1
Financial Statements
and Report of the
Board of Directors 2024
2Contents
Report of the Board of Directors 2024 3
Share and shareholders 6
Proposal for the distribution of profit 11
Key figures of the Group and formulas for the key figures 12
Sustainability report 15
Consolidated financial statements, IFRS 60
Consolidated income statement 60
Consolidated balance sheet 61
Consolidated cash flow statement 62
Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity 63
Notes to the consolidated financial statements 64
Parent company financial statements, FAS 83
Parent company income statement 83
Parent company balance sheet 84
Parent company cash flow statement 85
Notes to the parent company financial statements 86
Signatures to the financial statements and the report of the Board of Directors 95
Auditor’s Report 96
Assurance report on the Sustainability report 100
Independent Auditor’s Reasonable Assurance Report on
Marimekko Corporation’s ESEF Financial Statements 102
This is a voluntary published translation of the official ESEF financial statements.
Official Financial Statements are published in Finnish and
can be found on the company’s website.
3
Report of the Board of Directors 2024
2024 IN BRIEF
In 2024, Marimekko’s net sales increased by 5 percent and amounted to
EUR 182,604 thousand (174,105). Net sales were especially boosted by the
growth of retail sales in all market areas as well as an increase in wholesale
sales in the Asia-Pacific region and Scandinavia. Net sales in Finland grew by
2 percent and international sales by 9 percent.
Marimekko’s omnichannel retail sales increased by 10 percent with all market
areas contributing to growth. Wholesale sales grew in the Asia-Pacific region
and Scandinavia but total global sales were on a par with the comparable
year as wholesale sales in Finland and in the EMEA region decreased.
Marimekko’s licensing income grew by 11 percent from the record high in
the comparable year.
Brand sales¹ of Marimekko products amounted to EUR 419,167 thousand
(376,746). 68 percent (66) of brand sales were international sales.
Operating profit totaled EUR 31,380 thousand (31,400). Operating profit
included EUR 552 thousand (631) from items affecting comparability.
Comparable operating profit was EUR 31,932 thousand (32,031) equaling to
17.5 percent of net sales (18.4).
Operating profit was boosted by increased net sales. On the other hand,
especially higher fixed costs but also lower relative sales margin had a
weakening impact on the operating profit.
Result for the period was EUR 24,372 thousand (23,601) and earnings per
share were EUR 0.60 (0.58).
The Board of Directors proposes that a regular dividend of EUR 0.40 and
an extraordinary dividend of EUR 0.25 will be paid for 2024.
OPERATING ENVIRONMENT
The following outlook information is based on
materials published by the Confederation of Finnish
Industries EK and Statistics Finland.
The world economy outlook has remained largely
unchanged. The world economy is estimated to grow
3.3 percent in 2025, but the growth rate will vary
clearly between markets. Growth in the Euro area
is expected to reach only 1.0 percent even though
interest rates are estimated to decrease further.
There are major factors of uncertainty in the global
economic development, related to geopolitical
developments in particular. These include, for
example, possible new tariffs between different
countries.
The economic outlook for Finnish companies
is estimated to have turned, but the recovery
is expected to be moderate due to lower than
expected consumer demand, among other factors.
The confidence indicator for retail trade decreased
slightly at the beginning of the year and remains
below the long-term average in Finland. Retail sales
have continued to decrease, but sales expectations
for the coming months are moderately positive.
Consumer confidence continues to be clearly
below the long-term average. Consumer estimates
concerning the current state of personal finances
weakened and were at a very low level. Expectations
for the future of personal finances decreased slightly
while those of Finland’s economy were slightly higher
than before. Estimates concerning inflation and
expectations for its future development continued at
a fairly high level.
(Confederation of Finnish Industries EK: Business
Tendency Survey, January 2025; Confidence
Indicators, January 2025. Statistics Finland:
Consumer Confidence, January 2025.)
The working-day-adjusted turnover of Finnish
retail trade increased by 3.6 percent in December
compared to the previous year and the volume of
sales increased by 2.3 percent. The cumulative
working-day-adjusted turnover of retail trade in the
January–December period decreased by 0.6 percent
and the volume of sales decreased by 1.1 percent.
(Statistics Finland: Turnover of Trade, retail trade
flash estimate, December 2024.)
NET SALES
In 2024, Marimekko’s net sales increased by 5
percent and amounted to EUR 182,604 thousand
(174,105). Net sales were especially boosted by the
growth of retail sales both in Finland and in other
market areas as well as an increase in wholesale sales
in the Asia-Pacific region and Scandinavia. On the
other hand, net sales were negatively impacted by
¹ Brand sales are given as an alternative non-IFRS key figure,
representing the reach of the Marimekko brand through
different distribution channels. An unofficial estimate of sales
of Marimekko products at consumer prices, brand sales are
calculated by adding together the company’s own retail net
sales and the estimated retail value of Marimekko products
sold by other retailers. The estimated retail value is based on
the company’s realized wholesale sales and licensing income.
Brand sales do not include VAT, and the key figure is not
audited. Some licensees provide exact retail figures, in which
case these figures are used in reporting brand sales. For other
licensing agreements, Marimekko’s own retail coefficients for
different markets are used. Licensing income is reported as
brand sales when licensed products are sold.
4Report of the Board of Directors 2024
a decrease in wholesale sales in Finland and in the
EMEA region, where Marimekko is modernizing its
brand and distribution. In total, net sales in Finland
grew by 2 percent and international sales by 9
percent.
During the financial year, Marimekko’s
omnichannel retail sales grew in all market area
and increased by 10 percent. Wholesale sales were
on a par with the comparable year while licensing
income grew by 11 percent from the record high in the
comparable year.
Net sales in Finland increased by 2 percent
and amounted to EUR 100,986 thousand (98,914).
The strong appeal of the Marimekko brand and the
commercial agility of the company are demonstrated
by the good development of retail sales: In 2024,
retail sales in Finland grew by 6 percent and
comparable retail sales, which excludes new or
significantly renewed stores in both the review
and comparison periods, increased by 5 percent.
Wholesale sales in Finland decreased by 6 percent as
the non-recurring promotional deliveries were below
the comparable year, in line with the earlier estimate.
Domestic wholesale sales were also weakened by
some of the wholesale deliveries in the first quarter
of 2024 being already realized in the fourth quarter
of 2023.
In the company’s second-biggest market, the
Asia-Pacific region, net sales in 2024 grew by 11
percent to EUR 39,246 thousand (35,415). Net
sales were boosted by the good development of
both wholesale sales and retail sales. In addition,
licensing income grew. Wholesale sales in the market
area increased by 8 percent and in Japan, the most
significant country to Marimekko in this region, by
3 percent. Retail sales in the Asia-Pacific region
increased by 20 percent and licensing income by
12 percent.
FINANCIAL RESULT
In 2024, the Group’s operating profit was at the
comparable year’s record level and totaled EUR
31,380 thousand (31,400). Operating profit included
EUR 552 thousand (631) from items affecting
comparability. Comparable operating profit was
EUR 31,932 thousand (32,031). Operating profit was
improved by increased net sales. On the other hand,
especially higher fixed costs but also lower relative
sales margin had a weakening impact on operating
profit.
Fixed costs grew from comparable year due to
increased personnel and marketing expenses. The
increase in personnel expenses was especially due
to general pay increases in different markets but also
increased personnel costs in the stores supporting
retail sales growth. Marketing expenses grew due
to the planned investments in the 60th anniversary
of the Unikko print, among others. Relative sales
margin in 2024 was negatively affected especially by
higher logistic costs. On the other hand, record high
licensing income boosted relative sales margin.
Marketing expenses in 2024 were EUR 10,557
thousand (9,483), or 6 percent of the Group’s net
sales (5).
The Group’s depreciation during the financial
year amounted to EUR 9,344 thousand (9,180),
representing 5 percent of net sales (5).
In 2024, operating profit margin was 17.2 percent
(18.0) and comparable operating profit margin was
17.5 percent (18.4).
Net sales by market area
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023 Change, %
Finland 100,986 98,914 2
 Retail sales 70,636 66,627 6
 Wholesale sales 30,057 32,133 -6
 Licensing income 293 154 90
Scandinavia 18,475 15,557 19
 Retail sales 5,581 4,386 27
 Wholesale sales 12,744 11,096 15
 Licensing income 150 75 100
EMEA 13,052 14,645 -11
 Retail sales 3,639 3,008 21
 Wholesale sales 8,827 10,802 -18
 Licensing income 586 834 -30
North America 10,845 9,575 13
 Retail sales 5,613 4,523 24
 Wholesale sales 4,705 4,688 0
 Licensing income 527 365 45
Asia-Pacific 39,246 35,415 11
 Retail sales 8,104 6,775 20
 Wholesale sales 29,166 26,883 8
 Licensing income 1,976 1,758 12
International sales, total 81,618 75,191 9
 Retail sales 22,937 18,691 23
 Wholesale sales 55,441 53,469 4
 Licensing income 3,240 3,031 7
Total 182,604 174,105 5
 Retail sales 93,573 85,318 10
 Wholesale sales 85,498 85,602 0
 Licensing income 3,533 3,186 11
Wholesale net sales are
recognized according to the
geographical location of the
wholesale customer.
All figures in the table have
been individually rounded to
thousands of euros, so there
may be rounding differences
in the totals. The change
percentages have been
calculated on exact figures
before rounding.
5
Net financial items in the year under review
totaled EUR -406 thousand (-1,663), or 0 percent of
net sales (1). Financial items include exchange rate
differences amounting to EUR 315 thousand (-626), of
which EUR 381 thousand (-497) were unrealized. The
impact of lease liabilities on interest expenses was
EUR -1,003 thousand (-1,020).
The Group’s result before taxes in 2024 was EUR
30,974 thousand (29,737). Net result for the period
was EUR 24,372 thousand (23,601) and earnings per
share were EUR 0.60 (0.58).
BALANCE SHEET
The consolidated balance sheet total as at 31
December 2024 was EUR 130,349 thousand
(123,258). Equity was EUR 75,521 thousand (65,738),
or EUR 1.86 per share (1.62).
Non-current assets at the end of the year stood
at EUR 36,442 thousand (37,259). Lease liabilities
amounted to EUR 30,647 thousand (32,294).
Marimekko did not have financial liabilities at the
end of the year (EUR 615 thousand). The Group
had unused committed credit lines of EUR 32,637
thousand (31,932).
At the end of December, net working capital was
EUR 29,350 thousand (24,345). Inventories were
EUR 35,429 thousand (29,268). The inventories were
increased in part by the contingency planning for the
demand of the continuing collection in the event of
possible supply and logistic chain disruptions.
CASH FLOW AND FINANCING
In 2024, cash flow from operating activities was EUR
29,107 thousand (29,427), or EUR 0.72 per share
(0.73). Increased inventories weakened cash flow
from operating activities, while decrease in current
non-interest bearing trade receivables had a positive
impact. Cash flow before cash flow from financing
activities was EUR 26,776 thousand (27,402).
The Group’s cash and cash equivalents at the
end of the year amounted to EUR 40,376 thousand
(37,044). Dividends paid in the review period
totaled EUR 15,011 thousand (13,794). Return on
capital employed (ROCE) was at an excellent level,
31.4 percent (33.0). Unlike in the comparable year,
Marimekko had no interest-bearing credit facilities
drawn down in 2024 (EUR 615 thousand). The Group
had unused committed credit lines of EUR 32,637
thousand (31,932), including short-term revolving
credit facilities, which include covenants, totaling
EUR 16,000 thousand.
The Group’s equity ratio at the end of financial
year was 58.7 percent (54.1). Gearing was -12.9
percent (-6.3). The ratio of net debt to 12-month
rolling EBITDA was -0.24 (-0.10), i.e. well below the
company’s long-term goal, with the goal being a
maximum of 2.
INVESTMENTS
The Group’s gross investments in 2024 were EUR
2,330 thousand (2,033), or 1 percent of net sales
(1). The investments were mainly devoted to digital
development but also to the revamping of the store
network. New lease agreements included in balance
sheet (IFRS 16) are not included in gross investments
in the review or comparison period.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Marimekko’s product design and development costs
arise from the design of collections and collaborations
on new materials and manufacturing methods. Design
costs are recorded in expenses.
STORE NETWORK
Omnichannel retail sales, operated by the company
itself or its partners, represents the core of
Marimekko’s distribution strategy. It is complemented
with select, and increasingly online, retailers to gain
scale and access to new customers. Even in the
digitalized business, physical stores play an important
role not only as a distribution channel but also as the
hearts of brand culture, supporting, in addition, sales
online and in other channels.
Good store locations that cater to Marimekko’s
target audience are essential for the company. The
operations and efficiency of the store network are
continuously assessed and developed. In 2024, 10
new Marimekko stores were opened, of which 9 in
different locations in Asia. In addition, Marimekko
changed its loose-franchise partner responsible
for Taiwanese market at the beginning of the year.
As a result of the partner change, the Taiwanese
store network was fully revamped: five old stores or
shop-in-shops were closed and four new Marimekko
stores were opened instead. In other markets, eight
stores were closed during the year. At the end of
year, there were a total of 168 Marimekko stores and
shop-in-shops worldwide. Local customers make
up the primary audience for Marimekko stores in
each market, although sales to tourists represent a
significant portion at certain central stores, especially
during the holiday seasons. In addition to Marimekko
stores, 19 pop-up stores delighted the customers
mostly in the Asia-Pacific region during the year.
E-commerce plays an important role in
Marimekko’s omnichannel retail. Following a
successful pilot in the United States in spring, the
omnichannel Marimekko experience was further
strengthened as the fully revamped ecommerce
platform was introduced in all other markets where
Marimekko operates its own online store at the
beginning of September. Online sales developed well
and grew in 2024. The company’s own and partner-
operated Marimekko webstores serve customers
in 38 countries. In addition, Marimekko also has
distribution through other online channels.
Digital service solutions are constantly increasing
the integration of e-commerce and in-store
retailing. For this reason, Marimekko reports its own
e-commerce net sales as part of retail sales and sales
through other online channels as part of wholesale
sales. In order to accelerate its long-term international
growth, Marimekko continues to invest in its digital
and omnichannel business.
SUSTAINABILITY
Marimekko’s operations and design philosophy
have always been based on a sustainable approach:
Marimekko wants to offer its customers timeless,
functional and high-quality products that bring them
long-lasting joy and that they will not want to throw
away. Determined sustainability efforts support the
company’s long-term success and sustainability has
been defined as one of the five strategic success
factors during the strategy period of 2023–2027. The
company’s sustainability strategy from 2021 to 2025
Report of the Board of Directors 2024
6
is built on three guiding principles as well as related
ambitious targets and a roadmap for the entire value
chain: timeless design brings joy for generations to
come, the products of tomorrow leave no trace, and
positive change through fairness and equality.
In 2024, the company’s activities included, for
example, work to further increase the share of less
emission intensive materials in its collections as
well as to launch products designed in line with the
principles of circular economy. In 2024, Marimekko
for the first time reached its goal to reduce the
greenhouse gas emissions of textile materials (per
kg of sourced textiles) by 20 percent and to cut the
water scarcity score of these materials (per kg of
sourced textiles) to half compared to the baseline
of 2019. The greenhouse gas emissions of textile
materials (per kg of sourced textiles) decreased by
21 percent and the water scarcity score (per kg of
sourced textiles) reduced by 76 percent from the
baseline year levels. The emission intensity of textile
materials decreased especially due to smaller share
of animal-derived materials such as wool and leather,
reductions in the emission factor of leather as well as
an increased share of organic cotton from all cotton
sourced. In addition to Marimekko’s determined
execution of its material strategy, achieving the
goal was supported by a methodological update in
2023 to better account for the dyeing and printing
practices of different product types, implemented
since 2022. During 2024, Marimekko also prepared
its science-based near-term emission reduction
targets, and after the review period in January 2025
Science Based Targets announced the approval of
these targets. These new targets are in line with
the UN Paris Climate Agreement goals and a logical
next step in Marimekko’s long-term work to reduce
its environmental impact. Marimekko’s sustainability
work is described in more detail in the sustainability
report for 2024, in accordance with EU Corporate
Sustainability Reporting Directive, included in the
report of the Board of Directors 2024.
PERSONNEL
In 2024, the number of employees, expressed as full-
time equivalents, averaged 466 (462) and at the end
of the year, the Group had 480 (468) employees. By
market area, the number of Marimekko’s personnel
at the end of December was as follows: Finland 396
(385), Scandinavia 35 (33), North America 17 (16)
and the Asia-Pacific region 32 (33). The personnel
at company-owned stores, expressed as full-time
equivalents, totaled 233 (226) at the end of the year.
Marimekko’s headcount at the end of December
was 677 (654). Salaries, wages and bonuses paid
to personnel during the financial year amounted to
EUR 28,261 thousand (26,245). In 2024, the average
turnover of employees leaving was 16.7 percent (18.5).
More information on personnel and the development
of staff is available in the sustainability report for
2024.
MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors, management and auditors
Marimekko’s Annual General Meeting on 16 April
2024 appointed six members to the company’s Board
of Directors. Carol Chen, Mika Ihamuotila, Teemu
Kangas-Kärki, Tomoki Takebayashi and Marianne
Vikkula were re-elected, and Massimiliano Brunazzo
was elected as a new member to the Board of
Directors. From among its members, the Board of
Directors elected Mika Ihamuotila as Chair of the Board
and Teemu Kangas-Kärki as Vice Chair of the Board.
From among its members, the Board also elected
Teemu Kangas-Kärki as Chair and Mika Ihamuotila
and Marianne Vikkula as members of the Audit
and Remuneration Committee. The majority of the
Committee members are independent of the company
and its significant shareholders.
The AGM re-elected KPMG Oy Ab, Authorized
Public Accountants, as the company’s auditor, with
Heli Tuuri, Authorized Public Accountant, as the auditor
with principal responsibility. In addition, the AGM
elected the company’s auditor for the assurance of
the company’s sustainability reporting for the financial
year 2024. It was decided that the auditor’s fee will be
paid as per invoice approved by the company.
The following change in the company’s
management took place in 2024. On 2 November 2023,
Marimekko informed that Mikko-Heikki Inkeroinen was
appointed as Chief Technology Officer and member of
the Management Group as of 29 January 2024.
At the end of the year 2024, the company’s
Management Group comprised Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko
as Chair and Elina Anckar (Chief Financial Officer),
Rebekka Bay (Creative Director), Tina Broman (Chief
Supply Chain and Product Officer), Natacha Defrance
(Senior Vice President, Sales, Region East), Mikko-
Heikki Inkeroinen (Chief Technology Officer), Noora
Laurila (Senior Vice President, Sales, Region West),
Sanna-Kaisa Niikko (Chief Marketing Officer), Tanya
Strohmayer (Chief People Officer), Essi Weseri
(General Counsel) and Riika Wikberg (Chief Business
Development Officer) as members.
Corporate governance statement
The corporate governance statement for 2024
is issued separately from the report of the Board
of Directors. It will be available on the company’s
website and in the Marimekko’s year 2024
publication.
Remuneration of the Board and management
The remuneration of Marimekko’s Board of Directors
and President & CEO is presented in more detail in
the Remuneration Report for 2024. Remuneration
Report will be available at Marimekko’s website and in
the Marimekko’s year 2024 publication.
SHARES AND SHAREHOLDERS
Share capital and number of shares
Marimekko Corporation’s share is quoted in the
Consumer Discretionary sector of Nasdaq Helsinki
Ltd. Marimekko Corporation was listed on the I List of
the Helsinki Stock Exchange in March 1999 and on the
main list on 27 December 2002. Marimekko’s trading
code is MEKKO and its ISIN code is FI0009007660.
The company has one series of shares, each
conferring the same voting rights to their holders.
At the end of the financial year, the company’s fully
paid-up share capital, as recorded in the Trade
Register, amounted to EUR 8,040,000 and the
number of shares totaled 40,649,170.
Shareholdings
According to the book-entry register, Marimekko had
37,588 shareholders (39,014) at the end of December
2024. Of the shares, 14.77 percent (13.68) were
owned by nominee-registered or non-Finnish holders.
Report of the Board of Directors 2024
7Report of the Board of Directors 2024
Monthly updated information on the largest
shareholders can be found on the company’s website
at company.marimekko.com under Investors/Share
information/Shareholders.
At the end of the financial year, members of
the Board of Directors and the President and
CEO together, either directly or indirectly, owned
5,265,860 Marimekko shares corresponding to
12.95 percent of the number and voting rights of
the company’s shares. The management in total,
including also other members of the Management
Group, either directly or indirectly owned 5,359,010
Marimekko shares corresponding to 13.18 percent
of the number and voting rights of the company’s
shares.
Updated information on the holdings of the
Board of Directors, President and CEO and other
members of the Management Group can be found on
the company’s website at company.marimekko.com
under Investors/Share information/Shareholders/
Management’s shareholding.
Shareholder agreements
Marimekko has neither made nor is aware of any
shareholder agreements concerning the company’s
shares or other commitments agreeing on the
company’s ownership or the use of voting rights.
Own shares
Marimekko did not acquire the company’s own
shares during the financial year. On 31 December
2024, Marimekko held 77,790 of its own shares,
corresponding to approximately 0.19 percent of the
total number of the company’s shares. Marimekko
shares held by the company carry no voting rights
and no entitlement to dividends.
Flagging announcements
There were no flagging announcements on
Marimekko shares in 2024.
Share trading and the company’s market
capitalization
In 2024, a total of 6,022,481 Marimekko shares
(9,658,017) were traded on Nasdaq Helsinki,
representing 14.82 percent (23.76) of the shares
outstanding. The total value of the share turnover in
the January–December period was EUR 77,743,164
(95,729,933). The lowest price of the share was EUR
10.82 (8.56), the highest was EUR 16.02 (13.60) and
the average price was EUR 12.91 (9.91). At the end of
December, the closing price of the share was EUR
12.12 (13.31).
The company’s market capitalization on 31
December 2024, excluding the Marimekko shares
held by the company, was EUR 491,725,126
(540,005,068).
Authorizations
The Annual General Meeting on 16 April 2024
authorized the Board of Directors to decide on
the acquisition of a maximum of 150,000 of the
company’s own shares in one or more instalments.
The maximum number of shares represents
approximately 0.4 percent of the total number of the
company’s shares. The shares would be acquired
with funds from the company’s non-restricted equity,
which means that the acquisition would reduce
funds available for distribution. The shares would
be acquired otherwise than in proportion to the
shareholdings of the shareholders through public
trading on Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd at the market price
prevailing at the time of acquisition and in accordance
Ownership by size of holding, 31 December 2024
Number of % of Number of % of holding
Number of shares shareholders shareholders shares and votes and votes
1–100 23,245 61.84 833,747 2.05
101–500 9,842 26.18 2,494,488 6.14
501–1,000 1,987 5.29 1,563,676 3.85
1,001–5,000 2,035 5.41 4,538,954 11.17
5,001–10,000 237 0.63 1,726,460 4.25
10,001–50,000 184 0.49 3,588,008 8.83
50,001–100,000 27 0.07 1,870,037 4.60
100,001–500,000 21 0.06 4,480,993 11.02
500,001– 10 0.03 19,552,807 48.10
Total 37,588 100.00 40,649,170 100.00
Ownership by sector, 31 December 2024
Number of % of holding
Owner shares and votes and votes
Nominee-registered and non-Finnish holders 6,003,213 14.77
Households 17,044,072 41.93
Financial and insurance corporations 5,013,864 12.33
Non-financial corporations and housing corporations 7,320,684 18.01
Non-profit institutions 261,677 0.64
General government 5,005,660 12.31
Total 40,649,170 100.00
with the rules and regulations of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd.
The shares would be acquired to be used as a part
of the company’s incentive system, to be transferred
for other purposes or to be cancelled. The Board of
Directors is authorized to decide on all of the other
terms and conditions of the acquisition of the shares.
The authorization was not used during the financial
year. The authorization is valid until 16 October 2025.
Furthermore, the AGM on 16 April 2024 authorized
the Board of Directors to decide on the issuance of
new shares and the transfer of the company’s own
shares in one or more instalments. The total number
of shares to be issued or transferred pursuant to
the authorization may not exceed 200,000 new or
8Report of the Board of Directors 2024
Largest shareholders according to the book-entry register, 31 December 2024
Number of % of holding
Owner shares and votes and votes
1. PowerBank Ventures Oy (Mika Ihamuotila) 5,088,500 12.52
2. Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company 1,980,440 4.87
3. Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company 1,929,600 4.75
4. Ehrnrooth Anna Sophia 1,651,885 4.06
5. Nordea Nordic Small Cap Fund 1,049,425 2.58
6. Evli Finnish Small Cap Fund 962,129 2.37
7. Elo Pension Insurance Company Ltd. 713,000 1.75
8. Oy Talcom Ab 505,000 1.24
9. Oy Etra Invest Ab 500,000 1.23
10. Alahuhta Matti 447,750 1.10
Total 14,827,729 36.47
Management shareholdings, 31 December 2024
Number of % of holding
shares and votes and votes
Members of the Board of Directors, total 5,103,015 12.55
President and CEO 162,845 0.40
Other members of the Management Group, total 93,150 0.23
the company’s own shares. The number of shares
represents approximately 0.5 percent of the total
number of the company’s shares. Pursuant to the
authorization, the Board may decide on a directed
share issue in deviation from the shareholders’ pre-
emptive rights for a weighty financial reason, such
as the company’s incentive system, personnel share
issue, developing the company’s capital structure,
using the shares as consideration in possible
company acquisitions or carrying out other business
transactions. The share issue may be subject to a
charge or free. A directed share issue can be free of
charge only if there is a particularly weighty financial
reason for the company and taking into account the
interests of all of the company’s shareholders. The
subscription price of the new shares and the amount
paid for the company’s own shares would be recorded
in the company’s reserve for invested non-restricted
equity. The Board of Directors is authorized to
decide on all of the other terms and conditions of the
share issue. The authorization was not used during
the financial year. The authorization is valid until 16
October 2025.
During the financial year, the Board of Directors
had no valid authorizations to issue convertible bonds
or bonds with warrants.
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE NOTES TO
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Information on the Group’s personnel expenses is
disclosed in note 4.
Financial risks are presented in note 20 and
information on financial instruments measured at
fair value is disclosed in note 17.
Subsidiaries and related party transactions are
disclosed in note 19.
MAJOR RISKS AND FACTORS OF UNCERTAINTY
Marimekko’s business exposes the company to
various risks. The risks and uncertainties presented
below have the potential to substantially weaken
Marimekko’s business conditions, sales, financial
results and position. Marimekko’s risk management
practices are described in the Corporate Governance
Statement.
The economic and political operating environment
The uncertainties related to the general development
of the global economy, such as the risk of an
economic recession, and geopolitical tensions
influence consumer confidence, purchasing power
and behavior in all of Marimekko’s market areas.
Declining consumer confidence and purchasing
power may have a significant unfavorable impact
on Marimekko’s sales and profitability. This risk is,
in particular, emphasized in Finland and in other key
countries for Marimekko business, such as Sweden
and Japan.
Geopolitical tensions can also affect Marimekko’s
procurement and logistics chains and operating
possibilities in certain countries. Geopolitical tensions
may lead, for example, to military action, trade
disputes, economic sanctions, increasing tariffs
as well as export and import restrictions that can
affect the reliability and efficiency of the company’s
value chain as well as Marimekko’s competitiveness.
Pandemics and epidemics may also have a negative
impact on Marimekko’s sales, profitability and cash
flow as well as the reliability and efficiency of the
company’s supply chain.
Sudden market movements, development of
inflation, changes in the price development of
production factors, exchange rates (particularly the
US dollar) and taxation, as well as rising interest rates
may affect Marimekko’s financial position.
Marimekko is also exposed to labor market
disputes, and strikes and other labor market
disturbances may have a negative impact on the
company’s business.
Marimekko continuously monitors the
development of the economic and political operating
environment, takes various scenarios into account
in the management of the company’s business, and
adapts its operations as necessary. The company’s
strong balance sheet and stable financial position
introduce flexibility also in exceptional circumstances.
Risks are also mitigated by striving for diverse
geographical presence throughout the value chain.
9Report of the Board of Directors 2024
The retail environment, customers and partners
The company’s growth in the longer term is based,
in particular, on omnichannel retail: on increasing
e-commerce, on partner-led retail in Asia, as well
as on enhancing the sales per square meter of
existing stores in the company’s main market areas.
In addition, the company expands its distribution
through physical and digital wholesale channels
appropriate for the Marimekko brand. The Asia-
Pacific region is Marimekko’s second-biggest market,
and especially Asia plays an important role in the
company’s international growth.
The importance of omnichannel business in the
retail trade has been emphasized over the past years.
International e-commerce has increased the options
available to consumers and the significance of big
e-commerce operators. The digitization of retail and
weak macroeconomic situation has deepened the
financial difficulties for some wholesale customers
in the fashion and design sector. Structural changes
in the retail environment may have an impact on
Marimekko’s distribution channel decisions, the
prioritization of different distribution channels, sales
and profitability. The structural changes can also
lead to the creation of new revenue models. Risks
related to the sales structure may have an impact
on the company’s financial position. Maintaining
competitiveness in a rapidly changing operating
environment being revolutionized by digitization
demands agility, efficiency, flexibility and constant re-
evaluation of operations from the company.
Major partnership choices, partnering contracts,
licensing and other collaboration agreements involve
considerable risks. Store lease agreements in Finland
and abroad also contain risks. With the company’s
internationalization and the growing interest in its
brand, risks related to gray exports may increase,
which may have an impact on the company’s sales
and profitability, among others. In addition, risks
related to changes in the company’s cost structure
as well as the liquidity of customers and partners
may also have an impact on the company’s financial
position.
Other significant risks include risks related
to changes in the company’s design, product
assortment and product distribution and pricing.
Increased inflation creates pressure to raise prices
while the uncertainties in the global economy and
the operating environment may affect consumers’
purchasing power and behavior negatively. Fast
reactivity and competitive pricing are crucial in a
tactical operating environment. The company’s ability
to design, develop and commercialize new products
that meet consumers’ expectations while ensuring
the effectivity and quick reactions in the production,
sourcing and logistics as well as active work towards
sustainability has an impact on the company’s sales
and profitability.
Supply chain
The risks related to Marimekko’s supply chain are
associated especially with production, procurement
and logistics processes and their reliability, flexibility
and efficiency, sustainability, fluctuations in the prices
of raw materials and other factors of production
as well as the availability and price of logistics.
For example, geopolitical tensions, cyber security
incidents and possible epidemics and pandemics
as well as other uncertainties in the global economy
may cause even significant disruptions in production
and logistics chains that may have a negative impact
on the company’s sales, profitability and cash flow.
In addition, fires, natural disasters and machine
breakdowns can cause damages to suppliers
factories, Marimekko’s own textile printing factory
or the operations of the logistics chain. Overall, it is
of utmost importance to safeguard the operational
reliability of the company’s own printing factory in
all circumstances. The availability of biogas, among
others, is critical to the operations of the company’s
own printing factory. The company has a business
interruption insurance for assets and business
operations that covers insured risks of damage in line
with the terms and conditions of the insurance.
Higher costs of raw materials, energy and other
factors of production may affect Marimekko’s sales
and profitability. Early commitment to product
orders from partner suppliers, which is typical of
the industry, means that changes in costs affect the
company with a delay. These early commitments
have partly been further emphasized, for example,
by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, undermining the
company’s ability to optimize product orders and
respond to rapid changes in demand and consumer
behavior, which also increases risks related to
inventory management and cash flow. To avoid
even earlier commitment and the possible resulting
unoptimized production, Marimekko may need to
partly use faster but more emission-intensive air
freight instead of sea transport.
In addition to supply chain disruptions and even
earlier commitment to product orders, risks related to
inventory and product flow management increase as
product distribution is expanded and operations are
diversified, which may have a weakening impact on
the company’s sales, cash flow as well as on relative
profitability. Substantial non-recurring wholesale
promotions can also increase risks related to
procurement, transport and inventory management,
especially in exceptional circumstances. Any delays
or disturbances in supply, or fluctuations in the
quality of products, may have a harmful impact on
business, also on substantial non-recurring wholesale
promotions.
Marimekko works actively to ensure functioning
production and logistics chains, to avoid delays, to
mitigate the negative impacts of generally increased
costs, and to enhance inventory management.
Sustainability
Enhancing sustainability is increasingly important
for competitiveness in Marimekko’s industry, which
can have an impact on the company’s sales and
profitability. Versatile investments are required for the
enhancement. Risks and opportunities with regard to
Marimekko’s sustainability work and targets include,
for example, changes in consumer behavior and in
the company’s product portfolio weightings, growing
expectations as well as new tools for transparency in
the value chain, continuously evolving best practices
in the industry as well as increasing regulation that
may affect, for example, the company’s products,
communications and the value chain more broadly.
The company’s ability to anticipate changes, react to
them and actively advance its sustainability targets
throughout the value chain plays a key role with
regard to the company’s competitiveness.
Marimekko primarily uses partner suppliers to
manufacture its products. Global supply chains
in the fashion and design business are complex,
10Report of the Board of Directors 2024
which despite active sustainability work, makes it
challenging for companies to ensure the sustainability
of the entire supply chain. The sustainability elements
of manufacturing are of growing significance to
customers, in particular the social aspects (e.g.
human rights, working conditions and remuneration)
and environmental aspects (e.g. production methods
and raw materials and chemicals used) related to the
supply chain, as well as transparent communications
on these issues in compliance with continuously
increasing legislation. These sustainability topics
apply to Marimekko’s sourcing and the company’s
own production as well as to licensed products.
Marimekko can reduce the environmental impacts
and increase transparency in its upstream value chain
through material choices, among others. Therefore,
the company is committed to increasing the share
of, e.g., less emission-intense and water consuming
materials, such as certified organic and recycled
cotton, in its products and packaging. As a result of
complex supply chains, uncertainties may pertain also
to the use of certified materials.
Marimekko’s continuous sustainability work
as well as compliance with responsible business
practices and legislation are important in maintaining
the trust of customers and other stakeholders; any
failures or errors in these areas will involve reputation,
financial liability and business risks.
The environment and climate change
Climate change increases the likelihood of extreme
weather phenomena and natural disasters, such as
floods, forest fires, wildfires and storms. Extreme
weather phenomena and natural disasters pose a
risk to the operational reliability and efficiency of
Marimekko’s value chain. Climate change-related
heatwaves, drought, water shortages, soil depletion
and other changes may, in turn, affect the availability
and price of the raw materials used in Marimekko’s
products, such as cotton. Extreme weather
phenomena and natural disasters may also affect
the availability of products if they cause damage to
the company’s suppliers’ factories, the company’s
own textile printing factory or hamper the logistics
chains. In addition, Marimekko has stores and offices
in areas in which extreme weather phenomena or
natural disasters may occur, and if they damage
stores or offices or cause momentary changes in
consumer behavior, it may result in lost sales as well
as expenses.
Risks related to climate change are managed by,
for example, diversifying the material selection in use,
increasing the share of materials with lower emission
intensity and water consumption in Marimekko’s
collections and exploring new material and production
method innovations. Marimekko’s insurance program
covers insured risks of damage in line with the terms
and conditions of the insurance.
Compliance
Compliance with the applicable legislation,
regulations and ethical business practices, as well
as product safety and quality, are essential for
Marimekko. Potential allegations, failures or mistakes
can lead to, for example, reputation and business
damages for the company, fines, claims for damages,
or criminal charges. Internationalization increases the
regulations applicable to the company’s operations
and elevates the risk of potential allegations, failures
and mistakes. Risks are prevented by focusing on
sustainability and compliance work as well as by
ensuring product safety and continuous quality
control.
Intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights play a vital role in the
company’s success, and the company’s ability to
manage and protect these rights may have an impact
on the company’s business, value and reputation.
Agreements with freelance designers and fees
paid to designers based on these agreements
are also an essential part of the management of
intellectual property rights. As the company grows
and internationalizes, the risks related to intellectual
property rights in general may increase, in particular
for the most renowned prints of the company.
Information security risks
There are risks associated with information system
reliability, dependability and compatibility. With
digitization, internationalization, Russia’s war and
different geopolitical tensions, cybercrime and
cyber attacks as well as various other risks related
to cyber security and personal data protection have
also increased. DoS attacks, malfunctions in data
communications or, for example, in the company’s
own online store as well as system changes and
replacements may disrupt business or result in lost
sales. Personal data breaches can lead to claims
for damages, fines and reputation risks. Marimekko
manages risks with the systematic management
and development of cybersecurity. In addition, the
company has a cybersecurity insurance program.
Personnel and competence
As Marimekko is a small company, risks related to
securing the necessary talent for international growth
as well as risks related to key personnel can be
significant. Marimekko’s competence development
efforts include, for example, training of personnel on
leadership, among others, succession planning and
performance management. These measures support
a performance-oriented, diverse and inclusive culture.
Potential epidemics or pandemics may increase
risks related to taking care of the health and safety of
employees and securing sufficient workforce in cases
of sickness.
MARKET OUTLOOK AND GROWTH TARGETS
FOR 2025
The uncertainties related to the development of the
global economy, such as geopolitical tensions and
their impact on the general economic situation, and
general cost inflation influence consumer confidence,
purchasing power and behavior and, as a result,
can have an impact on Marimekko’s business in
2025, especially in the important domestic market
of Finland. Different exceptional situations may
cause even significant disruptions in production and
logistics chains, and may thus have a negative impact
on the company’s sales, profitability and cash flow.
