Annual Review 2025

Table of Contents

2

Glaston Annual Review 2025

accidents. In 2025, our lost time injury frequency rate LTIFR was 5.8 (5.7), indicating that continued systematic safety work is required. Our employee engagement level scored to an all- time high of 78, exceeding our target of 75. This is a strong result and shows the resilience and commitment within our teams, even during challenging times. In 2025, we made significant improvements in topics related to workload balance and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, DEI.

Technology forerunner

Glaston has a long tradition as a tech- nology frontrunner. In 2025, we contin- ued to build on this legacy, focusing on projects and innovations to automate our core products. We introduced the latest version of the Autopilot, which offers a fully automated tempering process for variable mixed production. The new automatic trimming system, Autotrim, helps increase capacity and reduce manual labor in the laminat- ing process by automating a typically manual step. In insulating glass tech- nologies, demand for the ULTRA TPS ® line for triple TPS ® insulating glass units with ultra-thin center glass, developed well. Further, the MUNTIN'MASTER, an automatic muntin positioning station for TPS ® insulating glass units, repre-

sents an important step towards fully automated production.

Creating customer value

Innovation is at the core of how we create value to our customers. By deepening our customer under- standing, we not only enhance the customer experience but also strengthen the competitiveness of our own operations.

Customer driven innovation is what enables us to anticipate future needs and differentiate our offering. By integrating lifecycle thinking, contin- uous innovation, and energy efficient technologies across our portfolio, we are building a strong foundation for long term, profitable, and sustainable growth.

2025 was a turbulent year, and I want to extend my sincere thanks to

Glaston’s team for their hard work and dedication throughout the year. I would also like to thank our customers, shareholders, and all our stakeholders for your continuous trust and support. We are clear about our direction, and confident in our ability to build strong performance going forward.

Miika Äppelqvist

President & CEO

Glaston’s strategic targets and execution

Targets medium-term (3-5 years), emission targets by 2032

2025

2024

2023

2022

Annual average net sales exceeding the addressable equipment markets growth

-4%

-1%

+3%

+17%

Comparable EBITA 10%

6.7%

7.0%

6.8%

6.4%

Comparable ROCE above 16%

11.3%

12.6%

12.7%

10.5%

Net Promoter Score above 40

37

64

62

53

Lost Time Accidents zero, measured by LTIFR

5.8

5.7

6.3

3.9

Employee engagement rate above 75 (out of 100)

78

76

70

70

GHG emissions reduction targets:

Reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 50.4% by 2032, compared to the 2022 base year 

1,498t

CO 2 e

1,539

tCO 2 e

1,238 tCO 2 e

1,491 tCO 2 e

Reduce the scope 3 GHG emission by 58.1% per square meter of sold machine processing capacity by FY2032, compared to the FY2022 base year (emission intensity)

0.00022 tCO 2 e/m 2

0.00017

tCO 2 e/m 2

0.00036 tCO 2 e/m 2

0.00043 tCO 2 /m 2

4

Glaston Annual Review 2025

14.0

15.3

Employees per region 31.12.2025, %, (FTE)

Finland .............. 25%

Germany ......... 38%

Other EMEA ..... 7%

Asia ..................... 24%

Americas ........... 6%

Architecture Tempering and Laminating Technologies

Insulating Glass Technologies

Mobility, Display & Solar

Service

Unallocated and eliminations

2024

2025

Received orders by product area, million

202.7

177.4

2024

2025

Comparable EBITA, million

Net sales per region, %

EMEA ................. 45%

Americas ......... 31%

APAC ................. 24%

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

2024

2025

Order book, million

98.2

61.3

5

Glaston Annual Review 2025

legislation and regulations. It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to further the interests of the Com- pany and all of its shareholders.

The main duties and operating principles of the Board of Directors are defined in the board charter approved by the Board. It is the Board’s duty to prepare the matters to be dealt with by a General Meeting and to ensure that the decisions made by a General Meeting are appropriately imple- mented. It is also the Board’s task to ensure the appropriate arrangement of the control of the Company’s accounts and finances. In addition, the Board directs and supervises the Company’s executive leadership, appoints and dismisses the President & CEO and decides on the President & CEO’s employment and other bene- fits. In addition, the Chair of the Board approves the salary and other benefits of the Executive Leadership Team. The Board approves the Executive Leadership Team’s charter.

The Board of Directors also decides on far-reaching and fundamentally important issues affecting the Group. Such issues are the Group’s strategy, approving the Group’s action plans and monitoring their implementa- tion, monitoring the Group’s financial development, acquisitions and the

Group’s operating structure, signi- ficant capital expenditures, internal control systems and risk manage- ment, key organizational issues and incentive schemes.

The Board of Directors is also responsible for monitoring the reporting process of the financial statements, the financial and sustain- ability reporting processes and the efficiency of the Company's internal control, internal auditing, and risk management systems pertaining to the financial and sustainability report- ing processes, monitoring the statu- tory audit of the financial statements and consolidated financial statements, monitoring the assurance of the sus- tainability statement, evaluating the independence of the statutory auditor or audit firm, particularly with respect to the provision of services unrelated to the audit, and preparing a proposal for resolution on the election of the auditor and assurance provider of the sustainability statement. The Board of Directors also regularly evaluates its own actions and working practices.

Meetings of the Board of Direc- tors are generally held in Helsinki. The Board of Directors also visits the Group's other operating locations and hold meetings there. The Board of Directors may also hold on-line meet-

ings. The Board of Directors meets according to a timetable agreed in advance, generally approximately 10 times per year and additionally, if necessary. The Company’s President & CEO and Chief Financial Officer generally attend the meetings of the Board. The Company’s General Coun- sel acts as Secretary to the Board. If necessary, such as in connection with the handling of strategy or the annual plan, other Members of the Executive Leadership Team may also attend Board meetings. The Auditor attends all Audit Committee meetings and at least one Board meeting per year.

Board of Directors in 2025

At the Annual General Meeting, held on April 16, 2025, the Members of the Board of Directors Veli-Matti Rein- ikkala, Sebastian Bondestam, Antti Kaunonen, Arja Talma, Tero Telaranta and Michael Willome were re-elected as members of the Board of Directors, and Tina Wu was elected as a new member of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors was elected for a term of office ending at the closing of the next Annual General Meeting.

In 2025, Veli-Matti Reinikkala served as Chair of the Board, and Sebastian Bondestam as Deputy Chair.

In 2025, the Board evaluated its

performance and procedures through a self-evaluation questionnaire. The evaluation, encompassed among other things, the diversity of the Board, the quality of the Board and committee work, and information sharing between the Board and the management. The board discussed and analyzed the evaluation results. Improvement proposals were agreed upon based on these discussions.

In 2025, key themes on the Board’s agenda were the recruitment of the new CEO, the approval and follow-up of the cost saving program, the finalization of the pre-processing equipment production transfer from Switzerland to China as well as review of the company’s updated strategy.

Diversity of the Board of Directors

The Board has a diversity policy. According to the policy, when plan- ning the composition of the Board, the Shareholder’s Nomination Board takes into account the needs and development stages of the compa- ny’s businesses as well as the areas of expertise required by the Board. Diversity ensures that the Board’s overall competence profile effectively supports Glaston’s current and future business development as well as the achievement of its strategic objectives.

8

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Board diversity is examined from various perspectives. For Glaston, essential factors include complemen- tary expertise among members, edu- cation and experience from different professions and industries, businesses at various stages of development, and leadership, as well as the personal qualities of the members. Diversity is further supported by experience in an international operating environment, expertise in the company’s industry and stage of development, as well as consideration of age and gender distribution. Both genders must be represented on Glaston’s Board of Directors.

In 2025, the board had seven members of which two were female (ca. 29 percent) and five were male (ca. 71 percent). Board members brought together diverse professional experience and educational back- grounds, particularly in engineering and economics. The members of Glaston’s Board hold, or have previ- ously held, management and board positions in both listed and unlisted companies across sectors relevant to Glaston’s business. The board also reflects diversity in background, with members born across three decades and three different nationalities repre- sented.

Glaston’s objective is to achieve a more balanced gender distribution of the Board. To reach this goal, the Nomination Board seeks to ensure that representatives of both genders are involved in the search and evalua- tion process for new Board members.

Independence of Members of the Board

According to an independence assessment performed by the Company’s Board of Directors, all of the Members of the Board were independent of the Company. Board Members Tero Telaranta and Sebas- tian Bondestam are dependent on a significant shareholder of the Com- pany, Ahlstrom Capital B.V., whose ownership was 26.39% on December 31, 2025. The Members of the Board have no conflicts of interest between the duties they have in the Company and their private interests.

As the secretary to the Board of Directors served General Counsel Kaisa Latva until July 31, 2025, and as of September 15, 2025, General Counsel Minna Toiviainen.

The CV details of the members of the Board are available on the com- pany website. The remuneration of the Board is described in the Remu- neration Report 2025.

9

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Members of the Board of Directors on December 31, 2025

Member of the Board

Gender Female (F)/ Male (M)

Member since

Independence

Year of birth

Share ownership on December 31, 2025

Education

Main occupation

Veli-Matti Reinikkala

M

2020, Chair of the Board

Independent of the company and of significant shareholders

1957

653,218 shares

eMBA, Non- executive Director

Board Professional

Sebastian Bondestam

M

2018, Deputy Chair of the Board

Independent of the company, dependent on a significant shareholders

1962

58,638 shares

M.Sc.(Eng.)

Georg Fischer, Head of BU Infrastructure

Antti Kaunonen

M

2018

Independent of the company and of significant shareholders

1959

99,940 shares

D.SC.(Tech), MBA

Board member and Advisor

Arja Talma

F

2021

Independent of the company and of significant shareholders

1962

36,937 shares

M.Sc. (Econ.), eMBA

Board Professional

Tero Telaranta

M

2017

Independent of the company, dependent on a significant shareholder

1971

37,125 shares

M.Sc.(Eng.), M.Sc.(Econ.)

A.Ahlström Oy, Senior Advisor

Michael Willome

M

2020

Independent of the company and of significant shareholders

1966

no shares

lic. oec HSG, M.A.

Synthomer Plc, Group Chief Executive Officer

Tina Wu

F

2025

Independent of the company and of significant shareholders

1974

no shares

B.Sc. Economics, MBA

DuPont, Global Vice President & General Manager, Adhesives & Fluids, Multibase and Tedlar

10

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Board meetings

Audit Committee

People and Remuneration Committee

Veli-Matti Reinikkala

13/13

4/4

Sebastian Bondestam

12/13

4/4

Antti Kaunonen

13/13

4/4

Sarlotta Narjus 1)

3/3

2/2

Arja Talma

13/13

6/6

Tero Telaranta

13/13

6/6

Michael Willome

13/13

4/4

Tina Wu 2)

10/10

4/4

Meeting attendance of Members of the Board 2025

In 2025, Glaston’s Board of Directors convened 13 times. The meeting attendance is reported in the table below.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Glaston’s Board of Directors has two committees: the Audit Committee and the People and Remuneration Committee. The Board of Directors appoints the members and chairs of the committees, taking into account the expertise and experience required for the duties of the committees. The members of the committees are appointed for the term of office of the Board of Directors. The committees are preparatory bodies of the Board of Directors and do not have their own decision-making power.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the

Board of Directors by preparing matters within the competence of the Board of Directors. The Commit- tee reports to the Board of Directors on matters discussed and measures taken at least four times a year and makes proposals to the Board for decision-making, if necessary.

The Board of Directors specifies the duties of the Audit Committee in a charter confirmed by the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee oversees the financial and sustainabil- ity reporting processes and monitors the effectiveness of internal control, internal audit and risk management systems. In addition, the Committee reviews the description of the main

features of the internal control and risk management systems associated with the financial reporting process, monitors the statutory audit of the financial statements and the consoli- dated financial statements, monitors the assurance of the sustainability reporting, evaluates the independ- ence of the statutory audit firm and prepares a proposal for the election and remuneration of the auditor and sustainability report assurance pro- vider. Other duties include evaluating compliance with laws, regulations and corporate practices, overseeing significant litigation concerning Group companies, and performing any other duties assigned to the Committee by the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee carries out a self-evaluation of its work annually, and the Chair of the Committee reports the results to the Board of Directors.

Audit Committee in 2025

Until the Annual General Meeting on April 16, 2025, Arja Talma served as Chair, and Sarlotta Narjus and Tero Telaranta as members of the Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee were independent of the Company. Tero Telaranta is dependent on a significant share-

holder of the Company. As of April 16, 2025, the composition of the Audit Committee was the following: Arja Talma served as Chair, and Tero Telar- anta and Tina Wu as members of the Audit Committee.

In 2025, the Audit Committee met six times. The meeting attendance is reported in the table to the left.

In 2025, the Committee focused on regular reviews of financial reporting, audit and risk management. In addi- tion, the committdde closely followed the finalization of the sustainability statement.

People and Remuneration Committee

The People and Remuneration Com- mittee assists the Board of Directors by preparing matters within the compe- tence of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is responsible for the duties it assigns to the Committee.

The Board of Directors specifies the duties of the People and Remuner- ation Committee in a charter con- firmed by the Board of Directors. Key duties of the Committee include pre- paring the remuneration policy and remuneration report for the Board and the Annual General Meeting, prepar- ing salaries and other benefits of Glas- ton’s CEO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team, preparing

1) Until April 16, 2025 2) As of April 16, 2025

11

Glaston Annual Review 2025

the nomination of the CEO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team and their successors, and pre- paring proposals for Glaston's short- and long-term incentive schemes as well as monitoring the company’s key personnel’s successor and develop- ment plan. In addition, the Commit- tee's duties include carrying out all other duties assigned to the Commit- tee by the Board of Directors.

The People and Remuneration Committee convenes at the invita- tion of the Chair, as necessary and at least twice a year. The Members of the Board of Directors and the CEO have the right to attend the meetings of the Committee.

The People and Remuneration Committee regularly carries out self-evaluation of its work, and the Chair of the Committee reports the results to the Board of Directors.

People and Remuneration Committee in 2025

Until the Annual General Meeting on April 16, 2025, Veli-Matti Reinik- kala served as Chair, and Sebastian Bondestam, Antti Kaunonen and Michael Willome as members of the People and Remuneration Committee. After the Annual General Meeting, Veli-Matti Reinikkala contin-

ued as Chair, with Sebastian Bondes- tam, Antti Kaunonen and Michael Willome as members of the commit- tee. The members of the People and Remuneration Committee were inde- pendent of the Company. Sebastian Bondestam is dependent on a signifi- cant shareholder of the Company.

In 2025, the People and Remuner- ation Committee met four times. The meeting attendance is reported in the table on page 11. On the Committee’s agenda were the incentive program for top management and the out- come of the same, top management review and remuneration as well as a talent review follow-up. In accordance with its duties, the Committee also prepared the selection and appoint- ment of Glaston’s new President & CEO. In addition, the Committee pre- pared the remuneration report for the governing bodies.

Shareholders’ Nomination Board

The Nomination Board’s task is to prepare and present annually for the Annual General Meeting and, if nec- essary, for an Extraordinary General Meeting, a proposal concerning the number of Members of the Board of Directors, a proposal on the identities of the Members of the Board, and a proposal on the remuneration of the

Members of the Board. An additional task of the Nomination Board is to seek candidates as potential Members of the Board of Directors.

In its activities, the Nomination Board complies with current legisla- tion, stock exchange rules applicable to the Company, and the Corporate Governance Code.

The Nomination Board consists of four (4) members, all of whom are appointed by the Company’s four largest shareholders, who appoint one member each. The Chair of the Com- pany’s Board of Directors serves as an advisory member of the Nomination Board.

The Company’s largest share- holders entitled to appoint members to the Nomination Board are deter- mined annually on the basis of the registered holdings in the company’s shareholder register held by Euroclear Finland Ltd on the first working day in September of the year in question. The Nomination Board elects a Chair from among its members.

The Nomination Board is estab- lished to serve until a General Meeting of Shareholders decides otherwise. The members of the Nomination Board are appointed annually and the term of office of the members expires when new members are appointed to

the Board.

The members of the Nomination Board shall be independent of the company, and no person belonging to the Company’s executive leadership shall be a member of the Nomination Board.

The Nomination Board shall submit its proposals to the Company’s Board of Directors annually by the end of January preceding the Annual General Meeting. Proposals for an Extraordi- nary General Meeting shall be sub- mitted to the Company’s Board of Directors so that they can be included in the notice to attend the meeting.

A decision of the Nomination Board shall be the opinion of a majority of the members of Nomination Board. If the votes are tied, then the Chair’s vote shall be decisive. If the votes are tied in the election of the Chair, the member candidate for Chair nomi- nated by the shareholder who had the largest number of shares when the Nomination Board was established shall be elected as Chair.

A report on the activities of the Nomination Board shall be presented at the Annual General Meeting and published on the Company’s website.

Shareholders’ Nomination Board 2025

Until August 31, 2025, the Shareholders’

12

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Nomination Board comprised of Jyrki Vainionpää (Chair), as the represent- ative nominated by Ahlstrom Capital B.V., Jaakko Kurikka as the representa- tive nominated by Hymy Lahtinen Oy, Pekka Pajamo as the representative nominated by Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company, and Esko Torsti as the representative nominated by llmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company.

In accordance with its charter, the Nomination Board prepared its pro- posal concerning the Board compo- sition and remuneration for the AGM 2025, and the AGM resolved in accord- ance with the proposal.

Based on ownership on September 1, 2025, the Shareholders’ Nomination Board comprised of Jyrki Vainionpää, as the representative nominated by Ahlstrom Capital B.V., Jaakko Kurikka, as the representative nominated by Hymy Lahtinen Oy, Pekka Pajamo, as the representative nominated by Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company, and Esko Torsti, as the rep- resentative nominated by llmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company. Veli-Matti Reinikkala, Chair of the Glas- ton Corporation’s Board of Directors, served as an advisory member of the Nomination Board.

In its organizing meeting on

September 24, 2025, the Nomina- tion Board elected Jyrki Vainionpää amongst its members as the Chair. The Board met three times during 2025, and the average attendance of members was 100%. No fees were paid to the members of the Nomina- tion Board.

President & CEO

The President & CEO handles the operational management of the Com- pany in accordance with instructions issued by the Board of Directors. He is responsible to the Board of Direc- tors for fulfilling the targets, plans and goals that the Board sets. The Presi- dent & CEO is responsible for ensur- ing that the Company’s accounting is in compliance with the law and that financial management has been arranged in a reliable manner. The President & CEO is supported by the Executive Leadership Team.

On February 17, 2025, Glaston announced that President & CEO Toni Laaksonen had submitted his resigna- tion from his position as the President & CEO of Glaston Corporation to join another company. On May 14, 2025, Glaston announced the appointment of Miika Äppelqvist as the new CEO & President of the company and he assumed his duties on June 1, 2025.

Executive Leadership Team

The Chair of the Company’s Board of Directors appoints, on the proposal of the President & CEO, the Members of the Executive Leadership Team and confirms their remuneration and other contractual terms. The Company’s President & CEO acts as the Chair of the Executive Leadership Team. The Executive Leadership Team handles the Group’s and business function’s strategy issues, capital expenditure, financial development, product policy, Group structure and control systems, and supervises the Company’s oper- ations.

The Members of the Executive Leadership Team report to the President & CEO and assist him in implementing the Company’s strat- egy, operational planning and mana- gement, and in reporting the devel- opment of business operations. The Executive Leadership Team meets under the direction of the President & CEO.

In 2025, the composition of the Executive Leadership Team was the following: CEO Toni Laaksonen (until May 31, 2025), President & CEO Miika Äppelqvist (as of June 1, 2025), CSO Sasu Koivumäki (until May 9, 2025), EVP Sales & Service Americas Joe Butler (as of May 6, 2025), EVP Sales

& Services EMEA & APAC Kimmo Kuusela (as of May 6, 2025), SVP People & Culture Riikka Laitasalo, General Counsel Kaisa Latva (until July 31, 2025), General Counsel Minna Toiviainen (as of September 15, 2025), CFO Päivi Lindqvist (until February 28, 2025), CFO Magnus Sjöblom (as of March 1, 2025), EVP Solutions & Opera- tions Jens Mayr (as of July 1, 2025) EVP Services Robert Jenks (as of April 1, 2025).

The Executive Leadership Team convened 11 times in 2025.

13

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Executive Leadership Team on December 31, 2025

Area of responsibility

Member since

Year of birth

Gender Female (F)/ Male (M)

Education

Share ownership on 31.12.2025* )

Miika Äppelqvist

President & CEO

Chair of the Executive Leadership Team as of June 1, 2025. Employed by the company since 2013. Member of the Executive Leadership Team since 2020

1981

M

M.Sc, Industrial engineering and management

13,666 shares

Other members of the Executive Leadership Team

Joe Butler

EVP Sales & Service, Americas

Employed by the company since 2021. Member of the Executive leadership Team as of May 6, 2025

1975

M

B.Sc, Physics

1,702 shares

Robert Jenks

EVP Services

Employed by the company and Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of April 1, 2025

1979

M

M.Sc. (Business Administration), B.Sc. (Production & Operations Management)

No shares

Kimmo Kuusela

EVP Sales & Service, EMEA & APAC

Employed by the company since 2005. Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of May 6, 2025

1980

M

B.Eng, Automation Engineer Technology.

7,473 shares

Riikka Laitasalo

SVP People & Culture

Employed by the company and Member of the Executive Leadership Team since August 2023

1979

F

M.Sc. (Econ.)

No shares

Jens Mayr

EVP Solutions & Operations

Employed by the company since 2019 and Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of July 1, 2025

1974

M

M.Sc. Business Administration

5,931 shares

Magnus Sjöblom

Chief Financial Officer

Employed by the company since 2022 and Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of March 1, 2025

1974

M

M.Sc. (Econ.)

No shares

Minna Toiviainen

General Counsel

Employed by the company and Member of the Executive Leadership Team since September 15, 2025

1979

F

Master of Laws, M.Sc. (Econ. and Business Adm.)

No shares

*) Share ownership includes also the ownership of Glaston Corporation shares by the entities controlled by the person in question.

Remuneration of the CEO & President and the Executive Leadership Team is described in the Remuneration Report 2025 and on the company’s website.

14

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Main Features of Internal Control and Risk Management Pertaining to the Financial Reporting Process

Internal control is an essential part of the Company’s administration and management. Its aim is to ensure that the Group’s operations are efficient, productive and reliable and that legislation and other regulations are complied with. The Group has spec- ified Group-wide principles for the main areas of its operations that form the basis for internal control.

The Group’s internal control sys- tems serve to provide reasonable assurance that the financial reports published by the Group give rea- sonably correct information about the Group's financial position. The Board of Directors and the President & CEO are responsible for arranging internal control. A report covering the Group's financial situation is supplied monthly to the Board of Directors. The Group's internal control is decen- tralized to different Group functions, which supervise compliance with instructions approved by the Board of Directors within their areas of responsibility. The Group’s financial management and operational control are supported and coordinated by the Group Finance and controller network.

The Group’s financial reporting process complies with the Group’s operating guidelines and stand- ards relating to financial reporting. The interpretation and application of financial reporting standards has been concentrated in the Group Finance organization, which maintains operating guidelines and standards relating to financial reporting and is responsible for internal communi- cation relating to them. The Group Finance organization also supervises compliance with these guidelines and standards.

The Group’s Finance organization regularly monitors the reporting of the Group’s units and addresses devia- tions perceived in reporting and, if necessary, performs either its own separate internal control auditing or commissions the internal con- trol auditing from external experts. Control of reporting and forecasting processes is based on the Group’s reporting principles, which are deter- mined and centrally maintained by the Group Finance's organization. The principles are applied consistently throughout the Group and a consist- ent Group reporting system is in place.

In 2025, internal audit was per- formed by an outsourced service provider.

Risk Management

Risk management is an essential part of Glaston's management and control system. The purpose of risk manage- ment is to ensure the identification, management and monitoring of risks relating to business targets and oper- ations. Risk management principles and operating practices have been specified in a risk management policy approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

The principle guiding Glaston's risk management is the continuous, sys- tematic and appropriate development and implementation of the risk man- agement process, with the objective being the comprehensive recogni- tion and appropriate management of risks. Glaston’s risk management focuses on the risks relating to busi- ness opportunities and on risks that threaten the achievement of Group objectives in a changing operating environment. From the perspective of risk management, the Company has divided risks into four different groups: strategic risks, operational risks, financial risks and hazard risks. Risks relating to property, business inter- ruption as well as liability arising from the Group’s operations have been covered by appropriate insurances. Management of financial risks is the

responsibility of the Group Treasury in the Group’s parent company.

Glaston's risk management policy includes guidelines relating to the Group's risk management. Risk man- agement policy also specifies the risk management processes and respon- sibilities. Glaston's risk management consists of the following stages: risk recognition, risk assessment, risk treatment, risk reporting and com- munication, and control of risk mana- gement activities and processes. As part of the risk management process, the most significant risks and their possible impacts are reported to the Company’s management and the Board of Directors regularly, based on which management and the Board are able to determine the level of risk that the Company’s business func- tions are potentially ready to accept in each situation or at a certain time.

It is the duty of Glaston’s Board of Directors to supervise the implemen- tation of risk management and to assess the adequacy and appropri- ateness of the risk management pro- cess and of risk management activ- ities. In practice, risk management consists of appropriately specified tasks, operating practices and tools, which have been adapted to Glaston’s business functions and Group-level

15

Glaston Annual Review 2025

management systems. Risk manage- ment is the responsibility of the EVP of each Business Function and the head of Group-level function. Risk recogni- tion is in practice the responsibility of every Glaston employee.

The Group Legal function is respon- sible for guidelines, support, control and monitoring of risk management measures. In addition, the function consolidates Business Function and Group-level risks. The Group Legal function reports on risk management issues to the President & CEO and the Executive Leadership Team and assesses in collaboration with them any changes in the probabilities or the impacts of identified risks and in the level of their management. The Group Legal function also reports the results of risk management processes to the Board of Directors.

Business Function and Group-level risk management is included in the annual Group-wide risk management process. The process can also always be initiated when required if substan- tial strategic changes requiring the initiation of the risk management pro- cess take place in a certain function.

The management of each function identifies and assesses its operational risks and specifies risk management measures by which an acceptable

level of risk can be achieved.

Utilizing the risk management pro- cess, risks are systematically identified and assessed in each Business Func- tion and at Group level. In addition, at each level actions are specified to achieve an acceptable risk level. Risks are consolidated at Group level. Action plans are prepared at each level of operations to ensure risks remain at an acceptable level.

The Group's risks are covered in more detail in the Report of the Board of Directors on page 34. The manage- ment and organization of the Group’s financial risks are presented in more detail in Note 5.4 of the consolidated financial statements on page 157.

Information and Communications

An effective internal control system requires sufficient, timely and reliable information to enable management to assess the achievement of the company’s goals. There is a need for both financial and other information on the Company’s internal and exter- nal events and activities. Employees have the opportunity to report, also through a whistleblowing channel, any questionable activity they observe. All external communications are han- dled in accordance with the Group’s Disclosure policy.

Auditing

The Company has one Auditor, which must be an auditing firm authorized by the Finnish Patent and Regis- tration Office. The Annual General Meeting elects the Auditor to audit the accounts for the financial year, and the Auditor’s duties cease at the close of the subsequent Annual General Meeting. It is the Auditor’s duty to audit the consolidated and parent company financial statements and accounting as well as the par- ent company’s governance, and to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. The Company’s Auditor presents the audit report required by law to the Compa- ny’s shareholders in connection with the annual financial statements and reports regularly to the Board of Direc- tors. The Auditor, in addition to fulfilling general competency requirements, must also comply with certain legal independence requirements guaran- teeing the execution of an independ- ent and reliable audit.

Audit 2025

At the 2025 Annual General Meeting, the accounting firm KPMG Oy Ab was re-elected as the Company’s Auditor.

The auditor with principal responsi- bility was Lotta Nurminen APA. Audit- ing units representing KPMG have served as the auditors of the Com- pany's subsidiaries in most operating countries. In 2025, the Group's audit- ing costs totaled EUR 337 thousand, of which KPMG received EUR 304 thousand. In addition, auditing units belonging to KPMG have provided legal statements to a total value of EUR 53 thousand and other advice to Group companies to a total value of EUR 104 thousand.

KPMG Oy Ab also carried out the assurance of the Company’s sustain- ability reporting for the financial year 2025.

Principles for Related Party Transactions

Glaston complies with legislation concerning related party transactions and, in accordance with legislation and the Corporate Governance Code, ensures that requirements related to monitoring, assessing, decision-mak- ing and disclosure of related party transactions are complied with. Glaston’s Board of Directors monitors and assesses the transactions of the Company and its related parties.

Glaston has defined the parties that are related to the Company, and

16

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston’s Communications Depart- ment maintains a list of individuals and legal persons who are considered to be related parties. Glaston maintains up-to-date guidelines on related party regulation and the monitoring thereof.

Glaston may enter into transac- tions with its related parties as long as the transactions are part of Glas- ton’s ordinary business operations and made on ordinary commercial terms and conditions. In such situ- ations, Glaston’s internal guidelines and decision-making processes are complied with. Related party trans- actions that deviate from Glaston’s normal business operations or are not made on ordinary commercial terms are decided on by Glaston’s Board of Directors, respecting provisions on disqualification.

Related party transactions are reg- ularly monitored in Glaston’s finance function. Management personnel belonging to Glaston’s related parties are obliged to notify Glaston’s Related Party Administration without undue delay about related party transactions or planned related party transactions that they become aware of. Potential conflicts of interest are monitored through internal controls. Results of the monitoring of related party transactions are reported regularly to

the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Glaston reports on related party transactions yearly in its financial statements. Related party transac- tions which are material to sharehold- ers, and which deviate from normal business or are not made according to ordinary commercial terms and con- ditions are published in accordance with the Securities Market Act and the rules of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd.

Insider Administration

In addition to the statutory insider regulations, Glaston complies with the insider guidelines of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd as well as the internal guidelines adopted by Glaston at any given time.

In accordance with the EU’s Market Abuse Regulation, Glaston prepares and maintains a list of persons dis- charging managerial responsibilities as well as persons and entities closely associated with them. In Glaston Corporation, the persons discharging managerial responsibilities are the Members of the Board of Directors, the President & CEO, and the Chief Financial Officer. At least once a year, Glaston checks the information of persons discharging managerial responsibilities that have a duty to declare as well as persons and entities

closely associated with them. Glaston reports the securities transactions of persons discharging manage- rial responsibilities and their related parties in accordance with the Market Abuse Regulation.

Glaston does not maintain an insider list relating to permanent insiders. During the preparation of significant projects and events, the Company maintains project- and event-specific lists of insiders. Insiders are given a written statement of their inclusion in an insider register as well as guidelines on insider obligations.

The Company’s persons dischar- ging managerial responsibilities, persons serving in certain key posi- tions and persons participating in the preparation of financial reports must not trade in the Company’s financial instruments during the 30-day period before the publication of interim reports and financial statement releases. With respect to project-spe- cific insiders, trading in the Company’s financial instruments is prohibited until the cancellation or publication of the project.

The Company’s insider adminis- tration, its implementation and supervision are the responsibility of Group Legal function and the Com- munications Department. Glaston’s

General Counsel is responsible for the Company’s insider issues. The Company’s Communications Depart- ment is responsible for maintaining the list of insiders and for overseeing the restriction on trading and duty to declare.

17

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston’s revised strategy was announced in 2021. The execution has proceeded according to plans with no major structural changes since the acquisition of Bystronic glass in 2019. In the 2021−2023 period, only minor adjustment measures have been implemented. In 2024, the closure of production in Switzerland was announced and the transfer of all pre-processing equipment produc- tion from Switzerland to China was completed in 2025. Due to the weaker demand environment, actions to improve efficiency and reduce costs were taken in 2025. As of November 2025, temporary lay-offs have been

EUR

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Annual remuneration of the Board

353,700

345,900

365,700

376,100

383,200

Annual remuneration of the President and CEO

330,622 1

644,244

472,977 2

116,129 3

368,292 4

Annual remuneration of the Deputy CEO 5

337,574

378,192

367,872

224,846 6

35,879 7

Annual remuneration of the Acting President and CEO

43,772 8

206,839 9

40,320 10

Average salary development 11

66,500

70,500

72,000

72,000

68,239

Remuneration development

implemented in Finland and as of December 2025 short time work in Germany.

In the 2021−2025 period, Glaston’s financial performance has been rela- tively stable despite the markets being more challenging in the 2023−2025 period. In 2022, strong development was noted, which was reflected in the CEO remuneration. In addition, as the company’s CEO has changed twice in the 2021−2025 period, 2022 was the only year with full-year remuneration for only one person. Due to the nature of the Board's duties and responsibil- ities, the remuneration of the Board includes fixed remuneration only.

1 Remuneration for Anders Dahlblom.

2 Remuneration for Anders Dahlblom until 15 November 2023.

3 Remuneration for Toni Laaksonen from the period 12 August to 31 December 2024.

4 Remuneration for Toni Laaksonen from the period 1 January to 31 May 2025 and for Miika Äppelqvist from the period 1 June to 31 December 2025.

5 Deputy CEO’s remuneration presented here for 2021-2024 is excluding reimbursement of costs and expenses paid directly to third parties based on the expatriate agreement. Deputy CEO’s role has been removed as of August 1, 2024.

6 Deputy CEO’s remuneration from the period 1 January to 31 July 2024. The reimbursement of costs and expenses paid directly to third parties during this period amounting to in total EUR 54,995. Total remuneration thus amounting to EUR 279,841. Deputy CEO role was removed as of August 1, 2024

7 The Deputy CEO, who served in the role from 1 January to 31 July 2024, received short term incentive (STI) remuneration of EUR 26,208 and long term incentive (LTI) remuneration of EUR 9,671. The remuneration was paid in 2025.

8 Remuneration from period 15 November to 31 December 2023 to Interim CEO Antti Kaunonen.

9 Remuneration from period 1 January 2024 to 11 August 2024 to Interim CEO Antti Kaunonen. Excluding remuneration to Kaunonen as a member of the Board.

10 Interim CEO Antti Kaunonen received short term incentive (STI) remuneration of EUR 40,320 for the period from 1 January 2024 to 11 August 2024. The remuneration was paid in 2025.

11 Average salary development at Glaston is calculated by dividing salaries and rewards by the average number of employees during the financial year. Amounts do not include employer’s social security costs.

EUR 1000

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Net sales

182,662

213,520

219,708

217,945

208,846

Comparable operating result (EBIT)

6,569

9,917

11,418

11,020

9,487

Comparable EBITA

11,098

13,624

14,869

15,261

14,019

Key financial metrics

19

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Remuneration of the Board of Directors

The 2025 Annual General Meeting resolved that an annual fee of EUR 74,000 shall be paid to the Chair of the Board, EUR 45,000 to the Deputy Chair and EUR 35,000 to other Members of the Board.

Further, the 2025 Annual General Meeting resolved that a member of the Board may choose to receive the annual fixed remuneration partly in company shares and partly in cash so that approximately 40% of the annual fixed remuneration is paid in Glaston Corporation’s shares. The number of shares forming the above remunera- tion portion, which would be payable in shares, will be determined based on the share value in the stock exchange trading maintained by Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd, calculated as the trade volume weighted average quotation of the share during the one-month period immediately following the date on which the interim report of Janu- ary-March 2025 of the Company is published.

A meeting fee of EUR 800 shall be paid to the Chair for meetings held in the Chair’s home country and EUR 1,500 for meetings held elsewhere, and EUR 500 shall be paid to the other Members of the Board for meetings held in their home country and EUR

1,000 for meetings held elsewhere. Half of the normal fee shall be paid for a board meeting held per capsulam. In addition, it was decided that Board members shall be paid travel and accommodation expenses and other direct expenses arising from board work pursuant to the Company's nor- mal practice.

Furthermore, the members of the Audit and People and Remuneration Committees shall be paid a meeting fee of EUR 500 for each meeting attended in the home country of the respective member and EUR 1,000 for each meeting attended elsewhere. In addition to the meeting fee, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall be paid an annual fee of EUR 10,000 and the Chair of the People and Remuneration Committee shall be paid an annual fee of EUR 7,500.

The members of the Board do not participate in any incentive plans.

All the payments to the members of the Board during the financial year 2025 were in compliance with the Remuneration Policy.

20

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Board

Audit Committee

People and Remuneration Committee

Annual fee (EUR)

Meeting fees (EUR)

Remuneration in total (EUR)

Veli-Matti Reinikkala, Chair of the Board

Chair

81,500

17,200

98,700

Sebastian Bondestam, Deputy Chair of the Board

Member

45,000

of which EUR 18,461 paid in Glaston shares

7,500

52,500

Antti Kaunonen

Member

35,000 of which EUR 14,359 paid in Glaston shares

8,000

43,000

Sarlotta Narjus * )

Member

8,750

2,500

11,250

Arja Talma

Chair

45,000 of which EUR 14,359 paid in Glaston shares

9,000

54,000

Tero Telaranta

Member

35,000 of which EUR 14,359 paid in Glaston shares

9,000

44,000

Michael Willome

Member

35,000

10,500

45,500

Tina Wu ** )

Member

26,250

8,000

34,250

Total

311,500

71,700

383,200

* ) until April 16, 2025

** ) as of April 16, 2025

In the financial year 2025, the following fees were paid to the members of the Board, an annual fee and meeting fees including both Board and committee related remuneration. As set out below, four members of the Board chose to receive the annual fixed remuneration partly in company shares.

21

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Remuneration of the President and CEO

The remuneration of the President and CEO comprises of a base salary, benefits and performance-based incentive plans.

Toni Laaksonen served as CEO until May 31, 2025. Miika Äppelqvist was appointed as the President and CEO in May 2025 and he started in his role on June 1, 2025.

In 2025, the President and CEO Toni Laaksonen was paid the total remuneration of EUR 153,125, which included variable pay of 28,125 12 . The relative proportion of the fixed pay was 82% and variable pay 18%.

The President and CEO Miika Äppelqvist was paid the total remu- neration of EUR 215,167 13 , which did not include any variable pay.

