5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-01-012022-12-31iso4217:GBP5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-01-012021-12-31xbrli:sharesiso4217:GBPxbrli:shares5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-12-315493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-12-315493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502020-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502020-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502020-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502020-12-315493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember5493004YMVUQ9Z7JGZ502021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember
1
Annual Report and
Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
2
1
CONTENTS
Overview
Financial Highlights 2
Objective and Investment Policy 4
Chairman’s Statement 8
Strategic and Business Review
Strategic Report 12
Investment Manager’s Report 18
Governance
Board of Directors 28
Report of the Directors 29
Directors’ Remuneration Report 32
Corporate Governance Statement 33
Report of the Audit Committee 40
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 45
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report 47
Independent Auditor’s Report (US GAAS) 55
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 57
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 58
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 59
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 60
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 61
Further Information
Alternative Performance Measures 98
Corporate Information 101
2
Overview
Financial Highlights
Key Highlights
Year ended
31 December 2022
Year ended
31 December 2021
NAV per Ordinary Share 105.20 p 103.09 p
Share Price 89.0 p 94.0 p
NAV total return
(1) (2)
7.7% 4.6%
Share Price total return
(1) (2)
0.45% 11.1%
Total Net Assets £416.1 m £421.6 m
Loans advanced at amortised cost
(including accrued income)
£432.5 m £414.6 m
Financial assets held at fair value
through profit or loss
£0.7 m £13.3 m
Cash and Cash Equivalents £3.6 m £3.0 m
Amount drawn under Revolving Credit
Facility (excluding accrued interest)
£19.0 m £8.5 m
Dividends per Ordinary Share
(2)
5.5 p 5.5 p
Invested Loan Portfolio unlevered
annualised total return
(1)
7.8% 6.9%
Invested Loan Portfolio levered
annualised total return
(1)
7.9% 7.0%
Ongoing charges percentage
(1)
1.1% 1.0%
Weighted average portfolio LTV to
Group first £
(1)
13.2% 16.4%
Weighted average portfolio LTV to
Group last £
(1)
58.6% 61.9%
(1)
Further explanation and definitions of the calculation is contained in the section
“Alternative Performance Measures” at the end of this financial report.
(2 )
Excludes additional dividend for 2022 announced on 23 March 2023.
3
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
Dec 12
Mar 13
Jun 13
Sep 13
Dec 13
Mar 14
Jun 14
Sep 14
Dec 14
Mar 15
Jun 15
Sep 15
Dec 15
Mar 16
Jun 16
Sep 16
Dec 16
Mar 17
Jun 17
Sep 17
Dec 17
Mar 18
Jun 18
Sep 18
Dec 18
Mar 19
Jun 19
Sep 19
Dec 19
Mar 20
Jun 20
Sep 20
Dec 20
Sep 21
Dec 21
Mar 21
Jun 21
Mar 22
Jun 22
Sep 22
Dec 22
Premium / Discount Cum-Fair
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Dec 12
Mar 13
Jun 13
Sep 13
Dec 13
Mar 14
Jun 14
Sep 14
Dec 14
Mar 15
Jun 15
Sep 15
Dec 15
Mar 16
Jun 16
Sep 16
Dec 16
Mar 17
Jun 17
Sep 17
Dec 17
Mar 18
Jun 18
Sep 18
Dec 18
Mar 19
Jun 19
Sep 19
Dec 19
Mar 20
Jun 20
Sep 20
Dec 20
Sep 21
Dec 21
Mar 21
Jun 21
Mar 22
Jun 22
Sep 22
Dec 22
Cumulative Fair NAV Total Return Index Share price total return Index
Share Price and Cum-Fair NAV Total Return
SHARE PRICE PERFORMANCE
As at 31 December 2022, the NAV was 105.20 pence per Ordinary Share
(2021: 103.09 pence) and the share price was 89.0 pence (2021: 94.0 pence).
The Company’s share price has been volatile since the market turbulence caused by Covid-19
in March 2020. The volatility has been driven by market conditions and trading flows rather
than a change in the Company’s performance.
Source: Morningstar
Premium / discount (%)
Cumulative fair NAV total return index Share price total return index
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
Dec 12
Mar 13
Jun 13
Sep 13
Dec 13
Mar 14
Jun 14
Sep 14
Dec 14
Mar 15
Jun 15
Sep 15
Dec 15
Mar 16
Jun 16
Sep 16
Dec 16
Mar 17
Jun 17
Sep 17
Dec 17
Mar 18
Jun 18
Sep 18
Dec 18
Mar 19
Jun 19
Sep 19
Dec 19
Mar 20
Jun 20
Sep 20
Dec 20
Sep 21
Dec 21
Mar 21
Jun 21
Mar 22
Jun 22
Sep 22
Dec 22
Premium / Discount Cum-Fair
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Dec 12
Mar 13
Jun 13
Sep 13
Dec 13
Mar 14
Jun 14
Sep 14
Dec 14
Mar 15
Jun 15
Sep 15
Dec 15
Mar 16
Jun 16
Sep 16
Dec 16
Mar 17
Jun 17
Sep 17
Dec 17
Mar 18
Jun 18
Sep 18
Dec 18
Mar 19
Jun 19
Sep 19
Dec 19
Mar 20
Jun 20
Sep 20
Dec 20
Sep 21
Dec 21
Mar 21
Jun 21
Mar 22
Jun 22
Sep 22
Dec 22
Cumulative Fair NAV Total Return Index Share price total return Index
Share Price and Cum-Fair NAV Total Return
4
INTRODUCTION
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
Limited (the “Company”) was established in
November 2012 to provide its shareholders
with regular dividends and an attractive total
return while limiting downside risk, through
the origination, execution, acquisition and
servicing of a diversified portfolio of real estate
debt investments in the UK and the European
Union’s internal market.
The Company, together with its subsidiaries
Starfin Public Holdco 1 Limited, Starfin
Public Holdco 2 Limited, Starfin Lux S.à.r.l,
Starfin Lux 3 S.à.r.l, and Starfin Lux 4 S.à.r.l,
(collectively the “Group”), has provided
a regular dividend to shareholders whilst
preserving capital by limiting downside risk.
On 31 October 2022, the Company
announced, that following a review of the
Company’s strategy and advice sought
from its advisers, the Board intended
to recommend to shareholders that the
investment objective and policy of the
Company were amended such that the
Board can pursue a strategy of orderly
realisation and the return of capital over
time to shareholders (the “Proposed Orderly
Realisation”). If approved by the shareholders,
the Company would seek to return cash to
shareholders in an orderly manner as soon
as reasonably practicable following the
repayment of loans, while retaining sufficient
working capital for ongoing operations and the
funding of committed but currently unfunded
loan commitments.
Overview
Objective and Investment Policy
On 28 December 2022, a Circular relating
to the Proposed Orderly Realisation and
containing a Notice of Extraordinary General
Meeting (EGM) was published. The Circular
set out details of, and sought shareholder
approval for, certain proposals (the
“Proposals”). The Proposals were:
(a) a change to the Company’s Investment
Policy to reflect the fact that the Company
will cease making any new investments
and will pursue a realisation strategy of
the remaining assets in the Company’s
portfolio; and
(b) adoption of new articles which provide for
the periodic Compulsory Redemption of
the Company’s Shares at the discretion of
the Directors to allow cash to be returned
to Shareholders following the full or partial
realisation of assets.
On 27 January 2023, these Proposals were
approved at the EGM.
The Investment Objective and Policy
which applied prior to the approval of the
Proposals, and for the whole of 2022, are
set out in the prior year Annual Report which
can be found on the company’s website
https://starwoodeuropeanfinance.com.
The Investment Objective applied for
the whole of 2022 was to provide its
shareholders with regular dividends and an
attractive total return while limiting downside
risk, through the origination, execution,
acquisition and servicing of a diversified
portfolio of real estate debt investments in
the UK and the European Union’s internal
market. The Investment Policy applied for the
whole of 2022 was to invest in a diversified
portfolio of real estate debt investments in
the UK and the European Union’s internal
market as the Group had done since its initial
public offering (IPO) in December 2012.
Set out below is the current Investment
Objective and Policy of the Company
following the approval of the Proposals.
5
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
Following the Company’s EGM on 27 January
2023, the Company’s investment objective is
to conduct an orderly realisation of the assets
of the Group.
INVESTMENT POLICY
The assets of the Group will be realised
in an orderly manner, returning cash to
Shareholders at such times and in such
manner as the Board may, in its absolute
discretion, determine. The Board will
endeavour to realise all of the Group’s
investments in a manner that achieves a
balance between maximising the net value
received from those investments and making
timely returns to Shareholders.
The Group may not make any new
investments save that:
• investments may be made to honour
commitments under existing contractual
arrangements or to preserve the value of
any underlying security; and
• cash held by the Group pending distribution
will be held in either cash or cash
equivalents for the purposes of cash
management.
Subject to the above restrictions, the
Company retains the ability to seek to
enhance the returns of selected loan
investments through the economic transfer
of the most senior portion of such loan
investments which would be by way
of syndication, sale, assignment, sub-
participation or other financing (including
but not limited to true sale securitisation,
repurchase transactions and loan-on-
loan financing) to the same maturity as
the original loan (i.e. “matched funding”)
while retaining a significant proportion as a
subordinate investment. It is anticipated that
where this is undertaken it would generate a
positive net interest rate spread and enhance
returns for the Company.
Transactions with Starwood Capital Group
or Other Accounts
Subject to the above restrictions, the
Company retains the ability to transact
with companies within the Starwood
Capital Group or any fund, company,
limited partnership or other account
managed or advised by any member of the
Starwood Capital Group (Other Accounts)
in furtherance of the Company’s investment
objective to conduct an orderly realisation
of the Group’s assets (for example, sales of
the Group’s assets to companies within the
Starwood Capital Group or certain Other
Accounts or amendments to pre-existing
arrangements). In order to manage the
potential conflicts of interest that may arise
as a result of any such transactions, any
such proposed transaction may only be
entered into if the independent Directors of
the Company have reviewed and approved
the terms of the transaction, complied with
the conflict of interest provisions in the
Registered Collective Investment Scheme
Rules and Guidance, 2021 issued by the
Guernsey Financial Services Commission
(“Commission”) under The Protection of
Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2020,
as amended, and, where required by the
Listing Rules, Shareholder approval would be
obtained in accordance with the listing rules
issued by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Typically, such transactions will only be
approved if: (i) an independent valuation
has been obtained in relation to the asset in
question: and (ii) the terms are at least as
favourable to the Company as would be any
comparable arrangement effected on normal
commercial terms negotiated at arms’
length between the relevant person and
an independent party, taking into account,
amongst other things, the timing of the
transaction.
6
While Starwood Capital Group and certain
Other Accounts are party to certain
pre-existing co-investment commitments,
no new co-investment arrangements are
expected to be entered into by, or in relation
to, the Company in the future during the
orderly realisation of the Company’s assets.
The change in investment objective does not
impact the below classifications.
Borrowings
The Company may utilise borrowings
from time to time for working capital and
general corporate purposes provided such
borrowings will not exceed an amount
equal to 30 per cent of the Net Asset Value
immediately following the drawdown of the
borrowings.
In calculating the Company’s borrowings for
this purpose, any liabilities incurred under
its foreign exchange hedging arrangements
(described below) shall be disregarded.
Hedging
The Company will not enter into derivative
transactions for purely speculative purposes.
However, the Company’s investments have
been typically made in the currency of the
country where the underlying real estate
assets are located. The Company may
continue to implement measures designed
to protect the investments against material
movements in the exchange rate between
Sterling, being the Company’s reporting
currency, and the currency in which certain
investments have been made. The analysis
as to whether such measures should be
implemented will take into account periodic
interest, principal distributions or dividends,
as well as the expected date of realisation
of the investment. The Company may bear a
level of currency risk that could otherwise be
hedged where it considers that bearing such
risk is advisable. The Company will only enter
into hedging contracts, such as currency
swap agreements, futures contracts, options
and forward currency exchange and other
derivative contracts when they are available
in a timely manner and on terms acceptable
to it. The Company reserves the right to
terminate any hedging arrangement in its
absolute discretion.
The Company may, but shall not be obliged
to, engage in a variety of interest rate
management techniques, particularly to
the extent the underlying investments are
floating rate loans which are not fully hedged
at the borrower level (by way of floating to
fixed rate swap, cap or other instrument).
Any instruments chosen may seek on the
one hand to mitigate the economic effect of
interest rate changes on the values of, and
returns on, some of the Company’s assets,
and on the other hand help the Company
achieve its risk management objectives. The
Company may seek to hedge its entitlement
under any loan investment to receive floating
rate interest.
FCA Listing Rule restrictions
The Company will continue to comply with
the restrictions imposed by the Listing Rules
in force and as amended from time to time.
Any material change to the Company’s
published investment policy will be made
only with the prior approval of the Financial
Conduct Authority and of Shareholders by
ordinary resolution at a general meeting of
the Company.
Overview
Objective and Investment Policy
7
UK Listing Authority Investment
Restrictions
The Company currently complies with the
investment restrictions set out below and will
continue to do so for so long as they remain
requirements of the UK Listing Authority and
the Company remains listed:
• neither the Company nor any of its
subsidiaries will conduct any trading activity
which is significant in the context of its
group as a whole;
• the Company will avoid cross-financing
between businesses forming part of its
investment portfolio;
• the Company will avoid the operation of
common treasury functions as between
the Company and investee companies;
• not more than 10 per cent, in aggregate, of
the Company’s NAV will be invested in other
listed closed-ended investment funds; and
• the Company will, at all times, invest
and manage its assets in a way which is
consistent with its object of spreading
investment risk and in accordance with the
published investment policy. As required
by the Listing Rules, any material change
to the investment policy of the Company
will be made only with the approval of
shareholders.
8
Overview
Chairman’s Statement
JOHN WHITTLE | Chairman
23 March 2023
Dear Shareholder,
On behalf of the Board, it is my pleasure to present the Annual Report and
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Starwood European Real Estate
Finance Limited for the year ended 31 December 2022.
The feeling of optimism across UK and global economies felt in early 2022 - post
the worst restrictions of the Covid-19 pandemic - was soon replaced by concerns
over energy prices, the rising cost of living, higher interest rates and the Russian
invasion of Ukraine.
Domestically, the UK government and economy faced a number of other
setbacks in the second half of the year with three prime ministers in as many
months, government U-turns on economic policy and a number of wide spread
and widely impacting strikes across key infrastructure sectors - by railway
workers, nurses and UK Border control, among others, at the end of the year.
Despite these challenging, volatile and uncertain economic and political times,
once again, the Group demonstrated its unique portfolio resilience through the
strength and consistency of its results. It is significant, and very gratifying to note,
that, once again, all loan interest and scheduled amortisation payments have
continued to be paid in full and on time. This excellent result is due both to the
evident rigorous underwriting of borrowers and sponsors and the diligent ongoing
portfolio management by our Investment Adviser and Manager. Meanwhile,
underlying collateral valuations continue to provide reassuring headroom in the
event of any asset under performance.
The last three years have demonstrated the positive fundamentals of the Group’s
portfolio as an attractive risk-adjusted source of alternative income tested in
the harshest of market environments. Against significant market challenges,
the Group not only maintained a stable Net Asset Value (‘NAV’) but also met
its dividend targets, delivering it’s targetted annualised 5.5 pence per share to
shareholders as well as an additional dividend of 2p per share announced on
23 March 2023.
Nevertheless, despite the resilience of the loan portfolio, a share buyback
programme (which was active from July 2022 to October 2022) and a stable
NAV, the Company’s share price has been unable to meaningfully narrow its
discount to the prevailing NAV which initially occurred as a result of the wider
market re-rating following the onset of Covid-19 (in the first half of 2020).
Under the Company’s discount control mechanisms (contained within its Articles
of Association), in Q1 2023 the Company would have been required to offer
shareholders an opportunity to redeem up to 75 per cent of their holding in
the Company as a result of the Company’s discount to its NAV per share being
greater than five per cent or more during the six-month period ending
31 December 2022 (the “Tender Offer”).
9
However, in October 2022, the Board
determined that, following discussions
with our larger shareholders, the likely
take-up of a potential future Tender Offer
would be significant and as a result the
Company would no longer be of a viable
size to provide shareholders with sufficient
liquidity and scale. Accordingly, the Board
resolved to recommend that the Company
be placed into a managed wind-down with
the aim of enabling shareholders to realise
their entire holdings in the Company ‘over
time’ in line with the repayment of the
relevant loan positions.
In reaching this decision, the Board
considered a range of options and several
factors including the prevailing and
persistent discount to NAV of the shares,
feedback from shareholders, and the
market capitalisation and liquidity of
the shares.
In light of this, the Board recommended
to shareholders that the investment
objective and policy of the Company
were amended such that the Board could
pursue a strategy of orderly realisation
and the return of capital ‘over time’ to
shareholders.
The orderly realisation strategy will not
result in the liquidation of the Company
in the immediate future or require the
Company to dispose of assets within a
defined timeframe. The new strategy,
approved by 99% of Shareholders voting
at the Company’s Extraordinary General
Meeting (‘EGM’) on 27 January 2023, will
be implemented in a manner that will seek
to maximise value to shareholders. It is
intended that the Company’s listing and
target annualised dividend of 5.5 pence
per share will be maintained as long as
feasible during the orderly realisation.
The Board anticipates that the orderly
realisation of the assets will happen over a
four to five year period with periodic share
redemptions being made as loans are
repaid and commitments are satisfied.
Whilst market sentiment may have changed
and the secure income generation offered
has recently fallen out of favour I feel it is
worth reflecting that over its life the Group
has successfully met the original objectives
set out at IPO, delivering stable and consistent
income and risk adjusted returns. To have
endured the huge disruption of the last couple
of years without a single missed payment
is a remarkable achievement. My thanks to
all involved - the Investment Adviser, the
Investment Manager and the Board.
HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2022
• Strong cash generation - the portfolio as a
whole continues to support annual dividend
payments of 5.5 pence per Ordinary Share,
paid quarterly. A dividend of 5.5 per pence
per Ordinary Share represents a 6.2 per cent
dividend yield on the share price as at
31 December 2022.
• Additional dividend - an additional dividend of
2.0 pence per share has been declared post
period end in respect of the 2022 earnings
period, leading to a total declared distribution
of 7.5 pence per share for the year.
• Income stability - all loan interest and
scheduled amortisation payments paid in
full and on time.
• 79 per cent of the portfolio is contracted
at floating interest rates (with floors) which
benefits the Group in the current rising
interest rate environment.
• Portfolio remains robust - despite the
economic disruption and uncertainty
experienced in 2022, the portfolio continues
to perform fully in line with expectations.
• Borrowers remain adequately capitalised
and are expected to continue to pay loan
interest and capital repayments in line with
contractual obligations.
• Further strategic progress - in 2022,
the Group committed a total of £66 million
to two new loans, located in the United
Kingdom and Europe, in the office and
industrial sectors.
• 51 per cent – share price total return since
IPO in December 2012 (excludes additional
dividend for 2022 announced on
23 March 2023).
• Portfolio remains fully invested
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
Interest & Amortisation Payments
All loan interest and scheduled amortisation
payments to date have been paid in full and
on time. This includes loans in sectors that
have been most impacted by the lasting
impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, namely,
hospitality and retail assets, where borrowers
continue to remain adequately capitalised as
previously reported.
Strong cash generation
The portfolio performance continues to
support the targeted annual dividend
payments of 5.5 pence, paid quarterly.
Dividend support
79 per cent of the portfolio is contracted at
floating interest rates (with floors) which has
started to provide an increase in revenue
as higher inflation has resulted in higher
interest rates.
The Invested Loan Portfolio unlevered
annualised total return has been increasing
steadily as interest rates curves have moved
upwards. The year on year increase at
31 December 2022 was 90 basis points
(i.e. at 7.8 per cent, up from 6.9 per cent in
December 2021). As interest rates continue
to rise there is additional support for the
dividend cover.
INVESTMENT MOMENTUM
The Group closed two loans in 2022 – Office
and Industrial Portfolio in the UK and the
Netherlands (total commitment which was
fully funded on signing - £5.5 million and
€16.4 million respectively, of which
€16.4 million had been repaid by the year
end and of which £5.5 million was repaid in
February 2023) and Industrial Estate in the UK
(total commitment - £46.2 million of which
£27.2 million was fully funded on signing).
The Group also funded a further £14.7 million
in relation to loan commitments made in prior
years which were unfunded.
One loan, Office, Scotland (£5.0 million) was
repaid in full during the year but a further £51.9
million (including the €16.4 million referred to
above) was received in partial repayments on
loans which still have outstanding balances as
at 31 December 2022.
10
Overview
Chairman’s Statement
The contractual maturity of the Group’s portfolio is set out on page 19 and shows that as at
31 December 2022, 40.5 per cent of invested loan balances held were expected to mature in
the next twelve months.
NAV PERFORMANCE
The table below and to the left shows the
NAV per share movements over the 12
months to 31 December 2022 by quarter and
for the year.
As anticipated, and as in the past, we are
pleased to report that the Group’s NAV has
once again remained stable during the year
demonstrating the highly resilient credentials
of the asset class that contributes to its
success as a reliable source of alternative
income. We do not expect to see significant
movements in NAV as the Group’s loans are
held at amortised cost and Euro exposures
are hedged.
The NAV would be materially impacted if
an impairment in the value of a loan was
required but, despite the recent disruption
to markets in general no such impairment
has been needed and the Group’s valuations
remain stable and current (the average age
of valuations is 1.43 years). Please refer to
the Investment Manager’s report on page 18
for detailed sector performance reporting,
information on the accounting for our loans
and the current loan to value position for the
portfolio as a whole and for each sector.
SHARE BUYBACKS AND SHARE
PRICE PERFORMANCE
During the year, the Company’s share price
has been relatively volatile, primarily as a
result of dislocation across financial markets.
During the year the Company’s share price
has traded in a range between 87.0 pence
and 97.6 pence. The year end share price
was 89.0 pence reflecting a 15.4 per cent
discount to NAV.
The share price was supported in the
latter half of 2022 by the share buyback
programme which ran from July 2022
until October 2022. During this period the
Company bought back an aggregate amount
of 13.3 million shares at an average cost per
share of 92.8 pence per share. These shares
are held in Treasury.
As at 31 December 2019 to 2022 the Group had commitments as shown in the table below.
2019 2020 2021 2022
Funded loans £411.1m £440.9m £412.0m £425.9m
Unfunded Commitments £78.2m £49.2m £44.5m £49.0m
Total £489.3m £490.1m £456.5m £474.9m
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2022
NAV at beginning of the period 103.09 103.13 103.42 103.58 103.09
Quarterly Movements
Operating Income available to
distribute
(1)
1.36 1.47 1.77 2.20 6.80
Realised FX gains/(losses) not
distributable
(2)
0.78 0.29 0.00 0.00 1.07
Unrealised FX gains/(losses)
(3)
-0.73 -0.09 -0.46 0.67
-0.61
Dividend declared -1.37 -1.38 -1.37 -1.38 -5.50
Impact on NAV of shares
bought back
0.00 0.00 0.22 0.13 0.35
NAV as end of period 103.13 103.42 103.58 105.20 105.20
(1)
Operating Income available to distribute comprises loan income recognised in the period less the cost of debt facilities utilised by the Group and
operating costs incurred. Included in loan income recognised in Q4 2022 is circa £1.3m (equivalent to 0.34p per share) of loan income related
to Office and Industrial Portfolio, Netherlands which was fully repaid in December 2022 and which benefited from early repayment income
protection. The Operating Income available to distribute also includes any realised foreign exchange gains or losses upon settlement of hedges,
except those described in note 2.
(2)
On occasion, the Group may realise a gain or loss on the roll forward of a hedge if it becomes necessary to extend a capital hedge beyond the
initial anticipated loan term. If this situation arises the Group will separate the realised FX gain or loss from other realised FX gains or losses and
not consider it available to distribute or as a reduction in distributable profits. The FX gain or loss will only be considered part of distributable
reserves or as a reduction in distributable profits when the rolled hedge matures or is settled and the final net gain or loss on the capital hedges
can be determined.
(3)
Unrealised foreign exchange gain/losses relate to the net impact of changes in the valuation of foreign exchange hedges and the sterling
equivalent value of Euro loan investments (using the applicable month end rate). Mis-matches between the hedge valuations and the loan
investments may occur depending on the shape of the forward FX curve and this causes some movement in the NAV. These unrealised FX
gains / losses are not considered part of distributable reserves.
1111
FUTURE SHARE ISSUANCE
At the last Annual General Meeting (“AGM”),
the Company sought and received authority to
disapply Pre-Emption Rights on the allotment
of equity securities for up to 10 per cent of
the Ordinary Shares in issue. As at the date
of this report, this authority has not been
utilised and given the recent change in policy
it is not intended that this authority will be
utilised or renewed.
DIVIDENDS
Total dividends of 5.5 pence per Ordinary
Share have been paid to date in relation to the
year ended 31 December 2022. In addition,
on 23 March 2023, the Company declared
a special dividend of 2 pence per Ordinary
Share in respect of the year ending 31
December 2022 to be paid on 21 April 2023
to shareholders on the register as at 31 March
2023.
The 2022 dividends paid to date (5.5 pence
per Ordinary Share) were covered 1.24 times
by earnings (excluding unrealised FX gains
and FX gains realised on the roll forward of
hedges). The Company maintains a dividend
reserve which is utilised, when needed, to
ensure dividends are not paid out of capital.
The Company intends to continue to target
to pay a 5.5 pence per Ordinary Share per
annum (payable quarterly) going forward
for as long as feasible during the orderly
realisation, and as noted above due to
increases in interest rates the dividend
coverage and headroom has improved. This
will provide a level of dividend which should be
fully covered by earnings whilst ensuring the
Company maintains strong credit discipline.
On the share price at 31 December 2022,
a dividend of 5.5 pence represents a
6.2 per cent dividend yield.
BOARD COMPOSITION AND
DIVERSITY
The Board believes strongly in the value and
importance of diversity in the boardroom and
we continue to consider the recommendations
of the Davies, Hampton Alexander and Parker
Reports and these recommendations will be
taken into account should the appointment of
a new director be required.
Based on the recent change to the FCA’s
Listing Rules regarding the disclosure
of diversity on listed company boards
and executive committees, effective for
accounting periods starting from April 2022,
the Board are considering the impact, if any,
on disclosure requirements.
I am very pleased with the current
composition of the Board (which is 50 per
cent female) both in terms of experience,
skills and diversity which places us well for
the upcoming challenges.
It had been anticipated that I would retire
from the Board at the end of 2023. However,
the Board have suggested that I remain
in post to guide the Company through
the orderly realisation of assets and I am
happy to accept their suggestion subject
to the usual shareholder agreement to my
continuation in office.
Further details are provided on the
succession planning in the Corporate
Governance Statement on page 35.
GOING CONCERN
Under the AIC Code and applicable regulations,
the Directors are required to satisfy
themselves that it is reasonable to assume
that the Group is a going concern.
The Directors have undertaken a
comprehensive review of the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern including a review
of the ongoing cash flows and the level of
cash balances as of the reporting date as well
as forecasts of future cash flows.
Furthermore, the Directors have also
considered, as disclosed in these financial
statements, the strategy of orderly realization
and return of capital to shareholders.
After making enquiries of the Investment
Manager, Investment Adviser and the
Administrator and having reassessed the
principal risks, the Directors considered it
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis
of accounting in preparing these Consolidated
Financial Statements.
OUTLOOK
The focus of the Group for 2023 is the
commencement of the orderly realisation
strategy and the return of capital to
shareholders over time.
The Board believes it is important to
communicate clearly with you, our
shareholders, and we will continue to
inform you of the Group’s progress by
way of the quarterly fact sheets and stock
market announcements. We welcome any
comments you have on the way in which we
communicate and provide information to you.
My thanks to all of our services providers for
their perseverance in these challenging times.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to close by
thanking shareholders for your commitment
and support. I look forward to briefing you
again on the Group’s progress later this year.
John Whittle | Chairman
23 March 2023
12
Strategic and Business Review
Strategic Report
The Strategic Report describes the business
of the Group and details the uncertainties,
principal and emerging risks associated with
its activities.
CORPORATE PURPOSE
Following the EGM held on 27 January
2023, the general corporate purpose of
the Company and the Group is to pursue a
strategy of orderly realisation and the return of
capital over time to shareholders.
OBJECTIVE, INVESTMENT POLICY
AND BUSINESS MODEL
The Objective and Investment Policy describes
the Group’s strategy and business model and
is set out in the Overview section of these
Annual Accounts.
The Investment Manager is Starwood
European Finance Partners Limited, a
Company incorporated in Guernsey with
registered number 55819 and regulated by
the Commission. The Investment Manager has
appointed Starwood Capital Europe Advisers,
LLP (the “Investment Adviser”), an English
limited liability partnership authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority,
to provide investment advice, pursuant to an
Investment Advisory Agreement.
CURRENT AND FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
A review of the year and outlook is contained in
the Investment Highlights and Portfolio Review
sections of the Investment Manager’s Report
and within the Chairman’s Statement.
PERFORMANCE
A review of performance is contained in the
Investment Highlights and Portfolio Review
sections of the Investment Manager’s Report.
A number of performance measures are
considered by the Board, the Investment
Manager and Investment Adviser in assessing
the Company’s success in achieving its
objectives. The Key Performance Indicators
(“KPIs”) used are established industry
measures to show the progress and
performance of the Group and are as follows:
• The movement in NAV per Ordinary Share;
• The movement in share price and the
discount / premium to NAV;
• The payment of targeted dividends;
• The portfolio yield, both levered and
unlevered;
• Ongoing charges as a percentage of
undiluted NAV; and
• Weighted average loan to value for
the portfolio.
Details of the KPIs achieved are shown in
the Financial Highlights section.
During 2023 the Board will consider what
new and/or additional performance measures
(if any) should be used to measure its new
strategy of orderly realisation and return of
capital to shareholders.
RISK MANAGEMENT
It is the role of the Board to review and
manage all risks associated with the Group,
both those impacting the performance
and the prospects of the Group and those
which threaten the ongoing viability. It is the
role of the Board to mitigate these either
directly or through the delegation of certain
responsibilities to the Audit Committee and
Investment Manager.
The Board performs a review of a risk matrix
at each Board meeting.
The Board considers the following principal
risks could impact the performance and
prospects of the Group but do not threaten
the ability of the Company or the Group to
continue in operation and meet its liabilities.