Finland, Marimekko’s important domestic market,
traditionally represents about half of the company’s
net sales. Sales in Finland in 2025 are impacted
by the weak general economy and low consumer
confidence as well as the development of purchasing
power and behavior. In addition, the tactical operating
environment continues to have an impact on the
11Report of the Board of Directors 2024
business. The timing between quarters of the non-
recurring promotional deliveries in Finnish wholesale
sales and their size typically vary on an annual basis.
In 2025, the non-recurring promotional deliveries in
wholesale sales are expected to be significantly lower
than in the comparable year and weighted clearly in
the second half of the year. Despite the weak market
situation, net sales in Finland are expected to be
approximately at the level of the previous year.
International sales are estimated to grow in
2025. In the strategy period 2023–2027, Marimekko
focuses on Asia as the most important geographical
area for international growth. In 2025, net sales in
the Asia-Pacific region, Marimekko’s second-largest
market, are expected to increase. All brick-and-
mortar Marimekko stores and most online stores in
Asia are partner-owned. In 2025, the aim is to open
approximately 10–15 new Marimekko stores and shop-
in-shops, and most of the planned openings will be
in Asia.
Licensing income in 2025 is forecasted to be
significantly below the previous year’s record level.
Due to the seasonal nature of Marimekko’s
business, a major portion of the company’s euro-
denominated net sales and operating result are
traditionally generated during the second half of
the year. Net sales and operating profit in the first
quarter of 2025 are significantly impacted by timing
differences from the comparison period. In the
comparable year, a large amount of non-recurring
promotional deliveries in Finnish wholesale sales
occurred exceptionally during the first quarter of the
year. In addition, a significant part of licensing income
in 2024 was recorded already during the first quarter
of the year, unlike in 2025.
Marimekko develops its business with a long-
term view and aims to continue scaling its profitable
growth in the upcoming years. In 2025, fixed costs are
expected to be up on the previous year. The general
cost inflation continues to also affect Marimekko in
2025. Personnel expenses are impacted, for example,
by general pay increases in different markets.
Marketing expenses are expected to increase (2024:
EUR 10.6 million).
Early commitments to product orders from
partner suppliers, typical of the industry and
partly further emphasized due to different factors,
undermine the company’s ability to optimize product
orders and respond to rapid changes in demand
and consumer behavior, which also increases risks
related to sales, inventory management, cash flow
and relative profitability. There are still significant
uncertainties related to global production and logistic
chains, which may cause delays. If realized, these
kinds of delays can have an impact on the company’s
sales and profitability. Marimekko works actively to
ensure functioning production and logistics chains,
to avoid delays, to mitigate the negative impacts of
generally increased costs, and to enhance inventory
management.
Marimekko is closely monitoring the general
economic situation, the development of consumer
confidence and purchasing power and the impacts
of possible exceptional situations and disruptions,
and the company will adjust its operations and plans
according to the circumstances.
FINANCIAL GUIDANCE FOR 2025
The Marimekko Group’s net sales for 2025 are
expected to grow from the previous year (2024: EUR
182.6 million). Comparable operating profit margin is
estimated to be approximately some 16–19 percent
(2024: 17.5 percent). Development of consumer
confidence and purchasing power especially in
Finland as well as general uncertainties and possible
disruptions in global supply chains, among others,
cause volatility to the outlook for 2025.
Uncertainties related to the development of net
sales and result are described in more detail in the
Major risks and factors of uncertainty section.
DIVIDEND POLICY
Marimekko aims to pay a regular dividend every year.
The dividends to be paid and their amount and the
payout date depend on the company’s financial result,
financial situation, equity ratio, need for working
capital and other factors.
Marimekko intends to follow a stable and active
dividend policy that by and large reflects the
company’s earnings trend. Marimekko’s goal is to
distribute as dividends at least half of earnings per
share annually.
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
The Annual General Meeting 2025 will be held on
Tuesday, 15 April 2025 at 2.00 p.m. EEST.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ PROPOSAL FOR DIVIDENDS
On 31 December 2024, the parent company’s distributable funds amounted to EUR
70,604,754.43; profit for the financial year was EUR 25,011,306.84. The Board of
Directors will propose to the Annual General Meeting that a regular dividend of EUR
0.40 and an extraordinary dividend of EUR 0.25 will be paid for 2024.
The Board will propose 17 April 2025 as the dividend payout record date and 28
April 2025 as the dividend payout date. A dividend of EUR 0.37 per share was paid
for 2023.
12
Key figures of the Group and formulas for the key figures
Key financial figures
2024 2023 2022
Net sales, EUR 1,000 182,604 174,105 166,515
Change in net sales, % 4.9 4.6 9.4
Operating profit, EUR 1,000 31,380 31,400 30,236
 % of net sales 17.2 18.0 18.2
Comparable operating profit, EUR 1,000 31,932 32,031 30,382
 % of net sales 17.5 18.4 18.2
Financial income, EUR 1,000 1,181 393 1,241
Financial expenses, EUR 1,000 -1,587 -2,056 -2,339
Result before taxes, EUR 1,000 30,974 29,737 29,139
 % of net sales 17.0 17.1 17.5
Taxes, EUR 1,000 6,602 6,137 6,430
Net result for the period, EUR 1,000 24,372 23,601 22,708
Balance sheet total, EUR 1,000 130,349 123,258 114,587
Net working capital, EUR 1,000 29,350 24,345 20,557
Interest-bearing liabilities, EUR 1,000 30,647 32,909 33,993
Shareholders’ equity, EUR 1,000 75,521 65,738 55,425
Net debt / EBITDA -0.24 -0.10 0.03
Return on equity (ROE), % 34.5 39.0 36.3
Return of capital employed (ROCE), % 31.4 33.0 31.5
Equity ratio, % 58.7 54.1 49.2
Gearing, % -12.9 -6.3 2.2
Gross investments, EUR 1,000 2,330 2,033 999
 % of net sales 1.3 1.2 0.6
Employee salaries, wages and bonuses, EUR 1,000 28,261 26,245 24,155
Average personnel 466 462 434
Personnel at the end of the financial year 480 468 459
Return on equity (ROE)
%
0
10
20
30
40
50
2022
36.3 39.0 34.5
2023 2024
Return of capital employed (ROCE)
%
0
10
20
30
40
2022
31.5 31.4
33.0
2023 2024
13Key figures of the Group and formulas for the key figures
Per-share key figures
2024 2023 2022
Earnings per share (EPS), EUR 0.60 0.58 0.56
Equity per share, EUR 1.86 1.62 1.37
Dividend per share, EUR¹ 0.65 0.37 0.34
Dividend per profit, %¹ 108.3 63.8 60.7
Effective dividend yield, %¹ 5.4 2.8 3.9
P/E ratio 20.2 22.9 15.5
Share issue adjusted average number of shares 40,571,380 40,571,380 40,623,999
Share issue adjusted number of shares at the end of the period 40,571,380 40,571,380 40,571,380
Earnings per share
Euroa
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2022
0.56 0.58 0.60
2023 2024
Dividend per share
Euroa
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
2022
0.65
0.34
0.37
2023 2024¹
Effective dividend yield
%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2022
3.9
2.8
5.4
2023 2024¹
P/E ratio
Euroa
0
5
10
15
20
25
2022
15.5
22.9
20.2
2023 2024
¹ The Board of Directors of Marimekko proposed on 19 February 2025 to the AGM on 15 April 2025 that a regular dividend of
EUR 0.40 and an extraordinary dividend of EUR 0.25 per share is paid for 2024.
14Key figures of the Group and formulas for the key figures
Reconciliation of alternative key figures to IFRS
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023 2022
Items affecting comparability
 Employee benefit expenses -552 -631 -146
Items affecting comparability in operating profit -552 -631 -146
EBITDA 40,724 40,580 39,887
 Employee benefit expenses 552 631 146
Comparable EBITDA 41,276 41,211 40,033
Operating profit 31,380 31,400 30,236
 Employee benefit expenses 552 631 146
Comparable operating profit 31,932 32,031 30,382
Net sales 182,604 174,105 166,515
Operating profit margin, % 17.2 18.0 18.2
Comparable operating profit margin, % 17.5 18.4 18.2
Items affecting comparability are exceptional transactions that are not related to the company’s regular
business operations. The Group’s management exercises its discretion when making decisions regarding the
classification of items affecting comparability. Items affecting comparability include, for example, restructuring
costs, expenses related to ending employment contracts as well as exceptional and unexpected events.
Formulas for key figures
Comparable EBITDA, EUR:
Operating result - depreciation - impairments - items affecting comparability
Comparable operating result, EUR:
Operating result - items affecting comparability in operating result
Comparable operating result margin, %:
(Operating result - items affecting comparability in operating result) x 100 / Net sales
Earnings per share (EPS), EUR:
(Profit before taxes - income taxes) / Adjusted number of shares (average for the period under review)
Comparable earnings per share (EPS), EUR:
Comparable profit before taxes - income taxes on comparable profit / Adjusted number of shares
(average for the period under review)
Return on equity (ROE), %:
Rolling 12 months (Profit before taxes - income taxes) x 100 / Shareholders’ equity (average)
Return on capital employed (ROCE), %:
Rolling 12 months (Profit before taxes + interest and other financial expenses) x 100 / Balance sheet total - non-interest-
bearing liabilities (average)
Equity ratio, %:
Shareholders’ equity x 100 / (Balance sheet total - advances received)
Equity per share, EUR:
Shareholders’ equity / Number of shares, 31 Dec.
Dividend per profit, %:
Dividend per share x 100 / Earnings per share (EPS)
Effective dividend yield, %:
Dividend per share x 100 / Adjusted share price, 31 Dec.
P/E ratio:
Adjusted share price, 31 Dec. / Earnings per share (EPS)
Net working capital, EUR:
Inventories + trade and other receivables + current tax assets - tax liabilities - current provisions - trade and other payables
Gearing, %:
Interest-bearing net debt x 100 / Shareholders’ equity
Net debt / EBITDA:
Interest-bearing net debt / Comparable rolling 12-month EBITDA
15
Sustainability report 2024
ESRS 2 – GENERAL DISCLOSURES
REPORTING PRINCIPLES
General basis for preparing the sustainability report
Company profile
Marimekko Corporation is a Finnish clothing
and textile design company. Marimekko and its
subsidiaries form a group that designs, produces,
sources, sells and markets clothing, bags and
accessories, as well as home décor items ranging
from textiles to tableware. A large proportion of the
fabrics used in Marimekko’s products are printed at
the company’s own textile printing factory in Finland.
In Marimekko’s sustainability report and
financial statements, operations are reported at
the Marimekko Group level. Any exceptions to
this principle are indicated in conjunction with the
information in question. In this report, Marimekko
has not used the possibility to exclude information
related to intellectual property, know-how or results
of innovation, or the exception related to impending
developments or matters in the course of negotiation
as per Article 19a(3) and Article 29a(3) of Directive
2013/34/EU.
This report contains relevant information on
upstream and downstream of Marimekko’s value
chain, particularly regarding environmental impacts
and supply chain. The upstream reporting includes
data related to materials, among others. The
complexity of value chain determines the extent of
tiers from which Marimekko collects information.
For example, in the textile value chain, the company
typically maps the sewing factory and the material
supplier. The company continuously strives to improve
the transparency of the supply chain. Downstream in
the value chain, the company reports on matters such
as its work to reduce the environmental impacts of
products in the use phase.
The sustainability report is published annually as
part of the Report of the Board of Directors, and the
reporting period is the same as for financial reporting.
This sustainability report covers the financial year
from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2024.
Reporting principles applied to each topic are
presented at the end of each ESRS standard.
Basis of preparation
This sustainability report has been prepared for
the financial year 2024 and replaces the previous
reporting of non-financial information in accordance
with the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive
(2014/95/EU, NFRD). In addition, the sustainability
report details on actions based on Marimekko’s
sustainability strategy for 2021–2025.
The sustainability report has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of Chapter 7 of
the Accounting Act and the Sustainability Reporting
Standards (ESRS) and Article 8 of the Taxonomy
Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European
Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of
a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and
amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088).
The topics and key figures reported in the
sustainability report are based on a double materiality
analysis. The double materiality analysis is described
in more detail in this section under Identification
and assessment of material impacts, risks and
opportunities.
The reported sustainability data and related
claims have been verified (limited verification) by
an independent third party, KPMG Oy Ab. The
verification was carried out in accordance with
the international verification standards ISAE
3000 (Revised). Data and benchmarks based on
Marimekko’s sustainability strategy 2021–2025 have
not been verified.
Use of transitional provisions
In the Sustainability Report 2024, Marimekko utilizes
the transitional provision in the E4 – Biodiversity and
ecosystems standard. With regard to this standard,
the company has identified the following material
sub-topics: factors directly impacting biodiversity
loss, impacts on the state of species, impacts on
the extent and state of ecosystems and impacts on
ecosystem services and dependencies on them.
Biodiversity and the preservation of ecosystems
are closely related to other environmental topics,
such as climate change and water and marine
resources, of which Marimekko reports in 2024.
Factors emphasized in Marimekko’s sustainability
work include, e.g., designing long-lasting products,
extending the life cycle of products and the use of
recycled materials, which play an important role
in mitigating the impacts on biodiversity through
reducing such factors as the pressure on land use
change related to the production of new materials,
greenhouse gas emissions and water use. The
company’s actions to mitigate climate change also
affect biodiversity, as climate change and biodiversity
are closely linked.
Material choices based on the company’s
sustainability and material strategies contribute to
the protection of biodiversity. For reasons related to
biodiversity, the company’s Product Requirements
outline that any material from species defined
endangered or vulnerable in the International Union
for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List or
included in the Convention on International Trade
in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) must not be used in Marimekko products.
The Product Requirements also prohibit the use
of leather from farms located in the felled Amazon
region or other areas where land has been cleared for
cultivation by felling old, endangered or conservation-
critical forests. Starting from 2024, Marimekko is
committed to sourcing only wood-based textile
materials that are made from recycled or FSC or
PEFC certified raw materials to reduce the risk of
deforestation in the supply chain.
Marimekko has mapped the locations of its own
operating sites in relation to biodiversity-sensitive
areas. During the reporting year, Marimekko
did not have any of its own operations in areas
classified as Key Biodiversity Areas, Ramsar areas,
UNESCO World Heritage Sites or legally protected
areas. Marimekko has not identified or assessed
dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems,
identified or assessed related transition or systemic
risks, or consulted affected communities on the
subject.
The company has not identified that it should
implement biodiversity-related mitigation measures,
which are identified, for example, in the following:
Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council on the conservation of wild birds; Council
Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural
habitats and of wild fauna and flora; an Environmental
16
Impact Assessment (EIA) as defined in Article 1(2), point
(g), of Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament
and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of
certain public and private projects on the environment.
The need for mitigating measures will be reassessed
once biodiversity impacts have been systematically
identified.
Marimekko intends to deepen the assessment
of its biodiversity impacts, particularly with regard
to the most significant raw materials and countries
of origin. The aim is to identify the most important
biodiversity impacts of the company’s operations in
order to systematically reduce them. In the coming
years, the company will examine the setting of targets
and indicators related to biodiversity and ecosystems
and further specify its operating principles related to
this theme.
Marimekko also makes use of the transitional
provision, where applicable, in relation to standards
S1 – Own workforce and S2 – Workers in the
value chain. The impacts related to these topics
on the company’s business model and strategy are
presented under Strategy and business model.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROLS
OVER SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
Marimekko’s sustainability report is prepared in
accordance with the Group’s statutory reporting,
risk management and internal control principles
and processes, which are consistent with financial
reporting where applicable. Risks related to the
company’s business are assessed by means
of comprehensive risk management, which is a
continuous and systematic process for identifying
and assessing key risks related to the company’s
operations and operating environment. Key risks
are those that may prevent the use of a business
opportunity, jeopardize or prevent the achievement
of strategic goals set by or the continuity of the
operations of the Group or a part of it, or otherwise
cause significant consequences for the company,
personnel or stakeholders. It is essential to identify
and assess the risks, threats and opportunities
that may be of significance to the implementation
of the company’s values and strategy and to the
achievement of short- and long-term goals, as well
as to identify and assess the company’s impact on
society and the environment.
In both financial and sustainability reporting, risk
assessment, prioritization and internal control are
based on risk identification and analysis. The control
is focused on the most material identified risks.
Marimekko’s internal control is based on the COSO
(Committee of Sponsoring Organizations) model, and
the internal control related to the reporting process is
part of Marimekko’s comprehensive internal control
and risk management framework.
The risks identified for sustainability reporting
comprise the completeness and integrity of the
reported information, particularly regarding the
information collected from the value chain, and the
timeliness of reporting. To ensure the accuracy and
timeliness of the reported information, Marimekko has
defined a governance model that includes the roles
and responsibilities of sustainability reporting.
The implementation of sustainability reporting
is the responsibility of Marimekko’s CFO together
with the sustainability team (part of the Business
Development and Transformation function) and
the company’s Legal, People & Culture as well as
Communications and Investor Relations teams. The
company also uses the Group’s financial services and
external service providers for sustainability reporting.
Business process owners are responsible for
producing reported information in a transparent
manner. The responsibility for the accuracy of reported
content, adherence to reporting schedules and
delivery according to the process is assigned to the
work roles defined in the governance model. Internal
controls are in place to ensure the accuracy and
timeliness of the reported content, and the reporting
is steered and monitored by Marimekko’s Audit and
Remuneration Committee and Management Group.
SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE
Role of the administrative, management and
supervisory bodies
The sustainability report contains information
on sustainability management. Information on
the general tasks, composition, competence of
the governance and control bodies as well as
risk management processes is presented in the
Corporate Governance Statement.
Sustainability management at Marimekko
Marimekko is committed to observing the same
operating principles all over the world, in compliance
with international and local laws and regulations,
Marimekko’s values and ethical business conduct.
Responsibility for sustainability matters lies with
the Board of Directors, the President and CEO and
the Management Group. Marimekko’s operating
practices are based on the company’s Code of
Conduct approved by the Board of Directors. In
addition, the Board of Directors has approved in the
beginning of 2025 Marimekko’s Sustainability Policy,
which further specifies the operating practices
related to sustainable business. More information on
the content of the Code of Conduct can be found in
section G1 – Business Conduct under Policies and
under each topic under Policies.
Marimekko’s sustainability work is guided by the
company’s business strategy as well as the related
sustainability strategy, which is set for the period
2021–2025. The focus areas of the sustainability
strategy and work are based on Marimekko’s brand,
vision and values, analyses of the megatrends
affecting the fashion and textile industry, consumer
trends and insight, studies on sustainability factors
throughout the value chain, the benchmarking of
industry practices, stakeholder dialogue and input
from employees. In addition, the company has carried
out a double materiality analysis required by the
Sustainability Reporting Directive, which contributes
to specifying sustainability actions. The double
materiality analysis is described under Identification
and assessment of material impacts, risks and
opportunities.
Sustainability-related impacts, risks and
opportunities are described in the section
Identification and assessment of material impacts,
risks and opportunities and topically in the sections
dealing with environmental, social and governance
aspects. Other significant risks and uncertainties
related to the company’s business operations are
described in the Report of the Board of Directors.
Board of Directors
The Annual General Meeting elects the Board of
Directors annually. A person elected to the Board of
Directors must have the competence required for
the position, including competence in sustainability
themes, and the opportunity to devote sufficient
time to the Board duties. Diversity of the Board
of Directors, including the members’ mutually
complementing competencies, education and
experience of different industries and geographical
regions significant for the company’s business,
as well as their personal characteristics, helps
ensure that the Board as a whole supports the
implementation of Marimekko’s business and
sustainability strategies and the customer orientation
of its business in an optimal manner.
Sustainability report 2024
17
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
• approves and signs the sustainability report
• approves Marimekko Code of Conduct, Sustainability Policy and ethics & compliance program and monitors its progress
• approves the sustainability strategy and its key targets and monitors the progress of the strategy
• sets annual sustainability targets for the President and CEO and Management Group members
AUDIT AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
• is responsible for the appropriate monitoring of the company’s sustainability reporting and its organization and assurance
• is responsible for monitoring the company’s impacts, risks and opportunities
• monitors the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems
• assesses risk reports and prepares matters related to risk management for the Board of Directors
PRESIDENT AND CEO
• is responsible for the company’s compliance with laws and regulations
• is responsible for the appropriate organization of risk management in the Group
• is responsible for implementing the ethics & compliance program in accordance with the Board’s instructions
THE MANAGEMENT GROUP
• is responsible for identifying and assessing risks both in general and each within their own areas of responsibility,
as well as for the appropriate risk management measures
• oversees the implementation of the ethics & compliance program
• approves Supplier Code of Conduct and its supporting detailed guidelines
Business Development & Transformation
and its Sustainability team
• is responsible for developing the
sustainability strategy in the company and
in the value chain
• with its in-depth expertise, supports and
advises the organization in wide-ranging
sustainability work
• monitors the progress of sustainability
work in relation to the targets
• is partly responsible for the sustainability
reporting
Design, Innovation & Creative Concepts
• is responsible for designing the collections
following Marimekko’s design philosophy
based on timelessness, functionality and
longevity, and taking into account the prin-
ciples of circular economy
Innovation Works team
• is responsible for promoting the adoption
of innovative and new projects related to
sustainability and circular economy, such as
new materials
Product and Supply Chain
• is responsible for product development,
procurement and manufacturing in line
with the sustainability strategy, taking into
account Marimekko’s material strategy and
the principles of circular economy
• selects partner suppliers and constantly
communicates with them in accordance
with the defined due diligence process
Quality team
• is responsible for product quality and
compliance in different markets
Other business units and teams
• mapping and mitigating sustainabi-
lity risks, sustainability measures and
sustainability work development in their
respective area
• providing information for sustainability
reporting from their area
Marimekko’s Board of Directors approves
the company’s Code of Conduct, sustainability
strategy and its key targets and is responsible
for sustainability reporting. In addition, the Board
approves the company’s ethics & compliance
program and monitors its progress. In accordance
with the annual cycle, the Board of Directors follows
up on the progress of the company’s sustainability
strategy and reviews the sustainability report.
The Board addresses other sustainability-related
matters as necessary and consults the company’s
sustainability experts.
At the end of 2024, Marimekko’s Board of
Directors consisted of 6 members (31 December
2023: 6), of whom 67 percent (67) were men and
33 percent (33) women. A total of 83 percent (83)
of the members are independent of the company
or the company’s significant shareholders. 1 of the
6 members of the Board of Directors also serves in
company management under a half-day executive
contract. The personnel do not have a representative
in the company’s management.
Through operational positions and/or positions of
trust, the Board members have diverse experience in
the fashion, clothing, technology and retail industries
and knowledge of the impacts, risks and opportunities
related to sustainable business in these industries.
This industry and business model expertise supports
the Board’s work with regard to material impacts,
risks and opportunities. In addition, all Board
members have strong expertise in good governance
through operational management positions and/or
positions of trust in listed companies or other large
companies. All members of the Board of Directors
have a university degree and one has a doctorate.
The degrees come from different fields, with a focus
on business and administration. The Board members’
ages vary between 32 and 60 years (31–59).
Sustainability report 2024
18
The sustainability competence of Marimekko’s
Board of Directors is ensured through regular sustain-
ability, environmental and compliance briefings
given by the company’s experts, which provide
the members of the Board with information on the
company’s most material sustainability-related
impacts, risks and opportunities as well as the
progress towards the company’s sustainability goals.
Based on this information and previous experience,
the Board of Directors is able to consider different
perspectives when overseeing the company’s
strategy and risk management process as well as
possible compromises in decision-making. The
Board of Directors and its Audit and Remuneration
Committee may also obtain external expert
assistance in sustainability matters, if necessary.
During the financial year 2024, the Board of
Directors met 8 times (7) and discussed the following
sustainability topics in its meetings: Risks; Personnel
competence mapping and succession planning;
Development of the company’s culture; Two updates
on the progress of the sustainability strategy and
reporting; Sustainability reporting in accordance with
CSRD; Setting science-based short-term emission
reduction targets; and The progress of the ethics
& compliance program. Each theme was presented
to the Board by a member of the company’s top
management, related to their respective area of
responsibility.
Board of Directors’ Committees
Marimekko’s Audit and Remuneration Committee
is responsible for the appropriate organization of
control over the company’s accounting, financial and
sustainability reporting, monitors the effectiveness
of internal control and risk management systems,
assesses risk reports and prepares risk management
matters for the Board of Directors.
During the financial year 2024, the Audit and
Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors
met 5 times (5) and discussed the following themes
related to material impacts, risks and opportunities in
its meetings: Risks; Four updates on the company’s
sustainability reporting in accordance with the
CSRD, including the double materiality analysis; Two
updates on the progress of the company’s material
strategy; and The progress of the company’s ethics &
compliance program.
President and CEO and Management Group
The Board of Directors sets annual targets for senior
management, which comprises the President and
CEO and the members of the Management Group.
The targets for senior management members also
include sustainability-related indicators related to
each member’s area of responsibility. These targets
are expanded to and implemented in Marimekko’s
teams and business units and the Management Group
monitors their progress at least once every six months.
The President and CEO is responsible for day-
to-day management in accordance with the Board’s
instructions. Responsible for the implementation of
the company’s sustainability measures, the President
and CEO reports to the Board of Directors on the
material impacts, risks and opportunities related
to sustainability as well as the progress towards
the sustainability targets by providing the Board
of Directors, alone or together with the company’s
sustainability experts, with an annual sustainability
report as well as reviews of sustainability-related
themes in accordance with the Board of Directors
annual cycle. In addition, the President and CEO is
responsible for the appropriate organization of risk
management in the Group.
Members of Marimekko’s Management Group have
diverse experience in the fashion, clothing, technology
and retail industries and knowledge of the impacts,
risks and opportunities related to sustainable
business practices in these industries. In addition,
the Management Group members have expertise
in good governance through earlier and/or current
management positions and/or positions of trust in
listed companies or other large companies. At the end
of 2024, Marimekko’s Management Group consisted
of 11 members (10), of whom 9 percent (0) were men
and 91 percent (100) women.
The members of the Management Group are
each responsible for sustainability measures in
their area of responsibility in accordance with the
Group’s sustainability strategy and for identifying and
assessing sustainability-related risks and appropriate
risk management measures. The responsibility
for implementing the sustainability strategy in the
company’s own operations and in the value chain,
monitoring material impacts, opportunities and risks
related to sustainability (double materiality analysis)
and developing sustainability work accordingly
belongs to the Director of Business Development
and Transformation. This Director reports to the
Management Group on topical sustainability issues
affecting the company every six months.
From the members of the Management Group,
the Chief Financial Officer is responsible for the
implementation of sustainability reporting. The
General Counsel is responsible for supporting the risk
assessment process, developing and harmonizing
risk management, risk management training and
guidance provision, and ensuring the consistency
of the reporting templates and systems used in risk
management.
The Group’s Legal, Communications and Investor
Relations, People & Culture as well as Business
Development and Transformation functions are
jointly responsible for the accuracy and timeliness of
sustainability communications and compliance with
laws and regulations related to reporting.
Integration of sustainability-related performance in
incentive schemes
Marimekko’s Remuneration Policy forms the basis for
the remuneration of Marimekko’s Board of Directors
and President and CEO. The Annual General Meeting
has confirmed Marimekko’s Remuneration Policy
with an advisory decision. The purpose of the policy
is to support the company’s long-term financial
performance and success, contribute to the positive
development of shareholder value and increase
commitment to the company. The remuneration
practices support Marimekko’s financial and business
strategy objectives and targets as well as the
company’s sustainability strategy and values.
Marimekko’s Annual General Meeting decides on
the remuneration of the Board of Directors annually.
There are no business or sustainability targets
included in the remuneration of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors decides on the remuneration of
the President and CEO and the Management Group on
the basis of a proposal by the Audit and Remuneration
Committee.
The short-term incentive scheme for the President
and CEO is decided annually and may not exceed
50 percent of the fixed annual salary. The incentive
is based on the achievement of the annually set
targets. In 2024, the earning criteria for the President
and CEO’s short-term incentive were based on the
development of the company’s net sales (30 percent
of the incentive) and comparable operating margin
(50 percent) as well as personal targets (20 percent),
which included various sustainability targets, such as
reducing greenhouse gas emissions intensity.
Other members of the Management Group
also have part of their remuneration tied to
sustainability targets related to their respective area
of responsibility. In 2024, the Management Group’s
sustainability targets included, for example, reducing
Sustainability report 2024
19
the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions and water
use, and promoting an ethical corporate culture in
the company’s value chain. For other members of
the Management Group, sustainability targets were
included in the personal targets with a maximum
weight of 20 percent in the remuneration for 2024.
Report on sustainability due diligence process
Marimekko Corporation complies with the Finnish
Limited Liability Companies Act, other regulations
concerning publicly listed companies, Marimekko
Corporation’s Articles of Association and the rules
and guidelines of Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. In addition,
Marimekko complies with the Corporate Governance
Code for listed companies, which entered into force
on 1 January 2025.
The due diligence process is integrated into
the company’s governance, strategy and business
model. The roles of the administrative, management
and supervisory bodies are described in the section
Sustainability management at Marimekko.
The most important ethical business principles
are outlined in the Marimekko Code of Conduct
and Supplier Code of Conduct. These codes cover,
among other things, the company’s commitment
to sustainability and responsible operation in such
matters as environmental issues, social aspects,
respect for human rights and combating corruption
and bribery. The Supplier Code of Conduct is
appended as a part of the agreements between
Marimekko and its partner suppliers i.e. contract
manufacturers.
The identification and assessment of adverse
impacts is described in more detail in the section
G1 – Business conduct under Identification
and assessment of material impacts, risks and
opportunities. The implementation of measures to
prevent adverse impacts is described in sections
E1 – Climate change, E3 – Water and marine
resources, S1 – Own workforce and S2 – Workers
in the value chain under Actions. The monitoring
and communication of the actions’ effectiveness is
reported in the section S2 – Workers in the value
chain under Processes to remediate negative
impacts and channels for value chain workers to
raise concerns.
Marimekko is a member of numerous international
cooperation networks, such as amfori BSCI, whose
monitoring mechanisms include interviewing
employees. In addition, public consultations are
carried out in connection with the regular review
of the criteria for these cooperation networks, and
employees can also participate in these consultations.
Interaction with affected stakeholders at key stages
of the due diligence process is described in section
S2 – Workers in the value chain under Actions.
Marimekko has instructions and defined processes
to apply in case of suspected violations of legislation
or the company’s Code of Conduct and other industry
guidelines. The company’s due diligence process is
continuously evaluated and developed.
STRATEGY, BUSINESS MODEL AND VALUE CHAIN
Strategy and business model
Marimekko’s design philosophy and operations have
since the company’s founding been based on the aim
of providing its customers in all markets with timeless,
functional and high-quality products that bring them
long-lasting joy and that they will not want to throw
away. Marimekko’s most significant product groups
are fashion, bags and accessories as well as home
products. There were no significant changes in these
during the reporting period.
Marimekko designs, produces, sources, markets
and sells clothing, bags and accessories, as well as
home décor items ranging from textiles to tableware.
The business model is based on a variety of
distribution channels, which include company-owned
Marimekko stores, outlet stores and e-commerce
(retail), partner-owned Marimekko stores, shop-in-
shops and e-commerce as well as department stores
and multi-brand stores or e-tailers (wholesale), and
licensing as well as various creative retail concepts,
such as pop-up stores, which are constantly
increasing in importance. Marimekko’s wide product
range is manufactured by an international network
of approximately 150 partner suppliers. In 2024, 44
percent (44) of Marimekko’s products sold were
manufactured in EU countries and the remainder was
mainly manufactured in non-EU European countries
or in Asia. A large proportion of the fabrics used in
different product lines are printed at the company’s
own textile printing factory in Helsinki, Finland. The
textile printing factory also serves as an innovation
hub for the company’s most important differentiator,
its art of printmaking, and enables active participation
in research and development projects related to
products and operations.
Marimekko’s key markets are Northern Europe,
the Asia-Pacific region and North America. Finland
is a strong domestic market for the company. At the
end of 2024, Marimekko’s personnel by headcount
(in an employment relationship on 31 December)
were distributed by market area as follows: Finland
544 (519), Scandinavia 57 (57), the EMEA region 0
(0), North America 24 (22), the Asia-Pacific region
52 (56). The average number of full-time equivalent
employees is presented in Note 4 to the consolidated
financial statements. The number of full-time
equivalent employees by market area is presented
in the Report of the Board of Directors under
Personnel.
Based on the business model, Marimekko’s
customer groups comprise consumers in all operating
countries as well as wholesale customers, such as
company’s partners in different markets, department
stores and multi-brand stores. There were no changes
in the key markets or customer groups during the
reporting period.
In both its business and its value chain, the
company emphasizes a proactive approach to solving
sustainability-related challenges. Long-lasting
products play a key role in this work, and in their
design and manufacture, factors taken into account
include, for example, the quality of the materials used
in the products, the environmental and social impacts,
the repairability of the product and the principles of
circular economy. In addition, in its operations the
company pays attention to direct logistics deliveries,
the use of renewable energy and closed-loop
production models.
Marimekko has defined five strategic success
factors on which the company intends to scale
its growth during the strategy period 2023–2027.
The company focuses on scaling the Marimekko
phenomenon and business to bring joy and empower
an increasing number of people around the world.
These five strategic SCALE success factors are:
S: Determined sustainability efforts support
Marimekko’s long-term success
C: Sharpened creative vision to speak to a wider global
audience
A: Accelerating growth in Asia
L: Love for Marimekko life
E: End-to-end digitalization to boost omnichannel
growth and efficiency
The company believes that determined
sustainability efforts support long-term success, which
is why sustainability work is one of the five success
factors in its strategy. Marimekko’s sustainability work
is based on the sustainability strategy for 2021–2025.
It is summarized in three main principles that extend
to the value chain in addition to the company’s own
Sustainability report 2024
20
operations. These principles and related targets are:
Timeless design that brings joy for generations to
come
Our design philosophy is based on timelessness
We offer durable, high-quality and functional
products
We actively work to prolong product lifetime
We contribute to the circular economy through new
processes and services
The products of tomorrow leave no trace
We work to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions
intensity throughout the value chain
We work to reduce the amount of chemicals used in
our supply chain
We work to reduce the water use intensity in our
supply chain
We minimize waste and maximize recycling and
upcycling of materials in our operations
Positive change through fairness and equality
We promote human rights, living wages, worker
empowerment, and safe working conditions in our
supply chain
We aim for full product transparency
We provide an inspiring, responsible and caring
workplace
Our culture is founded on equality, diversity, and
inclusivity and we promote and foster these values
in our entire value chain
These principles and targets guide everything
Marimekko does, from design and product
development to production, logistics and serving
customers in stores or online. More detailed
information on the actions related to these targets is
provided in each topical standard under Actions.
The value chain
In the fashion and textile industry, value chains
are typically long and global. The upstream of
Marimekko’s value chain is related to the products’
raw materials, such as the production of fibers and
materials (yarn, pulp and material production) as well
as assembly, including dyeing, cutting and sewing
and, in home products, also casting. In this part of
the value chain, direct suppliers include the factories
that manufacture the end products and the material
suppliers of the textile printing factory in Helsinki.
Marimekko’s own operations within the value
chain include product design and development that
steer the important material and production phases
and, consequently, the related sustainability impacts,
as well as material sourcing, the textile printing
factory’s production, product storage, logistics and
distribution, and product sales through Marimekko’s
own stores, online store and wholesale.
Consumers are downstream of the value chain,
and this phase also includes the end of the product
life cycle, such as reuse and recycling. For the
downstream of the value chain, Marimekko offers
in some markets repair, alteration and maintenance
services and an online reselling service to help to
extend the product life cycle.
INTERESTS AND VIEWS OF STAKEHOLDERS
At Marimekko, sustainability is integrated into business
decisions and long-term planning. This approach
reflects the company’s commitment to delivering
long-term benefits to stakeholders while reducing
environmental impacts and social risks. Marimekko’s
key stakeholders are: Consumers; Distribution partners
and retailers; Personnel; Shareholders and investors
and analysts; Contract manufacturers; Media and
influencers; Partners; NGOs and charities; Universities
and research institutions.
For consumer customers, for example, quality
and long-lasting products are factors that increase
satisfaction and loyalty. Investors can benefit from the
company’s expansion into international markets in the
form of return on investment. Marimekko’s continuous
sustainability work and compliance with responsible
operating practices and legislation are important
for maintaining the trust of customers and other
stakeholders. The company’s sustainability initiatives,
such as setting science-based emission reduction
targets and committing to material strategy and ethical
business practices, can improve its reputation and
reduce environmental impacts, thus benefiting a wide
range of stakeholders, such as communities along the
value chain and supply chain partners.
Marimekko is committed to the continuous
improvement of its products and practices in
collaboration with its personnel, partner suppliers and
other stakeholders. The company is a member of the
world’s largest corporate responsibility initiative, the
UN Global Compact, and is committed to fostering
its ten principles. Marimekko is also committed to the
Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and has set
near-term science-based emission reduction targets.
The company wants to communicate its
operations transparently and maintain an active
dialog with its stakeholders. For example, in creating
the company’s current SCALE strategy and annual
action plans, the company’s own workforce is
involved in defining the priorities and content through
workshops and surveys, among other things. In
addition, each function creates its own annual plan
based on company-level priorities, and this plan forms
the basis for each employee’s annual targets. The
execution of annual plans is reviewed within each
project as it progresses, within functions, and for
employees, at least every six months. Marimekko’s
management issues an update on the progress of
the company’s strategy and the achievement of its
objectives for the personnel at least quarterly.