Performance Actualisation 2025 (STI and LTI)

The President and CEO participated in the short-term incentive (STI) plan in 2025 tied to the following metrics:

Role

KPIs (weight)

Achievement

Notes:

President and CEO Miika Äppelqvist

Glaston EBITA (40%)

Group Net Sales (30%)

Individual target, cost saving program 14 (30%)

0%

28%

158%

STI calculated using the FY 2025 financials, but payment is pro-rated for the period in which Äppelqvist served in the President and CEO position.

For the purposes of STI evaluation, achievement is assessed on a scale of 0–200%, where 100% represents target achieve- ment and 200% represents maximum achievement. Remuneration paid or due to be paid under the STI is specified in more detail at the end of this section.

12 Variable pay for Toni Laaksonen consists of STI performance actualization in 2024, paid in 2025.

13 Total remuneration for the period Miika Äppelqvist has served as President and CEO 1.6.-31.12.2025.

14 Individual target for 2025 consisted of implementation of the cost saving program, announced on August 8, 2025.

Glaston has long-term incentive (LTI) plans to retain the key personnel and to offer them with a competitive reward plan based on the earning and accumulating the Company’s shares. In the LTI Plans, the participants shall hold 50% of the net number of shares received under the plan until the number of the Company’s shares held by the participant corresponds to the value of the participant’s gross annual base salary. Such number of shares shall be held during the term of the

employment or service of the partici- pant. As a rule, no reward will be paid in case the employment or service terminates before the reward pay- ment is made.

The President and CEO partici- pates in the Performance Share Plan 2025‒2029, which comprises of three (3) performance periods: calendar years 2025‒2027, 2026–2028 and 2027–2029. As Miika Äppelqvist was appointed as the President and CEO of the Company only in June 2025 he

participates in the first performance period of the said plan pro-rated for the period in the CEO position and the duration of the previous position at Glaston in 2025.

The Board of Directors resolves on the plan’s performance criteria and the performance levels at the begin- ning of each performance period. For the first two performance periods under the Performance Share Plan 2025‒2029, objectives are set regard- ing the Group as follows:

22

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Performance period under the Share Plan 2025-2029

KPI (weight)

Maximum Allocation for the President and CEO

Achievement

Payout year

LTI 2025‒2027

Group Cumulative Comparable EBITA (30%)

Cumulative Services Net Sales (40%)

Annual Earnings Per Share (EPS) (30%)

70,000 shares (allocated shares prorated according to the time in both the CEO and previous position in 2025) 15

N/A

2028

LTI 2026‒2028

Group Cumulative Comparable EBITA (30%)

Cumulative Services Net Sales (40%)

Annual Earnings Per Share (EPS) (30%)

100,000 shares

N/A

2029

Element

Remuneration Description

President and CEO Toni Laaksonen until May 31, 2025

President and CEO Miika Äppelqvist as of June 1, 2025

FIXED Base salary and benefits

EUR 125,000

Including fringe benefits 16

EUR 215,167

Including fringe benefits. 17

VARIABLE

Short-term incentive (STI)

Performance year 2024 (paid in 2025): EUR 28,125

Performance year 2025 (paid in 2026): N/A

The maximum amount of the President & CEO’s annual bonus: 60% of the annual salary.

Performance year 2024 (paid in 2025): N/A

Performance year 2025 (paid in 2026): EUR 29,295

The maximum amount of the President & CEO’s annual bonus: 60% of the annual salary.

VARIABLE

Long-term incentive (LTI) 2025-2029

For additional information on long-term incentive plans, please see Glaston’s website.

Finalized plans: N/A.

Finalized plans: N/A

Ongoing plans 18 :

The maximum reward for the ongoing performance period LTI 2025‒2027 is 70,000 shares, including also the portion to be paid in cash.

The maximum reward for the commenced performance period LTI 2026‒2028 is 100,000 shares, including also the portion to be paid in cash.

OTHER

The President and CEO may retire in accordance with the stipulations of the applicable law.

The President and CEO may retire in accordance with the stipulations of the applicable law.

Summary of remuneration to the President and CEO

15 On 22 April 2025, a reverse share split (2:1) was carried out. The number of shares have been adjusted accordingly.

16 Benefits include mobile phone and lunch benefit.

17 Benefits include a mobile phone benefit, car benefit as well as temporary expatriate agreement related benefits amounting in total to EUR 40,167 during 1.6.-31.12.2025. Miika Äppelqvist works temporar- ily in Germany as an expatriate. During the expatriate agreement, entered into in 2023, the company pays customary expatriate benefits including housing.

18 Additionally, Performance Share Plan 2022-2026 is currently ongoing in the company. Miika Äppelqvist was appointed as the President and CEO in June 2025, thus he does not participate in this plan as President and CEO. However, based on Äppelqvist’s previous positions at Glaston he participates in the ongoing 2022-2026 Plan.

23

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Board of Director’s review and financial statements

This pdf report has been published voluntarily and is not an xHTML document compliant with the ESEF (European Single Electronic Format) regulation.

This report is a non-official translation of the Finnish original.

24

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial development of the Group

Orders received and order book

In 2025, order intake was down by 13% compared to the corresponding period in the previous year and was EUR 177.4 (202.7) million. For Architectural Tempering and Laminating Technologies, the orders received for the full year were down by 3% year-on-year, despite the pick-up in orders in the final quarter. Orders received for Insulating Glass Technologies were down by 6%. For Mobility, Display & Solar Technologies, order intake was down by 47%. Services’ order intake was down by 5% from the comparison period.

Orders received, EUR million

1–12/2025

1–12/2024

Change%

Architecture

140.7

147.3

-4.5%

Mobility, Display & Solar

36.6

54.3

-32.5%

Total segments

177.4

201.7

-12.0%

Unallocated and eliminations

0.0

1.0

-100.0%

Total Glaston Group

177.4

202.7

-12.5%

Order book

At the end of the year, the order book stood at EUR 61.3 (98.2) million and was 38% lower than in the corresponding period in the previous year. The Architec- ture segment’s order book totaled EUR 46.0 (70.3) million, representing 75% of the Group’s order book, and the Mobility, Display & Solar segment’s order book totaled EUR 15.3 (27.9) million or 25% of the Group’s total.

Net sales

In 2025, Glaston’s net sales totaled EUR 208.8 (217.9) million. The Architecture segment’s net sales were 3% below the level of the comparison period and totaled EUR 162.2 (166.8) million. The Mobility, Display & Solar segment’s net sales were down 7% and totaled EUR 47.1 (50.5) million. Services’ net sales were up by 3%.

Net sales, EUR million

1–12/2025

1–12/2024

Change%

Architecture

162.2

166.8

-2.8%

Mobility, Display & Solar

47.1

50.5

-6.8%

Total segments

209.2

217.3

-3.7%

Unallocated and eliminations

-0.4

0.7

-159.4%

Total Glaston Group

208.8

217.9

-4.2%

Operating result and profitability

In 2025, comparable EBITA amounted to EUR 14.0 (15.3) million, i.e. 6.7 (7.0)% of net sales. In the Mobility, Display & Solar segment profitability improved, while in the Architecture segment, comparable EBITA fell.

The comparable operating result was EUR 9.5 (11.0) million, i.e. 4.5 (5.1)% of net sales. The Group’s operating result was EUR 4.4 (5.8) million. Items affecting comparability totaled EUR -5.1 (-5.2) million and were related to restructuring costs mainly in Switzerland. Financial income and expenses amounted to EUR -2.2 (-1.6) million. The result before taxes was EUR 1.9 (3.8) million. The result for the financial year was EUR 1.2 (2.5) million. Earnings per share were EUR 0.028 (0.059) and comparable earnings per share were EUR 0.151 (0.185).

M€

1–12/2025

1–12/2024

Change%

Operating result

4.4

5.8

-23.7%

Items affecting comparability (1

5.1

5.2

-3.1%

Comparable EBIT

9.5

11.0

-13.9%

Operating result

4.4

5.8

-23.7%

Amortization and purchase price allocation

4.3

4.0

7.3%

EBITA

8.7

9.8

-11.0%

Items affecting comparability (1

5.1

5.2

-3.1%

Comparable EBITA

14.0

15.3

-8.1%

% of net sales

6.7%

7.0%

-4.1.%

(1 + cost, - income

26

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial development of the reporting segments

Architecture segment’s year in brief

The Architecural market was soft throughout the year

Order intake was down by 5%; order intake for Tempering and Laminating Technologies decreased by 3% and for Insulating Glass Technologies by 6%

Net sales were down by 3%, biggest decrease in Insulating Glass Technologies

The lower margins and volume affected profitability

Architecture key ratios, EUR million

1-12/2025

1–12/2024

Change%

Orders received

140.7

147.3

-4.5%

of which service operations

55.4

57.8

-4.1%

of which service operations, %

39.4%

39.2%

Order book at end of period

46.0

70.3

-34.5%

Net sales

162.2

166.8

-2.8%

of which service operations

61.5

57.3

7.3%

of which service operations, %

37.9%

34.4%

Comparable EBITA

12.5

14.3

-12.2%

Comparable EBITA, %

7.7%

8.6%

Operating result (EBIT)

7.8

8.3

-6.2%

Operating result (EBIT), %

4.8%

5.0%

Mobility, Display & Solar segment’s year in brief

China remained the most active market

Order intake was down by 33% from a high comparison period

Net sales were down by 7% due to lower Services volume

Profitability improved mainly due to lower fixed costs and positive project margin in China

Mobility, display & solar key figures, EUR million

1-12/2025

1-12/2024

Change%

Orders received

36.6

54.3

-32.5%

of which service operations

18.4

19.7

-6.6%

of which service operations, %

50.2%

36.3%

Order book at end of period

15.3

27.9

-45.4%

Net sales

47.1

50.5

-6.8%

of which service operations

19.7

21.2

-7.2%

of which service operations, %

41.9%

42.1%

Comparable EBITA

1.5

0.7

104.2%

Comparable EBITA, %

3.2%

1.4%

Operating result (EBIT)

-3.3

-2.7

-21.4%

Operating result (EBIT), %

-7.1%

-5.4%

27

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial position, cash flow and financing

At the end of December, Glaston Group’s balance sheet total was EUR 172.4 (186.5) million. Intangible assets amounted to EUR 72.1 (75.6) million, of which goodwill was EUR 57.8 (58.5) million. At the end of the period, prop- erty, plant, and equipment amounted to EUR 21.5 (23.1) million and invento- ries to EUR 28.0 (37.0) million.

The comparable return on capital employed (ROCE) was 11.3 (12.6)%.

At the end of December, the com- pany’s net gearing was 43.8 (29.6)%. The equity ratio was 43.3 (43.4)%. Net interest-bearing debt totaled EUR 28.0 (19.8) million.

In January−December 2025, Glas- ton’s cash flow from operating activi- ties was EUR -0.4 (1.5) million. Net cash flow from investing activities was EUR -2.7 (-4.0) million and cash flow from financing activities was EUR 1.5 (-6.1) million.

On December 19, 2025, Glaston signed a new long-term financing agreement, which will be used for refinancing the current financing agreement and for general working capital purposes. The agreement consists of EUR 32 million long-term loans as well as a EUR 25 million revolv- ing credit facility. The agreement

is for three years and includes two one-year options for extension of the loan period. Additionally, Glaston has agreed on bilateral guarantee limits with its financing banks.

Related party transactions are presented in note 7.1 to the Consoli- dated Financial Statements, and the Group’s related party intra group loans are described in notes 12 and 14 in the Financial statements of the Parent company.

Investments and product development

Glaston Group’s January–December 2025 gross capital expenditure totaled EUR 2.7 (4.1) million and was primar- ily related to product development. Depreciation and amortization of property, plant, and equipment, and of intangible assets, totaled EUR -9.4 (-8.5) million.

Automation and digitalization con- tinued to be key themes in product development. The development work focused on projects and innovations related to the automation of key prod- ucts and the further development of robotics and autonomous machines. Tempering and laminating technolo- gies introduced the latest version of Autopilot in June, which offers a fully automated process for variable mixed production in tempering. Autopilot

reduces operator dependency, stabilizes quality, reduces waste and improves overall efficiency. In laminat- ing technologies, the new Autotrim automatic edge processing system increases customer capacity and reduces the need for manual work by automating a traditionally manual process.

In the production of insulating glass, MUNTIN'MASTER’s new cobot solu- tion was completed. It represents an important step towards fully auto- mated production and automates the process of transferring the pre-sorted dividing frames to MUNTIN'MASTER. In addition, the Glaston Batch Optimi- zation solution was introduced, which uses robotic optimization to maxi- mize the production capacity of the tempering line by creating the most efficient loading patterns for the type of glass and its handling requirements.

Other product development pro- jects combined mechanical design and process intelligence. The new glass temperature imaging system enables more precise tempera- ture control of Low-E glass and thus energy-efficient production without compromising on quality. The Aniso- tropy Control solution reduces aniso- tropy levels by up to 50%, thanks to advanced airflow control and temper-

ature regulation. The Adaptive Quench solution automatically adjusts cooling zones according to the length of the load, reducing energy consumption and carbon footprint while maintain- ing production efficiency. All new solutions are also available as upgrade products.

January–December 2025 research and product development expendi- ture, excluding depreciation, totaled EUR 8.2 (10.3) million, of which EUR 1.4 (1.9) million was capitalized. Research and product development expend- iture amounted to 3.9 (4.7)% of net sales.

Cost reduction program

In August 2025, Glaston announced a program to improve the company’s efficiency and reduce costs to ensure profitable performance, including, among other actions, a review of the operating model. Also, measures for adapting the company’s structure and ways of working to meet the lower than expected demand were announced.

As a result, Glaston sharpened its organizational model ensuring clear accountability across Market Areas, Solutions & Operations. Also, Services and Group functions ICT and Market- ing were reorganized to better align

28

Glaston Annual Review 2025

and support business growth.

As part of the program, strict cost control measures were implemented in all main operating countries. Also, a comprehensive review of the cost structure was carried out to lower the overall cost base. Measures to improve the efficiency of the supply chain were implemented by centralizing activities, and spare parts operations in Switzerland were transferred to Germany.

In Finland, change negotiations were completed during September 2025. The negotiations identified the need for temporary lay-offs in Finland in the period November 2025−June 2026. In Germany, reduced work- ing hours have been applied since December. In Glaston’s other loca- tions, readiness to respond to poten- tial market softening in accordance with local regulations were ensured.

The cost savings actions imple- mented by the end of the fourth quar- ter will lead to annual run rate savings of EUR 4.2 million and will be realized during 2026. As earlier communicated, Glaston expects that the planned measures will result in annual cost savings reaching approximately EUR 6 million.

Intangible resources

Glaston is the glass processing industry’s innovative technology leader and the company’s position is particularly strong as a developer of the most technologically demanding products. To remain at the forefront of the development of glass process- ing equipment and services, Glaston invests significantly in the continuous development of its technology portfo- lio and its research and development activities. Glaston holds patents for its key solutions and has been defending its Intellectual Property Rights. The Glaston trademark has a compre- hensive protection in countries where Glaston operates.

The company’s strength is its skilled, goal-oriented and motivated personnel and the company ensures continuous development of its employees’ expertise. In addition, the organization has a wealth of valuable skills built up through experience.

Organization & personnel

With the aim of strengthening its focus on customer experience, espe- cially in services, and ensuring positive profitability development, Glaston’s new organizational structure with the Business Functions Market Areas, Solutions & Operations, and Services

came into effect on January 1, 2025. To ensure clear accountability across Market Areas, Solutions & Operations and Services, and to guarantee an efficient and smooth One Glaston performance, the organizational model was sharpened in August. Also, Group functions ICT and Marketing were reorganized to better align and support business growth.

One of Glaston’s strategic goals is to increase the employee engage- ment rate to a level over 75 (on a scale of 1–100). To measure the engage- ment, eight personnel pulse surveys were conducted during the year. The engagement rate improved from the previous year and was 78 (76) and 684 employees across the organization responded to the survey.

A DEI (diversity, equity and inclu- sion) roadmap was approved by the Executive Leadership Team in December 2024, and the implemen- tation started in 2025. The aim of the roadmap is to create a diverse, equal and inclusive work environment for all employees regardless of their background or whether they belong to a minority. As a step towards a workplace where everyone feels valued and respected, a DEI online training program was launched in October 2025. The target set in the

DEI roadmap is for the proportion of women to be 20% in the entire organization and 40% in the Executive Leadership Team by the end of 2027. In 2025, the proportion of women among the personnel was 18 (17)%.

On December 31, 2025, Glaston Group had 772 (817) employees. At the end of December, the Architec- ture segment employed 602 (619) and the Mobility, Display & Solar segment employed 170 (197) people. Of the Group’s personnel, 38% worked in Germany, 25 % worked in Finland, 7% worked elsewhere in the EMEA area, 24% worked in Asia, and 6% worked in the Americas. In 2025, the Group had an average of 799 (809) employees.

Changes to the Executive Leadership Team

In February 2025, Glaston announced that President & CEO Toni Laaksonen had submitted his resignation from his position as the President & CEO of Glaston Corporation to join another company. Glaston’s Board of Directors appointed Miika Äppelqvist as Presi- dent & CEO of Glaston Corporation as of June 1, 2025. Äppelqvist took over as CEO from the position of Glaston’s Chief Solutions & Operations Officer.

Magnus Sjöblom was appointed CFO in December 2024 and he took

29

Glaston Annual Review 2025

up the position on March 1, 2025, suc- ceeding Päivi Lindqvist, who decided to leave Glaston for a position outside the company.

On March 17, 2025, Glaston announced that Robert Jenks was appointed EVP Service Supply & Development (EVP Services as of July 1, 2025) and a member of the Execu- tive Leadership Team. He took up the position on April 1, 2025.

On May 6, 2025, Glaston announced two appointments to the Executive Leadership Team with immediate effect. SVP Sales & Service, Americas Joe Butler was appointed EVP Sales & Service, Americas, and SVP Sales & Service APAC Kimmo Kuusela was appointed EVP Sales & Service, EMEA and APAC. In connection with these changes, as of May 6, 2025, the Chief Sales Officer role was no longer part of the Executive Leadership Team and Chief Sales officer Sasu Koivumäki left the company.

On June 25, 2025, Glaston announ- ced two appointments to the Execu- tive Leadership Team. SVP Insulating Glass Jens Mayr was appointed as EVP Solutions and Operations as of July 1, 2025 and Minna Toiviainen was appointed as General Counsel, suc- ceeding Kaisa Latva, who had decided to leave Glaston to join another com-

pany. Minna Toiviainen took up her position on September 15, 2025.

On December 31, 2025 the com- position of the Executive Leader- ship Team was the following; Miika Äppelqvist (CEO), Joe Butler (EVP Sales & Service, Americas), Robert Jenks (EVP Services), Kimmo Kuu- sela (EVP Sales & Service, EMEA & APAC), Riikka Laitasalo (SVP People & Culture), Jens Mayr (EVP Solutions & Operations), Magnus Sjöblom (CFO), Minna Toiviainen (General Counsel).

Strategy

A strategy update process was initi- ated in the summer to ensure that the growth and profitability targets are met. In the final quarter, the strategy process progressed in line with plans.

In October, Glaston’s second brand, Uniglass, was launched. With Uniglass, Glaston is broadening its product portfolio to increase the company’s addressable market. Uniglass brings a new offering especially to the EMEA and Americas regions at a new value price point. Uniglass’ digital and scal- able sales model enables fast and transparent interaction with custom- ers. Uniglass’ offering, which currently covers tempering and insulating tech- nologies has been well received in its target groups.

Development versus strategic medium-term targets

For the strategic targets, net sales decreased by 4% compared to the previous year. Glaston estimates that in 2025, the Architectural markets in China and EMEA stayed flat at the previous year's lower level, while they

declined in Americas and the rest of APAC. The mobility market in China returned to a more normal level after a record year in 2024 and elsewhere stayed flat. The comparable EBITA margin fell slightly to 6.7%. The com- parable return on capital employed (ROCE) fell to 11.3%.

Strategic targets

2025

2024

2023

Net sales annual average exceeding the addressable equipment market growth

-4%

-1%

+3%

Comparable EBITA 10%

6.7%

7.0%

6.8%

Comparable ROCE >16%

11.3%

12.6%

12.7%

Net Promoter Score (NPS) > 40

37

64

62

Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) zero

5.8

5.7

6.3

Employee engagement over 75 out of 100

78

76

70

GHG emissions reduction targets by 2032:

Reduce absolute scope 1 and scope 2 GHG emissions by 50.4% by 2032, compared to the 2022 base year

1,498

tCO 2 e

1,539

tCO 2 e

1,238

tCO 2 e

Reduce the scope 3 GHG emissions by 58.1% per square meter of sold machine processing capacity by FY2032 (emission intensity)

0.00022

tCO 2 /m 2

0.00017

tCO 2 /m 2

0.00036 tCO 2 /m 2

In 2025, the lost time injury frequency rate was 5.8 (5.7) as the number of accidents was the same as in 2024, nine in total. For employee engage- ment, the target was met and the engagement rate improved even fur-

ther and was 78 (76). NPS decreased and was 37 (64). In 2024, the number of respondents for NPS was relatively low and therefore the result cannot be considered fully representative.

30

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Shareholder

Number of shares

% of shares and votes

1

Ahlstrom Capital Bv

11,122,858

26.4%

2

Hymy Lahtinen Oy

5,150,081

12.2%

3

Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company

3,159,031

7.5%

4

Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company

3,081,251

7.3%

5

Sinituote Oy

2,093,912

5.0%

6

Nordea Nordic Small Cap Fund

1,597,619

3.8%

7

Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ) Helsinki branch

846,955

2.0%

8

Veli-Matti Reinikkala

653,218

1.5%

9

4capes Oy

650,000

1.5%

10

Mininvest Oy

491,246

1.2%

10 largest shareholders total

28,846,171

68.4%

Nominee registered shareholders

1,233,413

2.9%

Others

12,066,221

28.6%

Total

42,145,805

100.0%

Largest shareholders 31 December 2025

Shareholders by share ownership 31 December, 2025

Number of shares

Number of share- holders

% of shareholders

Shares total

% of shares and votes

1 - 100

2,595

37.43%

105,762

0.25%

101 - 1,000

2,831

40.83%

1,171,789

2.78%

1,001 - 10,000

1,303

18.79%

3,869,521

9.18%

10,001 - 100,000

174

2.51%

4,745,270

11.26%

100,001 - 99,999,999

30

0.43%

32,253,463

76.53%

Total

6,933

100.0%

42,145,805

100.0%

Number of shares issued

42,145,805

100.0%

The share ownership of the Board of Directors and the Executive Leadership Team is presented in Note 7.1 of the consolidated financial statements.

Ownership distribution 31 December, 2025

Shares total

% of shares and votes

Households

10,178,494

24.15%

Public sector institutions

6,240,282

14.81%

Financial and insurance institutions

1,886,435

4.48%

Corporations

10,645,756

25.26%

Non-profit institutions

13,672

0.03%

Foreign countries

11,947,753

28.35%

Total

40,912,392

97.07%

Nominee registered

1,233,413

2.93%

Total

42,145,805

100.0%

Total

42,145,805

100.0%

Shares and shareholders

Glaston Corporation’s shares are listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki Small Cap list. The trading code is GLA1V and the ISIN code is FI4000587340. Each share entitles its holder to one vote and voting right. Glaston Corporation’s share capital on December 31, 2025, was EUR 12.7 (12.7) million.

1.1.-31.12.2025

No. of shares

Share turnover, EUR million

GLA1V

42,145,805

6.4

Highest

Lowest

Closing

Average price * )

Share price

1.70

1.10

1.13

1.30

31.12.2025

31.12.2024

Market value

47.4

65.7

Number of shareholders

6,933

7,391

Foreign ownership, %

28.3

28.0

* ) trading-weighted average

31

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Reverse share split

The Annual General Meeting (AGM) decided on April 16, 2025, to merge the company's shares and on the related share redemption so that after the consolidation, every two (2) shares of the company correspond to one (1) share in the company.

The reverse share split was exe- cuted on April 22, 2025, and included a directed share issue without con- sideration, the redemption of shares, and the cancellation of the redeemed shares. After these measures, the new number of outstanding shares in the company is 42,145,805. Trading with the new total number and ISIN code of shares commenced on April 23, 2025.

Share-based incentive plan

For key employees, Glaston has a share-based incentive plan for the period 2022−2026. The Performance Share Plan comprises three perfor- mance periods: the calendar years 2022−2024, 2023−2025, and 2024−2026. The Board of Directors decides on the plan’s performance criteria and the performance levels at the beginning of each performance period.

Performance Period 2023−2025

The potential reward for the perfor- mance period 2023−2025 was based

on Glaston Group’s cumulative com- parable EBITA, cumulative Services net sales and cumulative earnings per share during the period January 1, 2023− December 31, 2025. The tar- gets were only partially met and the reward will be paid in 2026 in a manner resolved by the Board of Directors. In total, 7 key persons, including the company’s key executive leaders, belonged to the target group of the plan in the performance period 2023–2025.

Performance Period 2024−2026

The potential reward for the perfor- mance period 2024−2026 is based on the Glaston Group’s cumulative com- parable EBITA, cumulative services net sales, and cumulative earnings per share during January 1, 2024−Decem- ber 31, 2026. In total, 8 key employees, including the company’s key execu- tive leaders, belong to the plan’s tar- get group in the performance period 2024–2026.

In February 2025, the Board of Directors resolved on the share-based incentive plan 2025−2029 for the Group key employees in accordance with the terms and conditions mate- rially corresponding to the terms and conditions of the share-based incen- tive plan 2019−2023. The share-based

incentive plan 2025−2029 comprises three performance periods, calen- dar years 2025−2027, 2026−2028, and 2027−2029.

Performance Period 2025−2027

The potential reward for the perfor- mance period 2025−2027 is based on the Glaston Group’s Cumulative com- parable EBITA, cumulative Service Net Sales, and annual Earnings per Share during January 1, 2025−December 31, 2027. In total, 9 key employees, includ- ing the company’s key executive lead- ers, belong to the plan’s target group in the performance period 2025–2027.

Glaston has signed a contract with an external service provider for the administration of the share-based incentive plans for the company’s key employees and for the acquisition of the shares. At the end of 2025, the shares on the balance sheet were 100,733 shares.

Governance

Annual General Meeting 2025

The Annual General Meeting of Glas- ton Corporation was held on April 16, 2025 in Helsinki. The General Meeting adopted the financial statements and consolidated financial statements for the financial period from January 1 to

December 31, 2024 and discharged the members of the Board of Direc- tors and the President and CEO from liability for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2024.

In accordance with the proposal of the Board of Directors, the General Meeting resolved to authorize the Board of Directors to resolve on a later date on a repayment of capital for a maximum amount of EUR 4,635,945 or EUR 0.11 per share calculated on the number of outstanding shares after the execution of the reverse share split, to be distributed for the financial year ended on 31 December 2024.

Adoption of the Remuneration Report for governing bodies

In accordance with the proposal of the Board of Directors, the General Meeting resolved to adopt the Remu- neration Report for the governing bodies. The resolution on the adoption of the Remuneration Report is advi- sory.

Adoption of the Remuneration Policy for governing bodies

The General Meeting decided to adopt the Remuneration Policy for the governing bodies. The resolution on the adoption of the Remuneration Report is advisory.

32

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Composition of the Board of Directors

The number of members of the Board of Directors was resolved to be seven. Veli-Matti Reinikkala, Sebas- tian Bondestam, Antti Kaunonen, Arja Talma, Tero Telaranta and Michael Willome were re-elected as members of the Board of Directors and Tina Wu as a new member.

Remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors

The General Meeting resolved that the annual fee of the members of the Board of Directors are the follow- ing: Chair of the Board of Directors is paid an annual fee of EUR 74,000, the Deputy Chair an annual fee of EUR 45,000 and the other members of the Board of Directors an annual fee of EUR 35,000.

Further, the General Meeting resolved that a member of the Board of Directors may, at his/her discre- tion, choose to receive the annual fixed remuneration partly in com- pany shares and partly in cash so that approximately 40% of the annual fixed remuneration is paid in Glaston Cor- poration’s shares.

In addition, the General Meeting resolved, that meeting fees shall be paid for each meeting of the Board of Directors that a Member of the Board

has attended so that the Chair of the Board is paid EUR 800 for meetings held in the Chair’s home country and EUR 1,500 for meetings held else- where and the other Members of the Board are paid EUR 500 for meetings held in their home country and EUR 1,000 for meetings held elsewhere. For per capsulum Board Meetings, half of the normal meeting fee will be paid. Furthermore, it was resolved that each Member of the Board will be compensated for travel and accom- modation costs and direct expenses arising from their work for the Board of Directors in line with the Company’s normal practice.

In addition, the General Meeting resolved that all members of the Audit and People and Remuneration Com- mittees will be paid a meeting fee of EUR 500 for each meeting attended. In addition to the meeting fee, the Chair of the Audit Committee will be paid an annual fee of EUR 10,000 and the Chair of the People and Remu- neration Committee will be paid an annual fee of EUR 7,500.

Auditor

The General Meeting elected the authorized public accounting firm KPMG Oy Ab as the Company’s audi- tor. KPMG was also selected to carry

out the assurance of the company’s sustainability reporting for the finan- cial year 2025.

Reverse share split

In accordance with the proposal of the Board of Directors, the General Meeting resolved on a reverse share split, so that each two (2) current shares of the company correspond to one (1) share of the company, and thereto related redemption of shares and authorized the Board of Directors to decide on a directed share issue without consideration.

Authorization to the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase as well as on the acceptance as pledge of the company’s own shares

The General Meeting authorized the Board of Directors to decide on the repurchase of the Company's own shares. The number of own shares to be repurchased or accepted as pledge shall not exceed 4,000,000 shares, which corresponds to approx- imately 10 per cent of all registered shares in the company after the reverse share split, subject to the pro- visions of the Finnish Companies’ Act on the maximum amount of shares owned by or pledged to the company or its subsidiaries. The authorization

is effective until June 30, 2026 and it revokes corresponding earlier author- izations.

Authorization to the Board of Directors to decide on the issuance of shares, as well as the issuance of options and other rights entitling to shares

The General Meeting authorized the Board of Directors to resolve one or more issuances of shares which contain the right to issue new shares or dispose of the shares in the pos- session of the Company and to issue options or other rights entitling to shares pursuant to Chapter 10 of the Finnish Companies Act. The author- ization consists of up to 4,000,000 shares in the aggregate representing approximately 10 per cent of shares in the company after the reverse share split.

The authorization does not exclude the Board of Directors' right to decide on a directed issue of shares. The Board of Directors was authorized to resolve on all terms and conditions of the issuance of shares, options and other rights entitling to shares as referred to in Chapter 10 of the Com- panies Act. The authorization is effec- tive until June 30, 2026 and it revokes corresponding earlier authorizations.

33

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Organization of the Board of Directors

Convening after the Annual Gen- eral Meeting, the Board of Directors re-elected Veli-Matti Reinikkala as the Chair of the Board and Sebastian Bondestam as Deputy Chair of the Board. In addition, the composition of the Board committees was resolved to be as follows:

Audit Committee: Arja Talma (Chair), Tero Telaranta, Tina Wu

People and Remuneration Com- mittee: Veli-Matti Reinikkala (Chair), Sebastian Bondestam, Antti Kau- nonen, Michael Willome

Repayment of capital

The AGM resolved to authorize the Board of Directors to decide at a later date on a repayment of capital of a maximum amount of EUR 0.11 per share in one or more instalments after the execution of the reverse share split.

In accordance with the authoriza- tion, the Board of Directors decided on May 5, 2025, on the first instalment of the return of capital of EUR 0.06 per share. The capital repayment record date was May 8, 2025, and the repay- ment date May 15, 2025. Due to the subdued business environment and low order intake development during the second and third quarters of 2025,

Glaston Corporation’s Board of Direc- tors decided on November 28, 2025 not to exercise its authorization to pay a second instalment of the return of capital.

Shareholders’ Nomination Board

On September 24, 2025, Glaston announced the composition of the Shareholders Nomination Board. The Shareholders’ Nomination Board comprises one member appointed by each of the four largest shareholders of Glaston Corporation. The share- holders entitled to appoint a member are determined on the basis of the company’s shareholder register main- tained by Euroclear Finland Ltd. on the first working day in September.

Based on the ownership on Sep- tember 1, 2025, the following persons were nominated as members of the Nomination Board: Jyrki Vainionpää (Ahlstrom Capital BV), Jaakko Kurikka (Hymy Lahtinen Oy), Pekka Pajamo (Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company), and Esko Torsti (Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company). Veli-Matti Reinikkala, Chair of the Company’s Board of Directors, has served as an advisory member of the Nomination Board.

At its organizing meeting on September 24, 2025, the Nomination

Board elected Jyrki Vainionpää from amongst its members as the Chair.

Business risks

Glaston continuously analyses and evaluates risks that may result from changes in the business environment or the company’s operational activ- ities and plans for mitigation actions. The risk factors described below may potentially negatively impact the com- pany’s business and financial status and therefore the company’s value.

Strategic risks

A review of strategic risks is part of the Group’s strategic planning process. A risk is defined as strategic where, if realized, it may have long-term effects on the business.

Business and market environment risks

The company operates worldwide and business cycles and megatrends in the global economy directly impact the company’s operating conditions. Demand for the company's products is influenced by global, regional and national macroeconomic conditions, which affect the end users of its prod- ucts. As a result, Glaston is exposed to business cycles in its customers’ industries, in particular the construc- tion and mobility industries.

Currently, business operations globally are impacted by prolonged geopolitical instability and uncertainty of trade policies. These all contribute to a slowdown in global economic growth and investment activity, and therefore pose a risk to the company's operations and profitability. Given the uncertainties of the real estate market in China, special focus is put on the company’s strategy in China. Glaston is actively developing its offering in the higher-growth mobility market, thereby strengthening its competi- tiveness in the Chinese markets.

The general increase in market uncertainty may reduce customers’ willingness to invest, thereby nega- tively impacting Glaston’s order intake, net sales and earnings.

For Glaston, the US architectural glass machines market is important. Currently, US trade policy is subject to unpredictability and any new taxes imposed on the country's imports could have an impact on Glaston's business and economic development.

Changing consumer behavior, tighter regulation and changes in global automotive trade flows have led to a shift in the investments of mobil- ity industry customers. Prolonged disruption and structural changes in the mobility market could impact

34

Glaston Annual Review 2025

demand for the Group’s mobility glass processing machines. Supported by the transition to electric vehicles, the Chinese mobility production has developed favorably, which has driven demand for Glaston’s pre-processing technology. However, there are signs of a market slowdown. Also, uncer- tainty related to trade policies and tariffs could impact Glaston’s business in this industry.

Increasing mobility glass require- ments present new challenges for glass processing, bringing new players to the market and creating new opportunities for glass processing technology suppliers. From a technical perspective, environmental require- ments will be met through, among other things, the use of lighter vehicle structures, on which thin glass, in par- ticular, will have a positive impact.

In addition to sales of new machines, the company is focusing on increasing its services business, with the aim of partially balancing its cycli- cally sensitive business and improving its profitability. However, the growth in the Services business could fall short of expectations as continued market uncertainty affecting the machine uti- lization rate would affect the service business and service demand. Glas- ton is constantly evaluating opportuni-

ties to maximize service revenue e.g. through active installed base man- agement.

Competitive situation and price risks

Competition in the glass process- ing machines and services market is intense, and Glaston competes with several multinational companies and regional manufacturers and service providers, as well as indirectly also with its customers’ operations. The intensification of competition may lead to a deterioration of order intake, project margins or terms of payment, thereby adversely impacting Glaston’s business. Existing or new competi- tors may expand into one or more of the company’s key markets or may seek to increase their market share through aggressive pricing strategies or other means. For example, in China, which is the largest market for the glass processing industry, purchasing behavior is more cost-conscious than in other market areas. Consequently, price competition is intense and local players have a certain competitive advantage in the market.

Glaston’s strategy identifies opportunities for the company to strengthen its market position and cost competitiveness as well as seek growth by developing its product

range to better meet the needs of customers in the glass processing market.

Technology and IPR risks

One of Glaston’s most significant stra- tegic risks is technology risk, i.e. the entry into the market by a competing machine or glass processing technol- ogy, which would result in a reduction of Glaston’s market shares and require the company to make considerable investments in product development to stay competitive in the market. This risk could also be realized if Glas- ton’s technology would need to be changed or seized to avoid infringing third-party rights.

Sustainability

Sustainability is an integral part of Glaston’s strategy and as the innova- tive leader in its industry, the compa- ny’s ambition is to remain at the fore- front of moving the industry towards a more sustainable future.

Glass processing is energy intensive and affects the environment through electricity consumption and its emissions. Glaston has set ambitious Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emis- sions reduction targets to be achieved by 2032. Insufficient progress in emis- sions reduction targets may constitute

a risk and could lead to a negative impact on its reputation. Therefore, a key focus of Glaston’s product devel- opment work continues to be on the energy efficiency of products. As a result, customers can process their glass with lower electricity consump- tion than before. Further, there is also a risk that the company may not be able to harness the sustainability-re- lated growth opportunities.

Glaston’s sustainability risks and opportunities have been assessed as part of the Double Materiality Assess- ment (DMA) as outlined in the Corpo- rate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). In the DMA process, the most relevant sustainability topics in terms of the company's strategy, business model, risks and opportunities as well as impacts have been identified, and are separately discussed in the ESRS part of this report.

Compliance and corruption risk

Glaston recognizes the risk of becom- ing the target of third-party fraud as well as the possibility of corruption and fraud in the company’s operating areas. Glaston’s operations are guided by its Code of Conduct approved by the company’s Board of Directors. The company always adheres to high ethical operating principles and

35

Glaston Annual Review 2025

requires strict compliance with its anti-corruption procedures. The Code of Conduct describes the compa- ny’s requirements and expectations regarding responsible and ethical conduct. In addition, the Code of Conduct guides Glaston’s employees in their daily work with colleagues, customers, suppliers and other stake- holders. The topics covered include workplace conduct and responsible business practices as well as the environment and sustainable develop- ment. All personnel are trained in the Code of Conduct.

