iso4217:EURiso4217:EURxbrli:shares3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-313TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMemberifrs-full:FinancialEffectOfChangesInAccountingPolicyMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMemberifrs-full:FinancialEffectOfChangesInAccountingPolicyMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMemberifrs-full:FinancialEffectOfChangesInAccountingPolicyMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMemberifrs-full:FinancialEffectOfChangesInAccountingPolicyMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMemberifrs-full:FinancialEffectOfChangesInAccountingPolicyMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:FinancialEffectOfChangesInAccountingPolicyMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMemberifrs-full:OpeningBalanceAfterAdjustmentCumulativeEffectAtDateOfInitialApplicationMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMemberifrs-full:OpeningBalanceAfterAdjustmentCumulativeEffectAtDateOfInitialApplicationMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMemberifrs-full:OpeningBalanceAfterAdjustmentCumulativeEffectAtDateOfInitialApplicationMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMemberifrs-full:OpeningBalanceAfterAdjustmentCumulativeEffectAtDateOfInitialApplicationMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMemberifrs-full:OpeningBalanceAfterAdjustmentCumulativeEffectAtDateOfInitialApplicationMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:OpeningBalanceAfterAdjustmentCumulativeEffectAtDateOfInitialApplicationMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ingbank:ShareCapitalAndSharePremiumMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt13TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt13TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752022-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt13TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt13TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt13TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt13TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-01-012025-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752024-01-012024-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752023-01-012023-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ingbank:DebtSecuritiesInIssueMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ingbank:SubordinatedLoansMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ifrs-full:LeaseLiabilitiesMember3TK20IVIUJ8J3ZU0QE752025-12-31ingbank:SeniorNonPreferredDebt1
ING_Logo_White_CMYK.png
ING Bank
Annual Report
2025
ING_Identifier_FC_Tagline_White_CMYK.png
Table of contents
About this report
ING’s purpose is empowering people to stay a step
ahead in life and in business. This purpose guides
us in everything we do. In this Annual Report we
disclose our results, strategy, and management
approach in the context of external developments,
as well as emerging and existing impacts, risks
and opportunities.
In this Annual Report, unless otherwise stated or implied by context,
references to ‘ING Bank' or 'ING' refer to ING Bank N.V. The parent
company of ING Bank is ING Groep N.V. referred to as ING Group. This
Annual Report is intended to inform stakeholder groups that have an
impact on, or are affected by, our business. These include our customers,
clients, investors, society, employees and suppliers & partners.
This report covers the period of 1 January to 31 December 2025 and was
published on 26 February 2026. We published our previous Annual Report
on 6 March 2025, which covered the year 2024. This report consists of:
§ Report of the Management Board, which includes the sections 
‘Strategy, business model and value creation’, ‘Our financial
performance’, ‘Our leadership and corporate governance’, ‘Capital
management’ and ‘Risk management’;
§ Consolidated financial statements;
§ Parent company financial statements; and
§ Other information and appendices
The consolidated financial statements included in this report have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS), as adopted by the European Union (EU), and the relevant articles of
Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. The Parent company financial
statements of ING Bank N.V. are prepared in accordance with the financial
reporting requirements included in Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
Reasonable assurance for the consolidated financial statements and the
Parent company financial statements is provided by KPMG Accountants
N.V. (KPMG).
ING Bank makes use of the exemption for subsidiary undertakings as set
out in the Omnibus I simplification amending the accounting directive
(2013/34). The sustainability information of ING Bank is reported at group
level by our parent undertaking ING Group whose registered office is
located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ING Group reports in accordance
with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards which - together
with the subsidiary exemption - is expected to be implemented into Dutch
law with retroactive effect.
The report of the Executive Board of ING Group including its Sustainability
statement and the related limited assurance opinion, by KPMG, is available
on ing.com. As a result ING Bank is exempt from preparing a separate
Sustainability statement.
This document is the PDF version of the 2025 Annual Report of ING made
available on ing.com. Another version of this document has been prepared
in the European single electronic reporting format (ESEF). This ESEF
reporting package is also available on ing.com. In the event of any
discrepancies between this PDF version and the ESEF reporting package,
the ESEF reporting package takes precedence.
Strategy, business model and value creation
Strategy,
    business model
and value creation
Our strategy
Our 'Growing the difference' strategy is focused
on delivering superior value to our customers and
putting sustainability at the heart of what we do.
Our ambition is to accelerate growth, increase
impact and relevance, and deliver value to
become the best European bank.
Growing the difference means expanding our scale, impact and relevance
across the markets and segments we operate in to become the most
loved, most impactful and most valued European bank. We aim to
increase our relevance by deepening customer relationships, broadening
services, and continuing to make banking easier and more seamless. Our
two main priorities are providing superior customer value and putting
sustainability at the heart of what we do, supported by four key enablers.
This strategy translates into specific business goals: in Retail, we focus on
Private Individuals, including Gen Z and affluent customers, as well as
small and medium-sized enterprises through Business Banking, and high-
net-worth and investment clients via Private Banking & Wealth
Management. Each segment has a dedicated approach aligned with our
priorities: enhancing digital engagement for younger customers, offering
personalised solutions for affluent clients, and delivering superior value
across all relationships. In Wholesale Banking, we aim to create greater
value by reinforcing our role as a strategic partner and core bank for large
corporates, multinationals, and institutional clients. Guided by our purpose
to empower people to stay a step ahead, we help individuals and
businesses realise their vision for a better future.
Providing superior value for customers
Banking relies on strong relationships, and the strongest relationships are
those where people feel valued, confident, empowered and in control. This
is how we want our customers to feel throughout their journey with us.
Growing the difference means sharpening our focus on customer value,
moving beyond one-size-fits-all services towards more tailored solutions
for each customer segment. In Retail Banking, this means making banking
simple and expertise accessible. In Wholesale Banking, this means
leveraging our network, expertise and sustainability leadership.
Putting sustainability at the heart of what we do
Our sustainability strategy spans climate, nature and social agendas,
recognising their interdependencies and how they affect each other, both
positively and negatively, and taking into account the legal and regulatory
frameworks in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Each of these is a
complex and dynamic matter, so our response needs to be dynamic as
well. As scientific understanding is continually advancing, our approach
will also keep evolving. Therefore, our climate action has evolved to
encompass both mitigation and a growing emphasis on adaptation.
Increasingly, we are also exploring how we can play a role in halting and
reversing nature degradation and regenerating natural systems, while
respecting human rights and working to advance financial health and
inclusion for customers and communities.
Four enabling priorities
Providing seamless digital services
We can serve our customers better if we use ‘always-on’ channels,
providing data-enabled personalised experiences and end-to-end digital
processes, with human intervention only where needed or desired.
Using scalable technology and operations
A technology and operations foundation that is modular and scalable
brings many benefits, including superior customer experience and safety.
Staying safe and secure
Trust is fundamental for all stakeholders, especially at a digital-first bank
like ING. Customers rely on us to safeguard their money and data, and
maintaining this trust is essential. 
Unlocking our people’s full potential
We aim to attract, develop and retain future-ready talent and foster an
inclusive environment that enables employees to thrive, maximising their
growth and impact. 
1 Operative customers: fully onboarded, transacted once, and whose account remain open by end of 2025.
Superior value for customers
Providing superior value for customers is one of
our two overarching priorities, as we strive to
make banking easy, instant, personal and
relevant. For Retail Banking, delivering superior
customer value means making banking simple
and expertise accessible, offering the right
services, at the right time, in the right way.
For Wholesale Banking, delivering superior value
for customers means building on our network
strength, sector expertise, and sustainability
leadership.
Retail Banking
In Retail Banking, we service customers across three pillars: Private
Individuals, Business Banking, and Private Banking & Wealth Management.
Equipped with leading digital capabilities, we strive to provide a mobile-
first digital, frictionless, and relevant banking experience, shaped to
specific customer needs for all of these pillars. 
Private Individuals
We serve nearly 41 million Private Individual customers 1 across 10
markets: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Germany, Spain, Italy,
Türkiye, Poland, Romania and Australia.
ING offers a broad range of banking products and services for private
individuals, including savings accounts, payments, credit cards,
mortgages, unsecured lending, investment solutions and insurance
products. We seek to deliver banking that is easy, instant, personal and
relevant. We focus on simplifying our services, improving our digital
capabilities, and anticipating customer needs to help people manage their
financial lives. Our progress is reflected in customers choosing us as their
primary bank and in their willingness to recommend us, as indicated by
our leading NPS score in five out of ten retail markets.
ING aims to build primary relationships with customers. In Retail Banking,
we define this as customers holding an active payment account with
recurrent income, plus at least one other active product with us. Earning
primary relationships is a key driver of sustainable, profitable growth. It
leads to deeper loyalty, significantly higher engagement, greater
customer satisfaction and ultimately higher value, as customers choose
ING for a broader set of their financial needs.     
Growing the difference means focusing even more on growing value for
customers. We continue to expand our offering by developing relevant
propositions for our various customer groups and applying a personalised
approach enabled by our digital banking capabilities. Our priorities include
becoming the bank of choice for Gen Z and affluent customers, expanding
subscription-based services that provide superior customer value,
diversifying our Private Individuals lending portfolio, and partnering to offer
full-service solutions that help homeowners make their homes more
sustainable. We are also broadening our investment and savings offering
to help customers protect and grow their wealth and manage their
financial health more effectively.
We strive to provide a seamless, mobile-first digital experience, engaging
customers across their daily banking activities and offering personalised
products and services supported by advanced technology and data-driven
insights. As mobile adoption continues to grow, customer expectations for
digital services are rising. In 2025, 87 percent of customers chose mobile
as their primary channel, up from 84 percent in 2024.
This growth has led to an increase in mobile primary customers – defined
as customers with at least one mobile interaction through our app or
mobile website per quarter. In 2025, in line with our mobile-first ambition,
we expanded our mobile primary customer base by over 1 million to 15.4
million.
In 2025, customers visited our digital platforms 8.8 billion times, an
increase of 6 percent compared to 2024.
Business Banking
For Business Banking clients, growing the difference means making banking
simple, frictionless, and tailored to their needs. Our ambition is to be the first
choice for entrepreneurs and businesses to manage and grow their
operations. We define success by delivering superior customer value
through digital innovation, expert advice, and sector-specific solutions.
Business Banking serves clients in nine markets: the Netherlands, Belgium,
Luxembourg, Germany, Türkiye, Poland, Romania, Australia, and most
recently Italy, where we began offering Business Banking services to a select
group of customers at the end of 2025 ahead of the wider commercial
launch in January 2026.
Our service model addresses both basic and complex needs, offering
solutions through a mix of self-service digital platforms and remote or in-
person advisory. Through this approach, we aim to strengthen client
engagement and incorporate sector-specific expertise to support informed
decision-making.
Across all three segments – Self-Employed & Micro, SME, and Mid-Corps –
we focus on making banking effortless and accessible. As of 2025, we offer
digital onboarding journeys, and instant and fast-track lending across six
markets: the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Romania, Türkiye and Germany.
We aim to combine digital convenience with human expertise, making
sure every client, regardless of size, receives the support they need.
Private Banking & Wealth Management
Private Banking, Wealth Management & Investments combines our Private
Banking & Wealth Management activities with our total Retail investments
business across Private Individuals, Private Banking and Business Banking
clients. We do this through a scalable investments platform that we are
implementing across our Retail markets, designed to meet diverse client
needs.
Our Private Banking & Wealth Management offering provides tailored
banking solutions to ultra-high-net worth individuals and high-net-worth
individuals and their entities in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg,
and Poland. We provide clients with investment solutions focused on
managing, preserving, and growing their wealth. Beyond investments, we
offer solutions to meet specific client needs, including financial planning,
estate planning, real estate financing, and securities-based lending.
Our strategy builds on our strong Business Banking position to serve
entrepreneurs and their wealth needs. We continue to invest in digital
capabilities to enhance client engagement and provide actionable insights
through advanced analytics, while maintaining human expertise through
relationship managers supported by product specialists and portfolio
managers.
Our investments offering spans all Retail Banking countries, serving mass,
affluent, high-net-worth individuals and ultra-high-net worth individuals 
through a differentiated approach. For Private Individual clients, we aim to
provide a fully digital experience with simple onboarding, intuitive tools,
and innovative features for first-time investors. For affluent clients, we
offer a hybrid model that combines digital convenience with personalised
support.
In line with our ambition to make investing personal and accessible
throughout Europe, total assets under management and e-brokerage
reached €278 billion in 2025, representing a 16 percent increase from
2024. 
Wholesale Banking
Growing the difference for our clients means we strive to be the best – and
in this case, the best European wholesale bank. We define ‘best’ as
achieving a high NPS, ranking in the industry’s top quartile, leading in
sustainability, digital services and employer attractiveness, while delivering
sustainable returns. Our work starts with providing corporate clients and
financial institutions with the financial solutions they need across their
value chains. Underpinning this is the ‘ING difference’, encompassing three
major characteristics that offer value to clients:
1. Our global reach, with local experts: no matter where clients are, our
network of experts offers them a seamless local experience with a
global view.
2. We’re sector experts: clients trust us to provide tailored solutions to
meet their needs.
3. We’re sustainability pioneers: we work hand-in-hand with clients to
address some of the most pressing issues in the world today.
ING’s Wholesale Banking network serves clients around the world and
operates from 36 countries across three regions: EMEA, APAC and the
Americas. Clients benefit from our knowledge in eight areas, including:
commodities, food & agriculture; corporate sector coverage; energy;
financial institutions; infrastructure & real estate; sustainable value chains;
technology, media, telecom & healthcare; and transport & logistics. By
making use of our target sector research capabilities and our client
segmentation model, we aim to help clients navigate the highs and lows of
economic cycles. We provide them with relevant advice, data-driven
insights and customised, integrated solutions that support their business
ambitions.
As a large wholesale bank, with billions of euros flowing through our
balance sheet, ING aims to play an important role in supporting our clients’
transitions to net zero by 2050. We aim to be a leader in sustainable
finance, but our leadership goes beyond financial support and incentives.
We also help and advise clients by putting our climate-action experience
and other sustainability-related insights to work for them.
Given the significant level of sustainable finance needed for the energy
transition, banks have an opportunity to increase the available level of
finance. ING has achieved €166 billion sustainable volume mobilised by
year-end 2025, versus €130 billion in 2024. 
In 2025, our Wholesale Banking team was recognised by Global Finance as
Best Bank for Payments in Western and Central & Eastern Europe, and the
Most Innovative Bank for Trade Finance globally. Treasury Management
International named ING as the 2025 Best Bank for Trade & Supply Chain
Finance in Europe, and Global Capital recognised ING as the 2025 Most
Impressive Investment Bank for Corporate ESG Capital Markets and Advice.
How we aim to become the best European wholesale bank
We have identified several ‘must-win’ priorities for us to become the best
European wholesale bank and to drive impact for our clients. In
Transaction Services, we are expanding our product foundations to offer
more efficient cash management, trade finance, and payment solutions,
while diversifying our product mix to support clients’ global operations. In
Financial Markets, we are harmonising our product suite and increasing
access to green and conventional instruments, enabling clients to manage
risk and fund sustainable growth. And within Capital Markets & Advisory
(CMA), we are broadening our capabilities to deliver tailored financing and
advisory solutions, with more teams positioned close to clients for faster,
more relevant support.
In 2025 we took another step in strengthening our client offer with the
launch of a private markets unit. This will help clients access alternative
capital and diversify funding sources.
Alongside our focus on our three core differentiators, this year we also
worked towards achieving a fourth: digital. As such, we have advanced our
digitalisation efforts to enhance client experience. We expanded self-
service journeys on our InsideBusiness platform, streamlined processes,
and introduced new tools to make interactions simpler and faster. At the
same time, we equipped our front-office teams with integrated CRM and
GenAI capabilities, combining data, insights, and automation to deliver
proactive advice and deepen engagement.
We progressed our capital velocity strategy in 2025, and completed two
significant risk transfer (SRT) transactions, enabling us to deploy capital
more efficiently and expand our lending capacity. As a result, we are
better positioned to serve a wider range of clients and pursue new
business opportunities, while continuing to manage risks prudently. 
Our NPS performance
One of the ways we measure our ability to deliver superior
customer value is through the net promoter score (NPS). The NPS
indicates whether customers would recommend ING to others. We
compare our NPS to selected peers in each market.
Our ambition is to achieve a number one NPS ranking in all our
Retail markets. In 2025, ING ranked number one in five of our retail
markets: Australia, Poland, Germany, Romania and Spain.
We ran an NPS programme in 32 Wholesale Banking (WB) markets
throughout 2025, to ensure a broad coverage of our client base,
and achieved a 74 percent response rate. ING’s WB NPS score rose
to 77 (on a scale of -100 to +100), compared to a score of 74 in
2024. The insights from the survey showed how our sector
expertise, global reach and local experts are highly appreciated by
clients and important reasons for why they chose ING. We also
asked clients how satisfied they were with our product areas,
people, processes and digital offering, with the highest scores going
to our product offering, relationship management and client
support. Off the back of these results, we will continue to prioritise
building strong relationships with excellent execution, simplifying
and automating our KYC processes and optimising our digital
offering.
strategy_superior-value-for-customers.jpg
Sustainability at the heart
We strive to put sustainability at the heart of what
we do: it is a core pillar of our 'Growing the
difference' business strategy and central to our
long-term business resilience and commercial
success.
At ING, our sustainability strategy spans climate, nature and social
agendas, recognising their interdependencies and how they affect each
other, both positively and negatively. These issues are complex and
dynamic, so our response must evolve as scientific understanding
advances. Therefore, our climate action focuses on both mitigation and
adaptation. We are also exploring how we can play a role in halting and
reversing nature degradation and regenerating natural systems, while
respecting human rights and working to advance financial health and
inclusion.
We embed climate and nature topics into our business processes,
including risk assessment and client interactions, as these can influence
traditional banking risks. It is our ambition to play an important role in this
transition because it matters to our clients, to society and us as a bank.
To ensure the resilience and commercial success of our business means
managing risks that arise from global warming and nature degradation. As
a trusted partner, we help clients navigate these complex risks and with
the global transition underway, financing the new technologies,
infrastructure and business models for the transition of the economy
represents a growing opportunity for us and our clients.
Responding to the challenges of climate change has been central to our
sustainability approach for the past decade, from helping our clients with
their climate transition plans to contributing to governmental climate
goals. These efforts extend to the present day: in 2025 ING became the
first global systemically important bank to receive 1.5°C-aligned science-
based targets validation from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
A dynamic landscape
Our approach is also informed by, and reviewed against, a number of
external factors and trends that may influence the resilience of banks and
their customers. Many of these are constantly evolving and contribute to
heightened, and increasingly diverging, expectations from stakeholders
and society. In particular, geopolitical dynamics in 2025 have led to a
conflict of policies and laws between different national and regional legal
frameworks, affecting investment flows, regulations and corporate
disclosures. Companies and financial institutions face an increasing risk of
climate-related lawsuits, not only from activist NGOs but also due to
enforcement actions and legal challenges under laws like national
competition regulations. Society is transitioning to a low-carbon economy.
So are our clients, and so is ING. We finance a lot of sustainable activities,
but we still finance more that’s not.
Climate action
We are a large globally operating bank, so we have the opportunity to play
an important role in financing the change that is needed in the transition
to a more sustainable future. There are multiple ways in which we bring
together expertise and capital to act as a catalyst for our clients’ efforts in
the transition and for the development of wider systemic solutions. From
allocating capital towards decarbonisation to financing innovation, we can
help steer financial flows in support of our clients' transition. We play an
important role in managing and mitigating risk, and also invest in
adaptation and long-term resilience. We support an energy transition that
strengthens energy security, ensures stability of supply, and safeguards
affordability.
We base our climate actions on what we believe needs to happen in the
global transition – focusing on three action areas where we can have the
greatest impact. First, we are helping clients to transition to low-carbon
business models; second, we are building up the financing of new
technologies and sustainable systems; and third, we aim to find new ways
to enable people to play their part in the transition.
Drive down emissions: supporting clients in their transition
As a bank, we recognise the most significant contribution we can make to
help drive down global emissions is to engage with our clients, especially
those in the most carbon-intensive sectors, and help them transition to
sustainable business models. Increasingly, our large clients are setting
their own goals to drive down emissions and we are stepping up how we
support them in their transition, driving impact together.
Terra is our decarbonisation approach and the foundation of our sector
transition plans. In addition, it informs our broader process for managing
climate-related risks within the most carbon-intensive parts of our lending
book. We have implemented a data-driven assessment that has led to a
step-up in how we advise and support Wholesale Banking clients with their
sustainable business transformations. This approach strengthens our
ability to support clients in navigating their transition strategies and helps
us in identifying emerging financing opportunities. We have established a
foundation for targeted, fact-based discussions on transition planning,
helping us understand their evolving financing and advisory needs as well
as potential transition risk
1Amount has been restated following a change in methodology.
While our main impact lies in financing and supporting our clients, we also
aim to lead by example by working towards net zero in our own
operations. We monitor and manage our progress towards this ambition
through measures such as setting a CO2 cap for business travel,
transitioning to a fully electric car fleet and sourcing 100 percent
renewable electricity for buildings under our management control. In
2025, our total operations footprint (scopes 1, 2 and scope 3 business
travel) was 44kt of CO2 emissions, representing a reduction of 5kt (2024:
49kt 1). Our ambition is to achieve a 23 percent reduction in CO2 emissions 
by 2030, compared to the 2023 baseline of 54 kt1.
Building up a sustainable future: financing technologies and
solutions for a low-carbon world 
Society needs to transition to a future where the systems we rely on are
sustainable. Supporting our clients to drive down emissions and improving
efficiency of fossil fuel-based energy technologies is only one part of the
solution. At the same time, the world must build up solutions, technologies
and infrastructure needed for a resilient low-carbon world. Trillions of
euros per year are needed to make this transition a reality. 
ING seeks to play an important role in financing these technologies and
solutions, including building up the affordable supply of green and
renewable energy alternatives such as offshore and onshore wind and
solar power generation, which are necessary and powerful drivers in
reducing society’s dependence on existing, fossil fuel-based power. In 2025
we committed €9.6 billion in renewable power generation financing, up
from €7.0 billion in 2024.
In the past year, we launched our Transition Accelerator to identify and
incubate promising solutions and innovative green technologies, and
mobilise the capital needed to help them to scale. Finding innovative ways
to finance these pioneering technologies and enterprises puts us in a
position to help shape these new markets as they emerge and scale.
Including everyone in the transition: finding new ways to enable
people to stay a step ahead on climate
Our purpose is empowering our customers to stay a step ahead – and that
includes staying ahead on climate. This means we’re committed to finding
new ways to include people and enable them to make an impact, starting
with our existing and prospective retail customers. Through our large
mortgage portfolio, we finance people's homes, and that gives us the
opportunity to help them contribute to the transition by making their 
homes more energy and cost efficient, and future-fit. Making their homes
more sustainable matters to customers because it improves the long-term
resilience of what, for many, is their most valuable asset. And if it is in the
interests of homeowners, it is also in the interests of the bank. In helping to
make customers' homes future-fit, we are also future-proofing our
mortgage portfolio.
We incentivise sustainable home ownership in our core markets through
the mortgages we offer, with beneficial terms like attractive interest rates
linked to energy-label improvements across all energy labels, long-tenure
fixed interest periods, and mortgage features like top-ups and discounts
available to those who purchase energy-efficient homes or improve the
energy label of their property by renovating. And to tackle the challenge of
how to retrofit existing housing stock, we’re increasingly enabling
customers to upgrade their homes with dedicated renovation financing
options, incentives and related services that aim to lower any hurdles to
the renovation process.
Collaborating for impact
We engage with regulators and policymakers on policies and market
conditions which enable our clients in their transition, and clarify and
support the role of banks. That is how we can support the transition to a
sustainable, strong and resilient economy.
strategy_sustainability-at-the-heart.jpg
How we are growing the difference
We focus and continue to work on our four key
enablers that will help us grow the difference:
providing seamless digital services, using scalable
technology and operations, staying safe and
secure, and unlocking our people’s full potential.
Providing seamless digital services
Through our ‘Growing the difference’ strategy, we continue to build on our
success of making banking easy. One of the ways we aim to do this is by
making banking as frictionless and relevant as possible. We can serve our
customers better through our ‘always-on’ channels, data-enabled
personalised experiences, and end-to-end digital processes, with human
intervention where needed or desired. For Private Individuals, our ING
Banking App enables customers to open accounts in minutes, manage
investments, and receive real-time spending insights. In Business Banking,
our Mijn ING Zakelijk platform helps SMEs manage payments and link
accounting packages seamlessly, while larger corporates benefit from the
InsideBusiness portal, providing self-service access to trade finance and
cash management globally. For Private Banking & Wealth Management,
clients enjoy secure digital portfolio management and personalised
advisory services through our app, which offers tailored dashboards and
seamless access to expert support.
We use data analytics and machine learning to personalise digital services,
delivering relevant, data-driven insights that help customers make
informed financial decisions. As data becomes increasingly central to
delivering personal and relevant services, privacy and data security are
more important than ever.
Scalable technology and operations
ING uses scalable technology and operations that enable us to reach the
market faster, achieve volume more quickly, maintain consistent and
higher quality, and enhance productivity. This also helps us attract and
retain talent by offering employees the opportunity to not only work with
technology but also collaborate across countries and make an impact
globally. Scalable technology enables ING to create specific, local
propositions that serve our customers, while leveraging ING’s scale in
engineering, security, and data expertise.
Scalable technology
ING's technology vision is anchored in the 'Scalable Tech Platform', a
unified, integrated foundation. The platform hosts the IT modular
components we (re)use across countries and business lines to build and
operate customer propositions. It allows ING countries and business lines
to introduce propositions quickly, easily, and safely.
To fully unlock the potential of this platform and advance our ambition of
'Banking with Impact', the ING Tech strategy sets out three goals under the
leadership of the chief technology officer: increase productivity, excel in
customer experience, and be a top employer for engineering talent. 
In 2025, we translated these longer-term goals into clear priorities for the
years ahead:
§ Operational excellence: Enhancing reliability, reinforcing cybersecurity,
and investing in our workforce to ensure resilient and secure
operations.
§ Digital product governance: Advancing our digital product capabilities,
which contributes further to control, transparency, and strategic
alignment.
§ Engineering: Driving an engineering way of working and innovation,
including AI-enabled coding.
§ Transformation: Continuing the development and expansion of our
scalable technology platform.
§ Data and AI development: Accelerating the responsible and effective
use of data and artificial intelligence to unlock new opportunities and
efficiencies.
Our scalable technology consists of three core components: ING’s private
cloud infrastructure (IPC), our engineering pipeline (OnePipeline), and our
banking technology platform.
IPC is where we store and manage applications and data such as channel
applications, core banking systems, and other banking applications. We
measure IPC adoption by the percentage of physical cores – also known as
processing cores or CPU cores – in IPC compared to the total number of
physical cores in ING data centres globally. By the end of 2025, 68 percent
(2024: 67 percent) of all physical cores in ING were on IPC. This is in line
with our objective to evolve towards a structural hybrid cloud set up, which
allows us to optimise our infrastructure landscape by using both private
and public cloud to run our applications.
OnePipeline, our continuous integration and delivery pipeline, provides
engineers with a consistent and secure global capability to develop, test,
and deploy software. At the end of 2025, 90 percent of applications were
onboarded to this pipeline (2024: 85 percent) out of the total number of
applications registered in our IT management platform across all ING
entities.
Touchpoint is part of our banking technology platform. It provides reusable
shared services that help engineers build products – like Instant Payments
and Open Banking – more quickly and easily. At the end of 2025,
approximately 81 percent of customer logins used Touchpoint (2024:
approximately 75 percent). 
Digital access
In a digital society, customers expect to have round-the-clock access to
digital channels, including their banking services. To live up to their
expectations, we strive to provide uninterrupted access to our banking
services, while allowing for scheduled maintenance and downtime. For
2025, our Retail scope includes Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands.
The combined digital channel availability for these three countries was
99.89 percent (2024: 99.86 percent).
For Wholesale Banking clients worldwide, the availability for our Inside
Business Payments channel was 99.97 percent (2024: 99.82 percent) and
for our Inside Business Connect channel (file transfer), 99.99 percent 
(2024: 100 percent).
Scalable operations
Our scalable operations are driven by digitalisation and capability hubs,
focusing on becoming fully straight-through processing (STP), removing
friction towards a seamless experience for our customers in a safe and
secure way. In all we do, our customers are our point of departure. Our
processes, both digital and non-digital, are designed and executed to
embed excellent customer experience. We apply the same mindset to all
our employee journeys. 
Digitalising key customer journeys allows us to enable superior customer
value at a reduced cost-to-serve, while measuring impact through NPS and
cost efficiency. In 2025, our digi index score was 81.8 percent (2024: 77.2
percent).
Capability hubs provide shared services and solutions across ING
worldwide, leveraging expertise and using scale, and sharing productive,
quality services across the ING network. The hubs are located in the
Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, the Philippines and Türkiye. In
November 2025, ING opened a new hub in Madrid, Spain.
Through expanded and improved digital services we have reduced friction
and increased self service options, including GenAI chatbots. In 2025, we
reduced inbound contacts to contact centres by 43 percent (2024: 26
percent)
Data analytics
In 2025, ING Analytics continued to drive our strategy forward by
embedding AI and GenAI into our products, process, and interaction in
Retail, Wholesale, and the associated operations. Building on the targeted
approach in five priority domains – contact centres, Know Your Customer
(KYC), hyper-personalisation, Wholesale Banking Lending, and software
engineering – we scaled solutions and explored new opportunities.
Key milestones include the first large language model (LLM) voicebot
experiment and the introduction of machine learning-based client due
diligence assessments in Retail Banking. In Wholesale Banking, we
prioritised front-office productivity by embedding AI tools, including
enhancing liquidity management through machine learning and providing
near real-time visibility into client data to support faster, more informed
decision‑making.
We continued to advance our platform capabilities in line with ING’s
broader transformation objectives. The introduction of a unified data,
analytics, AI and agentic environment marked an important milestone in
strengthening our data infrastructure. The platform delivers analytics
initiatives with greater consistency and efficiency, while simplifying risk
assessments and strengthening data governance.
As AI adoption accelerated across 2025, moving from pilots to day‑to‑day
use in areas such as analytics, software development and customer
service, we strengthened our governance to ensure we scale AI responsibly
by establishing a dedicated central AI Risk Committee to oversee emerging
risks in new domains such as voicebots and agentic AI capabilities.
We continue to empower our workforce by shifting from AI education to
hands-on enablement across three key groups: employees, specialists,
and leaders. This year’s data fluency training reached more than 8,700
individual participants across 18 functions in 14 countries. These initiatives
aim to ensure ING talent remains at the forefront of responsible and
innovative AI adoption.
In Retail Banking, we have introduced GenAI-powered campaigns to
improve customer engagement and support sales. These tools are
currently live in Belgium, Germany, Spain, Romania, and Poland. In Spain,
early results show positive campaign uplifts. We are also assessing the use
of GenAI for educational and awareness content, including illustrated
messaging.
In consumer lending, we use AI to assess applicants and process loan
applications automatically. We enhanced the mortgage credit decision
process in Australia by introducing machine learning-based scorecards.
This improvement enables a more digitised application experience and
ensures reliable assessments aligned with our risk appetite.
Our contact centres underwent a GenAI transformation, with chatbots
now live in seven countries (the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Spain,
Italy, Romania, and Australia).
We integrated analytics and AI into KYC processes across Retail and
Wholesale Banking. Our Secondary Analytics Transaction Monitoring
solution distinguishes between high- and low-risk activity, improving
investigations and supporting compliance. The model is live in Belgium, the
Netherlands, Romania, and Australia.
We introduced STP 2.0 and a new Risk Assessment Model for customer due
diligence, shifting from manual checks to AI-driven risk management.
These solutions are designed to streamline processes, support compliance,
and enable dynamic risk scoring and smarter decisions globally.
In engineering, we have implemented GenAI to accelerate software
development, improve code quality, and reduce communication overhead.
Staying safe and secure
At ING, trust is the foundation of everything we do. As a digital-first bank,
we are entrusted with our customers’ money and personal data.
Safeguarding these assets is essential to maintaining the confidence of our
stakeholders.
We operate within a robust risk management framework designed to
identify, assess and manage material risks to our business. Our Risk
Appetite Framework (RAF) supports the execution of our ‘Growing the
difference’ strategy in a secure, compliant, and responsible manner,
ensuring we meet all regulatory obligations.
As we expand our customer base, we remain vigilant in protecting our
organisation, our clients and the broader financial system. Our anti-money
laundering (AML) activities include customer screening, due diligence and
transaction monitoring to detect and prevent suspicious activity. We also
continue to strengthen our fraud prevention capabilities, using innovative
technologies to reduce fraud-related harm to individuals and society.
Cybersecurity remains a top priority. We continuously monitor the threat
landscape and invest in capabilities across all cyber domains – prediction,
prevention, detection, response and recovery. In 2025, two Distributed
Denial of Service (DDoS) incidents were reported to the supervisors: one
impacted availability for individuals in Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands,
and another caused temporary interruptions in third-party service
availability within the Polish mobile payment system. Our Chief
Information Security Office (CISO) organisation maintains 24/7 vigilance,
actively monitoring our environment, investigating emerging threats, and
taking timely action to protect our customers and essential services.
As a global financial institution, we process personal data from customers,
employees, suppliers, and partners. Protecting this data is critical. We
continuously evaluate our compliance with evolving data ethics standards
and regulatory requirements. We also foster a culture of integrity by
encouraging employees to report unethical or unlawful behaviour through
secure and anonymous channels.
For more information on ING’s policies and processes to stay safe and
secure, see ‘Risk management’.
Unlocking our people’s full potential
Unlocking our people’s full potential is a key enabler of our strategy as we
believe we have an abundance of talent and potential at ING. We attract,
develop, retain, and reward the right fit-for-future talents and skills. We
strive to deliver a superior employee experience to unlock our people’s
time and energy to grow the difference. We are dedicated to fostering a
safe and inclusive environment for our 60,000+ employees, as we aim to
create a friendly and collaborative workplace that mirrors the diverse
world we operate in. This is reinforced by our Orange Culture and Orange
Behaviours. We ask our people to act with honesty, prudence, and
responsibility, and that they strive to ‘take it on and make it happen’, ‘help
others be successful’, and are ‘always a step ahead’.
In 2025, we continued to focus on unlocking our people’s potential through
three strategic pillars: ‘talent & leadership’, ‘culture & organisation’ and
‘employee experience’.
Talent & leadership
To grow the difference and keep ING fit for the future, we need the right
people with the right skills and a readiness to learn and develop. In 2025,
we launched ING University, our new global learning platform. This brings
learning into one place for all ING employees worldwide, making
development more accessible, personal, and relevant – so everyone has
the skills to thrive today and tomorrow. Alongside this, we have continued
to empower employees to take ownership of their growth through tools
like the Individual Development Plan (IDP), available globally to help map
personal learning journeys. We also offer high-quality learning content
tailored to different roles and ambitions. Employee feedback on learning
content is positive, with colleagues actively exploring topics beyond
mandatory training – showing appetite for self-driven learning.
Our focused attention on training complements our efforts to build strong,
diverse talent pipelines. Through our annual strategic global talent reviews,
conducted for approximately 5,000 senior employees, each domain
evaluated their contributions to growing the difference and identified the
talent, leadership, and capability needs to advance our ING goals and help
future-proof our talent pipelines. In 2025, we enhanced this review cycle
by integrating near-term and forward-looking assessments of
organisational and people requirements, including future workforce needs,
skills, and capacity, as well as future leadership requirements.
One example of how we are building future-ready leaders is our Global
Leadership Accelerator, run in partnership with the IMD Business School,
where, following completion, participants are demonstrating increased
readiness for senior roles. As we strengthen the talent of today, we can
also look ahead with confidence: the International Talent Programme
continues to welcome new trainees to ING to develop their banking skills,
cultivate professional expertise and support their personal growth. This
rigorous, global two-year programme is just one of our investments in
strengthening our leadership pipeline.
Our commitment to a fair and transparent performance and rewards
process supports our talent and leadership goals. We retained the same
focus in 2025 of providing our employees with clarity and consistency. ING
follows a Pay for Performance approach, supported by a five-point
performance rating scale in our performance evaluation scheme,
introduced in 2024. Remuneration decisions are clearly linked to
performance outcomes.
ING began using a structured variable remuneration framework based on
our job architecture in 2025. This means all employees eligible for variable
remuneration have a variable remuneration target. This provides
managers with a decision framework for determining variable
remuneration rewards equitably, while having enough flexibility to
differentiate outcomes for individual performance. Employees see
increased transparency and can better understand how their personal
performance influences their variable remuneration.
Culture & organisation
At ING we aim to unlock our people's full potential through our inclusive
culture where everyone has the opportunity to develop and have impact
for our customers and society.
Strong mental, social and physical wellbeing is essential for an inclusive
environment and a healthy, high-performing and engaged workforce. We
promote flexibility through hybrid working and have introduced healthy
'Working Habits', for which we provide training and resources. We have
also included a Wellbeing Index in our Organisational Health Index (OHI)
survey to track how our people are doing, identify improvement areas, and
monitor the link between wellbeing and performance. By prioritising
wellbeing and leveraging these insights, we aim to build a resilient
workforce and drive a sustainable high-performance culture.
Equally important is the role feedback plays in sustaining our Orange
Culture. We maintain a continuous listening framework, which gives our
people formal channels to provide feedback on our strategy, working
conditions, behaviours, and experiences. Our Organisational Health Index is
the most comprehensive of these listening tools. In 2025, we held two OHI
surveys and received feedback from 80 percent of our workforce. We saw
sustained strong organisational engagement among our employees
showing that it is desirable to continue with our Orange Culture. The
feedback showed that our people continue to value and appreciate their
colleagues, the ability to work hybrid, and the opportunities that support
their wellbeing.
Employee experience
Employee experience remains a top priority at ING. We believe that
delivering a great employee experience is essential to providing excellent
customer experience and to attract and retain talent. In 2025, ING
continued the collective efforts of the Employee Experience Design Board,
which brings together representatives from Human Resources, Facilities
Services, Operations, Information Technology, and Global Communications
to enhance the employee experience globally.
Throughout the year, this group focused on operational excellence and
service quality, enabling productivity from anywhere, and using data to
prioritise work that matters most. Initiatives included improving the office
environment, streamlining facility management ticketing, creating a
unified portal for employee support, and empowering employees to
be more self-sufficient by simplifying access to information. ING will
continue to focus on the moments that matter to deliver a superior
employee experience.
strategy_how-we-are-growing-the-difference.jpg
Our financial performance
Our financial
    performance
Our financial performance
In 2025, we have delivered strong commercial
growth, achieving a total income of €22.9 billion.
This performance was supported by growth in our
customer base and a 15% increase in fee income
to €4.6 billion. Commercial net interest income
remained resilient at €15.3 billion. We also realised
strong volume growth, including €56.9 billion in
net core lending growth, more than double the
amount recorded in the previous year. Our net
result remained broadly stable at €6.2 billion.
Client balances
We successfully executed our strategy to accelerate growth. Net core
lending growth more than doubled to €56.9 billion in 2025, representing
an 8.3% increase in customer lending since the start of the year. Retail
Banking contributed €38.6 billion to this growth, mainly driven by a €28.5
billion increase in our residential mortgage portfolio. Further expansion
was achieved across consumer and business lending, which together
increased by €10.1 billion. Wholesale Banking achieved a net core lending
growth of €18.3 billion, driven by increased volumes in Working Capital
Solutions and short-term trade-related financing, alongside a recovery in
long-term loan demand in the second half of the year.
Net core deposits growth was also strong at €38.1 billion. This reflects the
effectiveness of promotional savings campaigns in several retail markets,
as well as successful deposit gathering within Wholesale Banking
Transaction Services and Financial Markets.
Consolidated results
2025
2024
Change
Profit or loss (in € million)
Commercial net interest income1
15,316
15,459
-0.9%
Other net interest income
-775
-711
Net interest income
14,542
14,749
-1.4%
Net fee and commission income
4,597
4,002
14.9%
Total investment and other  income
3,752
3,584
4.7%
Total income
22,891
22,334
2.5%
Expenses excl. regulatory costs
11,710
11,234
4.2%
Regulatory costs
866
882
-1.8%
Operating expenses
12,576
12,116
3.8%
Gross result
10,315
10,219
0.9%
Addition to loan loss provisions
1,304
1,194
9.2%
Result before tax
9,012
9,025
-0.1%
Taxation
2,510
2,580
-2.7%
Non-controlling interests
275
258
6.6%
Net result2
6,226
6,187
0.6%
Key financial metrics
Net core lending growth (in € billion)3
56.9
27.7
Net core deposits growth (in € billion)3
38.1
47.4
Cost/income ratio
54.9%
54.2%
Risk costs in bps of average customer lending
19
18
1Commercial net interest income (NII) is the sum of lending NII and liability NII (excluding significant
volatile items). For a reconciliation with 'Net interest income' see appendix 'Alternative
2Net result in the table above reflects the net result attributable to shareholders of the parent.
3For a reconciliation of net core lending growth and net core deposits growth to customer lending
growth  and customer deposits growth respectively, see the appendix ' Alternative performance
Total income
In 2025, we again achieved higher revenues. Total income rose 2.5% to
€22,891 million, supported by sustained growth in our customer base. We
further expanded our loan portfolio and customer deposits, and recorded a
strong 15% increase in fee income.
Commercial net interest income remained resilient at €15,316 million. Net
interest income from lending rose by €134 million, as volume growth more
than offset a reduction in the average lending margin. This margin decline
was partly attributable to the ongoing expansion of our residential
mortgage portfolio, which delivers higher returns on equity but carries
lower average margins than other lending products. Liability net interest
income decreased by €277 million, as strong deposit growth could not
fully offset the impact of lower average margins on retail deposits and for
Payments & Cash Management in Wholesale Banking. The overall liability
margin stabilised during 2025 after the decline seen in 2024.
Other net interest income primarily comprises interest income from
Financial Markets and Treasury. The year-on-year decline mainly reflects a
structural shift in 2025, as commercial margins from our cash pooling and
netting services are now reported under commercial net interest income.
Net fee and commission income totalled €4,597 million, an increase of
15%, in line with our ambition to further diversify our income mix. In Retail
Banking, fee income from investment products rose significantly, driven by
growth in the number of investment accounts and higher customer
trading activity. Daily banking fees also increased, supported by strong
growth in primary customers and updated pricing for payment packages,
while Retail Banking also achieved solid growth in lending-related and
insurance fees. Fee income in Wholesale Banking rose 8.8%, primarily
reflecting higher deal flow in its Lending business and an increase in daily
banking fees.
Total investment and other income rose 4.7% to €3,752 million. The
majority of this amount relates to Financial Markets and Treasury. The
2025 figure included a positive revaluation of the derivative for a the
forward purchase of a stake in Van Lanschot Kempen, a €44 million gain
from the sale of an associate in Belgium, and higher income from
Corporate Investments. The previous year had included €77 million as our
share in the one-off profit of an associate in Belgium and a €53 million
receivable related to the prior insolvency of a financial institution in the
Netherlands.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses increased 3.8% to €12,576 million, including €866
million in regulatory costs — a slight decrease compared with the previous
year. Expenses in 2025 also included €297 million of incidental items,
primarily related to restructuring, versus €178 million of incidental items in
2024.
Expenses excluding regulatory costs and incidental items rose 3.2%,
reflecting inflationary pressure on salaries and other costs, as well as
continued investments to support business growth. These impacts were
partially mitigated by further increasing scalability and efficiency in our
operations, including enhanced client interactions in our contact centres,
and ongoing optimisation of our footprint across several retail countries.
Addition to loan loss provisions
Net additions to loan loss provisions amounted to €1,304 million compared
with €1,194 million in 2024. Risk costs for 2025 were equivalent to 19 basis
points of average customer lending, remaining below our through-the-
cycle average of 20 basis points.
Net additions to Stage 3 provisions declined sharply to €1,186 million,
down from €1,583 million in 2024. This reflects a limited inflow of new
Stage 3 files, as well as several repayments and recoveries on existing files
during 2025.
Total Stage 1 and 2 risk costs were €118 million (including €8 million of
modification losses). In 2024, these had amounted to €-389 million,
primarily due to a partial release of management overlays.
Net result
The net result (attributable to shareholders of the parent) for 2025
amounted to €6,226 million, slightly above the net profit of €6,187 million
achieved in 2024. The effective tax rate for 2025 was 27.9% compared
with 28.6% in the previous year.
Retail Banking
Retail Banking
Total Retail Banking
Retail Netherlands
Retail Belgium
Retail Germany
Retail Other
in EUR million
2025
2024
Change
2025
2024
Change
2025
2024
Change
2025
2024
Change
2025
2024
Change
Commercial net interest income
11,347
11,507
-1.4%
3,687
3,647
1.1%
1,692
1,816
-6.8%
2,270
2,400
-5.4%
3,698
3,643
1.5%
Other net interest income
-98
-58
-572
-621
93
142
-34.5%
187
247
-24.3%
195
174
12.1%
Net interest income
11,250
11,449
-1.7%
3,115
3,027
2.9%
1,786
1,959
-8.8%
2,457
2,647
-7.2%
3,892
3,817
2.0%
Net fee and commission income
3,168
2,694
17.6%
1,128
1,049
7.5%
692
603
14.8%
632
433
46.0%
717
609
17.7%
Total investment and other income
1,124
1,113
1.0%
726
835
-13.1%
197
189
4.2%
-98
-173
299
263
13.7%
Total income
15,542
15,256
1.9%
4,968
4,910
1.2%
2,674
2,751
-2.8%
2,991
2,906
2.9%
4,908
4,688
4.7%
Expenses excl. regulatory costs
7,588
7,361
3.1%
2,022
2,011
0.5%
1,617
1,605
0.7%
1,330
1,215
9.5%
2,618
2,532
3.4%
Regulatory costs
647
668
-3.1%
67
114
-41.2%
261
206
26.7%
32
88
-63.6%
287
261
10.0%
Operating expenses
8,234
8,030
2.5%
2,089
2,124
-1.6%
1,878
1,811
3.7%
1,362
1,303
4.5%
2,905
2,792
4.0%
Gross result
7,307
7,226
1.1%
2,880
2,786
3.4%
797
941
-15.3%
1,628
1,604
1.5%
2,003
1,896
5.6%
Addition to loan loss provisions
754
566
33.2%
107
-8
153
134
14.2%
171
149
14.8%
323
291
11.0%
Result before taxation
6,554
6,660
-1.6%
2,773
2,793
-0.7%
644
807
-20.2%
1,457
1,455
0.1%
1,680
1,605
4.7%
Taxation
1,781
1,819
-2.1%
733
723
1.4%
178
210
-15.2%
472
505
-6.5%
398
381
4.5%
Non-controlling interests
227
223
1.8%
0
0
0
0
2
1
100.0%
225
221
1.8%
Net result IFRS
4,546
4,618
-1.6%
2,040
2,070
-1.4%
466
597
-21.9%
983
949
3.6%
1,058
1,002
5.6%
Key figures
Net core lending growth (in € billion)
38.6
25.9
16.2
9.6
2.0
3.7
6.9
4.4
13.4
8.2
Net core deposits growth (in € billion)
30.1
31.6
11.5
5.0
-0.6
6.4
6.6
7.5
12.6
12.7
Cost/income ratio
53.0%
52.6%
42.0%
43.3%
70.2%
65.8%
45.6%
44.8%
59.2%
59.6%
Risk costs in bps of average customer lending
15
12
6
0
15
14
15
14
26
26
Return on equity based on 13.0% CET11
21.7%
23.4%
29.4%
30.9%
10.0%
13.2%
27.1%
29.0%
18.8%
19.8%
1After-tax return divided by average equity based on 13.0% of risk-weighted assets.
Retail Banking delivered a strong performance in 2025, supported by
sustained customer growth, solid commercial momentum and disciplined
cost management across all markets. Our mobile primary customer base
grew by more than one million during the year, in line with our ambition,
and reinforcing our position as a leading retail bank with over 15 million
mobile primary customers. Growth in customer balances and fee income
contributed to higher total income, while expenses rose only moderately.
This led to a result before tax of €6,554 million and a return on equity of
21.7%.
Net core lending growth was €38.6 billion, with €28.5 billion coming from
our residential mortgage portfolio, driven by strong production in the
Netherlands, Germany and Australia. We also continued to expand our
business and consumer lending portfolios across markets, supporting
customers and small and mid‑sized enterprises.
Net core deposits growth was €30.1 billion, complemented by significant
customer flows into investment products as more people opened
investment accounts and increased their trading activity. This strong
deposit performance was supported by targeted promotional savings
campaigns across several countries and sustained customer engagement
across our channels.
Commercial net interest income declined slightly year‑on‑year as liability
margins normalised, although this was largely offset by the substantial
growth in lending and deposits.
Fee and commission income rose by 18%, reflecting broad‑based growth
across investment products, daily banking, insurance and lending. Higher
customer activity and effective digital engagement drove increased
openings of investment accounts and higher trading volumes. Investment
and other income remained broadly stable.
Operating expenses totalled €8,234 million, including €647 million in
regulatory costs (slightly below 2024 levels) and €123 million in incidental
items (compared with €86 million in 2024). Excluding regulatory and
incidental costs, underlying expense growth remained well controlled,
reflecting continued investment in commercial growth, technology and
customer experience.
Net additions to loan loss provisions amounted to €754 million, equivalent
to 15 basis points of average customer lending. These additions were
primarily related to business and consumer lending, while risk costs
associated with mortgages remained low.
Overall, Retail Banking delivered strong balance sheet growth, deeper
customer engagement, and improved diversification in fee income,
positioning us well for continued performance in the years ahead.
Retail Netherlands
Retail Netherlands posted a result before tax of €2,773 million compared
with €2,793 million in 2024, a year in which risk costs benefited from a
modest net release. Income increased slightly  year-on-year, while
operating expenses showed a small decline.
Results in 2025 were supported by a further increase in both our customer
base and customer balances. Net core lending growth was  €16.2 billion,
fuelled by sustained strong mortgage production (€11.1 billion) and further
expansion across both business and consumer lending portfolios. The net
core deposits growth was  €11.5 billion, primarily driven by a solid net
inflow from private individuals.
Commercial net interest income was marginally higher, with the
expansion of lending portfolios and increased savings volumes more than
offsetting margin compression. Other net interest income amounted to
€-572 million (versus €-621 million the year before), mainly reflecting
funding costs for Treasury, for which corresponding revenues are
recognised within ‘other income’.
Net fee and commission income rose 7.5%, with growth across all product
categories — most notably in investment products, supported by an
increase in assets under management. Investment and other income
totalled €726 million (compared with €835 million in 2024) and included
lower Treasury-related income.
Operating expenses decreased slightly to €2,089 million. Regulatory costs
declined by €47 million, as no contribution to the Dutch deposit guarantee
fund was required in 2025, and we benefited from an adjustment to our
DGS contribution related to previous years. Expenses excluding regulatory
costs remained broadly stable year-on-year, as salary increases under the
collective labour agreement and higher restructuring costs were almost
fully offset by operational efficiencies and savings on external staffing.
Net additions to loan loss provisions were modest at €107 million, the
equivalent of six basis points of average customer lending. In the previous
year, there had been a net release of €8 million, mainly related to
mortgages.
Retail Belgium
The result before tax for Retail Belgium (which includes our retail activities
in Luxembourg) declined to €644 million (from €807 million in the prior
year), mainly due to a lower margin on liabilities and higher regulatory
costs. However, fee income increased significantly, and expenses
excluding regulatory costs remained well-contained.
Customer balances rose year-on-year. Net core lending growth was €2.0
billion, with growth in both mortgages and other lending. Net core deposits
declined by €0.6 billion, following the conclusion of a successful
promotional campaign originated in the third quarter of 2024. The
campaign was highly effective, enabling the retention of the vast majority
of term deposits and facilitating their conversion into investment products,
thereby enhancing long-term customer value.
Commercial net interest income declined 6.8% to €1,692 million, primarily
due to reduced liability margins. Other net interest income fell by €49
million year-on-year due to Treasury, although this was fully offset by
higher investment and other income within Treasury. Investment and
other income included a €44 million gain from the sale of an associate in
2025, while 2024 had included €77 million relating to our share in the one-
off profit of another associate.
Net fee and commission income was strong, rising 15% to €692 million.
This growth was primarily driven by higher fees from investment products,
reflecting the success of campaigns to attract new customers for
investment solutions, as well as from daily banking services.
Operating expenses amounted to €1,878 million, including €261 million in
regulatory costs (up from €206 million in 2024 due to a higher DGS
contribution) and €79 million in incidental restructuring costs (compared
with €59 million for this in 2024). These restructuring costs are part of
broader multi-year transformation programmes across Belgium and
Luxembourg, aimed at simplifying operations, increasing commercial
focus and improving long-term profitability, though they temporarily
impact reported returns. Expenses excluding regulatory costs and
incidental items declined 0.5%, as the impact of automatic salary
indexation was offset by lower accommodation and IT expenses.
The net addition to the provision for loan losses amounted to €153 million,
or 15 basis points of average customer lending, up from €134 million in
2024. Risk costs were mainly related to business lending.
Retail Germany
Retail Germany recorded a result before tax of €1,457 million, stable year-
on-year despite higher risk costs.
The business continued to demonstrate strong commercial momentum,
including a double-digit increase in the number of mobile primary
customers. Net core lending growth was €6.9 billion, with mortgages
remaining the principal driver of growth. Net core deposits increased by
€6.6 billion, reflecting the success of a promotional savings campaign, with
a portion of these funds subsequently channelled into investment
products during the second half of the year.
Commercial net interest income declined, as the positive impact of volume
growth was outweighed by narrower margins on liabilities and mortgages.
In the second half of 2025, the average liability margin improved, following
the conclusion of bonus rates for fresh money from the promotional
savings campaign that ran in the first quarter of the year.
Other net interest income for 2025 included a €-18 million impact from
incentive pay-outs linked to a customer acquisition campaign, compared
with €-51 million for a similar campaign in 2024. Treasury-related interest
income declined, although this was largely offset by an increase in
investment and other income.
Net fee and commission income surged 46% to €632 million. This was
driven by a growing customer base, a higher number of investment
product accounts, increased trading activity, and a rise in fees from daily
banking services.
Operating expenses in 2025 totalled €1,362 million. This comprised €32
million in regulatory costs, down from €88 million a year earlier, reflecting
a lower contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme. Expenses excluding
regulatory costs in both years, as well as €14 million of incidental
restructuring costs recorded in 2025, rose 8.3%. This was predominantly
due to higher internal staff expenses (related to annual salary increases)
and investments in business growth and scalability.
Net additions to loan loss provisions amounted to €171 million (15 basis
points of average customer lending) and were primarily related to
consumer lending and portfolio sales.
Retail Other
Retail Other comprises the retail markets in Spain, Italy, Australia, Poland,
Romania and Türkiye. The result before tax for Retail Other was €1,680
million compared with €1,605 million in 2024, with income growth more
than offsetting a modest increase in expenses and higher risk costs.
Net core lending growth reached €13.4 billion. This was led by an €11.1
billion expansion in the mortgage portfolio — most notably in Australia,
Italy, Spain, and Poland — alongside continued growth in business and
consumer lending. Net core deposits growth amounted to €12.6 billion,
reflecting substantial net inflows, particularly in Spain, Italy, and Poland.
Commercial net interest income rose 1.5% to €3,698 million, as the
favourable impact of higher lending and deposit volumes more than
compensated for lower liability margins and negative currency impacts.
Other net interest income increased because the prior year had included a
€-39 million impact from the Polish mortgage moratorium.
Net fee and commission income increased significantly to €717 million,
representing an 18% year-on-year rise. Fee income from investment
products grew substantially, driven by net inflows and a higher number of
trades. This was complemented by markedly higher fee income from daily
banking services and insurance, reflecting both customer growth and
successful cross-selling initiatives. Investment and other income also rose
year-on-year, thanks to an increase in Treasury-related income.
Operating expenses in 2025 amounted to €2,905 million. This included
€287 million of regulatory costs, a 10% increase, primarily due to a higher
contribution to the deposit guarantee scheme and increased bank taxes in
Poland. The previous year’s expenses had included €17 million in incidental
restructuring costs (versus €6 million in 2025) and a €35 million legal
provision. Excluding regulatory costs and these one-off items, expenses
rose 5.3%, mainly as a result of inflationary pressures and ongoing
investments in future business growth.
The net addition to loan loss provisions was €323 million, or 26 basis points
of average customer lending, with additions mainly in Poland.
Wholesale Banking
Wholesale Banking
in EUR million
2025
2024
Change
Commercial net interest income
3,969
3,952
0.4%
Other net interest income
-972
-693
Net interest income
2,997
3,259
-8.0%
Net fee and commission income
1,433
1,317
8.8%
Total investment and other income
2,579
2,405
7.2%
Total income
7,009
6,981
0.4%
of which:
    Lending
3,287
3,278
0.3%
    Daily Banking & Trade Finance
1,887
1,954
-3.4%
    Financial Markets
1,512
1,417
6.7%
    Treasury & Other
323
332
-2.7%
Total income
7,009
6,981
0.4%
Expenses excl. regulatory costs
3,618
3,346
8.1%
Regulatory costs
219
212
3.3%
Operating expenses
3,837
3,558
7.8%
Gross result
3,173
3,423
-7.3%
Addition to loan loss provisions
549
627
-12.4%
Result before taxation
2,624
2,796
-6.2%
Taxation
673
693
-2.9%
Non-controlling interests
48
35
37.1%
Net result IFRS
1,902
2,068
-8.0%
Key figures
Net core lending growth (in € billion)
18.3
1.8
Net core deposits growth (in € billion)
8.0
15.8
Cost/income ratio
54.7%
51.0%
Risk costs in bps of average customer lending
28
33
Return on equity based on 13.0% CET11
10.0%
10.6%
1After-tax return divided by average equity based on 13.0% of risk-weighted assets.
Wholesale Banking delivered a robust performance in 2025, with a result
before tax of €2,624 million, compared with €2,796 million in the previous
year. Total income grew slightly amid ongoing geopolitical uncertainties,
and was supported by a 9% rise in fee income, reflecting our strategic
focus on diversifying income streams. This growth helped to mitigate the
impact of margin compression in Payments & Cash Management and
€-200 million in negative currency impacts. Earnings were also impacted
by elevated investment costs aimed at supporting future growth and €90
million in restructuring provisions. Disciplined capital management —
highlighted by the successful execution of two significant risk-transfer
transactions — supported the €3.6 billion (or 2.4%) reduction in risk-
weighted assets and a return on equity of 10.0% in 2025.
Net core lending growth was significant at €18.3 billion. This was driven by
higher volumes in Working Capital Solutions and short-term trade-related
financing, alongside a recovery in long-term loan demand in the second
half of the year.
Net core deposits growth was €8.0 billion, reflecting net inflows in
Payments & Cash Management and Financial Markets.
Total income from Lending increased slightly, supported by higher
volumes and an increase in fee income. This was partly offset by negative
currency movements. The rise in deal flow and fee income highlights the
strength of our client relationships and advisory capabilities. Through
disciplined capital management, we reduced risk-weighted assets within
Lending by 5.3%, with capital-velocity measures offsetting lending growth
and currency movements also contributing.
Income from Daily Banking & Trade Finance declined 3.4% year-on-year.
Higher revenues from increased client demand in Working Capital
Solutions and Trade Finance Services, as well as a strong performance in
our cash pooling business, were more than offset by margin compression
in Payments & Cash Management.
Financial Markets income increased 6.7% to €1,512 million. This reflects
strong results in Interest Rate Derivatives, FX, Equity Derivatives, and
Capital Markets issuance, all benefiting from healthy client flows and
favourable market conditions.
Income from Treasury & Other declined by €9 million year-on-year, as
higher income from Corporate Investments almost fully offset a €70
million one-off income recorded in 2024.
Operating expenses for 2025 included €90 million in restructuring costs
(versus €10 million in 2024), of which €85 million related to workforce
redundancies — part of our efforts to ensure our teams are well positioned
for the future. Excluding these incidental costs as well as regulatory costs
(which increased slightly to €219 million), expenses rose 5.8% year-on-
year, driven by targeted, multi-year investment initiatives — focused on
digital foundations, platforms, and product capabilities — that are required
to structurally improve long-term profitability.
Net additions to loan loss provisions declined to €549 million (equivalent to
28 basis points of average customer lending), down from €627 million in
2024. Individual Stage 3 risk costs fell sharply due to lower inflows,
repayments and recoveries. Risk costs in Stage 1 and 2 were higher, as
2024 had included releases from collective provisions, including a partial
release of management overlays.
Our leadership and corporate governance
Our leadership
      and corporate
  governance
Our leadership and corporate governance
Effective governance is essential for ING to realise
its strategic ambitions and to safeguard the
interests of customers and other stakeholders. Our
leadership plays a pivotal role in this: the
Supervisory Board (SB) supervises and advises the
Management Board Banking (MBB) and oversees
the activities of ING and the business connected
with it.
We aim for a balanced composition of our SB and MBB, with the boards
consisting of a selection of people with - among other things - diverse
knowledge, skills and executive experience, preferably gained in the
banking sector, in large (stock-listed) companies and in the political and
social environment in which such companies operate.
There should also be a balance of experience and affinity with the nature
and culture of the business of ING. The boards play a role in setting and
promoting the culture, and underlying values, behaviours and code of
conduct that help to run our business in a way that contributes to
sustainable long-term value creation for our customers, our people, our
shareholders and society.
ING has a matrix structure combining hierarchical and functional lines that
work together to achieve a common goal, with dedicated roles and
responsibilities and mechanisms for reporting, delegation, decision-making
and escalation. ING’s risk governance safeguards the functioning of the
matrix structure and is based on the three-lines-of-defence model, which
has segregated duties and independent internal control functions.
Read more on ING’s risk governance and three lines of defence in 'Risk
strategy_our-leadership-and-corporate-governance.jpg
Members of the Supervisory Board
members-of-the-sc_karl.jpg
members-of-the-sc_mike.jpg
members-of-the-sc_juan.jpg
members-of-the-sc_stuart.jpg
Karl
Guha
(chairperson)
Born 1964
Nationality Dutch
Term expires 2027
Mike
Rees
(vice-chairperson)
Born  1956
Nationality British
Term expires  2027
Juan
Colombás
Born   1962
Nationality  Spanish
Term expires  2028
Stuart
Graham
Born   1967
Nationality  British/German
Term expires  2029
Karl was appointed chairperson of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2023.
Karl is chairperson of the Nomination and Corporate
Governance Committee and a member of the
Remuneration Committee, the Risk Committee, the Audit
Committee, the ESG Committee and the Technology &
Operations Committee.
Mike was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2019.
Mike is vice-chairperson of the SB, chairperson of the Risk
Committee and a member of the Nomination and
Corporate Governance Committee and the Audit
Committee.
Juan was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2020.
Juan is chairperson of the Technology & Operations
Committee and a member of the Risk Committee, the
Audit Committee and the ESG Committee.
Stuart was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2025.
Stuart is a member of the Risk Committee, the ESG
Committee, the Technology & Operations Committee and
the Audit Committee.
Former position
CEO of Van Lanschot Kempen N.V.
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Chairperson of the SB
§ Member of the supervisory board of SHV Holdings N.V.
§ Non-executive board member of Exor N.V.
Other ancillary positions
§ Member of the supervisory board of Rijksmuseum Fonds
Former position
Deputy CEO of Standard Chartered Bank PLC
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Vice-chairperson of the SB
§ Non-executive chairperson of the board of directors of
Midlands Mindforge
Other ancillary positions
§ Non-executive chairperson of the board of directors of
Mauritius Africa FinTech Hub
Former position
Chief operating officer, chief risk officer and executive board
member of the board of directors of Lloyds Banking Group
PLC
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Non-executive member of the board of directors of Azora
Capital S.L., Azora Investment Management S.L. and
Azora Gestion SGIIC
§ Non-executive chairperson of the board of directors of
Bluserena Spa Unipersonale
Other ancillary positions
§ Member of the global alumni advisory board of the
Institute de Empresa (IE) Business School
Former position
Co-founder and CEO of Autonomous Research
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
Other ancillary positions
§ None
members-of-the-sc_margarete.jpg
members-of-the-sc_lodewijk.jpg
members-of-the-sc_petri.jpg
members-of-the-sc_herman.jpg
Margarete
Haase
Born 1953
Nationality Austrian
Term expires 2027
Lodewijk Hijmans
van den Bergh
Born 1963
Nationality Dutch
Term expires 2029
Petri
Hofsté
Born  1961
Nationality  Dutch
Term expires  2029
Herman
Hulst
Born  1955
Nationality  Dutch
Term expires  2028
Margarete was appointed a member of the SB at the
General Meeting in May 2017.
Margarete is chairperson of the Audit Committee and a
member of the Risk Committee and the Remuneration
Committee.
Lodewijk was appointed a member of the SB at the
General Meeting in April 2021.
Lodewijk is chairperson of the ESG Committee and a
member of the Risk Committee.
Petri was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2025.
Petri is a member of the Risk Committee and the Audit
Committee.
Herman was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2020.
Herman is a member of the Audit Committee, the Risk
Committee and the ESG Committee.
Former position
CFO of Deutz AG
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Chairperson of the supervisory board of ams-OSRAM AG
§ Member of the supervisory board of Fraport AG
Other ancillary positions
§ Chairperson of the employers association of Kölnmetall
§ Member of the German Corporate Governance
Commission
Former position
Partner/member of the management committee of De
Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Member of the supervisory board of HAL Holding N.V.
§ Member of the supervisory board of Heineken N.V.
Other ancillary positions
§ Chairperson of the executive committee of Vereniging
Aegon
Former position
Various supervisory board positions at financial institutions,
(former) ABN Amro Group N.V. deputy CFO and DNB division
director banking supervision
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Member of the supervisory board of Royal Friesland
Campina N.V.
§ Member of the supervisory board of Pon Holdings B.V.
Other ancillary positions
§ Chair of the foundation board of the Nyenrode
Foundation
§ Member of the board of Oranje Fonds
§ Member of the NBA Stakeholders Forum
§ Member of the committee of reporting & accountancy
(Commissie Verslaggeving & Accountancy) of AFM
Former position
Global vice-chairperson EY Japan
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
Other ancillary positions
§ None
members-of-the-sc_harold.jpg
members-of-the-sc_alexandra.jpg
members-of-the-sc_herna.jpg
Harold
Naus
Born 1969
Nationality Dutch
Term expires 2028
Alexandra
Reich
Born 1963
Nationality Austrian
Term expires 2027
Herna
Verhagen
Born   1966
Nationality  Dutch
Term expires  2027
Harold was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2020.
Harold is a member of the Remuneration Committee, the
Risk Committee and the Technology & Operations
Committee.
Alexandra was appointed a member of the SB at the
General Meeting in April 2023.
Alexandra is a member of the Risk Committee, the
Technology & Operations Committee and the ESG
Committee.
Herna was appointed a member of the SB at the General
Meeting in April 2019. 
Herna is chairperson of the Remuneration Committee and
a member of the Nomination and Corporate Governance
Committee and the Risk Committee.
Former position
Global head of Trading Risk Management and general
manager Market Risk of ING Bank and CEO of various
Cardano entities
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Chairman of the advisory board of Cardano Nederland
B.V.
§ Member of the supervisory board and chair of the Audit
Committee and the Appointment & Remuneration
Committee of N.V. Eneco
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Former position
CEO of Telenor Thailand
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Member of the non-executive board of directors of Cellnex
Telecom S.A.
§ Member of the non-executive board of directors of DELTA
Fiber
§ Non-executive director on the board of the Connecting
Europe Broadband Fund
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Former position
CEO of PostNL N.V.
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the SB
§ Member of the supervisory board of Koninklijke Philips
N.V.
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Supervisory Board in numbers
Board members
11
Average age
62
Nationalities
5
Average board tenure (years)
4
Female
36%
person_at_desk_outline 2.svg
Independent board members*
100%
*As defined by the Dutch Corporate Governance Code
Members of the Executive Board and Management Board Banking
members-of-the-eb-mb_steven.jpg
members-of-the-eb-mb_tanate.jpg
members-of-the-eb-mb_ljiljana.jpg
members-of-the-eb-mb_pinar.jpg
Steven van
Rijswijk
(CEO)
Born 1970
Nationality Dutch
Tanate
Phutrakul
(CFO)
Born  1965
Nationality Thai
Ljiljana
Čortan
(CRO)
Born   1971
Nationality Croatian
Pinar
Abay
Born  1977
Nationality Turkish
Steven was appointed a member of the EB in May 2017
and a member of the MBB in August 2017. He has been
CEO and chairperson of both boards since July 2020. Prior
to his appointment as CEO and chairperson, he was the
chief risk officer.
Steven is responsible for ING's strategy, including ESG and
sustainability, and leads ING's governance including the
decision-making process, results, culture, branding,
reputation and people.
Tanate was appointed as chief financial officer and a
member of the MBB in February 2019. Subsequently,
Tanate was appointed a member of the EB at the Annual
General Meeting in April 2019.
Tanate is responsible for ING's financial strategy,
budgeting, cost control, and the financing of the company.
Ljiljana was appointed as chief risk officer and a member
of the MBB effective January 2021. Ljiljana was appointed
a member of the EB at the Annual General Meeting in April
2021.
Ljiljana is responsible for ING's risk activities, including
formulating our risk management framework and risk
appetite, risk culture and awareness, risk governance and
policies and compliance.
Pinar was appointed a member of the MBB in January
2020. She is also head of Retail, Market Leaders and
Challengers & Growth Markets.
Pinar is responsible for ING's retail banking activities
globally.
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ CEO and chairperson of the EB and MBB
Other ancillary positions
§ Member of the management board of the Nederlandse
Vereniging van Banken (NVB)
§ Member of the Cyber Security Council (CSR)
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ CFO and member of the EB and the MBB
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ CRO and member of the EB and the MBB
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the MBB
§ Non-executive member of the board of ING Belgium N.V./
S.A.
§ Member of the supervisory board of ING-DiBa A.G.
§ Member of the board of EPI Company SE
Other ancillary positions
§ None
members-of-the-eb-mb_andrew.jpg
members-of-the-eb-mb_marnix.jpg
members-of-the-eb-mb_daniele.jpg
Andrew
Bester
Born 1965
Nationality British/South African
Marnix
van Stiphout
(COO)
Born   1970
Nationality Dutch
Daniele
Tonella
(CTO)
Born  1971
Nationality Swiss
Andrew was appointed a member of the MBB and head of
Wholesale Banking in April 2021.
Andrew is responsible for ING's wholesale banking
activities globally.
Marnix was appointed a member of the MBB and chief
operations officer in September 2021.
Marnix is responsible for translating, overseeing, and
embedding ING's strategies into a strategy for the
operations function.
Daniele was appointed a member of the MBB and chief
technology officer in August 2024.
Daniele is responsible for overseeing and managing the
total IT landscape and advising on technology-driven
business opportunities.
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the MBB
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the MBB
Other ancillary positions
§ None
Relevant CRD IV position(s)
§ Member of the MBB
Other ancillary positions
§ Member of the Tech Advisory Board of The Hg Foundation
Executive Board in
numbers
Board
members
3
Average age
56
Nationalities
3
Average board
tenure (years)
6
Female
33%
Management Board
Banking in numbers
Board
members
7
Average age
55
Nationalities
6
Average board
tenure (years)
4.5
Female
29%
Supervisory Board report
This section contains the Supervisory Board report,
with information on the meetings of the SB and its
committees, attendance of SB members and the
MBB and SB annual self-evaluation.
Meetings of the Supervisory Board
The Supervisory Board (SB) met 13 times in 2025 and focused in particular
on strategy, including growth, risk, geopolitical developments, technology
and digitalisation, people & succession, and operational and regulatory
resilience. The Management Board Banking (MBB) were present at regular
SB meetings. The SB also had sessions without the MBB when this was
justified by the nature of the topics on the agenda. The purpose of these
sessions and SB-only meetings is to allow the SB to reflect independently
on and consider important matters in the absence of the MBB. The SB also
had so-called ‘Restricted SB meetings’, with only the CEO attending, except
when matters concerning the CEO were discussed. Topics addressed were
primarily nomination- and remuneration-related matters, and additional
attention was given to preliminary strategic and governance topics.
In regular SB meetings, ING staff, the auditors and advisors are frequently
asked to provide presentations on specific topics. Examples of such topics
are progress of ING’s performance in the various countries and business
lines, supervisory developments including the ECB’s Supervisory Review
and Evaluation Process (SREP), geopolitical developments including
defence, the financing of ING in accordance with ING’s capital and liquidity
adequacy, ING’s dividend and distribution policy, ING’s financials, investor
relations updates, strategy including M&A ambitions, risk appetite, audit
plans, and regulatory themes with a global ING scope. These topics
included operational resilience, cybersecurity, the use of GenAI, private
credit, third party & vendor management and ESG-related matters.
The SB was also informed throughout the year of potential financial, non-
financial and compliance risks for ING, including the political and economic
developments in various countries and regions, climate- and ESG-related
risks, cybersecurity and ransomware. Macroeconomic and geopolitical
uncertainty remains prevalent in 2025. In that context, the SB closely
monitored the macroeconomic developments and discussed the potential
consequences for ING’s operations with the MBB.
As one of the key focus areas, the SB regularly discusses the execution and
delivery of ING’s 'Growing the Difference' strategy with the MBB to accelerate
growth, increase our impact and deliver customer value, and to reach our
financial targets for 2027 and beyond. For more information, see 'Our
As core enablers of ING’s strategy, the SB maintained close oversight of the
digitalisation and scalability agenda. The objective is to deliver scalable
technology and operations that enable seamless, fully digital services, ensuring
an enhanced customer experience while maintaining the highest standards of
safety and security. Continued emphasis on operational resilience, supported
by robust monitoring, strengthens ING’s ability to anticipate and respond
swiftly to disruptions, thereby minimising their impact on customers.
One of the core pillars of ING’s strategy is sustainability and it is central to our
long-term commercial success. The need to support our clients in their
transition to a low-carbon business model comes with both opportunities and
risks, and it is ING’s ambition to play a an important role in supporting this
transition. That’s why we aim to put sustainability at the heart of what we do.
The MBB's focus on climate action and the Terra approach were discussion
items, including other ESG-related matters.
In addition to reviews by the SB of the composition and succession planning of
the SB and MBB, the SB also discussed broader people development,
organisational health within ING, and diversity and inclusion matters. In the
SB’s discussions with HR and the MBB, the focus is on talent and leadership,
culture and organisation, including the bank-wide diversity and inclusion
approach, and on operational excellence. Plans to develop, attract and retain
talent have been part of those discussions, as well as gender diversity targets.
The SB discusses and reconfirms all of its members’ outside positions on an
annual basis. In addition, it discusses any intended outside positions and
assesses if such positions can be approved while safeguarding the level of
engagement.
Attendance of SB members
The attendance rates in 2025 of SB members for SB and SB committee
meetings, as well as the number of meetings held, are listed in the
following table. The continued high attendance demonstrates that SB
members are engaged with ING and are able to devote sufficient time and
attention to overseeing ING's affairs.
In addition to the information included in this SB report, information on the
SB attendance 20251,2
SB
RiCo3
AC
NCGcom4
RemCo
ESGcom
T&Ocom
Karl Guha (chairperson)
13/13
8/8
7/7
10/10
7/7
4/4
6/6
Mike Rees (vice-chairperson)
13/13
8/8
7/7
10/10
Juan Colombás
12/13
8/8
7/7
4/4
6/6
Stuart Graham 5
4/5
4/4
2/2
3/3
Margarete Haase
12/13
7/8
7/7
6/7
Lodewijk Hijmans van den Bergh
12/13
8/8
4/4
Petri Hofsté 6
4/5
3/3
1/1
Herman Hulst
13/13
8/8
7/7
4/4
Harold Naus
11/13
8/8
7/7
6/6
Alexandra Reich
11/13
5/8
4/4
5/6
Herna Verhagen
12/13
8/8
9/10
7/7
Total attendance 7
91%
95%
100%
97%
96%
100%
97%
1This SB attendance overview shows the SB (committee) meetings that took place during the year.
In addition to these meetings, there were 12 Restricted SB meetings in 2025 in view of nomination
and remuneration matters, with a total attendance rate of 96% percent. These are not shown
separately in the overview for year-on-year, like-for-like comparison purposes.
2Abbreviations used: RiCo = Risk Committee, AC = Audit Committee, NCGcom = Nomination and
Corporate Governance Committee, RemCo = Remuneration Committee, ESGcom = ESG Committee;
T&Ocom = Technology & Operations Committee
3In addition to the eight regular RiCo meetings, in 2025, two RiCo meetings were held in
combination with the RemCo on remuneration matters that also required a risk view.
4In 2025, one NCGcom meeting was held in combination with the RemCo.
5Stuart Graham was appointed to the SB, the RiCo, the ESGcom and the T&Ocom effective 1 July
2025. He was also appointed to the AC effective 28 January 2026 and therefore did not attend any
AC meetings in 2025. His attendance is shown relative to his tenure. 
6Petri Hofsté was appointed to the SB effective 1 July 2025 and to the RiCo and the AC effective 1
August 2025. Her attendance is shown relative to her tenure.
7The numbers exclude SB observers, if any. If SB members cannot join a meeting they will always
receive the meeting materials prior to the meetings to allow them to provide feedback.
SB committee meetings and composition
There are currently six SB committees: the Risk Committee, the Audit
Committee, the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee, the
Remuneration Committee, the ESG Committee and the Technology &
Operations Committee. The committees report to the SB on their
deliberations and findings, prepare discussion and decision items, and
thereby play a significant role in supporting the SB in its oversight and
supervisory activities, allowing it to operate effectively. As such, all
relevant items discussed by the committees were reported to the SB, with
the SB approving those items if required from a governance
perspective.There was frequent interaction between the chairpersons of
the relevant SB committees and the members of the MBB. Furthermore,
the chairpersons of the Risk Committee and the Audit Committee
continued their informal interaction with the chairpersons of the local risk
and audit committees of ING’s five largest subsidiaries to enrich the SB
dialogue.
To manage each of the committees’ annual cycle of work and potential
committee interdependencies, each committee has drawn up an annual
work plan that is reviewed and updated throughout the year for priority-
setting and forward-looking purposes. These plans all feed into the SB’s
annual meeting cycle.
Composition of the SB committees on 31 December 2025
Supervisory Board
Risk Committee
Audit Committee
Nomination and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
Remuneration
Committee
ESG Committee
Technology &
Operations
Committee
Karl Guha (chairperson)
Member
Member
Chairperson
Member
Member
Member
Mike Rees (vice-chairperson)
Chairperson
Member
Member
—
—
—
Juan Colombás
Member
Member
—
—
Member
Chairperson
Stuart Graham
Member
—
—
—
Member
Member
Margarete Haase
Member
Chairperson
—
Member
—
—
Lodewijk Hijmans van den Bergh
Member
—
—
—
Chairperson
—
Petri Hofsté
Member
Member
—
—
—
—
Herman Hulst
Member
Member
—
—
Member
—
Harold Naus
Member
—
—
Member
—
Member
Alexandra Reich
Member
—
—
—
Member
Member
Herna Verhagen
Member
—
Member
Chairperson
—
—
Risk Committee
The Risk Committee met eight times in 2025, and two of these meetings
were combined with the Remuneration Committee to address
remuneration-related proposals that include risk methodology elements,
such as those relating to the Variable Remuneration Accrual Model (VRAM) 
(see also ‘Remuneration Committee’). All SB members are also member of
the Risk Committee, due to the continued importance of risk and how this
is managed and supervised. 
The Risk Committee assists and advises the SB with the performance of its
duties in relation to overseeing the setting and monitoring of ING’s risk
appetite and risk strategy for all types of risk. This includes but is not
limited to financial, non-financial and compliance risk, the effectiveness of
the internal risk management and control systems and other related risk
management topics.
At each quarterly Risk Committee meeting financial and model risks, non-
financial risks and compliance risks were discussed. This included the
status of ING’s accompanying metrics, such as for risks in the areas of
solvency, liquidity and funding, credit, market, non-financial risk and
compliance. The discussions were supported by different analyses
conducted on the macroeconomic and geopolitical impact and the
changing interest rate environment on ING and its customers and updates
on credit developments in certain countries and portfolios. The non-
financial and compliance risk discussions were supported by updates of
the bank-wide global financial crime prevention (GFCP) enhancement and
maturity efforts, a variety of topical dashboards such as on IT (risk),
cybersecurity, third-party risk, conduct & ethics and data protection
(including GDPR), and the status of implementation of related regulatory
programmes. The Risk Committee also regularly discussed the status of
reported whistleblower concerns, reviewed and discussed the annual
review of the Risk Appetite Framework, the annual update to ING’s
Recovery Plan and received updates on and discussed cybersecurity,
developments in AI, ING's IT risk control framework, and the management
of third-party risk in relation to outsourcing.
Thematic sessions were organised on a variety of topics to focus
specifically on themes that needed further attention and/or are forward
looking with respect to emerging risks and developments. Also, four deep
dives were organised for the Risk Committee in 2025 to contribute to a
more in-depth understanding of, among others, non-bank financial
institutions, leveraged finance and the impact of geopolitical risk on ING.
For more information on how ING manages its risks, see ‘Risk
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee met seven times in 2025. The Audit Committee
assists and advises the SB in performing its duties relating to the integrity
and quality of ING’s financial and non-financial reporting, as well as the
effectiveness of ING’s internal risk management and control systems in
relation to financial and non-financial reporting.
Throughout 2025, the Audit Committee addressed a range of recurring
topics, including those relating to financial reporting, such as the interim
accounts and financial statements and the Annual Report. The Audit
Committee also discussed judgemental accounting topics and key audit
matters identified in the auditors’ reports. Attention was given to the
external auditor’s audit plan, including the financial audit plan, as well as
the related engagement letters, independence reporting, and fees.
Updates were provided to the Audit Committee throughout 2025 with
regard to the status of Deloitte, ING's new external auditor as per the 2026
financial year in order to comply with the mandatory external auditor
rotation. Deloitte declared its independence in relation to ING as of 28 July
2025 in its role as new external auditor and it was confirmed that
Deloitte's independence is compliant with applicable rules and regulations.
In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed the overall internal control
environment and the internal controls over financial reporting, as well as
the work performed by both internal and external audit functions. The
Audit Committee also discussed matters related to the financing of the
company, including assessments of ING’s capital and liquidity position.
In 2025, specific attention was given to several key topics, including a
review of ING’s equity stakes and joint ventures. Furthermore, the Audit
Committee reviewed IFRS 9 and ESG disclosures and considered
developments under Pillar III.
To ensure proper preparation for the regular meetings, the chairperson of
the Audit Committee held separate sessions with the external auditor, the
general manager of the Internal Audit department, the chief financial
officer, and the group controller. The chairperson also met with the newly
appointed external auditor for 2026, to monitor the auditor transition
process and with various senior managers to remain informed of key
developments within their areas of responsibility.
Directly following each Audit Committee meeting, members of the Audit
Committee held a closed session with the internal and external auditors to
seek confirmation that all relevant topics had been discussed in the Audit
Committee meetings.
Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee met 10 times in
2025. The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee assists the
SB in performing its duties, including the selection and nomination of
members for the SB and MBB, as well as overseeing talent management
and the effectiveness of ING’s governance arrangements.
With regard to nomination-related matters, ING aims to ensure that all of
its boards are, at all times, adequately composed to perform their duties.
As its standard practice, the Nomination and Corporate Governance
Committee therefore discusses the performance of the individual
members of the MBB (also serving as input to the Remuneration
Committee), MBB and SB composition, bench strength and medium- to
long-term succession planning. A continuing conversation on MBB
succession planning is facilitated by the chief human resources officer as
part of the regular Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee
meetings in the form of deep dives by function and business line.
When selecting suitable board succession candidates, there are various
aspects to take into account regarding the board composition, such as
strategic priorities, regulatory requirements, suitability considerations,
banking and other industry knowledge, outside positions, independence,
potential conflicts of interest and availability. Also considered are the
minimum and optimal size of a board and diversity aspects, such as how
to arrive at an appropriate balance in its representation of regions, age,
gender, knowledge and expertise. The generic profile of the SB aims to
capture these elements. The profiles can be found on ing.com. Find more
on the boards’ composition in the ‘Composition of the Management Board
Banking and Supervisory Board’ and in the Diversity and Competence
Matrix.
The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee also focuses on
ING’s broader talent and succession planning in view of bench strength
and diversity at higher management levels, with selected key roles
receiving dedicated attention. This is done by taking into account ING’s
diversity and inclusion policy and by accelerating refreshment where
possible without jeopardising business continuity. The committee also
holds periodic conversations outside of its regular meetings with internal
talented individuals who are considered to have the potential to assume
more senior and complex roles in the organisation over time. The results of
these conversations feed into the individuals’ coaching and development
plans.
With regard to corporate governance, the Nomination and Corporate
Governance Committee discussed among other things the suitability
procedure being one of ING's key policies and its global implementation,
ING’s Governance Framework as well as organisational effectiveness,
annual updates to the corporate board charters and ING’s decision
structure. 
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee met seven times in 2025. The
Remuneration Committee assists the SB with the performance of its duties
in relation to remuneration, the remuneration policies and their
application and compliance. In doing so, the Remuneration Committee
takes into account the adequacy of information provided to shareholders
on remuneration policies and practices.
