.5
Group contributions
19.2
9.8
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING
-15.2
-86.9
Change in cash and cash equivalents according to cash flow statement
-3.0
-32.8
Net increase (+) / decrease (-) in cash and cash equivalents
-3.0
-32.8
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 Jan
11.8
44.5
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 Dec
8.8
11.8
Financial Statements 2025
186
Notes to the Parent Company Financial Statements
1. Parent Company’s accounting policies
for Financial Statements
Sanoma Corporation is a public limited-liability company, which is domiciled in Helsinki, Finland. Sanoma Corporation was
founded on 1 May 1999, as the result of a combination merger. Sanoma Corporation’s financial statements have been
prepared according to Finnish Accounting Standards (FAS). Sanoma Corporation is the Parent Company of Sanoma Group.
Sanoma has prepared its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with most recent IFRS Accounting Standards as
adopted by the European Union. The Finnish accounting practices applied by Sanoma Corporation and accounting principles
of IFRS standards are mainly consistent, thus the main accounting principles are available in the accounting policies of the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The most significant differences between the accounting policies of the Parent Company and Sanoma Group are the following:
Pensions
Statutory pension cover of Sanoma Corporation’s employees is managed by pension insurance companies. Supplementary
pension benefits are managed by the Sanoma Pension Fund and by insurance companies. Pension settlements and pension
costs are recognised during the period in which they are incurred. The potential deficit of the pension fund’s pension liability
has been recognised as an obligatory provision under the balance sheet of Sanoma Corporation.
Interest in Group companies
Interest in Group companies is measured at cost less any impairment losses. Interest in Group companies is tested for
impairment annually. Impairment testing also includes net receivables from subsidiaries. A possible permanent write-down is
booked through profit or loss.
Real estate investments and housing property investments
In accordance with the Finnish Accounting Act, investments in real estates and housing property are presented as investments
of non-current assets.
2. Net sales
EUR million
2025
2024
Net sales by business
Management and service fees
63.2
63.9
Total
63.2
63.9
Net sales by market areas
Finland
25.5
25.4
Other EU countries
35.1
35.5
Other countries
2.6
3.0
Total
63.2
63.9
3. Other operating income
EUR million
2025
2024
Rental income
0.1
0.1
Capital gains
1.8
0.0
Other
0.0
0.2
Total
2.0
0.3
Financial Statements 2025
187
4. Personnel expenses
EUR million
2025
2024
Wages, salaries and fees
-14.4
-14.3
Pension costs
-1.5
-1.7
Other social expenses
-0.3
-0.3
Total
-16.3
-16.3
Average number of employees (full-time equivalents)
104
100
The remuneration to the President and CEO and Board of Directors is presented separately, divided by persons, in the
Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6.3.
5. Other operating expenses
EUR million
2025
2024
Office and ICT expenses
-49.2
-49.2
Professional fees
-4.6
-2.0
Rents
-0.9
-1.0
Other
-7.7
-8.2
Total
-62.5
-60.3
Principal Audit fees
EUR million
2025
2024
Statutory audit
-0.3
-0.3
Audit related services
-0.2
0.0
Tax services
0.0
0.0
Other non-audit services
0.0
-0.3
Total
-0.6
-0.6
6. Financial income and expenses
EUR million
2025
2024
Dividend income
From Group companies
25.0
Total
25.0
Interest income from investments under non-current assets
From Group companies
26.6
39.1
Total
26.6
39.1
Other interest and financial income
From Group companies
1.0
2.1
From other companies
1.2
1.8
Exchange rate gains
3.6
3.3
Total
5.8
7.2
Interest and other financial expenses
To Group companies
-4.8
-6.1
To other companies
-33.7
-42.9
Exchange rate losses
-3.3
-3.2
Total
-41.8
-52.2
Total
15.5
-5.9
7. Income taxes
EUR million
2025
2024
Income tax on operational income
-3.1
0.0
Income taxes from previous periods
0.0
-0.1
Total
-3.1
-0.1
Financial Statements 2025
188
8. Intangible assets
Intangible assets 2025
EUR million
Immaterial
rights
Other
intangible
assets
Advance
payments
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