In order to put particular atten- tion on risks related to bribery and corruption, the Code of Conduct is complemented by the Anti-bribery and anti-corruption policy approved by the Board of Directors. The purpose of this policy is to increase Glaston employees’ awareness of the risk of corrupt payments, to unequivocally prohibit the payment and receipt of bribes, and to ensure that the com- pany conducts business honestly, in accordance with ethical standards and in compliance with anti-corrup- tion laws, rules and regulations. Local guidelines supplement the Group- level guidelines.

Glaston has a whistleblowing channel, which allows for anonymous

reporting for both internal and exter- nal stakeholders on any suspected violations of the Code of Conduct and other guidelines.

Operational risks

Operational risk management forms part of the daily work of business areas. Opportunities and risks are identified, assessed and managed on an ongoing basis.

Glaston’s most significant opera- tional risks include management and possible quality problems related to demanding customer projects, man- agement of the contractual partner and subcontractor network, product development and commercialization of new products, succeeding in the protection and efficient production of intellectual property rights as well as the availability and permanence of expert personnel. In some cases, the possible failure of even a single project may have significant financial impli- cations if its size or contractual terms and conditions are exceptional.

Data and cyber security risks

Glaston continually develops its infor- mation systems and, despite care- ful planning, temporary disruptions to operations might be associated with the introduction stages of new

systems. Because of the industrial internet and general development in the field of information systems, the significance of cyber security risks has increased, and the management of such risks is subject to particu- lar attention. Severe cyber security attacks may impact the company’s ability to conduct its business opera- tions without interruptions. The com- pany’s Information Security Policy lists the targets and principles and defines the responsibilities with respect to information security. The Informa- tion Security Policy is reviewed and audited regularly.

Disruptions in supply chains

Glaston actively mitigates the risks related to raw materials and compo- nent prices and availability as major supply chain disruptions may impact the company’s performance.

Other operational risks

The successful growth of the Group’s operations requires successful management, qualified talent that matches the business needs and the controlled growth of resources. In addition, digitalization is bringing new requirements for technological and business management expertise. The Group’s ability to attract talent and

maintain a high level of job satisfac- tion among its employees is further emphasized.

Glaston’s balance sheet contains a substantial amount of goodwill. A prolonged period of low demand may lead to a situation in which Glaston’s recoverable amounts are insufficient to cover the carrying amounts of asset items, particularly goodwill. If this happens, it will be necessary to recognize an impairment loss, which, when implemented, will weaken the result and equity.

Financial risks

The Group’s most significant financial risks are foreign exchange, liquidity, credit, interest rate and refinancing risks. Financial risks and their manage- ment are presented in note 5.4. of the financial statements,

The Group’s risk management pro- cesses are described in the Corporate Governance Statement.

Corporate Governance Statement

Glaston has published a separate Corporate governance statement for 2025. The statement is available on the company’s website.

36

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Short-term risks and business uncertainties

The ongoing uncertainty in the global business environment with its impact on the Architectural market continues to constitute the main short-term risk for Glaston. The uncertainty of trade policies and geopolitical instability may affect the company’s customers and suppliers. The prolonged process surrounding US tariffs has affected market activity, with local customers being very cautious with their invest- ment plans.

Typically, demand for Glaston’s products and services for the Archi- tectural market is affected by general economic cycles, particularly the level of activity within the construction industry. The construction market is expected to develop unevenly. Cautious development is predicted to continue in the Americas, particularly in North America. Elsewhere in Asia and in EMEA, particularly in the Middle East, the prospects are somewhat better.

Supported by the transition to electric vehicles, China is the Mobility market’s most active region. In China, the market growth is expected to continue, albeit at a slower pace, and demand for pre-processing technol- ogies has normalized from the high

levels in the previous years. Outside China, demand is below typical levels. However, there has been growing interest in the company’s mobility heat treatment technologies.

Glaston continuously monitors the global economy’s development out- look and its impact on the progress of its markets. If the weaker demand environment continues, this will affect Glaston’s net sales and earnings in the machines’ businesses, with a delay of four to six months. Any material slowdown in the demand for ser- vices would have a faster impact. The company’s services business, which account for 39% of the company’s net sales, is less cyclical and provides stability for the business. Also, project business in general could be affected by market uncertainty. Tighter availa- bility and the higher cost of financing may also increase customer-related credit risks.

Glaston delivers projects involving risks related to engineering, project execution, and installation. Failure to plan or manage these projects could lead to higher-than-estimated costs, revenue recognition delays, or dis- putes with customers.

In recent years, cyber security risks have increased. Potential cyber threats could cause various forms of

operational and financial damage to the company.

Major supply chain disruptions may impact the company’s performance as component scarcity may cause revenue recognition delays, whereas significantly increased raw materials prices may add to short-term profita- bility pressure.

Labor shortages and employee turnover are concerns in the mar- ket. Glaston’s ability to maintain a high level of job satisfaction among its employees and also attract new employees is further emphasized.

37

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Per Share Data

2025

2024*

2023*

Earnings per share, EUR

0.028

0.059

0.120

Comparable earnings per share

0.151

0.185

0.208

Return of capital per share, EUR

-

0.060

0.100

Return of capital ratio, %

-

101.8%

83.5%

Return of capital yield

-

3.8%

6.8%

Return of capital , EUR million

-

2.5

4.2

Adjusted equity attributable to owners of the parent per share, EUR

1.52

1.59

1.65

Price per earnings per share (P/E) ratio

39.8

26.5

12.3

Price per equity attributable to owners of the parent per share

0.74

0.98

0.89

Number of shares at the end of the year

42,145,805

42,145,805

42,145,805

Number of shares at the end of the year, excluding treasury shares

42,045,073

42,028,873

42,020,805

Number of shares, average, excluding treasury shares

42,039,436

42,032,581

42,109,834

2025

2024*

2023*

Share price and turnover

Share price, year high, EUR

1.70

1.96

2.18

Share price, year low, EUR

1.10

1.44

1.38

Share price, volume-weighted year average, EUR

1.30

1.67

1.78

Share price, end of year, EUR

1.13

1.56

1.47

Number of shares traded (1,000)

4,919

6,049

3,590

% of average number of registered shares

11.7%

14.4%

8.5%

Market capitalization of registered shares, end of year, treasury shares excluded, EUR million

47.4

65.7

61.9

* On 22 April 2025, a reverse share split (2:1) was carried out. The number of shares, the share price in the comparison period, and the key figures calculated from them have been adjusted accordingly.

38

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial Ratios

EUR thousand

2025

2024

2023

Income statement and profitability

Net sales

208,846

217,945

219,708

Operating result

4,417

5,787

8,144

% of net sales

2.1%

2.7%

3.7%

Comparable operating result (EBIT)

9,487

11,020

11,418

% of net sales

4.5%

5.1%

5.2%

Comparable EBITA

14,019

15,261

14,869

% of net sales

6.7%

7.0%

6.8%

Financial income and expenses (net)

-2,515

-1,984

-1,272

% of net sales

-1.2%

-0.9%

-0.6%

Result before income taxes and non- controlling interests

1,902

3,803

6,872

% of net sales

0.9%

1.7%

3.1%

Income taxes

-712

-1,325

-1,830

Net profit / loss attributable to owners of the parent

1,191

2,478

5,042

% of net sales

0.6%

1.1%

2.3%

Return on capital employed (ROCE), %

4.8%

6.0%

8.1%

Comprable return on capital employed (Comparable ROCE), %

11.3%

12.6%

12.7%

Return on equity, %

1.8%

3.6%

7.3%

Gross capital expenditure

2,687

4,120

7,542

% of net sales

1.3%

1.9%

3.4%

Order book, EUR million

61.3

98.2

106.5

EUR thousand

2025

2024

2023

Statement of financial position and solvency

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

40,113

46,189

47,970

Goodwill

57,775

58,524

58,154

Non-current assets total

101,509

108,827

108,209

Equity attributable to owners of the parent

63,839

66,844

69,313

Liabilities

108,520

119,682

127,154

Total assets

172,359

186,527

196,466

Capital employed

100,650

98,907

100,394

Net interest-bearing debt

27,955

19,779

10,929

Equity ratio, %

43.3%

43.4%

45.2%

Gearing, %

57.7%

48.0%

44.8%

Net gearing, %

43.8%

29.6%

15.8%

Personnel

Personnel, average

799

809

804

Personnel, at the end of the period

772

817

802

39

Glaston Annual Review 2025

EUR thousand

2025

2024

2023

Comparable operating result (EBIT) and EBITA

Operating result

4,417

5,787

8,144

Items affecting comparability

5,070

5,233

3,274

Comparable EBIT

9,486

11,019

11,417

Operating result

4,417

5,787

8,144

Amortization and purchase price allocation

4,532

4,241

3,451

Items affecting comparability (1

5,070

5,233

3,274

Comparable EBITA

14,019

15,261

14,869

% of net sales

6.7%

7.0%

6.8%

EUR thousand

2025

2024

2023

Comparable ROCE% and EPS

Profit/loss for the period before taxes

1,902

3,803

6,872

Financial expenses

2,895

2,142

1,401

Purchase price allocation

1,380

1380

1,380

Items affecting comparability

5,070

5,233

3,274

Total

11,247

12,558

12,927

Equity

63,839

66,844

69,313

Interest bearing liabilities

36,811

32,063

31,082

Avg (1.1.and end of period)

99,778

99,651

102,184

Comparable ROCE% annualized

11.3%

12.6%

12.7%

Profit/loss for the period

1,191

2,478

5,042

Purchase price allocation

1,380

1,380

1,380

Items affecting comparability

5,070

5,233

3,274

Tax

-1,290

-1,323

-931

Total

6,350

7,769

8,766

Number of shares , average

42,039

84,063

84,218

Comparable earnings per share

0.151

0.092

0.104

The reconciliation of alternative performance measures

(1 + cost, - income

40

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Definition of key ratios

Per share data

Earnings per share (EPS):

Net result attributable to owners of the parent

Average number of shares outstanding

Diluted earnings per share:

Net result attributable to owners of the parent

Average diluted number of shares outstanding

Dividend per share*:

Dividends paid

Number of issued shares at end of the period

Dividend payout ratio*:

(Dividend per share x 100)

Earnings per share

Dividend yield per share*:

(Dividend per share x 100)

Share price at end of the period

Equity attributable to owners of the parent per share:

Equity attributable to owners of the parent at end of the period

Number of shares at end of the period, excluding treasury shares

Average trading price:

Shares traded (EUR)

Shares traded (volume)

Price per earnings per share (P/E):

Share price at end of the period

Earnings per share (EPS)

Price per equity attributable to owners of the parent per share:

Share price at end of the period

Equity attributable to owners of the parent per share

Share turnover:

The proportion of number of shares traded during the period to weighted average number of shares, excluding treasury shares

Market capitalization:

Number of shares at end of the period x share price at end of the period

Number of shares at period end:

Number of issued shares - treasury shares

*The definition is also applied with return of capital

Financial ratios

EBITDA:

Profit / loss before depreciation, amortization and impairment

Operating result (EBIT):

Profit / loss after depreciation, amortization and impairment

41

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash + other financial assets (includes cash and cash equivalents at amortized cost)

Net interest-bearing debt:

Interest-bearing liabilities (includes interest-bearing liabilities at amortized cost) - cash and cash equivalents

Financial expenses:

Interest expenses of financial liabilities + fees of financing arrangements + foreign currency differences of financial liabilities

Equity ratio. %:

Equity (Equity attributable to owners of the parent + non-controlling interest) x 100

Total assets - advance payments received

Gearing, %:

(Interest-bearing liabilities x 100)

Equity (Equity attributable to owners of the parent + non-controlling interest)

Net gearing, %:

(Net interest-bearing debt x 100)

Equity (Equity attributable to owners of the parent + non-controlling interest)

Return on capital employed, % (ROCE):

(Profit / loss before taxes + financial expenses x 100)

Equity + interest-bearing liabilities, average of 1 January and end of the Financial year

Return on equity, % (ROE):

(Profit / loss for the Financial year x 100)

Equity (Equity attributable to owners of the parent + non-controlling interest), average of 1 January and end of the Financial year

Comparable EBIT:

Operating result after depreciation, amortization and impairment, +/- items affecting comparability

Comparable EBITDA:

Operating result before depreciation, amortization and impairment, +/- items affecting comparability

Comparable EBITA:

Operating result before amortization, impairment of intangible assets and purchase price allocation +/- items affecting comparability+ large, expensed cloud-comput- ing investments

Comparable return on capital employed, % (Comparable ROCE):

(Profit / loss before taxes + amortization of purchase price allocations +/- items affecting comparability + financial expenses x 100) / Equity + interest-bearing liabilities, average of 1 January and end of the Financial year

Comparable earnings per share (Comparable EPS):

Net result attributable to owners of the parent +/- (items affecting comparability+ amortization of purchase price allocations) net of tax / Average number of shares

Items affecting comparability:

Items affecting comparability are adjusted for non-business transactions or changes in valuation items when they arise from restructuring, acquisitions and dis- posals, related integration and separation costs, sale or impairment of assets. These may include staff reductions, rationalization of the product range, restructuring of the production structure, and reduction of premises.

Impairment losses on goodwill, gains or losses on disposals due to changes in the group structure, exceptionally large gains or losses on tangible and intangible assets, exceptional compensations for damages and legal proceedings are restated as an item affecting comparability.

42

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Events after the reporting period

On January 13, 2026, the Proposals of Glaston Corporation’s Sharehold- ers’ Nomination Board to the Annual General Meeting 2026 were disclosed. The Nomination Board proposes that seven (7) members shall be elected to the Board of Directors until the closing of the Annual General Meeting 2027 and that the current members of the Board of Directors Veli-Matti Reinikkala, Sebastian Bondestam, Antti Kaunonen, Arja Talma, Michael Wil- lome and Tina Wu shall be re-elected as Members of the Board of Direc- tors, and Sandra Wickström shall be elected as a new member. Further, the Nomination Board proposes that the annual remuneration of the Mem- bers of the Board of Directors remains unchanged and thus is the following: Chair of the Board EUR 74,000, Deputy Chair of the Board EUR 45,000 and other Members of the Board EUR 35,000. More information is available in the Stock Exchange release published on January 13, 2026.

On February 13, 2026 the com- mencement of a new plan period in the company’s share-based incentive plan 2025−2029 was announced. The share-based incentive plan 2025−2029 comprises three performance periods, calendar years 2025−2027, 2026−2028,

and 2027−2029. The Board of Directors resolves on the plan’s performance criteria and on the performance levels at the beginning of each performance period. The potential reward of the performance period 2026−2028 will be based on the Glaston Group’s Cumu- lative comparable EBITA, cumulative Service Net Sales and annual Earnings per Share, EPS during the period of 1 January 2026−31 December 2028. More information is available in the Stock Exchange release published on Febru- ary 13, 2026.

Glaston’s outlook for 2026

In 2026, Glaston expects the glass processing equipment markets to remain soft. The cautious develop- ment in the architectural glass processing equipment markets is expected to continue, with poten- tial improvement only anticipated towards the second half of the year. Driven by China, the mobility glass processing equipment market is expected to remain on the same level as in 2025. For services, the markets are expected to develop positively.

In the current market environ- ment, Glaston continues its actions for improved efficiency, cost man- agement, and selective growth opportunities. As geopolitical tensions

and global economic unpredictabil- ity continue, a higher-than-normal uncertainty is related to customers’ investment activity.

Glaston entered the year with a lower order backlog than the previ- ous year. Given the cautious market environment, Glaston Corporation estimates that its net sales and com- parable EBITA will decrease in 2026 from the levels reported for 2025. In 2025, Group net sales totaled EUR 208.8 million and comparable EBITA was EUR 14.0 million.

The board of directors’ proposal on the distribution of profits

The distributable funds of Glas- ton Corporation are EUR 52,605,316 of which EUR 508,536 represents the profit for the financial year. The company has no funds available for dividend distribution.

The Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meeting to be held on 16 April 2026 that the result for the financial year 2024 be placed in retained earnings and no dividend be paid. Further, the Board of Directors proposes to the Annual General Meet- ing that, based on the balance sheet to be adopted for financial period 2025, that no return of capital shall be distributed.

43

Glaston Annual Review 2025

2025), CFO Magnus Sjöblom (from March 1, 2025), EVP Solutions & Opera- tions Jens Mayr (from July 1, 2025), and EVP Services Robert Jenks (from April 1, 2025).

Glaston’s Board of Directors and its committees have been formed in such a way that their capabilities, compe- tence and diversity correspond to the company’s business and support its strategic objectives. The selection and composition of the members take into account the nature of the company’s business, the international scope of operations and the diversity of com- petence. Glaston's Nomination Board prepares proposals on nominations for the Annual General Meeting. The Nomination Board is also responsible for assessing the competence and composition of the Board of Direc- tors. In 2025, the Board of Directors had seven members, comprising two women and five men. The propor- tion of women was 29%. At the end of 2025, the proportion of independent Board members was 100%, and the proportion of members independent of significant shareholders was 71%. In 2025, the proportion of management representatives in the Executive Lead- ership Team was 100%. There were no employee representatives.

The Executive Leadership Team has

extensive business expertise related to sustainability, and its members include the executives in charge of personnel, legal affairs, and compli- ance, for example. EVP Solutions & Operations is responsible for sustain- ability at the Executive Leadership Team level. EVP Solutions & Opera- tions is also in charge of the compa- ny’s sustainability function. The exper- tise of the company’s Sustainability Working Group members is utilized in connection with special issues, such as environmental and personnel-re- lated matters. The activities of the Sustainability Working Group are pre- sented in more detail on page 46.

Glaston’s Board of Directors and Annual General Meeting

Glaston’s Board of Directors is the highest decision-making body for sustainability. It confirms the results of the double materiality assessment, decides on the sustainability strategy as part of the Group’s business strat- egy, decides on strategic sustainabil- ity targets, and approves all policies related to sustainability. The Board of Directors assesses the development of the company’s sustainability at least annually. The Board of Directors approves the sustainability statement and is responsible for the monitoring

of sustainability reporting. The Annual General Meeting approves the annual sustainability statement as part of the financial statements and appoints an assurer for the sustainability statement.

The Board of Directors' Audit Committee and People and Remuneration Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors supports the Board of Direc- tors in the monitoring and assessment of sustainability reporting, as well as the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control and risk manage- ment related to the reporting process. The Audit Committee monitors the assurance process in 2−3 meetings and prepares the Board of Directors’ proposal on the assurance provider for the Annual General Meeting. The Audit Committee may hire external sustainability advisors to support the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee in carrying out their sustainability-related tasks. The Audit Committee also reviews all sustaina- bility-related policies before the Board of Directors.

Glaston’s CEO and Executive Leadership Team

The CEO has overall responsibility for the implementation of Glaston’s

sustainability program as part of the strategy. The CEO is responsible for establishing an appropriate organ- ization for sustainability efforts and securing the necessary internal and external resources and expertise. The CEO is responsible for organizing Glaston’s sustainability reporting in such a way that it complies with appli- cable laws and regulations.

The Executive Leadership Team (ELT) is responsible for taking sus- tainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities into consideration in Glaston’s business strategy. The Exec- utive Leadership Team evaluates and prepares Glaston’s strategic direction, materiality assessment, target-set- ting, and performance. The Execu- tive Leadership Team evaluates the company’s sustainability program and reporting, as well as progress in these, at least twice a year. The Sustaina- bility Director participates in these sessions. The Executive Leadership Team establishes guidelines related to sustainability and decides on the prin- ciples and policies submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. The members of the Executive Leadership Team are responsible for allocating adequate resources in their respective organizations to Glaston’s sustainabil- ity efforts.

45

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston's EVP Solutions & Operations and sustainability function

Glaston's EVP Solutions & Operations is responsible for sustainability topics in the Executive Leadership Team and in charge of the Group's sustainability function. The executive responsi- ble for the sustainability function is in charge of Glaston’s sustainability efforts, which are carried out in the relevant functions and Group com- panies. The sustainability function is also responsible for the Group-wide implementation of environmental and climate issues in cooperation with the businesses and functions. If neces- sary, the sustainability function coop- erates with external experts to ensure compliance of reporting.

The Sustainability Director oversees sustainability reporting, and the Glas- ton Finance function is responsible for analyzing risks related to the reporting process and establishing internal con- trol to manage the risks.

Glaston Sustainability Working Group

Glaston’s Sustainability Compliance & Reporting Working Group coordinates development efforts related to sus- tainability and their practical imple- mentation throughout the Group. The Working Group is chaired by the company’s Sustainability Director and comprises representatives from the

legal, HR, environmental, communi- cations and financial functions. The Working Group meets regularly.

The Working Group monitors sus- tainability action plans and prepares reports, metrics (KPIs), targets and policies for decision-making by the Executive Leadership Team and the Board of Directors. The Working Group is also responsible for carrying out the double materiality assessment and sustainability risk assessment on a regular basis. The Working Group works closely with business functions, HR, Legal and Procurement.

In addition to Compliance & Reporting, there is an Operations & Environment subgroup focusing on operational and environmental responsibility issues. The subgroup is chaired by the company’s Sus- tainability Director and comprises representatives from production and operations.

Business functions and Group companies

Glaston’s businesses and Group com- panies carry out practical sustainabil- ity efforts and are responsible for the implementation of measures, report- ing on progress and providing infor- mation for sustainability reporting. All Glastonians are expected to take sus- tainability targets into account in their

day-to-day work and, if necessary, report any non-compliance with the sustainability targets to their supervi- sor, the local HR function, Group Legal or through Glaston’s whistleblowing channel.

Everyone at Glaston has a role to play in promoting the achievement of Glaston's sustainability targets. The responsibility for Glaston’s sustain- ability program is divided between multiple organizational levels and functions. Interaction with the person- nel on promoting the achievement of sustainability targets is key when sustainability is integrated into the company’s business.

The Sustainability Policy approved by Glaston’s Board of Directors out- lines the principles of sustainability management and the setting and reporting of sustainability targets. Sustainability-related actions are presented in connection with each material topic. Glaston’s day-to-day operations are guided by the Code of Conduct approved by the Board of Directors. Glaston also has a Supplier Code of Conduct, to which the com- pany requires its suppliers to commit. The majority of Glaston’s procure- ments are direct procurements. For these, the suppliers’ commitment is monitored in accordance with a systematic process. In 2025, the

process for indirect procurement was extended, whereby the indirect pro- curements of Switzerland and Ger- many were integrated into the same monitoring process. Next, the indirect procurements of Finland and China will be integrated into the process. The Code of Conduct documents have been drawn up in Finnish, Eng- lish, German, and Chinese. Glaston is committed to respecting human rights and labor rights, as defined in internationally recognized principles such as the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Glaston supports the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The Sustainability Policy and Code of Conduct are supplemented by other policies and guidelines that pro- vide guidance on sustainable operat- ing practices:

People Policy

Environment and Climate Change Policy

Human Rights Policy

Anti-Corruption and Anti-Bribery Policy

Sourcing Guidelines

Safety and Occupational Health Policy,

Information Security Policy, and

Taxation Policy.

46

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administra- tive, management and super- visory bodies (GOV-2)

Glaston has set medium-term stra- tegic targets and long-term strategic targets for emissions, the progress of which is regularly monitored by the Executive Leadership Team. The strategic targets also include targets related to sustainability. These are customer satisfaction (Net Promoter Score, NPS) above 40, accident fre- quency (LTIFR) zero and Employee Engagement Rate above 75. The progress of the strategic targets is also reported regularly to the Board of Directors. Sustainability covers matters related to the environment, society and corporate governance that affect the company’s current and future business operations and the impacts of the company’s operations and value chain on the environment and people.

In the double materiality assess- ment, key targets, KPIs and roadmaps have been determined for the sus- tainability topics related to Glaston’s business based on the identified risks, opportunities, and impacts. The selected KPIs are incorporated into the Group’s strategic targets. Mate-

rial risks, opportunities, and impacts are discussed in the meetings of the Executive Leadership Team, the Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors. Sustainability perspectives are incor- porated into decision-making related to Glaston's business as part of the assessment of risks and opportunities.

In particular, topics related to special issues of sustainable develop- ment, such as environmental aspects, are regularly discussed by the Execu- tive Leadership Team and the Board of Directors. An extensive Sustainability Review is discussed once a year. It is presented by the Group Sustainability Director to the Executive Leadership Team and the Board of Directors. The review covers sustainability targets and related performance, devel- opment measures and future plans related to sustainability topics, and sustainability reporting. In 2025, the Board of Directors discussed the 2024 sustainability statement and reviewed the status of the sustainability tar- gets, among other things. In addition, the Board of Directors reviewed the updated materiality assessment and approved the topics identified as material on the basis of the assess- ment.

In addition to the aforementioned matters, the topics discussed by the

Executive Leadership Team in 2025 included the updated materiality assessment, occupational health and safety topics, the results of the Group’s employee satisfaction survey and development measures.

The topics discussed at the Audit Committee meetings included the 2024 sustainability statement, the Green Omnibus relief package related to CSRD reporting and its potential impacts on Glaston, as well as prepar- ing for the 2025 sustainability reporting.

Integration of sustainability- related performance in incentive schemes (GOV-3)

The principles, decision-making process and practices concerning the remuneration of the members of the Board of Directors and the CEO are set out in more detail in Glaston's Remuneration Policy. The policy is drawn up by the People and Remu- neration Committee, approved by the Board of Directors and confirmed by the Annual General Meeting.

The People and Remuneration Committee takes into account the views and feedback of several inter- nal and external stakeholders. The Remuneration Policy enables sus- tainability-related targets as part of short-term or long-term targets. The

People and Remuneration Commit- tee evaluates the policy at least once a year. The purpose of remuneration is to attract and retain people at the senior management level who have the necessary skills, industry knowl- edge and experience to support the achievement of Glaston’s strategic goals and performance targets, including sustainability targets.

The remuneration of senior man- agement and the Group's key indi- viduals consists of fixed pay, pension benefits, and short-term and long- term incentives. Remuneration is linked to the achievement of financial and strategic targets in both short- term and long-term remuneration, and the targets can also include sustainability targets. The People and Remuneration Committee prepares the principles for target-setting for Glaston's long-term and short-term incentives for approval by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors decides on the target-setting of Glaston’s short-term and long-term incentives and whether they include sustainability-related KPIs.

In 2025, the short-term or long- term incentives did not include metrics related to sustainability, such as climate change mitigation or social themes.

47

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Core elements of due diligence

Paragraphs in the sustainability report

a) Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model

ESRS2: GOV-1

ESRS2: GOV-2

b) Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due diligence

ESRS2: SBM-2

ESRS2: IRO-2

c) Identifying and assessing adverse impacts

ESRS2, IRO-1,

ESRS2, SBM-3

d) Taking actions to address those adverse impacts

E1 Climate change: actions and resources related to policies

S1 Own workforce: policies, actions and resources

e) Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating

ESRS2: MDR-T, metrics and targets

Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting (GOV-5)

Sustainability reporting is determined by the accuracy, integrity and time- liness of the reported information. Glaston uses a sustainability man- agement model that is presented in sections GOV1 and GOV2 in this report. The collection of data for sustainability reporting is primarily the responsibility of the Group's HR func- tion, the sustainability function and the financial management function. The Group's communications function is responsible for producing the report.

The financial management function supports the development of controls and risk management related to the reporting process.

The monitoring of sustainabil- ity reporting is based on reporting guidelines, analysis of any deviating information and, if necessary, discus- sions between the reporting units and the group functions responsible for reporting. The correctness of the reporting is assessed by the Group’s HR for personnel data and by the sus- tainability function for environmental data. Sustainability reporting is subject to oversight by the Audit Commit-

tee. The risks related to sustainability reporting are related to manual data collection and processing, especially with regard to environmental data. These risks are mitigated by good detailed advance planning, the docu- mentation of processes and practices, and teamwork. The quality of sustain- ability reporting is developed through cooperation between different func- tions and discussions with other com- panies and the assurance provider.

The Group’s financial manage- ment organization regularly monitors the financial reporting of the Group units and takes action to address any deviations observed in the reporting. Internal audit activities are guided by the Audit Committee. The Group has an outsourced internal audit func- tion. The Audit Committee prepares an annual audit plan and the internal audit reports on the audits to the Audit Committee.

The control of financial reporting and forecasting processes is based on the Group’s reporting principles, whose specification and centralized maintenance is the responsibility of the Group’s financial organization. The principles are applied consistently throughout the Group and there is a uniform Group financial reporting system in place.

Market position, strategy, business model(s) and value chain (SBM-1)

Market position and business model

Glaston creates value by providing technologies that enable the process- ing of glass into safe and energy-ef- ficient glass solutions. The business strongly supports the aim of climate change mitigation and improves the safety of the built environment and mobility.

As the technology leader in the glass processing industry, Glaston supplies equipment, services and solutions for the architectural, mobil- ity, display, and solar energy indus- tries. The company also supports the development of new technologies integrating intelligence into glass. The key technologies of the company’s products facilitate the improvement of the energy efficiency and safety of buildings, for example.

Glaston has production opera- tions in Germany, Finland, and China. Glaston’s plants in Finland and China assemble machines and in Germany also partly manufacture machines. The production operations in Swit- zerland were relocated to China in 2025. The company also has sales and service points in nine countries.

Statement on due diligence (GOV-4)

48

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston’s customers are mainly glass processing enterprises that supply glass products to the construction and automotive industries. The cus- tomers operate in over 100 different countries. The company is domiciled in Helsinki. Glaston had 772 employees (FTE) at the end of 2025.

Measured in terms of the number of personnel, the three largest operating countries are Germany, Finland, and China.

Employees per region 2025, %, (FTE)

Finland .................. 25%

Germany ............. 38%

Other EMEA ......... 7%

Asia .......................... 24%

Americas ............... 6%

cooperation with the two other busi- ness functions, manage the sale of machines and services and lead the regional service functions. The Solu- tions & Operations business function is globally responsible for production operations, sourcing and supply chain. Production of Glaston technologies is located in Tampere, Finland, Neu- hausen, Germany, and Tianjin, China. During 2025, Glaston’s production of automotive glass pre-processing machines was relocated from Swit- zerland to Glaston’s Tianjin plant. Services leads the global lifecycle business, services development, pric- ing, spare part operations, demand planning and warehousing .

Glaston offers a technically advanced and wide range of heat treatment machines, maintenance, upgrade, and modernization services, as well as spare parts for glass temper- ing and laminating. The majority of the personnel of the business focused on tempering and laminating technology are located in Finland. In addition, Glas- ton offers high-technology machines for the production of insulating glass, as well as maintenance, upgrade, and modernization services and spare parts. The majority of the personnel of the business focusing on insulating glass technologies are located in Ger-

Glaston’s business activities are divided into three business functions: Market areas, Solutions & Operations, and Services.

The market areas operate at the customer interface and, in close

many. For the automotive market, the company offers pre-processing and heat treatment technologies as well as related service business. The majority of the personnel of the business are located in China.

Climate change affects glass pro- cessing by accelerating the demand for energy-saving insulating glass products and glass used in solar panels, for example. Glaston's offering also includes products for the heat treatment of solar panel glass.

Strategy

Glaston’s strategy is aimed at growth and profitability. At the core of the strategy are business function-spe- cific product development initiatives through which the company ensures future growth. The investments made in insulating glass technologies create positive impacts on climate change mitigation and adaptation. In addition, Glaston's tempering and laminating technologies have a positive impact on ensuring the safety of buildings and mobility.

The growth measures defined by the business functions and the imple- mentation of the strategy have also been supported by five Group-wide cornerstone initiatives. The initiatives have focused on innovating with

customers; industry-leading customer service; supporting Glaston's person- nel toward success to build a coherent corporate culture; sustainable busi- ness; and production management. As part of the strategy update process started in summer 2025, it was decided to include the cornerstone initiatives in new initiatives that support the imple- mentation of the strategy. Promoting sustainability and the green transition is part of Glaston’s strategy.

At Glaston, promoting sustainability is seen as an opportunity, and sustain- ability is an integral part of the compa- ny's strategy. As a technology supplier to the glass processing industry, the company plays a key role in improving the energy efficiency of the build- ing stock. In the European Union, for example, the heating and cooling of buildings accounts for half of the end consumption of energy. The insulat- ing glass technologies produced and developed by Glaston make it possible to manufacture even more energy-ef- ficient glass structures for both new construction and renovation. Glaston also offers heat treatment for solar glass, as certain pre-processing and heat treatment machines can also be used in series production to process glass panels suitable for the produc- tion of solar energy.

49

Glaston Annual Review 2025

The sustainability issues of the glass industry emphasize the energy efficiency of glass production and fur- ther processing, as glass production processes consume a lot of energy. At Glaston, the development of energy and material efficiency is a continuous effort, and the company’s product development has long focused on improving the energy efficiency of machines.

Value chain

Glaston aims to contribute to a better future by providing safer and more energy-efficient glass solutions. Promoting sustainability is an integral part of Glaston’s values. The com- pany participates in the creation of standards and practices related to the sustainability of the glass industry. Glaston participates in the activities of many international glass industry organizations and is also an active member, authorized by the Finnish national working group, of the glass industry committees of the CEN (European Committee for Standard- ization) and the ISO (International Organization for Standardization), as well as working groups focused on the preparation of standards related to safety glass (tempered and laminated glass). Glaston's strategy is focused on customers that process glass for

the architectural, mobility, display, and solar energy markets. Most of the glass processed using the company’s technology is supplied to the con- struction industry.

Suppliers of goods and services play an important role in Glaston’s value chain. The company carefully selects its suppliers and strives for long-term relationships with its key suppliers to ensure quality and com- pliance with its own requirements for both products and processes. Glas- ton’s quality and procurement organ- izations regularly audit key suppliers. Audits focus on quality management, security of supply and production processes. In the event of negative findings or product deterioration, the supplier is immediately placed under an unplanned audit and the supplier's operations are closely monitored until the issue is resolved.

Approximately 80% of Glaston’s purchases come from Europe. Asia accounts for 20% of procurement. The company’s key suppliers are located close to Glaston’s production facilities. In 2025, 84% of the German plant’s purchases came from Germany, while local procurement accounted for 87% of the plant in China and 80% of the plant in Finland.

Glaston is committed to sustainable sourcing practices, which include sup-

plier requirements and audits, as well as the realization of human rights and occupational safety. Glaston’s Supplier Code of Conduct aims to ensure that business partners meet the compa- ny’s expectations with regard to legal requirements, ethical practices, human rights and environmental issues. In fall 2025, a self-assessment of Chinese suppliers was carried out. The survey focused on the realization of human rights and was sent to suppliers rep- resenting 72% of local sourcing. The results of the survey are presented in the section Materiality assessment: own workforce S1 on page 56. The sustainability-related focus areas in direct procurement concern supplier audits, the implementation of the Code of Conduct and the assessment of emissions impacts as part of sourc- ing. Monitoring of the Supplier Code of Conduct commitments covers Glaston’s direct procurement. In 2025, indirect procurement in Germany and Switzerland was included in the scope of corresponding monitoring. The majority of Glaston’s procurements are direct procurements.

The key sustainability issues in the glass industry revolve around the energy consumption of glass pro- duction and further processing, the recyclability of glass and the emis- sions generated by the value chain.

A significant part of Glaston’s value chain emissions are related to cus- tomers’ heat treatment processes, which consume significant amounts of electricity. Glaston’s environmen- tal and climate impacts and risks have been identified throughout the company’s value chain, and the aim is to reduce and prevent them with a proactive approach.

Glaston’s value chain consists of suppliers of upstream raw materials and components, equipment and services all the way to the process- ing of glass products and end-use applications such as buildings and vehicles. Between these, Glaston’s own business activities include the design of machines and services, sourcing, production and assembly, as well as delivery and transport. Glaston supports its customers throughout the entire life-cycle of the equipment, from the sale of the equipment to glass processing at the customers’ premises and life-cycle maintenance and modernization of the equipment.

Glaston operates in nine countries and serves customers in over 100 countries. In total, Glaston has approx- imately 4,000 installed and operational machine lines.

In line with the company's life-cycle model and to increase the life span and safety of its products, Glaston also

50

Glaston Annual Review 2025

offers maintenance services. Operating practices and processes are continuously developed in cooperation with partners, creating value and a better user experience for customers.

Interests and views of stakeholders (SBM-2)

Glaston engages in regular interaction with its key stakeholders. Feedback received from stakeholders is valuable to Glaston, and the company takes it into account in the development of its operations. Stake- holder views were also taken into consid- eration in the double materiality assess- ment carried out in 2023, on the basis of which Glaston confirmed the sustainability themes that are material to its operations. Employees, investors, customers, suppli- ers and financing partners were engaged in the process, and the results of their engagement were discussed by both the Executive Leadership Team and the Board of Directors. In the annual review of the double materiality assessment, the material topics remained unchanged.

As part of the annual calendar, the Board of Directors is regularly informed of per- sonnel and customer satisfaction surveys and their results, for example. Key issues are also put on the agenda of the Board of Directors. The Executive Leadership Team monitors the feedback received from stakeholders as part of normal operational activities.

Stakeholder

(SBM-2) 45 (a) i, ii

Topics of key importance to stakeholders and purpose 45 (a) iv

Engagement and the organization of interaction 45 (a) iii

Impact on Glaston’s operations

45 (a) v

Personnel (own workforce

Competence development

Health and occupational safety

Diversity of the workplace community

Climate change

Innovation and collaboration

Annual personnel surveys

Sustainability survey

Supervisor interviews for the materiality assessment

Performance discussions, team meetings,

supervisor-subordinate discussions

Cooperation with personnel representatives

Developing the competence of the personnel

Developing employee engagement

Developing occupational safety and well-being

DEI strategy

Investments in product development

Investors

Climate change

Circular economy in the industry

Human rights of the personnel as part of risk management

Investor meetings

Interviews for the materiality assessment

Product development in- vestments in the development of the sustainability agenda

Customers

Climate change, especially reducing the industry's CO 2 emissions

Development of technology

Circular economy, especially glass recycling

Customer meetings and workshops

Customer satisfaction surveys

Interviews for the materiality assessment

Product development

Energy efficiency of machines

Material efficiency

Suppliers

Employee health and safety

Climate change Packaging and transport

Bilateral meetings

Supplier evaluations and audits

Interviews for the materiality assessment

Supplier evaluation as part of the selection process and during cooperation

Financing providers

Climate change

Occupational safety

Ethical operating practices

Bilateral discussions

Interviews for the materiality assessment

Product development

Investments in the develop- ment of the sustainability agenda

In 2025, no external stakeholders were engaged in the annual review of the double materiality assessment.