As an annual recurring topic, the Remuneration Committee reviewed the
remuneration report by way of benchmarking and alignment to shareholder
expectations in order to further improve it. In addition, the Remuneration
Committee discussed the progress and performance on the annual targets
set for the MBB, the SB remuneration policy update, SB remuneration
matters, including the benchmarking results, the identified staff and high
earner-related remuneration matters based on ING’s remuneration
governance structure, the variable remuneration and the application of ING’s
accompanying VRAM and updates to ING’s Remuneration Regulations
Framework.
ESG Committee
The ESG Committee met four times in 2025. The ESG Committee assists
the SB with matters relating to the various areas of ESG, including but not
limited to, the development of ESG and its integration in the company and
its strategy and ESG-related disclosures, reporting and assurance (the
latter together with the Audit Committee). In addition, the ESG Committee
assists the SB by monitoring and advising on potential impediments as
well as relevant trends and developments on ‘environmental’, ‘social’ and
‘governance’ topics and how to connect them with ING’s response, actions
and targets on the basis of ING’s ESG dashboard.
The ESG Committee discussed, among other things, ESG strategy
performance and updates, the outcome of the double materiality
assessment, ESG dilemmas and external ESG reporting. Given the dynamic
and continuously evolving nature of ESG, deep dives were held to
contribute to a more in-depth understanding of certain ESG- centred
topics.
Technology and Operations Committee
The Technology and Operations Committee met six times in 2025. The
Technology and Operations Committee assists the SB in relation to
oversight of ING’s use of technology and ING's operations. This includes the
technology strategy, major technology initiatives and programmes, and
other technology and operations-related topics.
The Technology and Operations Committee discussed, among other
things, ING’s cybersecurity strategy (together with the Risk Committee),
analytics developments, (Gen)AI opportunities and developments from
several perspectives, ING's data strategy and developments around the
ING Hubs. The Technology and Operations Committee was also provided
with a number of outside-in views on technology developments and
trends.
Continuous dialogue with stakeholders
At ING, we seek out open dialogue and maintain continuous interaction
with our stakeholders, responding to their views and concerns, to drive
increased collaboration. We aim to strike a balance between the interests
of all stakeholders, including customers, shareholders, employees,
regulators, supervisors, and society at large. In 2025, the SB had periodic
conversations with various stakeholders, including our clients and
shareholders, employees, supervisors and the MBB. A specific topic that
ING actively engaged on with investors and stakeholders, including
regulators, was the update of the SB remuneration policy. The SB exercised
its oversight role, which aimed to ensure that actions resulting from these
conversations were embedded in the organisation and were followed up
effectively. Examples of topics covered in 2025 in this respect are
cybersecurity, availability and reliability of ING’s channels, use of GenAI,
remuneration, climate risks, and other ESG-related topics.
The dialogue between ING and supervisors and regulators was a regular
agenda item for the SB throughout the year. This included several
discussions between the SB and the MBB on the results of and follow-up to
the annual SREP, through which the ECB aims to promote a resilient
banking system as a prerequisite for a sustainable and sound financing of
the economy. The SREP involves a comprehensive assessment of banks’
strategies, processes and risks, and takes a forward-looking view to
determine how much capital each bank needs to cover its risks.
Permanent education and other knowledge sessions
In 2025, several education sessions were organised, in line with prior years,
and delivered by both external and internal subject matter experts. These
sessions covered topics such as geopolitical and macroeconomic
developments and their impact on the bank, technology, people & talent
management, climate change, forward-looking overview of the global
regulatory environment, and governance. The sessions are aimed at
keeping the board up to date on ING relevant knowledge, skills and
expertise and at increasing the understanding of and engagement with
ING’s business operations and stakeholders.
For the newly appointed SB members, Stuart Graham and Petri Hofsté, a
comprehensive induction programme was designed to facilitate their
transition into the role.
In addition to the permanent education sessions, certain SB committees
held deep dives, which are technical discussions tailored to contribute to a
more in-depth understanding of key topics in the remit of the respective
committee.
As part of the annual business visit, the SB, together with the MBB, visited
the ING locations in Poland and Romania in September 2025. This visit
allowed the board members to get a better understanding of local clients,
business challenges and the country-specific market opportunities, also
contributing to a better mutual understanding and alignment on what
matters most to ING and its stakeholders.
The various educational sessions and the business visits provided
opportunities for SB members to interact with senior management,
subject-matter experts and local talent.
Management Board Banking and Supervisory Board
annual collective self-evaluation 
In 2025, an assessment of the MBB and SB collective self-evaluation took
place. Following this assessment, a renewed approach was adopted for the
self-evaluation, based on a recurring 3-year cycle in which a full review
followed by two interim reviews in subsequent years would take place. The
last full review took place over 2024 and therefore over 2025 an interim
review has taken place. This was facilitated by an independent external
party.
Results Management Board Banking
The MBB's collective dialogue was centred around the following questions:
1. Positive points: are the positive points previously identified still valid?
Where has the MBB further improved?
2. Priorities to improve: in the past year, did the MBB improve sufficiently
on the improvement areas previously defined? What would be the
priority areas the MBB needs to further improve in 2026?
The results of the review were positive overall and compared to previous
years, various positive points are still valid. The following points were
identified:
§ Management team composition, including skills, experience, and
diversity;
§ MBB dynamics, including quality of discussion / debate and balance of
contribution;
§ Overall management of meetings, including choreography, timing and
style of meetings and the evolution of the agendas;
§ Improved focus on operational / IT resilience and the macro-economic /
geopolitical conditions, M&A and other growth opportunities; and
§ Quality time devoted on talent management.
Areas to deprioritise were identified as follows:
§ Operational matters (e.g., KYC, model updates) that are now
considered well managed;
§ Time spent on Change & Transformation updates, given improved
governance structures; and
§ Detailed dashboards and KPIs for specific functions in order to focus
more on higher-level, strategic metrics.
Key priorities for the coming year were identified as follows:
§ Rebalancing the MBB’s focus towards strategic topics, particularly
technology and allocating more time on considering the strategic
implications of AI;
§ Increasing the consideration of customers, especially the customer
experience, digital customer journey and reducing friction;
§ Enhancing the focus on external developments, particularly
competitors and broader market trends, and spending more time on
outside-in perspectives;
§ Continuing investing in people / talent from strategic perspective to
enhance bench-strength; and
§ Effectively managing the transition and onboarding of (new) MBB
members, while defining the next phase of the culture.
Overall, the MBB agreed to a number of specific actions for 2026 to
contribute to its performance:
1. Continue educational and professional development sessions, with a
particular emphasis on AI.
2. Continue to optimise the MBB meeting agenda to enhance overall
effectiveness, including by allocating more time to strategic topics
while reducing focus on tactical and operational matters.
3. Develop the agenda for 2026 MBB ad hoc sessions to maximise impact
through incorporating external perspectives and ensuring that such
sessions are structured to facilitate the effective integration of new
MBB members.
Results Supervisory Board
The SB's collective dialogue was centred around the following questions:
1. Positive points: are the positive points previously identified still valid?
Where has the SB further improved?
2. Priorities to improve: in the past year, did the SB improve sufficiently on
the improvement areas previously defined? What would be the priority
areas the SB need to further improve in 2026?
The results of the review were positive overall and compared to previous
years, various positive points are still valid. The following points were
identified:
§ SB composition, including skills, experience, and diversity as well as the
interface between the Committees and the SB;
§ SB effectiveness at overseeing, supervising, challenging and advising
the EB and MBB;
§ Effective decision making through SB dialogues and interactions with
the EB and MBB;
§ Oversight of strategy, succession, compliance and risk;
§ Deep understanding of the external environment through enhanced
monitoring of macroeconomic and geopolitical developments and by
seeking external viewpoints; and
§ Taking into account the views of key stakeholders.
Key priorities for the coming year were identified as follows:
§ Continued focus on key topics with specific attention for strategy,
governance, succession & talent management, and digital & data;
§ Further deepen oversight of ING’s corporate structure and internal
governance model;
§ Enhanced focus on financial performance management and business
performance;
§ Continued monitoring of the external environment including
geopolitical developments, the competitive landscape and broader
market trends; and
§ Further optimised balance between strategic topics, operational
matters, governance matters, and regulatory updates to ensure
appropriate focus is given to each.
Overall, the SB agreed to a number of specific actions for 2026 to
contribute to its performance:
1. Continued attention for developments in the external environment and
potential implications for ING.
2. Increase oversight on financial performance management including
cost management and its alignment with ING strategy.
3. Support the CEO throughout the imminent composition changes of the
Executive Board and Management Board Banking.
Composition of the Management Board Banking and
Supervisory Board
ING aims to ensure that the boards are – at all times – adequately
composed to perform their duties. ING believes that throughout 2025 its
boards were well composed and balanced. At the 2025 General Meeting,
Petri Hofsté and Stuart Graham were appointed as members of the SB and
Margarete Haase and Lodewijk Hijmans van den Bergh were reappointed
as SB members.
On 24 July 2025, it was announced that Tanate Phutrakul will step down
from his position as chief financial officer and member of the Management
Board Banking as of the 2026 General Meeting. On 29 October 2025, it was
announced that Ida Lerner will be appointed as chief financial officer and
member of the Management Board Banking effective 1 April 2026.
Furthermore, on 23 October 2025, it was announced that Ljiljana Čortan
will step down as CRO and will succeed Andrew Bester as head of
Wholesale Banking. It has since been announced that Ljiljana will start as
head of Wholesale Banking and leave her position as CRO on 24 February
2026. The process of determining a proposed successor for the role of chief
risk officer is ongoing.
On 20 January 2026, it was announced that Herna Verhagen will resign
from the Supervisory Board as of the 2026 General Meeting. Herna will also
step down as chairperson of the Remuneration Committee and as
member of the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee and the
Risk Committee.
For more information on the composition of the SB, see 'Corporate
Diversity and competence matrix
Please note the following:
§ The purpose of this matrix is to provide an overview of the experience
and competencies that ING considers to be the most relevant for its
stakeholders.
§ The matrix represents the extent to which ING’s board members have
such experience and competencies (either developed already before
joining ING and/or during their position(s) at ING). The matrix is
approved by the Management Board Banking and the Supervisory
Board.
§ The content of the matrix is subject to change in light of ING’s
continually changing situation, markets and environment.
§ For the appointments of new board members, all relevant
competencies are also shared with ING’s supervisors DNB/ECB based on
their standard suitability matrix to assess the collective competence of
members of the management/supervisory body.
Management Board (EB/MBB)
Diversity
Experience & Core Competencies
Year of birth
Gender
Nationality
Executive
experience
International
experience
Banking
Finance/audit
Risk
Operations
IT &
cybersecurity
ESG
Steven van Rijswijk
EB/MBB, CEO
1970
Male
Dutch
Tanate Phutrakul
EB/MBB, CFO
1965
Male
Thai
Ljiljana Čortan
EB/MBB, CRO
1971
Female
Croatian
Pinar Abay
MBB, head of Retail,
Market Leaders and
Challengers & Growth
Markets
1977
Female
Turkish
Andrew Bester
MBB, head of
Wholesale Banking
1965
Male
British/
South
African
Marnix van
Stiphout
MBB, chief operations
officer
1970
Male
Dutch
Daniele Tonella
MBB, CTO
1971
Male
Swiss
  Meets the required knowledge/experience criteria for the role and it implies the capacity to take educated decisions on the relevant matters.
MB-SB-icons_dot.svg
  In addition is considered an expert based on experience in the current or previous roles.
MB-SB-icons_asterisk.svg
Supervisory Board
Diversity
Experience & Core Competencies
Year of birth
Gender
Nationality
Executive
experience
International
experience
Banking
Finance/audit
Risk
Operations
IT &
cybersecurity
ESG
Karl Guha
Chairperson
1964
Male
Dutch
Mike Rees
Vice-chairperson
1956
Male
British
Juan Colombás
1962
Male
Spanish
Margarete Haase
1953
Female
Austrian
Lodewijk Hijmans
van den Bergh
1963
Male
Dutch
Herman Hulst
1955
Male
Dutch
Harold Naus
1969
Male
Dutch
Alexandra Reich
1963
Female
Austrian
Herna Verhagen
1966
Female
Dutch
Petri Hofsté
1961
Female
Dutch
Stuart Graham
1967
Male
British/
German
Appreciation for management and employees
The SB would like to thank management and the employees for their
collaboration and hard work to execute our strategy to accelerate growth,
increase our impact and deliver customer value. ING delivered a strong
financial performance in 2025, despite the uncertain economic and volatile
geopolitical circumstances and this would not been possible without
dedication of our employees.
The SB expresses its sincere appreciation to all employees for their
commitment throughout the year.
Amsterdam, 23 February 2026
images_sc-report.jpg
Corporate governance
This section comprises ING Bank N.V.’s Corporate
Governance Statement, together with the
paragraph 'Own workforce strategy – Unlocking
our people’s full potential', the below-mentioned
booklets and other parts of this Annual Report to
which reference is made in the booklets, comprise
the corporate governance statement referred to in
section 2a of the Dutch Decree on information in
the management board report (Besluit inhoud
bestuursverslag).
Dutch Banking Code
The Dutch Banking Code is applied by ING Bank N.V. (ING Bank). The
application by ING Bank is described in the booklet ‘Application of the
Dutch Banking Code by ING Bank (FY2025)’, dated 26 February 2026,
available on ing.com. This is to be read in conjunction with and deemed to
be incorporated in the Annual Report of ING Bank. The Banking Code can
be downloaded from the website of the Dutch Banking Association
(nvb.nl).
Financial reporting
As ING Bank is a consolidated subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (ING Group), its
policies and procedures for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting are the same as those applied by ING
Group for its consolidated financial statements with respect to ING Bank
and the entities included in the latter's own consolidated financial
statements.
ING’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under
the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officers to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
ING's internal controls over financial reporting include those policies and
procedures that:
§ Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of ING;
§ Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our
receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorisations of our management and directors; and
§ Provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely
detection of unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of assets that
could have material effect on the financial statements.
ING has a process in place where, under the supervision and with the
participation of the CEO and CFO, the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting is evaluated, based on the criteria of the Committee of
Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission in Internal
Reporting (COSO) - Integrated Framework (2013 Framework).
Supervisory Board composition
ING aims to have an adequate and balanced composition of its SB, with a
mix of persons with knowledge, skills and executive experience, preferably
gained in the banking sector, experience in corporate governance of large
(stock-listed) companies and experience in the political and social
environment in which such companies operate. In the selection of SB
members, ING strivess, in line with applicable laws and regulations, for a
balance in nationality, gender education and work background. In
addition, there should be a balance of experience and affinity with the
nature and culture of the business of ING.
The SB is responsible for selecting and nominating candidates for
appointment or reappointment to the SB, among others based on the SB
profile, which is available on ing.com. The SB regularly assesses the
composition of the Supervisory Board.
As from 1 July 2025, the SB consisted of seven male members and four
female members. ING believes the Supervisory Board is well-balanced in
terms of other relevant diversity aspects. Furthermore, the SB had an
international composition in 2025, with six members of Dutch nationality
and five members of other nationalities.
Relevant positions pursuant to CRD IV
Members of the SB may hold other positions, including directorships, either
paid or unpaid. The Capital Requirements Directive 4 (CRD IV) restricts the
total number of supervisory board positions or non-executive directorships
with predominantly commercial organisations that may be held by a SB
member to four, or to two, if the SB member also has an executive board
position. The ECB may, under special circumstances, permit a SB member
to fulfil an additional supervisory board position or non-executive
directorship. Positions with, inter alia, subsidiaries or qualified holdings are
not taken into account in the application of these restrictions. Such
positions may not conflict with the interests of ING Bank. It is the
responsibility of the individual member of the SB and the SB collectively to
ensure that the directorship duties are performed properly and are not
affected by any other positions that the individual may hold outside ING
Bank.
Information on the members of the Supervisory
Board
Reference is made to the Our leadership section for information on the
members of the SB, which information is deemed incorporated by
reference. Also read more about the composition and duties of the SB and
its committees in the Supervisory Board report and on ing.com.
Management Board Banking composition
ING aims to have an adequate and balanced composition of its MBB, with a
diverse selection of persons with knowledge, skills and executive
experience, preferably gained in the banking sector, experience in
corporate governance of large (stock-listed) companies and experience in
the political and social environment in which such companies operate. In
addition, there should be a balance of experience and affinity with the
nature and culture of the business of ING. In the selection of the members
of the MBB, ING strives, in line with applicable laws and regulations, for a
balance in nationality, gender, education and work background. In
addition, there should be a balance of experience and affinity with the
nature and culture of the business of ING.
The SB regularly assesses the composition of the MBB.
The Gender Diversity Act, which came into force in the Netherlands on 1
January 2022, requires ING Group to set appropriate and ambitious targets
for gender diversity in its EB and senior management. ING Group has given
effect to that obligation on behalf of ING Bank. ING Group considers the
MBB to be part of this senior management  for which the target for gender
diversity is set at at least 30% by 2025.
Relevant positions pursuant to CRD IV
Members of the MBB may hold other positions, including directorships,
either paid or unpaid. CRD IV restricts the total number of supervisory
board positions or non-executive directorships with predominantly
commercial organisations that may be held by a Management Board
Banking member to two. Positions with, inter alia, subsidiaries or qualified
holdings are not taken into account in the application of these restrictions.
Such positions may not conflict with the interests of ING Bank.
Information on the members of the Management
Board Banking
Reference is made to the Our leadership and corporate governance section
for information on the members of the Management Board Banking, which
information is deemed incorporated by reference.
Conformity statement
The Management Board Banking is required to prepare the Financial
Statements and the Annual Report of ING Bank N.V. for each financial year
in accordance with applicable Dutch law and those International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) that were endorsed by the European Union.
Conformity statement pursuant to section 5:25c paragraph 2(c) of the
Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht).
The Management Board Banking is responsible for maintaining proper
accounting records, for safeguarding assets and for taking reasonable
steps to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. It is responsible
for selecting suitable accounting policies and applying them on a
consistent basis, making judgements and estimates that are prudent and
reasonable. It is also responsible for establishing and maintaining internal
procedures to ensure that all major financial information is known to the
Management Board Banking, so that the timeliness, completeness and
correctness of the external financial reporting are assured.
As required by section 5:25c paragraph 2(c) of the Dutch Financial
Supervision Act, each of the signatories hereby confirms that to the best of
his knowledge:
§ the ING Bank N.V. 2025 Financial Statements give a true and fair view of
the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of ING Bank
N.V. and the enterprises included in the consolidation taken as a whole;
and
§ the ING Bank N.V. 2025 Annual Report gives a true and fair view of the
position at the balance sheet date, the development and performance
of the business during the financial year 2025 of ING Bank and the
enterprises included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together
with a description of the principal risks ING Bank N.V. is being
confronted with.
Amsterdam, 23 February 2026
The Management Board Banking
S.J.A. (Steven) van Rijswijk
CEO, chairperson of the Management Board Banking
T. (Tanate) Phutrakul
CFO
L. (Ljiljana) Čortan
CRO
P. (Pinar) Abay
Head of Retail, Market Leaders and Challengers & Growth Markets
A.J.M. (Andrew) Bester
Head of Wholesale Banking
M.A. (Marnix) Stiphout
Chief operations officer
D. (Daniele) Tonella
Chief technology officer
Capital management
Capital
  management
Capital management
ING’s capital management strategy is designed to
maintain a robust capital position that adequately
covers all material risks, including economic risks,
across the Group, while ensuring compliance with
applicable local and global regulatory
requirements. At the same time, the strategy
supports sustainable value creation for
shareholders and enables ING to serve its clients
and underpin commercial activities. Despite an
uncertain and volatile geopolitical environment,
ING’s capital position remained strong during the
year. At both consolidated and entity levels, ING
maintains sufficient capital buffers to withstand a
range of adverse stress scenarios.
Capital management strategy
Group Treasury (GT) is responsible for maintaining adequate capitalisation
across ING Group and its banking entities to support the management of
risks associated with ING’s business activities. This includes capital
planning, allocation, and management within the Group, as well as the
execution of capital market, term capital funding, and risk management
transactions. ING employs an integrated approach to assessing capital
adequacy, whereby GT considers regulatory and internal economic capital
metrics alongside the interests of key stakeholders, including customers,
shareholders, and rating agencies.
ING applies the following main capital definitions:
§ Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital consists of shareholders’ equity
after the correction for applicable regulatory adjustments. The CET1
ratio is calculated as CET1 capital divided by risk-weighted assets
(RWAs).
§ Tier 1 capital is defined as CET1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 (AT1)
securities and other regulatory adjustments. The Tier 1 capital ratio is
defined as Tier 1 capital divided by RWAs.
§ Total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 subordinated liabilities,
after regulatory adjustments. The Total capital ratio is calculated as
Total capital divided by RWAs.
§ ING’s CET1 target ratio is built on the CET1 requirements specified for
ING, potential increase in the regulatory requirements, the potential
impact of a standardised and predetermined stress scenario and
available mitigating actions, and general uncertainties in its baseline
planning.
§ Leverage ratio (LR) is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by the leverage
exposure.
§ Minimum Required Eligible Liabilities (MREL)/Total Loss Absorbing
Capacity (TLAC) is Total capital plus senior unsecured bonds and
amortisations. Related MREL and TLAC ratios are expressed relative to
both risk-weighted assets and leverage exposure. 
Processes for managing capital
GT ensures adherence to ING’s solvency risk appetite statements by
capital planning and executing capital management transactions. The
ongoing assessment and monitoring of capital adequacy is embedded in
the capital planning process as part of the internal capital adequacy
assessment process (ICAAP) framework. As part of the dynamic business
planning process, ING prepares a capital and funding plan on a regular
basis for all its material businesses, and continuously assesses the timing,
need and feasibility for capital management actions in scope of its
execution strategy. Sufficient financial flexibility should be preserved to
meet important financial objectives. Risk appetite statements are at the
foundation of the capital plan and are cascaded to the different businesses
in line with ING’s risk management framework. Contingency capital
measures and early warning indicators are in place – in conjunction with
ING’s contingency and recovery plan – to support the strategy in times of
stress.
Adverse planning and stress testing, which reflect the outcome of the
annual risk assessment, are integral components of ING’s risk and capital
management framework. It allows us to (i) identify and assess potential
vulnerabilities in ING’s business model, business portfolios or operating
environment; (ii) understand the sensitivities of the core assumptions used
in ING’s strategic and capital plan; and (iii) improve decision-making and
business steering through balancing risk and return following a forward-
looking and prudent management approach.
Capital position as per 31 December 2025
ING Bank capital position according to CRR III / CRD V
in EUR million
2025
2024
Shareholders’ equity 1
47,744
42,743
- Interim profits not included in CET 1 capital
-699
0
- Other adjustments
-2,580
-2,146
Regulatory adjustments
-3,279
-2,146
Available common equity Tier 1 capital
44,465
40,597
Additional Tier 1 securities
7,460
7,967
Regulatory adjustments additional Tier 1
112
106
Available Tier 1 capital
52,037
48,671
Supplementary capital Tier 2 bonds
10,609
9,853
Regulatory adjustments Tier 2
98
81
Available Total capital
62,744
58,604
Risk weighted assets
340,186
334,770
Common equity Tier 1 ratio
13.1%
12.1%
Tier 1 ratio
15.3%
14.5%
Total capital ratio
18.4%
17.5%
1Shareholders' equity is determined in accordance with IFRS-EU.
Capital developments
ING Bank’s capital ratios increased compared with 2024, primarily driven
by higher available CET1 capital resulting from net profit. As of 1 January
2025, ING Bank’s CET1 requirement rose due to the introduction of the
Other Systemically Important Institution (O‑SII) buffer and the Pillar 2
requirement at Bank level. Consequently, ING Bank did not pay dividends
to ING Group during the first half of the year, increasing the available CET1
capital at ING Bank level. In the second half of 2025, ING Bank paid €1,129
million to ING Group. Risk-weighted assets were mainly impacted by
higher volume, currency movements, improvement in book quality and
model impacts.
ING Bank N.V. reported a CET1 ratio of 13.1% as at 31 December 2025
(2024: 12.1%), compared with an overall CET1 requirement of 11.03%. The
Bank’s Tier 1 ratio increased to 15.3% (2024: 14.5%) and its Total Capital
ratio rose to 18.4% (2024: 17.5%), both mainly driven by the increase in
available CET1 capital.
Risk transfer
ING employs securitisation initiatives as part of its capital management
strategy to achieve effective risk transfer, optimise RWAs, and support
efficient capital allocation. These transactions, which may include
securitisations but also credit insurance, credit derivatives and guarantees,
are executed in accordance with applicable EU regulatory requirements.
ING ensures that securitisation activities meet prudential standards,
maintain the continued effectiveness of risk transfer, and are supported by
a sound economic rationale. In November 2025, ING successfully executed
two significant risk transfer transactions, aligned with these objectives.
Capital velocity initiatives are embedded in ING’s capital planning
processes and are consistent with the Group’s risk appetite and capital
targets.
Regulatory requirements
Capital adequacy and regulatory capital requirements are based on the
standards issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the
Basel Committee) and implemented in the European Union Directives
through the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Capital
Requirements Directive (CRD), as implemented by De Nederlandsche Bank
(DNB) and the European Central Bank (ECB). Under the CRR, the minimum
Pillar 1 capital requirements applicable to ING Bank are a CET1 ratio of
4.5%, a Tier 1 ratio of 6.0%, and a Total capital ratio of 8.0% of
risk‑weighted assets.
The overall SREP CET1 requirement (including buffer requirements) for ING
Bank N.V. at a consolidated level was 11.03% at the end of 2025 (2024:
9.83%). This requirement is the sum of a 4.5% Pillar 1 requirement, a
0.93% Pillar 2 requirement, a 2.5% capital conservation buffer (CCB), a
0.93% countercyclical buffer (CCyB), 0.16% Sectoral Systemic Risk buffer
(s-SyRB) and a 2.0% Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII)
buffer that is set separately for Dutch systemic banks by DNB. This
requirement excludes the Pillar 2 guidance, which is not disclosed. ING met
the externally imposed regulatory capital requirements in 2025.
Ratings
ING’s credit ratings and outlook are shown in the table below. Each of
these ratings only reflects the view of the applicable rating agency at the
time the rating was issued. Any explanation of the significance of a rating
may only be obtained from the rating agency. Scope has been added as
fourth rating agency in 2025, with comparable credit ratings.
Main credit ratings of ING at 31 December 2025
S&P
Moody’s
Fitch
Scope
ING Bank N.V.
Issuer rating
Long-term
A+
A1
AA-
AA-
Short-term
A-1
P-1
F1+
S-1+
Outlook
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Senior unsecured rating
A+
A1
AA-
AA-
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities.
Each rating should be evaluated independently of other ratings. There is
no assurance that any credit rating will remain in effect for any given
period of time, or that it will not be lowered, suspended, or withdrawn
entirely by the rating agency if, in the rating agency’s judgement,
circumstances so warrant. ING accepts no responsibility for the accuracy
or reliability of the ratings.
Risk management
Risk
management
Risk management
As a global financial institution with a strong
European base, offering banking services, ING is
exposed to a variety of risks. We manage these
through a comprehensive risk management
framework that integrates risk management into
strategic planning and daily business activities.
This aims to safeguard ING’s financial strength and
reputation by promoting the identification,
measurement and management of risks at all
levels of the organisation. Taking measured risks
aligned with our risk appetite is core to ING’s
business.
This section sets out how ING manages its risks on a day-to-day basis.
It explains how the risk management function is embedded within the
organisation based on the ‘three-lines-of-defence’ (3 LoD) model. It
describes the key risks that arise from ING’s business model and how
these are managed. The section provides qualitative and quantitative risk
disclosures on solvency, credit, market, funding and liquidity, ESG
(environmental, social, and governance), operational, information
technology (IT), compliance, model, and business and strategy risks.
Basis of disclosures (*)
The risk management section contains information relating to the
nature and extent of the risks of financial instruments as required
by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 7 ‘Financial
Instruments: Disclosures’. These disclosures are an integral part of
the ING Bank Consolidated financial statements and are indicated
by the symbol (*). This is applicable for the chapters, paragraphs,
graphs, or tables within the risk management section that are
indicated with this symbol in the respective headings or table
header.
This risk management section includes additional disclosures
beyond those required by IFRS, such as certain legal and regulatory
disclosures. Not all information in this section can be reconciled
back to the primary financial statements and corresponding notes,
as it has been prepared using risk data that differs from the
accounting basis of measurement. Disclosures in accordance with
Part Eight of the CRR3 and CRD VI, and as required by the
supervisory authority, are published in our ‘Additional Pillar III
Report’, which can be found on our corporate website ing.com.
Top and emerging risks
The risks listed below are defined as the top existing and emerging risks
that could cause ING’s results to differ, in some instances materially, from
those anticipated. They may have a material impact on the reputation of
the company, introducing volatility in future operating results. These risks
can also impact ING’s medium- and long-term strategy, affecting its ability
to pay dividends, maintain appropriate levels of capital, or meet liquidity
and funding targets. An emerging risk is defined as a new or future risk
that might impact ING. Therefore, these risks require proactive
identification and monitoring as their impact on the organisation is more
difficult to assess compared to other risks. The key existing and emerging
risks are identified through the annual risk identification and risk
assessment process, covering both the ING Group and local entity
perspectives. Top risks are determined through an annual risk assessment
that evaluates the likelihood and potential impact of the risks, while
emerging risks are identified using horizon scanning and expert
judgement. The annual risk assessment is executed through risk surveys
and scenario analysis, with validation by senior management committees.
ING ensures that identified key risks feed into, among others, the annual
review of the Risk Appetite Framework (RAF) and Stress Testing
Framework. A number of key risks are listed below, with their sequence not
indicative of their likelihood or potential impact on ING.
Geopolitical risk
Geopolitical risk remains a key focus area for ING, requiring continuous
monitoring. In 2025, persistent policy uncertainty, intensifying trade
frictions, geo-economic confrontation and sanctions-related and supply-
chain restrictions shape the global landscape. These developments have
made cross-border trade and logistics increasingly challenging, driving up
costs and creating operational bottlenecks for global businesses. The
resulting uncertainty spills over into financial markets, heightening
volatility as investors react to tariff announcements and fluctuating risk
premium. These pressures translate into slower global growth and uneven
disinflation, with fragmented trade flows and elevated input costs
affecting productivity and monetary policy transmission. This could impact
ING beyond headline volatility, potentially leading to deteriorating credit
quality in exposed sectors, increased refinancing risk, and potential ratings
migration among ING clients. In addition, geopolitical events could trigger
the materialization of non-financial risks, for example the unavailability of
services provided by third-parties and increase of regulatory diversion.
Global trade and policy volatility
Global trade tensions intensified, reshaping economic relationships and
market dynamics. Trade relations between major economies deteriorated
as the US adopted protectionist measures through higher trade tariffs,
while the EU targeted Chinese industrial goods, including electric vehicles.
Transatlantic disputes over technology controls, digital taxation, and
green-trade measures escalated, prompting retaliatory actions from China
and the EU. Allegations of dumping and subsidy disputes added pressure
in the markets, contributing to episodic equity sell-offs, wider credit
spreads, and pressure on supply chain-linked commodities. For ING, this
backdrop could lead to reduced client cash flows, variability in collateral
quality, and changes in market risk and funding dynamics.
Europe
Fragmented policymaking and structural fiscal pressures, such as ageing
populations and higher defence spending, added complexity to the
European landscape. Due to the persistence of a higher-for-longer rate
environment, fiscal rules and national adjustment plans were closely
monitored. The challenges in implementing reforms were particularly
visible in France, as shown by its parliamentary deadlock and budget
disputes. These developments resulted in wider sovereign spreads and
tighter credit conditions. This backdrop affects ING through pressure on
corporate and household lending, changes in fixed-income pricing, and
higher costs for euro funding.
United States
US policy in 2025 featured efforts to advance a comprehensive omnibus
policy package ('One Big Beautiful Bill') combining tax reforms, industrial
policy, and border measures. The subsequent focus on reshoring and
strategic support reinforced tariff use as a negotiation tool. While
discussions on de-dollarisation gained momentum, the US dollar remained
dominant in global funding. Potential effects for ING include sector-specific
credit risk, variability in global funding costs, and changes in USD liquidity,
influencing both client exposures and wholesale funding markets.
Asia-Pacific
Security tensions persisted across key maritime and airspace zones due to
Chinese military activity near Taiwan and the Philippines. In South Asia,
renewed skirmishes and diplomatic strains between India and Pakistan
added to instability. These conditions may dampen regional investment
sentiment and equity markets, affecting ING through weaker trade finance
flows, increased counterparty risk, and potential stress on clients with
Asia-focused supply chains.
Ukraine
The war in Ukraine remained a central driver of European geopolitical risk.
Military activity continued without decisive shifts, while cross-border
strikes and attacks on energy infrastructure escalated concerns. Sanctions
tightened throughout the year, and debates over using frozen Russian
assets for Ukraine’s reconstruction raised legal and financial stability
questions. This environment heightens volatility in energy-sensitive
sectors, exposing ING to heightened credit risk across Eastern European
portfolios and increasing compliance costs linked to sanctions screening.
For more information on sanctions, see 'Compliance risk’.
Our credit exposure remained stable at €547 million (2024: €550 million),
mainly with Central Bank liquidity facilities and other lending. A significant
part is guaranteed by international parents or benefits from strong
collateral.
Exposure in Russia
In March 2022, we announced a decision to no longer do new business
with Russian counterparties. Nevertheless, ING’s remaining operations in
Russia and with Russian counterparties are subject to various risks,
including, but not limited to, credit risk, changes in laws and regulations –
including sanctions and counter sanctions – as well as conflicts of law,
potential litigations, and events that would trigger loss of control.
In December 2025, ING’s remaining credit exposures to Russian
counterparties, booked outside of Russia, was €0.6 billion (2024: €1.0
billion).
On 28 January 2025, ING announced the proposed sale of ING Bank
(Eurasia) JSC to Global Development JSC. Completion of the transaction is
subject to various regulatory approvals. This transaction will effectively
end ING’s activities in the Russian market. Under the terms of the
agreement, Global Development will acquire all shares of ING Bank
(Eurasia) JSC, taking over all Russian onshore activities and staff. Global
Development intends to continue to serve customers in Russia under a
new brand. As of the date of this report and as announced in September
2025, the buyer has not received all necessary approvals yet. We continue
working towards completing the transaction and our exit from the Russian
market. In the meantime, we are in discussion with regulators on the
conflicting regulatory requirements in various jurisdictions with respect to
the activities of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC.
ING expects a negative P&L impact of around €0.8 billion post tax. This
includes an estimated book loss of around €0.5 billion, representing the
difference between the sale price and the book value of the business. It
also includes an estimated negative impact of around €0.3 billion from
recycling the currency translation adjustment through P&L, which is
capital neutral. The sale is expected to have a negligible impact on ING’s
CET1 ratio.
Starting from 2024 a trend emerged whereby Russian parties hold
Western banks liable in Russian courts. The Russian parties claim that such
banks, by complying with sanctions imposed by the EU, US and other
authorities, have caused damage to the Russian party. There have also
been instances where Russian courts ruled in favour of the Russian party.
In these cases, Russian courts did not recognise such sanctions, did not
respect the choice of law and courts pursuant to the applicable contracts,
and held Russian subsidiaries of Western banks liable for acts by other
entities in that banking group. For more information on litigation involving
ING, see Note 40 ‘Legal proceedings’.
Middle East
The Israel-Gaza conflict moved through fragile ceasefire phases,
repeatedly disrupted by renewed hostilities. International mediation
efforts have focused on providing humanitarian relief to alleviate civilian
suffering and to reduce the risk of regional escalation. In the Red Sea,
maritime security incidents increased the risks of wider escalation, while
concerns grew over a potential spillover involving Israeli strikes on Iran and
Qatar. These developments could destabilise energy and logistics markets,
leading to higher commodity price volatility and operational challenges in
key trading routes. For ING, this also affects valuation risks in client
portfolios and sovereign and corporate exposures in the area.
Interest rate risk
Diverging monetary policy paths among major central banks reintroduced
volatility in interest rate and foreign exchange markets. The European
Central Bank (ECB) shifted from easing policy rates to holding them steady
as euro-area disinflation continued. Meanwhile, the US Federal Reserve
adopted a gradual return towards neutral policy, implementing rate cuts
and suspending Treasury runoff amid persistent inflation pressures.
Uneven disinflation and country-specific fiscal concerns kept interest rate
highly volatile. For ING, this environment affects funding costs, asset
valuations, and client behaviour, with knock-on effects on earnings
stability.
Cyber and Information Technology (IT) risk
Cybercrime remains an important risk. Threat actors are increasingly
sophisticated, leveraging emerging technologies such as generative AI to
develop advanced attack methods, including state-linked campaigns
targeting financial infrastructure. Regulatory requirements, including the
EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), reshaped expectations for
ICT risk management, incident reporting, and third-party oversight.
Operational resilience and business continuity have become central
themes, with regulators emphasising resilience testing, recovery
objectives, and contingency planning for critical service providers. The
growing complexity of IT ecosystems and reliance on cloud and third-party
vendors amplify these challenges, making resilience a systemic priority.
Disruptions in IT systems or third-party services can lead to service
outages, transaction delays, data breaches, and financial or reputational
losses for ING. IT resilience remains a priority for ING to ensure continuity
of services and protection of data. ING continues to strengthen its
measurement and reporting of IT and cyber risks while further developing
its ability to recover from large-scale ransomware events and maintain
recovery readiness for global, shared systems. These efforts are supported
by the Global Infrastructure organisation and the Chief Information
Security Office (CISO).
AI risk
AI adoption accelerated across 2025, moving from pilots to day-to-day use
in areas such as analytics, software development, and customer service.
This rapid rollout introduced risks related to data privacy and security,
model accuracy, bias, and accountability. The EU AI Act established clearer
obligations for high-risk systems; however, uneven global governance
continues to create compliance complexity and cybersecurity challenges.
These factors increase ING’s exposure to cyber incidents, misuse, and
compliance gaps, which can lead to operational and reputational impact.
As AI adoption grows, ING continues to strengthen its governance and risk
oversight through specialised structures such as the AI Risk Committee
and Centre of Excellence (CoE).
Environmental risk
Environmental risk remains an important concern for ING and the global
financial sector. This risk is increasingly shaped by the interplay of physical
climate impacts and accelerating transition pressures. Extreme weather
events and climate-related disruptions are now becoming systemic,
affecting infrastructure, supply chains, and asset valuations. The global
shift towards decarbonisation continues, but with uneven momentum:
regulatory mandates and technological advances are driving progress,
while political reality in regions such as the US and EU to ease climate
policies brings uncertainty. At the same time, increased polarisation and
politicisation of climate and broader ESG issues can produce conflicting or
rapidly changing policy signals, complicating transition pathways and
planning for financial institutions and clients. This divergence heightens
climate risk and amplifies political and macroeconomic volatility.
Biodiversity loss and resource scarcity further strain environmental
stability. These developments translate into heightened credit risk in
vulnerable sectors, market risk through valuation shifts, and operational
risks through supply chain disruptions and physical damage. Reputational
risk also intensifies as some stakeholders demand credible climate action
and others demand less.
For more details and mitigation actions, see ‘Environmental, social and
Risk governance
Effective risk management requires company-wide risk governance. ING’s
risk and control structure is based on the ‘three-lines-of-defence’ model.
This model aims to provide a sound governance framework for risk
management by defining and implementing three lines. Each line has a
specific role and defined responsibilities, with the execution of tasks being
distinct from the control of these same tasks. The three lines work closely
together to identify, assess, mitigate, and monitor risks.
This governance framework is designed in such a way that risk is managed
in line with the risk appetite approved by the Management Board Banking
(MBB) and the Supervisory Board (SB), and this approach is cascaded
throughout ING.
Board-level risk oversight
Both the EB (for ING Group) and the MBB (for ING Bank) play an important
role in managing and monitoring our risk management framework. For
more information on the SB, MBB, and EB duties, and powers and
responsibilities in relation to risk management, see ‘Corporate
Risk committees
In 2025, ING changed its risk-led MBB-key committees structure reporting
into the MBB. The key risk committees described below act within the
overall risk policy and delegated authorities granted by the MBB:
§ The Global Financial Risk Committee (GFRC) is the highest authority,
except for the MBB, to discuss and approve global policies,
methodologies, and procedures related to financial risk, covering
solvency, credit, market, funding & liquidity, and environmental, social
& governance risk. GFRC is a risk committee responsible for setting and
monitoring risk appetite statements & limits, stress testing and
financial risk frameworks & policies. The GFRC meets monthly.
§ The Model Risk Management Committee (MoRMC) is the owner of the
overall governance around models’ approval. MoRMC approves
frameworks, policies and procedures related to model risks. It sets
model risk strategies and monitors the model risk profile against the
RAS. The MoRMC meets monthly.
§ The Global Credit Committee – Transaction Approval (GCC(TA))
discusses and approves transactions that entail taking credit risk
(including investment risk), country, legal, and environmental and
social risk and approves Wholesale Banking transactions. The GCC(TA)
meets twice a week.
§ Group Non-Financial Risk Committee (Group NFRC) oversees the holding
company ING Group and all subsidiaries other than ING Bank N. V. It
opines on and approves non-financial risk matters. It ensures
appropriate action is taken by responsible management.
§ The Bank Non-Financial Risk Committee (Bank NFRC) is accountable for
the design and maintenance of the non-financial risk management
framework, including operational risk management, compliance and
legal policies, minimum standards, procedures and guidelines,
development of tools, methods, and key parameters (including major
changes) for risk identification, assessment, measurement, mitigating,
and monitoring/reporting. Bank NFRC meetings are held at least
monthly..
In addition, several other committees are involved in various steps in the different risk management frameworks, as illustrated in the graph below:
MBB
GFRC
Group Financial Risk Ct
MoRMC
Model Risk Management Ct
GCC-TA  Global Credit Ct for
Transaction approvals
Group & Bank NFRC
Group & Bank Non-Financial Ct
CRC
Credit Risk Ct
CRMC
Credit Risk Model Ct
GUC
Global Underwriting Ct
IT BNFRC
CARC
Capital and ALM Risk Ct
AIRCO
AI Risk Ct
DREC
Distress Real Estate Ct
GPAC
Global Client Protection
and Approval Ct
TCRC
Trading and CP Risk Ct
ERC
ESG Risk Ct
2Although support functions are part of the first line of defence, they provide subject matter expertise to both the first and second lines of defence
Three lines of defence 2
First line of defence
Second line of defence
Third line of defence
Who
Who
Who
Heads or their delegates of:
banking business, support functions1,
geographies, countries
COO
CTO
Risk including Compliance
Internal audit function CAS
Responsible for
§ Running business with clients and
accountable for assessing, controlling,
mitigating, and reporting all risks affecting
their businesses, to ensure risks are within
risk appetite, i.e. 1st LoD risk management
activities
§ Completeness and accuracy of the financial
statements and risk reports with respect to
their areas of responsibility
Responsible for
§ Setting, operating, and
maintaining effective and
efficient processes and running
operations for the bank, and
managing risks arising from
these activities
Responsible for
§ Setting, operating, and
maintaining an effective and
efficient IT architecture and IT
services provision for the bank,
and managing risks arising
from these activities
Responsible for
§ Develops, owns, and maintains the risk taxonomy, including clear
and consistent risk categories and definitions, forming the basis for
consistent risk identification, measurement, reporting, and
escalation.
§ Defines and owns risk measurement methodologies, models, and
assessment frameworks used to quantify and assess risks,
including risk materiality assessment frameworks to determine
which risks are significant.
§ Designs, maintains, and monitors the Risk Appetite Framework
(RAF), ensuring that risk appetite statements, limits, and thresholds
are aligned with strategy, capital planning, and regulatory
expectations, and that breaches and emerging risks are escalated
in a timely and transparent manner.
§ Provides independent monitoring and reporting of risks to support
informed decision making and effective governance by senior
management and governing bodies.
§ Oversees, advises, and challenges the First Line of Defence on risk
management and compliance activities, providing subject matter
expertise while maintaining independence.
§ Exercises escalation and veto powers in relation to activities or
decisions assessed to present unacceptable risks, ensuring
escalation to the appropriate governance bodies when required.
Responsible for
§ Independent assurance to the MB, the
Audit Committee, and the SB on the quality
and effectiveness of ING's internal control,
risk management, governance, and
implemented systems and processes in
both the first and second lines of defence
Regional and business unit level
ING’s regional and/or business unit management have primary
responsibility for the management of risks (credit, market, funding and
liquidity, operational, IT, compliance and model) that arise in their daily
operations. They are accountable for the implementation and execution of
appropriate risk frameworks affecting their businesses in compliance with
procedures and processes at the corporate level. Where necessary, the
implementation is adapted to local requirements.
Organisational structure
The CRO function is organised along the lines of a matrix structure
integrating (i) the Global Risk functions, (ii) the Regional/Country Risk
functions at entity level, and (iii) the Risk Segments. Global Risk functions,
organised by risk types into risk domains (departments), are ultimately
responsible and accountable for the functional steering of the respective
risk type globally. They ensure a uniform taxonomy and methodology are
used for the setting of the relevant risk appetite levels, further cascading
risk appetite into detailed risk strategies, and for the effective monitoring
and reporting of risks, on an individual and consolidated basis.
The Group Chief Risk Officer (CRO) and the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO)
each have direct access to the SB Risk Committee and its chair. Conversely,
the chair of the SB Risk Committee holds periodic bilateral consultations
individually with both the Group CRO and the CCO.
The current organisation chart outlines the reporting lines within the risk
management function. A refreshed chart will be introduced in 2026 to
align with the enhanced Risk Strategy designed to further strengthen and
future‑proof the Group Risk organisation. The proposed updates are guided
by four key principles: (i) reinforcing the Risk organisation by emphasising
its core activities, (ii) enhancing global functional steering, (iii) enabling
business strategies through expanded skills and capabilities, and (iv)
building a more effective, agile, and streamlined Risk organisation.
The departments in the purple colour reflect hierarchical reporting lines,
whereas the dotted lines are for the functional reporting lines:
The Group Chief Risk Officer
q
Credit Risk
Financial Risk
Non-Financial Risk
Model Risk
Integrated Risk
Risk Culture
& Behavioural Risk
Compliance Risk
Retail/
Rest of the World
Wholesale Banking
COO Risk
CRO Belgium
CRO
Netherlands
CRO Germany
Risk management framework
Risk policies and internal control documents
ING maintains a comprehensive system of risk management frameworks,
policies, mandatory instructions, procedures, and control standards
(collectively referred to as ‘internal control documents’), which establish
binding requirements for all ING locations. ING locations shall comply with
both internal control documents and local requirements. Internal control
documents are regularly reviewed, updated, and approved in accordance
with ING internal control binding principles. Senior management is
responsible for ensuring the implementation of, and staff adherence to,
internal control documents.
Internal risk management and control system
The enterprise risk management (ERM) framework and its related internal
control documents constitute the internal control framework in ING. The
ERM framework establishes an ING-wide governance model that aligns
strategy to risk appetite for all risk types. It applies to all business lines and
ING locations on the global and local level. The internal control framework
is based on the following principles:
§ Consistent Risk Governance at global and local level is defined
and adhered to using the three-lines-of-defence model and clear
decision-making.
§ Risk Appetite framework sets forward-looking risk limits and process to
ensure that risk-taking activities remain within acceptable ranges.
§ Risk Taxonomy sets a common risk language to identify and manage
all relevant risks.
§ Internal Control Documents facilitate effective risk management and
compliance with legal requirements and approved risk appetite.
§ Continuous Risk Management Cycle to identify, assess, mitigate,
monitor, and report risks supported by adequate Risk Data and Risk
Systems.
§ Strong risk culture and people that enable proactive risk management
balancing risk and reward.
The ERM Framework and underlying risk management frameworks are
based on the EBA Guidelines on Internal Governance (EBA/GL/2021/05,
2 July 2021) which is one of the drivers for the ING Governance Framework
and are aligned with the public criteria of the Committee of Sponsoring
Organisations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Reporting (COSO) –
Integrated Control Framework (2013 Framework).
Risk effectiveness
ING’s Internal Risk Management & Control (IRM&C) systems are designed
to safeguard risk effectiveness through:
§ Adequate and timely risk identification, assessment, measurement,
mitigation, monitoring, reporting, and follow up; and
§ Sufficient reliable insight that risks stay within risk appetite and can be
steered.
Internal monitoring of risk effectiveness safeguards and confirms
adequate functioning of our IRM&C systems and enables ING to adapt
them in response to emerging risks, regulatory changes, or lessons
learned.
The effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems is
monitored through the risk management activities themselves (e.g. risk
monitoring and reporting) and through dedicated mechanisms (e.g. risk
framework monitoring and quality assurance).
Risk culture
At ING, we attach great importance to a sound risk culture, which is
essential for keeping the bank safe and secure. We determine our risk
culture as the way in which employees identify, understand, discuss, and
act on the many financial and non-financial risks we are confronted with
every day.
Learning
In 2025, we continued to expand and strengthen our required learning
curriculum. This foundational learning ensures all staff understand key
regulations, policies, and risks, supporting compliance and protecting the
bank and its customers. The curriculum is tracked centrally to support
timely completion. We continue to refine our learning formats to enhance
engagement and ensure practical application of knowledge. The topics
covered in 2025 were Conflicts of Interest, the Global Code of Conduct,
Operational Resilience, the EU AI Act, Cybersecurity, and Record Retention.
In addition, we continue to expand our learning offering on a range of risk
topics for targeted audiences across the bank, including risk staff. Working
with risk experts, the Risk Academy created and curated role-based
learning for risk colleagues, providing a wide selection of learning to
support both immediate job performance and long-term professional
growth.
Dutch Banker’s Oath
In the Netherlands, all employees working for a bank are required to take
the Banker’s Oath. By taking the oath, employees declare that they will
work with integrity, diligence, and in accordance with the related Code of
conduct (gedragscode). ING requires employees to follow trainings before
taking the actual oath – to understand the content and stress the
importance of the oath, enable all employees in the Netherlands to discuss
any dilemmas they may face in their daily work, and how to carefully
balance the interests of all ING’s stakeholders therein. All employees who
have taken the oath are subject to the Dutch Disciplinary Law and
Regulations, executed by the ‘Stichting Tuchtrecht Banken’ (Foundation for
Disciplinary Law of the banking sector).
Remuneration
ING aims to align its remuneration policy with its risk profile and the
interests of all stakeholders. For more information on ING’s remuneration
approach and its relation to the risk taken, see the Capital Requirements
Regulation (CRR) remuneration disclosure published on ing.com.
Risk cycle process
ING identifies, measures, and manages risks through five recurrent phases
of the management cycle: risk identification, risk assessment, risk
mitigation, risk monitoring, and risk reporting. The risk cycle process is
embedded within dedicated risk domain frameworks, such as the Non-
Financial Risk Framework, Model Risk Framework, and ESG Risk Framework.
Each risk domain is responsible for ensuring its risk cycle process and
frameworks are operational and effective. Key components of the risk
cycle process are defined in the Enterprise Risk Management Framework
as follows:
Risk identification
Risk identification is performed periodically through a joint effort of the
business and the risk management functions, linked to ING’s common risk
language and ad hoc in case of material internal or external change.
Risk assessment
Risk assessment ensures that each identified risk is assessed (qualitatively
and quantitatively) in a structured and fact-based manner and classified
for importance based on impact and likelihood. This enables management
to decide which of the identified risks need mitigating (control) measures,
how strict or tolerant these measures should be, and to assign a Risk
Owner.
Risk mitigation
Risks mitigation refers to the process of dealing with (and controlling) risk
exposures through one or a combination of strategies: risk-level reduction
(e.g. controls), risk avoidance (e.g. stop activity), risk transfer (e.g.
insurance or securitisation), and/or risk acceptance.
Risk monitoring
Risk monitoring is a continuous process, performed at individual and
aggregate risk level. It involves tracking and reviewing risk exposures and
the effectiveness of risk management strategies, including the design and/
or operating effectiveness of mitigating (control) measures.
Risk reporting
Risk reporting provides senior and local management with comprehensive
and actionable risk information. It facilitates the measurement,
monitoring, and oversight of risk exposures against risk appetite and
tolerance.
The Enterprise risk Management Framework is reviewed regularly to
ensure it reflects regulatory developments, and incorporates changes
based on external and internal triggers.
Risk Appetite Framework
The Risk Appetite Framework (RAF) is one of the key elements of the ERM
framework. Its objective is to set an appropriate risk appetite at a
consolidated level across different risk categories and to allocate the risk
appetite throughout the organisation.
Procedure
The RAF procedure explains the setup of the overarching global risk
appetite. Within the RAF, ING monitors a range of financial and non-
financial risk metrics to ensure that our risk profile is in line with our risk
appetite while executing our strategy. ING’s RAF, which is approved by the
SB, defines the desired risk profile that is to be integrated in the strategic
decision-making and financial planning process. It is designed to be able to
withstand market volatility and stress, while meeting regulatory
requirements. The framework, including underlying metrics and
assumptions, is reviewed at least annually so that it remains relevant. The
RAF combines various financial and non-financial risk appetite statements
(RAS) into a single, coordinated approach.
Process
The RAF and underlying limit allocation are reviewed on an annual basis, or
more frequently if necessary, based on their monthly review in the MBB
and quarterly review in the EB and the SB. It is therefore a top-down
process, which bases itself on the ambition of the bank in terms of its risk
profile, the regulatory environment, and the economic context. Limits that
require SB approval are called boundaries, and the underlying instruments
supporting the boundaries require EB and MBB approval.
Step 1. Identify and assess ING’s key risks
The outcome of the risk-identification and risk-assessment process is used
as the starting point for the review of the RAF. Within this step, the risks
ING faces when executing its strategy are identified in the context of the
current economic, political, social, regulatory, and technological
environment. The assessment identifies whether the potential impact is
material and if it is sufficiently controlled.
Step 2. Set risk appetite framework
Based on ING’s risk assessment and risk purpose, boundaries and
instruments for the overarching risk frameworks are set. Once the
overarching risk appetite statements have been set and approved by the
EB/MBB and subsequently by the SB, the statements are translated into
risk type-specific statements and lower-level risk metrics. These are set
and approved by senior risk committees, like the Global Financial Risk
Committee (GFRC), Model Risk Management Committee (MoRMC) and Bank
Non-Financial Risk Committee (NFRC). Cascading is done via several
detailed risk appetite statements defined for each risk type. Together,
these statements aim to ensure compliance with the overarching
solvency, (credit) concentration, and funding and liquidity RAS.
ING includes climate risk in its RAF by, among other things, introducing
climate risk as one of the dimensions to determine sector concentration as
part of the credit risk appetite statements. In the coming years, ING will
extend the inclusion of climate risk impact on other risk types, ensuring
that potential risks – such as transition and physical risks – are properly
reflected in the RAF.
Step 3. Cascade into statements per risk type and business unit
The bank-wide risk appetite is defined per risk type, which is further
cascaded into the organisation. Risk appetite statements are then
translated into dedicated underlying risk limits that are used for the day-
to-day monitoring and management of ING’s risks. The risk appetite
statements serve as input for the quarterly planning process as well as for
the establishment of key performance indicators and targets for senior
management. The next graph is an illustrative and non-exhaustive
overview of the RAF.
Step 4. Monitor and manage underlying risk limits
To verify that ING remains within the RAF, it reports the risk positions vis-à-
vis their limits on a regular basis to senior management committees. A
monthly report is submitted to the MBB reflecting the exposure of ING
against the risk appetite. An extended report is submitted quarterly to the
EB and the SB’s Risk Committee. Moreover, the financial plan is checked
every quarter for potential limit excess within a one-year horizon, where in
the Strategic Dialogue the MBB can take mitigating measures or make
adjustments to the dynamic plan.
Stress testing
Stress testing is an important risk-management tool that provides input
for strategic decisions and capital planning. The purpose of stress testing is
to assess the impact of severe but plausible stress scenarios on ING’s
capital and liquidity position. Stress tests provide complementary and
forward-looking insights into vulnerabilities the bank is exposed to, with
regards to adverse macroeconomic circumstances, stressed financial
markets, changes in the political and geopolitical climate, and idiosyncratic
events. The outcomes of these stress tests help management get insight
into risk the bank is exposed to as well as mitigating actions to offset the
potential impact.
Types of stress tests
Within ING, we perform different types of stress tests. The most
comprehensive type of stress tests are the firm-wide scenario analyses,
which involve setting scenario assumptions for all the relevant
macroeconomic and financial market variables in all countries relevant to
ING. These assumptions usually follow a qualitative narrative that provides
a background to the scenario. In addition to firm-wide scenario analyses,
ING executes scenario analyses for specific countries or portfolios.
Furthermore, sensitivity analyses are performed, which focus on stressing
one or more risk drivers – usually without an underlying scenario narrative.
Finally, ING performs reverse stress tests, which aim to determine
scenarios that could lead to a predefined severe adverse outcome.
Process
ING’s stress-testing process consists of several stages:
§ Risk identification and risk assessment: it identifies and assesses the
risks ING or the relevant entity is facing when executing its strategy,
based on the current and possible future economic, political,
regulatory, and technological environment. It provides a description of
the main risks and risk drivers related to the nature of ING’s business,
activities, and vulnerabilities.
§ Scenario definition and parameterisation: based on the outcome of the
previous step, a set of scenarios is determined with the relevant scope
and set of risk drivers for each scenario, as well as its severity, the key
assumptions, and input parameters. The output of this phase includes a
quantitative description of the stress scenarios to be analysed, the
relevant output metrics, and, when applicable, a narrative description.
§ Impact calculation and aggregation: based on the quantitative
description of the stress scenarios, the impact is determined for the
relevant scenario, scope, and horizon. The impact calculation and
aggregation can be part of a recurring process or part of a specific
process set-up for one-off stress tests.
§ Scenario reporting: for each stress test, a report is prepared after each
calculation, which describes the results of the scenario and gives a
recap of the scenario with its main assumptions and parameters. The
stress-test report is sent to the relevant risk committees and/or senior
management. It is complemented, if needed, with advice for
management action based on the stress-testing results.
§ Scenario control and management assessment: depending on the
outcomes of the stress test and the likelihood of the scenario,
mitigating actions may be proposed. Mitigating actions may include,
but are not limited to, sales or transfers of assets and reductions
of risk limits.
Methodology
Detailed and comprehensive models are used to assess the impact of the
scenarios. In these models, statistical analysis is combined with expert
opinion to make sure the results adequately reflect the scenario
assumptions. The methodologies are granular and portfolio-specific, and
use different macroeconomic and market variables as input. The stress-
testing models are subject to review by Model Risk management and
underlying assessments are in line with financial and regulatory reporting
frameworks.
Framework Policy
and Procedures
ING Group Risk Appetitie Framework (RAF)
Integrated Risk
Boundaries /
Instruments
Boundaries and instruments for overarching and risk-type specific RAS
Integrated Risk, Financial Risk, Credit Risk, Non-Financial Risk
Solvency RAS
Integrated Risk
Funding & Liquidity
RAS
Financial Risk
Concentration RAS
Credit Risk
Credit RAS
Credit risk
Market RAS
Financial Risk
Non-Financial RAS
Non-Financial Risk
Business & Strategy
RAS
Integrated Risk
Compliance RAS
Compliance Risk
Model RAS
Model Risk
Local application
of RAF
Group Treasury
Limits & Qualitative Statements
Local entity / Business Line / Unit A
Limits & Qualitative Statements
Local entity / Business Line / Unit B
Limits & Qualitative Statements
Local entity / Business Line / Unit C
Limits & Qualitative Statements
Solvency risk
Introduction
Solvency risk is the risk of lacking sufficient capital to fulfil business
objectives, regulatory requirements, or market expectations. An insolvent
bank is unable to pay its debts and will be forced into bankruptcy.
The level and quality of capital is crucial for the resilience of individual
banks. Banks are expected to assess the risks they face and, in a forward-
looking manner, ensure they identify and manage all material risks. They
must also make sure these risks are sufficiently covered by loss-absorbing
capital to provide continuity if unexpected risks materialise in times of
stress. Given the interdependencies with other financial and non-financial
risks, this balancing act of capital adequacy needs to be done within a
sound and integrated management approach. It must coherently link and
align all the moving parts of the bank with its long-term business strategy.
ICAAP framework
ING’s internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) framework
aims to ensure that capital levels remain adequate – both forward-looking
and under adverse conditions, in terms of covering material risks-to-
capital from both a normative and an economic (internal) perspective. The
assessment of ING’s capital adequacy takes into account its business
strategy and risk profile, market environment, and operating macro
environment. This implies that views of various stakeholders, such as
regulators, shareholders, investors, rating agencies, clients, and customers
play an important role.
The continued strength of ING’s capital position, the adequacy of the
financial position, and risk management effectiveness are essential to
achieving the strategy. ING’s capital and funding strategy determines the
underlying ICAAP elements, and thereby contributes to ING’s business
continuity from different perspectives.
Managing ING’s capital entails finding the right balance between supply
and demand, while considering market and macro circumstances. The
process of balancing these strategic goals is captured in the ICAAP
framework. It is enabled by six building blocks and underlying elements
facilitating the ICAAP. The following building blocks have been defined in
the ICAAP framework, which are applied for both the ‘normative’ and
‘economic’ perspective, as defined in the ECB guide to ICAAP:
§ Risk identification and assessment;
§ Risk appetite;
§ Solvency stress testing;
§ Planning and forecasting;
§ Capital management; and
§ Continuity .
Risk identification and assessment
ING’s capital management and solvency risk management starts with the
risk-identification and risk-assessment process, which is performed on an
annual basis. In addition to this annual process, ING also reassesses its
risks as part of its capital adequacy statement, a quarterly process to
assess ING’s capital adequacy.
Risk appetite
ING has solvency risk appetite statements in place for the following
metrics: CET1 ratio, total capital ratio, leverage ratio, total loss-absorbing
capacity (TLAC), and minimum requirement for own funds and eligible
liabilities (MREL) based on RWA/leverage ratio and economic capital
adequacy.
Solvency stress testing
Solvency stress testing allows ING to examine the effect of plausible but
severe stress scenarios on the solvency position. It also provides insight
into which entities or portfolios are vulnerable to certain types of risks or
scenarios. Solvency stress testing is an important tool in identifying,
assessing, measuring, and controlling risks to capital, providing a
complementary and forward-looking perspective to other solvency risk
management tools. For solvency stress testing, ING follows the same steps
described in the overall section on stress testing.
The outcomes of solvency stress test analyses are taken into account in
capital planning, but also for setting risk appetite statements and the
capital management buffer.
Planning and forecasting
The capital and funding plan is an integral part of the dynamic plan, ING’s
financial and business planning process. For more information, see section
Capital management
Formulation of the CET1 target is a key element in solvency risk
management. The target ratio, based on the management buffer concept,
enables ING’s senior management to steer, benchmark, and assess the
bank’s current and future capital levels much more efficiently. The target
level clearly supports trust-building among ING’s key stakeholders (e.g.
regulators, investors, and customers).
The capital management buffer aims to protect the interests of key
stakeholders and plays an important role in the overall capital adequacy
governance. The rationale behind the buffer is that it provides an
additional cushion on top of the (local) regulatory minimum requirements
(e.g. supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) requirements) to
withstand a certain level of stress and facilitate awareness and
preparedness to take management actions. ING reviews its capital
management buffer on a regular basis to determine its effectiveness and
robustness, updating it as appropriate. For more information, see section
Continuity
Risk events with high severity or significant deteriorations of economic and
market conditions beyond ING’s control could cause deviations from the
business and capital plans, which may result in a potential capital shortfall.
ING has established a continuity (safety) net of contingency and recovery
planning. This includes ongoing monitoring of relevant indicators to
maintain awareness and enable proactive action to ensure continuity. The
intervention measures, which can be activated when deemed necessary,
consist of predefined RWA reduction measures, as well as direct capital-
increasing measures. The escalation mechanisms are defined, governed,
and detailed in the contingency and recovery plans.
Both plans aim to restore ING’s capital adequacy. Depending on the
severity of the situation, the contingency plan can be activated at this
warning phase, as well as trigger further mitigating action and the
formation of the contingency crisis teams. Further drops in capital levels
trigger the alert phase for recovery monitoring and/or the activation of the
recovery plan and corresponding crisis teams.
Assessing capital adequacy: Capital Adequacy Statement
The Capital Adequacy Statement is ING Group’s quarterly assessment of its
capital adequacy and considers different elements with respect to its
capital position. The degree to which ING’s capital position is considered
adequate depends on a variety of internal and external drivers:
§ Current supervisory requirements and (expected) requirements going
forward;
§ Current internal requirements and (expected) requirements going
forward (economic capital/view);
§ Coherence of the available capital with the (realisation of) strategic
plans; and
§ The ability to meet internal and external requirements in the case of
stressed events or should a risk materialise.
The Capital Adequacy Statement assesses the adequacy of ING’s capital
position in relation to the above-mentioned drivers and states the extent
to which the capital position consequently is considered as adequate. The
Capital Adequacy Statement document is prepared on a quarterly basis.
Additionally, each year the EB/MBB signs and provides a comprehensive
assessment of ING’s capital adequacy, supported by the ICAAP outcomes,
in the form of a capital adequacy statement.
Credit risk
Introduction
Credit risk is the risk of loss from the default and/or credit rating
deterioration of clients. Credit risks arise in ING’s lending, financial markets,
and investment activities. The credit risk section provides information on
how ING measures, monitors, and manages credit risk, and gives an insight
into the portfolio from a credit risk perspective.
Reconciliation between credit & counterparty risk categories and financial position (*)
Credit risk categories
Notes in the financial statements
Lending risk: The risk that the client (counterparty, corporate, or individual) does
not pay the principal interest or fees on a loan when they are due, or on demand
for letters of credit (LCs) and guarantees provided by ING.
2
Cash and balances with central banks
3
Loans and advances to banks
4
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
5
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
7
Loans and advances to customers
39
Commitments
Investment risk: The credit default and risk rating migration risk that is associated
with ING’s investments in bonds, commercial paper, equities, securitisations, and
other similar publicly traded securities. This can be viewed as the potential loss
that ING may incur from holding a position in underlying securities whose issuer's
credit quality deteriorates or defaults.
4
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
5
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
6
Debt securities
Money market risk: This arises when ING places short-term deposits with a
counterparty in order to manage excess liquidity. In the event of a counterparty
default, ING may lose the deposit placed.
2
Cash and balances with central banks
3
Loans and advances to banks
7
Loans and advances to customers
Pre-settlement risk: This arises when a client defaults on a transaction before
settlement and ING must replace the contract by a trade with another
counterparty at the then prevailing (possibly unfavourable) market price. This
credit risk category is associated with derivatives transactions (exchange-traded
derivatives, over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives and securities financing
transactions).
4
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
14
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
38
Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
Settlement risk: This arises when there is an exchange of value (funds or
instruments) and receipt from its counterparty is not verified or expected until
after ING has given irrevocable instructions to pay or has paid or delivered its side
of the trade. The risk is that ING delivers but does not receive delivery from its
counterparty.
4
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
11
Other assets
14
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
16
Other liabilities
Credit & counterparty risk categories (*)
In the table below, we describe the different types of credit and
counterparty risk categories and include a reconciliation with the notes in
the financial statements:
Credit risk appetite and concentration risk framework (*)
The credit risk appetite and concentration risk framework is designed to
prevent undesired high levels of credit risk and credit concentrations within
various levels of the ING portfolio. It is derived from the concepts of
boundaries and instruments as described in the ING Risk Appetite
Framework.
Credit risk appetite is the maximum level of credit risk ING is willing to
accept for growth and value creation. The credit risk appetite is linked to
the overall bank-wide framework and is expressed in quantitative and
qualitative measures.
The credit risk appetite is set at different levels and dimensions within ING.
The credit risk appetite framework specifies the scope and focus of the
credit risk ING is willing to take, as well the composition of the credit
portfolio, including the concentration and diversification objectives across
business lines, locations, sectors, and products.
The credit concentration risk framework is composed of:
§ Country risk concentration : Country risk is the risk that arises due to
events in a specific country (or group of countries). To manage the
maximum country loss ING is willing to accept, boundaries are
approved by the SB. The estimated level is correlated to the risk rating
assigned to a given country. Actual country limits are set by means of
country instruments, which are monitored monthly and updated when
needed. For countries with elevated levels of geopolitical or severe
economic cycle risk, monitoring is performed on a more frequent basis,
with strict pipeline and exposure management.
§ Single name concentration (including secondary risk): ING has an
established credit concentration risk framework to identify, measure,
and monitor single name concentration, including secondary risk. The
same concept of boundaries and instruments is applicable.
§ Sector and product concentration risk are managed via the credit risk
appetite framework.
Credit risk models (*)
Within ING, internal CRR-compliant models are used to determine
probability of default (PD), exposure at default (EAD), and loss given
default (LGD) for regulatory and economic capital purposes. These models
also form the basis of ING’s IFRS 9 loan loss provisioning (see ‘IFRS 9
models’ below).
There are two main types of PD, EAD and LGD models used throughout the
bank:
§ Statistical models are created where a large set of default or detailed
loss data is available. They are characterised by sufficient data points
to facilitate meaningful statistical estimation of the model parameters.
The model parameters are estimated with statistical techniques based
on the data set available.
§ Hybrid models are statistical models supplemented with knowledge
and experience of experts from risk management and front-office staff,
literature from rating agencies, supervisors and academics. These
models are only used for ‘(ultra) low default portfolios’, where limited
historical defaults exist.
Credit risk rating process (*)
The majority of risk ratings are based on a risk rating (PD) model that
complies with the minimum requirements detailed in CRR/CRD, ECB
Supervisory Rules and European Banking Authority (EBA) guidelines. This
concerns all borrower types and segments.
ING’s PD rating models are based on a 1-22 internal risk rating scale (1 =
best rating; 22 = worst rating) referred to as the ‘master scale’, which
roughly corresponds to the rating grades that are assigned by external
rating agencies, such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch. For
example, an ING rating of 1 corresponds to an S&P/Fitch rating of AAA and
a Moody’s rating of Aaa; an ING rating of 2 corresponds to an S&P/Fitch
rating of AA+ and a Moody’s rating of Aa1, and so on.
The 22 internal risk rating grades are composed of the following
categories:
§ Investment grade (risk rating 1-10);
§ Non-investment grade (risk rating 11-17);
§ Performing Restructuring (risk rating 18-19); and
§ Non-performing (risk rating 20-22).
The first three categories (1-19) are risk ratings for performing loans.
Ratings are calculated in IT systems with internally developed models,
based on manually or automatically fed data, or for part of the non-
performing loans set by the global or regional credit restructuring
department. Under certain conditions, the outcome of a manually fed
model can be challenged through a rating appeal process. For
securitisation portfolios, the external ratings of the tranche in which ING
has invested are leading indicators.
Risk ratings assigned to clients are reviewed at least annually, with the
performance of the underlying models monitored regularly. Some of these
models are global in nature, such as those for large corporates,
commercial banks, insurance companies, central governments, funds,
fund managers, project finance, and leveraged companies. Other models
are more regional or country-specific: there are PD models for small and
medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland, as
well as residential mortgage and consumer loan models in the various
retail markets.
Rating models for Retail clients are predominantly statistically driven and
automated, such that ratings can be updated on a monthly basis. Rating
models for large corporates, institutions and banks include both statistical
characteristics and expert input, with the ratings being manually updated
at least annually. More frequent reviews (e.g. quarterly) are performed
where considered necessary.
Credit risk tools and data standards
The acceptance, maintenance, measurement, management, and
reporting of credit risks at all levels of ING are executed through single,
common credit risk data standards using shared credit risk tools that
support standardised and transparent credit risk practices. ING has chosen
to develop and implement credit risk tools centrally with the philosophy of
using a single source of data in an integrated way.
Credit risk portfolio (*)
Within ING, credit risk exposures are classified into four sources: 1)
Consumer Lending (to private individuals), 2) Business Lending, 3)
Investment and Money Market and 4) Pre-settlement. ING’s credit
exposure is mainly related to lending to individuals (also referred to as
consumer lending, all Retail) and businesses (referred to as business
lending, both in Retail and Wholesale), followed by investments in bonds
and securitised assets, and money market (Wholesale). Loans to
individuals are mainly mortgage loans secured by residential property.
Loans (including guarantees issued) to businesses are often collateralised,
but may be unsecured based on the internal analysis of the borrower’s
creditworthiness. Bonds in the investment portfolio are generally
unsecured, but predominantly consist of bonds issued by central
governments and EU and/or OECD-based financial institutions. Secured
bonds, such as mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities,
are secured by the underlying diversified pool of assets (commercial or
residential mortgages, car loans and/or other assets) held by the securities
issuer. For money market, exposure is mainly deposits to central banks.
The last major credit risk source involves pre-settlement exposures which
arise from trading activities, including derivatives, repurchase transactions
and securities lending/borrowing transactions. This is also commonly
referred to as counterparty credit risk.
Overall portfolio (*)
During 2025, ING’s portfolio size increased by €41.1 billion (4.1%) to
€1,002.9 billion outstanding. Foreign exchange rate changes had a €22.0
billion negative impact on the portfolio size, mainly driven by the
depreciation of the US dollar which had an impact of €16.6 billion mainly
in Wholesale Banking. Following this, net growth in Wholesale Banking was
€4.4 billion. Retail Banking outstandings increased by €38.4 billion mainly
due to underlying growth in residential mortgages.
Rating distribution (*)
Overall, the rating class distribution remained stable in 2025. The share of
investment grade rating classes increased from 78.1% to 79.3%, while the
share of non-investment grade decreased from 19.9% to 18.7%.
Performing restructuring outstandings remained constant at 0.6%  of the
total portfolio in 2025, whereas non-performing loans (calculated including
Investment and Pre-Settlement exposures) decreased from 1.4% to 1.3%.
With respect to the rating distribution within the business lines, in
Wholesale Banking, investment grade increased to 84.3% from 83.7%,
while non-investment grade exposures decreased to 13.9% from 14.6%
compared to 2024. Performing restructuring assets increased from 0.6% to
0.7% of total Wholesale Banking assets where non-performing loans for
Wholesale Banking decreased from 1.2% to 1.1%. .
For Retail Banking, investment grade increased to 75.4% from 73.3%, while
non-investment grade exposures decreased to 22.5% from 24.4% as
compared to 2024. Performing restructuring decreased to 0.6% from 0.7%
whereas NPL remained constant at 1.5% in 2025.
Industry (*)
The industry breakdown is presented in accordance with the NAICS
definition. The increase of €41.1 billion in total volume during 2025 was
mainly due to the increase in Private Individuals (€28.7 billion) and Central
Governments (€13.4 billion) which was partially offset by the decrease in
Central Banks (€21.9 billion). The share of Private Individuals increased
from 39.5% last year to 40.7%.
Portfolio analysis per business line (*)
Outstandings per line of business (*)1, 2, 3
in EUR million
Wholesale Banking
Retail Banking
Corporate line
Total
Rating class
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Investment grade
1 (AAA)
43,030
53,363
34,022
29,151
27
1,790
77,079
84,304
2-4 (AA)
70,691
72,462
68,484
63,187
1
4
139,175
135,653
5-7 (A)
130,372
101,831
149,694
140,479
555
157
280,620
242,467
8-10 (BBB)
119,661
129,429
175,823
155,375
3,055
3,452
298,539
288,256
Non-investment grade
11-13 (BB)
49,980
53,757
90,916
94,753
140,896
148,510
14-16 (B)
8,900
7,396
33,663
31,165
42,563
38,561
17 (CCC)
1,224
1,037
3,147
3,345
147
170
4,518
4,552
Performing Restructuring
loans
18 (CC)
2,209
1,792
1,945
2,001
4,154
3,794
19 (C)
637
560
1,678
1,760
2,315
2,320
Non-performing loans
20-22 (D)
4,602
5,204
8,393
8,100
12,995
13,303
Total
431,305
426,832
567,764
529,317
3,784
5,572
1,002,854
961,720
Industry
Private Individuals
1,893
2,116
406,589
377,712
408,482
379,827
Central Banks
40,270
61,091
15,713
15,044
1,785
55,983
77,919
Natural Resources
39,229
39,974
1,757
1,925
40,985
41,899
Real Estate
25,024
24,643
29,665
28,738
54,689
53,381
Commercial Banks
44,604
41,027
6,351
6,662
3,638
3,619
54,593
51,308
Non-Bank Financial
Institutions
65,037
64,217
1,973
2,212
77
79
67,086
66,509
Central Governments
59,600
48,389
10,280
8,107
1
1
69,880
56,497
Transportation & Logistics
25,427
27,499
6,507
6,037
31,934
33,536
Utilities
26,378
25,517
2,431
2,196
28,809
27,713
Food, Beverages & Personal
Care
13,798
13,827
11,298
10,419
25,096
24,246
Services
9,489
8,844
13,756
13,442
19
27
23,265
22,312
General Industries
13,235
10,512
9,655
8,812
22,890
19,324
Lower Public Administration
8,904
6,959
22,529
19,598
31,433
26,557
Other
58,418
52,218
29,261
28,412
50
62
87,730
80,691
Total
431,305
426,832
567,764
529,317
3,784
5,572
1,002,854
961,720
Outstandings per line of business (*) - continued1, 2, 3
in EUR million
Wholesale Banking
Retail Banking
Corporate line
Total
Region
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Europe
Netherlands
35,256
44,486
180,030
164,590
526
1,906
215,812
210,981
Belgium
25,786
26,506
99,055
95,584
0
0
124,841
122,091
Germany
29,699
27,443
136,951
128,598
22
30
166,672
156,071
Poland
23,740
21,190
34,223
30,946
3
0
57,966
52,136
United Kingdom
30,475
28,257
252
265
78
91
30,805
28,613
France
26,462
24,351
3,742
3,122
3
3
30,207
27,476
Spain
15,568
11,990
31,015
28,507
38
36
46,620
40,533
Luxembourg
28,844
26,176
4,587
5,139
0
0
33,431
31,314
Rest of Europe
70,498
72,860
26,384
23,203
37
14
96,919
96,076
America
83,269
86,402
2,304
2,402
16
22
85,590
88,827
Asia
47,881
44,136
257
215
3,060
3,464
51,198
47,815
Australia
11,673
10,887
48,938
46,723
1
8
60,613
57,618
Africa
2,154
2,148
27
22
0
0
2,181
2,170
Total
431,305
426,832
567,764
529,317
3,784
5,572
1,002,854
961,720
1Based on credit risk measurement contained in lending, pre-settlement, money market and investment activities.
2Based on the total amount of credit risk in the respective column using ING’s internal credit risk measurement methodologies. Economic sectors (industry) below 2% are not shown separately but grouped in Other.
3Geographical areas are based on country of residence, except for private individuals for which the geographical areas are based on the primary country of risk.
Portfolio analysis per geographical area (*)
The portfolio analysis per geographical area re-emphasises the
international distribution of ING’s credit portfolio. The Netherlands
maintains the largest portfolio share in a single country with 21.5%
(2024: 21.9%) of the total amount, followed by Germany with 16.6%
(2024: 16.2%), and Belgium with 12.4% (2024: 12.7%).
In terms of region, the majority of the portfolio balance remained in
Europe with 80.1% (2024: 80.0%), followed by the Americas with 8.5%
(2024: 9.3%) and Australia with 6.0% (2024: 6.0%).
The top five countries within Rest of Europe based on outstandings were
Italy (€25.2 billion), Romania (€14.0 billion), Switzerland (€10.9 billion),
Türkiye (€9.7 billion), and Ireland (€5.2 billion).
The main contributors for the overall increase in outstanding are Germany
(€10.6 billion),  Spain (€6.1 billion), Poland (€5.8 billion), and the
Netherlands (€4.8 billion).
Private Individuals remained the largest composition of portfolio balances
for the Netherlands at 61.9% (2024: 58.3%), Belgium at 37.7% (2024:
37.4%), Germany at 68.5% (2024: 68.8%), and Australia at 68.1%
(2024: 66.1%). The decrease in Central Banks is mainly attributed to the
Netherlands (€13.8 billion), Belgium (€3.6 billion) and Asia (€3.1 billion). 
In individual countries, the total share of investment grade/non-
investment grade remains substantial for the Netherlands at 98.5% (2024:
98.5%), Germany at 98.7% (2024:98.9%), and Belgium 96.8% (2024:
96.6%).
In Europe, the increase in investment grade outstandings was mainly
observed in  Germany (€11.9 billion), Spain (€8.4 billion), Poland (€5.2
billion) and France (€3.0 billion).
The net decrease in non-investment grade outstandings was mainly
observed in Spain (€2.4 billion), America (€1.9 billion), and Germany
(€1.7 billion).
Outstandings by economic sectors and geographical area (*) 1
in EUR million
Region
Total
Industry
Netherlands
Belgium
Germany
Poland
Spain
United
Kingdom
Luxembourg
France
Rest of
Europe
America
Asia
Australia
Africa
2025
Private Individuals
133,644
47,047
114,235
18,871
29,412
117
2,734
2,038
18,761
183
128
41,294
20
408,482
Central Banks
8,742
6,621
13,938
1,499
577
3,791
6,088
0
6,912
0
6,426
1,388
0
55,983
Natural Resources
2,220
1,257
869
909
156
2,848
2,254
261
10,730
8,974
8,830
1,396
281
40,985
Real Estate
17,212
14,082
1,184
2,356
1,749
679
3,257
3,055
3,805
2,591
1,409
3,309
0
54,689
Commercial Banks
1,573
504
5,605
493
754
4,917
6,808
5,228
8,205
9,182
10,762
398
164
54,593
Non-Bank Financial Institutions
3,577
1,536
5,717
2,295
880
8,040
6,819
6,255
5,738
21,109
3,451
1,659
10
67,086
Central Governments
3,297
14,525
374
11,768
6,692
31
186
5,485
11,463
14,146
935
400
580
69,880
Transportation & Logistics
4,652
2,132
1,239
1,759
698
2,384
967
839
6,048
3,665
6,196
663
692
31,934
Utilities
1,678
1,868
3,890
1,127
1,932
3,184
539
593
4,291
6,144
1,376
2,067
121
28,809
Food, Beverages & Personal Care
8,415
3,675
604
2,425
340
261
1,472
801
2,998
2,358
1,269
476
1
25,096
Services
5,322
8,420
1,906
1,639
127
1,123
306
394
1,464
1,106
873
585
1
23,265
General Industries
5,118
3,232
1,304
2,957
208
262
476
550
4,399
2,575
1,461
322
25
22,890
Lower Public Administration
2,236
7,362
10,121
815
682
0
235
3,432
520
1,462
38
4,528
0
31,433
Other
18,125
12,579
5,685
9,053
2,413
3,169
1,290
1,277
11,584
12,097
8,044
2,127
287
87,730
Total
215,812
124,841
166,672
57,966
46,620
30,805
33,431
30,207
96,919
85,590
51,198
60,613
2,181
1,002,854
Rating class
Investment grade
171,707
74,908
148,033
41,249
41,114
25,930
29,551
24,917
71,116
71,085
45,214
50,441
147
795,414
Non-investment grade
40,889
45,899
16,505
14,477
4,771
4,664
3,586
5,048
22,521
12,841
5,430
9,527
1,821
187,976
Performing Restructuring
1,528
928
680
694
265
30
53
134
1,486
406
66
162
39
6,469
Non-performing loans
1,689
3,107
1,454
1,546
470
181
242
108
1,795
1,257
488
483
175
12,995
Total
215,812
124,841
166,672
57,966
46,620
30,805
33,431
30,207
96,919
85,590
51,198
60,613
2,181
1,002,854
1Geographical areas are based on country of residence, except for private individuals for which the geographical areas are based on the primary country of risk.
Outstandings by economic sectors and geographical area (*) 1
in EUR million
Region
Total
Industry
Netherlands
Belgium
Germany
Poland
Spain
United
Kingdom
Luxembourg
France
Rest of
Europe
America
Asia
Australia
Africa
2024
Private Individuals
122,914
45,611
107,415
16,525
27,083
122
3,058
2,260
16,391
198
129
38,106
16
379,827
Central Banks
22,529
10,196
13,966
1,729
510
1,935
5,737
10,913
9,525
879
0
77,919
Natural Resources
2,197
1,531
881
778
152
3,021
2,503
405
11,212
8,475
8,989
1,593
159
41,899
Real Estate
16,749
13,387
1,218
2,085
1,595
552
3,446
2,713
3,707
3,220
1,066
3,642
53,381
Commercial Banks
1,353
314
4,129
695
376
4,733
5,268
5,074
7,779
10,700
9,394
1,336
157
51,308
Non-Bank Financial Institutions
2,872
1,766
5,147
2,874
249
8,479
6,031
5,932
5,174
23,157
3,518
1,255
55
66,509
Central Governments
1,416
11,009
51
9,435
5,308
48
82
3,202
9,203
15,377
288
488
589
56,497
Transportation & Logistics
4,290
2,076
1,426
1,623
679
2,262
828
765
7,407
3,983
6,912
504
781
33,536
Utilities
1,805
1,843
3,920
814
1,971
2,826
395
712
3,951
5,886
1,187
2,253
152
27,713
Food, Beverages & Personal Care
7,377
3,690
695
2,215
351
328
1,393
1,102
3,008
2,498
1,168
406
14
24,246
Services
4,919
8,431
1,852
1,538
122
869
540
310
1,271
1,265
516
680
22,312
General Industries
4,568
2,690
1,059
2,824
219
301
539
484
3,862
2,039
708
23
8
19,324
Lower Public Administration
782
6,824
7,435
608
557
0
246
3,091
476
1,554
44
4,941
26,557
Other
17,208
12,722
6,876
8,394
1,361
3,137
1,248
1,426
11,722
10,475
4,372
1,513
238
80,691
Total
210,981
122,091
156,071
52,136
40,533
28,613
31,314
27,476
96,076
88,827
47,815
57,618
2,170
961,720
Rating class
Investment grade
170,161
74,882
136,096
36,029
32,741
23,844
27,235
21,886
67,110
72,476
41,203
46,959
59
750,680
Non-investment grade
37,689
43,059
18,238
13,948
7,126
4,388
3,858
5,229
25,679
14,763
5,859
9,889
1,898
191,623
Performing Restructuring
1,579
1,078
305
701
234
59
56
54
1,369
443
30
203
4
6,114
Non-performing loans
1,552
3,071
1,432
1,458
432
322
166
307
1,918
1,145
723
568
210
13,303
Total
210,981
122,091
156,071
52,136
40,533
28,613
31,314
27,476
96,076
88,827
47,815
57,618
2,170
961,720
1Geographical areas are based on country of residence, except for Private Individuals for which the geographical areas are based on the primary country of risk.