In deciding which risks are principal risks
the Board considers the potential impact
and probability of the related events or
circumstances, and the timescale over which
they may occur. Consequently, it has put
in place mitigation plans to manage those
identified risks. Details of the principal and
emerging risks considered as part of the
review of the risk matrix are highlighted on
the next page.
13
Principal Risks
Financial Market Volatility (risk that
dividends do not meet the targeted levels
and that the share price discount persists
and widens)
Subsequent to the EGM held on 27 January
2023 the Group’s strategy is for an orderly
realisation of its assets and the return
of capital to shareholders. During the
realisation period the Company intends to
target a similar per share level of dividends
as previously for as long as this is feasible
and to return capital to shareholders subject
to maintaining sufficient cash to fund as
yet unfunded commitments on loans and
ongoing operating costs.
The Group’s targeted returns are based
on estimates and assumptions that
are inherently subject to significant
business and economic uncertainties and
contingencies and, consequently, the actual
rate of return may be materially lower than
the targeted returns.
As a result, the level of dividends to be paid
by the Company may fluctuate and there is
no guarantee that any such dividends will
be paid. Since March 2020 the shares have
traded at a discount to NAV per share and
shareholders may be unable to realise their
investments through the secondary market
at NAV per share.
The Board, along with the Investment
Manager and the Investment Adviser,
monitor, review and consider the estimates
and assumptions that underpin the targeted
returns of the business and, where necessary,
communicate any changes in those estimates
and assumptions to the market.
The Board monitors the level of premium
or discount of the share price to NAV
per share and deployed a share buyback
programme during 2020, 2021 and 2022 in
order to support the share price. The new
strategy of returning capital to shareholders
over time should mean that, subject to no
unforeseen negative impacts on the value
of investments, shareholders will receive a
return of capital invested over time.
Long-Term Strategic Risk (risk that the
business model is no longer attractive)
Subsequent to the EGM held on 27
January 2023 the Group’s strategy is for
an orderly realisation and return of capital
to shareholders. It is anticipated that the
return of capital to shareholders will be
completed in the next four to five years.
The Group’s targeted returns are based
on estimates and assumptions that
are inherently subject to significant
business and economic uncertainties and
contingencies and, consequently, the actual
rate of return may be materially lower than
the targeted returns.
The Directors regularly receive information on
the performance of the existing loans, including
the performance of underlying assets versus
underwritten business plan and the likelihood
of any early repayments, or the need for any
loan amendments.
The Board continues to monitor the revised
investment strategy and performance on an
ongoing basis.
Market Deterioration Risk (risk of the
economies in which the Group operates
either stagnating or going into recession)
The Group’s investments are comprised
principally of debt investments in the UK
and the European Union’s internal market
and it is therefore exposed to economic
movements and changes in these markets.
Any deterioration in the global, UK or
European economy could have a significant
adverse effect on the activities of the
Group and may result in loan defaults or
impairments.
The Covid-19 pandemic has had a material
long term impact on global economies and
on the operations of the Group’s borrowers
since 2020.
The situation in Ukraine, following the
February 2022 incursion into Ukraine by
Russia, also presents a significant risk to
European and Global economies. While
the Group has no direct or known indirect
involvement with Ukraine, Russia or Belarus it
may be impacted by the consequences of the
instability caused by the ongoing Ukrainian/
Russian conflict.
The impact of the United Kingdom’s
departure from the European Union in 2020
still represents a potential threat to the UK
economy as well as wider Europe. On a
cyclical view, the national economies across
Europe appear to be heading towards lower
growth, and alongside the economic impact
of Covid-19 and the destabilising impact of
the conflict in Ukraine, towards recession.
In addition there is the impact of the ongoing
high inflationary environment to consider
(driven by increasing interest rates, energy
costs and costs of living). This environment
could make it harder for Borrowers to meet
their interest obligations to the Group and to
ultimately repay the loans advanced to them.
The Board have considered the impact
of market deterioration on the current
and future operations of the Group and
its portfolio of loans advanced. Because
of the cash and loan facilities available to
the Group and the underlying quality of
the portfolio of loans advanced, both the
Investment Manager and the Board still
believe the fundamentals of the portfolio
remain optimistic and that the Group can
adequately support the portfolio of loans
advanced despite current market conditions.
In the event of a loan default in the portfolio,
the Group is generally entitled to accelerate
the loan and enforce security, but the
process may be expensive and lengthy,
and the outcome is dependent on sufficient
recoveries being made to repay the
borrower’s obligations and associated costs.
Some of the investments held would rank
behind senior debt tranches for repayment
in the event that a borrower defaults, with
the consequence of greater risk of partial
or total loss. In addition, repayment of
loans by the borrower at maturity could
be subject to the availability of refinancing
options, including the availability of senior
and subordinated debt and is also subject
to the underlying value of the real estate
collateral at the date of maturity. The Group
is mitigated against this with an average
weighted loan to value of the portfolio of
14
Interest payments are normally hedged for
the period for which prepayment protection
is in place. However, the risk remains that
loans are repaid earlier than anticipated and
forward contracts need to be broken early.
In these circumstances, the forward curve
may have moved since the forward contracts
were placed which can impact the rate
received. In addition, if the loan repays after
the prepayment protection, interest after
the prepayment-protected period may be
received at a lower rate than anticipated
leading to lower returns for that period.
Conversely, the rate could have improved,
and returns may increase.
As a consequence of the hedging strategy
employed as outlined above, the Group is
subject to the risk that it will need to post
cash collateral against the mark to market on
foreign exchange hedges which could lead to
liquidity issues or leave the Group unable to
hedge new non-Sterling investments.
The Company had approximately £163.5
million (€184.1 million) of hedged notional
exposure with Lloyds Bank plc at 31
December 2022 (converted at 31 December
2022 FX rates).
As at 31 December 2022, the hedges were
in the money. If the hedges move out of
the money and at any time this mark to
market exceeds £15 million, the Company
is required to post collateral, subject to a
minimum transfer amount of £1 million. This
situation is monitored closely, however, and
as at 31 December 2022, the Company had
sufficient liquidity and credit available on
the revolving credit facility to meet any cash
collateral requirements.
Two loans within the portfolio are currently
classified as Stage 2 (increased risk of default).
These loans account for 10.8 per cent of
the loans advanced by the Group as at 31
December 2022. No expected credit losses
have been recognised against any of the loans,
because of the strong LTVs across the loan
portfolio and strong contractual agreements
with Borrowers, including against these
Stage 2 loans. The reasons, estimates and
judgements supporting this assessment are
described in the Investment Manager’s report.
Interest Rate Risk
The Group is subject to the risk that the loan
income and income from the cash and cash
equivalents will fluctuate due to movements
in interbank rates.
The loans in place at 31 December 2022
have been structured so that 79 per cent are
floating rate and 100 per cent of these floating
rate loans are subject to interbank rate floors
such that the interest cannot drop below a
certain level, which offers some protection
against downward interest rate risk.
The remaining 21 per cent by value of
the loans are fixed rate, which provides
protection from downward interest rate
movements to the overall portfolio (but also
prevents the Group from benefiting from any
interbank rate rises on these positions).
Foreign Exchange Risk
The majority of the Group’s investments
are Sterling denominated (63.1 per cent as
at 31 December 2022) with the remainder
being Euro denominated. The Group is
subject to the risk that the exchange
rates move unfavourably and that a)
foreign exchange losses on the Euro loan
principals are incurred and b) that Euro
interest payments received are lower than
anticipated when converted back to Sterling
and therefore returns are lower than the
underwritten returns.
The Group manages this risk by entering into
forward contracts to hedge the currency risk.
All non-Sterling loan principal is hedged back
to Sterling to the maturity date of the loan.
Strategic and Business Review
Strategic Report
58.6 per cent. Therefore, the portfolio
should be able to withstand a significant
level of deterioration before credit losses
are incurred.
The Investment Adviser has also mitigated
the risk of credit losses by undertaking
detailed due diligence prior to the signing
of each loan. Whilst the precise scope
of due diligence will have depended on
the proposed investment, such diligence
will typically have included independent
valuations, building, measurement and
environmental surveys, legal reviews of
property title, assessment of the strength of
the borrower’s management team and key
leases and, where necessary, mechanical
and engineering surveys, accounting and tax
reviews and know your customer checks.
The Investment Adviser, Investment
Manager and Board have also managed
these risks in the past by ensuring a
diversification of investments in terms of
geography, market and type of loan. Such
diversification will be harder to achieve as
the company pursues a strategy of orderly
realization and does not enter into any new
investments. The Investment Manager and
Investment Adviser operate in accordance
with the guidelines, investment limits and
restrictions as determined by the Board. The
Directors review the portfolio against these
guidelines on a regular basis.
The Investment Adviser obtains regular
performance reporting from all borrowers
and meets with all borrowers on a regular
basis to monitor developments in respect
of each loan and reports to the Investment
Manager and the Board periodically and on an
ad hoc basis where considered necessary.
The Group’s loans are held at amortised
cost. The performance of each loan is
reviewed quarterly by the Investment
Adviser for any indicators of significant
increase in credit risk, impaired or defaulted
loans. The Investment Adviser also provides
their assessment of any expected credit
loss for each loan advanced. The results of
the performance review and allowance for
expected credit losses are discussed with
the Investment Manager and the Board.
15
Risk of Default under the Revolving Credit
Facilities
The Group is subject to the risk that a
borrower could be unable or unwilling to
meet a commitment that it has entered
into with the Group as outlined above under
market deterioration risk. As a consequence
of this, the Group could breach the
covenants of its revolving credit facilities
and fall into default itself.
A number of the measures the Group
takes to mitigate market deterioration
risk as outlined above, such as portfolio
diversification and rigorous due diligence on
investments and monitoring of borrowers,
will also help to protect the Group from the
risk of default under the revolving credit
facility as this is only likely to occur as a
consequence of borrower defaults or loan
impairments.
The Board regularly reviews the balances
drawn under the credit facility against
commitments and reviews the performance
under the agreed covenants. The loan
covenants are also stress tested to test how
robust they are to withstand default of the
Group’s investments.
Cybercrime
The Group is subject to the risk of
unauthorised access into systems,
identification of passwords or deleting data,
which could result in loss of sensitive data,
breach of data physical and electronic,
amongst other potential consequences. This
risk is managed and mitigated by regular
reviews of the Group’s operational and
financial control environment. The matter
is also contained within service providers
surveys which are completed by the
Group’s service providers and are regularly
reviewed by the Board. No adverse findings
in connection with the service provider
surveys have been found. The Company
and its service providers have policies and
procedures in place to mitigate this risk,
the cybercrime risk continues to be closely
monitored.
Regulatory risk
The Group is also subject to regulatory risk
as a result of any changes in regulations
or legislation. Constant monitoring by the
Investment Adviser, Investment Manager
and the Board is in place to ensure the
Group keeps up to date with any regulatory
changes and compliance with them.
Operational risk
The Group has no employees and is reliant
on the performance of third-party service
providers. Failure by the Investment Manager,
Investment Adviser, Administrator or any
other third-party service provider to perform in
accordance with the terms of its appointment
could have a material detrimental impact on
the operation of the Group.
The Board maintains close contact with
all service providers to ensure that the
operational risks are minimised.
Emerging Risks
Emerging risks to the Group are considered
by the Board to be trends, innovations and
potential rule changes relevant to the real
estate mortgage and financial sector. The
challenge to the Group is that emerging
risks are known to some extent but are not
likely to materialise or have an impact in the
near term. The Board regularly reviews and
discusses the risk matrix and has identified
climate change as an emerging risk.
Climate change
The consequences that climate change
could have are potentially severe but highly
uncertain. The potential high impact of
possible losses has done a lot to raise
the awareness of this risk in investment
circles. The Board, in conjunction with
the Investment Manager and Investment
Adviser, considers the possible physical
and transitional impact of climate change
on properties secured on loans provided by
the Group and includes the consideration
of such factors in valuation instructions of
the collateral properties and in considering
any potential expected credit losses on
loans. The Investment Adviser considers
the possible physical and transitional
impact of climate change as part of
the origination process. In addition, the
Board, in conjunction with the Investment
Adviser, is monitoring closely the regulation
and any developments in this area (see
‘Environmental, Social and Corporate’
section for further information).
16
Strategic and Business Review
Strategic Report
ASSESSMENT OF PROSPECTS
The Group’s strategy of an orderly realisation
and return of capital to shareholders
(approved by the shareholders in January
2023) is central to an understanding of its
prospects. The Group’s focus is twofold:
i) to proactively manage the investments
already made to ensure that the loans
continue to perform and provide positive
returns to the Group, and
ii) return capital to shareholders on a timely
basis subject to ensuring the Group can
continue to fund as yet unfunded loan
commitments (£49.0 million as at
31 December 2022) and meet its
operating costs.
The Group updates its plan and financial
forecasts on a quarterly basis and detailed
financial forecasts are maintained and
reviewed by the Board regularly.
ASSESSMENT OF VIABILITY
The Directors have tested the potential
impact on the Group of a number of
scenarios by quantifying their financial
impact. These scenarios are based on
aspects of the following selected principal
risks, which are detailed in this Strategic
Report, and as described below:
• Foreign exchange risk;
• Market deterioration risk; specifically the
risk that all the Stage 2 loans held default,
resulting in a loss of interest income and
delay in the repayment of capital; and
• Risk of default under the revolving
credit facilities.
These scenarios represent ‘severe but
plausible’ circumstances that the Group could
experience. The scenarios tested included:
• A high level of loan default meaning that
the Group stopped receiving interest on the
Stage 2 loans in the portfolio and that the
outstanding capital on these loans was not
received until 6 or 12 months after the loan
maturity date plus Sonia and Euribor rates
falling to 0% from 2024 onwards;
• An analysis of the robustness of the
covenants under the revolving credit facility
to withstand default of the underlying
investments; and
• A deterioration in the valuation of the foreign
exchange hedges such that the Company is
required to post collateral up to £5m.
The results of this stress testing showed that
the Group would be able to withstand a high
level of underlying loan default or impairment
resulting from any of the risks identified over
the period of the financial forecasts albeit the
dividend may need to be reduced
to reflect the reduced cash available.
VIABILITY STATEMENT
In addition to the assessment of prospects
and viability above, the Directors also have
a reasonable expectation, based on the
scenario testing, that the Group will continue
to meet its liabilities as they fall due over
the three-year period ending 31 December
2025, and therefore the Group is expected
to remain viable from both a business model
and financial perspective.
Furthermore, the Directors have also
considered, as disclosed in these financial
statements, the strategy of orderly realization
and return of capital to shareholders.
In connection with the viability statement,
the Board confirm that they have carried out
a robust assessment of the principal and
emerging risks facing the company, including
those that would threaten its business model,
future performance, solvency or liquidity.
17
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
(“ESG”)
As an investment company, the Board and the
Investment Manager and Investment Adviser
consider the Group’s direct activities to have
a minimal direct impact on the environment.
Nevertheless, the Board regularly monitors
and discusses ESG matters both at the Board
meetings and with the Investment Manager
and Investment Adviser.
The Investment Manager and Investment
Adviser are part of the Starwood Capital
Group (SCG), which is a signatory to the
UN Principles for Responsible Investments
(UNPRI). In assessing new loans SCG
evaluates environmental risks associated with
any investments as part of the underwriting
process. A formal scope of work is followed
by the Investment Adviser, which requires
an environmental site assessment to be
performed which identifies environmental
conditions that may have a material adverse
impact on the property being assessed
or its immediate surrounding area and an
assessment of a property’s sustainability
and marketability through the review of
its environmentally friendly and unfriendly
characteristics.
The Board recognises that it has no direct
control over a borrower’s company policy
towards environment and social responsibility
and whilst it is an important part of the due
diligence process in understanding the impact
of such issues, decisions are not weighted
towards those investments with stronger
environmental and social characteristics. It
should be noted that a number of the loans
made by the Group involve refurbishment
projects and these will often improve the
environmental impact of the real estate
concerned. Additionally, whilst it is not an
investment criteria, the Group’s loan portfolio
is significantly funded in sectors with positive
social impact such as hospitality, healthcare
and residential.
In carrying out its activities and in its
relationship with the community, the Group
aims to conduct itself responsibly, ethically
and fairly; including in relation to social and
human rights issues. This approach is built
into the Investment Adviser’s origination and
underwriting process. Our risk management
framework is intended to facilitate an
enterprise wide view of risk that supports a
strong and collaborative risk management
culture within the Board and with its
relationship with SCG.
The Board (through its relationships with SCG,
its brokers and other advisers) is focused
on maintaining a productive dialogue with
shareholders and gathering feedback to inform
the decision making at Board level.
SCG, with in excess of 4,500 employees
worldwide, takes its social responsibilities
to its employees very seriously offering
a challenging, fast-paced and collegial
environment to its employees. SCG strives
to create diverse and inclusive workplaces
where all employees can perform to their full
potential and to be a good corporate citizen
for their communities by supporting charitable
organisations that promote education and
social wellbeing.
As an investment fund, the Group outsources
many of its activities to external service
providers and, therefore, the Group has no
direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions to report
from its own operations and is currently not
required to report on any other emission
producing sources.
While there is some travel involved for
the Directors and representatives from
the Investment Adviser, the Company’s
service providers are Guernsey office-based
companies, and the majority of the Directors
are based in Guernsey, thus having a relatively
low impact on the environment and negating
the need for long commutes or flights to and
from Board meetings. As a result of Covid-19
there has been an acceleration in the use
of interactive and virtual technology for
meetings, further reducing the need for travel.
The Group has no employees and the Board
is composed entirely of non-executive
Directors. Therefore, the Group is not within
scope of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and
is therefore not obliged to make a human
trafficking statement. However, the business
of the Company is conducted ethically and
with integrity and has a zero tolerance policy
towards modern slavery.
BOARD DIVERSITY
The Board considers that its members
have a balance of skills, qualifications
and experience which are relevant to
the Company. The Board supports the
recommendations of the Davies Report,
the Hampton Alexander Review and
the Parker Review and believes in the
value and importance of diversity in the
boardroom and it continues to consider
the recommendations of these reports and
reviews as part of its succession planning.
The Company has no employees and
therefore has no disclosures to make in
this regard.
John Whittle | Chairman
23 March 2023
18
MARKET SUMMARY AND
INVESTMENT OUTLOOK
After decades of declining interest rates and
a long period of benign inflation, 2022 saw a
sea change in inflation and a knock on effect
into interest rates across the globe. Rising
inflation was driven by two key factors. First
as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic
global supply chains and shipments slowed in
2020 and 2021 causing worldwide shortages
and affecting consumer patterns.
The causes of the economic slowdown
included workers becoming sick with Covid-19
as well as mandates and restrictions affecting
the availability of staff resulting in production
and logistics disruption with goods also
remaining at port due to staffing shortages.
The related global chip shortage contributed
to the supply chain crisis, particularly in the
automobile and electronics sectors. During
the Christmas and holiday season of 2021,
an increase in spending in North America,
combined with the spread of the Omicron
variant of Covid-19, further exacerbated
already tight supplies.
To start with, the market largely expected
these issues to be transitory and inflation
would settle back as an equilibrium in supply
chains was restored. As a result central banks
were initially cautious about raising rates
which could stall a fragile economic recovery.
Market concerns began to rise about more
persistent inflation in the later part of 2021,
but the second driver that compounded the
issues was the war in Ukraine which further
disrupted supply of energy, commodities and
food. The result was an unprecedented rise
in inflation in almost every country in the
world and a huge policy response.
Subsequently US, UK and Eurozone inflation
has peaked at 9.1 per cent,11.1 per cent and
10.6 per cent respectively. In response the
central banks have acted rapidly, with the
US Fed Funds rate, UK Bank of England Base
Rate and the ECB deposit policy rate leaping
from 0-0.25 per cent, 0.25 per cent and -0.5
per cent to 4.25-4.5 per cent, 3.5 per cent
and 2.0 per cent respectively between the
end of 2021 and the end of 2022. The knock
on effect for longer rates is that benchmarks
such as the five year swap which are
typically the benchmark for commercial real
estate loans have also risen significantly. The
US, UK and Euro 5 year swaps grew from
1.11 per cent, 1.05 per cent and -0.02 per
cent to 3.70 per cent, 4.10 per cent and
3.18 per cent respectively during the year.
At the beginning of the year most economists
had seen inflation having peaked and the
expectations of future interest rises having
peaked too. Goldman Sachs expected UK
rates peaking at 4.5 per cent in May 2023
versus expectations by some economists
that they might rise as far as 5 per cent or
even 6 per cent previously, however fears
that inflation and higher rates will be more
sticky have been growing in recent weeks
due to economic data particularly the
employment statistics.
Inflation and interest rates impact hard assets
in a number of ways. For example higher
inflation in labour and construction materials
and higher interest rates for the financing
of development all lead to a higher overall
construction cost which can lead to reduced
supply which benefits existing stock. Higher
rates generally can also put pressure on real
estate yields that may look less desirable
versus other forms of long income such as
long dated bonds and higher financing costs
will leave levered real estate buyers with less
free cash after debt. On the other side of
the coin, the income of real assets is often
strongly linked to inflation either through direct
linking in the terms of a lease or through
correlation of revenue with inflation.
In markets such as logistics and residential
to rent, low levels of vacancy combined with
high demand have seen increasing rents and
this trend is likely to continue in a number of
areas where there is insufficient new supply
delivered although a bad recession could
reset demand and / or the tenants ability
to pay. Rising rents will be supportive of
values in these asset classes even while
yields are softening.
Real estate and leveraged finance volumes
fell significantly in 2022. Conditions have
improved in the first weeks of 2023 but
volumes are still lower and pricing elevated. A
large share of the increase in financing costs
has been the base interest rate component
mentioned earlier with spreads having
widened as well. Larger loans that require
distributions through syndication CMBS
or CLOs are still rare in the US and there
have been none in Europe. However, we do
continue to see steady underlying activity in
bilateral and small club deals with spreads in
Europe having changed much less than in the
bond markets since 2021 albeit with more
conservative risk metrics and structures.
As is common in lower volume markets
there has been an increased gap in appetite
between prime and secondary assets and
stock selection through asset class, sponsor
and business plan combination is absolutely
key. Where rates settle is still uncertain and
it is likely that until the equilibrium is met
we will still see smaller volumes both in
transaction and financing volumes.
We are also continuing to see the existing
themes in the bank lending market. There
is a focus on stress tests, capital treatment
and managing risk weighted assets. As a
result, the trend towards banks working
together with non-banks in co-origination or
financing of loans as opposed to providing
direct loans is persisting. This is evident in
the latest Bayes lending survey which tracks
the UK commercial real estate lending
market. The most recent report shows
that alternative lenders now provide 24 per
cent of new origination from almost none a
decade ago and we see that trend towards
an increased portion of the market with
non-bank lenders continuing.
Strategic and Business Review
Investment Manager’s Report
19
PORTFOLIO STATISTICS
As at 31 December 2022, the portfolio was invested in line with the Group’s investment policy
and is summarised below.
The maturity profile of investments as at 31 December 2022 is shown below.
Strategic and Business Review
Investment Manager’s Report
31 December
2022
31 December
2021
Number of investments 20 19
Percentage of invested portfolio in floating rate loans
(1)
78.9% 78.0%
Invested Loan Portfolio unlevered annualised total return
(1)
7.8% 6.9%
Invested Loan Portfolio levered annualised total return
(1)
7.9% 7.0%
Weighted average portfolio LTV – to Group first £
(1)
13.2% 16.4%
Weighted average portfolio LTV – to Group last £
(1)
58.6% 61.9%
Average loan term (stated maturity at inception) 5.0 years 4.9 years
Average remaining loan term 1.7 years 2.3 years
Net Asset Value £416.1 m £421.6 m
Amount drawn under Revolving Credit Facility
(including accrued interest)
(£19.2 m) (£8.5 m)
Loans advanced at amortised cost
(including accrued income)
£432.5 m £414.6 m
Cash £3.6 m £3.0 m
Other net assets / (liabilities)
(including the value of FX hedges)
(£0.8 m) £12.5 m
(1)
Alternative Performance Measure – refer to page 97 for definitions and methodology.
*
excludes any permitted extensions. Note that borrowers may elect to repay loans before contractual maturity.
Sector
% of invested
assets
Hospitality 38.7
Office 20.8
Retail 11.4
Residential 10.6
Light industrial 6.5
Healthcare 5.9
Life Sciences 4.6
Logistics 1.1
Other 0.4
Country
% of invested
assets
UK 63.1
Republic of Ireland 17.6
Spain 16.5
Netherlands 2.2
Germany 0.6
Remaining years to
contractual maturity
*
Value of loans
(£m)
% of invested
portfolio
0 to 1 years £172.6 40.5
1 to 2 years £107.4 25.2
2 to 3 years £86.7 20.4
3 to 5 years £59.2 13.9
Loan currency
% of invested
assets
*
Sterling 63.1
Euro 36.9
Loan type
% of invested
assets
Whole loans 70.0
Mezzanine 30.0
PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION
The Group continues to achieve good portfolio
diversification as shown in the tables below:
*
The currency split refers to the underlying loan currency; however,
the capital and interest during protected periods on all non-sterling
exposure is hedged back to sterling.
20
Strategic and Business Review
Investment Manager’s Report
INVESTMENT DEPLOYMENT
As at 31 December 2022, the Group had 20 investments and commitments of £474.9 million as follows:
Transaction
Sterling
equivalent
balance
(1)
Sterling
equivalent unfunded
commitment
(1)
Sterling Total (Drawn
and Unfunded)
Hospitals, UK £25.0 m £25.0 m
Hotel & Residential, UK £49.9 m £49.9 m
Office, London £19.0 m £1.5 m £20.5 m
Hotel, Oxford £23.0 m
£23.0 m
Hotel, Scotland £42.6 m £42.6 m
Hotel, North Berwick £15.0 m £15.0 m
Life Science, UK £19.5 m £7.1 m £26.6 m
Hotel and Office, Northern Ireland £11.5 m £11.5 m
Hotels, United Kingdom £32.0 m £18.6 m £50.6 m
Office and Industrial Portfolio, UK £5.5 m £5.5 m
Industrial Estate, UK £27.2 m £19.0 m £46.2 m
Total Sterling Loans £270.2 m £46.2 m £316.4 m
Three Shopping Centres, Spain £30.3 m £30.3 m
Shopping Centre, Spain £15.1 m £15.1 m
Hotel, Dublin £42.0 m £42.0 m
Office, Madrid, Spain £16.4 m £0.9 m £17.3 m
Mixed Portfolio, Europe £7.8 m £7.8 m
Mixed Use, Dublin £11.2 m £1.8 m £13.0 m
Office Portfolio, Spain £8.5 m £0.1 m £8.6 m
Office Portfolio, Ireland £21.7 m £21.7 m
Logistics Portfolio, Germany £2.7 m £2.7 m
Total Euro Loans £155.7 m £2.8 m £158.5 m
Total Portfolio £425.9 m £49.0 m £474.9 m
(1)
Euro balances translated to sterling at period end exchange rates.
21
Between 1 January and 31 December 2022,
the following significant investments activity
occurred (included in the table above):
Additional funding by the Group (new loans
and existing commitments)
NEW LOAN: Office and Industrial Portfolio,
UK and The Netherlands
On 26 May 2022, the Group announced its
€16.4 million and £5.5 million investment in
a three-year multi-currency loan secured on
a portfolio of five offices and one industrial
property located in the Netherlands and the
UK. The €16.4 million tranche of the loan
was repaid in December 2022 and the
£5.5 million tranche of the loan was repaid
in February 2023.
NEW LOAN: Industrial Estate, UK
In September 2022 the Group funded the
initial advance of a £46.2 million floating rate
whole loan secured by an industrial estate in
Loughborough, UK.
In addition to the new loans detailed above
the Group also funded a further £14.7 million
in relation to loan commitments made in prior
years which were unfunded.
Loan Repayment
The following final loan repayment was
received during the year:
REPAYMENT OF LOAN: Office, Scotland
The £5 million loan repaid in full upon the sale
of the underlying property in line with the
sponsors business plan during the second
quarter of 2022.
Amortisation and early partial repayments
The following material loan amortisation
and early partial repayment amounts were
received during the year:
• €16.8 million of unscheduled amortisation
on the loan on the Mixed Portfolio, Europe,
following asset sales in line with the
borrower’s business plan;
• €16.4 million repayment of the euro tranche
of the Office and Industrial Portfolio, UK and
The Netherlands which was a new loan in
2022, following asset sales in line with the
borrower’s business plan;
• €12.6 million of early partial repayment on
Hotel, Dublin from surplus cash;
• €7.2 million of unscheduled amortisation
on the loan on the Office Portfolio, Dublin,
following an asset sale in line with the
borrower’s business plan;
• €3.1 million of unscheduled amortisation on
Logistics Portfolio, Germany, following an
asset sale in line with business plan; and
• €1.5 million of scheduled amortisation
on loan relating to Three Shopping
Centres, Spain loan.
22
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
The portfolio continues to perform in line
with expectations. All interest and scheduled
amortisation has been paid in line with
contractual obligations. Borrowers are also
continuing to make progress on underwritten
business plans including executing strategic
asset sales and paying down the loans.
During 2022, a total of £56.9 million was
repaid. The majority of these repayments were
related to strategic underlying property sales
executed by borrowers in line with business
plan and typically following the completion of
underwritten asset management initiatives,
with the remainder representing regular
scheduled loan amortisation or borrowers
electing to voluntarily pay down loan balances
with surplus cash.
The Group’s exposure to development and
heavy refurbishment projects continues to
decrease as current developments reach
completion. As at 31 December 2022,
£63 million or 13 per cent of total loan
commitments represented loans funding two
construction projects. Both of these projects
are expected to have reached substantial
completion during the first quarter of 2023.
The larger of these projects (with a total Group
loan commitment of £49 million) has pre-sold
the majority of its residential for-sale product
and we are forecasting the loan to be fully
repaid during 2023 from the proceeds of pre-
sold unit completions.