51

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO-1)

Description of the materiality assessment process

Glaston carried out its first materiality assessment based on the company’s strategy and business model and stakeholder consultation in 2019. The materiality assessment was subse- quently updated in 2021. The company has developed sustainable business as part of its business and its strate- gic cornerstone initiatives. One of the cornerstone initiatives is related to the development of the engagement and competence of the company's own workforce, which are critical priorities for the successful implementation of Glaston's strategy. The measures taken to put the strategy into action have positive impacts on the com- pany’s own workforce through the development of competence and increased job satisfaction. At the same time, the implementation of Glaston's strategy is dependent on the availa- bility of competent and committed personnel.

As part of the company's prepa- rations for the entry into force of the sustainability reporting standards,

Glaston carried out a double material- ity assessment between spring 2023 and fall 2024.

The first assessment based on double materiality examined the actual and potential positive and negative sustainability impacts of Glaston's business model, as well as financial risks and opportunities. The materiality assessment evaluated impacts on the environment, social factors and corporate governance, as well as financial risks and opportu- nities related to sustainability factors, including the company’s dependen- cies on human resources and natural resources.

The assessment covered the com- pany’s own operations and the key actors in the value chain, upstream and downstream, which the company has an impact on through its opera- tions, and which have an impact on the company’s operations.

The starting point for the materiality assessment was Glaston’s strategy and business model. As a rule, the assessment was carried out with a focus on the medium term. In addition, the assessment considered how the short-term impacts, risks, and oppor- tunities may differ from the medium term. Their probable development in the long term was also assessed.

The time horizons for the assess- ment were defined as follows:

short term, i.e. the reporting year,

medium term (1–5 years), and

long term (over 5 years).

Stakeholder engagement and impact assessment

The materiality assessment was car- ried out in stages. In the first stage, a long list of sustainability topics from the perspective of the company’s strategy and business model was created in a workshop attended by senior management and experts. The assessment covered all of Glaston’s operating countries and the relevant upstream and downstream parts of the value chain.

In the second stage, represent- atives of key stakeholders were engaged in the materiality assess- ment. The stakeholder engagement took place in spring 2023. Customers, suppliers, shareholders, financing providers and supervisors at Glas- ton were interviewed in connection with the assessment to evaluate their views and expectations regarding the company’s sustainability. In addition, a personnel survey was conducted. The Executive Leadership Team was engaged in the materiality assess- ment after the second stage.

In the third stage, the process con- tinued with workshops in which the impacts and financial risks and oppor- tunities were assessed on the basis of the previous stages. Both assess- ments involved identifying, assessing and prioritizing the impacts of opera- tions, connections between them, and risks and opportunities based on desk research, expert assessments and the views of stakeholders, extending the assessment to the company's value chain. The risks identified in the materiality assessment also serve as inputs to the Group’s annual strategic risk assessment process, in which all risks are assessed on the basis of their likelihood and financial effects.

In the fourth stage, a list of the most material sustainability topics was created on the basis of the impact assessment and the assessment of financial risks and opportunities. The Board of Directors approved the assessment in September 2024.

The data sources used included, among others, the results of person- nel surveys, summaries of stakeholder interviews, internal reviews concern- ing the sustainability function, internal climate risk and biodiversity analyses, results of previous materiality assess- ments, analyses of sourcing data, Group strategy and risk assessment

52

Glaston Annual Review 2025

documentation, emissions calculation data, and a report on human rights risks. External sources of information included sustainability risk profiles for the industry, a human rights and climate risk map and location-specific climate risk reports. Studies related to climate and energy saving in the architectural sector were used in the assessment of risks and opportunities.

Annual assessment of double materiality

Glaston conducted the annual double materiality assessment in accord- ance with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive between May and September 2025. Experts from within the company, such as Finance, Legal , Sustainability, and Communica- tions, were extensively involved in the assessment. The double materiality assessment methodology and the relevant IROs were reviewed together with an external expert and then internally between experts. The Board of Directors approved the results of the double materiality assessment in September 2025.

The assessment reviewed the timeliness of the company’s materi- ality assessment, taking into account any changes in the company’s busi- ness model, value chain, customer

relationships, operating environment, and markets. In the double material- ity review, ESRS topics identified as material to Glaston with regard to the environment were climate change mitigation, energy, and climate change adaptation (E1), as the topic is relevant from the perspective of both impacts and financial risks and opportunities. The material social top- ics were identified as the company's own workforce (S1), and consumers and end-users (S4) through creat- ing safety for the users of buildings. According to the assessment, no changes have taken place in any of

the above that would have an impact on the reported sustainability topics disclosed in the sustainability report.

The impact assessment used a scale of 1–5 for different factors, taking into account the time horizons. For potential positive impacts, the calcu- lation formula was severity x likelihood, wherein severity is the average of scale and scope. For potential neg- ative impacts, severity x likelihood. The maximum value was 25 and the materiality threshold was 16.

With regard to financial materiality, the scale was assessed on a scale of 1–5, taking into account the time

horizons. The scale was multiplied by the likelihood (1–5). The materiality assessments identified, assessed and prioritized the business impacts, their connections, risks and opportunities, extending to the material parts of the value chain. The threshold was 16.

When it comes to a potential adverse human rights impact, the severity of the impact takes priority over its likelihood. Therefore, serious unlikely effects may be material even if they are below the threshold. No such topics emerged in the assess- ment.

GLASTON supports its customers throughout the life cycle

Downstream

Flat glass processing by customers

End-use of glass products in society

Service and maintenance

Marketing and sales

Sourcing

Delivery and logistics

Production and assembly

Architectural

Buildings

Mobility

Vehicles

Display

Electronic displays

Solar

Solar energy

GLASTON

Upstream

Raw materials

Components, equipment and services

Core technologies

Tempering Laminating Insulating glass Pre-processing

Research and innovation

Development, design and engineering of machines and services

53

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model(s) (SBM-3)

During 2025, there were no signifi- cant changes in Glaston’s operations, customer or supplier relationships, or operating environment, and the company’s material topics remained unchanged in the annual double materiality review. Glaston's mate- rial ESRS topics related to the envi- ronment were identified as climate change mitigation, energy, and climate change adaptation (E1). The material social topics were identified as the company's own workforce (S1), and consumers and end-users (S4) through creating safety for the users of buildings. The most relevant of the impacts related to the compa- ny’s own workforce are the sub-sub- topics of health and safety, work-life balance and working time, diversity, and training and skills development, which are related to equal treatment and equal opportunities, as well as working conditions. As an own topic, employee commitment was identified as material. These are presented in more detail in the S1 section.

Glaston’s material risks and oppor- tunities did not trigger significant direct financial effects in 2025, and

they are not expected to trigger such effects in the short, medium or long term. Business opportunities related to climate change mitigation or improving the safety of buildings are material, but their effects cannot be distinguished from other market growth or growth expectations. Meas- ures related to the utilization of these opportunities or risk management are part of the Group’s normal devel- opment of personnel competence and well-being, as well as product development, as is the improvement of the energy and material efficiency of products. The target for the reduc- tion of direct GHG emissions can be achieved without significant new investments.

Other topics identified as impor- tant included business conduct, the circular economy, and biodiversity and ecosystems. Environmental topics E2 pollution, E3 water resources and marine resources, E4 biodiversity and ecosystems, and E5 resource use and circular economy were carefully assessed as part of the annual dou- ble materiality assessment, but these topics did not emerge as sustainability topics to be reported based on the thresholds defined in the annual dou- ble materiality assessment. Glaston has not carried out a resilience analy-

sis, as the potential risks and opportu- nities are indirect to the extent that it is impossible to predict the impacts.

Non-material topics: E2 Pollution and E3 Water and marine resources

The actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities related to pollu- tion and water and marine resources were assessed in 2023 as part of the first double materiality assess- ment. In 2025, Glaston had produc- tion operations in Germany, Finland, and China. The plants in Finland and China assemble machines from components. The plant in Germany mainly engages in the manufacture of machines, but the plant also produces a few special components itself. The assembly operations do not cause pollution of air, water, or soil. The use of chemicals is low. No risk related to the use of microplastics and substances of concern or of particular concern has been identified. The production activities also do not involve water consumption. Glaston's other sites include sales and service sites with offices and small warehouses. Based on the above, the impacts, pollution and water-related risks and opportu- nities were considered minor and not material in the annual double material- ity assessment.

Glaston purchases electrical and metal components primarily from suppliers located in close proximity to the production plants. Based on Glaston’s procurement volumes and the requirements set for suppliers, the upstream impacts, risks, and oppor- tunities were also considered to be minor and not material.

Glaston's machines use electricity as their energy source, which means that they do not create direct airborne emissions or other sources of pollu- tion. Glaston’s product range includes glass washers that use water, usually in a closed cycle. They represent a small proportion of the total number of machines delivered. Consequently, the downstream impacts, risks, and opportunities are minor and not mate- rial.

Non-material topics: E4 Biodiversity and E5 Resource use and circular economy

An assessment of the actual and potential impacts, risks and oppor- tunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems, resource use and circular economy was carried out in 2023. The assessment considered impacts, risks and opportunities in Glaston's own operations for each production site, including resource inflows and

54

Glaston Annual Review 2025

outflows as well as waste. The assess- ment also covered Glaston’s value chain. In 2025, there were no signifi- cant changes in the company’s oper- ations, and biodiversity was assessed as non-material in the annual double materiality assessment.

Glaston’s sites in Finland, Germany, and China are not located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas. In Glas- ton’s 2023 stakeholder engagement related to double materiality with cus- tomers, employees, suppliers, inves- tors, and financing providers, special attention was paid to topics related to biodiversity and the circular economy, and the results of the assessment were taken into account.

No material impacts, risks, or opportunities were identified with regard to biodiversity and ecosystems in the annual assessment. Similarly, no transition risks or physical risks related to diversity and ecosystems were identified, nor were cascading effects of physical risks and transition risks that would lead to the breakdown of the entire system (systemic risk). Glaston’s own operations or value chain are not dependent on biodiver- sity or ecosystems. Glaston’s position in the value chain related to the con- struction sector was examined as a potential negative impact and risk, as

glass production and the use of land for construction may have impacts on biodiversity. At the same time, glass products enable the renovation of the existing building stock, which reduces the need to construct new buildings. However, Glaston’s role in these impacts, risks, and opportunities is small.

The impacts, risks, and opportuni- ties related to resource use and the circular economy were considered to be low or moderate. The most significant direct impacts and oppor- tunities were the long life-cycle of Glaston’s machines and partnerships with customers with regard to main- taining and upgrading the machines for longer use, as well as the material efficiency and energy efficiency of the machines. The recycling of glass also involves moderate indirect risks and opportunities. If the glass indus- try were to fail to increase the use of recycled glass, this could affect the attractiveness of glass as a material. On the other hand, companies have opportunities to develop technologies that enable the use of recycled glass.

Materiality matrix

Impact and financial materiality of sustainability topics in the glass processing value chain on the medium-term horizon.*

FINANCIAL MATERIALITY ASSESSMENT

S1

S4

E1

IMPACT MATERIALITY ASSESSMENT

E2

S2

S3

E4

E3

G1

E5

E1= Climate change

S1= Own workforce S4= Glaston enabling safety in built environment (IRO in S4)

G1= Business conduct

E5= Resource use and circular economy

E2= Pollution

E3= Water and marine resources

E4= Biodiversity and ecosystems

S2= Workes in the value chain

S3= Affected communities

* ) 5 years

55

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Materiality assessment: climate change E1

ESRS E1, climate change in the value chain, is a material topic from the per- spective of both impacts and financial risks and opportunities. Glass process- ing is an energy-intensive activity, and it has a negative impact on the environ- ment through energy consumption and emissions. The process for identifying and assessing climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities, including impacts on climate change, climate-re- lated physical risks and climate-related transition risks, is described in section E-1 Climate change.

The electricity consumption of the machines manufactured by Glaston is the most significant source of GHG emissions in Glaston’s value chain and accounts for approximately 72% of the entire value chain’s GHG emissions. At the same time, glass produced with Glaston’s technology enables the reduction of CO 2 emissions and energy savings, thereby creating a positive impact in the value chain. Glass products processed with Glas- ton’s technology can serve as an ena- bler in improving the energy efficiency of buildings, for example by replacing old windows with energy-efficient insulating glass units or enabling the use of solar energy.

The transition to a low-carbon economy is reflected through demand growth as a potential oppor- tunity in Glaston’s business. With regard to financial materiality, the primary factors are related to decar- bonization and investments in the end-use industry, as well as the regu- latory environment and innovations in low-energy glass processing.

The aim of reducing the energy consumption of buildings and thereby emissions has an impact on the demand for insulating glass and, consequently, on the demand for Glaston’s insulating glass technologies and, partly, also safety glass technolo- gies. The achievement of the emission reduction targets set by many coun- tries and operators calls for reducing the emissions of new construction to zero and significantly accelerat- ing renovation construction. In the medium term, economic cycles may affect the pace of investment growth. In the long term, it is likely that invest- ments will need to be accelerated significantly, which will increase the impact on Glaston’s business.

Materiality assessment: own workforce S1

The primary drivers of the impacts related to the company's own work-

force are occupational safety, work- load and mental well-being, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), compe- tence development, good leadership and the continuity of work.

The primary drivers of financial materiality are employee engage- ment, competence development, and health and safety. Employees having a high level of engagement, compe- tence and well-being is a financially material topic for Glaston which, if realized, creates a positive impact on the personnel. A safe and healthy work environment is a key material topic in terms of impacts on the company's employees. Workload management and mental well-being are important topics, especially with regard to expert positions. Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) has been identified as a material topic that concerns all of the person- nel. Diversity is seen as a strength that can be further developed.

In 2025, Glaston had operations and employees in nine countries. The countries with the largest number of employees were Germany, Finland, and China. The company has employ- ees in both production and office roles. In 2025, 64% of the personnel were white-collar workers and 36% were blue-collar workers. Glaston's own workforce and the scope of the

information reported under ESRS 2 General disclosures includes all employees as discussed in this sec- tion ESRS 2 General disclosures.

Of the potential negative impacts, safety-related impacts are particu- larly relevant to job roles connected to plant production, while potential negative impacts related to workload are particularly relevant to expert roles. Risks and opportunities, as well as the measures to increase positive impacts and reduce negative impacts, are described in more detail in section S1 Own workforce.

Glaston operates on equal princi- ples and in compliance with the local legislation in each of its operating countries. Glaston has operations in China, and the risk of human rights infringements may be greater there than in the company’s other countries of operation. The company has not identified material human rights risk with regard to its own workforce. The company operates in China on equal principles, and the risk is managed by means of Glaston's global People Policy and HR practices. To identify potential material human rights risks for workers in the value chain (S2), a self-assessment of Tianjin factory suppliers was carried out in autumn 2025. The assessment focused on

56

Glaston Annual Review 2025

compliance, labour rights, access to documentation and compliance with international standards. Based on the results, the suppliers were classified into low, medium or high-risk cate- gories. The majority of respondents showed strong compliance and had a code of conduct and comprehensive documentation in place. The short- comings identified in the evaluation typically included the absence of eth- ical guidelines, human rights policy or due diligence process, as well as miss- ing or incomplete grievance mech- anisms. For high-risk suppliers, the company will engage in discussions to mitigate the potential risk.

Glaston recognizes its responsibil- ity for climate impacts throughout its value chain. The aim is to anticipate and prevent potential risks and to use Glaston's solutions, product devel- opment and full life-cycle machine maintenance services to create more energy-efficient, environmentally sustainable and safe glass solutions. Competent personnel are an enabling factor for Glaston's business opera- tions. Glaston is committed to devel- oping the competence of its person- nel as part of its environmental and business targets. The company has not recognized any particular impacts

on the personnel in relation to climate change mitigation.

Materiality assessment: consumers and end-users S4

In the annual materiality assessment, the personal safety of S4 consum- ers and end-users was still identified as a material topic through positive impact. Glaston’s tempering and lam- inating technologies make glass safe and indirectly improve the safety of the end-users of properties. A posi- tive impact was identified in this topic through increased safety, as well as a financial opportunity through business development.

Topic

Sub-topic/own topic

Sub-sub-topic

E1 Climate change

Climate change mitigation

Climate change adaptation

Energy

S1 Own workforce

Equal treatment and equal opportunities for all

Training and skills development

Diversity

Gender equality and equal pay for equal work

Working conditions

Health and safety

Working hours

Work-life balance

Employee engagement (own topic)

S4 Consumers and End-users

Personal safety of consumers and end-users

Health and safety

Glaston’s customers are glass pro- cessors that supply glass products to the construction industry, automotive manufacturing, and other industries that use specialty glass. In the value chain, the end-users of the products include the users of buildings and vehicles, for example. A material posi- tive impact was identified with regard to the safety of the users of buildings.

Glaston cooperates with its cus- tomers, property developers and the developers of safety standards. With respect to this topic, the aim is to grow the business and launch new products. The safety of buildings is a topic of growing attention. In the

context of glass solutions, this means the increasing use of tempered and laminated glass. Tempering, laminat- ing and insulating glass processes are Glaston’s core competencies, and the company offers the most advanced technology in these areas.

The material standard-specific topics are presented in the table below. The material impacts, risks and opportunities of the different areas are presented in the standard-spe- cific sections. Topics that have been assessed as non-material have not been included in the table.

57

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Metrics and targets (MDR-T)

Glaston’s medium-term (3–5 years) and long-term targets to promote sustainability are as follows:

Customer satisfaction (Net Pro- moter Score, NPS) over 40. Outcome in 2025: 37

Occupational safety: zero lost-time accidents (LTA, progress is meas- ured by accident frequency, LTIFR). Outcome in 2025: 5.8

Employee engagement rate over 75 (out of 100). Outcome in 2025: 78

Reducing the CO 2 emissions of Glaston’s own operations (Scope 1 + 2) by 50.4% by 2032, using 2022 as the baseline, and

Reducing value chain (Scope 3) CO 2 emissions by 58.1% relative to the glass processing capacity (m2) of machines sold by 2032, using 2022 as the baseline (emission intensity) Outcome in 2025: Scope 1+2: 1,498 tCO 2 e and Scope 3: 176,065 tCO 2 e

The targets related to climate change mitigation have been approved by the Science Based Tar- gets initiative (SBTi).

Customer satisfaction is calculated as follows: the number of promot- ers minus the number of detractors divided by the number of respondents and multiplied by 100. The employee engagement rate is based on regu-

List of ESRS requirements followed in the preparation of the sustainability report

Page

ESRS2

General Disclosures

BP-1 General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement

44

BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances

44

GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

44

GOV-2 Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies

47

GOV-3 Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes

47

GOV-4 Statement on due diligence

48

GOV-5 Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting

48

SBM-1 Strategy, business model and value chain

48

SBM-2 Interests and views of stakeholders

51

SBM-3 Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model

54

IRO-1 - Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities

52

IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement

58

E1

Climate change

E1-1 Transition plan for climate change mitigation

74

E1-2 Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation

74

E1-3 Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies

74

E1-4 Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation

75

E1-5 Energy consumption and mix

76

E1-6 Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions

77

larl employee pulse surveys, which all employees have the opportunity to answer. The responses are collected using a scale of 0–3 (completely disagree/completely agree) and an external service provider converts the responses into indices on a scale of 0–10 (10 = all completely agree). The target Employee engagement

rate over 75 corresponds to a result of 7.5/10.0 for the overall index.

In the loan margin of the financing agreement for the Revolving Credit Facility, the intention is to take into account the achievement of Glaston's sustainability targets annually. These will be agreed by 30 June 2026. The covenants of the financing package

are discussed in note 5.1 to Glaston’s financial statements, Capital manage- ment.

58

Glaston Annual Review 2025

List of ESRS requirements followed in the preparation of the sustainability report

Sivunumero

S1

Own workforce

S1-1 Policies related to own workforce

86

S1-2 Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers’ representa-tives about impacts

88

S1-3 Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own work-force to raise concerns

89

S1-4 Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions

91

S1-5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

91

S1-6 Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees

93

S1-8 Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue

94

S1-9 Diversity metrics

94

S1-10 Adequate wages

88

S1-11 Social protection

90

S1-13 Training and skills development metrics

92

S1-14 Health and safety metrics

94

S1-15 Work-life balance metrics

94

S1-16 Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)

95

S1-17 Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts

95

S4

Consumers and end-users

S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users

96

S4-2 Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts

97

S4-3 Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns

97

S4-4 Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end- users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions

97

S4-5 Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

97

59

Glaston Annual Review 2025

List of datapoints that derive from other EU legislation and information where these are disclosed

Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint

SFDR reference

Pillar 3 reference

Benchmark Regulation reference

EU Climate Law reference

Material/Not material

ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's gender diversity

Indicator number 13 of Table #1 of Annex 1

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/181627, Annex II

material , page 45

ESRS 2 GOV-1 Percentage of board members who are independent

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

material , page 45

ESRS 2 GOV-4 Statement on due diligence

Indicator number 10

Table #3 of Annex 1

material, page 48

ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities

Indicators number 4

Table

#1 of Annex 1

Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/245328Table 1: Qualitative information on

Environmental risk and Table 2: Qualitative information on Social risk

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

not material

ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to chemical production

Indicator number 9

Table #2 of Annex 1

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

not material

ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons

Indicator number 14

Table #1 of Annex 1

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/181829, Article 12(1) Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

not material

ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12(1) Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

not material

ESRS E1-1 Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050

Regulation (EU) 2021/1119,

Article 2(1)

material, page 74

ESRS E1-1 Undertakings excluded from Paris- aligned Benchmarks

Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking book- Climate Change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article12.1 (d) to (g), and Article 12.2

material , page 74

ESRS E1-4 GHG emission reduction targets

Indicator number 4

Table #2 of Annex 1

Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 6

material, page 84

ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors)

Indicator number 5

Table #1 and

Indicator n. 5 Table

#2 of Annex 1

material, page 83

ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix

Indicator number 5

Table #1 of Annex 1

material, page 83

ESRS E1-5 Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors

Indicator number 6

Table #1 of Annex 1

material, page 83

60

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint

SFDR reference

Pillar 3 reference

Benchmark Regulation reference

EU Climate Law reference

Material/Not material

ESRS E1-6 Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions

Indicators number 1

and 2 Table #1 of

Annex 1

Article 449a; Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking book Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 5(1), 6 and 8(1)

material, page 82

ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG emissions intensity

Indicators number 3

Table #1 of Annex 1

Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 8(1)

material, page 83

ESRS E1-7 GHG removals and carbon credits

Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1)

not material

ESRS E1-9 Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

not material

ESRS E1-9 Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk; ESRS E1-9 Location of significant assets at material physical risk

Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraphs 46 and 47;Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk.

not material

ESRS E1-9 Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy efficiency classes

Article 449a Regulation (EU) No

575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraph 34;Template 2:Banking book -Climate change transition risk: Loans collateralised by immovable property - Energy efficiency of the collateral

not material

ESRS E1-9 Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818,

Annex II

not material

ESRS E2-4 Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the E-PRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil

Indicator number 8

Table #1 of Annex

1 Indicator number

2 Table #2 of Annex

1 Indicator number

1 Table #2 of

Annex 1 Indicator

number 3 Table #2

of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E3-1 Water and marine resources

Indicator number 7

Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy

Indicator number 8

Table 2 of Annex 1

not material

61

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint

SFDR reference

Pillar 3 reference

Benchmark Regulation reference

EU Climate Law reference

Material/Not material

ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas

Indicator number 12

Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E3-4 Total water recycled and reused

Indicator number

6.2 Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E3-4 Total water consumption in m 3 per net revenue on own operations

Indicator number

6.1 Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS 2- SBM-3 - E4 paragraph 16 (a)i

Indicator number 7

Table #1 of Annex 1

material, page 54

ESRS 2- SBM-3 - E4 paragraph 16 (b)

Indicator number 10

Table #2 of Annex 1

material, page 54

ESRS 2- SBM-3 - E4 paragraph 16 (c)

Indicator number 14

Table #2 of Annex 1

material, page 54

ESRS E4-2 Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies

Indicator number 11

Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E4-2 Sustainable oceans / seas practices or

policies

Indicator number 12

Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E4-2 Policies to address deforestation

Indicator number 15

Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled waste

Indicator number 13

Table #2 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS E5-5 Hazardous waste and radioactive waste

Indicator number 9

Table #1 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of forced labour

Indicator number 13

Table #3 of Annex I

not material

ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of child labour

Indicator number 12

Table #3 of Annex I

not material

ESRS S1-1 Human rights policy commitments

Indicator number 9

Table #3 and

Indicator number 11

Table #1 of Annex I

material, page 87

ESRS S1-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

material, page 87

ESRS S1-1 processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings

Indicator number 11

Table #3 of Annex I

material, page 87

ESRS S1-1 workplace accident prevention policy or management system

Indicator number 1

Table #3 of Annex I

material, page 90

ESRS S1-3 grievance/complaints handling mechanisms

Indicator number 5

Table #3 of Annex I

material, page 89

ESRS S1-14 Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents

Indicator number 2

Table #3 of Annex I

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,

Annex II

material, page 94

62

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint

SFDR reference

Pillar 3 reference

Benchmark Regulation reference

EU Climate Law reference

Material/Not material

ESRS S1-14 Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness

Indicator number 3

Table #3 of Annex I

material, page 94

ESRS S1-16 Unadjusted gender pay gap

Indicator number 12

Table #1 of Annex I

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

material, page 95

ESRS S1-16 Excessive CEO pay ratio

Indicator number 8

Table #3 of Annex I

material, page 95

ESRS S1-17 Incidents of discrimination

Indicator number 7

Table #3 of Annex I

material, page 95

ESRS S1-17 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and

Human Rights and OECD

Indicator number 10

Table #1 and

Indicator n. 14

Table #3 of Annex I

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 Art 12 (1)

material, page 95

ESRS 2- SBM3 S2 Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain

Indicators number

12 and n. 13 Table

#3 of Annex I

not material

ESRS S2-1 Human rights policy commitments

Indicator number 9

Table #3 and Indicator n. 11

Table #1 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers

Indicator number 11 and n. 4 Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS S2-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and

Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines

Indicator number 10

Table #1 of Annex 1

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1)

not material

ESRS S2-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II

not material

ESRS S2-4 Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain

Indicator number 14

Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS S3-1 Human rights policy commitments

Indicator number 9

Table #3 of Annex 1

and Indicator

number 11 Table

#1 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS S3-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles or and OECD guidelines

Indicator number 10

Table #1 Annex 1

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1)

not material

ESRS S3-4 Human rights issues and incidents

Indicator number 14

Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end- users

Indicator number 9

Table #3 and

Indicator number 11

Table #1 of Annex 1

material, page 96

63

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint

SFDR reference

Pillar 3 reference

Benchmark Regulation reference

EU Climate Law reference

Material/Not material

ESRS S4-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines

Indicator number 10

Table #1 of Annex 1

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1)

not material

ESRS S4-4 Human rights issues and incidents

Indicator number 14

Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS G1-1 United Nations Convention against Corruption

Indicator number 15

Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS G1-1 Protection of whistleblowers

Indicator number 6

Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

ESRS G1-4 Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws

Indicator number 17

Table #3 of Annex 1

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II)

not material

ESRS G1-4 Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery

Indicator number 16

Table #3 of Annex 1

not material

64

Glaston Annual Review 2025

E Environment

Taxonomy eligibility and alignment

The Commission Delegated Act (EU) 2026/73 gives the possibility to apply the previous EU Taxonomy rules (including the related Delegated Acts (EU) 2021/2178) the Climate Delegated Act (The Commission Delegated Act (EU) 2021/2139), the Environmental Delegated Act (The Commission Delegated Act (EU) 2023/2486), that were applicable also for sustainability statements concerning the year 2024. This possibility has been applied in the 2025 EU Taxonomy reporting.

The taxonomy includes six environ- mental objectives and related techni- cal screening criteria. The objectives are as follows: 1) climate change miti- gation; 2) climate change adaptation; 3) sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; 4) transi- tion to a circular economy; 5) pollution prevention and control; and 6) protec- tion and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. Glaston has assessed the criteria, and the company has activities that significantly contribute to climate change mitigation. In order for a taxonomy-eligible activity to be considered aligned with the taxon- omy, it must also meet the technical

assessment criteria and not cause significant harm to other environmen- tal objectives. In addition, the under- taking must implement minimum safeguards for social responsibility.

Technical screening criteria

The technical screening criteria form the basis for taxonomy reporting and determine the conditions under which an economic activity is considered to significantly contribute to the environ- mental objectives and whether the activity in question causes significant harm to any other environmental objective. Glaston has assessed its activities and concluded that insu- lating glass technologies and related services, as well as all equipment and services offered to solar energy technology suppliers, are enabling functions that significantly contribute to climate change mitigation. Glas- ton’s insulating glass technologies, machines, production lines, upgrade products and services that enable the manufacture of insulating glass units are taxonomy-eligible activities that meet the definition and the insulating glass units manufactured with them meet internationally standardized

requirements and essential character- istics of insulating glass units. In addi- tion, manual or electric lifting, hand- ling, loading or unloading machines or edge processing machines and equipment are not considered taxon- omy-eligible activities if they have not been installed as part of existing or new insulating glass production lines.

The EU Taxonomy has set clear requirements for windows and doors concerning significantly contributing to climate change mitigation in the Annex to the Commission Delegated Regulation* ) . Manufacture of energy efficiency equipment for buildings (section 3.5 of the Annex) defines the manufacture of energy-efficient windows and their key components as an economic activity that significantly mitigates climate change. The share of insulating glass units (IGU) of the window’s surface area varies between 70−80%, and they are key components for the window’s energy efficiency, as shown in CO₂ studies** ) .

The technologies used in the manu- facture of insulating glass for windows made possible by Glaston equipment are essential for achieving the thres- hold specified in the regulation.

The economic activities related to the manufacture of energy-efficient windows and doors are included in section 3.5 of the Annex with NACE codes C16.23 and C25.12 in accord- ance with the statistical industry classification established in Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006. Glaston’s insu- lating glass technologies and related services are enabling activities within the meaning of Article 10 of Regula- tion (EU) 2020/852.

Based on the above, 46.1% (46.4%) of the Group’s net sales are taxon- omy-eligible. In total, the Group has identified 29.1% (31.5%) of its total capital expenditure and 25.8% (25.7%) of its operating expenditure as taxon- omy-eligible in 2025.

* ) COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) .../... supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determin- ing whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environ- mental objectives C/2021/2800 final

** ) Potential Impact of High Performance Glazing on Energy and CO 2 Savings in Europe, TNO, 2019.

65

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Do no significant harm

Glaston has conducted an assess- ment to ensure that the “do no significant harm” principle is met for the above environmental objectives 2–6 in accordance with the applicable technical screening criteria for climate change mitigation. The assessment has relied on scientific articles, pub- lications from industry organizations, and established international product standards. Glaston’s taxonomy-el- igible activities meet all the “do no significant harm” criteria set out in the Regulation.

The same “do no significant harm” criteria apply to the reported activi- ties related to insulating glass tech- nologies (3.5 Manufacture of energy efficiency equipment for buildings).

Glass is a fully recyclable and reus- able material that does not contain any substances of concern. Recycled glass is a valuable resource for the glass industry that can replace virgin raw materials and be used as a raw material to reduce energy consump- tion and carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, the material waste gener- ated in the processing of float glass can be recycled directly into glass furnaces thanks to its cleanliness. Float glass products manufactured in accordance with relevant product

standards guarantee a reasonable service life and sustainability. Insulat- ing glass units can also be disman- tled, recovered and recycled. Where appropriate, insulating glass units may be accompanied by information on traceability and substances of con- cern.

Minimum safeguards

In accordance with the EU Taxon- omy Regulation and the Minimum Safeguards report published by the EU Platform on Sustainable Finance Working Group, Glaston has assessed minimum safeguards in relation to human rights, bribery and corruption, tax regulation, and fair competition. Compliance with the minimum safe- guards has been assessed at com- pany level. Based on the assessment, Glaston believes it meets the criteria for minimum safeguards.

Glaston is committed to acting according to United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Glaston has signed the UN Global Compact initiative and is therefore commit- ted to its principles on human rights, labor, environment, and anti-cor- ruption. Glaston’s Code of Conduct and Human Rights Policy set require-

ments for all employees and all Glaston Group companies. Glaston also requires its business partners to comply with corresponding principles. Therefore, the company continuously encourages its business partners to improve and develop their human rights practices in order to meet the human rights standards and expec- tations set out in Glaston’s Human Rights Policy.

Conclusions

Glaston has reviewed the techni- cal screening criteria for each of its taxonomy-eligible activities, and all taxonomy-eligible activities meet the technical screening criteria for signif- icant contribution to climate change mitigation. In addition, based on the company’s analysis, it can be con- cluded that the identified activities do not cause significant harm to any of the other five environmental objec- tives. In addition, Glaston estimates that it meets the criteria for minimum safeguards.

Based on Glaston’s estimate, 46.1% (46.4%) of the Group’s net sales are taxonomy-aligned. In total, the Group has identified 29.1% (31.5%) of its total investments and 25.8% (25.7%) of its operating expenses as taxono- my-aligned in 2025. In addition, Glas-

ton discloses information referred to in Article 8(6) and (7) of the amended Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as in standard template 1, Nuclear and fossil gas related activities. Glaston does not have nuclear energy or fossil gas related activities. *** )

*** ) COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2022/1214 of 9 March 2022 amending Del- egated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards economic activities in certain energy sectors and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards specific public disclosures for those economic activities

66

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial year 2025

2025

Substantial contribution criteria

DNSH criteria

Economic activites (1)

Code (a) (2)

Turnover, EUR thousand (3)

Proportion of turnover, year 2025 (4)

Climate change mitigation (5)

Climate change adaptation (6)

Water (7)

Pollution (8)

Circular economy (9)

Biodiversity (10)

Climate change mitigation (11)

Climate change adaptation (12)

Water (13)

Pollution (14)

Circular economy (15)

Biodiversity (16)

Minimum safeguards (17)

Proportion of Taxonomy aligned (A.1) or eligible (A.2) turnover, year 2024 (18)

Category enabling activity (19)

Category transitional activity (20)

Text

Currency

%

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

%

E

T

A. TAXONOMY-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)

Insulating glass technologies

CCM 3.5

96,320

46.1%

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

45.6%

E

Glass processing technologies for photovoltaic modules

CCM 3.1

0

0.0%

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0.7%

E

Turnover of environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1)

46.1%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

46.4%

Of which enabling Of which transitional

96,320

100.0%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100.0%

E

0

0.0%

0.0%

0%

A.2. Taxonomy eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities)

Turnover of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2)

0

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

A. Turnover of taxonomy eligible activities (A.1 + A.2)

96,320

46.1%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

46.4%

B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

Turnover of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities (B)

112,525

53.9%

TOTAL

208,846

100.0%

Turnover

67

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial year 2025

2025

Substantial contribution criteria

DNSH criteria

Economic activities (1)

Code(a) (2)

CapEx, EUR thousand (3)

Proportion of CapEx, year 2025 (4)

Climate change mitigation (5)

Climate change adaptation (6)

Water (7)

Pollution (8)

Circular economy (9)

Biodiversity (10)

Climate change mitigation (11)

Climate change adaptation (12)

Water (13)

Pollution (14)

Circular economy (15)

Biodiversity (16)

Minimum safeguards (17)

Proportion of Taxonomy aligned (A.1) or eligible (A.2) CapEx, year 2024 (18)

Category enabling activity (19)

Category transitional activity (20)

Text

Currency

%

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

%

E

T

A. TAXONOMY-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)

Insulating glass technologies

CCM 3.5

1,029

29.1%

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

30.9%

E

Glass processing technologies for photovoltaic modules

CCM 3.1

0

0.0%

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

0.6%

E

CapEx of environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1)

1,029

29.1%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

31.5%

Of which enabling Of which transitional

1,029

100.0%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

K

100.0%

E

0

0.0%

0%

0.0%

A.2. Taxonomy eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities)

CapEx of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2)

0

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

A. CapEx of taxonomy eligible activities (A.1 + A.2)

1,029

29.1%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

31.5%

B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

CapEx of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities (B)

2,512

70.9%

TOTAL

3,541

100.0%

CapEx

68

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial year 2025

2025

Substantial contribution criteria

DNSH criteria

Economic activities (1)

Code(a) (2)

OpEx, EUR thousand (3)

Proportion of OpEx, year 2025 (4)

Climate change mitigation (5)

Climate change adaptation (6)

Water (7)

Pollution (8)

Circular economy (9)

Biodiversity (10)

Climate change mitigation (11)

Climate change adaptation (12)

Water (13)

Pollution (14)

Circular economy (15)

Biodiversity (16)

Minimum safeguards (17)

Proportion of Taxonomy aligned (A.1) or eligible (A.2) OpEx, year 2024 (18)

Category enabling activity (19)

Category transitional activity (20)

Text

Currency

%

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y; N; N/EL (b) (c)

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

Y/N

%

E

T

A. TAXONOMY-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)

Insulating glass technologies

CCM 3.5

2,851

25.1%

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

24.2%

E

Glass processing technologies for photovoltaic modules

CCM 3.1

81

0.7%

Y

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

1.5%

E

OpEx of environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1)

2,932

25.8%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

25.7%

Of which enabling Of which transitional

2,932

100.0%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

100.0%

E

0

0.0%

0%

0.0%

A.2. Taxonomy eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities)

OpEx of Taxonomy-eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2)

0

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

A. OpEx of taxonomy eligible activities (A.1 + A.2)

2,932

25.8%

100.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

25.7%

B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

OpEx of Taxonomy-non-eligible activities (B)

8,440

74.2%

TOTAL

11,371

100.0%

OpEx

69

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Accounting policy

The consolidated financial state- ments of Glaston Group are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), including International Accounting Standards (IAS) and Interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (SIC and IFRIC). The Taxonomy key performance indicators (KPIs) have been calculated by using the financial information presented in Glaston’s financial statements for the fiscal year 2025.

Turnover

Glaston has calculated the KPI for turnover based on its interpretation of definitions presented in the Disclo- sures Delegated Act.