Credit risk mitigation (*)
ING uses various techniques and instruments to mitigate the credit risk
associated with an exposure and to reduce the losses incurred subsequent
to a default by a customer. The most common terminology used in ING for
credit risk protection is ‘cover’. While a cover may be an important
mitigant of credit risk and an alternative source of repayment, generally it
is ING’s practice to lend on the basis of the customer’s creditworthiness
rather than relying on the value of the cover.
Cover forms (*)
Within ING, there are two distinct forms of covers. First, where the asset
has been pledged to ING as collateral or security, ING has the right to
liquidate it should the customer be unable to fulfil its financial obligation.
As such, the proceeds can be applied towards full or partial compensation
of the customer's outstanding exposure. This may be tangible (such as
cash, securities, receivables, inventory, plant and machinery, and
mortgages on real estate properties) or intangible (such as patents,
trademarks, contract rights, and licences). Second, where there is a third-
party obligation, indemnification or undertaking (either by contract and/or
by law), ING has the right to claim from that third party an amount if the
customer fails in its obligations. The most common examples are
guarantees, such as parent guarantees, export credit insurances, or third-
party pledged mortgages. Insurance or reinsurance covers, including
comprehensive private risk insurance (CPRI) may be recognised as
guarantees and effectively function in an equivalent manner. ING accepts
credit risk insurance companies and export credit agencies (ECAs) as cover
providers.
Cover valuation methodology (*)
General guidelines for cover valuation are established with the objective of
ensuring consistent application within ING. These also require that the
value of the cover is monitored on a regular basis. Covers are revalued
periodically and whenever there is reason to believe that the market is
subject to significant changes in conditions. The frequency of monitoring
and revaluation depends on the type of cover.
The valuation method also depends on the type of covers. For asset
collateral, the valuation sources can be the customer’s balance sheet (e.g.
inventory, machinery, and equipment), nominal value (e.g. cash and
receivables), market value (e.g. securities and commodities), independent
valuations (e.g. commercial real estate) and market indices (e.g. residential
real estate). For third-party obligations, the valuation is based on the value
that is attributed to the contract between ING and that third party.
Where collateral values are used in the calculation of Stage 3 individual
loan loss provisions, haircuts may be applied to the valuation in specific
circumstances to sufficiently include all relevant factors impacting future
cash flows. ING applies haircuts to the collateral values of real estate,
shipping and aviation assets that are used in the calculation of the loss-
given-default in recovery scenarios. The haircut reflects the risks of
adverse price developments between the moment of valuation of an asset
and the actual settlement/cash receipt.
Cover values (*)
This section provides insight into the types of cover and the extent to
which exposures benefit from collateral or guarantees. The disclosure
differentiates between risk categories (lending, investment, money market
and pre-settlement). The most relevant types of cover include mortgages
(market values), financial collateral (cash and securities), guarantees, and
other covers (mainly pledges). The scope of covers in this overview has
been revised due to CRR3 implementation to align with regulatory
reporting. This explains the decrease in the values of 'other covers', which
had only a limited effect on the fully covered part of the portfolio, as ING's
portfolio remains well collateralised. Collateral covering financial market
transactions is valued on a daily basis (margining), and is as such not
included in the following tables. To mitigate the credit risk arising from
financial markets transactions, the bank enters into legal agreements
governing the exchange of financial collateral (high-quality government
bonds and cash).
The cover values are presented for the total portfolio of ING, both the
performing and non-performing portfolio.
Cover values including guarantees received (*)
in EUR million
Cover type and value
Collateralisation
2025
Outstandings
Mortgages
Financial Collateral
Guarantees
Other covers
No cover
Partially covered
Fully covered
Consumer lending
407,552
905,028
5,317
37,473
842
7.8%
2.0%
90.2%
Business lending
383,443
186,276
31,834
166,953
215,177
42.1%
15.8%
42.1%
Investment and money market
151,639
—
—
1,506
—
99.6%
—%
0.4%
Total lending, investment and money market
942,634
1,091,304
37,151
205,932
216,019
36.6%
7.3%
56.1%
of which NPL
12,981
9,827
196
2,771
3,591
33.0%
18.5%
48.5%
Pre-settlement
60,220
Total Bank
1,002,854
Cover values including guarantees received (*)
in EUR million
Cover type and value
Collateralisation
2024
Outstandings
Mortgages
Financial Collateral
Guarantees
Other covers
No cover
Partially covered
Fully covered
Consumer lending
378,832
865,466
6,257
25,428
55,115
6.5%
2.0%
91.5%
Business lending
368,424
163,143
24,838
119,410
484,148
34.0%
23.7%
42.3%
Investment and money market
153,495
—
—
1,115
95
99.3%
—%
0.7%
Total lending, investment and money market
900,752
1,028,609
31,095
145,953
539,357
33.6%
10.5%
55.9%
of which NPL
13,295
10,427
194
3,093
11,109
27.6%
27.7%
44.7%
Pre-settlement
60,968
Total Bank
961,720
The above tables gives an overview of the collateralisation of ING’s total
portfolio. Excluding the pre-settlement portfolio, 56.1% (2024: 55.9%) of
ING’s outstandings were fully collateralised in 2025. Since investments
traditionally do not require covers, the ‘no covers’ percentage in this
portfolio is over 99.6%.
Consumer lending portfolio (*)
The consumer lending portfolio accounts for 40.6% (2024: 39.4%) of ING’s
total outstanding, primarily consisting of residential mortgage loans and
consequently most collateral consists of mortgages. Mortgage values are
collected in an internal central database and in most cases external data is
used to index the market value.
A significant part of ING’s residential mortgage portfolio is in the
Netherlands (2025: 35.0%, 2024: 35.0%), Germany (2025: 27.0%,
2024: 27.3%), Belgium (including Luxembourg) (2025: 12.0%, 2024: 12.2%)
and Australia (2025: 10.9%, 2024: 10.6%).
Business lending portfolio (*)
Business lending accounts for 38.2% (2024: 38.3%) of ING’s total
outstanding. Business lending presented in this section does not include
pre-settlement, investment and money market exposures.
Credit quality (*)
ING uses three distinct statuses to categorise the management of clients
with (perceived) deteriorating credit risk profiles. ING makes use of Early
Warning Indicators (EWIs) in daily credit risk management processes,
which relate to a change in (internal and/or external) circumstances or
outlook of the specific obligor, the sector or the portfolio. ING usually
classifies a client with a 'watch list' status (Business lending only) when
there are early warning indicators triggered that detect an increased risk
profile. Watch list status requires more than usual attention, increased
monitoring and quarterly reviews. Some clients with a watch list or EWI
status may develop into a performing restructuring status or a non-
performing status. When there is increasing doubt as to the performance
and collectability of the client’s contractual obligations, the loans are
managed by Global Credit Restructuring (GCR) or by restructuring units in
the various regions and business units. The statuses and links with rating
grades are illustrated in the table below.
Credit risk ratings
Internal Rating Grade
1-10
11-17
18-19
20-22
Category
Investment Grade
Non-investment
Grade
Performing
restructuring
Non-performing
Credit risk management
Regular incl EWI/
watch list
Regular incl EWI/
watch list
Credit restructuring
Credit restructuring
ECL Stage
1/21
1/21
2
3
1Stage 2 in case one of the Stage 2 triggers is hit, where Watchlist files are always Stage 2
Credit quality outstandings  (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Performing not past due
879,284
823,336
Business lending performing past due
8,071
9,174
Consumer lending performing past due
895
802
Non-performing
12,981
13,295
Total lending and investment
901,232
846,607
Money market
41,402
54,145
Pre-settlement
60,220
60,968
Total
1,002,854
961,720
Past due obligations (*)
Retail Banking measures its portfolio in terms of payment arrears and
determines on a monthly basis if there are any significant changes in the
level of arrears. This methodology applies to Private Individuals as well as
Business lending. An obligation is considered ‘past due’ if it is more than
one day late, subject to materiality thresholds in line with Definition of
Default Regulation. ING aims to help its customers as soon as they are past
due by reminding them of their payment obligations. In its contact with
customers, ING aims to solve the (potential) financial difficulties by offering
a range of measures (e.g. payment arrangements, restructuring). If the
issues cannot be resolved because the customer is unable or unwilling to
pay, for example, the contract is sent to the recovery unit. The facility is
downgraded to risk rating 20 (non-performing) when the facility or obligor
– depending on the level at which the non-performing status is applied – is
more than 90 days past due and to risk rating 21 or 22 in case of an exit
scenario.
The table below represents the breakdown of lending and investment
credit risk outstandings that are performing by age and geographic area.
The past due but performing consumer lending outstanding increased by
€93 million, due to the increase in 1-30 days (€90 million) and 31-60 days
(€3 million).
The largest single country increase was in Belgium (€42 million), followed
by the Netherlands (€22 million), mainly in the 1-30 days bucket.           
The largest decrease was seen in Australia (€21 million).
Ageing analysis (past due but performing): Consumer lending portfolio by geographic area, outstandings (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Region
Past due
for 1–30 days
Past due
for 31–60 days
Past due
for 61–90 days
Total
Past due
for 1–30 days
Past due
for 31–60 days
Past due
for 61–90 days
Total
Europe
Netherlands
84
32
6
122
62
35
4
101
Belgium
219
60
26
305
185
49
29
263
Germany
70
37
22
129
65
37
24
125
Poland
58
6
3
68
61
9
4
74
Spain
22
17
9
48
12
16
8
36
Luxembourg
25
5
4
34
22
6
3
32
Rest of Europe
121
23
6
150
93
15
4
112
America
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Asia
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
Australia
29
8
1
38
38
19
2
59
Africa
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
628
189
78
895
538
186
78
802
Ageing analysis (past due but performing): Business lending portfolio by geographic area, outstandings (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Region
Past due
for 1–30 days
Past due
for 31–60 days
Past due
for 61–90 days
Total
Past due
for 1–30 days
Past due
for 31–60 days
Past due
for 61–90 days
Total
Europe
Netherlands
586
31
9
626
929
14
943
Belgium
476
22
10
508
1,187
17
13
1,217
Germany
415
2
2
419
215
3
2
220
Poland
403
31
15
449
173
17
19
209
United Kingdom
516
531
1,046
830
8
838
France
73
73
194
194
Spain
9
9
26
26
Luxembourg
212
9
1
222
367
51
5
423
Rest of Europe
899
17
3
919
630
4
46
681
America
2,946
68
3,013
3,504
95
3,599
Asia
133
133
310
310
Australia
636
10
7
654
469
6
475
Africa
39
39
Total
7,303
720
47
8,071
8,873
215
86
9,174
Total past due but performing outstanding of business lending decreased
by €1.1. billion. The decrease was mainly witnessed in the 1–30 days past
due bucket (€1.6 billion) and was offset by the increase in 31-60 days
(€0.5 billion) past due bucket, fully in the United Kingdom related to
overdue fees. The largest decreases were in Belgium  (€0.7 billion) and
America  (€0.6 billion), while the largest increase were in Australia (€0.2
billion), Germany (€0.2 billion), Poland (€0.2 billion), and the United
Kingdom (€0.2 billion).
Forbearance (*)
Forbearance occurs when a client is unable to meet their financial
commitments due to financial difficulties they are facing or are about to
face and ING grants them concessions. Forborne assets are assets for
which forbearance measures have been granted.
Forbearance may enable clients experiencing financial difficulties to
continue repaying their debt.
For business clients, ING mainly applies forbearance measures to support
clients with fundamentally sound business models that are experiencing
temporary difficulties. The aim is to maximise the client’s repayment
ability, thereby avoiding a default situation, and help the client to return to
a performing situation.
For ING Retail units, clear criteria have been established to determine
whether a client is eligible for the forbearance process. Specific approval
mandates are in place to approve the measures, as well as procedures to
manage, monitor, and report the forbearance activities.
ING reviews the performance of forborne exposures at least quarterly,
either on a case-by-case (Business) or portfolio (Retail) basis.
Both performing (risk ratings 1-19) and non-performing (risk ratings 20-22)
exposures are eligible for Forbearance measures. ING uses specific criteria
to move forborne exposures from non-performing to performing or to
remove the forbearance statuses that are consistent with the
corresponding European Banking Authority (EBA) standards. An exposure
is reported as forborne for a minimum of two years. An additional one-
year probation period is applied to forborne exposures that move from
non-performing back to performing.
Summary Forborne portfolio (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Business line
Outstandings
Of which: performing
Of which: non-performing
% of total portfolio(1)
Outstandings
Of which: performing
Of which: non-performing
% of total portfolio(1)
Wholesale Banking
5,910
3,194
2,716
1.7%
5,934
3,191
2,743
1.9%
Retail Banking
7,551
4,538
3,013
1.4%
6,883
3,987
2,897
1.3%
Total
13,461
7,732
5,729
1.5%
12,817
7,178
5,640
1.5%
Summary Forborne portfolio by forbearance type (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Forbearance type
Outstandings
Of which: performing
Of which: non-performing
% of total portfolio(1)
Outstandings
Of which: performing
Of which: non-performing
% of total portfolio(1)
Loan modification
11,883
6,581
5,302
1.3%
11,726
6,734
4,993
1.4%
Refinancing
1,578
1,151
427
0.2%
1,091
444
647
0.1%
Total
13,461
7,732
5,729
1.5%
12,817
7,178
5,640
1.5%
1% of total portfolio is based on lending and investment outstandings.
Forborne assets increased by €644 million, mainly due to the increase of
€667 million in Retail Banking, which was offset by a €24 million decrease
in Wholesale Banking. The rise in Retail Banking forborne assets was
primarily driven by residential mortgages in the Netherlands, which
contributed €608 million. This increase was largely the result of the
implementation of an updated framework, under which more clients are
classified as forborne, while outflow is only allowed after a two-year
probation period.
In terms of forbearance type, the increase is mainly witnessed in
refinancing type (€487 million) driven by a few larger files in Wholesale
Banking.
Modification of financial assets (*)
The following table shows:
§ Financial assets that were modified during the year (i.e. qualified as
forborne) while they had a loss allowance measured at an amount
equal to lifetime ECL; and
§ Financial assets that were reclassified to Stage 1 during the period
while being modified before.
Financial assets modified (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Financial assets modified during the period
Amortised cost before modification
1,746
1,888
Net modification results
-72
-107
Financial assets modified since initial recognition
Gross carrying amount at 31 December of financial assets for which loss allowance has changed to 12-month
measurement during the period
1,027
1,506
Wholesale Banking (*)
Wholesale Banking forborne assets amounted to €5.9 billion (2024:
€5.9 billion), which represented 1.7% (2024: 1.9%) of the total Wholesale
Banking portfolio.
The net decrease in Wholesale Banking forborne assets was driven by a
€27 million reduction in non-performing forborne exposure and partially
offset by a €3 million rise in performing forborne exposures. 
Wholesale Bankings' forborne assets show an increase in Telecom due to
refinancing, which was offset by a decrease in other sectors, such as real
estate, food, beverages & personal care, chemicals, health &
pharmaceuticals and natural resources. These five sectors accounted for
69.6% of the total Wholesale Banking forborne outstandings.
Wholesale Banking: Forborne portfolio by geographical area (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Region
Outstandings
Of which:
performing
Of which: non-
performing
Outstandings
Of which:
performing
Of which: non-
performing
Europe
Netherlands
316
191
124
217
69
148
Belgium
3
3
172
165
7
Germany
336
29
307
372
62
310
Poland
662
305
357
630
284
346
United Kingdom
676
516
160
444
266
178
Italy
547
519
28
389
353
36
Rest of Europe
1,081
558
523
1,339
940
399
America
1,313
545
768
1,586
867
719
Asia
711
313
398
652
111
541
Australia
212
177
35
79
34
44
Africa
53
37
15
54
40
15
Total
5,910
3,194
2,716
5,934
3,191
2,743
Wholesale Banking: Forborne portfolio by economic sector (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Industry
Outstandings
Of which:
performing
Of which: non-
performing
Outstandings
Of which:
performing
Of which: non-
performing
Natural Resources
605
308
297
781
424
356
Real Estate
945
375
570
1,115
703
412
Transportation & Logistics
145
48
97
214
83
131
Food, Beverages & Personal Care
629
289
340
810
415
395
Services
172
149
24
211
176
34
Automotive
263
139
124
332
183
149
Utilities
497
218
279
677
301
376
General Industries
197
42
155
127
70
58
Retail
111
41
70
149
21
128
Chemicals, Health & Pharmaceuticals
619
74
545
668
136
532
Builders & Contractors
179
174
4
122
118
5
Telecom 1
1,314
1,166
148
486
383
103
Other
234
172
62
243
178
65
Total
5,910
3,194
2,716
5,934
3,191
2,743
1The presentation has been revised to separately disclose Telecom. Comparative figures have been
adjusted accordingly.
Retail Banking (*)
As of year end, Retail Banking forborne assets amounted to €7.6 billion
(2024: €6.9 billion), which represented 1.4% (2024: 1.3%) of the total Retail
Banking portfolio. Retail Banking performing forborne exposure increased
by €0.6 billion.
Retail Banking: Forborne portfolio by geographical area (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Region
Outstandings
Of which: performing
Of which: non-performing
Outstandings
Of which: performing
Of which: non-performing
Europe
Netherlands
2,136
1,711
424
1,548
1,134
414
Belgium
2,153
978
1,175
1,942
800
1,142
Germany
1,304
965
338
1,379
1,052
327
Poland
793
361
432
777
403
374
Spain
92
55
37
159
127
31
Italy
104
33
70
122
43
79
Türkiye
22
16
6
13
9
4
Romania
216
106
110
173
72
101
Rest of Europe
91
32
59
102
50
52
America
5
5
22
17
6
Asia
1
1
1
Australia
635
279
357
646
279
367
Africa
Total
7,551
4,538
3,013
6,883
3,987
2,897
The main concentration of forborne assets in a single country was in
Belgium with 28.5% (2024: 28.2%) of total Retail Banking forborne assets
and 39.0% (2024: 39.4%) of the non-performing forborne assets. The other
significant single country concentration is in the Netherlands with 28.3%
(2024: 22.5%), which increased during 2025 because of the
implementation of a new framework for mortgages, and Germany having
17.3% (2024: 20.0%) of the total Retail forborne assets.
Non-performing loans (*)
ING has aligned the regulatory concept of non-performing with that of the
definition of default. Hence, borrowers are classified as non-performing
when a default trigger occurs (non-exhaustive list):
§ ING believes the borrower is unlikely to pay. The borrower has
evidenced significant financial difficulty, to the extent that it will have a
negative impact on the future cash flows of the financial asset. The
following events could be seen as indicators of financial difficulty:
– The borrower (or third party) has started insolvency proceedings;
– A group company/co-borrower has NPL status;
– Indication of fraud (affecting the company’s ability to service its
debt);
– There is doubt as to the borrower’s ability to generate stable and
sufficient cash flows to service its debt;
– Restructuring of debt; and
– ING has granted concessions relating to the borrower’s financial
difficulty, the effect of which is a reduction in expected future cash
flows of the financial asset below current carrying amount.
§ The obligor has failed in the payment of principal, interest, or fees; the
total past due amount is above the materiality threshold, and this
remains the case for more than 90 consecutive days.
Furthermore, Wholesale Banking has an individual name approach, using
early warning indicators to signal possible future issues in debt service.
Also in Retail Banking early warning indicator frameworks have been
implemented.
The table below represents the breakdown of credit risk outstandings that
have been classified as non-performing by sector and business line.
Non-performing Loans: Outstandings by economic sector and business lines (*) 1
in EUR million
Wholesale Banking
Retail Banking
Total
Industry
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Private Individuals
3
4
4,899
4,766
4,902
4,769
Natural Resources
945
965
115
99
1,061
1,064
Food, Beverages & Personal Care
372
452
325
357
697
809
Transportation & Logistics
251
347
227
157
478
504
Services
94
102
375
394
469
495
Real Estate
586
831
656
603
1,241
1,434
General Industries
243
236
471
451
713
687
Builders & Contractors
31
51
541
445
571
496
Retail
184
157
189
224
373
381
Utilities
336
582
26
19
362
600
Chemicals, Health & Pharmaceuticals
602
654
150
185
752
839
Telecom 2
170
151
36
12
206
163
Other
771
666
383
387
1,154
1,052
Total
4,589
5,196
8,392
8,099
12,981
13,295
1Based on lending and investment outstandings.
2The presentation has been revised to separately disclose Telecom. Comparative figures have been
adjusted accordingly.
Non-performing loans: Outstandings by economic sectors and geographical area (*)
in EUR million
Region
Total
Industry
Netherlands
Belgium
Germany
Poland
Spain
United Kingdom
France
Luxembourg
Rest of Europe
America
Asia
Australia
Africa
2025
Private Individuals
697
1,481
1,113
220
357
10
8
39
574
2
2
399
1
4,902
Natural Resources
137
84
28
14
584
23
191
1,061
Food, Beverages & Personal Care
167
94
1
94
19
6
126
59
131
697
Transportation & Logistics
87
40
136
47
22
72
22
10
1
41
478
Services
68
262
75
1
3
4
16
26
13
469
Real Estate
24
419
59
115
45
47
101
8
377
48
1,241
General Industries
137
138
38
196
20
13
130
10
31
713
Builders & Contractors
89
219
7
182
8
66
571
Retail
80
79
33
56
1
4
15
105
373
Utilities
14
10
19
8
151
1
12
80
33
35
362
Chemicals, Health &
Pharmaceuticals
47
65
112
346
43
25
64
49
752
Telecom
37
4
3
15
146
2
206
Other
102
209
72
88
2
1
10
105
358
75
132
1,154
Total
1,686
3,105
1,454
1,546
470
181
108
242
1,786
1,257
488
483
175
12,981
Non-performing loans: Outstandings by economic sectors and geographical area (*)
in EUR million
Region
Total
Industry
Netherlands
Belgium
Germany
Poland
Spain
United Kingdom
France
Luxembourg
Rest of Europe
America
Asia
Australia
Africa
2024
Private Individuals
646
1,461
1,066
210
304
10
8
44
545
2
2
469
4,769
Natural Resources
13
54
33
569
31
343
21
1,064
Food, Beverages & Personal Care
196
154
1
93
23
5
158
51
127
809
Transportation & Logistics
93
40
3
124
47
1
136
1
59
504
Services
57
293
5
87
2
1
3
5
10
34
495
Real Estate
12
374
63
114
59
59
90
6
606
52
1,434
General Industries
153
123
24
147
20
2
1
170
17
30
687
Builders & Contractors
68
175
5
162
7
78
496
Retail
53
97
39
62
3
14
97
15
1
381
Utilities
13
8
25
21
285
12
128
109
600
Chemicals, Health &
Pharmaceuticals
37
94
84
340
1
110
113
36
24
839
Telecom
7
1
3
44
14
90
4
163
Other
202
198
117
60
2
72
17
90
54
92
150
1,052
Total
1,549
3,071
1,432
1,457
432
322
307
166
1,916
1,145
723
567
210
13,295
In 2025, the NPL portfolio decreased to €13.0 billion (2024: €13.3 billion),
mainly driven by the decrease of €0.6 billion in Wholesale Banking. The
decrease was offset by the increase in Retail Banking (€0.3 billion) in line
with strong portfolio growth, mainly in residential mortgages.
Total net decrease was mainly seen in sectors Utilities, Real Estate and
Food, Beverage & Personal Care while the largest increase was in Private
Individuals.
Loan loss provisioning (*)
ING recognises loss allowances based on the expected credit loss (ECL)
model of IFRS 9, which is designed to be forward-looking. The IFRS 9
impairment requirements are applicable to on-balance-sheet financial
assets measured at amortised cost or fair value through other
comprehensive income (FVOCI), such as loans, debt securities, and lease
receivables, as well as off-balance-sheet items such as undrawn loan
commitments and financial- and non-financial guarantees issued.
ING distinguishes between two types of calculation methods for credit loss
allowances:
§ Collective 12-month ECL (Stage 1) and collective lifetime ECL (Stage 2)
for portfolios of financial instruments, as well as collective lifetime ECL
for credit-impaired exposures (Stage 3) below €1 million; and
§ Individual lifetime ECL for credit-impaired (Stage 3) financial
instruments with exposures above €1 million.
IFRS 9 models (*)
ING’s IFRS 9 models leverage on the internal rating-based (IRB) models (PD,
LGD, EAD), which include certain required conservatism. To include IFRS 9
requirements, such regulatory conservatism is removed from the ECL
parameters (PD, LGD and EAD). The IFRS 9 models apply two other types of
adjustments to the IRB ECL parameters: (i) to the economic outlook and (ii)
for Stage 2 and Stage 3 assets only, to the lifetime horizon. The IFRS 9
model parameters are estimated based on statistical techniques and
supported by expert judgement.
ING has aligned the definition of default for regulatory purposes with the
definition of ‘credit-impaired’ financial assets under IFRS 9 (Stage 3). ING
has also aligned its definition of default between IFRS 9 and the regulatory
technical standards (RTS) and EBA guidelines.
Climate and environmental risks in IFRS 9 models (*)
Climate risk drivers (physical and transition risks) can reduce the ability of
businesses and households to fulfil their obligations due, under existing
lending contracts. These climate risks are partly reflected in IFRS9 ECL
through regular credit risk transmission channels such as the
macroeconomic forecast and relevant risk parameters.
On the other hand, future physical or transition risks from climate change
are not yet fully captured within the current ECL models. In our
assessment of physical risks, it is generally expected that these risks will
only become financially significant on the long-term horizon.
Consequently, for short- and medium-term loans, such risks are not
expected to lead to significant credit deterioration over the exposure’s
lifetime. For the long term, the probability and timing of physical risk
events remain highly uncertain. ING is however actively enhancing the
integration of physical and transition risks into collateral valuations,
ensuring that effects on property values are appropriately captured.
In case of risk events that have already occurred (e.g. floods, stranded
assets), the impact of such events is assessed in the calculation of Stage 3
individual provisions, collective SICR or management adjustments to ECL
models. For example, we consider whether affected assets have suffered
from a significant increase in credit risk (or are credit impaired) and
whether the ECL is appropriate.
Additionally, a management adjustment to ECL models for business
clients was introduced to specifically cover for medium- to long-term
transition risk on high greenhouse gas-emitting sectors. The management
adjustment reflects the risk of financial loss foreseen on the longer horizon
for lenders with higher transition risk in these high greenhouse gas-
emitting sectors as consequence of future carbon taxation.
ING is continuously improving on climate risk data, which will enable us to
further embed climate risks into the IFRS 9 ECL models. For more
information on ESG risk management, see ‘ESG risk’.
Reconciliation gross carrying amount (IFRS 9 eligible) and statement of financial position
in EUR million
2025
2024
Gross
carrying
amount 
Loan loss
provisions
Cash and on-
demand
bank
positions
Reverse
repurchase
transactions
Cash
collateral
Other
Statement
of financial
 position 
Gross
carrying
amount 
Loan loss
provisions
Cash and on-
demand
bank
positions
Reverse
repurchase
transactions
Cash
collateral
Other
Statement
of financial
 position 
Amounts held at central banks
53,671
-17
-1,297
532
52,889
71,280
-14
-1,550
637
70,353
Loans and advances to banks
8,445
-18
3,053
6,836
2,649
239
21,204
4,684
-22
3,195
10,777
2,362
773
21,769
Financial instruments FVOCI loans
3,244
-6
—
3,238
1,671
-7
-56
1,608
Financial instruments FVOCI debt
securities
50,868
-15
-36
50,817
42,185
-12
46
42,219
Securities at amortised cost
54,366
-11
-487
53,867
50,701
-15
-413
50,273
Loans and advances to customers
721,514
-5,894
3,866
4,595
-2,302
721,779
679,488
-5,833
3,471
4,956
-1,783
680,299
Total on-balance (IFRS 9 eligible)
892,108
-5,961
1,756
10,702
7,244
-2,055
903,794
850,009
-5,902
1,645
14,248
7,318
-796
866,521
Guarantees and irrevocable facilities
(IFRS 9 eligible)
243,207
-140
198,420
-146
Total gross carrying amount (IFRS
9 eligible)
1,135,315
-6,101
1,048,429
-6,048
This table presents the reconciliation between the statement of financial
position and the gross carrying amounts used for calculating the expected
credit losses. No expected credit loss is calculated for cash, on-demand
bank positions, reverse repurchase transactions, cash collateral received in
respect of derivatives, and other. Therefore, these amounts are not
included in the total gross carrying amount (IFRS 9 eligible). Other includes
hedge valuation adjustments, deferred acquisition costs on residential
mortgages, and a receivable which is offset against a liquidity facility.
Portfolio quality (*)
The table below describes the portfolio composition over the different
IFRS 9 stages and rating classes. The Stage 1 portfolio represents 92.0%
(2024: 91.1%) of the total gross carrying amounts, mainly composed of
investment grade, while Stage 2 makes up 6.8% (2024: 7.6%) and Stage 3
makes up 1.2% (2024: 1.3%) of the total gross carrying amounts,
respectively.
Gross carrying amount per IFRS 9 stage and rating class (*)1,2, 3
in EUR million
12-month ECL  (Stage 1)
Lifetime ECL not credit impaired (Stage 2)
Lifetime ECL credit impaired (Stage 3)
Total
Rating class
Gross carrying amount
Provisions
Gross carrying amount
Provisions
Gross carrying amount
Provisions
Gross carrying amount
Provisions
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Investment grade
1 (AAA)
79,938
79,076
2
1
126
281
80,064
79,357
2
1
2-4 (AA)
146,878
140,671
11
10
1,437
1,579
1
1
148,315
142,250
13
11
5-7 (A)
299,791
244,306
39
22
5,394
6,908
6
8
305,185
251,214
45
29
8-10 (BBB)
334,659
310,114
77
55
19,168
24,683
43
55
353,827
334,797
119
110
Non-investment
grade
11-13 (BB)
156,373
154,348
165
190
17,217
18,479
89
91
173,589
172,827
254
281
14-16 (B)
26,187
25,377
147
124
22,668
17,433
357
366
48,855
42,811
504
490
17 (CCC)
412
905
5
8
4,682
3,992
224
173
5,094
4,897
228
181
Performing
Restructuring
18 (CC)
4,349
4,059
262
233
4,349
4,060
262
233
19 (C)
2,447
2,474
198
203
2,447
2,474
198
203
Non-performing loans
20-22 (D)
13,590
13,742
4,476
4,509
13,590
13,742
4,476
4,509
Total
1,044,238
954,798
446
409
77,487
79,888
1,179
1,130
13,590
13,742
4,476
4,509
1,135,315
1,048,429
6,101
6,049
1Compared to the credit risk portfolio, the differences are due to undrawn committed amounts (€200.2 billion; 2024: €156.0 billion) and other positions (2025: nil; 2024:€6 billion) not included in credit outstandings and non-IFRS 9 eligible assets (€68.2 billion; 2024: €75.0 billion) included in credit outstandings but not
in the gross carrying amounts.
2Stage 3 lifetime credit impaired provision includes € 29 million (2024: €21 million) on purchased or
originated credit impaired.
Changes in gross carrying amounts and loan loss provisions (*)
The table below provides a reconciliation by stage of the gross carrying
amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers,
including loan commitments and financial guarantees. The transfers of
financial instruments represent the impact of stage transfers upon the
gross carrying/nominal amount and associated allowance for ECL. This
includes the net-remeasurement of ECL arising from stage transfers, for
example, moving from a 12-month (Stage 1) to a lifetime (Stage 2) ECL
measurement basis.
The net-remeasurement line represents the changes in provisions for
facilities that remain in the same stage.
Please note the following comments with respect to the movements observed in the table below:
§ Stage 3 gross carrying amount decreased by €0.2 billion from €13.7
billion as at 31 December 2024 to €13.6 billion as at 31 December 2025,
mainly as a result of €3.5 billion net inflow into NPL (credit impaired) in
2025, which is offset by €2.3 billion derecognitions and repayments
and €1.5 billion write-offs and disposals. Following the decrease in
carrying amount, Stage 3 provisions slightly decreased by €33 million
Stage 2 gross carrying amounts decreased by €2.4 billion from €79.9
billion as at 31 December 2024 to €77.5 billion as at 31 December 2025,
largely driven by €15.7 billion net transfers from Stage 1 into Stage 2,
including the impact of changes in risk drivers (including updated
macro-economic forecasts), model redevelopments mainly for Wholesale
Banking models, and new Stage 2 overlays. This was offset by a decrease
of exposure by €18.0 billion due to derecognised financial assets (including
sales and repayments) and €1.2 billion exposure moving to Stage 3. Stage
2 provisions increased by €49 million to €1.2 billion as of 31 December
2025.
Changes in gross carrying amounts and loan loss provisions (*) 1, 2
in EUR million
12-month ECL   
(Stage 1)
Lifetime ECL not
credit impaired
(Stage 2)
Lifetime ECL credit
impaired (Stage 3)
Total
12-month ECL 
(Stage 1)
Lifetime ECL not
credit impaired
(Stage 2)
Lifetime ECL credit
impaired (Stage 3)
Total
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
Gross
carrying
amount
Provisions
2025
2024
Opening balance
954,798
409
79,888
1,130
13,742
4,509
1,048,429
6,049
937,684
517
75,258
1,435
11,956
3,887
1,024,897
5,839
Transfer into 12-month ECL (Stage 1)
21,773
21
-21,555
-199
-218
-35
-212
20,276
22
-20,026
-195
-249
-34
0
-207
Transfer into lifetime ECL not credit impaired (Stage 2)
-37,208
-50
38,174
533
-966
-115
368
-43,155
-49
43,900
429
-745
-96
0
285
Transfer into lifetime ECL credit impaired (Stage 3)
-2,534
-14
-2,172
-138
4,705
1,259
1,108
-2,980
-18
-2,856
-235
5,836
1,802
0
1,548
Net remeasurement of loan loss provisions
7
-53
349
302
0
-180
0
-137
0
185
0
-133
New financial assets originated or purchased
263,371
189
22
2
263,393
191
212,529
192
0
0
0
0
212,529
192
Financial assets that have been derecognised
-119,098
-78
-12,295
-147
-1,422
-240
-132,814
-465
-126,858
-76
-11,840
-153
-1,450
-257
-140,148
-485
Net drawdowns and repayments
-57,441
-5,739
-853
-64,033
-41,763
0
-4,406
0
-309
0
-46,478
0
Changes in models/risk parameters
-33
71
-35
3
0
8
0
-6
0
-22
0
-20
Increase in loan loss provisions
43
68
1,185
1,296
-101
-297
1,578
1,179
Write-offs3
-937
-937
-937
-937
0
0
0
0
-1,017
-1,017
-1,017
-1,017
Disposals 3
-666
-3
-84
-3
-564
-286
-1,314
-291
-935
-1
-141
-8
-279
-215
-1,355
-225
Recoveries of amounts previously written off
58
58
0
0
0
0
0
69
0
69
Other movements
21,243
-4
1,268
-16
80
-53
22,591
-73
0
-5
0
0
0
208
0
203
Closing balance
1,044,238
446
77,487
1,179
13,590
4,476
1,135,315
6,101
954,798
409
79,888
1,130
13,742
4,509
1,048,429
6,049
1Stage 3 lifetime credit impaired provision includes €29 million (2024:€21 million) on purchased or originated credit impaired.
2The addition to the loan provision (in the consolidated statement of profit or loss) amounts to €1,304 million (2024: €1,194 million) of which €1,301 million (2024: €1,170 million) related to IFRS 9 eligible financial assets, €-5 million (2024: €9 million) to IFRS eligible commitments and €8 million (2024: €15 million) to
modification gains and losses on restructured financial assets.
Exposure per stage, coverage ratio and stage ratios 2
in EUR million
2025
2024
Balance sheet
Gross carrying amount
Loan loss provisions
Stage ratio
Gross carrying amount
Loan loss provisions
Stage Ratio
Loans and advances to banks (including central banks)
62,116
35
75,964
35
Stage 1
60,430
5
97%
74,631
4
98%
Stage 2
1,609
18
3%
1,258
15
2%
Stage 3
77
12
0.12%
75
16
%
Loans and advances to customers
721,513
5,894
679,488
5,833
Of which: Residential mortgages
374,780
822
348,432
814
Stage 1
341,281
49
91%
315,774
49
91%
Stage 2
30,181
288
8%
29,341
307
8%
Stage 3
3,318
485
1%
3,317
458
1%
Of which: Consumer lending (excl. Residential mortgages)
31,306
946
28,514
957
Stage 1
27,302
137
87%
24,134
112
85%
Stage 2
2,575
159
8%
3,090
191
11%
Stage 3
1,429
649
5%
1,290
654
5%
Of which: Loans to public authorities
29,089
21
23,930
17
Stage 1
28,568
8
98%
23,214
6
97%
Stage 2
298
3
1%
464
3
2%
Stage 3
222
11
1%
252
8
1%
Of which: Corporate lending
286,339
4,105
278,612
4,045
Stage 1
251,370
197
88%
237,305
196
85%
Stage 2
27,265
661
10%
33,427
575
12%
Stage 3
7,704
3,247
3%
7,880
3,274
3%
Other IFRS 9 eligible financial Instruments 1
351,685
173
292,977
180
Stage 1
335,286
51
95%
279,951
43
96%
Stage 2
15,559
49
4%
12,308
39
4%
Stage 3
840
72
0.2%
718
98
0.2%
Total gross carrying amount (IFRS 9 eligible)
1,135,315
6,101
1,048,428
6,048
1Includes off-balance sheet IFRS 9 eligible guarantees and irrevocable facilities. See Note 1 'Basis of preparation and material accounting policy information'.
2The exposure classification to residential mortgages, consumer lending, and corporate lending is
aligned to the regulatory definition.
Macroeconomic scenarios and sensitivity analysis of key sources
of estimation uncertainty (*)
Methodology (*)
This section outlines our methodology for adopting and generating
macroeconomic scenarios. We apply this methodology when producing
our probability-weighted ECL, incorporating alternative scenarios and
management adjustments where necessary. These adjustments are made
when management believes the consensus forecast does not fully capture
the extent of recent credit or economic events. The macroeconomic
scenarios are applicable to the whole ING portfolio in the scope of IFRS 9
ECLs.
The IFRS 9 standard, with its inherent complexities and potential impact on
the carrying amounts of our assets and liabilities, represents a key source
of estimation uncertainty. In particular, ING’s reportable ECL numbers are
sensitive to the forward-looking macroeconomic forecasts used as model
inputs, the probability weights applied to each of the three scenarios, and
the criteria for identifying a significant increase in credit risk. As such,
these crucial components require consultation and management
judgement, and are subject to extensive governance.
Baseline scenario (*)
As a baseline for IFRS 9, ING has adopted a market-neutral view combining
consensus forecasts for economic variables (GDP, unemployment) with
market forwards (for interest rates, exchange rates, and oil prices). Input
from a leading third-party service provider is used to complement the
consensus with consistent projections for variables for which there are no
consensus estimates available (most notably house prices and – for some
countries – unemployment), to generate alternative scenarios, to convert
annual consensus information to a quarterly frequency, and to ensure
general consistency of the scenarios. As the baseline scenario is consistent
with the consensus view, it can be considered as free from any bias.
The relevance and selection of macroeconomic variables is defined by the
ECL models under credit risk model governance. The scenarios are
reviewed and challenged by a panels of ING experts.
Alternative scenarios and probability weights (*)
Two alternative scenarios are taken into account: an upside and a
downside scenario. The alternative scenarios have statistical
characteristics as they are based on the forecast deviations of the leading
third-party service provider.
To understand the baseline level of uncertainty around any forecast, the
leading third-party service provider keeps track of all its deviations (so-
called forecast errors) of the past 30 years. The distribution of forecast
errors for GDP, unemployment, house prices, and share prices is applied to
the baseline forecast creating a broad range of alternative outcomes. In
addition, to understand the balance of risks facing the economy in an
unbiased way, the leading third-party service provider runs a survey with
respondents from around the world and across a broad range of
industries. In this survey, respondents put forward their views of key risks.
Following the survey results, the distribution of forecast errors (that is
being used for determining the scenarios) may be skewed.
For the downside scenario, ING has chosen the 90th percentile of that
distribution because this corresponds with the way risk management
earnings-at-risk is defined within the Group. The upside scenario is
represented by the 10th percentile of the distribution. The applicable
percentiles of the distribution imply a 20 percent probability for each
alternative scenario. Consequently, the baseline scenario has a 60 percent
probability weighting. Please note that, given their technical nature, the
downside and upside scenarios are not based on an explicit specific
narrative and have not changed compared to previous year.
Macroeconomic scenarios applied (*)
The macroeconomic scenarios applied in the calculation of loan loss
provisions are based on the consensus forecasts.
Baseline assumptions (*)
The general picture that the consensus conveys is that global economic
growth is slowing compared to recent years. US growth is expected to
continue to outpace European markets, but the gap is narrowing down.
China is expected to continue a declining growth trend, but still at higher
rates than seen in advanced markets. Inflation is expected to remain near
target for most advanced economies, but a bit above for the United States.
With interest rates moderating, monetary conditions are turning more
favourable for growth. For the housing market, continued price growth is
expected for almost all main markets.
The December 2025 consensus expects global output (as measured by the
weighted average GDP growth rate of ING’s 25 main markets) to remain at
a constant 2.4% from 2025-2027.
The eurozone economy has shown more resilience than expected despite
global headwinds, with sluggish but positive growth through 2025. The
coming years are expected to see modest growth rates as well. The trade
environment continues to be plagued by higher US tariffs and a stronger
euro. Expectations of a pickup in growth over the course of 2026 come
from stronger consumer spending and investment. German infrastructure
spending is expected to add to this momentum. Southern European
economies continue to benefit from European Recovery Fund investments.
Consensus expects the eurozone to have grown by 1.4% in 2025, before
slowing to 1.1% in 2026 and then recovering to 1.3% in 2027.
Elsewhere in Europe, the growth outlook is stronger. Poland’s growth
momentum remains solid, growing faster than its European peers. The key
growth drivers over the near-term forecast are consumption and public
investments, such as those carried out under the National Recovery Plan
(KPO). The economy is expected to grow by 3.6% in 2025, picking up to
3.7% in 2026 and settling at 3.2% in 2027. The consensus expectation for
Türkiye is to see stable growth of 3.5% and 3.4% in 2025 and 2026, as
domestic demand remains resilient and fixed investments and inventories
see an uptick. For 2027, a recovery to 3.7% is expected.
The American economy has held its ground despite the tariff war and
slowing employment growth. Its characterisation by a K-shaped economy
where most of the growth comes from high-income consumers and tech
investments is likely to continue in 2026. Tariffs are not feeding into
inflation as much as expected earlier in the year, and inflation
expectations remain benign, although still above the 2% target. This has
prompted the Federal Reserve to resume its rate cutting cycle. Inflation is
expected to remain around 2.8% and 2.9% in 2025 and 2026 before
steadying down at 2.4% in 2027.The US economy is expected to
experience steady growth of 2.0% in 2025-2027.
For China, economic underperformance continues as it still struggles with
the impact of the real estate correction and weak domestic demand.
However, the economy has come out resilient to the tariff war with a trade
surplus reaching record levels, making external demand the key driver of
2025. This enables the economy to reach its short-term growth target, but
medium-term consensus continues to be downbeat for the moment
because of its weak domestic economy. For 2025, consensus expects 4.9%
growth, down to 4.5% in 2026 and 4.3% in 2027.
Economic momentum in Australia is expected to be soft, as much of the
growth in 2025 came from government consumption. The economy is
lacking a clear growth engine, with the private sector struggling against
restrictive policy settings and consumers facing a tough outlook with
weaker employment growth and real wage gains moderating. Growth is
expected to come in at 1.8% in 2025, with a pick-up expected for 2026 to
2.2% and 2.3% for 2027.
When compared to the June 2025 consensus forecast, the December 2025
forecast has improved slightly because of better than expected growth in
major economies. Global GDP is expected to increase by 2.4% in both 2025
and 2026 (compared to 2.0% and 2.1% assumed before). The global
economy showed quite some resilience in 2025 despite trade and
geopolitical tensions, as GDP growth has continued despite political
disruptions. Markets, too, have adjusted to the new world of volatility.
Alternative scenarios and risks (*)
The baseline scenario assumes steady economic growth. However, further
escalation of geopolitical tensions and global trade uncertainty are seen as
key downside risks to the global economy. The balance of risks to the
baseline outlook is negative, and the alternative scenarios have a
downward skew.
The downside scenario sees a recession in 2026 and 2027 for most
countries. Unemployment increases strongly in this scenario and house
prices in most countries show outright falls. The downside scenario
captures the possible impact of geopolitical tensions, global trade policy
and heightened tariff uncertainty.
The upside scenario reflects the possibility of a better economic out-turn
resulting from the avoidance of further trade escalation, an AI-driven
productivity rebound and stronger European growth supported by defence
spending.
Management adjustments applied this reporting period (*)
In times of volatility and uncertainty where portfolio quality and the
economic environment are changing rapidly, models alone may not be
able to accurately predict losses. In these cases, management
adjustments can be applied to appropriately reflect ECL. Management
adjustments may also be applied when the impact of the updated
macroeconomic scenarios is over- or under-estimated by the IFRS 9
models, or to account for model redevelopment, recalibration, and periodic
assessment procedures that have not yet been incorporated into the IFRS9
models.
ING has an internal governance framework and controls in place to assess
the appropriateness of all management adjustments.
Management adjustments to ECL models (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Commercial Real Estate/ Inflation and interest rate
increases
50
Economic sector / portfolio based adjustments
9
38
Mortgage portfolio adjustments
121
112
Climate transition risk
47
29
Other Post Model Adjustments
7
-27
Total management adjustments
183
203
The management adjustment of €50 million for the Commercial Real
Estate portfolio, reported at 31 December 2024 due to prevailing risks in
this sector, is released in 2025 due to improved risk profile and partially
replaced with a management adjustment for a recent model update,
which corrects for the effects of the aforementioned risks on the model
outcome. As the model update has not been implemented in production
yet, a management adjustment of €10 million is reported under the Other
Post Model Adjustments category at 31 December 2025.
As at 31 December 2025, an economic sector / portfolio-based adjustment
is reported in the Mortgages portfolio in Australia (€9 million) to address
emerging risk from inflation, interest rate increases and overall cost of
living. The management adjustment reported at 31 December 2024 for the
increased credit risk in the Mortgages and Consumer Lending portfolios in
Spain – due to the effects of floods – has been released, as the remaining
affected performing customers are reported in Stage 2. Also the
adjustment taken in the Business Banking portfolio in Germany at 31
December 2024 to cover for the increased uncertainty in the German
economy has been released due to the agreed sale of the affected
portfolio.
As of 31 December 2025, the overall mortgage portfolio adjustment
amounts to €121 million (31 December 2024: €112 million) and fully
related to the management adjustment in Stage 2 for the risk
segmentation model that captures affordability, repayment, and
refinancing risk on performing mortgage customers with a bullet loan in
the Netherlands.
As of 31 December 2025, an adjustment of €47 million is in place to
address the impact of climate transition risk in Wholesale Banking (€31
million) and in Business Banking (€16 million). Climate transition risk is
expected to lead to a structural change in credit risk, which means specific
business activities will become structurally riskier due to environmental
policies, technological progress or changes in market sentiment and
preferences. The current IFRS 9 models do not capture this (novel) risk. The
management adjustment to ECL models for business clients was made to
specifically cover for the medium- to long-term transition risk on high
greenhouse gas-emitting sectors and is reported in Stage 2. The sectors
included in the overlay represent approximately 20% of the exposure
within Wholesale and Business Banking.
Other post-model adjustments mainly relate to the impact of model
redevelopment or recalibration and periodic model assessment
procedures that have not been incorporated in the ECL models yet. The
impact on total ECL can be positive or negative. These adjustments will be
removed once updates to the specific models have been implemented.
The change in balance compared to previous reporting date is due to i)
released negative overlays because of model updates that have been
implemented and ii) new overlays recognised for new recalibrations and
periodic model assessment procedures that have not been incorporated
yet.
Analysis on sensitivity (*)
The table below presents the analysis on the sensitivity of key forward-
looking macroeconomic inputs used in the ECL collective-assessment
modelling process and the probability weights applied to each of the three
scenarios. The countries included in the analysis are the most significant
geographic regions in ING. For Wholesale Banking, the US is the most
significant in terms of both gross contribution to reportable ECL and
sensitivity of ECL to forward-looking macroeconomics. Accordingly, ING
considers these portfolios to present the most significant risk of resulting in
a material adjustment to the carrying amount of financial assets within
the next financial year.
The purpose of the sensitivity analysis is to enable the reader to
understand the extent of the impact from the upside and downside
scenario on model-based reportable ECL.
In the table below, the real GDP is presented in percentage year-on-year
change, the unemployment in percentage of total labour force, and the
house price index (HPI) in percentage year-on-year change.
Sensitivity analysis as at December 2025  (*)
2026
2027
2028
Unweighted
ECL (€ mln)
Probability-
weighting
Reportable
ECL (€ mln) 1
Netherlands
Upside scenario
Real GDP
2.6
2.9
2.3
288
20%
389
Unemployment
3.5
3.2
3.2
HPI
8.2
8.5
7.0
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
1.1
1.4
1.5
364
60%
Unemployment
4.0
3.9
4.1
HPI
4.4
3.0
2.9
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-1.2
-0.9
0.2
566
20%
Unemployment
5.5
6.5
7.4
HPI
-0.8
-5.1
-5.1
Germany
Upside scenario
Real GDP
2.8
3.0
1.8
584
20%
633
Unemployment
3.0
2.4
2.2
HPI
8.2
9.8
9.4
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
1.1
1.5
1.3
623
60%
Unemployment
3.5
3.2
3.1
HPI
5.0
6.2
6.3
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-1.7
-1.1
0.4
713
20%
Unemployment
4.7
5.3
5.6
HPI
0.9
0.4
2.7
Belgium
Upside scenario
Real GDP
2.7
2.3
1.9
544
20%
596
Unemployment
5.1
4.6
4.5
HPI
5.2
4.9
5.4
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
1.1
1.4
1.6
585
60%
Unemployment
5.9
5.6
5.5
HPI
3.7
4.2
4.4
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-1.5
0.1
1.4
682
20%
Unemployment
7.0
7.7
7.9
HPI
1.8
2.6
2.6
United States
Upside scenario
Real GDP
3.2
2.9
2.7
64
20%
105
Unemployment
3.2
2.5
2.6
HPI
4.8
9.4
10.9
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
2.0
2.0
2.0
92
60%
Unemployment
4.3
4.1
4.1
HPI
1.4
2.7
3.6
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-0.4
-0.1
0.8
184
20%
Unemployment
6.7
7.2
7.5
HPI
-5.1
-7.9
-5.5
1Excluding management adjustments.
Sensitivity analysis as at December 2024 (*)
2025
2026
2027
Unweighted
ECL (€ mln)
Probability-
weighting
Reportable
ECL (€ mln) 1
Netherlands
Upside scenario
Real GDP
2.6
3.0
2.5
193
20%
270
Unemployment
3.5
3.3
3.3
HPI
18.9
11.7
2.5
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
1.5
1.4
1.5
249
60%
Unemployment
4.0
4.1
4.3
HPI
9.1
3.5
2.4
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-0.4
-1.4
-0.2
411
20%
Unemployment
5.7
7.2
8.1
HPI
-3.7
-7.2
2.2
Germany
Upside scenario
Real GDP
2.0
2.8
1.6
510
20%
548
Unemployment
2.9
2.4
2.0
HPI
5.4
8.9
9.9
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
0.5
1.1
1.2
540
60%
Unemployment
3.4
3.3
3.2
HPI
2.6
5.6
6.3
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-1.7
-1.7
0.3
609
20%
Unemployment
4.7
5.6
5.9
HPI
-1.7
1.3
2.2
Belgium
Upside scenario
Real GDP
2.2
2.6
2.1
534
20%
579
Unemployment
5.1
5.0
4.9
HPI
4.8
4.5
4.4
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
1.1
1.5
1.6
569
60%
Unemployment
5.7
5.7
5.6
HPI
3.2
4.1
3.8
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-0.6
-0.2
1.1
654
20%
Unemployment
7.0
8.0
8.0
HPI
1.2
2.9
2.5
United States
Upside scenario
Real GDP
3.1
3.5
3.2
74
20%
113
Unemployment
3.4
2.4
2.3
HPI
4.3
8.4
9.4
Baseline scenario
Real GDP
2.0
2.0
2.0
101
60%
Unemployment
4.2
4.1
4.0
HPI
3.3
3.7
3.9
Downside scenario
Real GDP
-0.1
-1.1
-0.4
187
20%
Unemployment
5.9
7.3
8.0
HPI
-0.7
-3.0
-2.5
1Excluding management adjustments.
When compared to the sensitivity analysis of 2024, the baseline
macroeconomic inputs have become slightly more positive overall,
underpinned by the resilience of the global economy in the face of trade
and geopolitical tensions. House price growth expectations are lower for
the Netherlands, given a rise in supply from the sale of rental properties
and slowdown of wage growth. In the US, a weak labour and housing
market both signal underlying economic challenges due to policy and
trade uncertainty, and persistent affordability issues. The upside and the
downside scenarios are not directly comparable with those of 2024 due to
an update in the basis of their derivation.
On a total ING level, the unweighted ECL for all collective provisioned
clients in the upside scenario was €2,938 million, in the baseline scenario
€3,232 million and in the downside scenario €3,993 million compared to
€3,326 million reportable model ECL as at 31 December 2025 (excluding all
management adjustments). To perform the sensitivity analysis, a point in
time reportable ECL is used as input, which slightly deviates from the total
reportable collective provisions as presented below:
Reconciliation of reportable collective ECL to total ECL (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Total reportable collective provisions
3,168
2,975
ECL from individually assessed impairments
2,750
2,871
ECL from management adjustments
183
203
Total ECL
6,101
6,049
Criteria for identifying a significant increase in credit risk (SICR) (*)
All assets and off-balance-sheet items that are in scope of IFRS 9
impairment and which are subject to collective ECL assessment are
allocated a 12-month ECL if deemed to belong in Stage 1, or a lifetime ECL
if deemed to belong in Stages 2 or 3. An asset belongs in Stage 2 if it is
considered to have experienced a significant increase in credit risk (SICR)
since initial origination or purchase.
The main determinant of SICR is a quantitative test, whereby the lifetime
PD of an asset at each reporting date is compared against its lifetime PD
determined at the date of initial recognition. If either a threshold for
absolute change in lifetime PD or a threshold for relative change in lifetime
PD is reached, the item is considered to have experienced an SICR (for more
details on absolute and relative thresholds, see the following sections).
Furthermore, any facility which shows an increase of 200 percent between
the PD at the date of initial recognition and the lifetime PD at the reporting
date (i.e. threefold increase in PD) must be classified as Stage 2. This is
considered a backstop within the quantitative assessment of SICR.
In Wholesale Banking, a significant increase in lifetime PD is not considered
plausible for assets of obligors with a credit rating at the reporting date in
the top range of investment grade. The assets of these Wholesale Banking
obligors are excluded from the assessment of significant increase in credit
risk triggers. For these obligors the qualitative significant increases in credit
risk triggers remain applicable (see the section below on Qualitative SICR
triggers). These are, for example, the watch list and/or forbearance
triggers. Finally, the 30 days past due backstop also remains applicable for
the top range of investment grade exposures to ensure a significant
increase in credit risk recognition.
Absolute lifetime PD threshold
The absolute threshold is a fixed value calibrated per portfolio/segment
and provides a fixed threshold that, if exceeded by the difference between
lifetime PD at reporting date and lifetime PD at origination, triggers Stage 2
classification. The absolute threshold is calibrated during model
development.
Relative lifetime PD threshold
The relative threshold defines a relative increase of the lifetime PD, beyond
which a given facility is classified in Stage 2 because of a significant
increase in credit risk. The relative threshold is dependent on the individual
PD assigned to each facility at the moment of origination, and a scaling
factor calibrated in the model development phase.
Ultimately, the relative threshold provides a criterion to assess whether
the ratio (i.e. increase) between lifetime PD at reporting date and lifetime
PD at origination date is deemed a significant increase in credit risk. If the
threshold is breached, SICR is identified and Stage 2 is assigned to the
given facility.
The threshold for the relative change in lifetime PD is inversely correlated
with the PD at origination; the higher the PD at origination, the lower the
threshold. The logic behind this is to allow facilities originated in very
favourable ratings to downgrade for longer without the need of a Stage 2
classification. In fact, it is likely that such facilities will still be in favourable
ratings even after a downgrade of a few notches. On the contrary, facilities
originated in already unfavourable ratings grades are riskier and even a
single-notch downgrade might represent a significant increase in credit
risk and thus a tighter threshold will be in place. Still, the relative threshold
is relatively sensitive for investment-grade assets while the absolute
threshold primarily affects non-investment grade assets.
Average threshold ratio
The table below shows the average increase in PD at origination needed to
be classified in Stage 2 is reported, taking into account the PD at
origination of the facilities included in each combination of asset class and
rating quality. In terms of rating quality, assets are divided into
'investment grade' and 'non-investment grade' facilities. Rating 18 and 19
are not included in the table, since facilities are not originated in these
ratings and they constitute a staging trigger of their own (i.e. if a facility is
ever to reach rating 18 or 19 at reporting date, it is classified in Stage 2). In
the table, values are weighted by IFRS 9 exposure and shown for both
year-end 2024 and year-end 2025.
To represent the thresholds as a ratio (i.e. how much should the PD at
origination increase in relative terms to trigger Stage 2 classification) the
absolute threshold is recalculated as a relative threshold for disclosure
purposes. Since breaching only relative or absolute threshold triggers
Stage 2 classification, the minimum between the relative and recalculated
absolute threshold is taken as value of reference for each facility.
Quantitative SICR thresholds  (*)
2025
2024
Average threshold ratio
Investment
grade (rating
grade 1-10)
Non-investment
grade (rating
grade 11-17)
Investment
grade (rating
grade 1-10)
Non-investment
grade (rating
grade 11-17)
Asset class category
Mortgages
2.9
2.4
2.9
2.4
Consumer lending
2.9
2.3
2.8
2.1
Business lending
2.7
2.0
2.7
2.1
Governments and financial institutions
2.9
1.8
2.9
1.9
Other Wholesale Banking
2.7
1.9
2.7
1.9
As it is apparent from the disclosures above, as per ING’s methodology, the
threshold is tighter the higher the riskiness at origination of the assets,
illustrated by the difference between the average threshold applied to
investment grade facilities and non-investment grade facilities.
Sensitivity of ECL to PD lifetime PD thresholds
The setting of PD threshold bands requires management judgement and is
a key source of estimation uncertainty. On Group level, the total model
ECL on performing assets, which is the ECL collective assessment without
taking management adjustments into account, was €1,501 million as at
31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: €1,328 million). To demonstrate
the sensitivity of the ECL to these PD threshold bands, hypothetically
solely applying the upside scenario would result in total model ECL on
performing assets of €1,159 million and a decrease in the Stage 2 ratio by
0.3%-point, while solely applying the downside scenario would result in
total model ECL on performing assets of €2,193 million and an increase in
the Stage 2 ratio by 1.6%-point.
Qualitative SICR thresholds
It should be noted that the lifetime PD thresholds are not the only drivers
of stage allocation as ING Group also relies on a number of qualitative
indicators to identify and assess SICR. An asset can also change stages as
a result of other triggers, such as having over 30 days arrears (used as a
backstop), the occurrence of an early warning indicator, collective SICR
assessment, being on a watch list, being under intensive care
management, having a substandard internal rating, or being forborne.
Market risk
Introduction (*)
Market risk is the risk that movements in market variables, such as interest
rates, equity prices, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, and real-estate
prices negatively impact the bank’s earnings, capital, market value, or
liquidity position. Market risk either arises through positions in banking
books or trading books.
The banking book positions are intended to be held for the long term (or
until maturity) or for the purpose of hedging other banking book positions.
The trading book positions are typically held with the intention of short-
term trading or to hedge other positions in the trading book. Policies and
processes are in place to monitor the inclusion of positions in either the
trading or banking book as well as to monitor the transfer of risk between
the trading and banking books.
The following sections elaborate on the various elements of the risk
management framework for:
§ Market risk in banking books;
§ Market risk in trading books; and
§ Market risk capital.
Market risk in banking books (*)
ING distinguishes between the trading and banking (non-trading) books.
Positions in banking books originate from the market risks inherent in
commercial products that are sold to clients, Group Treasury exposures, and
from the investment of our own funds (core capital). Both the commercial
products and the products used to hedge related market-risk exposures are
intended to be held until maturity, or at least for the long term.
Risk transfer (*)
Market risks in the banking book are managed via the risk transfer process.
In this process the interest rate, FX, funding, and liquidity risks are
transferred from the commercial books through matched funding or
replication to Group Treasury, where they are centrally managed. The
scheme below presents the transfer and management process of market
risks in the banking books.
Commercial books
Treasury books
Retail Banking and
Wholesale Banking
positions
u
Internal contracts
u
Offsetting internal
positions
Treasury books
Capital investments
Desired maturity
profile
u
Swap overlay
Risk measurement (*)
The main concepts and metrics used for measuring market risk in the
banking book are described below per risk type.
Interest rate risk in banking book (*)
Interest rate risk in the banking book is defined as the exposure of a bank’s
earnings, capital, and market value to adverse movements in interest
rates originated from positions in the banking book.
ING centralises interest rate risk management from commercial books
(that capture the products sold to clients) to globally managed interest
rate risk books. This enables a clear demarcation between commercial
business results and results based on unhedged interest rate positions.
ING distinguishes between three types of activities that generate interest
rate risk in the banking book:
§ Investment of own funds;
§ Commercial business; and
§ Group Treasury exposures, including strategic interest rate positions.
Group Treasury is responsible for managing the investment of own funds
(core capital). Capital is invested for longer periods to contribute to stable
earnings within the risk appetite boundaries set by ALCO Bank.
Commercial activities can result in linear interest rate risk due to different
re-pricing properties of assets and liabilities. Also, interest rate risk can
arise from customer behaviour and/or convexity risk, depending on the
nature of the underlying product characteristics.
To determine interest rate risk in specific products (such as savings or
mortgages) certain assumptions may need to be applied. Customer
behaviour risk is defined as the potential future loss (value) arising from
deviations between actual client behaviour and the modelled behaviour
regarding embedded options within commercial products. General sources
of customer behaviour risk include, among other things, the state of the
economy, competition, changes in regulation, legislation and tax regime,
developments in the housing market, and interest rate developments.
From an interest rate risk perspective, commercial activities can typically
be divided into the following main product types: savings and current
accounts (funds entrusted), demand deposits, mortgages, and loans.
Savings and demand deposits are generally invested in such a way that
both the value is hedged and the sensitivity of the margin to market
interest rates is minimised. This is achieved by creating the investment
profile distributed from short term to long term, which dampens the
immediate impact from changes in the market rates and stabilises margin
in the longer horizon. Interest rate risk is modelled based on the stability of
deposits and the pass-through rate. This takes account of different
elements, such as pricing strategies, volume developments, and the level
and shape of the yield curve.
In determining the interest rate profile of mortgages, prepayment or other
embedded optionality can be an important risk driver. In modelling this
risk, both interest-rate-dependent prepayments and constant
prepayments are considered. Next to a dependence on interest rates,
modelled prepayments may include other effects such as loan-to-value,
seasonality, and the reset date of the loan. In addition, the interest
sensitivity of embedded offered rate options is typically considered. 
Wholesale Banking loans typically do not experience interest-rate-
dependent prepayment behaviour, as these are mostly floating rate
products. These portfolios are match-funded, taking the constant
prepayment model into account, and typically do not contain significant
convexity risk. Wholesale Banking loans can have an all-in rate floor or a
floor on a reference rate.
Customer behaviour in relation to mortgages, loans, savings, and demand
deposits is modelled based on extensive analysis of historical data.
However, the substantial fluctuations in the interest rate environment in
recent years make the analysis more challenging than before and may
increase model risk. Models are backtested and updated when deemed
necessary, at least annually. Model parameters and the resulting risk
measures are approved by (local) ALCO, and are closely monitored on a
monthly basis.
Linear risk transfers take place from commercial business books to the
treasury book (Group Treasury), if necessary, by using estimations of
customer behaviour. The originating commercial business is ultimately
responsible for estimating this customer behaviour, leaving convexity risk
and (unexpected) customer behaviour risk with the commercial business.
Risk measurement and the risk transfer process take place at least
monthly. If deemed necessary, additional risk transfers can take place.
The commercial business manages the convexity risk that is the result of
products that contain embedded options, like mortgages. Here the
convexity risk is defined as the optionality effects in the value due to
interest rate changes, excluding the first-order effects. In some cases,
convexity risk is hedged by treasury using cap/floor contracts and
swaptions.
NII at Risk (*)
The NII-at-Risk measures the impact of changing interest rates on the
forecasted net interest income (before tax) of the banking book, excluding
the impacts of credit spread sensitivity, fees, and fair value impact. Future
projected balance sheet developments (dynamic plan) are included in this
risk metric. NII-at-Risk provides insight into the sensitivity of ING’s NII under
shocked interest rate scenarios against what is projected in a base case
scenario.
In its risk management, ING monitors the NII-at-Risk under a three-year
time frame. Interest rates are shocked during the first year of analysis
through the gradual application of shock. The rate changes considered
encompass both upward and downward scenarios, as well as both parallel
(equal movements across the yield curve) and non-parallel scenarios.
The impact of changing interest rates on ING’s NII is predominantly caused
by the following factors:
§ Change in returns of (re)investments of client deposits;
§ Change in client deposit rates (mainly savings), (partially) tracking
changes in market interest rates;
§ Change in the amortisation profile of mortgages, due to an increase or
decrease in expected prepayments;
§ Higher/lower returns of (re-)investments of core capital investment;
§ Open interest rate positions, leading to changes in return because of
different market rates; and
§ Assumed volume development of the balance sheet in line with ING’s
dynamic plan.
For projecting the change in client deposit rates, ING uses a client rate
model that describes the relation between market interest rates and client
deposit rates. The model is calibrated under a range of interest rate
scenarios. Per scenario, the actual change in client deposit rates may
deviate from this calibrated model. The actual NII development of
customer deposits may, indeed, differ from the provided scenarios,
depending on, among other things, actual interest rate and savings client
rate evolution, as well as changes to ING’s balance sheet composition,
such as net deposit growth and relative share of savings deposits and non-
remunerated current accounts.
The NII-at-Risk figures in the table below represent a parallel, linear
interest rate shift over one year (‘ramped’) based on the assumption that
balance sheet developments follow ING’s dynamic plan within a one-year
horizon.
The NII-at-Risk is mainly influenced by the difference in the sensitivity
between client liabilities and client assets and investments to rate
changes. The primary factor of NII-at-Risk are the investments of current
accounts, while the investments of own funds have a marginal effect, as
only a relatively small portion needs to be (re)invested within a one-year
period.
NII-at-Risk banking book per currency - year one (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Ramped, floored
Ramped, floored
parallel ▼
parallel ▲
parallel ▼
parallel ▲
By currency
Euro
-182
205
-144
158
US dollar
1
-1
-4
5
Other
-74
94
-2
21
Total
-254
298
-151
184
EUR ramped (floored at -100bps) is at +/- 120bps in 1 year
USD ramped (floored at -100bps) is at +/- 120bps in 1 year
The change in NII under declining and upward interest rate scenarios may
not be equal. This is due to different expected reactions in prepayment
behaviour of mortgages and different pricing developments of commercial
loans and deposits products (mainly savings). This is caused by embedded
options, explicit or implicit pricing floors, and other (assumed) pricing
factors.
The metrics mentioned above are internal metrics, which therefore
deviate from the regulatory NII SOT metric. Both internal and regulatory
measures are part of the bank's risk appetite framework and are actively
managed.
Year-on-year variance analysis (*)
In 2025, ING maintained its dynamic hedging strategy, transferring
interest rate risk from business units to Group Treasury, where it was
subsequently hedged in financial markets, resulting in overall limited
sensitivity of NII at Risk (NIIaR) compared to ING’s total net interest
income. Year-on-year NIIaR increase by €100 million under a parallel down
(worst case) scenario, is primarily driven by revised repricing assumptions
and positions taken by treasury.
Net present value (NPV) at Risk (*)
NPV-at-Risk measures the impact of changing interest rates on the value
of the positions in the banking book and it is defined as the outcome of an
instantaneous increase or decrease in interest rates from applying
currency-specific scenarios. The metric primarily reflects the impact of
interest rate fluctuations on the bank’s strategic interest rate positions
(e.g. investments of own funds), as well as on the savings and mortgage
portfolios. While strategic positions typically adjust proportionally with
changing rates, the savings and mortgage products exhibit more complex
behavior due to embedded optionalities. Customers can prepay or
reallocate their balances, resulting in non-linear value changes. As a result,
these portfolios may incur value losses both when interest rates increase
and decrease, contributing to the asymmetric NPV-at-Risk pattern
highlighted in the annual report.
The full value impact cannot be directly linked to the financial position or
profit or loss account, as fair value movements in banking books are not
necessarily reported through the profit or loss account or through other
comprehensive income (OCI). The changes in value are expected to
materialise over time in the profit and loss account if interest rates
develop according to forward rates throughout the remaining maturity of
the portfolio. The majority of the risk comes from the investments of own
funds and from positions exhibiting negative convexity due to embedded
optionality (most notably variable rate savings and fixed rate mortgages).
The metrics mentioned above are internal metrics, which therefore
deviate from the regulatory EVE SOT metric. Both internal and regulatory
measures are part of the bank’s risk appetite framework and are actively
managed.
NPV-at-Risk banking books per currency (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
floored
floored
parallel ▼
parallel ▲
parallel ▼
parallel ▲
By currency
Euro
1,319
-2,593
7
-1,473
US dollar
273
-265
274
-266
Other
269
-267
321
-329
Total
1,862
-3,125
602
-2,068
EUR (floored at -100bps) is at +/- 120bps
USD (floored at -100bps) is at +/- 120bps
Year-on-year variance analysis (*)
The overall NPV sensitivity increased considerably compared to the
previous year. The parallel up scenario continues to represent the worst-
case outcome, and the calculation shock for the primary currencies (EUR
and USD) was maintained at 120 basis points, consistent with the level
used in 2024. Year-over-year variations are explained by the evolving
balance sheet composition, movements in interest rates, and shifting
market expectations.
The impact of the benchmark rate reform (*)
In line with the recommendations of the Financial Stability Board, a
fundamental review of important interest rates benchmarks has been
undertaken. Some interest rate benchmarks have been reformed, while
others have or will be replaced by risk-free rates and discontinued.
In 2025, the benchmark rate reform of only one reference rate, to which
ING has significant exposures as at 31 December 2025, was continuing (i.e.
WIBOR in Poland).
On 24 January 2025, the Steering Committee of the National Working
Group (NWG SC) in Poland selected POLSTR (Polish Short Term Rate) as the
ultimate interest rate benchmark to replace WIBOR. POLSTR is calculated
based on unsecured deposits of Credit and Financial Institutions and is
expected to replace WIBOR by 31 December 2027.
In April 2025, the NWG SC published the updated transition roadmap of
the replacing process of WIBOR and announced in June 2025 that the
official determination of the POLSTR has started.
During the second half of 2025, the NWG SC approved several
recommendations for products based on POLSTR, and informed that
POLSTR has been applied for the first time in the domestic financial market
on 1 September 2025. Therefore, POLSTR gained a status of a benchmark
in accordance with the requirements of the EU Benchmark Regulation.
On 30 September 2025, the benchmark administrator GPW Benchmark
S.A, published the decision to cease providing the WIBOR reference rate for
various tenors in phases, between the end of 2025 and the end of 2026.
On 21 November 2025, the Ministry of Finance (of Poland) conducted the
first pilot issuance of treasury bonds linked to the POLSTR benchmark
during a sale auction.
Other important milestones of the process are planned in subsequent
years, including the construction of a market for financial products based
on the new benchmark and achieving regulatory and operational
readiness of all market participants to offer and operate these financial
products.
Due to the discontinuation of WIBOR, ING, its customers, and in general
those market participants with exposure to this benchmark rate will be
faced with a number of risks. These risks include legal, financial,
operational, reputational, and conduct risk. The WIBOR rates are used in
several of our lending and derivative products, and hence a project team
has been established to manage the transition. The WIBOR transition is
especially important for our Polish subsidiary (ING Bank Śląski S.A.) with a
significant amount of Polish zloty-denominated assets and liabilities
including derivatives that are continuously rebalanced to hedge the risk
exposures.
The tables below summarise the approximate gross exposure of ING that
has yet to transition related to WIBOR, excluding exposures expiring before
the transition date of 31 December 2027.
Non-derivative financial instruments to transition from WIBOR to POLSTR (*)
in EUR million
Financial assets
non-derivative
Financial
liabilities  non-
derivative
Off-balance
sheet
commitments
Carrying value
Carrying value
Nominal value
31 December 2025
25,333
360
2,301
31 December 2024
19,202
134
1,544
Derivative financial instruments to transition from WIBOR to POLSTR (*)
31 December 2025
31 December 2024
in EUR million
Nominal value
Nominal value
WIBOR
196,133
110,189
See sections 1.5.4 of Note 1 ‘Basis of preparation and material accounting
policy information’ for information on the Phase 1 amendments to IFRS.
As at 31 December 2025, Phase 1 reliefs are applicable to WIBOR indexed
fair value and cash flow hedge accounting relationships as there is
uncertainty arising from the WIBOR reform with respect to the timing and
the amount of the underlying cash flows that the Group is exposed to.
Therefore, for WIBOR financial instruments designated in hedge
accounting the applicable Phase 1 reliefs will continue to apply until the
relevant contract is modified. At that point in time, the reliefs of Phase 2
amendments to IFRS will become applicable.
Following the Phase 1 reliefs that allow ING to continue applying hedge
accounting, ING has to assume that the WIBOR-based cash flows from the
hedging instrument and hedged item will remain unaffected for the
affected fair value and cash flow hedge relationships. In addition, for the
forecast transactions that are subject to cash flow hedge accounting,
under the Phase 1 reliefs ING has to assume that the WIBOR benchmark
on which the hedged cash flows are based is not altered as a result of the
reform and, therefore, the forecast transactions still meet the highly
probable requirement.
The total gross notional amounts of hedging instruments that are used in
ING’s hedge accounting relationships for which the Phase 1 amendments
to IAS 39 were applied are:
Notional amounts of hedging instruments from WIBOR to POLSTR (*)
31 December 2025
31 December 2024
in EUR million
Nominal value
Nominal value
WIBOR
97,492
99,663
As at 31 December 2025, 50% (31 December 2024: 32%) of the notional
amounts have a maturity date beyond 31 December 2027. The notional
amounts of the derivative hedging instruments provide a close
approximation of the extent of the risk exposure ING manages through
these hedging relationships.
Credit spread risk in banking books (CSRBB) (*)
Credit spread risk is defined as risk driven by the changes of the market
price for credit risk, for liquidity and potentially other characteristics of
credit-risky instruments, which is not captured by another existing
prudential framework such as Interest Rate Risk in Banking Book or by
expected credit/(jump-to-) default risk. The CSRBB framework is
implemented based on EBA Guidelines. Metrics used are NPV-at-Risk, NII-
at-Risk and Market Value Changes-at Risk and view the positions across
different accounting treatments.
Credit spread risk is not part of the internal risk transfer towards Group
Treasury and therefore remains in the business unit it originated in. Group
Treasury itself is also an important driver of credit spread risk via its high-
quality liquid assets (HQLA) investment portfolio and issuance activities.
Risk appetite limits are set on a combination of metrics and accounting
scopes and are cascaded to local ALCOs depending on the type of limit
and materiality. Metrics and limits are monitored and reported monthly to
global and local risk committees, and various stakeholders.
Foreign exchange (FX) risk in banking books (*)
FX exposures in banking books result from core banking business activities
(business units doing business in currencies other than their base
currency), foreign currency investments in subsidiaries (including realised
net profit and loss), and strategic equity stakes in foreign currencies. The
policy regarding these exposures is briefly explained below.
Core banking business (*)
Every business unit hedges the FX risk resulting from core banking
business activities into its base currency to prevent volatility in profit and
loss. Consequently, assets and liabilities are matched in terms of currency,
within certain friction limits.
FX translation (*)
ING’s strategy is to protect the CET1 ratio against adverse impact from FX
rate fluctuations, while limiting the volatility in the profit and loss account
due to this CET1 hedging and limiting the RWA impact under the
regulatory framework. Currency exposure of Return on Equity is also
considered. Hedge accounting is applied to the largest extent possible.
Taking this into account, the CET1 ratio hedge can be achieved by
deliberately taking foreign currency positions equal to certain target
positions, such that the CET1 capital and risk-weighted assets are equally
sensitive in relative terms to changing FX rates.
Risk profile – FX translation (*)
The following table presents the currency exposures in the banking books
for the most important currencies for the FX translation result. Positive
figures indicate long positions in the respective currency. As a result of the
strategy to hedge the CET1 ratio, an open structural FX exposure exists.
To measure the volatility of the CET1 ratio from FX rate fluctuations,
different metrics are used, including the CET1 Ratio-at-Risk. The impact is
controlled via the Solvency and Financial Risk RAS.
Foreign currency exposures banking books (*)
in EUR million
Foreign
investments
Hedges
Net exposures
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
US Dollar 1
9,698
11,251
-4,500
-4,823
5,198
6,429
Pound Sterling
1,584
1,674
-515
-484
1,069
1,190
Polish Zloty
4,652
4,395
-2,009
-1,616
2,643
2,779
Australian Dollar
3,307
3,373
-1,933
-2,161
1,374
1,212
Turkish Lira
469
557
469
557
Chinese Yuan
2,015
2,439
1
-830
2,016
1,609
Russian Rouble
597
396
597
396
Romanian Leu
913
913
-228
-176
685
736
Thai Baht
1,307
1,266
-829
-838
478
428
Other currency
3,032
3,347
-1,995
-2,748
1,036
599
Total
27,573
29,612
-12,008
-13,675
15,565
15,936
*The FX sensitivity is expressed as the FX spot equivalent position.
EBA Structural FX guidelines
In line with the EBA guidelines on Structural FX, upon permission from the
competent authorities, certain currency positions are being excluded from
the calculation of net open currency positions under CRR article 352(2).
The resulting impact is presented in the Pillar 3 disclosure.
Equity price risk in banking books (*)
ING maintains a portfolio with substantial equity exposure in its banking
books.
Risk profile (*)
Equity price risk arises from the possibility that an equity security’s price
will fluctuate, affecting the values of the equity security itself as well as
other instruments whose values react similarly to the particular security, a
defined basket of securities, or a securities index. ING’s equity exposure
mainly consists of the investments in associates and joint ventures of
€1,607 million (2024: €1,679 million) and equity securities held at fair
value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) of €2,607 million
(2024: €2,562 million). The value of equity securities held at FVOCI is
directly linked to equity security prices with increases/decreases being
recognised in the revaluation reserve.
Investments in associates and joint ventures are measured in accordance
with the equity method of accounting, and the balance sheet value is
therefore not directly linked to equity security prices. The equity sensitivity
is expressed as the equity position.
Year-on-year variance analysis (*)
In 2025, the revaluation reserve equity securities decreased by €372
million from €1,816 million to €1,444 million due to revaluation of the
shares in Bank of Beijing with €-403 million. In 2025, the equity securities
at fair value through OCI increased by €45 million mainly due to increased
stake in Van Lanschot Kempen.
Revaluation reserve equity securities at fair value through other
comprehensive income (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Positive remeasurement
1,456
1,820
Negative remeasurement
-12
-4
Total
1,444
1,816
Market risk in trading books (*)
Within the trading portfolios, the positions are maintained in the financial
markets. These positions are often a result of transactions with clients and
may benefit from short-term price movements. In 2025, ING continued its
strategy of undertaking trading activities to develop its client-driven
franchise and deliver a differentiating experience by offering multiple
market and trading products.
With respect to the trading portfolios, Trading Risk Management (TRM)
focuses on the management of market risks of Wholesale Banking (mainly
Financial Markets) as this is the only business line within ING where trading
activities take place. Trading activities include facilitation of client business
and market making. TRM is responsible for the development and
implementation of trading risk policies and risk measurement
methodologies, and for reporting and monitoring risk exposures against
approved trading limits. TRM also reviews trading mandates and global
limits, and performs the gatekeeper role in the product review process
(PARP).
Risk measurement (*)
ING uses a comprehensive set of methodologies and techniques to
measure market risk in trading books: Value at Risk (VaR) and Stressed
Value at Risk (SVaR), Incremental Risk Charge (IRC), and stress testing.
Systematic validation processes are in place to validate the accuracy and
internal consistency of data and parameters used for the internal models
and modelling processes.
Value at Risk (*)
TRM uses the historical simulation VaR methodology (HVaR) as its primary
risk measure. The HVaR for market risk quantifies, with a one-sided
confidence level of 99 percent, the maximum overnight loss that could
occur in the trading portfolio of ING due to changes in risk factors (e.g.
interest rates, equity prices, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads,
implied volatilities), considering the positions remain unchanged for a time
period of one day.
Next to general market movements in these risk factors, HVaR also takes
into account market data movements for specific moves in, for example,
the underlying issuer or securities. A single model which diversifies general
and specific risk is used. In general, a full revaluation approach is applied,
while for a limited number of linear trading positions and risk factors in
commodity and equity risk classes, a sensitivity-based approach is
applied. The potential impact of historical market movements on today’s
portfolio is estimated, based on equally weighted observed market
movements of the previous year (260 business days). When simulating
potential movements in risk factors, depending on the risk factor type,
either an absolute or a relative shift is used.
The data used in the computations is updated daily. ING uses HVaR with a
one-day horizon for internal risk measurement, management control, and
backtesting, and HVaR with a 10-day horizon for determining regulatory
capital. To compute HVaR with a 10-day horizon, the one-day risk factor
shifts are scaled by the square root of 10 and then used as an input for the
revaluation. The same model is used for all legal entities within ING with
market risk exposure in the trading portfolio.
Limitations (*)
HVaR has some limitations: it uses historical data to forecast future price
behaviour, but future price behaviour could differ substantially from past
behaviour. Moreover, the use of a one-day holding period (or 10 days for
regulatory capital calculations) assumes that all positions in the portfolio
can be liquidated or hedged in one day. In periods of illiquidity or market
events, this assumption may not hold. Also, the use of a 99 percent
confidence level means that HVaR does not take into account any losses
that occur beyond this confidence level.
Backtesting (*)
Backtesting is a technique for the ongoing monitoring of the plausibility of
the HVaR model in use. Although HVaR models estimate potential future
trading results, estimates are based on historical market data. In a backtest,
the actual daily trading result (excluding fees and commissions) is
compared with the one-day HVaR.
In addition to using actual results for backtesting, ING also uses hypothetical
results, which exclude the effects of intraday trading, fees, and
commissions. When an actual or a hypothetical loss exceeds the HVaR, an
‘outlier’ occurs. Based on ING’s one-sided confidence level of 99 percent, an
outlier is expected once in every 100 business days.
On an overall level in 2025, there was one outlier for hypothetical P&L and
zero outliers for actual P&L. The hypothetical outlier occurred in the first
quarter of 2025, mainly driven by higher EUR rates due to anticipated
changes in German fiscal policy.
Stressed HVaR (*)
The stressed HVaR (SVaR) is intended to replicate the HVaR calculation that
would be generated on the bank’s current portfolio with inputs calibrated to
the historical data from a continuous 12-month period of significant
financial stress relevant to the bank’s portfolio.
To calculate SVaR, ING uses the same model that is used for 1DHVaR, with a
10-day horizon. The data for the historical stress period used currently
includes the height of the credit crisis around the fall of Lehman Brothers
(2008-2009), and this stressed period selection is reviewed annually. The
historical data period is chosen so that it gives the worst-scenario loss
estimates for the current portfolio. The same SVaR model is used for
management purposes and for regulatory purposes. The same SVaR model
is used for all legal entities within ING with market risk exposure in the
trading portfolio.
Incremental risk charge (*)
The incremental risk charge (IRC) for ING is an estimate of the default and
migration risks for credit products (excluding securitisations) in the trading
book, over a one-year capital horizon, with a 99.9 percent confidence level.
