
123
ELISA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2021
Responsibilities of the Board of
Directors and the Managing Director
for the Financial Statements
The Board of Directors and the Managing Director are
responsible for the preparation of consolidated nancial
statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted
by the EU, and of nancial statements that give a true and fair
view in accordance with the laws and regulations governing
the preparation of nancial statements in Finland and
comply with statutory requirements. The Board of Directors
and the Managing Director are also responsible for such
internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the
preparation of nancial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the nancial statements, the Board of Directors
and the Managing Director are responsible for assessing the
parent company’s and the group’s ability to continue as going
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going
concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. The
nancial statements are prepared using the going concern
basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate
the parent company or the group or cease operations, or
there is no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the
Audit of Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance on whether
the nancial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue
an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance with good auditing
practice will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to inuence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of the nancial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with good auditing practice,
we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional
scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the
nancial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design
and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks,
and obtain audit evidence that is sucient and appropriate
to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting
a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than
for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion,
forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to
the audit in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the eectiveness of the parent
company’s or the group’s internal control.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used
and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and
related disclosures made by management.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’
and the Managing Director’s use of the going concern basis
of accounting and based on the audit evidence obtained,
whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast signicant doubt on the parent
company’s or the group’s ability to continue as a going
concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists,
we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report
to the related disclosures in the nancial statements or, if
such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our
conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to
the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause the parent company or the group to
cease to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content
of the nancial statements, including the disclosures, and
whether the nancial statements represent the underlying
transactions and events so that the nancial statements
give a true and fair view.
• Obtain sucient appropriate audit evidence regarding the
nancial information of the entities or business activities
within the group to express an opinion on the consolidated
nancial statements. We are responsible for the direction,
supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain
solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged with governance
regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and
timing of the audit and signicant audit ndings, including
any signicant deciencies in internal control that we identify
during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a
statement that we have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence, and communicate
with them all relationships and other matters that may
reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and
where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged with
governance, we determine those matters that were of most
signicance in the audit of the nancial statements of the
current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We
describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or
regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or
when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a
matter should not be communicated in our report because
the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benets of such
communication.
THE REPORT OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PARENT COMPANY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BOARD’S PROPOSAL FOR PROFIT
DISTRIBUTION