The numerator of turnover KPI, as defined in the Disclosures Delegated Act, includes the portion of net turno- ver derived from products or services, including intangibles, associated with Taxonomy-aligned economic activi- ties. The denominator equals Group total net sales that are reported in the Financial Statements (see page 99) in accordance with IFRS for the period January 1 to December 31, 2025.

Glaston’s taxonomy-aligned turn- over for 2025 includes sales of insu-

lating glass machines and services. Special glass technologies, machines, manufacturing lines, upgrade options and services that enable manufac- turing of insulating glass unit systems are included whereas loading or unloading machinery, edge working machines and equipment when not installed as part of an existing or new insulating glass manufacturing lines are excluded. For the comparison year, taxonomy-aligned turnover also included revenues from the sale of tempering lines for glass components needed in the production of solar panels.

The turnover KPI is calculated on the basis of project-specific turno- ver and thereby double counting is avoided.

Capital expenditure

Glaston has calculated the KPI for taxonomy-aligned CapEx based on its interpretation of definitions presented in the Disclosures Delegated Act.

The denominator of CapEx KPI, as defined in the Disclosures Delegated Act, includes additions to tangible and intangible assets during the financial year considered before deprecia- tion, amortization and any re-meas- urements. Total capital expenditure covers costs that are accounted in

Row

Nuclear energy related activities

1.

The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.

NO

2.

The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.

NO

3.

The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.

NO

Fossil gas related activities

4.

The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.

NO

5.

The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/ cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.

NO

6.

The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.

NO

Nuclear and fossil gas related activities

70

Glaston Annual Review 2025

accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 38 Intangible Assets as well as IFRS 16 Leases. Glas- ton capitalizes development costs of new products. Additionally, CapEx includes other tangible and intangible assets, such as property, IT hardware and software, machinery and other equipment. Total CapEx inclusions are further described in Notes 3.1. Intangi- ble Assets, 3.2. Tangible Assets and 3.3. Leases.

The numerator of the CapEx KPI includes the part of capital expend- iture, as defined in the Disclosures Delegated Act, that relates to assets or processes that are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activ- ities. Should the capital expenditure relate only partly to taxonomy-aligned economic activity, the expenditure has been attributed through an alloca- tion key based on net sales.

Operating expenditure

Glaston has calculated the KPI for taxonomy-aligned OpEx based on its interpretation of definitions presented in the Disclosures Delegated Act.

The denominator of OpEx KPI, as defined in the Disclosures Delegated Act, includes direct non-capitalized costs that relate to research and development, building renovation

measures, short-term lease, mainte- nance and repair of property, plant and equipment. Research and devel- opment costs include personnel expenses and other fixed costs.

The numerator of the OpEx KPI includes the part of operating expenditure, as defined in the Dis- closures Delegated Act **** ) , that relates to assets or processes that are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities.

Should the operating expendi- ture relate only partly to a taxono- my-aligned economic activity, the expenditure has been attributed through an allocation key based on net sales. Depreciation is excluded from this KPI.

**** ) COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU 2021/2178 of 6 July 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the content and presentation of information to be disclosed by undertakings subject to Arti- cles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU con- cerning environmentally sustainable economic activities, and specifying the methodology to comply with that disclosure obligation

71

Glaston Annual Review 2025

E1 Climate change

Materiality and relevance in the busi- ness model (E1 ESRS 2, 12; ESRS 2 SBM-3; IRO-1)

Supporting sustainability and the green transition is an integral part of Glaston’s strategy and business. Climate change mitigation and the demand for energy-efficient solutions have an impact on glass process- ing. Glaston offers solutions to these challenges, in particular with insulating glass technologies and tempering lines designed for high production capacity volumes used, among other things, in the processing of solar glass. In its operations, Glaston invests in capabilities that can promote climate efforts in the glass industry value chain, in particular by improving the energy efficiency of glass processing.

Material impacts, risks, and opportunities

Material impacts, risks, and opportu- nities related to climate change have been assessed in the annual double materiality assessment conducted by Glaston. The materiality assessment is described in more detail in section ESRS 2 on page 52. Climate change has been identified as a material topic

for Glaston in the company’s value chain in terms of impacts, risks and opportunities. As a result of the ESRS double materiality assessment, the material topics related to climate change are climate change adap- tation, climate change mitigation and energy. Glaston also reports on greenhouse gas emissions in its own operations.

Climate change adaptation includes measures aimed at reduc- ing the current and future adverse impacts of climate change and pursuing identified opportunities. The transition to a low-carbon economy offers Glaston significant business opportunities in the form of growing demand. Glass is a key enabler in improving the energy efficiency of buildings, for example by replacing old windows with new energy-efficient windows or supporting increasing use of solar energy.

Climate change mitigation is linked to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Glass products processed with Glaston technology enable the reduction of carbon dioxide emis- sions and energy consumption in construction. Most of the glass pro-

cessed with Glaston machines ends up in construction. The technologies developed by Glaston enable the pro- duction of energy-efficient insulating glass with a significant positive climate impact. In addition, tempered or heat-strengthened glass is an impor- tant component in facades to ensure that the glass structures used meet the safety and energy requirements set for them. The company recog- nizes the avoided GHG emissions in construction as both a positive impact on climate change mitigation and a significant business opportunity as a result of increased demand.

With regard to climate change mitigation and energy, the company identifies negative impacts and risks in its downstream value chain and outside the value chain. With regard to heat treatment, glass processing is an energy-intensive process that has an impact on the environment, particularly through the electricity consumption and related emissions of machines during use. The GHG emissions and energy consumption of glass production have a negative impact outside the company’s own value chain. A negative impact out-

side Glaston’s own value chain could potentially jeopardize the industry’s decarbonization and thus also consti- tute a transition risk.

Innovations related to energy-ef- ficient glass processing have been identified as an economic opportunity based on the associated demand potential.

72

Glaston Annual Review 2025

The table below summarizes the material impacts, risks and opportunities identified in the double materiality assessment by subtopic:

Topic/subtopic

Impacts

Risks /Opportunities

Management

E1 Climate change adaptation

Glaston enables glass products that support adaptation, growth in demand

Glaston’s product development to enable emission-reducing and energy-efficient glass solutions

E1 Climate change mitigation

Avoided GHG emissions in the end-use of glass products

GHG emissions from materials and components (upstream)

Avoided GHG emissions in the end-use of glass products, increases demand

Glaston’s product development to enable emission-reducing and energy-efficient glass solutions

E1 Climate change mitigation and energy

GHG emissions and energy use in glass production (outside own value chain)

GHG emissions and energy use in glass processing (downstream)

GHG emissions and energy use in glass production (outside own value chain), decarbonization

Strategic SBTi targets set, resulting in Glaston’s decarbonization levers in its own operations and value chain

E1 Energy

Innovations to improve the energy efficiency of machines, potential for demand

Glaston’s product development to enable emission-reducing and energy-efficient glass solutions

The identified impacts, risks and opportunities are closely linked to Glaston’s business, as glass pro- duction processes consume a lot of energy and produce GHG emissions. The glass-making industry is a nat- ural gas-dependent industry. The green transition of the glass industry can have both positive and negative impacts on Glaston’s strategic tar- gets. Glaston has not assessed the resilience of its strategy and business using a separate resilience analysis based on climate scenarios.

Glaston’s business model and strategy are described in more detail in ESRS 2 on page 48.

Assessment of climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities

In addition to the annual double mate- riality assessment, Glaston carried out a climate and biodiversity risk assess- ment using the TCFD (Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures) framework in late 2024. The assess- ment investigated transition risks and physical risks affecting Glaston. For

the assessment of physical risks, data was collected from the production unit level, while transition risks were assessed at Group level. Transition risks were assessed in the short, medium and long term. Physical risks were not assessed in different time horizons, as from a climate change perspective, physical risks were found to be low. In the assessment, Glas- ton has, using the TCFD framework, identified climate-related threats and transition events and assessed the company’s business exposure to

these threats and transition events.

The assessment identified tran- sition risks related to the policies and legislation, technology, markets and the company’s reputation. In the medium and long term, replac- ing existing products and services with lower-emission alternatives and Glaston’s potentially unsuccessful investments in new technologies were assessed as risks with moderate financial effects. However, the likeli- hood of the risks was considered low.

Changing customer behavior and

73

Glaston Annual Review 2025

uncertainty in market signals were identified as market-related transition risks. Changing customer behavior, such as reduced demand due to a change in customer preferences, may affect the demand for Glaston’s products in the medium and long term. Even if the financial effect was significant, the likelihood of the risk was assessed as low. Uncertainty in market signals can lead to increased glass processing costs, for example, as a result of higher electricity prices. The risk was estimated to have a moderate financial effect and likeli- hood in the medium term.

Of the physical risks, the worsening of extreme weather phenomena was assessed to have a low to moderate impact in China, where the factory building is exposed to heavy rainfall, and the risk of storms and floods increases. Heavy rainfall has become more common in northern China, which increases risks related to the supply chain and plant operations. Over the past two years, there have been floods in the area. However, the effects of the risks are expected to be short-term. In Finland and Germany, the worsening of extreme weather phenomena may have temporary effects on the supply chain, but the risk was assessed to be low.

Glaston has assessed the impacts on climate change in connection with the SBTi target setting using the scenario analysis of the International Energy Agency (IEA). The Sustainable Development Scenario has been used to assess the development of emis- sions for significant emissions in the value chain. For more information on the scenario used, see GHG emis- sions.

Glaston has not carried out a climate scenario analysis to iden- tify climate-related transition risks and physical risks. The assessment of climate risks will be developed in the coming years to cover a more detailed analysis of climate-related threats and transition events and a broader utilization of climate scenar- ios in their identification.

Glaston has not taken climate-re- lated aspects into account in the company’s incentive schemes. For more information on remuneration, see ESRS 2 on page 47.

Transition plan for climate change mitigation E1-1

Transition plan

Glaston is committed to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), and Glaston's science based targets were

approved by the SBTi in July 2024. The Scope 1 and 2 targets set in accord- ance with the SBT initiative support the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. In 2025, Glaston prepared transition plans, but their processing has been postponed until 2026. In 2026, the company will prepare a detailed emis- sion intensity roadmap for 2032.

The decarbonization levers and the resources required for them are defined in more detail in the section on policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation on page 74.

Glaston is not excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks.

Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation E1-2 and Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies E1-3

Glaston’s environmental efforts are guided by the company’s Environ- mental and Climate Change Policy approved by the Board of Directors, defining a commitment to the sys- tematic reduction of environmental impact. In Finland, Glaston manages and guides production-related envi- ronmental matters in accordance with the certified ISO 14001 environmental management system. Glaston is also

committed to the guidelines of the UN Global Compact and SBTi initiatives in relation to the implementation of the Environmental and Climate Change Policy. The Sustainability Working Group was reorganized during the year. The aim of the change is to increase the impact of environmental work.

The Environmental and Climate Change Policy applies globally to all legal entities within the Glaston Group. It applies to all employees and external parties working on behalf of Glaston. The Environmental and Climate Change Policy was reviewed in 2025 and no need for changes was identified. Glaston recognizes its responsibility for the environmental and climate impacts caused through- out the company’s value chain and proactively seeks to prevent and miti- gate potential environmental impacts and risks caused by its operations. Glaston’s Executive Leadership Team and Board of Directors monitor the development of the Group’s envi- ronmental performance indicators annually. In addition, energy audits are carried out regularly in the company’s premises, and the energy efficiency and low-emission properties are con- tinuously developed.

The Environmental and Climate

74

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Change Policy takes a position on cli- mate change mitigation. In line with its policy, Glaston aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in its own opera- tions and value chain by focusing on energy savings and transitioning to low-carbon and renewable energy sources. Glaston is planning to phase out natural gas and other fossil energy sources in its operations in the long term and to significantly increase the share of renewable energy. In 2025, it was decided to phase out the use of electricity produced with fossil fuels in China. The company has set short-term science-based emissions reduction targets that cover the entire value chain. The target year for the science-based short-term target is 2032 and the baseline is 2022. To achieve these targets, the company’s policy is to improve the energy effi- ciency of the products it sells, support customers in their emission reduction targets and implement measures to reduce emissions in other parts of the value chain, such as purchased goods and services.

A significant part of the company’s contribution to climate change miti- gation is to provide products and ser- vices that promote decarbonization, improve energy efficiency and expand the use of renewable energy sources.

Glaston focuses on developing and delivering sustainable, upgradeable and energy-efficient products. The company offers its customers main- tenance and modernization services that can considerably extend the life cycle of machines. In 2025, Glaston’s product development accounted for 3.9% of net sales. Maintenance and modernization services accounted for 38.9% of net sales. Of emissions in Glaston's own operations (Scope 1 & 2), the share of fuels and natural gas (Scope 1) was approximately 59% and the share of electricity and district heat (Scope 2) approximately 41% in 2025.

The type of glass processing solu- tions ordered by Glaston's customers and the availability of emissions-free energy in different market areas are factors that have a substantial impact on the annual absolute amount of emissions, in particular for Scope 3.

Glaston does not estimate that taking actions related to climate change mitigation will require signifi- cant capital or operating expenditure. The company estimates that clear emphases in product development are key in taking actions. The com- pany strives to allocate product devel- opment resources efficiently in order to profitably take the planned actions

in accordance with the climate policy. The most significant transition risk is the decarbonization of Glaston’s glass production outside the value chain, which, should it fail, could affect the use of glass as a building material and thus also the demand for Glaston’s products. Globally significant glass producers have decarbonization programs and related investments. Glaston tracks this development and participates in discussions on the subject.

Glaston’s policy on climate change does not cover climate change adap- tation, energy efficiency, or renewable energy deployment.

Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation E1-4

In Glaston’s operations, the most significant climate impacts are caused by the electricity consumption of machines during use and associated emissions. To manage identified risks and negative impacts related to climate change mitigation and energy consumption, Glaston is committed to science-based emission reduction targets. The company’s final emission reduction targets for its own opera- tions (Scopes 1 and 2) and the value chain (Scope 3) were published in fall 2024 and have been approved by

the international SBT initiative. In line with the Paris Agreement, the sci- ence-based Scope 1 and 2 emission reduction targets aim to limit global warming to a maximum of 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Glaston is committed to reducing its absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions by 50.4% by 2032 compared to base year 2022. In addition, the company is committed to reducing its Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions in its value chain by 58.1% in relation to the sold glass processing capacity (m 2 ) over the same target period.

The targets are based on the decarbonization development path defined by the SBTi, which is based on scientifically substantiated climate scenarios. The target setting takes into account the IEA’s Announced Pledges Scenario (APS) in assess- ing the development of emissions. Glaston’s targets include critical assumptions related to, for exam- ple, future changes in sales volumes, developments in customer demand and preferences, regulatory factors, and the deployment of new technolo- gies. Assessing and considering these assumptions ensures the realism of the targets and their feasibility in the long term.

75

Glaston Annual Review 2025

2022 has been set as the base year for the SBTi targets. Before setting the SBTi targets, one of Glaston’s four non-financial targets was to halve the CO 2 emissions intensity of its own operations (emissions in relation to net sales) by 2025. This target was already achieved in 2022 through investments in energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy, as well as by increasing the share of zero-emission electricity.

Ensuring the management of changes in the base year is based on the consistency of the emissions cal- culation assumptions. The production assumptions used in the calculation are also retained in future calculations. Should the assumptions be changed later, these changes will also be made to the base year data in order to main- tain comparability and ensure the reliability of the analyses.

Annual Scope 3 emissions are significantly influenced by the types of glass processing solutions Glas- ton’s customers purchase each year and the availability of zero-emission energy in different market areas. The company delivers different kinds of machines to different countries in different years, which results in fluc- tuations in absolute Scope 3 emis- sions between years. At the same

time, it can be assumed that Glas- ton’s absolute Scope 3 emissions will increase as the number of machines sold increases. In order to achieve the reduction of emissions caused by new machines, the emission reduction tar- get for the value chain is proportional to the sold glass processing capacity.

Glaston’s GHG emissions inventory covers Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions and is based on the GHG Protocol standard. The undertaking is committed to the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) targets, which cover both its own operations (Scope 1 and 2) and the value chain (Scope 3) emissions. For Scope 1 and 2 emis- sions, the targets focus on low-carbon energy use and improving energy efficiency. Glaston’s emissions calcu- lations cover all companies over which the undertaking has operational con- trol. For Scope 3 emissions, the emis- sion targets set cover all calculation categories relevant to Glaston (1–7, 9, 11–13). This ensures that the targets are aligned with the GHG inventory boundaries.

The Sustainability Working Group is responsible for the systematic devel- opment of Glaston’s sustainability agenda. The working group monitors the progress of operations at least quarterly. Emissions data is calcu-

lated annually, so it is monitored on an annual basis. The working group also reports on progress to the Executive Leadership Team and the Board of Directors.

Apart from the SBTi process, no other stakeholders have been involved in the target setting.

Energy consumption and mix E1-5

The most significant climate impacts of Glaston’s operations are related to the use of sold machines, espe- cially the electricity consumption of tempering machines. The temper- ing process, in which glass is heated to over +600 degrees Celsius and quickly cooled to room temperature, is energy-intensive. Glaston’s product development focuses on improving the energy efficiency of machines. Automation and technological developments allow machines to efficiently optimize energy consump- tion in both the heating and cooling process, and new technologies can also be upgraded to existing produc- tion lines.

As part of its science-based targets, Glaston intends to gradually phase out natural gas and other fossil energy sources in its own operations in the long term and further signifi-

cantly increase the share of renewa- ble energy.

Glaston operates in sectors that are defined as sectors of significant environmental impact in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, falling within the main categories A–H and L in Annex I (as defined in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288). Glaston’s main business, manufacturing of glass processing machines, falls under main category H subcategory “Manufacture of other special-purpose machinery and equipment” and the Services business under main category H subcategory “Repair and mainte- nance of machinery and equipment”. The consulting business is classified in category N subcategory “Techni- cal operations and related technical consulting”, which is not classified among sectors with significant envi- ronmental impacts. Since the first two businesses account for almost all of Glaston’s annual net sales and it is dif- ficult to distinguish the net sales from consulting from the total net sales, the energy intensity has been calcu- lated using the company’s total net sales, i.e. the Group’s total net sales in accordance with IFRS reported in the company’s financial statements

76

Glaston Annual Review 2025

(see page 99) for the period January 1–December 31, 2025. The boundaries of emissions calculation, Scope 1 and 2, apply to the calculation of energy consumption.

Energy consumption data and energy intensity are presented in sec- tion E1 on page 83.

Gross and total Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG gas emissions E1-6

GHG emissions

The Scope 1 and 2 emissions of Glaston’s own operations account for only a small proportion of Glaston’s total emissions. The majority, approx- imately 99.2% of all emissions related to Glaston’s operations are generated in the company’s value chain (Scope 3). The most significant sources of emissions are electricity consumed during the life cycle of machines manufactured by Glaston (71.2%) and emissions caused by purchased goods and services (23.7%). Temper- ing lines used continuously in high-vol- ume production consume significantly more electricity than lines with smaller volumes. On the other hand, continu- ous tempering lines are more energy efficient.

Glaston’s annual Scope 3 emissions are significantly influenced by the

types of glass processing solutions customers purchase and the availabil- ity of zero-emission energy in differ- ent market areas. Absolute emissions are likely to fluctuate considerably in the coming years. In addition, it can be assumed that the company’s abso- lute Scope 3 emissions will increase as the number of new machines sold increases.

Logistics accounts for a small share of Glaston’s total emissions. The transport of manufactured machines to customers is handled by forwarding companies as land or sea transport. Smaller and urgent spare parts are also transported as air freight.

The denominator used in calcu- lating the GHG emissions intensity is the Group’s total net sales reported in accordance with IFRS for the period January 1–December 31, 2025 in the company's financial statements (see page 99).

In 2025, Glaston’s total GHG emis- sions amounted to 177,563 (186,470) tCO₂e, representing a 5% decrease from the previous year. Scope 1 and 2 emissions (own operations) amounted to 1,498 (1,539) tCO₂e and decreased by about 3% compared to the previous year. In 2025, emis- sions from Glaston's own operations accounted for approximately 0.8% of

the company’s total emissions.

In 2025, Scope 3 emissions (value chain) amounted to 176,065 (184,930) tCO₂e, which corresponds to about 99% of the company's total emissions. The absolute emissions of category 11 “Use of sold products” remained at the previous year’s level and accounted for approximately 71% of all emis- sions. The second largest category, category 1 “Purchased goods and services,” was approximately 42,117 (51,025) tCO₂e, a decrease of about 17% from the previous year. Emis- sions from other Scope 3 categories decreased by approximately 11% on average and accounted for 4.4% of all Scope 3 emissions.

There have been no changes in the undertaking’s operations or value chain that would trigger the recalcula- tion of emissions.

Calculation principles

Glaston’s emissions calculations cover all companies over which the undertaking has operational control. However, companies that do not have actual business operations and whose liquidation process has been initiated have been excluded from the calcu- lation. These are Glaston International Oy and Glaston Brazil Ltda.

The GHG emissions inventory is

based on the Greenhouse Gas Proto- col Accounting and Reporting stand- ard and the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting standard. In addition, the calculation takes into account the requirements of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard.

The reporting covers direct GHG emissions from own operations (Scope 1), indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2) and indirect GHG emis- sions from the company’s value chain (Scope 3). Four of the value chain calculation categories have been excluded from the calculation because they have been assessed as irrelevant or the emissions caused by them have been included in other categories. The categories excluded from the calculation are upstream leased assets, processing of sold products, franchising and invest- ments. The categories classified as irrelevant are not included in the Scope 3 emission reduction target. Both included and excluded catego- ries are presented in the table and calculation descriptions.

For each category, total GHG emis- sions (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs and SF₆) are reported in tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. Glaston's opera- tions do not generate emissions from

77

Glaston Annual Review 2025

the incineration, processing and dis- tribution phase of bioenergy or land use emissions or removals related to bioenergy raw materials.

Glaston did not engage in GHG trade during the reporting year, such as buying, selling or transferring car- bon credits or emission allowances.

The benchmark year for the emis- sions targets, Scope 1, 2 and 3, is 2022. The reference year was selected when Glaston committed to and set science-based emission reduction targets in 2023, and the selection of the reference year is based on the availability of more accurate and comprehensive information and the timeliness in relation to business for the period in question. Glaston is committed to reviewing and, if neces- sary, recalculating and confirming its targets in accordance with the latest criteria at least every five years. Glas- ton has set a 5% significance threshold for recalculating emissions.

Direct emissions from own operations (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased energy (Scope 2)

The Scope 1 & 2 inventory includes data from offices and factories of Glaston Finland Oy, Glaston Oyj Abp, Glaston Switzerland AG, Glaston Germany GmbH, Glaston America Inc,

Glaston UK Limited, Glaston Singa- pore Pte Ltd, and Glaston Tianjin Co. Ltd. Other units are excluded from the calculation since there are no Scope 1 and 2 emissions or their impact on the whole is marginal. Scope 1 and 2 emissions do not include biogenic CO 2 emissions.

Activity data was collected from each unit by using a data collection form. The data sources vary between units, and include but do not limit to electricity bills, utility invoices, fuel card data. Sources of emission factors include Statistics Finland, EPA, UBA, and EMBER, but other sources were also used. The quality of the reported activity data is classified as very good in all data quality areas, as the data was collected by unit for 2025 and contains exact data of the units' energy consumption. The quality of the emission factors is classified as good in geographical representative- ness and very good in other areas.

The emissions were calculated based on the amounts of used energy. Each energy or fuel type was assigned with the corresponding emission factor to calculate emissions from Scopes 1 and 2. It was assumed that the electricity and district heating used in some office buildings is like in 2024, as there were no changes in

operations and the calculations were made on the basis of assumptions.

Value chain emissions (Scope 3)

Category 1 inventory includes the factories and technology centers from Glaston’s largest sites in Finland, Germany, Switzerland, and China. The activities related to purchased goods and services at these locations have been identified as significant emission factors. Smaller sales and service units have been excluded from the calcu- lation, as the volume of purchases at these locations is low and, therefore, the impact on the total emissions has been estimated to be insignificant. No biogenic CO 2 emissions are associ- ated with Category 1 emissions.

Emissions were calculated using activity data from Glaston’s ERP systems. The emission factors are spend-based and based on BEIS and EPA data. The quality of the reported emissions activity data is classified as good or very good in completeness, reliability, and temporal represent- ativeness. The activity data is seen as poor in geographical and fair in technological representativeness. The quality of emission factors is classi- fied as good or fair in completeness, technological and temporal repre-

sentativeness. The quality of emission factors is seen poor in reliability and geographical representativeness.

Emissions were calculated using spend-based method. Each supplier is assigned to an emission factor cate- gory based on the materials, products or services they mainly supply. The categories are assumptions and might create uncertainties in the data. The quality of data was improved in 2025 by adding emission categories and re-categorizing the largest suppliers. The changes were not considered to have a significant impact on the results of the emissions account- ing. No allocations were used in the calculation of category 1. Category 1 emissions were not calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 2 inventory includes data from all applicable units that had assets belonging to the category. Companies with no actual operations, either functioning as administrative entities or being in the process of dissolution, are excluded. These com- panies have been listed above. No bio- genic CO 2 emissions are associated with Category 2 emissions.

Data for capital goods is by Group Treasury for CAPEX calculations. The

78

Glaston Annual Review 2025

emission factors are spend-based and retrieved from the BEIS databases. The quality of the reported activity data has been rated very good in terms of completeness, reliability, and temporal and geographical represent- ativeness, and fair in terms of techno- logical representativeness. The quality of the emission factors is considered to be good in terms of technological and temporal representativeness and completeness, fair in terms of reliabil- ity, and poor in terms of geographical representativeness.

Emissions were calculated using spend-based method. Data was divided to asset types, which are used to define the type of CAPEX projects. The biggest development projects were screened by using ERP reports for detailed cost information. The averages from all conducted screen- ings were used to estimate projects in the inventory. Salary costs were excluded from calculations. For the projects that were not thoroughly screened, an assumption of material/ salary costs was used. Category 2 emissions were not calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 3 inventory includes data from the same units that are included

in Scope 1 and 2. Category 3 emis- sions are calculated using the same data as in Scope 1 and 2. No biogenic CO 2 emissions are associated with Category 3 emissions.

The calculation uses the same activity data as for Scope 1 and 2. The sources of emission factors are UBA, UBA Austria, ADEME, BEIS, and VTT. The quality of the reported activity data is classified as very good in all data quality areas. The quality of the emission factors is classified as very good in technological and geograph- ical representativeness, as well as in completeness, but fair in temporal representativeness and good in reliability.

The emissions were calculated based on the amounts of used energy. Each energy or fuel type was assigned the corresponding emission factor to calculate emissions from Category 3. 76.0% of Category 3 emissions were calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 4 inventory follows the same boundaries and methodology as in Category 1. In addition, some of the activity data used was obtained directly from suppliers. However, well- to-wheel emission factors were esti-

mated using a conversion factor. The conversion factor was based on the ratio between other available tank- to-wheel and well-to-tank factors. In this category, 8.6% of emissions were calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 5 includes data from Glaston Finland Oy, Glaston Germany GmbH, Glaston Switzerland AG, Glaston Tianjin Co Ltd, and Glaston UK Lim- ited. Other locations were excluded from Category 5 calculations, as the amount of waste generated in the office areas does not contribute significantly to total emissions gener- ated in this category. No biogenic CO 2 emissions are associated with Cate- gory 5 emissions. 100% of Category 5 emissions were calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Activity data is collected directly from waste handling companies. The used emission factors are from BEIS and ADEME. The quality of the activity data is considered as very good in all data quality areas. Emission factors are considered as good or very good in all other areas except for geograph- ical representativeness, where the quality was considered fair.

The calculations are made based on the type, weight and treatment method of the waste. Each type of waste generated was calculated using an emission factor corresponding to the correct waste type and the reported treatment method.

Category 6 inventory includes data from Glaston Finland Oy, Glaston Ser- vices Ltd. Oy, Glaston Oyj Abp, Glaston Switzerland AG, Glaston Germany GmbH, Glaston America Inc, Glaston UK Limited, Glaston Singapore Pte Ltd, and Glaston (Tianjin) Co, Ltd. These locations have been identified as significant contributors to emissions within Category 6. There are no bio- genic CO 2 emissions associated with Category 6.

Inventory data was collected using the travel expense system and from supplier reports. The emissions of the different expense types in the travel expense system were calculated in a suitable way for each expense type, based on distance or fuel. Travel-re- lated spend that was not covered in the travel expense system or sup- plier data was estimated by CO 2 / eur-intensity factor from different expense types. It is assumed that the calculated intensity values are repre- sentative to calculate the emissions

79

Glaston Annual Review 2025

from the estimated spend from travel expenses as more accurate data was not available. The distance-based emission factors are from the BEIS database and for electricity from the EMBER database. Other calculation factors have been used to support the calculations.

The quality of the reported emis- sions activity data is classified as good or very good in all data quality areas. The quality of the emission factors has been assessed as good or very good in every area. Only mandatory business travel emissions were calcu- lated and reported in well-to-wheel bases. 41.4% of Category 6 emissions were calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 7 inventory includes employ- ees working for Glaston in all locations. Emissions from employees working remotely were excluded from the cal- culations. The transport modes cov- ered in the category are rail, bus, car travel by fuel type, walking, and biking. Emissions caused by remote work are excluded due to being optional. Category 7 does not include biogenic CO 2 emissions.

The calculation used the employee commuting survey conducted in 2024,

which was applied with the updated number of employees in 2025. The survey includes the employees’ main mode of transport, distance and the frequency of commuting. The sur- vey was sent randomly to selected Glaston employees. The rest of employee commuting emissions were estimated using the proportional amounts resulted by the survey. The category was calculated by using the stratified random sampling method in accordance with the GHG protocol and assumed 95% reliability. Directly calculated emissions from the survey are distance based using an assump- tion of 47 working weeks in a year. Estimated emissions are based on the same assumptions.

The emission factors used are the same as in Category 6 and based on the transport distance. Emissions are calculated using the distance-based method in accordance with the GHG protocol, and the emission factors are in the unit of g/km. Emissions are calculated on a well-to-wheel basis. The quality of activity data and emis- sion factors are classified as good and very good. There are no biogenic CO 2 emissions calculated in this category and emissions were not calculated using data obtained directly from sup- pliers or other value chain partners.

Category 8 is excluded as lack of relevance to the reporting bound- ary. No calculable emissions were identified as a result of reviewing the leased assets at the upstream end of the production chain. The asset types were deemed either economically insignificant or non-emitting. For some asset types, the emissions have been accounted under Scope 1 and 2 emissions. This category is excluded from the Scope 3 target boundary.

Category 9 inventory includes all Glaston locations and technology centers in Finland, Germany, Switzer- land, China, and America. The smaller locations are excluded, as the down- stream and distribution is focused on the manufacturing facilities and storages, and the shipments from the smaller locations are assumed to contribute only marginally to the total emissions in the category. Category 9 does not include biogenic CO 2 emis- sions.

Activity data was collected from value chain partners, if it was available. The rest of the data was collected from actual machine deliveries and based on supplier-specific costs. The quality of data was improved for Cat- egories 4 and 9, which is why some of the emissions previously included

in Category 4 were calculated as part of Category 9 emissions this year. These emissions were calculated using spend-based method. The used emission factors are from BEIS. The quality of activity data was considered good or moderate in all areas except for temporal representativeness, in which the data quality was considered very good. The quality of the used emission factors was considered very good in other categories than tech- nological and geographical represent- ativeness, where it was considered good. Emissions were calculated on a well-to-wheel basis. 38.3% of Cat- egory 9 emissions were calculated using data obtained directly from sup- pliers or other value chain partners.

Category 10 is not relevant to Glaston. The company does not sell end prod- ucts that require further processing before being sold to the final user. This category is excluded from the Scope 3 target boundary.

Category 11 includes the expected lifetime emissions of all products sold during the reporting year. This covers the direct emissions during the use of sold products from all Group compa- nies. Glaston’s products are powered exclusively by electricity, which is what

80

Glaston Annual Review 2025

also causes the emissions.

The machines included in the calculation are based on sales data. Sold products are included in the calculation based on the significance of the emissions in the use phase. Products valued less than EUR 20,000 are expected to have a low impact on total emissions and are excluded from the calculation. Exceptions have been made for some products if their consumption data is based on tab- ulated values and is easily available. The machinery consists of production lines and individual machines that can be used for glass processing and whose use-phase consumption can be estimated with reasonable accu- racy using estimates and assump- tions. Machine upgrades have been excluded from the calculation, assum- ing that their life cycle emissions were calculated in their year of sale. Cases where the annual energy consump- tion for the machine upgrade can be estimated with reasonable accuracy are included in the inventory.

The data used is collected from project and sales data, the ERP system and product data. All calcu- lated products are individual delivery projects customized to the custom- er’s requirements. This affects the energy consumption and efficiency of the machine. The method for calcu-

lating the electricity consumption of machines is based on a combination of actual data and assumptions made from machines in different use cases. These assumptions are simplified between different product groups and types. If the input data does not allow the determination of individual calcu- lation values, an estimate is made by selecting the most representative of the available values. A detailed calcu- lation method has been developed for each product group, based on infor- mation classified as confidential.

The most accurate emission factors available at the time of cal- culation were used in the calculation. The emissions were calculated on the basis of the estimated number of kilowatt hours and the destination countries. The emission factors are the location-based emission factors for electricity consumption in the EMBER database. Changes in electricity emis- sions during the product life cycle are assessed using the International Energy Agency (IEA) Announced Pledges Sce- nario (APS). It is assumed that the sold products will be commissioned no later than the year following the reporting, unless the date of commissioning is known in more detail. The expected service life and production time of the machines are fixed to ensure the consistency of the calculation year by

year. The expected service life of the products is based on assumptions in the emission calculations, using a life cycle of 17 years for heat treatment machines and 15 years for insulation and pre-processing machines.

Category 12 inventory includes the machines included in the calculation in Category 11. Emissions have been calculated from the estimated weight of the machines included in the inven- tory. Emission factors are from BEIS.

The quality of activity data was considered very good in temporal and geographical representativeness, as well as in completeness, and good in technological representativeness and reliability. The quality of emission factors was considered very good in temporal representativeness and reliability. In addition, it was considered fair in technological representative- ness and completeness, and poor in geographical representativeness.

Category 12 emissions were not calculated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 13 includes the emissions of electricity sold to tenants. The cate- gory data is based on the measured consumption of tenants and emission factors obtained from suppliers. 100%

of Category 13 emissions were cal- culated using data obtained directly from suppliers or other value chain partners.

Category 14 is excluded as not rele- vant to the reporting boundary. The company does not own or operate franchising in exchange for royalties or other payments. This category is excluded from the Scope 3 target boundary.

Category 15 has been excluded, as in 2025, there were no joint ventures, new subsidiaries, or other financial activities that needed to be reported or included in the greenhouse gas inventory. This category is excluded from the Scope 3 target boundary.

The internal audit process of emis- sions accounting was implemented as a cross-check between the account- ants and different experts to ensure the most accurate inventory and consistent final result possible. Glas- ton has not identified any significant events affecting the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions between the entities in the value chain and Glaston at the reporting date.

81

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Retrospective

2022 Base year

2024

2025

Change % 2025/2024

Scope 1 GHG emissions

Scope 1 gross greenhouse gas emissions (tCO 2 eq)

605

848

878

4%

Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions covered by regulated emissions trading schemes (%)

0

0

0

0%

Scope 2 GHG emissions

Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO 2 eq)

1,340

1,228

1,108

-10%

Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO 2 eq)

886

692

619

-10%

Significant Scope 3 GHG emissions

Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO 2 eq) 1

685,073

184,930

176,065

-5%

1 Purchased goods and services

52,722

51,025

42,117

-17%

2 Capital goods

1,213

753

428

-43%

3 Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)

596

609

446

-27%

4 Upstream transportation and distribution 1

1,015

2,317

1,760

-24%

5 Waste generated in operations

31

22

21

-7%

6 Business travel 1

1,345

1,831

1,775

-3%

7 Employee commuting 1

685

813

687

-16%

8 Upstream leased assets

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

9 Downstream transportation 1

2,054

1,197

2,378

99%

10 Processing of sold products

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

11 Use of sold products

625,168

126,258

126,393

0%

12 End-of-life treatment of sold products

113

23

13

-40%

13 Downstream leased assets

131

83

48

-43%

14 Franchises

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

15 Investments

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Total GHG emissions

Total GHG emissions (location-based) (tCO 2 eq) 1

687,018

187,006

178,051

-5%

Total GHG emissions (market-based) (tCO 2 eq) 1

686,564

186,470

177,563

-5%

1 Reported including WTW (well-to-wheel) emissions.

82

Glaston Annual Review 2025

In total, 1.3% of Scope 3 emissions was calculated using primary data. Primary data was used for calculation in Categories 3–6, 9 and 13. Their percentages of the emis- sions of each category are stated above in the descriptions of the emission categories.

Energy intensity in relation to net sales

2024

2025

Change % 2025/2024

Total energy consumption of operations in highest climate impact sectors in relation to net sales from operations in high climate impact sectors (MWh/€)

0.000047

0.000049

5%

Energy consumption and mix

2024

2025

Fuel consumption from coal and coal products (MWh)

-

-

Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products (MWh)

1,791

1,604

Fuel consumption from natural gas (MWh)

1,957

2,008

Fuel consumption from other fossil sources (MWh)

-

-

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, or cooling from fossil sources (MWh) 1

2,766

2,722

Total energy consumption from fossil sources (MWh) 1

6,514

6,333

Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption (%) 1

64

62

Consumption from nuclear sources (MWh)

2,600

2,993

Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption (%)

26

29

Fuel consumption for renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) (MWh)

-

-

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources (MWh) 1

996

915

The consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy (MWh)

56

43

Total renewable energy consumption (MWh) 1

1,052

958

Share of renewable energy sources in total energy consumption (%) 1

10

9

Total energy consumption (MWh)

10,166

10,284

Total renewable energy production (MWh)

277

289

1 The values for 2024 have been adjusted regarding the classification of district heating, resulting in an increase in the amount and share of fossil energy in total energy, while renewable energy has correspondingly decreased from the originally reported figures for 2024.