Trading positions (excluding securitisations) of ING, which are subject to
specific interest rate risk included in the internal model approach for market
risk regulatory capital, are in scope of the IRC model. By model choice,
equity is excluded from the model. For the calculation of IRC, ING performs a
Monte Carlo simulation based on a multi-factor t-copula. In the multi-factor
IRC model the supervisory asset correlations are no longer applicable and
the calibration of the correlations is based on historical market data. The
rating change is simulated for all issuers over the different liquidity horizons
(i.e. time required to liquidate the position or hedge all significant risks)
within one year. Movements across different rating categories and
probabilities of default are governed by a credit-rating transition matrix. An
internal transition matrix along with internal LGDs is used, to comply with
the consistency requirement. The financial impact is then determined for
the simulated migration to default, or for the simulated migration to a
different rating category, based on LGD or credit spread changes,
respectively.
The liquidity horizon has been set to the regulatory minimum of three
months for all positions in scope. ING reviews the liquidity horizons on a
yearly basis, based on a structured assessment of the time it takes to
liquidate the positions in the trading portfolio.
Stress testing and event risk (*)
Stress testing is a valuable risk management tool. In addition to the bank-
wide stress-test framework as described in the stress-testing section,
Trading Risk Management performs stress tests specific to the trading book
with various frequencies. The trading book stress tests evaluate the impact
on the bank’s trading book under severe but plausible stress scenarios, using
a full revaluation approach. The framework is based on historical as well as
hypothetical scenarios. The stress result is an estimate of the profit and loss
caused by a potential event and its worldwide impact for ING. The results of
the stress tests are used for decision-making, aimed at maintaining a
financially healthy going-concern institution after a severe event occurs.
In stress scenarios, shocks are applied to prices (credit spreads, interest
rates, equity, commodities, and FX rates) and volatilities. Depending on the
type of the stress test, additional scenario assumptions can be made, for
example on correlations, dividends, or recovery rates. The structural
scenarios are defined to cover market moves in various directions and
capture different asset class correlations. Scenarios are calculated using a
full revaluation approach. The worst scenarios are determined for each
product line, business line, and super business line, and compared against
limits
Other trading limits
HVaR and event risk limits are the most important limits to control the
trading portfolios. Additionally, limits have been set on SVaR and IRC, and
ING uses a variety of other controls to supplement these limits. Position
and sensitivity limits are used to prevent large concentrations in specific
issuers, sectors, or countries. Moreover, other risk limits are set with
respect to the activities in complex derivatives trading. The market risk of
these products is controlled by product-specific limits and constraints.
Risk profile
The following chart shows the development of the overnight HVaR under a
99 percent confidence level and a one-day horizon versus actual and
hypothetical daily trading profits and losses. In calculation of the
hypothetical daily profit and loss, the trading position is kept constant and
only the market movement is taken into account. The overnight HVaR is
presented for the ING trading portfolio for 2025.
EU MR4. Consolidated trading VaR ING Bank
in EUR million
19791209349794
The risk figures shown in the backtesting graph above and in the following table relate to all trading books that use the internal model approach.
1d VaR for internal model approach trading portfolios
in EUR million
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Year end
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Interest rate 1
6
6
23
17
10
12
6
11
Equity and commodity
4
2
9
7
7
4
6
6
Foreign exchange
2
1
6
14
3
3
4
2
Credit spread
2
2
6
12
3
4
2
3
Diversification 2
-9
-7
-8
-6
Total VaR 2
10
7
19
21
14
15
11
16
1For calculation of HVaR per risk class the full valuation is performed according to HVaR methodology using a set of scenario changes for the risk factors for the particular risk class, while risk factors for all other risk classes are kept unchanged.
2The total HVaR for the columns Minimum and Maximum cannot be calculated by taking the sum of the individual components since the minimum/maximum observations for both the individual markets as well as for total HVaR may occur on different dates. Therefore, diversification is not calculated for the
minimum and maximum categories.
Average 1D/10D HVaR, SVaR, and IRC over 2025 has decreased compared
to 2024, resulting in a decrease in overall capital for 2025. The overall
average has decreased in 2025 for all trading portfolios, mainly due to an
increase in diversification, despite high volatility due to the ongoing
geopolitical tensions and increased trade frictions.
ING does not calculate comprehensive risk capital charge and therefore it
appears as n/a in the table below.
EU MR3: internal model approach values for trading portfolios
in EUR million
2025
2024
VaR (10 day 99%)
1 Maximum value
59
73
2 Average value
41
48
3 Minimum value
29
29
4 Period end
33
47
Stressed VaR (10 day 99%)
5 Maximum value
149
175
6 Average value
90
109
7 Minimum value
47
56
8 Period end
51
98
Incremental risk charge (99.9%)
9 Maximum value
288
232
10 Average value
144
125
11 Minimum value
46
64
12 Period end
144
100
Comprehensive risk capital charge (99.9%)
13 Maximum value
n/a
n/a
14 Average value
n/a
n/a
15 Minimum value
n/a
n/a
16 Period end
n/a
n/a
Sensitivities (*)
As part of the risk monitoring framework, TRM actively monitors the
sensitivities of the trading portfolios. Sensitivities measure the impact of
movements in individual market risk factors (foreign exchange rates,
interest rates, credit spreads, equity and commodity prices) on profit and
loss results of the trading positions and portfolios.
The following tables show the five largest trading positions in terms of
sensitivities to foreign exchange, interest rate, and credit spread risk factor
movements. These largest exposures also reflect concentrations of risk in
FX risk per currency, interest rate risk per currency, and credit spread risk
per country, rating, and sector. Due to the nature of the trading portfolios,
positions in the portfolios can change significantly from day to day, and
sensitivities of the portfolios can change daily accordingly.
Most important foreign exchange year-end trading positions (*)
in EUR million
2025
2024
Foreign exchange
Foreign exchange
US Dollar
-260
US Dollar
-93
Turkish Lira
229
Turkish Lira
84
Chinese Yuan
88
Korean Won
62
Japanese Yen
-49
Japanese Yen
61
Romanian Leu
42
Chinese Yuan
-37
Most important interest rate and credit spread sensitivities at
year-end (*)
in EUR thousand
2025
2024
Interest rate (BPV) 1
Interest rate (BPV) 1
Euro
-312
Euro
-799
US Dollar
-161
US Dollar
-198
British Pound
-133
British Pound
-189
Japanese Yen
133
Korean Won
-54
Philippine Peso
-98
Philippine Peso
-54
Credit spread (CSO1) 2
Credit spread (CSO1) 2
France
178
United States
193
United Kingdom
111
Netherlands
-165
Netherlands
75
France
-113
Indonesia
-63
Poland
69
South Korea
63
Germany
49
1Basis point value (BPV) measures the impact on value of a one basis point increase in interest
rates.
2Credit spread sensitivity (CS01) measures the impact on value of a one basis point increase in
credit spreads. Exposures to supranational institutions are not assigned to a specific country.
Credit spread sensitivities per risk class and sector at year-end (*)
in EUR thousand
2025
2024
Corporate
Financial
institutions
Corporate
Financial
institutions
Credit spread (CSO1) 1
Risk classes
1 (AAA)
-2
-19
-2
-118
2–4 (AA)
26
-13
-44
-27
5–7 (A)
64
-37
49
-246
8–10 (BBB)
191
-54
93
-76
11–13 (BB)
38
-14
38
-13
14–16 (B)
56
8
23
-12
17–22 (CCC and NPL)
6
4
4
2
Total
378
-124
162
-489
1Credit spread sensitivity (CS01) measures the impact on value of a one basis point increase in
credit spreads.
Internal model approach
Market risk regulatory capital has decreased during 2025 compared to
2024. This mainly reflects lower interest rate positions during 2025, as well
as the reduced regulatory-driven capital multiplier.
EU MR2-A: Market risk under internal model approach
in EUR million
2025
2024
RWA
Total own funds
requirements
RWA
Total own funds
requirements
1
VaR (higher of values a and b)
1,521
122
1,964
157
(a)
Previous day’s VaR (VaRt-1)
33
49
(b)
Multiplication factor (mc)  x average of previous 60 working days (VaRavg)
122
157
2
SVaR (higher of values a and b)
2,877
230
4,915
393
(a)
Latest available SVaR (SVaRt-1))
51
116
(b)
Multiplication factor (ms)  x average of previous 60 working days (sVaRavg)
230
393
3
IRC (higher of values a and b)
2,014
161
1,457
117
(a)
Most recent IRC measure
144
116
(b)
12 weeks average IRC measure
161
117
4
Comprehensive risk measure (higher of values a, b and c)
(a)
Most recent risk measure of comprehensive risk measure
(b)
12 weeks average of comprehensive risk measure
(c)
Comprehensive risk measure - Floor
5
Other
582
47
340
27
6
Total
6,994
560
8,676
694
Standardised approach
EU MR1: market risk under standardised approach
in EUR million
2025
2024
RWA
RWA
Outright products
1 Interest rate risk (general and specific)
92
31
2 Equity risk (general and specific)
3 Foreign exchange risk
4,968
4,374
4 Commodity risk
Options
5 Simplified approach
6 Delta-plus method
7 Scenario approach
8 Securitisation (specific risk)
9 Total
5,060
4,405
The MRWA under standardised approach have increased compared to
2024.
Market risk capital
Economic capital
Market risk economic capital (MREC) measures the capital ING must hold
to protect itself against losses due to market risks. MREC covers the entire
balance sheet of ING Group, and includes market risk sub-types such as:
interest rate and basis risk, credit spread risk, customer behaviour risk, FX
risk, equity risk, and commodity risk.
MREC is calculated as the 99.9 percent worst value loss that can be
incurred from one-year shocks to the underlying risk drivers. While
aggregating the different economic capital market risk figures for the
different portfolios, diversification benefits are taken into account as it is
not expected that all extreme market movements will appear at the same
moment.
Regulatory capital
Market risk regulatory capital is the amount of capital that ING has to hold
to protect itself against losses due to market risks, as required by the
financial regulator. From a regulatory capital perspective, market risk
stems from all the positions included in a bank’s trading book, as well as
from commodity and foreign exchange risk positions in the whole balance
sheet of ING Group. According to the Capital Requirements Regulation
(CRR/CRD IV), regulatory capital (own funds requirements) for market risk
can be calculated using the standardised approach or an internal model
approach.
FX risk in banking book
Regulatory Capital requirements for FX risk in banking book is set out in
Part 3, Title IV, Chapter 3 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
This is further supplemented by EBA guidelines on Structural FX for the
calculation of the net open currency positions (CRR Art 352(2)). ING uses
the standardised approach where the capital requirement is 8 percent of
this total net currency and gold position.
Equity risk in banking book
Equity regulatory capital is included as part of Credit RWA as prescribed by
regulations. As of January 2025, ING applies the Standardised Approach
(SA) for the calculation of Regulatory Capital as described in Capital
Requirements Regulation (CRR3) Art 133. Under CRR3 SA, the RWA amount
is calculated by multiplying the risk weight with the exposure value (not
tailored to a specific internal model). The capital requirement is 8 percent
of the RWA value.
Trading book
ING has regulatory approval to use an internal model to determine the
regulatory capital for the market risk in all trading books of ING. Market
risk capital of trading books is calculated according to the CRR, using
internal HVaR, SVaR, and IRC models, where diversification is taken into
account. Collective investment undertakings (CIUs), cryptocurrency assets
(Bitcoin NDF) and asset-backed securities (ABS) exposures in trading books
are calculated using the standardised approach with fixed risk weights.
ING does not have a correlation trading portfolio in the trading book.
Funding and liquidity risk
Introduction (*)
Funding and liquidity (F&L) risk is the risk that ING or one of its subsidiaries
cannot meet their financial obligations upon their maturity date at a
reasonable cost and in a timely manner. ING incorporates funding and
liquidity risk management in its business strategy and has established a
funding and liquidity risk framework to manage these risks within pre-
defined boundaries.
The following sections elaborate on the various elements of funding and
liquidity risk:
§ Funding and liquidity risk framework;
§ Funding and liquidity risk management strategy and objectives;
§ Funding and liquidity adequacy and risk appetite;
§ Funding and liquidity risk indicators;
§ Liquidity stress testing; and
§ Contingency funding planning.
Funding and liquidity risk framework (*)
Macroeconomic and market environments are important considerations in
ING’s F&L framework. The macroeconomic environment is comprised of
various exogenous factors over which ING has no control, but which may
have a material impact on ING’s F&L position. Exogenous factors analysed
on a regular basis include:
§ performance of global and local macroeconomic indicators, e.g. shifts
in gross domestic product, inflation rates, unemployment rates, and
public deficit/surplus;
§ developments and risks arising from geopolitical tensions and trends;
§ monetary policy with a focus on the alternative monetary measures
employed by central banks in recent years as a result of the global
energy crisis and periods of high inflation; and
§ regulatory requirements, e.g. understanding the changing regulatory
landscape as well as the impact of ING’s actions on existing regulatory
boundaries.
The strategic ambitions of ING, together with the design and execution of
the funding plan, are assessed under both current and projected market
conditions. An emphasis is placed on understanding overall market trends
and developments, credit rating changes, and peer comparisons.
The EB, MBB, and staff departments from the CRO and CFO domains, as
well as Group Treasury, have oversight of, and are responsible for,
managing funding and liquidity risks.
Funding and liquidity management strategy and objectives (*)
The main objective of ING’s funding and liquidity risk management is to
maintain sufficient liquidity to fund the commercial activities of ING both
under normal and stressed market circumstances across various locations,
currencies and tenors.
ING’s funding consists mainly of retail and corporate deposits contributing
to 53 percent and 22 percent of total funding, respectively. These funding
sources provide a stable funding base. The remainder of the required
funding is attracted primarily through a combination of long-term and
short-term professional funding. Group Treasury manages the professional
funding in line with the F&L risk appetite with the aim of ensuring a
sufficiently diversified and stable funding base.
Funding mix 1
2025
2024
Funding type
Customer deposits (private individuals)
53%
52%
Customer deposits (other)
22%
23%
Lending/repurchase agreements
5%
5%
Interbank
2%
2%
CD/CP
5%
5%
Long-term senior debt
6%
6%
Subordinated debt
7%
7%
Total
100%
100%
1Liabilities excluding trading securities and IFRS equity
ING’s long-term professional funding is diversified across maturities and
currencies. The main portion of long-term professional funding is euro and
US dollar denominated, which is in line with the currency composition of
customer lending.
Funding and liquidity adequacy and risk appetite (*)
ING identifies key drivers of short-term and future liquidity and funding
needs on an ongoing basis through the periodic risk-identification process.
Taking into consideration the identified risk drivers, ING regularly assesses
its current and future liquidity adequacy and, if deemed necessary, takes
action to further improve ING’s liquidity position and maintain sufficient
counterbalancing capacity. A Liquidity Adequacy Statement is formulated
on a regular basis to substantiate and reflect the management view on
the current funding and liquidity position as well as the potential future
challenges. The Liquidity Adequacy Statement is an important part of
ING’s ILAAP process. Additionally, ING completes ad-hoc funding and
liquidity assessments if deemed necessary. 
ING assesses its F&L adequacy through three lenses – stress, economic,
and normative:
§ Through the stress lens, ING evaluates its ability to withstand periods of
prolonged F&L stress for both normative and economic requirements.
Limits under idiosyncratic, market-related, combined idiosyncratic and
market-related, and climate risk scenarios, which lead to customer
deposit outflows, deterioration of access to funding markets, and lower
liquidity value of counterbalancing capacity are evaluated.
§ Through the economic lens, ING assesses the extent to which its
customers, professional counterparties, and investors are comfortable
to provide deposits and funding in the tenors, currencies, and
instruments necessary to sustainably fund the business (intraday,
short-term, and long-term) in a going-concern situation.
§ Through the normative lens, ING ascertains that the bank is in the
position to meet current and future domestic and host regulatory
requirements.
For each lens, ING has established a related set of risk appetite statements,
which define ING’s risk appetite, commensurate with the principles of
liquidity adequacy.
The F&L risk appetite statements are translated into metrics with
appropriate boundaries and instruments which are used to regularly
measure and manage ING’s funding and liquidity risk. The risk appetite
with respect to the stress lens aims to have sufficient counterbalancing
capacity under various internally defined stress scenarios. Regarding the
economic perspective, an internally defined stable funding to loans (SFtL)
ratio and stable funding surplus (SFS) metric (supplemented by other
metrics) is used to stimulate a diversified funding base and to prevent
overreliance on professional funding. Finally, the liquidity coverage ratio
(LCR) and the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) regulatory metrics are
monitored in terms of both ING’s risk appetite and normative
requirements. 
Liquidity stress testing (*)
Funding and liquidity stress testing forms part of the overall F&L
framework. It allows ING to examine the effects of exceptional but
plausible future events on ING’s funding and liquidity position and provides
insight into which entities, business lines, or portfolios are vulnerable to
which types of risk drivers or scenarios.
The stress-testing framework encompasses the funding and liquidity risks
of the consolidated balance sheet of ING Group, including all entities,
business lines as well as on- and off-balance sheet positions. The net
liquidity position (NLP) is the main stress-testing measure and is measured
at different time buckets.
The stress-testing framework considers idiosyncratic, market-wide,
combined (idiosyncratic and market-wide) and climate-stress scenarios.
The design of the framework is based on empirical evidence supplemented
by expert judgment. The framework can be extended to additional ad-hoc
scenarios. For example, it can be used as input for firm-wide stress testing
and reverse stress testing.
Outcomes of the stress tests are considered in the key aspects of ING’s F&L
risk framework and F&L risk management, including:
§ Risk Appetite Framework (through risk appetite statements);
§ Risk identification and assessment;
§ Monitoring of the liquidity and funding position;
§ Business actions (if needed);
§ Contingency funding plan; and
§ Early-warning indicators.
The funding and liquidity stress-testing framework is also subject to
regular internal validation by model validation.
In line with supervisory expectations, ING’s liquidity position is stress tested
on (at minimum) a monthly basis using scenarios that form part of the
F&L risk appetite statement. The results of all internal stress scenarios are
monitored and assessed on a monthly basis. In addition, ad-hoc scenarios
based on current economic and market developments are run to
determine their potential impacts on the funding and liquidity position of
ING . In 2025, this included stress-test scenarios assessing the impact of a
shutdown of US short- and long-term funding markets and FX markets.
The internal stress scenarios and their corresponding results serve as input
in the decision on holding additional contingency measures.
Contingency funding planning (*)
ING’s contingent F&L risks are addressed in its Contingency Capital and
Funding Plan (CCFP). The objectives of the CCFP include:
§ Establishment of a monitoring framework to detect approaching
contingent events as well as their impact on ING’s F&L position;
§ Provision of a plan for responding to various and increasing levels of a
bank’s liquidity and capital shortfall under adverse and stressed
conditions;
§ Designation of management responsibilities, crisis communication
methods and channels, and reporting requirements;
§ Identification of contingent capital and liquidity sources under
escalating adverse and stressed conditions; and
§ Description of the steps needed to ensure the bank’s capital and
liquidity sources are sufficient to fund scheduled operating
requirements and meet the institution’s commitments, with minimal
costs and disruption.
The contingency funding measures are developed in conjunction with the
ING Recovery Plan and are reviewed and tested on a regular basis.
1In line with the European Central Bank (ECB) guide on Climate-related and Environmental risks
2 As per the ING Group Risk Identification and Risk Assessment Procedure for ICLAAP purposes.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk
Introduction
ESG risk is defined as any negative financial and/or non-financial impact on
ING due to the present or future impact to/dependencies from factors on
and stemming from ING’s full value chain.
ESG risk is not an independent risk category/risk type but rather a set of
drivers 1  affecting the likelihood and severity of existing risk categories/risk
types. ESG risk is an overarching set of risk drivers affecting:
§ Financial risks: credit risk, market risk, funding and liquidity risk;
§ Non-financial risks and compliance risk; and
§ Other overarching risks: model risk and business and strategy risk
The risk drivers 2 are defined as risk events that lead to an impact on ING’s
financial solvency or funding and liquidity position via the above-
mentioned risk types. Our comprehensive approach ensures we integrate
ESG considerations into our risk management practices, aligning with our
commitment to sustainable growth and resilience.
Definitions
ESG factors
ESG factors are defined as environmental, social or governance matters that may have a positive or negative impact on the non-financial/financial performance
or solvency of an entity, sovereign, or individual. ING's ESG taxonomy of ESG factors are defined through the consideration of the CSRD and EUT.
sustainability_outline.svg
Environment
§ Climate-change adaptation
§ Climate-change mitigation
§ Pollution
§ Water & marine resources
§ Circular economy
§ Biodiversity and ecosystems
icon_Employees.svg
Social
§ Own workforce and workers in the value chain
§ Customers
§ Communities
Business_Deposit_Outline.svg
Governance
§ Business conduct
Value chain
Value chain is a concept derived from CSRD Annex II as 'the full range of activities, resources and relationships related to the business model(s) of the undertaking
and the external environment in which it operates'. For ING, the concept of the value chain defines the scope of the ESG risk management lifecycle.
Supply chain
Own operations
Wholesale
Banking
Business Banking
Private Individuals
& Private Banking
Treasury & other
investments
Double materiality
ING must identify both actual and potential:
§ impacts on people and the environment (impact materiality, inside-out); as well as
§ sustainability matters that  impact ING's financial positions (financial materiality, outside-in).
Impact materiality and financial materiality assessments are interrelated, as financial materiality may stem from negative impact, dependency on resources and
context analysis. ING defines material ESG factor per value chain for both impact and financial materiality.
1Important ESG factors are determined on a case by case basis and consider international standards such as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on responsible business conduct and the UNGPs on Business and Human Rights.
The ESG risk framework
The ESG risk framework provides a definition of ESG risk, the governance
structure supporting the management of ESG risk, and an overview of the
various roles and responsibilities related to ESG risk. The framework assists
in managing ESG risk effectively through the application of the risk
management process at various levels of the organisation. The framework
integrates governance components, including the three lines of defence,
defined organisational responsibilities, and ESG oversight bodies, and is
underpinned by a continuous ESG Risk Management Cycle (aligned with
the Risk Management Cycle) encompassing identification, assessment,
mitigation, reporting, and monitoring, as described in detail below.
Governance
ING has a governance structure with well-defined, transparent, and
consistent lines of responsibility in managing ESG risk in line with the three
lines of defence. For more information, see ‘Three lines of defence’.
ESG risk bodies
The ESG committees and bodies at ING are responsible for overseeing and
integrating ESG matters into ING’s strategy and daily operations in line
with our sustainability governance. The following committees, bodies, and
their associated charters are relevant with regard to the framework:
§ Supervisory Board ESG Committee (SB-ESG): The ESG Committee assists
the SB by generally monitoring and advising on relevant ESG
developments.
§ Executive Board (EB) and Management Board Banking (MBB): ING’s EB/
MBB has overall responsibility for the ESG risk framework and is
accountable for having it implemented and embedded.
§ The key risk committees: Acting within delegated authorities granted
by the MBB, support on implementation and execution of the controls
mitigating material ESG risks.
§ ESG Risk Committee (ERC): A standing committee that receives its
mandate from the MBB, and is responsible for the approval of ESG risk
procedures and mandatory instructions as well as its rollout in the
different impacted functions. In addition, it advises MBB and MBB-
delegated committees on the implementation and execution of the
controls mitigating material ESG risk.
Organisational bodies
Management of ESG risk is embedded within all material risk types across
the three lines of defence. Within the CRO domain, ESG risk governance is
embedded into the existing global risk governance framework. It aligns
with the structures that steer risk categories and types globally.
The global ESG Risk department’s role is to ensure that all risk functions
incorporate ESG considerations into their processes, while the local (ESG)
risk functions are responsible for the local adoption of the global policies,
methodologies and instructions issued by the global ESG Risk department.
Managing ESG risk
The primary concern relates to the long-term impact on credit quality and
income, rather than immediate solvency. Climate and environmental-
related risks may increase the risk of borrower default and reduce income
from vulnerable sectors. The focus is on managing underlying risks by
increasing risk management intensity. The ESG risk framework assists in
managing ESG risk effectively through the application of the risk
management process at varying levels of the organisation. The risk cycle
describes the processes by which ING can identify, assess, mitigate,
monitor, and report ESG risk integrated within the existing risk types. 
Risk identification
It is our policy to formalise and maintain an up-to-date ESG impact and
risk inventory. This inventory includes descriptions of the drivers of ESG
negative impacts and ESG risks. Regarding the risk drivers, the inventory
further details their transmission channels and maps them to the risk
categories where ESG risk drivers can materialise. Additionally, the
inventory briefly outlines the drivers of positive impact and opportunities.
Risk assessment
ESG metrics are defined and assessed against predetermined thresholds to
determine materiality. The outcome of the double materiality assessment
(DMA) defines the way ESG risk is adopted in the business strategy and the
risk management of each risk category/risk type to be mitigated. In
addition to the results of the DMA, ING considers some ESG factors to be
important 1 for the risk assessment and due-diligence processes that
follow.
1 Material with reputational risk
Transmission channels
Material: Financial & non-financial risks 1
garden_outline-wit.svg
E1: Climate change;
E4: Biodiversity and ecosystems
Business
§ Property damage &
Business disruption
§ Stranded assets & New
capital expenditure
Households
§ Loss of income
§ Property damage
Macro economy
§ Shifts in prices
§ Productivity changes
§ Labour market frictions
Risk category
Short term
Medium-long term
Credit risk
E1, E4
E1, E4
Compliance risk
S1, S4, G1
E1, E4, S1, S4, G1
Market risk
In scope of the assessment, no material risks identified
Liquidity risk
Non financial risk
S1
S1
Business risk
E1 (climate change mitigation)
E1 (climate change mitigation)
3 persons_Outline.svg
S1: Own workforce;
S4: Consumers and end-users
Social and governance
§ Negative customer and
investor preference
§ Legal liability for damages
caused and loss of
customer preference
§ Negative impact on
workforce
handshake_outline_wit.svg
G1: Business conduct
The above visualisation and the following paragraphs illustrate the
mapping of ESG risk drivers to financial and non-financial risks across
different time horizons.
§ Credit risk
– Climate transition risk: ING has credit exposure to clients whose
business models may be more vulnerable to climate transition risks,
potentially resulting in business disruption and reduced earnings,
which could impair their ability to repay loans or meet other
financial obligations. In addition, adverse climate conditions may
lead to depreciation in the value of collateral.
• Entities may be affected by increased operating costs and
reduced revenue due to fines, taxes and adaptation costs which,
in turn, might decrease clients’ affordability and ability to repay,
thus increasing PDs.
• The transition to environmentally sustainable economies might
make carbon intensive assets in ING’s lending portfolio more
vulnerable to disinvestment and demand – leading to potential
write-offs, stranded assets, early retirement of assets (based on
carbon profiling/intensity) and a decrease in the collateral value
for brown assets. This in turn might result in higher loan to
values (LTVs) and LGDs.
– Climate physical risk: Climate-related physical impacts can lead to
significant losses, unexpected expenses, and reduced income and
profits for borrowers. This may impair their ability to repay loans,
thereby increasing credit risk for ING. Additionally, the frequency
and intensity of extreme events can affect the value of real estate
or other collateral, altering the relationship between the loan and
the asset’s value.
• Acute and chronic risks can negatively impact cash flows of
affected entities: 1) as damaged physical capital might generate
less income, 2) operational disruptions might lead to decreased
productivity and increased operational costs and 3) increased
insurance premiums. This might decrease clients’ affordability
and ability to repay debt and therefore increase PDs. For
sovereign and municipal exposures, the income effects from
physical risk events may primarily arise through lower tax
revenues and higher spending channels to compensate for
negative impacts and adaptation costs.
• Impact on LGD: Write-offs, asset devaluation and early
retirement of existing assets due to acute events decrease the
value of collateral and have a negative impact on LTVs, and
therefore LGDs.
– Biodiversity and ecosystems (impact on species): The negative
impact on biodiversity, which can result in a demise in natural
resources, can disrupt clients’ operations, leading to financial losses.
Financial losses can also occur due to reputational damage. This
may leave them unable to repay loans or meet their obligations on
other financial transactions at the same time as reducing the value
of the business.
§ Compliance risk
– Climate transition risk: Assuming that regulation in Europe will
continue to increase in the coming years and decades, the inherent
risk may rise accordingly. These risks are expected to become more
pronounced in the medium and long term, driven by increased
regulatory expectations and stronger embedding in the prudential
framework.
– Biodiversity and ecosystems: compliance risk due to increasing
expectations on the integration of biodiversity and ecosystems into
European regulation and the prudential framework.
– Business Conduct: Financial loss, regulatory fines, and reputational
damage resulting from infringements of our corporate culture,
potential instances of bribery and corruption, and failure to protect
whistleblowers.
– Consumers and end-users: materialisation of negative impact due
to not providing access to quality information on transition and
physical risks. Also includes privacy risk when failing to protect our
customers’ data.
– Own workforce: privacy risk linked to data protection of our own
employees.
§ Non-financial risk
– Own workforce: Due to People Risk and/or Employment & Practice
Risk (EPR), regarding the employment and inclusion of persons with
disabilities and from diverse backgrounds, including gender
equality. Moreover, EPR due to significant concerns raised on
violence and harassment in the workplace.
§ Business and strategy risk
– Climate transition risk: High transition risk may materialise if ING’s
clients are unable to adapt their business models in line with
climate regulation. In such cases, increasing carbon costs,
regulatory restrictions, or declining market demand can weaken
clients’ profitability and balance‑sheet strength. This may translate
into reduced lending opportunities, ultimately affecting future
income generation.
Failing to meet the commitments made can result in a loss of trust among
ING’s customers and stakeholders, which can result in customers choosing
to take their business elsewhere. ING may therefore face increased costs
related to customer acquisition and retention efforts, ultimately affecting
profitability.
Measurement methodologies and impact 
ING measures its exposure to ESG risks by assessing risks through risk
quantification methodologies and tools. The methodologies take into
account qualitative and quantitative criteria, different time horizons, and
scenario analysis and stress testing,supporting an assessment of the
organisation’s resiliency under various climate and ESG‑related conditions.
Quantification leverages on top-down and bottom-up approaches, when
applicable.
§ Physical risk tool: ING has developed a tool to measure and assign a
level of physical risk for four chronic and nine acute physical risks
across the short, medium, and long term for portfolios and geographies
in which ING operates. This range of hazards is recognised under EU
Taxonomy. The thorough selection of hazards means this tool caters
for broad, continent-spanning risks as well as local and nuanced ones.
The tool has been developed using physical risk maps obtained and
recognised by academically reputable sources.
§ Transition risk scorecard: Used by ING to quantify transition risk with a
scorecard approach at client-level. Methodology helps to identify the
pool of high-risk clients within specific sectors, in order to subsequently
manage these high-risk subsegments, taking into account ING’s public
commitments and sector-specific climate strategies (Terra approach).
This pool of high-risk clients is subsequently managed via the climate
risk-appetite setting.
§ ESG risk-assessment tool: For WB, ING has developed an ESG risk-
assessment approach which considers the (climate and)
environmental, social and governance risk factors, negative impacts
and dependencies of our WB customers, and fully integrates the
previous ESR framework, which is now embedded under the umbrella
of the new ESG Risk Framework. Tooling was developed to support the
implementation of the assessment approach in the credit granting
process. Depending on the ESG risk-assessment outcome and the
impact on financial risks, additional mitigation might be required and
factored in as one factor for the broader credit risk assessment.
§ Climate Stress Test and Resilience Analyses: ING continues enhancing
its climate stress-testing methodology to assess the impact of climate
risks on corporate and mortgage exposures from a credit risk
perspective under different climate scenarios.The methodology for
short-/medium-term stress test (referred to as Climate Stress Test or
CST) builds on existing stress test methodology (e.g. ICAAP, EBA), while
a dedicated long-term methodology has been developed (referred to
as Climate Resilience Analysis or CRA) to assess the impact on
provisions under various scenarios and portfolio assumptions.
For both CST and CRA, dedicated climate scenarios are used, developed
using NGFS short-term and long-term (Phase V) scenario publications as
foundational inputs. These scenarios cover different narratives and explore
the impact of 1) a baseline/continuation of current policies scenario, 2) a
Net-Zero smooth transition scenario, 3) a delayed and abrupt transition
scenario, 4) a low transition risk but high physical risk scenario. These
scenarios influence macro-economic variables projections (e.g. GDP,
unemployment rate, house prices, etc.) which, in turn, determine the
forecast of the main credit risk parameters (e.g. risk migrations, PDs, LGDs
etc.). This is referred to as the "macro" transmission channel.
In addition, dedicated climate overlays are incorporated to account for the
impact of transition, physical and nature risk on a more granular level. This
is referred to as the "micro" transmission channel.
For mortgages transition risk is modelled by estimating the relationship
between household income and probability of default (PD), factoring in
rising carbon prices, energy costs, and renovation expenses required for
low energy label properties. A PD multiplier is then derived per portfolio,
per energy performance certificates (EPC) level. Physical risk is assessed
using ING’s in-house Physical Risk Tool, which combines hazard maps and
property-level exposure data to estimate expected losses. LGD is adjusted
based on modelled damage functions and loss estimates of material
Physical Risk.
For corporates, the dedicated overlays are implemented in the form of PD
multipliers across 16 NACE sectors. These multipliers are derived using
ING’s EEST (Environmental Elasticity Scenario Tool) which assesses the
impact of transition, physical and nature risk shocks on the market price
and volume per sector, and subsequently the impact of these shocks on
the counterparty’s financial position. The resulting financial stress is then
reflected in PDs.
The long‑term analysis informs the resilience of the bank’s business model.
ING’s proactive portfolio steering, sector‑specific transition engagement,
and transaction‑level risk‑management measures collectively enhance the
bank’s capacity to navigate increasing climate pressures and preserve its
business resilience over time.
Risk mitigation
The mitigation of the identified risks in line with the risk appetite can be
performed through several risk mitigating strategies, such as reducing the
risk level, avoiding risk, accepting risk, or transferring the risk. The
measures are embedded as part of the updates of the existing policies and
procedures in the different risk categories/risk types in order to mitigate
ESG risks with a material financial impact. Mitigation activities can be
performed at a process, product, portfolio, client, or transaction level and
include, but are not limited to:
§ engaging with high ESG risk counterparties to understand and support
their mitigation plans;
§ setting RAS to limit the level of acceptable risks;
§ incorporating ESG risks in the collateral valuation process; and
§ ensuring appropriate business continuity plans and insurance are in
place to reduce the impact of more frequent and severe ESG events for
ING’s value chain.
Risk monitoring, reporting and disclosures 
ING aims to provide regular and transparent ESG reports and regulatory
disclosures to ensure the management body and all relevant units in ING
receive ESG risk information in a timely, accurate, concise, clear and
meaningful manner. These reports cover the identification, assessment,
measurement, monitoring, and management of ESG risks.
The ESG risk dashboard consists of comprehensive and integrated ESG risk-
related, financial and non-financial information on business activities and
own operations, summarising the following:
§ Results of the double materiality assessment, detailing negative
impacts, financial and non-financial materiality for each value chain
segment;
§ ING key climate risk indicators for material ESG risks across value chain
segments. The depth of reporting is informed by the materiality
assessments performed; and
§ The outcome of the latest climate stress-testing assessment.
Non-Financial risk
Introduction
Non-financial risk (NFR) is defined as the risk of financial loss, legal or
regulatory sanctions, or reputational damage due to inadequate or failing
internal processes, people and systems, a failure to comply with laws,
regulations and standards, or external events.
Non-financial risk management
Risk categories
ING categorises non-financial risks in the following 10 areas:
§ Compliance risk is the risk of personal harm, financial loss, regulatory
fines, litigation, business disruption and/or reputational damage due to
impairment of ING Group’s integrity caused by a failure (or perceived
failure) to comply with applicable external laws, regulations and market
standards, societal expectations and internal ING rules.
§ Information (technology) risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory
fines, litigation, business disruption and/or reputational damage,
breach of confidentiality, failure of integrity of systems and
information, inappropriateness or unavailability of systems and
information or inability to change information technology (IT) within a
reasonable timeframe and with reasonable costs when the
environment or business requirements change (i.e. agility). This
includes security risks resulting from inadequate or failed internal
processes or external events including cyberattacks or inadequate
physical security.
§ Operational resilience/business continuity risk is the risk of financial
loss, regulatory fines, litigation, business disruption, and/or reputational
damage due to the organisation’s inability to deliver its Critical Business
Services within their impact tolerance levels, and to respond and
recover from severe disruption or crisis within predefined time frames,
service levels, and capacity.
§ Control risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory fines, litigation,
business disruption, and/or reputational damage due to not complying
with controls set through governance procedures and/or project
management methods, caused by improper or insufficient monitoring
(testing) of entities or activities. The key components of Control Risk
include Third and Intragroup Party Risk (TIPM) and Model Risk.
§ Processing risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory fines, litigation,
business disruption and/or reputational damage due to unintentional
(human) error during (transaction) processing, or due to data issues
(including inadequate data governance, poor data quality, data not
available for use, or data architectures not supporting business needs
for data aggregation/consumption or reporting).
§ Unauthorised activity risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory fines,
litigation, business disruptions and/or reputational damage due to
unauthorised employee activities, approvals, or overstepping of
authority that breach delegated mandates without constituting fraud.
§ Personal and physical security risk is the risk of financial loss,
regulatory fines, litigation, business disruption, and/or reputational
damage due to criminal and environmental threats that might
endanger the security or safety of ING personnel at work, people in ING
locations, ING assets or assets entrusted to ING, people at ING event
locations, or might impact the organisation’s confidentiality, integrity,
or availability.
§ Employment practice risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory fines, 
litigation, business disruptions and/or reputational damage due to
breaches of employment, health, and/or safety laws, regulations or
agreements from payment of personal injury claims, from diversity/
discrimination events, unsafe physical and psychosocial working
conditions, or from the unavailability of staff.
Fraud Risk consists of two risk areas:
§ Internal fraud risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory fines, litigation,
business disruption, and/or reputational damage due to acts of fraud
performed by or in collusion with an ING employee.
§ External fraud risk is the risk of financial loss, regulatory fines, litigation,
business disruption, and/or reputational damage due to acts of fraud or
scams by individuals, and/or parties excluding ING staff (and ING
contractors).
In line with ING’s sustainability strategy and regulatory requirements
relating to ESG Risk Management, the NFR Framework has been updated
to ensure ESG Risk is properly embedded in our risk management cycle
and material risk types in line with the overarching ESG Risk Management
Framework.
Risk appetite and tolerances
ING sets a Group-wide risk appetite for non-financial risks, supported by
quantitative and qualitative tolerances. Tolerances are cascaded to
business lines and are calibrated to reflect our strategy, stakeholder
expectations, and regulatory requirements. Performance against appetite
is monitored through a suite of Key Risk Indicators and assessed quarterly
by management committees, with breaches triggering predefined
escalation and remediation. The Supervisory Board is informed of material
movements relative to appetite through regular risk reporting.
Issue management and remediation
Issues arising from risk assessments, control testing, events, audits, and
supervisory reviews are recorded in a central issue management system.
Each issue has a clearly defined owner, risk classification, target
remediation date, and acceptance criteria. Progress is tracked through
regular governance routines, and overdue items are periodically reported
to senior management for follow-up. Closure is subject to evidence-based
validation.
Measurement approach 
As of 1 January 2025, following CRR3 regulation, ING is using the
Standardised Measurement Approach (SMA), a non-model-based formula
to calculate regulatory operational risk capital. An internal Operational Risk
Economic Capital (OREC) model is used for economic capital and stress
testing purposes (Pillar II). The OREC model estimates the economic capital
required to cover potential losses arising from various non-financial risks
within ING. The OREC model involves the use of historical internal and
external losses together with forward-looking and expert-driven loss
estimates to arrive at bank-level loss distribution. The outcomes of the
OREC model are reported quarterly.
Main developments in 2025
The external environment continues to present significant uncertainty and
complexity. Geopolitical tensions and regulatory divergence across
jurisdictions create challenges for global operations. These dynamics may
increase exposure to non-financial risks, requiring ongoing enhancement
of risk mitigation measures and capabilities. At the same time, evolving
consumer expectations and strengthened consumer protection
regulations are likely to raise the standards for secure and resilient
banking operations. ING is continuously working to further mature its risk
management practices, ensuring continued readiness and resilience in this
changing landscape.
Continuity Risk
Providing safe, secure, and seamless services for our customers is central
to ING’s strategy as we focus on providing superior value to our customers.
Operational and IT Resilience measures are key in preventing disruptions
and ensuring a quick recovery when disruptions do occur. During 2025, ING
has further strengthened the implementation of the Operational Resilience
framework in the organisation. The framework aims at safeguarding the
resilience of our most critical business services and the related processes
and systems, facilities, people, data, and third- and intragroup services. As
an example, more real-life simulations of outages are performed to test
the resilience of our critical business services under severe stress scenarios,
including the effectiveness of anticipated contingency measures. The bank
continues to strengthen the framework, including measures related to
concentration risk and the oversight of material subcontractors in
outsourcing. Strengthening our Operational Resilience is a multi‑year
journey and a lot of progress has already been made. Over the coming
period, we will further enhance areas such as supplier concentration risk
management, oversight of material sub‑contractors, and the scope and
realism of our outage simulations.
Information (Technology) Risk
The mission of Information (Technology) Risk, together with the IT
organisation, is to help ING stay safe and secure by preventing and
mitigating unauthorised access to systems and safeguarding the
confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data within them. To
deliver on this mission, we are continuously strengthening and maturing
our joint framework, ensuring it is equipped to adapt to emerging risks.
These risks arise from new or changing regulations (such as the EU
Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) and Payment Services Directive 3 (PSD3)),
rapidly shifting threat landscapes (e.g., AI-enabled attacks, QR-code
phishing, quantum-related risks), ongoing digitalisation of value chains,
adoption of new technologies and digital products, and geopolitical
developments. To keep ahead, ING implemented further enhancements in
measuring and reporting on IT risks in 2025, which will continue in 2026.
The overall cybersecurity maturity increased, due to in particular to
significant progress in the area of Identity & Access Management (IAM). IT
Resilience remains a key focus to prevent and mitigate disruption of
services and data. This is done by further developing capabilities to recover
from large-scale ransomware events and by enhancing failover and
recovery of global, shared systems, supported by the Global Infrastructure
organisation and the Chief Information Security Office (CISO). In 2025, ING
continued to develop, improve, and test these capabilities. Since the
external cyber threat landscape is evolving quickly, which demands
continuous improvement for the coming years.
Fraud Risk
In 2025, ING reinforced its commitment to fraud resilience, focusing on
early detection, smarter prevention, and stronger governance. Our global
strategy is designed to prevent and reduce fraud-related losses and
provide customers with tools to recognise and avoid fraud, like the ‘check
the call’ feature.
Increasing complexity and rising volumes of fraud, driven by technological
developments such as AI-enabled schemes, are already evident.
Capabilities are enhanced through predictive analytics, extended
reporting, and cross-market alignment via the Global Fraud Target
Operating Model. These efforts ensure consistent execution and
continuous improvement across countries. Collaboration remains central
to our approach. ING works closely with industry peers, regulators, and law
enforcement to address fraud as a societal challenge.
Personal & Physical Security Risk
In 2025, the complex geopolitical situation continued to pose significant
threats to the safety and security of ING’s assets and employees (e.g. wars
in Ukraine and the Middle East, hybrid warfare, and unstable political
environments). ING is monitoring these geopolitical risks closely, and
security measures and procedures are being implemented to mitigate
both current and potential impacts on ING’s assets and staff.
Rising activist actions, political extremism, and social polarisation are
creating an increasingly volatile threat landscape, heightening uncertainty
for ING and its operations. These risks require specific actions to protect
assets and people from security threats and disruptive movements,
including heightened vigilance and proactive coordination with authorities.
To strengthen and accelerate response capabilities, a dedicated global
first-line Safety and Security department was established in 2025.
Data risk management
At ING, managing Data Risk is about having the right data of good quality
readily available for business or regulatory purposes, in a secure and
compliant way. As emerging technologies such as AI continue to evolve
and data volumes expand at a rapid pace, our primary objectives are to
address data-related regulatory obligations, manage risks associated with
data-driven technologies like AI, and ensure ongoing alignment with
societal expectations. ING has set up clear governance and initiatives to
ensure the ethical handling of data, and to integrate regulatory
requirements (e.g. EU AI Act, BCBS239) in its policies and way of working.
ING’s data strategy is making steady progress, strengthening data quality
and data governance, and supporting clear accountability across the
organisation. Data Risk Management is applied to the data strategy to
oversee and anticipate business expectations (incl. regulatory
requirements), to measure (e.g. via KRIs) against our defined risk appetite
statement, as well as to monitor the status of regulatory programmes
(e.g. BCBS239). Since the Data Risk landscape is evolving rapidly, ING will
continue to enhance Data Risk Management. In the coming years ING will
invest in data literacy, scaling data capabilities, tooling and strengthening
governance for data and AI-driven technologies.
Compliance risk
Introduction
ING aims to conduct its business activities in compliance with applicable
internal rules (including ING’s risk appetite statements) and external laws
and regulations, whilst also taking societal expectations into consideration.
Compliance risk is defined as the risk of personal harm, financial loss,
regulatory fines, litigation, business disruption and/or reputational damage
due to the impairment of ING Group’s integrity caused by a failure (or
perceived failure) to comply with applicable external laws, regulations and
market standards, societal expectations and internal ING rules.
Within ING, we apply the following compliance risk categories:
§ Financial crime risk refers to the risk of the bank’s products and services
being abused for illicit purposes, generating, facilitating or disguising
financial and/or economic crimes (FEC).
§ Conduct risk refers to compliance risk arising from (the perception of)
breaching our obligations towards customers and/or other parties,
including inappropriate market conduct.
§ Data protection (personal data protection, data retention) risk refers to
the personal data protection risk of financial loss (regulatory fines,
reputational damage) due to not protecting the personal data rights of
individuals as required, and as to data retention risk, to having the
records being destroyed too soon or retained too long.
The Compliance organisation has the mission to drive compliance risk
management by desire and design throughout the organisation.
Compliance ’ s primary role is advising, challenging, and overseeing the first
line of defence in how they manage compliance risks, as well as raising
awareness and stimulating a sound compliance risk culture.
Training and awareness
At ING we believe all our people play a role in protecting our customers,
the bank and, through that, society too. A sound risk culture is promoted
by empowering our employees with the skills and knowledge they need to
manage compliance risks. In 2025, we continued to train our people with
mandatory trainings on financial crime, conduct and data protection.
Senior Management (MBB and SB) are trained on various compliance risk
topics based on a multi-year training plan.
Financial crime and fraud prevention
Financial Crime and Fraud Prevention (FCFP) in the first line of defence and
Financial Crime Compliance (FCC) in the second line of defence continue to
jointly play a major role in our aim to make sure we only engage and do
business with people and entities that meet regulatory requirements.
Knowing who we do business with is vital to keeping ING safe, secure, and
compliant. As part of our ongoing anti-money laundering efforts, we
continuously assess relationships with both new and existing customers,
monitor and screen transactions to fulfill our regulatory and reporting
obligations, whilst ensuring unusual and/or potentially suspicious
transactions are reviewed/investigated. Where applicable, we report these
to the relevant authorities.
Financial crime risk management
The day-to-day responsibility for the oversight of ING’s compliance with
our legal and regulatory obligations, in relation to financial crime risks, sits
with the global head of Financial Crime Compliance, who reports to ING’s
CCO, with oversight by the CRO. As a global financial institution combatting
financial crime, and to comply with anti-money laundering and counter-
terrorism financing (AML/CTF) laws and regulations, we have established a
reasonable and risk-based control framework to mitigate continuously
evolving financial crime risk, and seek to provide useful information to
relevant government agencies.
Operational effectiveness (OE)
ING’s global KYC policy and related control standards set the minimum
requirements and control objectives for all ING entities to guard against
involvement in financial crime activity, while reflecting relevant national
and international laws, regulations, guidance documents, and guidelines
from national, European and international authorities, (supra)national risk
assessments, and industry standards. In 2025, our focus has shifted from
foundational maturity to maintaining operational effectiveness, with
oversight and challenge from the second line of defence. This evolution is
supported by the completion of the multi-year KYC Enhancement
Programme, which strengthened our customer due diligence and
transaction monitoring capabilities.
Evolving financial crime and regulatory landscape 
Financial crime continues to evolve, whether through technology, new and
sophisticated techniques used by criminals, or the results of geopolitical
events. The widespread digitalisation of the economy and use of AI has led
to a reshaping of the methods used to launder money and finance
terrorism. Criminal groups have adopted and are misusing new
technologies, AI, and anonymity-enhancing technologies, such as virtual
currencies and mixers, to commit criminal activities. 
In response to this and heightened supervisory expectations, so too has
the regulatory environment evolved. The EU’s Anti-Money Laundering
Regulation (AMLR) and the establishment of the Anti-Money Laundering
Authority (AMLA) mark a significant step toward harmonised oversight
across member states, with full implementation expected by 2027.
ING actively participates in industry consultations and regulatory
dialogues to shape these frameworks, while embedding operational
effectiveness and advanced analytics into KYC and transaction monitoring
processes. These developments reflect ING’s strategic ambition to
safeguard the integrity of the financial system and strengthen resilience
against financial crime risks. In addition, we are committed to a risk-based
approach (RBA), ensuring resources are focused on higher-risk areas while
maintaining compliance with evolving global standards. This is
underpinned by investment in data-driven, continuous risk assessment
methodologies aimed at providing dynamic insights into emerging threats
and enabling proactive risk mitigation strategies.
These innovative technological capabilities enhance our cooperation with
law-enforcement agencies, industry bodies and regulators, and further
development of intelligence and data-led collaborative solutions to detect
and disrupt financial crime. In this context, this may at times include
sharing information within ING to manage our financial crime risk
exposure, in line with General Data Protection Regulation requirements
and local privacy laws and regulations.
Bribery and corruption 
Bribery and corruption undermine business confidence and corporate
integrity, hinder fair business competition, and harm international trade.
Bribery and corruption risks are considered as part of our client and third-
party due diligence, and financial crime risk monitoring measures. This
supports our zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption, which is
also part of the governance elements of our sustainability objectives and a
main principle in our Global Code of Conduct.
Customer tax compliance
Compliance with customer tax-related regulations and reporting
obligations, under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), the
Common Reporting Standard (CRS), and Mandatory Disclosure Rules, aims
to ensure that ING is not involved in facilitating tax-related financial crime,
such as tax evasion and harmful aggressive tax-avoidance schemes, on
behalf of its customers. 
Sanctions
It is ING’s policy to take into consideration the applicable sanctions regimes
as imposed by international authorities and by local mandatory sanctions
law (as applicable). ING’s policy generally prohibits relationships or
transactions involving sanctioned persons and entities or comprehensively
sanctioned countries, territories and their governments. This sometimes
also means that ING’s risk appetite may be stricter than legal obligations,
and we may choose not to support certain customer relationships,
business activities and transactions, even if permitted by law.
ING continuously monitors external developments to remain proactive to
new sanctions packages or updates to existing sanctions packages.
Throughout 2025, geopolitical risk has grown (e.g. conflict in the Middle
East and the continuation of Russia’s invasion in Ukraine), and global
sanctions regimes remained increasingly active, creating a complex
regulatory and legislative environment. There has been an increasing
focus on the potential circumvention of sanctions against Russia, and the
roles of third countries and companies in facilitating any circumvention or
undermining the sanctions’ measures. This has prompted a concerted
effort by governments to impose pressure on companies operating in
these jurisdictions, and to prevent sanctions measures being sidestepped
by targeted Russian parties. ING’s sanctions programme is designed to
comply with sanctions across the multiple jurisdictions in which ING has
business operations.
Since February 2022, ING has taken measures to not engage in new
business with and in Russia and follows an active de-risking approach. The
approach aims to reduce ING’s overall exposure towards Russia, including
measures to reduce operational risks and to further ringfence activities of
ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC. On 28 January 2025, ING announced the proposed
sale of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC to Global Development JSC. Completion of
the transaction is subject to various regulatory approvals. As of the date of
this report and as announced in September 2025, the buyer has not
received all necessary approvals yet. We continue working towards
completing the transaction and our exit from the Russian market. In the
meantime, we are in discussion with regulators on the conflicting
regulatory requirements in various jurisdictions with respect to the
activities of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC.
As a result of frequent evaluation of the business from economic, strategic
and risk-based perspectives, ING, with limited exception, does not engage
in business involving certain countries, including Cuba, Iran, North Korea,
Sudan, Syria and the Crimea region. ING has a policy not to enter into new
relationships with clients from these countries and processes are in place
to discontinue existing relationships involving these countries.
Public-private partnerships
We continue to work with our peers, regulators and law enforcement in
public-private partnerships (PPPs) in our major markets, and on an
international level, by being part of existing PPPs and by initiating new
partnerships, such as those with German stakeholders and counterparts.
We recognise that our risk management frameworks and controls benefit
from having a direct dialogue with public partners as well as
complementing our understanding of relevant and evolving financial crime
threats and risks. Sharing and applying these insights across the
organisation helps us move beyond technical regulatory compliance and
enhances our ability to manage risks.
Conduct compliance and ethics
ING’s product governance and conduct compliance risk management
amplify that we aim to act in the interest of our customers. Focus areas
include customer protection and transparency (referred to as customer
centricity), market conduct (including counteracting market manipulation
and abuse), anti-competitive conduct, and management of conflicts of
interest.
Customer centricity
Putting our customers at the heart of what we do continues to be reflected
in ING’s Compliance framework around customer centricity. The Customer
Centricity Policy (CCP) sets central norms to meet customer needs on a
continuous basis, from the creation of a product and throughout the full
product lifecycle. In order to ensure the customer voice is reflected in the
way we measure compliance with customer centricity norms, we
developed a data driven approach to measure customer outcomes by
combining customer experience-related data with control data, increasing
our insight into trends and allowing business and Compliance to respond
to potential customer harm at an early stage. In 2025, we have
implemented the EU Accessibility Act setting the minimum norms for the
accessibility of products and services.
ESG
In line with ING’s strategy to put sustainability at the heart of what we do,
the ESG & Ethics team in Group Compliance aims to ensure a structural
and embedded approach to ESG within Compliance. Material ESG-related
topics are increasingly influenced by fast-moving regulatory changes, and
rising stakeholder expectations. To proactively manage these risks, ING is
strengthening its Compliance framework on several fronts. We are
continuing to enhance controls to prevent greenwashing, aligning ESG
commitments with evolving disclosure standards, and integrating physical
and transition risks into customer-centricity assessments. As new
regulations emerge, they are systematically incorporated into our
compliance risk management framework.
Speak up and ethics
ING wants to create, facilitate and maintain an environment in which
employees feel encouraged and supported to speak up at all times.
Conduct ethics is about supporting and protecting our employees by
means of (i) dealing with dilemmas; (ii) setting the right environment for
ethical decisions and behaviours; and (iii) providing for an escalation/
reporting process in case of concerns, and ensuring fair consequence
management. We rely on our Orange Code, containing the values and
behaviours that guide us, the Global Code of Conduct that prevents and
protects employees from behaving unethically, and the whistleblowing
framework in case of concerns.
A new global platform that enables anonymous reporting has been
implemented across the vast majority of ING locations. We also continued
our focus on anti-retaliation, fair consequence management, deliberate
after-care and aligning best practices and data collection across different
Speak up channels.
Data protection
At ING, data protection is at the core of our strategy and business
operations. As part of our strategic priority of ‘Staying safe & secure’ our
main principle is ‘the right people using the right data for the right
purpose’, i.e. personal data usage and record retention must be strictly
necessary and based on a legitimate basis. More information can be found
in the privacy statement on our corporate website.
As a globally operating bank, our data protection governance and
technical and organisational measures aim to ensure compliance with
European and local data protection laws. A group-wide personal data
protection framework is in place and was overhauled in 2025 to remain
compliant with changing European legislation and guidelines. In addition,
we have binding corporate rules to ensure appropriate safeguards for our
internal data transfers. It is our policy that our business entities, support
functions, as well as third parties that we engage with, ensure that the
data subject is granted a level of protection equivalent to that guaranteed
by the GDPR, especially if personal data is transferred outside of the
European economic area (EEA).
Regulatory developments which potentially lead to emerging or changing
data protection risks are monitored and managed on an ongoing basis.
Advancements in technology, particularly in artificial intelligence and
digitalisation have substantially increased the complexity of personal data
processing activities. These developments demand increased attention
and monitoring to remain within risk appetite and to make sure we
comply with privacy laws and ethical standards. Therefore, we have
further strengthened our data protection risk management by refining
procedures and guidelines, particularly around risk related to technology
and AI. This ensures alignment with applicable information security
standards and enhances our cooperation with third-party providers. This
also includes our regular monitoring and reporting approach. 
We will continue to enhance our data protection assessment processes
and continuously perform regular internal audits on the personal data
processing that we do for clients and employees, including ING’s
technologies. We stay closely connected to the relevant supervisory
authorities and notify them as required.
Model risk
Introduction
Model risk is the risk of financial loss or reputational damage resulting from
decisions that are principally based on the output of models due to errors
in the development, implementation, or use of models.
Model lines of defence
ING’s model risk and control structure is based on the three-model-lines-
of-defence (MLoD) approach and defines three different management
layers with distinct roles and oversight responsibilities.
§ The first MLoD is comprised of business entities which own, use, or
develop models.
§ The second MLoD sets the model risk management framework,
monitors and reports on model-related risk, performs independent
model validation, and challenges 1MLoD risk management activities.
§ The third MLoD is the internal audit function.
Model Risk Management (MoRM)
The ING MoRM policy framework comprises the total set of measures and
tools in place to manage model risk. ING defines and implements controls
across the model lifecycle. ING uses four classes of models that represent
their inherent level of model risk based on their criticality, financial
materiality, and complexity. The model classification determines the depth
and extent of the applied model risk management activities, including
model validation. Model validation is the independent assessment of
whether a model is valid for its intended use. Models are validated
according to procedures applicable to key model types. These procedures
are continuously being enhanced to keep up to date with regulatory and
technical developments, and industry trends. 
Model risk appetite (model RAS)
The model risk appetite is designed to determine the level of model risk
ING is willing to accept in pursuit of its strategic objectives. The model RAS
metrics focus on the most material models for ING as reflected via the
model classification. These metrics are reported to the MBB monthly.
On an aggregated level, model risk is monitored via analysis of data from
the global model inventory, collected across the bank to manage ING’s
model landscape. Insights are shared with the MoRM Committee, MBB, and
other stakeholders, enabling senior management to make informed
decisions on whether to accept or further mitigate model risk.
AI risk management
In 2025, ING strengthened its commitment to responsible AI adoption by
creating an AI governance framework and control mechanisms, supported
by ethical principles that are applicable to all AI solutions. There are
dedicated staff allocated to AI risk management to support the risk
assessments in collaboration with the various risk functions. ING adopted a
qualitative Generative AI RAS (Risk Appetite Statement) focused on
customer protection, ethics, and accuracy and performance. The ING RAS
guides early-stage decision-making in areas where quantitative thresholds
are still under development, ING is committed to continue to strengthen its
AI risk management to ensure AI adoption remains safe and secure.
Business & strategy risk
Introduction
Business & strategy risk for ING has been defined as the risk inherent to
strategy decisions and internal efficiency measured by the value or
earnings loss from planning deviations, e.g. non-bank competition, internal
cost pressure, decreasing demand for loans, etc. This risk can be expressed
as earnings loss in terms of volumes, margins, expenses, and fee and
commission income. Business risk is accounted for within the economic
capital framework using a statistical model combined with a forward-
looking scenario module, which covers fee and commission income,
operating expenses, and regulatory expenses/costs.
Risk management
ING applies an explicit risk appetite statement regarding business and
strategy risk. It reflects the risks not already covered within the main risk-
type specific RAS, e.g. capturing risk costs, RWA, or NII. The underlying
economic capital risk types (expense risk, volume-margin risk, and
regulatory costs) are mitigated and managed via the financial
performance of the bank and the business units. Through this process, the
reported numbers are compared quarterly against financial projections
and discussed continuously within different parts of the organisation.
Consolidated financial statements
Consolidated
          financial
  statements
Contents
Consolidated statement of financial position
As at 31 December
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Assets
Liabilities
Cash and balances with central banks 2
52,889
70,353
Deposits from banks 12
18,521
16,722
Loans and advances to banks 3
21,204
21,769
Customer deposits 13
724,707
699,725
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 4,6
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss 14
– Trading assets
55,734
72,906
– Trading liabilities
23,427
35,255
– Non-trading derivatives
1,657
2,463
– Non-trading derivatives
1,338
2,101
– Designated as at fair value through profit or loss
3,448
5,740
– Designated as at fair value through profit or loss
55,764
49,539
– Mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
72,322
56,481
Current tax liabilities
411
276
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income 5,6
56,662
46,389
Deferred tax liabilities 32
365
287
Securities at amortised cost 6
53,867
50,273
Provisions 15
913
752
Loans and advances to customers 7
721,779
680,299
Other liabilities 16
10,755
10,596
Investments in associates and joint ventures 8
1,607
1,679
Debt securities in issue 17
103,116
94,459
Property and equipment 9
2,478
2,434
Senior non-preferred debt 18
48,090
49,393
Intangible assets 10
1,510
1,334
Subordinated loans 19
18,100
17,879
Current tax assets
491
599
Total liabilities
1,005,507
976,986
Deferred tax assets 32
893
1,069
Other assets 11
7,965
6,935
Equity 20
Share capital and share premium
17,067
17,067
Other reserves
-675
78
Retained earnings
31,352
25,598
Shareholders’ equity (parent)
47,744
42,743
Non-controlling interests
1,255
995
Total equity
48,999
43,738
Total assets
1,054,507
1,020,724
Total liabilities and equity
1,054,507
1,020,724
References relate to the accompanying notes. These are an integral part of the Consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated statement of profit or loss
For the years ended 31 December
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Interest income using effective interest rate method
43,481
49,221
44,486
Addition to loan loss provisions
1,304
1,194
520
Other interest income
7,568
9,685
7,741
Staff expenses 26
7,600
7,184
6,725
Total interest income
51,049
58,905
52,228
Other operating expenses 27
4,976
4,931
4,838
Total expenses
13,879
13,310
12,083
Interest expense using effective interest rate method
-29,855
-35,164
-28,693
Other interest expense
-6,652
-8,993
-7,726
Result before tax
9,012
9,025
10,318
Total interest expense
-36,507
-44,157
-36,419
Taxation 32
2,510
2,580
2,926
Net interest income 21
14,542
14,749
15,809
Net result
6,501
6,445
7,392
Fee and commission income
6,292
5,598
5,100
Net result attributable to:
Fee and commission expense
-1,695
-1,596
-1,514
Non-controlling interests
275
258
235
Net fee and commission income 22
4,597
4,002
3,586
Shareholders of the parent
6,226
6,187
7,157
6,501
6,445
7,392
Valuation results and net trading income 23
3,422
3,407
2,910
Investment income 24
129
13
95
Share of result from associates and joint ventures 8
209
205
149
Impairment of associates and joint ventures 8
-9
-35
-5
Net result on derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost
0
-2
3
Other net income 25
3
-3
-146
Dividend per ordinary share
2.43
10.72
22.08
Total income
22,891
22,334
22,401
Total amount of dividend paid (in million euros)
1,129
4,986
10,269
References relate to the accompanying notes. These are an integral part of the Consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
For the years ended 31 December
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Net result
6,501
6,445
7,392
Other comprehensive income
Items that will not be reclassified to the statement of profit or loss:
Unrealised revaluations property in own use
7
3
10
Remeasurement of the net defined benefit asset/liability
-4
-16
-85
Change in fair value of equity instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
-364
664
-30
Changes in fair value related to changes in own credit risk for financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss
-34
-46
-39
Items that may subsequently be reclassified to the statement of profit or loss:
Change in fair value of debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
457
-261
68
Realised gains/losses on debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income reclassified to the statement of profit or loss
-21
63
9
Changes in cash flow hedge reserve
763
383
1,138
Exchange rate differences
-774
563
-85
Total other comprehensive income
30
1,353
986
Total comprehensive income
6,531
7,798
8,378
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Non-controlling interests
456
303
444
Shareholders of the parent
6,075
7,495
7,934
6,531
7,798
8,378
Each component of the other comprehensive income is presented after taxation. For the disclosure on the income tax effects on each component, reference is made to Note 32 'Taxation'.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
in EUR million
Share capital
and share
premium
Other reserves
Retained
earnings
Shareholders'
equity (parent)
Non-controlling
interests
Total equity
Balance as at 31 December 2024
17,067
78
25,598
42,743
995
43,738
Net result
14
6,212
6,226
275
6,501
Other comprehensive income
-151
-151
181
30
Total comprehensive income net of tax
-137
6,212
6,075
456
6,531
Dividends
-1,129
-1,129
-195
-1,324
Employee share-based compensation plans
52
52
0
52
Transfers
-616
616
Other changes
3
3
-1
2
Balance as at 31 December 2025
17,067
-675
31,352
47,744
1,255
48,999
Changes in individual Reserve components are presented in Note 20 'Equity'.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity - continued
in EUR million
Share capital
and share
premium
Other reserves
Retained
earnings
Shareholders'
equity (parent)
Non-controlling
interests
Total equity
Balance as at 31 December 2023
17,067
-769
23,893
40,191
944
41,135
Net result
125
6,062
6,187
258
6,445
Other comprehensive income
1,307
1,307
46
1,353
Total comprehensive income net of tax
1,432
6,062
7,495
303
7,798
Dividends
-4,986
-4,986
-253
-5,239
Employee share-based compensation plans
45
45
0
45
Transfers
-585
585
Other changes
-1
-1
0
-1
Balance as at 31 December 2024
17,067
78
25,598
42,743
995
43,738
Changes in individual Reserve components are presented in Note 20 'Equity'.
Consolidated statement of changes in equity - continued
in EUR million
Share capital
and share
premium
Other reserves
Retained
earnings
Shareholders'
equity (parent)
Non-controlling
interests
Total equity
Balance as at 31 December 2022
17,067
-984
26,462
42,546
504
43,050
Impact of changes in accounting policies 1
-45
-45
-1
-46
Balance as at 1 January 2023
17,067
-984
26,417
42,500
503
43,004
Net result
336
6,821
7,157
235
7,392
Other comprehensive income
777
777
209
986
Total comprehensive income net of tax
1,113
6,821
7,934
444
8,378
Dividends
-10,269
-10,269
-3
-10,272
Employee share-based compensation plans
30
30
0
30
Transfers
-899
899
Other changes
-5
-5
0
-5
Balance as at 31 December 2023
17,067
-769
23,893
40,191
944
41,135
1Changes in policy following the adoption of IFRS 17 and change in policy for non-financial guarantees.
Changes in individual Reserve components are presented in Note 20 'Equity'.
Consolidated statement of cash flows
in EUR million, for the years ended 31 December
2025
2024
2023
Cash flows from operating activities
Result before tax
9,012
9,025
10,318
Adjusted for:
– Depreciation and amortisation
665
673
674
– Addition to loan loss provisions
1,304
1,194
520
– Revaluations
3,437
-780
-2,836
– Exchange rate differences and other
-427
1,134
447
Taxation paid
-2,250
-2,753
-2,700
Changes in:
–  Loans and advances to banks, not available on demand
3,546
-7,736
12,693
–  Deposits from banks, not payable on demand
1,098
-7,819
-31,804
–  Trading assets
17,211
-12,663
-3,366
–  Trading liabilities
-11,829
-1,964
-1,869
–  Loans and advances to customers
-58,376
-34,416
-5,815
–  Customer deposits
31,488
38,916
12,541
–  Non–trading derivatives
1,486
-54
2,409
–  Assets designated at fair value through profit or loss
1,218
35
256
–  Assets mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
-18,984
274
-7,402
–  Other assets
-915
265
1,724
–  Other financial liabilities at fair value through profit or
loss
10,024
-7,801
4,384
–  Provisions and other liabilities
1,152
-635
2,143
Net cash flow from/(used in) operating activities
-11,140
-25,105
-7,682
Cash flows from investing activities
Investments and advances:
- Associates and joint ventures
-1
-26
-55
- Financial assets at fair value through other
comprehensive income
-43,294
-21,091
-19,995
– Securities at amortised cost1
-152,945
-110,052
-49,614
– Property and equipment
-351
-332
-246
2025
2024
2023
– Other investments
-421
-383
-310
Disposals and redemptions:
– Associates and joint ventures
225
107
164
- Financial assets at fair value through other
comprehensive income
33,095
16,949
11,913
– Securities at amortised cost1
147,953
108,732
49,525
– Property and equipment
39
50
57
– Other investments
4
13
15
Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities
-15,697
-6,033
-8,545
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from senior non-preferred debt
7,464
9,533
7,013
Repayments of senior non-preferred debt
-6,749
-3,692
-5,451
Proceeds from debt securities 1
142,965
115,308
110,477
Repayments of debt securities 1
-129,996
-109,358
-86,061
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated loans
3,734
4,603
2,225
Repayments of subordinated loans
-2,808
-2,931
-2,894
Repayments of principal portion of lease liabilities
-282
-290
-291
Dividends and other cash distributions paid
-1,324
-5,239
-10,272
Net cash flow from/(used in) financing activities
13,006
7,935
14,746
Net cash flow
-13,831
-23,203
-1,481
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
69,068
93,011
95,390
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
-1,089
-740
-898
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
54,148
69,068
93,011
1Cash flows are reported on a gross basis and include investments and borrowings of short term securities.
Consolidated statement of cash flows - continued
Cash and cash equivalents
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Treasury bills and other eligible bills included in securities at AC
0
37
0
Deposits from banks
-7,065
-6,303
-5,132
Loans and advances to banks
8,324
4,981
7,930
Cash and balances with central banks
52,889
70,353
90,214
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
54,148
69,068
93,011
Cash and cash equivalents includes only deposits from banks and loans and advances to banks that are payable
on demand. Included in cash and cash equivalents are minimum mandatory reserve deposits held at various
central banks. Reference is made to Note 37 'Transfer of financial assets, assets pledged and received as collateral'
for restrictions on cash and balances with central banks.
Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
Debt securities in issue
Subordinated Loans
Lease liabilities
Senior non-preferred
debt
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Opening
balance
94,459
84,423
58,075
17,879
15,404
15,789
1,116
1,162
1,174
49,393
40,213
37,806
Cash flows:
Additions
142,965
115,308
110,477
3,734
4,603
2,225
7,464
9,533
7,013
Redemptions /
Disposals
-129,996
-109,358
-86,061
-2,808
-2,931
-2,894
-282
-290
-291
-6,749
-3,692
-5,451
Non cash
changes:
Amortisation
560
1,062
730
21
28
34
27
27
28
42
-3
1
Other
-44
111
403
22
24
12
203
212
256
-17
1,669
102
Changes in
unrealised
revaluations
-280
594
1,279
287
188
473
325
544
1,436
Foreign
exchange
movement
-4,548
2,318
-479
-1,036
564
-236
-15
5
-4
-2,369
1,129
-694
Closing balance
103,116
94,459
84,423
18,100
17,879
15,404
1,050
1,116
1,162
48,090
49,393
40,213
Part of Debt securities in issue and subordinated loans are subject to fair value hedge accounting. Hence, changes
in unrealised revaluations represent fair value adjustments to the hedged item attributable to the hedged interest
rate risk. Reference is made to the paragraph 'fair value hedge accounting' in Note 34 'Derivatives and hedge
accounting'.
The table below presents the Interest and dividend received and paid.
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Interest received
51,600
57,201
51,030
Interest paid
-37,845
-41,459
-33,859
13,756
15,742
17,171
Dividend received
319
235
205
Dividends and other cash distributions paid
-1,324
-5,239
-10,272
Dividends received from associates and joint ventures are included in investing activities; interest received, interest
paid and other dividends received are included in operating activities; and dividend paid is included in financing
activities in the Consolidated statement of cash flows.
Notes to the Consolidated financial statements
1  Basis of preparation and material accounting policy information
1.1  Reporting entity and  authorisation of the Consolidated financial statements
ING Bank N.V. (Naamloze Vennootschap) is a company domiciled in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Commercial
Register of Amsterdam, number 33031431 . ING Bank N.V. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V.
domiciled in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. These Consolidated financial statements, as at and for the year ended
31 December 2025, comprise ING Bank N.V. (the Parent company) and its subsidiaries, together referred to as ING
Bank. ING Bank is a global financial institution with a strong European base, offering a wide range of retail and
wholesale banking services to customers. 
The ING Bank Consolidated financial statements, as at and for the year ended 31 December 2025, were authorised
for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Management Board Banking on 23 February 2026. The General
Meeting of the Shareholder may decide not to adopt the financial statements, but may not amend these.
1.2  Basis of preparation of the Consolidated financial statements
The ING Bank Consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and the relevant articles
of Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU are IFRS Accounting Standards and IFRS Interpretations as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) with some
limited modifications such as the temporary ‘carve-out’ from IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement’ (herein, referred to as IFRS).
Under the EU carve-out, ING Bank applies fair value hedge accounting to portfolio hedges of interest rate risk
(macro hedging). For more information, reference is made to paragraph 1.5.4  Derivatives and hedge accounting
of this note and to Note 34 'Derivatives and hedge accounting'.
The ING Bank Consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and there are no
significant doubts about the ability of ING Bank to continue as a going concern.
The Consolidated financial statements are presented in euros and rounded to the nearest million, unless stated
otherwise. Amounts may not add up due to rounding.
1.2.1  Presentation of Risk management disclosures
To improve transparency, reduce duplication and present related information in one place, certain disclosures on
the nature and extent of risks related to financial instruments required by IFRS 7 ‘Financial instruments:
Disclosures’ are included in the ‘Risk management’ section of the Annual Report.
These disclosures are an integral part of ING Bank Consolidated financial statements and are indicated in the ‘Risk
management’ section by the symbol (*). Chapters, paragraphs, graphs or tables within the risk management
section that are indicated with this symbol in the respective headings or table header are considered to be an
integral part of the Consolidated financial statements.
1.3  Changes to accounting policies and presentation
ING Bank has consistently applied its accounting policies to all periods presented in these Consolidated financial
statements.
During 2025, ING Bank has revised the presentation in Note 27  Other operating expenses, to enhance its
relevance and improve comparability. Consequently, comparative figures for 2024 and 2023 have been updated
accordingly.
1.3.1  Changes in IFRS effective in 2025
The following amendments to IFRS became effective in the current reporting period (and have been EU endorsed)
with no significant impact for ING Bank:
§ Amendments to IAS 21 'The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates': Lack of Exchangeability (issued in
August 2023). Amendments provide guidance on determining exchange rates when a currency lacks
exchangeability, including estimation methods and disclosure requirements.
1.3.2  Upcoming changes in IFRS after 2025
ING Bank has not early adopted any of the following Standards, interpretations or amendments that have been
issued, but are not yet effective:
Effective in 2026 (EU endorsed):
§ Amendments to IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' and IFRS 7 'Financial Instruments: Disclosures':
Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments (issued in May 2024). The amendments clarify that a
financial liability is derecognised on the ‘settlement date’ and introduce an accounting policy choice to
derecognise financial liabilities settled using an electronic payment system before the settlement date. Other
clarifications relate to the classification of financial assets with ESG linked features, non-recourse loans and
contractually linked instruments. Further, additional disclosure requirements introduced for equity investments
at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) and financial instruments with contingent cash flow
features.
§ Amendments to IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' and IFRS 7 'Financial Instruments: Disclosures': Contracts
Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity (issued in December 2024). Amendments clarify accounting for
renewable electricity contracts, including own-use and hedge accounting and related disclosures.
§ Annual Improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards: Volume 11 (issued in July 2024). Amendments include
minor clarifications and corrections across a number of Standards to improve consistency and clarity.
The implementation of the above amendments is expected to have no significant impact on ING Bank's
Consolidated financial statements as they become effective.
Effective in 2027:
§ Amendments to IAS 21 'The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates': Translation to a Hyperinflationary
Presentation Currency (issued in November 2025, not yet EU endorsed). Amendments clarify accounting when
translating from a non-hyperinflationary functional currency to a hyperinflationary presentation currency.
There is no impact expected on ING Bank's financial statements.
§ New Standard IFRS 18 'Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements' (issued in April 2024, EU endorsed).
IFRS 18 replaces IAS 1 'Presentation of Financial Statements', carrying forward many of the requirements in IAS
1 unchanged and complementing them with new requirements. In addition, some paragraphs from IAS 1 have
been moved to IAS 8 'Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors' and IFRS 7.
Furthermore, the IASB has made minor amendments to IAS 7 'Statement of Cashflows' and IAS 33 'Earnings per
Share'. IFRS 18 introduces new requirements to:
– present specified categories (operating, investing, financing, income tax and discontinued operations) and
defined subtotals in the statement of profit or loss;
– provide disclosures on management-defined performance measures (MPMs) in the notes to the financial
statements; and
– improve aggregation and disaggregation.
The implementation of IFRS 18 is expected to have no significant impact on ING Bank's consolidated financial
statements as it only affects the presentation and disclosure of items in the financial statements and does not
change the underlying recognition or measurement of assets, liabilities, income or expenses.
ING Bank is currently assessing the impact the amendments will have on the Consolidated financial statements. To
date, the following potential impacts have been identified:
§ IFRS 18 will not affect ING's net profit, but will reclassify income and expenses into new categories in the
statement of profit or loss and introduce a new subtotal line item 'operating profit'.
§ The line items presented in the primary financial statements might change as a result of the enhanced
principles introduced on 'aggregation and disaggregation'. ING does not expect there to be a significant change
in the information that is currently disclosed in the notes because the requirements to disclose material
information remain unchanged.
§ New disclosure requirements for management-defined performance measures (MPMs).
§ For the statement of cash flows, the starting point for calculating cash flows from operating activities will
change to 'operating profit' as noted above.
In addition, in May 2024, the IASB also issued a new accounting Standard IFRS 19 'Subsidiaries without Public
Accountability: Disclosures'. However, it is not applicable for the consolidated financial statements of ING Bank.
1.4  Significant judgements and critical accounting estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the Consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgements in the
process of applying its accounting policies and to use estimates and assumptions. The estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities and the amounts of the contingent assets and contingent
liabilities at the balance sheet date, as well as reported income and expenses for the year. The actual outcome
may differ from these estimates. The process of setting assumptions is subject to internal control procedures and
approvals.
ING Bank has identified areas that require management to make significant judgements and use critical
accounting estimates and assumptions based on the information and financial data that may or may not change
in future periods. These areas are:
§ Loan loss provisions (financial assets) (refer to Note 1.5.6 ‘Impairment of financial assets');
§ The determination of the fair values of financial assets and liabilities (refer to Note 1.5.3 for ‘Fair values of
financial assets and liabilities’); 
§ Investment in associate - assessment of additional impairment losses or reversal of previous impairment losses
(refer to Note 1.10 ‘Investment in associates and joint ventures');
§ Investment in associate - determination of significant influence over associates (refer to Note 1.10 'Investment
in associates and joint ventures'); and
§ Provisions (refer to Note 1.15 ‘Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets’).
In addition, in January 2025 ING has reached an agreement on the sale of the business in Russia (ING Bank
(Eurasia) JSC), subject to several conditions, including substantive and uncertain regulatory approvals. Judgement
is required to evaluate the probability of the sale. Given the prevailing uncertainties around substantive regulatory
approvals as at 31 December 2025, no loss was recognised for the year ended 31 December 2025 and assets and
liabilities of the disposal group were not classified as held for sale. Reference is made to Note 30 'Potential sale of
ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC'.
In March 2024 ING repaid the final EUR 6 billion of its Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations (TLTRO) III
participation. As a result, accounting for TLTRO is no longer an area of significant judgement in 2025 and 2024,
while it was as such in 2023.
1.5  Financial instruments
ING Bank applies IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ to the recognition, classification and measurement, and
derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities and the impairment of financial assets. ING Bank applies
the requirements of IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ for hedge accounting purposes.
1.5.1  Recognition and derecognition of financial instruments
Recognition of financial assets
Financial assets are recognised in the balance sheet when ING Bank becomes a party to the contractual provisions
of the instrument. For a regular way purchase or sale of a financial asset, trade date and settlement date
accounting is applied, depending on the classification of the financial asset.
Derecognition of financial assets
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or
where ING Bank has transferred the rights to receive the cash flows from the financial asset or assumed an
obligation to pass on the cash flows and has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset. If ING
Bank neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of a financial asset, it
derecognises the financial asset if it no longer has control over the asset. The difference between the carrying
amount of a financial asset that has been derecognised and the consideration received is recognised in profit or
loss.
Recognition of financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are recognised on the date that the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the
instrument.
Derecognition of financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are derecognised when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or
expired. The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability that has been extinguished and the
consideration paid is recognised in profit or loss.
1.5.2  Classification and measurement of financial instruments
Financial assets
ING Bank classifies its financial assets in the following measurement categories:
§ those to be measured subsequently at fair value (either through OCI, or through profit or loss); and
§ those to be measured at amortised cost (AC).
At initial recognition, ING Bank measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not
at FVPL, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs
of financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss (FVPL) are expensed in the statement of profit or loss.
Financial assets – Debt instruments
The classification depends on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual
terms of the cash flows at initial recognition.
Business models
Business models are classified as Hold to Collect (HtC), Hold to Collect and Sell (HtC&S) or Other depending on how
a portfolio of financial instruments as a whole is managed. ING Bank’s business models are based on the existing
management structure of the bank, and refined based on an analysis of how businesses are evaluated and
reported, how their specific business risks are managed and on historic and expected future sales. Sales are
permissible in a HtC business model when these are due to an increase in credit risk, take place close to the
maturity date (where the proceeds from the sales approximate the collection of the remaining contractual cash
flows), are insignificant in value (both individually and in aggregate) or are infrequent.
Contractual cash flows Solely Payments of Principal and Interest (SPPI)
The contractual cash flows of a financial asset are assessed to determine whether they represent SPPI. Interest
includes consideration for the time value of money, credit risk and for other basic lending risks such as
consideration for liquidity risk and costs associated with holding the financial asset for a particular period of time.
In addition, interest can include a profit margin that is consistent with a basic lending arrangement. Financial
assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are
SPPI.
In assessing whether the contractual cash flows are SPPI, ING Bank considers the contractual terms of the
instrument. This includes assessing whether the financial asset contains a contractual term that could change the
timing or amount of contractual cash flows such that it would not meet this condition.
Based on the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash
flows, there are three measurement categories into which ING Bank classifies its debt instruments:
§ Amortised Cost (AC):
Debt instruments that are held for collection of contractual cash flows under a HtC business model where those
cash flows represent SPPI are measured at AC. Interest income from these financial assets is included in Interest
income using the Effective Interest Rate (EIR) method. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognised
directly in profit or loss. Impairment losses are presented as a separate line item in the statement of profit or
loss.
§ FVOCI:
Debt instruments that are held for collection of contractual cash flows and for selling the financial assets under a
HtC&S business model, where the assets’ cash flows represent SPPI, are measured at FVOCI. Movements in the
carrying amount are recognised in OCI, except for the recognition of impairment gains or losses, interest revenue
and foreign exchange gains and losses which are recognised in profit or loss. When the financial asset is
derecognised, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is reclassified from equity to profit or loss
and presented in Investment income or Other net income, based on the specific characteristics of the business
model. Interest income from these financial assets is included in Interest income using the EIR method.
Impairment losses are presented as a separate line item in the statement of profit or loss.
§ FVPL:
Debt instruments that do not meet the criteria for AC or FVOCI are measured at FVPL. This includes debt
instruments that are held-for-trading (presented separately as Trading assets) and all other debt instruments
that do not meet the criteria for AC or FVOCI (presented separately as Mandatorily at FVPL). ING Bank may in
some cases, on initial recognition, irrevocably designate a financial asset as classified and measured at FVPL.
This is the case where doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch that would otherwise
arise on assets measured at AC or FVOCI. Fair value movements on trading securities, trading loans and deposits
(mainly reverse repos) are presented fully within valuation result and net trading income. This also includes
interest. The interest arising on financial assets designated as at FVPL is recognised in profit or loss and
presented within Other interest income or Other interest expense in the period in which it arises. The interest
arising on a debt instrument that is part of a hedge relationship, but not subject to hedge accounting, is
recognised in profit or loss and presented within Other interest income or Other interest expense in the period in
which it arises.
ING Bank reclassifies debt instruments if, and only if, its business model for managing those financial assets
changes. Such changes in business models are expected to be very infrequent. There have been no
reclassifications during the reporting period.
Financial assets – Equity instruments
All equity investments are measured at fair value. ING Bank applies the fair value through OCI option to
investments which are considered strategic, consisting of investments that add value to ING Bank’s core banking
activities.
There is no subsequent recycling of fair value gains and losses to profit or loss following the derecognition of
investments if elected to be classified and measured as FVOCI. However, the cumulative gain or loss is transferred
within equity to retained earnings on derecognition of such equity instruments. Dividends from such investments
continue to be recognised in profit or loss as investment income when ING’s right to receive payments is
established. Impairment requirements are not applicable to equity investments classified and measured as FVOCI.