The Group continues to closely monitor
all of its loan exposures. Asset classes
representing more than 10 per cent of total
investments include Hospitality (39 per cent),
Office (21 per cent), Retail (11 per cent) and
Residential (11 per cent). The Hospitality
exposure is diversified across seven different
loan investments. Hotel performance on the
trading hotel assets has continued to improve
and recover from the pandemic very well
during 2022. Despite the potential that trading
may be impacted from lower discretionary
consumer spending related to inflationary
pressures, the Group’s borrowers on trading
assets such as hotels have generally indicated
a positive end to 2022 and the outlook for
2023 is cautiously optimistic based on forward
Strategic and Business Review
Investment Manager’s Report
sales activity as at year end. Office exposure
(21 per cent) is spread across eight loan
investments. Occupancy across the leased
office portfolio has held up well, with the vast
majority of the underlying tenants renewing
leases and staying in occupation. We also
continue to see prospective new tenants being
attracted particularly to newly refurbished,
high quality buildings. The Retail exposure (11
per cent) has continued to perform in line
with expectations; occupancy continues to
remain robust and footfall continues its post
pandemic recovery. Our retail loan borrowers
continue their active asset management and
are signing new leases where tenants wish to
expand and renew existing leases. Residential
exposure (11 per cent) is predominantly
related to the successfully pre-sold residential
for sale development project that is due to
complete during the first half of 2023, with
the loan projected to be fully repaid in 2023.
In general, market outlook for residential
product remains high as rents have trended
upwards with inflation over the prior year and
many markets remain supply challenged.
Across all loans we continue to benefit from
material headroom in underlying collateral
value against the loan basis, with a current
weighted average LTV of 58.6 per cent
across the portfolio. These metrics are based
on independent third party appraisals which
are typically updated annually for income
producing assets and following completion
on newly constructed or refurbished assets.
While the average age of valuations is
just over one year for income producing
assets and we recognise that interest rate
increases within the last twelve months
are expected to place downward pressure
on valuation inputs, we are confident in the
very significant buffer to absorb any negative
valuation impact of the current market. On
loans where new valuations were instructed
in the second half of 2022, average values
did not change materially as in many cases
increased rents and asset management
initiatives being achieved by sponsors
outweighed or offset any increase in discount
or capitalisation rates.
LIQUIDITY AND HEDGING
The Group is very modestly levered with net
debt of £15.4 million (3.7 per cent of NAV)
at 31 December 2022 and has significant
liquidity available with undrawn revolving credit
facilities (see note 17(
c
) and note 23 for further
information) to fund existing commitments.
The way in which the Group’s borrowing
facilities are structured means that it does not
need to fund mark to market margin calls. The
Group does have the obligation to post cash
collateral under its hedging facilities. However,
cash would not need to be posted until the
hedges were more than £20 million out of the
money. The mark to market of the hedges at
31 December 2022 was £0.7 million (in the
money) and with the robust hedging structure
employed by the Group, cash collateral has
never been required to be posted since
inception. The Group has the majority of its
investments currently denominated in Sterling
(although this can change over time) and is
a sterling denominated group. The Group is
therefore subject to the risk that exchange
rates move unfavourably and that a) foreign
exchange losses on the loan principal are
incurred and b) that interest payments
received are lower than anticipated when
converted back to Sterling and therefore
returns are lower than the underwritten
returns. The Group manages this risk by
entering into forward contracts to hedge the
currency risk. All non-Sterling loan principal
is hedged back to Sterling to the maturity
date of the loan (unless it was funded using
the revolving credit facilities in which case it
will have a natural hedge). Interest payments
are generally hedged for the period for which
prepayment protection is in place. However,
the risk remains that loans are repaid earlier
than anticipated and forward contracts need
to be broken early. In these circumstances
the forward curve may have moved since the
forward contracts were placed which can
impact the rate received. In addition, if the
loan repays after the prepayment protection,
interest after the prepayment protected
period may be received at a lower rate than
anticipated leading to lower returns for
that period. Conversely the rate could have
improved and returns may increase.
23
EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (IMPAIRMENT)
All loans within the portfolio are classified and measured at amortised cost less impairment.
Under IFRS 9 a three stage approach for recognition of impairment was introduced, based on
whether there has been a significant deterioration in the credit risk of a financial asset since initial
recognition. These three stages then determine the amount of impairment provision recognised.
For the purposes of classifying between
stages 1 to 3 after initial recognition, the
Group considers a change in credit risk based
on a combination of the following factors:
• Underlying income performance is at a
greater than 10 per cent variance to the
underwritten loan metrics;
• Loan to Value is greater than 75-80 per cent;
• Loan to Value or income covenant test
results are at a variance of greater than
5-10 per cent of loan default covenant level;
• Late payments have occurred and not
been cured;
• Loan maturity date is within six months
and the borrower has not presented an
achievable refinance or repayment plan;
At Initial Recognition
Recognise a loss allowance equal to 12 months expected
credit losses resulting from default events that are possible
within 12 months.
After initial recognition:
Stage 1
Credit risk has not increased significantly since initial recognition.
Recognise 12 months expected credit losses.
Stage 2
Credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition.
Recognise lifetime expected losses.
Interest revenue recognised on a gross basis.
Stage 3
Credit impaired financial asset.
Recognise lifetime expected losses.
Interest revenue recognised on a net basis (i.e., losses are
“above the line” and impact P&L and NAV).
• Covenant and performance milestones
criteria under the loan have required more
than two waivers;
• Increased credit risk has been identified on
tenants representing greater than 25 per
cent of underlying asset income;
• Income rollover / tenant break options exist
such that a lease up of more than 30 per
cent of underlying property will be required
within 12 months in order to meet loan
covenants and interest payments; and
• Borrower management team quality has
adversely changed.
At 31 December 2022 two loans which
account for 10.8 per cent of loans advanced
by the Group are classified as Stage 2 and the
remaining loans are still classified as Stage
1. The loans classified to Stage 2 are in the
Spanish retail sector.
24
It is important to note that although these
loans have been classified as Stage 2 no ECLs
have been recognized. This is because the
formula for calculating the expected credit
loss is:
“Present Value of loan” x “probability of
default” x “value of expected loss”.
Although credit risk has increased for these
loans compared with the credit risk at
origination we have considered a number
of scenarios and as a result of these do not
currently expect to realise a loss in the event
of a default (i.e. the last part of the formula
above is considered to be zero for all loans).
This assessment has been made, despite the
continued global economic pressure on the
retail markets, on the basis of information in
our possession at the date of reporting, our
assessment of the risks of each loan and
certain estimates and judgements around
future performance of the assets. The position
on any potential ECLs on the Stage 2 assets
in particular continues to be closely monitored
and analysed, and we have sought input,
analysis and commentary from Spanish
market advisers and have updated external
valuations during 2022 to supplement our
own information. Although we continue to
update the information available at this point
in time we have no reason to believe that any
ECLs should be recognised against any of the
loans determined to be Stage 2. The reasons,
estimates and judgements supporting our
current assessment are as follows:
• Significant headroom on the two loans with
LTVs of between 70 per cent and 73 per
cent based on the latest valuations dated
June 2022;
• Performance of the centres when local
restrictions were lifted following the
different waves of Covid-19 has been very
encouraging for future recovery; as a result
we consider that income in the centers is
well positioned to recover post pandemic;
• We have determined that although there is
pressure in this market, it is unlike the UK
retail market as we are currently seeing no
evidence of significant liquidations in the
Spanish retail market.
Strategic and Business Review
Investment Manager’s Report
25
FAIR VALUE OF PORTFOLIO VS AMORTISED COST
The table below represents the value of the loans based on a discounted cash flow basis using
different discount rates.
The effective interest rate (“EIR”) – i.e. the discount rate at which future cash flows equal the
amortised cost, is 8.9 per cent. We have sensitised the cash flows at EIR intervals of 0.5 per
cent up to +/- 2.0 per cent. The table reflects how a change in market interest rates or credit
risk premiums may impact the fair value of the portfolio versus the amortised cost. The Group
considers the EIR of 8.9 per cent to be relatively conservative as many of these loans were
part of a business plan which involved transformation and many of these business plans are
either completed or well advanced in execution and therefore significantly de-risked from the
original underwriting and pricing. The volatility of the fair value to movements in discount rates
is low due to the low remaining duration of most loans.
Discount Rate Fair Value % of Book Value
6.0% (fair value) £453,301,433 104.8
6.9% £446,378,688 103.2
7.4% £442,812,482 102.4
7.9% £439,304,831 101.6
8.4% £435,854,418 100.8
8.9% £432,459,966 100.0
9.4% £429,120,227 99.2
9.9% £425,833,994 98.5
10.4% £422,600,089 97.7
10.9% £419,417,368 97.0
26
• On the origination of a loan, for a straight
forward standing investment asset
(for example, an occupied office), the
independent open market value determined
by an independent valuer under RICS
guidelines will be used. When considering
the relevance of these valuations in the
current market, it is important to consider
how quickly a portfolio churns. Our average
loan term from origination to repayment is
approximately 2.4 years and therefore our
valuations have been relatively fresh.
• After loan origination the Group has the
right under loan documents to obtain
valuations on an annual basis at the
expense of the borrower (based on loan
anniversary, not Group financial year end).
Where a follow on valuation has been
done we use the latest valuation number
in our calculations. However, the Group
does not instruct independent third party
valuations on a strict annual basis, only
when it is considered necessary and useful
to obtain one. 65 per cent of the total
income producing loan book have had their
valuation updated in the twelve months to
31 December 2022.
• For development projects there are a
number of potential valuation methodologies.
Our selected approach is based on giving the
clearest and most consistent presentation
of the risk. For development projects our
calculation includes the total facility available
and is calculated against the appraised
market value on completion of the relevant
project. There are other potential approaches
such as using current drawn loan balance
and current value or using total cost as a
proxy for value. However each of these
approaches has limitations. For example,
using the approach of drawn loan balance
divided by current project value will typically
understate the LTV in the earlier days of a
development when less debt is drawn before
converging to a higher LTV that matches
our methodology at the end once all the
debt is drawn. We generally retain the same
rights to valuation on development loans
as for investment assets. It is also worth
noting that the weighting of the loan within
the portfolio calculation is based off the
latest drawn balance and not the total loan
commitment.
Total loan drawn less any deductible lender
controlled cash reserves and less any
amortization received to date (including any
debt provided by other lenders which rank
alongside or senior to the Group’s position)
Market value determined by the last
formal lender valuation received by the
reporting date
LOAN TO VALUE
Given the need for the Group and most of its
peers to record loans at amortised cost, the
loan to value of companies in our sector has
understandably been an area of focus for
many of our shareholders and stakeholders
seeking to understand underlying risk further.
In order to try to assist in understanding the
underlying credit risk, we have always quoted
the last £ loan to value (“last LTV”) of our
portfolio and have outlined further detail below
on our approach to this calculation.
Methodology
Our methodology to calculate the last LTV for
each individual loan is:
Each individual loan LTV is then weighted by
the amount of the loan currently drawn (in the
Group only, ignoring the position of other third
party lenders) to give a weighted average last
LTV across the Group’s portfolio.
Valuations Process
The following describes the valuation basis
that is used in our calculation. As the vast
majority of our portfolio is originated directly
by the Investment Adviser, the Group has
discretion over when and how to instruct
valuations. We consider this to be a strength
of our valuation process as we have control
over timing and complete access to the detail
of the valuation process and the output.
Where loans are not directly originated the
lender could have a lack of control over the
timing and no input to the process which we
prefer to avoid where possible.
Strategic and Business Review
Investment Manager’s Report
27
Change in
Valuation
Hospitality Retail Residential Other Total
-15% 67.5% 81.5% 67.6% 67.2% 69.0%
-10% 63.7% 77.0% 63.8% 63.5% 65.1%
-5% 60.4% 72.9% 60.5% 60.1% 61.7%
0% 57.3% 69.3% 57.4% 57.1% 58.6%
5% 54.6% 66.0% 54.7% 54.4% 55.8%
10% 52.1% 63.0% 52.2% 51.9% 53.3%
15% 49.9% 60.2% 49.9% 49.7% 51.0%
On the basis of the methodology previously
outlined, at 31 December 2022 the Group
has an average last LTV of 58.6 per cent
(2021: 61.9 per cent).
The table above shows the sensitivity of
the loan to value calculation for movements
in the underlying property valuation
and demonstrates that the Group has
considerable headroom within the currently
reported last LTVs
Dividend Policy
To date, the Company has paid dividends of
5.5 pence per Ordinary Share in respect of
the year ended 31 December 2022 (2021:
5.5 pence per Ordinary Share). In addition,
on 23 March 2023, the Company declared
a special dividend of 2 pence per Ordinary
Share in respect of the year ending 31
December 2022 to be paid on 21 April 2023
to shareholders on the register as at 31
March 2023. Dividends are recognised in the
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
when declared. Dividends are usually paid
within one month of the declaration date.
The Company may pay dividends out of
reserves provided that the Board of Directors
is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the
Company will, immediately after payment,
satisfy the solvency test (as defined in
the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, as
amended), and satisfy any other requirement
in its memorandum and articles.
The following loans have been repaid in
full since year end up to 23 March 2023:
• Hotel, Oxford - £22,950,000
• Office and Industrial Portfolio, UK -
£5,500,000
During January and February 2023, a
total amount of £19,000,000 was paid to
Morgan Stanley as repayment of amounts
owed as at 31 December 2022 under the
credit facility held with them.
On 21 January 2023 the Directors declared
a dividend in respect of the fourth quarter
of 2022 of 1.375 pence per Ordinary Share
payable on 24 February 2023 to shareholders
on the register at 3 February 2023.
In addition, on 23 March 2023, the
Company declared a special dividend of 2
pence per Ordinary Share in respect of the
year ending 31 December 2022 to be paid
on 21 April 2023 to shareholders on the
register as at 31 March 2023.
Subsequent to year end the Lloyds credit
facility agreement was extended to May
2024 with a reduced facility amount of
£25.0 million.
Starwood European Finance
Partners Limited | Investment Manager
23 March 2023
For the year ended December 2022
5.5 pence per share has been paid out in
dividends which to date was covered 1.24x
by earnings (excluding unrealised FX gains
and losses and realised FX gains on hedges
relating to loans that have been extended).
In addition, on 23 March 2023, the Company
has declared a special dividend of 2 pence
per Ordinary Share in respect of the year
ending 31 December 2022 to be paid on 21
April 2023 to shareholders on the register as
at 31 March 2023. The Company maintains
a dividend reserve which is utilised, when
needed, to ensure dividends are not paid out
of capital.
EVENTS AFTER THE
REPORTING PERIOD
The following amounts have been drawn
under existing commitments, up to
23 March 2023:
• Mixed Use, Dublin - €109,357
The following loan amortisation (both
scheduled and unscheduled) has been
received since the year-end up to
23 March 2023:
• Hotel, Dublin - €2,449,200
• Hotel and Office, Northern Ireland -
£1,000,000
• Mixed Portfolio, Europe - €1,516,035
• Three Shopping Centres, Spain - €359,732
Governance
Board of Directors
JOHN WHITTLE | Non-executive Director – Chairman of the Board
John is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and holds the Institute of
Directors Diploma in Company Direction. He is a Non-Executive Director and Audit Committee Chairman of The
Renewable Infrastructure Group Ltd (FTSE 250), Sancus Lending Group Ltd (listed on AIM), and Chenavari Toro
Limited Income Fund Limited (listed on the SFS segment of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange).
He was previously Finance Director of Close Fund Services, a large independent fund administrator, where he
successfully initiated a restructuring of client financial reporting services and was a key member of the business
transition team. Prior to moving to Guernsey, he was at Pricewaterhouse in London before embarking on a
career in business services, predominantly telecoms. He co-led the business turnaround of Talkland International
(which became Vodafone Retail) and was directly responsible for the strategic shift into retail distribution and its
subsequent implementation; he subsequently worked on the private equity acquisition of Ora Telecom. John is a
resident of Guernsey.
GARY YARDLEY | Non-executive Director
Gary is a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and holds a degree in estate management from
Southbank University and an MBA. He has been a senior deal maker in the UK and European real estate market
for over 25 years. Gary was formally Managing Director & Chief Investment Officer of Capital & Counties Property
PLC (“Capco”) and led Capco’s real estate investment and development activities. Leading Capco’s team on the
redevelopment of Earls Court, Gary was responsible for acquiring and subsequently securing planning consent for
over 11m sq. ft. at this strategic opportunity area capable of providing over 7,500 new homes for London. Gary
was also heavily involved in the curation and growth of the Covent Garden estate for Capco, now an established
premier London landmark. Gary is a Chartered Surveyor with over 30 years’ experience in UK & European real
estate. He is a former CIO of Liberty International and former equity partner of King Sturge and led PwC’s real
estate team in Prague and Central Europe in the early 1990s. Gary is a resident of the United Kingdom.
SHELAGH MASON | Non-executive Director – Management Engagement Committee
Chairman and Senior Independent Director
Shelagh Mason is a solicitor specialising in English commercial property who retired as a consultant with Collas
Crill LLP in 2020. She is the Non-Executive Chairman of the Channel Islands Property Fund Limited listed on the
International Stock Exchange and is also Non-Executive Chairman of Riverside Capital PCC, sits on the board of
Skipton International Limited, a Guernsey Licensed bank, and until 28 February 2022, she was a Non-Executive
Director of the Renewables Infrastructure Fund a FTSE 250 company, standing down after nine years on the board. In
addition to the Company, she has a non-executive position with Ruffer Investment Company Limited, also a FTSE 250
company. Previously Shelagh was a member of the board of directors of Standard Life Investments Property Income
Trust, a property fund listed on the London Stock Exchange for 10 years until December 2014. She retired from the
board of Medicx Fund Limited, a main market listed investment company investing in primary healthcare facilities in
2017 after 10 years on the board. She is a past Chairman of the Guernsey Branch of the Institute of Directors and
she also holds the IOD Company Direction Certificate and Diploma with distinction. Shelagh is a resident of Guernsey.
CHARLOTTE DENTON | Non-executive Director - Audit Committee Chairman
Charlotte is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and holds a degree in
politics from Durham University. She is also a member of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners, a
Chartered Director and a fellow of the Institute of Directors. During Charlotte’s executive career she worked in
various locations through roles in diverse organisations, including KPMG, Rothschild, Northern Trust, a property
development startup and a privately held financial services group. She has served on boards for over fifteen years
and is currently a Non-Executive Director of various entities including Butterfield Bank (Guernsey) Limited, the GP
boards of Private Equity groups Cinven and Hitec and the Investment Manager for NextEnergy. She is also the
Audit Chair for the listed Investment Company River and Mercantile UK Micro Cap. Charlotte is a resident
of Guernsey.
28
29
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES AND
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
The Principal Activities and Investment
Objective are fully detailed in the Objective and
Investment Policy section.
STRUCTURE
The Company was incorporated with limited
liability in Guernsey under the Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 2008, as amended, on 9
November 2012 with registered number
55836 and has been authorised by the
Guernsey Financial Services Commission
as a registered closed-ended investment
company. The Company’s Ordinary Shares
were admitted to the premium segment of
the Financial Conduct Authority’s (“FCA”)
Official List and to trading on the Main
Market of the London Stock Exchange
as part of its IPO which completed on
17 December 2012. Further issues have
taken place since IPO and are listed under
“Capital” below. The issued capital during
the year comprises the Company’s Ordinary
Shares denominated in Sterling.
The Company makes its investments through
Starfin Lux S.à.r.l (indirectly wholly owned via
a 100% shareholding in Starfin Public Holdco
1 Limited), Starfin Lux 3 S.à.r.l and Starfin
Lux 4 S.à.r.l. (both indirectly wholly owned
via a 100% shareholding in Starfin Public
Holdco 2 Limited).
References to the Group refer to the
Company and its subsidiaries.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Company has a target dividend of 5.5
pence per Ordinary Share per annum, based
on quarterly dividend payments.
DIVIDENDS PAID AND PAYABLE
The Company has paid dividends of 1.375
pence per Ordinary Share for each of the
calendar quarters of 2022. To date, the
Company has paid a total of £22,107,601
in respect of 2022 (5.5 pence per Ordinary
Share) (2021: £22,490,120: 5.5 pence per
Ordinary Share). In addition, on 23 March
2023, the Company declared a special
dividend of 2 pence per Ordinary Share in
respect of the year ending 31 December 2022
to be paid on 21 April 2023 to shareholders
on the register as at 31 March 2023.
BUSINESS REVIEW
The Group’s performance during the year
to 31 December 2022, its position at that
date and the Group’s future developments
are detailed in the Chairman’s Statement,
the Strategic Report and the Investment
Manager’s Report.
CAPITAL
As part of the Company’s IPO completed on
17 December 2012, 228,500,000 Ordinary
Shares of the Company, with an issue price
of 100 pence per share, were admitted to the
premium segment of the UK Listing Authority’s
Official List and to trading on the Main Market
of the London Stock Exchange.
The following issues have been made since
the IPO:
Admission Date
Number of
Ordinary Shares
Price (pence per
Ordinary Share)
21 March 2013 8,000,000 104.25
9 April 2013 1,000,000 104.50
12 April 2013 600,000 104.00
23 July 2015 23,780,000 103.00
29 September 2015 42,300,000 102.75
12 August 2016 70,839,398 103.05
15 May 2019 38,200,000 104.75
Governance
Report of the Directors
The Company holds 17,626,702 (2021:
4,308,125) shares in treasury. The total
number of voting rights in the Company
is 395,592,696, which may be used by
shareholders as the denominator for the
calculations by which they can determine if
they are required to notify their interest in, or a
change to their interest in, the Company under
the Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure
and Transparency Rules. As disclosed in the
Chairman’s Statement, during the year ended
31 December 2022, the Company bought
back 13,318,577 Ordinary Shares at an
average cost of 92.84 pence per share (2021:
660,000 Ordinary Shares at an average cost
of 89.63 pence per share).
30
SUBSTANTIAL INTERESTS
Information provided to the Company by major
shareholders pursuant to the FCA’s Disclosure
and Transparency Rules (“DTR”) is published
via a Regulatory Information Service and is
available on the Company’s website. The
Company has been notified under Rule 5 of
the DTR of the following holdings of voting
rights in its shares as at 31 December 2022
and as at the date of this report.
Name
% holding of Ordinary
Shares at 31 December
2022
% holding of Ordinary
Shares at 7 March 2023
(the latest available)
BlackRock 19.37 19.27
Close Brothers Asset
Management
7.72 7.84
Waverton Investment
Management
7.71 7.99
Schroder Investment
Management
5.85 6.39
Fidelity International 5.05 5.05
SG Private Banking 4.09 3.76
Premier Miton Investors 3.99 3.99
Quilter Cheviot Investment
Manager
3.88 3.85
James Hambro & Partners 3.50 2.73
City of London 3.18 3.35
The Directors have adopted a code of
Directors’ dealings in Ordinary Shares, which
is based on EU Market Abuse Regulation
(“MAR”). MAR came into effect across the
EU (including the UK) on 3 July 2016. The
Board is responsible for taking all proper
and reasonable steps to ensure compliance
with MAR by the Directors and reviews such
compliance on a regular basis.
DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS
IN SHARES
The Directors’ interests in shares are
shown opposite:
Name
Ordinary Shares at
31 December 2022
Ordinary Shares at
31 December 2021
John Whittle 33,866 23,866
Shelagh Mason 112,819 112,819
Charlotte Denton 44,444 -
Gary Yardley - -
Governance
Report of the Directors
EVENTS AFTER THE
REPORTING PERIOD
Details of events after the reporting period
are contained in note 23 to the consolidated
financial statements.
31
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The Directors, at the recommendation of
the Audit Committee, conducted a tender
for the position of Independent Auditor
to the Company for the audit of the year-
ending 31 December 2023 as a form of best
practice given PricewaterhouseCoopers
CI LLP has served as the Company’s
Independent Auditor for two consecutive
terms of five years. Following a competitive
tender process, the Audit Committee
recommended that the Board continue to
engage PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP, who
have been engaged since the Company’s
inaugural meeting on 22 November 2012
and have been re-appointed at each AGM
held since. PricewaterhouseCoopers CI
LLP have indicated their willingness to
continue as Auditor. The Directors, at the
recommendation of the Audit Committee,
will place a resolution before the AGM to
re-appoint them as independent auditor
for the ensuing year, and to authorise the
Directors to determine their remuneration.
INVESTMENT MANAGER AND
SERVICE PROVIDERS
The Investment Manager during the year was
Starwood European Finance Partners Limited
(the “Investment Manager”), incorporated
in Guernsey with registered number 55819
and regulated by the GFSC and Alternative
Investment Fund Management Directive. The
Investment Manager has appointed Starwood
Capital Europe Advisers, LLP (the “Investment
Adviser”), an English limited liability
partnership authorised and regulated by the
FCA, to provide investment advice pursuant to
an Investment Advisory Agreement.
The administration of both the Company and
Investment Manager was delegated to Apex
Fund and Corporate Services (Guernsey)
Limited (the “Administrator”) during the year.
ORDERLY REALISATION AND
RETURN OF CAPITAL TO
SHAREHOLDERS
Under the Company’s discount control
mechanisms (contained within its previous
Articles of Association), the Company would
have been required to offer to redeem up
to 75 per cent of the shares in issue as the
Company’s discount to its Net Asset Value
per share was greater than 5 per cent or
more during the six-month period ending 31
December 2022 (the “Tender Offer”).
However, on 31 October 2022, the Company
announced, that following a review of the
Company’s strategy and advice sought from
its advisers, the Board intended to recommend
to shareholders that the investment objective
and policy of the Company were amended
such that the Board can pursue a strategy of
orderly realisation and the return of capital over
time to shareholders (the “Proposed Orderly
Realisation”). If approved by the shareholders,
the Company would seek to return cash to
shareholders in an orderly manner as soon as
reasonably practicable following the repayment
of loans, while retaining sufficient working
capital for ongoing operations and the funding
of committed but currently unfunded loan
commitments.
On 28 December 2022, a Circular relating
to the Proposed Orderly Realisation and
containing a Notice of Extraordinary General
Meeting to be held on 27 January 2023 (the
“EGM”) was published. The Circular set out
details of, and sought shareholder approval
for, certain Proposals.
The Proposals were:
a) a change to the Company’s Investment
Policy to reflect the fact that the
Company will cease making any new
investments and will pursue a realisation
strategy of the remaining assets in the
Company’s portfolio; and
b) adoption of the New Articles which
provide for the periodic Compulsory
Redemption of the Company’s Shares
at the discretion of the Directors
to allow cash to be returned to
Shareholders following the full or
partial realisation of assets.
On 27 January 2023, these Proposals were
approved at the EGM.
The Investment Objective and Policy
which applied prior to the approval of the
Proposals, and for the whole of 2022, are
set out in the prior year Annual Report. The
current Investment Objective and Policy
of the Company following the approval of
the Proposals are set out on page 4. The
Company maintains share repurchase
powers, as approved at the 10 June 2022
Annual General Meeting, that allow the
Company to repurchase Ordinary Shares in
the Market up to 14.99 per cent of the share
capital, subject to annual renewal of the
Shareholder authority. It is not the intention
of the Company to raise fresh capital
including through a placing programme
(subject to the publication of a prospectus of
the Company) and through opportunistic tap
issues following the approval of the Proposals
at the EGM.
SHARE BUYBACKS
The Company renewed its authority at the
recent AGM to purchase in the market up
to 14.99 per cent of the Ordinary Shares
in issue on 10 June 2022 at a price not
exceeding: (i) five per cent above the average
of the mid-market values of the Ordinary
Shares for the five Business Days before the
purchase is made; or (ii) the higher of the
last independent trade or the highest current
independent bid for the Ordinary Shares.
The Directors will give consideration to
repurchasing Shares under this authority, but
are not bound to do so, where the market
price of an Ordinary Share trades at more
than 7.5 per cent below the Net Asset Value
per Share for more than 3 months, subject
to available cash not otherwise required for
working capital purposes or the payment of
dividends in accordance with the Company’s
dividend policy.
If not previously used, this authority shall
expire at the conclusion of the Company’s
AGM in 2023. The Directors intend to seek
annual renewal of this buyback authority
from Shareholders each year at the
Company’s AGM.
As disclosed in the Chairman’s statement,
the Company has bought back 13,318,577
shares during the year ended 31 December
2022 at an average cost per share of 92.84
pence. These shares are held in treasury.
John Whittle | Chairman
23 March 2023
32
Governance
Directors’ Remuneration Report
REMUNERATION POLICY
& COMPONENTS
The Board endeavours to ensure the
remuneration policy reflects and supports
the Company’s strategic aims and objectives
throughout the year under review. It has
been agreed that, due to the small size
and structure of the Company, a separate
Remuneration Committee would be inefficient;
therefore, the Board as a whole is responsible
for discussions regarding remuneration.
As per the Company’s Articles of
Incorporation, all Directors are entitled
to such remuneration as is stated in the
Company’s Prospectus or as the Company
may determine by ordinary resolution; to not
exceed the aggregate overall limit of £300,000
per annum. Subject to this limit, it is the
Company’s policy to determine the level of
Directors’ fees, having regard for the level of
fees payable to non-executive Directors in
the industry generally, the role that individual
Directors fulfil in respect of responsibilities
related to the Board, Management
Engagement Committee and Audit Committee
and the time dedicated by each Director to the
Company’s affairs. Base fees are set out in the
table below.
Director
Role
Total Fee
2022
£
Total Fee
2021
£
John Whittle
Chairman with effect from
1 January 2022
60,000 45,000
Shelagh Mason
Management Engagement
Committee Chairman and Senior
Independent Director
45,000 42,500
Charlotte Denton
Audit Committee Chairman with
effect from 1 January 2022
50,000 40,000
Gary Yardley
Non-Executive Director with effect
from 6 September 2021
42,000 12,712
Stephen Smith
Chairman with effect to
31 December 2021
- 50,000
Aggregate fees 197,000 190,212
Aggregate expenses 6,373 5,198
Total 203,373 195,410
As outlined in the Articles of Incorporation, the
Directors may also be paid for all reasonable
travelling, accommodation and other out-
of-pocket expenses properly incurred in
the attendance of Board or Committee
meetings, general meetings, or meetings with
shareholders or debentures of the Company or
otherwise in discharge of their duties; and all
reasonable expenses properly incurred by them
seeking independent professional advice on any
matter that concerns them in the furtherance
of their duties as Directors of the Company.
No Director has any entitlement to pensions,
paid bonuses or performance fees, has been
granted share options or been invited to
participate in long-term incentive plans. No
loans have been originated by the Company
for the benefit of any Director.
None of the Directors have a service contract
with the Company. Each of the Directors have
entered into a letter of appointment with the
Company. The letters of appointment were
reviewed and amended in 2019 by an external
party to ensure that they were in line with
market standards prevailing at the time. Each
Director is subject to annual re-election.