The company receives feedback on its operations
through, e.g., customer feedback from retail and
wholesale customers, suggestions from employees,
meetings and surveys with investors, suppliers and
other stakeholders, and via traditional and social
media. Key stakeholder messages and essential
feedback are regularly reported to Marimekko’s Board
of Directors and Management Group.
Stakeholder views were utilized in the double
materiality analysis conducted in 2023–2024, on the
basis of which Marimekko confirmed the operationally
material sustainability themes. Different stakeholders
highlighted different perspectives, but all stakeholder
groups valued environmental and social aspects and
good governance throughout the value chain. The
interviews deepened Marimekko’s view of topics that
are significant to different stakeholders, and they are
reflected in the themes that proved to be material in
the double materiality analysis.
The sustainability expectations and perspectives
that emerged through the double materiality analysis
and other stakeholder surveys already have an
impact on the company’s sustainability strategy and
sustainability work as well as the communication
of sustainability-related matters at the product and
company level. They also serve as the basis for
the planning and implementation of the company’s
sustainability strategy period starting in 2026.
The double materiality analysis is described in
more detail under Identification and assessment of
material impacts, risks and opportunities.
IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF
MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
For this sustainability report, Marimekko’s
material impacts, risks and opportunities related
to sustainability have been identified in a double
materiality analysis based on the principles of the
company’s risk management process.
Sustainability report 2024
21
Other risks related to the company’s business
are assessed by means of comprehensive risk
management, which is a continuous and systematic
process for identifying and assessing key risks
related to the company’s operations and operating
environment. Key risks are those that may prevent the
use of a business opportunity, jeopardize or prevent
the achievement of strategic goals set by or the
continuity of the operations of the Group or a part
of it, or otherwise cause significant consequences
for the company, personnel or stakeholders. It is
essential to identify and assess the risks, threats
and opportunities that may be of significance to the
implementation of the company’s values and strategy
and to the achievement of short- and long-term
goals, as well as to identify and assess the company’s
impact on society and the environment.
According to the comprehensive analysis, risks
and opportunities related to Marimekko’s material
sustainability themes include the impacts of climate
change and loss of biodiversity on the availability and
supply chain of raw materials, changes in consumer
behavior and in the company’s product portfolio
weightings, increasing expectations and new tools
regarding the transparency of the value chain,
continuously evolving best practices in the industry
as well as increasing regulation that may affect, for
example, the company’s products, communications
and the value chain more broadly.
The themes arising from the double materiality
analysis are consistent with the findings of Marimekko’s
comprehensive risk management process.
The members of Marimekko’s Management
Group are responsible for identifying and assessing
risks both as a whole and in their respective areas
of responsibility, implementing appropriate risk
management measures and communicating risks
and measures to the personnel. The General
Counsel is responsible for supporting the risk
assessment process and developing and steering
risk management, among other things. The material
impacts, risks and opportunities identified in the
double materiality analysis are managed in the same
way as the risks identified in the comprehensive risk
management process.
Double materiality analysis
The identification and assessment of sustainability-
related impacts, risks and opportunities covers the
company’s own operations as well as different stages
and business relationships in the international value
chain and other parties that are or may be affected
by the company’s operations. The company strived to
extensively examine impacts, risks and opportunities
in the value chain, from raw material production
to product end-of-life and recycling. Marimekko’s
double materiality assessment process did not focus
on any specific activities, business relationships or
geographical areas, and Marimekko’s due diligence
process has recognized regional differences in such
areas as the assessment of human rights risks. These
were taken into account as part of the assessment of
impacts, risks and opportunities.
Marimekko does not have own workforce in
countries that have been identified as high-risk areas,
and its own workforce does not involve the risk of
using child or forced labor.
Marimekko conducted the double materiality
analysis in four phases in 2023–2024. The first
phase consisted of defining Marimekko’s value chain
and the impacts of Marimekko’s operations in its
various parts as well as sorting the impacts between
those attributable to Marimekko’s strategy and
business model and those attributable to business
relationships.
In the second phase, views on the company’s
actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities
were collected from internal and external
stakeholders by conducting interviews and surveys
as well as analyzing research and survey results
concerning Marimekko and its industry. The ten
topics defined in the EU Sustainability Reporting
Standard were used as a reference framework.
In addition to the company’s own personnel, the
involved stakeholders comprised raw material
suppliers, product manufacturers (partner suppliers),
customers, consumers as well as investors and NGOs.
The sustainability impacts were identified
using Marimekko’s internal and external reporting
data, existing assessments on various topics, the
company’s operating principles and objectives,
external research and surveys as well as expert
opinions collected in stakeholder interviews.
Environmental impacts related to climate, water
and marine resources were identified using targets
and policies set by Marimekko, previous reporting
and assessments on environmental impacts such as
greenhouse gas calculations, and data on energy
and water consumptions and generated waste.
The material impacts, risks and opportunities of water
resources are related to Marimekko’s entire business,
which is the Group’s only business segment. Water
is a material issue in the company’s own operations
in Finland. Upstream of the value chain, water is
a material issue in several geographies in Europe
and Asia for the sourcing of raw materials and the
manufacture of products. Downstream of the value
chain, water is a material issue in the use phase of
products that require frequent washing. Marimekko
does not use significant amounts of marine
natural resources that are essential for the good
environmental status or protection of marine waters.
APPLIED MATERIAL IMPACT CRITERIA AND VALUES
Criterion Criterion description Applied numerical values
Scale How severe is the negative impact, whether it leads
to non-compliance with laws or regulations; or how
beneficial is the positive impact for people or the
environment?
1–5
(minimal–absolute)
Scope How widespread are the negative impacts?
Regarding environmental impacts, extent refers
to the spread of environmental damage or a
geographical region; with regard to impacts on
people, to the number of people affected.
1–5
(limited–very widely spread)
Irremediability Can the negative impacts be mitigated and to what
extent; can the environment be restored or people’s
previous state recovered?
1–5
(easy–non-remediable)
Likelihood How likely is it that the impact will occur? 25/50/75/100 %
(very unlikely–very likely)
The materiality of positive impacts was calculated using the formula: (scale + extent)/2 x likelihood percentage
The materiality of negative impacts was calculated using the formula: (scale + extent + restorability)/3 x likelihood percentage
If an identified impact scored 3.5 or more in this calculation, it was assessed to be material.
Sustainability report 2024
22Sustainability report 2024
However, the company’s printing factory uses some
chemicals, for which seaweed is used for raw material
production.
Impacts on own workforce, workers in the value
chain and business operations were identified
using Marimekko’s values, objectives and operating
principles of the company, information generated
from internal and external reporting concerning, for
example, the company’s own workforce, personnel
surveys and the human rights risk assessment carried
out by Marimekko.
In the third phase, internal workshops were
arranged to identify and assess the financial impacts
of the material topics. Risks and opportunities for
Marimekko’s business were assessed on the basis
of the thresholds in euros defined in the company’s
risk management process as well as the likelihood
and possible time horizon of the event. Risks and
opportunities were identified using internal and
external reporting data, risks identified in the risk
management system, existing reports on different
topics, Marimekko’s operating principles and
objectives, and the expert opinions gathered in the
workshops and stakeholder interviews. In addition, a
scenario analysis based on climate scenarios defined
by the IPCC was used in the identification of climate
risks. Water risks and opportunities related to the
company’s own operations and value chain have been
identified using the same climate scenarios as in the
climate risk assessment, as well as publicly available
geographic information tools that provide information
on regional water risks.
Risks and opportunities related to the company’s
own workforce were identified with reference to
existing practices and guidelines, external reporting
and the equality plan. Risks related to workers in the
value chain and business operations were identified
using Marimekko’s external reporting, sustainability
strategy, existing reports on operating principles and
NGO reports on sustainability in the textile sector.
In the fourth phase, the project team reviewed
the topics raised in the analysis. Marimekko’s
management and sustainability experts validated
the impacts, risks and opportunities based on their
likelihood, scope and irremediability, and assessed
the time frame for their possible realization using
the same time frames that are generally used in
the company’s assessment of financial risks and
opportunities:
short term (1–2 years)
medium term (2−5 years)
long term (more than 5 years).
The time frames related to climate change are
an exception to the above, and they are presented in
connection with section E1 – Climate change.
The project team proposed threshold values
for the most material themes. With regard to the
selected threshold values, it was emphasized that the
impacts, risks and opportunities of the topics defined
as material are clearly severe or significant for the
company, in which case the threshold value on a scale
of 1–5 starts at 3.5 (+70%).
In the double materiality analysis, the threshold
for material topics was exceeded in terms of positive
and/or negative impacts. In the double materiality
analysis, there were no risks or opportunities whose
impact on the company’s financial status, result or
financing was material.
Based on the threshold values, Marimekko’s
material sustainability topics and sub-topics
(in brackets) were:
E1 – Climate change (climate change mitigation,
energy)
E3 – Water and marine resources (water)
E4 – Biodiversity and ecosystems (factors directly
impacting biodiversity loss, impacts on the state
of species, impacts on the extent and state of
ecosystems and impacts on ecosystem services
and dependencies on them)
S2 – Workers in the value chain (working
conditions, equal treatment and opportunities for
all, other work-related rights).
The double materiality analysis was reviewed by
Marimekko’s Management Group, which approved
the threshold value for the double materiality analysis
but decided that, based on the company’s values,
strategy and the continuity of reporting as well as
the decision-making needs of report users, the
material themes to be reported according to the EU
Sustainability Reporting Standard shall also include
the following:
S1 – Own workforce (working conditions, equal
treatment and equal opportunities for all)
G1 – Business conduct (corporate culture,
whistleblower protection, animal welfare, political
interaction and lobbying, relationships with
suppliers of goods and services, including payment
practices, corruption and bribery)
The material impacts, risks and opportunities of
these topics are the sub-topics whose value rose to
the highest in the double materiality analysis, being
3.0 (+60%). These sub-topics, which are all positive
impacts, are presented in the table Material topics
and sub-topics.
The double materiality analysis was then
presented to the company’s Audit and Remuneration
Committee, which confirmed six themes for the
company’s sustainability reporting.
In addition to the required reporting on material
topics according to the double materiality analysis,
the sustainability report includes company-specific
key figures related to greenhouse gas emissions
(section E1 – Climate change), water use (section E3
– Water and marine resources ) and workers in the
value chain (section S2 – Workers in the value chain).
SUSTAINABILITY TOPICS DEFINED AS MATERIAL
The sustainability topics in the green section of the matrix
have been identified as material for Marimekko. The letter-
number abbreviations in the matrix correspond to the
sustainability topics’ abbreviations used in the Sustainability
Reporting Directive.
23
MATERIAL TOPICS AND SUB-TOPICS
Descriptions, impacts, origin, time horizon and phase in the value chain
Theme and description (material sub-theme) Impact (positive/negative) and its origin (strategy/business model) and relation
(own operations/business relationship)
Value chain phase Time horizon of
impacts
E1 – Climate change (E1.2, E1.3)
Greenhouse gas emissions from raw material production Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to business relationships Upstream Short
Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from the product
manufacturing process
Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to business relationship Upstream Short
Greenhouse gas emissions from product transport Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to business relationships Own operations Short
Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions during the product use phase Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to business relationships Downstream Short
E3 – Water and marine resources (E3.1.)
Using organic and recycled cotton to reduce the use of blue water Positive impact on people and the environment due to strategy; relation due to business relationships Upstream Short
Water use and emissions into water from raw material production Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to business relationships Upstream Short
Water use and emissions into water from the product manufacturing process Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to business relationships Upstream Short
Water use in the use phase of textile and ceramic products Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to the business relationship Downstream Short
E4 – Biodiversity and ecosystems (E4.1, E4.2, E4.3, E4.4)
Land use pressure and loss of habitats and deterioration of soil quality due to raw
material production and textile production
Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to the business relationship Upstream Short
Biodiversity loss due to global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to the business relationship Upstream Short
Biodiversity loss due to water and soil pollution from textile dyeing and printing and
leather tanning
Negative impact on people and the environment due to the business model; relation due to the business relationship Upstream Short
S1 – Own workforce (S1.1, S1.2)
Opportunities for professional development and career development Positive impact on people due to strategy; relation due to own operations Own operations Short
Actions related to occupational health and safety management and well-being Positive impact on people due to business model; relation due to own operations Own operations Short
Developing the employee experience through the development of leadership skills
and managerial work and through an inspiring and caring workplace
Positive impact on people due to strategy; relation due to own operations Own operations Short
Global corporate culture based on equality, diversity and inclusion Positive impact on people due to strategy; relation due to own operations and business relationship Own operations,
downstream
Short
S2 – Workers in the value chain (S2.1, S2.2, S2.3)
Promoting a socially responsible supply chain, including the implementation of
human rights, guided by Marimekko’s Supplier Code of Conduct
Positive impact on people due to strategy; relation due to business relationship Upstream Short
External audits and visits help to ensure compliance with guidelines at product
manufacturing sites
Positive impact on people due to strategy, relation due to business relationship Upstream Short
Improvement of due diligence processes to ensure up-to-date practices in the
changing value chain conditions
Positive impact on people due to strategy; relation due to business relationship Upstream Short
Neglecting human rights, such as appropriate working conditions, working hours
and wages, in the value chain
Negative impact on people due to the business model; relation due to business relationship Upstream Short
Sustainability report 2024
24
Theme and description (material sub-theme) Impact (positive/negative) and its origin (strategy/business model) and relation
(own operations/business relationship)
Value chain phase Time horizon of
impacts
G1 – Business conduct (G1.1, G1.2, G1.4, G1.5, G1.6)
Environmental practices, strict risk and due diligence practices and compliance
with environmental legislation throughout the supply chain lead to a healthier and
more responsible environment
Positive impact on people and the environment due to strategy; relation due to own operations and business relationship Upstream,
own operations
Medium
Human-related business practices, such as working conditions, occupational
safety and human rights aspects, improve the lives of Marimekko’s employees and
workers in the value chain
Positive impact on people due to strategy and business model; relation due to own operations and business relationship Upstream,
own operations
Short
Ethical business practices, such as combating corruption and bribery, avoidance
of conflicts of interest and fair payment practices, build trust in the value chain and
business
Positive impact on people and the environment due to strategy and business model; relation due to own operations and business
relationship
Upstream,
own operations
Short
Favoring long-lasting materials and banning materials that do not promote animal
welfare
Positive impact on people and the environment due to strategy and business model; relation due to own operations and business
relationship
Upstream,
own operations
Short/medium
Assessing the impacts, risks and opportunities of
non-material themes
As part of the double materiality analysis, Marimekko
also identified impacts, risks and opportunities
for themes that did not exceed the materiality
threshold in the assessment. With regard to topics
E2 – Pollution and E5 – Resource use and circular
economy, Marimekko’s internal and external reporting
data, studies on various themes, the company’s
policies and targets, external studies and surveys,
and expert views gathered in stakeholder interviews
were utilized in identifying sustainability impacts,
risks and opportunities. The company did not conduct
consultations with affected communities on pollution
or resource use and circular economy.
Regarding the topic E2 – Pollution, Marimekko
mapped the locations of its offices and operations.
The company’s only industrial plant is located in
Helsinki, Finland, where pollution is prevented in
accordance with the valid environmental permit.
There is no risk of pollution in the company’s other
own operations, as they do not generate wastewater
or involve hazardous chemicals. Downstream of the
value chain, disposal of products is also not estimated
to cause pollution, as the products do not contain
any hazardous substances. At the beginning of the
value chain, the company has not systematically
assessed pollution risks, but the company’s policies,
such as the Supplier Code of Conduct, compliance
with REACH and the company’s list of prohibited
substances, are in place to prevent pollution.
Regarding to topic E5 – Use of resources and
circular economy, Marimekko treated the company’s
raw material procurement and product manufacturing
as resource inflows. The treatment of resource
outflows included products sold and their compliance
with circular economy, as well as waste generated in
operations. With regard to waste, the company’s aim
to use materials efficiently, reduce waste generated
and sort waste as efficiently as possible for further
recycling were considered in the assessment. In
its value chain, Marimekko strives to promote the
sustainable use of natural resources and operating
models in line with circular economy, as well as to
promote the recycling of materials in cooperation
with its suppliers. In addition, the company has
requirements for the waste management of partner
suppliers.
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their
interaction with the strategy and business model
The identified material impacts, risks and
opportunities are considered in the company’s
business and strategy. For example, the material
strategy created by the company in 2021 plays an
important role in reducing the environmental impacts
of the products. Marimekko’s material strategy aims
to clearly increase the use of organic, regenerative,
recycled and bio-based materials and new material
innovations by the end of 2025. In addition, by
increasing the use of such fibers in the collections,
the company further aims to also improve the status
of workers in the value chain, as social aspects are
included in the criteria related to the certification of
organic fibers, for example.
Marimekko has not prepared a company-wide
strategy or business resilience analysis in relation to
the material impacts, risks or opportunities identified
in the double materiality analysis. As part of its normal
operations, the company mitigates identified risks and
potential negative impacts identified in a number of
ways: The material strategy executed by the company
improves the resilience in relation to the availability
of raw materials due to extreme weather conditions,
among other things. The geographical diversification
of raw material sourcing and product manufacture
increases the resilience of the business in various
disruptions and other such situations. The company
has made a climate-related resilience analysis that is
described in the section E1 – Climate change under
Identification and assessment of material impacts,
risks and opportunities.
Sustainability report 2024
25
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ESRS COVERED BY THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Disclosure requirement Item
ESRS 2 – General disclosures
BP-1 – General basis for preparation of sustainability statements ESRS 2 under Principles for preparing the sustainability report
BP-2 – Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances ESRS 2 under Principles for preparing the sustainability report and Identification and assessment of material impacts, risks
and opportunities and E1, E3, S1, S2 and G1 under Reporting principles for metrics
GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies ESRS 2 under The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
GOV-2 – Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and
supervisory bodies
ESRS 2 under The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
GOV-3 – Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes ESRS 2 under Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
GOV-4 – Statement on due diligence ESRS 2 under Statement on due diligence
GOV-5 – Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting ESRS 2 under Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
SBM-1 – Strategy, business model and value chain ESRS 2 under Strategy, business model and value chain
SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders ESRS 2 under Interests and views of stakeholders
SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model ESRS 2 under Identification and assessment of material impacts, risks and opportunities
IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities ESRS 2 under Identification and assessment of material impacts, risks and opportunities and Use of transitional provisions;
E1, E3, S1, S2 and G1 under Identification and assessment of material impacts, risks and opportunities
IRO-2 – Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement ESRS 2 under Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement
E1 – Climate change
E1-1 – Transition plan for climate change mitigation E1 under Transition plan for climate change mitigation
E1-2 – Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation E1 under Policies
E1-3 – Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies E1 under Actions
E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation E1 under Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix E1 under Actions
E1-6 –Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions E1 under Actions
E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits E1 under Actions
E3 – Water and marine resources
E3-1 – Policies related to water and marine resources E3 under Policies
E3-2 – Actions and resources related to water and marine resources E3 under Actions
E3-3 – Targets related to water and marine resources E3 under Targets related to water and marine resources
E3-4 – Water consumption E3 under Actions
E3-5 – Potential financial effects from water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities Not reported in 2024
Sustainability report 2024
26
Disclosure requirement Item
E4 – Biodiversity and ecosystems
IRO-1 – Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities ESRS 2 under Use of transitional provisions and Identification and assessment of material impacts, risks and opportunities
S1 – Own workforce
S1-1 – Policies related to own workforce S1 under Policies
S1-2 –Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts S1 under Policies
S1-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns S1 under Policies and G1 under Mechanisms for identifying, reporting and investigating concerns
S1-4 –Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material
opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
S1 under Actions
S1-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and
opportunities
S1 under Actions
S1-6 – Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees Reported partly in 2024, S1 under Actions and ESRS 2 under Strategy and business model
S1-8 – Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue S1 under Actions
S1-9 – Diversity metrics S1 under Actions
S1-10 – Adequate wages Reported partly in 2024, S1 under Actions
S1-14 – Health and safety metrics Reported partly in 2024, S1 under Actions
S1-15 – Work-life balance metrics Reported partly in 2024, S1 under Actions
S1-17 – Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts G1 under Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
S2 – Workers in the value chain
S2-1 – Policies related to value chain workers S2 under Policies
S2-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns Reported partly in 2024, S2 under Actions and Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers
to raise concerns
S2-4 – Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing
material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions
S2 under Actions
S2-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and
opportunities
Reported partly in 2024, S2 under Actions
G1 – Business conduct
G1-1 – Corporate culture and business conduct policies G1 under Business conduct policies and corporate culture
G1-2 – Management of relationships with suppliers G1 under Management of relationships with suppliers and S2 under Actions
G1-3 – Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery G1 under Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
G1–4 – Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery G1 under Mechanisms for identifying, reporting and investigating concerns
G1-5 – Political influence and lobbying activities G1 under Political influence and lobbying
G1-6 – Payment practices G1 under Payment practices
Sustainability report 2024
27
ADDENDUM 56 B: LIST OF DATA POINTS FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY AND THEMATIC STANDARDS DERIVED FROM EU LEGISLATION
Disclosure requirement and related
data point
Reference to the Disclosure Regulation Reference to pillar 3 Reference to the reference value
setting
Reference to European Climate Law Item
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Gender distribution of the
Board of Directors, paragraph 21(d)
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 13 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1816(5), Annex
ESRS 2 under Sustainability
management at Marimekko
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Percentage of
independent Board members, paragraph
21(e)
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
ESRS 2 under Sustainability
management at Marimekko
ESRS 2 GOV-4 Statement on due
diligence item 30
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 10 ESRS 2 under Report on sustainability
due diligence process
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Participation in fossil fuel-
related activities 40(d)(i)
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 4 Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453(6) Table 1:
Qualitative data on environmental risk,
and Table 2: Qualitative information on
societal risk
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
Not material
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Participation in activities
related to the production of chemicals
40(d)(ii)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 9 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
Not material
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Participation in activities
related to controversial weapons 40(d)
(iii)
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 14 Article 12(1) of Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818(7), Annex II to Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1816
Not material
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Participation in activities
related to tobacco cultivation and
production 40(d)(iv)
Article 12(1) of Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Annex II to Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1816
Not material
ESRS E1-1 Transition plan for achieving
climate neutrality by 2050, paragraph 14
Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 E1 under Transition plan for climate
change mitigation
ESRS E1-1 Companies excluded from EU
Paris-aligned benchmarks 16(g)
Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template
1: Items outside the banking book –
Climate change transition risk: Credit
rating of liabilities according to sector,
emissions and remaining maturity
Article 12(1)(d)-(g) and Article 12(2) of
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818
E1 under Transition plan for climate
change mitigation
Sustainability report 2024
28
Disclosure requirement and related
data point
Reference to the Disclosure Regulation Reference to pillar 3 Reference to the reference value
setting
Reference to European Climate Law Item
ESRS E1-4 Greenhouse gas emission
reduction targets, paragraph 34
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 4 Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template
3: Items outside the banking book
– Climate change transition risk:
Adaptation metrics
Article 6 of Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1818
E1 under Targets related to climate
change mitigation and adaptation
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption from
fossil sources disaggregated by source
(sectors with material climate impact
only) paragraph 38
Appendix 1 Table 1 indicator 5 and Table
2 indicator 5
E1 under Actions
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix,
paragraph 37
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 5 E1 under Actions
ESRS E1-5 Energy intensity associated
with activities in high climate impact
sectors, paragraphs 40–43
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 6 E1 under Actions
ESRS E1-6 Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total
GHG emissions, paragraph 44
Appendix 1, Table 2 Indicators 1 and 2 Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template
1: Items outside the banking book –
Climate change transition risk: Credit
rating of liabilities according to sector,
emissions and remaining maturity
Article 5(1), Article 6 and Article 8(1) of
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818
E1 under Actions
ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG intensity,
paragraphs 53–55
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 3 Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template
3: Items outside the banking book
– Climate change transition risk:
Adaptation metrics
Article 8(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1818
E1 under Actions
ESRS E1-7 GHG removals and GHG
mitigation projects, paragraph 56
Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 E1 under Actions
ESRS E1-9 The exposure of the
benchmark portfolio to physical climate-
related risks, paragraph 66
Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1818; Annex II to Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1816
Not material
ESRS E1-9 Proportion of assets at
material physical risk over the short and
long term, paragraph 66(a)
ESRS E1-9 The location of significant
assets at material physical risk,
paragraph 66(c)
Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, paragraphs
46 and 47; Template 5: Items outside the
banking book – Climate change physical
risk: Exposures subject to physical risk
Not material
Sustainability report 2024
29
Disclosure requirement and related
data point
Reference to the Disclosure Regulation Reference to pillar 3 Reference to the reference value
setting
Reference to European Climate Law Item
ESRS E1-9 A breakdown of the carrying
value of the undertaking’s real estate
assets by energy efficiency classes,
paragraph 67(c)
Article 449a of Regulation (EU) No
575/2013; Commission Implementing
Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, paragraph
34; Template 2: Items outside the
banking book – Climate change
transition risk: Loans collateralised by
immovable property – Energy efficiency
of the collateral
Not material
ESRS E1-9 Consideration of climate-
related opportunities in the portfolio,
paragraph 69
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818,
Annex II
Not material
ESRS E2-4 Quantity of each air, water
and soil pollutant listed in the E-PRTR
(European Pollutant Release and
Transfer Register), Annex II, list item 28
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 8, Table 2
Indicators 1, 2 and 3
Not material
ESRS E3-1 Water and marine natural
resources, paragraph 9
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 7 E3 under Policies
ESRS E3-1 Targeted policies, paragraph
13
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 8 E3 under Policies
ESRS E3-1 Sea and ocean sustainability,
paragraph 14
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 12 Not material
ESRS E3-4 Total water recycled and
reused, paragraph 28(c)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 6.2 E3 under Actions
ESRS E3-4 Total water consumption in
m3 per net revenue on own operations,
paragraph 29
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 6.1 E3 under Actions
ESRS 2 – SBM-3 – E4 paragraph 16(a)(i) Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 7 ESRS 2 under Principles for preparing
the sustainability report
ESRS 2 – SBM-3 – E4 paragraph 16(b) Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 10 ESRS 2 under Principles for preparing
the sustainability report
ESRS 2 – SBM-3– E4 paragraph 16(c) Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 14 ESRS 2 under Principles for preparing
the sustainability report
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable land/agriculture
practices or policies, paragraph 24(b)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 11 Not reported in 2024
(transitional provision)
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable ocean/sea
practices or policies, paragraph 24(c)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 11 Not reported in 2024
(transitional provision)
Sustainability report 2024
30
Disclosure requirement and related
data point
Reference to the Disclosure Regulation Reference to pillar 3 Reference to the reference value
setting
Reference to European Climate Law Item
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable ocean/sea
practices or policies, paragraph 24(c)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 12 Not reported in 2024
(transitional provision)
ESRS E4-2 Policies to address
deforestation, paragraph 24(d)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 15 Not reported in 2024
(transitional provision)
ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled waste,
paragraph 37(d)
Appendix 1 Table 2 Indicator 13 Not material
ESRS E5-5 Hazardous waste and
radioactive waste, paragraph 39
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 9 Not material
ESRS 2 – SBM-3 – S1 Risk of forced
labor, paragraph 14(f)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 13 S1 under Identification and assessment
of material impacts, risks and
opportunities
ESRS 2 – SBM-3 – S1 Risk of incidents of
child labour, paragraph14(g)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 12 S1 under Identification and assessment
of material impacts, risks and
opportunities
ESRS S1-1 Human rights policy
commitments, paragraph 20
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 9 and Table
1 Indicator 11
S1 under Policies
ESRS S1-1 Due diligence with regard to
the eight fundamental conventions of
the International Labor Organization,
paragraph 21
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
S1 under Policies
ESRS S1-1 Processes and measures
addressing the prevention of human
trafficking, paragraph 22
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 11 S1 under Policies
ESRS S1-1 Workplace accident
prevention policy or management
system, paragraph 23
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 1 S1 under Policies
ESRS S1-3 Grievance/complaints
handling mechanism related to employee
matters, paragraph 32(c)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 5 S1 under Policies and G1 under
Mechanisms for identifying, reporting
and investigating concerns
ESRS S1-14 Number of fatalities and
number and rate of recordable work-
related accidents, paragraphs 88(b)
and (c)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 2 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
S1 under Actions
ESRS S1-14 Number of days lost to work-
related injuries and fatalities from work-
related accidents, work-related ill health,
paragraph 88(e)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 3 S1 under Actions
ESRS S1-16 Pay gap between female and
male employees, paragraph 97(a)
Appendix I Table 1 Indicator 12 Delegated Regulation (EU) Not reported in 2024
(transitional provision)
Sustainability report 2024
31
Disclosure requirement and related
data point
Reference to the Disclosure Regulation Reference to pillar 3 Reference to the reference value
setting
Reference to European Climate Law Item
ESRS S1-16 Disproportionately high
salary of the President and CEO,
paragraph 97(b)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 8 Not reported in 2024
(transitional provision)
ESRS S1-17 Incidents of discrimination,
paragraph 103(a)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicator 7 S1 under Actions
ESRS S1-17 Non-compliance with the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights and OECD Guidelines,
paragraph 104(a)
Appendix I Table 1 Indicator 10 and Table
3 Indicator 14
Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1816; Article 12(1) of Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1818
S1 under Actions
ESRS2 – SBM-3 – S2 Significant risk of
child labor or forced labor in the value
chain, paragraph 11(b)
Appendix I Table 3 Indicators 12 and 13 S2 under Policies
ESRS S2-1 Human rights policy
commitments, paragraph 17
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 9 and Table
1 Indicator 11
S2 under Policies
ESRS S2-1 Policies in relation to value
chain workers, paragraph 18
Appendix 1, Table 3, Indicators 11 and 4 S2 under Policies
ESRS S2-1 Non-compliance with the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights and OECD Guidelines,
paragraph 19
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 10 Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1816; Article 12(1) of Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1818
S2 under Actions
ESRS S2-1 Due diligence with regard to
the eight fundamental conventions of
the International Labor Organization,
paragraph 19
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
S2 under Actions
ESRS S2-4 Human rights issues and
incidents connected to its upstream and
downstream value chain, paragraph 36
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 14 S2 under Actions
ESRS S3-1 Human rights policy
commitments, paragraph 16
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 9 and Table
1 Indicator 11
Not material
ESRS S3-1 Non-compliance with the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights, ILO principles and OECD
Guidelines, paragraph 17
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 10 Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1816; Article 12(1) of Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1818
Not material
ESRS S3-4 Human rights issues and
incidents, paragraph 36
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 14 Not material
ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers
and end users, paragraph 16
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 9 and Table
1 Indicator 11
Not material
ESRS S4-1 Non-compliance with the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights and OECD Guidelines,
paragraph 17
Appendix 1 Table 1 Indicator 10 Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU)
2020/1816; Article 12(1) of Delegated
Regulation (EU) 2020/1818
Not material
Sustainability report 2024
32
Disclosure requirement and related
data point
Reference to the Disclosure Regulation Reference to pillar 3 Reference to the reference value
setting
Reference to European Climate Law Item
ESRS S4-4 Human rights issues and
incidents, paragraph 35
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 14 Not material
ESRS G1-1 United Nations Convention
against Corruption, paragraph 10(b)
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 15 G1 under Policies
ESRS G1-1 Protection of whistleblowers,
paragraph 10(d)
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 6 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816,
Annex II
G1 under Mechanisms for identifying,
reporting and investigating
ESRS G1-4 Fines for violations of
anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws,
paragraph 24(a)
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 17 G1 under Prevention and detection of
corruption and bribery
ESRS G1-4 Anti-corruption and anti-
bribery norms, paragraph 24(b)
Appendix 1 Table 3 Indicator 16 G1 under Prevention and detection of
corruption and bribery
Sustainability report 2024
33
E – ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
INFORMATION PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 8 OF REGULATION (EU)
2020/852 (TAXONOMY REGULATION)
GENERAL
Marimekko’s EU Taxonomy reporting complies
with Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European
Parliament and of the Council. The purpose of
the EU’s Sustainable Finance Taxonomy is to help
undertakings and investors to assess whether their
economic activities are environmentally sustainable.
TAXONOMY REPORTING
The taxonomy defines criteria for business operations
that can be used to assess the extent to which the
activities of an undertaking support the achievement
of environmental objectives. The objectives are:
Climate change mitigation;
Climate change adaptation;
The sustainable use and protection of water and
marine resources;
The transition to a circular economy;
Pollution prevention and control;
The protection and restoration of biodiversity and
ecosystems.
The reporting obligations defined in the EU
Taxonomy have entered into force gradually. The
technical screening criteria related to the first two
objectives, climate change mitigation and climate
change adaptation, entered into force in 2021, and
the technical screening criteria related to other
environmental objectives in 2023. Taxonomy eligibility
and alignment have been reported for activities
related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
since 2023. With regard to other environmental
criteria, taxonomy alignment will be reported for the
first time for 2024.
The following key figures are presented for
taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-aligned activities:
share of the company’s turnover, operating
expenditure (OpEx) and capital expenditure (CapEx).
Marimekko presents the key figures in accordance
with the tables defined in the Taxonomy Regulation
for non-financial companies. In addition, a table of
activities related to nuclear power and fossil gas is
presented in accordance with the regulation, even
though the company does not have any business
operations related to these activities.
ASSESSMENT OF TAXONOMY ELIGIBILITY AND
ALIGNMENT AND MARIMEKKO’S ACTIVITIES
Marimekko annually assesses the taxonomy eligibility
of its activities and the taxonomy alignment of
eligible activities. In 2024, the company introduced
a tool for carrying out and documenting the annual
assessments. The assessment of taxonomy eligibility
is carried out by comparing the definitions of
taxonomy-eligible economic activities defined in
the Regulation with Marimekko’s activities. When an
activity has been identified as eligible, the related
potential turnover, capital expenditure and operating
expenditure are also identified.
In its operations, Marimekko has identified the
management of Marimekko’s marketplace focused
on the sale of vintage and second-hand products
(Marimekko Pre-loved), the sale of vintage and
second-hand products in different channels, and the
Care & Repair service as taxonomy-eligible economic
activities. These economic activities are taxonomy-
eligible for the “Transition to a Circular Economy”
objective. In addition, the installation of electric
car charging stations at Marimekko’s Herttoniemi
property has been identified as taxonomy-eligible
operating expenditure and the installation of an
energy efficiency equipment at the same property
as taxonomy-eligible capital expenditure for 2024.
Both are taxonomy-eligible for the “Climate change
mitigation” objective.
The assessment of taxonomy alignment takes into
account whether the activity significantly contributes
to at least one of the environmental objectives of the
taxonomy, whether the activity significantly harms
other environmental objectives mentioned in the
Taxonomy Regulation (so-called DNSH criteria) and
whether the minimum safeguards in accordance
with the Taxonomy Regulation are implemented.
The assessment of minimum safeguards considers
the fulfillment of criteria related to human rights,
corruption and bribery, fair competition, and taxation.
Marimekko’s guidelines and measures related to
minimum safeguards are described in more detail in
sections S2 – Workers in the value chain and G1 –
Business conduct under Policies and Actions.
Marimekko has assessed the taxonomy alignment
of the activities it has identified as taxonomy-eligible.
According to the assessment carried out, none of
the activities identified by Marimekko as taxonomy-
eligible meet the criteria set for taxonomy alignment.
No separate criteria for substantial contribution
have been set for the installation of charging stations
for electric cars, so they are considered to be met in
the assessment. The DNSH criteria are not met as
Marimekko has not assessed the climate risks of this
activity and has not prepared an adaptation plan for
significant risks. For this reason, the implementation
of the minimum safeguards was not assessed, either.
The installation of energy efficiency equipment
at the Herttoniemi property does not meet the
DNSH criteria, as Marimekko has not assessed the
climate risks of this activity and has not prepared an
adaptation plan for significant risks. For this reason,
the implementation of substantial contribution or
minimum safeguards was not assessed, either.
Moreover, the management of the Marimekko
Pre-loved marketplace and the Care & Repair service
do not meet the DNSH criteria, as Marimekko has not
assessed the climate risks of these activities and has
not drawn up an adaptation plan for significant risks.
For this reason, the implementation of substantial
contribution or minimum safeguards was not
assessed, either.
Sales of second-hand products in different
channels do not meet the criteria for substantial
contribution, as the paper bags used for packaging
the products are not mainly made of recycled
material and are not designed for reuse. The DNSH
criteria are not met, either, as Marimekko has not
assessed the climate risks of this activity and has not
prepared an adaptation plan for significant risks. For
these reasons, the implementation of the minimum
safeguards was also not assessed for this function.
Turnover related to the Care & Repair service
and the management of the Marimekko Pre-loved
marketplace, capital expenditure related to the
installation of energy efficiency equipment and
operating expenditure related to the installation of
electric car charging stations are insignificant in
relation to Marimekko’s business as a whole and are
rounded to zero in the table.
Sustainability report 2024
34Sustainability report 2024
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACCOUNTING
POLICY
Turnover
Marimekko applies the same accounting principles
to the calculation of the taxonomy turnover KPI as
for net sales in the consolidated financial statements
prepared in accordance with IFRS. The accounting
policies for net sales are presented in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. The total turnover
presented in the following tables corresponds to
Marimekko Group’s net sales for 2024.