Other remaining equity investments are measured at FVPL. All changes in the fair value are recognised in
Valuation result and Net trading income in the Consolidated statement of profit or loss.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified and subsequently measured at AC, except for financial guarantee contracts,
derivatives and liabilities designated at FVPL. Financial liabilities classified and measured at FVPL are presented as
follows:
§ The amount of change in the fair value that is attributable to changes in own credit risk of the liability
designated at FVPL is presented in OCI. Upon derecognition this Debit Valuation Adjustment (DVA) impact does
not recycle from OCI to profit or loss; and
§ The remaining amount of change in the fair value is presented in profit or loss in ‘Valuation results and net
trading income’. Interest on financial liabilities at FVPL is also recognised in the valuation result, except for items
voluntarily designated as FVPL for which interest is presented within ‘Other interest income (expense).
A financial guarantee contract is a contract that requires ING Bank to make specified payments to reimburse the
holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the
original or modified terms of a debt instrument. Such a contract is initially recognised at fair value and is
subsequently measured at the higher of (a) the amount determined in accordance with impairment provisions of
IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments’ (see section 'Impairment of financial assets') and (b) the amount initially recognised
less, when appropriate, cumulative amortisation recognised in accordance with the revenue recognition principle
of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’.
Repurchase transactions and reverse repurchase transactions
Securities sold subject to repurchase agreements (repos), securities lending and similar agreements continue to be
recognised in the Consolidated statement of financial position as ING Bank continues to be exposed to
substantially all risks and rewards of the transferred financial asset. The counterparty liability is designated and
measured at FVPL if the asset is measured mandatorily at FVPL. Otherwise, the counterparty liability is included in
Deposits from banks, Customer deposits, or Trading.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (reverse repos), securities borrowings and similar agreements are
not recognised in the Consolidated statement of financial position as the counterparty continues to be exposed to
substantially all risks and rewards of the transferred security. Based on the business model assessment and
counterparty, the consideration paid to purchase securities is recognised as Loans and advances to customers,
Loans and advances to banks, financial assets mandatorily at FVPL or Trading assets.
1.5.3  Fair values of financial assets and liabilities
All financial assets and liabilities are recognised initially at fair value. The fair value of a financial instrument on
initial recognition is generally its transaction price (that is, the fair value of the consideration given or received).
However, if there is a material difference between the transaction price and the fair value of financial instruments
whose fair value is based on a valuation technique using significant unobservable inputs, the entire 'day one'
difference (a ‘Day One Profit or Loss’) is deferred. ING Bank defers the Day One Profit or Loss relating to financial
instruments classified as Level 3 and financial instruments with material unobservable inputs into CVA which are
not necessarily classified as Level 3. The deferred Day One Profit or Loss is recognised in the statement of profit or
loss over the life of the transaction until the transaction matures, or until the significant unobservable inputs
become observable, or until the significant unobservable inputs become non-significant. In all other cases, ING
Bank recognises the difference as a gain or loss at inception.
Subsequently, except for financial assets and financial liabilities measured at amortised cost, all the other financial
assets and liabilities are measured at fair value.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It assumes that market participants would
use and take into account the characteristics of the asset or liability when pricing the asset or liability. Fair values
of financial assets and liabilities are based on unadjusted quoted market prices where available. Such quoted
market prices are primarily obtained from exchange prices for listed financial instruments. Where an exchange
price is not available, quoted prices in an active market may be obtained from independent market vendors,
brokers, or market makers. In general, positions are valued at the bid price for a long position and at the offer price
for a short position or are valued at the price within the bid-offer spread that is most representative of fair value in
the circumstances. In some cases where positions are marked at mid-market prices, a fair value adjustment is
calculated.
For certain financial assets and liabilities, quoted market prices are not available. For such instruments, fair value is
determined using valuation techniques. These range from discounting of cash flows to various valuation models,
where relevant pricing factors including the market price of underlying reference instruments, market parameters
(volatilities, correlations and credit ratings), and customer behaviour are taken into account. ING Bank maximises
the use of market observable inputs and minimises the use of unobservable inputs in determining the fair value. It
can be subjective dependent on the significance of the unobservable input to the overall valuation. All valuation
techniques used are subject to internal review and approval. Most data used in these valuation techniques are
validated on a daily basis when possible.
When a group of financial assets and liabilities are managed on the basis of their net risk exposures, the fair value
of a group of financial assets and liabilities are measured on a net portfolio level.
To include credit risk in fair value, ING Bank applies both Credit and Debit Valuation Adjustments (CVA, DVA, also
known as Bilateral Valuation Adjustments or BVA). Own issued debt and structured notes that are designated at
FVPL are adjusted for ING Bank’s own credit risk by means of a DVA.
To include the funding risk, ING Bank applies an additional ‘Funding Valuation Adjustment’ (FVA) to the
uncollateralised derivatives based on the market price of funding liquidity. ING Bank also applies to certain
positions other valuation adjustments to arrive at the fair value such as Bid-Offer adjustments, Model Risk
Adjustments and Collateral Valuation Adjustments (CollVA).
Significant judgements and critical accounting estimates and assumptions:
§ Even if market prices are available, when markets are less liquid there may be a range of prices for the
same security from different price sources. Selecting the most appropriate price requires judgement and
could result in different estimates of fair value. 
§ Valuation techniques are subjective in nature and significant judgement is involved in establishing fair
values for certain financial assets and liabilities. Valuation techniques involve various assumptions
regarding pricing factors. The use of different valuation techniques and assumptions could produce
significantly different estimates of fair value. 
§ Price testing is performed to assess whether the process of valuation has led to an appropriate fair value
of the position and to minimise the potential risks of economic losses due to incorrect or misused
models.
§ Assessing whether a market is active, and whether an input is observable and significant, requires
judgement. ING Bank categorises its financial instruments that are either measured in the statement of
financial position at fair value or of which the fair value is disclosed, into a three level hierarchy based on
the observability and significance of the valuation inputs. The use of different approaches to assess
whether a market is active, whether an input is observable, and whether an unobservable input is
significant could produce different classification within the fair value hierarchy as well as potentially
different deferral of the Day One Profit or Loss.
§ Reference is made to Note 33 'Fair value of assets and liabilities ' and to the ‘Market risk’ paragraph in
the ‘Risk management’ section of the Annual Report for the basis of the determination of the fair value
of financial instruments and related sensitivities.
1.5.4  Derivatives and hedge accounting
IFRS 9 includes an accounting policy choice to defer the adoption of IFRS 9 hedge accounting and to continue with
hedge accounting under IAS 39. ING Bank decided to exercise this accounting policy choice and did not adopt IFRS
9 hedge accounting as of 1 January 2018. Furthermore, ING Bank applies fair value hedge accounting for portfolio
hedges of interest rate risk (macro fair value hedges) in accordance with the EU carve-out version of IAS 39.
Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are
subsequently measured at fair value. Fair values are obtained from quoted market prices in active markets,
including market transactions and valuation techniques (such as discounted cash flow models and option pricing
models), as appropriate. All derivatives are carried as assets when their fair value is positive and as liabilities when
their fair value is negative. Fair value movements on derivatives are presented in profit or loss in 'Valuation result
and net trading income', except for derivatives in either a formal hedge relationship or so-called economic hedges
that are not in a formal hedge accounting relationship where a component is presented separately in interest
result in line with ING Bank’s risk management strategy.
Embedded derivatives are separated from financial liabilities and other non-financial contracts and accounted for
as a derivative if, and only if:
1. The economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic
characteristics and risks of the host contract;
2. A separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a
derivative; and
3. The combined instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in profit or loss.
If an embedded derivative is separated, the host contract is accounted for as a similar free-standing contract.
The method of recognising the resulting fair value gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as
a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. ING Bank designates certain derivatives as
hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or firm commitments (fair value hedge), hedges of highly
probable future cash flows attributable to a recognised asset or liability or a forecast transaction (cash flow
hedge), or hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting is used for derivatives designated
in this way provided certain criteria are met.
At the inception of the transaction, ING Bank documents the relationship between hedging instruments and
hedged items, its risk management objective, together with the methods selected to assess hedge effectiveness.
ING Bank also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the
derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash
flows of the hedged items.
Fair value hedges
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recognised in the
statement of profit or loss, together with fair value adjustments to the hedged item attributable to the hedged
risk. If the hedge relationship no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the cumulative adjustment of the
hedged item is, in the case of interest-bearing instruments, amortised through the statement of profit or loss over
the remaining term of the original hedge or recognised directly when the hedged item is derecognised. For non-
interest bearing instruments, the cumulative adjustment of the hedged item is recognised in the statement of
profit or loss only when the hedged item is derecognised.
Cash flow hedges
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges
are recognised in the Other Comprehensive Income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is
recognised immediately in the statement of profit or loss. Amounts accumulated in the Other Comprehensive
Income are recycled to the statement of profit or loss in the periods in which the hedged item affects net result.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting,
any cumulative gain or loss existing in the Other Comprehensive Income at that time remains in the Other
Comprehensive Income and is recognised when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognised in the statement
of profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was
reported in the Other Comprehensive Income is transferred immediately to the statement of profit or loss.
Net investment hedges
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for in a similar way to cash flow hedges. Any gain
or loss on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of the hedge is recognised in the Other
Comprehensive Income and the gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the
statement of profit or loss. Gains and losses accumulated in the Other Comprehensive Income are included in the
statement of profit or loss when the foreign operation is disposed.
Benchmark rate reform – specific policies for hedges directly affected by the benchmark rate reform
As explained in the ‘Impact of the benchmark rate reform’ paragraph of the ‘Risk management’ section, a
fundamental review of important interest rate benchmarks has been carried out, and is still ongoing for some of
them (for instance, WIBOR). Interest Rate Benchmark Reform Phase 1 and Phase 2 amendments to IFRS provide
specific reliefs that allow hedge accounting relationships to continue when the benchmark rate reform is ongoing.
Phase 1 reliefs remained relevant for ING Bank as at 31 December 2025 for WIBOR hedges, and will cease to apply
once uncertainty about the timing and amount of the benchmark rate-based cash flows is resolved, or when the
hedging instrument is discontinued. ING’s policy is to cease applying Phase 1 reliefs when the relevant contract
(hedging instrument or hedged item) is modified. When this occurs, Phase 2 reliefs become  applicable still
allowing hedge accounting relationships to continue. Refer to note ‘Risk management/Impact of the benchmark
rate reform’ for further details on WIBOR transition and ING’s exposures related to WIBOR that have yet to
transition.
Non-trading derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Derivative instruments that are used by ING Bank as part of its risk management strategies, but which do not
qualify for hedge accounting under ING Bank’s accounting policies, are presented as non-trading derivatives. Non-
trading derivatives are measured at fair value with changes in the fair value taken to the statement of profit or
loss.
1.5.5  Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount is reported in the statement of financial
position, when ING Bank has a current legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and intends to
either settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. Offsetting is applied to
derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and cash pooling agreements. A significant portion of
offsetting is applied to derivatives and related cash margin balances, which are either directly cleared through
central clearing parties or cleared through clearing members of central clearing parties. For more information,
reference is made to Note 38 ‘Offsetting financial assets and liabilities’.
1.5.6Impairment of financial assets
An Expected Credit Loss (ECL) model is applied to financial assets accounted for at AC or FVOCI such as loans, debt
securities and lease receivables, as well as off-balance sheet items such as undrawn loan commitments, certain
financial guarantees issued, and undrawn committed revolving credit facilities. Under the ECL model, ING Bank
calculates the ECL by considering on a discounted basis the cash shortfall it would incur in case of a default and
multiplying the shortfall by the probability of a default occurring. The ECL is the sum of the probability-weighted
outcomes. The ECL estimates are unbiased and include reasonable and supportable information about past
events, current conditions, and forecasts of future economic conditions. ECL is recognised on the balance sheet as
loan loss provisions (LLP).
Three stage approach
Financial assets are classified in one of the below three stages at each reporting date. A financial asset can move
between stages during its lifetime. The stages are based on changes in credit quality since initial recognition and
defined as follows:
§ Stage 1
Financial assets that have not had a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition (i.e. no Stage 2 or
3 triggers apply). Assets are classified as Stage 1 upon initial recognition (with the exception of purchased or
originated credit impaired (POCI) assets) and ECL is determined by the probability that a default occurs in the
next 12 months (12 months ECL);
§ Stage 2
Financial assets showing a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition. For assets in Stage 2 ECL
reflects an estimate on the credit losses over the remaining maturity of the asset (lifetime ECL); or
§ Stage 3
Financial assets that are credit-impaired. Also for these assets ECL is determined over the remaining maturity
of the asset.
Significant increase in credit risk
ING Bank established a framework, incorporating quantitative and qualitative indicators, to identify and assess
significant increases in credit risk (SICR). This is used to determine the appropriate ECL Stage for each financial
asset. Reference is made to the ‘Criteria for identifying a significant increase in credit risk (SICR)’ in the ‘Risk
management’ section of the Annual Report.
An asset that is in Stage 2 will move back to Stage 1 when none of the above criteria are in place anymore.
However, if the asset was moved to Stage 2 based on the forbearance status, then the asset stays in Stage 2 for at
least 24 months. If the asset was classified as Stage 2 due to the '30 days past due' trigger, then the asset is
moved back to Stage 1 only after three months from when the trigger no longer applies.
Credit-impaired financial assets (Stage 3)
Financial assets are assessed for credit-impairment at each reporting date and more frequently when
circumstances warrant further assessment. Evidence of credit-impairment includes arrears of over 90 days on any
material credit obligation, indications that the borrower is experiencing significant financial difficulty, a breach of
contract, bankruptcy or distressed restructuring. The definition of 'credit-impaired' under IFRS 9 (Stage 3) is aligned
with the definition of 'default' used by ING Bank for internal risk management purposes, which is also the definition
used for regulatory purposes.
An asset (other than a POCI asset) that is in Stage 3 will move back to Stage 2 when, as at the reporting date, it is
no longer considered to be credit-impaired subject to certain probation periods. The asset will migrate back to
Stage 1 when its credit risk at the reporting date is no longer considered to have increased significantly since initial
recognition.
Macroeconomic scenarios
ING Bank has established a quarterly process whereby forward-looking macroeconomics scenarios and probability
weightings are developed for the purpose of ECL. ING Bank applies data predominantly from a leading service
provider enriched with the internal ING Bank view. A baseline, up-scenario and  down-scenario are determined to
reflect an unbiased and probability-weighted ECL amount. As a baseline scenario, ING Bank applies the market-
neutral view combining consensus forecasts for economic variables such as unemployment rates, GDP growth,
house prices, commodity prices, and short-term interest rates. Applying market consensus in the baseline scenario
ensures unbiased estimates of the expected credit losses.
The alternative scenarios are based on observed forecast errors in the past, adjusted for the risks affecting the
economy today and the forecast horizon. The probabilities assigned are based on the likelihoods of observing the
three scenarios and are derived from confidence intervals on a probability distribution. The forecasts for the
economic variables are adjusted on a quarterly basis.
The probability weights applied to each of the three scenarios
ING Bank uses three macroeconomic scenarios when determining IFRS 9 ECL (baseline, upside and downside). The
management approach used to determine the weights of each scenario and in selecting the parts of the
distribution of forecast errors from which the weights are derived is disclosed in the 'Alternative Scenarios and
Probability Weights' section. Additionally, this approach is detailed in the sensitivity analysis within the 'Risk
Management' section of the Annual Report.
Measurement of ECL
ING Bank applies a collective assessment method to measure ECL for Stage 1, Stage 2, and certain Stage 3 assets.
Other credit-impaired assets subject to ECL measurement apply the individual assessment method.
Collectively assessed assets (Stages 1 to 3)
For collective assessed assets, ING Bank applies a model-based approach. ECL is determined by, expressed
simplistically, multiplying the probability of default (PD) with the loss given default (LGD) and exposure at default
(EAD), adjusted for the time value of money. Assets that are collectively assessed are grouped on the basis of
similar credit risk characteristics, taking into account the loan type, industry, geographic location, collateral type,
past due status and other relevant factors. These characteristics are relevant to the estimation of future cash flows
for groups of such assets by being indicative of the debtors’ ability to pay all amounts due according to the
contractual terms of the assets being evaluated and the loss in case the debtor is not able to pay all amounts due.
For Stage 3 assets the PD equals 100% and the LGD and EAD represent a lifetime view of the losses based on
characteristics of defaulted facilities.
For the measurement of ECL, ING Bank’s expected credit loss models (PD, LGD, EAD) used for regulatory purposes
have been adjusted. These adjustments include removing embedded prudential conservatism (such as floors) and
converted through-the-cycle estimates to point-in-time estimates. The models assess ECL on the basis of forward-
looking macroeconomic forecasts and other inputs. For most financial assets, the expected life is limited to the
remaining maturity. For overdrafts and certain revolving credit facilities, such as credit cards, the maturity is
estimated based on historical data as these do not have a fixed term or repayment schedule.
Individually assessed assets (Stage 3)
ING Bank estimates ECL for individually significant credit-impaired financial assets within Stage 3 on an individual
basis. ECL for these Individually assessed assets are determined using the discounted expected future cash flow
method. To determine expected future cash flows, one or more scenarios are used. Each scenario is analysed
based on the probability of occurrence and includes forward looking information.
In determining the scenarios, all relevant factors impacting the future cash flows are taken into account. These
include expected developments in credit quality, business and economic forecasts, and estimates of if/when
recoveries will occur taking into account ING Bank’s restructuring/recovery strategy.
The best estimate of ECL is calculated as the weighted-average of the shortfall (gross carrying amount minus
discounted expected future cash flow using the original EIR) per scenario, based on best estimates of expected
future cash flows. Recoveries can arise from, among other things, repayment of the loan, collateral recovery and
the sale of the asset. Cash flows from collateral and other credit enhancements are included in the measurement
of ECL of the related financial asset when it is part of or integral to the contractual terms of the financial asset and
the credit enhancement is not recognised separately. For the individual assessment, with granular (company or
asset-specific) scenarios, specific factors can have a larger impact on the future cash flows than macroeconomic
factors.
When a financial asset is credit-impaired, interest income is no longer recognised based on the gross carrying
amount of the asset. Instead, interest income is calculated by applying the original effective interest rate to the
amortised cost of the asset, which is the gross carrying amount less the related loan loss provision.
Purchased or Originated Credit Impaired (POCI) assets
POCI assets are financial assets that are credit-impaired on initial recognition. Impairment on a POCI asset is
determined based on lifetime ECL from initial recognition. POCI assets are recognised initially at an amount net of
ECL and are measured at AC using a credit-adjusted effective interest rate. In subsequent periods any changes to
the estimated lifetime ECL are recognised in profit or loss. Favourable changes are recognised as an impairment
gain if the lifetime ECL at the reporting date is lower than the estimated lifetime ECL at initial recognition.
Write-off and debt forgiveness
Loans and debt securities are written off (either partially or in full) when there is no reasonable expectation of
recovery and/or collectability of amounts due. The following events can lead to a write-off:
§ After a restructuring has been completed and there is a high improbability of recovery of part of the remaining
loan exposure (including partial debt forgiveness);
§ In a bankruptcy liquidation scenario;
§ After divestment or sale of a credit facility at a discount; and
§ Specific fraud cases with no recourse options.
When a loan is uncollectable, it is written off against the related loan loss provision. Subsequent recoveries of
amounts previously written off are recognised in ‘Addition to loan loss provisions’ in the Consolidated statement of
profit or loss.
Debt forgiveness (or debt settlement) involves write-off, but also involves the forgiveness of a legal obligation, in
whole or in part. This means that ING Bank forfeits the legal right to recover the debt. As a result, the financial
asset needs to be derecognised.
Presentation of ECL
ECL for financial assets measured at AC is deducted from the gross carrying amount of the assets. For debt
instruments at FVOCI, the ECL is recognised in OCI, instead of deducting it from the carrying amount of the asset.
ECL also reflects any credit losses related to the portion of the loan commitment that is expected to be drawn
down over the remaining life of the instrument. The ECL on issued financial guarantee contracts, in scope of IFRS 9
and not measured at FVPL, is recognised as liabilities and presented in Other provisions. ECL are presented in profit
or loss in Addition to loan loss provision.
Significant judgements and critical accounting estimates and assumptions:
The calculation of ECL requires a number of judgements and estimates. In particular:
§ ING Bank makes various assumptions about the risk of default, the credit loss rates in case of a default
and expected future cash flows. For collective provisions, ING Bank applies significant judgement when
estimating modelled parameters such as PD, LGD and EAD, including the selection and calibration of
relevant models. For stage 3 individual provisioning, the determination and probabilities of restructuring
and recovery scenarios as well as the amount and timing of expected future cash flows may be
particularly subjective.
§ Forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios used in impairment assessments are uncertain in nature. The
use of alternate forward-looking macroeconomic scenarios can produce significantly different estimates
of ECL. This is demonstrated in the sensitivity analysis in the ‘Risk Management’ section of the annual
report, where the un-weighted ECL under each of the three scenarios for some significant portfolios is
disclosed.
§ When determining whether the credit risk on a financial asset has increased significantly (criteria for
identifying a significant increase in credit risk), ING Bank considers reasonable and supportable
information to compare the risk of default occurring at reporting date with the risk of a default occurring
at initial recognition of the financial asset. Whilst judgement is required in applying a PD rating to each
financial asset, there is significant judgement used in determining the Stage allocation PD banding
thresholds. The process of comparing a financial asset’s PD with the PD banding thresholds determines its
ECL Stage. Assets in Stage 1 are allocated a 12 month ECL, and those in Stage 2 are allocated a lifetime
ECL, and the difference is often significant. As such, the judgement made in assigning financial asset PDs
and the PD banding thresholds constitutes a significant judgement. Analysis of the sensitivity associated
with the assessment of a significant increase in credit risk is presented in the ‘Risk Management’ section
of the Annual Report.
§ Judgement is exercised in management’s evaluation of whether there is objective evidence that
exposures are credit-impaired.
§ To reflect the risks that are not properly captured by the ECL models (including climate risk), a number of
management adjustments to the model-based ECL were necessary as at 31 December 2025, which
required significant judgement. Reference is made to the ‘Management adjustments applied this
reporting period’ paragraph in the ‘Risk management’ section of the Annual Report.
1.5.7  Modification of financial instruments
In certain circumstances ING Bank grants borrowers postponement, reduction of loan principal and/or interest
payments on a temporary period of time to maximise collection opportunities, and if possible, avoid default,
foreclosure, or repossession. When such postponement, reduction of loan principal and/or interest payments are
executed based on credit concerns they are also referred to as forbearance (refer to the ‘Risk Management’
section of the Annual Report for more details) and require analysis on whether the contractual terms have been
substantially modified or not. A similar assessment is needed when contractual terms are modified for reasons
other than forbearance.
ING Bank determines whether there has been a substantial modification using both quantitative and qualitative
factors. If the modification results in a substantial modification of the terms of the loan, the original loan is
derecognised and a new loan is recognised at fair value at the modification date. In case of a non-substantial
modification, a modification gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss.
1.5.8  Accounting for Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations (TLTRO)
ING Bank participated in the Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations (TLTRO III), which mainly affected
comparative periods as, in March 2024, ING repaid the final EUR 6 billion of its TLTRO III participation. ING Bank
considered TLTRO funding provided by the ECB to banks to be on market terms on the basis that the ECB has
established a separate market with TLTRO programmes. They have specific terms which are different from other
sources of funding available to banks, including those provided by the ECB. Consequently, the rate under TLTRO
was considered to be a market conforming rate and TLTRO funding was recognised fully as a financial liability.ING
Bank interpreted the whole rate set by the ECB under TLTRO as a floating rate on the financial liability, being the
market rate for each specific period in time. This resulted in discrete rates for discrete interest periods over the life
of TLTRO. The change in the applicable rate between interest periods was seen as a change in the floating rate and
was accounted for prospectively. Similarly, if the ECB announced changes in the rate for the amounts already
drawn under the existing TLTRO, then such changes also represented a change in a floating rate. Following this,
such changes led to the recognition of an increased/decreased interest in the relevant period of life of the
exposure, rather than by the recognition of an immediate modification gain or loss at the moment of the change
of terms by the ECB. If the change related to the periods already passed, the impact for those past periods was
recognised in profit or loss immediately. Reference is made to Note 21 ‘Net interest income’ for the presentation
of ING Bank’s participation in TLTRO programmes.
1.5.9  Financial guarantees purchased (ING as holder)
When ING purchases a financial guarantee, it assesses whether the guarantee is integral or non‑integral to the
related loan.
Integral financial guarantees are not accounted for separately but included in the accounting for the loan under
IFRS 9:
§ For loans measured at amortised cost or FVOCI, the guarantee is reflected in the expected credit loss (ECL)
measurement. Premiums paid are treated as transaction costs and recognised as part of Interest income using
the effective interest rate method.
§ For loans measured at FVTPL, the guarantee is included in the fair value of the loan. Premiums paid are treated
as transaction costs and recognised within Fee and commission expense.
Non‑integral financial guarantees are accounted for separately, within Other assets, by analogy to
reimbursements under IAS 37 'Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets':
§ For loans measured at amortised cost or FVOCI, a compensation right asset is recognised and measured based
on ECL, provided recovery is virtually certain.
§ Changes in compensation right assets are recognised as a reduction in risk costs within Addition to loan loss
provisions line in profit or loss. Premiums paid are recognised within Fee and commission expense.
§ For loans measured at FVTPL, non‑integral financial guarantees are designated at FVTPL, with premiums
recognised within Fee and commission expense.
1.6  Consolidation
ING Bank comprises ING Bank N.V. (the Parent Company) and all other subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are entities
controlled by ING Bank N.V. Control exists if ING Bank N.V. is exposed or has rights to variable returns and has the
ability to affect those returns through the power over the subsidiary.
For interests in structured entities, the existence of control requires judgement as these entities are designed so
that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity. This judgement
includes, for example, the involvement in the design of the structured entity, contractual arrangements that give
rights to direct the structured entities relevant activities and commitment to ensure that the structured entity
operates as designed.
A list of principal subsidiaries is included in Note 41 ‘Principal subsidiaries’ and a description of ING's activities
involving structured entities is included in Note 42 'Structured entities'.
A list containing the information referred to in Section 379 (1), Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code has been filed with
the office of the Commercial Register of Amsterdam, in accordance with Section 379 (5), Book 2 of the Dutch Civil
Code.
ING Bank N.V. and its Dutch group companies are subject to legal restrictions regarding the amount of dividends
they can pay to their shareholders. The Dutch Civil Code contains the restriction that dividends can only be paid up
to an amount equal to the excess of the company’s own funds over the sum of the paid-up capital and reserves
required by law. Certain Group companies are also subject to other restrictions in certain countries, in addition to
the restrictions on the amount of funds that may be transferred in the form of dividends, or otherwise, to the
parent company.
Furthermore, in addition to the restrictions regarding the minimum capital requirements that are imposed by
industry regulators in the countries in which the subsidiaries operate, other limitations exist in certain countries.
1.7  Segment reporting
An operating segment is a distinguishable component of ING Bank, engaged in providing products or services,
whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Executive Board of ING Bank and the Management Board
Banking (together they make up the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM)) who decide which resources to
allocate to the segment and assess its performance.
The CODM reviews and assesses ING Bank's performance primarily by line of business. As a result, ING identified
five operating segments which are also disclosed as reportable segments.
1.8  Hyperinflation accounting
Since the second quarter of 2022, Türkiye has been considered a hyperinflationary economy for accounting
purposes. As ING Bank has a subsidiary in Türkiye, ING Bank has applied IAS 29 ‘Financial Reporting in
Hyperinflationary Economies’ to its operations since then.  IAS 29 continued to be relevant for ING’s operations in
Türkiye in 2023, 2024 and 2025. Under IAS 29, the results of the operations in Türkiye should be stated in terms of
the current purchasing power at the reporting date. For that, the consumer price index (CPI) as determined by the
Turkish Statistical Institute was used.The CPI for Türkiye (2003=100) at 31 December 2025 was 3,513.87, at 31
December 2024 was 2,684.55 and at 31 December 2023 it was 1,859.38 (movement 2025: 30.89%; 2024: 44.38%,
2023: 64.77%). The effect of such restatement for inflation in the current period of the statement of
comprehensive income and the balance sheet has been recognised in the statement of profit or loss within ‘Other
net income’ as a ‘Net monetary gain or loss’. The net monetary loss for the period represents the loss of
purchasing power by the net monetary position (monetary assets exceeding monetary liabilities) of ING Türkiye.
After the application of the above restatement procedures in Turkish Lira under IAS 29, the financial position and
the results for the period of ING Türkiye were translated and presented in EUR at the exchange rate on 31
December 2025. For the statement of comprehensive income this is in contrast with the usual translation
procedures where items of comprehensive income are translated at the exchange rate at the date of transaction.
Furthermore, ING Bank chose to present both the restatement effect resulting from restating ING Bank’s interest in
the equity of ING Türkiye as required by IAS 29, and the translation effect from translating at a closing rate that
differs from the previous closing rate, in the Currency translation reserve.
1.9  Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of ING Bank’s entities are measured using the currency of the
primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The Consolidated financial
statements are presented in euros, which is ING Bank’s presentation currency.
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate prevailing at the
date of the transactions. Exchange rate differences resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from
the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies
are recognised in the statement of profit or loss, except when deferred in equity as part of qualifying cash flow
hedges or qualifying net investment hedges.
Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the
exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
Exchange rate differences on non-monetary items, measured at fair value through profit or loss, are reported as
part of the fair value gain or loss. Non-monetary items are retranslated at the date the fair value is determined.
Exchange rate differences on non-monetary items measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
are included in other comprehensive income and get accumulated in the revaluation reserve in equity.
Exchange rate differences in the statement of profit or loss are generally included in ‘Valuation results and net
trading income’. Reference is made to Note 23 ‘Valuation results and net trading income’, which discloses the
amounts included in the statement of profit or loss. Exchange rate differences relating to the disposal of debt and
FVPL equity securities are considered to be an inherent part of the capital gains and losses recognised in
Investment income. As mentioned below, in Group companies relating to the disposals of group companies, any
exchange rate difference deferred in equity is recognised in the statement of profit or loss in ‘Result on disposal of
group companies’. Reference is also made to Note 20 'Equity', which discloses the amounts included in the
statement of profit or loss.
Group companies
The results and financial positions of all group companies that have a functional currency different from the
presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
§ Assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the date of the statement of financial position; 
§ Income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable
approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income
and expenses are translated at the dates of the transactions). However, under hyperinflation accounting,
income and expenses of ING Türkiye are translated at the closing rate; and 
§ All resulting exchange rate differences are recognised in a separate component of equity. 
On consolidation, exchange rate differences arising from the translation of a monetary item that forms part of the
net investment in a foreign operation, and of borrowings and other instruments designated as hedges of such
investments, are taken to shareholders’ equity. When a foreign operation is sold, the corresponding exchange rate
differences are recognised in the statement of profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on sale.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising from the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated as assets and
liabilities of the foreign operation and translated at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date.
1.10  Investments in associates and joint ventures
Associates are all entities over which ING Bank has significant influence but not control. Significant influence is the
ability to participate in the financial and operating policies of the investee. It generally results from a shareholding
of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights or through situations including, but not limited to one or more of the
following:
§ Representation on the board of directors; 
§ Participation in the policymaking process; and 
§ Interchange of managerial personnel. 
Joint ventures are entities over which ING Bank has joint control.
Investments in associates and joint ventures are initially recognised at cost and subsequently accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. ING Bank’s investment in associates and joint ventures (net of any accumulated
impairment loss) includes goodwill identified on acquisition. ING Bank’s share of its associates and joint ventures
post-acquisition profits or losses is recognised in the statement of profit or loss, and its share of post-acquisition
changes in reserves is recognised in equity. The cumulative post-acquisition changes are adjusted against the
carrying amount of the investment. When ING Bank’s share of losses in an associate or joint venture equals or
exceeds its interest in the associate or joint venture, including any long-term interests in the associate like
uncollateralised loans that are neither planned nor likely to be settled in the foreseeable future, ING Bank does not
recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate or joint
venture.
Unrealised gains on transactions between ING Bank and its associates and joint ventures are eliminated to the
extent of ING Bank’s interest in the associates and joint ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless they
provide evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates and joint ventures
have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by ING Bank.
The recoverable amount, being the higher of fair value less cost of disposal and value in use, of the investment in
associate and joint venture is determined when there is an indication of potential (reversal of) impairment. In case
of an indication of potential impairment, an impairment loss is recognised when the carrying amount of the
investment exceeds its recoverable amount. Goodwill on acquisitions of interests in associates and joint ventures is
not tested separately for impairment, but is assessed as part of the carrying amount of the investment. An
impairment loss is subsequently reversed if there is indication of a reversal and there is a change in the estimates
used to determine the recoverable amount. In case of an indication of a potential reversal of impairment, an
impairment loss is reversed to the extent that the recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount, but cannot
exceed the original impairment loss.
The reporting dates of certain associates and joint ventures can differ from the reporting date of the Group, but by
no more than three months.
Significant judgements and critical accounting estimates and assumptions:
Potential impairment and reversal assessment
Identification of impairment indicators as well as indicators of potential reversal of previous impairments of
ING Bank’s investment in TMBThanachart Bank Public Company Limited (hereafter: TTB), an associate,
requires significant judgement. When there is objective evidence of impairment or indicators that prior
period impairment losses no longer exist or may have decreased, value in use (VIU) needs to be
determined. Estimation of VIU involves significant estimates and management assumptions. See Note 8
‘Investment in associates and joint ventures’.
Determination of significant influence over associates
It is presumed that an entity has significant influence when it holds 20% or more of the voting power of the
investee. Conversely, it is presumed that an entity does not have significant influence when voting power is
less than 20% in the investee. Depending on the facts and circumstances, the presumption is rebutted
when ING can clearly demonstrate whether or not it has power to participate in the investee’s financial and
operating policy decisions. The consideration of all relevant factors requires judgement, including, amongst
others, the investment purpose, investee’s governance structure and legal regime, ability to obtain
meaningful board representation and participation in policymaking decisions. Refer to Note 5 'Financial
assets at fair value through other comprehensive income' regarding ING’s accounting for its investment in
Van Lanschot Kempen.
1.11  Property and equipment
Property in own use
Land and buildings held for own use are stated at fair value at the balance sheet date. Depreciation is recognised
on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life (in general 20–50 years). On disposal, the related revaluation
reserve is transferred to retained earnings.
Equipment
Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. The cost of the assets is
depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are generally as follows: two to five
years for data processing equipment, and four to ten years for fixtures and fittings. 
Disposals of property and equipment
The difference between the proceeds on disposal and net carrying value is recognised in the statement of profit or
loss under Other net income.
Right-of-use assets - ING Bank as the lessee
A lessee is required to recognise a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying leased asset and a
corresponding liability representing its obligation to make lease payments at the date at which the leased asset is
available for use by ING Bank. Each lease payment is allocated between the repayment of the liability and finance
cost. The finance costs are charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate
of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The right-of-use asset is depreciated over the
shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term on a straight-line basis.
Assets and liabilities arising from a lease are initially measured on a present value basis. Lease liabilities include
the net present value of the following lease payments:
§ Fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments), less any lease incentives receivable;
§ Variable lease payments that are based on an index or a rate;
§ Amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value guarantees;
§ The exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option; and
§ Payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising that option.
The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease. If that rate cannot be readily
determined, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate is used, being the rate that the lessee would have to pay to
borrow the funds necessary to obtain an asset of similar value in a similar economic environment with similar
terms and conditions.
Right-of-use assets are measured at cost comprising the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability,
any lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received and any initial
direct costs and restoration costs.
The right-of-use asset is included in the statement of financial position line-item ‘Property and equipment’. The
lease liability is included in the statement of financial position line-item ‘Other liabilities’. Refer to Note 9 ‘Property
and equipment’ and to Note 16 ‘Other liabilities’.
Subsequent to initial recognition, the right-of-use asset amortises using a straight-line method to the income
statement over the life of the lease. The lease liability increases for the accrual of interest and decreases when
payments are made. Any remeasurement of the lease liability due to a lease modification or other reassessment
results in a corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset.
1.12  ING Bank as lessor
When ING Bank acts as a lessor, a distinction should be made between finance leases and operating leases. For
ING Bank as a lessor, these are mainly finance leases and are therefore not included in 'Property and equipment'.
Instead, the present value of the lease payments is recognised as a receivable under Loans and advances to
customers or Loans and advances to banks. The difference between the gross receivable and the present value of
the receivable is unearned finance lease income. Lease income is recognised over the term of the lease using the
net investment method (before tax), which reflects a constant periodic rate of return.
1.13  Goodwill and other intangible assets
Impairment of goodwill and other non-financial assets
ING Bank assesses at each reporting period whether there is an indication that a non-financial asset may be
impaired. Irrespective of whether there is an indication of impairment, intangible assets with an indefinite useful
life, including goodwill acquired in a business combination, and intangible assets not yet available for use, are
tested annually for impairment. Goodwill is allocated to groups of cash generating units (CGUs) for the purpose of
impairment testing. These groups of CGUs represent the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal
management purposes. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the carrying value of the group of CGUs to
the recoverable amount of that group of CGUs. Impairment of goodwill, if applicable, is included in the statement
of profit or loss in Other operating expenses and is not subsequently reversed.
Computer software
Computer software that has been purchased or generated internally for own use is stated at cost less amortisation
and any impairment losses. Amortisation is calculated on a straight-line basis over its useful life, which generally
does not exceed five years. Amortisation is included in Other operating expenses.
1.14  Taxation
Income tax on the result for the year consists of current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the
statement of profit or loss but it is recognised directly in equity if the tax relates to items that are recognised
directly in equity.
Uncertain tax positions are assessed continually by ING Bank and in case it is probable that there will be a cash
outflow, a current tax liability is recognised.
Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, for temporary differences arising between the
tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the Consolidated statement of financial position.
Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at
the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the
deferred income tax liability is settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.
Deferred tax assets are recognised when it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the
temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred income tax is provided for temporary differences arising from
investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is
controlled by ING Bank and it is probable that the difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The tax
effects of income tax losses available for carry forward are recognised as an asset where it is probable that future
taxable profits will be available against which these losses can be utilised.
Fair value remeasurements of debt and equity instruments measured at FVOCI and cash flow hedges are
recognised directly in equity. Deferred tax related to this fair value remeasurement is also recognised directly in
equity and is subsequently recognised in the statement of profit or loss together with the deferred gain or loss.
1.15  Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
A provision is a present obligation arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an
outflow of resources embodying economic benefits. However, the timing or the amount is uncertain. Provisions are
discounted when the effect of the time value of money is significant using a pre-tax discount rate.
Reorganisation provisions include employee termination benefits when ING Bank is demonstrably committed to
either terminate the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of
withdrawal, or providing termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy.
A liability is recognised for a levy when the activity that triggers payment, as identified by the relevant legislation,
occurs. For a levy that is triggered upon reaching a minimum threshold, the liability is recognised only upon
reaching the specified minimum threshold.
A contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed
only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of
ING Bank or a present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because it is either not probable
that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation or the amount of the obligation
cannot be measured reliably. Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the statement of financial position, but
are rather disclosed in the notes unless the possibility of the outflow of economic benefits is remote.
A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by
the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of ING
Bank. Contingent assets are recognised in the statement of financial position only when realisation of the income
that arises from such an asset is virtually certain. Contingent assets are disclosed in the notes when an inflow of
economic benefits is probable.
Significant judgements and critical accounting estimates and assumptions:
The recognition and measurement of provisions is an inherently uncertain process involving using
judgement to determine when a present obligation exists and estimates regarding probability, amounts
and timing of cash flows.
ING Bank may become involved in governmental, regulatory, arbitration and legal proceedings and
investigations and may be subject to third party claims. With or without reference to the above, ING Bank
may also offer compensation to certain of its customers. Judgement is required to assess whether a
present obligation exists and to estimate the probability of an unfavourable outcome and the amount of
potential loss. The degree of uncertainty and the method of making the accounting estimate depends on
the individual case, its nature and complexity. Such cases are usually one of a kind. For the assessment of
related provisions ING Bank consults with internal and external legal experts. Even taking into consideration
legal experts’ advice, the probability of an outflow of economic benefits can still be uncertain and the
provision recognised can remain sensitive to the assumptions used. Reference is made to Note 15
'Provisions'. For proceedings where it is not possible to make a reliable estimate of the expected financial
effect, that could result from the ultimate resolution of the proceedings, no provision is recognised, however
disclosure is included in the financial statements, where relevant. Reference is made to Note 40 'Legal
proceedings'.
Critical accounting estimates and assumptions for the reorganisation provision are in estimating the
amounts and timing of cash flows as the announced transformation initiatives are implemented over a
period of several years. Reference is made to Note 15 'Provisions'.
1.16  Irrevocable Payment Commitments on contributions to SRF and DGS
ING makes contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) and Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS). The annual
contributions are paid in cash or, in some cases, partly using Irrevocable Payment Commitments (IPCs) that
become payable if and when called. Cash contributions are accounted for as levies as described in section 1.15
above while IPCs are disclosed in Note 39 Commitments. Cash collateral posted on IPCs to the SRF is accounted for
as an interest bearing financial asset at amortised cost. Government bonds posted as collateral on IPCs to DGS
continue to be recognised as assets of ING as securities at amortised cost.
1.17  Other liabilities
Defined benefit plans
The net defined benefit asset or liability recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of defined
benefit pension plans is the fair value of the plan assets less the present value of the defined benefit obligation at
the balance sheet date.
Changes in plan assets include mainly:
§ Return on plan assets are recognised as staff costs in the statement of profit or loss. It is determined using a
high quality corporate bond rate (identical to the discount rate used in determining the defined benefit
obligation) at the start of the reporting period; and 
§ Remeasurements which are recognised in Other comprehensive income. 
The defined benefit obligation is calculated by internal and external independent qualified actuaries through
actuarial models and calculations using the projected unit credit method. This method considers expected future
payments required to settle the obligation resulting from employee service in the current and prior periods,
discounted using a high quality corporate bond rate. Inherent in these actuarial models are assumptions including
discount rates, rates of increase in future salary and benefit levels, mortality rates, consumer price index and the
expected level of indexation. The assumptions are based on available market data as well as management
expectations and are updated regularly. 
Changes in the defined benefit obligation include mainly:
§ Service cost which is recognised as staff costs in the statement of profit or loss; 
§ Interest expenses are recognised as staff costs in the Statement of profit or loss. It is determined using a high
quality corporate bond rate at the start of the period;
§ Remeasurements which are recognised in Other comprehensive income (equity) and not recycled to the
Statement of profit or loss;
§ Any past service cost relating to a plan amendment is recognised in profit or loss in the period of the plan
amendment; and
§ Gains and losses on curtailments and settlements are recognised in the Statement of profit or loss when the
curtailment or settlement occurs.
The recognition of a net defined benefit asset in the Consolidated statement of financial position is limited to the
present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plans or reductions in future
contributions to the plans.
Defined contribution plans
For defined contribution plans, ING Bank pays contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance
plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. ING Bank has no further payment obligations once the
contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognised as staff expenses in the profit or loss when they
are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the
future payments is available.
Other post-employment obligations
Some group companies provide other post-employment benefits to former employees. The entitlement to these
benefits is usually conditional on the employee remaining in service up to retirement age and the completion of a
minimum service period. The expected costs of these benefits are accrued over the period of employment using an
accounting methodology similar to that for defined benefit pension plans.
1.18  Income recognition
Interest
Interest income and expense are recognised in the statement of profit or loss using the effective interest method.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial
liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest
rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the
financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or
financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, ING Bank estimates cash flows considering all
contractual terms of the financial instrument (for example, prepayment options) but does not consider future
credit losses.
The calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral
part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts. Once a financial asset or
a group of similar financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, interest income is
recognised using the rate of interest used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the
impairment loss.
Interest results on instruments classified at Amortised Cost, assets measured at FVOCI and derivatives in a formal
hedge accounting relationship are presented in ‘Interest income (expense) using effective interest rate method’.
Interest result on financial assets and liabilities voluntarily designated as at FVPL and derivatives in so called
economic hedges and instruments designated at fair value are presented in ‘Other interest income (expense)’.
Interest result on all other financial assets and liabilities at FVTPL is recognised in ‘Valuation results and net trading
income’.
Fees and commissions
Fees and commissions are generally recognised as the service is provided. Loan commitment fees for loans that
are likely to be drawn down are deferred (together with related direct costs) and recognised as an adjustment to
the effective interest rate on the loan. Loan syndication fees are recognised as income when the performance
obligation has been satisfied based on the particular contract and ING Bank has retained no part of the loan
package for itself or has retained a part at the same effective interest rate as the other participants. Commission
and fees arising from negotiating, or participating in the negotiation of, a transaction for a third party – such as
the arrangement of the acquisition of shares or other securities or the purchase or sale of businesses – are
recognised on completion of the underlying transaction. Portfolio and other management advisory and service
fees are recognised based on the applicable service contracts as the service is provided. Asset management fees
related to investment funds and investment contract fees are recognised on a pro-rata basis over the period the
service is provided. The same principle is applied for wealth management, financial planning and custody services
that are continuously provided over an extended period of time. Fees received and paid between banks for
payment services are classified as commission income and expenses.
Lease income
The proceeds from leasing out assets under operating leases are recognised on a straight-line basis over the life of
the lease agreement. Lease payments received in respect of finance leases when ING Bank is the lessor are divided
into an interest component (recognised as interest income) and a repayment component based on a pattern
reflecting a constant periodic rate of return on the lessor’s net investment in the lease.
1.19  Expense recognition
Expenses are recognised in the statement of profit or loss as incurred, or when a decrease in future economic
benefits related to a decrease in an asset or an increase in a liability has arisen that can be measured reliably. Fee
and commission expenses generally result from contracts with ING service providers, who perform their service for
ING Bank’s customers. Costs are generally presented as ‘Commission expenses’ if they are specific, incremental,
directly attributable and identifiable to generate income. 
Share-based payments
ING Bank only engages in share-based payment transactions with its staff and directors. Share-based payment
expenses are recognised as a staff expense over the vesting period. A corresponding increase in equity is
recognised for equity-settled share-based payment transactions. A liability is recognised for cash-settled share-
based payment transactions. The fair value of equity-settled share-based payment transactions are measured at
the grant date, and the fair value of cash-settled share-based payment transactions are measured at each
balance sheet date. Rights granted will remain valid until the expiry date, even if the share based payment
scheme is discontinued. The rights are subject to certain conditions, including a pre-determined continuous period
of service.
1.20  Statement of cash flows
The statement of cash flows is prepared in accordance with the indirect method, distinguishing cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities. In the net cash flow from operating activities, the result before tax is
adjusted for those items in the statement of profit or loss and changes in items per the statement of financial
position, which do not result in actual cash flows during the year.
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, Cash and cash equivalents include deposits from banks and loans
and advances to banks that are on demand. Furthermore, it includes treasury bills and other eligible bills shorter
than three months. Investments qualify as a cash equivalent if they are readily convertible to a known amount of
cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Cash flows arising from foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the
exchange rates at the date of the cash flows.
The net cash flow shown in respect of Loans and advances to customers relates only to transactions involving
actual payments or receipts. The Addition to loan loss provision, which is deducted from the item Loans and
advances to customers in the statement of financial position, has been adjusted accordingly from the result before
tax and is shown separately in the statement of cash flows.
The difference between the Net cash flow in accordance with the statement of cash flows and the change
between the opening and closing balance of Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of financial position is
due to exchange rate differences and is presented separately in the cash flow statement.
Liabilities arising from financing activities are debt securities, lease liabilities and subordinated loans.
1.21  Parent company financial statements
The Parent company financial statements of ING Bank N.V. are prepared in accordance with the financial reporting
requirements included in Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. In accordance with subsection 8 of section 362,
Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, the recognition and measurement principles applied in the Parent company
financial statements are the same as those applied in the Consolidated financial statements.
Notes to the Consolidated statement of financial position
2  Cash and balances with central banks
Cash and balances with central banks
in EUR million
2025
2024
Amounts held at central banks 1
51,133 
68,708 
Cash and bank balances
1,756 
1,645 
52,889
70,353
1Amounts held at central banks include an amount of EUR -17 million (2024: EUR -14 million) of Loan loss provisions.
Amounts held at central banks reflect on-demand balances. The movement reflects ING’s active liquidity
management.
Reference is made to Note 37 'Transfer of financial assets, assets pledged and received as collateral' for restrictions
on amounts held at central banks.
3  Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to banks
Netherlands
Rest of the world
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Loans and advances to banks1
12,362
14,343
8,841
7,426
21,204
21,769
1Loans and advances to banks include EUR -18  million (2024: EUR -22  million) of Loan loss provisions.
Loans and advances include balances of reverse repurchase transactions. For more information, refer to Note 4
'Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss' . Furthermore, it includes on-demand and term loans, and cash
collateral transactions. Reference is made to Note 7 'Loans and advances to customers' for information on finance
lease receivables included in Loans and advances to banks.
As at 31 December 2025 and at 31 December 2024, all loans and advances to banks are non-subordinated.
4  Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
in EUR million
2025
2024
Trading assets
55,734
72,906
Non-trading derivatives
1,657
2,463
Designated at fair value through profit or loss
3,448
5,740
Mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
72,322
56,481
133,160
137,590
(Reverse) repurchase transactions
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include securities lending and sales and repurchase transactions
with securities. At ING, these types of transactions are recognised in several lines in the statement of financial
position depending on business model assessment and counterparty. Netting is applicable to repurchase
agreements that are governed by an established Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA) when ING has the
intention to settle net. This netting is restricted to transactions involving the same currency and maturity date,
and must occur within the same legal entity. Reference is made to Note 38 'Offsetting financial assets and
liabilities'.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (reverse repos), securities borrowings and similar agreements are
not recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position as the counterparty continues to be exposed to
substantially all risks and rewards of the transferred security. Based on the business model assessment and
counterparty, the consideration paid to purchase securities is recognised as Loans and advances to customers,
Loans and advances to banks, financial assets mandatorily at FVPL or Trading assets.
Securities sold subject to repurchase agreements (repos), securities lending and similar agreements continue to be
recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position as ING Bank continues to be exposed to
substantially all risks and rewards of the transferred financial asset. The counterparty liability is designated and
measured at FVPL if the asset is measured mandatorily at FVPL. Otherwise, the counterparty liability is included in
Deposits from banks, Customer deposits or Trading. Furthermore, for repurchase agreements, the gross amount of
assets must be considered together with the gross amount of related liabilities, which are presented separately on
the statement of financial position since IFRS does not always allow the netting of these positions in the statement
of financial position. 
Reference is made to Note 37 'Transfer of financial assets, assets pledged and received as collateral' for
information on transferred assets which were not derecognised.
ING Bank’s exposure to (reverse) repurchase transactions is included in the following lines in the statement of
financial position:
Exposure to (reverse) repurchase agreements
in EUR million
2025
2024
Reverse repurchase transactions
Loans and advances to banks
6,836
10,777
Loans and advances to customers
3,866
3,471
Trading assets, loans and receivables
1,574
12,033
Loans and receivables mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
68,469
53,393
80,746
79,675
Repurchase transactions
Deposits from banks
330
33
Customer deposits
182
1
Trading liabilities, funds on deposit
31
5,269
Funds entrusted designated and measured at fair value through profit or loss
46,211
38,420
46,755
43,723
Trading assets
Trading assets by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Equity securities
21,276
20,726
Debt securities
8,120
10,080
Derivatives
24,346
29,805
Loans and receivables
1,991
12,295
55,734
72,906
Trading assets include assets that are closely related to servicing the needs of the clients of ING Bank. ING offers
institutional clients, corporate clients, and governments products that are traded on the financial markets. A
significant part of the derivatives in the trading portfolio is related to servicing corporate clients in their risk
management to hedge, for example, currency or interest rate exposures. In addition, ING provides its customers
access to equity and debt markets for issuing their own equity or debt securities (securities underwriting).
Reference is made to Note 14 'Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss' for information on trading
liabilities.
Non-trading derivatives
Non-trading derivatives by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Derivatives used in
-  fair value hedges
578
617
-  cash flow hedges
459
158
-  hedges of net investments in foreign operations
68
82
Other non-trading derivatives
550
1,606
1,657
2,463
Reference is made to Note 34 'Derivatives and hedge accounting' for information on derivatives designated in
hedge accounting.
Other non-trading derivatives mainly includes interest-rate swaps, foreign exchange swaps, and cross currency
swaps for which no hedge accounting is applied.
Designated at fair value through profit or loss
Designated at fair value through profit or loss by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Debt securities
2,330
4,718
Loans and receivables
1,118
1,022
3,448
5,740
‘Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss’ is partly economically hedged by credit derivatives.
The hedges do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting and the loans and debt securities are recorded at fair
value to avoid an accounting mismatch. The maximum credit exposure of the loans and receivables and debt
securities included in ‘Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss’ approximates its carrying
value and amounts to EUR 3,448 million (2024: EUR 5,740 million). In 2025, the change in fair value of these loans
and debt securities amounts to EUR -177 million (2024: EUR 5 million).
ING has mitigated the credit risk exposure on part of the portfolio. The cost at initial recognition of the financial
assets designated at fair value through profit or loss that are economically hedged by credit derivatives is EUR
2,454 million (2024: EUR 3,797 million). The cumulative change in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk for
the financial asset economically hedged is EUR 85 million (2024: EUR 173 million) and the change for the current
year is EUR -88 million (2024: EUR 24 million). The cumulative change in fair value attributable to changes in credit
risk for the financial assets non-economically hedged with credit derivatives is EUR 513 million (2024: EUR
489 million) and the change for the current year is EUR 23 million.
The notional value of the related credit derivatives is EUR 2,486 million (2024: EUR 3,807 million). The cumulative
change in fair value of the credit derivatives since the financial assets were first designated, amounts to EUR
-85 million (2024: EUR -214 million) and the change for the current year is EUR 128 million (2024: EUR -95 million).
The changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk have been calculated by determining the changes in
credit spread implicit in the fair value of loans and bonds issued by entities with similar credit characteristics.
Mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
Mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Equity securities
310
228
Debt securities
769
789
Loans and receivables
71,243
55,464
72,322
56,481
Equity securities are individually insignificant for ING Bank. For total exposure to debt securities, reference is made
to Note 6 'Debt securities'. Loans and receivables include mainly reverse repurchase agreements.
5  Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Equity securities
2,607
2,562
Debt securities 1
50,817
42,219
Loans and advances 1
3,238
1,608
56,662
46,389
1Debt securities includes an amount of EUR -15 million (2024: EUR -12 million) and Loans and advances includes EUR -6 million (2024: EUR -7 million) of
Loan loss provisions.
Exposure to equity securities
Equity securities designated as at fair value through other comprehensive income
Carrying
value
Carrying
value 1
Dividend
income
Dividend
income 1
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Investment in Bank of Beijing
1,838
2,241
98
101
Investment in Van Lanschot Kempen
462
51
12
2
Other Investments
307
270
6
14
2,607
2,562
116
117
The table has been updated to present the increased stake in Van Lanschot Kempen separately from other investments.
As at 31 December 2025 ING holds 13% (2024: 13%) of the shares of Bank of Beijing, a bank listed on the Shanghai
Stock Exchange. The stake in Bank of Beijing is part of the Corporate Line. As per regulatory requirements set by
the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, ING, as a shareholder holding more than 5% of the
shares, is required to supply additional capital when necessary. No request for additional capital was received in
2025 (2024: nil).
In 2025 ING increased its ownership in Van Lanschot Kempen by acquiring an additional 17.6% stake, raising its
total interest based on the issued share capital from 2.7% to 20.3%. Despite ING holding over 20% voting rights in
VLK (a presumption of significant influence in IFRS), this presumption is rebutted given that ING holds rights similar
to other ordinary shareholders where voting does not include financial and operating policy decisions and ING
does not have the rights or ability to obtain board representation. Therefore, the increased investment in VLK is
designated at fair value through other comprehensive income consistent with ING’s passive investment purpose.
The stake is part of the Corporate Line.
Changes in fair value through other comprehensive income
The following table presents changes in financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income:
Changes in fair value through other comprehensive income financial assets
FVOCI equity
securities
FVOCI debt
instruments 1
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
2,562
1,885
43,827
39,231
46,389
41,116
Additions
395
11
42,899
21,080
43,294
21,091
Amortisation
75
77
75
77
Transfers
10
1
10
1
Changes in unrealised revaluations 2
-156
605
322
-96
166
509
Impairments
-10
2
-10
2
Reversals of impairments
7
-7
7
-7
Disposals and redemptions
-7
-1
-33,124
-16,906
-33,131
-16,907
Exchange rate differences
-178
62
-1,088
443
-1,267
506
Other changes
-19
1,148
1,128
Closing balance
2,607
2,562
54,055
43,827
56,662
46,389
1Fair value through other comprehensive income debt instruments includes both debt securities and loans and advances.
2Changes in unrealised revaluations of FVOCI debt instruments include changes on hedged items which are recognised in the statement of profit or loss.
Reference is made to Note 20 'Equity' for details on the changes in the revaluation reserve.
FVOCI equity securities
Exchange rate differences of EUR -178 million (31 December 2024: EUR 62 million) are mainly related to the stake
in Bank of Beijing following the depreciation of CNY versus EUR. In 2025, changes in unrealised revaluations of
equity securities are mainly related to a revaluation of the stake in Bank of Beijing of EUR -225 million (31
December 2024: EUR 590 million) following a change in the share price.
FVOCI debt instruments
In 2025, changes in interest rates and portfolio composition resulted in changes in unrealised revaluations of debt
securities of EUR 322 million (31 December 2024: EUR -96 million).
Reference is made to Note 6 'Debt securities' for details on ING Bank’s total exposure to debt securities.
6  Debt securities
ING Bank’s exposure to debt securities is included in the following lines in the statement of financial position:
Exposure to debt securities
in EUR million
2025
2024
Debt securities at fair value through other comprehensive income
50,817
42,219
Debt securities at amortised cost
53,867
50,273
Total debt securities at fair value through other comprehensive income and amortised cost
104,684
92,493
Trading assets
8,120
10,080
Debt securities designated and measured at fair value through profit or loss
2,330
4,718
Debt securities mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
769
789
Total debt securities at fair value through profit or loss
11,219
15,586
115,903
108,078
ING Bank’s total exposure to debt securities (excluding debt securities held in the trading portfolio) of EUR 107,783
million ( 31 December 2024: EUR 97,999 million ) is specified as follows:
Debt securities by type of exposure
Debt Securities at
FVPL 1
Debt Securities at
FVOCI
Debt Securities at
AC
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Government bonds
288
289
32,578
24,757
25,297
22,734
58,163
47,780
Central bank bonds
376
444
2,541
2,900
2,917
3,344
Sub-sovereign, Supranationals
and Agencies
413
1,027
13,788
11,513
16,744
15,445
30,945
27,985
Covered bonds
3,750
4,108
5,362
5,683
9,111
9,791
Corporate bonds
89
848
109
79
50
106
248
1,033
Financial institutions' bonds
1,176
2,141
28
980
96
139
1,300
3,261
ABS portfolio
757
757
578
794
3,790
3,281
5,125
4,832
3,099
5,506
50,832
42,231
53,879
50,288
107,809
98,026
Loan loss provisions
-15
-12
-11
-15
-26
-27
Debt securities portfolio
3,099
5,506
50,817
42,219
53,867
50,273
107,783
97,999
1Debt securities at FVPL includes both debt securities designated - and mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss.
7  Loans and advances to customers
Loans and advances to customers by type
Netherlands
Rest of the world
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Loans and advances to public authorities
3,452
1,888
19,583
16,773
23,034
18,661
Residential mortgages
126,772
117,223
242,297
227,992
369,069
345,216
Other personal lending
5,033
5,007
34,690
31,789
39,723
36,797
Corporate Lending
68,866
66,987
226,981
218,473
295,847
285,459
204,122
191,105
523,551
495,027
727,673
686,132
Loan loss provisions
-836
-811
-5,058
-5,023
-5,894
-5,833
203,286
190,295
518,493
490,004
721,779
680,299
For details on credit quality and loan loss provisioning, refer to ‘Risk management – Credit risk’ – paragraphs ‘Credit
quality’ and 'Loan loss provisioning'.
As at 31 December 2025 EUR 721,543 million (2024 : EUR 680,085 million ) of loans and advances to customers are
non-subordinated.
Loans and advances to customers and, to a lesser extent, to banks include finance lease receivables which are
detailed as follows:
Finance lease receivables 1
in EUR million
2025
2024
Maturities of gross investment in finance lease receivables
-  within 1 year
4,121
3,962
-  between 1-2 years
3,040
2,961
-  between 2-3 years
2,408
2,283
-  between 3-4 years
1,563
1,577
-  between 4-5 years
935
902
-  more than 5 years
1,609
1,555
13,677
13,240
Unearned future finance income on finance leases
-1,122
-1,145
Net investment in finance leases
12,554
12,095
Included in Loans and advances to banks
3
5
Included in Loans and advances to customers
12,551
12,091
12,554
12,095
1The total loan loss provision for finance lease receivables is EUR 191 million (2024: EUR  193 million).
The finance lease receivables mainly relate to the financing of equipment and real estate for third parties where
ING is the lessor and are mainly part of corporate lending. Interest income in 2025 on finance lease receivables
amounts to EUR 513 million (2024: EUR 522 million).
8  Investment in associates and joint ventures
Investments in associates and joint ventures
2025
2024
in EUR million
Interest
held (%)
Fair value of
listed
investments
Balance
sheet value
Interest held
(%)
Fair value of
listed
investments
Balance
sheet value
TMBThanachart Bank Public
Company Limited
23%
1,212
1,307
23%
1,164
1,266
Other investments in associates and
joint ventures
300
412
1,607
1,679
TMBThanachart Bank Public Company Limited
ING Bank has an 23% investment in TMBThanachart Bank Public Company Limited (hereafter: TTB), a bank listed on
the stock exchange of Thailand. TTB is providing products and services to wholesale, small and medium enterprise
(SME), and retail customers. TTB is accounted for as an investment in associate based on the size of ING's
shareholding and representation on the Board. The investment in TTB is reflected in the Corporate Line.
A summary of the unaudited financial information of TTB as of the end of September 2025 based on the data
available at the time the consolidated financial statements were prepared is presented below. TTB’s statutory
reporting date is 31 December. For the year ending 31 December 2025, ING recognised the associate’s results
using TTB’s financial statements for the 12‑month period ending 30 September 2025.
Selected balance sheet information TMBThanachart Bank Public Company Limited
As at 30 September
in EUR million
2025
2024
Loans to customers and accrued interest receivables, net
31,009
33,878
Interbank and money market items, net
5,856
7,152
Investments, net
5,917
4,680
Other
3,158
3,436
Total assets
45,940
49,147
Deposits
34,345
36,563
Interbank and money market items
2,663
2,633
Debts issued and borrowings
462
1,139
Other
1,942
2,218
Total liabilities
39,412
42,554
Equity
6,529
6,593
Selected profit or loss information TMBThanachart Bank Public Company Limited
For the 12 months ended 30 September
in EUR million
2025
2024
Total operating income
1,795
1,991
Total expenses
1,266
1,548
Profit for the period
555
586
Total other comprehensive income for the period
170
17
Other investments in associates and joint ventures
Included in Other investments in associates and joint ventures are mainly financial services and (non-) financial
technology funds or vehicles operating predominantly in Europe, and are individually not significant to ING.
Significant influence for associates in which the interest held is below 20%, is based on the combination of ING’s
financial interest and other arrangements, such as participation in the Board of Directors.
The associates and joint ventures of ING are subject to legal and regulatory restrictions regarding the amount of
dividends they can pay to ING. These restrictions are, for example, dependent on the laws in the country of
incorporation for declaring dividends or as a result of minimum capital requirements that are imposed by industry
regulators in the countries in which the associates and joint ventures operate.
In addition, the associates and joint ventures also consider other factors in determining the appropriate levels of
equity needed. These factors and limitations include, but are not limited to, the rating agency and regulatory
views, which can change over time.
Changes in Investments in associates and joint ventures
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
1,679
1,509
Additions
1
26
Transfers
-29
-7
Revaluations
35
0
Share of results
209
205
Dividends received
-160
-91
Disposals
-66
-16
Impairments
-9
-35
Exchange rate differences
-54
87
Closing balance
1,607
1,679
Share of results from associates and joint ventures of EUR 209 million (2024: EUR 205 million) as included in the
table above is mainly attributable to our share in the results of TTB of EUR 136 million (2024: EUR 123 million) and
a EUR 44 million gain from the sale of an associate in Belgium, while 2024 included EUR 77 million as our share in
the result of an associate in Belgium following its one-off profit.
Impairments and reversal thereof on the investment in TTB
Accumulated impairments on the investment in TTB of EUR 395 million (2024: EUR 395 million) were recognised in
previous years. There is no impairment trigger observed as per 31 December 2025. A Value in Use ('VIU') was
estimated following the prolonged increase of the quoted TTB share price over the original cost price of the
investment and the sustained improved broker consensus outlook. As the VIU did not significantly exceed the
carrying amount of the investment in TTB, no reversal of impairment was recognised.
Methodology
The recoverable amount is determined as the higher of the fair value less costs of disposal and VIU. Fair value less
costs of disposal is based on observable share price. The VIU calculation uses discounted cash flow projections
based on management’s best estimates. VIU is derived using a Dividend Discount Model (DDM) where distributable
equity, i.e. future earnings available to ordinary shareholders, is used as a proxy for future cash flows. The
valuation looks at expected cash flows into perpetuity resulting in two main components to the VIU calculation:
§ The estimation of future earnings over a 5-year forecast period; and
§ The terminal value being the extrapolation of earnings into perpetuity applying a long-term growth rate. The
earnings that are used for extrapolation represent the stable long-term financial results and position of TTB, i.e.
a steady state. The terminal value comprises the majority of the total VIU.
Key assumptions used in the VIU calculation as at 31 December 2025
The VIU is determined using a valuation model which is subject to multiple management assumptions. The key
assumptions, i.e. those to which the overall result is most sensitive to, are the following:
§ Expected future earnings of TTB: Short- to medium-term expectations are based on forecasts derived from
broker consensus. Longer-term and steady-state expectations into perpetuity are derived using reasonable
and supportable assumptions capturing a combination of TTB specific and market data points; A capital
maintenance charge is applied, which is management’s forecast of the earnings that need to be withheld in
order for TTB to meet target regulatory requirements over the forecast period;
§ Discount rate (cost of equity): 10.17% (2024: 10.96%), based on the capital asset pricing model (CAPM)
calculated for TTB using current market data and expert judgement; and
§ Terminal growth rate: 2.41% (2024: 2.74%) consistent with current long term government bond yield in
Thailand as a proxy for a risk-free rate.
The model was evaluated for reasonably possible changes to key assumptions in the model. This reflects the
sensitivity of the VIU to each key assumption on its own and it is possible that more than one favourable and/or
unfavourable change may occur at the same time. The selected rates of reasonably possible changes to key
assumptions are based on external analysts’ forecasts and other relevant external data sources, which can change
period to period. The sensitivity of the VIU to each key assumption is as follows:
§ A favourable change of 10% in the cash flows would result in an increase in VIU of EUR 89 million (2024: EUR 57
million), while an unfavourable change of -10% would result in a decrease in VIU of EUR -90 million (2024: EUR
-59 million); 
§ A favourable change of 1% in the discount rate would result in an increase in VIU of EUR 159 million (2024: EUR
95 million), while an unfavourable change of -1% would result in a decrease in VIU of EUR -122 million (2024:
EUR -75 million);
§ A favourable change of 1% in the terminal growth rate would result in an increase in VIU of EUR 118 million
(2024: EUR 68 million), while an unfavourable change of -1% would result in a decrease in VIU of EUR -90
million (2024: EUR -53 million).
9  Property and equipment
Property and equipment by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Property in own use
863
758
Equipment:
- Data processing equipment
197
218
- Other equipment
447
426
Right- of- use assets:
- ROU property
837
895
- ROU cars
123
124
- ROU other leases
12
13
2,478
2,434
Changes in property and equipment
Property in own use
Equipment
Right-of-use assets
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
758
616
643
705
1,033
1,078
2,434
2,399
Additions
147
92
203
240
160
141
510
473
Transfers
-15
83
11
-78
-4
-3
1
Depreciation
-11
-11
-194
-204
-237
-242
-442
-457
Impairments1
-8
-9
-6
-10
-3
-4
-16
-23
Reversals of impairments 1
6
5
7
5
Remeasurements
15
5
40
75
56
80
Disposals
-28
-36
-11
-14
-10
-18
-48
-68
Exchange rate differences
-3
13
-3
5
-12
8
-18
25
Closing balance
863
758
644
643
972
1,033
2,478
2,434
Cost price
994
871
2,827
3,027
1,982
1,933
5,803
5,831
Accumulated depreciation
-299
-298
-2,176
-2,376
-1,237
-1,098
-3,712
-3,772
Accumulated impairments
-95
-97
-7
-8
-31
-31
-134
-136
Accumulated revaluation surplus
264
282
264
282
Accumulated remeasurement
258
229
258
229
Net carrying value
863
758
644
643
972
1,033
2,478
2,434
1Impairments and reversals of impairments of property and equipment are presented as Other operating expenses in the statement of Profit or Loss.
ING considers valuations from third-party experts in determining the fair values of property in own use. The vast
majority of the land and buildings were appraised during 2025. Property in own use purchase costs amounted to
EUR 994 million (2024: EUR 871 million ). Cost or the purchase price less accumulated depreciation and
impairments would have been EUR 599 million ( 2024: EUR 476 million) had property in own use been valued at
cost instead of at fair value.
10  Intangible assets
Changes in intangible assets
Goodwill
Software
Other
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
476
469
855
727
3
2
1,334
1,198
Additions
6
35
43
1
35
50
Capitalised expenses
380
324
380
324
Amortisation
-223
-215
-223
-216
Impairments 1
-7
-12
-7
-12
Exchange rate differences
1
1
-10
8
-9
9
Disposals
-2
-9
-2
-9
Other changes
2
-10
1
2
-10
Closing balance
477
476
1,030
855
3
3
1,510
1,334
Gross carrying amount
477
476
3,281
2,986
9
8
3,767
3,471
Accumulated amortisation
-2,197
-2,079
-4
-4
-2,201
-2,084
Accumulated impairments
-53
-52
-1
-2
-55
-53
Net carrying value
477
476
1,030
855
3
3
1,510
1,334
1Impairments of intangible assets are presented within Other operating expenses in the statement of Profit or Loss.
Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to groups of cash generating units (CGUs) as follows:
Goodwill allocation to group of CGUs
in EUR million
Method used for
recoverable amount
Discount rate
Terminal growth rate
Goodwill
Group of CGUs
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Retail Netherlands
Value in use
7.20%
7.81%
2.00%
2.00%
30
30
Retail Germany
Value in use
7.20%
7.77%
2.20%
2.00%
356
356
Retail Poland
Value in use
8.76%
9.30%
2.50%
2.50%
77
76
Retail Romania
Value in use
10.86%
11.45%
2.60%
3.00%
14
15
477
476
Impairment testing
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter by comparing the recoverable amount of each
goodwill-carrying CGU with its carrying amount. The key assumptions used in the calculation of the recoverable
amounts are included in the table above. Furthermore, ING Bank tests goodwill whenever a triggering event is
identified. In 2025, no triggering events were identified. 
At the annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, the recoverable amount exceeds the carrying value of the
CGUs as at 31 December 2025 and therefore no impairment is required (31 December 2024: nil).
Methodology
The recoverable amount is determined as the higher of the fair value less costs of disposal and Value in Use (VIU).
The VIU calculation is based on a Dividend Discount model using three-year management-approved plans,
updated for expected changes in the macroeconomic environment. When estimating the VIU of a CGU, local
conditions and requirements determine the capital requirements, discount rates, and terminal growth rates. These
local conditions and requirements determine the ability to upstream excess capital and profits to ING Bank. The
discount rate calculation includes other inputs such as equity market premium, country risk premium, and long-
term inflation which are based on market sources and management’s judgement. The long-term growth rate is
based on the long-term inflation rate obtained from market sources. The impacts of climate risk are included to
the extent that they are observable in discount rates and assets prices.
Sensitivity of key assumptions
Key assumptions in the goodwill impairment test model are the projected locally available cash flows (based on
local capital requirements and projected profits), discount rates (cost of equity), and long-term growth rates.
The recoverable amounts of the CGUs are sensitive to the above key assumptions. A decrease in the available cash
flows of 10%, an increase in the discount rate of 1 percent point or a reduction of the future growth rate to zero
are considered reasonably possible changes in key assumptions. If the aforementioned changes occur to one of
the above key assumptions holding the other key assumptions constant, goodwill of the remaining CGUs will
continue to be recoverable.
Software
Software includes internally developed software amounting to EUR 956 million (2024: EUR 768 million). Software
capitalisation amounts increased in 2025 following the significant IT-platform investments in our Retail business.
Software is reviewed for indicators of impairment. Irrespective of whether there is an indication of impairment,
software under development is tested annually for impairment.
11  Other assets
Other assets by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Assets held for sale
164
0
Net defined benefit assets
528
568
Investment properties
27
19
Property development and obtained from foreclosures
17
18
Prepayments
827
412
Accrued assets
477
496
Amounts to be settled
4,074
3,548
Other
1,850
1,875
7,965
6,935
Disclosures in respect of Net defined benefit assets are provided in Note 30 'Pensions and other post-employment
benefits'.
Amounts to be settled include primarily transactions not settled at the balance sheet date. The nature of these
transactions is short term and they are expected to settle shortly after the closing date of the balance sheet. Other
relates to various receivables in the normal course of business, including short-term receivables from mortgages
issued to notary accounts pending transfer to customers and other amounts receivable from customers.
12  Deposits from banks
Deposits from banks by type
Netherlands
Rest of the world
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Non-interest bearing
2
4
115
166
117
170
Interest bearing
6,443
5,845
11,962
10,707
18,404
16,553
6,444
5,849
12,077
10,873
18,521
16,722
Deposits from banks includes non-subordinated deposits and, to a lesser extent, repurchase transactions. For more
information on reverse repurchase transactions, refer to Note 4 'Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss' .
13  Customer deposits
Customer deposits
in EUR million
2025
2024
Current accounts / Overnight deposits
239,106
227,951
Savings accounts
382,066
354,560
Time deposits
101,767
115,636
Other
1,768
1,579
724,707
699,725
Current accounts / Overnight deposits, Savings accounts and Time deposits include balances with individuals,
respectively EUR 113,580 million (2024: EUR 107,068 million ), EUR 347,234 million (2024: EUR 324,134 million) and
EUR 50,033 million (2024: EUR 56,599 million ).
Customer deposits by type
Netherlands
Rest of the world
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Non-interest bearing
3
26
30,036
27,142
30,039
27,168
Interest bearing 1
249,480
245,375
445,187
427,182
694,667
672,557
249,484
245,401
475,223
454,324
724,707
699,725
1Interest bearing includes current accounts which are not remunerated. However, ING holds the contractual right to revise the rates.
     
In 2025, Customer deposits includes EUR 3,340 million (31 December 2024: EUR 8,064 million) from ING Group in
time deposits and current accounts.
14  Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
in EUR million
2025
2024
Trading liabilities
23,427
35,255
Non-trading derivatives
1,338
2,101
Designated at fair value through profit or loss
55,764
49,539
80,529
86,896
Trading liabilities
Trading liabilities by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Equity securities
682
467
Debt securities
1,872
3,185
Funds on deposit
191
5,437
Derivatives
20,681
26,166
23,427
35,255
Non-trading derivatives
Non-trading derivatives by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Derivatives used in:
-  fair value hedges
54
79
-  cash flow hedges
254
573
-  hedges of net investments in foreign operations
74
117
Other non-trading derivatives
957
1,332
1,338
2,101
Reference is made to Note 34 'Derivatives and hedge accounting' for information on derivatives used for hedge
accounting.
Other non-trading derivatives mainly include interest-rate swaps, foreign-exchange swaps and cross-currency
swaps for which no hedge accounting is applied.
Designated at fair value through profit or loss
Designated at fair value through profit or loss by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Debt securities
8,202
9,326
Funds entrusted
47,431
40,092
Subordinated liabilities
131
122
55,764
49,539
As at 31 December 2025, the change in the fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit
or loss attributable to changes in credit risk is EUR 57 million on a cumulative basis (2024: EUR  17 million ). This
change has been determined as the amount of change in fair value of the financial liability that is not attributable
to changes in market conditions that gave rise to market risk (i.e. mainly interest-rate risk based on yield curves).
The amount that ING Bank is contractually required to pay at maturity to the holders of financial liabilities
designated at fair value through profit or loss excluding repurchase agreements (part of funds entrusted) is EUR
9,574 million ( 2024: EUR 11,376 million ).
Funds entrusted include mainly repurchase agreements. For more information on repurchase transactions refer to
Note 4 'Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss'.
15  Provisions
Provisions by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Reorganisation provisions
333
201
Litigation provisions
362
288
Other provisions
78
118
773
606
Loan loss provisions for guarantees and loan commitments
140
146
913
752
For details and changes on loan loss provisioning for guarantees and loan commitments, refer to ‘Risk
management – Credit risk’ paragraph 'Loan loss provisioning'.
Changes in provisions
Reorganisation
Litigation
Other provisions
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
201
231
288
193
118
334
606
758
Additions 1
295
146
128
116
35
26
457
288
Releases 1
-6
-4
-9
-15
-13
-46
-28
-64
Utilised
-146
-163
-45
-31
-58
-196
-248
-390
Exchange rate differences
-5
1
1
-1
-1
-5
Other changes
-5
-10
-2
25
-3
-10
15
Closing balance
333
201
362
288
78
118
773
606
1Additions to provisions and unused amounts released are presented in Note 27 'Other operating expenses' in the Statement of Profit 
or Loss.
As at 31 December 2025 , amounts expected to be settled within 12 months in provisions amount to EUR 666
million (2024: EUR 552 million). The amounts included are based on best estimates with regard to amounts and
timing of cash flows required to settle the obligation.
Reorganisation provisions
Reorganisation initiatives are implemented over a period of several years and the estimate of the reorganisation
provisions is inherently uncertain.
Litigation provisions
Furthermore, we refer to Note 40 'Legal proceedings' for any contingent liabilities in respect of legal proceedings.
Other provisions
In 2024, the utilisations in the Other provisions mainly relate to the provision for the compensation of Dutch retail
customers for past interest charges that did not sufficiently track market rates.
16  Other liabilities
Other liabilities by type
In EUR million
2025
2024
Net defined benefit liability
141
152
Other post-employment benefits
42
38
Other staff-related liabilities
798
784
Other taxation and social security contributions
837
899
Rents received in advance
15
14
Costs payable
2,021
1,763
Amounts to be settled
4,188
4,290
Lease liabilities
1,050
1,116
Other
1,665
1,538
10,755
10,596
Disclosures in respect of Net defined benefit liabilities are provided in Note 30 'Pensions and other post-
employment benefits'. Other staff-related liabilities comprise provisions for vacation leave, jubilee, disability and
illness, as well as liabilities for variable compensations.
Lease liabilities relate to right-of-use assets. Disclosures regarding right-of-use assets are provided in Note 9
'Property and equipment'. The total cash outflow for leases in 2025 was EUR 282 million (2024: EUR 290 million).
Amounts to be settled include primarily transactions not settled at the balance sheet date. The nature of these
transactions is short term and have settled after the closing date of the balance sheet. The line Other relates
mainly to amounts payable to suppliers.
17  Debt securities in issue
Debt securities in issue relate to debentures and other issued debt securities with either fixed interest rates or
interest rates based on floating interest rate levels, such as certificates of deposit and accepted bills issued by ING
Bank, except for subordinated items. Debt securities in issue do not include debt securities presented as Financial
liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. ING Bank does not have debt securities that are issued on terms other
than those available in the normal course of business.
Debt securities in issue – maturities
In EUR million
2025
2024
Fixed rate debt securities
Within 1 year
30,850
26,358
More than 1 year but less than 2 years
4,401
5,718
More than 2 years but less than 3 years
6,851
4,429
More than 3 years but less than 4 years
6,081
5,907
More than 4 years but less than 5 years
5,463
6,105
More than 5 years
12,393
12,335
Total fixed rate debt securities
66,039
60,851
Floating rate debt securities
Within 1 year
28,774
26,262
More than 1 year but less than 2 years
1,004
2,343
More than 2 years but less than 3 years
830
1,080
More than 3 years but less than 4 years
1,056
117
More than 4 years but less than 5 years
913
902
More than 5 years
4,501
2,903
Total floating rate debt securities
37,077
33,607
Total debt securities
103,116
94,459
Reference is made to the Consolidated statement of cash flows for more information on issuances, redemptions
and non-cash movements.
18  Senior non-preferred debt
Senior non-preferred debt
In EUR million
2025
2024
Senior non-preferred debt
48,090
49,393
48,090
49,393
Senior non-preferred debt is lent on by ING Groep N.V. to ING Bank N.V. In the event of bankruptcy, such senior
non-preferred debt ranks senior to subordinated liabilities but junior to any other liabilities of ING Bank N.V.
19  Subordinated loans
Subordinated loans
In EUR million
2025
2024
Subordinated loans
18,100
17,879
18,100
17,879
Subordinated loans are bonds issued by ING Groep N.V. and its subsidiaries to raise Tier 1 and Tier 2 (CRR-  eligible)
capital. Under IFRS these securities are classified as liabilities and for regulatory purposes, they are considered as
capital. Subordinated loans of EUR 18,299 million (2024: EUR 18,403 million) have been placed with ING Bank N.V.
by ING Groep N.V.
In 2025 ING Groep N.V. issued EUR 1.25 billion 4.13% Fixed Rate Subordinated Green Tier 2 Notes in May, EUR 1.25
billion 3.88% Fixed Rate Subordinated Tier 2 Notes in August and USD 1.50 billion 7.00% Perpetual AT1 Contingent
Convertible Capital Securities in September.
In 2025 ING Groep N.V. redeemed EUR 750 million 2.00% Fixed Subordinated Tier 2 notes in March, USD 1.25 billion
6.50% Perpetual AT1 Contingent Convertible Capital Securities in April and EUR 1 billion 1.00% Fixed Subordinated
Tier 2 notes in November.
Reference is made to the Consolidated statement of cash flows for further information on issuances and
redemptions.
20  Equity
Total equity
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Share capital and share premium
            -  Share capital
525
525
525
            -  Share premium
16,542
16,542
16,542
17,067
17,067
17,067
Other reserves
            -  Revaluation reserve: Equity securities at FVOCI
1,444
1,816
1,152
            -  Revaluation reserve: Debt instruments at FVOCI
-41
-479
-277
            -  Revaluation reserve: Cash flow hedge
-1,096
-1,693
-2,058
            -  Revaluation reserve: Credit liability
-49
-15
31
            -  Revaluation reserve: Property in own use
156
161
178
            -  Net defined benefit asset/liability remeasurement reserve
-345
-333
-317
            -  Currency translation reserve
-2,774
-1,986
-2,527
            -  Share of associates and joint ventures and other reserves
2,032
2,607
3,048
-675
78
-769
Retained earnings
31,352
25,598
23,893
Shareholders’ equity (parent)
47,744
42,743
40,191
Non-controlling interests
1,255
995
944
Total equity
48,999
43,738
41,135
Adjustments for hyperinflation
ING applies IAS 29 ‘Hyperinflation’ on its investment in Türkiye since 2022. The IAS 29 indexation impact on equity
was EUR 34 million (2024: EUR 50 million; 2023: EUR 54 million) of which EUR 123 million (2024: EUR 202 million;
2023: EUR 284 million) in the currency translation reserve, EUR 0 million ( 2024: EUR 4 million; 2023: EUR 3 million)
in revaluation reserves and EUR -89 million (2024: EUR -156 million; 2023: EUR -234 million) in profit or loss.
Share capital and share premium
Share capital
Ordinary shares (par value EUR 1.13)
Number x 1,000
Amount
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Authorised share capital
1,600,000
1,600,000
1,600,000
1,808
1,808
1,808
Unissued share capital
1,134,965
1,134,965
1,134,965
1,283
1,283
1,283
Issued share capital
465,035
465,035
465,035
525
525
525
No change occurred in the issued share capital and share premium in 2025, 2024 and 2023.
All ordinary shares are in registered form. No share certificates have been issued. Ordinary shares may be
transferred by means of a deed of transfer, subject to the approval of the general meeting of ING Bank. The par
value of ordinary shares is EUR 1.13.
The authorised ordinary share capital of ING Bank N.V. consists of 1,600 million shares of which as at 31 December
2025, 465 million ordinary shares were issued and fully paid.
ING Bank has 50 authorised preference shares with par value of EUR 1.13 per preference share. As at 31 December
2025, 7 preference shares were issued and fully paid (2024: 7 preference shares; 2023: 7 preference shares)
amounting to EUR 8 (2024: EUR 8 and 2023: EUR 8).
Revaluation reserves
Changes in revaluation reserve: Equity securities and Debt instruments at FVOCI
Equity securities at FVOCI
Debt instruments at FVOCI
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance
1,816
1,152
1,187
-479
-277
-339
Unrealised revaluations
-366
664
-35
459
-265
53
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement
of profit or loss
-21
62
9
Realised revaluations transferred to retained
earnings
-6
0
1
Closing balance
1,444
1,816
1,152
-41
-479
-277
Equity securities at FVOCI
In 2025, the unrealised revaluation of EUR -366 million (2024: EUR 664 million; 2023: EUR -35 million) includes
revaluation of shares in Bank of Beijing for EUR -403 million (2024: EUR 652 million; 2023: EUR -24 million).