The Directors do not have any interests
in contractual arrangements with the
Company or its investments during the
year under review, or subsequently. Each
appointment can be terminated in accordance
with the Company’s Articles and without
compensation. As outlined in the letters
of appointment, each appointment can be
terminated at the will of both parties with
one month’s notice either by (i) written
resignation; (ii) unauthorised absences from
Board meetings for 12 months or more; (iii)
written request of the other Directors; or (iv) a
resolution of the shareholders.
Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance
cover is maintained by the Company but is not
considered a benefit in kind nor constitutes
a part of the Directors’ remuneration. The
Company’s Articles indemnify each Director,
Secretary, agent and officer of the Company,
former or present, out of assets of the
Company in relation to charges, losses,
liabilities, damages and expenses incurred
during the course of their duties, in so far
as the law allows and provided that such
indemnity is not available in circumstances of
fraud, wilful misconduct or negligence.
By order of the Board
John Whittle | Chairman
23 March 2023
33
Governance
Corporate Governance Statement
JOHN WHITTLE | Chairman
As a regulated Guernsey incorporated
company with a Premium Listing on the
Official List and admission to trading on the
Main Market for Listed Securities of the
London Stock Exchange, the Company is
required to comply with the principles of the
UK Corporate Governance Code dated July
2018 (“UK Code”).
As an AIC member, the Board has also
considered the principles and provisions of
the AIC Code of Corporate Governance dated
February 2019 (“AIC Code”). The AIC Code
addresses all the principles set out in the
UK Code, as well as setting out additional
principles and provisions on issues of specific
relevance to the Company. The AIC Code has
been endorsed by the Financial Reporting
Council as ensuring investment company
boards fully meet their obligations to the UK
Code and LR 9.8.6 of the Listing Rules.
Except as disclosed within the report, the
Board is of the view that throughout the
year ended 31 December 2022, the
Company complied with the principles
and provisions of the AIC Code. Key
issues affecting the Company’s corporate
governance responsibilities, how they are
addressed by the Board and application of
the AIC Code are presented below. There
is no information that is required to be
disclosed under Listing Rule 9.8.4.
The UK Code includes provisions relating to:
the role of the chief executive; executive
Directors’ remuneration; and the need for
an internal audit function which are not
considered by the Board to be relevant to
the Company, being an externally managed
investment company. The Company has
therefore not reported further in respect
of these provisions.
The Guernsey Financial Services Commission
Finance Sector Code of Corporate
Governance (“GFSC Code”) came into force
in Guernsey on 1 January 2012 and was
amended in February 2016 and June 2021.
The Company is deemed to satisfy the GFSC
Code provided that it continues to conduct
its governance in accordance with the
requirements of the AIC Code.
CHAIRMAN
Appointed to the position of Chairman of
the Board on 1 January 2022, John Whittle
is responsible for leading the Board in all
areas, including determination of strategy,
organising the Board’s business and ensuring
the effectiveness of the Board and individual
Directors. He also endeavours to produce an
open culture of debate within the Board.
The Chairman’s appointment is in line with the
previously released Succession Plan. Prior to
the Chairman’s appointment, a job specification
was prepared which included an assessment
of the time commitment anticipated for the
role. Discussions were undertaken to ensure
that the Chairman was sufficiently aware of
the time needed for his role and agreed to this
upon signature of his letter of appointment.
Other significant business commitments of the
Chairman were disclosed to the Company prior
to his appointment to the Board and a current
list of commitments is set out in his biography
on page 28.
The effectiveness and independence of the
Chairman is evaluated on an annual basis as
part of the Board’s performance evaluation;
the Management Engagement Committee
Chairman is tasked with collating feedback and
discussing with the Chairman on behalf of the
rest of the Board.
As per the Company’s Articles, all Directors,
including the Chairman, must disclose any
interest in a transaction that the Board and
Committees will consider. To ensure that all
Board decisions are independent, the said
conflicted Director is not entitled to vote in
respect of any arrangement connected to
the interested party but may be counted in
the quorum.
34
BOARD
Independence and Disclosure
The Chairman confirms that the initial Board,
consisting of Messrs. Jonathan Bridel (resigned
31 December 2020), Stephen Smith (resigned
31 December 2021) and himself were
selected prior to the Company’s launch and
were able to assume all responsibilities at an
early stage, independent of the Investment
Manager and Investment Adviser. Shelagh
Mason was appointed as a non-executive
Director during 2020 and Charlotte Denton
and Gary Yardley were appointed as non-
executive Directors on 1 January 2021 and 6
September 2021, respectively, in accordance
with the Board’s previous Succession Planning
Memorandum. The Board is composed entirely
of independent non-executive Directors, who
meet as required without the presence of the
Investment Manager or service providers to
scrutinise the achievement of agreed goals,
objectives and monitor performance. Through
the Audit Committee and the Management
Engagement Committee they are able to
ascertain the integrity of financial information
and confirm that all financial controls and risk
management systems are robust and analyse
the performance of the Investment Manager
and other service providers on a regular basis.
Following the annual performance evaluation,
it was deemed that the Directors had been
proven to challenge the Investment Manager
throughout the year under review, as minuted
and recorded, therefore for the purposes of
assessing compliance with the AIC Code, the
Board as a whole considers that each Director
is independent of the Investment Manager and
free from any business or other relationship
that could materially interfere with the exercise
of their independent judgment. If required,
the Board is able to access independent
professional advice. The Investment Manager is
also requested to declare any potential conflicts
surrounding votes, share dealing and soft
commissions on an annual basis to the Board
to help with the assessment of investments.
Open communication between the
Investment Manager and the Board is
facilitated by regular Board meetings, to
which the Investment Manager is invited to
attend and update the Board on the current
status of the Company’s investments, along
with ad hoc meetings as required.
Coming to mutual agreement on all decisions,
it was agreed that the Board had acted in the
best interests of the Company to the extent
that, if deemed appropriate, a Director would
abstain or have his objection noted, which
would be reflected within the minutes.
Similar to the process outlined above for
the appointment of the Chairman, a job
specification was prepared for each initial
directorship which included an assessment
of the time commitment anticipated for the
role to ensure each Director was aware of
the time commitment needed for the role.
The Directors’ other significant business
commitments were disclosed to the
Company prior to their appointment to the
Board and were publicly disclosed in the
Company’s Prospectus dated 28 November
2012. A similar process was followed as
part of the succession planning outlined
above. Any subsequent changes have been
declared. Certain of these commitments can
be identified in each Director’s biography on
page 28. Details of the skills and experience
provided by each Director can also be found
in their biographies, alongside identification
of the role each Director currently holds in
the Company.
The terms and conditions of appointment for
non-executive Directors are outlined in their
letters of appointment and are available for
inspection by any person at the Company’s
registered office during normal business hours
and at the AGM for fifteen minutes prior to and
during the meeting. The letters of appointment
were previously reviewed by an external party
and amended to ensure that they are in line
with current market standards.
There is no executive Director function in
the Company; all day-to-day functions are
outsourced to external service providers.
Development
The Board believes that the Company’s
Directors should develop their skills and
knowledge through participation at relevant
courses. The Chairman is responsible for
reviewing and discussing the training and
development of each Director according to
specific needs. Upon appointment, all Directors
participate in discussions with the Chairman
and other Directors to understand the
responsibilities of the Directors, in addition to
the Company’s business and procedures. The
Company also provides regular opportunities
for the Directors to obtain a thorough
understanding of the Company’s business
by regularly meeting members of the senior
management team from the Investment
Manager, Investment Adviser and other service
providers, both in person, by phone and through
virtual meetings.
Balance of the Board and Diversity Policy
It is perceived that the Board is well-balanced,
with a wide array of skills, experience and
knowledge that ensures it functions correctly
and that no single Director may dominate the
Board’s decisions.
The Board’s position on diversity can be seen
in the Strategic Report. All Directors currently
sit on all the Committees, with the exception
of the Chairman, who is not a member of
the Audit Committee; additionally, no single
Director fills more than one Committee
chairmanship post.
Annual Performance Evaluation
The Board’s balance is reviewed on a regular
basis as part of a performance evaluation
review. Using a pre-determined template
based on the AIC Code’s provisions as a basis
for review, the Board undertook an evaluation
of its performance, and in addition, an
evaluation focusing on individual commitment,
performance and contribution of each Director
was conducted. The Chairman then met
with each Director to fully understand their
views of the Company’s strengths and to
identify potential weaknesses. If appropriate,
new members are proposed to resolve any
perceived issues, or a resignation is sought.
Following discussions and review of the
Chairman’s evaluation by the other Directors,
the Management Engagement
Committee Chairman reviewed the Chairman’s
performance. Training and development
needs are identified as part of this process,
thereby ensuring that all Directors are able to
discharge their duties effectively.
Given the Company’s size and the structure
of the Board, no external facilitator or
independent third party was used in the
performance evaluation. The need to appoint
an external facilitator is reviewed by the Board
on an annual basis.
Governance
Corporate Governance Statement
35
Re-election and Board Tenure
There is currently no Nominations Committee
for the Company as it is deemed that the size,
composition and structure of the Company
would mean the process would be inefficient
and counterproductive. The Board therefore
undertakes a thorough process of reviewing
the skill set of the individual Directors,
and proposes new, or renewal of current
appointments to the Board.
Each Director is required to be elected
by shareholders at the AGM following his
appointment by the Board. As part of the
recommendations of the AIC Code, the
Directors put themselves forward for annual
re-election. In light of this, all Directors,
are therefore submitting themselves for
re-election.
The Audit Committee Members and the Board
confirm that all Directors have proven their
ability to fulfil all legal responsibilities and to
provide effective independent judgment on
issues of strategy, performance, resources
and conduct. The Board therefore has no
hesitation in recommending to Shareholders
that all Directors are re-elected.
Appointment Process
The Directors appointment process involves
identifying gaps and needs in the Board’s
composition and then reviewing the skill set of
potential candidates with a view to making an
appointment that fills the identified gaps and
needs. Currently there is no gap that currently
needs to be filled. Should a gap be identified,
the Board would engage an independent
search consultancy with no connection to
the Company or its Directors, to assist in
appointments to satisfy such gaps.
Succession Planning
The Company enters its eleventh year in
2023 and the Board has been mindful in the
implementation of the previously announced
succession plan. During Q4 2019, the Directors
devised a Succession Planning Memorandum.
The Memorandum stated that a new Director
was to be appointed to the Board during the
second half of 2021 giving them time to get up
to speed prior to Stephen Smith standing down
from the Board in December 2021. Charlotte
Denton and Gary Yardley were duly appointed
on 1 January 2021 and 6 September 2021,
respectively.
Upon Stephen Smith’s retirement from the
Board during December 2021, John Whittle
was subsequently appointed as Chairman of
the Board as of 1 January 2022. Charlotte
Denton became Chairman of the Audit
Committee as of 1 January 2022. Shelagh
Mason became the Senior Independent
Director as of 20 January 2022.
As disclosed in previous reports, it was the
Board’s intention that John Whittle would
remain on the Board until December 2023 in
light of (i) John Whittle’s extensive familiarity
with the Company; (ii) the previously
challenging market circumstances facing the
Company; and (iii) the extensive rotation of the
Board in recent years. Given the shareholder
approval to progress the Orderly Realisation and
Return of Capital, as passed by shareholder
resolution at the Extraordinary General Meeting
on 27 January 2023, the Board are of the
view that it is in shareholders’ best interests
that John Whittle remains on the Board until
the completion of the Orderly Realisation and
Return of Capital to Shareholders. This will
ensure that the Board and shareholders will
benefit from the significant experience and
knowledge of the Company and its portfolio
that John Whittle has developed since the
Company’s IPO.
In terms of the new appointments, with the
approval of the Orderly Realisation and Return
of Capital and the previously announced
succession plan being largely completed, the
Directors believe that the current composition
of three Guernsey Directors and one Director
from the United Kingdom works well in terms
of satisfying the Company’s requirements.
To the extent applicable or required, the Board
will continue to consider diversity when
making the new appointments to the Board.
At present, the Directors wish to leave the
succession and the tenure policy of the
Chairman open indefinitely, with no changes
currently planned.
BOARD AND COMMITTEES
Board
Matters reserved for the Board include review
of the Company’s overall strategy and business
plans; approval of the Company’s half-yearly
and annual reports; review and approval of any
alteration to the Group’s accounting policies
or practices and valuation of investments;
approval of any alteration to the Company’s
capital structure; approval of the dividend
policy; appointments to the Board and
constitution of Board Committees; observation
of relevant legislation and regulatory
requirements; and performance review of
key service providers. The Board also retains
ultimate responsibility for Committee decisions;
every Committee is required to refer to the
Board, who will make the final decision.
Terms of reference that contain a formal
schedule of matters reserved for the Board of
Directors and its duly authorised Committee
for decision has been approved and can be
reviewed at the Company’s registered office.
The meeting attendance record is displayed
in the Corporate Governance statement. The
Company Secretary acts as the Secretary to
the Board.
Audit Committee
The Board has established an Audit Committee
which was composed of all the independent
members of the Board other than Chairman
of the Board. The Chairman of the Board,
although not a member of the Committee,
may still attend the meetings upon invitation
by the Audit Committee Chairman. The Audit
Committee, its membership and its terms of
reference are kept under regular review by
the Board, and it is confident that all members
have sufficient financial skills and experience,
and competence relevant to the Company’s
sector. John Whittle was the Audit Committee
Chairman until 31 December 2021. Charlotte
Denton was appointed on 24 March 2021
to the Audit Committee and has become
chairman of the Audit Committee with effect
from 1 January 2022.
The Audit Committee met four times during
2022 (2021: three times). The Company
Secretary acts as the Secretary to the
Audit Committee.
Owing to the size and structure of the
Company, there is no internal audit function.
The Audit Committee has reviewed the need
for an internal audit function and perceived
that the internal financial and operating control
systems in place within the Group and its
service providers, for example as evidenced
by the Report on Controls at a Service
Organisation (“SOC 1 Type 2 Report”) on the
internal procedures of the Administrator, give
sufficient assurance that a sound system of
internal control is maintained that safeguards
shareholders’ investment and Group’s assets.
36
The Audit Committee is intended to assist the
Board in discharging its responsibilities for the
integrity of the Group’s consolidated financial
statements, as well as aiding the assessment
of the Group’s internal control effectiveness
and objectivity of the external Auditors.
Further information on the Audit Committee’s
responsibilities is given in the Report of the
Audit Committee.
Formal terms of reference for the Audit
Committee are available at the registered
office and on the Company’s website and
are reviewed on a regular basis.
Management Engagement Committee
The Company has established a Management
Engagement Committee which comprises
all the Directors, with Shelagh Mason as the
Chairman of the Committee. The Management
Engagement Committee’s main function is
to review and make recommendations on
any proposed amendment to the Investment
Management Agreement and keep under
review the performance of the Investment
Manager; and undertake an assessment
of the Investment Manager’s scope and
responsibilities as outlined in the service
agreement and prospectus on a formal basis
every year. Discussions on the Investment
Manager’s performance are also conducted
regularly throughout the year by the Board.
Reviews of engagements with other service
providers, such as the Administrator, to
ensure all parties are operating satisfactorily
are also undertaken by the Management
Engagement Committee so as to ensure
the safe and accurate management and
administration of the Company’s affairs and
business and that they are competitive and
reasonable for Shareholders.
The Management Engagement Committee
met twice during 2022 (2021: once) and
undertook a review of the key service
providers to the Group and the Company,
utilising a service provider questionnaire. No
material weaknesses were identified and the
recommendation to the Board was that the
current arrangements were appropriate and
provided good quality services and advice to
the Company and the Group.
Formal terms of reference for the Management
Engagement Committee are available at the
registered office and the Company’s website
and are reviewed on a regular basis.
(1)
The ad hoc Board meetings are convened at short notice to deal with administrative matters. It is not therefore always logistically feasible, or a
necessity, for the Chairman of the Board to attend such meetings.
Scheduled
Board
Ad hoc
Board
(1)
Audit
Committee
Management
Engagement
Committee
John Whittle 4 9 4 2
Shelagh Mason 4 10 4 2
Charlotte Denton 4 9 4 2
Gary Yardley 4 9 4 2
Total Meetings
for year
4 10 4 2
The Company Secretary acts as the secretary
to the Management Engagement Committee.
Board and Committee Meeting Attendance
Individual attendance at Board and committee
meetings is set out above.
In addition to the scheduled quarterly and
additional ad hoc meetings, the Directors
and the Investment Manager have been
provided with a number of videoconference
or telephone investment briefings by the
Investment Adviser in order to keep the
Directors and the Investment Manager fully
apprised and up to date with the current
investment status and progress. During 2018,
a committee of one Director was appointed
to approve dividends should a quorum of two
Directors not be available.
BOARD REMUNERATION
As outlined in the Prospectus, Directors are
paid in accordance with agreed principles
aimed at focusing on long-term performance
of the Company. Further information can be
found in the Directors’ Remuneration Report
COMPANY SECRETARY
Reports and papers, containing relevant,
concise and clear information, are provided to
the Board and Committees in a timely manner
to enable review and consideration prior to
both scheduled and ad-hoc specific meetings.
This ensures that Directors are capable of
contributing to, and validating, the development
of Company strategy and management. The
regular reports also provide information that
enables scrutiny of the Company’s Investment
Manager and other service providers’
Governance
Corporate Governance Statement
performance. When required, the Board has
sought further clarification of matters with
the Investment Manager and other service
providers, both by means of further reports and
in-depth discussions, in order to make more
informed decisions for the Company.
Under the direction of the Chairman, the
Company Secretary facilitates the flow of
information between the Board, Committees,
the Investment Manager and other service
providers through the development of
comprehensive, detailed meeting packs,
agendas and other media. These are circulated
to the Board and other attendees in sufficient
time to review the data.
Full access to the advice and services of the
Company Secretary is available to the Board;
in turn, the Company Secretary is responsible
for advising on all governance matters through
the Chairman. The Articles and schedule of
matters reserved for the Board indicate the
appointment and resignation of the Company
Secretary is an item reserved for the full Board.
A review of the performance of the Company
Secretary is undertaken by the Board on a
regular basis.
FINANCIAL AND BUSINESS
INFORMATION
An explanation of the Directors’ roles and
responsibilities in preparing the Annual
Report and Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended 31 December
2022 is provided in the Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities.
37
Further information enabling shareholders to
assess the Company’s performance, business
model and strategy can be sourced in the
Chairman’s Statement, the Strategic Report
and the Report of the Directors.
GOING CONCERN
The Directors also considered it appropriate
to prepare the financial statements on the
going concern basis, as explained in the
‘Basis of preparation’ paragraph in note 2(a)
of the financial statements which includes
consideration of the EGM.
RISK CONTROL
In addition to the earlier assessment of
principal risks and uncertainties contained
within the Strategic Report, the Board is
required annually to review the effectiveness
of the Group’s key internal controls such as
financial, operational and compliance controls
and risk management. The controls are
designed to ensure that the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives is minimised and
are intended to provide reasonable assurance
against material misstatement or loss. This
is not absolute assurance that all risks are
eliminated.
Through regular meetings of the Audit
Committee, the Board seeks to maintain
full and effective control over all strategic,
financial, regulatory and operational issues.
The Board maintains an organisational and
committee structure with clearly defined lines
of responsibility and delegation of authorities.
RISK MANAGEMENT
As part of the compilation of the risk register
for the Company, appropriate consideration has
been given to the relevant control processes
and that risk is considered, assessed and
managed as an integral part of the business.
The Company’s system of internal control
includes inter alia the overall control exercise,
procedures for the identification and evaluation
of business risk, the control procedures
themselves and the review of these internal
controls by the Audit Committee on behalf of
the Board. Each of these elements that make
up the Company’s system of internal financial
and operating control is explained in further
detail as below.
(i) Control Environment
The Company is ultimately dependent upon
the quality and integrity of the staff and
management of the Investment Manager,
the Investment Adviser and its Fund
Administration & Company Secretarial service
provider. In each case, qualified and able
individuals have been selected at all levels.
The staff of both the Investment Manager
and Administrator are aware of the internal
controls relevant to their activities and are also
collectively accountable for the operation of
those controls. Appropriate segregation and
delegation of duties is in place.
The Audit Committee undertakes a review
of the Company’s internal financial and
operating controls on a regular basis.
The Auditors of the Company consider
internal controls relevant to the Company’s
preparation and fair presentation of the
consolidated financial statements in order
to design their audit procedures, but not for
the purpose of expressing an audit opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal controls.
In its role as a third-party fund administration
services provider, Apex Fund and Corporate
Services (Guernsey) Limited produces an
annual SOC 1 Type 2 Report on the internal
control procedures in place within Apex Fund
and Corporate Services (Guernsey) Limited
and this is subject to review by the Audit
Committee and the Board.
(ii) Identification and Evaluation of
Business Risks
Another key business risk is the performance of
the Company’s investments. This is managed
by the Investment Manager, which undertakes
regular analysis and reporting of business
risks in relation to the loan portfolio, and then
proposes appropriate courses of action to the
Board for their review.
(iii) Key Procedures
In addition to the above, the Audit Committee’s
key procedures include a comprehensive
system for reporting financial results to the
Board regularly, as well as quarterly impairment
reviews of loans conducted by the Board as
a whole (including reports on the underlying
investment performance).
Although no system of internal control can
provide absolute assurance against material
misstatement or loss, the Company’s system
is designed to assist the Directors in obtaining
reasonable assurance that problems are
identified on a timely basis and dealt with
appropriately. The Company, given its size, does
not have an internal audit function. It is the view
of the Board that the controls in relation to the
Company’s operating, accounting, compliance
and IT risks performed robustly throughout
the year. In addition, all have been in full
compliance with the Company’s policies and
external regulations, including:
• Investment policy, as outlined in the IPO
documentation, and subsequently amended
by EGMs held on 2 May 2014, 9 March 2015,
6 May 2016 and 27 January 2023;
• Personal Account Dealing, as outlined in the
Model Code;
• Whistleblowing Policy;
• Anti-Bribery Policy;
• Applicable Financial Conduct Authority
Regulations;
• Listing Rules, and Disclosure and
Transparency Rules;
• Treatment and handling of confidential
information;
• Conflicts of interest;
• Compliance policies; and
• Anti-Money Laundering Regulations.
There were no protected disclosures made
pursuant to the Company’s whistleblowing
policy, or that of service providers in relation
to the Company, during the year to
31 December 2022.
In summary, the Board considers that the
Company’s existing internal financial and
operating controls, coupled with the analysis
of risks inherent in the business models of
the Company and its subsidiaries, continue to
provide appropriate tools for the Company to
monitor, evaluate and mitigate its risks.
38
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT
FUND MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE
(“AIFMD”)
The AIFMD, which was implemented
across the EU on 22 July 2013 with the
transition period ending 22 July 2014, aims
to harmonise the regulation of Alternative
Investment Fund Managers (“AIFMs”)
and imposes obligations on managers
who manage or distribute Alternative
Investment Funds (“AIFs”) in the EU or
who market shares in such funds to EU
investors. Following the UK’s cessation of EU
membership on 31 January 2020, the FCA
has implemented an equivalent regulation
(“UK AIFMD”) for the marketing of AIFs in the
UK and to UK investors.
After seeking professional regulatory and
legal advice, the Company was established
in Guernsey such that, upon implementation
of AIFMD it would be a Non-EU/UK AIF, with
Starwood European Finance Partners Limited
appointed to act as the Non-EU/UK AIFM.
In accordance with AIFMD disclosure
obligations, note 6 provides a summary of
realised and unrealised gains and losses.
The Investment Manager does not receive an
additional fee, to that stated in notes 3 and
22, as a result of acting as the AIFM. The
Board of the Investment Manager received an
aggregate fee of £63,600 for the year ended
31 December 2022.
The marketing of shares in AIFs that are
established outside the EU/UK (such
as the Company) to investors in an EU
member state/ UK is prohibited unless
certain conditions are met. Certain of these
conditions are outside the Company’s control
as they are dependent on the regulators
of the relevant third country (in this case
Guernsey) and the relevant EU member
state/UK entering into regulatory co-
operation agreements with one another.
The AIFM has given written notification
to the United Kingdom Financial Conduct
Authority (“FCA”), pursuant to Regulation 59
of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers
Regulations 2013 (SI 1773/2013) (the “AIFM
Regulations”) of its intention to market the
shares to investors in the United Kingdom in
accordance with the AIFM Regulations and
the rules and guidance of the FCA.
The AIFM has given written notification to
the Netherlands Authority for the Financial
Markets (“AFM”) pursuant to Article 1:13b
section 1 and 2 of the Act on the Financial
Supervision (Wet op het financieel toezicht)
(the “AFS”) of its intention to market the
shares to investors in the Netherlands in
accordance with the AFS, any rules and
regulations promulgated pursuant thereto
and the rules and guidance of the AFM.
On 12 February 2016, the AIFM obtained a
marketing licence in Sweden in accordance
with Chapter 5, Section 10 of the Swedish
Alternative Investment Fund Managers
Act (Sw. lag (2013:561) om förvaltare av
alternativa investeringsfonder). This enables
shares in the Company to be marketed to
professional investors in Sweden.
Currently, the National Private Placement
Regime (“NPPR”) provides a mechanism to
market Non-EU AIFs that are not allowed
to be marketed under the AIFMD domestic
marketing regimes. The Board is utilising
NPPR in order to market the Company,
specifically in the UK, Sweden and the
Netherlands. The Board works with the
Company’s advisers to ensure the necessary
conditions are met, and all required notices
and disclosures are made under NPPR.
Any regulatory changes arising from
implementation of the AIFMD (or otherwise)
that limit the Company’s ability to market
future issues of its shares may adversely
affect the Company’s ability to carry out its
investment policy successfully and to achieve
its investment objective, which in turn may
adversely affect the Company’s business,
financial condition, results of operations,
NAV and/or the market price of the
Ordinary Shares.
The Board, in conjunction with the
Company’s advisers, will continue to monitor
the development of the AIFMD and its impact
on the Company. The Company will continue
to use NPPR pending further consultation
from the European Securities and Marketing
Authority (“ESMA”).
The Board has considered the disclosure
obligations under Articles 22 and 23 and can
confirm that the Company complies with
the various organisational, operational and
transparency obligations.
The Board has considered requirements of
Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation 2019/2088
on sustainability-related disclosures in the
financial services sector dated 27 November
2019 and have made the necessary
disclosures on the Company’s website.
FOREIGN ACCOUNT TAX
COMPLIANCE ACT (“FATCA”) AND
THE OECD COMMON REPORTING
STANDARDS (“CRS”)
FATCA became effective on 1 January
2013 and is being gradually implemented
internationally. The legislation is aimed at
determining the ownership of US assets
in foreign accounts and improving US Tax
compliance with respect to those assets.
More than 90 jurisdictions, including all 34
member countries of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development
(“OECD”) and the G20 members, have
committed to implement the Common
Reporting Standard for automatic exchange of
tax information (“CRS”). Building on the model
created by FATCA, the CRS creates a global
standard for the annual automatic exchange
of financial account information between the
relevant tax authorities.
The Board in conjunction with the Company’s
service providers and advisers have ensured
that the Company complies with FATCA and
CRS’s requirements to the extent relevant to
the Company.
SECTION 172 STATEMENT
Whilst directly applicable to UK domiciled
companies, the intention of the AIC Code is that
the below matters set out in section 172 of the
UK Companies Act, 2006 are reported.
Risk Management
In order to minimise the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives, the Company
actively identifies, evaluates, manages
and mitigates risk as well as continually
evolving the approach to risk management.
For further details in connection with Risk
Management of the Company, please refer
to the Strategic Report and the Corporate
Governance Statement.
Governance
Corporate Governance Statement
39
Our People
The Company has no employees, however, to
succeed we need to manage the Company’s
performance by bringing through talent to
the Board while ensuring we operate as
efficiently as possible, as demonstrated with
the succession plan. For further details in
connection with the succession plan, please
refer to the Corporate Governance Statement.
Business Relationships
In order for the Company to succeed, it
requires to develop and maintain long-term
relationships with service providers and
borrowers. The Company values all of its
service providers and borrowers.
Community and Environment
As an investment company, the Group’s
activities have minimal direct impact on the
environment. Please refer to the Strategic
Report for more details in connection with
the impact of the Group’s operations on the
community and environment.
Business Conduct
The Company is committed to act responsibly
and ensure that the business operates in a
responsible and effective manner and with
high standards in order to meet its objectives.
Shareholders
The Board place a great deal of importance
on communication with all shareholders and
envisage to continuing effective dialogue with
all shareholders. Please refer to section below
for more details on how the Company engages
with the shareholders.
Throughout 2023, the Board of the Company,
both individually and together, will continue to
review and challenge how the Company can
continue to act in good faith to promote the
success of the Company for the benefit of its
stakeholders in the decisions taken.
DIALOGUE WITH SHAREHOLDERS
The Directors place a great deal of importance
on communication with shareholders. The
Company’s Chairman, Investment Manager and
the Broker, aim to meet with large shareholders
at least annually, together with the Investment
Adviser, and calls are undertaken on a regular
basis with shareholders. The Board also
receives regular reports from the Broker on
shareholder issues. Publications such as the
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial
Statements and quarterly factsheets - which
in light of the considerable disruption from
Covid-19 the Board has sought to provide more
detailed updates and disclosures - are reviewed
and approved by the Board prior to circulation
and are widely distributed to other parties who
have an interest in the Company’s performance
and are available on the Company’s website.
The Chairman met with multiple large
shareholders in October 2022, where it was
concluded that the likely take-up of a potential
future Tender Offer would be significant
and that the Company would no longer
be of a viable size to provide shareholders
with sufficient liquidity and scale. Following
these consultations and the subsequent
announcement on 31 October 2022, the
Company’s Proposed Orderly Realisation
was progressed and approved at the EGM as
discussed on page 4.
All Directors are available for discussions
with the shareholders, in particular the
Chairman (John Whittle), Senior Independent
Director (Shelagh Mason) and the Audit
Committee Chairman (Charlotte Denton),
as and when required.
Should a situation arise where shareholders
cast a vote of 20 per cent or more against
a board recommendation the directors will
consult with shareholders to understand their
reasons behind this vote. The Board will publish
the views received from the shareholders
within six months of the shareholder meeting.
CONSTRUCTIVE USE OF AGM
The Notice of AGM is sent out at least 20
working days in advance of the meeting. All
shareholders have the opportunity to put
questions to the Board or Investment Manager,
either formally at the Company’s AGM,
informally following the meeting, or in writing
at any time during the year via the Company
Secretary. The Company Secretary is also
available to answer general shareholder queries
at any time throughout the year.