Taxonomy-eligible turnover includes the share
of the Group’s total net sales that is allocated to
taxonomy-eligible activities. Marimekko has identified
the turnover of Marimekko’s marketplace focused
on the sale of vintage and second-hand products
(Marimekko Pre-loved) (CE 5.6), the turnover of
vintage and second-hand products in different
channels (CE 5.4) and the turnover related to the
Care & Repair service (CE 5.1) as taxonomy-eligible
economic activities in its operations.
Capital expenditure (CapEx)
According to the taxonomy definition, taxonomy-
eligible or taxonomy-aligned capital expenditure can
be identified in three different categories (numerator):
A) it is linked to assets or processes related to
taxonomy-aligned economic activities;
B) it is part of a plan to expand taxonomy-aligned
economic activities or convert taxonomy-eligible
economic activities to taxonomy-aligned (CapEx plan);
C) it relates to the purchase of outputs from
taxonomy-aligned economic activities and individual
measures to make the activities concerned low-
carbon or to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; in
particular, the activities listed in points 7.3 to 7.6
of Annex I to the Climate Delegated Act and other
economic activities listed in Article 10(3) of Regulation
(EU) 2020/852, in delegated acts adopted pursuant
to Articles 11(3), 12(2), 13(2), 14(2) and 15(2), provided
that such measures are implemented and initiated
within 18 months.
Taxonomy-eligible capital expenditure identified
by Marimekko falls into category C). There was no
capital expenditure related to category A) in 2024.
Marimekko does not have a CapEx plan referred to
in category B) with the aim of expanding taxonomy-
aligned financial activities or converting taxonomy-
eligible financial activities to taxonomy-aligned.
Activity CCM 7.3 Installation, maintenance and
repair of energy efficiency equipment has been
identified as taxonomy-eligible capital expenditure in
category C).
The energy efficiency investment related to
the Herttoniemi property has been identified as
taxonomy-eligible capital expenditure.
Marimekko includes increases in tangible and
intangible assets as well as increases in right-of-use
assets during the financial year in capital expenditure.
Increases in fixed assets and right-of-use assets are
presented in Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements.
The definition in the Taxonomy Regulation
differs from the gross investments KPI reported
by Marimekko, which does not include right-of-use
assets in accordance with IFRS 16. In the financial
year 2024, the Group’s gross investments amounted
to EUR 2.3 million. The disaggregation of capital
expenditure required by the Taxonomy Regulation
is presented in table Taxonomy capital expenditure
(CapEx) disaggregation.
Taxonomy capital expenditure (CapEx)
disaggregation
EUR million 2024
Increases in intangible assets (Note 11.1) 1.3
Increases in tangible assets (Note 11.2) 7.9
Total 9.3
Operating expenditure (OpEx)
In accordance with the taxonomy definition, operating
expenditure includes direct uncapitalized costs
related to research and development, renovation
of buildings, short-term leases, maintenance and
repairs. In addition, operating expenditure includes all
other direct expenses related to the maintenance of
tangible fixed assets carried out by the undertaking or
outsourced to a third party and which are necessary
to ensure the continuous and efficient operation of
these assets.
Marimekko’s operating expenditure includes
the costs of servicing, maintenance and repairs.
In addition, operating expenditure includes wage
costs related to development and research, as well
as external services. In the income statement, these
expenses are included in other operating expenses
presented in Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements and in employee benefits expenses
presented in Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements.
Taxonomy-eligible operating expenditure includes
defined operating expenses related to the following
activities: Operating expenditure of Marimekko’s
marketplace focusing on the sale of vintage and
second-hand products (Marimekko Pre-loved) (CE
5.6), operating expenditure related to the sale of
vintage and second-hand products (CE 5.4) and
operating expenditure of the Care & Repair service
(CE 5.1). In addition, taxonomy-eligible operating
expenditure includes the operating expenditure
of electric car charging stations installed at the
Herttoniemi property (CCM 7.4).
Duplicate calculation
At Marimekko, all costs, investments and turnover
are recorded in only one cost center, which means
that it is not possible for the figures to be included in
the numerator as duplicate figures. In addition, the
consolidation phase of the taxonomy figures checks
separately that the figures in the numerator are not
duplicated under different activities. The verification
is carried out by comparing the total figures of the
cost centers with the figures presented in the table
in order to ensure that the total figures do not exceed
100 percent.
35Sustainability report 2024
36Sustainability report 2024
37Sustainability report 2024
38
NUCLEAR ENERGY AND FOSSIL GAS RELATED ACTIVITIES
Row Nuclear energy related activities
1. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development,
demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce
energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
NO
2. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of
new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of
district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety
upgrades, using best available technologies.
NO
3. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear
installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district
heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as
their safety upgrades.
NO
Fossil gas related activities
4. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity
generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
NO
5. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and
operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
NO
6. The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and
operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
NO
E1 – CLIMATE CHANGE
IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF
MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Marimekko has assessed the impacts, risks and
opportunities related to climate as part of the double
materiality analysis related to its sustainability
reporting. The material themes that emerged were
all negative impacts. The double materiality process
and material impacts are presented in section
ESRS 2 – General disclosures under Identification
and assessment of material impacts, risks and
opportunities.
Marimekko has also carried out a more detailed
climate risk assessment using two time horizons: risks
until 2030 (short and medium term) and risks beyond
2030 (long term). Risk identification and assessment
covers both Marimekko’s own operations and assets
as well as the value chain, focusing on upstream value
chain risks. The most significant climate-related risks
identified by Marimekko in the short and medium term
as well as an analysis of the strategy and business
resilience to these risks are described in table
Marimekko’s key climate risks and resilience. The
risks are divided into physical risks and transition risks.
The resilience of the strategy and business has
been analyzed with regard to the most significant
identified risks in the short and medium term. The
analysis includes both Marimekko’s own operations
and the value chain and covers both physical and
transition risks. Both the sourcing of raw materials
and the manufacturing of products have been
taken into account in the upstream value chain.
The resilience analysis considered the climate
change mitigation measures already implemented or
planned by the company, such as the use of recycled
materials and reducing the water scarcity score of
textile materials, and the resources used for them.
The resilience analysis was carried out under the
leadership of Marimekko’s Sustainability team during
2024, and it is updated annually as part of the update
of the risk assessment.
No assets subject to significant risks were
identified in the risk assessment.
The climate-related risks described in the table
Marimekko’s key climate risks and resilience are more
significant in the long term, i.e. beyond 2030, than in
the short and medium term. Risks related to pests,
floods and heavy rainfall as well as sea level rise are
identified as significant risks in the long term.
Identified opportunities related to global warming
include diversification of the material base, reducing
dependence on virgin raw materials by further
increasing the share of recycled materials and
offering Marimekko’s customers lower-emission
products or services, such as circular economy
services. The opportunities related to the demand for
lower-emission products or services are highlighted in
the lower-emission scenario, while the opportunities
related to the diversification of the material base and
the reduction of dependence on virgin raw materials
are highlighted in the high-emission scenario.
There are significant uncertainties related to the
pace, severity and probability of climate change,
as the climate and the factors affecting it are a
complex system and it is not possible to model future
changes with complete certainty. Thus, there are
also uncertainties related to the climate risks and
opportunities identified by Marimekko as well as the
resilience of the strategy and business in these areas.
Sustainability report 2024
39
MARIMEKKO’S KEY CLIMATE RISKS AND RESILIENCE
Key identified climate risks in the short and medium term (until 2030) and an assessment of the resilience of the strategy and business to them.
Risk Type of risk Description of the risk Strategy and business resilience
Rising temperatures and
heat waves
Physical risk Elevated average temperatures and acute heat waves can have a negative impact on the health of both
Marimekko’s own personnel and employees in the supply chain and reduce work efficiency. Heat waves
can also affect the production of agricultural raw materials, which can lead to increased prices and lower
availability. Above-average winter temperatures can also have a negative impact on the demand for winter
collections.
Marimekko diversifies the sourcing of raw materials and the manufacturing of its products geo-
graphically, which increases resilience to the identified risks. Marimekko has increased and con-
tinues to increase the share of recycled materials, which increases resilience to risks related to
raw material availability and prices. Resilience is weakened by hot climate zones accounting for a
significant share of manufacturing and raw material sourcing. Resilience can be further increased
by diversifying the material base from the current one.
Drought and water
scarcity
Physical risk Global warming increases the likelihood and severity of extreme drought, which can affect the production
of agricultural raw materials, especially in areas where the risk of water scarcity is already high. Extreme
drought can lead to lower raw material availability and higher prices. Drought can also cause disruptions in
product manufacturing processes and reduce the availability of clean drinking water in the supply chain.
The geographical diversification of raw material sourcing and product manufacturing increases
resilience to risks related to water availability. Increasing the share of recycled materials inc-
reases resilience, as less water is required to produce the raw material compared to virgin raw
materials. Marimekko works actively to reduce the water scarcity score of the textiles it purcha-
ses, which increases resilience. Resilience is weakened by areas with a high water scarcity risk
accounting for a significant share of manufacturing and raw material sourcing. Resilience can be
further increased by preferring water-saving production processes.
Wildfires Physical risk Increased temperatures and drought increase the likelihood and severity of wildfires, which can destroy
forests serving wood industry and thus affect the availability and prices of wood or wood-based raw mate-
rials used by Marimekko. Wildfires may also cause temporary closures of Marimekko’s stores or offices as
well as factories in the supply chain.
Marimekko has several sales channels, which increases resilience to the harm caused by indivi-
dual store closures. Wood-based materials account for only a small part of Marimekko’s material
base, which increases resilience to the risks associated with wildfires.
Storms Physical risk Extreme weather events, such as strong winds and storms, can cause power outages and temporary
shutdowns at Marimekko’s own textile printing factory, stores and offices as well as in Marimekko’s supply
chain.
Marimekko has several sales channels, which increases resilience to the harm caused by indivi-
dual store closures or power outages. Marimekko’s production is diversified to several partner
suppliers, which increases business resilience to production delays caused by local storms.
Increased regulation Transition risk The EU’s due diligence regulation may also apply to Marimekko in the future. This would mean increased
responsibility for climate risks in the supply chain, for example, and additional investments in due diligence
processes.
Marimekko actively monitors regulatory developments and prepares for future regulations in
good time. Marimekko actively develops supply chain due diligence processes. Resilience can be
increased by further developing Marimekko’s climate and environmental due diligence process.
Increased energy costs,
investments in energy
equipment and power
outages
Transition risk Fossil fuels continue to be an important energy source in global textile value chains. The prices of fossil
fuels are expected to increase due to emissions pricing, which may lead to increased production costs in
Marimekko’s supply chain and indirectly affect the availability and prices of biogas used in the company’s
own textile printing factory. Achieving the climate targets requires a transition to renewable energy
sources in Marimekko’s supply chain, which may lead to investment needs and thereby an increase in
production costs. The introduction of new carbon taxes can also increase production costs in some
regions. In addition, electricity distribution may be restricted in some production countries, which may
cause production delays.
Marimekko’s production is diversified to several partner suppliers, which increases resilience
to rising production costs caused by rising energy prices or investment needs. However, the
significant share of fossil energy sources in the value chain weakens resilience to the identified
risks, and resilience can be actively increased by accelerating the adoption of renewable energy
and promoting energy efficiency in Marimekko’s value chain. Resilience in the company’s own
textile printing factory can be further increased by considering alternative energy sources
alongside biogas.
Sustainability report 2024
40
Description of the processes to identify and
assess material climate-related impacts, risks and
opportunities
Marimekko’s material impacts, risks and opportunities
related to climate change have been identified in
the company’s double materiality analysis, which is
presented in section ESRS 2 – General disclosures
under Identification and assessment of material
impacts, risks and opportunities. In addition, the
company has identified its climate-related impacts
by calculating the annual greenhouse gas emissions
(Scopes 1, 2 and 3) of its own operations and value
chain in accordance with the GHG Protocol standards.
Marimekko’s most significant sources of
emissions are related to indirect emissions in the
value chain (Scope 3), and include, for example,
purchased products and services, in particular
purchased textiles, use of sold products as well as
transport and distribution. More detailed information
on Marimekko’s Scope 1–3 emissions can be found
under Gross Scopes 1, 2 and 3 and Total GHG
emissions.
The identification of physical risks and
opportunities considered chronic and acute risks
related to global warming, water and wind. Transition
risks and opportunities have been identified taking
into account the impacts on business caused by the
transition to a low-carbon society, such as the costs
caused by the transition to lower-emission technology,
as well as changes in the requirements and
expectations of customers and other stakeholders.
Scenario analysis has been used to identify risks
and opportunities. The risks and opportunities have
been assessed in two different scenarios based on
the climate scenarios presented in the IPCC’s sixth
assessment report (AR6): the lower emissions scenario
(SSP1-2.6) and the high emissions scenario (SSP5-8.5).
In scenario SSP1-2.6, global warming is likely to
be limited to 1.2–1.8 degrees Celsius by 2040 and
1.3–2.4 degrees Celsius by 2100, according to the
IPCC. Correspondingly, in the SSP5-8.5 scenario, the
climate is likely to warm by 1.3–1.9 degrees Celsius by
2040 and 3.3–5.7 degrees Celsius by 2100, according
to the IPCC. In the short and medium term defined
by Marimekko (until 2030), the risks of these two
different scenarios do not differ significantly from
each other, but in the long term (beyond 2030), the
physical risks of the high-emissions scenario are
clearly emphasized.
The lower emissions scenario SSP1-2.6 has been
selected to represent the development of global
warming in line with Marimekko’s climate targets
and transition plan. SSP5-8.5 has been selected
to represent a development path that deviates
significantly from the previous one, where global
warming is significantly greater, in order to take into
account the worst threats caused by global warming
in the risk management of the undertaking.
The risks presented in table Marimekko’s key
climate risks and resilience are material in both
climate scenarios used, but their probability and
impact on Marimekko’s profitability are higher in the
high-emissions scenario.
The risks identified by Marimekko, including the
most significant identified climate risks, are taken
into account in Marimekko’s strategy updates and
business planning.
POLICIES
Marimekko aims to reduce the intensity of
greenhouse gas emissions throughout the value
chain. Marimekko has set science-based climate
targets for its own operations and value chain by
2030. In addition, the company’s sustainability
strategy extending to 2025 sets three targets related
to climate change mitigation that guide its operations
and are related to reducing the greenhouse gas
emissions of its own operations and the greenhouse
gas emissions intensity of its logistics and purchased
textile materials.
The Marimekko Code of Conduct covers the
principles for mitigating climate impacts in both
Marimekko’s own operations and those of contractual
partners. In accordance with the Code of Conduct, the
company assesses the environmental impacts of its
operations and takes measures to reduce and prevent
any negative impacts, such as climate impacts.
Marimekko’s Supplier Code of Conduct contains
requirements related to climate change mitigation for
Marimekko’s partner suppliers. Marimekko requires
partner suppliers to strive to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions where possible, for example, by favoring
renewable energy sources and continuously improving
the energy efficiency of their operations. Marimekko
also requires partner suppliers to report their
greenhouse gas emissions to Marimekko upon request.
For the time being, Marimekko’s climate-related
policies do not cover climate change adaptation.
However, some climate change mitigation measures,
such as increasing the share of recycled materials,
support the company’s adaptation to the impacts of
climate change. More information on the content of the
Code of Conduct can be found in sections ESRS 2 –
General information under Sustainability governance
and G1 – Business conduct under Policies.
TARGETS RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION
Marimekko has set targets for reducing Scope 1–2
emissions and Scope 3 emission intensity, and these
are presented in table Marimekko’s Scope 1–3
emission reduction targets. Marimekko’s emission
reduction targets implement the company’s policy of
aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emission intensity
throughout the value chain.
The targets to reduce Scope 1–2 emissions by
42.0 percent and Scope 3 emissions by 51.6 percent
per value added (EUR million) by the end of 2030
are science-based emission reduction targets
validated by the Science Based Targets initiative and
aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement. The
target boundaries include land-related emissions
and removals from bioenergy feedstocks. No other
external stakeholders of Marimekko have been
engaged in setting the targets. The targets have
been set using absolute reduction and economic
intensity (GEVA) methods. Targets have not been set
according to sectoral development paths (SDA), but
according to cross-sector pathways. Marimekko’s
emissions modeling for 2030 and Marimekko’s value
added modeling in accordance with Marimekko’s
business strategy have been used in setting the
targets.
The target for Scope 1–2 emissions covers
100 percent of Marimekko’s Scope 1–2 emissions.
In the base year of the target, Scope 1 emissions
accounted for 57 percent of the total Scope 1–2
emissions and Scope 2 emissions for 43 percent.
The target is a combined target that does not have
a target level defined separately for Scope 1 and
2 emissions. The Scope 2 emissions included in
the target are calculated using the market-based
method and the target is aligned with the goal of
limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
In 2024, Marimekko’s Scope 1–2 emissions were
203 tCO2e (2023: 203), remaining at the previous
year’s level. However, the combined scope 1 and 2
emissions were 7 percent higher than the target in
the base year 2022, mainly due to the increase in
Sustainability report 2024
41
MARIMEKKO’S SCOPE 1–3 EMISSION REDUCTION TARGETS
Description of the target Scope Target period Base year level Reduction target Target level Comparative (2023) 2024 2024 change from
base year (%)
Reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions
by 42 percent. The target boundary includes land-related
emissions and removals from bioenergy feedstocks.
Scopes 1 and 2 2022–2030 189 tCO2e -42% 110 tCO2e 203 tCO2e 203 tCO2e +7%
Reduce Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions by 51.6 percent
per value added (EUR million). The target boundary inclu-
des land-related emissions and removals from bioenergy
feedstocks.
Scope 3 2022–2030 597 tCO2e/M€ -51.6% 289 tCO2e/M€ 461 tCO2e/M€ 504 tCO2e/M€ -16%
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions of textile materials by
20% per kg of sourced textiles.
Scope 3 2019–2025 13.9 kgCO2e/kg -20% 11.1 kgCO2e/kg 12.7 kgCO2e/kg 11.0 kgCO2e/kg -21%
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from logistics by 50%
per kilogram of transported product.
Scope 3 2018–2025 2.2 kgCO2e/kg -50% 1.1 kgCO2e/kg 1.5 kgCO2e/kg 1.7 kgCO2e/kg -20%
purchased electricity consumption in countries with a
relatively high electricity emission factor.
The economic intensity target for Scope 3
emissions covers all of the company’s Scope 3
emissions, except for emissions from the use of sold
products (Scope 3, Category 11). The Scope 3 target
is aligned with the target of limiting global warming
to well below 2 degrees Celsius. Marimekko’s
Scope 3 emissions per value added (EUR million)
were 504 tCO2e/M€, 16 percent lower than in the
base year 2022. The positive development is due
to the reduction in emissions included in the Scope
3 target boundary compared to the 2022 level and
the simultaneous increase in Marimekko’s added
value. Compared to the base year 2022, emissions
have decreased particularly in purchased goods and
services (Scope 3, Category 1) and transportation
and distribution (Scope 3, Categories 4 and 9). The
emissions development of purchased goods and
services is mainly due to the lower total volume of
purchased products, as Marimekko prepared for
the demand for the continuous collection in 2022
in the event of any supply chain disruptions and the
number of purchased products was thus higher, as
well as a decrease in the emission intensity of textile
products. Compared to 2023, Marimekko’s Scope
3 emissions in relation to value added increased
mainly due to the higher volume of purchased textile
products, a decrease in the volume of lower-emission
ceramic purchases, and increased emissions from
transportation and distribution. The development of
emissions is presented in more detail in section Gross
Scope 1, 2 and 3 and Total GHG emissions.
The base year for Marimekko’s science-based
climate targets published at the beginning of 2025
is 2022. The company has estimated that 2022
represents a sufficiently normal business year, as
Marimekko purchased significantly fewer ceramic
and glass products in 2023 due to the good inventory
situation, which affected the emissions of purchased
products and logistics.
In addition to the aforementioned science-based
climate targets, Marimekko aims to reduce the
greenhouse gas emissions of textile materials by 20
percent per kilogram of sourced textiles by the end of
2025 and the greenhouse gas emissions of logistics by
50 percent per kilogram of transported product by the
end of 2025. The target period for the target for textile
materials is 2019–2025 and the target period for the
target for logistics is 2018–2025. The purpose of these
targets is to support Marimekko in systematically
reducing and monitoring the emission intensity of
emission sources identified as material. Emissions
calculation and modeling have been used in setting the
targets. These intensity targets are not science-based
emission reduction targets and are therefore not
aligned with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5
degrees Celsius. The targets have not been validated
by a third party and Marimekko’s external stakeholders
have not participated in setting them.
The greenhouse gas emissions of textile
materials per kg of sourced textiles in 2024 were
11.0 kgCO2e/kg (2023: 12.7), 21 percent lower than
in the target base year 2019. In 2024, Marimekko
achieved its goal of reducing the emission intensity
of textile materials. The emission intensity of textile
materials was reduced in particular by a decrease in
the proportion of animal-derived materials, such as
wool and leather, the lower emission factor of leather
and an increase in the share of organic cotton of all
sourced cotton. In addition to determined execution
of Marimekko’s material strategy, the achievement of
the target was supported by a methodological update
in 2023, thanks to which product category-specific
dyeing and printing practices have been better taken
into account in the calculations from 2022 onwards.
Emissions of logistics per kilogram of transported
product are calculated by dividing Scope 3, Category 4
emissions by the total weight of ordered products (kg)
with a delivery date in the reporting year. Emissions
of logistics per kilogram of transported product in
2024 were 1.7 kgCOe/kg (2023: 1.5), or 20 percent
lower than in the target base year 2018. The increase
in the emission intensity of logistics compared to the
previous year is due to an increase in the share of air
freight in the company’s shipments. Early commitment
to product orders from partner suppliers is typical of
the textile industry. Russia’s attack on Ukraine in spring
2022 ended sea-train transport, which is faster than
sea transport. This further amplified the lead-time
needed for product orders from the supply chain. In
order to avoid over-production, this necessitated also
in 2024 some increase in faster, but more emission-
intensive air transport, which increased the emissions
intensity of logistics.
Sustainability report 2024
42
For the time being, Marimekko does not plan
to adopt new production technologies in its own
operations to achieve the emission reduction
targets. The use of new low-emission technologies
is promoted in the value chain together with the
company’s partners. The key emission reduction
measures and their quantitative contributions
to achieving the emission reduction targets are
described in section Transition plan for climate
change mitigation.
Factors influencing the achievement of
Marimekko’s emission reduction targets include the
achievement of the business strategy targets and the
resulting development of value added, which has an
impact on the economic intensity target in particular,
as well as changes in customer preferences, which
may have an impact on, for example, the materials
used by the company and the weightings between
different product categories.
Transition plan for climate change mitigation
In 2024, Marimekko prepared a transition plan for
climate change mitigation. The transition plan extends
to 2030, which is also the end year for Marimekko’s
science-based emission reduction targets. The
company has not set a science-based net-zero target
for 2050.
Marimekko’s transition plan is based on the
science-based emission reduction targets validated
by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The
targets for Scope 1 and 2 emissions are aligned with
the 1.5 degrees Celsius warming target and the target
for Scope 3 emissions is aligned with the well below 2
degrees Celsius warming target.
Marimekko’s means of reducing emissions can be
divided into four main categories: material transition,
logistics optimization, transition to renewable energy,
and other measures. Marimekko’s transition plan
includes the actions already taken and planned
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or emission
intensity. According to the estimated emission
reduction potential, the actions are divided into
three categories: low potential (less than 50 tCO2e
reduction on an annual basis), medium potential
(50–500 tCO2e reduction on an annual basis) and
high potential (more than 500 tCO2e reduction on an
annual basis).
The actions to achieve the Scope 1 and 2 target
are related to the transition to renewable energy.
The most important actions include phasing out
the use of fossil fuel oil in the heating of the leased
factory property in Kitee and switching to renewable
electricity in all own electricity contracts worldwide.
The impact of both actions has been assessed
as medium. Marimekko has already switched to
renewable electricity in most of its own contracts
in Finland, but the transition is underway in foreign
electricity contracts. Preparations are being made to
discontinue the use of fuel oil at Kitee.
The most significant planned actions to achieve
the Scope 3 target are related to continuing the
material transition in line with Marimekko’s material
strategy, optimizing logistics and transitioning
to renewable energy. In 2024, purchased textile
materials accounted for 36 percent of Marimekko’s
total carbon footprint and logistics for 12 percent.
Correspondingly, purchased textile materials
accounted for 48 percent of the emissions included
in Marimekko’s science-based Scope 3 target
boundary and logistics for 16 percent. The following
planned actions are estimated to have a high emission
reduction potential (a reduction of more than 500
tCO2e):
increasing the proportion of organic and recycled
cotton
increasing the share of traceable and lower-
emission leather
increasing the share of recycled wool
optimizing logistics routes, especially in Asia
supporting Marimekko’s partner suppliers in the
energy transition
In addition, the following planned actions are
estimated to have a medium emission reduction
potential (50–500 tCO2e reduction): further
increasing the share of recycled materials in materials
other than cotton and wool, increasing the share
of lower-emission packaging materials, reducing
e-commerce returns and taking used energy sources
into account when selecting new suppliers.
Some of the actions with high and medium
emission reduction potential listed above have
already been implemented or are underway. The
rest are planned to be implemented in 2025–2030,
i.e. during the target period of Marimekko’s science-
based climate targets. The feasibility, method and
schedule of the measures are assessed on a case-by-
case basis.
Marimekko has been advancing its material
strategy since 2021 and has made progress in
transitioning to its preferred materials, such as
organic, recycled, and innovative materials. The
progress is described in more detail in section
Actions. However, the transition in materials
continues, and the share of materials preferred by
Marimekko will continue to increase. The company
has been optimizing logistics routes for a long time,
but as business grows in Asia, there is still a need for
this. Marimekko has required its contractual partners
to favor renewable energy and strive for emission
reductions. The company is now investigating
concrete ways to support its partners in the transition
to renewable energy.
Marimekko has carried out a qualitative
assessment of the potential locked-in greenhouse gas
emissions of key assets and products. The company
owns one fossil-fuel-powered plant, the heating oil
boiler of the property in Kitee. However, the company
has decided to discontinue the use of fuel oil at the
Kitee property, which is why Marimekko estimates
that the achievement of its emission reduction targets
will not be compromised and that no transition risk
will arise.
During the reporting period, Marimekko did not
make any significant capital investments related
to coal, oil or gas-related economic activities.
Marimekko also made no capital investments related
to climate change mitigation during the reporting
period.
Marimekko is not excluded from the EU’s Paris-
aligned Benchmarks.
The transition plan has been approved by
the company’s Management Group and Board of
Directors. The transition plan has been worked on and
the costs or investment needs caused by the actions
have been assessed together with the members of
the Management Group, and they have been partially
taken into account in the company’s budget. The
member of the Management Group responsible for
preparing Marimekko’s business strategy is also
responsible for the transition plan. These actions are
aimed to ensure that the transition plan is aligned
with Marimekko’s business strategy. Any need for
changes in the company’s business strategy caused
by the transition plan will be assessed regularly in
connection with the updates to the transition plan.
In 2024, Marimekko had financial activities related
to climate change mitigation, which are described
in section Actions. Marimekko has no objectives
or plans to adapt its operations to comply with the
criteria set out in Commission Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2021/2139.
Sustainability report 2024
43Sustainability report 2024
ACTIONS
Marimekko’s most important climate change
mitigation measures are related to continuing the
material transition in line with Marimekko’s material
strategy, optimizing logistics, and transitioning to
renewable energy.
In 2024, Marimekko continued the work to
increase the share of lower-emission recycled
materials, organic materials, materials from
regenerative farming and innovative materials. In
2024, the share of recycled materials remained
nearly at the previous year’s level, being 20 percent
(21), the share of organic materials and materials
from regenerative farming increased to 39 percent
(20), and the share of new innovative materials
remained at 0 percent (0) of all sourced textile
materials. The remaining sourced textile materials
are classified by Marimekko as conventional or
conventional enhanced materials. The emission
intensity of Marimekko’s textile materials per
kilogram of sourced textiles decreased compared
to the previous year and was 21 percent lower
than in 2019, the base year of Marimekko’s target.
Marimekko thus achieved its emission target for
textile materials in 2024.
In 2024, Marimekko continued to optimize
logistics routes by increasing direct deliveries
from suppliers to wholesale customers in Asia and
opening new direct delivery routes to Korea and
Malaysia, which shortened transport routes and
thus reduced emissions from logistics. As the share
of emission-intensive air freight in Marimekko’s
shipments increased at the same time, the emission
intensity of Marimekko’s logistics per kilogram
of transported product increased compared
to the previous year. More information on the
development of the emissions intensity of logistics
and its reasons is provided in section Targets related
to climate change mitigation and adaptation.
The aforementioned climate change mitigation
measures do not cause capital expenditure.
Marimekko does not have a CapEx plan as referred to
in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.
Financial investments have been allocated to the
action related to the material transition described
above, which are reflected as part of product costs
in Marimekko’s operating expenditure and taken
into account in the company’s budget. However, the
additional costs of the material transition cannot
be separated from product costs as required by
the reporting standard. The company’s ability to
implement the material transition depends, to some
extent, on the availability and costs of lower-emission
materials.
More detailed information on Marimekko’s climate
change mitigation measures and planned measures
is presented in section Transition plan for climate
change mitigation.
Energy consumption and mix
Marimekko’s energy intensity (total energy
consumption per net sales) is presented in table
Energy intensity per net revenue. The energy
consumption in the entire Group’s own operations has
been taken into account in the calculation of energy
intensity, as the NACE code corresponding to the
Group’s main industry is 4771 (Retail sale of clothing),
which is classified as an industry with significant
climate impacts. The entire Group’s net sales, which
are presented under Net sales in the Report of the
Board of Directors, have therefore been used in
calculating the energy intensity.
ENERGY INTENSITY PER NET REVENUE
Comparative
(2023) 2024 % 2024/2023
Total energy consumption per net revenue from activities in high
climate impact sectors (MWh/M€)
39 40 +2%
TOTAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF MARIMEKKO’S OWN OPERATIONS
Energy consumption and mix
Comparative
(2023)
2024
Fuel consumption from coal and coal products (MWh) 0 0
Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products (MWh) 336 349
Fuel consumption from natural gas (MWh) 0 0
Fuel consumption from other fossil sources (MWh) 0 0
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, or cooling from fossil
sources (MWh)
102 110
Total fossil energy consumption (MWh) 438 459
Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption (%) 6% 6%
Consumption from nuclear sources (MWh) 58 34
Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption (%) 1% 0%
Fuel consumption for renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial
and municipal waste of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) (MWh)
3,786 4,265
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from
renewable sources (MWh)
2,436 2,455
The consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy (MWh) 156 152
Total renewable energy consumption (MWh) 6,378 6,872
Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption (%) 93% 93%
Total energy consumption (MWh) 6,874 7,365
44Sustainability report 2024
Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
The table Marimekko’s GHG emissions (Scopes 1–3) presents Marimekko’s Scope 1–3 greenhouse gas
emissions for all emission categories relevant to Marimekko’s operations. Marimekko’s Scope 3 emissions
calculation includes all emission categories except categories 10 (processing of sold products), 13
(downstream leased assets) and 15 (investments), as they are not relevant to Marimekko’s operations.
MARIMEKKO’S GHG EMISSIONS (SCOPES 1–3)
Retrospective Target years
Base year (2022) Comparative (2023) 2024 % 2024/2023 2030
Annual % target/
base year
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions (tCO2eq) 109 124 105 -15% - -
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% - -
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq) 282 279 274 -2% - -
Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq) 81 79 98 +23% - -
Significant Scope 3 GHG emissions
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO2eq) 68,302 50,119 51,110 +2% - -
1. Purchased goods and services 33,368 26,021 29,837 +15% - -
2. Capital goods 360 366 476 +30% - -
3. Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) 276 249 215 -14% - -
4. Upstream transportation and distribution 4,372 3,647 4,138 +13% - -
5. Waste generated in operations 19 14 26 +87% - -
6. Business traveling 274 596 757 +27% - -
7. Employee commuting 240 394 423 +7% - -
8. Upstream leased assets 134 132 310 +134% - -
9. Downstream transportation 2,390 1,800 2,054 +14% - -
11. Use of sold products 26,063 15,985 12,478 -22% - -
12. End-of-life treatment of sold products 75 52 16 -70% - -
14. Franchising 730 863 380 -56% - -
Total GHG emissions
Total GHG emissions (location-based) (tCO2eq) 68,693 50,522 51,489 +2% - -
Total GHG emissions (market-based) (tCO2eq) 68,492 50,323 51,313 +2% - -
45
Marimekko’s biogenic emissions in 2024 were
850 tCO2e (754). Biogenic emissions increased by
13 percent year-on-year due to increased production
and biogas consumption of Marimekko’s own
printing factory. The biogenic emissions of indirect
emissions of purchased energy (Scope 2) or other
indirect emissions (Scope 3) have not been calculated
separately, as no information on the share of biogenic
emissions was available. The calculation therefore
assumes that the indirect emissions of purchased
energy and other indirect emissions are entirely fossil
emissions.
In connection with the calculation of emissions
in 2024, a methodological change was made to the
calculation of market-based Scope 2 emissions, the
impact of which on the Scope 1+2 emissions in the
base year 2022 of Marimekko’s target was more
than 5 percent, i.e. above the threshold of change
considered significant by Marimekko. For this reason,
the same methodological change was also made to
the calculation of market-based Scope 2 emissions for
2022–2023. In the change, the source of the emission
factors for purchased energy was changed to country-
specific residual mix emission factors when no energy
company-specific emission factor was available.
Previously, the emission factors used in location-
based calculations had been used in corresponding
situations. The change is aligned with the GHG
Protocol guidelines. Due to the change, the market-
based Scope 2 emissions for 2022–2023 differ from
the figures previously reported by the company.
Some methodological changes were also made
to the calculation of Scope 3 emissions in 2024, and
the calculation of emissions in 2022–2023 has been
subsequently adjusted due to their significance or
instructions received from the Science Based Targets
initiative. This makes Marimekko’s science-based
Scope 3 emissions target base year 2022 comparable
with subsequent years. The biggest change is the
inclusion of land use sector emissions in the calculation
of Scope 3 Category 1 (purchased goods and services)
starting from 2022, which increased Category 1
emissions. Another significant change is the transfer
of emissions from Marimekko’s distribution center
and e-commerce warehouses as well as from
distribution transports from Category 9 (downstream
transportation) to Category 4 (upstream transportation
and distribution) from 2022 onwards. The change did
not affect the total emissions of transportation and
distribution, but increased Category 4 emissions and
correspondingly reduced Category 9 emissions. The
calculation of Category 12 (end-of-life treatment of
sold products) has been changed for 2022–2023 so
that the emission factor for the treatment of mixed
waste has been updated from the Finnish emission
factor to a Defra factor that is more representative
of the global situation. In addition, a minor calculation
error in the 2022 Category 14 (franchising) emissions
was corrected in the calculation. Due to the above-
mentioned changes, Marimekko’s Scope 3 emissions
for 2022–2023 deviate somewhat from the company’s
previously reported figures.
The greenhouse gas emissions intensity per net
sales is presented in table GHG intensity per net
revenue.
GHG INTENSITY PER NET REVENUE
Comparative
(2023) 2024 % 2024/2023
Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue
(tCO2eq/M€)
290 282 -3%
Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue
(tCO2eq/M€)
289 281 -3%
The net sales presented in section Net sales of
the Report of the Board of Directors have been used
in calculating the greenhouse gas emissions intensity.
GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed
through carbon credits
During the reporting year, Marimekko has not
allocated significant funding to projects aimed
at climate change mitigation or greenhouse gas
removals in the company’s own operations, value
chain or outside the value chain.
REPORTING PRINCIPLES FOR METRICS
Calculation of Scope 1–3 emissions
Greenhouse gas emissions are presented for the
entire Marimekko Group. Marimekko calculates its
greenhouse gas emissions on a calendar year basis
in accordance with the GHG Protocol standards.
The standards used include the GHG Protocol
Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard,
Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and
Reporting Standard and GHG Protocol Land Sector
and Removals Guidance. Greenhouse gas emissions
are presented in tons of carbon dioxide equivalents
and are calculated taking into account the following
greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PCFs), sulfur hexafluoride
(SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).
Some methodological changes were made to the
calculation of Scope 1–3 greenhouse gas emissions in
2024, which did not have a significant impact on the
total emissions, and thus no changes were made to
the calculation of the company’s emission target base
year 2022. Since 2024, the biogenic emissions of
petrol and diesel have been added to the Scope 1
calculation, as fuels are subject to the distribution
obligation in Finland. Since 2024, Category 14 has
been calculated on the basis of the assumption that
retailer-owned stores in Asia do not have district
heating due to the fact that the majority of stores are
unlikely to have heating due to the warmer climate. As
of 2024, only the electricity consumption of retailer-
owned stores has hence been taken into account in
the calculation of Category 14.
Scope 3 Category 1 land-use sector emissions
calculation takes into account emissions from
land use and land-use change. Land-use change
emissions have been calculated by considering the
2–3 most significant countries of origin of the sourced
materials, for which land-use change emissions have
been calculated on the basis of country-specific
information, and for materials sourced from other
countries of origin (or if the country of origin is
unknown), the assumption of the country of origin
has been made in the calculation, applying the
precautionary principle.