Changes in cash flow hedge and credit liability reserve
Cash flow hedge
Credit liability
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance
-1,693
-2,058
-3,055
-15
31
70
Changes in credit liability reserve
-34
-46
-39
Unrealised revaluations
597
365
997
Closing balance
-1,096
-1,693
-2,058
-49
-15
31
Cash flow hedge
The increase in the cash flow hedge reserve, primarily related to floating rate lending with interest rate swaps, in
2025 (EUR 597 million) reflects the impact of changes in interest rates, pull-to-par effect and amortisation of de-
designated hedges. Reference is made to Note 34 'Derivatives and hedge accounting'.
Changes in Property in own use reserve
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance
161
178
176
Unrealised revaluations
7
3
10
Realised revaluations transferred to retained earnings
-12
-20
-8
Closing balance
156
161
178
Net defined benefit asset/liability remeasurement reserve
Reference is made to Note 31 'Pensions and other post-employment benefits'.
Currency translation reserve
Changes in currency translation reserve
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance
-1,986
-2,527
-2,395
Unrealised revaluations
637
-222
183
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement of profit or loss
1
Exchange rate differences
-1,425
763
-316
Closing balance
-2,774
-1,986
-2,527
Unrealised revaluations relates to changes in the value of hedging instruments that are designated as net
investment hedges. The hedging strategy is to protect the CET1 ratio against adverse impact from exchange rate
fluctuations. The net decrease of unrealised revaluations and Exchange rate differences of EUR -788 million is
related to several currencies including USD (EUR -664 million), TRY (EUR -21 million including EUR 123 million IAS 29
indexation effect), GBP (EUR -64 million), PLN (EUR 29  million), UAH (EUR -16 million), AUD (EUR -69 million), RUB
(EUR 87 million), THB (EUR -19 million), RON (EUR -13 million) and other currencies (EUR -39 million).
Share of associates and joint ventures and other reserves
Changes in share of associates, joint ventures and other reserves
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance
2,607
3,048
3,604
Result for the year
14
125
336
Transfer to/from retained earnings
-590
-565
-892
Closing balance
2,032
2,607
3,048
The Share of associates, joint ventures and other reserves includes non-distributable profits from associates and
joint ventures of EUR 963 million (2024: EUR 940 million; 2023: EUR 815 million). Other reserves includes a
statutory reserve of EUR 108 million (2024: EUR 897 million; 2023: EUR 1,602 million) related to the former
Stichting Regio Bank and the former Stichting Vakbondsspaarbank SPN and a legal reserve of EUR 956 million
(2024: EUR 768 million; 2023: EUR 628 million) related to internally developed software. The transfer to retained
earnings of EUR -590 million includes the release of the Regio bank and Vakbondsspaarbank SPN reserve of EUR
-802 million (2024: EUR -830 million; 2023: EUR -998 million) against regulatory expenses which are recognised in
the statement of profit or loss.
Retained earnings
Changes in retained earnings
In EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance
25,598
23,893
26,462
Impact on opening balance 1
-45
Transfer to/from other reserves
616
585
899
Result for the year
6,212
6,062
6,821
Dividend and other cash distributions
-1,129
-4,986
-10,269
Employee share plans
52
45
30
Changes in composition of the group and other changes
3
-1
-5
Closing balance
31,352
25,598
23,893
12023: Changes in policy following the adoption of IFRS 17 and change in policy for non-financial guarantees.
Restrictions with respect to dividend and repayment of capital
ING Bank N.V. is subject to legal restrictions regarding the amount of dividends it can pay to its shareholder.
Pursuant to the Dutch Civil Code, dividends can only be paid up to an amount equal to the excess of the
company’s own funds over the sum of the paid-up capital and reserves required by law. Moreover, ING Bank N.V.’s
ability to pay dividends is dependent on the dividend payment ability of its subsidiaries, associates and joint
ventures. ING Bank N.V. is legally required to create a non-distributable reserve insofar as profits of its subsidiaries,
associates and joint ventures are subject to dividend payment restrictions which apply to those subsidiaries,
associates and joint ventures themselves.
The following equity components cannot be freely distributed: Revaluation reserves, Net defined benefit asset/
liability remeasurement reserve, Currency translation reserve, Share of associates and joint ventures reserve and
Other reserves including the part related to the former Stichting Regio Bank and the former Stichting
Vakbondsspaarbank SPN.
Non distributable reserves, determined in accordance with the financial reporting requirements included in Part 9
of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, from ING Bank’s subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounts to EUR 6,225
million (2024: EUR 5,672 million).
Furthermore there are restrictions to the ability of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures to distribute reserves
to ING Bank N.V. as a result of minimum capital requirements that are imposed by industry regulators in the
countries in which the subsidiaries operate.
In addition to the legal and regulatory restrictions on distributing dividends from subsidiaries, associates and joint
ventures to ING Bank N.V. there are various other considerations and limitations that are taken into account in
determining the appropriate levels of equity in the Bank’s subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. These
considerations and limitations include, but are not restricted to, minimum capital requirements that are imposed
by industry regulators in the countries in which the subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures operate, or other
limitations which may exist in certain countries and may or may not be temporary in nature. It is not possible to
disclose a reliable quantification of these limitations.  Refer to Note 44 'Capital management' for an overview of
the minimal capital requirements of ING Bank.
Without prejudice to the authority of the Executive Board to allocate profits to reserves and to the fact that the
shares are the most junior securities issued by ING Bank N.V., no specific dividend payment restrictions with
respect to the shares exist.
Furthermore, ING Bank N.V. is subject to legal restrictions with respect to repayment of capital to Its shareholder.
Pursuant to the Dutch Civil Code, capital may only be repaid if none of ING Bank N.V.’s creditors opposes such a
repayment within two months following the announcement of a resolution to that effect.
Notes to the Consolidated statement of profit or loss
21  Net interest income
Net interest income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Interest income on loans1
30,683
33,892
31,850
Interest expense on deposits2
14,658
16,849
13,282
Interest income on debt securities at amortised cost
1,333
1,204
877
Interest expense on debt securities in issue
3,427
3,796
2,856
Interest income on financial assets at fair value through OCI
1,790
1,481
1,078
Interest expense on subordinated loans
813
752
707
Interest income on non-trading derivatives (hedge accounting)
9,676
12,644
10,682
Interest expense on non-trading derivatives (hedge accounting)
10,957
13,767
11,849
Total interest income using effective interest rate method
43,481
49,221
44,486
Total interest expense using effective interest rate method
29,855
35,164
28,693
Interest income on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
5,401
6,343
4,934
Interest expense on financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
4,419
5,479
4,410
Interest income on non-trading derivatives (no hedge accounting)
2,044
3,168
2,637
Interest expense on non-trading derivatives (no hedge accounting)
2,059
3,308
3,131
Interest income other
123
173
171
Interest expense on lease liabilities
27
27
28
Total other interest income
7,568
9,685
7,741
Interest expense other
147
178
157
Total other interest expense
6,652
8,993
7,726
Total interest income
51,049
58,905
52,228
Total interest expense
36,507
44,157
36,419
Net interest income
14,542
14,749
15,809
1Includes interest income on loans to customers and banks, cash balances as well as negative interest on liabilities. Negative interest on liabilities amounted to EUR 11 million (2024: EUR 8 million; 2023: EUR 19 million).
2Includes interest paid on deposits from customers and banks, senior non-preferred debt and negative interest on assets. Negative interest on assets amounted to EUR 12 million (2024: EUR 1 million; 2023: nil).
For 2024 Interest expense on deposits includes interest paid under the TLTRO III programme of EUR 59 million (2023: EUR 557 million).
The funding under this programme was fully repaid during the first quarter of 2024.
22  Net fee and commission income
Net fee and commission income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Fee and commission income
Payment Services
2,478
2,219
2,062
Securities business
922
734
584
Insurance and other broking
650
594
529
Portfolio management
796
699
625
Lending business
727
650
602
Financial guarantees and other commitments
461
454
459
Other fee and commission income
259
249
239
Total fee and commission income
6,292
5,598
5,100
Fee and commission expenses
Payment Services
858
756
704
Securities business
170
147
129
Distribution of products
457
475
480
Other fee and commission expenses
210
218
202
Total fee and commission expenses
1,695
1,596
1,514
Net fee and commission income
4,597
4,002
3,586
Payment services fees are earned for providing services for deposit accounts and cards, cash management and
transaction processing including interchange. Securities fees and commissions are fees for securities brokerage
and securities underwriting. Portfolio management fees include fees earned for asset management activities,
fiduciary and related activities in which ING holds or invests assets on behalf of its customers. Fees and
commissions from lending (syndication) business include income earned for lending advisory, origination,
underwriting and loan commitments which are not part of the effective interest rate. Financial guarantees and
other commitments fees and commissions are earned from bank guarantees, letters of credit and other trade
finance related products, factoring and leasing. Fees paid for distribution of products are all fees paid for the
distribution of ING’s products and services through external providers.
Reference is made to Note 28 'Segments' which includes net fee and commission income, as reported to the
Management Board Banking, disaggregated by segment.
23  Valuation results and net trading income
Valuation results and net trading income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Securities trading results
4,801
996
873
Derivatives trading results
-3,053
207
116
Other trading results
263
336
273
Change in fair value of derivatives relating to
–  fair value hedges
3,481
-766
-3,028
–  cash flow hedges (ineffective portion)
10
35
48
–  other non-trading derivatives
-819
1,923
563
Change in fair value of assets and liabilities (hedged items)
-3,445
750
2,962
Valuation results on assets and liabilities designated at FVPL (excluding trading)
8
31
-127
Foreign exchange transactions results
2,176
-105
1,230
3,422
3,407
2,910
In general, the fair value movements are influenced by changes in the market conditions, such as stock prices,
credit spreads, interest rates and currency exchange rates.
Net trading income relates to trading assets and trading liabilities which include assets and liabilities that are
classified under IFRS as Trading but are closely related to servicing the needs of the clients of ING. ING offers
products that are traded on the financial markets to institutional clients, corporate clients, and governments. ING’s
trading books are managed based on internal limits and comprise a mix of products whose results may neutralise
one another. A significant part of the derivatives in the trading portfolio are related to servicing corporate clients in
their risk management to hedge for example currency or interest rate exposures. From a risk perspective, the
gross amount of trading assets must be considered together with the gross amount of trading liabilities, which are
presented separately on the statement of financial position. However, IFRS does not always allow the netting of
these positions in the statement of financial position. Reference is made to Note 4 'Financial assets at fair value
through profit or loss' and Note 14 'Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss' for information on trading
assets and trading liabilities respectively.
Securities trading results include the results of market making in instruments such as government securities,
equity securities, corporate debt securities, and money-market instruments. The majority of the risks involved in
security and currency trading are economically hedged with derivatives. The securities trading results are partly
offset by results on these derivatives. Derivatives trading results include the results of derivatives such as interest
rate swaps, options, futures, and forward contracts. Trading gains and losses relating to trading securities still held
as at 31 December 2025 amount to EUR 1,219 million (2024: EUR 20 million; 2023: EUR 160 million).
Other trading results include the results of trading loans and funds entrusted.
Foreign-exchange transactions results include gains and losses from spot, options, futures, and translated foreign
currency assets and liabilities. The result on currency trading is included in foreign exchange transactions results.
Valuation results and net trading income include the fair value movements on derivatives (used for both hedge
accounting and economically hedging exposures) as well as the changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities
included in hedging relationships as hedged items. In 2025, fluctuations in interest rate had a significant impact on
the fair value changes of both the derivatives and the hedged items designated in fair value hedges. Reference is
made to Note 34 'Derivatives and hedge accounting' for information on derivatives used for hedge accounting.
Furthermore, derivatives trading results are also impacted by fair value movements arising from changes in credit
spreads (CVA and DVA), bid offer spreads, model risk and incremental cost of funding on derivatives (FVA and
CollVA). Refer to Note 33 'Fair value of assets and liabilities' for information on these valuation adjustments.
24  Investment income
Investment income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Dividend income
116
117
105
Realised gains/losses on disposal of debt instruments measured at FVOCI
28
-104
-11
Other investment income
-15
129
13
95
Dividend income mainly consists of dividend received from ING’s equity stake in Bank of Beijing.
25  Other net income
Other net income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Net monetary loss reflecting IAS 29 hyperinflation impact
-84
-159
-244
Income related to a prior insolvency of a financial institution in the Netherlands
16
53
Sale of the remaining NNHB mortgages
21
Other
71
82
98
3
-3
-146
The net monetary loss, reflecting the IAS 29 hyperinflation impact, is fully related to the indexation of ING Türkiye's
statement of financial position and statement of profit or loss with an offsetting effect in the currency translation
reserve.
26  Staff expenses
Staff expenses
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Salaries
5,277
4,906
4,559
Pension costs and other staff-related benefit costs
488
455
418
Social security costs
752
690
635
Share-based compensation arrangements
52
45
30
External employees
662
720
776
Education
56
49
50
Other staff costs
313
319
256
7,600
7,184
6,725
Share-based compensation arrangements include EUR 52 million (2024: EUR 45 million; 2023: EUR 30 million)
relating to equity-settled share-based payment arrangements. 
Number of employees
Netherlands
Rest of the world
Total
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Total average number of
internal employees at full time
equivalent basis
15,280
14,821
14,449
47,490
46,301
44,985
62,770
61,121
59,434
Remuneration of senior management, Management Board Banking and Supervisory Board
Reference is made to Note 43 'Related parties' .
Share plans
ING grants various types of share awards, namely deferred and upfront shares, which form part of the variable
remuneration offering via the Long-term Sustainable Performance Plan (LSPP). The entitlement to the LSPP share
awards is granted conditionally. If the participant remains in employment for an uninterrupted period between the
grant date and the vesting date, the entitlement becomes unconditional, with the exception of the upfront shares
which are immediately vested upon grant. Upfront and deferred shares awarded to the Management Board
members of ING Bank as well as identified staff, have a retention obligation that must be adhered to upon vesting,
typically a minimum retention of 12 months applies for staff and up to 60 months for Board. ING has the authority
to apply a holdback to awarded but unvested shares and a clawback to vested shares.
The share awards granted in 2025 relate to the performance year 2024. In 2025, 145,472 share awards (2024:
180,994; 2023: 224,796) were granted to the members of the Management Board Banking. To senior management
and other employees 3,876,388 share awards (2024: 4,248,400; 2023: 3,244,951) were granted.
Changes in share awards
Share awards (in numbers)
Weighted average grant date fair values
(in euros)
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Opening balance as at 1 January
4,853,529
3,895,787
3,697,542
10.88
8.81
7.97
Granted
4,021,860
4,429,394
3,469,747
17.57
13.75
9.71
Vested
-3,448,317
-3,343,429
-3,113,115
14.67
12.29
8.83
Forfeited
-138,970
-128,223
-158,387
13.99
10.73
8.54
Closing balance
5,288,102
4,853,529
3,895,787
13.44
10.88
8.81
The fair value of share awards granted is recognised as an expense under Staff expenses and is allocated over the
vesting period of the share awards. The fair value calculation takes into account the current share prices, expected
volatilities and the dividend yield of ING shares.
As at 31 December 2025, total unrecognised compensation costs related to share awards amount to EUR 33
million (2024: EUR 25 million; 2023: EUR 15 million). These costs are expected to be recognised over a weighted
average period of 2.0 years ( 2024: 2.0 years; 2023: 2.0 years).
27  Other operating expenses
Other operating expenses
in EUR million
2025
2024 1
2023 1
Promotional and clients acquisition costs
443
441
369
IT related expenses (excluding outsourcing and subcontracting)
768
694
653
Outsourcing and subcontracting
697
664
579
Facilities
271
277
289
Market data services
153
136
120
Advisory fees
292
315
294
Audit and supervisory fees
142
142
123
Indirect taxes
208
235
107
Regulatory costs
866
882
1,042
Depreciation and impairment of property and equipment 9
451
475
493
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets 10
230
228
218
Additions and releases of provisions 15
322
219
243
Other
132
224
308
4,976
4,931
4,838
1ING changed the presentation of Other operating expenses as of 2025. The comparative figures for 2024 and 2023 have been updated accordingly. The
reclassifications do not affect the total amount of Other operating expenses.
Reference is made to Note 9 'Property and equipment' for (reversals of) impairments of property and equipment
and Note 10 'Intangible assets' for (reversals of) impairments of intangible assets. For more information on
addition to (unused amounts reversed of) provision for reorganisations refer to Note 15 'Provisions' and for more
information on addition to (unused amounts reversed of) other provisions refer to Note 15 'Provisions' and Note 40
'Legal proceedings'.
Regulatory costs
Regulatory costs represent contributions to the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS), the Single Resolution Fund
(SRF), local bank taxes and local resolution funds. Included in Regulatory costs for 2025 , are contributions to DGS of
EUR 167 million (2024 : EUR 230 million; 2023: EUR 320 million) mainly related to Belgium, Poland, Germany and
the Netherlands and contributions to the SRF and local resolution funds of EUR 41 million (2024: EUR 35 million;
2023: EUR 251 million). In 2025 local bank taxes increased by EUR 41 million from EUR 617 million in 2024 to EUR
657 million (2023 : EUR 472 million).
Audit and non-audit services
Audit and non-audit services include fees for services provided by the Bank’s auditors and increases are due to
one-off additional audit procedures and inflation.
Segment reporting
28  Segments
ING Bank’s segments are based on the internal reporting structure by lines of business.
The Management Board Banking of ING Bank (Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM)) set the performance
targets, approve and monitor the budgets prepared by the business lines. Business lines formulate strategic,
commercial, and financial plans in conformity with the strategy and performance targets set by the CODM.
Recognition and measurement of segment results are in line with the accounting policies as described in Note 1
'Basis of preparation and material accounting policy information'. The results for the period for each reportable
segment are after intercompany and intersegment eliminations and are those reviewed by the CODM to assess
performance of the segments. Corporate expenses are allocated to business lines based on time spent by head
office personnel, the relative number of staff, or on the basis of income, expenses and/or assets of the segment.
Interest income per segment is reported as net interest income because management relies primarily on net
(rather than gross) interest revenue to assess the performance of the segments.
The following table specifies the segments by line of business and the main sources of income of each of the
segments:
Specification of the main sources of income of each of the segments by line of business
Segments by line of business
Main source of income
Retail Netherlands
Income from products and services provided to private individuals, business
banking clients and private banking clients in the Netherlands. The main products
and services offered are daily banking, lending, savings, investments and
insurance.
Retail Belgium
Income from products and services provided to private individuals, business
banking clients and private banking clients in Belgium and Luxembourg. The main
products and services offered are similar to those in the Netherlands.
Retail Germany
Income from products and services provided to private individuals, business
banking clients and private banking clients in Germany. The main products and
services offered are similar to those in the Netherlands.
Retail Other
Income from products and services provided to private individuals, business
banking clients and private banking clients in the other retail countries. The main
products and services offered are similar to those in the Netherlands.
Wholesale Banking
Income from wholesale banking activities of which the main products are:
lending, payments & cash management, working capital solutions, trade finance,
financial markets, corporate finance and treasury.
Specification of geographical split of the segments
Geographical split of the segments
Main countries
The Netherlands
Belgium
Including Luxembourg
Germany
Other Challengers
Australia, Italy, Spain and Portugal
Growth Markets
Poland, Romania and Türkiye
Wholesale Banking Rest of World
Other countries in Europe & Middle East, Americas, Asia
Other
Corporate Line
ING Bank monitors and evaluates the performance of ING Bank at a consolidated level and by segment. The
Management Board Banking consider this to be relevant to an understanding of the Bank’s financial performance,
because it allows investors to understand the primary method used by management to evaluate the Bank’s
operating performance and make decisions about allocating resources.
ING Bank reconciles the total segment results to the total result using Corporate Line. The Corporate Line includes
capital management activities, as ING Bank applies a system of capital charging for its banking operations in order
to create a comparable basis for the results of business units globally, irrespective of the business units’ book
equity and the currency they operate in.
Corporate Line also includes certain other income and expenses that are not allocated to the banking businesses,
such as our investments in Bank of Beijing and TMBThanachart Bank (Asian stakes) as well as our stake in Van
Lanschot Kempen (which in 2025 was increased to 20.3%). Furthermore, as from 2022, results in the Corporate
Line have been impacted by the application of hyperinflation accounting in the consolidation of our subsidiary in
Türkiye (IAS 29).
Total income within the Corporate Line increased to EUR 340 million, up from EUR 97 million in the previous year.
This growth was driven by higher income from foreign currency ratio hedging (up EUR 70 million year-on-year),
increased results from our financial stakes (EUR +49 million, including a favourable revaluation of the derivative
related to the forward purchase of a stake in Van Lanschot Kempen), and a diminished impact from IAS 29
(reflecting lower inflation in Türkiye). In both years, results also included a receivable related to the prior insolvency
of a financial institution in the Netherlands: EUR 16 million in 2025 and EUR 53 million in 2024.
Operating expenses for the Corporate Line decreased to EUR 505 million, compared with EUR 528 million in 2024.
The 2025 figure comprised a hyperinflation impact of EUR 12 million and EUR 73 million in restructuring costs. In
2024, expenses included a EUR 35 million hyperinflation impact, EUR 25 million in restructuring costs, a EUR 22
million one-off CLA-related payment to staff in the Netherlands, and a EUR 21 million litigation provision. Expenses
excluding the aforementioned items declined year-on-year due to a higher VAT refund.
The information presented in this note is in line with the information presented to the Management Board Banking
of ING Bank.
This note does not provide information on the types of products and services from which each reportable segment
derives its revenues, as this is not reported internally.
Segments
12 month period
2025
2024
2023
in EUR million
Retail
Nether-
lands
Retail
Belgium
Retail
Germany
Retail
Other
Wholesale
Banking
Corporate
Line
Total
Retail
Nether-
lands
Retail
Belgium
Retail
Germany
Retail
Other
Wholesale
Banking
Corporate
Line
Total
Retail
Nether-
lands
Retail
Belgium
Retail
Germany
Retail
Other
Wholesale
Banking
Corporate
Line
Total
Income
Net interest income
3,115
1,786
2,457
3,892
2,997
295
14,542
3,027
1,959
2,647
3,817
3,259
40
14,749
3,096
2,063
2,862
3,437
4,028
323
15,809
Net fee and
commission income
1,128
692
632
717
1,433
-4
4,597
1,049
603
433
609
1,317
-9
4,002
959
502
357
519
1,259
-10
3,586
Total investment and
other income
726
197
-98
299
2,579
49
3,752
835
189
-173
263
2,405
65
3,584
945
117
-67
277
1,771
-37
3,006
– of which share of
result from associates
and joint ventures
-8
119
11
-56
133
200
81
8
-36
118
170
7
31
107
144
– of which
revaluations and
trading income
689
118
-112
257
2,571
-102
3,422
810
81
-160
253
2,478
-55
3,407
898
61
-57
264
1,730
13
2,910
Total income
4,968
2,674
2,991
4,908
7,009
340
22,891
4,910
2,751
2,906
4,688
6,981
97
22,334
5,001
2,683
3,152
4,233
7,057
275
22,401
Expenditure
Operating expenses
2,089
1,878
1,362
2,905
3,837
505
12,576
2,124
1,811
1,303
2,792
3,558
528
12,116
2,135
1,852
1,243
2,479
3,313
541
11,563
– of which Regulatory
costs
67
261
32
287
219
866
114
206
88
261
212
1
882
212
211
96
252
271
0
1,042
Addition to loan loss
provisions
107
153
171
323
549
1
1,304
-8
134
149
291
627
1
1,194
5
169
119
313
-92
5
520
Total expenses
2,196
2,031
1,533
3,228
4,386
506
13,879
2,117
1,944
1,452
3,083
4,185
528
13,310
2,140
2,022
1,362
2,792
3,222
546
12,083
Result before taxation
2,773
644
1,457
1,680
2,624
-166
9,012
2,793
807
1,455
1,605
2,796
-431
9,025
2,861
661
1,790
1,441
3,836
-270
10,318
Taxation
733
178
472
398
673
57
2,510
723
210
505
381
693
67
2,580
740
182
631
359
900
114
2,926
Non-controlling
interests
0
2
225
48
275
0
1
221
35
258
0
174
61
235
Net result1
2,040
466
983
1,058
1,902
-222
6,226
2,070
597
949
1,002
2,068
-499
6,187
2,121
479
1,159
908
2,875
-385
7,157
1Net result in the table above reflects the net result attributable to shareholders of the parent.
Geographical split of the segments
12 month period
2025
2024
2023
in EUR million
Nether-
lands
Belgium
Ger-
many
Other
Challen
gers
Growth
markets
Wholesale
Banking
Rest of
World
Other
Total
Nether-
lands
Belgium
Ger-
many
Other
Challen
gers
Growth
markets
Wholesale
Banking
Rest of
World
Other
Total
Nether-
lands
Belgium
Ger-
many
Other
Challen
gers
Growth
markets
Wholesale
Banking
Rest of
World
Other
Total
Income
Net interest income
2,925
2,277
2,936
2,099
2,526
1,487
292
14,542
3,063
2,478
3,182
2,131
2,409
1,448
37
14,749
3,773
2,712
3,375
2,121
1,961
1,548
320
15,809
Net fee and
commission income
1,387
948
698
397
513
660
-6
4,597
1,329
832
484
337
445
585
-9
4,002
1,239
715
400
285
384
573
-10
3,586
Total investment and
other income
2,079
198
-112
37
455
1,040
56
3,752
1,889
207
-188
27
408
1,167
73
3,584
1,627
145
-81
21
487
829
-24
3,006
– of which share of
result from
associates and joint
ventures
1
54
11
133
200
-45
87
8
120
170
31
7
107
144
– of which
revaluations and
trading income
2,072
137
-147
3
409
1,074
-127
3,422
1,916
119
-191
2
403
1,217
-59
3,407
1,568
95
-83
4
479
841
6
2,910
Total income
6,392
3,422
3,522
2,533
3,493
3,186
343
22,891
6,282
3,517
3,478
2,495
3,262
3,200
102
22,334
6,639
3,573
3,694
2,427
2,833
2,950
286
22,401
Expenditure
Operating expenses
3,067
2,260
1,587
1,468
1,922
1,766
507
12,576
3,026
2,170
1,512
1,454
1,759
1,669
526
12,116
3,065
2,195
1,437
1,320
1,495
1,509
543
11,563
– of which Regulatory
costs
112
285
33
36
320
80
866
159
228
90
61
260
83
1
882
296
243
103
92
207
101
0
1,042
Addition to loan loss
provisions
168
298
259
134
239
205
1
1,304
42
148
222
188
214
378
1
1,194
-111
139
35
166
189
96
5
520
Total expenses
3,235
2,558
1,846
1,602
2,161
1,970
508
13,879
3,068
2,319
1,734
1,642
1,973
2,047
526
13,310
2,954
2,334
1,472
1,486
1,683
1,605
548
12,083
Result before taxation
3,157
865
1,676
931
1,333
1,216
-165
9,012
3,213
1,198
1,744
853
1,289
1,153
-425
9,025
3,685
1,239
2,222
941
1,149
1,345
-263
10,318
Retail Banking
2,773
644
1,457
593
1,087
6,554
2,793
807
1,455
534
1,071
6,660
2,861
661
1,790
649
792
0
6,753
Wholesale Banking
384
221
219
338
246
1,216
2,624
420
391
289
319
218
1,153
7
2,796
824
577
432
292
357
1,345
8
3,836
Corporate Line
-166
-166
-431
-431
-270
-270
Result before taxation
3,157
865
1,676
931
1,333
1,216
-165
9,012
3,213
1,198
1,744
853
1,289
1,153
-425
9,025
3,685
1,239
2,222
941
1,149
1,345
-263
10,318
Taxation
833
236
543
292
263
287
57
2,510
847
308
563
272
256
267
66
2,580
909
349
723
282
225
335
104
2,926
Non-controlling
interests
0
2
273
275
0
1
256
258
0
234
235
Net result1
2,324
629
1,131
639
796
929
-222
6,226
2,367
889
1,179
581
777
886
-491
6,187
2,776
889
1,499
659
690
1,011
-367
7,157
1Net result in the table above reflects the net result attributable to shareholders of the parent.
29  Information on geographical areas
ING Bank’s business lines operate in different geographical areas: the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Rest of
Europe and Rest of the World. The geographical analyses are based on the location of the office from which the
transactions are originated and do not include countries where ING only has representation offices. The
Netherlands is ING Bank’s country of domicile.
In order to increase ING Bank’s tax transparency, additional financial information on a per country basis has been
included in this disclosure: Tax paid represents all income tax paid to and/or received from tax authorities in the
current year, irrespective of the fiscal year to which these payments or refunds relate. Total assets by country do
not include intercompany balances and reconcile to the total assets in the consolidated statement of financial
position of ING Bank.
ING Bank is subject to top-up tax (Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two)) in relation to its operations in
countries where the effective tax rate falls below 15%. This includes Switzerland, Ireland and Bulgaria as a result of
their lower nominal tax rates, as well as Singapore, where special local tax rates for certain types of income reduce
the effective tax rate.
ING Bank has applied a temporary mandatory relief from deferred tax accounting for the impacts of the top-up tax
and accounts for it as a current tax when it is incurred. The total top-up tax that is expected to be paid by ING Bank
per jurisdiction over 2025 amounts to EUR 5.8 million (2024: EUR 9.5 million).
Overview Top up tax to be paid per jurisdiction (EUR million)
Country
2025
2024
Singapore
3.0
6.5
Ireland
2.2
2.1
Bulgaria
0.3
0.6
Switzerland
0.3
0.3
5.8
9.5
The table below provides additional information, for the years 2025, 2024 and 2023 respectively, on names of
principal subsidiaries and branches, the nature of main activities and the average number of employees on a full
time equivalent basis by country/tax jurisdiction.
Additional information by country
Geographical
area
Country/Tax
jurisdiction
Name of principal
subsidiary
Main (banking)
activity
Average number of
employees at full-time
equivalent basis
Total income
Total assets
Result before tax
Taxation
Tax paid
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Netherlands
Netherlands
ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale /
Retail
15,280
14,821
14,449
5,434
4,618
5,370
302,740
300,167
292,868
1,444
833
1,651
475
371
514
297
589
601
Belgium
Belgium
ING België N.V.
Wholesale /
Retail
5,828
5,994
6,392
3,114
3,274
3,246
137,150
137,225
128,437
890
1,266
1,209
246
325
339
245
272
169
Luxembourg
ING Luxembourg S.A.
Wholesale /
Retail
865
887
939
405
492
608
14,104
13,942
14,392
114
215
349
28
54
89
113
116
40
Germany
Germany
ING DiBa A.G.
Wholesale /
Retail
5,673
5,460
5,499
3,733
3,848
3,931
182,899
172,828
168,991
1,887
2,119
2,467
588
686
807
549
663
904
Rest of Europe
Poland 1
ING Bank Slaski S.A
Wholesale /
Retail
11,130
11,575
11,677
2,798
2,620
2,350
61,344
56,090
52,134
1,411
1,313
1,236
310
280
286
241
231
136
Spain
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale /
Retail
1,748
1,692
1,576
1,208
1,230
1,165
38,559
35,912
33,083
553
555
541
182
176
128
170
185
114
Italy
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale /
Retail
1,335
1,235
1,190
522
514
438
20,313
16,448
14,836
116
120
133
41
38
55
13
16
19
Romania 1
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale /
Retail
4,514
4,282
3,971
778
749
690
14,151
12,937
11,496
364
401
396
63
67
61
69
76
55
Türkiye
ING Bank A.S.
Wholesale /
Retail
2,574
2,795
2,973
208
142
14
4,958
4,897
4,770
-73
-110
-232
3
18
-20
11
5
29
UK
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
762
741
722
782
811
758
63,746
59,615
50,572
385
249
510
88
52
131
55
70
101
Switzerland
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
305
300
292
214
228
248
9,641
9,086
8,501
90
104
137
14
16
19
14
29
52
France 2
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
209
194
194
244
241
252
7,780
7,819
8,322
115
4
122
37
4
33
7
9
7
Ireland
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
147
119
82
107
135
83
4,047
3,592
3,907
99
99
65
15
15
8
12
10
8
Czech Republic
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
124
122
134
75
77
76
3,561
3,382
3,191
27
37
33
6
8
6
8
4
10
Hungary
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
131
128
127
54
63
85
2,183
2,179
1,893
-2
6
35
3
3
7
2
9
9
Russia
ING Bank (Eurasia) Z.A.O.
Wholesale
239
236
259
186
139
136
1,086
764
925
157
99
151
38
19
31
35
21
20
Slovakia 1
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
1,605
1,489
1,347
19
22
20
686
612
618
3
8
11
1
3
2
2
4
2
Portugal
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
12
11
10
23
23
17
714
815
620
16
18
12
4
4
3
6
4
2
Ukraine
PJSC ING Bank Ukraine
Wholesale
94
92
91
38
45
53
567
651
590
24
29
44
6
14
22
10
25
7
Bulgaria
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
64
64
61
25
27
23
611
570
530
6
13
11
1
2
1
3
2
1
Austria
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
23
20
17
12
10
9
845
394
383
-1
-2
-4
0
0
-1
0
0
1
1Includes significant number of FTEs in relation to global services provided.
2Public subsidies received, as defined in article 89 of the CRD IV, amounts to EUR 0.0 million (2024: EUR 0.1 million; 2023: EUR 0.2 million).
Additional information by country (continued)
Geographical
area
Country/Tax
jurisdiction
Name of principal
subsidiary
Main (banking)
activity
Average number of
employees at full time
equivalent basis
Total income
Total assets
Result before tax
Taxation
Tax paid
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Rest of the
World
Australia
ING Bank (Australia) Ltd.
Wholesale /
Retail
2,050
1,994
1,820
971
994
1,033
55,976
53,895
52,734
485
460
572
150
142
174
174
195
185
USA
ING Financial Holdings
Corp.
Wholesale
714
659
603
1,262
1,277
1,124
61,483
65,197
66,143
598
759
654
160
195
185
161
175
183
Singapore
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
590
572
576
403
474
354
38,414
34,593
26,816
206
333
172
30
44
24
44
24
13
Japan
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
40
32
32
43
42
40
7,401
9,570
14,267
16
25
17
8
5
7
5
4
10
South Korea
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
89
86
86
84
86
92
8,343
8,050
6,167
34
32
39
8
7
9
-6
7
24
Hong Kong
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
100
100
104
70
76
101
3,469
3,512
4,378
18
24
-18
3
4
-2
0
0
0
Taiwan
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
38
37
37
34
27
39
6,054
3,507
2,597
16
4
0
6
1
1
1
3
0
China
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
80
78
78
25
29
18
1,129
1,935
998
-8
-5
-12
-3
-1
2
2
0
-9
Philippines 1
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
6,392
5,290
4,079
16
16
10
496
477
403
17
14
1
2
3
2
3
3
2
United Arab
Emirates
Branch of ING Bank N.V.
Wholesale
14
12
11
0
0
-2
1
1
1
0
0
-3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sri Lanka
Branch of ING Hubs B.V.
Global services
1
5
4
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Brazil
ING ADMINISTRAÇÃO
LTDA.
In run-off /
liquidation
0
0
2
4
4
18
55
63
73
3
3
17
1
25
0
1
1
4
Mexico
ING Consulting, S.A. de
C.V.
In run-off /
liquidation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Canada
Payvision Canada
Services Ltd.
Dissolved in
2023
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
62,770
61,121
59,434
22,891
22,334
22,401
1,054,507
1,020,724
975,636
9,012
9,025
10,318
2,510
2,580
2,926
2,250
2,753
2,700
1Includes significant number of FTEs in relation to global services provided.
2025
The higher tax charge of 33% in the Netherlands (compared to the statutory rate of 25.8%) was mainly caused by
the non-deductible Dutch bank tax (EUR 256 million) and other non-deductible expenses.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, ING has a policy in place to take on no new business with Russian clients. In
2025, we have further scaled down operations and continued actions to separate the business from ING’s
networks and systems, which resulted in additional workload for the local operation. On 28 January 2025, an
agreement was announced on the sale of our business in Russia to Global Development JSC. As of the date of this
report, and as announced in September 2025, the buyer has not received all necessary approvals yet. We continue
to work towards completing the transaction and our exit from the Russian market. As reported earlier, on
completion of the divestment we expect a negative P&L impact of around EUR 0.8 billion post tax and a negligible
impact on our CET1 ratio. The local income and result on a standalone basis over 2025 are driven by the high local
interest rate as most of the assets are deposited at the Russian central bank, supported by the appreciation of the
rouble against the euro. Under local law and banking regulations, ING Russia must accept rouble inflows and
deposits from existing clients. We are in discussion with regulators on the conflicting regulatory requirements in
various jurisdictions with respect to the activities of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC. For further information, reference is
made to Note 32 'Potential sale of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC'.
2024
The higher tax charge of 45% in the Netherlands (compared to the statutory rate of 25.8%) was mainly caused by
the non-deductible Dutch bank tax (EUR 246 million) and other non-deductible expenses.
The positive tax charge reported for ING Türkiye with respect to its loss was mainly caused by the non-deductibility
for tax purposes of the accounting loss based on hyperinflation accounting.
The high tax charge in Brazil was caused by tax corrections for prior periods in connection with the run-off of our
Brazilian operations.
2023
The higher tax charge of 31% in the Netherlands (compared to the statutory rate of 25.8%) was mainly caused by
the non-deductible Dutch bank tax (EUR 189 million) and other non-deductible expenses.
The lower tax charge in Spain was caused by a tax refund (EUR 43 million) regarding previous years.
ING continued reducing Russian-related exposure during 2023, the local results on a standalone basis were
positively impacted by releases of loan loss provisions following improved macroeconomic indicators and decrease
in exposures following sales and repayments.
The lower negative tax charge reported for ING Türkiye with respect to its loss was mainly caused by the non
deductibility for tax purposes of the accounting loss based on hyperinflation accounting.
Additional notes to the consolidated financial statements
30  Potential sale of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC
On 28 January 2025, ING announced the proposed sale of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC to Global Development JSC.
Completion of the transaction is subject to various regulatory approvals. This transaction will effectively end ING’s
activities in the Russian market. Under the terms of the agreement, Global Development JSC will acquire all shares
of ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC, taking over all Russian onshore activities and staff. Global Development JSC intends to
continue to serve customers in Russia under a new brand. As of the date of this report and as announced in
September 2025, the buyer has not received all necessary approvals yet. We continue working towards
completing the transaction and our exit from the Russian market. In the meantime, we are in discussion with
regulators on the conflicting regulatory requirements in various jurisdictions with respect to the activities of ING
Bank (Eurasia) JSC.
ING has taken on no new business with Russian companies, has scaled down operations and has taken actions to
separate the business from ING’s networks and systems. Until sales completion ING continues to direct the
relevant activities of ING Eurasia and, therefore, continues to control and to consolidate it.
Based on 31 December 2025 position, ING estimates a negative impact to the Result on disposal of Group
companies of EUR 0.8 billion post tax. This includes an estimated book loss of EUR 0.5 billion, representing the
expected difference between the sale price and the book value of the business. It also includes an estimated
negative impact of EUR 0.3 billion from recycling the currency translation adjustment net of the Net Investment
hedge reserve through P&L. These estimates are subject to change, depending on the position at the closing date.
Given the prevailing uncertainties around substantive regulatory approvals as at 31 December 2025, no book loss
was recognised in 2025 and assets and liabilities of the disposal group were not classified as held for sale.
Furthermore, recycling of the currency translation reserve and the net investment hedge reserve through P&L will
only occur upon deal closing when ownership and control over ING Eurasia is transferred. Such recycling of the
reserves will have no impact on total equity and, hence, ING’s CET1 ratio.
31  Pensions and other post-employment benefits
Most group companies sponsor defined contribution pension plans. The assets of all ING Bank’s defined
contribution plans are held in independently administered funds. Contributions, including the defined contribution
plan in the Netherlands, are principally determined as a percentage of remuneration. These plans do not give rise
to provisions in the statement of financial position, other than relating to short-term timing differences included in
other assets and in other liabilities.
ING Bank maintains defined benefit retirement plans in some countries. These plans provide benefits that are
related to the remuneration and service of employees upon retirement. The benefits in some of these plans are
subject to various forms of indexation. The indexation is, in some cases, at the discretion of management; in other
cases it is dependent upon the sufficiency of plan assets.
Annual contributions are paid to the funds at a rate necessary to adequately finance the accrued liabilities of the
plans calculated in accordance with local legal requirements. Plans in all countries are designed to comply with
applicable local regulations governing investments and funding levels.
ING Bank provides other post-employment benefits to certain former employees. These post-employment benefits
are primarily discounts on ING products.
Defined contribution plans
ING, as part of the labour agreements with its employees, sponsors a number of defined contribution plans. ING’s
obligation is limited to contributions which are agreed in advance and also includes employee contributions. The
most significant plans are in the Netherlands and Belgium. The employer's contribution is recognised as an
expense which amounted in 2025 to EUR 460 million (2024: EUR 423 million and 2023: EUR 391 million).
Transition Plan on the New Dutch Pension Plan Legislation
In 2024, ING and unions agreed on a transition plan for a new pension plan, based on the new Dutch pension
legislation. This new plan will replace the current pension plan and will remain to be classified as a Defined
Contribution Plan and will continue to be executed by the ING CDC Pension fund.
Defined benefit retirement plans
Statement of financial position - Net defined benefit asset/liability
Plan assets and defined benefit obligation per country
Plan assets
Defined benefit
obligation
Funded Status
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
The Netherlands
302
325
381
415
-79
-90
United States
226
250
224
235
1
15
United Kingdom
1,129
1,206
706
751
423
455
Belgium
514
513
441
450
72
63
Other countries
327
341
358
368
-31
-26
Funded status (Net defined benefit asset/liability)
2,497
2,636
2,110
2,219
387
416
Presented as:
- Other assets
528
568
- Other liabilities
-141
-152
387
416
The most recent (actuarial) valuations of the plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation
were carried out as at 31 December 2025. The present value of the defined benefit obligation, and the related
current service cost and past service cost, were determined using the projected unit credit method.
Changes in the fair value of plan assets for the period were as follows:
Changes in fair value of plan assets
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
2,636
2,678
Interest income
108
106
Remeasurements: Return on plan assets excluding amounts included in interest income
-37
-118
Employer's contribution
13
23
Participants contributions
4
4
Benefits paid
-121
-128
Effect of curtailment or settlement
-12
-8
Exchange rate differences
-93
79
Closing balance
2,497
2,636
Actual return on the plan assets
70
-12
As at 31 December 2025 the defined benefit plans did not hold any direct investments in ING Groep N.V. (2024: nil).
During 2025 and 2024 there were no purchases or sales of assets between ING and the pension funds.
ING does not manage the pension funds and thus receives no compensation for fund management. The pension
funds have not engaged ING in any swap or derivative transactions to manage the risk of the pension funds.
No plan assets are expected to be returned to ING Bank during 2026.
Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation and other post-employment benefits for the period
were as follows:
Changes in defined benefit obligation and other post-employment benefits
Defined benefit
obligation
Other post-
employment
benefits
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
2,219
2,288
38
30
Current service cost
28
28
1
1
Interest cost
86
87
3
3
Remeasurements: Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in
demographic assumptions
6
-3
Remeasurements: Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in
financial assumptions
-32
-94
6
5
Participants’ contributions
4
3
Benefits paid
-127
-132
-1
-1
Past service cost
1
1
Effect of curtailment or settlement
-12
-9
Exchange rate differences and other changes
-65
51
-5
1
Closing balance
2,110
2,219
42
38
Amounts recognised directly in Other comprehensive income were as follows:
Changes in the net defined benefit assets/liability remeasurement reserve
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
-333
-317
Remeasurement of plan assets
-37
-118
Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions
-6
3
Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in financial assumptions
32
94
Taxation and Exchange rate differences
5
Total Other comprehensive income movement for the year
-12
-16
Closing balance
-345
-333
In 2025, the EUR -37  million (2024: EUR -118  million) of remeasurements of plan assets, that is recognised as a
loss in other comprehensive income, is driven by yield changes on investments. The EUR 32  million (2024: EUR 94 
million) of actuarial gains arising from changes in financial assumptions in the calculation of the defined benefit
obligation is mainly due to changes in discount rates.
The accumulated amount of remeasurements recognised directly in Other comprehensive income is EUR
-433 million(EUR -345 million after tax) as at 31 December 2025 (2024: EUR -447  million; EUR -333  million after
tax).
Amounts recognised in the statement of profit or loss related to pension and other staff-related benefits are as
follows:
Pension and other staff-related benefit costs
Net defined benefit
asset/liability
Other post-employment
benefits
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Current service cost
28
28
27
1
1
1
29
29
28
Past service cost
1
1
1
1
1
1
Net Interest cost
-21
-19
-23
3
3
2
-19
-16
-21
Effect of curtailment or settlement
-1
-1
Defined benefit plans
7
9
5
3
4
3
11
13
8
Defined contribution plans
460
423
391
Pension and other post employment
benefits
471
435
399
Other staff related benefits
16
20
19
Pension and other staff-related benefits
488
455
418
Determination of the net defined benefit asset/liability
The net defined benefit asset/liability is reviewed and adjusted annually. The assumptions used in the
determination of the net defined benefit asset/liability and the Other post-employment benefits include discount
rates, mortality rates, expected rates of salary increases (excluding promotion increases), and indexation. The
rates used for salary developments, interest discount factors, and other adjustments reflect country-specific
conditions.
The key assumption in the determination of the net defined benefit asset/liability is the discount rate. The discount
rate is the weighted average of the discount rates that are applied in different regions where ING Bank has defined
benefit pension plans (weighted by the defined benefit obligation). The discount rate is based on a methodology
that uses market yields on high quality corporate bonds of the specific regions with durations matching the
pension liabilities as key input. Market yields of high quality corporate bonds reflect the yield on corporate bonds
with an AA rating for durations where such yields are available. An extrapolation is applied in order to determine
the yield to the longer durations for which no AA-rated corporate bonds are available. As a result of the limited
availability of long-duration AA-rated corporate bonds, extrapolation is an important element of the determination
of the discount rate. The weighted average discount rate applied for net defined benefit asset/liability for 2025 was
4.2% (2024: 4.4%) based on the pension plan in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, the United States of America,
and the United Kingdom. The average discount rate applied for Other post-employment benefits in 2025 was
5.4% (2024: 5.7%).
Sensitivity analysis of key assumptions
ING performs sensitivity analyses on the most significant assumptions: discount rates, mortality, expected rate of
salary increase, and indexation. The sensitivity analysis has been carried out under the assumption that the
changes occurred at the end of the reporting period.
The sensitivity analysis calculates the financial impact on the defined benefit obligation of an increase or decrease
of the weighted averages of each significant actuarial assumption with all other assumptions held constant. In
practice, this is unlikely to occur, and some changes of the assumptions may be correlated. Changes to mortality,
expected rate of salary increase, and indexation would have no material impact on the defined benefit obligation.
The most significant impact would be from a change in the discount rate. An increase or decrease in the discount
rate of 1.0% creates an impact on the defined benefit obligation of EUR 200 million (increase) and EUR 228 million
(decrease), respectively.
Expected cash flows
ING Bank’s subsidiaries should fund the cost of the entitlements expected to be earned on a yearly basis. For 2026,
the expected contributions to defined benefit pension plans are EUR 48 million.
The benefit payments for defined benefit and other post-employment benefits expected to be made by the plan
between 2026-2030 are estimated to be between EUR 159 million and EUR 174 million per year. From 2030 to
2034, the total payments made by the plan are expected to be EUR 790 million.
32  Taxation
Statement of financial position – Deferred tax
Deferred taxes are recognised on all temporary differences under the liability method using tax rates applicable in
the jurisdictions in which ING Bank is subject to taxation.
Changes in deferred tax
in EUR million
2025
Net
liability (-)
Net asset (+)
opening
balance
Change
through
equity
Change
through
net result
Exchange
rate
differences
Changes in the
composition of
the group and
other changes
Net
liability (-)
Net asset (+)
ending
balance
Financial assets at FVOCI
126
-155
5
2
-22
Financial assets and liabilities at FVPL
-19
-47
-13
-79
Depreciation
-22
18
6
2
Cash flow hedges
363
-43
2
322
Pension and post-employment
benefits
-32
4
-1
1
-28
Other provisions
62
-1
61
Loans and advances
427
1
-42
-9
376
Unused tax losses carried forward
85
-47
-4
35
Other
-208
57
21
-8
-139
Total
781
-137
-93
-23
528
Presented in the statement of
financial position as:
–  Deferred tax liabilities
-287
-365
–  Deferred tax assets
1,069
893
781
528
The above table shows netted deferred tax amounts related to right-of-use assets and lease liabilities included in
the row ‘Other’, and includes a deferred tax amount for right-of-use assets of EUR 164 million (2024: EUR 178
million and 2023: EUR 195 million ) and a deferred tax amount for lease liabilities of EUR 181 million (2024: EUR 197
million and 2023: EUR 217 million).
The deferred tax on cash flow hedges relate to floating rate lending with interest rate swaps. Due to interest rate
developments in 2025 there was a positive revaluation of the cash flow hedge through other comprehensive
income. This resulted in a decline in the deferred tax asset by EUR 43 million compared to the decline in deferred
tax assets in 2024 by EUR 138 million due to the decline in the interest yield curve. The deferred tax asset in cash
flow hedges decreased from EUR 363 million in 2024 to EUR 322 million in 2025.
The deferred tax on Loans and advances changes through net result in 2025 EUR -42 million (2024: EUR -49 
million) relates mainly to differences in valuation between accounting (carrying) value and tax value caused by for
example collectively assessed expected credit losses and fee amortisation in Germany.
The deferred tax changes through equity - Other in 2025 of EUR 57 million (2024: EUR -41 million)is due to FX
developments following the USD depreciation and the application of IAS 29 Hyperinflation in Türkiye.
Changes in deferred tax
in EUR million
2024
Net
liability (-)
Net asset (+)
opening
balance
Change
through
equity
Change
through
net result
Exchange
rate
differences
Changes in
the
composition
of the group
and other
changes
Net
liability (-)
Net asset (+)
ending
balance
Financial assets at FVOCI
63
71
-8
126
Financial assets and liabilities at FVPL
-3
-28
12
-19
Depreciation
-13
-9
-22
Cash flow hedges
502
-138
-1
363
Pension and post-employment benefits
-33
6
1
-5
-1
-32
Other provisions
48
12
1
1
62
Loans and advances
475
-49
427
Unused tax losses carried forward
209
-128
3
85
Other
-154
-41
-9
-5
1
-208
Total
1,096
-102
-219
6
781
Presented in the statement of financial
position as:
–  deferred tax liabilities
-184
-287
–  deferred tax assets
1,280
1,069
1,096
781
Deferred tax in connection with unused tax losses carried forward
in EUR million
2025
2024
Total unused tax losses carried forward
860
1,345
Unused tax losses carried forward not recognised as a deferred tax asset
640
951
Unused tax losses carried forward recognised as a deferred tax asset
220
394
Average tax rate
15.7%
21.6%
Deferred tax asset
35
85
Total unused tax losses carried forward analysed by expiry terms
No deferred tax 
asset recognised
Deferred tax asset
recognised
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Within 1 year
More than 1 year but less than 5 years
55
135
152
14
More than 5 years but less than 10 years
9
30
66
More than 10 years but less than 20 years
Unlimited
585
808
38
313
640
951
220
394
Deferred tax assets are recognised for temporary deductible differences, for tax losses carried forward and unused
tax credits only to the extent that realisation of the related tax benefit is probable
Breakdown of certain net deferred tax asset positions by jurisdiction
in EUR million
2025
2024
Australia
14
1
Czech Republic
1
China
8
9
Hong Kong
5
Singapore
2
Taiwan
10
Türkiye
30
40
United States of America
1
55
66
The table above includes a breakdown of certain net deferred tax asset positions by jurisdiction for which the
utilisation of the deferred tax asset is dependent on future taxable profits in excess of the profits arising from the
reversal of existing taxable temporary differences whilst the related entities have incurred losses in either the
current or the preceding year.
At 31 December 2025 and 2024, ING Bank had no significant temporary differences associated with the parent
company’s investments in subsidiaries and associates as any economic benefit from those investments will not be
taxable at parent company level.
Statement of profit or loss – Taxation
Taxation by type
Netherlands
Rest of the world
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Current taxation
476
384
558
1,942
1,977
2,120
2,418
2,361
2,677
Deferred taxation
-1
-13
-45
93
232
293
93
219
249
475
371
513
2,036
2,209
2,413
2,510
2,580
2,926
Reconciliation of the weighted average statutory income tax rate to ING Bank’s effective income tax rate
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Result before tax from continuing operations
9,012
9,025
10,318
Weighted average statutory tax rate
25.2%
25.1%
25.5%
Weighted average statutory tax amount
2,267
2,263
2,634
Permanent differences affecting current tax
Participation exemption
-69
-87
-43
Other income not subject to tax
-123
-64
-68
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
476
424
398
Current tax from previously unrecognised amounts
0
-1
1
State and local taxes
56
77
99
Adjustments to prior periods
-92
-34
-72
Differences affecting deferred tax
Impact on deferred tax from change in tax rates
-6
-1
2
Deferred tax benefit from previously unrecognised amounts
-1
-30
Write-off/reversal of deferred tax assets
1
4
4
Effective tax amount
2,510
2,580
2,926
Effective tax rate
27.9%
28.6%
28.4%
The weighted average statutory tax rate in 2025 (25.2%) increased compared to that of 2024 (25.1%).
The effective tax rate of 27.9% in 2025 is higher than the weighted average statutory tax rate. This is mainly
caused by the impact in 2025 of the following non-deductible items for income tax purposes: interest expenses
based on Dutch thin capitalisation rules for banks, bank taxes, and other non-deductible expenses in various
countries. State and local taxes mainly relate to taxes in the United States of America.
The weighted average statutory tax rate in 2024 (25.1%) was lower than the rate of 25.5% in 2023.
The effective tax rate of 28.6% in 2024 was higher than the weighted average statutory tax rate. This is mainly
caused by the impact in 2024 of the following non-deductible items for income tax purposes: hyperinflation
accounting loss in Türkiye, interest expenses, and bank- and local taxes in various countries. State and local taxes
mainly relate to Base Erosion and anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT) in the United States of America and top-up Tax based on
Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two).
The effective tax rate of 28.4% in 2023 was higher than the weighted average statutory tax rate. This is mainly
caused by the impact in 2023 of the following non-deductible items for income tax purposes: hyperinflation
accounting loss in Türkiye,  interest expenses, and bank- and local taxes in various countries. Adjustments to prior
periods mainly relate to a tax refund in Spain.
Equity – Other comprehensive income
Income tax related to components of other comprehensive income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
Unrealised revaluations of financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive
income and other revaluations
-162
100
-7
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement of profit or loss (reclassifications
from equity to profit or loss)
7
-29
-3
Changes in cash flow hedge reserve
-43
-138
-251
Remeasurement of the net defined benefit asset/liability
4
6
31
Changes in fair value of own credit risk of financial liabilities at fair value through profit
or loss
6
5
2
Exchange rate differences and other
51
-46
19
Total income tax related to components of other comprehensive income
-137
-102
-209
33  Fair value of assets and liabilities
a) Valuation m ethods
The estimated fair values represent the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is a market-based measurement,
which is based on assumptions that market participants would use and takes into account the characteristics of the
asset or liability that market participants would take into account when pricing the asset or liability.
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities are based on quoted prices in active market where available. When such
quoted prices are not available, the fair value is determined by using valuation techniques.
b) Valuation control framework
The valuation control framework covers the product approval process (PARP), pricing, market data assessment and
independent price verification (IPV), valuation adjustments, model use, fair value hierarchy and day one profit or
loss. Valuation processes are governed by the Global Valuation and Impairment Committee (GV&IC) and its
delegate, based on the valuation and valuation adjustment models approved by Trading and Counterparty Risk
Committee (TCRC), with outcomes monitored under the valuation Risk Appetite Statement established by Group
Financial Risk Committee (GFRC) and TCRC.
The Global Valuation and Impairment Committee is responsible for the oversight and the approval of the outcome
of impairments (other than loan loss provisions) and valuation processes. It oversees the quality and coherence of
valuation methodologies and performance. The Group Financial Risk Committee (GFRC) is the highest committee
next to Management Board Banking (MBB) to discuss and approve global policies, methodologies and risk appetite
related to Financial Risk. The Trading and Counterparty Risk Committee (TCRC) is responsible for the approval of all
valuation models used for the Fair valuation (IFRS) and Prudent Valuation (CRR) of positions measured at fair value.
The Local Parameter Committee discusses the valuation results and monitors the performance of the valuation
activities carried out on local or regional level. The Global Financial Markets Parameter Committee reviews the
consolidated valuation outcome and resulting P&L for Financial Market products, targeting a globally consistent
treatment across Financial Markets. The Banking Book Parameter Committee (BBPC) discusses the valuation topics
for non-Financial Market and non-Group Treasury Wholesale Banking portfolios. The Market Data Committee is
responsible for the approval of the market data used in valuation. 
c) Valuation adjustments
Valuation adjustments are an integral part of the fair value. They are the adjustments to the output from a
valuation technique in order to appropriately determine a fair value in accordance with IFRS13. ING considers
various fair value adjustments including Bid-Offer adjustments, Model Risk adjustments, Bilateral Valuation
Adjustments (BVA, consisting of Credit Valuation Adjustments or CVA, and Debit valuation Adjustments or DVA),
Collateral Valuation Adjustment (CollVA) and Funding Valuation Adjustment (FVA).
For financial instruments where the fair value at initial recognition is based on one or more significant unobservable
inputs, a difference between the transaction price and the fair value resulting from the internal valuation process
can occur. Such difference is referred to as Day One Profit or Day One Loss (hereafter: DOP). ING defers material
DOP of instruments with significant unobservable valuation inputs, which are the financial instruments classified as
Level 3 and financial instruments with material unobservable inputs into CVA which are not necessarily classified as
Level 3. The DOP is amortised over the life of the instrument, or until the significant unobservable inputs become
observable, or until the significant unobservable inputs become non-significant. The adjustments in fair value and
the DOP reserve are disclosed in the below table.
Deferred Day One Profit or Loss Reserve
The table below summarises the movement in the aggregate DOP not recognised when financial instruments were
initially recognised, because of the use of valuation techniques for which not all the inputs were market observable
data.
Deferred day one profit or loss reserve
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance at 1 January
-94
-90
DOP deferred on new transactions during the period
-37
-62
DOP recognised in the statement of profit or loss during the period:
– of which release
13
27
– of which amortisation and exchange differences
27
32
Closing balance at 31 December
-91
-94
The following table presents the adjustments in fair value for financial assets and liabilities.
Adjustments in fair value on financial assets and liabilities
in EUR million
2025
2024
Deferred Day One Profit or Loss
-91
-94
Own Credit Adjustments
-57
-17
Bid/Offer
-130
-130
Model Risk
-48
-33
CVA
-88
-123
DVA
43
50
CollVA
-11
-3
FVA
-82
-64
Other Valuation Adjustments
3
2
Total Valuation Adjustments
-462
-412
Own Credit Adjustment
Own issued debt and structured notes that are designated at fair value through profit or loss are adjusted for ING’s
own credit risk by means of DVA. 
Bid-Offer Adjustment
For positions priced based upon mid-market input parameters, Bid-Offer adjustments are required in order to
reflect the valuation of that position based on bid price or offer price. In practice this adjustment accounts for the
difference in valuation from ‘mid to bid’ and ‘mid to offer’ for long and short exposures respectively. In principle,
assets are valued at the bid prices and liabilities are valued at the offer price. For certain assets or liabilities, where a
market-quoted price is not available, the price used is the fair value that is most representative within the bid-offer
spread.
Model Risk Adjustment
Financial instruments that are valued using a valuation model can be subject to model risk. Model risk is the risk of
possible financial loss resulting from a pricing model or model-based parameter deficiencies and/or uncertainties.
Bilateral Valuation Adjustments (Credit and Debit Valuation Adjustments)
Bilateral Valuation Adjustment is the valuation adjustment reflecting the counterparty credit risk of derivative
contracts. It has a bilateral nature, where both the counterparty’s credit risk (i.e. Credit Valuation Adjustment or
CVA) and ING’s own credit risk (Debit Valuation Adjustment or DVA) are taken into account:
§ CVA is the fair value adjustment applicable to derivative instruments to account for the possibility that the
counterparty defaults (i.e. it is the market value of the counterparty’s credit risk).
§ DVA is the fair value adjustment applicable to derivative instruments to account for the possibility that ING
defaults (i.e. it is the market value of ING’s credit risk).
The calculation of CVA and DVA on derivatives is based on their expected exposures, and the counterparties’ and
ING’s risk of default, taking into account the collateral agreements as well as netting agreements. The
counterparties’ risk of default is measured by probability of default and expected loss given default, which is based
on market information including credit default swap (CDS) spreads. Where counterparty CDS spreads are not
available, relevant proxy spreads are used. Additionally, wrong-way risk (which occurs when the probability of
default by the counterparty increases or decreases when ING’s exposure to the counterparty increases (decreases))
and right-way risk (which occurs when the probability of default by the counterparty increases (decreases) when
ING’s exposure to the counterparty decreases (increases)) are included in the adjustment.
Collateral Valuation Adjustment (CollVA)
Collateral Valuation Adjustment is a fair valuation adjustment applied on derivative instruments to capture specific
features of CSA (Credit Support Annex) with a counterparty that the regular OIS discounting framework does not
capture. Non-standard CSA features may include deviations in relation to the currencies in which ING posts or
receives collateral, deviations in the remuneration rate on collateral which may pay lower or higher rate than the
overnight rate or even no interest at all; other deviations can be posting securities rather than cash as collateral.
Funding Valuation Adjustment (FVA)
Funding Valuation Adjustment (FVA) is a fair valuation adjustment applied on derivative instruments to address the
asymmetry in funding costs or funding benefits between collateralised and uncollateralised derivative portfolios.
This adjustment is based on the expected exposure profiles of the uncollateralised or partially collateralised OTC
derivatives and market-based funding spreads.
Other Valuation Adjustments
This pertains to other valuation adjustments that are immaterial to ING. Most of the balance consists of the Market
Price Uncertainty (MPU) adjustment in fair value, which accounts for the price uncertainty risk inherent in the
valuation inputs to fair value.
d) Fair value hierarchy
ING Bank has categorised its financial instruments that are either measured in the statement of financial position
at fair value or of which the fair value is disclosed, into a three level hierarchy based on the observability of the
valuation inputs. Highest priority is retained to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities and the lowest priority to valuation techniques supported by unobservable inputs.
Transfers into and transfers out of fair value hierarchy levels are made on a quarterly basis at the end of the
reporting period.
Level 1 – (Unadjusted) quoted prices in active markets
This category includes financial instruments whose fair value is determined directly by reference to (unadjusted)
quoted prices in an active market. A financial instrument is regarded as quoted in an active market if quoted prices
are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer markets, brokered markets, or principal to principal
markets. Those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions with sufficient frequency and
volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Transfers out of Level 1 into Level 2 or Level 3 occur
when ING Bank establishes that markets are no longer active and therefore (unadjusted) quoted prices no longer
provide reliable pricing information.
Level 2 – Valuation technique supported by observable inputs
This category includes financial instruments whose fair value is based on market observable inputs, either directly
or indirectly, other than quoted prices included within Level 1. The fair value for financial instruments in this
category can be determined by reference to quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable or market-corroborated inputs. ING analyses how the prices are derived and determines whether the
prices are liquid tradable prices or model-based consensus prices taking various data as inputs.
For financial instruments that do not have a reference price available, fair value is determined using a valuation
technique (e.g., a model), where inputs in the model are taken from an active market or are observable, such as
interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, implied volatilities, and credit spreads.
Instruments where inputs are unobservable are classified in this category, provided that the impact of those
unobservable inputs on the overall valuation is insignificant. The notion of significant is particularly relevant for the
distinction between Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities, as the significance assessment of the valuation input
on the entire fair value measurement will determine whether the instrument should be classified as Level 2 or Level
3. Expert judgement is required on the significance assessment approach.
Level 3 – Valuation technique supported by unobservable inputs
This category includes financial instruments whose fair value is determined using a valuation technique for which a
significant part of the overall valuation is driven by unobservable valuation inputs. Where valuation inputs are
unobservable, the Group must use the best information available to value the instruments. This may require
internally derived inputs taking into account market participants' assumptions that are reasonably available,
including assumptions on the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value and the
risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. Unobservable inputs may include, among others, volatility,
correlation, spreads to discount rates, default rates, recovery rates, prepayment rates, and certain credit spreads.
Financial instruments at fair value
The fair values of the financial instruments were determined as follows:
Methods applied in determining fair values of financial assets and liabilities (carried at fair value)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Financial Assets
Financial assets at fair value
through profit or loss
- Equity securities
21,395
20,798
4
15
187
141
21,586
20,954
- Debt securities
6,492
7,485
2,793
4,596
1,934
3,505
11,219
15,586
- Derivatives
52
1
25,178
31,792
773
475
26,003
32,268
- Loans and receivables
0
0
65,811
62,168
8,542
6,614
74,352
68,782
27,940
28,285
93,785
98,571
11,435
10,734
133,160
137,590
Financial assets at fair value
through other
comprehensive income
- Equity securities
2,301
2,292
0
0
307
270
2,607
2,562
- Debt securities
49,529
39,859
1,288
2,360
0
0
50,817
42,219
- Loans and receivables
0
0
3,238
1,608
0
0
3,238
1,608
51,829
42,151
4,526
3,967
307
270
56,662
46,389
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities at fair
value through profit or loss
–  Debt securities
899
824
7,289
8,437
15
67
8,204
9,328
–  Deposits
0
0
47,751
45,648
0
0
47,751
45,648
–  Trading securities
2,534
3,631
11
12
9
10
2,554
3,653
–  Derivatives
152
45
21,090
27,528
777
694
22,019
28,267
3,585
4,501
76,142
81,625
802
770
80,529
86,896
The following methods and assumptions were used by ING to estimate the fair value of the financial instruments:
Equity securities
Instrument description: Equity securities include stocks and shares, corporate investments and private equity
investments.
Valuation: If available, the fair values of publicly traded equity securities and private equity securities are based on
quoted market prices. In the absence of active markets, fair values are estimated by analysing the investee’s
financial position, result, risk profile, prospect, price, earnings comparisons and revenue multiples. Additionally,
reference is made to valuations of peer entities where quoted prices in active markets are available. For equity
securities, best market practice will be applied using the most relevant valuation method. All non-listed equity
investments, including investments in private equity funds, are subject to a standard review framework which
ensures that valuations reflect the fair values.
Fair value hierarchy: The majority of equity securities are publicly traded, and quoted prices are readily and
regularly available. Hence, these securities are classified as Level 1.  Equity securities which are not traded in active
markets mainly include corporate investments, fund investments and other equity securities and are classified as
Level 3.
Debt securities
Instrument description: Debt securities include government bonds, financial institutions bonds and Asset-backed
securities (ABS).
Valuation: Where available, fair values for debt securities are generally based on quoted market prices. Quoted
market prices are obtained from an exchange market, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory
service. The quoted prices from non-exchange sources are reviewed on their tradability of market prices. If quoted
prices in an active market are not available, fair value is based on an analysis of available market inputs, which
include consensus prices obtained from one or more pricing services. Furthermore, fair values are determined by
valuation techniques discounting expected future cash flows using market interest rate curves, referenced credit
spreads, maturity of the investment, and estimated prepayment rates where applicable.
Fair value hierarchy: Government bonds and financial institution bonds are generally traded in active markets.
Where quoted prices are readily and regularly available, they are classified as Level 1. The remaining positions are
classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the trading activity and observability of prices. Asset backed securities
for which no active market is available and a wide discrepancy in quoted prices exists, are classified as Level 3.
Derivatives
Instrument description: Derivative contracts can either be exchange-traded or over the counter (OTC). Derivatives
include interest rate derivatives, FX derivatives, credit derivatives, equity derivatives and commodity derivatives.
Valuation: The fair value of exchange-traded derivatives is determined using quoted market prices in an active
market and are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. For instruments that are not actively traded, fair
values are estimated based on valuation techniques. OTC derivatives and derivatives trading in an inactive market
are valued using valuation techniques. The valuation techniques and inputs depend on the type of derivatives and
the nature of the underlying instruments. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are based on,
among others, discounted cash flows, option pricing models and Monte Carlo simulations. These valuation models
calculate the present value of expected future cash flows, based on ‘no-arbitrage’ principles. The models are
commonly used in the financial industry and inputs to the validation models are determined from observable
market data where possible. Certain inputs may not be observable in the market, but can be determined from
observable prices via valuation model calibration procedures. These inputs include prices available from exchanges,
dealers, brokers or providers of pricing, yield curves, credit spreads, default rates, recovery rates, dividend rates,
volatility of underlying interest rates, equity prices, and foreign currency exchange rates and reference is made to
quoted prices, recently executed trades, independent market quotes and consensus data, where available. For
uncollateralised OTC derivatives, ING applies Credit Valuation Adjustment to correctly reflect the counterparty
credit risk in the valuation and Debit Valuation Adjustments to reflect the credit risk of ING for its counterparty. In
addition, for these derivatives ING applies Funding Valuation Adjustment. See sections CVA/DVA and FVA in section
c) Valuation Adjustments for more details regarding the calculation.
Fair value hierarchy: The majority of the derivatives are priced using observable inputs and are classified as Level 2.
Derivatives for which the input cannot be implied from observable market data are classified as Level 3.
Loans and receivables
Instrument description: Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable
payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables carried at fair value include trading loans,
being securities lending and similar agreement comparable to collateralised lending, syndicated loans, loans
expected to be sold and receivables with regards to reverse repurchase transactions.
Valuation: The fair value of loans and receivables is generally estimated by discounting expected future cash flows
using a discount rate that reflects credit risk, liquidity, and other current market conditions. The fair value of
mortgage loans is estimated by taking into account prepayment behaviour.
Fair value hierarchy: Loans and receivables are predominantly classified as Level 2. Loans and receivables for
which current market information about similar assets to use as observable, corroborated data for all significant
inputs into a valuation model is not available, are classified as Level 3.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss
Instrument description: Financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss include debt securities and debt
instruments, primarily comprised of structured notes, which are held at fair value under the fair value option.
Besides that, they include derivative contracts and repurchase agreements.
Valuation: The fair values of securities in the trading portfolio and other liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
are based on quoted market prices, where available. For those securities not actively traded, fair values are
estimated based on internal discounted cash flow valuation techniques using interest rates and credit spreads that
apply to similar instruments.
Fair value hierarchy: The majority of the derivatives and debt instruments are classified as Level 2. Derivatives and
debt instruments for which the input cannot be derived from observable market data are classified as Level 3.
e) Transfers between Level 1 and 2
As a consequence of change in observable inputs, ING recorded for financial assets measured at fair value through
profit or loss a EUR 0.3 billion (2024: nil) transfer from Level 1 to Level 2 and a EUR 0.4 billion (2024: EUR 0.8 billion)
transfer from Level 2 to Level 1 within debt securities. For financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or
loss, EUR 0.2 billion (2024: nil) of trading securities were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. No other significant
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 were recorded during the 2025 reporting period (2024: nil).
f) Level 3: Valuation techniques and inputs used
Financial assets and liabilities in Level 3 include both assets and liabilities for which the fair value was determined
using (i) valuation techniques that incorporate unobservable inputs as well as (ii) quoted prices which have been
adjusted to reflect that the market was not actively trading at or around the balance sheet date. Unobservable
inputs are inputs which are based on ING’s own assumptions about the factors that market participants would use
in pricing an asset or liability, developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.
Unobservable inputs may include volatility, correlation, spreads to discount rates, default rates and recovery rates,
prepayment rates, and certain credit spreads. Valuation techniques that incorporate unobservable inputs are
sensitive to the inputs used.
Of the total amount of financial assets classified as Level 3 as at 31 December 2025 of EUR 11.7 billion (2024: EUR
11.0 billion), an amount of EUR 10.1 billion (86.2%) (2024: EUR 9.6 billion, being 87.2%) is based on unadjusted
quoted prices in inactive markets. As ING does not generally adjust quoted prices using its own inputs, there is no
significant sensitivity to ING’s own unobservable inputs.
Furthermore, Level 3 financial assets include EUR 0.1 billion (2024: EUR 0.1 billion) which relates to financial assets
that are part of structures that are designed to be fully neutral in terms of market risk. Such structures include
various financial assets and liabilities for which the overall sensitivity to market risk is insignificant. Whereas the fair
value of individual components of these structures may be determined using different techniques and the fair value
of each of the components of these structures may be sensitive to unobservable inputs, the overall sensitivity is by
design not significant.
The remaining EUR 1.5 billion (2024: EUR 1.3 billion) of the fair value classified in Level 3 financial assets is
established using valuation techniques that incorporate certain inputs that are unobservable.
Of the total amount of financial liabilities classified as Level 3 as at 31 December 2025 of EUR 0.8 billion (2024: EUR
0.8 billion), an amount of EUR 0.6 billion (72.7%) (2024: EUR 0.6 billion, being 75.7%) is based on unadjusted quoted
prices in inactive markets. As ING does not generally adjust quoted prices using its own inputs, there is no
significant sensitivity to ING’s own unobservable inputs.
Furthermore, Level 3 financial liabilities include EUR 0.1 billion (2024: EUR 0.1 billion) which relates to financial
liabilities that are part of structures that are designed to be fully neutral in terms of market risk. As explained
above, the fair value of each of the components of these structures may be sensitive to unobservable inputs, but
the overall sensitivity is by design not significant.
The remaining EUR 0.1 billion (2024: EUR 0.1 billion) of the fair value classified in Level 3 financial liabilities is
established using valuation techniques that incorporates certain inputs that are unobservable.
The table below provides a summary of the valuation techniques, key unobservable inputs and the lower and upper
range of such unobservable inputs, by type of Level 3 asset/liability. The lower and upper range mentioned in the
overview represent the lowest and highest variance of the respective valuation input as actually used in the
valuation of the different financial instruments. Amounts and percentages stated are unweighted. The range can
vary from period to period subject to market movements and change in Level 3 position. Lower and upper bounds
reflect the variability of Level 3 positions and their underlying valuation inputs in the portfolio, but do not
adequately reflect their level of valuation uncertainty. For valuation uncertainty assessment, reference is made to
section Sensitivity analysis of unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Valuation techniques and range of unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Liabilities
Valuation techniques
Significant unobservable inputs
Lower range
Upper range
In EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
At fair value through profit or loss
Debt securities
1,934
3,504
9
10
Price based
Price (%)
0%
0%
103%
120%
Price (price per share)
201
327
412
520
Present value techniques
Price (%)
n.a.
95.85%
n.a.
100%
Equity securities
187
141
Price based
Price (price per share)
0
0
5,475
5,475
Loans and advances
1,978
1,565
0
0
Price based
Price (%)
0%
0%
109%
107%
Present value techniques
Credit spread (bps)
120
576
709
629
Prepayment rate (%)
2%
2%
2%
100%
(Reverse) repos
6,563
5,050
Present value techniques
Interest rate (%)
n.a.
2%
n.a.
2%
Structured notes
15
67
Price based
Price (%)
96%
93%
103%
104%
Option pricing model
Equity volatility (%)
18%
n.a.
22%
n.a.
Equity/Equity correlation
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
Equity/FX correlation
-0.6
n.a.
0.2
n.a.
Dividend yield (%)
0.4%
n.a.
1.9%
n.a.
Present value techniques
Prepayment rate (%)
n.a.
99.59%
n.a.
100.09%
Derivatives
–  Rates
628
413
670
389
Option pricing model
Interest rate volatility (bps)
45
n.a.
91
n.a.
Present value techniques
Reset spread (%)
1%
2%
1%
2%
–  FX
2
6
4
8
Option pricing model
Implied volatility (%)
1.7%
2%
42%
15%
–  Credit
134
39
48
241
Present value techniques
Credit spread (bps)
10
0
88
91
Price based
Price (%)
0%
0%
100%
100%
–  Equity
7
10
46
47
Option pricing model
Equity volatility (%)
13%
7%
75%
81%
Equity/Equity correlation
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
Equity/FX correlation
-0.7
-0.6
0.5
0.6
Dividend yield (%)
0%
0%
51%
33%
–  Other
2
6
10
9
Option pricing model
Commodity volatility (%)
20%
13.1%
76%
61%
Com/FX correlation
-0.25
-0.40
-0.25
-0.25
Price based
Price (commodity)
66
68
66
68
At fair value through other comprehensive income
–  Equity
307
270
Present value techniques
Credit spread (bps)
5.15
5.67
5.15
5.76
Interest rate (%)
2.5%
1.5%
2.5%
3.5%
Payout ratio (%)
70%
70%
90%
90%
Price based
Price (%)
n.a.
122%
n.a.
122%
Price (price per share)
126
n.a
126
n.a
Total
11,742
11,005
802
770
1The abbreviation n.a. stands for not applicable or not available.
Price
For securities where market prices are not available, fair value is measured by comparison with observable pricing
data from similar instruments. Prices of 0% are distressed to the point that no recovery is expected, while prices
significantly in excess of 100% or par are expected to pay a yield above current market rates.
Credit spreads
Credit spread is the premium above a benchmark interest rate required by the market participant to accept a lower
credit quality. Higher credit spreads indicate lower credit quality and a lower value of an asset.
Volatility
Volatility is a measure for variation of the price of a financial instrument or other valuation input over time.
Volatility is one of the key inputs in option pricing models. Typically, the higher the volatility, the higher value of the
option. Volatility varies by the underlying reference (equity, commodity, foreign currency and interest rates), by
strike, and maturity of the option. The minimum level of volatility is 0% and there is no theoretical maximum.
Correlation
Correlation is a measure of dependence between two underlying references which is relevant for valuing derivatives
and other instruments having more than one underlying reference. High positive correlation (close to 1) indicates a
strong positive (statistical) relationship, where underliers move, everything else equal, into the same direction. The
same holds for a high negative correlation.
Interest rate
An interest rate is the amount of interest due per period, as a proportion of the amount lent, deposited, or
borrowed.
Reset spread
Reset spreads are key inputs to mortgage-linked prepayment swaps valuation. Reset spread is the future spread at
which mortgages will re-price at interest rate reset dates.
Dividend yield
Dividend yield is an important input for equity option pricing models showing how much dividends a company is
expected to pay out each year relative to its share price. Dividend yields are generally expressed as an annualised
percentage of share price.
Payout ratio
Dividend payout ratio is an input that shows the percentage of dividends a company is expected to pay out each
year relative to its net income.
Prepayment rate
Prepayment rate is a key input to mortgage and loan valuation. Prepayment rate is the estimated rate at which
mortgage borrowers will repay their mortgages early, e.g. 5% per year. Prepayment rate and reset spread are key
inputs to mortgage-linked prepayment swaps valuation.
Level 3: Changes during the period
Changes in Level 3 Financial assets
Trading assets
Non-trading derivatives
Financial assets
mandatorily at FVPL
Financial assets
designated at FVPL
Financial assets at FVOCI
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1 January
824
848
68
286
5,721
3,499
4,121
3,547
270
938
11,005
9,118
Realised gain/loss  recognised in the statement of profit or loss during the period 1
247
-175
63
-38
211
294
-798
-54
-278
28
Revaluation recognised in other comprehensive income during the period 2
8
-3
8
-3
Purchase of assets
953
486
0
198
5,177
4,424
1,208
1,600
182
154
7,520
6,862
Sale of assets
-109
-111
0
-257
-1,765
-1,605
-1,160
-10
-163
-418
-3,197
-2,402
Maturity/settlement
-128
-140
0
-7
-166
-294
-763
-988
0
-20
-1,057
-1,449
Reclassifications
0
0
-1
0
18
0
0
0
10
0
28
0
Transfers into Level 3
316
370
0
0
824
615
0
30
0
0
1,139
1,014
Transfers out of Level 3
-974
-454
-9
-114
-2,389
-1,214
0
-3
0
-384
-3,372
-2,169
Exchange rate differences
-14
0
0
0
-6
5
-33
-2
0
9
-53
12
Changes in the composition of the group and other changes
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
0
0
-5
0
-6
Closing balance
1,114
824
121
68
7,625
5,721
2,576
4,121
307
270
11,742
11,005
1 Net gains/losses were recorded as ‘Valuation results and net trading income’ in the statement of profit or loss. The total amounts includes EUR 280 million (2024: EUR -41 million) of unrealised gains and losses recognised in the statement of profit or loss.
2 Revaluation recognised in other comprehensive income is included on the line ‘Net change in fair value of debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income’.
In 2025, transfers out of Level 3 within trading assets relate mainly to securities, as their valuations were no longer
significantly influenced by unobservable inputs. In 2024, transfers out of Level 3 in trading assets primarily involved
derivative instruments, as their valuations were no longer significantly impacted by unobservable inputs.
In 2025 and 2024, the transfer into Level 3 trading assets consisted of cross currency swap trades, which were
transferred to Level 3 as a result of the valuation being significantly impacted by unobservable inputs. In 2024, the
transfer out of Level 3 in non-trading derivatives primarily involved derivative instruments, as their valuations were
no longer significantly impacted by unobservable inputs.
In 2025 and 2024, transfers into and out of Level 3 of financial assets mandatorily at fair value mainly relate to
(long- term) reverse repurchase transactions for which the valuation being significantly impacted by unobservable
inputs and no longer significantly impacted by unobservable inputs, respectively.
In 2024, the transfer out of Level 3 of financial assets at FVOCI relates to Hold-to-Collect and Sell portfolio
transferred to Level 2 resulting from change in methodology.
Changes in Level 3 Financial liabilities
Trading liabilities
Non-trading
derivatives
Financial liabilities
designated as at fair
value through profit
or loss
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance as at 1
January
637
382
67
301
67
47
770
729
Realised gain/loss recognised
in the statement of profit or
loss during the period 1
81
-104
82
-98
-6
-5
157
-206
Additions
205
55
3
190
11
29
219
274
Redemptions
-74
-12
0
-209
0
0
-74
-222
Maturity/settlement
-160
-15
0
-7
-64
-4
-225
-26
Transfers into Level 3
19
364
0
0
19
34
38
399
Transfers out of Level 3
-72
-33
0
-111
-12
-34
-84
-179
Exchange rate differences
-1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
Closing balance
636
637
151
67
15
67
802
770
1 Net gains/losses were recorded as ‘Valuation results and net trading income’ in the statement of profit or loss. The total amount includes EUR 158 million
(2024: EUR -206 million) of unrealised gains and losses recognised in the statement of profit or loss.
In 2025, the transfers out of Level 3 mainly consisted of trading liabilities related to securities transferred out of
Level 3 as a result of the valuation being no longer impacted by significantly unobservable inputs.
In 2024, the transfers into Level 3 mainly consisted of trading liabilities attributed to cross currency swap trades
transferred into Level 3 as a result of the valuation being significantly impacted by unobservable inputs. The
transfers out of Level 3 for non-trading derivatives are driven by interest rate swap trades, which were reclassified
out of Level 3 as their valuations were no longer influenced by significantly unobservable inputs.
g) Recognition of unrealised gains and losses in Level 3
Amounts recognised in the statement of profit or loss relating to unrealised gains and losses during the year that
relate to Level 3 assets and liabilities are included in the line item ‘Valuation results and net trading income’ in the
statement of profit or loss.
h) Level 3: Sensitivity analysis of unobservable inputs
Where the fair value of a financial instrument is determined using inputs which are unobservable and which have a
more than insignificant impact on the fair value of the instrument, the actual value of those inputs at the balance
date may be drawn from a range of reasonably possible alternatives. In line with market practice, the upper and
lower bounds of the range of alternative input values reflect a level of valuation certainty. The actual levels chosen
for the unobservable inputs in preparing the financial statements are consistent with the valuation methodology
used for fair valued financial instruments.
In practice, valuation uncertainty is measured and managed per exposure to individual valuation inputs (i.e. risk
factors) at portfolio-level across different product categories. Where the disclosure looks at individual Level 3 inputs,
the actual valuation adjustments may also reflect the benefits of portfolio offsets.
This disclosure does not attempt to indicate or predict future fair value movement. The numbers in isolation give
limited information as in most cases these Level 3 assets and liabilities should be seen in combination with other
instruments (for example as a hedge) that are classified as Level 2.
The valuation uncertainty in the table below is broken down by related risk class rather than by product. The
possible impact of a change of unobservable inputs in the fair value of financial instruments where unobservable
inputs are significant to the valuation is as follows:
Sensitivity analysis of Level 3 instruments
Positive fair value
movements from
using reasonable
possible alternatives
Negative fair value
movements from
using reasonable
possible alternatives
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Equity (equity derivatives, structured notes)
20
21
-12
-20
Interest rates (Rates derivatives, FX derivatives)
1
5
0
0
Credit (Debt securities, Loans, structured notes, credit derivatives)
12
2
-14
-27
Loans and advances
0
0
0
0
33
28
-26
-47
i) Financial instruments not measured at fair value
The following table presents the estimated fair values of the financial instruments not measured at fair value in the
statement of financial position.