By order of the Board
John Whittle | Chairman
23 March 2023
40
Governance
Report of the Audit Committee
The Board is supported by the Audit
Committee, which during the year comprised
of Charlotte Denton, as Chairman, Shelagh
Mason, and Gary Yardley. John Whittle, as
Chairman of the Board, does not sit on the
Audit Committee. The Board has considered
the composition of the Audit Committee and
is satisfied that it has sufficient recent and
relevant skills and experience. In particular the
Board has considered the requirements of the
AIC Code that the Audit Committee should
have at least one Member who has recent
and relevant financial experience and that the
Audit Committee as a whole has competence
relevant to the sector in which the Company
invests. The Board considers all of the relevant
requirements to have been met.
ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The primary role and responsibilities of the
Audit Committee are outlined in the Audit
Committee’s terms of reference, available at
the registered office, including:
• Reviewing the Group’s internal financial
controls, and the Group’s internal control and
risk management systems;
• Monitoring the need for an internal audit
function annually;
• Monitoring and reviewing the scope,
independence, objectivity and effectiveness of
the external Auditor, taking into consideration
relevant regulatory and professional
requirements;
• Making recommendations to the Board in
relation to the appointment, re-appointment
and removal of the external Auditor and
approving their remuneration and terms of
engagement, which in turn can be placed
before the shareholders for their approval at
the AGM;
• Development and implementation of the
Group’s policy on the provision of non-
audit services by the external Auditor, as
appropriate;
• Reviewing the arrangements in place to
enable Directors and staff of service providers
to, in confidence, raise concerns about
possible improprieties in matters of financial
reporting or other matters insofar as they may
affect the Group;
• Providing advice to the Board on whether
the consolidated financial statements,
taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and
understandable and provide the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the
Group’s performance, business model and
strategy; and
• Reporting to the Board on how the Committee
discharged all relevant responsibilities at each
Board meeting.
Financial Reporting
The primary role of the Audit Committee in
relation to the financial reporting is to review
with the Administrator, Investment Manager
and the Auditor the appropriateness of the
Annual Report and Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements and Interim Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements,
concentrating on, amongst other matters:
• The quality and acceptability of accounting
policies and practices;
• The clarity of the disclosures and
compliance with financial reporting
standards and relevant financial and
governance reporting requirements;
• Material areas in which significant
judgements have been applied or there has
been discussion with the Auditor;
• Whether the Annual Report and Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements,
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced
and understandable and provides the
information necessary for the shareholders
to assess the Group’s performance,
business model and strategy; and
• Any correspondence from regulators in
relation to the Group’s financial reporting.
41
To aid its review, the Audit Committee
considers reports from the Administrator
and Investment Manager and also reports
from the Auditor on the outcomes
of their half-year review and annual
audit. The Audit Committee supports
PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP (“PwC”)
in displaying the necessary professional
scepticism their role requires.
The Audit Committee met four times during
the year under review; individual attendance
of Directors is outlined in the Corporate
Governance Statement. The main matters
discussed at those meetings were:
• Review and approval of the external Auditor
and when tabled, consideration of the final
audit findings report;
• Discussion and approval of the fee for the
external audit;
• Detailed review of the Annual Report and
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
and recommendation for approval by
the Board;
• Review and approval of the interim review
findings report of the external Auditor;
• Detailed review of the Interim Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and
recommendation for approval by the Board;
• Discussion of reports from the external
Auditor following their interim review and
annual audit;
• Assessment of the effectiveness of the
external Auditor as described below;
• Assessment of the independence of the
external Auditor;
• Review of the Group’s key risks and internal
controls;
• Consideration of the AIC Code, FRC Guidance
on Audit Committees and other regulatory
guidelines; and
• Consideration of the proposals received
as part of the competitive tender process
conducted for the role of the Company’s
independent auditor for the audit of the
year-ended 31 December 2023.
The Committee has also reviewed and
considered the whistleblowing policy in
place for the Administrator and other service
providers and is satisfied the relevant staff can
raise concerns in confidence about possible
improprieties in matters of financial reporting
or other matters insofar as they may affect
the Company.
Annual General Meeting
The Audit Committee Chairman, or other
members of the Audit Committee appointed
for the purpose, shall attend each AGM
of the Company, prepared to respond to
any shareholder questions on the Audit
Committee’s activities.
Internal Audit
The Audit Committee considers at least once
a year whether or not there is a need for an
internal audit function. Currently, the Audit
Committee does not consider there to be a
need for an internal audit function, given that
there are no employees in the Group and
all outsourced functions are with parties /
administrators who have their own internal
controls and procedures. This is evidenced
by the annual SOC 1 Type 2 Report provided
by the Administrator, which gives sufficient
assurance that a sound system of internal
control is maintained at the Administrator.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES IN RELATION
TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the year, the Audit Committee
considered a number of significant risks in
respect of the Annual Report and Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements. The
Audit Committee reviewed the external audit
plan at an early stage and concluded that
the appropriate areas of audit risk relevant
to the Group had been identified and that
suitable audit procedures had been put in
place to obtain reasonable assurance that the
consolidated financial statements as a whole
would be free of material misstatements.
The table on the next page sets out the Audit
Committee’s view of the key areas of risk and
how they have addressed the issues.
42
Significant Issues Actions to Address Issue
Carrying amount
and impairment/
expected credit
losses of loans
advanced
The Audit Committee reviews the investment process of the Investment Manager and Investment Adviser including
the controls in place around deal sourcing, investment analysis, due diligence and the role of the Investment Adviser’s
investment committee and the Investment Manager’s Board. The Audit Committee also reviews the controls in place
around the effective interest loan models and is notified regularly by the Investment Manager of any changes to
underlying assumptions made in the loan models.
The Audit Committee receives regular updates and reports on the performance of each loan and discusses with the
Investment Manager and Investment Adviser whether there are any indicators of significant increase in credit risk or
impaired or defaulted loans. The Audit Committee also assesses the ECL methodology focusing on the estimation of
probability of default, exposure at default and loss given default.
Formal loan performance reviews and credit risk assessments are also prepared by the Investment Adviser and
Investment Manager which are reviewed at each Audit Committee meeting and the Audit Committee considers
whether there are any indicators that would warrant a change to the expected credit loss assessed for each loan
advanced. For all new loans advanced, the Investment Manager presents, as part of the investment recommendation
process, their assessment of any expected credit loss required at inception of the loan arrangement.
All existing loans advanced as at 31 December 2022 were assessed so as to ensure compliance with IFRS 9. As
disclosed in note 2 and in the Investment Manager’s report, while two loans amounting to £46,909,623 (2021: three
loans amounting to £59,031,888 (one loan was moved to Stage 1 during 2022)) remain classified as Stage 2, during
the year ended 31 December 2022, no expected credit losses were considered necessary based on the loan to value
ratios headroom as at 31 December 2022 and strong security packages in place.
Risk of fraud and
error in income
from loans
advanced
Income from loans advanced is measured in accordance with the effective interest rate method. The requirement to
estimate the expected cash flows when forming an effective interest rate model is subject to significant management
judgements and estimates.
The Audit Committee discusses with the Investment Manager and Investment Adviser the reasons for the changes
in key assumptions made in the loan models such as changes to expected drawdown or repayment dates or other
amendments to expected cash flows such as changes in interbank rates on floating loans. The Audit Committee ensures
that any changes made to the models are justifiable based on the latest available information.
A separate income rationalisation which is prepared outside of the detailed loan models is provided to the Board on a
quarterly basis as a secondary check on the revenue being recognised in the loan models. This is also reviewed by the
Audit Committee and questions raised where appropriate.
Governance
Report of the Audit Committee
43
REVIEW OF EXTERNAL AUDIT
PROCESS EFFECTIVENESS
The Audit Committee communicated
regularly with the Investment Manager,
Investment Adviser and Administrator to
obtain a good understanding of the progress
and efficiency of the audit process. Similarly,
feedback in relation to the efficiency of the
Investment Manager, Investment Adviser
and other service providers in performing
their relevant roles was sought from relevant
involved parties, including the audit partner
and team. The external Auditor is invited to
attend the Audit Committee meetings at
which the interim and annual consolidated
financial statements are considered, also
enabling the Auditor to meet and discuss any
matters with the Audit Committee without
the presence of the Investment Manager or
the Administrator.
During the year, the Audit Committee
reviewed the external Auditor’s performance,
considering a wide variety of factors including:
• The quality of service, the Auditor’s specialist
expertise, the level of audit fee, identification
and resolution of any areas of accounting
judgement, and quality and timeliness of
papers analysing these judgements;
• Review of the audit plan presented by the
Auditor, and when tabled, the final audit
findings report;
• Meeting with the Auditor regularly to discuss
the various papers and reports in detail;
• Furthermore, interviews of appropriate staff
in the Investment Manager, Investment
Adviser and Administrator to receive
feedback on the effectiveness of the audit
process from their perspective; and
• Compilation of a checklist with which to
provide a means to objectively assess the
Auditor’s performance.
In addition to the regular and ad hoc
meetings held with the auditors, the Audit
Committee Chairman and Chairman of the
Company received a presentation on PwC’s
use of technology in their audit process on
7 February 2022.
AUDITOR’S TENURE
AND OBJECTIVITY
The Group’s current Auditor, PwC, have
acted in this capacity since the Company’s
inaugural meeting on 22 November 2012. The
Committee reviews the Auditor’s performance
on a regular basis to ensure the Group
receives an optimal service and make regular
enquiries to confirm the quality findings of audit
work undertaken by both the firm and lead
engagement partner on the audit. Subject to
annual appointment by shareholder approval
at the AGM, the appointment of the Auditor is
formally reviewed by the Audit Committee on
an annual basis. PwC follows the FRC Ethical
Standards and their rotation rules require the
lead audit partner to rotate every 5 years, key
partners involved in an audit every 7 years
and PwC’s own internal policy would generally
expect senior staff to have consideration given
to the threats to their independence after 7
years and to be rotated after 10 years. Rotation
ensures a fresh look without sacrificing
institutional knowledge.
Rotation of audit engagement partners, key
partners involved in the audit and other staff in
senior positions is reviewed on a regular basis
by the lead audit engagement partner. Roland
Mills is currently serving his fifth year of five as
engagement partner and a new audit partner
will be in place for the 31 December 2023
audit, with a full handover taking place at the
conclusion of the 2022 year end audit.
PwC regularly updates the Audit Committee
on the rotation of audit partners, staff, level
of fees, details of any relationships between
the Auditor and the Group, and also provides
overall confirmation of its independence and
objectivity. There are no contractual obligations
that restrict the Group’s choice of Auditor. Any
non-audit work would be reviewed by the Audit
Committee to confirm it appropriate under
the FRC Ethical Standard and approved by the
Audit Committee Chairman prior to the Auditor
undertaking any work.
Following a review of PwC’s tenure, the Audit
Committee recommended that the Board of
Directors conduct a competitive tender process
for the role of the Company’s independent
auditor for the audit of the year-ended 31
December 2023. Following the completion
of the competitive tender process, the Audit
Committee were satisfied that PwC were
still best placed to service the Company as
its independent auditors and as such will be
recommending their continued appointment by
the Board.
44
CONCLUSIONS IN RESPECT
OF THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The production and the audit of the Annual
Report and Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements is a comprehensive process
requiring input from a number of different
contributors. In order to reach a conclusion
on whether the Group’s consolidated
financial statements are fair, balanced and
understandable, as required under the
AIC Code, the Board has requested that
the Audit Committee advise on whether
it considers that the Annual Report and
Consolidated Financial Statements fulfils these
requirements. In outlining its advice, the Audit
Committee has considered the following:
• The comprehensive documentation that is
in place outlining the controls in place for
the production of the Annual Report and
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements,
including the verification processes in place
to confirm the factual content;
• The detailed reviews undertaken at various
stages of the production process by the
Investment Manager, Investment Adviser,
Administrator, Auditor and the Audit
Committee that are intended to ensure
consistency and overall balance;
• Controls enforced by the Investment
Manager, Investment Adviser,
Administrator and other third-party service
providers to ensure complete and accurate
financial records and security of the
Group’s assets; and
• The existence and content of a satisfactory
controls report that has been reviewed
and reported upon by the Administrator’s
service Auditor to verify the effectiveness
of the internal controls of the Administrator,
such as the SOC 1 Type 2 Report.
Governance
Report of the Audit Committee
As a result of the work performed, the Audit
Committee has concluded that it has acted in
accordance with its’ terms of reference and
has ensured the independence and objectivity
of the external Auditor. It has reported to the
Board that the Annual Report for the year
ended 31 December 2022, taken as a whole, is
fair, balanced and understandable and provides
the information necessary for shareholders
to assess the Group’s performance, business
model and strategy. The Board’s conclusions
in this respect are set out in the Statement of
Directors’ Responsibilities.
The Audit Committee has recommended to
the Board that, following a competitive tender
process, the external auditor be re-appointed
for the 2023 year end annual report.
Charlotte Denton | Audit Committee
Chairman
23 March 2023
Governance
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing
consolidated financial statements for each
financial year which give a true and fair
view, in accordance with applicable laws
and regulations, of the state of affairs of
the Company and of the profit or loss of the
Company for that year.
Company law requires the Directors to
prepare financial statements for each
financial year. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in
accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union (“IFRS”). In preparing the
consolidated financial statements, the
Directors are required to:
• Select suitable accounting policies and
apply them consistently;
• Make judgments and estimates that are
reasonable and prudent;
• State whether applicable accounting
standards have been followed, subject
to any material departures disclosed and
explained in the consolidated financial
statements; and
• Prepare the consolidated financial
statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that
the Company will continue in business.
The maintenance and integrity of the
Company’s website is the responsibility of
the Directors; the work conducted by the
Auditor does not involve consideration of the
maintenance and integrity of the website
and, accordingly, the Auditor accepts no
responsibility for any changes that may
have occurred to the consolidated financial
statements since they are initially presented
on the website. Legislation in Guernsey
governing the preparation and dissemination
of the consolidated financial statements may
differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
The Directors are responsible for keeping
proper accounting records that are sufficient
to show and explain the Company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable
accuracy at any time the financial position of
the Company and the Group and enable them
to ensure that the consolidated financial
statements comply with the Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 2008, as amended. They
are also responsible for safeguarding the
assets of the Company and the Group and
hence for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other
irregularities.
Each of the Directors confirms that, to the
best of their knowledge:
• They have complied with the above
requirements in preparing the consolidated
financial statements;
• There is no relevant audit information of
which the Company’s Auditor is unaware;
• All Directors have taken the necessary
steps that they ought to have taken to
make themselves aware of any relevant
audit information and to establish that the
Auditor is aware of said information;
• The consolidated financial statements,
prepared in accordance with the applicable
set of accounting standards, give a true and
fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial
position and profit or loss of the Company
and Group; and
• The Chairman’s Statement, Strategic
Report, Investment Manager’s Report,
Report of the Directors and Corporate
Governance Statement include a fair review
of the development and the position of the
Company and the Group, together with
a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that they face and take into
account the results of the EGM.
The UK Code, as adopted through the
AIC Code by the Company, also requires
Directors to ensure that the Annual Report
and Consolidated Financial Statements are
fair, balanced and understandable. In order to
reach a conclusion on this matter, the Board
has requested that the Audit Committee
advise on whether it considers that the
Annual Report and Consolidated Financial
Statements fulfil these requirements.
The process by which the Committee has
reached these conclusions is set out in the
Report of the Audit Committee on pages
40-44. Furthermore, the Board believes
that the disclosures set out on pages 6-9 of
the Annual Report provide the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the
Company’s performance, business model
and strategy.
Having taken into account all the matters
considered by the Board and brought to
the attention of the Board during the year
ended 31 December 2022, as outlined in the
Chairman Statement, Investment Manager’s
Report, Corporate Governance Statement,
Strategic Report and the Report of the Audit
Committee, the Board has concluded that
the Annual Report and Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended 31
December 2022, taken as a whole, is fair,
balanced and understandable and provides
the information necessary for shareholders
to assess the Company’s performance,
business model and strategy.
For Starwood European Real Estate
Finance Limited
John Whittle | Chairman
23 March 2023
45
4646
Financial Statements
47
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited
OUR OPINION
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements give a true and fair view of the
consolidated financial position of Starwood
European Real Estate Finance Limited (the
“company”) and its subsidiaries (together
“the group”) as at 31 December 2022, and
of their consolidated financial performance
and their consolidated cash flows for the year
then ended in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by
the European Union and have been properly
prepared in accordance with the requirements
of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008.
WHAT WE HAVE AUDITED
The group’s consolidated financial statements
comprise:
• the consolidated statement of financial
position as at 31 December 2022;
• the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income for the year then ended;
• the consolidated statement of changes in
equity for the year then ended;
• the consolidated statement of cash flows for
the year then ended; and
• the notes to the consolidated financial
statements, which include significant
accounting policies and other explanatory
information.
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance with
International Standards on Auditing (“ISAs”).
Our responsibilities under those standards are
further described in the
Auditor’s responsibilities
for the audit of the consolidated financial
statements
section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion.
INDEPENDENCE
We are independent of the group in
accordance with the ethical requirements that
are relevant to our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of the group, as required
by the Crown Dependencies’ Audit Rules and
Guidance. We have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with these
requirements.
OUR AUDIT APPROACH
OVERVIEW
Audit scope
• The company is based in Guernsey, has
subsidiaries located in Guernsey and
Luxembourg and engages Starwood
European Finance Partners Limited
(the “Investment Manager”) to manage
its assets. The consolidated financial
statements are a consolidation of the
company and all the subsidiaries.
• We conducted our audit of the consolidated
financial statements from information
provided by Apex Fund and Corporate
Services (Guernsey) Limited (the
“Administrator”) and its related group
entities to whom the board of directors has
delegated the provision of certain functions.
We also had significant interaction with
Starwood Capital Europe Advisers, LLP (the
“Investment Adviser”) in completing aspects
of our overall audit work.
• We conducted our audit work in Guernsey
and we tailored the scope of our audit taking
into account the types of investments within
the group, the involvement of the third
parties referred to above, and the industry in
which the group operates.
• We performed an audit of the consolidated
financial information of the company and its
Guernsey and Luxembourg subsidiaries and
we consider them all as one component.
• Scoping was performed at the group level,
irrespective of whether the underlying
transactions took place within the company
or within any of the subsidiaries. Our testing
was performed on a consolidated basis
using thresholds which are determined with
reference to the overall group performance
materiality and the risks of material
misstatement identified.
KEY AUDIT MATTERS
• Carrying amount, expected credit losses
and impairment of loans advanced
• Risk of fraud in income from loans advanced
• Amendment to group investment objective
and policy to pursue a strategy of orderly
realisation
MATERIALITY
• Overall group materiality: £8.3 million
(2021: £8.4 million) based on 2% of
consolidated net assets.
• Performance materiality: £6.2 million
(2021: £6.3 million).
THE SCOPE OF OUR AUDIT
As part of designing our audit, we determined
materiality and assessed the risks of material
misstatement in the consolidated financial
statements. In particular, we considered
where the directors made subjective
judgements; for example, in respect of
significant accounting estimates that involved
making assumptions and considering future
events that are inherently uncertain. As in all
of our audits, we also addressed the risk of
management override of internal controls,
including among other matters, consideration
of whether there was evidence of bias that
represented a risk of material misstatement
due to fraud.
KEY AUDIT MATTERS
Key audit matters are those matters that,
in the auditor’s professional judgement,
were of most significance in the audit of
the consolidated financial statements of
the current period and include the most
significant assessed risks of material
misstatement (whether or not due to fraud)
identified by the auditor, including those
which had the greatest effect on: the overall
audit strategy; the allocation of resources
in the audit; and directing the efforts of the
engagement team. These matters, and any
comments we make on the results of our
procedures thereon, were addressed in
the context of our audit of the consolidated
financial statements as a whole, and in
forming our opinion thereon, and we do not
provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified
by our audit.
.
48
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the Key audit matter
Carrying amount, expected credit losses and impairment of
loans advanced
As detailed within notes 2(g) and 10 to the consolidated financial
statements, loans advanced at the year-end of £432.5 million are
measured at amortised cost and comprise of both fixed and floating
rate loans.
Loans advanced make up a significant part of the consolidated
statement of financial position and due to the nature of this
balance, their carrying amount, expected credit losses (“ECL”) and
impairment is subject to judgement and estimation.
The judgements exercised in determining the carrying amount, ECL
and impairment of loans advanced could significantly impact the net
asset value of the group and this is considered to be a key source
of estimation uncertainty as described in note 2(c) and 2(h) of the
consolidated financial statements.
The specific areas of judgement include:
• The impact of changes in the expected cash flows for each loan on
the carrying amount of the loans measured at amortised cost; and
• How management determine the underlying assumptions when
determining the carrying amount and preparing the ECL and
impairment review analyses, such as significant changes in the
credit risk of a borrower, changes in the probability of default of
a borrower, changes in valuation of underlying collateral and the
Loan-To-Value ratios headroom, the ability of the borrowers to
deliver in accordance with their business plans and their projected
financial performance figures.
Given the level of judgement and estimate used by management
in determining the carrying amount, ECL, and impairment of loans
advanced, combined with the significance of the balance of the
loans advanced in the consolidated statement of financial position,
meant that this was considered a key audit matter.
We understood and evaluated the internal control environment in place
at the Administrator and the Investment Adviser over the carrying
amount of the loans advanced, in particular management’s processes
and assumptions used to measure the loans at amortised cost and
used to determine ECL and the level of impairment (if any) required on
the loans advanced, either at inception, or on an ongoing basis.
We assessed the accounting policy for loans advanced for compliance
with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union and planned and executed our audit procedures to
ensure that the loans advanced were accounted for in accordance
with the stated accounting policy.
Our procedures included:
• Detailed testing over the amortised cost models used by
management to value the loans at amortised cost using the effective
interest rate method;
• Testing and challenging the assumptions and inputs into the
amortised cost models and inspecting the associated agreements
and other legal documentation;
• Back-testing procedures were performed to assist in our
conclusions as to the cash flow forecasting reliability applied by the
Investment Adviser;
• Understanding, assessing and challenging the assumptions and
judgements made by the Investment Adviser in respect of the ECL for
each loan advanced including;
°
obtaining the Investment Adviser’s impairment papers and
assessing the ECL methodology, focussing on and challenging the
estimation of probability of default, exposure at default and loss
given default, and how forward-looking information was considered
in this regard;
°
assessing the consistency and appropriateness of the Investment
Adviser’s assumptions applied in determining whether any loan
advanced was performing, underperforming or non-performing,
including consideration as to whether a significant increase in credit
risk of each borrower had occurred during the year;
°
obtaining evidence to support any significant assumptions presented
in the assessment of the ECL, including consideration of the financial
information on the borrower and the collateral in place to assess their
ability to meet future payment commitments, and progress against
business plans, including any ongoing impact caused by COVID-19 or
other global crises, including management’s assessment of the Loan-
To-Value ratio headroom for each of the loans;
°
assessing the Investment Adviser’s application of its impairment and
ECL criteria to evaluate the appropriateness and completeness of
the loans moved between ECL stages;
°
recalculating a targeted sample of the Investment Adviser’s
sensitivity analysis of the Loan-To-Values ratios headroom;
°
engaging our Real Estate valuation experts to work with our audit
team through the inspection of a sample of third-party real estate
valuation reports on the underlying properties against which collateral
is held by the group for the loans advanced, and which underpin the
Loan-To-Value considerations applied in the ECL modelling; and
°
inspecting a sample of compliance certificates signed by each
respective underlying borrower in respect of compliance with
covenants as at the year-end.
• Obtained and reviewed management’s calculation with respect to any
impairment on loans advanced (if any).
Based on the audit procedures performed we have nothing to report to
those charged with corporate governance.
49
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the Key audit matter
Risk of fraud in income from loans advanced
Income from loans advanced for the year was £33.4 million (Note
10) and was measured in accordance with the accounting policies
as described in note 2(l) of the consolidated financial statements.
The group has a key investment objective to provide shareholders
with regular dividends through investment in debt instruments and
therefore we focussed on this risk.
The requirement to estimate the expected cash flows when
calculating an effective interest rate model is subject to significant
management judgements and estimates, and as such could be open
to manipulation by management of factors including:
• Expected timing of repayments;
• Expectations of partial or full prepayments; and
• Associated exit fees and make-whole payments.
Changes to the estimated timings of cash flows can have a
significant impact on the recognition of income from loans advanced
and is considered to be a key source of estimation uncertainty as
described in note 2(c) of the consolidated financial statements.
As a result of the significance of interest income and the level of
estimation that can be applied, the risk of fraud in income from loans
advanced was considered a key audit matter.
Amendment to group investment objective and policy to pursue
a strategy of orderly realisation
As referred to in note 2(a), on 28 December 2022, a Circular
relating to the Proposed Orderly Realisation and containing a Notice
of Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) was published which set
out details of, and sought shareholder approval for, proposals with
respect to the Board’s recommendation to pursue a strategy of
orderly realisation of the group’s loans advanced and the return
of capital over time to shareholders (the “Proposed Orderly
Realisation”).
On 27 January 2023, these Proposals were approved at the EGM.
Based on the current terms of the group’s loans advanced, the
orderly realisation could take up to 5 years to complete and given the
significant shift in the investment strategy, we have considered this
a key audit matter.
We assessed the accounting policy for the recognition of interest
income for compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
as adopted by the European Union; and we planned and executed
our audit procedures to ensure that income from loans had been
accounted for in accordance with the stated accounting policy.
We held discussions with the Investment Adviser and the Administrator
to understand and evaluate the processes in place for recognising
income from loans and to understand the estimates made.
Our procedures included:
• Detailed testing over the amortised cost models used by
management to measure the loans at amortised cost and calculate
the effective interest income in the consolidated financial statements,
including how the arrangement, origination and commitment fees,
which are integral to the loan arrangements, have been considered in
the models;
• Assessing the judgements made in respect of the estimated cash
flows timing (versus the contractual repayment date) and amount
including arrangement, origination and commitment fees, through
testing of the amortised cost models for each loan;
• Recalculating interest income using the original effective interest rate,
paying due consideration to any early, partial or full prepayments or
management’s re-estimate thereof;
• Inspecting supporting documents, such as correspondence with
the underlying borrower and timing of cash receipts, as part of our
assessment of management’s estimates and assumptions; and
• For those loans advanced that were also held at 31 December 2021,
comparing the estimated future cash flows in the amortised cost
models as at 31 December 2022 and evaluating the rationale behind
any significant changes from the estimated cash flows in the 31
December 2021 models.
Based on the audit procedures performed, we have nothing to report
to those charged with corporate governance.
We obtained a detailed understanding of the Board’s proposals with
respect to the Proposed Orderly Realisation through discussions with the
Board and the Investment Adviser and from reviewing the Circular.
We considered these proposals in light of the requirements of
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European
Union, the current accounting policies of the group and in considering
the ongoing basis of preparation of the financial statements.
We also considered the adequacy of the disclosures made by the
Directors with respect to the Proposed Orderly Realisation in the Annual
Report and Financial Statements.
Based on our enquiries and the matters considered above with respect
to the Proposed Orderly Realisation, we have nothing to report to those
charged with corporate governance.
50
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited
professional judgement have tailored our audit
scope to account for the group’s consolidated
financial statements as a single component.
Scoping was performed at the group level,
irrespective of whether the underlying
transactions took place within the company
or within the subsidiaries. The group audit
was led, directed, controlled and reviewed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP and all audit
work for material items within the consolidated
financial statements was performed in
Guernsey by PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP.
The transactions relating to the company
and the subsidiaries are maintained by the
Administrator and its related group entities and
HOW WE TAILORED THE
AUDIT SCOPE
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure
that we performed enough work to be able to
give an opinion on the consolidated financial
statements as a whole, taking into account
the structure of the group, the accounting
processes and controls, the industry in which
the group operates, and we considered the
risk of climate change and the potential impact
thereof on our audit approach.
The company is based in Guernsey with two
subsidiaries located in Guernsey and three
underlying subsidiaries located in Luxembourg.
The consolidated financial statements are
a consolidation of the company and all the
subsidiaries. We have considered whether
the consolidated subsidiaries included within
the group comprise separate components
for the purpose of our audit scope. However,
we have taken into account the group’s
financial reporting system and the related
controls in place at the Administrator and at
the Investment Adviser, and based on our
therefore we were not required to engage with
component auditors from another PwC global
network firm operating under our instruction.
Our testing was therefore performed on a
consolidated basis using thresholds which
are determined with reference to the overall
group materiality and the risks of material
misstatement identified
MATERIALITY
The scope of our audit was influenced by
our application of materiality. We set certain
quantitative thresholds for materiality. These,
together with qualitative considerations,
helped us to determine the scope of our
audit and the nature, timing and extent of our
audit procedures on the individual financial
statement line items and disclosures and
in evaluating the effect of misstatements,
both individually and in aggregate on the
consolidated financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we
determined materiality for the consolidated
financial statements as a whole as follows:
Overall group materiality £8.3 million (2021: £8.4 million)
How we determined it 2% of consolidated net assets
Rationale for benchmark
applied
We believe consolidated net assets to be the appropriate basis
for determining materiality since this is a key consideration
for members of the company when assessing financial
performance. It is also a generally accepted measure used for
companies in this industry.
We use performance materiality to reduce to
an appropriately low level the probability that
the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected
misstatements exceeds overall materiality.
Specifically, we use performance materiality
in determining the scope of our audit and the
nature and extent of our testing of account
balances, classes of transactions and
disclosures, for example in determining sample
sizes. Our performance materiality was 75%
(2021: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting
to £6.2 million (2021: £6.3 million) for the
group financial statements.
51
In determining the performance materiality,
we considered a number of factors – the
history of misstatements, risk assessment
and aggregation risk and the effectiveness
of controls - and concluded that an amount
at the upper of our normal range was
appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we
would report to them misstatements identified
during our audit above £0.4 million (2021:
£0.4 million) as well as misstatements below
that amount that, in our view, warranted
reporting for qualitative reasons.
REPORTING ON OTHER
INFORMATION
The other information comprises all the
information included in the Annual Report and
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
(the “Annual Report”) but does not include
the consolidated financial statements and our
auditor’s report thereon. The directors are
responsible for the other information.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements does not cover the other
information and we do not express any form
of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the
consolidated financial statements, our
responsibility is to read the other information
and, in doing so, consider whether the other
information is materially inconsistent with
the consolidated financial statements or our
knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise
appears to be materially misstated. If, based
on the work we have performed, we conclude
that there is a material misstatement of this
other information, we are required to report
that fact. We have nothing to report based on
these responsibilities.