The data used in the calculation of greenhouse
gas emissions comes from, among other things,
Marimekko’s service providers (e.g. energy and
biogas consumption data and emission factors),
logistics partners (emission reports, delivery data,
and data on energy consumption of warehouses),
partner suppliers (e.g. emission factors of ceramics
and some textile materials, such as cupro and
Sustainability report 2024
46
traceable leather, as well as data on emissions arising
from the sewing of Marimekko’s products), from
Marimekko’s own systems (e.g. quantities of materials
procured and cost information), from Marimekko’s
employees (emissions from commuting have been
determined by means of a survey) and from several
databases (e.g. Higg MSI 3.9.1, which collects
environmental impact information on materials,
available at app.worldly.io, and the emission factors of
the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs (Defra), available at Greenhouse gas reporting:
conversion factors 2024 – GOV.UK). Approximately
24 percent of the reported scope 3 emissions in 2024
have been calculated based on primary information
from Marimekko’s suppliers and other partners. The
figure only includes those emissions for which there is
primary data both for activities and emission factors.
The calculation of greenhouse gas emissions from
the manufacture of Marimekko’s products is based
on energy consumption and emissions data collected
from Marimekko’s tier 1 suppliers in an annual survey.
The results of the 2023 survey have been used in
the calculation for 2024, as newer data was not yet
available. The survey results for the years in question
have been used in the calculation of emissions for
2022 and 2023. As data was not obtained from
all suppliers, the result has been extrapolated to
represent all suppliers based on the weight of
products purchased from the suppliers.
The Scope 1–3 emissions have been calculated
by a third party but have not been validated by other
external parties. The GHG intensity per net revenue
has not been validated by an external party.
Calculation of Marimekko’s emission targets
Marimekko’s target for Scope 1 and 2 emissions
is calculated as the sum of Scope 1 emissions
and market-based Scope 2 emissions. The target
boundary includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions. The
economic intensity target for Marimekko’s Scope
3 emissions is calculated by dividing the Scope 3
emissions in tons of carbon dioxide equivalents by
the added value, which is the sum of EBITDA and
personnel costs in millions of euros. The target covers
all of the company’s Scope 3 emissions, excluding
emissions from the use of sold products (Scope 3,
Category 11). The target boundary includes emissions
from the land use sector. Both Scope 1 and 2 as well
as Scope 3 emission reduction targets cover land-
related emissions and removals from bioenergy
feedstocks. The base year and target year levels for
Scope 1–2 and Scope 3 have been validated by a third
party (the Science Based Targets initiative).
The greenhouse gas emissions intensity of
textile materials per kilogram of sourced textiles is
calculated by Marimekko and is based on emission
factors obtained from the Higg MSI 3.9.1 database.
The intensity is calculated by dividing the cradle-to-
gate emissions from the production of purchased
textiles (part of Scope 3, Category 1)
by the total amount of textiles purchased during
the reporting period, which is the weight of ordered
textile products (kg) with a planned delivery date
in the reporting year. Marimekko has only included
emissions from the land-use sector comprehensively
in the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions
since 2022, and the change in textile emissions is
significant to the extent that the new sources of
emissions from the land use sector included in the
calculation (mainly land-use change emissions) have
not been taken into account in the calculation of
the emission intensity of textile materials in order to
maintain comparability with the target base year. The
greenhouse gas emissions intensity of Marimekko’s
textile materials has not been validated by an external
party.
The emission intensity of logistics presented
in the Actions section is calculated by dividing the
greenhouse gas emissions from logistics paid by
Marimekko (emissions included in Scope 3 Category
4, upstream transportation and distribution) by the
total amount of ordered products (kg) with a planned
delivery date in the reporting year. As of 2022,
emissions from Marimekko’s distribution center
and e-commerce warehouses as well as delivery
transports from them have been added to Category 4
emissions, which increases the emission intensity of
logistics and weakens the comparability of 2022–
2024 with previous years to some extent. However,
the change is not significant. The metric has not been
validated by an external party.
Total energy consumption
The reporting boundaries for total energy
consumption are consistent with the reporting
of Scope 1 and 2 emissions. The total energy
consumption includes the consumption of fuels
purchased by Marimekko and the consumption of
electricity and heat purchased and generated by
Marimekko worldwide. The origin of purchased
electricity and heat is divided into consumption
from renewable sources, nuclear sources and fossil
sources in accordance with Marimekko’s contracts. In
some cases, the exact electricity origin mix was not
available from the energy utility in question, in which
case information on the country-specific residual
mix was used. The calculation method for 2023 has
been adjusted to be consistent with the calculation
for 2024, which is why the energy consumption data
for 2023 differs slightly from the figures previously
reported by the company. In some cases, accurate
information on electricity consumption was not
obtained, in which case electricity consumption was
estimated based on the surface area of the premises
in question using Motiva Oy’s conversion factors. The
consumption of fossil fuels in megawatt hours has
been calculated by converting the consumption from
units of volume to megawatt hours using fuel-specific
density values and default lower effective heating
values. The fuel classification published by Statistics
Finland for the latest available year was used as the
source of these conversion factors (for 2023–2024,
2023 factors were used). Marimekko’s total energy
consumption and energy intensity per net revenue
have not been validated by an external party.
Sustainability report 2024
47
E3 – WATER AND MARINE RESOURCES
IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF
MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Marimekko has assessed the impacts, risks and
opportunities related to water and marine resources
as part of the double materiality analysis related to
its sustainability reporting. The emerged material
topics included both positive and negative impacts.
The double materiality analysis process and material
impacts are presented in section ESRS 2 – General
disclosures under Identification and assessment of
material impacts, risks, and opportunities.
Water-related risks and opportunities have
also been identified and assessed in a separate
risk assessment as part of the company’s risk
management process. Risks related to water
resources are identified and assessed annually by
Marimekko’s Sustainability team, and Marimekko’s
Management Group reviews the most significant
identified risks annually as part of the company’s risk
management process.
Marimekko uses two time horizons for water-
related risk assessment: risks until 2030 (short and
medium term) and risks beyond 2030 (long term).
The risk assessment covers both Marimekko’s own
operations and assets as well as the value chain,
focusing on the risks in the upstream value chain.
The most significant water risks facing Marimekko
are related to the adequacy of water in the upstream
value chain, especially in the cultivation of agricultural
raw materials, but also in the textile manufacturing
process. Global warming can increase water scarcity,
which can reduce the availability of raw materials and
increase raw material prices and production costs or
disrupt production processes, especially in areas of
high water stress. In addition, the increasing scarcity
of water resources may impair access to clean drinking
water and sanitation, especially for Marimekko’s
value chain workers. In the long term, these risks will
increase. No significant water risks related to own
operations have been identified. No stakeholder
consultations have been organized to identify water-
related risks and opportunities.
The most significant opportunities related to
water include, for example, reducing the use of virgin
raw materials, which reduces dependence on water-
intensive agricultural raw materials, and reducing the
use of water-intensive cotton.
POLICIES
Marimekko’s environmental work is guided by
Marimekko’s sustainability strategy and related action
plan. The Marimekko Code of Conduct covers the
principles for the use of water in both the company’s
own operations and those of its partner suppliers.
The company’s sustainability strategy sets a target
related to the water scarcity score of sourced textile
materials, which guides operations. The company aims
to reduce the intensity of water use in the upstream
value chain by favoring less water-intensive materials.
Marimekko’s Supplier Code of Conduct includes
requirements related to water use and wastewater
for Marimekko’s partner suppliers. In order to prevent
and reduce the pollution of water bodies, Marimekko
requires that partner suppliers ensure the adequate
and appropriate treatment of wastewater and that
suppliers continuously strive to improve the efficiency
of water use. The quality of wastewater is monitored
regularly at the company’s own textile printing
factory in accordance with the environmental permit
conditions, and wastewater is treated at a municipal
wastewater treatment plant. More information on
the content of the Code of Conduct is available
in sections ESRS 2 – General information under
Sustainability governance and G1 – Business
conduct under Policies.
TARGETS RELATED TO WATER AND MARINE
RESOURCES
Marimekko’s target is to reduce the water scarcity
score of sourced textile materials by 50 percent
per kilogram of sourced textiles by the end of 2025
compared to 2019. The baseline score for 2019 was
41.4, so the target level by the end of 2025 is 20.7.
The target is relative, as the water scarcity score
is measured in relation to the sourced kilograms of
textiles. The target is voluntary and applies to the
upstream value chain and is not a science-based
nature target.
The target is related to both water consumption
and water risks, as the water scarcity score of
textile materials takes into account the blue water
consumption in the cradle-to-gate production of
textiles (from raw material to finished fabric) and
the water scarcity of the region where the water is
consumed. Ecological thresholds or the definition of
community-specific shares have not been considered
in setting the target, and Marimekko’s external
stakeholders have not been engaged in setting it.
During the target period, one methodological
change related to the metric describing water
scarcity was made. From 2022, the material-specific
water scarcity scores used in calculating the metric
have considered which product types are only dyed
on average and which are both dyed and printed. This
methodological change has a very small impact on
the annual water scarcity score of textile materials, so
the results for different years are comparable despite
the change. No other changes have been made to
the target or its metric or the methods or sources
underlying the metric.
In 2024, the water scarcity score of textile
materials sourced by Marimekko per kilogram of
sourced textiles was 9.8 (27.8), which is 76 percent
lower than in 2019. The decrease in the score was
mainly due to the lower water scarcity score of Better
Cotton, which was driven by a regular update of the
factors in the Higg MSI database in December 2024,
as well as an increase in the share of organic cotton to
52 percent (29) of all cotton sourced. Marimekko thus
achieved the target set for water scarcity score.
Marimekko does not have a target related to
the water consumption of its own operations, but
Marimekko strives to use water efficiently in its own
operations and monitors the water consumption and
water consumption intensity of the head office and its
own textile printing factory.
ACTIONS
In line with its material strategy, Marimekko aims to
increase the share of less water-intensive organic and
recycled materials as well as new innovative materials
of all sourced materials. In 2024, 20 percent of the
textile materials sourced by Marimekko were recycled
materials (21) and 39 percent were organic and
regenerative materials (20). According to Marimekko’s
own classification, the remaining materials were
conventional and conventional enhanced materials.
Actions related to reducing the water use intensity
of materials are also indirectly linked to areas at water
risk, as Marimekko monitors its progress with the
water scarcity score of textile materials. This score
takes into account both the consumption of blue
water in the cradle-to-gate production of textiles
and the water scarcity of the region where water is
consumed.
Sustainability report 2024
48
In addition to material choices, Marimekko aims to
reduce the water use intensity of textile production
by utilizing water-saving production technologies.
In 2024, for example, laser and ozone technologies
were used to create patterns, wear and finishes
for Marimekko Maridenim products, which use less
water than conventional manufacturing methods.
The actions mentioned are related to the mitigation
hierarchy level “Reduction of the use of water
resources”.
The actions listed above are global, as Marimekko
sources raw materials from and manufactures
products in several different countries. The
actions apply to the upstream value chain and own
operations. The actions apply directly to the farmers
of the raw materials for textile materials used by
Marimekko and Marimekko’s partner suppliers, and
indirectly to those communities whose water supply
is located in the same areas as the water supply
of the raw material farmers and factories used by
Marimekko.
Marimekko has no specific activities or resources
allocated to marine resources.
Water consumption
Marimekko uses water in its own textile printing
factory mainly for steam production and for
washing fabrics and tools. In addition, water is used
as domestic and sanitary water at Marimekko’s
headquarters, other offices and stores.
Marimekko’s total water consumption in 2024
was 716 cubic meters. The total water consumption
is a theoretical estimate made by Marimekko, which
includes the water evaporated in the processes using
steam at the textile printing factory and the water
consumed with food and drink in the head office and
canteen located in the same property. Marimekko’s
water intensity, i.e. total water consumption per net
sales, was 3.9 cubic meters per million EUR in 2024.
The total water withdrawal of Marimekko’s own
textile printing factory and head office in 2024
was 22,432 cubic meters (21,422). The total water
withdrawal includes all water withdrawn from the
water supply network for the textile printing factory
and the head office.
In Marimekko’s own textile printing factory,
water is recycled in the washing of the rotary and
flatbed printing machines. The amount of recycled
and reused water in 2024 was 673 cubic meters
(643). The figure is a theoretical estimate made by
Marimekko, based on the total water withdrawal
and an estimate of the proportion of recycled water
obtained from the employees of the printing factory.
Marimekko does not store water.
The water withdrawn for Marimekko’s own textile
printing factory and head office is purchased from
the Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority
(HSY), and it is surface water from Lake Päijänne.
Päijänne is located in an area of low water stress
and low overall water risk, so all water consumption
reported by Marimekko concerns an area with low
water risk.
Domestic water used at Marimekko’s other
locations, i.e. stores and offices, is not included in
the reported total water consumption or total water
withdrawal, as data on the water consumption of all
locations is not available. The other locations are
located in river basins with a physical and regulatory
water risk that ranges from very low to moderate.
The water risk associated with the reputation of the
river basins varies from low to very high. However,
as the water consumption at these locations is
minor, Marimekko does not have significant water
withdrawal or consumption in areas with high water
risk or high water stress.
Marimekko monitors the water consumption of
sourced textiles in the upstream value chain. The
target and metric for sourced textiles is described
in more detail under Targets related to water and
marine resources. In other respects, the company
does not measure or monitor water consumption in
the upstream or downstream value chain, particularly
because it is difficult to obtain reliable information on
water consumption.
REPORTING PRINCIPLES FOR METRICS
Marimekko has calculated the water scarcity score
of sourced textile materials for 2024 using material-
specific water scarcity scores from the Higg
MSI 3.9.1 database and data from the company’s
systems on the volumes of textile materials sourced
by the company. Water scarcity scores from the
Higg MSI database are based on the AWARE LCIA
methodology. The Higg MSI database is available
at app.worldly.io. The water scarcity score of
Marimekko’s sourced textile materials has not been
validated by an external party.
Marimekko’s total water consumption is a
theoretical estimate made by Marimekko based on
the total water withdrawal of the company’s own
textile printing factory and head office, an estimate
of the amount of water evaporated in the printing
processes and an estimate of the domestic water
consumption based on the number of visitors to the
head office and canteen. The estimate of the amount
of water evaporated in the printing processes has
been obtained from Marimekko’s printing factory
employees and Marimekko’s partner responsible
for the operation of the steam boiler. The estimate
of the number of daily visitors to the head office
and canteen is based on observations made by
Marimekko and the head office restaurant operator.
The estimates of the domestic water used at the
head office and in the canteen per visitor are made by
Marimekko. Marimekko’s water intensity is calculated
by dividing the estimated total water consumption
by the net sales for the reporting period. The metrics
have not been validated by an external party.
The water withdrawal in 2023 differs from the
previously reported figure (21,294 cubic meters),
as the total water withdrawal was obtained from a
different source at that time. The water withdrawal
in 2023 has now been adjusted to be comparable
with the water withdrawal in 2024. The total water
withdrawal figure is obtained from the property’s
usage monitoring report prepared by an external
party. The water withdrawal reading in the usage
monitoring report is based on the property’s water
meter.
The amount of water recycled and reused in
Marimekko’s own operations is an estimate made
by Marimekko based on the total water withdrawal
of the company’s own textile printing factory and
head office, as well as an estimate of the proportion
of recycled water obtained from Marimekko’s
employees. The metric has not been validated by an
external party.
The assessment of the water risk in the area from
which HSY withdraws the water used by Marimekko’s
textile printing factory and head office is based on
the Aqueduct 4.0 service, which is available at
https://www.wri.org/applications/aqueduct/.
The estimate of the water risk in the river basins
where Marimekko’s other own operations are located
is based on the WWF Water Risk Filter tool, which is
available at https://riskfilter.org/water.
Sustainability report 2024
49
S – SOCIAL INFORMATION
S1 – OWN WORKFORCE
IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF
MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Marimekko has assessed the impacts, risks and
opportunities related to its own workforce as part
of the double materiality analysis carried out in
conjunction with its sustainability reporting. The
analysis utilized, for example, the human rights impact
assessment carried out by the company in 2022 on its
own workforce, which covered all of the company’s
personnel groups, i.e. the textile printing factory, stores
and offices in every country in which it operates.
The company did not identify any material themes
exceeding the set threshold related to the company’s
own workforce in its double materiality analysis. The
sub-topics with the highest value in the analysis,
all of which are positive impacts, are considered as
material sub-topics in the reporting. These sub-
topics are presented in section ESRS 2 – General
disclosures under Identification and assessment of
material impacts, risks, and opportunities. As a rule,
the identified impacts apply to all of the company’s
own workforce and do not primarily concern a specific
personnel group.
Marimekko assesses the special needs of
different groups on a case-by-case basis. Potential
needs may emerge in addition to direct feedback,
for example, through the company’s employee
engagement surveys or reports of misconduct,
as raised by employee representatives or in the
preparation of the annual plan regarding diversity,
equity and inclusion.
Marimekko does not have own workforce in
countries that have been identified as high-risk areas
and there is no risk of child or forced labor associated
with its own workforce.
With regard to possible epidemics or pandemics,
the employees of Marimekko’s textile printing factory
and stores are seen to be in a particularly vulnerable
position, among other things, because on-site work
is emphasized in the work. The risk of occupational
accidents is also seen to be greater in the textile
printing factory, for example, related to the operation
of equipment and the use of chemicals.
POLICIES
Marimekko is committed to promoting human
rights, living wages, employee empowerment and
safe working conditions. The company’s ways of
working are based on its values and Marimekko
Code of Conduct, which follows the ten principles
of the United Nations Global Compact. The content
of the Code of Conduct is described in more detail
in sections ESRS 2 – General information under
Sustainability governance and G1 – Business
conduct under Policies.
The company’s human rights practices are based
on the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business
and Human Rights (UNGP). The company respects
internationally recognized human rights in accordance
with the United Nations International Bill of Human
Rights and the International Labour Organization’s
Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at
Work and the core conventions that underpin it.
The company respects its employees’ freedom
of association, right to collective bargaining and
the national regulations on working hours. A large
proportion of Marimekko’s employees are in Finland
and other countries where, for example, the statutory
requirements regarding working conditions, such
as reasonable working hours, annual leave, parental
leave and part-time work, are high-quality. More
than 80 percent of the company’s employees are in
Finland. Marimekko respects children’s rights and has
zero tolerance for the use of child or forced labor or
human trafficking.
At Marimekko, all employees are paid adequate
wages in accordance with the applicable benchmarks.
Marimekko pays all employees covered by collective
agreements at least the minimum wage as specified
in the collective agreements, which is in accordance
with the minimum wage set in accordance with
Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament
and of the Council. Outside the EEA, rewarding in
accordance with local legislation is applied in relation
to adequate pay.
Marimekko has guidelines and processes to
provide an inspiring and caring workplace. They
cover topics such as occupational health and safety,
well-being at work, employee engagement and
performance. In addition, the company prepares
annually a diversity, equity and inclusion plan. The
company has a work community development plan
covering learning and professional development.
The company has no specific commitments
related to principles that concern those who are in
a particularly vulnerable position. In addition to the
broad application of the Marimekko Code of Conduct,
the company takes into account, for example,
possible feedback related to persons in vulnerable
positions in the preparation of the annually updated
diversity, equity and inclusion plan and related
measures.
Diversity, equity and inclusion
Marimekko’s corporate culture and working
environment are founded on equality, valuing
diversity, and inclusion. The company wants to
provide a safe, caring, communal and respectful
working environment for all its employees. Among
other things, Marimekko Code of Conduct includes
zero tolerance for all forms of discrimination,
and the company does not tolerate any form of
discrimination based on, for example, gender, gender
identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, age,
origin, nationality, language, religion, conviction,
opinion, political activity, trade union activity, family
relationships, health, disability or discrimination
or other inappropriate treatment based on
other personal ground. Both direct and indirect
discrimination or other inappropriate treatment are
prohibited regardless of whether they are based
on a fact or an assumption concerning the person
themselves or someone else. The process of
implementing any measures related to discrimination
or other inappropriate treatment immediately upon
observation is described in G1 – Business conduct
under Mechanisms for identifying, reporting and
investigating concerns.
Marimekko’s equality plan is the basis for
promoting equality in the company and success is
measured through the results of employee surveys,
among other things. The company’s Diversity, Equity
and Inclusion (DEI) Foundational Principles are the
framework for the annually updated Diversity, Equity
and Inclusion Plan, covering both Marimekko’s DEI
measures and the related key performance indicators.
The company prepares annually a work
community development plan and an equality and
non-discrimination plan as required by Finnish law.
In addition, the company has an equality working
group in Finland, which includes occupational safety
and health deputy delegates and shop stewards
of each personnel group as well as the employer’s
representatives. The equality working group
participates in the annual updating of the above
mentioned plans.
Sustainability report 2024
50Sustainability report 2024
Occupational health and safety
Marimekko’s policies and management system
for preventing work-related accidents consist of
different levels of entities. The company’s well-being
at work and the promotion of work ability are guided
by the Code of Conduct. Marimekko promotes the
well-being of personnel by, among other things,
supporting its employees’ physical and mental
health, work ability and functional capacity, and by
ensuring an empowering working atmosphere. This
work is done in close cooperation with occupational
health care, the People & Culture team, managers
and the occupational safety organization. In Finland,
the company has in use an early support model that
is aimed at improving work ability and workplace
well-being. Marimekko’s entire own workforce was
covered by the company’s occupational health and
safety management system in both 2023 and 2024.
In Finland, Marimekko’s occupational safety is
guided by the company’s general safety instructions
as well as the property safety instructions, such as
the fire and rescue instructions, of each location. As
preventive occupational safety measures, hazards
and risks related to work are identified and assessed.
This helps the company to prevent accidents and
near misses. The company also ensures that the
work environment is safe and ergonomic, and that
appropriate tools and protective equipment are used.
Marimekko’s safety management system takes
into account the legislation of each country, such as
the Finnish Occupational Safety and Health Act. In
Finland, Marimekko offers its employees occupational
health care beyond the statutory requirements and, in
other countries where it has its own employees, offers
an occupational health benefit in accordance with
local market practice.
Engaging with own workforce and workers
representatives about impacts and processes to
remediate negative impacts
Marimekko complies with local labor laws and
applicable collective agreements in all of its countries
of operation. Collective cooperation is carried out
in accordance with the local legislation of each
countries. The aim of the collective cooperation is to
develop the company’s operations and the personnel’s
opportunities to influence the company’s decision-
making regarding their work, working conditions and
position in the company. In addition to the collective
agreements in Finland, the company complies with
two local collective agreements in Sweden and
operates in accordance with the General Retail
Industry Award guidelines and regulation in Australia.
In Finland, collective cooperation with Marimekko’s
employee representatives is active and exceeds the
scope set out in the Finnish Act on Co-operation
in Undertakings. Marimekko’s Chief People Officer
has the overall responsibility for ensuring that the
cooperation has been carried out in accordance with
the Finnish Act on Co-operation in Undertakings.
As part of the collective cooperation in Finland,
the personnel cooperation committee meets four
times a year. In addition to the Chief People Officer,
the committee includes President and CEO, Chief
Financial Officer and employee representatives.
The meetings discuss topical matters, such as
the development of the company’s business, the
impact of sustainability measures on personnel and
the themes proposed by the quarterly convening
personnel cooperation working group.
The above-mentioned parties are responsible
for their part for the operational implementation
of the collective cooperation. If development or
KEY FIGURES RELATED TO OWN WORKFORCE
Gender
Number of employees
(head count) 2024
Male 66
Female 611
Other -
Not reported -
Total employees 677
Country
Finland 544
2024 2023
Of the total number of employees (head count)
under 30 years of age (head count / %) 197 / 29 189 / 29
aged 30–50 (head count / %) 364 / 54 353 / 54
over 50 years of age (head count / %) 116 / 17 112 / 17
Employee turnover
Employees who have left, head count 85 78
Average turnover, total personnel, % 16.7 18.5
Occupational accidents
 Work-related accidents, Finland 8 12
 Fatal work-related accidents, entire company 0 0
Diversity
 Number of men and women in top management (Management Group) 1 / 10 0 / 10
 Ratio of men to women in top management (Management Group; %) 9 / 91 0 / 100
Family leaves
 Share of employees entitled to family-related leave, % 100 100
Marimekko's personnel headcount by market area can be found from ESRS 2 – General information under Strategy and business model.
change needs arise in the collective cooperation,
discussions on the necessary changes are held
directly and carried out together with the employee
representatives. In addition, the company engages in
regular dialogue to resolve personnel-related matters
or make information about them to flow easily.
The needs regarding employees in a particularly
vulnerable position are always addressed as
necessary, for example, on the basis of the results
of employee engagement surveys or otherwise on
the basis of direct feedback received from employee
representatives.
51Sustainability report 2024
The company assesses the effectiveness of its
engagement with its personnel by means of bi-annually
conducted employee engagement surveys, through
which the company obtains information from different
parts of the organization about matters of relevance
to employees. In addition, the whistleblowing channel
open to employees is an important feedback channel.
Collective cooperation, employee engagement surveys
and the whistleblowing channel also enable raising
matters related to compliance with human rights
policy commitments. The procedures for dealing with
the issues raised or the related communication with
persons of own workforce vary depending on the
topic. The whistleblowing channel, raising concerns
and handling of reports, including possible corrective
actions, are described in more detail in section G1 –
Business conduct under Mechanisms for identifying,
reporting and investigating concerns.
ACTIONS
Marimekko’s SCALE strategy, business model and
corporate culture create opportunities and positive
impacts for the company’s employees in the form of
both career and development opportunities.
Reflecting the themes that have emerged
as material impacts, Marimekko invests, e.g.,
in personnel training, succession planning and
performance management, which support the
company’s profitability and business continuity. In
addition, the company invests in the continuous
development of the employee experience by,
for example, developing the leadership culture,
managerial work as well as processes and systems.
The development of leadership and managerial
work and, for example, people processes is
continuous, but their focuses and scopes vary
annually. In 2024, the renewal of the onboarding
process continued and the outputs of the first
development phase were launched. The second
phase of the development work was also started
during the year. More information on the development
of the onboarding processes can be found in G1
– Business conduct under Code of Conduct and
corporate culture. The section also covers the
development of the feedback culture.
Marimekko trains its personnel on people
processes. Training on these topics is offered, for
example, on the performance management process
and other topical themes. People managers are also
continuously offered customizable support regarding
the processes or other personnel matters.
Work on diversity, equity and inclusion contributes
to building the employee experience. The measures
of the annually created DEI plan, such as training,
apply to the entire personnel or its employee groups
based on the needs that have arisen, for example,
through the results of employee engagement surveys
or other feedback. Some of the actions are recurring
or continuous in nature unless the need for them
changes. More information on Marimekko’s DEI work
can be found in G1 – Business conduct under Code of
Conduct and corporate culture.
At Marimekko, employees are regularly trained
related to occupational safety. The company ensures
that the employees have the appropriate competence
to perform their duties. The company’s employees
are under an obligation to report any safety-related
problems or shortcomings. In Finland, employees
report their safety observations through a joint
system. Marimekko regularly monitors reported
observations and work-related accidents and takes
necessary corrective measures based on them.
Marimekko carries out regular risk assessments
in stores, the textile printing factory and offices
in Finland, collects information and feedback
through employee engagement and leadership
surveys and works in close cooperation with
employee representatives in Finland. The employee
METRICS RELATED TO MARIMEKKO’S OWN WORKFORCE
Metric Description Evaluation of impact 2024 2023
Employee Net Promoter Score
(eNPS), range of results -100–100
Measures the commitment of employees and their willingness to recommend the company.
The full-year result takes into account the weighted eNPS result of the two employee
engagement surveys conducted within the year.
Actions are implemented based on the results. The results are reviewed at company, market area,
function, team or other similar levels in accordance with the process. 28 30
Leadership KPIs: Total result,
office employees
Measures the quality of leadership and managerial work of office employees globally. The
result is obtained by means of a survey conducted once a year. Results on a scale of 1–5
(Strongly disagree; Strongly agree).
Managers implement actions based on their results and plan actions also with the People & Culture
team. More extensive actions are taken into account, for example, in the training offering or performance
management model.
4.2 4.3
Leadership KPIs: Total result,
retail
Measures the quality of leadership and managerial work of store managers globally. The result
is obtained by means of a survey conducted once a year. Results on a scale of 1–5 (Strongly
disagree; Strongly agree).
Same as above. Possible actions are implemented for example with the market area’s retail management.
4.2 4.3
Sick leaves, % Applies to employees in Finland. An overview of sick leaves is discussed with the occupational health and safety committee. The People
& Culture team has the main responsibility for the actions in cooperation with the Finland’s occupational
health service provider.
2.8 3.1
Number of work-related accidents Applies to employees in Finland. In Finland, the occupational health and safety committee handles work-related accidents and implements
actions in cooperation with the occupational health service provider and the People & Culture team.
8 12
The company’s Management Group defines the target levels and reviews the results of the metrics and the effectiveness of the actions. The target levels of the metrics will be defined in 2025. The results of the employee Net Promoter Score are also covered by the
Board of Directors of Marimekko.
52Sustainability report 2024
SHARE OF EMPLOYEES COVERED BY COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS
Collective bargaining coverage Social dialogue
Coverage rate
Employees – EEA
(countries with more than 50 employees
representing more than 10% of the total number
of employees)
Employees – Non-EEA
(estimate for regions with more than 50
employees representing more than 10% of the total
number of employees)
Workplace representation (EEA only)
(for countries with more than 50 employees
representing more than 10% of the total
number of employees)
0–19%
20–39%
40–59%
60–79% Finland Finland
80–100%
engagement surveys are conducted twice a year
and the survey on leadership and managerial work
is carried out once a year as part of the Maripeople
performance management process.
As described above, the company’s actions
related to material impacts on its own workforce are
by nature, for example, continuous development work
related to processes, ways of working, organizational
culture as well as leadership and managerial work.
The company monitors the data presented in the
Metrics related to Marimekko’s own workforce table
annually as part of its impacts.
The number of complaints and cases of severe
human rights incidents filed through channels for
personnel in the undertaking’s own workforce are
reported in G1 – Business Conduct in table Key
figures related to ethical business practices.
Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
At Marimekko, the percentage of employees covered
by collective agreements is 67 percent (68). In
Finland, this ratio is 78 percent (78). In addition, in
Finland 75 percent (78) of employees have workplace
representation. The other countries do not have more
than 10 percent of the total number of employees or
more than 50 employees required for reporting.
The company has no agreements with employees
of the company on representation by a European
Works Council (EWC), a Societas Europaea (SE)
Works Council or a Societas Cooperativa Europaea
(SCE) Works Council.
REPORTING PRINCIPLES FOR METRICS
Metrics related to Marimekko’s own workforce
Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) takes into
account the results of the two surveys during the
same reporting year. The number of responses is
taken into account in the calculation, i.e. the result is
weighted. The numbers used in the calculation are
from the system of an external partner.
Leadership KPI total results (office employees
& retail) take into account the results for the
five statements. Following the 2023 results, one
statement was revised for 2024 and another one was
replaced. However, the total results are comparable
between these years as they represent the overall
success of leadership and managerial work against
the defined target state.
Sick leaves applies to employees in Finland,
where more than 80 percent of Marimekko’s
employees are located. Calculated by dividing
sick leave absence hours by theoretical working
hours.
Work-related accidents applies to employees
in Finland, where more than 80 percent of
Marimekko’s employees are located.
Key figures related to own workforce
Employee figures reported as head count at
the end of the year (31 December). Employees
include active and absent employees.
The number of employees who have left
the company includes employees that have left
voluntarily, have been terminated or have retired
as well as employment relationships that have
been terminated by mutual agreement. Fixed-
term employment is not included in the number
of left employees.
Average turnover calculation is based on
the head count and only considers permanent
employment relationships. The average turnover
is calculated using the following formula: Average
turnover = ((permanent employees who have joined
the company + permanent employees who have left the
company)/2)/number of permanent employees at the
end of the period. The number of employees at the end
of the period includes employees, i.e. both active and
absent employees.
Work-related accidents include employees in
Finland, accounting for more than 80 percent of
Marimekko’s personnel. The fatal work-related
accidents number covers all of the company’s own
operations globally. The number of occupational
accidents and fatal occupational accidents has been
provided by the accident insurance company.
Diversity figures reported as at the end of the year
(31 December).
All employees are entitled to a family leave based
on the labor legislation of each country and/or the
collective agreement applicable to the employee.
The share of employees covered by collective
agreements
Figures are reported as at the end of the year
(31 December). The share (%) of employees in scope
of collective agreements of all employees and of
employees of Finland has been calculated taking
into account employees who are in scope of some
collective agreement. For Finland, the difference
between the coverage of collective agreements
and social dialogue (workplace representation)
is due to one of the employee groups not having,
as an exception, a representative at the end of
the year even though the employees belonging to
this employee group in question are in scope of a
collective agreement.
The metrics have not been validated by an external
party.
53
S2 – WORKERS IN THE VALUE CHAIN
IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF
MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Marimekko has assessed the impacts, risks and
opportunities related to workers in the value chain
as part of the double materiality analysis related
to its sustainability reporting. The material themes
detected in the double materiality analysis included
both positive and negative impacts. The double
materiality process and material impacts are
presented in section ESRS 2 – General disclosures
under Identification and assessment of material
impacts, risks and opportunities, and resources used
to manage material impacts are presented in the
same section, under Sustainability governance and
strategy.
Marimekko’s operations have an impact on
employees working in the supply chain of the
company’s products. Marimekko has not identified
any employee groups that would be particularly
affected by material impacts. Impacts related to the
company’s own workforce are addressed in section
S1 – Own workforce.
Regarding the sustainability elements of
manufacturing, social aspects related to the supply
chain (e.g. human rights, working conditions and
remuneration) and environmental aspects (e.g.
production methods as well as raw materials
and chemicals used) as well as transparent
communications on these issues in compliance with
continuously increasing legislation, are of growing
significance to customers. These sustainability topics
apply to Marimekko’s sourcing and own production as
well as to licensed products.
Marimekko’s extensive product range is
manufactured by an international network of
approximately 150 partner suppliers in the Baltic
countries, Portugal, China and Thailand, among
others. In 2024, 44 percent (2023: 44) of Marimekko’s
products sold were manufactured in EU countries and
the remainder was mainly manufactured in non-EU
European countries or Asia. The company’s objective
is to always find the most suitable manufacturing
location for each product category. Partner
suppliers have a significant impact on Marimekko’s
competitiveness, so the company strives to establish
long-term partnerships with its partner suppliers.
The complexity of global supply chains in the
fashion and design business makes it challenging for
companies to ensure sustainability throughout the
entire value chain despite active efforts. Improving
the transparency of complex multi-actor supply
chains from raw materials to the store requires
persistent work. Marimekko publishes a list of its
partner suppliers on its website and on the Open
Supply Hub platform. The content of the list is aligned
with the requirements of the Apparel and Footwear
Supply Chain Transparency Pledge.
Marimekko can have a positive impact on supply
chain workers through its Supplier Code of Conduct
that contains requirements related to human
rights, employee rights and working conditions,
environmental aspects and business principles.
The fulfillment of these requirements is monitored
by Marimekko’s own factory visits and third-party
audits. Marimekko uses a specific tool to check the
background of partner suppliers and other significant
business partners, including potential trade sanctions
and corruption risk. Negative impacts may arise
if the requirements are neglected and the partner
supplier does not commit to corrective measures.
Marimekko’s primary objective is always to ensure
that corrective measures are implemented and that
the partner supplier commits to the continuous
improvement of its operations. If the partner supplier
refuses to do this, Marimekko has the contractual
right to terminate the cooperation.
POLICIES
In accordance with its sustainability strategy,
Marimekko promotes equality and fairness
throughout its value chain. The company continuously
strives to improve the transparency of its value chain
and is committed to promoting human rights, living
wages, employee empowerment and safe working
conditions in all of its operations. The company’s
human rights practices are based on the United
Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human
Rights (UNGP).
Marimekko’s commitment to human rights,
including respect for freedom of association and the
right to collective bargaining, the prohibition of forced
labor and child labor and the prohibition of human
trafficking, is included in Marimekko Code of Conduct
and Supplier Code of Conduct, which also outline
Marimekko’s zero tolerance for discrimination and
principles related to the management of other social
aspects. The Code of Conduct and the Supplier Code
of Conduct are also described in ESRS 2 – General
Disclosures in Sustainability governance and G1 –
Business Conduct under Policies.
Marimekko’s sourcing complies with the principles
of sustainable sourcing and the Supplier Code of
Conduct. Marimekko’s Supplier Code of Conduct
is based on the amfori Business Social Compliance
Initiative (BSCI) Code of Conduct, which in turn
is based on key international principles on human
rights and labor rights, such as the UN Declaration of
Human Rights, the International Labor Organization
(ILO) Conventions, the OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises and the UN Children’s
ORIGIN OF MARIMEKKO’S PURCHASES
2024 2023
Origin of products, share of sales, %
EU countries 44 44
Non-EU countries 56 56
Share of purchases from audited
suppliers in non-EU countries, %
100 100
Main countries of origin of products,
share of sales, %
China 19 24
Thailand 16 18
Portugal 15 17
Türkiye 12 6
Estonia 10 11
Lithuania 6 4
Finland 5 5
India 3 2
Romania 3 2
Pakistan 2 3
Hungary 2 3
Vietnam 2 2
Italy 2 2
Sustainability report 2024
54
Rights and Business Principles. The Supplier Code
of Conduct is appended as a part of the agreements
between Marimekko and its partner suppliers. By
signing the Supplier Code of Conduct, partner
suppliers undertake to comply with the principles
described therein and to take adequate measures to
ensure that they are complied with throughout their
supply chain.
