
Annual Financial Report 44
The changes in the aggregate fair value of IFFIm’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities were:
Group and Parent Company
In Thousands of US$ 2021 2020 2019
Balance as of the beginning of the year 3,285,785 2,073,836 2,250,485
Initial fair value of pledges 719,784 1,347,303 59,150
Donor payments (443,356) (348,928) (331,119)
Fair value (losses) gains (125,648) 213,574 95,320
Balance as of the end of the year 3,436,565 3,285,785 2,073,836
Total fair value losses on sovereign pledges of US$ 126 million for the year ended 31 December 2021 are
recognised in Net fair value gains on pledges and pledge swaps in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income and are comprised of realised gains of US$ 156 million and unrealised losses of US$
282 million.
For its financial assets and liabilities, IFFIm determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the
hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation at the end of each reporting period. There were no transfers
between levels in the current or prior year.
The bases for techniques that IFFIm applied in determining the fair values of financial assets and liabilities
are summarised below.
Funds Held in Trust: The World Bank, as treasury manager, maintains IFFIm’s investments on a pooled
accounting basis and the pooled investments are reported at fair value. IFFIm’s share in pooled cash and
investments represents IFFIm’s allocated share of the Pool’s fair value at the end of the year. The fair value
is based on market quotations where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are
based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. The corresponding proportionate interest income
and investment gains or losses are recognised by IFFIm in the year in which they occur.
Sovereign Pledges Receivable: Fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow method. Each cash flow
is reduced by an estimated reduction amount due to the GPC (the “GPC Fair Value Adjustment”), except
when a Grantor irrevocably commits to make grant payments in full without applying any reduction due to
the GPC, and the reduced cash flows are discounted to present value using observable Grantor-specific
interest rates.
The GPC allows the Grantors to reduce their payments if an IFFIm-eligible country falls into protracted arrears
on its obligations to the International Monetary Fund (the “IMF”). Each implementing country has been
ascribed a weight in a reference portfolio that will remain static for the life of IFFIm. Grantors reduce the
amounts they pay IFFIm by the aggregate percentage weights of countries that are in protracted arrears to
the IMF. When countries clear their arrears to the IMF, future amounts payable by Grantors to IFFIm are
increased by the respective weights of those clearing countries. The reference portfolio comprises 70
predetermined IFFIm-eligible countries. Each implementing country has been given a weighting of either
0.5%, 1%, 3% or 5%, totalling of 100%, as shown in the table below. The amount of each Grantor payment
is determined 25 business days prior to the due date of such payment.
The reference portfolio as of 31 December 2021 was as follows:
Country
Country
Weighting Total Share
South Sudan, Sudan 0.5% 1%
Afghanistan, Angola, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Burkina, Faso,
Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo,
Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Eritrea, The Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-
Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Kenya, Kiribati, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Lesotho,
Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique,
Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Papua New Guinea, Rwanda, Sao Tome &
Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan,
Tanzania, Timor-Leste, Togo, Uganda, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Yemen Republic,
Zambia, Zimbabwe
1% 61%
Vietnam 3% 3%
Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria,
Pakistan
5% 35%
The GPC Fair Value Adjustment is calculated using a probabilistic model, which estimates the likelihood and
duration that any implementing country might fall into arrears with the IMF over the life of the Grantor
pledges. This probabilistic model assumes that the performance of the implementing countries since 1981 is