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND THE AUDIT
Responsibilities of the directors for the
consolidated financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement
of Directors’ Responsibilities, the directors
are responsible for the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements that give
a true and fair view in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards
as adopted by the European Union, the
requirements of Guernsey law and for such
internal control as the directors determine
is necessary to enable the preparation of
consolidated financial statements that are
free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial
statements, the directors are responsible for
assessing the group’s ability to continue as
a going concern, disclosing, as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless
the directors either intend to liquidate the
group or to cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the
consolidated financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s
report that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance, but
is not a guarantee that an audit conducted
in accordance with ISAs will always detect
a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error
and are considered material if, individually
or in aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions
of users taken on the basis of these
consolidated financial statements.
52
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited
Our audit testing might include testing
complete populations of certain transactions
and balances, possibly using data auditing
techniques. However, it typically involves
selecting a limited number of items for
testing, rather than testing complete
populations. We will often seek to target
particular items for testing based on their
size or risk characteristics. In other cases,
we will use audit sampling to enable us to
draw a conclusion about the population from
which the sample is selected.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs,
we exercise professional judgement and
maintain professional scepticism throughout
the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error,
design and perform audit procedures
responsive to those risks, and obtain audit
evidence that is sufficient and appropriate
to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk
of not detecting a material misstatement
resulting from fraud is higher than for one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve
collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of
internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control
relevant to the audit in order to design
audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the group’s internal control.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness
of accounting estimates and related
disclosures made by the directors.
• Conclude on the appropriateness of the
directors’ use of the going concern basis
of accounting and, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a material
uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt
on the group’s ability to continue as a going
concern over a period of at least twelve
months from the date of approval of the
consolidated financial statements. If we
conclude that a material uncertainty exists,
we are required to draw attention in our
auditor’s report to the related disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements or, if
such disclosures are inadequate, to modify
our opinion. Our conclusions are based on
the audit evidence obtained up to the date
of our auditor’s report. However, future
events or conditions may cause the group
to cease to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure
and content of the consolidated financial
statements, including the disclosures,
and whether the consolidated financial
statements represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that
achieves fair presentation.
• Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
regarding the financial information of
the entities or business activities within
the group to express an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements. We are
responsible for the direction, supervision and
performance of the group audit. We remain
solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with those charged with
governance regarding, among other matters,
the planned scope and timing of the audit
and significant audit findings, including any
significant deficiencies in internal control that
we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with
governance with a statement that we
have complied with relevant ethical
requirements regarding independence, and
to communicate with them all relationships
and other matters that may reasonably be
thought to bear on our independence, and
where applicable, related safeguards.
53
From the matters communicated with those
charged with governance, we determine those
matters that were of most significance in the
audit of the consolidated financial statements
of the current period and are therefore the key
audit matters. We describe these matters in
our auditor’s report unless law or regulation
precludes public disclosure about the matter
or when, in extremely rare circumstances,
we determine that a matter should not be
communicated in our report because the
adverse consequences of doing so would
reasonably be expected to outweigh the public
interest benefits of such communication.
Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been
prepared for and only for the members as a
body in accordance with Section 262 of The
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 and for
no other purpose. We do not, in giving these
opinions, accept or assume responsibility for
any other purpose or to any other person to
whom this report is shown or into whose hands
it may come save where expressly agreed by
our prior consent in writing.
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Company Law exception reporting
Under The Companies (Guernsey) Law,
2008 we are required to report to you if, in
our opinion:
• we have not received all the information
and explanations we require for our audit;
• proper accounting records have not been
kept; or
• the consolidated financial statements are not
in agreement with the accounting records.
We have no exceptions to report arising from
this responsibility.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
STATEMENT
The Listing Rules require us to review the
directors’ statements in relation to going
concern, longer-term viability and that part
of the corporate governance statement
relating to the company’s compliance with the
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance
Code specified for our review. Our additional
responsibilities with respect to the corporate
governance statement as other information
are described in the Reporting on other
information section of this report.
The company has reported compliance against
the 2019 AIC Code of Corporate Governance
(the “Code”) which has been endorsed by
the UK Financial Reporting Council as being
consistent with the UK Corporate Governance
Code for the purposes of meeting the
company’s obligations, as an investment
company, under the Listing Rules of the FCA.
Based on the work undertaken as part of
our audit, we have concluded that each
of the following elements of the corporate
governance statement, included within the
Strategic Report is materially consistent with
the consolidated financial statements and our
knowledge obtained during the audit, and we
have nothing material to add or draw attention
to in relation to:
• The directors’ confirmation that they have
carried out a robust assessment of the
emerging and principal risks;
• The disclosures in the Annual Report
that describe those principal risks, what
procedures are in place to identify emerging
risks and an explanation of how these are
being managed or mitigated;
• The directors’ statement in the consolidated
financial statements about whether they
considered it appropriate to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting in preparing
them, and their identification of any
material uncertainties to the group’s ability
to continue to do so over a period of at least
twelve months from the date of approval of
the consolidated financial statements;
54
• The directors’ explanation as to their
assessment of the group’s prospects, the
period this assessment covers and why the
period is appropriate; and
• The directors’ statement as to whether
they have a reasonable expectation that
the company will be able to continue in
operation and meet its liabilities as they
fall due over the period of its assessment,
including any related disclosures drawing
attention to any necessary qualifications or
assumptions.
Our review of the directors’ statement
regarding the longer-term viability of the
group was substantially less in scope than an
audit and only consisted of making inquiries
and considering the directors’ process
supporting their statements; checking that the
statements are in alignment with the relevant
provisions of the Code; and considering
whether the statement is consistent with the
consolidated financial statements and our
knowledge and understanding of the group
and its environment obtained in the course of
the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken
as part of our audit, we have concluded
that each of the following elements of the
corporate governance statement is materially
consistent with the consolidated financial
statements and our knowledge obtained
during the audit:
• The directors’ statement that they consider
the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is
fair, balanced and understandable, and
provides the information necessary for the
members to assess the group’s position,
performance, business model and strategy;
• The section of the Annual Report that
describes the review of effectiveness of
risk management and internal control
systems; and
• The section of the Annual Report describing
the work of the Audit Committee.
We have nothing to report in respect of our
responsibility to report when the directors’
statement relating to the company’s
compliance with the Code does not properly
disclose a departure from a relevant provision
of the Code specified under the Listing Rules
for review by the auditors.
OTHER MATTERS
In due course, as required by the Financial
Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance
and Transparency Rule 4.1.14R, these
consolidated financial statements will
form part of the ESEF-prepared annual
financial report filed on the National Storage
Mechanism of the Financial Conduct
Authority in accordance with the ESEF
Regulatory Technical Standard (“ESEF RTS”).
This auditor’s report provides no assurance
over whether the annual financial report
will be prepared using the single electronic
format specified in the ESEF RTS.
As explained in note 21 to the consolidated
financial statements, in addition to our
responsibility to audit and express an opinion
on the consolidated financial statements in
accordance with ISAs and Guernsey law,
we have been requested by the directors
to express an opinion on the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America as issued by the
AICPA, in order to meet the requirements
of Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment
Advisers Act (the “Custody Rule”). We have
reported separately in this respect within
the Annual Report.
Roland Mills
For and on behalf of
PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP
Chartered Accountants and
Recognised Auditor
Guernsey, Channel Islands
23 March 2023
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited
55
OPINION
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated financial statements of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
Limited (“the Company”) and its subsidiaries
(together “the group”), which comprise
the consolidated statements of financial
position as of 31 December 2022 and 31
December 2021 and the related consolidated
statements of comprehensive income,
changes in equity and cash flows including
the related notes for the years then ended
(collectively referred to as the “consolidated
financial statements”).
In our opinion, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the group as of 31 December
2022 and 31 December 2021, and the
results of their operations and their cash
flows for the years then ended in accordance
with International Financial Reporting
Standards (“IFRSs”) as adopted by the
European Union.
BASIS FOR OPINION
We conducted our audit in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America (US
GAAS). Our responsibilities under those
standards are further described in the
Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of
the Consolidated Financial Statements
section of our report. We are required to be
independent of the group and to meet our
other ethical responsibilities, in accordance
with the relevant ethical requirements
relating to our audit. We believe that the
audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF
MANAGEMENT FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation
and fair presentation of the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with IFRSs
as adopted by the European Union, and for
the design, implementation, and maintenance
of internal control relevant to the preparation
and fair presentation of consolidated financial
statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial
statements, management is responsible for
assessing the group’s ability to continue as
going concerns, disclosing as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless
management either intends to liquidate the
group or to cease operations, or has no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Directors of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited (US GAAS)
56
Financial Statements
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Directors of
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited (US GAAS)
AUDITORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
FOR THE AUDIT OF THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance
is a high level of assurance but is not absolute
assurance and therefore is not a guarantee
that an audit conducted in accordance
with US GAAS will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement resulting
from fraud is higher than for one resulting from
error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or
the override of internal control. Misstatements
are considered material if there is a substantial
likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate,
they would influence the judgment made by
a reasonable user based on the consolidated
financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with
US GAAS, we:
• Exercise professional judgement and
maintain professional scepticism
throughout the audit.
• Identify and assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error,
and design and perform audit procedures
responsive to those risks. Such procedures
include examining, on a test basis, evidence
regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control
relevant to the audit in order to design
audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the group’s internal control. Accordingly,
no such opinion is expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of
significant accounting estimates made
by management, as well as evaluate the
overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements.
• Conclude whether, in our judgement, there
are conditions or events, considered in the
aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about
the group’s ability to continue as a going
concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those
charged with governance regarding, among
other matters, the planned scope and timing
of the audit, significant audit findings, and
certain internal control-related matters that
we identified during the audit.
OTHER INFORMATION
Management is responsible for the other
information included in the Annual Report
and Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (the “Annual Report”). The
other information comprises the information
included in the Annual Report, but does
not include the consolidated financial
statements and our auditor’s reports
thereon. Our opinion on the consolidated
financial statements does not cover the
other information, and we do not express an
opinion or any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the
consolidated financial statements,
our responsibility is to read the other
information and consider whether a material
inconsistency exists between the other
information and the consolidated financial
statements or the other information
otherwise appears to be materially
misstated. If, based on the work performed,
we conclude that an uncorrected material
misstatement of the other information exists,
we are required to describe it in our report.
RESTRICTION OF USE
This report, including the opinion, has been
prepared for and only for the directors in
relation to the requirements of Rule 206(4)-2
of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the
“Custody Rule”) as it applies to the company
and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving
this opinion, accept or assume responsibility
for any other purpose or to any other person
to whom this report is shown or into whose
hands it may come save where expressly
agreed by our prior consent in writing.
PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP
Chartered Accountants,
Guernsey, Channel Islands
23 March 2023
57
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 31 December 2022
Notes
1 January 2022 to
31 December 2022
£
1 January 2021 to
31 December 2021
£
Income
Income from loans advanced 10 33,356,702 28,382,742
Net foreign exchange gains/(losses) 6 3,046,164 (3,043,374)
Total income 36,402,866 25,339,368
Expenses
Investment management fees 3(a), 22 3,122,755 3,147,075
Credit facility interest and amortisation of fees 1,080,499 685,815
Credit facility commitment fees 828,876 844,694
Legal and professional fees 437,622 266,154
Other expenses 432,649 179,262
Administration fees 3(b) 354,426 344,950
Audit and non-audit fees 5 233,773 229,387
Professional fees for the orderly realisation proposals 210,000 -
Directors' fees and expenses 4, 22 203,373 195,410
Broker's fees 3(d) 50,000 53,250
Total operating expenses 6,953,973 5,945,997
Operating profit for the year before tax 29,448,893 19,393,371
Taxation 20 90,287 100,452
Operating profit for the year 29,358,606 19,292,919
Other comprehensive loss
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations
2(k) (112,256) (329,895)
Other comprehensive loss for the year (112,256) (329,895)
Total comprehensive income for the year 29,246,350 18,963,024
Weighted average number of shares in issue 7 404,881,933 408,939,505
Basic and diluted earnings per Ordinary Share (pence) 7 7.25 4.72
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
58
Notes
As at
31 December 2022
£
As at
31 December 2021
£
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 8 3,576,155 2,994,357
Other receivables and prepayments 9 26,792 37,652
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 11 706,661 13,291,598
Loans advanced 10 432,459,966 414,632,512
Total assets 436,769,574 430,956,119
Liabilities
Credit facility 12 18,863,204 7,914,993
Trade and other payables 13 1,758,606 1,484,526
Total liabilities 20,621,810 9,399,519
Net assets 416,147,764 421,556,600
Capital and reserves
Share capital 15 395,075,556 407,440,011
Retained earnings 21,218,267 14,150,392
Translation reserve (146,059) (33,803)
Total equity 416,147,764 421,556,600
Number of Ordinary Shares in issue 15 395,592,696 408,911,273
Net asset value per Ordinary Share (pence) 105.20 103.09
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
as at 31 December 2022
These consolidated financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 23 March 2023, and signed on its
behalf by:
Chairman Director
59
Year ended 31 December 2022
Share capital
£
Retained
earnings
£
Translation
reserves
£
Total Equity
£
Balance at 1 January 2022 407,440,011 14,150,392 (33,803) 421,556,600
Share buybacks (12,364,455) - - (12,364,455)
Dividends paid - (22,290,731) - (22,290,731)
Operating profit for the year - 29,358,606 - 29,358,606
Other comprehensive loss:
Other comprehensive loss for the year
- - (112,256) (112,256)
Balance at 31 December 2022 395,075,556 21,218,267 (146,059) 416,147,764
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
for the year ended 31 December 2022
Year ended 31 December 2021
Share capital
£
Retained
earnings
£
Translation
reserves
£
Total Equity
£
Balance at 1 January 2021 408,031,544 18,369,871 296,092 426,697,507
Share buybacks (591,533) - - (591,533)
Dividends paid - (23,512,398) - (23,512,398)
Operating profit for the year - 19,292,919 - 19,292,919
Other comprehensive loss:
Other comprehensive loss for the year
- - (329,895) (329,895)
Balance at 31 December 2021 407,440,011 14,150,392 (33,803) 421,556,600
60
Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the year ended 31 December 2022
(1)
Net of arrangement fees of £820,118 (2021: £1,125,342) withheld.
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1 January 2022 to
31 December 2022
£
1 January 2021 to
31 December 2021
£
Operating activities:
Operating profit for the year before tax 29,448,893 19,393,371
Adjustments:
Net interest income (33,356,702) (28,382,742)
Decrease/(increase) in prepayments and receivables 10,860 (20,558)
Increase in trade and other payables 458,661 132,570
Net unrealised losses / (gains) on foreign exchange derivatives 12,584,938 (12,373,339)
Net foreign exchange (gains) / losses (15,292,556) 15,488,570
Net foreign exchange gains on hedges 5,618,298 895,944
Credit facility interest 707,171 236,071
Credit facility amortisation of fees 373,328 449,744
Credit facility commitment fees 828,876 844,694
Currency translation difference (5,663,501) 2,722,148
Corporate taxes paid (84,274) (87,724)
(4,366,008) (701,251)
Loans advanced
(1)
(60,788,846) (90,597,307)
Loan repayments and amortisation 56,894,392 103,474,780
Origination fees paid (872,020) (300,456)
Interest income from loans advanced 28,373,979 25,567,309
Commitment and exit fee income from loans advanced 1,211,844 1,115,354
Net cash inflow from operating activities 20,453,341 38,558,429
Cash flows from financing activities
Interest income from cash and cash equivalents - -
Net cash inflow from investing activities - -
Cash flows from financing activities
Share buybacks (12,364,455) (677,120)
Dividends paid (22,290,731) (23,512,398)
Proceeds under credit facility 94,223,490 63,800,000
Repayments under credit facility (84,158,141) (75,128,132)
Credit facility interest paid (533,577) (262,221)
Credit facility commitment fees paid (834,495) (647,799)
Net cash outflow from financing activities (25,957,909) (36,427,670)
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (5,504,568) 2,130,759
Cash and cash equivalents at the start of the year 2,994,357 2,939,408
Net foreign exchange gains/(losses) on cash and cash equivalents 6,086,366 (2,075,810)
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 3,576,155 2,994,357
61
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Limited (the “Company”)
was incorporated with limited liability in Guernsey under the
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, as amended, on 9 November
2012 with registered number 55836, and has been authorised by
the Guernsey Financial Services Commission (the “GFSC”) as a
registered closed-ended investment scheme. The registered office
and principal place of business of the Company is 1, Royal Plaza,
Royal Avenue, St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands, GY1 2HL.
On 12 December 2012, the Company announced the results of its
IPO, which raised net proceeds of £223.9 million. The Company’s
Ordinary Shares were admitted to the premium segment of the
UK FCA’s Official List and to trading on the Main Market of the
London Stock Exchange as part of its IPO which completed on 17
December 2012. Further issues took place in March 2013, April
2013, July 2015, September 2015, August 2016 and May 2019.
On 10 August 2020 the Company announced the appointment of
Jefferies International Limited as buyback agent to effect share
buybacks on behalf of the Company. During the year ended 31
December 2022, the Company had repurchased 13,318,577
(year ended 31 December 2021: 660,000) Ordinary Shares at
an average cost of 92.84 (year ended 31 December 2021: 89.63
pence) per share. These Ordinary Shares are held in treasury.
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial
statements of the Company, Starfin Public Holdco 1 Limited (the
“Holdco 1”), Starfin Public Holdco 2 Limited (the “Holdco 2”),
Starfin Lux S.à.r.l (“Luxco”), Starfin Lux 3 S.à.r.l (“Luxco 3”) and
Starfin Lux 4 S.à.r.l (“Luxco 4”) (together the “Group”) as at 31
December 2022.
The Company’s investment objective is to conduct an orderly
realisation of the assets of the Group. The assets of the Group will
be realized in an orderly manner, returning cash to Shareholders at
such times and in such manner as the Board may, in its absolute
discretion, determine. The Board will endeavour to realise all of the
Group’s investments in a manner that achieves a balance between
maximising the net value received from those investments and
making timely returns to Shareholders. Further details have been
covered under the Objective and Investment Policy section.
The Company has appointed Starwood European Finance Partners
Limited as the Investment Manager (the “Investment Manager”),
a company incorporated in Guernsey and regulated by the GFSC.
The Investment Manager has appointed Starwood Capital Europe
Advisers, LLP (the “Investment Adviser”), an English limited liability
partnership authorised and regulated by the FCA, to provide
investment advice pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement.
The administration of the Company is delegated to Apex Fund and
Corporate Services (Guernsey) Limited (the “Administrator”).
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of
these financial statements are set out below. These policies
have been consistently applied to the years presented, unless
otherwise stated.
a) Going Concern
Note 17 includes the Group’s objectives, policies and processes
for managing its capital, its financial risk management objectives,
details of financial instruments and exposure to credit risk
and liquidity risk. The Directors, at the time of approving
these Annual Accounts, are required to satisfy themselves
that they have reasonable expectation that the Company has
adequate resources to continue in operational existence for
the foreseeable future. At the EGM of the Company held on 27
January 2023, following a recommendation from the Board as
published in the Circular and EGM Notice dated 28 December
2022, the resolutions for the Proposed Orderly Realisation
received shareholder votes in favour amounting to 99.97% of the
shareholder votes cast, voting for a change to the Company’s
Objective and Investments Policy which would lead to the orderly
realisation of the Company’s assets and a return of capital to
shareholders. The Directors have undertaken a rigorous review of
the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, reviewing the
ongoing cash flows and the level of cash balances and available
liquidity facilities.
After making enquiries of the Investment Manager and the
Administrator and reviewing the viability model prepared by the
Investment Adviser, the Directors have a reasonable expectation
that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for at least one year from the date the consolidated
financial statements were signed. Accordingly, the Directors
continue to adopt a going concern basis in preparing these
consolidated financial statements.
In addition to a going concern statement, the Directors have
undertaken a longer term viability assessment of the Group, the
results of which can be found in the Strategic Report. A range of
scenarios have been evaluated as part of this analysis. The worst
case scenario evaluated was an interest payment default on all
Stage 2 loans, and simultaneously the repayment of the loan
principal is not received until 6 to 12 months after their maturity
dates and that Sonia and Euribor rates fall to 0% from 2024. In
this scenario the Group is still able to meet its liabilities as they fall
due although the dividend might need to be reduced to reflect the
reduced cash received.
62
b) Statement of compliance
The Company has prepared its consolidated financial
statements in accordance with The Companies (Guernsey)
Law, 2008 (as amended) and International Financial Reporting
Standards (“IFRS”) as adopted by the European Union, which
comprise standards and interpretations approved by the
International Accounting Standards Boards (“IASB”) together
with the interpretations of the IFRS Interpretations Committee
(“IFRIC”) as approved by the International Accounting Standards
Committee (“IASC”) which remain in effect and were adopted
by the European Union. The Directors of the Company have
taken the exemption in Section 244 of The Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 2008 (as amended) and have therefore
elected to only prepare consolidated and not separate financial
statements for the year.
(i) Standards and amendments to existing standards
effective 1 January 2022
Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have
been published that are effective 1 January 2022 and have
not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial
statements. These standards are not expected to have a
material impact on the Group in the current or future reporting
periods and on foreseeable future transactions.
(ii) New standards, amendments and interpretations
effective after 1 January 2022 and have not been
early adopted
A number of new standards, amendments to standards and
interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning after 1
January 2022, and have not been early adopted in preparing the
Group’s consolidated financial statements. None of these are
expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements of the Group.
c) Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on
a going concern basis and under the historical cost convention
as modified by the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities to
fair value.
Critical accounting judgements and key sources of
estimation uncertainty
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS
requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It
also requires the Board of Directors to exercise its judgement
in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The
areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or
areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
consolidated financial statements relate to:
(i) Critical accounting estimates and assumptions
• Models used for loans accounted at amortised cost use
assumptions and estimates regarding the receipt and timing
of scheduled and unscheduled payments of loans advanced.
Changes in these assumptions and estimates could impact
liquidity risk and the interest income (see note 17).
• The measurement of both the initial and ongoing expected
credit loss allowance (“ECL”) for financial assets measured at
amortised cost is an area that requires the use of significant
assumptions about credit behaviour such as likelihood of
borrowers defaulting and the resulting losses (see note 2(h)).
The determination of ECL using the LTV headroom analysis is a
key estimate/judgement.
(ii) Critical accounting judgements
• The functional currency of subsidiary undertakings of the
Company, which is considered by the Directors to be Euro
for Luxco 3; Sterling for all other subsidiaries (see notes 2(e)
and 2(k)).
• The operating segments, of which the Directors are currently of
the opinion that the Company and its subsidiaries are engaged
in a single segment of business, being the provision of a
diversified portfolio of real estate backed loans (see note 2(f)).
• A number of significant judgements are also required in
applying the accounting requirements for measuring ECL,
such as determining the criteria for significant increase in
credit risk, choosing the appropriate model and assumptions
for the measurement of ECL, determining the probabilities of
default and loss given default (see note 2(h)).
Subsidiary
undertakings
Date of
Control
Ownership
%
Country of
Establishment
Principal
place of
business
Starfin Lux
S.à.r.l
11/30/2012 100 Luxembourg Luxembourg
Starfin Public
Holdco 1
Limited
9/11/2017 100 Guernsey Guernsey
Starfin Public
Holdco 2
Limited
9/11/2017 100 Guernsey Guernsey
Starfin Lux 3
S.à.r.l
9/19/2017 100 Luxembourg Luxembourg
Starfin Lux 4
S.à.r.l
12/11/2017 100 Luxembourg Luxembourg
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
63
d) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial
statements of the Company and entities controlled by the
Company (its subsidiary undertakings) made up to the end of the
reporting period. Control is achieved where the Company has the
power to govern the financial and operating policies of an investee
entity so as to obtain benefits directly from its activities. The
existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently
exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether
the Company controls another entity. The Company also assesses
existence of control where it does not have more than 50 per
cent of the voting power but is able to govern the financial and
operating policies by virtue of de-facto control.
Subsidiary undertakings are fully consolidated from the date
on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-
consolidated from the date that control ceases.
The Group applies the acquisition method to account for
business combinations.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. No
consideration, other than for the par value of any share capital
or capital contributions, has been paid in respect of the
acquisition of subsidiary undertakings. The Company acquired
the subsidiaries at the time of their initial establishment and
hence they had no net assets at the date of the acquisition.
Intercompany transactions, balances, income and expenses
on transactions between Group companies are eliminated on
consolidation. Profits and losses resulting from intercompany
transactions that are recognised in assets are also eliminated.
e) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s
entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic
environment in which the entity operates (the “functional
currency”). Therefore, the Directors have considered in assessing
the functional currency of each of the Group’s entities:
• the share capital of all members of the Group is denominated in
Sterling except for Luxco 3 share capital which is denominated
in Euro;
• the dividends are paid in Sterling;
• Euro non-investment transactions represent only a small
proportion of transactions in the Luxembourg entities; and
• proportion of non Sterling investments in each portfolio of
Luxembourg entities.
The functional and presentation currency of each Group
entity is Sterling, apart from Luxco 3 for which the functional
currency is Euro. Luxco 3 holds loans and investments in Euro
currencies. The Directors have also adopted Sterling as the
Group’s presentation currency (as the Group holds a significant
proportion of its assets in the UK, although this may vary from
time to time, capital was raised in Sterling, Group expenses are
primarily incurred in Sterling and performance is measured in
Sterling) and, therefore, the consolidated financial statements
for the Group are presented in Sterling.
f) Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with
the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-
maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible
for allocating resources and assessing performance of the
operating segments, has been identified as the Board, as the
Board makes strategic decisions. The Directors, after having
considered the way in which internal reporting is provided to
them, are of the opinion that the Company and its subsidiaries
are engaged in a single segment of business, being the provision
of a diversified portfolio of real estate backed loans. Equally,
based on the internal reporting provided, the Directors do not
analyse the portfolio based on geographical segments.
g) Financial assets and liabilities
Classification and subsequent measurement
The Group classifies its financial assets into the following
measurement categories: at amortised cost, at fair value
through profit or loss and at fair value through other
comprehensive income. The classification depends on
the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired.
Management determines the classification of its financial assets
at initial recognition.
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
A financial asset is measured at amortised cost if both of the
following conditions are met: (a) the financial asset is held within
a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in
order to collect contractual cash flows and (b) the contractual
terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to
cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest
on the principal amount outstanding. The carrying amount of
these assets is adjusted by any expected credit loss allowance
recognised and measured as described in note 2(h). Interest
income from these financial assets is included in “Income from
loans advanced” using the effective interest rate method.
Financial assets at fair value through other
comprehensive income
A financial asset is measured at fair value through other
comprehensive income if both of the following conditions are
met: (a) the financial asset is held within a business model whose
objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows
and selling financial assets and (b) the contractual terms of the
financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are
solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount
outstanding. Movements in the carrying amount are taken
through other comprehensive income, except for the recognition
64
of impairment gains and losses, interest revenue and foreign
exchange gains and losses on the instrument’s amortised cost
which are recognised in profit or loss.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial
instruments that (a) either designated in this category upon initial
recognition or subsequently or (b) not classified in any of the other
categories. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are
carried in the statement of financial position at fair value with net
changes in fair value recognised in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income. This category includes currency forward
contracts. Gains or losses on currency forward contracts are
recognised within “Net foreign exchange gains or losses”.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are
carried in the statement of financial position at fair value
with net changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
These comprise currency forward contracts which represent
contractual obligations to purchase domestic currency and sell
foreign currency on a future date.
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Financial liabilities that are not classified through profit or loss,
including bank loans, are measured at amortised cost.
Recognition and measurement
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on
the trade date, the date on which the Group commits to purchase
or sell the asset. Financial assets not carried at fair value through
profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction
costs. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or
loss are initially recognised at fair value, and transaction costs
are expensed in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
and financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive
income are subsequently carried at fair value. Financial assets at
amortised cost are subsequently measured using the effective
interest method and are subject to impairment using the expected
credit loss model. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss
when the asset is derecognised, modified or impaired.
Derecognition
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive
cash flows from the investments have expired or have been
transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks
and rewards of ownership.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when they are
extinguished, that is, when the obligation specified in the
contract is discharged or cancelled or expires.
Amortised cost and effective interest rate
The amortised cost is the amount at which the financial asset
or financial liability is measured at initial recognition minus the
principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation
using the effective interest method of any difference between
that initial amount and the maturity amount and, for financial
assets, adjusted for any loss allowance.
The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts
estimated future cash payments or receipts through the
expected life of financial assets or financial liability to the
gross carrying amount of a financial asset (i.e., its amortised
cost before any loss allowance) or to the amortised cost of a
financial liability. The calculation does not consider expected
credit losses and includes transaction costs and all fees paid or
received that are integral to the effective interest rate.
Fair value estimation
The fair value of financial assets, which comprise derivatives
not designated as hedges, are valued based on the difference
between the agreed price of selling or buying the financial
instruments on a future date and the price quoted on the year
end date for selling or buying the same or similar financial
instruments.
h) Expected credit loss measurement
The following describes the valuation basis that is used in our
calculation. As the vast majority of our portfolio is originated
directly by the Investment Adviser, the Group has discretion
over when and how to instruct valuations. We consider
this to be a strength of our valuation process as we have
control over timing and complete access to the detail of the
valuation process and the output. Where loans are not directly
originated the lender could have a lack of control over the
timing and no input to the process which we prefer to avoid
where possible. Further details on the valuation process are
covered in the Investment Manager’s Report.
The Group follows a three-stage model for impairment
based on changes in credit quality since initial recognition as
summarised below:
• A financial instrument that is not credit-impaired on initial
recognition is classified as Stage 1 and has its credit risk
continuously monitored by the Group. The expected credit loss
(“ECL”) is measured over a 12 month period of time.
• If a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition is
identified, the financial instrument is moved to Stage 2 but is
not yet deemed to be credit-impaired. The ECL is measured on
a lifetime basis.
• If the financial instrument is credit-impaired it is then moved to
Stage 3. The ECL is measured on a lifetime basis.