Partner suppliers also undertake to observe
Marimekko’s Product Requirements on sustainable
material sourcing in their own operations and
throughout their supply chain. The Product
Requirements state that the company does not
accept materials from extremely high-risk countries.
This applies to, for example, the sourcing of cotton
from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and the Xinjiang
Uygur Autonomous Region in China. As part of
its material strategy and in line with the Product
Requirements, Marimekko has increased the share
of traceable materials, such as organic cotton
and certified wool, in its products. Many material
certifications, such as the Global Organic Textile
Standard (GOTS) and Global Recycled Standard
(GRS), also include social sustainability requirements
that all certified companies must meet. They also help
Marimekko monitor the fulfillment of these criteria
throughout the supply chain.
Marimekko offers training to its partner suppliers,
especially in connection with updates to the Supplier
Code of Conduct and Product Requirements. The
latest training events took place in 2022. Personnel
involved in Marimekko’s sourcing also receive training
related to sustainable sourcing practices and human
rights matters.
As a member of the UN Global Compact initiative,
Marimekko is committed to following the ten
principles of the initiative in its own operations and in
its value chain. Marimekko is also a member of, e.g.,
the following international cooperation networks:
amfori BSCI – an initiative that promotes the
monitoring and development of working conditions
in global supply chains
Better Cotton – an initiative to help cotton farmer
communities thrive while protecting and restoring
the environment
Leather Working Group (LWG) – an initiative
committed to building a sustainable leather supply
chain
Responsible Sourcing Network (RSN) – an initiative
to combat human rights violations and the use
of forced labor associated with raw materials for
consumer products.
ACTIONS
The factories of Marimekko’s partner suppliers are
monitored by independent third-party inspections
mainly in countries outside Europe that are classified
as higher-risk countries, by factory visits carried
out by Marimekko employees in Europe and Asia,
and by surveys conducted among partner suppliers
regarding such matters as the origin of the materials
used.
Third-party audits are mandatory for Marimekko’s
partner suppliers operating outside the EU in higher
risk countries. In 2024, a total of 100 percent of
products sourced from outside the EU were subject
to social compliance audits. Of these, 83 percent
(82) were covered by amfori BSCI audits and the rest
by other similar social compliance audits, such as
SA8000 or SMETA.
Amfori BSCI has updated its auditing system
to comply with the new amfori Code of Conduct
published at the beginning of 2022. When drafting
the new Code of Conduct in 2021, stakeholders were
consulted extensively: The draft version of the Code
of Conduct was open to comments from such parties
as amfori members, industry associations, other
sustainability initiatives and NGO representatives for
two months, and the comments received were taken
into account when preparing the final version. Audits
in accordance with the new amfori Code of Conduct
began in September 2023, and the transition period
given to factories to fully implement all changes
ended in October 2024.
Amfori audits include interviews with factory
management, a document review, factory tour
and employee interviews. The auditor selects the
employees to be interviewed. The interviews are
confidential, and it is not possible for the employer
to identify the interviewed employees from the
audit report. Employees in a particularly vulnerable
position, such as young employees, migrant workers
and pregnant employees, are identified as part of the
audit and special attention is paid to the realization of
their rights in the audit.
In 2024, a total of 33 amfori BSCI audits (27)
were carried out at Marimekko’s partner suppliers’
factories. The number of audits varies from year to
year due to the timing of audits, as audits are carried
out every one or two years depending on the results
of the previous audit, or changes in the supplier field,
as a new factory may, for example, have an audit
other than amfori BSCI.
No findings were made in the audits concerning
workers’ freedom of association or collective
bargaining, discrimination, child labor or special
protection for young workers. Most of the findings
concerned occupational health and safety issues,
management systems and workers’ involvement and
protection. The relative share of observations by
performance area is presented in the table Audits and
audit findings. The audits carried out during the year
identified two findings in the category "Prohibition of
AUDITS AND AUDIT FINDINGS
2024 2023
Number of audits and audit results
Outstanding (A) 10 2
Good (B) 6 7
Acceptable (C) 15 18
Insufficient (D) 2 0
Total 33 27
amfori BSCI audit findings by
performance area, %
Occupational health and safety 34 35
Social management system and
cascade effect 23 23
Workers’ involvement and
protection 15 14
Fair remuneration 12 10
Decent working hours 8 8
Protection of the environment 3 5
No precarious employment 2 0
Ethical business behavior 2 5
No bonded labor 1 0
The rights of freedom of
association and collective
bargaining 0 0
No discrimination 0 0
No child labor 0 0
Special protection for young
workers 0 0
Sustainability report 2024
55
forced labor". These findings concerned a situation
where the factory did not have sufficiently robust
policies to assess and address risks related to the
recruitment of migrant workers, nor to document and
communicate disciplinary practices in a language
that workers could understand. No forced labor or
actual disciplinary cases were detected at the factory.
Marimekko will reassess the cooperation with the
factory once the follow-up audit has been carried out.
Corrective actions identified as necessary in
monitoring actions are followed up regularly, either
during factory visits or in separate supplier meetings.
Based on the follow-up audits carried out in 2024,
corrective measures had been implemented with
regard to 30 percent (38) of the observations.
However, the observations and required corrective
actions are not fully comparable: some observations
concern issues that may require a lot of time and
resources to correct, while other issues are smaller
and easier to correct. Marimekko monitors the
implementation of the pending corrective actions, and
they will also be monitored in future audits according
to the amfori BSCI audit cycle.
PROCESSES TO REMEDIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS
AND CHANNELS FOR VALUE CHAIN WORKERS TO
RAISE CONCERNS
Marimekko has instructions and defined processes to
apply in case of suspected violations of legislation or
the company’s Code of Conduct and other guidelines.
Possible violations can be reported personally or
through a channel maintained by an external service
provider that also allows anonymous reporting. The
channel is also open to parties outside the company.
In 2024, Marimekko did not receive any reports from
its supply chain employees via this channel.
In addition, amfori BSCI’s Speak for Change
program offers supply chain employees and
communities from areas close to the factories the
opportunity to report any violations of the amfori
Code of Conduct. Amfori requires that the Code of
Conduct must be visibly available to employees in the
local language on the factory premises. The Speak
for Change channel is provided in the local language
and it allows anonymous reporting by many means,
including by phone, scanning a QR code or via a chat
app. The aim is to make the channel as accessible as
possible to the factory employees and surrounding
communities. The program includes an investigation
by an independent party and the definition of
corrective measures in case any report is found to be
justified. The Speak for Change program is active in
Vietnam, Türkiye, Bangladesh, India and Cambodia
and is currently being rolled out in other countries. In
2024, Marimekko did not receive any reports through
the amfori Speak for Change program.
REPORTING PRINCIPLES FOR METRICS
Information on the total number of partner suppliers
has been collected from the purchase report and
Marimekko’s supplier management system. It includes
factories that manufactured Marimekko’s products
and consumer-visible packaging during the reporting
year, as well as related agents and suppliers (tier 0
and 1). License partners are included if their products
are sold in Marimekko’s own channels.
The manufacturing of products in EU and non-EU
countries and the shares of the products’ countries
of origin have been calculated from the sales data
for the reporting year, which includes sales both
to wholesale customers and in Marimekko’s retail
channels. Internal wholesale is not included. The
figure is based on sales in euros.
Information related to amfori BSCI audits comes
from amfori platform and information on other audits
comes from Marimekko’s supplier management
system. The data includes the audit results of
factories that manufactured Marimekko’s products
and packaging visible to consumers during the
reporting year.
The coverage of amfori and other audits for
products procured from outside the EU has been
calculated on the basis of the purchase report at
supplier level so that the most common audit used
at the supplier’s factories has been generalized to
cover all purchases from the supplier in question: for
example, if three out of five factories have an amfori
audit and two have an SMETA audit, all purchases
from this supplier are included in amfori audits.
The implementation percentage of corrective
actions detected in audits is calculated as the share
of actions taken according to the follow-up audit of
the reporting year as a proportion of the number of
observations made in the previous full audit.
The metrics have not been validated by an
external party.
Sustainability report 2024
56
G – GOVERNANCE INFORMATION
G1 – BUSINESS CONDUCT
Role of the administrative, management and
supervisory bodies
Marimekko is committed to observing the same
operating principles all over the world, in compliance
with international and local laws and regulations,
Marimekko’s values and ethical business conduct.
The most important ethical business principles are
outlined in the Marimekko Code of Conduct and
Supplier Code of Conduct.
The role of the company’s administrative,
management and supervisory bodies in sustainability
is described in more detail in section ESRS
2 – General disclosures under Sustainability
management at Marimekko.
The company’s Board members’ competence in
sustainability-related themes is described in more
detail in section ESRS 2 – General disclosures under
Board of Directors. The competence of the members
of the Management Group in relation to sustainability
is described in more detail in section ESRS 2 –
General disclosures under President and CEO and
Management Group.
IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF
MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Marimekko has assessed the impacts, risks and
opportunities related to business operations and
ethical business conduct as part of the double
materiality analysis related to its sustainability
reporting.
The double materiality analysis did not reveal any
material themes related to business conduct that
exceed the set threshold. The sub-themes addressed
as material in reporting are those with the highest
threshold value, which are all positive impacts. These
sub-themes are presented in section ESRS 2 – General
disclosures under Identification and assessment of
material impacts, risks and opportunities.
Risks related to ethical business conduct are
identified and addressed as part of the Group’s risk
management and presented quarterly in the company’s
interim reports and in the Report of the Board of
Directors. The members of the Management Group
are responsible for identifying and assessing risks in
their respective areas of responsibility, implementing
appropriate risk management measures and
communicating risks and measures to the personnel.
In the identification, analysis and management
of the impacts, risks and opportunities related to
ethical business conduct, key measures include
supplier assessments and audits, internal controls,
classroom training for employees and a whistleblowing
channel. To ensure the ethical business conduct of the
company’s suppliers, customers and other partners,
Marimekko uses a risk management tool maintained by
a third party to check partners’ backgrounds regarding
trade sanctions, corruption, money laundering,
human rights violations and various misconduct risks.
Practices of ensuring suppliers’ sustainability are
described in more detail in section S2 – Workers in the
value chain.
BUSINESS CONDUCT POLICIES AND CORPORATE
CULTURE
Business conduct
In addition to applicable legislation, Marimekko’s
ethical business conduct is guided by the company’s
values approved by the Board of Directors, the
Marimekko Code of Conduct and other policies and
guidelines based on it. The Code of Conduct covers,
among other things, the company’s commitment to
sustainability and ethical business conduct in such
matters as environmental issues, social aspects,
respect for human rights and combating corruption
and bribery. The content of the Code covers all
material themes identified in the company’s double
materiality analysis.
The Marimekko Code of Conduct and other
policies and guidelines based on it contain operating
principles on combating corruption and bribery
in accordance with the UN Convention against
Corruption. The requirements for suppliers are set
out in Marimekko’s Supplier Code of Conduct, which
is based on the ILO conventions and the amfori BSCI
Code of Conduct. As a participant in the UN Global
Compact initiative, Marimekko is committed to
following the ten principles of the initiative in its own
operations and in its value chain.
The Supplier Code of Conduct applies to all
Marimekko suppliers, their subcontractors and third
parties acting on behalf of the supplier, regardless of
where they are located. The internal Marimekko Code
of Conduct applies to all employees and management
of the company.
All of Marimekko’s policies and guidelines based
on the Code of Conduct were updated between
2022 and 2024 to reflect the development of
legislation and the company’s operating practices.
The Marimekko Code of Conduct is reviewed and, if
necessary, updated at least every two years, most
recently in 2024. Code of Conduct, Supplier Code
of Conduct and Sustainability Policy are publicly
available, other policies and guidelines are internal.
More about Policies in ESRS 2 – General information
under Sustainability governance.
All employees and management in the Group
must complete an e-learning module on the Marimekko
Code of Conduct every two years. The Code of
Conduct e-learning module covers the key practices of
ethical business conduct followed at Marimekko and
procedures for reporting misconduct, and illustrates
ethical business conduct through examples and
assignments. According to Marimekko’s assessment,
the personnel functions most at risk in respect of
corruption and bribery are those working in sourcing
and wholesale. These employees must complete
the above-described Code of Conduct e-learning
module, including principles of combating corruption
and bribery. Every year, all employees must also
complete an e-learning module on information security.
In addition, relevant employees must participate
annually in classroom training on competition law and
complete e-learning modules on data protection and
the company’s Insider Policy every two years. Every
Marimekko business area and function also receives a
tailored classroom training session including a section
on ethical business conduct once a year on average.
The company’s onboarding processes and the
separately provided instructions and training on
HR processes also contribute to the company’s
corporate culture and compliance with ethical business
conduct. Adherence to the desired working and
operating methods is also supported by Marimekko’s
performance management process Maripeople.
The completion of the e-learning modules and
classroom training sessions on the Code of Conduct,
data protection, competition law and insider guidelines
is monitored and the results are reported to the
Board of Directors once a year as part of the ethics
& compliance review. The completion rates for these
training modules are presented in table Key figures
related to ethical business practices.
Marimekko publishes an internal quarterly
newsletter on a selected topic related to ethical
Sustainability report 2024
57
business conduct. In 2024, the featured topics
were the responsible use of AI applications,
consideration of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)
in HR processes, the revised Code of Conduct, and
conflicts of interest. In addition, themes related to
ethical business conduct and sustainability in a larger
perspective are regularly discussed in briefings
and training sessions aimed at supervisors and all
employees.
Policies with respect to animal welfare
The company’s policies related to animal welfare are
described in Marimekko’s Sustainability Policy and in
more detail in Product Requirements, which is binding
on the company’s suppliers as part of the Supplier
Code of Conduct.
The Product Requirements state that when using
animal derived materials, Marimekko’s suppliers must
comply with the “Five Freedoms” as defined by the
World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH; prev.
OIE) concerning such matters as nutrition, health and
species-typical behavior. Suppliers must also take
the necessary measures to ensure that their sub-
suppliers comply with these principles. Furthermore,
any material from species defined as endangered or
vulnerable in the International Union for Conservation
of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List or included in the
Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) are ruled out
from use in Marimekko products.
Marimekko is committed to using responsibly
sourced raw materials and prefers certified materials
in its procurement. Marimekko strives to ensure
animal welfare by using wool, alpaca and mohair
meeting the requirements of the Responsible Animal
Fiber (RAF) standard and down and feathers meeting
the Responsible Down Standard (RDS) in its products.
Corporate culture
Marimekko believes in fairness, courage and
cooperation and fosters an open, low-hierarchy
corporate culture that is built on creativity and
entrepreneurship. Equality, valuing diversity, and
inclusion are also important pillars of Marimekko’s
corporate culture and working environment.
Discrimination in any form is prohibited at Marimekko.
The company wants to provide a safe, caring,
communal and respectful working environment for all
its employees.
Marimekko’s ways of working are based on
the company’s values and Code of Conduct. The
company has created its own principles regarding
diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI Foundational
Principles) and, based on them, creates an annual DEI
action plan. This topic is addressed in more detail in
section S1 – Own workforce under Policies.
Diversity, equity and inclusion are an important
and continuously developed part of Marimekko’s
people processes. In 2024, the company provided
training regarding DEI themes for new people
managers, organized events on the topic and
shared information more widely with the whole
organization. As in previous years, the company was
an official partner of Helsinki Pride and supported the
LGBTQIA+ community through omnichannel content
and collaborations. Marimekko worked with various
models, influencers and creatives to make sure that
the company fosters diversity, for example, in age,
size, gender and ethnic background. Supporting
inclusion through, for example, choices in imagery
and representation is a constant and consistent part
of the company’s marketing activities.
In addition to DEI themes, the company also
promotes other necessary important company
culture- and value-based actions. The company
continuously develops its people processes and
leadership culture, as they play an important role
in building employee experience. Marimekko has
guidelines and processes to support providing an
inspiring, responsible and caring workplace. This
topic is addressed in more detail in section S1 – Own
workforce under Policies.
In 2024, the company focused, e.g., on developing
its feedback culture by organizing training and a pilot
project, among other things. The aim of developing
the feedback culture is to enable more effective
development at the individual level, utilization of each
employee’s potential and agility and, thereby, also to
achieve gradual improvements at the organizational
level, for example in the capabilities important to
the company. The effectiveness of the development
actions of 2024 is monitored through, for example,
surveys regarding feedback culture. The progress of
this theme has been included in Marimekko’s metrics
of the quality of leadership and managerial work.
In 2024, the company started a renewal of
its onboarding processes. The content related to
company culture is a key part of the onboarding
journeys and DEI perspectives related to, for example,
the availability of information, language and process
application are now taken into account better than
before. The revised materials also provide employees
who have worked in the company for a longer
period of time with a comprehensive compilation of
important instructions, ways of working and content
regarding corporate culture. The development of
onboarding processes continues in 2025.
DEI themes are discussed regularly by the
company’s Board of Directors and Management
Group.
MECHANISMS FOR IDENTIFYING, REPORTING
AND INVESTIGATING CONCERNS
Employees and other stakeholders are encouraged
to report suspected misconduct related to
Marimekko’s operations, and the reporting channel
is also introduced as part of the company’s Supplier
Code of Conduct. Employees are primarily asked to
contact their supervisor, Marimekko’s Chief People
Officer or the General Counsel. They can also use
the reporting channel maintained by an external
service provider that enables anonymous reporting.
This whistleblowing channel tool is available on
Marimekko’s intranet and the company’s public
website. In addition, the company’s whistleblowing
channel instructions must be available in the break
room of each Marimekko store.
The channel is also available to external
stakeholders. More information on reporting channels
available for suppliers is provided in section S2 –
Workers in the value chain under Processes to
remediate negative impacts and channels for value
chain workers to raise concerns.
All cases of misconduct and suspected
misconduct that the company becomes aware of are
investigated in accordance with a predetermined
process. In this process, Marimekko complies with
the EU Whistleblowing Directive (2019/1937/EU)
and the national regulations issued on the basis of
it. Marimekko is committed to fairly investigating
all reports made in good faith and, based on the
investigation and its outcome, taking the necessary
measures. Those investigating the cases must
be separate from the chain of command involved
in the matter. The company is also committed to
protecting the rights and privacy of persons who
have submitted misconduct reports in good faith.
These commitments are confirmed in Marimekko’s
Sustainability report 2024
58
Whistleblowing Guidelines, which were last updated
in 2024. In 2024, the company did not become aware
of any cases where whistleblowers would have been
subjected to retaliation.
The Group’s Chief People Officer and General
Counsel are responsible for steering the investigation
of suspected misconduct. The purpose of this
steering is, among other things, to ensure that
the consequences in cases of similar severity
are consistent and that corrective measures are
sufficient. Confirmed misconduct may result in
disciplinary or legal action. Any suspected crimes
are reported to the police. The company’s General
Counsel reports all investigations annually to the
Management Group and Board of Directors.
Apart from the continuous development of its
ethics & compliance program, the company has not
identified any need to initiate separate development
projects regarding anti-bribery and anti-corruption
processes. Marimekko has not been involved in any
legal proceedings or court rulings related to corruption,
bribery or other unethical business in 2024.
MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH
SUPPLIERS
Marimekko strives to establish long-term partnerships
with its partner suppliers and always find the most
suitable manufacturing location for each product
category. Marimekko’s sourcing complies with the
principles of sustainable sourcing and the Supplier
Code of Conduct. The Supplier Code of Conduct
is appended as a part of the agreements between
Marimekko and its partner suppliers. Marimekko
has the right to terminate the agreement if the
supplier violates the stipulations of the Supplier
Code of Conduct. However, Marimekko always aims
to support its partner supplier in taking corrective
measures in the event of violations.
Marimekko selects its partner suppliers carefully.
In addition to commercial terms, it pays attention
to sustainability aspects and possible certifications
and audits in its selection. When Marimekko selects
partner suppliers operating in countries outside the
EU, it requires that the factory has already undergone
an amfori BSCI audit or SA8000 certification, or that
such audit or certification process is started. On
a case-by-case basis, the company also approves
suppliers covered by other social compliance audits.
The audits of our contract manufacturers and their
results are described in more detail in section S2 –
Workers in the value chain under Actions.
Marimekko maintains continuous contact with
its partner suppliers. Sourcing personnel are trained
in supplier relationship management mainly through
on-the-job learning when they participate in various
supplier meetings. Other training is arranged as
necessary. The aim is to conduct regular factory visits
to all suppliers. The implementation of corrective
actions identified in third-party audits is monitored
through factory visits and separate supplier
meetings. The company conducts regular supplier
surveys on such issues as the origin of materials
and environmental aspects. In addition, suppliers
are provided with training on, for example, the
requirements of the Supplier Code of Conduct and
Product Requirements, especially in connection with
updates to these documents.
Marimekko uses a supplier rating, which is
updated regularly. The rating assesses the supplier’s
performance based on factors such as quality,
pricing, delivery reliability, product development,
supply chain transparency, setting sustainability
targets and environmental management. Suppliers
are given feedback on the assessment results and
corrective actions are agreed on when necessary.
KEY FIGURES RELATED TO ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES
2024 2023
Ethical business conduct training completion records
Marimekko’s objective is a completion rate exceeding 90 for each training module.
Code of Conduct e-learning (including anti-corruption and anti-bribery principles)
All personnel (incl. Management Group and Board of Directors), %
Risk functions, %
85
94
89
-
E-learning module on insider information and unpublished financial information
• Employees who regularly process unpublished financial information, % 100 100
Classroom training on competition law
• Employees working in wholesale and other selected groups, %
100
100
E-learning module on EU General Data Protection Regulation
• Employees working in the EU or processing personal data of EU residents, % 93 86
Classroom training modules including a section on ethical business conduct for
Marimekko’s business areas and other functions. Members of the Management
Group are obliged to participate in the classroom training module for their
respective function. 12 pcs / 13 hours 13 pcs / 13 hours
Violations of ethical business conduct
All reports of potential misconduct that led to an investigation
• Related to corruption or bribery
• Related to discrimination, harassment or bullying (of which against one’s own
workforce)
• Related to serious human rights violations (of which against one’s own workforce)
6
0
2 (1)
0 (0)
9
0
4 (1)
0 (0)
All confirmed cases of misconduct
• Of which related to corruption or bribery
• Of which related to discrimination or harassment
2
0
0
8
0
1
Number of convictions and fines for breaches of anti-corruption and
anti-bribery laws 0 / 0 euros 0 / 0 euros
Number of fines, penalties or damages paid in response to cases of discrimination
and complaints (of which related to own labour) 0 euros (0) 0 euros (0)
Sustainability report 2024
59
The risks related to Marimekko’s supply chain are
associated especially with production, procurement
and logistics processes and their reliability, flexibility
and efficiency, sustainability, fluctuations in the prices
of raw materials and other factors of production as
well as the availability and price of logistics. Risks
related to the supply chain and their management
are described in more detail in the Report of the
Board of Directors under Most significant risks and
uncertainties.
PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF CORRUPTION
AND BRIBERY
Marimekko is committed to observing anti-corruption
and anti-bribery activities in its own operations and
in relations with its partners. The Marimekko Code of
Conduct prohibits corruption and bribery. The same
prohibition is also included in Marimekko’s Supplier
Code of Conduct. In addition, the Marimekko Code
of Conduct contains principles regarding conflicts of
interest and gifts and hospitality, which are essential
in the prevention of corruption. The company also has
separate guidelines regarding gifts and hospitality.
The most important means of preventing and
detecting corruption and bribery are:
Training on ethical business conduct (for more
information, see Business conduct).
Risk assessment regarding ethical business
conduct (for more information, see Management of
relationships with suppliers).
A whistleblowing channel available to all internal
and external stakeholders. There are instructions
and a predefined process for submitting and
processing reports (for more information, see
Mechanisms for identifying, reporting and
investigating concerns).
Sustainability surveys and background checks
among partners (for more information, see
Management of relationships with suppliers).
Continuous development of ethical business
conduct in the supply chain. In this, the most
important means are audits and assessments
of partner suppliers and their commitment to
Supplier Code of Conduct. Other partners, such
as IT and other service providers, may also
observe their own operating principles similar to
Supplier Code of Conduct (for more information,
see Management of relationships with suppliers).
During the reporting period, the company was
not aware of any complaints about its operations
to the OECD Contact Points for Multinational
Enterprises.
POLITICAL INFLUENCE AND LOBBYING
Marimekko systematically monitors upcoming
legislation and develops its operating practices
accordingly. However, Marimekko does not engage
in direct political influence or lobbying and is not
registered in the EU Transparency Register.
Marimekko is a member of several trade and
industry organizations, the most important of
which are:
The Finnish Fashion and Sports Commerce
association
Fashion Finland
The Finnish Textile and Fashion Association
The Finnish Commerce Federation
Finnish Business & Society
Ellen MacArthur Foundation Trading Ltd.
Better Cotton Initiative
AISBL amfori
Leather Working Group Limited
The Climate Leadership Coalition
The Responsible Sourcing Network
Marimekko may participate in open consultations
or requests for opinions related to the development
of legislation as part of the joint statements of these
organizations.
In 2024, Marimekko paid a total of EUR 151,925
(184,496) in membership fees to trade and industry
organizations. Marimekko does not make donations to
political campaigns.
During the reporting period, no persons were
appointed as members of Marimekko’s administrative,
management or supervisory bodies who, during the
two years preceding their appointment, had held
similar positions in the public administration (including
regulatory authorities).
PAYMENT PRACTICES
Marimekko has uniform payment practices for all its
customer groups.
Marimekko has not set a standard term of
payment; this is agreed on a contract-specific
basis with each supplier or customer. The standard
contract term is payment on receipt of the invoice,
but no later than the due date. The most common
payment terms for suppliers vary from 7 to 45 days
net. Marimekko has 0 pending legal proceedings (0)
due to late payments.
Marimekko’s payments to suppliers and service
providers follow the company’s internal invoice
approval policy. According to this policy, the number
of approvers required for each invoice depends on
the internal process and the euro amount-based
approval limits set for each approver. The purchase
invoice is paid as soon as the approvals have been
obtained. The company’s finance department
regularly monitors that invoices have been approved
for payment. These procedures aim to prevent
payment delays to all customer groups.
Marimekko’s supplier network is extensive
and includes companies of many sizes from
many countries, which means that there are also
differences in payment practices. Domestic payments
arrive in the supplier’s account on the same day and
SEPA payments to countries within the EU on the
same day or no later than the next two banking days.
For other foreign and foreign currency payments,
it may take longer than two banking days for the
payment to arrive.
As the payment terms are agreed on an order- and
agreement-specific basis and vary greatly, Marimekko
does not monitor the average time it takes for the
company to pay an invoice from the date from which
the contract or statutory payment term is determined.
Marimekko is preparing to report the average
payment period, payment terms by supplier group
and the percentage of payments made in the coming
years.
REPORTING PRINCIPLES FOR METRICS
In the completion data for training related to ethical
business conduct, the completion percentages
include all employees in the target group, including
those with longer absences, such as those on
parental leave.
Cases that violate ethical business conduct, the
figure on reports of possible misconduct that led to
an investigation includes reports received through
whistleblowing channels on the company’s intranet
and external websites, as well as reports received
through other reporting methods instructed by the
company.
The metrics have not been validated by an
external party.
Sustainability report 2024
60
Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
(EUR 1,000) Note 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
NET SALES 1. 182,604 174,105
Other operating income 2. 143 91
Change in inventories of finished goods and work in progress 5,755 -4,489
Raw materials and consumables 3. -77,923 -63,190
Employee benefit expenses 4. -35,868 -33,512
Depreciation and impairments 5. -9,344 -9,180
Other operating expenses 6. -33,986 -32,425
OPERATING PROFIT 31,380 31,400
Financial income 7. 1,181 393
Financial expenses 8. -1,587 -2,056
-406 -1,663
RESULT BEFORE TAXES 30,974 29,737
Income taxes 9. -6,602 -6,137
NET RESULT FOR THE PERIOD 24,372 23,601
Distribution of net result to equity holders
of the parent company 24,372 23,601
Basic and diluted earnings per share calculated
on the result attributable to equity holders
of the parent company, EUR 10. 0.60 0.58
COMPREHENSIVE CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
(EUR 1,000) 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
Net result for the period 24,372 23,601
Items that could be reclassified to profit or loss
at a future point in time
 Change in translation difference -87 90
COMPREHENSIVE RESULT FOR THE PERIOD 24,285 23,691
Distribution of net result to equity holders of the parent company 24,285 23,691
The notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
61Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(EUR 1,000) Note 31 Dec. 2024 31 Dec. 2023
ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Intangible assets 11.1 1,644 453
Tangible assets 11.2 33,279 35,100
Other financial assets 11.3, 17. 530 595
Deferred tax assets 14. 989 1,110
36,442 37,259
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories 12.1 35,429 29,268
Trade and other receivables 12.2 17,683 19,688
Current tax assets 419 -
Cash and cash equivalents 17. 40,376 37,044
93,907 85,999
ASSETS, TOTAL 130,349 123,258
(EUR 1,000) 31 Dec. 2024 31 Dec. 2023
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO EQUITY HOLDERS
PARENT COMPANY
Share capital 13. 8,040 8,040
Reserve for invested non-restricted equity 13. 1,228 1,228
Treasury shares 13. -541 -541
Translation differences -119 -32
Retained earnings 66,914 57,043
Shareholders’ equity, total 75,521 65,738
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Lease liabilities 15.1, 20. 22,297 24,984
22,297 24,984
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables 16. 24,181 24,599
Current tax liabilities - 12
Lease liabilities 15.2, 20. 8,350 7,309
Financial liabilities 17., 20. - 615
32,531 32,536
Liabilities, total 54,827 57,520
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES, TOTAL 130,349 123,258
The notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
62Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
(EUR 1,000) 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net result for the period 24,372 23,601
Adjustments
 Depreciation and impairments 9,344 9,180
 Financial income and expenses 406 1,663
 Taxes 6,602 6,137
 Share-based payments 510 417
Cash flow before change in working capital 41,234 40,997
Change in working capital -4,443 -3,342
 Increase (-) / decrease (+) in current
 non-interest-bearing trade receivables 2,046 -7,690
 Increase (-) / decrease (+) in inventories -6,140 4,449
 Increase (+) / decrease (-) in current
 non-interest-bearing liabilities -348 -101
Cash flow from operating activities before
financial items and taxes 36,790 37,655
Paid interest and payments on other financial expenses -1,418 -1,532
Interest received and payments on other financial income 633 223
Taxes paid -6,900 -6,919
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 29,107 29,427
(EUR 1,000) 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investments in tangible and intangible assets -2,330 -2,025
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES -2,330 -2,025
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Short-term loans drawn - 149
Short-term loans repaid -621 -1,562
Payments of lease liabilities -7,978 -7,381
Dividends paid -15,011 -13,794
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES -23,610 -22,588
Change in cash and cash equivalents 3,166 4,814
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 37,044 32,711
Effects of exchange rate fluctuations 166 -482
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 40,376 37,044
The notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
63Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent company
Reserve for invested Treasury Translation Retained Shareholders’
(EUR 1,000) Share capital non-restricted equity shares differences earnings equity total
Shareholders’ equity, 1 Jan. 2023 8,040 1,228 -541 -122 46,820 55,425
Comprehensive result
Net result for the period 23,601 23,601
Translation differences 90 90
Total comprehensive result for the period 90 23,601 23,691
Transactions with owners
Dividends paid -13,794 -13,794
Share-based payments 417 417
Shareholders’ equity, 31 Dec. 2023 8,040 1,228 -541 -32 57,043 65,738
Shareholders’ equity, 1 Jan. 2024 8,040 1,228 -541 -32 57,043 65,738
Comprehensive result
Net result for the period 24,372 24,372
Translation differences -87 -87
Total comprehensive result for the period -87 24,372 24,285
Transactions with owners
Dividends paid -15,011 -15,011
Share-based payments 510 510
Shareholders’ equity, 31. Dec. 2024 8,040 1,228 -541 -119 66,914 75,521
The notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
64Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPANY PROFILE
Marimekko Corporation (business identity code
0111316-2) is a Finnish clothing and textile design
company. Marimekko Corporation and its subsidiaries
form a Group that designs, sources, sells and
markets clothing, bags and accessories, and interior
decoration products. In addition, the company
produces printed fabrics in its own textile printing
factory.
Marimekko Corporation’s shares are quoted on
Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd. The company is domiciled in
Helsinki, and its registered address is Puusepänkatu
4, 00880 Helsinki, Finland. The financial year of all
Group companies is the calendar year.
Copies of the consolidated financial statements
are available at company.marimekko.com and
the head office of the Group’s parent company at
Puusepänkatu 4, 00880 Helsinki, Finland.
Marimekko Corporation’s Board of Directors
approved these financial statements for publication at
its meeting on 4 March 2025 According to the Finnish
Companies Act, shareholders have the right to accept
or reject the financial statements at the AGM held
after the publication. The AGM may also amend the
financial statements.
ACCOUNTING POLICY APPLIED IN THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting policy
The financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS), complying with the IAS
and IFRS standards as well as the SIC and IFRIC
interpretations in force as at 31 December 2024. In
the Finnish Accounting Act and the provisions laid
down pursuant to the Act, International Financial
Reporting Standards refer to the standards approved
for use in the EU in accordance with the procedures
laid down in IAS Regulation (EC) 1606/2002 of the
European Parliament, and the interpretations of these
standards. The notes to the consolidated financial
statements also comply with Finnish accounting
and company legislation which complements IFRS
regulations.
Financial statement information is presented in
thousands of euros.
Marimekko has in its double materiality analysis
concluded that climate change does not have a
material impact on the Group’s results or balance
sheet.
Sources of uncertainty related to accounting
estimates
When preparing consolidated financial statement in
accordance with the International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS), the company’s management must
make estimates and assumptions about the future,
which include uncertainty.
The company’s management must evaluate
the recording of deferred tax assets, as their
realization requires taxable income in the coming
years. In addition, there is uncertainty related to the
assessment of the useful life of fixed assets and
the execution or non-execution of lease contract
extension options. There is also uncertainty related to
the valuation of inventory and credit losses on trade
receivables. Uncertainty in inventory is related to
situations where the stock moves slowly. For credit
losses on trade receivables, the uncertainty is related
to the assessment of credit losses based on the
historical data and information available at the time of
the review.
The estimates and assumptions included in the
consolidated financial statements are based on the
best knowledge of the management as at the closing
of the books. The actual figures may deviate from
these estimates.
Estimates based on the management judgement
Estimates based on the management judgement
are related to the return accrual and its calculation.
In some cases, the customer has the right to
return the product. The estimate on the number of
products potentially returned is calculated based on
the historical data. In addition, management uses
estimates on likely lease period of renewable lease
agreements when determining the total lease period.
Principles of consolidation
Marimekko’s consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the parent company
Marimekko Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group
has control. The Group controls an entity where it
is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from
its involvement with the entity and has the ability to
affect those returns through its power to direct the
activities of the entity.
Translation of items denominated in foreign currency
The results and the financial position of the Group
units are measured in the currency used in the
primary business environment of the unit in question
(functional currency). The consolidated financial
statements are presented in euros, the functional and
presentation currency of the parent company.
Transactions in foreign currencies are recognized
in the functional currency at the exchange rate
on the date of transaction. The foreign-currency-
denominated receivables and liabilities of the parent
company and its Finnish subsidiary have been
converted to euro amounts using the exchange
rates quoted by the European Central Bank on the
closing date. The foreign-currency-denominated
receivables and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries have
been converted at the exchange rate of the country
in question on the closing date. Foreign exchange
differences in business operations are booked in the
corresponding income statement accounts above
operating profit and foreign exchange differences on
financial items in financial income and expenses.
The foreign-currency-denominated income
statements of subsidiaries are converted to euro
amounts using the average exchange rate for
the financial year and the balance sheets at the
exchange rate on the closing date. Differences
arising from translation and translation differences in
shareholders’ equity are recorded as a separate item
in shareholders’ equity.
Revenue recognition and net sales
The Group sells products in Marimekko’s retail stores
and online store, and through wholesale channels in
Finland and abroad. Most of the Group’s income is
comprised of wholesale and retail sales of products
plus licensing income.
The goods are handed over to the customer
one item or several items at a time in the stores or
65Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
by a carrier. The customer can utilize each sold
product separately and the utilization of a single
product is not dependent on other products sold
by Marimekko. Revenue is recognized when the
buyer obtains control of the product – that is when
the significant risks and rewards of ownership have
been transferred to the buyer. In wholesale, this
is mainly the moment when the goods are handed
over to the customer as set forth in the agreed
delivery clause. In wholesale and export trade,
the terms of delivery determine the point of time
when the customer obtains control of the goods. In
retail where cash, credit card or gift card is used as
means of payment, the income is recognized at the
time of sale.
Sales revenues are recognized at the amount to
which Marimekko expects to be entitled in exchange
for transferring the promised goods to the
customer, except for amounts collected on behalf
of third parties, such as indirect taxes. Discounts
granted are taken into account when determining
the revenue to be recognized. The fulfillment
of performance obligations is verifiable from
payment receipts or transportation documents. In
compliance with IFRS 15, customer contributions
are allocated to distinct goods and recognized
as revenue by the Group when the goods are
handed over to the customer in the store or when
a wholesale customer obtains control of the goods
according to the terms of delivery. In some cases,
the customer has the right to return the product.
