
Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Recognition of revenue
Revenue is measured at fair value of the
consideration agreed exclusive of VAT and
duties and after deduction of discounts and
customer bonus.
We focused on revenue recognition
because revenue is the most significant
financial statement line item, consists of a
large number of IT-dependent transactions
and is based on many individual contracts.
We refer to note 2.1 of the Financial State-
ments.
We carried out risk assessment procedures
to gain an understanding of relevant IT
systems, business procedures and controls
for revenue recognition, including customer
bonus. For relevant controls we assessed
whether they were designed and imple-
mented to effectively address the risk of
material misstatement.
For selected controls, which we planned to
rely on in our audit, we tested whether they
had been carried out on a consistent basis.
We analysed revenue transactions and iden-
tified transactions that did not follow the
usual or expected transaction pattern. On a
sample basis we tested the transactions to
the underlying contractual basis.
We performed analytical procedures over
revenue and discussed significant fluc-
tuations with management and obtained
corroborating evidence of material fluctua-
tions, where deemed necessary.
We reviewed Management's calculation of
customer bonus and on sample basis tested
it to the underlying contracts as well as to
subsequent and historical settlements.
Measurement of inventories and calculation
of supplier bonus receivable
I Inventories are measured at the lower of
cost and net realisable value.
The measurement of inventories contains
significant accounting estimates related
to their net realisable value and expected
supplier bonus. Additionally, inventories
acquired through business combinations
require assessment of the fair value at the
date of take-over.
The calculation of supplier bonus is based
on individual and complex contracts as well
as estimates of the total purchases for the
year made through international procure-
ment cooperations.
We focused on the measurement of inven-
tories as inventories represent a significant
line item in the Financial Statements and
since technical obsolescence of inventories
and changes in consumption patterns may
lead to significant write-downs. Further,
because the assessment of the fair value
of inventories acquired through business
combinations is subject to management’s
estimate and uncertainty.
We focused on the calculation of supplier
bonus receivables as recognition is based
on comprehensive contracts and significant
data volumes as well as estimates of the
total purchases for the year made through
international procurement cooperation.
We refer to notes 2.2 and 3.4 of the Finan-
cial Statements.
We carried out risk assessment procedures
to gain an understanding of relevant IT
systems, business procedures and controls
for inventories and supplier bonuses. For
relevant controls, we assessed whether
they were designed and implemented to
effectively address the risk of material
misstatement.
For selected controls, which we planned to
rely on in our audit, we tested whether they
had been carried out on a consistent basis.
We assessed management’s estimate of the
fair value of inventories acquired through
business combinations, and reviewed the
underlying method, assumptions and data.
We compared cost prices with underlying
documentation and reviewed Management's
method, assumptions and data for its esti-
mate of the net realisable value of the indi-
vidual goods, including look back analysis of
historical inventory write-downs.
On a sample basis, we tested Manage-
ment's calculation of supplier bonus to the
underlying contractual basis, as well as
management’s look back analysis of histor-
ical settlements and confirmations from
counterparties.
In addition, we reviewed Management's
assumptions and data for its estimates of
the total purchases made through inter-
national procurement cooperations and
expected final settlements.
Statement on Management’s Review
Management is responsible for Management’s Review.
Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not
cover Management’s Review, and we do not as part of
the audit express any form of assurance conclusion
thereon.
In connection with our audit of the Financial State-
ments, our responsibility is to read Management’s
Review and, in doing so, consider whether Manage-
ment’s Review is materially inconsistent with the Finan-
cial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit,
or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
Moreover, we considered whether Management’s
Review includes the disclosures required by the Danish
Financial Statements Act. This does not include the
requirements in paragraph 99 a related to the sustain-
ability statement covered by the separate auditor’s
limited assurance report hereon.
Based on the work we have performed, in our view,
Management’s Review is in accordance with the Consol-
idated Financial Statements and the Parent Company
Financial Statements and has been prepared in accord-
ance with the requirements of the Danish Financial
Statements Act, except for the requirements in para-
graph 99 a related to the sustainability statement, cf.
above. We did not identify any material misstatement in
Management’s Review.
In brief Performance Corporate governance Sustainability statementsStrategy
Financial statements
Annual Report 2024