Methods applied in determining fair values of financial assets and liabilities (carried at amortised cost)
Carrying Amount
Carrying amount
presented as fair value 1
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total fair value
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Financial Assets
Loans and advances to banks
21,204
21,769
3,053
3,194
14,722
15,614
3,366
2,957
21,141
21,766
Loans and advances to customers
721,779
680,299
18,233
18,296
12,782
18,626
678,392
630,493
709,408
667,415
Securities at amortised cost
53,867
50,273
47,722
42,871
2,381
2,908
2,692
2,523
52,796
48,303
796,850
752,341
21,286
21,490
47,723
42,871
29,885
37,149
684,450
635,973
783,344
737,483
Financial liabilities
Deposits from banks
18,521
16,722
5,401
4,347
9,162
8,208
3,745
3,943
18,308
16,498
Customer deposits
724,707
699,725
621,172
582,511
85,801
69,790
17,433
46,984
724,406
699,285
Debt securities in issue
103,116
94,459
36,782
33,019
62,567
59,141
3,857
2,000
103,207
94,161
Senior non-preferred debt
48,090
49,393
49,155
50,230
49,155
50,230
Subordinated loans
18,100
17,879
18,722
18,357
18,722
18,357
912,534
878,178
626,573
586,857
36,782
33,019
225,408
205,726
25,035
52,927
913,798
878,530
1In accordance with IFRS and for the purpose of this disclosure, the carrying amount of financial instruments with an immediate on demand feature is presented as fair value, excluding the negative macro fair value hedge adjustment.
The aggregation of the fair values presented above does not represent, and should not be construed as
representing, the underlying value of ING. These fair values were calculated for disclosure purposes only. The
carrying amount of financial instruments presented in the above table includes, when applicable, the fair value
hedge adjustment.
Loans and advances to banks
For short-term receivables from banks, carrying amounts represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. The fair
value of long-term receivables from banks is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using a discount
rate based on specific available market data, such as interest rates and appropriate spreads, that reflects current
credit risk or quoted bonds.
Loans and advances to customers
For short-term loans, carrying amounts represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. The fair value of long-
term loans is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using a discount rate that reflects current credit
risk, current interest rates, and other current market conditions where applicable. The fair value of mortgage loans
is estimated by taking into account prepayment behaviour. Loans with similar characteristics are aggregated for
calculation purposes.
Securities at amortised cost
Where available, fair values for debt securities are generally based on quoted market prices. Quoted market prices
are obtained from an exchange market, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory service. The
quoted prices from non-exchange sources are reviewed on their tradability of market prices. If quoted prices in an
active market are not available, fair value is based on an analysis of available market inputs, which include
consensus prices obtained from one or more pricing services. Furthermore, fair values are determined by valuation
techniques discounting expected future cash flows using market interest rate curves, referenced credit spreads,
maturity of the investment, and estimated prepayment rates where applicable.
Deposits from banks
For short-term payables to banks, carrying amounts represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. The fair
value of long-term payables to banks is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using a discount rate
based on available market interest rates and appropriate spreads that reflect ING’s own credit risk.
Customer deposits
There is an embedded value in our on-demand deposits. However, for the purpose of this disclosure, and in
accordance with IFRS, the fair value of deposits with an immediate on demand feature approximates the carrying
amount, excluding the negative macro fair value hedge adjustment.
The fair value of deposits with fixed contractual terms has been estimated based on discounting future cash flows
using the interest rates currently applicable to deposits of similar maturities.
Debt securities in issue
The fair value of debt securities in issue is generally based on quoted market prices, or if not available, on estimated
prices by discounting expected future cash flows using a current market interest rate and credit spreads applicable
to the yield, credit quality and maturity.
Subordinated loans
The fair value of publicly traded subordinated loans are based on quoted market prices when available. Where no
quoted market prices are available, fair value of the subordinated loans is estimated using discounted cash flows
based on interest rates and credit spreads that apply to similar instruments.
34  Derivatives and hedge accounting
Use of derivatives
ING uses derivatives for economic hedging purposes to manage its asset and liability portfolios and structural risk
positions. The primary objective of ING’s hedging activities is to manage the risks which arise from structural
imbalances in the duration and other profiles of its assets and liabilities. The objective of economic hedging is to
enter into positions with an opposite risk profile to an identified risk exposure to reduce that exposure. The main
risks which are being hedged are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. These risks are
primarily hedged with interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign exchange forwards/swaps.
ING uses credit derivatives to manage its economic exposure to credit risk, including total return swaps and credit
default swaps, to sell or buy protection for credit risk exposures in the loan, investment, and trading portfolios.
Hedge accounting is not applied in relation to these credit derivatives.
Hedge accounting
Derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS are classified and accounted for in accordance with the
nature of the instrument hedged and the type of IFRS hedge accounting model that is applicable. The three
models applicable under IFRS are: fair value hedge accounting, cash flow hedge accounting, and hedge accounting
of a net investment in a foreign operation. How and to what extent these models are applied are described under
the relevant headings below. The company’s detailed accounting policies for these three hedge models are set out
in paragraph 1.5 ‘Financial instruments’ of Note 1 ‘Basis of preparation and material accounting policy
information’.
The benchmark rate reform
Reference is made to note 'Risk management / The impact of the benchmark rate reform' for information on how
ING is managing the transition to alternative benchmark rates and ING’s progress in completing the transition with
respect to derivatives in hedge accounting relationships.
Fair value hedge accounting
ING’s fair value hedges principally consist of interest rate swaps that are used to protect against changes in the fair
value of fixed-rate instruments due to movements in market interest rates. ING’s approach to managing market
risk, including interest rate risk, is discussed in ‘Risk management –Market risk’. ING’s exposure to interest rate risk
is disclosed in paragraph ‘Interest rate risk in banking book’.
ING Bank designates specific non-contractual risk components of hedged items. This is usually determined by
designating benchmark interest rates such as EURIBOR, SOFR, SONIA or TONAR, between others, because the fair
value of a fixed-rate instrument varies directly in response to changes in its benchmark interest rate.
By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, ING also exposes itself to
credit risk of the derivative counterparty, which is not offset by the hedged item. ING minimises counterparty
credit risk in derivative instruments by clearing most of the derivatives through Central Clearing Counterparties. In
addition, ING only enters into transactions with high-quality counterparties and requires posting collateral.
ING applies fair value hedge accounting on micro level in which one hedged item is hedged with one or multiple
hedging instruments as well as on macro level whereby a portfolio of items is hedged with multiple hedging
instruments. For these macro hedges of interest rate risk ING applies the EU 'carve-out'. The EU ‘carve-out’ for
macro hedging enables a group of derivatives (or proportions) to be viewed in combination and jointly designated
as the hedging instrument and removes some of the limitations in fair value hedge accounting relating to hedging
core deposits and under-hedging strategies. In retail operations, exposure on retail funding (savings and current
accounts) and retail lending (mortgages) is initially offset. The remaining exposure is hedged in a portfolio hedge,
using the EU carve-out, in which a portion of the retail lending portfolio and core deposits are designated as a
hedged item for hedge accounting purposes.
For portfolio hedges the fair value is projected based on contractual terms and other variables including
prepayment expectations. These projected fair values of the portfolios form the basis for identifying the notional
amount subject to interest rate risk that is designated under fair value hedge accounting.
Micro fair value hedge accounting is mainly applied on issued debt securities and purchased debt instruments for
hedging interest rate risk.
Before fair value hedge accounting is applied, ING determines whether an economic relationship between the
hedged item and the hedging instrument exists based on an evaluation of the quantitative characteristics of these
items and the hedged risk that is supported by quantitative analysis. ING considers whether the critical terms of
the hedged item and hedging instrument closely align when assessing the presence of an economic relationship.
ING evaluates whether the fair value of the hedged item and the hedging instrument respond similarly to similar
risks. In addition, ING is mainly using regression analysis to assess whether the hedging instrument is expected to
be and has been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item.
For the macro hedges of interest rate risk, ING follows a dynamic hedging strategy. This means that on monthly
basis, based on the new portfolio projection, the hedging relationship is renewed. From an operational point of
view, the existing hedging relationship is adjusted based on the new portfolio projection and additional hedging
instruments are added to the hedging relationship.
ING uses the following derivative financial instruments in a fair value hedge accounting relationship:
Gross carrying value of derivatives designated under fair value hedge accounting
in EUR million
Assets
2025
Liabilities
2025
Assets
2024
Liabilities
2024
As at 31 December
Hedging instrument on interest rate risk
– Interest rate swaps
26,279
19,625
26,963
24,107
– Other interest derivatives
213
13
207
23
Hedging instrument on FX rate risk
– Cross currency swaps
12
3
The derivatives used for fair value hedge accounting are included in the statement of financial position line-item
‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss – Non-trading derivatives’ for EUR 578 million (2024: EUR 617
million) respectively ‘Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss – Non-trading derivatives’ EUR 54 million
(2024: EUR 79 million). The difference between the gross carrying value as presented in the table and the net
carrying value as presented in the statement of financial position is due to offsetting with other derivatives and
collaterals paid or received.
For our main currencies the average fixed rate for interest rate swaps used in fair value hedge accounting are
1.85% (2024: 1.69%) for EUR and 4.43% (2024: 4.22%) for USD.
The following table shows the net notional amount of derivatives designated in fair value hedging, split into the
maturity of the instruments. The net notional amounts presented in the table are a combination of payer (-) and
receiver (+) swaps.
Maturity derivatives designated in fair value hedging
in EUR million
Less
than 1
month
1 to 3
months
3 to 12
months
1 to 2
years
2 to 3
years
3 to 4
years
4 to 5
years
>5 years
Total
As at 31 December 2025
Hedging instrument on
interest rate risk
– Interest rate swaps
4,133
304
17,551
-373
10,494
2,859
-2,524
-52,863
-20,419
– Other interest derivatives
-3
93
229
131
-303
184
212
260
803
As at 31 December 2024
Hedging instrument on
interest rate risk
- Interest rate swaps
43
1,224
4,308
15,305
2,179
4,580
3,259
-51,039
-20,140
– Other interest derivatives
-4
29
182
248
91
-193
121
383
858
Hedging instrument on FX
rate risk
– Cross currency swaps
-142
-60
-98
-299
Gains and losses on derivatives designated under fair value hedge accounting are recognised in the statement of
profit or loss. The effective portion of the fair value change on the hedged item is also recognised in the statement
of profit or loss in 'Valuation results and net trading income'. As a result, only the net accounting ineffectiveness
has an impact on the net result.
Hedged items included in a fair value hedging relationship
Carrying amount of the hedged items
Accumulated amount of fair value hedge
adjustment on the hedged item included in the
carrying amount of the hedged item
Change in fair value of the
hedged item for
measuring ineffectiveness
for the period
Change in fair value
hedging instruments for
the period
Hedge ineffectiveness
recognised in the
statement of profit or
loss gain (+) / loss (-)
in EUR million
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
As at 31 December 2025
Interest rate risk and FX rate risk
– Debt securities at fair value through other comprehensive income
44,165
n/a
-480
– Loans at FVOCI
n/a
– Loans and advances to customers
71,093
-7,441
-2,352
– Debt instruments at amortised cost
20,695
-438
-284
– Debt securities in issue
40,839
-1,193
280
– Senior non-preferred debt
46,566
-934
-325
– Subordinated loans
18,058
-327
-287
– Customer deposits and other funds on deposit
10,040
-9
3
– Discontinued hedges
1,444
Total
135,953
115,502
-6,435
-2,463
-3,445
3,481
36
As at 31 December 2024
Interest rate risk and FX rate risk
– Debt securities at fair value through other comprehensive income
35,119
n/a
269
– Loans at FVOCI
n/a
1
– Loans and advances to customers
73,364
-5,177
1,771
– Debt instruments at amortised cost
13,802
-179
49
– Debt securities in issue
38,246
-915
-594
– Senior non-preferred debt
45,423
-1,320
-544
– Subordinated loans
17,143
-665
-188
– Customer deposits and other funds on deposit
29
-1
-14
– Discontinued hedges
1,851
-5
Total
122,285
100,842
-3,505
-2,906
750
-766
-17
During 2025, the interest rate movements significantly affected the fair value changes of both the derivatives and
the hedged items designated in fair value hedges. However, no material hedging relationship was discontinued as
a result of the interest rate movements in 2025. Refer to Note 23 'Valuation results and net trading income'.
In addition, the net increase in hedged items is mainly due to higher volumes in debt securities as well as the
extension of the macro fair value hedge on core deposits in 2025. Discontinued hedges mainly relate to the
transfer of derivatives from UK-based clearing houses to EU-based clearing houses related to Brexit in 2020.
The main sources of ineffectiveness are:
§ differences in maturities of the hedged item(s) and hedging instrument(s);
§ different interest rate curves applied to discount the hedged item(s) and hedging instrument(s);
§ differences in timing of cash flows of the hedged item(s) and hedging instrument(s).
There were no other sources of significant ineffectiveness in these hedging relationships.
Cash flow hedge accounting
ING applies cash flow hedge accounting on a micro and macro level. ING’s cash flow hedges mainly consist of
interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps that are used to protect against the exposure to variability in future
cash flows on non-trading assets and liabilities that bear interest at variable rates or are expected to be refunded
or reinvested in the future. The amounts and timing of future cash flows, representing both principal and interest
flows, are projected for each portfolio of financial assets and liabilities, based on contractual terms and other
variables including estimates of prepayments. These projected cash flows form the basis for identifying the
notional amount subject to interest rate risk or foreign currency exchange rate risk that is designated under cash
flow hedge accounting.
ING’s approach to manage market risk, including interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk, is
discussed in ‘Risk management – Market risk’. ING determines the amount of the exposures to which it applies
hedge accounting by assessing the potential impact of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates on the future cash flows from its floating-rate assets and liabilities. This assessment is performed using
analytical techniques.
As noted above for fair value hedges, by using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, ING exposes itself to credit risk of the derivative counterparty,
which is not offset by the hedged items. This exposure is managed similarly to that for fair value hedges.
Gains and losses on the effective portions of derivatives designated under cash flow hedge accounting are
recognised in Other Comprehensive Income. Interest cash flows on these derivatives are recognised in the
statement of profit or loss in ‘Net interest income’ consistent with the manner in which the forecasted cash flows
affect the net result. The gains and losses on ineffective portions of such derivatives are recognised immediately in
the statement of profit or loss in ‘Valuation results and net trading income’.
ING determines an economic relationship between the cash flows of the hedged item and the hedging instrument
based on an evaluation of the quantitative characteristics of these items and the hedged risk that is supported by
quantitative analysis. ING considers whether the critical terms of the hedged item and hedging instrument closely
align when assessing the presence of an economic relationship. ING evaluates whether the cash flows of the
hedged item and the hedging instrument respond similarly to the hedged risk, such as the benchmark interest
rate of foreign currency. In addition, a regression analysis is performed to assess whether the hedging instrument
is expected to be and has been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item.
ING uses the following derivative financial instruments in a cash flow hedge accounting relationship:
Gross carrying value of derivatives used for cash flow hedge accounting
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
in EUR million
2025
2025
2024
2024
As at 31 December
Hedging instrument on interest rate risk
– Interest rate swaps
9,414
10,066
10,635
12,814
Hedging instrument on FX rate risk
– Cross currency swaps
1,042
139
472
339
Hedging instrument on combined interest and FX rate risk
– Cross currency interest rate swaps
63
10
The derivatives used for cash flow hedge accounting are included in the statement of financial position line-item
‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss – Non-trading derivatives’ EUR 459 million (2024: EUR 158
million) respectively ‘Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss – Non-trading derivatives’ EUR 254
million (2024: EUR 573 million). The difference between the gross carrying value as presented in the table and the
net carrying value as presented in the statement of financial position is due to offsetting with other derivatives and
collaterals paid or received.
For the main currencies the average fixed rate for interest rate swaps used in cash flow hedge accounting are
1.81% (2024: 1.79%) for EUR, 4.27% (2024: 4.37%) for PLN, 3.85% (2024: 3.99%) for USD and 3.38% (2024: 3.29%)
for AUD. The average currency exchange rates for cross currency interest rate swaps used in cash flow hedge
accounting is for EUR/USD 0.97 (2024: 1.03) and for EUR/AUD 1.56 (2024: 1.52).
The following table shows the net notional amount of derivatives designated in cash flow hedging split into the
maturity of the instruments. The net notional amounts presented in the table are a combination of payer (+) and
receiver (-) swaps.
Maturity derivatives designated in cash flow hedging
in EUR million
Less
than 1
month
1 to 3
months
3 to 12
months
1 to 2
years
2 to 3
years
3 to 4
years
4 to 5
years
>5
years
Total
As at 31 December 2025
Hedging instrument on interest
rate risk
– Interest rate swaps
-2,023
-3,542
-6,217
-15,357
-14,152
-4,549
-4,381
-11,676
-61,897
Hedging instrument on FX rate
risk
– Cross currency swaps
456
964
654
-1,271
-446
607
-601
-1,572
-1,210
Hedging instrument on combined
interest and FX rate risk
– Cross currency interest rate
swaps
-1,246
-1,518
-2,765
As at 31 December 2024
Hedging instrument on interest
rate risk
– Interest rate swaps
-1,805
-768
-10,590
-13,389
-10,551
-6,040
-4,522
-3,222
-50,886
Hedging instrument on FX rate
risk
– Cross currency swaps
-241
-972
122
-1,029
-262
-238
-999
-3,619
Hedging instrument on combined
interest and FX rate risk
– Cross currency interest rate
swaps
-25
-1,283
-1,578
-2,887
The following table shows the cash flow hedge accounting impact on profit or loss and comprehensive income:
Cash flow hedging – impact of hedging instruments on the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
in EUR million
Change in
value of
hedged item
used for
calculating
hedge
ineffectiveness
for the period
Carrying
amount cash
flow hedge
reserve at the
end of the
reporting
period 1
Amount
reclassified
from CFH
reserve to
profit or loss 2
Change in
value of
hedging
instrument
recognised in
OCI for the
period
Hedge
ineffectiveness
recognised in
the statement
of profit or
loss, gain (+) /
loss (-)
As at 31 December 2025
Interest rate risk on:
– Floating rate lending
-1,265
-1,157
536
– Floating rate borrowing
289
-141
-146
– Other
– Discontinued hedges
-323
7
Total interest rate risk
-977
-1,619
397
602
7
FX rate risk on:
– Floating rate lending
-15
-58
-171
– Floating rate borrowing
34
-4
-38
– Other
– Discontinued hedges
-1
Total FX risk
20
-62
-209
195
3
Combined interest and FX rate risk on:
– Floating rate lending
37
47
-39
– Floating rate borrowing
– Other
– Discontinued hedges
Total combined interest and FX risk
37
47
-39
2
1
Total cash flow hedge
-920
-1,635
149
799
10
Cash flow hedging – impact of hedging instruments on the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
in EUR million
Change in
value of
hedged item
used for
calculating
hedge
ineffectiveness
for the period
Carrying
amount cash
flow hedge
reserve at the
end of the
reporting
period 1
Amount
reclassified
from CFH
reserve to
profit or loss 2
Change in
value of
hedging
instrument
recognised in
OCI for the
period
Hedge
ineffectiveness
recognised in
the statement
of profit or
loss, gain (+) /
loss (-)
As at 31 December 2024
Interest rate risk on:
– Floating rate lending
-668
-2,850
496
– Floating rate borrowing
114
125
-425
– Other
1
1
– Discontinued hedges
89
-51
Total interest rate risk
-553
-2,635
20
526
39
FX rate risk on:
– Floating rate lending
-79
-55
-121
– Floating rate borrowing
12
5
-37
– Other
– Discontinued hedges
-4
Total FX risk
-67
-51
-162
220
-3
Combined interest and FX rate risk on:
– Floating rate lending
70
72
-68
– Floating rate borrowing
– Other
– Discontinued hedges
Total combined interest and FX risk
70
72
-68
-3
-2
Total cash flow hedge
-550
-2,614
-209
743
35
1The carrying amount is the gross amount, excluding tax adjustments.
2The amounts are reclassified to Net interest income - interest income and/or expense on non-trading derivatives (hedge accounting).
In 2025, EUR -1 million was reclassified from CFH reserve to profit or loss for cash flows that are no longer expected
to occur (2024: nil).
The increase in the carrying amount of the cash flow hedge reserve is driven by the interest rate movements. No
material hedging relationship was discontinued as a result of the interest rate movements in 2025.
The main sources of ineffectiveness for cash flow hedges are:
§ Differences in timing of cash flows of the hedged item(s) and hedging instrument(s); and
§ Mismatches in reset frequency between hedged item and hedging instrument.
The following table shows the movement of the cash flow hedge reserve:
Movement cash flow hedge reserve
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
-1,693
-2,058
Value changes recognised in OCI
799
743
Amounts recycled to profit or loss
149
-209
Income tax
-175
-140
Exchange rate and other changes
-12
-14
Adjustment for non controlling interest
-163
-14
Movement for the year
597
365
Ending balance
-1,096
-1,693
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
A foreign currency exposure arises from a net investment in subsidiaries that have a different functional currency
from the presentation currency of ING. The risk arises from the fluctuation in spot exchange rates between the
functional currency of the subsidiaries and ING’s presentation currency, which causes the amount of the net
investment to vary in the consolidated financial statements of ING. This risk may have a significant impact on ING’s
financial statements. ING’s policy is to hedge these exposures only when these are expected to have a significant
impact on the regulatory capital ratios of ING and its subsidiaries.
ING’s net investment hedges principally consist of derivatives (including currency forwards and swaps) and non-
derivative financial instruments such as foreign currency denominated funding. When the hedging instrument is
foreign currency-denominated debt, ING assesses effectiveness by comparing past changes in the carrying
amount of the debt that are attributable to a change in the spot rate with past changes in the investment in the
foreign operation due to movement in the spot rate (the offset method).
Gains and losses on the effective portions of derivatives designated under net investment hedge accounting are
recognised in Other Comprehensive Income. The balance in equity is recognised in the statement of profit or loss
when the related foreign subsidiary is disposed of. The gains and losses on ineffective portions are recognised
immediately in the statement of profit or loss in 'Valuation results and net trading income'.
ING has the following derivative financial instruments used for net investment hedging:
Gross carrying value of derivatives used for net investment hedging
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
in EUR million
2025
2025
2024
2024
As at 31 December
– FX forwards and Cross currency swaps
68
74
82
117
The derivatives used for net investment hedge accounting are included in the statement of financial position line-
item ‘Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss – Non-trading derivatives’ EUR 68 million (2024: EUR 82
million) respectively ‘Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss – Non trading derivatives’ EUR 74 million
(2024: EUR 117 million).
For ING’s main currencies the average exchange rates used in net investment hedge accounting for 2025 are EUR/USD
1.12 (2024: 1.08), EUR/PLN 4.24 (2024: 4.31), EUR/AUD 1.75 (2024: 1.64) and EUR/THB 36.98 (2024: 38.00).
The following table shows the notional amount of derivatives designated in net investment hedging split into the
maturity of the instruments:
Maturity derivatives designated in net investment hedging
in EUR million
Less than
1 month
1 to 3
months
3 to 12
months
1 to 2
years
2 to 3
years
3 to 4
years
4 to 5
years
>5 years
Total
As at 31 December 2025
– FX forwards and cross
currency swaps
-6,683
-4,298
-86
-11,066
As at 31 December 2024
– FX forwards and Cross
currency swaps
-8,681
-4,158
-76
-12,916
The effect of the net investment hedge accounting in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income is as follows:
Net investment hedge accounting – Impact on statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
in EUR million
Change in
value of
hedged item
used for
calculating
hedge
ineffectiveness
for the period
Carrying
amount net
investment
hedge reserve
at the end of
the reporting
period1
Hedged item
affected
statement of
profit or loss
Change in
value of
hedging
instrument
recognised in
OCI
Hedge
ineffectiveness
recognised in
the statement
of profit or loss,
gain(+) /
Loss(-)
As at 31 December 2025
Investment in foreign operations
-816
488
816
Discontinued hedges
535
As at 31 December 2024
Investment in foreign operations
295
-95
-295
Discontinued hedges
302
1The carrying amount is the gross amount, excluding tax adjustments.
35  Assets by contractual maturity
Amounts presented by contractual maturity are the amounts as presented in the statement of financial position and are discounted cash flows. Reference is made to ‘Risk Management – Funding and liquidity risk’.
Assets by contractual maturity
in EUR million
2025
Less than 1 month 1
1-3 months
3-12 months
1-5 years
Over 5 years
Maturity not applicable
Total
Cash and balances with central banks
52,889
52,889
Loans and advances to banks
12,910
1,581
3,735
2,258
720
21,204
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
–  Trading assets
20,958
3,508
7,988
11,974
11,305
55,734
–  Non-trading derivatives
160
62
185
517
732
1,657
–  Mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
31,075
14,907
14,182
9,967
1,881
310
72,322
–  Designated as at fair value through profit or loss
14
233
383
1,698
1,120
3,448
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
–  Equity securities
2,607
2,607
–  Debt securities
135
628
1,136
23,026
25,892
50,817
–  Loans and advances
321
569
654
1,056
639
3,238
Securities at amortised cost
1,714
1,932
5,629
24,150
20,442
53,867
Loans and advances to customers
61,978
23,768
62,643
235,586
337,804
721,779
Other assets 2
5,581
363
1,454
1,155
1,331
5,060
14,946
Total assets
187,735
47,551
97,989
311,386
401,867
7,977
1,054,507
2024
Cash and balances with central banks
70,353
70,353
Loans and advances to banks
16,825
1,254
1,322
1,759
610
21,769
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
–  Trading assets
22,154
8,044
14,501
16,006
12,202
72,906
–  Non-trading derivatives
602
368
465
356
672
2,463
–  Mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
30,002
11,263
7,222
5,931
1,835
228
56,481
–  Designated as at fair value through profit or loss
145
198
1,070
2,110
2,217
5,740
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
–  Equity securities
2,562
2,562
–  Debt securities
365
456
2,027
18,064
21,307
42,219
–  Loans and advances
2
4
94
871
637
1,608
Securities at amortised cost
2,075
2,646
5,729
22,838
16,985
50,273
Loans and advances to customers
53,738
26,456
61,544
216,035
322,526
680,299
Other assets 2
5,600
590
1,048
698
1,107
5,006
14,050
Total assets
201,860
51,279
95,021
284,668
380,098
7,796
1,020,724
1Includes assets on demand.
2Includes assets such as current and deferred tax assets as presented in the consolidated statement of the financial position. Additionally, assets are included in that position where maturities are not applicable such as property and equipment and investments in associates and joint ventures. Due to their nature,
non-financial assets consist mainly of assets expected to be recovered after more than 12 months.
36  Liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments by maturity
The tables below include all liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments by maturity based on contractual,
undiscounted cash flows. These balances are included in the maturity analysis as follows:
§ Perpetual liabilities are included in the column ‘Maturity not applicable’.
§ Derivative liabilities are included on a net basis if cash flows are settled net. For other derivative liabilities the
contractual gross cash flow payable is included.
§ Undiscounted future coupon interest on financial liabilities payable is included in a separate line and in the
relevant maturity bucket.
§ Non-financial liabilities are included based on a breakdown of the amounts per statement of financial position,
per expected maturity.
§ Loans and other credit-related commitments are classified on the basis of the earliest date they can be drawn
down.
ING Bank’s expected cash flows on some financial liabilities vary significantly from contractual cash flows. Principal
differences are in demand deposits from customers that are expected to remain stable or increase and in
unrecognised loan commitments that are not all expected to be drawn down immediately. Reference is made to
the liquidity risk paragraph in ‘Risk Management – Funding and liquidity risk’ for a description on how liquidity risk
is managed.
Liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments by maturity
in EUR million
2025
Less than 1 month 1
1–3 months
3–12 months
1–5 years
Over 5 years
Maturity not applicable
Adjustment  2
Total
Deposits from banks
10,307 
2,433 
2,392 
1,737 
1,617 
34 
18,521 
Customer deposits
649,957 
26,346 
37,769 
6,769 
2,049 
1,816 
724,707 
Financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss
–  Other trading liabilities
704 
48 
110 
1,028 
610 
247 
2,745 
–  Trading derivatives
2,509 
2,290 
4,604 
7,508 
2,459 
1,311 
20,681 
–  Non-trading derivatives
170 
199 
229 
304 
128 
309 
1,338 
–  Designated at fair value through
profit or loss
39,279 
6,980 
937 
4,110 
4,558 
36 
-137 
55,764 
Debt securities in issue
1,268 
17,674 
40,682 
26,598 
17,731 
-838 
103,116 
Senior non preferred debt
2,032 
1,139 
 
28,600 
16,791 
-473 
48,090 
Subordinated loans
 
 
 
 
10,612 
7,627 
-139 
18,100 
Lease liabilities
15 
34 
172 
574 
304 
-50 
1,050 
Financial liabilities
706,242 
57,144 
86,894 
77,227 
56,860 
7,663 
2,081 
994,112 
Other liabilities 3
7,289 
843 
2,221 
490 
553 
11,395 
Total liabilities
713,531 
57,986 
89,115 
77,717 
57,413 
7,663 
2,081 
1,005,507 
Coupon interest due on financial
liabilities
1,913 
1,331 
4,661 
11,837 
8,866 
476 
29,086 
Commitments:
–  Guarantees
28,690 
 
 
552 
 
29,242 
–  Irrevocable letters of credit
15,230 
 
 
 
 
15,230 
Irrevocable facilities
200,000 
39 
6 
77 
76 
200,198 
243,920
39
6
629
76
244,670
1Includes liabilities on demand.
2This column reconciles the contractual undiscounted cash flows on financial liabilities to the statement of financial position values. The adjustments mainly relate to the impact of discounting and fair value hedge adjustments, and for derivatives, to the fact that the contractual cash flows are presented on a gross
basis (unless the cash flows are actually settled net).
3Includes Other liabilities, Current and deferred tax liabilities, and Provisions as presented in the Consolidated statement of financial position.
Liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments by maturity
in EUR million
2024
Less than 1 month 1
1–3 month
3–12 months
1–5 years
Over 5 years
Maturity not applicable
Adjustment 2
Total
Deposits from banks
9,104
1,367
2,085
1,637
2,484
46
16,722
Customer deposits
610,590
23,479
50,034
11,141
2,081
2,399
699,725
Financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss
–  Other trading liabilities
5,790
230
313
1,325
1,465
-34
9,089
–  Trading derivatives
2,631
2,367
3,730
7,641
5,499
4,298
26,166
–  Non-trading derivatives
419
57
-36
711
149
801
2,101
–  Designated at fair value through
profit or loss
32,644
5,842
1,798
5,095
4,365
34
-239
49,539
Debt securities in issue
1,949
17,635
33,037
26,600
15,704
-466
94,459
Senior non preferred debt
975
30,121
19,153
-856
49,393
Subordinated loans
9,962
8,415
-498
17,879
Lease liabilities
20
44
162
607
328
-45
1,116
Financial liabilities
663,148
51,995
91,125
84,879
61,190
8,448
5,405
966,190
Other liabilities 3
7,294
456
2,073
502
470
10,795
Total liabilities
670,442
52,451
93,198
85,381
61,660
8,448
5,405
976,986
Coupon interest due on financial
liabilities
2,278
1,600
5,981
10,388
8,065
516
28,829
Commitments:
–  Guarantees
26,355
3
550
26,908
–  Irrevocable letters of credit
16,388
16,388
Irrevocable facilities
175,000
9
15
143
56
175,222
217,743
9
15
146
606
218,518
1Includes liabilities on demand.
2This column reconciles the contractual undiscounted cash flows on financial liabilities to the statement of financial position values. The adjustments mainly relate to the impact of discounting and fair value hedge adjustments, and for derivatives, to the fact that the contractual cash flows are presented on a gross
basis (unless the cash flows are actually settled net).
3Includes Other liabilities, Current and deferred tax liabilities, and Provisions as presented in the Consolidated statement of financial position.
37  Transfer of financial assets, assets pledged and received as collateral
Financial assets pledged as collateral
The financial assets pledged as collateral consist primarily of mortgages pledged to secure covered bonds and
securitisations, deposits from the Dutch Central Bank and other banks, as well as debt and equity securities used in
securities lending or sale and repurchase transactions. They serve to secure margin accounts and are used for
other purposes required by law. Pledges are generally conducted under terms that are usual and customary for
collateralised transactions including standard sale and repurchase agreements, securities lending and borrowing
and derivatives margining. The financial assets pledged are as follows:
Financial assets pledged as collateral
in EUR million
2025
2024
Banks
–  Cash and balances with central banks
499
397
–  Loans and advances to banks
2,672
2,211
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
20,561
28,905
Financial assets at fair value through OCI
1,519
3,037
Securities at amortised cost
3,339
3,184
Loans and advances to customers
71,321
67,706
Other assets
479
503
100,392
105,944
In some jurisdictions ING Bank N.V. has an obligation to maintain a reserve with central banks. As at 31 December
2025, the minimum mandatory reserve deposits with various central banks amount to EUR 11,925 million (2024 :
EUR 11,648 million ).
Financial assets received as collateral
The financial assets received as collateral that can be sold or repledged in absence of default by the owner of the
collateral consists of securities obtained through reverse repurchase transactions and securities borrowing
transactions.
These transactions are generally conducted under standard market terms for most repurchase transactions and
the recipient of the collateral has an unrestricted right to sell or repledge it, provided that the collateral (or
equivalent collateral) is returned to the counterparty at term.
Financial assets received as collateral
in EUR million
2025
2024
Total received collateral available for sale or repledge at fair value
–  equity securities
21,494
22,815
–  debt securities
144,257
140,285
of which sold or repledged at fair value
–  equity securities
16,018
12,024
–  debt securities
98,422
90,708
Transfer of financial assets
The majority of ING's financial assets that have been transferred, but do not qualify for derecognition are debt and
equity instruments used in securities lending or sale and repurchase transactions. These transferred financial
assets remain recognized on the balance sheet as ING retains substantially all the risk and rewards of ownership
and remains exposed to the changes in the fair value of the assets.
Transfer of financial assets not qualifying for derecognition
Securities lending
Sale and repurchase
Equity
Debt
Equity
Debt
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Transferred assets at carrying
amount
Financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss
4,163
4,141
3
3
5,929
7,273
9,687
16,929
Financial assets at fair value through
other comprehensive income
314
603
886
1,956
Securities at amortised cost
399
635
989
819
Associated liabilities at carrying
amount1
Financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
5,398
7,005
6,684
11,901
1The table includes the associated liabilities which are reported after offsetting, compared to the gross positions of the encumbered assets.
The table above does not include assets transferred to consolidated securitisation entities as the related assets
remain recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position. Transferred financial assets that are
derecognised in their entirety are mentioned in Note 42 'Structured entities'.
38  Offsetting financial assets and liabilities
The following tables include information about rights to offset and the related arrangements. The amounts
included consist of all recognised financial instruments that are presented net in the statement of financial
position under the IFRS netting criteria (legal right to offset and intention to settle net or to realise the asset and
settle the liability simultaneously) and amounts presented gross in the statement of financial position but subject
to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar arrangements.
At ING Bank amounts that are offset mainly relate to derivatives transactions, sale and repurchase agreements,
securities lending agreements and cash pooling arrangements. A significant portion of offsetting is applied to OTC
derivatives which are cleared through central clearing parties.
Related amounts not offset in the statement of financial position include transactions where:
§ The counterparty has an offsetting exposure and a master netting or similar arrangement is in place with a
right to offset only in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy, or the offsetting criteria are otherwise not
satisfied; and
§ In the case of derivatives and securities lending or sale and repurchase agreements, cash and non-cash
collateral has been received or pledged to cover net exposure in the event of a default or other predetermined
events. The effect of Over-collateralization is excluded.
The net amounts resulting after offsetting are not intended to represent ING’s actual exposure to counterparty
risk, as risk management employs a number of credit risk mitigation strategies in addition to netting and collateral
arrangements. Reference is made to the Risk Management Credit risk section ‘Credit risk mitigation'.
Financial assets subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements
in EUR million
2025
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial assets
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial liabilities
offset in the
statement of
financial position
Net amounts of
financial assets
presented in the
statement of
financial position
Related amounts not offset                     
in the statement of financial position
Net amount
Amounts not
subject to
enforceable
netting
arrangements
Statement of
financial position
total ¹
Financial
instruments
Cash and financial
instruments
received as
collateral
Statement of financial position line item
Financial instrument
Loans and advances to banks 2
Reverse repurchase, securities 
borrowing and similar agreements
4,964
-77
4,886
4,859
27
1,949
6,836
4,964
-77
4,886
4,859
27
1,949
6,836
Financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss
Trading and Non-trading
Reverse repurchase, securities
borrowing and similar agreements
102,179
-48,514
53,665
26
53,507
132
16,378
70,044
Derivatives 3
81,453
-59,208
22,245
10,755
3,068
8,421
3,758
26,003
183,632
-107,722
75,910
10,782
56,575
8,553
20,136
96,047
Loans and advances to customers 4
Reverse repurchase, securities
borrowing and similar agreements
3,247
-32
3,215
3,205
9
652
3,866
Cash pools
211,791
-209,568
2,222
37
1,847
338
2,222
215,038
-209,601
5,437
37
5,052
347
652
6,089
Other items where offsetting is applied in
the statement of financial position 5
742
-657
85
45
39
85
Total financial assets
404,375
-318,057
86,318
10,864
66,487
8,967
22,738
109,056
1‘The statement of financial position total’ is the sum of ‘Net amounts of financial assets presented in the statement of financial position’ and ’Amounts not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements’.
2At 31 December 2025, the total amount of ‘Loans and advances to banks’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 14,368 million which is not subject to offsetting.
3Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include certain exchange traded future and option positions with the same underlying.
4At 31 December 2025, the total amount of ‘Loans and advances to customers’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 717,912 million of which the net cash pool position of EUR 2,222 million is subject to offsetting.
5Other items include amounts to be settled with Central Clearing Counterparties regarding derivatives transactions and is included in ‘Other Assets – Amounts to be settled’ for EUR 4,074 million in the statement of financial position of which EUR 85 million is subject to offsetting as at 31 December 2025.
Financial assets subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements
in EUR million
2024
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial assets
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial liabilities
offset in the
statement of
financial position
Net amounts of
financial assets
presented in the
statement of
financial position
Related amounts not offset                     
in the statement of financial position
Net amount
Amounts not
subject to
enforceable
netting
arrangements
Statement of
financial position
total ¹
Financial
instruments
Cash and financial
instruments
received as
collateral
Statement of financial position line item
Financial instrument
Loans and advances to banks 2
Reverse repurchase, securities 
borrowing and similar agreements
3,752
-31
3,721
3,683
38
7,057
10,777
Other
3,752
-31
3,721
3,683
38
7,057
10,777
Financial assets at fair value through profit
or loss
Trading and Non-trading
Reverse repurchase, securities
borrowing and similar agreements
98,679
-49,365
49,315
219
48,676
420
16,112
65,426
Derivatives
93,034
-66,877
26,157
17,598
3,643
4,916
6,111
32,268
191,713
-116,241
75,472
17,818
52,319
5,336
22,222
97,694
Loans and advances to customers 3
Reverse repurchase, securities
borrowing and similar agreements
4,444
-1,216
3,228
3,191
37
243
3,471
Cash pools
237,248
-234,838
2,410
65
1,730
615
2,410
241,691
-236,053
5,638
65
4,921
652
243
5,881
Other items where offsetting is applied in
the statement of financial position 4
6,666
-6,284
382
79
303
382
Total financial assets
443,822
-358,609
85,213
17,962
60,922
6,329
29,522
114,735
1‘The statement of financial position total’ is the sum of ‘Net amounts of financial assets presented in the statement of financial position’ and ’Amounts not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements’.
2At 31 December 2024, the total amount of ‘Loans and advances to banks’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 10,992 million which is not subject to offsetting.
3Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include certain exchange traded future and option positions with the same underlying.
4At 31 December 2024, the total amount of ‘Loans and advances to customers’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 676,828 million of which the net cash pool position of EUR 2,410 million is subject to offsetting.
5Other items include amounts to be settled with Central Clearing Counterparties regarding securities and derivatives transactions and is included in ‘Other Assets – Amounts to be settled’ for EUR 3,550 million in the statement of financial position of which EUR 382 million is subject to offsetting as at 31 December
2024.
Financial liabilities subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements
in EUR million
2025
Related amounts not offset in the
statement of financial position
Amounts not
subject to
enforceable
netting
arrangements
Statement of
financial position
total ¹
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial liabilities
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial assets
offset in the
statement of
financial position
Net amounts of
financial liabilities
presented in the
statement of
financial position
Financial
instruments
Cash and financial
instruments
pledged as
collateral
Net amount
Statement of financial position line item
Financial instrument
Deposits from banks 2
Repurchase, securities lending
and similar agreements
79
-77
1
1
329
330
Other
287
-287
366
-365
1
1
329
330
Customer deposits 4
Repurchase, securities lending
and similar agreements
32
-32
182
182
Cash pools
228,013
-209,568
18,445
8
18,437
18,445
228,045
-209,601
18,445
8
18,437
182
18,627
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or
loss
Trading and Non-trading
Repurchase, securities lending
and similar agreements
84,997
-48,514
36,483
26
36,520
-63
9,760
46,243
Derivatives 3
71,427
-53,882
17,545
10,783
3,409
3,353
4,474
22,019
156,424
-102,395
54,028
10,809
39,929
3,291
14,234
68,262
Other items where offsetting is applied in the
statement of financial position 5
5,742
-5,697
45
45
45
Total financial liabilities
390,577
-318,057
72,520
10,862
39,929
21,729
14,745
87,265
1‘The statement of financial position total’ is the sum of ‘Net amounts of financial liabilities presented in the statement of financial position’ and ’Amounts not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements’.
2At 31 December 2025, the total amount of ‘Deposits from banks’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 18,190 million of which EUR 0 million is subject to offsetting.
3Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include certain exchange traded future and option positions with the same underlying.
4At 31 December 2025, the total amount of ‘Customers deposits’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 724,525 million of which the net cash pool position of EUR 18,445 million is subject to offsetting.
5Other items include amounts to be settled with Central Clearing Counterparties regarding derivatives transactions and is included in ‘Other Liabilities – Amounts to be settled’ for EUR 4,188 million in the statement of financial position of which EUR 45 million is subject to offsetting as at 31 December 2025.
Financial liabilities subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements
in EUR million
2024
Related amounts not offset in the
statement of financial position
Amounts not
subject to
enforceable
netting
arrangements
Statement of
financial position
total ¹
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial liabilities
Gross amounts of
recognised
financial assets
offset in the
statement of
financial position
Net amounts of
financial liabilities
presented in the
statement of
financial position
Financial
instruments
Cash and financial
instruments
pledged as
collateral
Net amount
Statement of financial position line item
Financial instrument
Deposits from banks 2
Repurchase, securities lending
and similar agreements
64
-31
33
33
33
Other
62
-62
126
-93
33
33
33
Customer deposits 3
Repurchase, securities lending
and similar agreements
1,214
-1,214
1
1
Cash pools
251,655
-234,838
16,817
21
16,796
16,817
252,868
-236,052
16,817
21
16,796
1
16,818
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or
loss
Trading and Non-trading
Repurchase, securities lending
and similar agreements
81,384
-49,365
32,019
219
31,669
130
11,671
43,689
Derivatives
89,386
-67,731
21,655
17,639
2,745
1,272
6,612
28,267
170,769
-117,095
53,674
17,859
34,414
1,402
18,283
71,956
Other items where offsetting is applied in the
statement of financial position 4
5,609
-5,368
242
83
159
242
Total financial liabilities
429,373
-358,608
70,765
17,962
34,447
18,357
18,283
89,049
1‘The statement of financial position total’ is the sum of ‘Net amounts of financial liabilities presented in the statement of financial position’ and ’Amounts not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements’.
2At 31 December 2024, the total amount of ‘Deposits from banks’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 16,690 million of which EUR 0 million is subject to offsetting.
3Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include certain exchange traded future and option positions with the same underlying.
4At 31 December 2024, the total amount of ‘Customers deposits’ excluding repurchase agreements is EUR 699,724 million of which the net cash pool position of EUR 16,817 million is subject to offsetting.
5Other items include amounts to be settled with Central Clearing Counterparties regarding securities and derivatives transactions and is included in ‘Other Liabilities – Amounts to be settled’ for EUR 4,290 million in the statement of financial position of which EUR 242 million is subject to offsetting as at 31 December
2024.
39  Commitments
In the normal course of business, ING Bank is party to activities where risks are not reflected in whole or in part in
the consolidated financial statements. In response to the needs of its customers, the Group offers financial
products related to loans. These products include traditional off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments.
Commitments
in EUR million
2025
2024
–  Guarantees
29,242
26,908
–  Irrevocable letters of credit
15,230
16,388
44,472
43,296
Irrevocable facilities
200,198
175,222
244,670
218,518
Guarantees relate both to credit and non-credit substitute guarantees. Credit substitute guarantees are
guarantees given by ING Bank in respect of credit granted to customers by a third party. Many of them are
expected to expire without being drawn on and therefore do not necessarily represent future cash outflows.
Irrevocable letters of credit mainly secure payments to third parties for a customer’s foreign and domestic trade
transactions in order to finance a shipment of goods. ING Bank’s credit risk in these transactions is limited since
these transactions are collateralized by the commodity shipped and are of a short duration.
Irrevocable facilities mainly constitute unused portions of irrevocable credit facilities granted to corporate clients.
Many of these facilities are for a fixed duration and bear interest at a floating rate. ING’s credit risk and interest
rate risk in these transactions is limited. The unused portion of irrevocable credit facilities is partly secured by
customers’ assets or counter-guarantees by the central governments and other public sector entities under the
regulatory requirements. Irrevocable facilities also include commitments made to purchase securities to be issued
by governments and private issuers. In addition, irrevocable facilities includes certain revocable facilities where the
ability to withdraw such facilities is constrained in practice, and cancellation typically occurs only after a significant
increase in credit risk, these commitments are treated as “in substance irrevocable” and are therefore included
within the scope of the IFRS 9 impairment requirements.
ING uses Irrevocable Payment Commitments (IPCs) for a part of its contributions to the Single Resolution Fund
(SRF). ING Bank has EUR 346 million of IPCs outstanding to the SRF as at 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024:
EUR 346 million). No IPCs were provided to the SRF during 2025 (2024: nil). No IPCs were called by the SRF in 2025
(2024: nil). Cash collateral provided to the SRF is equal to the outstanding amount of IPCs.
ING also uses IPCs for a part of its contributions to the Deposit Guarantee Scheme in Germany. IPCs amount to EUR
322 million as at 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: EUR 309 million). Of these, EUR 13 million of IPCs were
provided to the DGS during 2025 (2024: EUR 35 million). No IPCs were called by the DGS in 2025 (2024: nil). ING
posted government bonds as collateral for the total nominal amount of EUR 336 million as at 31 December 2025
(31 December 2024: EUR 336 million).
In addition to the items included in commitments, ING Bank has issued certain guarantees as participant in
collective arrangements of national banking funds and as a participant in required collective guarantee schemes
which apply in different countries.
ING Bank N.V. provided a guarantee to the German Deposit Guarantee Fund (‘Einlagensicherungsfonds’ or ESF)
under section 5 (10) of the by-laws of this fund, where ING Bank N.V. indemnifies the Association of German Banks
Berlin against any losses it might incur as result of actions taken with respect to ING Germany. The ESF is a
voluntary collective guarantee scheme for retail savings and deposits in excess of EUR 100,000.
40  Legal proceedings
ING Bank and its consolidated subsidiaries are involved in governmental, regulatory, arbitration and legal
proceedings and investigations in the Netherlands and in a number of foreign jurisdictions, including the U.S.,
involving claims by and against them which arise in the ordinary course of their businesses, including in
connection with their activities as lenders, broker-dealers, underwriters, issuers of securities and investors and their
position as employers and taxpayers. In certain of such proceedings, very large or indeterminate amounts are
sought, including punitive and other damages. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate
outcome of all pending or threatened governmental, regulatory, arbitration and legal proceedings and
investigations, ING is of the opinion that the proceedings and investigations set out below may have or have in the
recent past had a significant effect on the financial position, profitability or reputation of ING and/or ING and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Settlement agreement: On 4 September 2018, ING announced that it had entered into a settlement agreement
with the Dutch Public Prosecution Service relating to previously disclosed investigations regarding various
requirements for client on-boarding and the prevention of money laundering and corrupt practices. Following the
entry into the settlement agreement, ING has experienced heightened scrutiny from authorities in various
countries. ING is also aware, including as a result of media reports, that other parties may, among other things,
seek to commence legal proceedings against ING in connection with the subject matter of the settlement. Certain
parties filed requests with the Court of Appeal in The Netherlands to reconsider the prosecutor’s decision to enter
into the settlement agreement with ING and not to prosecute ING or (former) ING employees. In December 2020,
the Court of Appeal issued its final ruling. In this ruling the prosecutors' decision to enter into the settlement
agreement with ING was upheld, making the settlement final. However, in a separate ruling, the Court ordered the
prosecution of ING’s former CEO. In December 2025, the Court decided that ING’s former CEO does not have to be
prosecuted. This case is now closed.
Litigation by investors: In February and March 2024, ING and certain (former) board members were served with a
writ of summons for litigation in The Netherlands on behalf of investors who claim to have suffered financial losses
in connection with ING's disclosures on historic shortcomings in its financial economic crime policies, related risk
management and control systems, the investigation by and settlement with the Dutch authorities in 2018 and
related risks for ING. ING does not agree with the allegations and will defend itself against these and the claimed
damages of EUR 587 million. In February 2025, ING and the (former) board members filed their statement of
defence against the allegations and in November 2025, the court rejected all claims by the investors. In February
2026, the investors filed an appeal against this decision of the court. Separately, but relating to the same matters,
in July 2024 another group of investors claiming to have suffered financial losses requested disclosure of certain
ING documents and to question witnesses. The court issued a decision on the request in May 2025 where it
rejected the entirety of the request made by these investors. These investors may decide to pursue further legal
action. ING follows IFRS rules for taking legal provisions and would disclose material amounts in this regard if and
when applicable - which currently is not the case.
Findings regarding AML processes: As previously disclosed, after its September 2018 settlement with Dutch
authorities concerning anti-money laundering matters, and in the context of significantly increased attention on
the prevention of financial economic crime, ING has experienced heightened scrutiny by authorities in various
countries. The interactions with such regulatory and judicial authorities have included, and can be expected to
continue to include, onsite visits, information requests, investigations and other enquiries. Such interactions, as
well as ING’s internal assessments in connection with its global enhancement programme, have in some cases
resulted in satisfactory outcomes, and also have resulted in, and may continue to result in, findings, or other
conclusions which may require appropriate remedial actions by ING, or may have other consequences. ING intends
to continue to work in close cooperation with authorities as it seeks to improve its management of non-financial
risks in terms of policies, tooling, monitoring, governance, knowledge and behaviour.
In January 2022, a Luxembourg investigating judge informed ING Luxembourg that he intends to instruct the
relevant prosecutor to prepare a criminal indictment regarding alleged shortcomings in the AML process at ING
Luxembourg. In November 2024, a Luxembourg Court decided to refer the case to the ‘Tribunal Correctionnel’ for
alleged shortcomings in a limited number of individual client files. ING Luxembourg filed an appeal against this
procedural decision. In December 2025, the Court of Appeal upheld the first decision without making any
substantive changes, as a result of which the case can now be heard before the Tribunal Correctionnel. It is
currently not possible to determine how this matter will be resolved or the timing of any such resolution, ING does
not expect the outcome of this matter to have a material financial effect.
ING continues to take steps to enhance its management of compliance risks and embed stronger awareness
across the whole organisation. These steps are part of the global KYC programme and set of initiatives, which
includes enhancing KYC files and working on various structural improvements in compliance policies, tooling,
monitoring, governance, knowledge and behaviour.
Tax cases: Because of the geographic spread of its business, ING may be subject to tax audits, investigations and
procedures in numerous jurisdictions at any point in time. Although ING believes that it has adequately provided
for all its tax positions, the ultimate resolution of these audits, investigations and procedures is uncertain and may
result in liabilities which are materially different from the amounts recognised.
Claims regarding accounts with predecessors of ING Bank Türkiye: ING Bank Türkiye has received numerous
claims from (former) customers of legal predecessors of ING Bank Türkiye. The claims are based on offshore
accounts held with these banks, which banks were seized by the Savings Deposit Insurance Fund (“SDIF”) prior to
the acquisition of ING Bank Türkiye in 2007 from OYAK. Pursuant to the acquisition contract, ING Bank Türkiye can
claim compensation from SDIF if a court orders ING Bank Türkiye to pay amounts to the offshore account holders.
SDIF has made payments to ING Bank Türkiye pursuant to such compensation requests, but filed various lawsuits
to receive those amounts back. In April 2022, the Turkish Supreme Court decided that the prescription period for
the offshore account holders’ compensation claims starts on the transfer date of the account holders to the
offshore accounts.
In 2024 SDIF initiated enforcement procedures against ING Bank Türkiye, based on the decision in April 2022 by the
Turkish Supreme Court referred to above. SDIF alleges that this decision means that ING Bank Türkiye has to return
certain payments made by SDIF regarding the offshore depositors' receivables cases, as the statute of limitations
had already expired.
Additionally, ING Bank Türkiye has initiated enforcement proceedings against SDIF regarding accumulated
receivables that SDIF has either partially or completely failed to pay.
As of February 2026, four lawsuits have been finalized in favour of ING Bank Türkiye with the Turkish Supreme
Court's verdict, which are likely to be precedent decisions for the other files. At this moment it is not possible to
assess the outcome of these procedures nor to provide an estimate of the (potential) financial effect of these
claims.
Mortgage expenses claims: ING Spain has received claims and is involved in procedures with customers regarding
reimbursement of expenses associated with the formalisation of mortgages. In most first instance court
proceedings the expense clause of the relevant mortgage contract has been declared null and ING Spain has been
ordered to reimburse all or part of the applicable expenses. Since 2018, the Spanish Supreme Court and the
European Court of Justice ("CJEU") have issued rulings setting out which party should bear notary, registration,
agency, and stamp duty costs. In January 2021, the Spanish Supreme Court ruled that valuation costs of
mortgages, signed prior to 16 June 2019, the date the new mortgage law entered into force, should be borne by
the bank. Media attention for the statute of limitations applicable to the right to claim reimbursement of costs
resulted in an increased number of claims at the beginning of 2021. In June 2021, the Spanish Supreme Court
published a press release stating its decision to ask the CJEU for a preliminary ruling regarding the criteria that
should be applied to determine the date from which the action for claiming the reimbursement of mortgage
expenses is considered to be expired. In January 2024, the CJEU ruled that the limitation period for the judicial
claim for reimbursement of expenses cannot begin to run from a Supreme Court decision declaring the clause null
and void, nor from the moment of the payment of the expenses. The CJEU indicated that it is up to national case-
law to determine the criterion that should be applied for the calculation of the limitation period. In April 2024, the
CJEU ruled that it was not against European Union laws that the period of prescription began to be calculated from
the moment the clause was declared null. Following the CJEU approach, on 14 June 2024 the Spanish Supreme
Court issued its final decision stating in short that the 5-year period to claim the reimbursement of costs can only
begin from the date each individual clause is declared null by a judge. The Spanish Supreme Court also leaves a
small door open for banks in case they can demonstrate that a specific individual indeed had knowledge of the
unfairness of the clause before that moment. ING has adapted its strategy to the latest developments.
ING Spain was also included, together with other Spanish banks, in three class actions filed by customer
associations. In one of the class actions an agreement was reached with the association. In another class action
the association withdrew from the proceedings. With respect to the third class action, ING filed an appeal asking
the Spanish Court of Appeal to determine that the ruling of the court of first instance is only applicable to the
consumers that were part of the case. The National Court has revoked the ruling and declared that the consumers
will not be able to initiate an action for compensation based on the first instance ruling, as the claimant
association intended. This last decision is not yet final, as it has been appealed in the Supreme Court.
A provision has been established in the past and has been adjusted where appropriate.
Claims regarding mortgage loans in Swiss franc in Poland: ING Poland is a defendant in several lawsuits with
retail customers who took out mortgage loans indexed to the Swiss franc. Such customers have alleged that the
mortgage loan contract contains abusive clauses. One element that the court is expected to consider in
determining whether such contracts contain abusive clauses is whether the rules to determine the exchange rate
used for the conversion of the loan from Polish zloty to Swiss franc are unambiguous and verifiable. In December
2020, the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (PFSA) proposed that lenders offer borrowers voluntary out-of-
court settlements on foreign-currency mortgage disputes, with mortgages indexed to Swiss franc serving as a
reference point. In February 2021, ING Poland announced its support for this initiative and in October 2021 began
offering the settlements to the borrowers following the PFSA’s proposal. In October 2022, a hearing of the CJEU
was held inter alia on the question whether, after cancellation of a contract regarding a Swiss franc loan by a
court, banks may still charge interest for the amount borrowed under such loan prior to cancellation.
In June 2023, the CJEU issued a ruling. It ruled that under EU law when a loan agreement indexed to the Swiss
franc is declared null and void, banks cannot claim any remuneration (i.e. interest) for the duration the principal
amount was available to the customer. The customer, however, may assert claims against banks in addition to
reimbursement of interest and installments previously paid to the bank. In September and December 2023, the
CJEU issued rulings providing further clarity on the limitation period and about the question of when a contract
clause can be considered unfair. In April 2024, the Polish Supreme Court issued a ruling stating that if it is
impossible to establish a binding foreign currency exchange rate for the parties in the indexed or denominated
loan agreement, the agreement is also not binding in other respects. ING has recorded a portfolio provision. In
October and November 2024, seven new preliminary questions were referred to the CJEU which focus on the
claims of banks in a situation of annulment of a credit agreement.
In June 2025, the CJEU issued a judgement in one of the Polish cases concerning banks' capital recovery after
invalidation of the mortgage Swiss franc loan agreement. The verdict was passed in the case brought by a bank.
The CJEU questioned the compliance with European Union law of the so-called two-claims theory, which has so far
been widely used in Polish jurisprudence. It was based on the assumption that each party of the invalidated
contract has its own claim. A consumer is entitled to ask for all the installments paid to the bank, and a bank is
entitled to ask for the capital (in two separate civil proceedings). CJEU said that this approach is against EU law.
Both claims should be taken into consideration in one proceeding. A bank is entitled to ask only for the result of
subtraction of its claim and a claim of a consumer (the balance theory). Despite this CJEU ruling, the majority of
Polish courts continues issuing judgments in accordance with two-claims theory.
Since September 2025, ING Poland has seen an increase in the number of settlements.
In January 2026, the CJEU issued a judgement confirming that it is permissible to settle both parties’ claims in a
Swiss franc dispute within a single proceeding by way of set off. The CJEU found that banks may raise the defence
of set-off even if the invalidity of the contract is disputed. The CJEU pointed out that if the bank were deprived of
the possibility of raising a set-off defence against the consumer, his right to effective judicial protection would be
disproportionately infringed. Although the judgment is generally favorable to banks, certain theses contained in
the judgment may result in an approach to calculating interest that is unfavorable for banks. At this point,
however, it is unclear how the courts will approach the application of this ruling. This requires observation.
Certain Consumer Credit Products: In October 2021, ING announced that it would offer compensation to its Dutch
retail customers in connection with certain revolving consumer loans with variable interest rates that allegedly did
not sufficiently follow market rates. This announcement was made in response to several rulings by the Dutch
Institute for Financial Disputes (Kifid) regarding similar products at other banks. ING has recognized a provision of
EUR 180 million in 2021 for compensation and costs in connection with this matter. On 22 December 2021, ING
announced that it reached an agreement with the Dutch Consumers’ Association (Consumentenbond) on the
compensation methodology for revolving credits. Based on a Kifid ruling regarding similar products, ING has
amended its previously announced compensation scheme by also compensating interest on interest. In the third
quarter of 2022, ING increased its provision for this matter by EUR 75 million. In the fourth quarter of 2022, ING and
the Dutch Consumers’ Association reached an agreement on the compensation of customers who have had an
overdraft facility or a revolving credit card with a variable interest rate. ING has started compensating such
customers in line with Kifid rulings about revolving credits including ‘interest-on-interest’-effect in these cases.
Timelines for compensation vary depending on customer and product segmentation and are dependent on the
availability of data. In 2024 the compensation process was expedited. ING substantially finalized the compensation
process in the first half of 2025, with a spill-over to the third quarter of 2025 for after-care in individual cases. ING
has reached out to its customers with respect to the Kifid ruling, to also compensate amounts under EUR 50. Kifid
confirmed ING's calculation methodology in relation to older consumer credits, where there is no relevant data
available to determine the start delta and in relation to the interest-on-interest effect. The compensation process
is still ongoing and may take until Q2 2026.
Climate litigation: In January 2024, Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) announced that it holds ING
liable for alleged contribution to climate change and threatened to initiate legal proceedings against ING. In March
2025, Milieudefensie started legal proceedings at the Court in Amsterdam against ING by serving the writ of
summons. ING will defend its science-based climate approach in court and submitted its statement of defence in
February 2026.
Russian claims: Several ING entities have received claims from, and are involved in litigation with, certain Russia-
linked entities. They claim the payment of principal or interest or other amounts that they have not received
pursuant to sanctions. Claims are also made related to the settlement of contracts that have been terminated
after sanctions were imposed. In at least one case, the claimant seized assets in Russia of ING entities. ING does
not agree with these claims, as they do not comply with the underlying contracts or applicable laws, including
sanctions. ING follows IFRS rules for taking legal provisions and would disclose material amounts in that regard if
and when applicable which currently is not the case.
41  Principal subsidiaries, investments in associates and joint ventures
For the majority of ING’s principal subsidiaries, ING Bank N.V. has control because it either directly or indirectly
owns more than half of the voting power. For subsidiaries in which the interest held is below 50%, control exists
based on the combination of ING’s financial interest and its rights from other contractual arrangements which
result in control over the operating and financial policies of the entity.
For each of the subsidiaries listed, the voting rights held equal the proportion of ownership interest and
consolidation by ING is based on the majority of ownership.
For the principal investments in associates and joint ventures ING Bank has significant influence but not control.
Significant influence generally results from a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights, but also
the ability to participate in the financial and operating policies through situations including, but not limited to one
or more of the following:
§ Representation on the board of directors;
§ Participation in the policymaking process; and
§ Interchange of managerial personnel.
The principal subsidiaries, investments in associates and joint ventures of ING Bank N.V. and their statutory place
of incorporation or primary place of business are as follows:
Principal subsidiaries, investments in associates and joint ventures
Proportion of ownership and
interest held by the group
2025
2024
Subsidiary
Statutory place of
Incorporation
Country of operation
ING Belgium S.A./N.V.
Brussels
Belgium
100%
100%
ING Luxembourg S.A.
Luxembourg City
Luxembourg
100%
100%
ING-DiBa AG
Frankfurt am Main
Germany
100%
100%
ING Bank Slaski S.A. 1
Katowice
Poland
75%
75%
ING Financial Holdings Corporation
Delaware
United States of
America
100%
100%
ING Bank A.S.
Istanbul
Türkiye
100%
100%
ING Bank (Australia) Ltd
Sydney
Australia
100%
100%
ING Commercial Finance B.V.
Amsterdam
the Netherlands
100%
100%
Investments in associates and joint
ventures
TMBThanachart Bank Public Company
Ltd2
Bangkok
Thailand
23%
23%
1The shares of the non-controlling interest stake of 25% are listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, for summarised financial information we refer to Note
29 'Information on geographical areas'
2Reference is made to Note 8 'Investment in associates and joint ventures'.
42  Structured entities
ING Bank’s activities involve transactions with various structured entities (SE) in the normal course of its business. A
structured entity is an entity that has been designed so that voting or similar rights are not the dominant factor in
deciding who controls the entity, such as when any voting rights relate to administrative tasks only and the
relevant activities are directed by means of contractual arrangements. ING Bank’s involvement in these entities
varies and includes both debt financing and equity financing of these entities as well as other relationships. Based
on its accounting policies ING establishes whether these involvements result in no significant influence, significant
influence, joint control or control over the structured entity.
The structured entities over which ING can exercise control are consolidated. ING may provide support to these
consolidated structured entities as and when appropriate. However, this is fully reflected in the consolidated
financial statements of ING Bank as all assets and liabilities of these entities are included and off-balance sheet
commitments are disclosed.
ING’s activities involving structured entities are explained below in the following categories:
1. Consolidated ING originated securitisation programmes;
2. Consolidated ING originated Covered bond programme (CBC);
3. Consolidated ING sponsored Securitisation programme (Mont Blanc);
4. Unconsolidated Securitisation programme; and
5. Other structured entities.
1. Consolidated ING originated securitisation programmes
ING Bank enters into liquidity management securitisation programmes in order to obtain funding and improve
liquidity. Within the programme ING Bank sells ING originated assets to a structured entity. The underlying
exposures include residential mortgages and SME loans in the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Italy, Australia and
Germany.
The structured entity issues securitised notes (traditional securitisations) which are eligible collateral for central
bank liquidity purposes. In most programmes ING Bank acts as investor of the securitised notes. ING Bank
continues to consolidate these structured entities if it is deemed to control the entities.
The structured entity issues securitisation notes in two or more tranches, of which the senior tranche obtains a
high rating (AAA or AA) by a rating agency. The retained tranche can subsequently be used by ING Bank as
collateral in the money market for secured borrowings.
ING Bank originated various securitisations, as at 31 December 2025, these consisted of EUR 76 billion (2024: EUR
74 billion) of senior and subordinated notes, of which EUR 4 billion (2024: EUR 4 billion) were issued externally. The
underlying exposures are residential mortgages and SME loans. Apart from the third party funding, these
securitisations did not impact ING Bank’s Consolidated statement of financial position and profit or loss.
In 2025 , there are no non-controlling interests as part of the securitisation structured entities that are significant
to ING Bank.
2. Consolidated ING originated covered bond programme (CBC)
ING Bank has entered into a covered bond programme. Under the covered bond programme, ING issues bonds.
The payment of interest and principal is guaranteed by the ING administered structured entities presented in table
below. In order for these entities to fulfil their guarantee, ING legally transfers mainly mortgage loans originated
by ING. Furthermore, ING offers protection against deterioration of the mortgage loans. The entities are
consolidated by ING Bank.
Covered bond programme
Fair value pledged
mortgage loans
in EUR million
2025
2024
Dutch Covered Bond programmes
29,131
27,172
Diba Mortgage Pfandbriefe
18,811
15,050
ING Belgium Residential Pandbrieven Programme
8,986
9,024
IBAL Covered Bond
3,492
3,676
ING Bank Hipoteczny CBP
820
602
61,240
55,524
For the covered bond programme, third-party investors in securities issued by the structured entity have recourse
to the assets of the entity and to the assets of ING Bank.
3. Consolidated ING sponsored Securitisation programme (Mont Blanc)
In the normal course of business, ING Bank structures financing transactions for its clients by assisting them in
obtaining sources of liquidity by selling the clients’ receivables or other financial assets to a Special Purpose Vehicle
(SPV). The senior positions in these transactions may be funded by the ING administered multi seller Asset Backed
Commercial Paper (ABCP) conduit Mont Blanc Capital Corp. (rated A-1/P-1). Mont Blanc Capital Corp. funds itself
externally in the ABCP markets.
ING Bank facilitates these transactions by acting as administrative agent, swap counterparty and liquidity provider
to Mont Blanc Capital Corp. ING Bank also provides support facilities (i.e. liquidity) backing the transactions funded
by the conduit. The types of asset currently in the Mont Blanc conduit include trade receivables, consumer finance
receivables, car leases.
ING Bank supports the ABCP programmes by providing Mont Blanc Capital Corp. with short-term liquidity facilities.
Once drawn these facilities bear normal credit risk.
The liquidity facilities provided to Mont Blanc are EUR 4,800 million (2024: EUR 3,119 million). The drawn liquidity
amount is nil as at 31 December 2025 (2024: nil).
The standby liquidity facilities are reported under irrevocable facilities. All facilities, which vary in risk profile, are
granted to the Mont Blanc Capital Corp. subject to normal ING Bank credit and liquidity risk analysis procedures.
The fees received for services provided and for facilities are charged subject to market conditions.
4. Unconsolidated Securitisation programmes
In 2013 ING transferred financial assets (mortgage loans) for an amount of EUR 2 billion to a special purpose
vehicle (SPV). The transaction resulted in full derecognition of the financial assets from ING’s statement of financial
position. Following this transfer ING continues to have two types of ongoing involvement in the transferred assets:
as counterparty to the SPE of a non-standard interest rate swap, which is recognised as a non-trading derivative,
and as servicer of the transferred assets. Service fee income recognised, for the role as administrative agent, in
the statement of profit or loss in 2025 amounted to EUR 1 million (2024: EUR 1 million). The cumulative income
recognised in profit or loss since derecognition amounts to EUR 21 million (2024: EUR 20 million).
In 2025, ING established two SPVs, which are Designated Activity Companies incorporated in Ireland, for the
purpose of significant risk transfer securitizations. ING transferred the credit risk on the selected diversified
portfolios of corporate loans without transferring the assets to the SPVs. Each SPV has issued a series of credit
linked notes varying in seniority of the referenced loans to the investors. Subsequently, SPVs provide a financial
guarantee to ING in respect of the referenced loans and, in return for a fee, are liable to make protection
payments to ING upon the occurrence of a credit event in relation to any of the referenced loans.As of 31
December 2025, credit linked notes held by third parties amounted to EUR 676 million (2024: nil) and funds raised
by the sale of the credit linked notes are deposited within ING as collateral for the credit protection. The associated
corporate loans were EUR 10 billion (2024: nil). The SPVs are not consolidated by ING because the third-party
investors have the exposure, or rights to all variability of returns of the entities. No assets are transferred to, or
income received from these entities and the credit linked notes are fully cash collateralized.
5. Other structured entities
In the normal course of business, ING Bank enters into transactions with structured entities as counterparty.
Predominantly in its structured finance operations, ING can be instrumental in facilitating the creation of these
structured entity counterparties. These entities are generally not included in the consolidated financial statements
of ING Bank, as ING facilitates these transactions as administrative agent by providing structuring, accounting,
funding, lending, and operation services.
ING Bank offers various investment fund products to its clients. ING Bank does not invest in these investment funds
for its own account nor acts as the fund manager.
43  Related parties
In the normal course of business, ING Bank enters into various transactions with related parties. Parties are
considered to be related if one party has the ability to control or exercise significant influence over the other party
in making financial or operating decisions. Related parties of ING Bank include, among others, its subsidiaries,
associates, joint ventures, key management personnel, and various defined benefit and contribution plans. For
post-employment benefit plans, reference is made to Note 31 'Pensions and other post-employment benefits'.
Transactions between related parties include rendering or receiving of services, leases, transfers under finance
arrangements and provisions of guarantees or collateral. All transactions with related parties took place at
conditions customary in the market. There are no significant provisions for doubtful debts or individually significant
bad debt expenses recognised on outstanding balances with related parties. ING Bank forms part of ING Group and
also enters into transactions with ING Group. These transactions vary from financing activities to regular purchase
and sales transactions. Disclosed in the table below, are the transactions with ING Groep N.V.
Parent Company
Transactions with ING Groep N.V.
in EUR million
2025
2024
Assets
83
72
Liabilities
71,222
77,739
Income received
0
0
Expenses paid
2,656
2,507
Liabilities to ING Groep N.V. mainly comprise long-term funding.
Associates and joint ventures
Transactions with ING Bank’s main associates and joint ventures
Associates
Joint ventures
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Assets
117
142
Liabilities
242
263
7
10
Off-balance sheet commitments
18
23
Income received
21
16
Expenses paid
2
Assets, liabilities, commitments, and income related to Associates and joint ventures result from transactions
which are executed as part of the normal Banking business. Dividends received by associates and joint ventures
are included in Note 8 'Investment in associates and joint ventures'.
Key management personnel compensation
The Executive Board of ING Groep N.V., the Management Board Banking and the Supervisory Board are considered
Key Management personnel of ING. In 2025, 2024 and 2023, the three members of the Executive Board of ING
Groep N.V. were also members of the Management Board Banking.
Transactions with key management personnel, including their compensation are included in the tables below.
Key management personnel compensation (Executive Board and Management Board Banking)
2025
in EUR thousands
Executive Board of
ING Groep N.V.
Management Board
Banking 1
Total
Fixed Compensation
–  Base salary
4,615
4,306
8,921
–  Collective fixed allowances 2
1,094
984
2,078
–  Pension costs
83
111
194
–  Severance benefits 3
1,347
444
1,791
Variable compensation
–  Upfront cash
745
745
–  Upfront shares
330
745
1,075
–  Deferred cash
1,118
1,118
–  Deferred shares
494
1,118
1,613
–  Other emoluments 4
340
468
808
Total compensation
8,302
10,041
18,343
1Excluding members of the Management Board Banking that are also members of the Executive Board of ING Groep N.V.
2The collective fixed allowances consist of two savings allowances applicable to employees in the Netherlands; an individual savings allowance of 3.5%
and a collective savings allowance to compensate for the  loss of pension benefits with respect to salary in excess of EUR 137,800.
3In accordance with the Executive Board remuneration policy and with due observance of applicable legal requirements, a severance payment equal to
one year's base salary has been granted.
4 This includes expatriate allowances (such as housing, school/tuition fees and international health insurances, if applicable); banking and insurance
benefits from ING (on the same terms as for other employees of ING in the Netherlands); tax and financial planning services to ensure compliance with
the relevant legislative requirements; and the use of a company car or driver service.
Key management personnel compensation (Executive Board and Management Board Banking)
2024
in EUR thousands
Executive Board of
ING Groep N.V.
Management Board
Banking 1
Total
Fixed Compensation
–  Base salary
4,388
3,598
7,987
–  Collective fixed allowances 2
1,033
790
1,823
–  Pension costs
84
95
179
–  Severance benefits
Variable compensation
–  Upfront cash
609
609
–  Upfront shares
302
609
911
–  Deferred cash
914
914
–  Deferred shares
453
914
1,367
–  Other emoluments 3
306
418
724
Total compensation
6,566
7,948
14,513
1Excluding members of the Management Board Banking that are also members of the Executive Board of ING Groep N.V.
2The collective fixed allowances consist of two savings allowances applicable to employees in the Netherlands; an individual savings allowance of 3.5%
and a collective savings allowance to compensate for the loss of pension benefits with respect to salary in excess of EUR 137,800.
3 This includes expatriate allowances (such as housing, school/tuition fees and international health insurances, if applicable); banking and insurance
benefits from ING (on the same terms as for other employees of ING in the Netherlands); tax and financial planning services to ensure compliance with
the relevant legislative requirements; reimbursement of costs under the Directors & Officers indemnity provided by ING; and the use of a company car or
driver service.
Key management personnel compensation (Executive Board and Management Board Banking)
2023
Executive Board of
ING Groep N.V.
Management Board
Banking 1
Total
in EUR thousands
Fixed Compensation
–  Base salary
4,220
4,200
8,420
–  Collective fixed allowances 2
1,002
887
1,889
–  Pension costs
78
107
185
–  Severance benefits
734
734
Variable compensation
–  Upfront cash
598
598
–  Upfront shares
293
598
891
–  Deferred cash
897
897
–  Deferred shares
439
897
1,336
–  Other emoluments 3
344
487
832
Total compensation
6,376
9,405
15,782
1Excluding members of the Management Board Banking that are also members of the Executive Board of ING Groep N.V.
2The collective fixed allowances consist of two savings allowances applicable to employees in the Netherlands; an individual savings allowance of 3.5%
and a collective savings allowance to compensate for loss of pension benefits with respect to salary in excess of EUR 128,810.
3 This includes amongst others: housing, school/tuition fees, international health insurance, relocation costs and tax and financial planning.
ING indemnifies the members of the EB against direct financial losses in connection with claims from third parties
filed, or threatened to be filed, against them by virtue of their service as a member of the EB, as far as permitted
by law, on the conditions laid down in the Articles of Association and their commission contract. ING has taken out
liability insurance for the members of the EB.
In accordance with the Articles of Association ING indemnifies the members of the Supervisory Board as far as
legally permitted against direct financial losses in connection with claims from third parties filed or threatened to
be filed against them by virtue of their service as a member of the Supervisory Board.
Key management personnel compensation is generally included in Staff expenses in the statement of profit or
loss. The total remuneration of the Executive Board and Management Board Banking is disclosed in the table
above. Under IFRS, certain components of variable remuneration are not recognised in the statement of profit or
loss directly, but are allocated over the vesting period of the award. The comparable amount recognised in Staff
expenses in 2025 relating to the fixed expenses of 2025 and the vesting of variable remuneration of earlier
performance years, is EUR 16 million (2024: EUR 12 million; 2023: EUR 14 million). 
The table below shows the total of fixed remuneration, expense allowances and attendance fees for the
Supervisory Board in 2025, 2024 and 2023.
Key management personnel compensation (Supervisory Board)
in EUR thousands
2025
2024
2023
Total compensation
1,434
1,191
1,152
Loans and advances to key management personnel
As at 31 December 2025 Loans and advances outstanding to key management personnel amounted to EUR 1.1
million (2024: EUR 1.1 million) with an average interest rate of 1.7% (2024: 2.1%) and loan commitments to key
management personnel amounted to EUR 162 thousand (2024: EUR 145 thousand). Total interest received in 2025
on these loans and advances amounted to EUR 17 thousand (2024: EUR 28 thousand).
These loans and advances and loan commitments (1) were made in the ordinary course of business, (2) were
granted on conditions that are comparable to those of loans and advances granted to all employees and (3) did
not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features.
Deposits outstanding and bonds invested in by key management personnel
As at 31 December 2025 Deposits outstanding from key management personnel amounted to EUR 12.9 million
(2024: EUR 15.8 million) and bonds invested in by key management personnel amounted to EUR 226 thousand
(2024: nil). Total interest paid in 2025 on these deposits amounted to EUR 1.1 million (2024: EUR 324 thousand)
and total interest paid in 2025 on these bonds amounted to EUR 3 thousand (2024: nil). These transactions are
entered into under the same commercial and market terms, including interest rates, that apply to non-related
parties.
ING shares held by key management personnel
Number of ING Groep N.V. shares to key management personnel
ING Groep N.V. shares
in numbers
2025
2024
Executive Board members
178,187
152,652
Management Board Banking
415,008
343,055
Supervisory Board members
9,395
5,295
44  Capital management
Capital management strategy
Group Treasury (GT) is responsible for maintaining adequate capitalisation across ING Group and its banking
entities to support the management of risks associated with ING’s business activities. This includes capital
planning, allocation, and management within the Group, as well as the execution of capital market, term capital
funding, and risk management transactions. ING employs an integrated approach to assessing capital adequacy,
whereby GT considers regulatory and internal economic capital metrics alongside the interests of key
stakeholders, including customers, shareholders, and rating agencies.
ING applies the following main capital definitions:
§ Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital consists of shareholders’ equity after the correction for applicable
regulatory adjustments. The CET1 ratio is calculated as CET1 capital divided by risk-weighted assets (RWAs).
§ Tier 1 capital is defined as CET1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 (AT1) securities and other regulatory adjustments.
The Tier 1 capital ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by RWAs.
§ Total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 subordinated liabilities, after regulatory adjustments. The Total
capital ratio is calculated as Total capital divided by RWAs.
§ ING’s CET1 ratio target is built on the CET1 requirements specified for ING, potential increase in the regulatory
requirements, the potential impact of a standardised and predetermined stress scenario and available
mitigating actions, and general uncertainties in its baseline planning.
§ Leverage ratio (LR) is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by the leverage exposure.
§ Minimum Required Eligible Liabilities (MREL)/ Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) is Total capital plus senior
unsecured bonds and amortisations. Related MREL and TLAC ratios are expressed relative to both risk-weighted
assets and leverage exposure. 
Capital position as per 31 December 2025
ING Bank capital position according to CRR III / CRD V
in EUR million
2025
2024
Shareholders’ equity 1
47,744
42,743
- Interim profits not included in CET 1 capital
-699
0
- Other adjustments
-2,580
-2,146
Regulatory adjustments
-3,279
-2,146
Available common equity Tier 1 capital
44,465
40,597
Additional Tier 1 securities
7,460
7,967
Regulatory adjustments additional Tier 1
112
106
Available Tier 1 capital
52,037
48,671
Supplementary capital Tier 2 bonds
10,609
9,853
Regulatory adjustments Tier 2
98
81
Available Total capital
62,744
58,604
Risk weighted assets
340,186
334,770
Common equity Tier 1 ratio
13.1%
12.1%
Tier 1 ratio
15.3%
14.5%
Total capital ratio
18.4%
17.5%
1Shareholders' equity is determined in accordance with IFRS-EU.
In accordance with the applicable regulation, credit and operational risk models used in the capital ratios
calculations are not audited.
Regulatory requirements
Capital adequacy and regulatory capital requirements are based on the standards issued by the Basel Committee
on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee) and implemented in the European Union Directives through the
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), as implemented by De
Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) and the European Central Bank (ECB). Under the CRR, the minimum Pillar 1 capital
requirements applicable to ING Bank are a CET1 ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 ratio of 6.0%, and a Total capital ratio of
8.0% of risk‑weighted assets.
The overall SREP CET1 requirement (including buffer requirements) for ING Bank N.V. at a consolidated level was
11.03% at the end of 2025 (2024: 9.83%). This requirement is the sum of a 4.5% Pillar 1 requirement, a 0.93% Pillar
2 requirement, a 2.5% capital conservation buffer (CCB), a 0.93% countercyclical buffer (CCyB), 0.16% Sectoral
Systemic Risk buffer (s-SyRB) and a 2.0% Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) buffer that is set
separately for Dutch systemic banks by DNB. This requirement excludes the Pillar 2 guidance, which is not
disclosed. ING met the externally imposed regulatory capital requirements in 2025.
45  Subsequent events
There are no subsequent events to report.
Authorisation of Consolidated Financial Statements
Amsterdam, 23 February 2026
The Supervisory Board
K.K. (Karl) Guha, chairperson
A.M.G. (Mike) Rees, vice-chairperson
J. (Juan) Colombás
M. (Margarete) Haase
L.J. (Lodewijk) Hijmans van den Bergh
H.A.H. (Herman) Hulst
H.H.J.G. (Harold) Naus
A. (Alexandra) Reich
H.W.P.M.A. (Herna) Verhagen
P.H.M. (Petri) Hofsté
S.O. (Stuart) Graham
The Management Board Banking
S.J.A. (Steven) van Rijswijk, CEO and chairperson
T. (Tanate) Phutrakul, CFO
L. (Ljiljana) Čortan, CRO
P. (Pinar) Abay, head of Retail, Market Leaders and Challengers & Growth Markets
A.J.M. (Andrew) Bester, head of Wholesale Banking
M.A. (Marnix) van Stiphout, Chief operations officer
D. (Daniele) Tonella, Chief technology officer
Parent company financial statements
Parent company
        financial
  statements
Parent compan y statement of financial position
as at 31 December before appropriation of result
in EUR million
2025
2024
in EUR million
2025
2024
Assets
Liabilities
Cash and balances with central banks 2
19,949
34,633
Deposits from banks 13
39,356
39,625
Short-dated government paper 3
1,169
270
Customer deposits 14
388,252
368,569
Loans and advances to banks 4
83,588
78,966
Debt securities in issue 15
69,399
61,656
Loans and advances to customers 5
404,283
366,825
Other liabilities 16
52,849
63,675
Debt securities 6
56,049
55,059
Provisions 17
867
697
Equity securities 7
11,495
9,925
Senior non-preferred debt 18
48,090
49,393
Investments in group companies 8
32,613
31,692
Subordinated loans 19
18,109
17,861
Investments in associates and joint ventures 9
1,396
1,378
Total liabilities
616,923
601,475
Intangible assets 10
694
634
Property and equipment 11
1,013
963
Equity 20
Other assets 12
51,607
63,386
Share capital
525
525
Accrued assets
811
488
Share premium
16,542
16,542
Revaluation reserves
739
733
Legal and statutory reserves
-1,414
-655
Other reserves
26,029
21,256
Unappropriated result
5,323
4,342
Total equity
47,744
42,743
Total assets
664,667
644,218
Total liabilities and equity
664,667
644,218
T he comparative balances 2024 have been adjusted due to legal mergers using the 'pooling of interests' method. Reference is made to Note 1 'Basis of presentation'.
References relate to the accompanying notes. These form an integral part of the Parent company financial statements.
Parent company statement of profit or loss
for the years ended 31 December     
in EUR million
2025
2024
Interest income
26,399
31,513
Interest expense
-21,037
-26,460
Net interest income 21
5,362
5,053
Investment income and results from participating interests 22
4,047
4,389
Fee and commission income
3,010
2,720
Fee and commission expense
-815
-660
Net fee and commission income 23
2,195
2,060
Results from financial transactions 24
2,252
2,022
Other income
-26
13
Total income
13,830
13,537
Staff expenses 25
3,880
3,657
Depreciation, amortisation and impairments 26
335
354
Other expenses 27
2,144
2,154
Addition to loan loss provisions
273
399
Total expenses
6,633
6,565
Result before tax
7,198
6,972
Taxation 28
971
785
Result after tax
6,226
6,187
The comparative balances 2024 have been adjusted due to legal mergers using the 'pooling of interests' method.
Reference is made to Note 1 'Basis of presentation'
References relate to the accompanying notes. These form an integral part of the Parent company financial
statements.