0.0
9.8
0.8
10.6
Increases
7.3
7.3
Decreases
-1.5
-1.5
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
0.0
8.3
8.1
16.4
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
0.0
-7.8
-7.8
Decreases
1.5
1.5
Amortisation for the period
-0.9
-0.9
Impairment losses for the period
-0.2
-0.2
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
0.0
-7.4
-7.4
Book value at 31 Dec 2025
1.0
8.1
9.0
Intangible assets 2024
EUR million
Immaterial
rights
Other
intangible
assets
Advance
payments
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
0.0
9.8
0.0
9.8
Increases
0.1
0.8
0.8
Reclassifications
0.0
0.0
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
0.0
9.8
0.8
10.6
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-6.4
-6.4
Amortisation for the period
-1.0
-1.0
Impairment losses for the period
-0.4
-0.4
Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
0.0
-7.8
-7.8
Book value at 31 Dec 2024
2.1
0.8
2.8
9. Tangible assets
Tangible assets 2025
EUR million
Land and
water
Machinery and
equipment
Other
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
4.2
0.8
0.3
5.2
Increases
0.2
0.1
0.3
Decreases
-0.9
-0.6
-1.5
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
3.3
0.4
0.4
4.1
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-0.6
-0.6
Decreases
0.5
0.5
Depreciation for the period
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
Impairment losses for the period
0.0
0.0
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
-0.1
0.0
-0.2
Book value at 31 Dec 2025
3.3
0.3
0.4
3.9
Tangible assets 2024
EUR million
Land and 
water
Machinery and
equipment
Other
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
4.2
0.7
0.3
5.2
Increases
0.1
0.1
Decreases
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
4.2
0.8
0.3
5.2
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 1 Jan
-0.5
-0.5
Decreases
0.0
0.0
Depreciation for the period
-0.1
-0.1
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 Dec
-0.6
-0.6
Book value at 31 Dec 2024
4.2
0.2
0.3
4.7
Financial Statements 2025
189
10. Investments
Investments 2025
EUR million
Interest in
Group
companies
Receivables
from Group
companies
Interest in
associated
companies
Other shares
and holdings
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
815.5
576.1
0.2
5.2
1,397.0
Increases
39.0
0.3
39.3
Decreases
-0.7
-44.0
-0.1
-44.8
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
853.8
532.1
0.2
5.4
1,391.5
Accumulated impairment losses at 1 Jan
-12.9
-0.8
-13.7
Increases
-0.1
-0.1
Accumulated impairment losses at 31 Dec
-12.9
-0.9
-13.8
Book value at 31 Dec 2025
840.9
532.1
0.2
4.5
1,377.7
Investments 2024
EUR million
Interest in
Group
companies
Receivables
from Group
companies
Interest in
associated
companies
Other shares
and holdings
Total
Acquisition cost at 1 Jan
635.5
811.7
0.2
5.2
1,452.6
Increases
180.0
110.0
290.0
Decreases
-345.6
-345.6
Acquisition cost at 31 Dec
815.5
576.1
0.2
5.2
1,397.0
Accumulated impairment losses at 1 Jan
-12.9
-0.8
-13.7
Accumulated impairment losses at 31 Dec
-12.9
-0.8
-13.7
Book value at 31 Dec 2024
802.6
576.1
0.2
4.4
1,383.3
11. Receivables
Long-term receivables
EUR million
2025
2024
Accrued income1
0.8
Short-term receivables
EUR million
2025
2024
Trade receivables
2.7
0.8
Loan receivables
22.3
32.3
Accrued income1
55.4
38.0
Total
80.4
71.1
Receivables from Group companies
Trade receivables
2.7
0.8
Loan receivables
22.3
32.3
Accrued income
48.2
31.7
Total
73.2
64.8
1Most significant items under accrued items are the unpaid group contributions EUR 37.5 million (2024: 19.2) and accrued interests EUR 10.6 million (2024: 12.5).
Intra-group loans
The Parent Company provides intra-group financing to its subsidiaries as part of the Group’s centralised treasury
management. Internal loans are used to support business operations and to ensure efficient liquidity management across the
Group. The loans can have different maturities and interest rates, which are determined by market conditions.
The total amount of the loans is EUR 542.1 million. The current portfolio of long-term internal loans has maturities ranging
from approximately two and a half to three and a half years. The pricing is determined on an arm’s length basis. It varies
approximately between 3% and 5% depending on the credit standing of the subsidiary and the term of the loan.