The estimate on the number of products potentially
returned is calculated based on the historical data.
Licensing income is recognized in accordance
with the clauses of the agreement between
Marimekko and the licensee when the later of the
following events occurs:
(a) the subsequent sale or usage occurs, and
(b) the performance obligation to which some or all
of the sales-based or usage-based royalty has been
allocated has been fully or partially satisfied.
The clauses in the licensing agreements provide
for licensing income payable to Marimekko for
sales of products covered by the agreement as
percentage-based licensing income or lump sum
payments based on the fulfillment of performance-
based obligations. Some licensees paying
percentage-based licensing income are according
to the agreement obligated to pay at least an annual
minimum licensing income.
The Group also engages in commission trading,
where Marimekko is considered as principal, as
Marimekko determines the selling price of the
products and is responsible for the inventory
and product defects, although the agent handles
complaints. The group records the revenue as
gross amount to which it expects to be entitled of in
exchange for specified goods or services delivered.
Commission trading is carried out on a shop-in-shop
basis, where the seller of the product is an agent who
charges the customer for the product, provides a
sales receipt and acts on his own behalf. Any defects
in the products are reported to the agent.
Other operating income
Other operating income includes, for example, rental
income from operating lease agreements classified as
other lease agreements, insurance payouts and sales
proceeds of fixed assets.
Operating profit
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements does not
contain a definition of operating profit. The Group
has defined this concept as follows: operating profit
is the net amount of net sales and other operating
income less purchase expenses adjusted with change
in inventories of finished goods and work in progress
and the expenses incurred due to production for own
use, less employee benefit expenses, depreciation,
possible impairment loss and other operating
expenses. Any income statement items other than
the above are presented below the operating profit.
Foreign exchange differences are included in the
operating profit, provided they are attributable to
items related to business operations. Otherwise, they
are recognized in financial items.
Employee benefits
Pension commitments
The pension security of the personnel of the Group’s
Finnish companies has been arranged under the
Finnish statutory employee pension plan (TyEL)
through an external pension insurance company.
Foreign subsidiaries have arranged pensions for
their personnel in accordance with local legislation.
The Group’s pension cover is arranged wholly
under defined contribution schemes. Under a
defined contribution arrangement, the Group pays
contributions to publicly or privately managed
pension insurances. These contributions are either
compulsory, based on an agreement or voluntary.
The Group does not have any payment obligations
other than these contributions. The contributions
are recognized as employee benefit expenses at the
time when they become due. Any contributions paid
in advance are included in the assets on the balance
sheet, insofar as they are recoverable as future
refunds or future reductions of contributions.
Share-based payment
The Board of Directors of Marimekko Corporation
decided in 2022 to continue the share-based long-
term incentives for the company’s management.
Estimate of the fair value of share-based payments is
recorded evenly over the duration of the program to
the employee benefit expenses.
The incentive system for years 2022–2026
is described in greater detail in note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Interest income
Interest income is recognized on a time-proportion
basis using the effective interest method.
Dividend income
Dividend income is recognized as income when the
right to dividends is established.
Income taxes
Taxes on the Group companies’ financial results
for the period, taxes from previous periods and the
change in deferred taxes are recorded as the Group’s
taxes. Taxes on the taxable income for the period are
calculated on taxable income in accordance with the
tax rate in force in the country in question. Deferred
taxes are calculated on all temporary differences
between the book value and the taxable value.
However, a deferred tax liability is not accounted
for if it arises from the initial recognition of an asset
or liability in a transaction, other than a business
66Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
combination, that at the time of the transaction
affects neither accounting nor taxable income.
Deferred tax is not recognized for distributable
earnings of subsidiaries where it is probable that
the difference will not reverse in the foreseeable
future. Deferred taxes are calculated using the tax
rates set by the closing date. Deferred tax assets are
recognized to the extent that it is probable that future
taxable profit, against which the temporary difference
can be utilized, will be available.
Earnings per share
The basic earnings per share are calculated by
dividing the result for the period attributable to equity
holders of the parent company by the weighted
average of shares outstanding. The weighted average
number of shares used to calculate the diluted
earnings per share takes into account the diluting
effect of the conversion of potential common shares
into actual shares during the period. There are no
potential shares outstanding at the moment.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are
recognized in the balance sheet at original cost
less depreciation. Depreciation of intangible assets
is carried out on a straight-line basis over their
estimated useful life.
The estimated useful lives are as follows:
intangible rights 5 years
computer software 3–5 years.
The major intangible assets are computer
software. In addition, intangible rights include
trademarks.
The accounting for cloud computing
arrangements depends on whether the cloud-based
software classifies as a software intangible asset or
a service contract. Those arrangements where the
company does not have control over the underlying
software are accounted for as service contracts
providing the company with the right to access
the cloud provider’s application software over the
contract period. The ongoing fees to obtain access
to the application software, together with related
configuration or customization costs incurred, are
recognized as other operating expenses when the
services are received.
Tangible assets
Tangible assets consist of leased fixed assets and
owned fixed assets which mainly comprise buildings,
machinery and equipment. Tangible assets also
include expenditures on conversions and renovations
of leased premises comprising, for example,
completion work on business interiors in rented
premises. Tangible assets are recorded in the balance
sheet at original cost less depreciation. Depreciation
of tangible assets is carried out on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful life.
The estimated useful lives are as follows:
• buildings and structures 3–30 years
• machinery and equipment 3–15 years.
The residual value and useful life of tangible
assets are reviewed at the end of each financial year
and if necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in the
expectation of economic benefit.
If a tangible asset consists of several parts
with different useful lives, each part is treated as a
separate asset. Significant cost of replacing a part is
capitalized when the company will derive economic
benefit from the asset. Other expenses such as
regular maintenance, repair and servicing costs are
entered as expenses in the income statement when
they are incurred.
Provisions
A provision is recognized when the Group has a
present legal or constructive obligation as a result
of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of
resources will be required to settle the obligation and
a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can
be made.
A restructuring provision is recognized when the
Group has compiled a detailed restructuring plan,
launched its implementation or informed the parties
concerned.
Impairment
On each closing date, asset items are assessed
for indications of impairment. If there are such
indications, the recoverable amount of said asset
item is estimated. The impairment recognized is the
amount by which the book value of the asset item
exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher
of its net selling price or value in use. Value in use
is based on discounted future net cash flows as a rule.
Lease agreements
In accordance with IFRS 16, the Group assesses at
the inception of a contract whether the contract is, or
contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease
if the contract conveys the right to control the use of
an identified asset for a period of time in exchange
for consideration. The Group has elected to separate
non-lease components from lease components at the
inception of a contract.
The Group recognizes a right-of-use asset and a
lease liability at the lease commencement date. The
right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which
comprises the initial amount of the lease liability
adjusted for any lease payments made before the
commencement date, incentives received, initial
direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to
restore the underlying asset. The right-of-use asset is
depreciated over the lease term.
The lease liability is initially measured at the
present value of the lease payments that are not paid
at the commencement date, discounted using the
interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot
be readily determined, the Group’s incremental
borrowing rate. The lease liability is measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Lease payments included in the measurement of the
lease liability comprise the following: fixed payments
and variable lease payments that depend on an
index or a rate. An option to extend the lease term is
included in the lease term if it is reasonably certain
that the option will be exercised.
The lease term for renewable leases is determined
based on non-cancelable lease term of the contract
and management judgement based on estimate of
the likely rental period.
The Group has elected not to recognize right-of-
use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases
(max. 12 months) and leases of low-value assets. The
Group recognizes the lease payments associated with
these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis
over the lease term.
67Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
Marimekko is a lessee. Lease contracts include
headquarter and printing facilities in Helsinki,
retail stores in Finland and other countries where
Marimekko operates as well as company housing and
leasing cars. In general, lease contracts vary from
1 year to 15 years.
Inventories
Inventories are presented at the acquisition cost
or at the lower probable net realization value. The
acquisition cost of manufactured inventories includes
not only purchase expenditure on materials, direct
labor and other direct costs, but also a share of the
fixed and variable general costs of production. Net
realizable value is the estimated selling price in the
ordinary course of business, less the estimated direct
costs for completion and selling expenses.
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified based on the Group’s
financial asset management business model and
their contractual cash flow characteristics into the
following categories: measured at amortized cost and
measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial assets measured at amortized cost
consist of other financial assets, trade receivables,
other receivables, prepaid expenses and accrued
income, as well as cash and cash equivalents. They
are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently
at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
For the estimation of expected credit losses on
trade receivables, the so-called simplified approach
permitted by IFRS 9 is used, according to which credit
losses are recorded at an amount equal to lifetime
expected credit losses. Expected credit losses are
estimated based on historical credit losses, and
the model also takes into account the information
available on future financial conditions at the time of
review. Expected credit losses are recognized in other
operating expenses in the income statement.
A final impairment of trade receivables is
recognized when there is objective evidence that
the Group will not receive all of the benefits on the
original terms. Indications of the impairment of trade
receivables include significant financial difficulties
of the debtor, the likelihood of bankruptcy, failure to
make payments, or a delay of over 90 days in paying.
Impairment loss is recognized under other operating
expenses in the income statement.
Financial assets measured at fair value through
profit or loss comprise shares and they are included in
noncurrent assets, unless it is intended that they will
be held for less than 12 months from the closing date,
in which case they are included in current assets.
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities
classified as level 1 is based on unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets at the closing date. Level 1
includes listed shares.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Group’s cash and cash equivalents include cash
on hand and at banks. The Group does not have any
other items classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Dividends, shareholders’ equity and treasury shares
The Board of Directors’ proposal for dividend
distribution has not been recognized in the financial
statements; dividends are only recognized on the
basis of the AGM’s approval.
Outstanding common shares are presented
as share capital. Costs related to the granting or
acquisition of the company’s own equity instruments
are presented as equity allowance. If the company
purchases its own shares, the price including direct
costs is recognized as decrease in equity.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value
excluding transaction costs and subsequently at
amortized cost using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities are non-current, unless they are
repayable on demand within the next 12 months.
New standards and interpretations and change in
accounting principles
These consolidated financial statements have been
prepared using the same accounting principles as
were applied in the 2023. The new and amended
IFRS accounting standards that came into effect
during 2024 have no material effect on the financial
statements.
Adoption of new and amended standards in future
financial years
According to the company’s preliminary assessment,
the following new and amended IFRS accounting
standards applied in future financial periods may have
an impact on the consolidated financial statements:
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial
Statements (effective for financial years beginning
on or after 1 January 2027, early application is
permitted).
IFRS 18 will replace IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements. The key new requirements are as follows:
Income and expenses in the income statement to
be classified into three new defined categories—
operating, investing and financing—and two new
subtotals to be presented: “Operating profit or loss”
and “Profit or loss before financing and income tax”.
Disclosures about management-defined
performance measures (MPMs) in the financial
statements are to be presented. MPMs are
subtotals of income and expenses used in public
communications to communicate management’s
view of the company’s financial performance.
Disclosure of information based on enhanced
general requirements on aggregation and
disaggregation. In addition, specific requirements
to disaggregate certain expenses, in the notes, will
be required for companies that present operating
expenses by function in the income statement.
68Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
1. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF SALES
The Group’s business segment is the Marimekko business. The segment information presented by the Group
is based on internal reporting to the chief operational decision-maker. The President and CEO of the company
acts as the chief operational decision-maker.
The total amount of assets in Finland was EUR 110,422 thousand (106,872), of which the amount of non-current
assets excluding financial instruments and deferred tax assets was EUR 27,439 thousand (29,797). The amount
of assets in other countries was EUR 19,927 thousand (16,386), of which non-current assets accounted for EUR
8,014 thousand (6,352).
Marimekko has no individual customers representing 10 percent or more of the Group’s total income.
Net sales by market area
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Finland Retail sales 70,636 66,627 Wholesale sales 30,057 32,133 Licencing income 293 154Total 100,986 98,914Scandinavia Retail sales 5,581 4,386 Wholesale sales 12,744 11,096 Licencing income 150 75Total 18,475 15,557EMEA Retail sales 3,639 3,008 Wholesale sales 8,827 10,802 Licencing income 586 834Total 13,052 14,645North America Retail sales 5,613 4,523 Wholesale sales 4,705 4,688 Licencing income 527 365Total 10,845 9,575
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Asia-Pacific Retail sales 8,104 6,775 Wholesale sales 29,166 26,883 Licencing income 1,976 1,758Total 39,246 35,415International sales (total) Retail sales 22,937 18,691 Wholesale sales 55,441 53,469 Licencing income 3,240 3,031Total 81,618 75,191Retail sales 93,573 85,318Wholesale sales 85,498 85,602Licencing income 3,533 3,186Total 182,604 174,105Net sales by product line(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Fashion 60,230 55,171Home 82,284 77,475Bags and accessories 40,090 41,460Total 182,604 174,105Investments (excluding the impact of IFRS 16)(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Finland 2,096 1,191Other countries 234 842Total 2,330 2,033
69Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
2. OTHER OPERATING INCOME
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Rental income 54 54Other income 89 37Total 143 91
3. RAW MATERIALS AND CONSUMABLES
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Materials and supplies Purchases during the financial year 51,419 40,232 Increase (-) / decrease (+) in inventories -451 -71 Total 50,968 40,161External services 26,955 23,029Total 77,923 63,190
Exchange rate differences included in raw materials and consumables
Exchange rate gains (-) / losses (+) on purchases 190 -41
4. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EXPENSES
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Salaries, wages and bonuses 28,261 26,245Share-based payments 510 417Pension expenses – defined contribution plans 3,979 3,745Other indirect social expenditure 3,118 3,105Total 35,868 33,512
Average number of employees2024 2023Salaried employees 450 443Production personnel 16 19Total 466 462
Share-based payments
The Board of Directors of Marimekko Corporation decided at 15th of February 2022 to continue the share-based
long-term incentives for the company’s management. The share-based incentive system for years 2022–2026
is targeted to the Management Group of Marimekko and at the end of financial period, it encompasses 11 people
including the President and CEO.
The Performance share plan 2022–2026 is composed of two earnings periods: 1 January 2022–30 June 2025
and 1 January 2023–30 June 2026. The potential reward from each earnings period is based on total sharehol-
der return (TSR) i.e. the total yield on Marimekko Corporation’s shares, including dividends, at the end of the
period. The achievement of the required TSR levels will determine the proportion out of the maximum reward
that will be paid to a participant. The potential rewards are primarily planned to be paid half in company shares
and half in cash after each earnings period. The cash part of the reward is intended to cover the taxes and tax-li-
ke payments incurred by the participant. The arrangement is treated entirely as equity paid. Earning the reward
requires that the person is still working for the company at the time of the payment. The reward amounts earned
through the system will be capped if the maximum limit set by the Board for the payable reward is reached. The
shares received as part of the reward are subject to a two-year transfer restriction. An estimate of the fair value
of possible rewards is recorded evenly over the entire duration of the program as employee benefits expenses.
The Board of Directors of Marimekko has decided that if the targets set for the first earnings period are met
in full, the rewards to be paid on the basis of it correspond to the value of an approximate maximum total of
170,706 Marimekko shares including also the cash portion of the reward. The potential rewards from the first
earnings period are estimated to be paid in early autumn 2025.
The Board of Directors has decided that if the targets set for the second earnings period of 1 January 2023–
30 June 2026 are met in full, the rewards to be paid on the basis of the period correspond to the value of an
approximate maximum total of 290,148 Marimekko shares including also the cash portion of the reward. The po-
tential rewards from the second earnings period are estimated to be paid at the latest by the end of September
2026.
For the financial year 2024, a total of EUR 510 thousand (417) has been recorded from the incentive system
for years 2022–2026 in the employee benefits expenses in the Marimekko Group’s 2024 consolidated income
statement.
70Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
5. DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENTS
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Intangible assets Intangible rights 53 44 Computer software 95 139 Total 148 183Tangible assets Buildings and structures 339 263 Machinery and equipment 588 505 Right-of-use assets, buildings and structures 8,165 8,159 Right-of-use assets, machinery and equipment 105 70 Total 9,196 8,998Total 9,344 9,180
6. OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Leases 2,473 1,850Marketing 10,557 9,483Management and maintenance of business premises 1,644 1,634Administration 10,752 11,200Other expenses 8,560 8,258Total 33,986 32,425
Exchange rate differences included in other operating expenses
Exchange rate gains (-) / losses (+) on sales -44 101Rents(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Low-value rents 506 484Variable rents 1,967 1,366Total 2,473 1,850
Auditor’s fee
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023KPMG  Audit 127 124 Assignments referred to in Section 1, Subsection 1, Paragraph 2 of the Auditing Act 38 - Tax advice 2 2 Other services 29 3Total 196 129Others Audit 13 9Total 13 9
Remuneration to KPMG Oy Ab on other services to Marimekko Group companies: EUR 29 thousand (3).
71Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
7. FINANCIAL INCOME
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Interest income on loans and other receivables 557 193Exchange rate gains, realized 67 71Exchange rate gains, unrealized 557 45Change in fair value of shares - 85Total 1,181 393
8. FINANCIAL EXPENSES
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Interest expenses on financial liabilities measured at amortized cost 120 173Interest expenses on lease liabities 1,003 1,020Exchange rate losses, realized 134 200Exchange rate losses, unrealized 175 542Change in fair value of shares 66 -Other financial expenses 90 123Total 1,587 2,056
9. INCOME TAXES
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Taxes on taxable earnings for the financial year 6,283 6,380Taxes from previous financial years 185 136Deferred taxes 134 -379Total 6,602 6,137
Reconciliation statement of taxes calculated on the basis of tax expenses in the income statement and the
Group’s Finnish tax rate (20 percent both in 2024 and 2023)
Result before taxes 30,974 29,737Taxes calculated at the Finnish tax rate 6,195 5,947Different tax rates of foreign subsidiaries 0 -7Non-recognized deferred tax assets on taxable losses 122 69Taxes from previous financial years 185 136Non-deductible items 8 5Others 92 -14Taxes in the income statement 6,602 6,137
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
2024 2023Net result for the period, EUR 1,000 24,372 23,601Weighted average number of shares, 1,000 40,571 40,571Basic and diluted earnings per share, EUR 0.60 0.58
72Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
11. NON-CURRENT ASSETS
11.1 Intangible assets
2024
Advance paymentsIntangible Computer and acquisitions(EUR 1,000) rights software in progress TotalAcquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2024 2,627 7,105 235 9,968Translation differences 2 -37 -35Increases 48 45 1,246 1,339Decreases -Transfers between categories 954 -954 -Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2024 2,677 8,067 528 11,272Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2024 2,469 7,045 9,515Translation differences 2 -37 -35Accumulated depreciation of decreases -Depreciation during the financial year 53 95 148Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2024 2,524 7,103 9,627Book value, 31 Dec. 2024 153 964 528 1,644
Advance payments and acquisitions in progress of intangible assets presentation has been changed during 2024
and comparative figures has been adjusted accordingly.
2023
Advance paymentsIntangible Computer and acquisitions(EUR 1,000) rights software in progress TotalAcquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2023 2,551 7,336 9,887Translation differences -1 2 1Increases 77 36 235 348Decreases -269 -269Transfers between categories -Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2023 2,627 7,105 235 9,968Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2023 2,427 7,173 9,600Translation differences -1 2 1Accumulated depreciation of decreases -269 -269Depreciation during the financial year 44 139 183Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2023 2,469 7,045 9,515Book value, 31 Dec. 2023 158 60 235 453
73Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
11.2 Tangible assets
2024
Right-of-use assets, Right-of-use assets, Advance paymentsBuildings and Machinery and buildings and machinery and and acquisitions(EUR 1,000) Land structures Equipment structures equipment in progress TotalAcquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2024 55 5,957 20,425 78,791 691 69 105,988Translation differences 11 209 144 364Increases 118 316 6,916 28 557 7,935Decreases -729 -729Transfers between categories 103 465 -568 -Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2024 55 6,188 21,416 85,122 719 58 113,558Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2024 3,471 18,171 48,763 482 70,888Translation differences 7 206 159 372Accumulated depreciation of decreases -177 -177Depreciation during the financial year 339 588 8,165 105 9,196Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2024 3,816 18,965 56,911 587 80,279Book value, 31 Dec. 2024 55 2,372 2,451 28,211 132 58 33,279
74Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
11.2 Tangible assets
2023
Right-of-use assets, Right-of-use assets, Advance paymentsBuildings and Machinery and buildings and machinery and and acquisitions(EUR 1,000) Land structures Equipment structures equipment in progress TotalAcquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2023 55 6,106 20,170 71,624 470 81 98,507Translation differences -46 -165 -587 -798Increases 719 548 7,772 221 417 9,677Decreases -915 -465 -18 -1,398Transfers between categories 92 337 -429 -Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2023 55 5,957 20,425 78,791 691 69 105,988Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2023 4,171 18,296 41,067 412 63,946Translation differences -49 -165 -453 -666Accumulated depreciation of decreases -915 -465 -10 -1,390Depreciation during the financial year 263 505 8,159 70 8,998Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2023 3,471 18,171 48,763 482 70,888Book value, 31 Dec. 2023 55 2,486 2,254 30,028 209 69 35,100
11.3 Other financial assets
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Other financial assets 530 595
Other financial assets comprise listed shares and bonds.
75Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
12. CURRENT ASSETS
12.1 Inventories
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Raw materials and consumables 5,775 5,211Finished products/goods 29,655 24,057Total 35,429 29,268Impairment of inventories -487 -458
12.2 Trade and other receivables
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Trade receivables 13,645 16,643Other receivables 1,172 877Prepaid expenses and accrued income 2,866 2,168Total 17,683 19,688Prepaid expenses and accrued income Royalty receivables 219 277 Receivables from payment service providers 675 89 Commission receivables 145 24 Employee benefits 45 5 Other prepaid expenses and accrued income 1,782 1,773Total 2,866 2,168
Analysis of trade receivables by age
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Trade receivables not past due 9,587 12,775Past due less than 30 days 2,834 2,760 30–60 days 699 595 more than 60 days 525 513Total 13,645 16,643
The amount of credit loss provisions recognized on trade receivables, EUR 80 (155) thousand, reduces
receivables in the balance sheet. The expected credit loss risk is not material due to the Group’s effective credit
management policy, where the credit history of wholesale customers is monitored regularly and prepayments,
guarantees and letters of credit are used when needed.
76Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
13. SHARES AND OTHER EQUITY
Reserve for investedNumber of shares non-restricted Number ofoutstanding Share capital, EUR equity, EUR treasury shares Treasury shares, EUR1 Jan. 2023 40,571,380 8,040,000 1,227,957 77,790 -541,10531 Dec. 2023 40,571,380 8,040,000 1,227,957 77,790 -541,1051 Jan. 2024 40,571,380 8,040,000 1,227,957 77,790 -541,10531 Dec. 2024 40,571,380 8,040,000 1,227,957 77,790 -541,105
Marimekko Corporation’s Articles of Association do not specify maximum share capital. Marimekko Corporation
has one series of shares; the shares do not have a nominal value. All shares in issue have been paid in full. As
at 31 December 2024, Marimekko Corporation held 77,790 treasury shares. The Group does not have any share
option schemes.
The Board of Directors of Marimekko proposed on 19 February 2025 to the AGM on 15 April 2025 that a regular
dividend of EUR 0.40 and an extraordinary dividend of EUR 0.25 per share is paid for 2024.
The reserve for invested non-restricted equity contains other equity-like investments and the share subscription
price to the extent that this is not entered in share capital under a specific decision.
77Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
14. DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset against each other where the Group has a legally enforceable
right to offset deferred tax assets and liabilities based on taxable earnings for the period against each other
and where they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on the same taxpayer or different
taxpayers and the intention is to settle on a net basis. The amounts offset against each other are as follows:
Changes in deferred taxes in 2024
Recognized in the(EUR 1,000) 1 Jan. 2024 income statement 31 Dec. 2024Deferred tax assets Internal margin of inventories 416 76 493 Lease agreements 6,459 159 6,618 Intangible assets 726 -191 535Total 7,601 44 7,645Deferred tax liabilities Accumulated depreciation difference -259 -27 -286 Lease agreements -6,054 -100 -6,154 Fixed costs included in inventories -177 -39 -216Total -6,491 -165 -6,656Deferred tax asset, net 1,110 989
Changes in deferred taxes in 2023
Recognized in the(EUR 1,000) 1 Jan. 2023 income statement 31 Dec. 2023Deferred tax assets Internal margin of inventories 371 45 416 Lease agreements 6,354 105 6,459 Intangible assets 587 139 726Total 7,312 289 7,601Deferred tax liabilities Accumulated depreciation difference -225 -35 -259 Lease agreements -6,133 79 -6,054 Fixed costs included in inventories -206 29 -177Total -6,564 73 -6,491Deferred tax asset, net 748 1,110
Deferred tax assets are recognized for tax losses carried forward to the extent that the realization of the related
tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable. Deferred tax assets amounting to EUR 122 thousand (69)
have not been recognized.
78Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
15. INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
15.1 Non-current liabilities
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Lease liabilities 22,297 24,984Total 22,297 24,984
15.2 Current liabilities
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Lease liabilities 8,350 7,309Financial liabilities - 615Total 8,350 7,925
16. OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Trade payables and other current liabilities Trade payables 9,277 9,808 Other payables 5,778 5,618 Accrued liabilities and deferred income 7,334 7,359 Advances received 1,790 1,815Total 24,181 24,599Accrued liabilities and deferred income Employee benefits 5,463 5,104 Unpaid designer and agent provisions 848 772 Return accruals 699 655 Other accrued liabilities and deferred income 325 828Total 7,334 7,359
17. FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Other financial assets 205 271
Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss comprise listed shares, bonds and currency
derivatives.
Financial assets measured at amortized cost
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Other financial assets 324 324Trade receivables 13,645 16,643Other receivables, prepaid expenses and accrued income 4,038 3,045Cash and cash equivalents 40,376 37,044
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
Trade payables 9,277 9,808Credit facilities drawn down - 615Other liabilities 14,903 14,791
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities measured at amortized cost equals their book value.
18. GUARANTEES, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Other own liabilities and commitments Lease liabilities for machinery and equipment 1,136 739
Lease liabilities relate to low-value and short-term leases not recorded in the balance sheet.
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Guarantees 4,329 4,880
Guarantees are related to letter of credits, rental and customs guarantees.
79Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
19. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Group’s related parties include the members of the Board of Directors and the Management Group, as well
as their close family members and controlling entities, the Group’s parent company and its subsidiaries.
The relationships of the Group’s parent company and subsidiaries are as follows:
Parent company
Marimekko Corporation, Helsinki, Finland¹
Subsidiaries
Share ofCompany and domicile Group’s holding, % voting rights, %Marimekko Services Oy, Helsinki, Finland 100 100Marimekko AB, Stockholm, Sweden² 100 100Marimekko Australia PTY Ltd, Victoria, Australia 100 100Marimekko GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 100 100Marimekko North America LLC, Delaware, United States 100 100Marimekko North America Retail LLC, Delaware, United States 100 100Marimekko North America Holding Co, Delaware, United States 100 100Marimekko Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China 100 100Marimekko UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom 100 100Marimekko Denmark ApS, Herlev, Denmark 100 100Marimekko Japan Godo Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan 100 100Marimekko Singapore Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Republic of Singapore 100 100Marimekko Korea Limited, Yongin, South Korea 100 100
The following transactions were carried out with related parties:
Management’s employee benefits
Paid remuneration of the President and CEO and other members of the Management Group
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Mika Ihamuotila, Chair of the Boar 58 53Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko, President and CEO 504 453Other members of the Management Group 2,405 2,294Total 2,967 2,799
Share-based incentive system
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko, President and CEO 110 105Other members of the Management Group 400 312Total 510 417
Share-based incentive system presentation has been changed to accrual basis and comparative figures has
been adjusted accordingly.
Pensions
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Mika Ihamuotila, Chair of the Boar 19 17Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko, President and CEO 86 77Other members of the Management Group 266 236Total 371 330
Remuneration to the Board of Directors
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Carol Chen 30 26Mika Ihamuotila 55 48Mikko-Heikki Inkeroinen - 31Tomoki Takebayashi 31 26Marianne Vikkula 35 31Teemu Kangas-Kärki 50 45Massimiliano Brunazzo 31 -Total 232 207Management’s employee benefits, total 4,080 3,753
Pension benefits include only statutory pension payments. The management does not have additional pension
benefits.
Related parties are among beneficiaries of a share-based incentive system. The management’s long-term incentive
system is presented in greater detail under note 4 to the financial statements.
¹ Marimekko Corporation has branch in France.
² Marimekko AB has branches in Norway and Denmark.
³ Fee paid to Mika Ihamuotila for half-time duty pursuant to a separate service agreement
80Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
20. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
During the normal course of its business operations, the Marimekko Group is exposed to financial risks. The
principal financial risks are liquidity risk, credit risk, foreign currency risk and interest rate risk.
The company’s Board of Directors has confirmed the principles, responsibilities and organization of risk
management for the Group. The Board of Directors also monitors the success of risk management. According to
its risk management principles, Marimekko classifies its risks as strategic, operational, economic and accident
risks. Economic risks include financial risks. Responsibility for the implementation of risk management measures
concerning financial risks lies with the Group’s CFO. The main objective of financial risk management is to
ensure reasonably-priced financing in all circumstances, and thereby minimize the unfavorable effects, if any, on
the Group’s financial performance.
Liquidity risk
The Group continuously seeks to assess and monitor the amount of funding required for business operations
to ensure that sufficient liquid funds are available for daily business and repayment of maturing debts. The
assessment is based on monthly cash flow and liquidity forecasts. The Group aims to maintain a high liquidity
level at all times in order to eliminate liquidity risk. In order to minimize liquidity risk, the Group’s near-term and
next few years’ financing needs can be covered by liquid funds as well as committed long-term or short-term
credit facilities or credit facilities valid until further notice. At the end of the financial year, the Group credit
facilities and revolving credit facilities totaled EUR 32,637 thousand (32,547). The amount of credit facilities
drawn down at the end of the year was EUR 0 thousand (615). Revolving facilities remained unused during 2024.
Maturity analysis for the Group’s financial liabilities; the figures are not discounted, and they include both
interest payments and capital repayments:
31 Dec. 2024(EUR 1,000) Less than 1 year 1–2 years 3–5 years Over 5 yearsLease liabilities 9,267 12,794 6,889 4,079Trade and other payables 24,181 - - -Total 33,447 12,794 6,889 4,07931 Dec. 2023(EUR 1,000) Less than 1 year 1–2 years 3–5 years Over 5 yearsLease liabilities 8,259 13,410 6,811 6,516Credit facilities drawn down 615 - - -Trade and other payables 24,599 - - -
Total 33,473 13,410 6,811 6,516
The presentation has been changed in 2024 and the comparable year has been adjusted accordingly.
Credit risk
The trade receivables generated in the Group’s wholesale operations are associated with a credit risk, which is
reduced by the Group’s broad and geographically diverse clientele. Marimekko continuously monitors the credit
limits, credit history and financial situation of its customers. The Group has a centralized process in place for this
purpose. Responsibility for the credit monitoring process lies with the Group’s CFO. The credit risk related to
the wholesale business is also reduced by means of credit insurance, advance payments, bank guarantees and
letters of credit.
Retail customers pay for their purchases using cash or the most common debit/credit cards.
Note 12.2 (Trade and other receivables) to the consolidated financial statements includes an analysis of trade
receivables by age.
Foreign currency risk
The Group’s currency risk consists of sales and purchases made in foreign currency as well as balance sheet
items and foreign-currency-denominated net investments in units abroad.
Transaction risk
The Group’s transaction risk derives from currency flows connected with wholesale and retail sales as well as
purchases and operating expenses of the Group’s business units, and from loans and receivables denominated
in foreign currency. The Group’s principal sales currency is the Euro. The other significant sales and invoicing
currencies are the US dollar, Swedish krona, Danish krone, Norwegian krone, Australian dollar and Canadian
dollar. The principal currencies used for purchases are the Euro and, to a lesser extent, the US dollar. In 2024,
foreign-currency-denominated sales accounted for approximately 22 percent (21) of the Group’s total sales and
foreign-currency-denominated purchases made up about 19 percent (19) of the Group’s purchases.
Marimekko protects itself against the transaction risk of sales by taking account of the estimated exchange rate
changes at the time of sale when carrying out wholesale and retail pricing of products. Foreign subsidiaries are
financed primarily in local currency, so they do not incur significant transaction risk.
The Group’s transaction exposure
Foreign-currency-denominated assets and liabilities (cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade
payables) converted to euro amounts using the exchange rates quoted on the closing date(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023 USD SEK AUD USD SEK AUDCurrent assets 2,694 7,970 3,064 3,416 4,580 4,653Current liabilities -230 -190 -87 -722 -138 -90Foreign currency exposure in the balance sheet 2,464 7,780 2,977 2,694 4,442 4,563
81Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
Sensitivity analysis, effect on net result for the period
The strengthening or weakening of the Euro against the US dollar, the Swedish krona or the Australian dollar
would, given that all other factors remain unchanged, impact the Group’s net result for the period as follows. The
impact portrays the Group’s transaction risk.
2024 2023 USD SEK AUD USD SEK AUDStrengthening of the Euro by 10 percent Effect on net result for the period, EUR 1,000 399 -1,228 -459 281 -1,086 -470
Translation risk
The Marimekko Group incurs translation risk when the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are
translated into euro amounts in the consolidated financial statements. For foreign-currency-denominated
net investments, the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates appear as translation differences
in the Group’s equity. Marimekko has so far not hedged against translation risk for equity, as the
subsidiary sales and net investments are small from the Group’s perspective.
Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk primarily results from changes in interest rates on cash and cash
equivalents and on current and noncurrent interest-bearing liabilities due to changes in market rates.
Changes in the interest rates of these assets and liabilities have an impact on the Group’s profit.
The average interest rate of interest-bearing liabilities without lease liabitilies was 0% (3.97%) since group
had no other interest bearing liabilities at balance sheet date. The change in the interest rate does not have a
significant effect on the financial year’s result.(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Cash and cash equivalents 40,376 37,044Credit facilities drawn down - 615
21. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The purpose of capital management is to maintain a capital structure that optimally supports the Group’s
strategic objectives. Efficient capital management measures ensure normal operating conditions for the
business and increase the shareholder value in the long term. The principal factors affecting the capital
structure are profitability, dividend distribution and investments. The capital managed equals the shareholders’
equity shown on the consolidated balance sheet. No external capital requirements are applied to the Group.
The Group continuously monitors its capital structure. The Group’s strategic objective is to keep the ratio of net
debt to EBITDA at or below 2 (one of the company’s long-term financial goals). At the end of 2024, the ratio of
net debt to EBITDA was -0.24 (-0.10), i.e. well below the long-term goal level.
Net debt / EBITDA
(EUR 1,000) 2024 2023Interest-bearing liabilities Non-current lease liabilities 22,297 24,984 Current lease liabilities 8,350 7,309 Other current interest-bearing liabilities - 615Total 30,647 32,909Cash and cash equivalents 40,376 37,044Net debt -9,729 -4,135EBITDA 40,724 40,580Net debt / EBITDA -0.24 -0.10
82Consolidated financial statements, IFRS
Change in net debt
Loans from Cash andfinancial Lease cash(1 000 euroa) institutions liabilities Equivalents TotalBook value, 1 Jan. 2024 -615 -32,294 37,044 4,135Changes in net debt, cash: Loan repayments 621 621 Payments of lease liabilities 7,978 7,978 Change in cash and cash equivalents 3,166 3,166Cash flows, total 621 7,978 3,166 11,766Changes in net debt, non-cash: Changes in lease liabilities including effects of exchange rate fluctuations -6,332 -6,332 Effects of exchange rate fluctuations -6 0 166 160Non-cash movements, total -6 -6,332 166 -6,171Book value, 31 Dec. 2024 - -30,647 40,376 9,729Book value, 1 Jan. 2023 -2,169 -31,824 32,711 -1,282Changes in net debt, cash: Loan repayments 1,562 1,562 Payments of lease liabilities 7,381 7,381 Change in cash and cash equivalents 4,814 4,814Cash flows, total 1,562 7,381 4,814 13,757Changes in net debt, non-cash: Changes in lease liabilities including effects of exchange rate fluctuations -7,851 -7,851 Effects of exchange rate fluctuations -8 -482 -490Non-cash movements, total -8 -7,851 -482 -8,341Book value, 31 Dec. 2023 -615 -32,294 37,044 4,135
22. EVENTS AFTER THE CLOSING DATE
The management of the company is not aware of any significant events after the closing date.