Data on energy consumption and mix was collected from the units’ factories and offices using a data collection form in connection with Scope 1 and 2 data collection. Data sources include fuel cards, electricity bills and operating expense invoices. The consumption meters have not been validated/verified by Glaston.

83

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston’s emission reduction targets

2022 Base year

2024

2025

Target 2032

Absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions (market based) -50.4% from base year (tCO 2 eq)

1,491

1,539

1,498

740

Scope 3 GHG emissions -58.1% in relation to sold glass processing capacity (m 2 ) from base year (tCO 2 eq/m2)

0.00043

0.00017

0.00022

0.00018

GHG intensity in relation to net sales

2024

2025

Change % 2025/2024

Total GHG emissions (location-based) in relation to net sales (tCO 2 eq/EUR million)

858

853

-1%

Total GHG emissions (market-based) in relation to net sales (tCO 2 eq/EUR million)

856

850

-1%

The Scope 1 and 2 target is a combined target, validated by SBTi and has not been updated for the sustainability reporting separately for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. The absolute emissions for the scope 3 target year are not reported due to the sensitive nature of the data, ESRS 2 BP-1 5d.

84

Glaston Annual Review 2025

S1 Own workforce

Personnel strategy and objectives

Professional, committed and healthy employees are the foundation of Glas- ton’s success. The employees play an important role in the implementation of Glaston’s strategy. Glaston is com- mitted to promoting a diverse, inclu- sive and equal workplace community where all employees are treated with respect and where everyone has equal opportunities for professional growth and development.

Glaston’s strategy and business model are presented in section ESRS2, SBM-3. The aim is for Glaston’s strate- gic targets to be achieved in 3−5 years, with the exception of the emission reduction targets, which the company aims to achieve by 2032. Glaston’s sustainability-promoting non-financial strategic objectives with regard to the personnel are as follows:

Zero work-related accidents result- ing in lost time (LTA). Progress is measured by the accident fre- quency (LTIFR, lost time injury fre- quency rate/million hours worked). In 2025, the LTFR was 5.8 (5.7).

Employee engagement rate over 75 (out of 100). Progress is measured by means of regular personnel pulse surveys. In 2025, the engagement rate was 78 (76).

Glaston has targets that support the strategic objectives and have been identified in the materiality assessment as material with regard to the personnel. These targets are presented in the sections describing each area.

Glaston’s objective is to be a safe workplace, which consists of the fol- lowing areas:

We are an equal employer that values diversity

Our management culture strengthens success together

We encourage skills development

We enable career advancement

We attend to well-being and safety at work

The materiality assessment, which is based on double materiality, is pre- sented in section IRO-1 Description of the materiality assessment. In the annual double materiality assessment, working conditions and non-discrim-

ination and equal treatment were identified as material sub-topics with respect to the personnel. The mate- rial sub-sub-topics related to working conditions are working hours, work- life balance and health and safety. With regard to non-discrimination and equal treatment, the aspects identi- fied as the most material are gender equality and compensation, train- ing and development and diversity. Employee engagement was identified as a separate material topic in the assessment. The material impacts, risks and opportunities related to the personnel and the management practices concerning these impacts, risks and opportunities are presented in the table on page 86.

The personnel-related key themes identified in the 2025 double materi- ality assessment are in line with the material themes identified in Glaston's materiality assessments carried out in 2019, 2021, and 2024.

85

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Sub-topic/own topic

Impacts

Risks / Opportunities

Management

Working conditions

Working hours

Work-life balance

Health and safety

If Glaston is not committed to developing safe working conditions and a workplace with a good work-life balance, it can affect employees' motivation and engagement. When realized, this has a positive impact on the workplace community.

Occasional excessive workload can increase the amount of work and hours worked, and work can cause stress. When realized, this has a negative impact on the workplace community.

Glaston is committed to providing a healthy work-life balance, and this attracts employees.

Engaged employees are more likely to perform well and stay with the company.

Opportunities for flexible and hybrid work, monitoring of working hours.

Occupational safety is managed systematically, reporting channels, training, policies and instructions.

Through supervisory work, support and actions concerning functions in which potential negative impacts have been identified.

Non-discrimination and equal treatment

Diversity

Gender equality and equal pay for equal work

Training and skills development

At Glaston, women feel that they have equal opportunities

A diverse and equal work environment increases engagement and promotes the well-being of employees. If diversity and inclusion are not part of the corporate culture, it can have a negative impact on employee engagement and well-being.

If Glaston does not develop its personnel’s capabilities, the lack of opportunities for learning and development may lead to employee dissatisfaction.

Glaston is perceived as an equal employer, and this is a pull factor

Operating in accordance with diversity, equity and inclusion principles.

Developing DEI activities.

Development plans for Glaston employees.

Learning environments.

Oma aihe

Employee engagement

Glaston employees are highly engaged and motivated

Personnel development measures.

Personnel survey feedback and targets.

Policies related to own workforce S1-1

The company’s operations are guided by the Code of Conduct approved by the Board of Directors. The Code of Conduct determines how Glaston interacts with employees, customers

and other stakeholders. The guide- lines were updated in 2025 and have been published in Finnish, German, English, and Chinese.

All of the employees are required to complete a mandatory course on the Code of Conduct once every two

years, and familiarization with the Code of Conduct is part of induc- tion training. The General Counsel is in charge of the implementation of the Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct was not drawn up with the interests of any specific group in mind.

Instead, they are intended as generally applicable principles.

Glaston’s business objectives are set out in the company's strategy, which is approved by the Board of Directors. Glaston has a People Policy approved by the Board of Directors,

86

Glaston Annual Review 2025

and it applies to the entire Group. The People Policy supplements the Group’s Code of Conduct and sets out principles concerning working conditions, equity, training and devel- opment, and equality.

The Group’s People Policy includes a commitment to the principles of equal- ity and non-discrimination with respect to gender, age, religious beliefs, gender identity, political opinions, and national or social origin. Glaston has not identi- fied particularly vulnerable groups and therefore has no specific policies or operating principles in relation to such groups. Glaston has a process in place to enable the reporting of conduct that violates the company's policies and guidelines. Glaston's employees have many ways to report potential non-compliance. For example, they can contact their immediate supervi- sor or report incidents or issues via an externally maintained whistleblowing channel that the employees can also use to report issues anonymously. Glaston investigates all reported incidents promptly and confidentially and takes appropriate action based on the findings of the investigation. The concerned parties are informed of the outcome of the investigation process.

Glaston's DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) roadmap was approved

by the Executive Leadership Team in December 2024. The aim of the DEI roadmap is to create a diverse, equal and inclusive work environment for all employees regardless of their background or minority. One of the goals of the roadmap is to increase the proportion of women among the personnel and the company's senior management.

Glaston respects human rights and workers’ rights as defined in interna- tionally recognized instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) and the OECD Guidelines for Multina- tional Enterprises.

Glaston is a signatory to the UN Global Compact initiative and is committed to its principles on human rights, labor, environment, and anti-corruption. The company is also committed to the International Labour Organization (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Glaston joined the UN Global Compact in 2023.

Glaston’s commitment to human rights is described in the compa- ny’s Code of Conduct and separate Human Rights Policy. Negative human rights impacts arising from Glaston's operations and value chain were

identified and assessed by means of a human rights risk assessment conducted by an external expert in 2023. The assessment was based on reviewing internal practices and documentation as well as interviews with key personnel. Risks related to occupational safety, particularly with regard to the company's own person- nel, were identified as having the most serious potential impacts.

Glaston has operations in China and the company has recognized that the probability of potential human rights risks may be greater there than in the company’s other countries of operation. At the same time, the company has not identified groups among Glaston's own employees that are particularly at risk with regard to working conditions or general labor and human rights.

Human rights-related risks and impacts are assessed regularly at Glaston. The first human rights risk assessment was carried out in 2023 and the next assessment is planned for 2026. The company aims to recog- nize, assess and prioritize any negative human rights impacts of its business as part of operational activities and risk management. The company aims to prevent and mitigate these impacts and take action as necessary to reme-

diate negative impacts.

Glaston has separate guidelines in place to assess and mitigate risks relating to occupational safety. The policies have been communicated to the personnel, and relevant occupa- tional safety instructions are reviewed on a task-specific basis. Any deficien- cies and violations can be reported through the line organization or by using the anonymous whistleblowing channel. Corrective actions are deter- mined on a case-by-case basis.

The management of occupational safety and health is guided by Glas- ton's Safety and Occupational Health Policy. It sets out targets and Glas- ton Group's global health and safety guidelines.

Glaston does not use child labor or forced labor, and does not allow the use of child labor or forced labor by its suppliers or subcontractors. This commitment is laid down in the Supplier Code of Conduct and the Group’s People Policy. According to the Supplier Code of Conduct, Glaston's suppliers are expected to respect the rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the fundamental rights set out in the eight fundamental Conventions of the International Labour Organization. The Supplier Code of Conduct has

87

Glaston Annual Review 2025

been approved by Glaston's Board of Directors. The primary responsibility for its implementation lies with the procurement organization, and the legal department monitors compli- ance with the Supplier Code of Con- duct. The Supplier Code of Conduct also applies to tier 1 suppliers, con- tractors and other business partners of Glaston’s suppliers. Suppliers are responsible for compliance with the applicable laws regarding working hours, minimum wages, overtime, suf- ficient breaks and rest time, sick leave and annual holidays, as well as parental leave and mandatory benefits, such as social security, and maintain appropri- ate records of these, and ensure that all employees are made aware of the key terms of their employment prior to commitment to work.

Suppliers must provide their employees with a healthy, safe and secure workplace in compliance with all laws and regulations appli- cable to its operations, and comply with the agreed-upon health and safety requirements. The Supplier Code of Conduct also addresses the prevention of forced labor, as well as non-discrimination and commitment to equal treatment and the right to organize. Suppliers are expected to commit to these principles. In fall

2025, a self-assessment of human rights implementation was carried out among Glaston Tianjin’s largest suppliers. The assessment focused on compliance, labor rights, availability of documentation and compliance with international standards. Based on the results, suppliers were classified as low, medium or high risk. The majority of the respondents demonstrated extensive compliance and had clear policies and comprehensive docu- mentation. Shortcomings identified in the assessment typically included the absence of a code of conduct, human rights policy or due diligence process, and missing or incomplete grievance mechanisms. For high-risk suppliers, the company will enter into discus- sions to mitigate the potential risk.

Glaston’s People Policy lays down the Group’s uniform practices pertaining to working conditions, including the personnel's freedom of association and the employee’s freedom to choose their political views. All employees have the right to be a member of a trade union of their choice and to bargain collectively. Dis- crimination against employee repre- sentatives is strictly prohibited by the company’s binding internal operating guidelines. Employee representa- tives are encouraged to cooperate

with other employees. Cooperation between management and employee representatives is based on local laws and regulations and is organized at the country level. In China, Glaston has been a member of a local Chinese trade union since 2020. The organ- ization represents all employees in the Tianjin region. The trade union’s activities are based on local legislation, which aims to guarantee safe working conditions and look after employee benefits, such as minimum wages.

Glaston is committed to complying with all applicable local labor laws and regulations and to ensuring that remu- neration practices meet the legal requirements at all operating loca- tions. Glaston is committed to paying adequate wages for subsistence, and the principles are documented in the company's Human Rights Policy and People Policy. To ensure adequate wages, Glaston follows a global job evaluation and classification meth- odology provided by its partner, an international personnel consultancy. Together with the partner, the com- pany compares wages in different pay grades with corresponding market wages at all of the company’s sites every 1–3 years. Glaston’s goal is for the wages paid to be at least 80 per cent of the market’s median wages.

To ensure equal and competitive remuneration, Glaston participates in an annual pay level survey in which the company compares base salaries with the market median to calculate local salary indices. Glaston ensures that any dismissal processes are con- ducted fairly and in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations. Dismissals are not made on discrimi- natory grounds.

Processes for engaging with own workers S1-2

Glaston promotes an open and trans- parent communication culture where employees are encouraged to share their ideas, give feedback and raise concerns.

In addition to day-to-day manage- ment and interaction, feedback is collected by means of regular Group level pulse surveys throughout the year, and the results of the surveys are communicated on a regular basis. Any Group-level development measures are communicated to the personnel through the existing internal com- munication channels and processes. Feedback received through the per- sonnel survey is taken into account in the annual planning related to person- nel, and the SVP, People and Culture is responsible for taking the feedback

88

Glaston Annual Review 2025

into account at the Group level. The survey and related action plans are prepared annually. Employees are also encouraged to participate in dialogue and decision-making on topics related to their team and working conditions. Similarly, all supervisors are encour- aged to regularly share feedback with their team members to ensure the continuous development of teams and individuals.

Glaston’s units in Finland have a co-operation committee, and the units in Germany and Switzerland have a Workers Council, covering all local employees. These committees and councils discuss matters related to cooperation between the employer and employees, potential impacts related to the company’s own work- force, which are described below, and the employees' position, work- ing conditions and prerequisites for work. Such impacts may include, for example, the position of the personnel and benefits such as working hours and holidays, occupational safety and well-being at work, the development of the work environment and the company's financial situation. In China, a trade union committee consisting of employee representatives meets once a year as a rule. The committee is also convened as necessary, such

as in connection with any adaptation measures planned by the employer.

In order to create a safety culture, safety standards and the reporting of accidents and near misses have been harmonized throughout the Group. Alongside reporting and operating principles, a safe work culture is also built on safety awareness, anticipation, and learning from near-miss situa- tions. A safe work culture also means a sense of mental safety. Reporting of near-miss situations is encouraged, and a new practice of rewarding the best near miss report twice a year was adopted in 2025.

Glaston has not identified any particular at-risk personnel groups among its own workforce with regard to the realization of human rights. The company’s binding internal policies require that all employees are treated equally and on the same principles. Any incidents and deviations that come to the company’s attention are addressed and investigated by the HR function and the legal department. The personnel survey provides feed- back and information on development areas on a wide range of topics, such as working conditions, non-discrimi- nation, and equal treatment.

Processes to remediate negative impacts S1-3

Glaston has several different channels in place to obtain information about the effectiveness of measures related to the identified personnel-related impacts, risks and opportunities.

Glaston has an anonymous whistle- blowing channel that is available to everyone. The company's employees and external parties can use the chan- nel to report concerns anonymously. The channel is openly accessible to everyone via the company's web- site. Glaston investigates all reported incidents promptly and confidentially and takes appropriate action based on the findings of the investigation. The necessary measures are initiated when a report of possible concerns or negative impacts is received. In the first phase, the whistleblowing team decides whether to approve the report for investigation. If nec- essary, the whistleblowing team can ask follow-up questions through the whistleblowing channel. Experts from outside the team can be involved to support the investigation and are also bound by a duty of confidentiality. The whistleblower will be responded to within three months of receiving the report. The implementation of cor- rective actions is monitored. Glaston

has not received information via other channels, such as feedback sent through the personnel survey, regard- ing the process being ineffective or any significant concerns or negative impacts. Glaston’s People Policy lays down principles on whistleblower protection.

The Group’s regular personnel pulse surveys provide feedback on a wide range of perspectives, such as working conditions, well-being at work, and perceived equity and diver- sity. In 2025, a total of 684 employ- ees responded to the pulse surveys. Communication efforts are used to increase the response rate by send- ing reminders, for example, so that as many employees as possible are aware of the survey and could provide feedback related to any grievances.

Glaston has an online reporting tool in place to improve occupational safety. The tool can be used on a con- tinuous basis to report any observa- tions concerning occupational safety. The tool can also be used on a mobile basis with the company's devices. Reports sent via the channel are forwarded to the occupational safety manager and the remediation of any deficiencies is initiated immediately by implementing preventive measures. Accidents are divided into three cate-

89

Glaston Annual Review 2025

gories based on their severity (mini- mal, minor and large). Minor and large incidents are also discussed in weekly safety calls, the participants in which include the management team in charge of occupational safety and the local occupational safety managers.

Working conditions

Actions and targets in relation to own workforce, S1-4 and Metrics and targets S1-5

Annual resource allocation and invest- ments in development related to the company’s own personnel are made in connection with annual planning. Annual planning takes into account and prioritizes material potential neg- ative impacts related to personnel and aims to reduce them while increas- ing positive impacts. Development measures and investments may be allocated towards occupational safety and health or equal opportunities for training and development. Human resources and adequate financial resources are both taken into consid- eration in resource allocation.

Work-life balance, working hours

Glaston values the work-life balance of its employees. Glaston complies with local regulations concerning

working hours and offers flexible work arrangements whenever possible, taking into account the nature of the work and the applicable legisla- tion and work instructions. To help employees maintain work-life bal- ance, flexible work arrangements can include hybrid work, flexible working times and part-time work. Glaston adheres, at a minimum, to the stand- ards established by local legislation and practices with regard to paren- tal leave and other family-friendly programs and offers parental leave and other family-friendly programs in accordance with local legislation at a minimum. These are offered to all Glaston employees on an equal basis, regardless of gender and other diver- sity factors.

Work-life balance has been iden- tified as both a positive impact and a potential negative impact at Glaston. The workload varies between differ- ent roles. According to the personnel surveys, some functions have a higher risk of work-related stress and men- tal strain. At the same time, work-life balance is perceived as a strength in certain functions. Through supervisory work, Glaston allocates support and measures to functions in which a risk has been identified, and the effective- ness of the measures is monitored by

means of the regular personnel pulse surveys, for example.

Workload monitoring is included in the following HR processes. The real- ization of a healthy work-life balance is measured with the regular person- nel pulse surveys, and the necessary measures are taken based on the results. Based on the 2024 personnel survey, the key areas of development included the everyday work situation and sustainable pace of work. In 2025, the implementation of local well-be- ing plans related to these themes continued. In addition, a 'Sustainable Work Pace'-themed learning path was published on the organization’s e-learning platform.

The company has taken meas- ures to prevent and mitigate poten- tial adverse impacts. In 2025, the company switched from an annual employee survey to regular pulse surveys conducted eight times a year. The aim of the change is to collect continuous feedback by team and monitor the situation with regard to workload management and coping at work. In addition, the implementation of the local well-being at work plans introduced the previous year was con- tinued in 2025.

All of Glaston's employees at the main operating locations are covered

by social protection due to major life events such as illness, unemployment, occupational injury or disability, paren- tal leave and retirement.

Health and safety

Glaston’s goal is to look after the well-being and safety of its person- nel. The company is committed to providing healthy and safe working conditions for all employees. Glas- ton complies with all applicable local health and safety laws and regulations and strives to improve health and safety performance. The company’s strategic goal is zero work-related accidents, and LTIFR is used as the metric. The aim is to achieve the tar- get in 3−5 years.

Every Glaston employee and every- one working at Glaston's production plants and business locations should comply with the rules and safety instructions provided and protect themselves, their colleagues, the workplace, the community and the environment by reporting unreasona- ble health or safety conditions, taking preventive measures, and minimizing potential harm.

Glaston Group’s Health and Safety Policy lays down global goals and guidelines for health and safety. Any deficiencies observed with regard

90

Glaston Annual Review 2025

to occupational safety are actively addressed in accordance with Glas- ton's process. Adverse impacts are minimized by taking development measures and allocating resources to mitigation measures as necessary. Glaston reacts quickly to any serious deficiencies. For accidents and seri- ous near-miss incidents, the company has a standardized operating model that aims to minimize risks. Every Glastonian has the right to refuse work that they do not perceive to be safe. A reporting tool is available for reporting near-miss incidents.

The development and management of safety at Glaston is the responsibil- ity of a steering group consisting of representatives of different functions and local units, which closely monitors the development of indicators that measure occupational safety. The day-to-day management and devel- opment of occupational safety is the responsibility of the company’s various units, led by the local safety manager. There are nine local safety managers in the company's operating countries.

Risk assessments are carried out as part of regular plant inspections. The reported risks are analyzed and corrective measures are taken to pre- vent the recurrence of the risks. Fire and evacuation drills and occupational safety training are held regularly at all

of Glaston’s assembly and production units. A Group-wide occupational safety week is organized annually to promote occupational safety culture. In addition to various drills and exer- cises, safety improvement projects are carried out at different sites and lessons are shared to promote occu- pational safety and health.

Occupational safety has been on the agenda throughout the year and investments have been made in the personnel's occupational safety awareness. The accident frequency rate in 2025 was 5.8 (5.7). Glaston has not identified any specific occupa- tional diseases related to its opera- tions.

The comprehensive well-being of employees is essential both from the perspective of the personnel and the company’s performance. Glaston is committed to fostering a culture of well-being that supports the employ- ees’ physical, mental and emotional health. The company's employee benefits include physical and psycho- logical health programs and initiatives that encourage employees to focus on their well-being.

Glaston has recognized the impor- tance of maintaining mental health in particular. The company strives to provide employees with support and a stigma-free environment to respond

to any needs related to mental health challenges, and thereby prevent and mitigate potential adverse impacts. In Finland, Germany, Switzerland, and the United States, online services are available to support the mainte- nance of mental health and provide low-threshold opportunities to discuss challenging issues with occupational psychologists. There are plans to also introduce corresponding services at other sites.

Non-discrimination and equal treatment

Actions and targets in relation to own workforce, S1-4 and Metrics and targets S1-5

Glaston's goal is to be an equal oppor- tunity employer that values diversity. The People Policy lays down diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) princi- ples, according to which all Glaston employees are treated fairly and equally by both the company's man- agement and other employees. The company wants to actively increase diversity in terms of both gender and other individual characteristics.

Equality and diversity are supported by a sense of inclusion in the commu- nity and the fact that everyone can feel safe and express their thoughts. These are an important part of psy-

chological safety in creating a healthy workplace environment and ensuring well-being. Glaston aims to develop operating practices and processes in order to be even better able to dispel any unconscious prejudices and thereby mitigate any negative impacts and strengthen the positive impacts.

Glaston is committed to the princi- ple of equal opportunities, which pro- hibits all forms of discrimination. Equal and non-discriminatory treatment is incorporated into all operating prac- tices. It means equal opportunities for a mentally and physically safe work- place community, equal opportunities for training, and harmonized remuner- ation practices.

Coherent practices and manage- ment enable an equal and non-dis- criminatory work culture. Diversity, the equality of training and pay equality have been identified as material impacts and topics related to equal- ity. Equality is key at Glaston, and no discrimination or harassment of any kind is allowed. All reported incidents of discrimination and harassment are investigated, and appropriate measures are taken as necessary. The company’s target with regard to harassment is "zero incidents of harassment". This target is permanent and continuous. No incidents were reported in 2025.

91

Glaston Annual Review 2025

The aim is to increase awareness about the issue in order to mitigate potential negative impacts related to perceived inequality, for example, while simultaneously strengthening the positive impacts.

Diversity

Glaston’s goal is to increase the diversity of the workplace community in terms of both gender and other individual diversity factors. Glaston's DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) roadmap was approved by the Exec- utive Leadership Team in December 2024. The aim of the DEI roadmap is to create a diverse, equal and inclusive work environment for all employees regardless of their background or minority. The roadmap guides devel- opment measures and target-setting over the next years. The goals include increasing the proportion of women among the personnel and manage- ment, for example. The target set in the roadmap is for the proportion of women to be 20% in the entire organization and 40% in the Executive Leadership Team by the end of 2027. A key concrete action for 2025 was a new DEI e-learning for all employees, especially managers.

Glaston is an international work- place community with diverse jobs. The company operates in a technical

field where the gender distribution is traditionally very male-dominated and an individual company has limited opportunities to influence it, but the goal is to increase diversity. In recruit- ment advertising, for example, the goal is gender neutrality. The propor- tion of women among the personnel in 2025 was 17%.

According to the personnel survey, Glaston’s employees perceive the workplace community as diverse. Inclusion in the workplace community, being seen and heard, and everyone being able to feel safe and express their thoughts are important factors in ensuring well-being among Glastoni- ans, which supports diversity.

Training and development

Glaston’s goal is to encourage the personnel to develop their compe- tence. Competent employees are critical to Glaston and it is impor- tant for the company to ensure the development of business-critical skills. The aim is to ensure competence by means of the Group-level People Deep Dive process and through per- formance dialogue in which devel- opment needs are reviewed at the individual level.

The People Policy outlines Glas- ton’s commitment to the continuous development of employee com-

petence and providing an inspiring work environment where employees can learn, develop and use their skills and abilities to improve team per- formance. Glaston strives to provide equal opportunities for training.

The purpose of Glaston’s perfor- mance dialogue (PD) process is to ensure that all employees, teams and their supervisors have regular perfor- mance and development discussions. The aim is to have an annual perfor- mance dialogue (PD) with all Glas- ton employees, which includes the documentation of a personal devel- opment plan. The share of employees who have a performance dialogue is monitored yearly in connection with annual reporting. In 2025, 86% of full-time employees participated in a performance dialogue.

The goal of the performance dia- logue is to have open dialogue between the employee and the supervisor to establish a shared understanding of the requirements of the job, personal targets and performance in relation to these targets, as well as individual development needs. The performance dialogue process is one way to enable the development of the personnel’s competence and increase the positive impact, as well as prevent the potential negative impact of competence falling behind the required level of compe-

tence. The performance dialogues are an important part of competence development, and they also help to ensure that every Glaston employee understands what their role is and what is required of them to implement the strategy. The performance dialogue process enables bilateral feedback on working conditions and other factors that influence employee engagement and well-being.

It is the responsibility of each supervisor to ensure that they con- duct regular performance dialogues with their team members in accord- ance with the schedule set by the company. People Deep Dive discus- sions are also held annually at Glaston between the senior management and the HR function. The aim is to identify the skills and personnel development needs that are essential for the imple- mentation of the strategy and to take care of the succession planning of the organization and the related person- nel development plans.

All employees also have access to the Glaston e-Learning Portal, which includes internal training, supervisor training and microlearning content related to interaction and recovery, for example.

At Glaston, the majority of compe- tence development is based on inter- active on-the-job learning, and actual

92

Glaston Annual Review 2025

training is a small part of the overall picture of competence development. Training hours are not collected at the Group level. Instead, competence development is examined as part of the annual PD discussions.

Remuneration

Glaston is committed to maintaining equality and ensuring equal and con- sistent remuneration for employees who work in similar roles, with similar responsibilities and similar experience. Glaston strives to ensure that there are no unjustified differences in remu- neration between genders.

All of Glaston’s employees are cov- ered by remuneration schemes that include, among other things, perfor- mance-based bonus and profit-shar- ing models based on the company’s financial performance. The com- pany also hands out Glaston Award bonuses for good work performance that supports the achievement of strategic objectives.

In 2025, Glaston prepared for the entry into force of the Pay Transpar- ency Directive, among other things.

Employee engagement

Actions and targets in relation to own workforce S1-4 and Metrics and targets S1-5

Glaston's aim is for the company to be attractive to potential employees and to have a high level of engage- ment among the existing employees. Engaged employees play an impor- tant role in the achievement of strate- gic goals.

Employee engagement was identi- fied as a material topic through pos- itive impact in the double materiality assessment. Past survey results indicate that Glaston’s employees are highly engaged and motivated. No potential negative impacts have been identified in relation to employee engagement. Consequently, no measures have been taken in relation to this topic.

One of the Group-wide strategic goals is to increase the employee engagement rate to a level over 75 (on a scale of 1–100) over a period of 3–5 years, which is linked to the strategy period. In 2025, the company switched from an annual employee survey to regular personnel pulse sur- veys, which measure the commitment of Glaston employees to the company and thus also assess the effective- ness of actions. The engagement rate

2025

2024

Number of employees (FTE)

772

817

Total number of employees

828

878

Male

685

728

Female

143

150

Permanent personnel

681

721

Male

558

593

Female

123

128

Fixed-term personnel

147

157

Male

127

135

Female

20

22

Full-time employees

774

808

Male

661

694

Female

113

114

Part-time employees

54

70

Male

24

34

Female

30

36

2025

2024

Average number of permanent employees

700

730

Permanent employees who left

82

66

Total employee turnover, permanent personnel, %

11.7

9.0

Male

12.3

9.8

Female

8.8

5.4

Personnel key ratios

Employee turnover

improved from the previous year and was 78 (76) (on a scale of 0–100).

Interaction and feedback on engagement is obtained by means of the personnel pulse survey. In 2025, a total of 684 employees responded to the pulse surveys. Employee engagement is a material topic in itself, but it is also an indicator and metric that reflects other person-

nel-related impacts. The results of the survey were at a good level across the organization. Based on the results of the survey, action plans are annu- ally drawn up and implemented both globally and locally. For example, actions based on the results of the personnel survey were implemented in 2025 to support the management of the personnel’s workload and well-being at work.

93

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Germany

Finland

China

USA

Switzerland

2025

2024

2025

2024

2025

2024

2025

2024

2025

2024

Number of employees* )

334

333

203

220

166

166

49

45

32

65

Male

287

286

147

165

142

143

43

39

26

52

Female

47

47

56

55

24

23

6

6

6

13

Collective bargaining coverage

Social dialogue

Coverage rate

Employees EEA

Employees non-EEA

Workplace representation (EEA only)

0–19%

Germany

USA, China

20–39%

40–59%

60–79%

80–100%

Finland

Switzerland

Germany, Finland

Employees by country

Diversity

Training and skills development

Health and safety

Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue

*Countries with nearly or more than 50 employees

Countries with nearly or more than 50 employees

Gender distribution of top management

2025

2024

Number

Male: 6

Male: 3

Female: 2

Female: 3

Percentage

Male: 75%

Male: 50%

Female: 25%

Female: 50%

2025

2024

Employees who participated in regular performance and career development reviews, %

85.6%

77.1%

Male

85.1%

75.3%

Female

88.3%

85.7%

Own workforce

2025

2024

Work-related accidents, including work- related accidents resulting in lost time

74

97

Work-related accidents resulting in lost time

9

9

Fatal work-related accidents

0

0

Occupational diseases

0

0

Occupational diseases resulting in death

0

0

Occupational accident frequency

5.8

5.7

Employees covered by an occupational health and safety system, %

100%

100%

Age distribution of employees, %

2025

2024

Under 30 years old

12%

13%

30–50 years old

55%

55%

Over 50 years old

33%

32%

The most typical work-related accidents are minor cuts and scratches. Work-related accidents and near misses are reported on a monthly basis in an occupational safety report. The report is delivered to the Executive Leadership Team and it is also accessible via the company’s intranet.

Work-life balance

Family-related leaves

2025

2024

Employees entitled to family leave, number

828

878

Employees entitled to family leave, %

100

100

Females on family leave, number

8

7

Females on family leave, %

5.6%

4.7%

Males on family leave, number

34

29

Males on family leave, %

5.0%

4.0%

94

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Remuneration metrics

2025

2024

Unadjusted gender pay gap

2.1%

1.5%

Number of incidents of discrimination and harassment

2025

2024

Reports of workplace harassment

0 cases

2 cases

Reports to national contact points

0 cases

0 cases

Total remuneration

2025

2024

Ratio of the highest-paid person's annual total

earnings to the median annual total earnings

645%

658%

(excluding the highest-paid person)

Incidents of discrimination and harassment

Based on the reported cases, the company has not paid any fines or damages.

Principles for preparing metrics

The figures on the company's own workforce include all internal employ- ees of Glaston Group. External work- ers are not included in the reported figures, as there are fewer than 50 external workers in Glaston's own workforce. The number of personnel used in the calculations is based on the number at the end of the report- ing period (December 31, 2025). The number of employees also includes

non-active employees, such as those on family leave.

Employee turnover: Employee turnover is calculated by taking the number of employees who have left the company for any reason and dividing it by the average number of employees for the year. The turnover figure includes permanent employ- ment relationships.

Proportion of women in manage- ment: The proportion of women in

management includes women in middle management and senior man- agement (management level) (Vice President/Senior Vice President/Chief Executive Officer).

Gender pay gap: The gender pay gap includes all employees who are in an active employment relationship. Seasonal workers and trainees are not included. The calculation is based on pay figures for November 2025.

Total pay ratio: The calculation uses the basic wages, compensations and value of fringe benefits for November 2025, and the amounts are multiplied by the number of payment months in the year. For incentives, actual amounts paid during the report- ing period are used. The calculation includes all employees who are in an active employment relationship. In the calculation of the ratio between the total annual remuneration of the high- est paid individual and the total annual median remuneration of employees, seasonal workers and trainees have been excluded from the calculation of the median.

Accident frequency (LTIFR): The accident frequency includes Glaston's own personnel and work-related acci- dents resulting in lost time of at least one day. The frequency is calculated by multiplying the number of days of

lost time by one million, divided by the total number of hours worked by employees.

Employee engagement rate: The employee engagement rate is based on regular Group-level personnel pulse surveys. All Glaston employees have the opportunity to respond to the survey. The responses are col- lected using a scale of 0–3 (com- pletely disagree/completely agree) and an external service provider converts the responses into indices on a scale of 0–10 (10 = all completely agree). The target Employee engage- ment rate over 75 corresponds to a result of 7.5/10.0 for the overall index.

Employees who participated in reg- ular performance and career develop- ment discussions: The figure covers all employees who started before April 30, 2025, excluding trainees (Appren- tice, Summer Worker and Trainee). The figure indicates how many employees have been set targets and have had a Performance Dialogue (PD) discussion by April 30, 2025.

The company’s top management : Glaston’s Executive Leadership Team

No external expert has been used to verify the metrics.

95

Glaston Annual Review 2025

S4 - Consumers and end-users

Materiality, interaction with the strategy and business model

Promoting sustainability is an integral part of Glaston’s business strategy. The company’s technologies enable and thus improve the energy effi- ciency and safety of buildings. Glas- ton’s strategy and business model are presented in section ESRS2, SBM-3.

In the double materiality assess- ment, enabling the safety of consum- ers and end-users in the value chain was identified as a material sustain- ability topic to be reported from the perspective of both positive impacts and financial opportunities. Glaston develops glass processing technolo- gies for its customers that enable them to meet stringent and regulated safety and energy efficiency requirements.

The material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model are also presented in the materiality description in section SBM-3, ESRS2 on page 54. The interests and views of stakeholders are presented in the table on page 51. The materiality assessment, which is based on double materiality assessment, is presented in section IRO-1 Description of the materiality assessment.

Safety glass technologies enable the further processing of glass into various types of safety glass, and this is part of Glaston’s strategy. Safety glass can be tempered or laminated or combinations of these. Safety glasses are widely used in various applications requiring additional protection and durability. Safety glass ensures both the safety of users and the durability and longevity of glass structures in various environments.

The net sales of glass tempering and laminating technologies and related services amounted to EUR 65.7 million in 2025, representing 31.4% of the Group’s total net sales. In line with the Group’s overall growth target, growth in net sales is also pursued in the tempering and laminating businesses. Glaston’s products are technologically advanced and growth is sought by introducing increasingly automated, energy-efficient and material-efficient technologies to the market and investing in the service business. Research and development expenses accounted for 4.1% of net sales in the tempering and laminating businesses in 2025.

Topic

Impacts

Risks / Opportunities

Management

Personal safety of consumers and end-users

Glaston's technologies enable safety in the built environment

Glaston enables safety in the built environment

Promoting safety glass technologies is an integral part of Glaston’s strategy, business and product development.

Glaston’s purpose is to build a better tomorrow through safer and more energy-efficient glass solutions. Glass processed with Glaston’s machinery is used in the architectural, mobility, display and solar energy industries.

Safety is essential and a built-in part of the use of glass elements in the built environment. Glaston's prod- uct development and technologies address this need in cooperation with customers.

Glaston's tempering and laminat- ing machines produce high-quality safety glass for demanding applica- tions that create safety for end-us- ers in buildings. The company offers a broad and technically advanced range of tempering and laminating machines, as well as maintenance, upgrade and modernization services

and spare parts for glass tempering and laminating.

The safety of the glass surfaces and glass solutions of buildings is a key factor in increasing safety for their users. Buildings with glass elements place high demands on the durability properties of the glass, both in terms of large structural glass surfaces and key details such as door and railing solu- tions. Glaston’s safety glass technology has been delivered worldwide, which means that glass processed using the company's machinery can be found all over the world. Glaston’s impact on the safety of consumers and end-us- ers is indirect but significant, as the production of safety glass would not be possible without high-quality glass processing machinery.

Glaston’s safety glass business and

96

Glaston Annual Review 2025

related product development are a significant part of the company’s busi- ness and strategy, and the positive safety impacts indirectly benefit the end-users of the products of Glaston's customers. For this reason, the com- pany does not have separate policies pertaining to consumers and end-us- ers. EVP, Solutions & Operations is in charge of the business.

Processes and engagement S4-2 and processes and channels to remediate negative impacts S4-3

Glaston is actively involved in the development of its industry. In line with its vision, Glaston wants to lead the development of the global glass processing industry with innovative technologies and life cycle solutions.

Glaston does not have a separate process or channel for engagement with consumers and end-users, as the impact of the business on end-users is indirect. The company will also not create a separate process. Stake- holder engagement is discussed in section (SBM-2).

Glaston does not have a separate channel for raising potential nega- tive impacts or for consumers and end-users to raise concerns. A whis- tleblowing channel is available to all of Glaston's stakeholders.

Metrics S4-4 and targets S4-5

Glaston has not prepared action plans or set targets and metrics that are directly focused on consumer and end-user safety, as the impacts are indirect. Product development involves collaborative development with customers and property devel- opers as well as the developers of safety standards. The goals are business growth, increased efficiency and new services. Glaston’s positive impact on end-user safety increases indirectly through these actions. This indirect impact is assessed through the net sales of the business and investments in it through the amount of R&D expenditure.

Glaston’s purpose is to build a bet- ter tomorrow through safer and more energy-efficient glass solutions. The company invests significantly in the continuous development of its tech- nology portfolio and R&D activities. In 2025, R&D expenses accounted for 3.9% of net sales.

Helsinki, February 26, 2026

GLASTON CORPORATION

Board of Directors

97

Glaston Annual Review 2025

EUR thousand 2024

Note

Share capital

Other restricted equity reserves

Reserve for invested unrestricted equity

Treasury shares

Other unrestricted equity reserves

Retained earnings

Cumulative exchange difference

Total equity

Equity 1 January

12,696

71

101,962

-203

505

-50,453

4,735

69,313

Profit for the period

-

-

-

-

-

2,478

-

2,478

Other comprehensive income

Total exchange differences on translating foreign operations

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,212

1,212

Actuarial gains and losses arising from defined benefit plans

2.7.