Financial Statements 2025
190
12. Shareholders’ equity
EUR million
2025
2024
Restricted equity
Share capital at 1 Jan
71.3
71.3
Share capital at 31 Dec
71.3
71.3
Restricted equity 31 Dec
71.3
71.3
Unrestricted equity
Treasury shares at 1 Jan
-3.0
-4.1
Purchase of treasury shares
-4.0
-1.9
Shares delivered
0.1
3.0
Treasury shares at 31 Dec
-6.8
-3.0
Fund for invested unrestricted equity at 1 Jan
209.8
209.8
Fund for invested unrestricted equity at 31 Dec
209.8
209.8
Retained earnings at 1 Jan
341.2
402.8
Dividends paid
-63.5
-60.5
Share based payments
2.5
1.8
Shares delivered
0.0
-2.1
Retained earnings at 31 Dec
280.2
341.9
Result for the year
35.5
-0.7
Unrestricted equity 31 Dec
518.6
548.0
Total
589.9
619.3
Further information on share capital is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5.4.
Distributable earnings
EUR million
2025
2024
Treasury shares
-6.8
-3.0
Fund for invested unrestricted equity
209.8
209.8
Retained earnings
280.2
341.9
Result for the year
35.5
-0.7
Total
518.6
548.0
13. Appropriations
EUR million
2025
2024
Group contributions
37.5
19.2
Cumulative depreciation differences
0.2
0.0
Total
37.7
19.2
14. Non-current liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Debentures
149.8
299.8
Loans from financial institutions
210.0
218.9
Accrued expenses
-1.2
-0.4
Total
358.6
518.3
Financial Statements 2025
191
15. Current liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Debentures
150.0
Loans from financial institutions
50.6
Commercial papers
39.9
37.4
Trade payables
7.8
6.4
Accrued expenses 1
21.8
20.4
Advances received
0.3
Other liabilities
311.9
220.8
Total
531.4
336.0
Liabilities to Group companies
Trade payables
4.8
0.6
Accrued expenses
0.2
0.0
Other liabilities2
311.4
220.4
Total
316.4
221.0
1Most significant items under accrued items are related to accrued personnel expenses EUR 5.0 million (2024: 4.8) and accrued interests EUR 11.6 million
(2024: 12.1).
2Other liabilities to Group companies include balances in IHC account EUR 245.0 million (2024: 220.4) and current deposits EUR 66.5 million (2024: 0.0).
16. Contingent liabilities
EUR million
2025
2024
Contingencies for own commitments
Other contingent liability for own commitments
25.0
15.0
Total
25.0
15.0
Contingencies incurred on behalf of Group companies
Guarantees
125.3
92.2
Total
125.3
92.2
Other liabilities1
53.1
63.6
Total
53.1
63.6
Total
203.4
170.8
1Other liabilities include commitments of contracts.
The amount of contingent liabilities due in 2026 is EUR 54.2 million.
Nominal values of derivatives
EUR million
2025
2024
Currency derivatives
Forward exchange contracts, external
20.7
16.6
Forward exchange contracts, internal
0.0
0.1
Total
20.6
16.7
Fair values of derivatives
EUR million
2025
2024
Currency derivatives
Forward exchange contracts, external
-0.1
0.1
Financial Statements 2025
192
Board’s proposal for
distribution of profits
The retained earnings of the Parent Company, Sanoma Corporation, according to the balance sheet as at 31 December 2025,
were EUR 308,841,593.86 of which the profit for the financial year 2025 was EUR 35,515,455.64. Including the fund for
invested unrestricted equity of EUR 209,767,212.33 the distributable funds amounted to EUR 518,608,806.19 at 31 December
2025. The Board of Directors will propose to the Annual General Meeting that:
a dividend of EUR 0.42 per share shall be paidEUR 68,364,654.12*
shareholders’ equity shall be set atEUR 450,244,152.07
No essential changes have taken place in the financial status of the Company after the financial year. The Company’s liquidity
is good and according to the Board of Directors the proposed dividend will not compromise the Company’s liquidity.
*The dividend shall be paid in three instalments. The first instalment of EUR 0.14 per share shall be paid to a shareholder who
is registered in the shareholder register of the Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Oy on the dividend record date
11 May 2026. The payment date proposed by the Board of Directors for this instalment is 19 May 2026.
The second instalment of EUR 0.14 per share shall be paid in September 2026. The second instalment shall be paid to a
shareholder who is registered in the shareholder register of the Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Oy on the dividend
record date. The Board of Directors proposes that the dividend record date for this instalment is 15 September 2026, and the
payment date 22 September 2026.
The third instalment of EUR 0.14 per share shall be paid in November 2026. The third instalment shall be paid to a
shareholder who is registered in the shareholder register of the Company maintained by Euroclear Finland Oy on the dividend
record date. The Board of Directors proposes that the dividend record date for this instalment is 3 November 2026, and the
payment date is 10 November 2026.
