
19
Our material themes and management approach
Sif conducted a double materiality assessment in 2023 as part of the annual
strategy process aiming the creation of sustainable long term value. We applied our
own reporting criteria, that are inspired by ESRS, to all defined KPI’s. We were
assisted by Deloitte and started the assessment by making a value chain analysis
and listing our most important stakeholders. The selection of stakeholders reflects
their strategic importance in Sif’s long-term value creation model. Applying peer
group and regulatory analysis - in which we analyzed the European Sustainability
Reporting Standards (ESRS) in relation to Sif’s business model - we identified
34 ESG topics that were compiled into a long list. From this long list, 12 material
ESG aspects through which the organization may have an impact on the economy,
the environment and people were shortlisted. These material ESG aspects were then
discussed with the listed stakeholders using personal interviews to prioritize and
score significance on a scale from one to five in accordance with the stipulations
outlined in ESRS 2 (chapters 4.2 and 5). To determine impact materiality, Sif used
thresholds based on scoring on a scale from one to five whereby materiality of
a topic was assessed high if the highest consolidated score for the short, medium or
long term exceeded 3.0 and as low if it scored less than 3.0. Sif assumes less than
one year for short term, two to five years for medium term and more than five years
for long term.
The financial materiality was assessed through a workshop with internal
stakeholders only, including members of the Executive Board, and based on risk
management thresholds. During the financial materiality assessment, stakeholders
assessed the financial materiality per topic based on “likelihood” and “impact” in the
short, medium and long-term. The highest score resulting from the rating on the
short, medium and long term is considered in the double materiality assessment
with a view to ensuring Sif can measure and steer on all material topics in a timely
manner.
We analysed the financial and reputational impact of these aspects on the company,
using short, medium and long-term EBITDA impact to determine materiality. Aspects
are material from a financial perspective if the aspect triggers financial effects on
the organization, i.e., generates risks or opportunities that are likely to influence the
future cash flows in the short, medium or long term.
Of the shortlist of 12, ultimately 8 aspects were classified material from both an
impact and a financial perspective with climate change and resource use and
circularity rated very high, five topics rated high and the non-GHG air pollution rated
medium from an impact perspective only since this was determined to have very
low impact on Sif from a financial materiality perspective. Main reason for this is
that Sif has established effective procedures to ensure nitrogen emissions remain
within the permitted levels. Aspects such as diversity, human rights in the supply
chain, water management and affected communities near operations remain on the
agenda of Sif’s management but are not classified material in the assessment that
was performed in 2023. The result of this analysis is shown in the materiality matrix
on page 20. For climate change, resource and circularity and talent development,
risk and opportunity were separately assessed on their materiality.
Important conclusions we gained from the discussions with stakeholders were that
Sif’s stakeholders consistently recognize Sif’s sustained position in the renewable
energy sector and the crucial role of health and safety procedures in Sif’s
operations. Stakeholders suggest and expect a potentially higher impact from Sif in
the areas of resource use and circularity and biodiversity and ecosystems in the
medium and long term. This is largely due to a growing social interest in re-use and
recycling and to the exponential growth in knowledge, technical advancements and
emerging business opportunities. Internal stakeholders indicated an increase in the
likelihood of a positive financial impact on Sif from talent development efforts and
a decrease in the likelihood of a negative financial impact related to health and
safety and talent development risks due to ongoing enhancements in employee
compensation, training initiatives and work environment. Sif’s stakeholders,
particularly its management, consider employee conditions as highly relevant from
both an impact and a financial materiality perspective. The relatively high employee
turnaround negatively impacts Sif’s results and requires management attention and
efforts to retain staff. This encompasses employees' development through targeted
trainings. It also includes working conditions, employees’ perception of equality and
inclusion, wages, working hours, housing and social security benefits. The
successful implementation of these factors is fundamental for Sif’s ability to
maintain its reputation as an employer of choice.
2023Sif Annual Report