-

-

-

-

-

-1,200

-

-1,200

Taxes on actuarial gains and losses arising from defined benefit plans

2.9.

-

-

-

-

-

264

-

264

Cash flow hedges

-

-

-

-

-1,226

-

-

-1,226

Taxes on cash flow hedges

2.9.

-

-

-

-

254

-

-

254

Total other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

-972

-936

1,212

-697

Total comprehensive income for the period

-

-

-

-

-972

1,542

1,212

1,781

Acquisition of treasury shares

-

-

-

-128

-

-

-

-128

Disposal of treasury shares

-

-

-

103

-

-

-

103

Share-based incentive plan

2.6.

-

-

-

-

-

-21

-

-21

Taxes on share-based incentive plan

2.9.

-

-

-

-

-

14

-

14

Return of capital

-

-

-4,208

-

-

-

-

-4,208

Total transactions with the owners of the Company

-

-

-4,208

-25

-

-8

-

-4,241

Other changes

-

-

-

-

-

-9

-

-9

Equity 31 December

12,696

71

97,754

-228

-468

-48,928

5,947

66,844

The main calculations presented by the Group must be read together with the relevant notes.

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

103

Glaston Annual Review 2025

than 20 percent of voting rights, are classified as assets recognized at fair value through other comprehensive income, or if the fair value cannot be measured reliably, at acquisition cost, and dividends received from them are recognized in profit or loss.

All inter-company transactions are eliminated as part of the consolidation process. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates are elim-inated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the entity. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the similar way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impair-ment.

Transactions in Foreign Currency

In their own day-to-day accounting the Group companies translate trans-actions in foreign currencies into their functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At the end of the report-ing period, the unsettled balances of foreign currency transactions are measured at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the reporting period. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from trade receivables are entered as adjustments of net sales and foreign exchange gains and losses related to trade paya-

bles are recorded as adjustments of purchases. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from financial items are recorded as financial income and expenses.

1.4. Estimates and assessments by Management

The preparation of financial state-ments in conformity with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period and the recognized amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

In addition, management uses judgment in applying the accounting principles and in choosing the appli-cable accounting policies, if IFRS allow alternative methods.

The following items include critical accounting estimates: impairment testing of assets; useful lives of other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; future economic benefits arising from capitalized development cost; measurement of inventories and trade and loan receiv-ables; recognition and measurement of deferred taxes; estimates of the

amount and probability of provisions and actuarial assumptions used in defined benefit plans. The critical accounting estimates and judgments are described in more detail in the notes.

1.5. Applied new and amended IFRS standards and IFRIC interpretatios

At the beginning of the financial year, no new standards or amendments to standards have entered into force that would have had a material effect on the Glaston Group's financial state-ments.

The Group will adopt new IFRS standards, IFRIC interpretations and changes to existing standards and interpretations that enter into effect in 2026 or later.

The new standard ‘IFRS 18 Pres-entation and Disclosure in Financial Statements’ was published on 9 April 2024, and it will be effective for finan-cial reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

The new standard includes instruc-tions especially in relation to the presentation of the statement of profit or loss. The standard also requires the presentation of Management-defined Performance Measures in the finan-cial statements. The new standard

will impact the presentation of the statement of profit or loss and the information presented in the financial statements.

107

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Reporting segments

EUR thousand2025

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

Total segments

Unallocated

Total

External net sales

161,821

47,024

208,845

0

208,846

Internal net sales

339

53

392

-392

-

Total net sales

162,160

47,078

209,238

-392

208,846

Operating result

7,753

-3,337

4,416

1

4,417

Financial items

-

-

-

-2,515

-2,515

Income taxes

-

-

-

-712

-712

Result for the reporting period

7,753

-3,337

4,416

-3,226

1,191

Segment assets

132,067

28,982

161,049

-

161,049

of which investments

2,567

120

2,687

-

2,687

Other assets

-

-

-

11,310

11,310

Total assets

132,067

28,982

161,049

11,310

172,359

Segment liabilities

50,203

11,327

61,530

-

61,530

Other liabilities

-

-

-

46,990

46,990

Total liabilities

50,203

11,327

61,530

46,990

108,520

Operative net working capital

44,084

11,828

55,912

2

55,915

110

Glaston Annual Review 2025

EUR thousand2024

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

Total segments

Unallocated

Total

External net sales

166,556

50,341

216,897

1,048

217,945

Internal net sales

208

180

387

-387

-

Total net sales

166,763

50,521

217,284

661

217,945

Operating result

8,265

-2,748

5,517

270

5,787

Financial items

-

-

-

-1,984

-1,984

Income taxes

-

-

-

-1,325

-1,325

Result for the reporting period

8,265

-2,748

5,517

-3,039

2,478

Segment assets

137,291

33,368

170,659

-

170,659

of which investments

3,086

1,035

4,120

-

4,120

Other assets

-

-

-

15,868

15,868

Total assets

137,291

33,368

170,659

15,868

186,527

Segment liabilities

62,960

13,351

76,311

-

76,311

Other liabilities

-

-

-

43,521

43,521

Total liabilities

62,960

13,351

76,311

43,521

119,832

Operative net working capital

47,666

18,897

66,563

516

67,079

Non-cash income and expenses included in operating result

2025

2024

Segment total

-579

1,075

Total non-cash expenses and income

-579

1,075

Non-cash income and expenses in 2025 included the following items: impairment losses of trade receiv-ables EUR -1.3 million, impairment losses of inventory EUR 0.3 million, changes in provisions EUR 0.5 million.

Non-cash income and expenses in 2024 included the following items: impairment losses of trade receiv-ables EUR -0.6 million, impairment losses of inventory EUR 0.2 million, changes in provisions EUR 1.5 million.

111

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Personnel

Number of personnel at the end of the year by segment

2025

2024

Architecture

602

619

Mobility, Display & Solar

170

197

Total Segments

772

816

Unallocated

-

1

Total Glaston Group

772

817

Number of personnel at the end of the year by geographical location

2025

2024

Finland

194

211

Other EMEA*

348

374

Americas*

48

45

APAC*

182

187

Total

772

817

Entity-wide disclosures

Net sales by product groups

2025

2024

Goods sold

196,720

207,667

Services rendered

12,126

10,278

Total

208,846

217,945

Net sales by country by destination

2025

2024

Finland

7,494

10,997

Other EMEA*

85,959

85,856

Americas*

65,300

66,701

APAC*

50,093

54,391

Total

208,846

217,945

Assets by country

2025

2024

Finland

51,777

41,030

Other EMEA*

85,390

102,762

Americas*

15,932

16,614

APAC*

19,260

26,120

Total

172,359

186,527

*EMEA = Europe, the Middle East and Africa

*Americas = North, Central and South America

*APAC = China and the rest of the Asia-Pacific area

Glaston's revenues from any single external customer do not exceed 10 per cent of Glaston's total revenue.

112

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Revenue from contracts with customer

Classification of net sales

EUR thousand

2025

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

Total segment

Unallocated

Total

External net sales

161,821

47,024

208,845

0

208,846

Internal net sales

339

53

392

-392

-

Total net sales

162,160

47,078

209,238

-392

208,846

Revenue recognition

Over time

112,483

30,449

142,931

-

142,931

At a point in time

49,677

16,629

66,306

-392

65,914

Total net sales

162,160

47,078

209,238

-392

208,846

2024

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

Total segment

Unallocated

Total

External net sales

166,556

50,341

216,897

1,048

217,945

Internal net sales

208

180

387

-387

-

Total net sales

166,763

50,521

217,284

661

217,945

Revenue recognition

Over time

119,055

32,966

152,021

-

152,021

At a point in time

47,708

17,555

65,263

661

65,924

Total net sales

166,763

50,521

217,284

661

217,945

114

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Contract assets and liabilities

EUR thousand

31.12.2025

31.12.2024

Contract assets

Trade receivables

15,906

14,529

Project income receivables

14,430

9,110

Contract assets total

30,336

23,639

Contract liablities

Advance payments

-24,904

-32,411

Project expense liablities

-56

-438

Contract liablities total

-24,960

-32,849

Gross contract assets/liabilities

5,376

-9,210

31.12.2025

31.12.2024

Transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are partially or fully unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period

Allocated transaction price expected to be recognised as revenue

36,777

86,864

115

Glaston Annual Review 2025

total of 109,900 Glaston Corporation shares, including also the proportion to be paid in cash.

The potential reward from the performance period 2024−2026 will be paid in 2027 in a manner resolved by the Board of Directors, either partly in the company’s shares and partly in cash, in which case the cash propor-tion is intended to cover taxes and tax-related costs arising from the reward to the key employee, or fully in cash.

The reward to be paid on the basis of the plan may be reduced if the reward cap set by the Board of Direc-tors is reached.In total 8 key persons belong to the target group of the plan in the perfor-mance period 2024–2026.

Performance Period 2023—2025

The potential reward of the perfor-mance period 2023−2025 was based on the Glaston Group’s comparable EBITA, Service Net Sales and EPS

during the period of 1 January 2023−31 December 2025. The performance levels of the performance criteria for the performance period 2023–2025 are achieved partly and the rewards correspond to a approximately total of 2,690 Glaston Corporation shares, including also the proportion to be paid in cash.

The potential reward from the performance period 2023−2025 will be paid in 2026 in a manner resolved by the Board of Directors, either partly

in the company’s shares and partly in cash, in which case the cash propor-tion is intended to cover taxes and tax-related costs arising from the reward to the key employee, or fully in cash.

The reward to be paid on the basis of the plan may be reduced if the reward cap set by the Board of Direc-tors is reached.

In total 7 key persons belong to the target group of the plan in the perfor-mance period 2023–2025.

Basic information of the share-based plans

2025-2027

2024-2026

2023-2025

Grant date

1 July 2025

29 April 2024

12 April 2023

Nature of the plan

Shares/cash

Shares/cash

Shares/cash

Target group

Key personnel

Key personnel

Key personnel

Maximum amount of shares (including cash)

271,792 shares

109,900 shares

89,650 shares

Total amount of shares at the end of the performance period (including cash)

-

-

2,690 shares

Performance period begins

1 January 2025

1 January 2024

1 January 2023

Performance period ends

31 December 2027

31 December 2026

31 December 2025

End of restriction period/ payment

1 April 2028

1 April 2027

1 April 2026

Vesting conditions

Group's comparable EBITA, Service Net Sales and EPS

Group's comparable EBITA, Service Net Sales and EPS

Group's comparable EBITA, Service Net Sales and EPS

Service period

Service period

Service period

Maximum contractual life, years

3

3

3

Remaining contractual life, years

2

1

0

Number of persons involved 31 December 2025

9

8

7

Effect on the profit or loss for the period and on financial position

2025

2024

Effect on the result of the reporting period, EUR thousand

50

68

120

Glaston Annual Review 2025

The Group has a defined benefit pension plan in Glaston Switzerland AG, Switzerland. The Group has also defined contribution pension plans, of which the charge to the income statement was EUR 4.6 (5.0) million.

In addition to defined benefit pen-sions, Glaston has no other long-term defined employee benefits in 2025 and 2024.

Pension benefits

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Amounts in the statement of financial position relating to defined benefit pension plans

14,902

18,200

Present value of funded obligations

14,420

17,555

Fair value of plan assets

-482

-645

Total deficit of defined benefit pension plans

-482

-645

Difference

Amounts in the statement of financial position

1.1. Net liability (asset +)

-

-

Liabilities

-482

-645

Assets

-

-

Adjustment to asset ceiling

-

-

31.12. Net liability (asset +)

-482

-645

Amounts in the statement of financial position relating to other long-term employee benefits

EUR thousand

Present value of obligation

Fair value on plan assets

Total

1.1.2025

18,200

17,555

645

Foreign exchange difference

192

186

6

Interest expense / income

164

158

6

Current service cost

376

-

376

Past service cost

-

-

-

Employee contributions

360

360

-

Employer contributions

-

393

-393

Benefits paid

-1,189

-1,189

-

OCI: Actuarial gains (-) / losses (+)

2,286

-

2,286

Gains and losses on settlement / curtailment

-5,496

-5,348

-148

Administration cost

9

-

9

OCI: Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in the net interest expense)

-

2,305

-2,305

31.12.2025

14,902

14,420

482

EUR thousand

Present value of obligation

Fair value on plan assets

Total

1.1.2024

25,826

26,998

-1,172

Foreign exchange difference

-417

-437

20

Interest expense / income

462

485

-23

Current service cost

548

-

548

Past service cost

0

-

-

Employee contributions

508

508

-

Employer contributions

-

557

-557

Benefits paid

-4,474

-4,474

-

OCI: Actuarial gains (-) / losses (+)

1,785

-

1,785

Gains and losses on settlement / curtailment

-6,051

-5,492

-559

Administration cost

13

-

13

OCI: Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in the net interest expense)

-

-590

590

31.12.2024

18,200

17,555

645

122

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Plan asset classes

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Cash and cash equivalents

433

527

Equity instruments

5,583

6,751

Debt instruments

4,130

5,063

Real estate

3,553

4,336

Other

721

878

Total plan assests

14,420

17,555

Sensitivity analysis, defined benefit obligation

EUR thousand

Changes in parameters (effect to obligation)

2025

2024

Discount rate

- 0.25%

15,439

18,871

Discount rate

+ 0.25%

14,399

17,572

Interest rate on retirement savings capital

- 0.25%

14,767

18,026

Interest rate on retirement savings capital

+ 0.25%

15,040

18,379

Salary increase

- 0.25%

14,845

18,133

Salary increase

+ 0.25%

14,956

18,272

Life expectancy

+ 1 year

15,272

18,634

Life expectancy

- 1 year

14,527

17,761

Glaston Switzerland AG is affiliated to the foundation GEMINI Sammel-stiftung which pension foundation is able to adapt the contribution and benefits. In case of underfunding there is a risk for the employer to be involved in additional payments to the foundation.

The Group expects to contribute EUR 278 thousand to its other long-term employee benefit plans in 2026.

Actuarial assumptions

2025

Defined pension plans

2024

Defined pension plans

Discount rate, %

1.10%

0.90%

Future salary increase, %

1.00%

1.00%

Duration in years

14.1

14.4

123

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Estimates and assessments by Management

Recognition and measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets include management estimates, especially deferred tax assets arising from confirmed tax losses of group companies or from other temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible tem-porary differences and tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which tax credits and deductible temporary differences can be utilized. All tax liabilities and assets are reviewed at the end of the reporting period and changes are recognized in profit or loss.

Income taxes

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Income tax charge in income statement

Income tax of accounting period

-3,331

-2,240

Income tax of previous years

464

-24

Deferred tax charge

2,360

1,091

Other

-204

-152

Total income tax charge

-712

-1,325

Income taxes recognized in other comprehensive income and in equity

Deferred taxes

Share-based incentive plan recognized in equity

10

14

Actuarial gains and losses arising from defined benefit plans

-4

264

Cash flow hedge

-121

254

Total taxes recognized in other comprehensive income and in equity

-115

531

126

Glaston Annual Review 2025

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Reconciliation of income tax expense calculated at statutory tax rates with income tax expense in the income statement

Profit before taxes

1,902

3,803

Tax at the tax rate applicable to the parent

-380

-761

Difference due to different tax rates of foreign subsidiaries

-458

-478

Tax exempt income and non-deductible expenses

-621

-236

Losses, where no deferred tax benefit is recognized

-245

-796

Deferred taxes recognized during the reporting period in respect of previous years' temporary differences

-63

32

Withholding taxes and adjustments in respect of current income tax of previous periods

251

-194

Use of losses for which deferred tax has not been recognized

804

465

Deferred tax assets recognized in respect of confirmed losses in previous years

-

644

Income taxes in the income statement

-712

-1,324

Effective tax rate

37%

35%

The Group companies have tax losses totaling EUR 37.4 (37.4) million, which can be applied against future taxable income. A deferred tax asset has not been recognized for all tax losses, due to the uncertainty regarding the extent to which they can be used. Tax losses expire in the period 2026-2035. Some of the losses do not have an expiration date. Over the next two years, the losses will expire by approximately EUR 2.0 million.

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Tax assets and tax liabilities

Deferred tax assets

2,437

2,713

Assets for current tax

-

-

Deferred tax liabilities

6,474

9,006

Liabilities for current tax

3,663

1,933

127

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Reconciliation of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities 2025

Deferred tax assets

1 January

Exchange difference

Other changes

Change in income statement (- tax expense)

Recognized in equity

Recognized in other comprehensive income

31 December

Unrealized internal profits, inventory

99

5

-

38

-

-

142

Confirmed tax losses carried forward

1,985

-

-

-85

-

-

1,900

Share-based payments

-17

-

-

2

10

-

-5

Other temporary differences

104

-30

-

-35

-

-

38

Currency and interest hedging

97

-

-

-

-

-121

-24

Fixed assests (cloud services)

223

-

-

17

-

-

240

Lease liabilities

1,518

-

-

-439

-

-

1,079

Deferred tax netting

-1,295

-

362

-

-

-

-933

Deferred tax assets in statement of financial position

2,713

-25

362

-502

10

-121

2,437

Deferred tax liabilities

1 January

Exchange difference

Other changes

Change in income statement (+ tax expense)

Recognized in equity

Recognized in other comprehensive income

31 December

Untaxed reserves

158

-

-

-37

-

-

121

Defined benefit employee benefits

-193

-8

-

-

-4

-

-205

Fair value changes of financial assets

0

-

-

-

-

-

0

PPA allocation

3,171

-

-

-308

-

-

2,863

Other temporary differences (incl. revenue recognition and capitalized development costs)

5,922

4

-

-2,155

-

-

3,771

Currency and interest hedging

-63

-

-

-

-

-24

-87

Right of use assets

1,295

-

-

-362

-

-

933

Deferred tax netting

-1,285

-

362

-

-

-

-923

Deferred tax liabilities in statement of financial position

9,006

-4

362

-2,862

-4

-24

6,474

Total change in deferred taxes in income statement (- tax expense)

2,360

128

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Reconciliation of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities 2024

Deferred tax assets

1 January

Exchange difference

Other changes

Change in income statement (- tax expense)

Recognized in equity

Recognized in other comprehensive income

31 December

Unrealized internal profits, inventory

108

-

-

-9

-

-

99

Confirmed tax losses carried forward

1,413

38

-

534

-

-

1,985

Share-based payments

-31

-

27

-

-14

-

-18

Other temporary differences

95

3

215

14

-

-

327

Currency and interest hedging

-

-

-

-

-

97

97

Lease liabilities

1,528

-

-

-10

-

-

1,518

Deferred tax netting

-1,528

-

233

-

-

-

-1,295

Deferred tax assets in statement of financial position

1,585

41

475

529

-14

97

2,713

Deferred tax liabilities

1 January

Exchange difference

Other changes

Change in income statement (+ tax expense)

Recognized in equity

Recognized in other comprehensive income

31 December

Untaxed reserves

144

-

-

15

-

-

158

Defined benefit employee benefits

94

-23

-

-

-264

-

-193

Fair value changes of financial assets

-1

-

-

1

-

-

0

PPA allocation

3,484

-

-

-313

-

-

3,171

Other temporary differences (incl. revenue recognition and capitalized development costs)

6,097

-2

120

-293

-

-

5,922

Currency and interest hedging

-

-

94

-

-

-157

-63

Right of use assets

1,266

-

-

29

-

-

1,295

Deferred tax netting

-1,528

-

243

-

-

-

-1,285

Deferred tax liabilities in statement of financial position

9,557

-25

458

-562

-264

-157

9,006

Total change in deferred taxes in income statement (- tax expense)

1,091

129

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Acquisitions have been recognized in accordance with IFRS 3. Pur-chase consideration has been allocated to intangible assets, if they have met the recognition criteria stated in IAS 38 (Intangible Assets).

In accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations, goodwill is not amortized. The carrying amount of goodwill is tested annually for impair-ment. The testing is made more frequently if there are indications of impairment of the goodwill. Any possible impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss.

Glaston’s goodwill has been allocated to the cash generating units of the Group.

Glaston has no other intangible assets than goodwill with indefinite useful life. All intangible assets with the exception of goodwill are amor-tized over their useful lives.

Estimates and assessments by Management

Useful lives of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are based on management's best estimate of the period the asset is expected to be available for use by Glaston.

Customer relationships, trademarks, product development assets and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination are measured at fair value at the acquisition date and subsequently amortized over their estimated useful lives.

The actual useful life can, however, differ from the expected useful life resulting in adjustment of annual depreciation or amortization of the asset or in recording of impairment loss.

Glaston capitalizes development costs of new products. In addition to other capitalization criteria, management has to estimate the future economic benefits arising from the development cost. If management estimates that there will not be future economic benefits, the develop-ment cost is recognized in profit or loss. Whether a development cost is capitalized or recognized immediately in profit or loss, it can have an effect on the result of the reporting period. At the end of the reporting period of 2025, Glaston had EUR 8.4 (9.5) million of capitalized develop-ment expenditure and related advance payments of the development expenditure on its statement of financial position.

133

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Intangible assets

EUR thousand

2025

Capitalized development expenditure

Intangible rights

Customer relations

Goodwill

Advances paid

Total

Acquisition cost at beginning of year

35,434

16,408

11,400

52,263

1,749

117,255

Other increases

210

294

-

-

1,256

1,760

Decreases

-211

-243

-

-

-

-454

Reclassifications and other changes

1,164

146

-

-

-1,403

-94

Exchange differences

-63

35

-

-748

0

-776

Acquisition cost at end of year

36,534

16,641

11,400

51,515

1,603

117,693

Accumulated amortization and impairment at beginning of year

-27,330

-14,034

-6,555

6,260

-

-41,659

Accumulated amortization relating to decreases and transfers

20

242

-

-

-

262

Amortization during the reporting period

-2,458

-694

-1,140

-

-

-4,292

Exchange differences

47

8

-

-

-

56

Accumulated amortization and impairment at end of year

-29,721

-14,478

-7,695

6,260

-

-45,634

Carrying amount at end of year

6,813

2,163

3,705

57,775

1,603

72,059

2024

Acquisition cost at beginning of year

31,954

17,203

11,400

51,894

3,409

115,859

Other increases

540

159

-

-

1,721

2,420

Decreases

-132

-1,184

-

-

-

-1,316

Reclassifications and other changes

3,082

297

-

-

-3,380

-0

Exchange differences

-10

-66

-

370

-1

293

Acquisition cost at end of year

35,434

16,408

11,400

52,263

1,749

117,255

Accumulated amortization and impairment at beginning of year

-25,269

-14,375

-5,415

6,260

-

-38,799

Accumulated amortization relating to decreases and transfers

132

969

-

-

-

1,101

Amortization during the reporting period

-2,164

-697

-1,140

-

-

-4,001

Exchange differences

-29

68

-

-

-

40

Accumulated amortization and impairment at end of year

-27,330

-14,034

-6,555

6,260

-

-41,659

Carrying amount at end of year

8,105

2,374

4,845

58,524

1,749

75,596

134

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston has given liens on chattel as security for liabilities. These are pre-sented in Note 5.8. At the end of 2025 and 2024, Glaston did not have any pledged property, plant and equip-ment or intangible assets as security for liabilities.

At the end of 2025 and 2024, Glaston did not have contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment.

In 2025 or 2024, Glaston did not receive any material third party com-pensation for items of property, plant

and equipment that were impaired, lost or given up.

In 2024, the buildings included the investment property which is part of the plant situated in Tianjin, China. This has been taken into own use since the beginning of 2025. Rental income in

2025 was EUR 0.0 million. Costs related to the investment property were EUR 0.0 million.

Property, plant and equipment

EUR thousand

2025

Land and water areas

Buildings and constructions

Investment property

Machinery and equipment

Other tangible assets

Advances paid and assets under construction

Total property, plant and equipment

Right-of-use assets

Total property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets

Acquisition cost at beginning of year

6,708

29,981

2,682

20,797

1,312

1,392

62,871

24,680

87,552

Other increases

-

195

-

369

-

363

927

975

1,902

Decreases

-

-142

-

-735

-

-

-877

-

-877

Reclassifications and other changes

-

3,474

-2,682

776

-108

-1,606

-146

95

-51

Exchange differences

-

-418

-

-51

-21

-

-490

-

-490

Acquisition cost at end of year

6,708

33,090

-

21,156

1,182

149

62,285

25,750

88,035

Accumulated depreciation and impairment at beginning of year

-

-21,347

-1,226

-16,438

-755

-

-39,766

-18,668

-58,434

Accumulated depreciation relating to decreases and transfers

-

142

-

734

-

-

876

-

876

Depreciation during the reporting period

-

-1,283

-

-910

-196

-

-2,389

-2,792

-5,181

Reclassifications and other changes

-

-1,226

1,226

40

153

-

192

-

192

Exchange differences

-

295

-

28

17

-

341

-

341

Accumulated depreciation and impairment at end of year

-

-23,419

-

-16,547

-780

-

-40,746

-21,460

-62,206

Carrying amount at end of year

6,708

9,671

-

4,609

402

149

21,539

4,290

25,829

136

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Property, plant and equipment

EUR thousand

2024

Land and water areas

Buildings and constructions

Investment property

Machinery and equipment

Other tangible assets

Advances paid and assets under construction

Total property, plant and equipment

Right-of-use assets

Total property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets

Acquisition cost at beginning of year

6,708

30,016

2,591

19,557

1,377

1,901

62,150

21,775

83,925

Other increases

-

5

-

425

36

1,235

1,700

2,051

3,751

Decreases

-

-

-

-930

-117

-

-1,047

-

-1,047

Reclassifications and other changes

-

-0

-

1,744

-

-1,744

-0

854

854

Exchange differences

-

-40

91

1

16

-

68

-

68

Acquisition cost at end of year

6,708

29,981

2,682

20,797

1,312

1,392

62,871

24,680

87,552

Accumulated depreciation and impairment at beginning of year

-

-20,619

-1,050

-16,578

-695

-

-38,942

-15,920

-54,861

Accumulated depreciation relating to decreases and transfers

-

-

-

904

117

-

1,021

-

1,021

Depreciation during the reporting period

-

-702

-136

-769

-209

-

-1,815

-2,722

-4,538

Reclassifications and other changes

-

-46

-

-

46

-

0

-

0

Exchange differences

-

20

-41

5

-14

-

-30

-28

-57

Accumulated depreciation and impairment at end of year

-

-21,347

-1,226

-16,438

-755

-

-39,766

-18,669

-58,436

Carrying amount at end of year

6,708

8,634

1,456

4,359

557

1,392

23,105

6,011

29,116

Carrying amount of machinery and equipment used in production 31 December, 2025

3,757

Carrying amount of machinery and equipment used in production 31 December, 2024

3,292

137

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Average incremental borrowing rate applied at the date of initial application was 4.73% for all lease liabilities valid at the end of 2025.

Maturity of lease liabilities is shown in note 5.6.

Leases in profit and loss statement

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Depreciation of right-of-use assets

-2,797

-2,711

Interest expense on lease liabilities

-335

-410

Low value lease expense

-344

-356

Short-term lease expense

-161

-199

Total amounts recognised in profit or loss

-3,638

-3,675

139

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Estimates and assessments by Management

The most significant management estimates relate to impairment tests, which require use of estimates in the calculations. In impairment testing, management estimates recoverable amount of an asset or a cash gen-erating unit. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. When calculating value in use, management estimates the future cash flows as well as the discount rates used in discounting the cash flows. Discount rates reflect current market assess-ments of the time value of money at the time of impairment testing and the risks related to the tested assets. Estimated cash flows include assumptions of, among other things, future prices, production levels, costs and development of the markets. Impairment loss is recorded if the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Depreciation and amortization(1

Intangible assets

Intangible rights

-1,834

-1,837

Capitalized development expenditure

-2,458

-2,164

Property, plant and equipment

Buildings and constructions

-2,992

-2,529

Machinery and equipment

-1,999

-1,788

Other tangible assets

-196

-209

Total depreciation and amortization

-9,478

-8,527

Impairment losses

Intangible assets

Capitalized development expenditure

-

-

Property, plant and equipment

Machinery and equipment

54

-6

Total impairment losses

54

-6

Total depreciation, amortization and impairment

-9,424

-8,533

(1 Depreciation includes depreciation of right-of-use assets presented in Note 3.3

141

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Impairment of assets

The most significant assumptions used in value in use calculations in 2025

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

Pre-tax discount rate

15.3%

15.7%

Long-term growth rate

1.0%

1.0%

The most significant assumptions used in value in use calculations in 2024

Architecture

Mobility, Display & Solar

Pre-tax discount rate

14.1%

14.5%

Long-term growth rate

1.0%

1.0%

Impairment testing of goodwill

Goodwill

EUR million

Cash generating unit

1 January, 2025

31 December, 2025

Architecture

49.7

49.1

Mobility, Display & Solar

8.8

8.7

Total

58.5

57.8

142

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Sensitivity analysis

The recoverable amounts used in impairment testing are subject to change if the assumption used in cal-culation of the recoverable amounts changes.

The recoverable amounts of these cash generating units exceed their carrying amounts by 14 (45; 2024) per cent in the Architecture business and by 15 (24; 2024) per cent in the Mobil-ity, Display & Solar business.

A change in an assumption which, other things being equal, would cause the recoverable amount to equal the carrying amount:

2025

2024

Pre-tax discount rate

Value assignedto the assumption

Value Change

Value assigned to the assumption

Value Change

Architecture

15.3%

17.4%

14.1%

20.4%

Mobility, Display & Solar

15.7%

18.3%

14.5%

18.0%

2025

2024

Long-term growth rate

Value assignedto the assumption

Value Change

Value assigned to the assumption

Value Change

Architecture

1.0%

-1.4%

1.0%

-6.8%

Mobility, Display & Solar

1.0%

-2.0%

1.0%

-3.6%

The costs of Architecture business are estimated to be 89 per cent of the estimated net sales during the testing period. Should the costs be 1 percent-age points higher, the recoverable amount, other things being equal, would equal the carrying amount.

The costs of Mobility, Display & Solar business are estimated to be 90 per cent of the estimated net sales during the testing period. Should the costs be 1 percentage points higher, the recoverable amount, other things being equal, would equal the carrying amount.

143

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Trade and other receivables

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Receivables

Trade receivables

14,802

13,431

Trade receivables, falling due after 12 months(1

1,104

1,097

Total trade receivables

15,906

14,529

Finance leasing receivables

104

100

Finance leasing receivables, falling due after 12 months(1

73

176

Prepaid expenses and accrued income

1,573

2,116

Prepaid expenses and accrued income, falling due after 12 months (1

-

120

Other receivables

3,111

3,637

Total receivables

20,766

20,678

(1In non-current assets

Prepaid expenses and accrued income consist mainly of accruals of financial items, fair values of derivative instruments, accruals related to sales, accruals related to insurances and other accruals.

Prepaid expenses and accrued income related to derivative instruments are disclosed in more detail in Note 5.7.

Ageing analysis of trade receivables at 31 December

Past due

Carrying amount of trade receivables after recognizing allowance account

Not past due

< 30 days

31-180 days

181-360 days

> 360 days

2025

15,906

11,022

2,817

1,587

408

72

2024

14,529

10,759

2,113

1,429

185

42

Impairment losses of trade receivables and changes in allowance account of trade receivables

EUR thousand

Allowance account 1 January, 2024

1,770

Exchange difference

136

Charge for the year

1,420

Utilized

-289

Unused amounts reversed

-837

Allowance account 31 December, 2024

2,200

Exchange difference

113

Charge for the year

1,938

Utilized

-163

Unused amounts reversed

-680

Allowance account 31 December, 2025

3,409

Impairment losses of trade receivables recognized in profit or loss, net (- income)

2025

1,290

2024

615

147

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Finance lease receivables

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Minimun lease receivables

Unearned finance income

Minimun lease receivables

Unearned finance income

Finance lease receivables are due as follows

No later than 1 year

104

7

100

10

Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years

73

4

176

11

Total finance lease receivables

176

11

276

21

Present value of minimum lease receivables

205

303

Operating leases as a lessor

Glaston has some other operating lease agreements where the Group acts as lessor. In Finland, premises adjacent to the factory are leased to external parties. The minimum payments for these non-cancellable lease agreements are shown in the table below.

2025

2024

Minimum future payments of operating leases

Maturity within 1 year

415

558

Maturity later than 1 year and not later than 5 years

-

81

Total minimum future payments of operating leases

415

639

148

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Non-current provisions

EUR thousand

2025

Warranty provision

Other provisions

Total

Carrying amount 1 January

287

112

399

Reclassification

-345

-

-345

Increase in provisions

1,229

11

1,239

Provisions released during the period

-224

-

-224

Carrying amount 31 December

946

123

1,069

2024

Carrying amount 1 January

244

124

368

Reclassification

-214

-

-214

Increase in provisions

536

-

536

Provisions released during the period

-280

-12

-291

Carrying amount 31 December

287

112

399

Current provisionsEUR thousand2025

Warranty provision

Restructuring provision

Other provisions

Total

Carrying amount 1 January

3,813

1,065

80

4,958

Exchange difference

-44

10

-2

-35

Reclassification

-674

-

-

-674

Increase in provisions

4,158

761

-

4,919

Provisions used during the period

-831

-1,220

-50

-2,100

Provisions released during the period

-2,245

-70

-

-2,315

Carrying amount 31 December

4,177

546

29

4,752

2024

Carrying amount 1 January

3,072

280

144

3,496

Exchange difference

46

-22

1

25

Reclassification

-55

-

-

-55

Increase in provisions

3,236

1,200

20

4,456

Provisions used during the period

-1,599

-393

-84

-2,077

Provisions released during the period

-887

-

-

-887

Carrying amount 31 December

3,813

1,065

80

4,958

Reclassification refers to a transfer from long-term to short-term or change in classification.

Warranty provisions

Glaston grants to its machine deliv-eries a guarantee period of 1 to 2 years. During the guarantee period Glaston repairs the defects, if any, of the machines and carries the costs of the repairing. The warranty provisions are expected to be realized within the next two years.

Restructuring provisions

Glaston has recorded restructuring provisions for rationalization measures by closing production units or reduc-ing activities at the units. Restructur-ing provisions only include expenses that are necessarily entailed by the restructuring, and which are not asso-ciated with the on-going activities. The restructuring provision includes,

but is not limited to, provisions for employee benefits related to per-sonnel whose employment has been terminated. For some of the provisions it is not possible to estimate timing of the outflow of economic benefits, for example due to that the timing of such outflows are dependent on the actions of an external party.

Other provisions

Other provisions include, among other things, litigation provisions and provisions for costs, for which third party compensation has not yet been recognized.

151

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Share capital and number of shares

Shares and Voting Rights

Glaston Corporation has one class of shares. The number of outstanding shares is 42,145,805 and each share carries one vote at general meetings of shareholders. On December 31, 2025, Glaston Corporation's share capital amounted to EUR 12,696,000. The share has no nominal value. The share's counter book value is EUR 0.30 per share. Glaston’s shares are registered in the book-entry securities system maintained by Euroclear Finland Ltd. The shares are subject to the redemption clause of the Articles of association.

Number of shares and treasury shares

2025

2024

Number of shares (registered)(1

Number of shares 1 January

42,145,805

42,145,805

Number of shares 31 December

42,145,805

42,145,805

Treasury shares 1.January

116,933

125,000

Disposal of treasury shares

-16,200

-8,067

Treasury shares 31 December

100,733

116,933

Number of shares excluding treasury shares 31 December

42,045,072

42,028,873

The company has an agreement with an external service provider for the man-agement of key personnel's share-based incentive scheme and the acquisi-tion of shares. On 31 December 2025, there were 100,733 shares on the balance sheet. These shares are the property of EAI Hedging 3 Oy until the shares are handed over to the participants within the incentive systems.

The legal ownership of EAI Hedging 3 Oy is with an external service provider, but based on the agreement, Glaston Oyj Abp actually exercises control over the arrangement, which is why the holding company is combined with the IFRS consolidated financial statements as a structured community.

Equity attributable to owners of the parent per share

2025

2024

Equity attributable to owners of the parent, EUR thousand

63,839

66,844

Number of shares excluding treasury shares

42,045,072

42,028,873

Equity attributable to owners of the parent per share, EUR

1.52

1.59

Distribution of profit

Return of capital per share, EUR

-

0.06

(1 On 22 April 2025, a reverse share split (2:1) was carried out. The number of shares have been adjusted accordingly

156

Glaston Annual Review 2025

most probable orders by case-by-case assessment were hedged by currency forward contracts. Cash flow hedging was based on IFRS 9 hedge accounting in 2025. Cash flow hedging is presented in note 5.7. The Group has not hedged net investments in foreign entities nor internal loans.

For the sensitivity analysis as

defined in IFRS 7, a possible +/- 10 per cent change in the main currencies was assessed, with all other factors remaining unchanged. The sensitiv-ity analysis is based on the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities as of 31 December 2025. The analysis takes into consideration the impact of foreign exchange deriva-

tives, if such instruments have been used, which offsets the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates.

In the table below, the effect of the main currencies on consolidated result before taxes has been analysed. Only risks that are related to finan-cial instruments are included in the analysis.

2025

Change in currency rate, Gross position

Change in currency rate, Net position

EUR thousand

Gross position

Currency Forwards nominal value

Net position

-10 per cent

+10 per cent

-10 per cent

+ 10 per cent

USD/EUR

-14,365

8,224

-6,141

-1,596

1,306

-682

558

CHF/EUR

-190

-

-190

-21

17

-21

17

CNY/EUR

-12,178

-

-12,178

-1,353

1,107

-1,353

1,107

GBP/EUR

-13,485

345

-13,140

-1,498

1,226

-1,460

1,195

-40,218

8,568

-31,650

5.4.2.2. Interest rate risk

Possible changes in the interest rates cause a risk that will affect the result of the Group. The objective of interest risk management is to minimize, if necessary, the effect of interest rate fluctuations on the Group’s annual result.

As a measurement for the man-agement of interest rate risk an effect of the 1 per cent changed of interest rates to interest expenses for the period of 12 months has been used. At the end of 2025 this effect was EUR 220 thousand (EUR 30 thousand).