Financial Statements 2025
193
Signatures to the Financial Statements and
the Report of the Board of Directors
The financial statements prepared in accordance with applicable accounting regulations, give a true and fair view of the
assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the companies included in its consolidated financial
statements.
The Report by the Board of Directors contains a truthful description of the development and result of the business operations
of the Company and the Group, as well as a description of the most significant risks and uncertainties and other aspects of the
Company’s condition.
The Sustainability Statement included in the Report by the Board of Directors has been prepared in accordance with Chapter
7 of the accounting act and Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy Regulation.
Helsinki, 24 March 2026
Pekka Ala-PietiläKlaus CawénJulian Drinkall
ChairVice Chair
Rolf GrisebachAnna HerlinSebastian Langenskiöld
Eugenie van WiechenJannica FagerholmTimo Lappalainen
Rob Kolkman
President and CEO
Auditor’s note
A report on the audit performed has been issued today.
Helsinki, 26 March 2026
PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy
Authorised Public Accountants
Tiina Puukkoniemi
APA
Financial Statements 2025
194
Independent auditor's report on the ESEF financial statements
of Sanoma Corporation
(Translation of the Finnish original)
To Management of Sanoma Corporation
We have performed a reasonable assurance engagement on the financial statements 743700XJC24THUPK0S03-2025-12-31-
fi.zip of Sanoma Corporation (business identity code 1524361-1) that have been prepared in accordance with the
Commission's regulatory technical standard for the financial year 1 January 2025 – 31 December 2025.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the preparation of the company's report of the Board of
Directors and financial statements (the ESEF financial statements) in such a way that they comply with the requirements of the
Commission's regulatory technical standard. This responsibility includes:
preparing the ESEF financial statements in XHTML format in accordance with Article 3 of the Commission's regulatory
technical standard
tagging the primary financial statements, notes and company's identification data in the consolidated financial statements
that are included in the ESEF financial statements with iXBRL tags in accordance with Article 4 of the Commission's
regulatory technical standard and
ensuring the consistency between the ESEF financial statements and the audited financial statements.
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF financial statements in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's
regulatory technical standard.
Auditor’s independence and quality management
We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are applicable in Finland and are
relevant to the engagement we have performed, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with
these requirements.
The auditor applies International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 1, which requires the firm to design, implement and
operate a system of quality management including policies or procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements,
professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Auditor’s responsibilities
Our responsibility is to, in accordance with Chapter 7, Section 8 of the Securities Markets Act, provide assurance on the
financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with the Commission's regulatory technical standard. We express
an opinion on whether the consolidated financial statements that are included in the ESEF financial statements have been
tagged, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of Article 4 of the Commission's regulatory technical
standard.
Our responsibility is to indicate in our opinion to what extent the assurance has been provided. We conducted a reasonable
assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised).
The engagement includes procedures to obtain evidence on:
whether the primary financial statements in the consolidated financial statements that are included in the ESEF financial
statements have been tagged, in all material respects, with iXBRL tags in accordance with the requirements of Article 4 of
the Commission's regulatory technical standard and
whether the notes and company's identification data in the consolidated financial statements that are included in the ESEF
financial statements have been tagged, in all material respects, with iXBRL tags in accordance with the requirements of
Article 4 of the Commission's regulatory technical standard and
whether there is consistency between the ESEF financial statements and the audited financial statements.
Financial Statements 2025
195
The nature, timing and extent of the selected procedures depend on the auditor’s judgment. This includes an assessment of
the risk of a material deviation due to fraud or error from the requirements of the Commission's regulatory technical standard.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Opinion
Our opinion pursuant to Chapter 7, Section 8 of the Securities Markets Act is that the primary financial statements, notes and
company's identification data in the consolidated financial statements that are included in the ESEF financial statements of
Sanoma Corporation 743700XJC24THUPK0S03-2025-12-31-fi.zip for the financial year 1 January 2025 – 31 December 2025
have been tagged, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's regulatory technical
standard.
Our opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements of Sanoma Corporation for the financial year 1 January 2025
– 31 December 2025 has been expressed in our auditor's report dated 26 March 2026. With this report we do not express an
opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements nor express another assurance conclusion.
Helsinki 26 March 2026
PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy
Authorised Public Accountants
Tiina Puukkoniemi
Authorised Public Accountant (KHT)
Sanoma_logo_nega.svg
Sanoma Corporation
Visiting address:
Töölönlahdenkatu 2
FI-00100 Helsinki
Finland
tel. +358 105 1999