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
65
The Group’s financial assets at amortised cost were all classified
within Stage 1 at inception for the following reasons:
• All loans are the subject of very detailed underwriting,
including the testing of resilience to aggressive downside
scenarios with respect to the loan specifics, the market and
general macro economic changes, and therefore the Group
considers that value of losses given default (“LGD”) currently
have a nil value for all loans;
• Loans have very robust covenants in place which trigger as
an early warning (long before there would be any indicators
of significant increase in credit risk) and this enables the
Investment Adviser to become highly involved in the execution
of business plans to avoid ECL;
• Loans have strong security packages and many are amortising
with relatively short terms which further reduces the risk; and
• All loans have significant loan-to-value headroom which further
mitigates the risk of ECL.
During the year ended 31 December 2022 two loans with a
carrying value of £46,909,623 (31 December 2021: three loans
amounting to £59,031,888) have been classified as Stage 2, no
loss allowance has been recognised on 12-month and lifetime
expected credit losses for Stage 1 and Stage 2 loans advanced
respectively, as based on the information available there is no
reason to believe that there has been any impairment in the value
of the loans held by the Group. For further information, see the
Investment Manager’s report. The paragraph below describes
how the Group determines when a significant increase in credit
risk has occurred, such that a loan would move from Stage 1
to Stage 2. No loans have been moved to Stage 2 or to Stage 3
during 2022.
The Group considers that for prepayments and capitalised cost,
the ECL is by default nil as these are non-monetary items with no
credit risks. For trade and other receivables the Group applies the
simplified approach which requires expected lifetime losses to be
recognised from initial recognition of the receivables.
Significant increase in credit risk - Stage 2
The Group uses both quantitative and qualitative criteria which
is monitored no less than quarterly in order to assess whether
an increase in credit risk has occurred. Increased credit risk
would be considered if, for example, all or a combination of the
following has occurred:
• underlying income performance is at a greater than 10 per cent
variance to the underwritten loan metrics;
• Loan to Value is greater than 75-80 per cent;
• Loan to Value or income covenant test results are at a variance
of greater than 5-10% of loan default covenant level (note that
loan default covenant levels are set tightly to ensure that an
early cure is required by the borrower should they breach which
usually involves decreasing the loan amount until covenant tests
are passed);
• late payments have occurred and not been cured within 3 days;
• loan maturity date is within six months and the borrower has
not presented an achievable refinance or repayment plan;
• covenant and performance milestones criteria under the loan
have required more than two waivers;
• increased credit risk has been identified on tenants representing
greater than 25 per cent of underlying asset
• income rollover / tenant break options exist such that a lease up
of more than 30 per cent of underlying property will be required
within 12 months in order to meet loan covenants and interest
payments; and
• borrower management team quality has adversely changed.
Default and credit-impaired assets - Stage 3
Non-performing financial assets would be classified with Stage
3, which is fully aligned with the definition of credit- impaired,
when one or more of the following has occurred:
• the borrower is in breach of all financial covenants;
• the borrower is in significant financial difficulty; and
• it is becoming probable that the borrower will enter
bankruptcy.
An instrument is considered to have been cured, that is no
longer in default, when it no longer meets any of the default
criteria for a sufficient period of time.
Write-off policy
The Group writes off financial assets, in whole or in part, when it
has exhausted all practically recovery efforts and has concluded
there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators that
there is no reasonable expectation of recovery include:
• ceasing enforcement activity; and
• where the Group’s recovery method is foreclosing on collateral
and the value of the collateral is such that there is no
reasonable expectation of recovering in full.
Sensitivity analysis
The most significant period-end assumptions used for the
expected credit loss estimates are the LGD and probability of
default (“PD”) as described above.
The default probabilities are based on initial loan-to-value (“LTV”)
headroom which the Investment Adviser believes to be a good
predictor of the PD, in accordance with recent market studies
of European commercial real estate loans.
66
In measuring the LGD for this sensitivity analysis, the loans
advanced have been assessed on a collective basis as they
possess similar covenants and security package characteristics.
The selected LGD of 0.30% is based on the aggregate losses
of all AAA rated notes issued in Europe from 1995 to 2020
(totalling €177 billions), according to recent market studies
of European commercial real estate loans. AAA rated notes
are considered the most representative of the Group’s loan
portfolio. The Investment Adviser considers this to be a
reasonable estimate for loss given default parameter.
As explained on Note 2 (b)(i), the year-end ECL are nil. Set out
below is the sensitivity to the ECL as at 31 December 2022
and 31 December 2021 that could result from reasonable
possible changes in the LTV and LGD actual assumptions used
for calculation of ECL as at the respective year-end. On an
individual loan basis, the LTV was increased by 25%, and a new
PD determined, which was multiplied by a constant LGD of
0.30% for all loans and the loan exposure as at each year-end.
All other variables are held constant.
Reasonable
possible shift
(absolute value)
31 December
2022 ECL
£
31 December
2021 ECL
£
LTV +25% (2021: +25%)
322,561 264,231
LGD +0.3% (2021: +0.3%)
presented in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income within “net foreign exchange losses/(gains)”.
Group companies
The results and financial position of all the Group entities that
have a functional currency different from the presentation
currency of the Group are translated into the presentation
currency of the Group as follows:
i. assets and liabilities for each Statement of Financial Position
presented are translated at the closing rate at the end of the
reporting period;
ii. income and expenses for each Statement of Comprehensive
Income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this
average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative
effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in
which case income and expenses are translated at the rate
on the dates of the transactions);
iii. share capital is translated at historical cost (translated using
the exchange rates at the transaction date); and
iv. all resulting exchange differences are recognised in other
comprehensive income.
The cumulative amount of translation exchange differences is
presented in a separate component of equity until disposal of
the entity.
Luxco 3 has Euro as its functional currency.
l) Interest income
Interest income on financial assets within Stage 1 and 2 is
recognised by applying the effective interest rate to the gross
carrying amount of financial assets. For financial assets that
are classified within Stage 3, interest revenue is calculated by
applying the effective interest rate to their amortised cost (that
is net of expected credit loss provision). Interest income on non-
performing financial assets at amortised cost is recognised to
the extent the Group expects to recover the interest receivable.
Interest on cash and cash equivalents is recognised at
amortised cost basis.
m) Origination, exit and loan arrangement fees
Origination fees paid to the Investment Manager and exit and
direct loan arrangement fees received will be recognised using the
effective interest rate method under loans advanced and amortised
over the lifetime of the related financial asset through income from
loans advanced in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income. Syndication costs are recognised in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income when incurred.
Change in ECL allowance (+)
i) Cash and cash equivalents
In the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash
equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held at call with
banks and other short-term highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less.
j) Share capital
Ordinary Shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs
directly attributable to the issue of new Ordinary Shares are
shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
k) Foreign currency translation
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional
currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the
transactions or valuation where items are re-measured. Foreign
exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such
transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange
rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are recognised in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income. Foreign exchange gains and losses
that relate to loans advanced, borrowings and cash and cash
equivalents and all other foreign exchange gains and losses are
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
67
n) Expenses
All other expenses are included in the Consolidated Statement
of Comprehensive Income on an accruals basis.
o) Taxation
The Company is a tax-exempt Guernsey limited liability company
as it is domiciled and registered for taxation purposes in
Guernsey where it pays an annual exempt status fee under The
Income Tax (Exempt Bodies) (Guernsey) Ordinances1989 (as
amended). Accordingly, no provision for Guernsey tax is made.
The Holdcos are exempted for Guernsey tax purposes, and
therefore no provision for taxes has been made.
The Luxcos are subject to the applicable general tax regulations
in Luxembourg and taxation is provided based on the results for
the year (see note 20).
p) Other receivables
Trade and other receivables are amounts due in the ordinary
course of business. They are classified as assets. Trade and
other receivables are recognised initially at fair value and
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method, less allowance for ECL.
q) Other payables
Trade and other payables are obligations to pay for services that
have been acquired in the ordinary course of business. They are
classified as liabilities. Trade and other payables are recognised
initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised
cost using the effective interest rate method.
r) Dividend distributions
Dividend distributions to the Company’s shareholders are recognised
as a liability in the Company’s financial statements in the period in
which the dividends are declared by the Board of Directors.
s) Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported
on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position when there is a
legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and there
is an intention to settle on a net basis or realise the asset and settle
the liability simultaneously.
t) Financial liabilities at amortised cost
Financial liabilities at amortised cost, including bank loans are
initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at
amortised cost using the effective interest method. Financial
liabilities are derecognised when the contractual obligation is
discharged, cancelled or expires.
u) Capitalised expenses on credit facilities
Expenses in connection with the process of originating,
prolongation, or restructuring of a credit facility, such as
application and underwriting fees, are capitalised and
subsequently amortised over the period of the relevant credit
facility in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
within “credit facility interest”.
3. MATERIAL AGREEMENTS
a) Investment management agreement
The Company and the Investment Manager have entered into an
investment management agreement, dated 28 November 2012
(the “Investment Management Agreement”), (which was amended
on 7 March 2014, 14 May 2014, 7 September 2015 and 6 October
2017) pursuant to which the Investment Manager has been given
overall responsibility for the discretionary management of the
Company’s assets in accordance with the Company’s investment
objectives and policy.
The Investment Manager is entitled to a management fee which
is calculated and accrued monthly at a rate equivalent to 0.75
per cent per annum of NAV. In calculating such fee, there shall
be excluded from the NAV attributable to the Ordinary Shares
the uninvested portion of the cash proceeds of any new issue of
Shares (or C Shares) until at least 90 per cent of such proceeds
are invested in accordance with the Company’s investment policy
(or deployed to repay borrowings under any credit facility of
the Group or other liabilities of the Group) for the first time. The
management fee is payable quarterly in arrears.
In addition, the Investment Manager is entitled to an asset
origination fee of 0.75 per cent of the value of all new loan
investments made or acquired by the Group (see note 22). The
asset origination fee to be paid by the Group is expected to be paid
upon receipt by the Group of loan arrangement fees received on
the deployment of the Group’s funds.
The Investment Management Agreement is terminable by either
the Investment Manager or the Company giving to the other not
less than 12 months’ written notice. The Company is also able to
terminate the appointment of the Investment Manager in the event
of a change of control of the Investment Manager. A change of
control shall be deemed to occur where a person acquires a direct
or indirect interest in the Investment Manager, which is calculated
68
by reference to 15 per cent or more of the voting rights. In addition
the Investment Management Agreement can be terminated by
the Company for any failure to act in good faith with the due skill,
care and diligence which would reasonably be expected from an
experienced manager in the sector and to exercise appropriate
prudence in the management of the Group’s portfolio.
Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement’s provisions,
a performance fee would apply from 1 January 2018. The amount
of such Performance Fee is 20 per cent of the excess (if any) of
the returns generated by the Group over the Hurdle Total Return
(described below). The measurement period over which the
Performance Fee is calculated is two years, with the payment of
any performance fee earned being made at the end of each such
two year period.
The Hurdle Total Return will be achieved when the NAV of the
Company at the end of the two year period, plus the total of all
dividends declared and paid to Ordinary Shareholders in that two
year period, is equal to the NAV of the Company at the start of
each two year measurement period, as increased by 8 per cent
per annum, on a simple interest basis (but excluding performance
fees accrued and deemed as a creditor on the balance sheet at
the start of the two year measurement period). No performance
fee will be payable in relation to performance that recoups previous
losses (if any).
To the extent that the Company makes further issues of Ordinary
Shares and/or repurchases or redeems Ordinary Shares, the
Hurdle Total Return will be adjusted accordingly, by reference to
the issue proceeds of such further issues and dividends declared
subsequent to such issues. Other corporate actions will also be
reflected as appropriate in the calculation of the Hurdle
Total Return.
The Investment Manager has appointed Starwood Capital Europe
Advisers, LLP (the “Investment Adviser”), an English limited liability
partnership authorised and regulated by the FCA, to provide
investment advice pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement.
b) Administration agreement
The Company has engaged the services of Apex Fund and
Corporate Services (Guernsey) Limited (the “Administrator”)
to act as Administrator and Company Secretary. Under the
terms of the service agreement dated 25 September 2018,
the Administrator is entitled to a fee of no less than £225,000
per annum for Guernsey registered companies of the Group,
€96,000 for Luxembourg registered subsidiaries and further
amounts as may be agreed in relation to any additional services
provided by the Administrator. The Administrator is, in addition,
entitled to recover third party expenses and disbursements.
c) Registrar’s agreement
The Company and Computershare Investor Services (Guernsey)
Limited (the “Registrar”) entered into a Registrar agreement
dated 28 November 2012, pursuant to which the Company
appointed the Registrar to act as Registrar of the Company for
a minimum annual fee payable by the Company of £7,500 in
respect of basic registration.
d) Brokerage agreement
On 19 June 2020 Jefferies Group LLC (“Jefferies”) was
appointed to act as Broker. Jefferies is entitled to receive a fee
of £50,000 per annum plus expenses. The previous brokerage
agreement with Stifel Nicolaus Europe Limited was terminated
on the same date.
e) Licence agreement
The Company and Starwood Capital Group Management,
LLC (the “Licensor”) have entered into a trade mark
licence agreement dated 28 November 2012 (the “Licence
Agreement”), pursuant to which the Licensor has agreed to
grant to the Company a royalty-free, non-exclusive worldwide
licence for the use of the “Starwood” name for the purposes of
the Company’s business.
Under the terms of the Licence Agreement, it may be
terminated by the Licensor; (i) if the Investment Management
Agreement or any other similar agreement between the
Company and the Investment Manager (or either of their
respective affiliates) is terminated for any reason whatsoever
or expires; (ii) if the Company suffers an insolvency event or
breaches any court order relating to the Licence Agreement; or
(iii) upon two months’ written notice without cause.
f) Hedging agreements
The Company and Lloyds Bank plc entered into an international
forward exchange master agreement dated 5 April 2013 and on
7 February 2014 the Company entered into a Professional Client
Agreement with Goldman Sachs, pursuant to which the parties
can enter into foreign exchange transactions with the intention
of hedging against fluctuations in the exchange rate between
Sterling and other currencies. Both agreements are governed by
the laws of England and Wales.
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
69
31 December
2022
£
31 December
2021
£
Directors’ emoluments 197,000 190,212
Other expenses 6,373 5,198
203,373 195,410
4. DIRECTORS’ FEES
g) Revolving credit facility
Under its investment policy, the Company is limited to
borrowing an amount equivalent to a maximum of 30 per cent
of its NAV at the time of drawdown, of which a maximum of
20 per cent can be longer term borrowings. In calculating the
Company’s borrowings for this purpose, any liabilities incurred
under the Company’s foreign exchange hedging arrangements
shall be disregarded.
On 4 December 2014, the Company entered into a £50 million
revolving credit facility with Lloyds Bank plc (the “Lloyds
Facility”) which is intended for short-term liquidity. This facility
was amended and extended on 7 January 2022. The current
maturity date is 5 May 2023. Subsequent to year end the
facility was extended for a further year from May 2023 to
May 2024, albeit at a lower facility amount of £25.0 million.
The facility is secured by a pledge over the bank accounts of
the Company, its interests in Holdco 1 and the intercompany
funding provided by the Company to Holdco 1. Holdco 1 also
acts as guarantor of the facility and has pledged its bank
accounts as collateral. The undertakings and events of default
are customary for a transaction of this nature.
On 18 December 2017, the Group entered into a separate £64
million secured borrowing facility with Morgan Stanley (the
“MS Facility”). This facility was amended and extended on 14
November 2019. The current maturity date is 14 November
2024 and the borrowing facility was increased to £76 million.
The debt can be drawn in respect of underlying loans which are
eligible under the facility. Certain loans will not be eligible, for
example mezzanine loans and loans above 75 per cent loan to
value. It is secured by a customary security package of bank
account pledges, intercompany receivables security, share
security over the two borrower entities (Luxco 3 and Luxco
4) and their shares. The MS Facility does not have recourse
to the Company. The undertakings and events of default are
customary for a facility of this nature.
70
The following table discloses the audit and non audit fees paid to the auditors for audit and non-audit services and their associated network
firms for non-audit services, where and as applicable.
5. AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Audit and non-audit fees expensed in the Consolidated Statement
of Comprehensive Income
Audit of company 140,563 120,800
Audit of subsidiaries 68,215 84,756
Total audit 208,778 205,556
Audit related assurance services (Interim review) 24,995 23,831
Total assurance services 24,995 23,831
Non-audit services not covered above - -
Total non-audit services 24,995 23,831
Total fees expensed 233,773 229,387
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
71
6. NET FOREIGN EXCHANGE GAINS / (LOSSES)
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Loans advanced gains - realised 511,596 153,504
Loans advanced losses - realised (996,010) (1,929,067)
Forward contracts gains - realised 6,507,544 1,998,286
Forward contracts losses - realised (428,644) (330,105)
Other gains - realised 110,951 328,245
Other losses - realised (38,684) (49,430)
5,666,753 171,433
Loans advanced gains - unrealised 9,987,926 -
Loans advanced losses - unrealised (23,578) (15,588,146)
Forward contracts gains - unrealised 2,337,351 13,707,768
Forward contracts losses - unrealised (14,922,288) (1,334,429)
(2,620,589) (3,214,807)
3,046,164 (3,043,374)
On occasion, the Group may realise a gain or loss on the roll forward of a hedge if it
becomes necessary to extend a capital hedge beyond the initial anticipated loan term.
If this situation arises the Group will separate the realised FX gain or loss from other
realised FX gains or losses and not consider it available to distribute (or as a reduction
in distributable profits). The FX gain or loss will only be considered part of distributable
reserves when the rolled hedge matures or is settled and the final net gain or loss on the
capital hedges can be determined.
7. EARNINGS PER SHARE AND NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
The calculation of basic earnings per Ordinary Share is based on the operating profit of
£29,358,606 (2021: £19,292,919) and on the weighted average number of Ordinary
Shares in issue during the year of 404,881,933 (2021: 408,939,505) Ordinary Shares.
The calculation of NAV per Ordinary Share is based on a NAV of £416,147,764 (2021:
£421,556,600) and the actual number of Ordinary Shares in issue at 31 December 2022
of 395,592,696 (2021: 408,911,273).
72
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
9. OTHER RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Prepayments 26,792 37,439
Investment proceeds receivable - 213
26,792 37,652
8. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents comprise the following:
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Cash at bank 3,576,155 2,994,357
3,576,155 2,994,357
Cash and cash equivalents comprises cash held by the Group and short term deposits held with
various banking institutions with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amount
of these assets approximates their fair value. For further information and the associated risks
refer to note 17.
73
10. LOANS ADVANCED
The Group’s accounting policy on the measurement of financial assets is discussed in note 2(g).
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
UK
Hotel & Residential, UK 49,876,920 49,922,112
Hotel, Scotland 43,109,284 42,390,350
Hotels, United Kingdom 32,134,282 30,016,910
Industrial Estate, UK 27,435,196 -
Hospitals, UK 25,367,475 25,364,814
Hotel, Oxford 23,181,461 21,579,756
Life Science, UK 19,955,081 19,620,908
Office, London 19,336,450 14,156,850
Hotel, North Berwick 15,211,739 14,123,338
Hotel and Office, Northern Ireland 11,947,821 12,719,727
Office and Industrial Portfolio, UK 5,594,291 -
Office, Scotland - 5,121,199
Ireland
Hotel, Dublin 42,752,233 50,842,327
Office Portfolio, Ireland 21,950,119 26,570,048
Mixed Use, Dublin 11,469,547 5,108,054
Spain
Three Shopping Centres, Spain 31,023,568 30,171,573
Office, Madrid, Spain 16,510,039 15,595,042
Shopping Centre, Spain 15,886,055 14,736,977
Office Portfolio, Spain 9,027,980 9,845,168
Germany
-
Logistics Portfolio 2,744,282 4,958,050
Europe
Mixed Portfolio 7,946,143 21,789,309
432,459,966 414,632,512
No element of loans advanced are past due or impaired. For further information and the
associated risks see the Investment Manager’s Report.
74
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Loans advanced at the start of the year 414,632,512 442,659,649
Loans advanced 61,420,419 91,935,602
Income from loans advanced 33,356,702 28,382,742
Foreign exchange gains/(losses) 9,478,582 (17,363,712)
Origination fees received for the year 872,020 300,456
Exit fees paid (501,062) (527,953)
Commitment fees paid (710,782) (586,841)
Arrangement fees paid (820,118) (1,125,342)
Interest payments received (28,373,979) (25,567,309)
Loan repayments (56,894,392) (103,474,780)
Loans advanced at the end of the year 432,459,966 414,632,512
Loans advanced at fair value 453,301,433 431,658,356
Discount Rate
Value calculated £ 31 December 2022
Value increase / (decrease) £
6.0% (fair value) 453,301,433 20,841,467
6.9% 446,378,688 13,918,722
7.4% 442,812,482 10,352,516
7.9% 439,304,831 6,844,865
8.4% 435,854,418 3,394,452
8.9% (Carrying value) 432,459,966 -
9.4% 429,120,227 (3,339,739)
9.9% 425,833,994 (6,625,972)
10.4% 422,600,089 (9,859,877)
10.9% 419,417,368 (13,042,598)
IFRS 7 requires the disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments not measured at fair
value for comparison to their carrying amounts. The fair value of loans advanced has been
determined by discounting the expected cash flows at a market rate of interest using the
discounted cash flow model. For the avoidance of doubt, the Group carries its loans advanced
at amortised cost in the consolidated financial statements, consistent with the requirement of
IFRS 9 as the Group’s intention and business model is to collect both interest and the capital
repayments thereof.
The following table sets out the sensitivity to the above reported fair value to a change in the
discount rate used in the discounted cash flow model (see the Investment Manager’s report on
page 18 for more information):
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
10. LOANS ADVANCED (CONTINUED)
The table below reconciles the movement of the carrying value of loans advanced in the year:
75
Discount Rate
Value calculated £ 31 December 2021
Value increase / (decrease) £
4.9% 432,710,809 18,078,297
5.1% (fair value) 431,658,356 17,025,843
5.4% 428,059,002 13,426,490
5.9% 423,496,872 8,864,360
6.4% 419,002,118 4,389,606
6.9% (Carrying value) 414,632,512 -
7.4% 410,325,896 (4,306,616)
7.9% 406,100,176 (8,532,336)
8.4% 401,953,326 (12,679,186)
8.9% 397,883,380 (16,749,132)
(1)
Euro amounts are translated at the year end exchange rate
(1)
Euro amounts are translated at the year end exchange rate
Notional contract
amount
(1)
£
Fair values
Total
£
31 December 2022
Assets
£
Liabilities
£
Foreign exchange derivatives
Currency forwards:
Lloyds Bank plc 309,280,796 4,697,637 (3,990,976) 706,661
Total 309,280,796 4,697,637 (3,990,976) 706,661
Notional contract
amount
(1)
£
Fair values
Total
£
31 December 2021
Assets
£
Liabilities
£
Foreign exchange derivatives
Currency forwards:
Lloyds Bank plc 305,663,797 14,394,963 (1,103,365) 13,291,598
Total 305,663,797 14,394,963 (1,103,365) 13,291,598
11. FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT
OR LOSS
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss comprise currency forward contracts which
represent contractual obligations to purchase domestic currency and sell foreign currency on a
future date at a specified price.
The underlying instruments of currency forwards become favourable (assets) or unfavourable
(liabilities) as a result of fluctuations of foreign exchange rates relative to their terms. The
aggregate contractual or notional amount of derivative financial instruments, the extent to which
instruments are favourable or unfavourable, and thus the aggregate fair values of derivative
financial assets and liabilities, can fluctuate significantly from time to time. The foreign exchange
derivatives are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting agreements for each counterparty.
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are set out below:
76
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
12. CREDIT FACILITIES
Under its investment policy, the Group is limited to borrowing an amount equivalent to
a maximum of 30 per cent of its NAV at the time of drawdown, of which a maximum
of 20 per cent can be longer term borrowings. In calculating the Group’s borrowings
for this purpose, any liabilities incurred under the Group’s foreign exchange hedging
arrangements shall be disregarded. The Group has two credit facilities as described in
note 3(g) of these financial statements.
As at 31 December 2022 an amount of £19,000,000 (2021: £8,500,000) was drawn
and interest of £181,907 (2021: £7,997) was payable.
The revolving credit facility capitalised costs are directly attributable costs incurred in
relation to the establishment of the credit loan facilities and an amount of £319,675
(2021: £593,004) was netted off against the loan facilities outstanding.
The changes in liabilities arising from financing activities are shown in the table below.
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Borrowings at the start of the year 7,914,993 18,626,837
Proceeds during the year 94,223,490 63,800,000
Repayments during the year (84,158,141) (75,128,132)
Interest expenses recognised for
the year
707,171 236,071
Interest paid during the year (533,577) (262,221)
Credit facility amortisation of fees 373,328 563,496
Foreign exchange and translation
difference
335,940 78,942
Borrowings at the end of the year 18,863,204 7,914,993
77
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Investment management fees payable 777,556 791,344
Audit fees payable 289,457 98,896
Accrued expenses 273,183 103,470
Administration fees payable 203,420 87,815
Commitment fees payable 164,855 169,746
Tax provision 25,727 19,742
Loan amounts payable 24,408 212,953
Directors' expense payable - 560
1,758,606 1,484,526
13. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
14. COMMITMENTS
As at 31 December 2022, the Group had outstanding commitments in respect of loans
not fully drawn of £49,063,014 (2021: £44,543,155).
As at 31 December 2022, the Group has entered into forward contracts under
the Hedging Master Agreement with Lloyds Bank plc to sell €309,280,796 (2021:
€219,050,014) to receive Sterling. At the end of the reporting period, these forward
contracts have a fair value of £706,661 asset (2021: £13,291,598 asset).
78
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
15. SHARE CAPITAL
The authorised share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of
redeemable Ordinary Shares of no par value which upon issue the Directors may classify
into such classes as they may determine. The Ordinary Shares are redeemable at the
discretion of the Board.
At the year end, the Company had issued and fully paid up share capital as follows:
Rights attached to shares
The Company’s share capital is denominated in Sterling. At any general meeting of the
Company each Ordinary Share carries one vote. The Ordinary Shares also carry the right to
receive all income of the Company attributable to the Ordinary Shares, and to participate in
any distribution of such income made by the Company, such income shall be divided pari
passu among the holders of Ordinary Shares in proportion to the number of Ordinary Shares
held by them.
Significant share movements
1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022:
31 December 2022
Number of shares
31 December 2021
Number of shares
Ordinary Shares of no par value
Issued and fully paid
413,219,398 413,219,398
Shares held in treasury (17,626,702) (4,308,125)
Total Ordinary Shares, excluding
those in treasury
395,592,696 408,911,273
Ordinary Shares Number £
Balance at the start of the year 408,911,273 415,730,000
Shares bought back in 2022 (13,318,577) (12,364,455)
Balance at the end of the year
Issue costs since inception
395,592,696 403,365,545
(8,289,989)
Net proceeds 395,075,556
Ordinary Shares Number £
Balance at the start of the year 409,571,273 416,321,533
Shares bought back in 2021 (660,000) (591,533)
Balance at the end of the year
Issue costs since inception
408,911,273 415,730,000
(8,289,989)
Net proceeds 407,440,011
1 January 2021 to 31 December 2021:
79
Period to:
Dividend rate per
Share (pence)
Net dividend
paid (£)
Payment date
31 March 2022 1.375 5,622,530 27 May 2022
30 June 2022 1.375 5,606,271 26 August 2022
30 September 2022 1.375 5,439,400 25 November 2022
31 December 2022
(1)
1.375 5,439,400 24 February 2023
Period to:
Dividend rate per
Share (pence)
Net dividend
paid (£)
Payment date
31 March 2021 1.375 5,622,530 4 June 2021
30 June 2021 1.375 5,622,530 3 September 2021
30 September 2021 1.375 5,622,530 3 December 2021
31 December 2021
(1)
1.375 5,622,530 24 February 2022
16. DIVIDENDS
Dividends will be declared by the Directors and paid in compliance with the solvency
test prescribed by Guernsey law. Under Guernsey law, companies can pay dividends
in excess of accounting profit provided they satisfy the solvency test prescribed by the
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008. The solvency test considers whether a company is
able to pay its debts when they fall due, and whether the value of a company’s assets is
greater than its liabilities. The Group passed the solvency test for each dividend paid.
Subject to market conditions, the financial position of the Group and the investment
outlook, it is the Directors’ intention to pay quarterly dividends to shareholders (for more
information see Chairman’s Statement).
The Group paid the following dividends in respect of the year to 31 December 2022:
(1)
Declared after year end and to be paid on 24 February 2023 to shareholders on the register as at 3 February 2023.
This was declared after year end hence was not accrued at year end.
(1)
Declared after year end and were paid on 25 February 2022 to shareholders on the register as at 4 February 2022.
In addition, on 23 March 2023, the Company declared a special dividend of 2 pence per
Ordinary Share in respect of the year ending 31 December 2022 to be paid on 21 April
2023 to shareholders on the register as at 31 March 2023. As this special dividend was
declared after year end it was not accrued for at year end.
The Group paid the following dividends in respect of the year to 31 December 2021:
80
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
17. RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The Group through its investment in whole loans, subordinated loans, mezzanine loans,
bridge loans, loan-on-loan financings and other debt instruments is exposed to a variety of
financial risks, including market risk (including currency risk and interest rate risk), credit
risk and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management programme focuses on the
unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the
Group’s financial performance.
It is the role of the Board to review and manage all risks associated with the Group,
mitigating these either directly or through the delegation of certain responsibilities to the
Audit Committee, Investment Manager and Investment Adviser.
The Board of Directors has established procedures for monitoring and controlling risk. The
Group has investment guidelines that set out its overall business strategies, its tolerance for
risk and its general risk management philosophy.
In addition, the Investment Manager monitors and measures the overall risk bearing capacity
in relation to the aggregate risk exposure across all risk types and activities. Further details
regarding these policies are set out below:
a) Market risk
Market risk includes market price risk, currency risk and interest rate risk.
i) Market price risk
If a borrower defaults on a loan and the real estate market enters a downturn it could
materially and adversely affect the value of the collateral over which loans are secured.
However, this risk is considered by the Board to constitute credit risk as it relates to the
borrower defaulting on the loan and not directly to any movements in the real estate market.