On 31 December 2025, the Group’s interest-bearing net debt mainly con-sisted of loans agreed with lenders in the financing agreement signed in 2025. In August 2024, Glaston entered into a 3-year interest rate swap with a nominal value of EUR 10 million to hedge a variable rate loan. The interest rate swap is subject to hedge accounting.

For the sensitivity analysis as defined by IFRS 7, a possible +1 / -0.5 percentage point change in the interest rates was assessed. The effect of the change on the Group’s result before taxes given the level of debt with floating interest rates on 31 December 2025 is EUR -0.22 / +0.11 (-0.03 / +0.02) million and the effect

158

Glaston Annual Review 2025

to Group's equity is EUR +0.28 / -0.14 million.

5.4.3. Credit and counterparty risk

The Group becomes exposed to credit and counterparty risks when it grants payment time to the custom-ers. The credit worthiness of these counterparties may decrease and affect the Group’s result. Credit risk management is conducted in accord-ance with the Group’s Credit Manage-ment Policy.

The objective for credit risk man-agement is to reduce this risk as much as possible without compromising the flexibility needed by different busi-ness functions. Risk management is performed together with the business management with the objective to avoid major credit risk concentrations and to verify, that sufficient guaran-tees and collaterals are received. The Group reduces its credit risk by using letters of credit and various types of guarantees received from the cus-tomers to secure the receivables. In addition, the Group uses advance payments to reduce risk and to accel-erate fund inflows. Glaston is closely monitoring and managing its liquidity and financial position. Credit risks are mitigated through stringent customer payment terms with significant cus-

tomer advances. Orders are only reg-istered in the order book upon receipt of a customer advance. In measur-ing expected credit losses, Glaston applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach, which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance from trade receivables to be assessed and recognized regularly.

At the end of 2025 20.5 (27.1) per cent of Group’s trade receivables were secured by LCs and other collat-erals received.

The Group’s client base is diversi-fied over several different geograph-ical areas and customer segments which reduces major concentrations of credit risk. The largest single cus-tomer’s share of the Group’s receiv-ables is not significant in terms of risk management. Significant unfavour-able changes in the level of invest-ment demand might, however, cause changes in the development of the Group’s credit risk.

5.4.3.1. Trade receivables

The quality of trade receivables is assessed by each Group company based on the Group’s Credit Manage-ment Policy. Based on these assess-ments, impairment losses on trade receivables are recognized in accord-ance with the Credit Policy.

The total carrying amount of trade

receivables on 31 December 2025 was EUR 15.9 million (EUR 14.5 million).

Ageing analysis and changes in allowance account of trade receiva-bles are presented in Note 4.2. to the consolidated financial statements.

5.4.4. Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Group’s funds and borrowing facilities become insufficient to meet the business needs or that significant extra costs are incurred in order to arrange the financing needed.

Liquidity risk is managed through effective use of advance payments in order to reduce the amount of work-ing capital tied up in the operations. A special focus is set on the working capital management and the develop-ment is monitored regularly. Short- and long-term cash planning is part of Group companies’ operational activity together with the Group Treasury. As a measurement for the liquidity risk are the Group's liquid funds and unused credit facilities. Group Treasury reports the Group’s liquidity position regularly to the management and to the Board of Directors of Glaston Corporation

Glaston Corporation has agreed to extend its long-term financing agree-ment by three years in December 2025. The financing agreement con-

sists of EUR 32 million long-term loans and a EUR 25 million Revolving Credit Facility. The agreement includes two one-year options for extension of the loan period. In the loan margin of the financing agreement for the Revolving Credit Facility, the intention is to take into account the achievement of Glas-ton's sustainability targets annually. These will be agreed by 30 June 2026. The covenant terms of the financing package are described in the note 5.1. Management of capital.

159

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Committed credit facilities

EUR million

In use

Unused

Total

Committed credit facilities 31.12.2025

5.0

20.0

25.0

Committed credit facilities 31.12.2024

15.0

10.0

25.0

Maturity analysis of financial liabilities 31 December 2025

EUR thousand

Maturing in

Maturity of financial liabilities

Carrying amount

Contractual cash flows

< 12 months

1-2 years

> 2 years

Financial liabilities

Loans from financial institutions

31,694

35,411

4,047

3,937

27,427

Other interest-bearing loans

78

80

40

40

-

Lease liabilities

5,007

5,319

2,373

2,021

925

Trade payables

15,134

15,134

15,134

-

-

Total

51,913

55,944

21,594

5,998

28,352

Maturity analysis of financial liabilities 31 December 2024

EUR thousand

Maturing in

Maturity of financial liabilities

Carrying amount

Contractual cash flows

< 12 months

1-2 years

> 2 years

Financial liabilities

Loans from financial institutions

24,856

27,745

3,126

1,080

23,540

Other interest-bearing loans

118

120

40

40

40

Lease liabilities

7,089

7,601

2,822

2,264

2,515

Trade payables

21,100

21,100

21,100

-

-

Total

53,163

56,566

27,088

3,384

26,094

160

Glaston Annual Review 2025

in current assets and liabilities. Trade date accounting is used in recognizing sales and purchases of derivatives.

Hedge accounting was used in hedging the trade receivables of projects and in hedging a variable rate loan. In August 2024, Glaston entered into a 3-year interest rate swap with a nominal value of EUR 10 million to hedge a variable rate loan. The interest rate swap is subject to hedge accounting. At the end of reporting period 2025, Glaston had open foreign exchange and interest rate forward contracts.

Other Assets Recognized at Fair Value through Profit or Loss

Other assets recognized at fair value through profit or loss may include current investments that are acquired and held for trading, i.e. acquired or incurred for the main purpose of selling them in the short term. Other assets recognized at fair value through profit or loss are included in current assets in the statement of financial position.

Fair values of other financial assets recognized at fair value through profit or loss are estimated to correspond to their carrying amounts because of their short maturities. Trade date accounting is used in recognizing pur-chases and sales of other assets recognized at fair value through profit or loss.

Loans and Other Receivables

Loans and other receivables are assets which are not included in derivative assets. Loans and other receivables arise when money, goods or services are delivered to a debtor. They are not quoted in an active market and payments related to them are either fixed or determinable. Loans and receivables granted by the Group are measured at amortized cost.

Loan receivables, trade receivables and other receivables have been classified as loans and other receivables. They are included in current or non-current financial assets in accordance with their maturity. Loan and

trade receivables falling due after 12 months are discounted, if no interest is charged separately, and the increase in the receivable which reflects the passage of time is recognized as interest income in financial income and expenses.

Trade receivables are carried at the original invoice amount less the share of the discounted interest and an estimate made for doubtful receivables. The estimate made for doubtful receivables is based on a review of all trade receivables outstanding on the reporting date as well as on an assessment of the impairment of financial assets based on expected credit losses. Impairment losses of trade receivables are recorded in a separate allowance account within trade receivables, and the impairment losses are recog-nized in profit or loss as other operating expenses. If the impairment loss is final, the trade receivable is derecognized from the allowance account. If a payment is later received from the impaired receivable, the received amount is recognized in profit or loss as a deduction of other operating expenses. If no impairment loss has been recognized in allowance account and the impairment loss of the trade receivable is found to be final, impairment loss is recognized directly as deduction of trade receivables.

Loan receivables are carried at the original amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables. The estimate made for doubtful receivables is based on a separate review of all loan receivables outstanding on the reporting date as well as on an assessment of the impairment of financial assets based on expected credit losses. For example, payment defaults or late payments are considered as indications of impairment of the receivable. Impairment losses of loan receivables are recognized in profit or loss as financial expenses. If a payment is later received from the impaired receivable, the received amount is recognized in profit or loss in financial items.

Financial Assets Valued at Fair Value through other comprehensive income

Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income

162

Glaston Annual Review 2025

are financial assets not included in derivative assets, assets or liabilities recognized at fair value through profit or loss, or other receivables.

Listed investments included in financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income are valued at the market price at the end of the reporting period. The value of investments whose fair value is not based on verifiable market data, such as unlisted shares and other investments, is based on information obtained from the company or on the fair value of substantially similar instruments.

Unrealized changes in the fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income are recognized in other comprehensive income less tax effects and are included in the fair value reserve in equity.

Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income are included in non-current assets in the statement of financial position.

Financial Liabilities Measured at Amortized Cost

On initial recognition financial liabilities are measured at their fair values that are based on the consideration received. Subsequently, financial liabil-ities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Transaction costs are included in the acquisition cost. Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost include pension loans, loans from financial institutions, finance lease liabilities, trade payables and advances received. They are included in current or non-current liabilities in accordance with their maturity.

Interest expenses are accrued for and mainly recognized in profit or loss for each period. If an asset is a qualifying asset as defined in IAS 23 Borrow-ing Costs, the borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisi-tion, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalized to the acquisition cost of the asset. The capitalization applies mainly to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

163

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Financial assets and liabilities by category

EUR thousand

31 December, 2025

Note

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through other comprehensive income

Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

Financial liabilities at amortized cost

Total carrying amounts

Total fair value

Cash

5.2.

-

-

8,856

8,856

-

Trade receivables

4.2.

-

-

15,906

15,906

-

Other interest-free receivables

4.2.

-

-

3,328

3,328

-

Derivatives (receivables)

5.7.

218

-

-

218

-

Shares and other long-term investments

8

-

-

8

-

Non-current interest-bearing liabilities

5.6.

-

-

-31,841

-31,841

-28,967

Current interest-bearing liabilities

5.6.

-

-

-4,970

-4,970

-5,026

Trade payables

4.3.

-

-

-15,134

-15,134

-

Other current interest-free liabilities

4.3.

-

-

-2,144

-2,144

-

Derivatives (liabilities)

5.7.

-12

-

-

-12

-

Total

214

-

-25,999

-25,785

-33,992

31 December, 2024

Cash

5.2.

-

-

12,283

12,283

-

Trade receivables

4.2.

-

-

14,529

14,529

-

Other interest-free receivables

4.2.

-

-

3,851

3,851

-

Derivatives (receivables)

5.7.

214

-

-

214

-

Shares and other long-term investments

8

-

-

8

-

Non-current interest-bearing liabilities

5.6.

-

-

-27,820

-27,820

-25,396

Current interest-bearing liabilities

5.6.

-

-

-4,243

-4,243

-4,711

Trade payables

4.3.

-

-

-21,100

-21,100

-

Other current interest-free liabilities

4.3.

-

-

-3,039

-3,039

-

Derivatives (liabilities)

5.7.

-752

-

-

-752

-

Total

-531

-

-25,539

-26,070

-30,106

164

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Fair value measurement hierarchy

31.12.2025

31.12.2024

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets

Currency and interest rate forward contracts

-

218

-

218

-

214

-

214

Total

-

218

-

218

-

214

-

214

Liabilities

Finacial liabilities

-

-33,992

-

-33,992

-

-30,106

-

-30,106

Currency and interest rate forward contracts

-

-12

-

-12

-

-752

-

-752

Total

-

-34,004

-

-34,004

-

-30,859

-

-30,859

Fair value measurement hierarchy:

Level 1 = quoted prices in active markets

Level 2 = other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly

Level 3 = not based on observable market data

Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments include:

The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined by using forward rates at the closing date

The use of quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments

165

Glaston Annual Review 2025

In reporting periods 2025 and 2024, hedge accounting was used in hedg-ing the trade receivables of projects. In August 2024, Glaston entered into a 3-year interest rate swap with a nom-inal value of EUR 10 million to hedge a variable rate loan. The interest rate swap is subject to hedge accounting. At the end of reporting periods 2025 and 2024, Glaston had open foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate swaps.

Nominal and fair values of derivative instruments

2025

2024

EUR thousand

Nominal value

Fair value

Nominal value

Fair value

Currency rate forwards

8,568

212

14,699

-634

Interest rate forwards

10,000

-7

22,000

95

EUR thousand

2025

2024

Derivative instruments in the income statement

Items included in net sales

387

-512

Financial items

101

282

Derivative instruments in the statement of financial position, receivables and liabilities

Accrued expenses and deferred income

Currency and interest rate forwards

12

752

Accrued income

Currency and interest rate forwards

218

214

168

Glaston Annual Review 2025

The remuneration of the Executive Leadership Team includes salaries only for the period of membership.

The President and CEO's period of notice is 6 months. In the event the company would give notice to the President and CEO, he will receive an additional remuneration equaling 9 -12 months' salary.

Compensation of the President and CEO and other members of the Executive Leadership Team consists of a fixed monthly salary, an annual bonus and a share-based incentive plan intended as a long-term incen-tive (described in more detail in Note 2.6). The criteria for bonus payments are consolidated result, result of the business unit as well as functional tar-gets. The maximum annual bonus of the President and CEO is 60 per cent of the annual salary. The maximum annual bonus of the other members of the Executive Leadership Team is 40 per cent of the annual salary.

The retirement age of the Presi-dent and CEO of Glaston Corporation and other members of the Execu-tive Leadership Team is according to the normal local legislation, ie. 63-68 years.

Remuneration of the Board of Directors, accrual based

2025

2024

EUR

annual fee

meeting fee

Total

annual fee

meeting fee

Total

Veli-Matti Reinikkala, Chair of the Board of Directors

-81,500

-17,200

-98,700

-80,500

-17,100

-97,600

Sebastian Bondestam, Deputy Chair of the Board of Directors

-45,000

-7,500

-52,500

-44,500

-8,000

-52,500

Sarlotta Narjus(1

-8,750

-2,500

-11,250

-34,500

-9,000

-43,500

Antti Kaunonen

-35,000

-8,000

-43,000

-34,500

-6,500

-41,000

Arja Talma

-45,000

-9,000

-54,000

-44,500

-8,500

-53,000

Tero Telaranta

-35,000

-9,000

-44,000

-34,500

-9,000

-43,500

Michael Willome

-35,000

-10,500

-45,500

-34,500

-10,500

-45,000

Tina Wu(2

-26,250

-8,000

-34,250

-

-

-

Total

-311,500

-71,700

-383,200

-307,500

-68,600

-376,100

The members of Glaston Corpora-tion's Board of Directors were paid an annual remuneration and a meet-ing fee; other compensation was not paid. The 2025 Annual General Meeting resolved that an annual fee of EUR 74,000 (74,000) shall be paid to the Chair of the Board, EUR 45,000 (45,000) to the Deputy Chair and EUR 35,000 (35,000) to other Members of the Board. In addition, a meeting fee of EUR 800 (800) per meeting held in the Chair's home country and EUR 1,500 per meeting held elsewhere were paid to the Chair. The other

members of Glaston Corporation's Board of Directors were paid EUR 500 per meeting held in the Board mem-ber's home country and EUR 1,000 per meeting held elsewhere. For the Board Meeting, which is hold per cap-sulam, will be paid half of the regular fee. Member of the Board may, at his/her discretion, choose to receive the annual fixed remuneration partly in company shares and partly in cash so that approximately 40% of the annual fixed remuneration is paid in Glaston Corporation’s shares.

The members of Glaston Corpo-ration's Audit and People and Remu-neration Committees are paid for every meeting, that a member has participated, EUR 500 per meeting held in the member's home coun-try and EUR 1,000 per meeting held elsewhere. In addition, the Chair of the Audit Committee was paid annual fee of EUR 10,000 and to the Chair of the People and Remuneration Committee an annual fee of EUR 7,500.

1) Board member until April 16, 2025

2) Board member as of April 16, 2025

174

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Board of Directors, share ownership*

Glaston shares

31.12.2025

31.12.2024

Veli-Matti Reinikkala,Chair of the Board of Directors

653,218

487,446

Sebastian Bondestam, Deputy Chair of the Board of Directors

58,638

45,264

Sarlotta Narjus(1

-

-

Antti Kaunonen

99,940

89,538

Arja Talma

36,937

26,535

Tero Telaranta

37,125

26,723

Michael Willome

-

-

Tina Wu(2

-

-

1) Board member until April 16, 2025

2) Board member as of April 16, 2025

Share ownership includes also the ownership of Glaston Corporation shares by the related parties of the person in question and entities controlled by the person in question.

Executive Leadership Team, share ownership*

Glaston shares

31.12.2025

31.12.2024

Miika Äppelqvist(3 , President and CEO

13,666

9,380

Joe Butler(4

1,702

-

Robert Jenks(5

-

-

Kimmo Kuusela(6

7,473

-

Riikka Laitasalo

-

-

Jens Mayr(7

5,931

-

Magnus Sjöblom(8

-

-

Minna Toiviainen(9

-

-

(3President and CEO as of 1 June.2025

(4Member of the Executive leadership Team as of May 6, 2025

(5Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of April 1, 2025

(6Member of the Executive leadership Team as of May 6, 2025

(7Member of the Executive Leadership team as of July 1, 2025

(8Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of March 1, 2025

(9Member of the Executive Leadership Team as of September 15, 2025

*On 22 April 2025, a reverse share split was carried out. The number of shares in the comparison period have been adjusted accordingly.

175

Glaston Annual Review 2025

2. Net Sales

4. Material's and services

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 2

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 4

EUR

2025

2024

Net sales by business

Service sales

6,494,297

5,120,342

Net sales by country by destination

Finland

1,611,507

1,692,298

Other EMEA

3,411,572

2,663,276

Americas

834,496

582,537

Asia

636,722

182,231

Total

6,494,297

5,120,342

EMEA = Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Americas = North, Central and South America

Asia = China and the rest of the Asia-Pacific area

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 3

3. Other Operating Income

EUR

2025

2024

Charges from Group companies

6,623,707

7,551,498

Other operating income, total

6,623,707

7,551,498

EUR

2025

2024

External services

-885,724

-

Total

-885,724

-

5. Personnel Expenses

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 5

EUR

2025

2024

Salaries and fees

-2,789,962

-2,911,136

Pension expenses

-495,655

-494,005

Other personnel expenses

-63,767

-40,571

Total

-3,349,383

-3,445,712

Salaries and remuneration paid to members of the Board of Directors and Managing Director

749,042

800,614

Employees during financial year, average

White collar

22

23

Total

22

23

181

Glaston Annual Review 2025

7. Other Operating Expenses

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 7

EUR

2025

2024

Rents

-258,177

-212,466

ICT costs

-5,881,665

-6,676,437

Travel expenses

-140,355

-171,747

Losses on disposals of assets

-1,290

-185,325

Credit losses

-10,692

50,323

Other expenses

-1,890,651

-1,678,274

Other operating expenses, total

-8,182,829

-8,873,926

Fees paid to auditors

Audit

-71,500

-74,000

Statutory statements

-51,023

-67,868

Tax advisory

-

-12,420

Total

-122,523

-154,288

EUR

2025

2024

Interest and other financial income

From Group companies

1,517,898

1,486,873

From external parties

604,966

656,246

Interest and other financial income

2,122,863

2,143,119

Interest and other financial income, total

2,122,863

2,143,119

Interest and other financial expenses

To Group companies

-814,657

-801,147

To external parties

-1,764,353

-1,902,282

Interest and other financial expenses, total

-2,579,010

-2,703,428

Net financial items, total

-456,147

-560,309

Other financial income and expenses include foreign exchange gains and losses (net)

-64,185

-37

8. Net Financial Items

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 8

6. Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment Losses

EUR

2025

2024

Depreciation and amortization according to plan

Intangible assets

Intangible rights

-619,124

-588,858

Other capitalized expenditure

-15,353

-43,691

Tangible assets

Machinery and equipment

-5,172

-6,720

Total depreciation and amortization according to plan

-639,649

-639,270

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 6

182

Glaston Annual Review 2025

9. Appropriations

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 9

EUR

2025

2024

Received Group contributions

1,100,000

-

Difference between depreciation and amortization according to plan and depreciation and amortization in taxation

-4,029

-1,253

Total

1,095,971

-1,253

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 10

10. Income Taxes

EUR

2025

2024

Income taxes for operations

-191,706

-138,347

Total

-191,706

-138,347

183

Glaston Annual Review 2025

11. Fixed Assets

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 11

Intangible assets

EUR

Intangible rights

Other capitalized expenditure

Advance payments and investments in progress

Total

Acquisition cost 1 January, 2025

7,513,654

609,815

638,029

8,761,498

Additions

2,395

-

293,877

296,272

Disposals

-172,660

-

-

-172,660

Reclassifications

211,675

-

-211,675

-

Intra-Group reorganisations (+/-)

-

-

-205,104

-205,104

Acquisition cost 31 December, 2025

7,555,064

609,815

515,128

8,680,007

Accumulated amortizations and impairment losses 1 January, 2025

-5,510,806

-549,936

-

-6,060,742

Accumulated amortizations of disposals and transfers

171,370

-

-

171,370

Amortization of the period

-619,124

-15,353

-

-634,477

Accumulated amortizations and impairment losses 31 December, 2025

-5,958,560

-565,289

-

-6,523,849

Carrying amount at 31 December, 2025

1,596,504

44,526

515,128

2,156,158

Carrying amount at 31 December, 2024

2,002,848

59,879

638,029

2,700,756

Tangible assets

EUR

Machinery and

equipment

Other tangible assets

Advance payments and investments in progress

Total

Acquisition cost 1 January, 2025

122,680

112,568

235,248

Additions

-

-

-

-

Disposals

-59,074

-

-

-59,074

Acquisition cost 31 December, 2025

63,606

112,568

-

176,174

Accumulated depreciations and impairment losses 1 January, 2025

-105,739

-102,700

-

-208,439

Accumulated depreciations of disposals and transfers

59,074

-

-

59,074

Depreciation for the period

-5,172

-

-

-5,172

Accumulated depreciations and impairment losses 31 December, 2025

-51,837

-102,700

-

-154,537

Carrying amount 31 December, 2025

11,769

9,868

-

21,637

Carrying amount at 31 December, 2024

16,941

9,868

-

26,809

184

Glaston Annual Review 2025

12. Investments

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 12

EUR

Shares

Group companies

Shares

Others

Subordinated loan

receivable

Group companies

Total

Carrying amount at 1 January, 2025

17,203,790

7,689

36,846,040

54,057,519

Carrying amount at 31 December, 2025

17,203,790

7,689

36,846,040

54,057,519

The company has granted a capital loan to its subsidiary. The capital of the loan may be repaid if the conditions specified in Section 12:1 of the Companies Act are met. According to the loan agreement, the capital and interest of the loan may be paid in the company's liquidation and bankruptcy only with a priority lower than all other debts. Otherwise, the capital may be repaid or interest paid only to the extent that the company's unrestricted equity and all capital loans at the time of pay- ment exceed the amount of the loss according to the company's most recently approved financial statements. No security is provided for the payment of the capital or interest. The interest rate on the loan is 1.75%.

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 13

13. Shares and holdings owned by the Parent

Subsidiary shares

EUR

Ownership %

Number of shares

Carrying amount

Uniglass Solutions Oy (former Uniglass Engineering Oy), Tampere, Finland

100%

20,000

2,351,183

Glaston Services Ltd. Oy, Tampere, Finland

100%

1,800,000

14,852,607

Total

17,203,790

Other

Other shares and holdings

7,689

Total

7,689

Whole Group structure is presented in the Group consolidated financial statements note 6.1.

185

Glaston Annual Review 2025

14. Receivables

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 14

EUR

2025

2024

Non-current receivables

Receivables from external parties

Deferred tax assets

100,218

110,214

Other receivables

190,843

228,426

Total

291,061

338,640

Receivables from Group companies

Loan receivables

77,700,000

77,700,000

Total

77,700,000

77,700,000

Non-current receivables, total

77,991,061

78,038,640

Current receivables

Receivables from external parties

Trade receivables

1,665

19,282

Other receivables

28,776

48,785

Prepaid expenses and accrued income

677,719

699,311

Total

708,160

767,378

Receivables from Group companies

Trade receivables

1,064,587

3,971,090

Loan receivables

3,947,060

5,137,576

Group Contribution receivables

1,100,000

-

Accrued interest receivables

1,341,123

1,341,123

Prepaid expenses and accrued income

152,911

16,502

Total

7,605,681

10,466,291

Current receivables, total

8,313,841

11,233,669

Relevant items of prepaid expenses and accrued income

Personnel expenses

238

-

Interest SWAP

-

146,214

Financial items

306,289

150,967

Prepaid insurances

14,517

3,522

Other

509,588

415,110

Prepaid expenses and accrued income, total

830,631

715,813

EUR

2025

2024

Share capital 1 January

12,696,000

12,696,000

Share capital 31 December

12,696,000

12,696,000

Hedging reserve account 1 January

35,868

307,129

Change in financial year

-36,741

-271,261

Hedging reserve account 31 December

-873

35,868

Reserve for invested unrestricted equity 1 January

102,475,666

106,683,969

Capital repayment

-2,522,704

-4,208,302

Reserve for invested unrestricted equity 31 December

99,952,962

102,475,666

Retained earnings 1 January

-47,856,182

-46,869,204

Retained earnings 31 December

-47,856,182

-46,869,204

Profit / loss for the financial year

508,536

-986,978

Equity at 31 December

65,300,443

67,351,353

On 22 April 2025, a reverse share split (2:1) was carried out.

Distributable funds at 31 December

Reserve for invested unrestricted equity

99,952,962

102,475,666

Retained earnings

-47,856,182

-46,869,204

Profit / loss for the financial year

508,536

-986,978

Distributable funds

52,605,316

54,619,484

15. Equity

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 15

The company has granted loans to a Group company. The total amount of the loans is 77 000 000 euros.

The interest on the loans is paid once a year. The loans will mature at the latest in 2029.

The interest rate of the loans is fixed at 1.75%. The loans are unsecured.

186

Glaston Annual Review 2025

16. Accumulated Appropriations

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 16

EUR

2025

2024

Accumulated depreciation difference 1 January

112,314

111,061

Increase (+) / decrease (-)

4,029

1,253

Accumulated depreciation difference 31 December

116,343

112,314

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 17

17. Provisions

EUR

2025

2024

Current provisions

Restructuring provision

205,750

-

Current provisions, total

205,750

-

Provisions, total

205,750

-

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 18

18. Non-current Liabilities

EUR

2025

2024

Liabilities to external parties

Loans from financial institutions

29,200,000

23,000,000

Liabilities to external parties, total

29,200,000

23,000,000

Non-current liabilities, total

29,200,000

23,000,000

19. Current Liabilities

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 19

EUR

2025

2024

Liabilities to external parties

Loans from financial institutions

2,800,000

2,000,000

Trade payables

652,390

937,074

Other liabilities

164,672

307,879

Accrued expenses and deferred income

1,022,858

1,489,193

Deferred tax liability

-

19,180.90

Liabilities to external parties, total

4,639,920

4,753,326

Liabilities to group companies

Other interest-bearing liabilities

45,330,286

52,564,719

Trade payables

212,982

122,211

Liabilities to group companies, total

45,543,268

52,686,930

Current liabilities, total

50,183,188

57,440,256

Accrued expenses and deferred income

Salary and other personnel expense accruals

376,012

736,410

Interests

31,858

296,662

Interest SWAP

6,679

51,069

Other

608,309

405,052

Accrued expenses and deferred income, total

1,022,858

1,489,193

187

Glaston Annual Review 2025

20. Contingent Liabilities

Notes to parent company financial statements (FAS) / Note 20

EUR

2025

2024

Leasing liabilities

Maturity within one year

61,969

74,094

Maturity later than one year

20,153

66,958

Total

82,122

141,052

The leasing agreements have normal terms.

Other rental liabilities

Maturity within one year

59,153

123,275

Maturity later than one year

-

61,565

Total

59,153

184,840

Pledges

On behalf of Group companies

2,694,456

7,200,926

Loans secured with pledged assets and mortgages

Loans from financial institutions

32,000,000

25,000,000

Liens on chattel

On own behalf

97,500,000

97,500,000

Carrying amount of pledged securities

14,852,607

14,852,607

Mortgages, liens on chattel and pledged assets are given on own and other Group companies behalf.

Liens on chattel are given jointly with Glaston Services Ltd. Oy and Glaston Finland Oy.

188

Glaston Annual Review 2025

The key audit matter

How the matter was addressed in the audit

Revenue recognition (Note 2.2 Revenue from contracts with customers)

The consolidated revenue comprise different revenue flows based on different contract types, such as sale of machines, spare parts and services.

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognized at a point in time or over time when the buyer receives the goods or gains control. Revenue from services rendered and repair work is recognized when the service has been rendered or the work has been completed.

The most significant risks relate to revenue from tailor-made glass process- ing machine deliveries for which the revenue is recognized over time. These involve management estimates related to measuring the progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation and total estimated costs. Net sales for the reporting period include EUR 142.9 million revenue recognized over time representing 68 percent of total net sales.

Selection of revenue recognition methods and revenue recognition involve management judgement and estimates and thus revenue recognition is con- sidered a key audit matter.

Our audit procedures included evaluation of the revenue recognition prin- ciples applied by the Group and assessment of their appropriateness by reference to IFRS standards.

We have obtained an understanding of processes relating to different revenue flows and identified and assessed internal controls over revenue recognition as well as tested their effectiveness. In addition, we performed substantive testing and analytical procedures, partly based on data analyt- ics, in order to assess the appropriateness of revenue recognition and the accounting treatment of recording revenue and the related expenses in the correct period.

We assessed the control environment in respect of the main sales soft- ware and the related user rights management.

We discussed with the management the revenue recognition practices applied and decisions involving management judgement and estimates which had an impact on revenue recognition.

Furthermore, we considered the appropriateness of the Group’s disclo- sures in respect of revenue recognition principles and net sales.

Valuation of goodwill (Notes 3.1 Goodwill and Intangible Assets and 3.4 Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment of Assets)

Value of goodwill amounts to EUR 57.8 million, which is 34 percent of the total assets and 91 percent of the consolidated equity.

Goodwill is not amortized, instead it is tested for impairment at least on an annual basis. Impairment tests are based on future cash flow forecasts and determining the underlying key assumptions require management estimates.

Due to the high level of management estimates related to the forecasts used in goodwill impairment tests and the significant carrying amounts involved, valuation of goodwill is considered as a key audit matter.

We have assessed the key assumptions used in the impairment calculations, such as profitability, discount rate and long-term growth rate with relation to the forecasts presented to the Board of Directors, external references and our own views.

We involved KPMG valuation specialists when assessing the technical accuracy of the calculations and comparing the assumptions used with external market and industry data.

In addition, we considered the appropriateness of the Group’s disclosures in respect of goodwill impairment testing.

We have not identified key audit matters relating to the parent company’s financial statements.

191

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director for the Financial Statements

The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU, and of financial state- ments that give a true and fair view in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the prepara- tion of financial statements in Finland and comply with statutory require- ments. The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are also respon- sible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstate- ment, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial state- ments, the Board of Directors and the Managing Director are responsible for assessing the parent company’s and the group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applica- ble, matters relating to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. The financial statements are prepared using the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the parent com-

pany or the group or cease opera- tions, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements

Our objectives are to obtain reason- able assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with good auditing practice will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstate- ments can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individ- ually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.

As part of an audit in accordance with good auditing practice, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the finan- cial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform

audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evi- dence that is sufficient and appro- priate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.

Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of express- ing an opinion on the effectiveness of the parent company’s or the group’s internal control.

Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting esti- mates and related disclosures made by management.

Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’ and the Managing Director’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncer- tainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the parent company’s or the group’s ability to continue as a

going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related dis- closures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inade- quate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the parent company or the group to cease to continue as a going con- cern.

Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the finan- cial statements, including the dis- closures, and whether the financial statements represent the underly- ing transactions and events so that the financial statements give a true and fair view.

Plan and perform the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the finan- cial information of the entities or business units within the group as a basis for forming an opinion on the group financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit work performed for purposes of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

192

Glaston Annual Review 2025

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal con- trol that we identify during our audit.

We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independ- ence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where appli- cable, related safeguards.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Other Reporting Requirements

Information on our audit engagement

We were first appointed as auditors by the Annual General Meeting on May 28, 2020, and our appointment repre- sents a total period of uninterrupted engagement of 6 years.

Other Information

The Board of Directors and the Man- aging Director are responsible for the other information. The other infor- mation comprises the report of the Board of Directors and the information included in the Annual Report, but does not include the financial state- ments or our auditor’s report thereon. We have obtained the report of the Board of Directors prior to the date of this auditor’s report, and the Annual Report is expected to be made avail- able to us after that date. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsi- bility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other informa- tion is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise

appears to be materially misstated. With respect to the report of the Board of Directors, our responsibility also includes considering whether the report of the Board of Directors has been prepared in compliance with the applicable provisions, excluding the sustainability report information on which there are provisions in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act and in the sustainability reporting standards.

In our opinion, the information in the report of the Board of Directors is consistent with the information in the financial statements and the report of the Board of Directors has been pre- pared in compliance with the applica- ble provisions. Our opinion does not cover the sustainability report infor- mation on which there are provisions in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act and in the sustainability reporting standards.

If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Tampere, 26 February 2026

KPMG OY AB

Audit Firm

LOTTA NURMINEN

Authorised Public Accountant, KHT

193

Glaston Annual Review 2025

sustainability reporting standards and in which the information for reporting in accordance with the sustainability reporting standards has been identified,

the compliance of the group sustainability statement with the requirements laid down in Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regula- tion (EU) 2019/2088, and for

such internal control as the Board of Directors and the Managing Director determine is necessary to enable the preparation of a group sustaina- bility report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Inherent Limitations in the Preparation of a Sustainability Report

Preparing a group sustainability report requires a company to make materiality assessment to identify relevant mat- ters to report. This includes significant management judgement and choices. It is also characteristic to the sustaina- bility reporting that reporting of this kind of information includes estimates and assumptions as well as measurement and estimation uncertainty.

The determination of greenhouse

gases is subject to inherent uncer- tainty due to the incomplete scientific data used to determine the emission factors and the numerical values needed to combine emissions of dif- ferent gases.

When reporting forward-looking information in accordance with ESRS standards, a company's management is required to make assumptions about possible future events, and to dis- close the company's possible future actions in relation to those events, as well as to prepare the forward-looking information based on these assump- tions. Actual results are likely to differ because forecasted events often do not occur as expected.

Responsibilities of the Authorised Group Sustainability Auditor

Our responsibility is to perform an assurance engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the group sustainability report is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue a lim- ited assurance report that includes our opinion. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are consid- ered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the decisions of users taken on the basis of the group sustainability report.

Compliance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised) requires that we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the engagement. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the group sustainability report, whether due to fraud or error, and obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the engagement in order to design assurance procedures that are appropriate in the circum- stances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effec- tiveness of the parent company’s or the group’s internal control.

Design and perform assurance procedures responsive to those risks to obtain evidence that is suf- ficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, inten- tional omissions, misrepresenta- tions, or the override of internal control.

Description of the Procedures That Have Been Performed

The procedures performed in a lim- ited assurance engagement vary in

nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for, a reasonable assur- ance engagement. The nature, timing and extent of assurance procedures selected depend on professional judg- ment, including the assessment of risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been per- formed.

Our procedures included, among others, the following:

We interviewed the company’s management and persons respon- sible for collecting and preparing the information contained in the group sustainability report at the group.

Regarding the double materiality assessment process, we assessed the implementation of the process carried out by the company and the information disclosed on the pro- cess in relation to the requirements of the ESRS standards.

Through interviews we gained understanding of the group’s key processes related to collecting and consolidating the sustainability information.

195

Glaston Annual Review 2025

We got acquainted with the group’s internal guidelines and operating principles relevant to the sustain- ability information disclosed in the group sustainability report.

We got acquainted with the back- ground documentation and docu- ments prepared by the company, as applicable, and assessed whether they support the information included in the group sustainability report.

We assessed the information dis- closed on material sustainability matters in the group sustainability report in relation to the require- ments of the ESRS standards.

In relation to the EU taxonomy information, we gained understand- ing about the process by which the company has defined taxon- omy eligible and taxonomy aligned activities, and assessed the regula- tory compliance of the information provided.

Tampere, 26 February 2026

KPMG OY AB

Authorised Sustainability Audit Firm

LOTTA NURMINEN

Authorised Sustainability Auditor, KRT

196

Glaston Annual Review 2025

ance with the requirements of Arti- cle 4 of the Commission's regulatory technical standard and

whether the notes and company's identification data in the consol- idated financial statements that are included in the ESEF financial statements have been tagged, in all material respects, with iXBRL tags in accordance with the requirements of Article 4 of the Commission's regulatory technical standard and

whether there is consistency between the ESEF financial state- ments and the audited financial statements.

The nature, timing and extent of the selected procedures depend on the auditor’s judgment. This includes an assessment of the risk of a material deviation due to fraud or error from the requirements of the Commission's regulatory technical standard.

We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Opinion

Our opinion pursuant to Chapter 7, Section 8 of the Securities Mar- kets Act is that the primary financial statements, notes and company's identification data in the consol-

idated financial statements that are included in the ESEF financial statements of Glaston Corporation 743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L62-2025-12-31- 1-fi.zip for the financial year ended 31.12.2025 have been tagged, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's regulatory technical standard.

Our opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements of Glaston Corporation for the finan- cial year ended 31.12.2025 has been expressed in our auditor's report dated 26.2.2026. With this report we do not express an opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial state- ments nor express another assurance conclusion.

Tampere 24 March 2026

KPMG OY AB

Audit Firm

Lotta Nurminen

Authorised Public Accountant, KHT

198

Glaston Annual Review 2025

Glaston Corporation

Lönnrotinkatu 11, 00120 Helsinki, Finland

Finland

Tel. +358 500 500

Website: www.glaston.net

Business identity code: 1651585-0

Glaston Corporation is the glass processing industry’s innovative technology leader supplying equipment, services and solutions to the architectural, mobility, solar and display industries. The company also supports the development of new technologies integrating intelligence to glass.

Glaston is committed to providing its clients with both the best know-how and the latest technologies in glass processing, with the purpose of build- ing a better tomorrow through safer, smarter, and more energy efficient glass solutions. Glaston operates globally with manufacturing, services, and sales offices in 9 countries. Glaston Corporation Plc's shares (GLA1V) are listed on NASDAQ Helsinki Ltd.

743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherRestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherRestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherRestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31GLA:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31GLA:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31GLA:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622025-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherRestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherRestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31GLA:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31GLA:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31GLA:ReserveForOtherUnrestrictedEquityMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember743700V3I7CLI3DJ8L622023-12-31iso4217:EURiso4217:EURxbrli:shares