83
Parent company financial statements, FAS
PARENT COMPANY INCOME STATEMENT
(€) Note 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
NET SALES 1. 175,552,280.63 168,742,808.88
Other operating income 2. 137,915.30 86,355.88
Change in inventories of finished goods and work in progress 5,164,093.70 -4,735,944.43
Materials and services 3. -76,691,866.71 -62,082,858.54
Personnel expenses 4. -26,775,117.68 -26,039,583.87
Depreciation and impairments 5. -2,233,845.06 -1,677,494.37
Other operating expenses 6. -44,919,626.26 -42,430,207.49
OPERATING PROFIT 30,233,833.92 31,863,076.06
Financial income and expenses 7. 1,170,873.43 -91,439.55
RESULT BEFORE APPROPRIATIONS AND TAXES 31,404,707.35 31,771,636.51
Appropriations 8. -132,845.25 -172,809.00
Income taxes 9. -6,260,555.26 -6,239,355.46
NET RESULT FOR THE PERIOD 25,011,306.84 25,359,472.05
84Parent company financial statements, FAS
PARENT COMPANY BALANCE SHEET
(€) Note 31 Dec. 2024 31 Dec. 2023
ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS
Intangible assets 10.1 6,068,596.48 5,943,073.44
Tangible assets 10.2 2,233,513.27 2,091,294.81
Investments 10.3
 Participations in Group companies 2,294,459.41 1,939,748.32
 Other shares and participations 205,660.46 271,425.58
 Other receivables 323,854.00 2,823,973.87 323,854.00 2,535,027.90
FIXED ASSETS, TOTAL 11,126,083.62 10,569,396.15
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories 11. 31,957,531.06 26,342,614.37
Long-term receivables 12. 6,367,274.87 0.00
Current receivables 13. 27,662,699.00 32,485,912.66
Cash in hand and at banks 34,610,577.60 32,348,915.99
CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL 100,598,082.53 91,177,443.02
ASSETS, TOTAL 111,724,166.15 101,746,839.17
(€) Note 31 Dec. 2024 31 Dec. 2023
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 14.
Share capital 8,040,000.00 8,040,000.00
Reserve for invested non-restricted equity 1,227,957.00 1,227,957.00
Retained earnings 44,365,490.59 34,017,429.14
Net result for the period 25,011,306.84 25,359,472.05
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY, TOTAL 78,644,754.43 68,644,858.19
ACCUMULATED APPROPRIATIONS 15. 1,429,298.54 1,296,453.29
LIABILITIES 16.
Current liabilities 31,650,113.18 31,805,527.69
LIABILITIES, TOTAL 31,650,113.18 31,805,527.69
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND LIABILITIES, TOTAL 111,724,166.15 101,746,839.17
85Parent company financial statements, FAS
PARENT COMPANY CASH FLOW STATEMENT
(€) 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS
Net result for the period 25,011,306.84 25,359,472.05
 Depreciation and impairments 2,233,845.06 1,677,494.37
 Change in depreciation difference 132,845.25 172,809.00
 Financial income and expenses -1,170,873.43 91,439.55
 Taxes 6,260,555.26 6,239,355.46
Cash flow before change in working capital 32,467,678.98 33,540,570.43
Change in working capital
 Increase (-) / decrease (+) in current non-interest-bearing
 trade receivables -661,480.90 -10,025,658.64
 Increase (-) / decrease (+) in inventories -5,614,916.69 4,674,934.76
 Increase (+) / decrease (-) in current non-interest-bearing
 liabilities -155,055.38 1,206,888.05
Cash flow from operations before financial items and taxes 26,036,226.01 29,396,734.60
Paid interest and payments on other financial expenses -290,561.04 -328,254.85
Interest received and payments on other financial income 1,151,424.79 612,175.94
Taxes paid -6,507,375.30 -6,659,352.23
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS 20,389,714.46 23,021,303.46
(€) 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2024 1 Jan.–31 Dec. 2023
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTS
Investments in tangible and intangible assets -2,501,586.56 -2,754,303.15
Purchase of subsidiary shares -67,688.46 -33,910.41
Change in loan receivables -730,985.97 -407,112.71
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTS -3,300,260.99 -3,195,326.27
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING
Dividends paid -15,011,410.60 -13,794,269.20
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING -15,011,410.60 -13,794,269.20
Change in cash and cash equivalents 2,078,042.87 6,031,707.99
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year 32,348,915.99 26,616,403.29
Effects of exchange rate fluctuations 183,618.74 -299,195.29
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year 34,610,577.60 32,348,915.99
86Parent company financial statements, FAS
NOTES TO THE PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ACCOUNTING POLICY
Marimekko Corporation’s financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with the legislation and
regulations that are in force in Finland. The financial
year of the company is the calendar year.
Valuation of fixed assets
Fixed assets are recorded in the balance sheet at the
original acquisition cost less depreciation according
to plan. Depreciation according to plan has been
calculated using straight-line depreciation on the
estimated useful life of the fixed assets.
Periods of depreciation:
· intangible rights 5 years
· computer software 3–5 years
· other capitalized expenditure 3–15 years
· buildings 30 years
· machinery and equipment 5–15 years.
Shares have been valuated at fair value in
accordance with IFRS 9 standard.
More information on valuation can be found in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Inventories
Inventories are presented at the acquisition cost or
at the lower probable net realisation value. The value
of inventories does not include any share of fixed
purchasing and manufacturing costs.
Pension commitments
The pension security of the company’s personnel has
been arranged under the statutory employee pension
plan (TyEL) through a pension insurance company.
Items denominated in foreign currency
The foreign-currency-denominated receivables and
liabilities of the company have been converted to
euro amounts using the exchange rate quoted by the
European Central Bank on the closing date.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized when the buyer obtains control
of the product – that is when the significant risks and
rewards of ownership have been transferred to the
buyer. In wholesale, this is mainly the moment when
the goods are handed over to the customer as set
forth in the agreed delivery clause. In wholesale and
export trade, the terms of delivery determine the
point of time when the customer obtains control of
the goods. In retail where cash or a credit card is used
as means of payment, the income is recognized at the
time of sale.
More information on revenue recognition can
be found in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Leasing
Leasing payments are treated as rental expenditures.
Appropriations
Appropriations consist of depreciation differences
due to differences between accounting and tax
depreciation of tangible and intangible assets.
Taxes
Income taxes include income taxes calculated on
the result for the financial year and taxes paid or
refunded in previous financial years. Deferred taxes
are not recognized in the parent company’s income
statement and balance sheet.
Branches
Branches are consolidated into Marimekko
Corporation’s accounts and intercompany items have
been eliminated.
Marimekko Corporation has branch in France.
Loans
Loan receivables from the Group companies are
presented as non-current receivables in the financial
statements for 2024. Previously these were classified
as current receivables.
87Parent company financial statements, FAS
NOTES TO THE INCOME STATEMENT
1. NET SALES BY MARKET AREA
(€) 2024 2023
Finland
 Retail sales 70,636,029.03 66,626,663.02
 Wholesale sales 30,056,564.61 32,133,033.47
 Licencing income 293,451.37 154,297.09
Total 100,986,045.01 98,913,993.58
Scandinavia
 Retail sales 2,517,618.27 2,174,961.34
 Wholesale sales 14,767,445.19 12,705,221.35
 Licencing income 150,000.00 75,000.00
Total 17,435,063.46 14,955,182.69
EMEA
 Retail sales 3,639,362.46 3,008,161.86
 Wholesale sales 8,826,658.28 10,802,263.96
 Licencing income 585,981.79 834,100.90
Total 13,052,002.53 14,644,526.72
North America
 Wholesale sales 7,964,858.67 7,235,749.13
 Licencing income 527,229.02 364,562.78
Total 8,492,087.69 7,600,311.91
Asia-Pacific
 Wholesale sales 33,610,648.74 30,871,046.85
 Licencing income 1,976,433.21 1,757,747.13
Total 35,587,081.95 32,628,793.98
(€) 2024 2023
International sales (total)
 Retail sales 6,156,980.73 5,183,123.20
 Wholesale sales 65,169,610.88 61,614,281.29
 Licencing income 3,239,644.02 3,031,410.81
Total 74,566,235.63 69,828,815.30
Retail sales 76,793,009.76 71,809,786.22
Wholesale sales 95,226,175.49 93,747,314.76
Licencing income 3,533,095.38 3,185,707.90
Total 175,552,280.63 168,742,808.88
Net sales by product line
Fashion 56,792,956.49 52,185,009.61
Home 79,741,590.08 75,575,047.58
Bags and accessories 39,017,734.06 40,982,751.69
Total 175,552,280.63 168,742,808.88
2. OTHER OPERATING INCOME
(€) 2024 2023
Rental income 54,000.00 54,000.00
Other income 83,915.30 32,355.88
Total 137,915.30 86,355.88
88Parent company financial statements, FAS
3. MATERIALS AND SERVICES
(€) 2024 2023
Materials and supplies
 Purchases during the financial year 50,916,612.44 40,007,296.95
 Increase (-) / decrease (+) in inventories -450,823.00 -70,930.00
 Total 50,465,789.44 39,936,366.95
External services 26,226,077.27 22,146,491.59
Total 76,691,866.71 62,082,858.54
4. PERSONNEL EXPENSES
(€) 2024 2023
Salaries, wages and bonuses 22,475,894.60 21,669,677.04
Pension and pension insurance payments 3,765,262.42 3,591,466.59
Other indirect social expenditure 533,960.66 778,440.24
Total 26,775,117.68 26,039,583.87
Salaries and bonuses for management
 Members of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO 794,179.00 712,595.00
Itemised in the note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
Average number of employees
Salaried employees 372 365
Production personnel 16 19
Total 388 384
5. DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENTS
DEPRECIATION
(€) 2024 2023
Intangible assets
 Intangible rights 52,868.58 43,750.08
 Computer softwares 1,342,709.99 970,356.86
 Other capitalised expenditure 212,055.72 195,780.96
 Total 1,607,634.29 1,209,887.90
Tangible assets
 Buildings and structures 5,038.87 5,038.88
 Machinery and equipment 507,015.85 462,567.59
 Total 512,054.72 467,606.47
IMPAIRMENTS
(€) 2024 2023
Intangible assets
 Computer softwares 114,156.05 0.00
 Total 114,156.05 0.00
 Total 2,233,845.06 1,677,494.37
89
6. OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
(€) 2024 2023
Leases 8,781,409.47 7,660,106.78
Marketing 13,744,002.66 13,478,116.53
Other costs 22,394,214.13 21,291,984.18
Total 44,919,626.26 42,430,207.49
AUDITOR’S FEE
(€) 2024 2023
KPMG
 Audit 84,087.89 81,057.73
 Assignments referred to in section 1, subsection 1,
 point 2 of the Audit Act 38,300.00 0.00
 Other services 29,301.25 3,360.00
Total 151,689.14 84,417.73
7. FINANCIAL INCOME AND EXPENSES
(€) 2024 2023
Other interest and financial income
 From Group companies 522,784.56 391,887.32
 From others 1,176,594.45 306,257.55
  Changes in value of investments 0.00 82,894.18
  Change in fair value of derivatives 0.00 1,788.00
Total 1,699,379.01 782,827.05
Interest and other financial expenses
 Change in fair value of shares 65,765.12 0.00
 To others 462,740.46 874,266.60
 Total 528,505.58 874,266.60
Financial income and expenses total 1,170,873.43 -91,439.55
Financial income and expenses include exchange
rate differences (net)
 Realised -19,024.26 -26,852.50
 Unrealised 384,624.54 -501,271.82
Total 365,600.28 -528,124.32
8. APPROPRIATIONS
(€) 2024 2023
Change in depreciation difference -132,845.25 -172,809.00
Total -132,845.25 -172,809.00
9. INCOME TAXES
(€) 2024 2023
Income taxes on operations 6,260,555.26 6,239,355.46
Total 6,260,555.26 6,239,355.46
Parent company financial statements, FAS
90
10. NOTES TO THE BALANCE SHEET
FIXED ASSETS
10.1 Intangible assets
2024
Advance payments
Intangible Computer Other capitalized and acquisitions
(€) rights software expenditure in progress Total
Acquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2024 1,943,762.08 10,642,613.71 7,018,066.47 2,099,846.12 21,704,288.38
Increases 47,651.41 44,913.00 136.15 1,652,072.91 1,744,773.47
Transfers between categories 3,126,879.40 102,539.91 -3,126,879.40 102,539.91
Decreases -613,599.02 -613,599.02
Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2024 1,991,413.49 13,200,807.09 7,120,742.53 625,039.63 22,938,002.74
Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2024 1,788,510.22 8,819,195.06 5,153,509.66 15,761,214.94
Depreciation during the financial year 52,868.58 1,342,709.99 212,055.72 1,607,634.29
Impairments 114,156.05 114,156.05
Accumalated depreciaton of decreases -613,599.02 -613,599.02
Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2024 1,841,378.80 9,662,462.08 5,365,565.38 16,869,406.26
Book value, 31 Dec. 2024 150,034.69 3,538,345.01 1,755,177.15 625,039.63 6,068,596.48
2023
Advance payments
Intangible Computer Other capitalized and acquisitions
(€) rights software expenditure in progress Total
Acquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2023 1,866,392.00 10,100,423.40 7,463,121.77 1,076,696.26 20,506,633.43
Increases 77,370.08 46,944.16 147,459.92 1,787,361.23 2,059,135.39
Transfers between categories 764,211.37 91,886.11 -764,211.37 91,886.11
Decreases -268,965.22 -684,401.33 -953,366.55
Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2023 1,943,762.08 10,642,613.71 7,018,066.47 2,099,846.12 21,704,288.38
Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2023 1,744,760.14 8,117,803.42 5,642,130.03 15,504,693.59
Depreciation during the financial year 43,750.08 970,356.86 195,780.96 1,209,887.90
Accumalated depreciaton of decreases -268,965.22 -684,401.33 -953,366.55
Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2023 1,788,510.22 8,819,195.06 5,153,509.66 15,761,214.94
Book value, 31 Dec. 2023 155,251.86 1,823,418.65 1,864,556.81 2,099,846.12 5,943,073.44
Parent company financial statements, FAS
91
10.2 Tangible assets
2024
Advance payments
Land and Buildings and Machinery and Other tangible and acquisitions
(€) water areas structures equipment assets in progress Total
Acquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2024 38,165.97 55,633.88 13,619,501.79 28,033.93 68,600.00 13,809,935.57
Increases 199,811.03 557,002.06 756,813.09
Transfers between categories 465,117.35 -567,657.26 -102,539.91
Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2024 38,165.97 55,633.88 14,284,430.17 28,033.93 57,944.80 14,464,208.75
Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2024 -9,451.53 11,728,092.29 11,718,640.76
Depreciation during the financial year 5,038.87 507,015.85 512,054.72
Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2024 -4,412.66 12,235,108.14 12,230,695.48
Book value, 31 Dec. 2024 38,165.97 60,046.54 2,049,322.03 28,033.93 57,944.80 2,233,513.27
2023
Advance payments
Land and Buildings and Machinery and Other tangible and acquisitions
(€) water areas structures equipment assets in progress Total
Acquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2023 38,165.97 285,816.33 13,465,156.30 28,033.93 81,244.40 13,898,416.93
Increases 278,532.43 416,635.33 695,167.76
Transfers between categories 337,393.62 -429,279.73 -91,886.11
Decreases -230,182.45 -461,580.56 -691,763.01
Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2023 38,165.97 55,633.88 13,619,501.79 28,033.93 68,600.00 13,809,935.57
Accumulated depreciation, 1 Jan. 2023 215,692.04 11,727,105.26 11,942,797.30
Depreciation during the financial year 5,038.88 462,567.59 467,606.47
Cumulative depreciation of decreases -230,182.45 -461,580.56 -691,763.01
Accumulated depreciation, 31 Dec. 2023 -9,451.53 11,728,092.29 11,718,640.76
Book value, 31 Dec. 2023 38,165.97 65,085.41 1,891,409.50 28,033.93 68,600.00 2,091,294.81
Parent company financial statements, FAS
92
10.3 Investments
2024
Shares in Group Other shares and Other
(€) companies participations receivables Total
Acquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2024 1,939,748.32 271,425.58 323,854.00 2,535,027.90
Increases 354,711.09 354,711.09
Changes in value -65,765.12 -65,765.12
Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2024 2,294,459.41 205,660.46 323,854.00 2,823,973.87
Book value, 31 Dec. 2024 2,294,459.41 205,660.46 323,854.00 2,823,973.87
Detailed information of Group holdings is presented in note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
2023
Shares in Group Other shares and Other
(€) companies participations receivables Total
Acquisition cost, 1 Jan. 2023 1,905,837.91 188,531.38 323,854.00 2,418,223.29
Changes in value 33,910.41 33,910.41
Transfers between groups 82,894.20 82,894.20
Acquisition cost, 31 Dec. 2023 1,939,748.32 271,425.58 323,854.00 2,535,027.90
Book value, 31 Dec. 2023 1,939,748.32 271,425.58 323,854.00 2,535,027.90
11.  INVENTORIES
(€) 2024 2023
Raw materials and consumables 5,515,589.00 5,064,766.00
Finished products/goods 26,441,942.06 21,277,848.37
Total 31,957,531.06 26,342,614.37
12.  LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
(€) 2024 2023
Receivables from Group companies
 Loan receivables 6,367,274.87 0.00
Total 6,367,274.87 0.00
13.  CURRENT RECEIVABLES
(€) 2024 2023
Trade receivables 13,322,018.25 16,316,711.23
Receivables from Group companies
 Trade receivables 11,044,898.59 8,480,148.81
 Loan receivables 0.00 5,722,305.73
 Prepaid expenses and accrued income 216.20 1,498.16
 Total 11,045,114.79 14,203,952.70
Other receivables 311,658.71 17,912.88
Prepaid expenses and accrued income 2,983,907.25 1,947,335.85
Total 27,662,699.00 32,485,912.66
Prepaid expenses and accrued income
 Royalty receivables 218,670.00 227,268.03
 Occupational health care reimbursement 120,000.00 130,000.00
 Receivables from payment service providers 675,206.17 89,462.41
 Commission receivables 145,000.55 23,687.23
 Other prepaid expenses and accrued income 1,825,030.53 1,426,918.18
Total 2,983,907.25 1,947,335.85
Parent company financial statements, FAS
93
14.  SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Restricted Shareholders’ equity
(€) 2024 2023
Share capital, 1 Jan. 8,040,000.00 8,040,000.00
Share capital, 31 Dec. 8,040,000.00 8,040,000.00
Restricted Shareholders’ equity, total 8,040,000.00 8,040,000.00
Non-restricted Shareholders’ equity
Reserve for invested non-restricted equity, 1 Jan. 1,227,957.00 1,227,957.00
Reserve for invested non-restricted equity, 31 Dec. 1,227,957.00 1,227,957.00
Treasury shares, 1 Jan. -541,105.08 -541,105.08
Treasury shares, 31. Dec -541,105.08 -541,105.08
Retained earnings, 1 Jan. 59,918,006.27 48,352,803.42
Dividends paid -15,011,410.60 -13,794,269.20
Retained earnings, 31 Dec. 44,906,595.67 34,558,534.22
Net result for the period 25,011,306.84 25,359,472.05
Non-restricted Shareholders’ equity, total 70,604,754.43 60,604,858.19
Shareholders’ equity, total 78,644,754.43 68,644,858.19
Calculation of distributable funds, 31 Dec.
(€) 2024 2023
Retained earnings 44,906,595.67 34,558,534.22
Net result for the period 25,011,306.84 25,359,472.05
Purchase of own shares -541,105.08 -541,105.08
Reserve for invested non-restricted equity 1,227,957.00 1,227,957.00
Total 70,604,754.43 60,604,858.19
15.  ACCUMULATED APPROPRIATIONS
(€) 2024 2023
Accumulated depreciation difference
 Intangible rights 28,451.90 24,310.85
 Other capitalised expenditure 885,932.97 771,333.76
 Machinery and equipment 391,328.92 372,866.54
 Buildings and structures 123,584.75 127,942.14
Total 1,429,298.54 1,296,453.29
16.  LIABILITIES
(€) 2024 2023
Advances received 1,741,761.86 1,760,847.64
Trade payables 8,699,901.85 9,250,777.88
Debts to Group companies
 Trade payables 3,003,875.10 2,609,605.63
 Accrued liabilities and deferred income 6,379,578.79 6,587,405.43
Other current liabilities 4,452,567.89 4,376,503.65
Accrued liabilities and deferred income 7,372,427.69 7,220,387.46
Total 31,650,113.18 31,805,527.69
Accrued liabilities and deferred income
 Wages and salaries with social security contributions 5,208,259.66 4,932,486.19
 Unpaid designer provisions and agent fees 848,080.20 771,665.77
 Return accruals 698,511.20 655,062.04
 Other accrued liabilities and deferred income 617,576.63 861,173.46
Total 7,372,427.69 7,220,387.46
Parent company financial statements, FAS
94
17.  GUARANTEES, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
(€) 2024 2023
Leasing liabilities
 Payments due in the following financial year 611,623.56 526,478.65
 Payments due later 708,092.59 433,175.79
Total 1,319,716.15 959,654.44
Liabilities relating to lease agreements
 Payments due in the following financial year 7,326,304.92 6,862,477.68
 Payments due later 19,206,510.95 25,442,703.57
Total 26,532,815.87 32,305,181.25
Guarantees on behalt of subsidiaries 878,903.62 1,596,585.84
Indirect liability for rent and other guarantees 3,450,384.28 3,283,541.61
The breakdown of guarantees on behalf of subsidiaries and other indirect liabilities including lease liabilities has
been changed. The comparable year has been adjusted accordingly.
Parent company financial statements, FAS
95
Signatures to the financial statements and
the report of the Board of Directors
CONFIRMATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE PRESIDENT & CEO
We confirm that
the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with the
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European
Union and the financial statements of the parent company prepared in
accordance with the laws and regulations governing the preparation of financial
statements in Finland give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial
position and profit or loss of the company and the undertakings included in the
consolidation taken as a whole;
the Report of Board of Directors includes a fair review of the development
and performance of the business and the position of the company and the
undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a
description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face and
that the sustainability report within the Report of Board of Directors is prepared
in accordance with sustainability reporting standards referred to in Chapter 7 of
the Accounting Act (1336/1997) and with the Article 8 of Taxonomy Regulation
(EU) 2020/852.
Helsinki, 4 March 2025
Mika Ihamuotila Teemu Kangas-Kärki
Chair of the Board Vice Chair of the Board
Tomoki Takebayashi Massimiliano Brunazzo
Member of the Board Member of the Board
Carol Chen Marianne Vikkula
Member of the Board Member of the Board
Tiina Alahuhta-Kasko
President and CEO
THE AUDITOR’S NOTE
Our auditor’s report has been issued today.
Helsinki, 4 March 2025
KPMG Oy Ab
Heli Tuuri
Authorized Public Accountant
96
Auditor’s Report
TO THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MARIMEKKO CORPORATION
REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of Marimekko Corporation (business identity code 0111316-2) for the
year ended 31 December 2024. The financial statements comprise the consolidated balance sheet, income
statement, statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity, statement of cash flows and
notes, including material accounting policy information, as well as the parent company’s balance sheet, income
statement, statement of cash flows and notes.
In our opinion
the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the group’s financial position, financial
performance and cash flows in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU
the financial statements give a true and fair view of the parent company’s financial performance and financial
position in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the preparation of financial statements in
Finland and comply with statutory requirements.
Our opinion is consistent with the additional report submitted to the Audit and Remuneration Committee.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with good auditing practice in Finland. Our responsibilities under
good auditing practice are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Statements section of our report.
We are independent of the parent company and of the group companies in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are applicable in Finland and are relevant to our audit, and we have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
In our best knowledge and understanding, the non-audit services that we have provided to the parent
company and group companies are in compliance with laws and regulations applicable in Finland regarding
these services, and we have not provided any prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of
regulation (EU) 537/2014. The non-audit services that we have provided have been disclosed in note 6 to the
consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. The materiality is determined based
on our professional judgement and is used to determine the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures
and to evaluate the effect of identified misstatements on the financial statements as a whole. The level of
materiality we set is based on our assessment of the magnitude of misstatements that, individually or in
aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have influence on the economic decisions of the users of the
financial statements. We have also taken into account misstatements and/or possible misstatements that in our
opinion are material for qualitative reasons for the users of the financial statements.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of
the financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the
financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion
on these matters. The significant risks of material misstatement referred to in the EU Regulation No 537/2014
point (c) of Article 10(2) are included in the description of key audit matters below.
We have also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls. This includes consideration of
whether there was evidence of management bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
97Auditor’s Report
THE KEY AUDIT MATTER HOW THE MATTER WAS ADDRESSED IN THE AUDIT
Revenue recognition (”Revenue recognition and net sales” in the consolidated accounting principles and note 1)
Marimekko Group’s revenue is generated from wholesale and retail sales of clothes, bags and accessories, and
interior decoration products as well as licensing income.
Group’s net sales were EUR 183 million, consisting of a large number of transactions from different revenue
streams as well as diverse sales contracts and terms with customers.
Wholesale contracts include several different delivery terms and might contain right of return, which
determine when the ownership of the product is transferred to the customer. Retail sales mainly consists of
small transactions paid by cash or payment cards and the revenue is recognized when the product is sold to the
customer. Revenue from licensing is recognized in accordance with the terms of the contract.
Revenue recognition is a key audit matter due to a large number of transactions as well as for a risk that
revenue is recognized in an incorrect period.
We have formed an understanding of accounting principles and practices in different revenue streams and
evaluated the appropriateness of the revenue recognition principles in relation to IFRS, tested company’s key
controls related to sales and performed substantive audit procedures.
For wholesale we have selected a sample of sales transactions comparing them to sales invoices, contracts,
delivery notes and payments received.
For retail sales we have reviewed cash and sales routines in selected retail stores.
We have tested that the revenue has been recognized in the right financial period by comparing sales
transactions, invoices and delivery terms to actual deliveries as well as by testing possible return provisions
and a sample of credit invoices made at the beginning of 2025.
We have also compared selected accounts receivables to the confirmations received from counterparties.
We have reviewed the most significant licensing contracts and that the revenue has been recognized in
accordance with the contract terms.
In addition, we considered the appropriateness of the disclosure regarding net sales.
Valuation and existence of inventory (“Inventories” in the consolidated accounting principles and note 12.1)
Marimekko purchases, manufactures and sells consumer goods and is subject to changing consumer demands.
Inventory consists of fabrics and other raw materials as well as half-finished and finished goods including
clothes, bags, accessories and interior decoration products.
Inventories are valued at the lower of acquisition cost or probable net realizable value. Manufactured
inventories include a share of directly attributable general costs of production.
Inventory value EUR 35 million is a significant item in Marimekko’s balance sheet and inventories are in
several locations. Inventory accounting includes manual processes in valuation and compiling the inventory
balances and it increases, therefore the risk for human errors. In addition, inventory includes management’s
judgement on probable net realizable value.
We evaluated the appropriateness of the accounting policies by reference to IFRS standards and tested the
company’s key controls and performed substantive audit procedures. We have attended physical stock takings
in selected inventory locations. We have analyzed company’s own results of stocktaking differences and how
they have been resolved.
We have compared the value of selected inventory items to the latest purchase prices.
We have tested slow-moving inventory items as well as exceptional values in inventory accounting.
We have compared the unit prices of selected inventory items to their sales prices.
In addition, we considered the appropriateness of the disclosure regarding inventory.
We have not identified other key audit matters relating to the financial statement of the parent company.
98Auditor’s Report
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO for the Financial Statements
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the preparation of consolidated financial
statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU,
and of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the laws and regulations governing
the preparation of financial statements in Finland and comply with statutory requirements. The Board of
Directors and the President and CEO are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible
for assessing the parent company’s and the group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as
applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting. The financial
statements are prepared using the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate
the parent company or the group or cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our
opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted
in accordance with good auditing practice will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial
statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with good auditing practice, we exercise professional judgment and
maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud
or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement
resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the parent company’s or the group’s internal control.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates
and related disclosures made by management.
Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’ and the President and CEO’s use of the going
concern basis of accounting and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists
related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the parent company’s or the group’s ability
to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw
attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures
are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the
date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the parent company or the
group to cease to continue as a going concern.
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures,
and whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events so that the financial
statements give a true and fair view.
Plan and perform the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial
information of the entities or business units within the group as a basis for forming an opinion on the
group financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit work
performed for purposes of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope
and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control
that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with relevant
ethical requirements regarding independence, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters
that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that
were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the
key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditors report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not
be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected
to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
99Auditor’s Report
OTHER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Information on our audit engagement
We were first appointed as auditors by the Annual General Meeting on 12 April 2018, and our appointment
represents a total period of uninterrupted engagement of 7 years.
Other Information
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the other information. The other
information comprises the report of the Board of Directors and the information included in the Annual Report,
but does not include the financial statements or our auditor’s report thereon. We have obtained the report of
the Board of Directors prior to the date of this auditor’s report, and the Annual Report is expected to be made
available to us after that date. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information
identified above and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the
financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
With respect to the report of the Board of Directors, our responsibility also includes considering whether the
report of the Board of Directors has been prepared in compliance with the applicable provisions, excluding the
sustainability report information on which there are provisions in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act and in the
sustainability reporting standards.
In our opinion, the information in the report of the Board of Directors is consistent with the information in
the financial statements and the report of the Board of Directors has been prepared in compliance with the
applicable provisions. Our opinion does not cover the sustainability report information on which there are
provisions in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act and in the sustainability reporting standards.
If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this
auditor’s report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to
report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Helsinki, 4 March 2025
KPMG Oy Ab
Heli Tuuri
Authorized Public Accountant, KHT
100
Assurance Report on the Sustainability Report
TO THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MARIMEKKO CORPORATION
We have performed a limited assurance engagement on the group sustainability report of Marimekko
Corporation (business identity code 0111316-2) that is referred to in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act and that is
included in the report of the Board of Directors for the financial year 1 January–31 December 2024.
Opinion
Based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained, nothing has come to our
attention that causes us to believe that the group sustainability report does not comply, in all material respects,
with
1) the requirements laid down in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act and the sustainability reporting standards
(ESRS);
2) requirements laid down in Article 8 of the Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the
Council on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation
(EU) 2019/2088 (EU Taxonomy).
Point 1 above also contains the process in which Marimekko Corporation has identified the information for
reporting in accordance with the sustainability reporting standards (double materiality assessment) and the
tagging of information as referred to in Chapter 7, Section 22 of the Accounting Act.
Our opinion does not cover the tagging of the group sustainability report with digital XBRL sustainability
tags in accordance with Chapter 7, Section 22, Subsection 1(2), of the Accounting Act, because sustainability
reporting companies have not had the possibility to comply with that provision in the absence of the ESEF
regulation or other European Union legislation.
Basis for Opinion
We performed the assurance of the group sustainability report as a limited assurance engagement in
compliance with good assurance practice in Finland and with the International Standard on Assurance
Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised) Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical
Financial Information.
Our responsibilities under this standard are further described in the Responsibilities of the Authorized
Group Sustainability Auditor section of our report.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
Other Matter
We draw attention to the fact that the group sustainability report of Marimekko Corporation that is referred to
in Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act has been prepared and assurance has been provided for it for the first time
for the financial year 1 January–31 December 2024. Our opinion does not cover the comparative information
that has been presented in the group sustainability report. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Authorized Group Sustainability Auditor’s Independence and Quality Management
We are independent of the parent company and of the group companies in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are applicable in Finland and are relevant to our engagement, and we have fulfilled our other
ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
The authorized group sustainability auditor applies International Standard on Quality Management ISQM 1,
which requires the authorized sustainability audit firm to design, implement and operate a system of quality
management including policies or procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional
standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO of Marimekko Corporation are responsible for:
the group sustainability report and for its preparation and presentation in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 7 of the Accounting Act, including the process that has been defined in the sustainability
reporting standards and in which the information for reporting in accordance with the sustainability reporting
standards has been identified as well as the tagging of information as referred to in Chapter 7, Section 22 of
the Accounting Act and
the compliance of the group sustainability report with the requirements laid down in Article 8 of the
Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a
framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088;
such internal control as the Board of Directors and the President and CEO determine is necessary to enable
the preparation of a group sustainability report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error.
101
Inherent Limitations in the Preparation of a Sustainability Report
Preparation of the sustainability report requires company to make materiality assessment to identify relevant
matters to report. This includes significant management judgement and choices. It is also characteristic to the
sustainability reporting that reporting of this kind of information includes estimates and assumptions as well as
measurement and estimation uncertainty. Furthermore, when reporting forward looking information company
has to disclose assumptions related to potential future events and describe company´s possible future actions
in relation to these events. Actual outcome may differ as forecasted events do not always occur as expected.
Responsibilities of the Authorized Group Sustainability Auditor
Our responsibility is to perform an assurance engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the group
sustainability report is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue a limited
assurance report that includes our opinion. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the decisions of
users taken on the basis of the group sustainability report.
Compliance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised) requires
that we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the engagement. We
also:
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the group sustainability report, whether due to
fraud or error, and obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the engagement in order to design
assurance procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the parent company’s or the group’s internal control.
Design and perform assurance procedures responsive to those risks to obtain evidence that is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting
from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional
omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Description of the Procedures That Have Been Performed
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in
extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement. The nature, timing and extent of assurance procedures
selected depend on professional judgment, including the assessment of risks of material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement
is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance
engagement been performed.
Our procedures included for ex. the following:
We interviewed company’s management and persons responsible for the preparation and gathering of the
sustainability information.
We familiarized with interviews to the key processes related to collecting and consolidating the sustainability
information.
We got acquainted with the relevant guidances and policies related to the sustainability information disclosed
in the sustainability report.
We acquainted ourselves to the background documentation and other records prepared by the company, as
appropriate and assessed how they support the information included in the sustainability report.
In relation to the double materiality assessment process, we interviewed persons responsible for the process
and familiarized ourselves with the documentation and background materials of the double materiality
assessment.
In relation to the EU taxonomy information we interviewed the management of the company and persons
with key roles in reporting taxonomy information to understand how taxonomy eligible activities have been
identified, we obtained evidence supporting the interviews and reconciled the reported EU taxonomy
information to supporting documents and to the bookkeeping, as applicable.
We assessed the application of the ESRS sustainability reporting standards reporting principles in the
presentation of the sustainability information.
Helsinki, 4 March 2025
KPMG Oy Ab
Authorized Sustainability Audit Firm
Heli Tuuri
Authorized Sustainability Auditor, KRT
Assurance Report on the Sustainability Report
102
Independent auditor’s report on the ESEF financial
statements of Marimekko Corporation
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MARIMEKKO CORPORATION
We have performed a reasonable assurance engagement on the financial statements
74370053IOY42B9YJ350-2024-12-31-0-en.zip of Marimekko Corporation (Business ID 0111316-2) that have
been prepared in accordance with the Commission’s regulatory technical standard for the financial year ended
31 December 2024.
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are responsible for the preparation of the company’s report
of the Board of Directors and financial statements (the ESEF financial statements) in such a way that they
comply with the requirements of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard. This responsibility includes:
preparing the ESEF financial statements in XHTML format in accordance with Article 3 of the Commission’s
regulatory technical standard
tagging the primary financial statements, notes and company’s identification data in the consolidated
financial statements that are included in the ESEF financial statements with iXBRL tags in accordance with
Article 4 of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard and
ensuring the consistency between the ESEF financial statements and the audited financial statements.
The Board of Directors and the President and CEO are also responsible for such internal control as they
determine is necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF financial statements in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard.
Auditor’s independence and quality management
We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are applicable in Finland
and are relevant to the engagement we have performed, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities
in accordance with these requirements.
The auditor applies International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 1, which requires the firm to
design, implement and operate a system of quality management including policies or procedures regarding
compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Auditor’s responsibilities
Our responsibility is to, in accordance with Chapter 7, Section 8 of the Securities Markets Act, provide
assurance on the financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with the Commission’s
regulatory technical standard. We express an opinion on whether the consolidated financial statements that
are included in the ESEF financial statements have been tagged, in all material respects, in accordance with the
requirements of Article 4 of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard.
Our responsibility is to indicate in our opinion to what extent the assurance has been provided. We
conducted a reasonable assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance
Engagements (ISAE) 3000.
The engagement includes procedures to obtain evidence on:
whether the primary financial statements in the consolidated financial statements that are included in the
ESEF financial statements have been tagged, in all material respects, with iXBRL tags in accordance with the
requirements of Article 4 of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard and
whether the notes and company’s identification data in the consolidated financial statements that are
included in the ESEF financial statements have been tagged, in all material respects, with iXBRL tags in
accordance with the requirements of Article 4 of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard and
whether there is consistency between the ESEF financial statements and the audited financial statements.
The nature, timing and extent of the selected procedures depend on the auditor’s judgment. This
includes an assessment of the risk of a material deviation due to fraud or error from the requirements of the
Commission’s regulatory technical standard.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
Opinion
Our opinion pursuant to Chapter 7, Section 8 of the Securities Markets Act is that the primary financial
statements, notes and company’s identification data in the consolidated financial statements that are included
in the ESEF financial statements of Marimekko Corporation 74370053IOY42B9YJ350-2024-12-31-0-en.zip for
the financial year ended 31 December 2024 have been tagged, in all material respects, in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission’s regulatory technical standard.
Our opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements of Marimekko Corporation for the financial
year ended 31 December 2024 has been expressed in our auditor’s report dated 4 March 2025. With this
report we do not express an opinion on the audit of the consolidated financial statements nor express another
assurance conclusion.
Helsinki, 17 March 2025
KPMG Oy Ab
Heli Tuuri
Authorized Public Accountant, KHT
103
marimekko.com
74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-01-012024-12-3174370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-01-012023-12-3174370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-12-3174370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-12-3174370053IOY42B9YJ3502022-12-3174370053IOY42B9YJ3502022-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502022-12-31MAR:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-12-31MAR:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502022-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-12-31MAR:ReserveForInvestedUnrestrictedEquityMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-12-31ifrs-full:TreasurySharesMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember74370053IOY42B9YJ3502024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMemberiso4217:EURiso4217:EURxbrli:shares