The Investment Manager moderates market risk through a careful selection of loans within
specified limits. The Group’s overall market position is monitored by the Investment Manager
and is reviewed by the Board of Directors on an ongoing basis.
ii) Currency risk
The Group, via the subsidiaries, operates across Europe and invests in loans that are
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the Company. Consequently
the Group is exposed to risks arising from foreign exchange rate fluctuations in respect of
these loans and other assets and liabilities which relate to currency flows from revenues
and expenses. Exposure to foreign currency risk is hedged and monitored by the Investment
Manager on an ongoing basis and is reported to the Board accordingly.
The Group and Lloyds Bank plc entered into an international forward exchange master
agreement dated 5 April 2013 and on 7 February 2014 the Group entered into a Professional
Client Agreement with Goldman Sachs, pursuant to which the parties can enter into foreign
exchange transactions with the intention of hedging against fluctuations in the exchange rate
between Sterling and other currencies. The Group does not trade in derivatives but holds
them to hedge specific exposures and have maturities designed to match the exposures
they are hedging. The derivatives are held at fair value which represents the replacement
cost of the instruments at the reporting date and movements in the fair value are included in
the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income under net foreign exchange losses/
(gains). The Group does not adopt hedge accounting in the financial statements. At the end
of the reporting period the Group had 109 (2021: 134) open forward contracts.
81
31 December 2022
Danish Krone
£
Sterling
£
Euro
£
Total
£
Assets
Loans advanced - 273,150,000 159,309,966 432,459,966
Financial assets at fair value through - 706,661 - 706,661
Other receivables and prepayments - 16,792 10,000 26,792
Cash and cash equivalents 49 3,496,721 79,385 3,576,155
Liabilities
Revolving credit facility - (18,863,204) - (18,863,204)
Trade and other payables - (1,462,729) (295,877) (1,758,606)
Net currency exposure 49 257,044,241 159,103,474 416,147,764
31 December 2021
Danish Krone
£
Sterling
£
Euro
£
Total
£
Assets
Loans advanced - 192,279,327 222,353,185 414,632,512
Financial assets at fair value through - 13,291,598 - 13,291,598
Other receivables and prepayments - 17,094 20,558 37,652
Cash and cash equivalents 101 2,858,545 135,711 2,994,357
Liabilities
Revolving credit facility - (7,914,993) - (7,914,993)
Trade and other payables - (1,375,329) (109,197) (1,484,526)
Net currency exposure 101 199,156,242 222,400,257 421,556,600
As at 31 December 2022 the Group had the following currency exposure:
82
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
Currency sensitivity analysis
Should the exchange rate of the Euro against Sterling increase or decrease by 10 per cent
with all other variables held constant, the net assets of the Group at 31 December 2022
would increase or decrease by £15,910,347 (2021: £22,240,026). Should the exchange
rate of the Danish Krone against Sterling increase or decrease by 10 per cent with all
other variables held constant, the net assets of the Group at 31 December 2022 would
increase or decrease by £5 (2021: £10). These percentages have been determined based
on potential volatility and deemed reasonable by the Directors. This does not include the
impact of hedges in place which would be expected to reduce the impact.
In accordance with the Group’s policy, the Investment Manager monitors the Group’s
currency position, and the Board of Directors reviews this risk on a regular basis.
iii) Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments and related income
from loans advanced and cash and cash equivalents will fluctuate due to changes in
market interest rates.
The majority of the Group’s financial assets are loans advanced at amortised cost, credit
linked notes, receivables and cash and cash equivalents. The Group’s investments have
some exposure to interest rate risk but this is limited to interest earned on cash deposits
and floating interbank rate exposure for investments designated as loans advanced.
Loans advanced have been structured to include a combination of fixed and floating
interest and 78.6% (2021: 76.8%) of investments designed as loans advanced at
31 December 2022 have a floating interbank interest rate. The interest rate risk is
mitigated by the inclusion of interbank rate floors on floating rate loans, preventing
interest rates from falling below certain levels.
.
83
The following table shows the portfolio profile of the financial assets at 31 December 2022:
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Floating rate
Loans advanced
(1)
340,705,532 318,642,491
Cash and cash equivalents 3,576,155 2,994,357
Fixed rate
Loans advanced 91,754,434 95,990,021
Total financial assets subject
to interest rate risk
436,036,121 417,626,869
(1)
Loans advanced at floating rates include loans with interbank rate floors.
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Floating rate
Increase of 50 basis points
(1)
1,721,408 1,608,184
Decrease of 50 basis points (1,721,408) (1,608,184)
(1)
Loans advanced at floating rates include loans with interbank rate floors.
At 31 December 2022, if interest rates had changed by 50 basis points, with all other variables
remaining constant, the effect on the net profit and equity would have been as shown in the
table below:
These percentages have been determined based on potential volatility and deemed reasonable
by the Directors.
84
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
b) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will be unable to pay amounts in full when due.
The Group’s main credit risk exposure is in the investment portfolio, shown as loans advanced
at amortised cost, where the Group invests in whole loans and also subordinated and
mezzanine debt which rank behind senior debt for repayment in the event that a borrower
defaults. There is a spread concentration of risk as at 31 December 2022 due to several
loans being advanced since origination. There is also credit risk in respect of other financial
assets as a portion of the Group’s assets are cash and cash equivalents or accrued interest.
The banks used to hold cash and cash equivalents have been diversified to spread the credit
risk to which the Group is exposed. The Group also has credit risk exposure in its financial
assets classified as financial assets through profit or loss which is diversified between
hedge providers in order to spread credit risk to which the Group is exposed. At year-end the
derivative exposures were with one counterparty.
The total exposure to credit risk arises from default of the counterparty and the carrying
amounts of financial assets best represent the maximum credit risk exposure at the year-
end date. As at 31 December 2022, the maximum credit risk exposure was £436,742,782
(2021: £430,918,680).
The Investment Manager has adopted procedures to reduce credit risk exposure by
conducting credit analysis of the counterparties, their business and reputation which
is monitored on an ongoing basis. After the advancing of a loan a dedicated debt asset
manager employed by the Investment Adviser monitors ongoing credit risk and reports to
the Investment Manager, with quarterly updates also provided to the Board. The debt asset
manager routinely stresses and analyses the profile of the Group’s underlying risk in terms
of exposure to significant tenants, performance of asset management teams and property
managers against specific milestones that are typically agreed at the time of the original
loan underwriting, forecasting headroom against covenants, reviewing market data and
forecast economic trends to benchmark borrower performance and to assist in identifying
potential future stress points. Periodic physical inspections of assets that form part of the
Group’s security are also completed in addition to monitoring the identified capital expenditure
requirements against actual borrower investment.
The Group measures credit risk and ECL using probability of default, exposure at default
and loss given default. The Directors consider both historical analysis and forward looking
information in determining any ECL. The Directors consider the loss given default to be close
to zero as all loans are the subject of very detailed underwriting, including the testing of
resilience to aggressive downside scenarios with respect to the loan specifics, the market
and general macro changes. In addition to this, all loans have very robust covenants in
place, strong security packages and significant loan- to-value headroom. During the year
ended 31 December 2022, two loans with a value of £46,909,623 (31 December 2021: the
three loans with a value of £59,031,888) remain classified as Stage 2 and the remaining
loans are classified as Stage 1. The main reason for moving the loans to Stage 2 in the
second quarter of 2020 was expected income covenant breaches due to the disruption
from Covid-19. Following loan amendments agreed with borrowers, no income breaches
have occurred. Since origination these loans have been classified as Stage 2 loans, no
expected credit loss has been recognised at 31 December 2022 (2021: £nil) as although
the credit risk has increased for these loans, the Group does not anticipate realising a loss in
the event of a default.
85
The Group uses both quantitative and qualitative criteria for monitoring the loan
portfolio as described in note 2(h). The gross carrying amount of loan portfolio is
presented in the table below and also represents the Group’s maximum exposure to
credit risks on these assets.
A reconciliation of changes in the loss allowance was not presented as the allowance
recognised at the end of the reporting period was £nil (2021: £nil).
The Group maintains its cash and cash equivalents across various different banks to
diversify credit risk which have been all rated A1 or higher by Moody’s and this is subject
to the Group’s credit risk monitoring policies as mentioned above.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value.
Total as at
31 December 2022
£
Total as at
31 December 2021
£
Barclays Bank plc 2,276,081 2,980,544
ING Luxembourg, SA 1,299,092 12,743
Lloyds Bank plc 698 778
HSBC Bank plc 154 227
Royal Bank of Scotland International 130 65
Total cash and cash equivalents 3,576,155 2,994,357
Stage 1
£
Stage 2
£
Stage 3
£
Total as at
31 December 2022
£
Total as at
31 December 2021
£
Loans advanced 385,550,343 46,909,623 - 432,459,966 414,632,512
Gross carrying amount 385,550,343 46,909,623 - 432,459,966 414,632,512
Carrying amount 385,550,343 46,909,623 - 432,459,966 414,632,512
86
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not have sufficient resources available to meet
its liabilities as they fall due. The Group’s loans advanced are illiquid and may be difficult or
impossible to realise for cash at short notice.
The Group manages its liquidity risk through short term and long term cash flow forecasts to
ensure it is able to meet its obligations. In addition, the Company is permitted to borrow up
to 30 per cent of NAV and has entered into revolving credit facilities of total of £126,000,000
(2021: £126,000,000) of which £19,000,000 (2021: £85,00,000) was drawn at the end of the
reporting period.
The table below shows the maturity of the Group’s non-derivative financial assets and
liabilities arising from the advancement of loans by remaining contractual maturities
at the end of the reporting date. The amounts disclosed under assets are contractual,
undiscounted cash flows and may differ from the actual cash flows received in the forecast
future as a result of early repayments and interest rate changes:
(1)
Loan commitments are estimated forecasted drawdowns at year end.
(1)
Loan commitments are estimated forecasted drawdowns at year end.
31 December 2022
Up to 3 months
£
Between 3 and
12 months
£
Over 12 months
£
Total
£
Assets
Loans advanced 42,752,233 145,719,555 243,988,178 432,459,966
Liabilities and commitments
Loan commitments
(1)
(3,258,958) (20,660,608) (25,143,447) (49,063,014)
Credit facilities (182,879) (19,000,000) - (19,182,879)
Trade and other payables (1,758,606) - - (1,758,606)
37,551,790 106,058,947 218,844,731 362,455,467
31 December 2021
Up to 3 months
£
Between 3 and
12 months
£
Over 12 months
£
Total
£
Assets
Loans advanced 14,736,977 90,989,466 308,906,069 414,632,512
Liabilities and commitments
Loan commitments
(1)
(8,324,454) (15,850,277) (19,186,697) (43,361,428)
Credit facilities (7,997) (8,500,000) - (8,507,997)
Trade and other payables (1,484,526) - - (1,484,526)
4,920,000 66,639,189 289,719,372 361,278,561
87
The table below analyses the Group’s derivative financial instruments that will be settled on
a gross basis into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the end of
the reporting date. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows:
31 December 2022
Derivatives
Up to 3 months
£
Between 3 and
12 months
£
Over
12 months
£
Total as at
31 December 2022
£
Lloyds Bank plc:
Foreign exchange derivatives
Outflow
(1)
(45,083,803) (44,996,439) (72,650,196) (162,730,438)
Inflow 45,342,288 45,603,942 74,248,795 165,195,025
31 December 2021
Derivatives
Up to 3 months
£
Between 3 and
12 months
£
Over
12 months
£
Total as at
31 December 2021
£
Lloyds Bank plc:
Foreign exchange derivatives
Outflow
(1)
(3,104,840) (51,449,438) (129,195,826) (183,750,104)
Inflow 3,115,540 52,103,985 132,586,030 187,805,555
(1)
Euro amounts translated at year end exchange rate.
(1)
Euro amounts translated at year end exchange rate.
88
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
Capital management policies and procedures
The Group’s capital management objectives are:
• To ensure that the Group will be able to continue as a going concern; and
• To maximise the income and capital return to equity shareholders through an
appropriate balance of equity capital and long-term debt.
The capital of the Company is represented by the net assets attributable to the holders
of the Company’s shares.
In accordance with the Group’s investment policy, the Group’s principal use of cash
(including the proceeds of the IPO and subsequent tap issues and placings) has
been to fund investments in the form of loans sourced by the Investment Adviser
and the Investment Manager, as well as initial expenses related to the issue, ongoing
operational expenses and payment of dividends and other distributions to shareholders in
accordance with the Company’s dividend policy.
The Board, with the assistance of the Investment Manager, monitors and reviews the
broad structure of the Company’s capital on an ongoing basis. The Company has no
imposed capital requirements.
The Company’s capital at the end of the reporting period comprises:
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Equity
Equity share capital 395,075,556 407,440,011
Retained earnings and translation
reserve
21,072,208 14,116,589
Total capital 416,147,764 421,556,600
89
18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
IFRS 13 requires the Group to classify fair value measurements using a fair value
hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements.
The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
a) Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1).
b) Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from
prices including interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment rates, credit risks
and default rates) or other market corroborated inputs (level 2).
c) Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is,
unobservable inputs) (level 3).
The following table analyses within the fair value hierarchy the Group’s financial assets
and liabilities (by class) measured at fair value:
31 December 2022
Level 1
£
Level 2
£
Level 3
£
Total
£
Assets
Derivative assets - 706,661 - 706,661
Total - 706,661 - 706,661
31 December 2021
Level 1
£
Level 2
£
Level 3
£
Total
£
Assets
Derivative assets - 13,291,598 - 13,291,598
Total - 13,291,598 - 13,291,598
90
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
There have been no transfers between levels for the year ended 31 December 2022
(2021: nil).
The Directors were responsible for considering the methodology and assumptions used
by the Investment Adviser and for approving the fair values reported at the financial
period end.
The following table summarises within the fair value hierarchy the Group’s assets and
liabilities (by class) not measured at fair value at 31 December 2022 but for which fair
value is disclosed:
31 December 2022
Level 1
£
Level 2
£
Level 3
£
Total fair
values
£
Total carrying
amount
£
Assets
Loans advanced - - 453,301,433 453,301,433 432,459,966
Total - - 453,301,433 453,301,433 432,459,966
Liabilities
Credit facility - 18,863,204 - 18,863,204 18,863,204
Total - 18,863,204 - 18,863,204 18,863,204
91
For cash and cash equivalents, other receivables and prepayments, trade and other
payables and credit facilities the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of the
fair value. The Group carries its loans advanced at amortised cost in the consolidated
financial statements. Refer to note 10 for further information.
The carrying amounts of the revolving credit facilities included in the above tables are
considered to approximate its fair values. The fair value of loans advanced have been
determined by discounting the expected cash flows using a discounted cash flow
model based on the variable interest rates. For avoidance of doubt the Group carries
its loans advanced at amortised cost in the financial statements. Refer to note 10 for
further information.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash at hand and fixed deposits held with banks.
Other receivables and prepayments include the contractual amounts and obligations
due to the Group and consideration for advance payments made by the Group. Credit
facilities and trade and other payables represent the contractual amounts and obligations
due by the Group for contractual payments
31 December 2021
Level 1
£
Level 2
£
Level 3
£
Total fair
values
£
Total carrying
amount
£
Assets
Loans advanced - - 431,658,356 431,658,356 414,632,512
Total - - 431,658,356 431,658,356 414,632,512
Liabilities
Credit facility - 7,914,993 - 7,914,993 7,914,993
Total - 7,914,993 - 7,914,993 7,914,993
92
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
19. CONTROLLING PARTY
In the opinion of the Directors, on the basis of shareholdings advised to them, the
Company has no immediate or ultimate controlling party.
20. TAXATION
The Company is exempt from Guernsey taxation under the Income Tax (Exempt Bodies)
(Guernsey) Ordinance 1989 for which it pays an annual fee of £1,200.
The Luxembourg indirect subsidiaries of the Company are subject to the applicable
tax regulations in Luxembourg. The table below analyses the tax charges incurred at
Luxembourg level:
Luxco had no operating gains on ordinary activities before taxation and was therefore for
the year ended 31 December 2022 subject to the Luxembourg minimum corporate income
taxation at €4,815 (2021: €4,815). Luxco 3 and Luxco 4 are subject to Corporate Income
Tax and Municipal Business Tax based on a margin calculated on an arm’s-length principle.
The effective tax rate in Luxembourg during the reporting period was 24.94% (2021:
24.94%).
31 December 2022
£
31 December 2021
£
Current tax
Tax expenses on profit of the reporting period 90,287 100,452
Total current tax 90,287 100,452
21. RECONCILIATION OF IFRS TO US GAAP
To meet the requirements of Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisors Act 1940 (the
“Custody Rule”) the consolidated financial statements of the Group have also been audited
in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards applicable in the United States
(“US GAAS”). As such two independent Auditor’s reports are included on pages 47-56, one
under International Standards on Auditing as required by the Crown Dependencies Audit
Rules and the other under US GAAS. Compliance with the Custody Rule also requires a
reconciliation of the operating profit and net assets under IFRS to US GAAP.
The principal differences between IFRS and US GAAP relate to accounting for financial
assets that are carried at amortised cost. Under US GAAP the calculation of the effective
interest rate is based on contractual cash flows over the asset’s contractual life, however,
under the IFRS basis, the effective interest rate calculation is based on the estimated cash
flows over the expected life of the asset.
93
The Directors have assessed the operating profit and NAV of the Group under both
IFRS and US GAAP and have concluded that no material differences were identified and
therefore no reconciliation has been presented in these consolidated financial statements.
22. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party
or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational
decisions. Details on the Investment Manager and other related party transactions are
included in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
The following tables summarise the transactions occurred with related parties during the
reporting period and outstanding at 31 December 2022 and 31 December 2021:
94
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
2022
Fees, expenses and other payments
Outstanding at
31 December 2022
£
For the year ended
31 December 2022
£
Directors’ fees and expenses paid
John Whittle - 60,000
Shelagh Mason - 45,000
Charlotte Denton - 50,000
Gary Yardley - 42,000
Expenses paid - 6,373
Investment Manager
Investment management fees 777,556 3,122,755
Origination fees - 501,936
Expenses - 120,099
2021
Fees, expenses and other payments
Outstanding at
31 December 2021
£
For the year ended
31 December 2021
£
Directors’ fees and expenses paid
Stephen Smith
(resigned 31 December 2021)
- 50,000
John Whittle - 45,000
Shelagh Mason - 42,500
Charlotte Denton
(appointed 1 January 2021)
- 40,000
Gary Yardley
(appointed 6 September 2021)
- 12,712
Expenses paid 560 5,198
Investment Manager
Investment management fees 791,344 3,147,075
Origination fees 380,000 300,456
Expenses - 68,107
The following tables summarise the transactions occurred with related parties during the
reporting period and outstanding at 31 December 2022 and 31 December 2021:
95
The following tables summarise the dividends paid to related parties during the reporting
period and number of Company’s shares held by related parties at 31 December 2022
and 31 December 2021:
2022
Shareholdings and
dividends paid
Dividends paid during
the year ended
31 December 2022
£
As at
31 December 2022
Number of shares
Starwood Property Trust Inc. 502,700 9,140,000
SCG Starfin Investor LP 125,675 2,285,000
John Whittle 1,725 33,866
Charlotte Denton 1,833 44,444
Shelagh Mason 6,205 112,819
Duncan MacPherson
*
8,333 133,333
Lorcain Egan
*
3,818 61,093
2021
Shareholdings and
dividends paid
Dividends paid during
the year ended
31 December 2021
£
As at
31 December 2021
Number of shares
Starwood Property Trust Inc. 525,550 9,140,000
SCG Starfin Investor LP 131,388 2,285,000
Stephen Smith
(resigned 31 December 2021)
4,538 78,929
John Whittle 1,372 23,866
Shelagh Mason 6,487 112,819
Duncan MacPherson
*
7,667 133,333
Lorcain Egan
*
3,513 61,093
*
Employees at the Investment Adviser
*
Employees at the Investment Adviser
96
Financial Statements
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended 31 December 2022
Loan Related party co-lenders
Hotel and Residential, UK STWD
Hotels, United Kingdom STWD
Mixed Portfolio, Europe STWD
Office Portfolio, Spain STWD
Office Portfolio, Ireland STWD
2 Hotels, UK SEREDF I
Other
The Group continues to participate in a number of loans in which Starwood Property
Trust, Inc. (“STWD”) acted as a co‐lender. The details of these loans are shown in the
table below. The Group also acted as co-lender with Starwood European Real Estate
Debt Finance I LP (“SEREDF I”) an affiliate entity.
.
23. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
Subsequent to 31 December 2022, the following amounts have been drawn under
existing commitments, up to 23 March 2023:
Local currency
Mixed Use, Dublin €109,357
Local currency
Hotel, Dublin €2,449,200
Hotel and Office, Northern Ireland £1,000,000
Mixed Portfolio, Europe
€1,516,035
Three Shopping Centres, Spain
€359,732
Local currency
Hotel, Oxford
£22,950,000
Office and Industrial Portfolio, UK
£5,500,000
Subsequent to 31 December 2022, the following loan amortisation (both scheduled
and unscheduled) has been received up to 23 March 2023:
Subsequent to 31 December 2022, the following loans have been repaid in full up to
23 March 2023:
During January and February 2023, a total amount of £19,000,000 was paid to Morgan
Stanley as repayment of amounts owed as at 31 December 2022 under the credit facility
held with them.
On 21 January 2023, the Directors declared a dividend in respect of the fourth quarter
of 1.375 pence per Ordinary Share payable on 24 February 2023 to shareholders on
the register at 3 February 2023.
In addition, on 23 March 2023, the Company declared a special dividend of 2 pence per
Ordinary Share in respect of the year ending 31 December 2022 to be paid on 21 April
2023 to shareholders on the register as at 31 March 2023.
Subsequent to year end the Lloyds credit facility agreement was extended to May 2024
with a reduced facility amount of £25.0 million.
97
Further Information
Alternative Performance Measures
In accordance with ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”) the
Board has considered what APMs are included in the Annual Financial Report and Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements which require further clarification. An APM is defined as
a financial measure of historical or future financial performance , financial position, or cash
flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting
framework. APMs included in the financial statements, which are unaudited and outside the
scope of IFRS, are deemed to be as follows:
NAV PER ORDINARY SHARE
The NAV per Ordinary Share represents the net assets attributable to equity shareholders
divided by the number of Ordinary Shares in issue, excluding any shares held in treasury. The
NAV per Ordinary Share is published monthly. This APM relates to past performance and is
used as a comparison to the share price per Ordinary Share to assess performance. There are
no reconciling items between this calculation and the Net Asset Value shown on the balance
sheet (other than to calculate by Ordinary Share).
NAV TOTAL RETURN
The NAV total return measures the combined effect of any dividends paid, together with the
rise or fall in the NAV per Ordinary Share. This APM relates to past performance and takes into
account both capital returns and dividends paid to shareholders. Any dividends received by a
shareholder are assumed to have been reinvested in the assets of the Company at its NAV per
Ordinary Share.
SHARE PRICE TOTAL RETURN
The share price total return measures the combined effects of any dividends paid, together
with the rise or fall in the share price. This APM relates to past performance and assesses the
impact of movements in the share price on total returns to investors. Any dividends received
by a shareholder are assumed to have been reinvested in additional shares of the Company at
the time the shares were quoted ex-dividend.
NAV TO MARKET PRICE DISCOUNT / PREMIUM
The discount / premium is the amount by which the share price of the Company is lower
(discount) or higher (premium) than the NAV per Ordinary Share at the date of reporting and
relates to past performance. The discount or premium is normally expressed as a percentage
of the NAV per Ordinary Share.
INVESTED LOAN PORTFOLIO UNLEVERED ANNUALISED TOTAL RETURN
The unlevered annualised return is a calculation at the quarterly reporting date of the estimated
annual return on the portfolio at that point in time. It is calculated individually for each loan
by summing the one-off fees earned (such as up-front arrangement or exit fees charged on
repayment) and dividing these over the full contractual term of the loan, and adding this to the
annual returns. Where a loan is floating rate (partially or in whole or with floors), the returns
are based on an assumed profile for future interbank rates, but the actual rate received may be
higher or lower. The return is calculated only on amounts funded at the quarterly reporting date
and excludes committed but undrawn loans and excludes cash uninvested. The calculation also
excludes origination fees paid to the Investment Manager, which are accounted for within the
interest line in the financial statements.
An average, weighted by loan amount, is then calculated for the portfolio.
98
This APM gives an indication of the future performance of the portfolio (as constituted at
the reporting date). The calculation, if the portfolio remained unchanged, could be used to
estimate “income from loans advanced” in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income if adjusted for the origination fee of 0.75 basis points amortised over the average life of
the loan. As discussed earlier in this report the figure actually realised may be different due to
the following reasons:
• In the quoted return, we amortise all one-off fees (such as arrangement and exit fees) over
the contractual life of the loan, which is currently four years for the portfolio . However, it
has been our experience that loans tend to repay after approximately 2.5 years and as such,
these fees are actually amortised over a shorter period.
• Many loans benefit from prepayment provisions, which means that if they are repaid before
the end of the protected period, additional interest or fees become due. As we quote the
return based on the contractual life of the loan these returns cannot be forecast in the return.
• The quoted return excludes the benefit of any foreign exchange gains on Euro loans. We do
not forecast this as the loans are often repaid early and the gain may be lower than this once
hedge positions are settled.
Generally speaking, the actual annualised total return is likely to be higher than the reported
return for these reasons, but this is not incorporated in the reported figure, as the benefit of
these items cannot be assumed.
PORTFOLIO LEVERED ANNUALISED TOTAL RETURN
The levered annualised total return is calculated on the same basis as the unlevered annual
return but takes into account the amount of leverage in the Group and the cost of that leverage
at current SONIA rates.
ONGOING CHARGES PERCENTAGE
Ongoing charges represents the management fee and all other operating expenses excluding
finance costs and transactions costs, expressed as a percentage of the average monthly net
asset values during the year and allows users to assess the running costs of the Group. This
is calculated in accordance with AIC guidance and relates to past performance. The charges
include the following lines items within the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income:
• Investment management fees
• Administration fees
• Audit and non-audit fees
• Other expenses
• Legal and professional fees
• Directors’ fees and expenses
• Broker’s fees and expenses
• Agency fees
The calculation adds back any expenses unlikely to occur absent any loan originations or
repayments and as such, the costs associated with hedging Euro loans back to sterling have
been added back. The calculation does not include origination fees paid to the Investment
Manager; these are recognised through “Income from loans advanced”.
Further Information
Alternative Performance Measures
99
WEIGHTED AVERAGE PORTFOLIO LTV TO GROUP FIRST AND LAST £
These are calculations made as at the quarterly reporting date of the loan to value (“LTV”) on
each loan at the lowest and highest point in the capital stack in which the Group participates.
LTV to “Group last £” means the percentage which the total loan commitment less any
amortisation received to date (when aggregated with any other indebtedness ranking alongside
and/or senior to it) bears to the market value determined by the last formal lender valuation
received by the quarterly reporting date. LTV to “first Group £” means the starting point of the
loan to value range of the loan commitments (when aggregated with any other indebtedness
ranking senior to it). For development projects, the calculation includes the total facility
available and is calculated against the assumed market value on completion of the project.
An average, weighted by the loan amount, is then calculated for the portfolio.
This APM provides an assessment of future credit risk within the portfolio and does not directly
relate to any financial statement line items.
PERCENTAGE OF INVESTED PORTFOLIO IN FLOATING RATE LOANS
This is a calculation made as at the quarterly reporting date, which calculates the value of
loans, which has an element of floating rate in part, in whole and including loans with floors, as
a percentage of the total value of loans. This APM provides an assessment of potential future
volatility of the income on loans, as a large percentage of floating rate loans would mean that
income would move up or down with changes in SONIA.
AVERAGE LOAN TERM AND AVERAGE REMAINING LOAN TERM
The average loan term is calculated at the quarterly reporting date by calculating the average
length of each loan from initial advance to the contractual termination date. An average,
weighted by the loan amount, is then calculated for the portfolio.
The average remaining loan term is calculated at the quarterly reporting date by calculating the
average length of each loan from the quarterly reporting date to the contractual termination
date. An average, weighted by the loan amount, is then calculated for the portfolio.
This APM provides an assessment of the likely level of repayments occurring in future years
(absent any early repayments) which will need to be reinvested. In the past, the actual term
of loans has been shorter than the average contractual loan term due to early repayments
and so the level of repayments is likely to be higher than this APM would suggest. However,
this shorter actual loan term cannot be assumed as it may not occur and therefore it is not
reported as part of this APM.
100
NET CASH
Net cash is the result of the Group’s total cash and cash equivalents minus total credit facility
utilised as reported on its consolidated financial statements.
UNUSED LIQUID FACILITIES
Unused liquid facilities is the result of the Group’s total cash and cash equivalents plus the
available balance to withdraw under existing credit facilities at the reporting date.
PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION
The portfolio diversification statistics are calculated by allocating each loan to the relevant
sectors and countries based on the value of the underlying assets. This is then summed for the
entire portfolio and a percentage calculated for each sector / country.
This APM provides an assessment of future risk within the portfolio due to exposure to specific
sectors or countries and does not directly relate to any financial statement line items.
Further Information
Alternative Performance Measures
Further Information
Corporate Information
Directors
John Whittle (Non-executive Director)
Shelagh Mason (Non-executive Director)
Charlotte Denton (Non-executive Director)
Gary Yardley (Non-executive Director)
(all care of the registered office)
Investment Manager
Starwood European Finance
Partners Limited
1 Royal Plaza
Royal Avenue
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 2HL
Solicitors to the Company
(as to English law and U.S.
securities law)
Norton Rose Fullbright LLP
3 More London Riverside
London
SE1 2AQ
United Kingdom
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services
(Guernsey) Limited
1st Floor
Tudor House
Le Bordage
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 1DB
Broker
Jefferies Group LLC
100 Bishopsgate
London, EC2N 4JL
United Kingdom
Administrator, Designated Manager
and Company Secretary
Apex Fund and Corporate Services
(Guernsey) Limited
1 Royal Plaza
Royal Avenue
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 2HL
Registered Office
1 Royal Plaza
Royal Avenue
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 2HL
Investment Adviser
Starwood Capital Europe Advisers, LLP
2nd Floor
One Eagle Place
St. James`s
London
SW1Y 6AF
United Kingdom
Advocates to the Company
(as to Guernsey law)
Carey Olsen
PO Box 98
Carey House, Les Banques
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 4HP
Independent Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers CI LLP
Royal Bank Place
1 Glategny Esplanade
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 4ND
Principal Bankers
Barclays Private Clients International Limited
PO Box 41
Le Marchant House
St Peter Port
Guernsey
GY1 3BE
Website:
www.starwoodeuropeanfinance.com
101