Parent company statement of changes in equity
in EUR million
Share capital
Share premium
Revaluation
reserves
Legal and
statutory
reserves
Other reserves
Unappropriated
results
Total
Balance as at 31 December 2023
525
16,542
-163
-557
22,379
1,465
40,191
Net result
125
6,062
6,187
Amounts net of tax recognised directly in equity
898
409
1,307
Dividends and other cash distributions
-2,500
-2,486
-4,986
Transfers
-3
-631
1,333
-699
Other changes
44
44
Balance as at 31 December 2024
525
16,542
733
-655
21,256
4,342
42,743
Net result
14
6,212
6,226
Amounts net of tax recognised directly in equity
6
-157
-151
Dividends and other cash distributions
-240
-889
-1,129
Transfers
0
-616
4,958
-4,342
Other changes
55
55
Balance as at 31 December 2025
525
16,542
739
-1,414
26,029
5,323
47,744
Changes in individual Reserve components are presented in Note 20 'Equity'.
Notes to the parent company financial statements
1  Basis of presentation
ING Bank N.V. ( Naamloze Vennootschap) is registered at Bijlmerdreef 106, 1102 CT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
(Commercial Register of Amsterdam under number 33031431). ING Bank N.V. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ING
Groep N.V. domiciled in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ING Bank is a global financial institution with a strong
European base, offering a wide range of retail and wholesale banking services to customers. These Parent financial
statements, as at and for the year ended 31 December 2025, comprise ING Bank N.V. also referred to as ING Bank.
The Parent company financial statements of ING Bank are prepared in accordance with the financial reporting
requirements included in Part 9 of Book 2, of the Dutch Civil Code. In accordance with subsection 8 of section 362,
Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, the recognition and measurement principles applied in these Parent company
financial statements are the same as those applied in the ING Bank Consolidated financial statements, reference is
made to Note 1 'Basis of preparation and material accounting policy information' of the consolidated financial
statements.
Investments in group companies are accounted in the Parent company accounts according to the equity method.
In addition to the notes to these financial statements, further information is included in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. A list containing the information referred to in Section 379 (1), Book 2, of the
Dutch Civil Code has been filed with the office of the Commercial Register of Amsterdam, in accordance with
Section 379 (5), Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
The parent company financial statements are presented in euros, rounded to the nearest million, unless stated
otherwise. Amounts may not add up due to rounding. The ING Bank Parent financial statements, as at and for the
year ended 31 December 2025, were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Management
Board Banking on 23 February 2026.
Parent company equity and related reserves
The total amount of equity in the Parent company financial statements equals Shareholders’ equity (parent) in the
Consolidated financial statements. Certain components within equity are different, as a result of the following
presentation differences between the parent company accounts and consolidated accounts:
§ Unrealised revaluations including those related to cash flow hedges within consolidated group companies,
presented in Other reserves - Revaluation reserve in the consolidated accounts, are presented in the Share of
associates and joint ventures reserve in the parent company accounts;
§ Foreign currency translation from consolidated group companies, presented in Other reserves - Currency
translation reserve in the consolidated accounts, is presented in the Share of associates and joint ventures
reserve in the parent company accounts;
§ Revaluations on investment property and certain participations recognised in income and consequently
presented in Retained earnings in the consolidated accounts, is presented in the Share of associates and joint
ventures reserve in the parent company accounts.
A legal reserve is carried at an amount equal to the share in the results of associates and joint ventures since their
first inclusion at net asset value less the amount of profit distributions to which rights have accrued in the interim.
Profit distributions which can be repatriated to the Netherlands without restriction are likewise deducted from the
Share of associates and joint ventures reserve.
On 1 July 2025, B.V. Maatschappij van Onroerende Goederen 'Het Middenstandshuis' (a wholly owned subsidiary of
ING Bank N.V.) legally merged into its parent company, ING Bank N.V. The 2025 parent company financial
statements of ING Bank N.V. reflect the combined operations of the merged entities using the 'pooling of interests'
method which requires that the parent's financial statements include the merged business as if the merger was
always effective. Accordingly, 2025 results of ING Bank N.V. include the results of 'Het Middenstandshuis' for the
full year and the comparative figures for prior year have also been updated. The impact on the financial
statements has been limited. Both assets and liabilities of ING Bank N.V. decreased by EUR 0.3 billion in total in
2024. There was no impact on total Equity and total Profit or Loss. The merger had no impact on the activities of
the bank.
Presentation parent company assets and liabilities
The presentation of assets and liabilities in the parent company financial statements differs from the presentation
in the consolidated financial statements. In below tables a reconciliation is included between the presentation in
the parent company versus consolidated financial statements.
Presentation Parent company financial statements versus Consolidated financial statements, Assets
in EUR million
Parent company statement of financial position
Assets as at 31 December 2025
Cash and
balances with
central banks
Short-dated
government
paper
Loans and
advances to
banks
Loans and
advances to
customers
Debt
securities
Equity
securities
Investments
in associates
and joint
ventures
Intangible
assets
Property and
equipment
Accrued and
other assets
Total
Included in Consolidated statement of financial position:
Cash and balances with central banks
19,949
19,949
Loans and advances to banks
58,950
58,950
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
–  Trading assets
473
783
871
6,743
8,957
36,412
54,239
–  Non-trading derivatives
10,270
10,270
–  Designated as at fair value through profit or loss
3
871
193
1,915
2,981
–  Mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
22,932
33,168
767
58
56,925
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
191
52
2,334
22,131
2,480
27,188
Securities at amortised cost
502
24,493
24,995
Loans and advances to customers
367,716
367,716
Investments in associates and joint ventures
1,396
1,396
Property and equipment
1,011
1,011
Intangible assets
694
694
Current tax assets
225
225
Deferred tax assets
473
473
Other assets
2
5,038
5,040
Total assets
19,949
1,169
83,588
404,283
56,049
11,495
1,396
694
1,013
52,418
632,054
Presentation Parent company financial statements versus Consolidated financial statements, Liabilities
in EUR million
Parent company statement of financial position
Liabilities as at 31 December 2025
Deposits from
banks
Customer
deposits
Debt
securities in
issue
Other
liabilities
Provisions
Senior non-
preferred debt
Subordinated
loans
Total
Included in Consolidated statement of financial position:
Deposits from banks
25,373
25,373
Customer deposits
372,616
372,616
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
–  Trading liabilities
90
107
35,078
35,275
–  Non-trading derivatives
12,504
12,504
–  Designated as at fair value through profit or loss
13,893
15,529
7,881
131
37,433
Current tax liabilities
110
110
Deferred tax liabilities
298
298
Provisions
561
561
Other liabilities
5,157
8
5,166
Debt securities in issue
61,518
61,518
Senior non-preferred debt
48,090
48,090
Subordinated loans
17,978
17,978
Total liabilities
39,356
388,252
69,399
52,849
867
48,090
18,109
616,923
Notes to the Parent company statement of financial position
2  Cash and balances with central banks
Amounts held at central banks amount to EUR 19,022 million (2024: EUR 33,737 million). In 2025, the movement in
Cash and balances with central banks reflects ING’s active liquidity management.
3  Short-dated government paper
Short-dated government paper includes Dutch and international government paper amounting to EUR 1,169
million (2024: EUR 270 million) for the company.
4  Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to banks
in EUR million
2025
2024
Non-subordinated receivables from:
Group companies
37,369
34,124
Third parties
42,359
41,328
79,728
75,453
Subordinated receivables from:
Group companies
3,860
3,513
83,588
78,966
As at 31 December 2025, Loans and advances to banks includes receivables with regard to securities, which have
been acquired in reverse repurchase transactions amounting to EUR 30,779 million ( 2024: EUR 32,908 million).
5  Loans and advances to customers
Loans and advances to customers
in EUR million
2025
2024
Non-subordinated receivables from:
ING Groep N.V.
76
67
Group companies
31,544
29,178
Third parties
371,261
336,177
402,880
365,422
Subordinated receivables from:
Group companies
1,402
1,403
404,283
366,825
As at 31 December 2025, receivables included in Loans and advances to customers that are part of the trading
portfolio amount to EUR 871 million (2024: EUR 10,961 million).
Loans and advances to customers includes receivables with regard to securities which have been acquired in
reverse repurchase transactions amounting to EUR 34,789 million (2024: EUR 30,682 million) for the company.
6  Debt securities
Debt securities by issuer
in EUR million
2025
2024
Public sector
37,226
33,522
Other
18,823
21,537
56,049
55,059
Debt securities by listing
in EUR million
2025
2024
Listed
44,818
41,760
Unlisted
11,231
13,299
56,049
55,059
Debt securities includes the following non subordinated debt securities:
in EUR million
2025
2024
Non-subordinated debt securities issued by:
Third parties
55,137
54,184
55,137
54,184
Changes in debt securities 1
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
41,156
38,072
Additions
31,279
27,616
Amortisation
-38
-60
Changes in unrealised revaluations
-14
-135
Disposals and redemptions
-24,140
-25,275
Exchange rate differences
-1,919
891
Other changes
300
46
Closing balance
46,624
41,156
1  Excluding fair value through profit or loss portfolio.
7  Equity securities
Equity securities by listing
in EUR million
2025
2024
Listed
11,307
9,756
Unlisted
188
169
11,495
9,925
Changes in equity securities at fair value through OCI
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
2,444
1,778
Additions
396
9
Changes in unrealised revaluations
-165
596
Disposals
-1
-1
Exchange rate differences
-178
61
Other changes
-16
0
Closing balance
2,480
2,444
The cost or purchase price of the shares in the trading portfolio of EUR 8,957 million (2024 : EUR 7,450 million)
approximates their fair value. As at 31 December 2025 the cost or purchase price of shares excluding trading
portfolio is EUR 1,408 million lower (2024: EUR 1,773 million lower) than the carrying amount.
8  Investments in group companies
Investments in group companies
in EUR million
2025
2024
Interest
held (%)
Statement of financial
position  value
Interest 
held (%)
Statement of financial 
position  value
ING Holding Deutschland GmbH
100
11,507
100
10,457
ING Belgium S.A./N.V.
100
9,056
100
9,388
ING Bank (Australia) Limited
100
3,348
100
3,466
ING Financial Holdings Corporation
100
2,872
100
3,378
ING Bank Slaski S.A.
75
3,759
75
2,981
ING Bank A.S.
100
511
100
573
ING Bank (Eurasia) JSC
100
598
100
390
ING Corporate Investments B.V.
100
78
100
58
ING Lease (Nederland) B.V.
100
185
100
135
ING Hubs B.V.
100
139
100
149
Other (including financing companies)
559
718
32,613
31,692
As at 31 December 2025, Investments in group companies includes credit institutions of EUR 17,412 million (2024:
EUR 16,936 million).
As at 31 December 2025 listed investments in group companies amount to EUR 3,759 million (2024: EUR 2,981
million).
Changes in investments in group companies
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
31,692
30,979
Repayment of capital injection
-162
-33
Revaluations
611
-132
Results from group companies
3,813
4,207
Dividends received
-4,380
-4,745
Capital contribution1
1,550
1,200
Mergers and liquidations
0
3
Exchange rate differences
-459
209
Other changes
-51
4
Closing balance
32,613
31,692
1Capital contribution includes EUR 1.6 billion (2024: EUR 1.2 billion) additional Tier 1 subordinated loan provided to ING Holding Deutschland GmbH.
9  Investments in associates and joint ventures
Investments in associates and joint ventures
in EUR million
2025
2024
Interest
held (%)
Statement of financial
position value
Interest 
held (%)
Statement of financial
position value
TMBThanachart Bank Public Company
23
1,307
23
1,266
Other
89
111
1,396
1,378
Changes in investments in associates and joint ventures
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
1,378
1,243
Additions
1
6
Share of results
131
115
Dividends received
-82
-70
Disposals
-2
Impairments
-3
Revaluations
35
Exchange rate differences
-54
87
Other changes
-11
Closing balance
1,396
1,378
10  Intangible assets
Changes in intangible assets
Goodwill
Software
Other
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
2025
2024
Opening balance
120
119
512
461
1
2
634
582
Additions
211
206
211
206
Disposals
-2
-10
-2
-10
Amortisation
-142
-140
0
0
-142
-140
Impairments
-4
-6
-4
-6
Exchange rate differences
1
1
-2
0
0
0
-1
1
Other changes
0
0
0
Closing balance
121
120
572
512
1
1
694
634
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually.
11  Property and equipment
Changes in property and equipment
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
963
907
Additions
217
228
Depreciation
-190
-204
Disposals
-2
-8
Impairments
-2
-6
Reversal of impairments
3
2
Exchange rate differences
-3
4
Other changes
27
42
Closing balance
1,013
963
Gross carrying amount as at 31 December
2,396
2,263
Accumulated depreciation as at 31 December
-1,383
-1,300
Net carrying value
1,013
963
Property and equipment includes EUR 30 million (2024: EUR 27 million) cumulative revaluation surplus.
12  Other assets
Other assets
in EUR million
2025
2024
Derivatives
46,682
58,003
Deferred tax assets
473
587
Income tax receivables
225
356
Pension asset
411
445
Other receivables
3,816
3,995
51,607
63,386
Derivatives includes transactions with group companies of EUR 26,508 million ( 2024: EUR 32,333 million).
Other receivables includes EUR 2,378 million (2024: EUR 2,434 million) related to transactions still to be settled at
balance sheet date. As at 31 December 2025, an amount of EUR 808 million (2024: EUR 676 million) is expected to
be settled after more than one year from the balance sheet date.
13  Deposits from banks
Deposits from banks by counterparty
in EUR million
2025
2024
Group companies
14,911
18,081
Third parties
24,445
21,543
39,356
39,625
14  Customer deposits
Customer deposits by counterparty
in EUR million
2025
2024
ING Groep N.V.
3,849
8,583
Group companies
11,539
8,754
Third parties
372,865
351,232
388,252
368,569
Customer deposits by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Current accounts / Overnight deposits
129,858
126,253
Savings deposits
177,313
161,578
Time deposits
63,672
65,423
Other
17,409
15,314
388,252
368,569
15  Debt securities in issue
Debt securities in issue  by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Long term bonds
19,510
17,199
Covered bonds
27,824
25,916
Commercial paper
17,747
14,825
Other
4,319
3,716
69,399
61,656
16  Other liabilities
Other liabilities
in EUR million
2025
2024
Derivatives
45,965
55,325
Trading liabilities
1,617
2,845
Costs payable
1,035
877
Income tax payable
110
109
Other taxation and social security contribution
199
195
Other amounts payable
3,923
4,324
52,849
63,675
Derivatives includes transactions with group companies of EUR 28,553 million ( 2024: EUR 32,131 million).
Other amounts payable includes EUR 2,439 million (2024 : EUR 2,817 million) related to transactions still to be
settled at balance sheet date. As at 31 December 2025, an amount of EUR 71 million ( 2024: EUR 74 million) is
expected to be settled after more than one year from the balance sheet date.
17  Provisions
General provisions
in EUR million
2025
2024
Deferred tax liabilities
298
256
Pension liabilities and other staff-related liabilities
8
10
Reorganisations and relocations
193
101
Other
367
330
867
697
As at 31 December 2025, an amount of EUR 344 million ( 2024: EUR 296 million) is expected to be settled after
more than one year from the balance sheet date.
18  Senior non-preferred debt
All senior non-preferred debt instruments are loans from ING Groep N.V. The average interest rate of Senior non-
preferred debt with a maturity of more than 1 year is 3.4% (2024: 3.3%).
19  Subordinated loans
Subordinated loans by group companies and third parties
in EUR million
2025
2024
ING Groep N.V.
18,430
18,523
Third parties including value changes hedged part loans
-321
-663
18,109
17,861
Subordinated loans by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Capital debentures
2
2
Private loans
18,106
17,858
18,109
17,861
The subordinated loans rank subordinated to the other liabilities in a winding-up of ING Bank.
The average interest rate of subordinated loans with a maturity of more than 1 year is 4.7% (2024: 4.5% ).
20  Equity
Equity
in EUR million
2025
2024
Share capital
525
525
Share premium
16,542
16,542
Revaluation reserves
739
733
Legal and statutory reserves
-1,414
-655
Other reserves
26,029
21,256
Unappropriated result
5,323
4,342
Total equity
47,744
42,743
Share capital
Ordinary shares (par value EUR 1.13)
Number x 1,000
Amount in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Authorised share capital
1,600,000
1,600,000
1,808
1,808
Unissued share capital
1,134,965
1,134,965
1,283
1,283
Issued share capital
465,035
465,035
525
525
No changes occurred in the issued share capital and share premium in 2025 and 2024.
ING Bank has 50 authorised preference shares with par value of EUR 1.13 per preference share. As at 31 December
2025 , 7 preference shares were issued and fully paid (2024: 7 preference shares) amounting to EUR 8 ( 2024: EUR
8).
Changes in revaluation reserves
in EUR million
2025
Property in own use 
reserve
Equity securities at
fair value through
other
comprehensive
income
Debt instruments at
fair value through
other
comprehensive
income
Cash flow hedge 
reserve
Net defined benefit
assets/- liability
remeasurement
reserve
Credit liability
Total
Opening balance
39
1,773
-305
-729
-30
-15
733
Unrealised revaluations
-7
-365
277
-30
-125
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement of profit or loss
-8
-8
Changes in cash flow hedge reserve
147
147
Change in net defined benefit assets/liability
-8
-8
Closing balance
31
1,408
-36
-582
-38
-45
739
2024
Opening balance
46
1,119
-208
-1,142
-8
30
-163
Unrealised revaluations
-4
654
-125
-46
480
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement of profit or loss
27
27
Realised revaluations reclassified to retained earnings
-3
-3
Changes in cash flow hedge reserve
413
413
Change in net defined benefit assets/liability
-22
-22
Closing balance
39
1,773
-305
-729
-30
-15
733
Changes in legal and statutory reserves
in EUR million
2025
Share of associates
and joint ventures
reserves
Currency translation
reserve
Statutory reserves
Capitalised software
Total
Opening balance
11
-2,023
897
460
-655
Result for the year
14
14
Unrealised revaluations available-for-sale investments and other
170
170
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement of profit or loss
-13
-13
Changes in cash flow hedge reserve
450
450
Unrealised revaluation property in own use
2
2
Changes in net defined benefit asset/liability remeasurement reserve
-5
-5
Exchange rate differences
-26
-762
-788
Changes in composition of the group and other changes
139
-802
74
-590
Closing balance
729
-2,785
108
534
-1,414
2024
Opening balance
0
-2,567
1,602
408
-557
Result for the year
125
125
Unrealised revaluations available-for-sale investments and other
-131
-131
Realised gains/losses transferred to the statement of profit or loss
35
35
Changes in cash flow hedge reserve
-48
-48
Unrealised revaluation property in own use
-10
-10
Changes in net defined benefit asset/liability remeasurement reserve
6
6
Exchange rate differences
-3
544
541
Changes in composition of the group and other changes
163
-830
52
-614
Closing balance
11
-2,023
897
460
-655
The Share of associates and joint ventures reserve includes the following components: Reserve for non-
distributable retained earnings of associates of EUR 1,389 million (2024: EUR 1,250 million), Revaluation reserve of
associates and joint ventures EUR -363 million (2024: EUR -973 million), Currency translation reserve of EUR 11
million (2024: EUR 37 million) and Net defined benefit asset/liability remeasurement reserve of EUR -308 million
(2024: EUR -303 million).
The Statutory reserves include non-distributable reserves of EUR 108 million (2024: EUR 897 million) related to the
former Stichting Regiobank and the former Stichting Vakbondspaarbank SPN that cannot be freely distributed in
accordance with the article 23.1 of the articles of association. The reserve have been utilized for an amount of EUR
-802 million (2024: EUR -830 million) which is presented as part of Changes in the composition of the group and
other changes.
Changes in the value of hedging instruments that are designated as net investment hedges, are included in the
line Exchange rate differences and other.
Changes in other reserves, retained earnings
in EUR million
2025
2024
Opening balance
21,256
22,379
Transfer from unappropriated result
4,342
699
Dividends and other cash distributions
-240
-2,500
Employee share plans
52
45
Changes in the composition of the group and other changes
619
633
Closing balance
26,029
21,256
Dividends and other cash distributions includes the cash distributions to the parent company ING Groep N.V. to
fund the share buyback programmes.
The reserve for cash flow hedges is included in the Share of associates and joint ventures reserve on a net basis.
The Revaluation reserve, Share of associates and joint ventures reserve and Currency translation reserve cannot be
freely distributed. Retained earnings can be freely distributed, except for an amount equal to the negative balance
in each of the components of the Revaluation reserve , Share of associates and joint ventures reserve and the
Currency translation reserve. Unrealised gains and losses on derivatives, other than those used in cash flow
hedges, are presented in the statement of profit or loss and are therefore part of Retained earnings and are not
included in Share of associates and joint ventures reserve.
The total amount of non-distributable reserves, in accordance with the financial reporting requirements per Part 9
of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, is EUR 6,225 million (2024: EUR 5,672 million).
Reference is made to Note 20 'Equity' and Note 44 'Capital management' in the ING Bank Consolidated financial
statements for additional information, including restrictions with respect to dividend and repayment of capital.
Notes to the Parent company statement of profit or loss
21  Net interest income
Net interest income
in EUR million
2025
2024
2025
2024
Interest income on loans
16,390
18,748
Interest expense on deposits from banks
977
1,307
Interest income on impaired loans
67
91
Interest expense on customer deposits1
8,741
9,486
Negative interest on liabilities
12
8
Interest expense on debt securities
1,614
1,899
Total interest income on loans
16,468
18,846
Interest expense on subordinated loans
813
752
Interest expense on securities at fair value through profit or loss
2,009
2,153
Interest income on financial assets at fair value through OCI
702
551
Interest expense on non-trading derivatives (no hedge accounting)
2,617
4,641
Interest income on financial assets at amortised cost
539
496
Interest expense on non-trading derivatives (hedge accounting)
4,202
6,149
Interest income on securities at fair value through profit or loss
3,083
3,221
Other interest expense
50
64
Interest income on non-trading derivatives (no hedge accounting)
2,532
4,569
Negative interest on assets
14
9
Interest income on non-trading derivatives (hedge accounting)
3,062
3,800
Interest expense
21,037
26,460
Other interest income
12
30
Interest income
26,399
31,513
Net interest income
5,362
5,053
1Includes interest paid on customer deposits and senior non-preferred debt.
Interest income includes EUR 3,695 million (2024: EUR 5,366 million) from group companies. Interest expense includes EUR 4,839 million (2024: EUR 5,776 million) to group companies.
22  Investment income and results from participating interest
Investment income and results from participating interests
in EUR million
2025
2024
Results from shares and other non-fixed income securities
103
69
Results from group companies
3,813
4,207
Results from associates, joint ventures and other participations
131
116
Impairment of associates and joint ventures
0
-3
4,047
4,389
Impairments
There were no material impairments of associates and joint ventures in 2025 and 2024.
23  Net fee and commission income
Fee and commission income
in EUR million
2025
2024
Payment services
1,490
1,341
Securities business
278
240
Insurance and other broking
116
103
Portfolio Management fees
346
299
Lending business
364
336
Financial guarantees and other commitments
265
261
Other
151
140
3,010
2,720
Fee and commission expenses
in EUR million
2025
2024
Payment services
479
379
Securities business
110
89
Distribution of products (Externally)
111
98
Other
114
94
815
660
24  Results from financial transactions
Results from financial transactions
in EUR million
2025
2024
Results from securities trading portfolio
2,443
985
Results from foreign exchange transactions
1,877
-287
Results from non-trading derivatives
-864
1,992
Other
-1,204
-668
2,252
2,022
Result from financial transactions includes EUR -721 million (2024: EUR 358 million) from group companies. Other
includes EUR -629 million (2024: EUR 46 million) related to fair value changes on trading derivatives.
25  Staff expenses
Staff expenses
in EUR million
2025
2024
Salaries
2,626
2,426
Social security costs
325
293
Pension costs and other staff related benefit costs
371
341
Other staff expenses
559
596
3,880
3,657
The average number of FTE's was 23,743 ( 2024: 23,071 ) of which outside the Netherlands 8,504 (2024 : 8,287).
Remuneration of Senior management, Management board and Supervisory board Reference is made to Note 43
'Related parties' in the ING Bank Consolidated financial statements.
26  Depreciation, amortisation and impairments
Depreciation and amortization
in EUR million
2025
2024
Depreciation of equipment
190
204
Amortisation of software and other intangible assets
142
140
Impairments and reversal of impairments
4
10
335
354
Impairments includes software (EUR 4 million, 2024 : EUR 6 million) and equipment (EUR 2 million, 2024: EUR 6
million).
27  Other expenses
Other expenses1
in EUR million
2025
2024
Promotional and clients acquisition costs
208
212
IT related expenses (excluding outsourcing and subcontracting)
452
407
Outsourcing and subcontracting
420
413
Facilities
130
124
Market data services
98
84
Advisory fees
194
210
Audit and supervisory fees
90
90
Indirect taxes
103
135
Regulatory costs
334
398
Additions and releases of provisions
181
119
Other
(66)
(38)
2,144
2,154
1 ING changed the presentation of Other operating expenses as of 2025. The comparative figures for 2024 have been updated accordingly. The
reclassifications do not affect the total amount of Other operating expenses.
28  Taxation
in EUR million
2025
2024
Current taxation
900
760
Deferred taxation
72
25
971
785
Reconciliation of the weighted average statutory income tax rate to ING Bank’s effective income tax rate
in EUR million
2025
2024
Result before tax from continuing operations
7,198
6,972
Weighted average statutory tax rate
25.0%
24.7%
Weighted average statutory tax amount
1,802
1,725
Permanent differences affecting current tax
Participation exemption
-1,019
-1,144
Other income not subject to tax
-68
-23
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
255
230
Current tax from previously unrecognised amounts
0
-1
State and local taxes
21
21
Adjustments to prior periods
-22
-27
Differences affecting deferred tax
Impact on deferred tax from change in tax rates
1
0
Deferred tax from previously unrecognised amounts
0
0
Write-off/reversal of deferred tax assets
1
4
Effective tax amount
971
785
Effective tax rate
13.5%
11.3%
For more information on the reconciliation of the weighted average statutory income tax rate to ING Bank’s
effective income tax rate reference is made to Note 32 'Taxation' in the ING Bank Consolidated financial
statements.
29  Maturity of certain assets and liabilities
Analysis of certain assets and liabilities by maturity
in EUR million
2025
Less than 
1 month
1–3
months
3–12
months
1–5 years
Over 5 
years
Maturity
not
applicable
Total
Assets
Loans and advances to banks
14,887
3,629
7,480
27,078
5,850
24,663
83,588
Loans and advances to customers
42,663
12,669
28,617
117,834
168,363
34,138
404,283
Liabilities
Deposits from banks
11,542
2,768
4,626
4,756
948
14,717
39,356
Customer deposits
321,096
18,839
24,828
4,143
2,137
17,209
388,252
Debt securities in issue
1,243
9,365
22,256
12,138
12,334
12,064
69,399
Senior non-preferred debt
2,032
1,139
28,600
16,791
-473
48,090
Subordinated loans
18,117
-8
18,109
Analysis of certain assets and liabilities by maturity
in EUR million
2024
Less than 
1 month
1–3
months
3–12
months
1–5 years
Over 5 
years
Maturity
not
applicable
Total
Assets
Loans and advances to banks
17,947
2,602
6,630
23,375
5,151
23,261
78,966
Loans and advances to customers
32,786
13,626
26,729
108,417
155,219
30,047
366,825
Liabilities
Deposits from banks
12,816
4,331
6,837
1,150
673
13,817
39,625
Customer deposits
301,928
13,765
26,156
9,195
2,192
15,333
368,569
Debt securities in issue
1,852
9,305
13,179
13,162
10,602
13,555
61,656
Senior non-preferred debt
975
30,121
19,153
-856
49,393
Subordinated loans
18,237
-376
17,861
30  Assets not freely disposable
Assets not freely disposable
in EUR million
2025
2024
Equity and debt instruments
14,775
22,366
Lending
47,112
46,207
Banks
8,604
6,456
Other assets
407
439
70,897
75,468
The table includes assets relating to securities lending as well as sale an d repurchase transactions.
31  Commitments
Commitments by type
in EUR million
2025
2024
Guarantees
47,571
48,908
Irrevocable letters of credit
11,822
11,720
Contingent debts
59,393
60,628
Irrevocable facilities
103,763
93,736
163,155
154,364
Contingent debts
in EUR million
2025
2024
Group companies
28,957
31,535
Third parties
30,435
29,092
59,393
60,628
Irrevocable facilities
in EUR million
2025
2024
Group companies
0
0
Third parties
103,763
93,736
103,763
93,736
32  Other
Guarantees
ING Bank has issued guarantees as participant in collective arrangements of national banking funds and as a
participant in required collective guarantee schemes. For example, ING Bank N.V. provided a guarantee to the
German Deposit Guarantee Fund (‘Einlagensicherundsfonds’ or ESF) under section 5 (10) of the by-laws of this
fund, where ING Bank N.V. indemnifies the Association of German Banks Berlin against any losses it might incur as
result of actions taken with respect to ING Germany. The ESF is a voluntary collective guarantee scheme for retail
savings and deposits in excess of EUR 100,000.
ING Bank N.V. has issued statements of liabilities in connection with Section 403 Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code
(‘403 statements’) and issued third party guarantees (and third party letters of comfort/awareness) in a limited
number of cases. Third party guarantees are used when ING Bank N.V. is requested to issue a guarantee to a third
party creditor of one of its subsidiaries in order to guarantee the (financial) performance of this subsidiary. 403
statements have been issued for the following Dutch subsidiaries:
§ B.V. Deelnemings- en Financieringsmaatschappij 'Nova Zembla'
§ BMG monumenten B.V.
§ Cofiton B.V.
§ Entero B.V.
§ ING Bank Personeel B.V.
§ ING Hubs B.V.
§ ING Commercial Finance B.V.
§ ING Corporate Investments B.V.
§ ING Corporate Investments Mezzanine Fonds B.V.
§ ING Corporate Investments Participaties B.V.
§ ING Corporate Investments Structured Finance B.V.
§ ING Lease (Nederland) B.V.
§ ING Sustainable Investments B.V.
§ ING Vastgoed Ontwikkeling B.V.
§ Nationale-Nederlanden Intervest II B.V.
§ WestlandUtrecht Verzekeringen B.V.
Claim agreements
In the ordinary course of business we have entered into a number of agreements whereby we are provided
indemnifications related to sale of our past businesses and agreements whereby we made detailed arrangements
regarding allocation and handling of claims.
Fiscal unity
ING Bank N.V. forms a fiscal unity with ING Groep N.V. and several Dutch banking entities for corporation tax
purposes. ING Bank N.V. and ING Groep N.V. and its banking subsidiaries that form part of the fiscal unity are jointly
and severally liable for taxation payable by the fiscal unity. Settlements of corporate income tax paid or received
are executed by ING Bank N.V.
33  Proposed appropriation of results
For 2025 , it is proposed that the result, insofar at the disposal of the General Meeting, will be appropriated as
follows:
Proposed appropriation of result
in EUR million
2025
Net result
6,226
- Addition to reserves pursuant to Article 25 of the Articles of Association
14
- Proposed to be added to the Other Reserves pursuant to Article 25 of the Articles of Association
4,624
- Available for dividend distribution
1,588
The total dividend of EUR 1,588 million was paid in November 2025 (EUR 889 million) and in February 2026 (EUR
699 million) as an interim dividend.
34  Subsequent events
There are no subsequent events to report.
Authorisation of Parent company financial statements
Amsterdam, 23 February 2026
The Supervisory Board
K.K. (Karl) Guha, chairperson
A.M.G. (Mike) Rees, vice-chairperson
J. (Juan) Colombás
M. (Margarete) Haase
L.J. (Lodewijk) Hijmans van den Bergh
H.A.H. (Herman) Hulst
H.H.J.G. (Harold) Naus
A. (Alexandra) Reich
H.W.P.M.A. (Herna) Verhagen
P.H.M. (Petri) Hofsté
S.O. (Stuart) Graham
The Management Board Banking
S.J.A. (Steven) van Rijswijk, CEO and chairperson
T. (Tanate) Phutrakul, CFO
L. (Ljiljana) Čortan, CRO
P. (Pinar) Abay, head of Retail, Market Leaders and Challengers & Growth Markets
A.J.M. (Andrew) Bester, head of Wholesale Banking
M.A. (Marnix) van Stiphout, Chief operations officer
D. (Daniele) Tonella, Chief technology officer
Other information and appendices
Other information
      and appendices
Independent auditor's report
To: the General Meeting of the Shareholder and the Supervisory Board
of ING Bank N.V.
Report on the audit of the financial statements 2025
included in the annual report
Our opinion
In our opinion:
• the accompanying consolidated financial statements give a true and
fair view of the financial position of ING Bank N.V. as at 31
December 2025 and of its result and its cash flows for the year then
ended, in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the European Union (EU) and with
Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code;
• the accompanying company financial statements give a true and fair
view of the financial position of ING Bank N.V. as at 31 December
2025 and of its result for the year then ended in accordance with
Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
What we have audited
We have audited the financial statements 2025 of ING Bank N.V. (the
’Company’ or ‘ING Bank’) based in Amsterdam. The financial
statements include the consolidated financial statements and the
company financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements comprise:
1 the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December
2025;
2 the following consolidated statements for 2025: the statement of
profit or loss, the statements of comprehensive income, changes in
equity and cash flows; and
3 the notes comprising material accounting policy information and
other explanatory information.
The company financial statements comprise:
1 the parent company statement of financial position as at 31
December 2025;
2 the parent company statement of profit or loss and the statement of
changes in equity for 2025; and
3 the notes comprising the basis of preparation and other explanatory
information.
Basis for our opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Dutch law, including the
Dutch Standards on Auditing. Our responsibilities under those
standards are further described in the ‘Our responsibilities for the audit
of the financial statements’ section of our report.
We are independent of ING Bank N.V. in accordance with the
‘Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van accountants bij
assurance-opdrachten’ (ViO, Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants, a regulation with respect to independence) and other
relevant independence regulations in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we
have complied with the ‘Verordening gedrags- en beroepsregels
accountants’ (VGBA, Dutch Code of Ethics).
We designed our audit procedures in the context of our audit of the
financial statements as a whole and in forming our opinion thereon. The
information in respect of going concern, fraud and non-compliance with
laws and regulations, climate-related risks and the key audit matters
was addressed in this context, and we do not provide a separate
opinion or conclusion on these matters.
We believe the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Information in support of our opinion
Summary
Materiality
•Group materiality of EUR 350 million (2024: EUR 350 million).
•3.9% of profit before tax (2024: 3.9% of profit before tax).
Group audit
•Performed audit procedures over 70% of profit before tax.
•Performed audit procedures over 90% of total assets.
Risk of material misstatements related to Fraud, Non-compliance
with laws and regulations, Going concern and Climate-related risks
•Fraud risks: presumed risk of management override of controls and
the risk of management override over the collective loan loss
provisioning identified and incorporated in our audit response.
•Non-compliance with laws and regulations (NOCLAR) risks: our
risk assessment procedures related to NOCLAR risks did not result
in the identification of a risk of material misstatement of the 2025
financial statements.
•Going concern risks: no going concern risks identified.
Key audit matters
•Assessment of expected credit losses on loans and advances to
customers and loans and advances to banks.
•User access and change management.
Materiality
Based on our professional judgement we determined the materiality for
the financial statements as a whole at EUR 350 million (2024: EUR 350
million). The materiality is determined with reference to profit before tax
and represents 3.9% (2024: 3.9%) of that number. We consider profit
before tax as the most appropriate benchmark based on our
assessment of the general information needs of the users of the
financial statements and given the fact that ING Bank is a profit-oriented
listed entity. We have also taken into account misstatements and/or
possible misstatements that in our opinion are material for the users of
the financial statements for qualitative reasons.
We agreed with the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board that
misstatements identified during our audit in excess of EUR 17.5 million
(2024: EUR 17.5 million) would be reported to them, as well as smaller
misstatements that in our view must be reported on qualitative grounds.
Scope of the group audit
ING Bank is at the head of a group of components. The financial
information of this group is included in the consolidated financial
statements of ING Bank.
ING Bank is structured in six segments: Retail Netherlands, Retail
Belgium, Retail Germany, Retail Other, Wholesale Banking and
Corporate Line, each comprising of multiple legal entities and/or
covering different countries.
Because we are ultimately responsible for the group audit, we are
responsible for directing, supervising and performing the group audit. In
this respect, we have determined the nature and extent of audit
procedures to be carried out for group entities or so-called components.
We performed risk assessment procedures throughout our audit to
determine which of ING Bank’s components are likely to include risks of
material misstatement to the 2025 financial statements. To appropriately
respond to those assessed risks, we planned and performed further
audit procedures, either at component level or centrally. Across 16
countries we identified 22 components associated with a risk of material
misstatement. For 17 out of these 22 components we involved
component auditors. We as group auditor audited the remaining
components.
In supervising and directing our component auditors, we:
• Held our annual planning conference in The Netherlands, for
material components in scope of the group audit. Besides discussing
our risk assessment and audit approach with our component
auditors, our component auditors were also directly informed by
ING’s senior management on current internal and external
developments relevant to ING Bank.
• Held risk assessment discussions with component auditors to obtain
their input and to identify matters relevant to the group audit.
• All components in scope for group reporting are audited by KPMG
member firms. We sent detailed audit instructions to all component
auditors, covering significant areas such as the identified risks of
material misstatement on a group level and further set out the
information that is required to be reported to the group audit team.
We received written communication about the results of the work
performed at the component level.
• We set component performance materiality levels considering the
component’s size and risk profile. Component materiality ranges
from EUR 53 million to EUR 125 million, based on the mix of their
relative size and the nature of the risks of material misstatements
identified for the components, in order to reduce aggregation risk to
an acceptable level.
• We held conference calls and/or had remote meetings with the audit
teams of our components and attended closing meetings with
management for components in The Netherlands, Belgium and
Germany. During these meetings and calls, planning, risk
assessment, procedures performed, findings and observations
reported to the group auditor were discussed in detail and any
further work deemed necessary by the group audit team was then
performed.
• Inspected the work performed by component auditors in the
Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Poland and the United States and
evaluated the appropriateness of audit procedures performed and
conclusions drawn from the audit evidence obtained, and the
relation between communicated findings and work performed. In our
inspection we mainly focused on expected credit losses on loans
and advances to customers as well as procedures performed to
address the risk of management override.
• We performed on site visits of components in Belgium, Luxembourg,
Germany, Poland, Spain and the United States.
The consolidation of the financial information of components in the
group, the preparation of the disclosures in the financial statements and
certain accounting topics that are performed on a group level were
further covered by the group audit team. Procedures performed by the
group audit team included, but were not limited to, substantive
procedures with respect to equity and certain elements of the expected
credit loss provisioning process.
We have performed audit procedures for 70% of ING Bank’s profit
before tax (2024: 72%) and 90% of ING Bank’s total assets (2024:
90%). At group level, we assessed the aggregation risk in the remaining
financial information and concluded that there is a less than reasonable
possibility of a material misstatement.
We consider that the scope of our group audit forms an appropriate
basis for our audit opinion. Through performing the procedures
mentioned above we obtained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence
about the ING Bank’s financial information to provide an opinion on the
financial statements as a whole.
Audit response to the risk of fraud and non-compliance with
laws and regulations
Introduction
In the Chapter ‘Risk management’, specifically the sections ‘Non-
financial risk’ and Compliance risk’ of the annual report and note 40 of
the financial statements, the Management Board Banking describes its
procedures in respect of the risk of fraud and non-compliance with laws
and regulations. In the Supervisory Board report the assessment in
respect of these topics is described.
As part of our audit, we have gained insights into the Company and its
business environment and the Company’s risk management in relation
to fraud and non-compliance.
Our procedures included, among other things, assessing the
Company’s code of conduct, whistleblowing procedures, incidents
register and its procedures to investigate indications of possible fraud
and non-compliance. Furthermore, we performed relevant inquiries with
management, the Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board and other
relevant functions, such as Internal Audit, Legal Counsel and
Compliance. We corroborated these inquiries with the results of our
inspection of correspondence with relevant supervisory authorities and
regulators. We have also incorporated elements of unpredictability in
our audit, such as making changes to our high-risk criteria that we
applied to journal entry testing, varying the timing of audit procedures
including testing of controls and involving forensic specialists in our
audit procedures.
Non-compliance with laws and regulations
As a result of our risk assessment, we identified the following laws and
regulations as those most likely to have a material effect on the financial
statements in case of non-compliance:
• fraud, corruption and anti-bribery law (reflecting the Company’s
significant and geographically diverse nature of operations and
clients);
• data protection law (reflecting the processing of sensitive data
inherent to the Company’s business activities);
• prudential and supervision regulations (reflecting the Company’s
nature of operations);
• anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing law (reflecting the
Company’s involvement in a number of ongoing investigations and
(regular) inspections by national competent authorities); and
• sanction law (reflecting the Company’s significant and
geographically diverse nature of operations and clients).
Our procedures did not result in the identification of a reportable risk of
material misstatement in respect of non-compliance with laws and
regulations.
Fraud risk
We assessed the presumed fraud risk on revenue recognition as not
significant as the accounting of interest income and commission income
is based on automatically generated accruals based on static data
taken from the source systems and therefore contains routine
transactions not subject to management judgement. Furthermore, the
contracts used in the financial sector generally use standardised
definitions which reduce the complexity of revenue recognition to a low
level.
Based on the above and on the auditing standards, we identified the
following fraud risks that are relevant to our audit and responded as
follows:
• Management override of controls (presumed fraud risk)
Management is in a unique position to manipulate accounting records
and prepare fraudulent financial statements by overriding controls that
otherwise appear to be operating effectively, such as reporting fictitious
journal entries.
We evaluated the design and the implementation and tested the
operating effectiveness of internal controls that mitigate fraud risks,
such as processes related to journal entries and estimates related to
loan loss provisions. We also performed a data analysis of high-risk
journal entries and evaluated key estimates and judgments for bias by
the Company’s management. Where we identified instances of
unexpected journal entries or other risks through our data analytics, we
performed additional audit procedures to address each identified journal
entry, including testing of transactions back to source information.
• Management override of collective loan loss provisioning
(ECL)
With respect to the fraud risks and responses for management override
of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) provision results, we refer to the Key
audit matter ‘Assessment of Expected Credit Losses on loans and
advances to customers and loans and advances to banks’.
Our evaluation of procedures performed in relation to fraud and non-
compliance with laws and regulations did not result in an additional key
audit matter. Our audit procedures did not reveal indications and/or
reasonable suspicion of fraud and non-compliance that are considered
material for our audit.
We communicated our risk assessment, audit responses and results to
the Management Board Banking and the Audit Committee of the
Supervisory Board.
Audit response to going concern
As explained on page 117 of the financial statements, the Management
Board Banking has performed its going concern assessment and has
not identified a going concern risk. To assess the Management Board
Banking’s assessment, we have performed, inter alia, the following
procedures:
• we considered whether the Management Board Banking’s
assessment of the going concern risks includes all relevant
information of which we are aware as a result of our audit;
• we considered whether the developments in interest rates,
geopolitical uncertainty and risks of disruption due to innovation and
the emergence of new competitors from the technology sector
indicate a going concern risk;
• we analysed the Company’s financial position as at year-end and
compared it to the previous financial year in terms of indicators that
could identify going concern risks; and
• we inspected regulatory correspondence to obtain an understanding
of the Company’s capital and liquidity position, that underpins
management’s assessment of the going concern assumption for
financial reporting.
The outcome of our risk assessment procedures on the going concern
assessment, including our consideration of findings from our audit
procedures on other areas, did not give reason to perform additional
audit procedures on the Management Board Banking’s going concern
assessment.
Audit response to climate-related risks
In planning our audit, we considered the potential impact of risks arising
from climate change on the Company’s business and its financial
statements. The Company has set out its commitments and ambitions
relating to climate change in the chapters ‘Strategy, business model and
value chain’ (‘Sustainability at the heart’) and ‘Risk
management’ (‘Environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk’) of
the annual report. Besides reaching net zero in its own operations, the
Company focusses on three action areas: helping its clients to transition
to low-carbon business models; building up ING Bank’s financing of
new technologies and sustainable systems; and finding new ways to
enable people to play their part in the transition.
Management assessed, against the background of the Company’s
business and operations, how climate-related risks and opportunities,
and the Company’s own commitments and ambitions, could have a
significant impact on its business or could impose the need to modify its
strategy and operations. Management has considered the impact of
both transition and physical risks on the financial statements in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, more
specifically the impact on expected credit losses (‘ECL’) on loans and
advances, as described in the section ‘Risk management – Climate and
environmental risks in IFRS 9 models’ of the annual report.
Management prepared the financial statements, including considering
whether the implications from climate-related risks and commitments
and the current financial effects relating to sustainability matters have
been appropriately accounted for and disclosed.
As part of our audit, we assessed whether the impact of climate-related
risk and the Company’s commitments and ambitions in respect of
climate change could result in a risk of material misstatement of the
2025 financial statements that requires a response in our audit. We
performed the following:
• To understand management's processes:
◦ we performed an analysis of the external environment and
obtained an understanding of relevant sustainability themes and
issues relevant for the Company;
◦ we made inquiries with the Management Board Banking, other
senior management, members of the ESG Committee and the
Audit Committee of the Supervisory Board;
◦ we have inspected minutes (such as of the Management Board
Banking and the Supervisory Board) and documents relevant for
assessing the climate-related risks in the audit;
◦ we inspected regulatory correspondence to obtain an
understanding of how climate risk impacts financial reporting and
specifically credit risk;
◦ we gained an understanding whether any current and/or future
regulations may impact ING Bank, such as greenhouse gas
emission regulations, potential increases in taxes on certain
products and future climate reporting obligations; and
◦ we gained an understanding of the Company’s Net Zero
alignment pathways, including the intermediate target setting for
2030.
• The parent company of ING Bank, ING Groep N.V., prepared a
Sustainability Statement in accordance with the European
Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). As part of risk
assessment procedures for the financial statements audit of ING
Bank, we have read the draft of this Sustainability Statement, which
includes information over material sustainability matters relating to
material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to climate change.
We specifically considered the current financial effects of
sustainability matters, such as the impact on ECL on loans and
advances and whether these have been appropriately accounted for
and disclosed.
• We have evaluated climate related fraud risk factors, such as
management board remuneration being linked to climate related
KPIs. This did not result in an additional key audit matter.
• We inquired with the Legal Counsel on any climate risk related
allegations and claims against the Company, as disclosed in Note 40
Legal Proceedings.
• We used our credit risk modelling experts to assist in gaining
understanding how climate-related risks are of impact on the
expected credit loss estimation, including the credit risk models, as
determined by the Company.
• We challenged the Company’s conclusion, as included in the section
‘Climate and environmental risks in IFRS 9 models’ on page 72 of
the annual report that:
◦ part of the impact of climate risk on ECL is not explicitly
observable but is embedded in other credit-risk drivers such as
macro-economic forecasts and relevant risk parameters that are
inputs into (IFRS 9 ECL) credit risk models.
◦ the effect of physical climate risk (except for events that have
already occurred) is expected to become financially significant on
the longer-term horizon. It therefore does not impact ECL for
ING’s predominantly short and medium-term loan book.
◦ at this point the impact of climate-related risk on ECL can only be
separated for physical climate risks that have already occurred
and the ECL from the transition risks of clients in certain high
greenhouse gas-emitting sectors for which management
recorded an adjustment to the model based ECL.
Based on our risk assessment procedures, we did not identify a risk of
material misstatement specific to climate-related risk, including on the
determination of expected credit losses on loans and advances. As a
result, no further audit response was considered necessary and hence
reflected in our key audit matters.
Furthermore, we have read the ‘Other information’ relating to climate
change as included in the annual report and considered whether such
information contains material inconsistencies with the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained through the audit, in particular as
described above and our knowledge obtained otherwise.
Our key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement,
were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements. We
have communicated the key audit matters to the Audit Committee of the
Supervisory Board. The key audit matters are not a comprehensive
reflection of all matters discussed.
Assessment of expected credit losses on loans and advances to
customers and loans and advances to banks
Description
As discussed in the Credit Risk section on pages 56 to 82 and in Note 3
and Note 7 in the consolidated financial statements, the Loans and
advances to customers amount to EUR 722 billion and Loans and
advances to banks amount to EUR 21 billion as at 31 December 2025.
These loans and advances are measured at amortised cost less
expected credit losses (‘ECL’) of EUR 5.9 billion. For collectively
determined ECL, management uses models that estimate expected
credit losses using three components: probability of default (‘PD’), loss
given default (‘LGD’) and exposure at default (‘EAD’). Management also
applied forward looking economic scenarios with associated weights.
Relevant macroeconomic factors include the gross domestic product
(‘GDP’), house price index (‘HPI’) and the unemployment rate.
The current economic conditions, most notably the heightened
geopolitical tensions, are outside the bounds of historical experience
used to develop ECL model methodologies and result in greater
uncertainties to estimate ECLs. These uncertainties are considered by
management in their assessment of whether judgemental overlays to
model-based provisions need to be applied. For individually determined
provisions, management estimates ECL using the amount and timing of
future expected recovery scenarios and applying probability weights if
more than one recovery scenario is present.
Our response
Based on our risk assessment procedures, including those in relation to
the impact of climate-related risk on ECL as described in the section
‘Audit response to climate-related risks’, we identified the assessment
of ECL on loans and advances to customers and loans and advances to
banks as a key audit matter. Predominantly, because of the significant
and complex auditor judgment and specialised skills and knowledge
required to evaluate the following elements of the overall ECL estimate:
• The judgements used to develop the model-driven PD and LGD
parameters.
• The use of forward-looking macroeconomic forecasts in ECL,
including determining macroeconomic factors such as GDP, HPI and
unemployment rate.
• The consistent identification and application of criteria for identifying
significant increase in credit risk (‘SICR’).
• The determination of management overlays to the modelled ECL
considering the volatility and uncertainty in the economic
environment combined with the delay in which the models capture
emerging risks.
• The determination of the amount and timing of expected future
recovery cash flows for individual loan provision assessments for
impaired loans and advances and the probability weights applied in
case of more than one recovery scenario.
• The following are the primary procedures we performed to address
this key audit matter.
• We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of
certain internal controls related to the estimation of ECL for loans
and advances to customers and loans and advances to banks. This
included controls relating to the selection of key assumptions
(including PD, LGD and macroeconomic forecasts), review and
authorisation of model outputs, governance and monitoring of the
ECL process, determination of credit risk ratings, the estimation of
future recovery cash flows of individual loan loss provisions and
associated scenario weights assigned and the determination of
management overlays to the modelled ECL.
• We involved credit risk professionals with specialised skills and
knowledge who assisted in evaluating the assumptions used to
determine the PD and LGD parameters in models used by the
Company to determine the collective provisions, including the
evaluation of the recalibrated and redeveloped credit risk models.
This included reperforming back-testing of certain models to
evaluate the current model performance and evaluation of the
identification of SICR in loans and advances by challenging the
scope of management’s criteria used in staging assessments,
consistent application of the thresholds applied within each criterion,
and the ability of staging criteria to identify SICR prior to loans and
advances being credit impaired. In addition, the credit risk
professionals assisted in testing management overlays recorded.
• We involved economic professionals with specialised skills and
knowledge, who assisted in assessing the Company’s methodology
to determine the macroeconomic forecasts used in determining the
ECL. We tested the reasonableness of management’s forecasts
against other external benchmarks and our own internal forecasts.
• We involved valuation and credit risk professionals with specialised
skills and knowledge, who assisted in assessing the methodologies,
cash flows and collateral values used in expected future recovery
cash flow assessments of individual loan loss provisions for impaired
loans and advances and in challenging management’s use of
recovery scenarios and expected cash flows by comparing against
industry trends and comparable benchmarks and recalculating
recovery amounts.
Our observation
Based on our procedures performed, we found management’s overall
assessment relating to the valuation of loans and advances to
customers and banks within an acceptable range and adequately
disclosed in Note 3 and Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements.
User access and change management
Description
ING Bank is highly dependent on its IT environment for the continuity of
operations and reliability of financial reporting. The IT environment of
ING Bank evolves over time, which includes the implementation of
tooling to support automated control execution related to user access
and change management of IT assets. We consider general IT controls,
and in particular user access and change management controls, that
support the effective operations of automated controls a key audit
matter.
Our response
Our audit approach relies to a large extent on the operating
effectiveness of automated controls, which are dependent on user
access and change management general IT controls to operate
effectively. With the support of our IT auditors, we test the design,
implementation and operating effectiveness of automated controls and
general IT controls for applications, databases, operating systems and
supporting tooling. The general IT controls include access provisioning,
high privileged user access and monitoring, and the testing and
approval of changes prior to implementation.
Our audit procedures identified deficiencies in high privileged user
access and monitoring in several systems, including access to modify
configurations, deploy code and/or change data. These deficiencies
were similar in nature, however, due to management’s progress in
remediation, less severe compared to prior year. Since these
deficiencies were open during (some of) the year, we performed
additional procedures to respond to the risk of unauthorised and/or
unintentional access or changes to automated controls and/or data.
These procedures included testing compensating controls implemented
by management and additional substantive procedures when
necessary.
Our observation
Our testing of controls and additional substantive procedures did not
identify unauthorised user activities in the systems relevant to financial
reporting which would have required us to significantly expand the
extent of our planned detailed testing.
Report on the other information included in the annual
report
In addition to the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon,
the annual report contains other information.
Based on the following procedures performed, we conclude that the
other information:
• is consistent with the financial statements and does not contain
material misstatements; and
• contains the information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch
Civil Code for the management report and other information.
We have read the other information. Based on our knowledge and
understanding obtained through our audit of the financial statements or
otherwise, we have considered whether the other information contains
material misstatements.
By performing these procedures, we comply with the requirements of
Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code and the Dutch Standard 720.
The scope of the procedures performed is less than the scope of those
performed in our audit of the financial statements.
The Management Board Banking is responsible for the preparation of
the other information, including the information as required by Part 9 of
Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements and
ESEF
Engagement
We were initially appointed by the General Meeting of Shareholders as
auditor of ING Bank N.V. on 11 May 2015, as of the audit for the year
2016 and have operated as statutory auditor ever since that financial
year. We have been reappointed by the General Meeting of
Shareholders on 24 April 2023 to continue to serve ING Bank as its
external auditor for the financial years 2024 and 2025. Due to the
legally required mandatory audit firm rotation requirements in the
Netherlands, our mandate has ended upon completion of the audit of
the 2025 financial statements.
No prohibited non-audit services
We have not provided prohibited non-audit services as referred to in
Article 5(1) of the EU Regulation on specific requirements regarding
statutory audits of public-interest entities.
Services rendered
For the period to which our statutory audit relates, in addition to this
audit, we have provided the following services to the Company and its
controlled undertakings:
• agreed-upon procedures and assurance engagements for the
benefit of external stakeholders, largely driven by regulatory
requirements.
European Single Electronic Format (ESEF)
The Company prepared its annual report in ESEF. The requirements for
this are set out in the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 with regard
to regulatory technical standards on the specification of a single
electronic reporting format (hereinafter: the RTS on ESEF).
In our opinion the annual report prepared in XHTML format, including
the (partly) marked-up consolidated financial statements as included in
the reporting package by ING Bank, complies in all material respects
with the RTS on ESEF.
The Management Board Banking is responsible for preparing the
annual report including the financial statements in accordance with the
RTS on ESEF, whereby the Management Board Banking combines the
various components into one single reporting package.
Our responsibility is to obtain reasonable assurance for our opinion
whether the annual report in this reporting package complies with the
RTS on ESEF. We performed our examination in accordance with
Dutch law, including Dutch Standard 3950N ’Assurance-opdrachten
inzake het voldoen aan de criteria voor het opstellen van een digitaal
verantwoordingsdocument’ (assurance engagements relating to
compliance with criteria for digital reporting). Our examination included
among others:
• Obtaining an understanding of the entity's financial reporting
process, including the preparation of the reporting package.
• Identifying and assessing the risks that the annual report does not
comply in all material respects with the RTS on ESEF and designing
and performing further assurance procedures responsive to those
risks to provide a basis for our opinion, including:
◦ obtaining the reporting package and performing validations to
determine whether the reporting package containing the Inline
XBRL instance document and the XBRL extension taxonomy files
have been prepared in accordance with the technical
specifications as included in the RTS on ESEF; and
◦ examining the information related to the consolidated financial
statements in the reporting package to determine whether all
required mark-ups have been applied and whether these are in
accordance with the RTS on ESEF.
Description of responsibilities regarding the financial
statements
Responsibilities of the Management Board Banking and the
Supervisory Board for the financial statements
The Management Board Banking is responsible for the preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the
European Union (EU) and Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
Furthermore, the Management Board Banking is responsible for such
internal control as the Management Board Banking determines is
necessary to enable the preparation of the financial statements that are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In that
respect the Management Board Banking, under supervision of the
Supervisory Board, is responsible for the prevention and detection of
fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations, including
determining measures to resolve the consequences of it and to prevent
recurrence.
As part of the preparation of the financial statements, the Management
Board Banking is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. Based on the financial reporting
frameworks mentioned, the Management Board Banking should
prepare the financial statements using the going concern basis of
accounting unless the Management Board Banking either intends to
liquidate the Company or to cease operations or has no realistic
alternative but to do so. The Management Board Banking should
disclose events and circumstances that may cast significant doubt on
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the financial
statements.
The Supervisory Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s
financial reporting process.
Our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objective is to plan and perform the audit engagement in a manner
that allows us to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence for our
opinion.
Our audit has been performed with a high, but not absolute, level of
assurance, which means we may not detect all material errors and
fraud during our audit.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material
if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to
influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements. The materiality affects the nature, timing and
extent of our audit procedures and the evaluation of the effect of
identified misstatements on our opinion.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements is included in the appendix of this auditor's report. This
description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Utrecht, 23 February 2026
KPMG Accountants N.V.
P.A.M. de Wit RA
Appendix:
Description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Appendix
Description of our responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements
We have exercised professional judgement and have maintained
professional scepticism throughout the audit, in accordance with Dutch
Standards on Auditing, ethical requirements and independence
requirements. Our audit included among others:
• identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the
financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, designing and
performing audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtaining
audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement
resulting from fraud is higher than the risk resulting from error, as
fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control;
• obtaining an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in
order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on
the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control;
• evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures
made by the Management Board Banking;
• concluding on the appropriateness of the Management Board
Banking’s use of the going concern basis of accounting, and based
on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists
related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude
that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention
in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial
statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our
opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained
up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or
conditions may cause a company to cease to continue as a going
concern;
• evaluating the overall presentation, structure and content of the
financial statements, including the disclosures; and
• evaluating whether the financial statements represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We are responsible for planning and performing the group audit to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial
information of the entities or business units within the group as a basis
for forming an opinion on the financial statements. We are also
responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit work
performed for purposes of the group audit. We bear the full
responsibility for the auditor’s report.
We communicate with the Supervisory Board regarding, among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit
findings, including any significant findings in internal control that we
identify during our audit. In this respect we also submit an additional
report to the audit committee in accordance with Article 11 of the EU
Regulation on specific requirements regarding statutory audits of public-
interest entities. The information included in this additional report is
consistent with our audit opinion in this auditor’s report.
We provide the Supervisory Board with a statement that we have
complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence,
and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that
may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where
applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the Supervisory Board, we
determine the key audit matters: those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial statements. We describe these
matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances,
not communicating the matter is in the public interest.
Alternative performance measures
Our financial information is prepared in accordance with IFRS as detailed in
the financial statements of our Annual Report. In addition, in the
discussion of our financial performance, we use a number of alternative
performance measures, including resilient net profit, commercial net
interest income and net core lending and deposits growth. Resilient net
profit is defined as net profit adjusted for significant items not linked to the
normal course of business, reference is made to 'Capital Management' for
a reconciliation.
We consider commercial net interest income, and the derived commercial
net interest margin, to be useful information because the scope is
restricted to those products that are mainly interest driven and excludes
the interest on products where performance measurement is primarily
done based on fee income or at the total income level (including Financial
Markets and Treasury). Commercial net interest income also excludes
significant volatile items in lending and liability net interest income, thus
removing items that distort period-on-period comparisons.
We consider net core lending and deposits growth as useful information to
track our real commercial growth in customer balances. It measures the
development of our customer lending and deposits adjusted for currency
impacts and changes in the Treasury and run-off portfolios. The below
tables show how these measures can be reconciled to the nearest IFRS
measure.
Reconciliation commercial net interest income (NII)
Retail Netherlands
Retail Belgium
Retail Germany
Retail Other
Wholesale Banking
Corporate Line
Total
in EUR million
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2024
2023
Net interest income IFRS
3,115
3,027
3,096
1,786
1,959
2,063
2,457
2,647
2,862
3,892
3,817
3,437
2,997
3,259
4,028
295
40
323
14,542
14,749
15,809
Exclude: Other NII (excl. significant volatile items) 1
-572
-621
-535
93
142
198
205
298
151
195
213
207
-972
-693
-171
295
40
323
-757
-621
171
Exclude: Significant volatile items2
-18
-51
-39
70
-18
-20
Commercial net interest income
3,687
3,647
3,631
1,692
1,816
1,866
2,270
2,400
2,711
3,698
3,643
3,231
3,969
3,882
4,199
15,316
15,389
15,638
1Other NII mainly includes NII for Financial Markets and Treasury. In Financial Markets this primarily reflects the funding costs of positions for which associated revenue is reported in 'other income'. For Treasury, it includes the funding costs of specific money market and FX transactions where an offsetting revenue is
recorded in 'other income', as well as interest income from other Treasury activities (such as foreign currency ratio hedging) that are not allocated to Retail or Wholesale. Furthermore, other NII includes the funding costs for our equity stakes, the NII related to investment portfolios, as well as the effect of indexation
of NII required by IAS 29 due to hyperinflation in Türkiye.
2Significant volatile items in lending and liability NII are lending- and liability-related interest items that management would consider as outside the normal course of business and large enough to distort a proper period-on-period comparison. For the years 2025 and 2024, it includes €-18 million (2025) and €-51
million (2024) for incentives to attract new customers (Retail Germany), €-39 million for the Polish mortgage moratorium (2024), and a €+70 million one-off in Wholesale Banking (2024).
Customer lending and Net core lending growth by business line
Retail Netherlands
Retail Belgium
Retail Germany
Retail Other
Wholesale Banking
Corporate Line
Total
in EUR billion
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
Customer lending IFRS-EU 1
179.2
164.3
14.9
100.1
98.3
1.8
116.6
110.2
6.4
128.4
117.2
11.2
203.1
195.8
7.3
0.3
0.3
0.0
727.7
686.1
41.6
Exclude: FX impact
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
8.9
11.2
Exclude: Treasury, run-off portfolios and other
1.3
0.3
0.5
-0.1
2.1
0.0
4.1
Net core lending growth
16.2
2.0
6.9
13.4
18.3
0.0
56.9
1Loans and advances to customers excluding LLP.
Customer deposits and Net core deposits growth by business line
Retail Netherlands
Retail Belgium
Retail Germany
Retail Other
Wholesale Banking
Corporate Line
Total
in EUR billion
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
2025
2024
change
Customer deposits IFRS-EU
209.1
200.7
8.5
96.5
97.1
-0.6
157.7
151.1
6.6
173.4
163.2
10.2
84.6
79.6
5.0
3.3
8.1
-4.7
724.7
699.7
25.0
Exclude: FX impact
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
1.4
3.7
Exclude: Treasury, run-off portfolios and other
3.1
-0.1
0.0
0.1
1.6
4.7
9.4
Net core deposits growth
11.5
-0.6
6.6
12.6
8.0
0.0
38.1
Customer lending and Net core lending growth by business line
Retail Netherlands
Retail Belgium
Retail Germany
Retail Other
Wholesale Banking
Corporate Line
Total
in EUR billion
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
Customer lending IFRS-EU 1
164.3
152.8
11.4
98.3
94.3
4.0
110.2
102.9
7.3
117.2
109.8
7.4
195.8
188.0
7.8
0.3
0.3
0.0
686.1
648.1
38.1
Exclude: FX impact
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
-4.7
-3.8
Exclude: Treasury, run-off portfolios and other
-1.9
-0.4
-2.9
-0.2
-1.3
0.0
-6.6
Net core lending growth
9.6
3.7
4.4
8.2
1.8
0.0
27.7
1Loans and advances to customers excluding LLP.
Customer deposits and Net core deposits growth by business line
Retail Netherlands
Retail Belgium
Retail Germany
Retail Other
Wholesale Banking
Corporate Line
Total
in EUR billion
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
2024
2023
change
Customer deposits IFRS-EU
200.7
199.7
1.0
97.1
91.2
5.9
151.1
143.6
7.5
163.2
151.0
12.1
79.6
64.8
14.9
8.1
11.7
-3.7
699.7
662.0
37.7
Exclude: FX impact
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
-0.4
0.3
Exclude: Treasury, run-off portfolios and other
4.0
0.5
0.0
-0.1
1.3
3.7
9.4
Net core deposits growth
5.0
6.4
7.5
12.7
15.8
0.0
47.4
Articles of Association – Appropriation of results
Appropriation of results
The result is appropriated pursuant to Article 25 of the Articles of Association of ING Bank N.V., the relevant
stipulations of which state that the result shall firstly be appropriated to the Stichting Regio Bank Reserve,
respectively the Reserve Stichting Vakbondsspaarbank SPN or charged to that reserves in proportion to the
ratio between the Stichting Regio Bank Reserve, respectively the Reserve Stichting Vakbondsspaarbank SPN and
the company's equity at the end of the relevant financial year and that the remainder shall be at the disposal
of the General Meeting.
Risk factors
Summary of risk factors
The following is a summary of the principal risk factors that could have a
material adverse effect on the reputation, business activities, financial
condition, results and prospects of ING. Please carefully consider all the
information presented in this section for a detailed description of these
risks.
Risks related to financial conditions, market environment and
general economic trends
§ Our revenues and earnings are affected by volatility, regime shifts and
cross-market contagion of the economic, business, liquidity, funding
and capital markets environments of the various geographic regions in
which we conduct business, as well as by changes in customer
behaviour in these regions, and an adverse change in any one region
could have an impact on our business, results and financial condition.
§ Inflation and deflation scenarios, as well as interest rate volatility and
changes may adversely affect our business, results and financial
condition.
§ The default of a major market participant could disrupt the markets
and may have an adverse effect on our business, results and financial
condition.
§ Continued risk of political instability and fiscal uncertainty around the
globe, as well as ongoing volatility in the financial markets and the
economy generally have adversely affected, and may continue to
adversely affect, our business, results and financial condition.
§ Market conditions, including those observed over the past few years,
may increase the risk of loans being impaired and have a negative
effect on our results and financial condition.
§ Discontinuation of interest rate benchmarks may negatively affect our
business, results and financial condition.
§ We may incur losses due to failures of banks falling under the scope of
resolution funding or deposit schemes.
Risks related to the regulation and supervision of the Group
§ Non-compliance with laws and/or regulations could result in fines and
other liabilities, penalties or consequences for us, which could
materially affect our business and reputation and reduce our
profitability.
§ Changes in laws and/or regulations governing financial services or
financial institutions or the application of such laws and/or regulations
may increase our operating costs and limit our business activities.
§ We are subject to additional legal and regulatory risk in certain
countries with less developed or less predictable legal and regulatory
frameworks or the supervision thereof.
§ We are subject to the regulatory supervision of the ECB and other
regulators and public bodies with extensive supervisory and
investigatory powers.
§ Failure to meet minimum capital and other prudential regulatory
requirements as applicable to us from time to time may have a
material adverse effect on our business, results and financial condition
and on our ability to make payments on certain of our securities.
§ Our US commodities and derivatives business is subject to CFTC and SEC
regulation under the Dodd-Frank Act.
§ We are subject to the EU recovery and resolution regime and several
other bank recovery and resolution regimes that include statutory
write-down and conversion as well as other powers, which remain
subject to significant uncertainties as to the scope and impact on us.
Risks related to litigation, enforcement proceedings and
investigations and to changes in tax laws
§ We may be subject to litigation, enforcement proceedings,
investigations or other regulatory actions, and adverse publicity.
§ We are subject to different tax regulations in each of the jurisdictions
where we conduct business, and are exposed to changes in tax laws
and risks of non-compliance resulting in proceedings or investigations
with respect to tax laws.
§ Our reputation could be harmed and we could be subject to
enforcement actions, fines and penalties if we fail to comply with our
obligations under tax laws and regulations.
§ ING is exposed to the risk of claims from customers or stakeholders
who feel misled or treated unfairly because of advice or information
received.
Risks related to the Group’s business and operations
§ ING may be unable to meet evolving expectations or requirements with
respect to ESG-related matters.
§ ING may be unable to adapt its products and services to meet
changing customer behaviour and demand, including as a result of
ESG-related matters.
§ ING’s business and operations are exposed to transition risks related to
climate change.
§ ING’s business and operations are exposed to physical risks, including
as a direct result of climate change.
§ Operational and IT risks, such as systems disruptions or failures,
breaches of security, human error, changes in operational practices,
inadequate controls including in respect of third parties with which we
do business or outbreaks of communicable diseases may adversely
impact our reputation, business and results.
§ We are subject to increasing risks related to cybercrime and
compliance with cybersecurity regulation.
§ Because we operate in highly competitive markets, including our home
market, we may not be able to increase or maintain our market share,
which may have an adverse effect on our results.
§ We may not always be able to protect our intellectual property
developed in our products and services and may be subject to
infringement claims, which could adversely impact our core business,
inhibit efforts to monetise our internal innovations and restrict our
ability to capitalise on future opportunities.
§ The inability of counterparties to meet their financial obligations or our
inability to fully enforce our rights against counterparties could have a
material adverse effect on our results.
§ Ratings are important to our business for a number of reasons, and a
downgrade or a potential downgrade in our credit ratings could have
an adverse impact on our results and net results.
§ An inability to retain or attract key personnel may affect our business
and results.
§ We may incur further liabilities in respect of our defined benefit
retirement plans if the value of plan assets is not sufficient to cover
potential obligations, including as a result of differences between
actual results and underlying actuarial assumptions and models.
Risks related to the Group’s risk management practices
§ Risks relating to our use of quantitative models to model client
behaviour for the purposes of our calculations may adversely impact
our results and reputation.
§ We may be unable to manage our risks successfully through
derivatives.
Risks related to the Group’s liquidity and financing activities
§ We depend on the capital and credit markets, as well as customer
deposits, to provide the liquidity and capital required to fund our
operations, and adverse conditions in the capital and credit markets, or
significant withdrawals of customer deposits, may negatively impact
our liquidity, borrowing and capital positions, as well as increase the
cost of liquidity, borrowings and capital.
Risk factors
Any of the risks described below could have a material adverse effect on
the business activities, financial condition, results and prospects of ING as
well as ING’s reputation. ING may face a number of the risks described
below simultaneously and some risks described below may be
interdependent. While the risk factors below have been divided into
categories, some risk factors could belong in more than one category and
investors should carefully consider all of the risk factors set out in this
section. Additional risks of which the Company is not presently aware, or
that are currently viewed as immaterial, could also affect the business
operations of ING and have a material adverse effect on ING’s business
activities, financial condition, results and prospects. The market price of
ING shares or other securities could decline due to any of those risks
including the risks described below, and investors could lose all or part of
their investments.
Although the risk factors that ING currently believes to be most material
have been presented first within each category, the order in which the risk
factors are presented is not necessarily an indication of the likelihood of
the risks actually materialising, of the potential significance of the risks or
of the scope of any potential negative impact to our business, results,
financial condition and prospects.
Risks related to financial conditions, market environment and
general economic trends
Our revenues and earnings are affected by volatility, regime shifts and
cross-market contagion of the economic, business, liquidity, funding and
capital markets environments of the various geographic regions in which
we conduct business, as well as by changes in customer behaviour in
these regions, and an adverse change in any one region could have an
impact on our business, results and financial condition.
Because ING is a multinational banking and financial services corporation,
with a global presence and serving 40 million customers, corporate clients
and financial institutions in 38 countries, ING’s business, results and
financial condition may be significantly impacted by turmoil and volatility
in the worldwide financial markets or in the particular geographic areas in
which we operate. In Retail Banking, our products include savings,
payments, investments, loans and mortgages. In Wholesale Banking, we
provide specialised lending, tailored corporate finance, debt and equity
market solutions, payments & cash management, trade and treasury
services. Negative developments in relevant financial markets and/or
countries or regions have in the past had and may in the future have a
material adverse impact on our business, results and financial condition,
including as a result of the potential consequences listed below.
Factors such as inflation or deflation, interest rates, government spending,
geopolitical events and trends, supply chain disruptions, shortages,
terrorism, pandemics and epidemics (such as Covid-19 pandemic) or other
widespread health emergencies, securities prices, the volatility and
strength of the capital markets, exchange rates, credit spreads, liquidity
spreads, real estate values and private equity valuations, consumer
spending, business investment, changes in customer behaviour and
climate change, all impact the business and economic environment and,
ultimately, our solvency, liquidity and the amount and profitability of
business we conduct in a specific geographic region. Some of these risks
are often experienced globally as well as in specific geographic regions and
are described in greater detail below under the headings: ‘Inflation and
deflation scenarios, as well as interest rate volatility and changes may
adversely affect our business, results and financial condition'; 'Market
conditions, including those observed over the past few years may increase
the risk of loans being impaired and have a negative effect on our results
and financial condition'; and 'Continued risk of political instability and fiscal
uncertainty, as well as ongoing volatility in the financial markets and the
economy generally have affected, and may adversely affect, our business,
results and financial condition'. All of these are factors in local and regional
economies as well as in the global economy, and we may be affected by
changes in any one of these factors in any one country or region, and
more if more of these factors occur simultaneously and/or in multiple
countries or regions or on a global scale.
In case one or more of the factors mentioned above adversely affects the
profitability of our business, this might also result, among other things, in
the following:
§ inadequate reserves or provisions, in relation to which losses could
ultimately be realised through profit and loss and shareholders’ equity;
§ the write-down of tax assets impacting net results and/or equity;
§ impairment expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets,
impacting our net result and equity; and/or
§ movements in risk-weighted assets for the determination of required
capital.
In particular, we are exposed to financial, economic, market and political
conditions in the Benelux countries and Germany, from which we derive a
significant portion of our revenues in both Retail Banking and Wholesale
Banking, and which could present risks of economic downturn. Though less
material, we also derive substantial revenues in the following geographic
regions: United States, Türkiye, Poland and the remainder of Eastern
Europe, Southern Europe, East Asia and Australia. In an economic
downturn affecting some or all of these jurisdictions, we expect that higher
unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, higher
corporate and private debt defaults, lower business investments and lower
consumer spending would adversely affect the demand for banking
products, and that ING may need to increase its reserves and provisions,
each of which may result in overall lower earnings. Securities prices, real
estate values and private equity valuations may also be adversely
impacted, and any such losses would be realised through profit and loss
and shareholders’ equity. We also offer a number of financial products
that expose us to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates,
securities prices, corporate and private default rates, the value of real
estate assets, exchange rates and credit spreads. As a result, their impact
may continue to affect our business. We also have wholesale banking
activities in both Russia and Ukraine, as well as investments in Russia,
some of which are denominated in local currency. In response to Russia’s
invasion of Ukraine, the international community imposed various punitive
measures, including sanctions, capital controls, restrictions on SWIFT
access and restrictions on central bank activity. These measures and
Russia’s response thereto have significantly impacted, and may continue
to significantly impact, Russia’s economy, our activities in Russia and our
activities involving Russian-owned parties. They have contributed to
heightened instability in global markets and increased inflation due in part
to supply chain constraints, as well as continued volatile and periodic
elevation of energy and commodity prices. Should prices remain elevated
for an extended period, most businesses and households would be
negatively impacted, and our business in Russia and Ukraine, as well as
our broader business, may be adversely affected, including through spill-
over risk to the entire wholesale banking portfolio (e.g. commodities
financing, energy and utilities and energy-consuming clients).
On 28 January 2025, ING announced its intention to sell its business in
Russia to a third party. As the buyer has not received all necessary
approvals, ING has been unable to complete the deal within the expected
timeframe. There is no guarantee that any such approvals will be received,
or any certainty as to the timing or occurrence of closing of the proposed
transaction, or the ultimate divestment of ING’s business in Russia.
Environmental and/or climate risks have also directly and indirectly
impacted ING without significant financial impact, for example through,
among other things, losses suffered as a result of extreme weather events,
the impact of climate-related transition risk on the risk and return profile
or value of security or operations of certain categories of customer to
which ING has exposure. In addition, these risks may also increase ING’s
reputational and litigation risk if the economic activity that ING supports is
not in line with community expectations or ING’s external commitments or
legal or regulatory requirements (this includes, but is not limited to,
greenwashing risk).
For more information on ING’s exposure to particular geographic areas,
see Note 29 ‘Information on geographical areas’ to the consolidated
financial statements.
Inflation and deflation scenarios, as well as interest rate volatility and
changes may adversely affect our business, results and financial
condition.
In general, both inflation and deflation may influence consumers’
spending habits, affecting the economic activity and consequently our
core revenue stream (e.g. in terms of overall financial health of borrowers
and loan demand, and collateral management, among other things).
Furthermore, inflation and deflation may have repercussions on interest
rate spreads, and therefore on the profitability of traditional banking
activities. Overall, both inflation and deflation can pose significant
challenges, impacting our ability to generate revenue, manage risk, and
maintain a stable financial position.
Furthermore, a significant and sustained increase in inflation has
historically also been associated with decreased prices for equity securities
and sluggish performance of equity markets generally. A sustained decline
in equity markets may:
§ result in impairment charges to equity securities that we hold in our
investment portfolios and reduced levels of unrealised capital gains
available to us which would reduce our net income, and;
§ lower the value of our equity investments impacting our capital
position.
Central banks continue to adopt a cautious stance in response to
persistent inflationary pressures, moderate economic growth, and
elevated geopolitical risks. With EU inflation converging toward the 2%
target and expected to remain near this level over the medium term,
markets anticipate stable interest rates through 2026.
Changes in interest rates may impact our business. In case of increased
interest rates, we may:
§ experience a decrease of the estimated fair value of certain fixed
income securities that we hold in our investment portfolios, resulting in:
– reduced levels of unrealised capital gains available to us, which
could negatively impact our solvency position and net income, and/
or
– a decrease in collateral values;
§ face an increased withdrawal of certain savings products, particularly
those with fixed rates below market rates;
§ be required, as an issuer of securities, to pay higher interest rates on
debt securities that we issue in the financial markets from time to time
to finance our operations, which would increase our interest expenses
and reduce our results;
§ experience further customer defaults as interest rate rises flow through
into payment stress for lower credit quality customers.
On the other hand, a decrease in prevailing interest rates may lead to
lower interest income from loans and investments, reduced profitability of
traditional banking activities, and potential declines in the value of certain
fixed income securities we hold in our investment portfolio, as well as
negatively affecting our business in other ways, including leading to:
§ compress in the net interest income margins because of a potential
reduction in the interest income earned from loans;
§ lower earnings over time on investments, as reinvestments will earn
lower rates;
§ increased prepayment or redemption of mortgages and fixed maturity
securities in our investment portfolios, as well as increased
prepayments of corporate loans. This as borrowers seek to borrow at
lower interest rates potentially combined with lower credit spreads.
Consequently, we may be required to reinvest the proceeds into assets
at lower interest rates;
§ lower profitability as the result of a decrease in the spread between
client rates earned on assets and client rates paid on savings, current
account and other liabilities;
§ higher costs for certain derivative instruments that may be used to
hedge certain of our product risks;
§ lower profitability since we may not be able to fully track the decline in
interest rates in our savings rates;
§ lower profitability since we may not always be entitled to impose
surcharges to customers to compensate for the decline in interest
rates;
§ lower profitability since we may have to pay a higher premium for the
defined contribution scheme in the Netherlands for which the premium
paid is dependent on interest rate developments and the Dutch Central
Bank’s (DNB) methodology for determining the ultimate forward rate;
§ lower interest rates that may cause asset margins to decrease, thereby
lowering our results. This may, for example, be the consequence of
increased competition for investments as result of the low rates,
thereby driving margins down; and/or
§ (depending on the position) a significant collateral posting requirement
associated with our interest rate hedge programs, which could
materially and adversely affect liquidity and our profitability.
In addition, given the volatility in inflation and related volatility in interest
rates, a failure to accurately anticipate inflation on an ongoing basis and
factor it into our product pricing assumptions may result in the mispricing
of our products, which could materially and adversely impact our results.
Each of the preceding risks, should they materialise, may adversely affect
our business, results and financial condition.
The default of a major market participant could disrupt the markets and
may have an adverse effect on our business, results and financial
condition.
Within the financial services industry, the severe distress or default of any
one institution (including sovereigns and central counterparties (CCPs))
could lead to defaults by, or the severe distress of, other market
participants. While prudential regulation may reduce the probability of a
default by a major financial institution, the actual occurrence of such a
default could have a material adverse impact on ING. Such distress of, or
default by, a major financial institution could disrupt markets or clearance
and settlement systems and lead to a chain of defaults by other financial
institutions, since the commercial and financial soundness of many
financial institutions may be closely related as a result of credit, trading,
clearing or other relationships. Also, the perceived lack of creditworthiness
of a sovereign or a major financial institution (or a default by any such
entity) may lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults
by us or by other institutions. This risk is also referred to as ‘systemic risk’
and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing
agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges with
whom we interact on a daily basis, and financial instruments of sovereigns
in which we invest. Systemic risk could impact ING directly, by exposing it
to material credit losses on transactions with defaulting counterparties or
indirectly by significantly reducing the available market liquidity on which
ING and its lending customers depend to fund their operations and/or
leading to a write-down of loans or securities held by ING. In addition, ING
may also be faced with additional open market risk for which hedging or
mitigation strategies may not be available or effective (either by hedges
eliminated by defaulting counterparties, or reduced market liquidity).
Systemic risk could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise
new funding and on our business, results and financial condition. In
addition, such distress or failure could impact future product sales as a
potential result of reduced confidence in the financial services industry.
Continued risk of political instability and fiscal uncertainty around the
globe, as well as ongoing volatility in the financial markets and the
economy generally have adversely affected, and may continue to
adversely affect, our business, results and financial condition.
Our global business and results are materially affected by conditions in the
global capital markets and the economy generally. In Europe, there are
continuing concerns over weaker economic conditions, levels of
unemployment in certain countries, as well as geopolitical developments,
including tariffs or other trade barriers introduced by the United States and
responses to those trade barriers, the availability and cost of credit, as well
as credit spreads. In addition, geopolitical issues, including military
conflicts, the risk of further military escalation, trade tensions between
major economies, increasing protectionism between key countries, and
issues with respect to North Korea and the Middle East, may all contribute
to adverse developments in the global capital markets and the economy
generally. Sustained uncertainty about, or worsening of, current global
economic conditions and further escalation of trade tensions between the
US and its trading partners, especially China, could result in a global
economic slowdown and long-term changes to global trade. In particular,
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the conflict in the Middle East and other
existing or emerging military conflicts, as well as the risk that such
conflicts could escalate or widen, and related international response
measures have had, and are expected to continue to have, a negative
impact on regional and global economic conditions, including heightened
instability in global markets and increased inflation due in part to supply
chain constraints, as well as higher energy and commodity prices. Should
prices remain elevated for an extended period, most businesses and
households would be negatively impacted, and our business in Russia and
Ukraine, as well as our broader business, may be adversely affected,
including through spill-over risk to our entire Wholesale Banking portfolio,
in areas such as commodities financing, energy and utilities and energy-
consuming clients
Moreover, there is a risk that an adverse credit event at one or more
European sovereign debtors (including a credit rating downgrade, such as
that experienced by France in 2025, or a default) could trigger a broader
economic downturn in Europe and elsewhere. In addition, the confluence
of these and other factors has resulted in volatile foreign exchange
markets. International equity markets have also continued to experience
heightened volatility and turmoil. These events, market upheavals and
continuing risks, including high levels of volatility, may have an adverse
effect on our results, in part because we have a large investment portfolio.
There is also continued uncertainty over the long-term outlook for the tax,
spending and borrowing policies of the US, the future economic
performance of the US within the global economy and any potential future
budgetary restrictions in the US, with a potential impact on a future
sovereign credit ratings downgrade of the US government, including the
rating of US Treasury securities. A downgrade of US Treasury securities
could also impact the ratings and perceived creditworthiness of
instruments issued, insured or guaranteed by institutions, agencies or
instrumentalities directly linked to the US government. US Treasury
securities and other US government-linked securities are key assets on the
balance sheets of many financial institutions and are widely used as
collateral by financial institutions to meet their day-to-day cash flows in
the short-term debt market. The impact of any further downgrades to the
sovereign credit rating of the US government or a default by the US
government on its debt obligations would create broader financial turmoil
and uncertainty, which would weigh heavily on the global financial system
and could consequently result in a significant adverse impact to the
Group’s business and operations.
In many cases, the markets for investments and instruments have been
and remain illiquid, and issues relating to counterparty credit ratings and
other factors have exacerbated pricing and valuation uncertainties.
Valuation of such investments and instruments is a complex process
involving the consideration of market transactions, pricing models,
management judgement and other factors, and is also impacted by
external factors, such as underlying mortgage default rates, interest rates,
rating agency actions and property valuations. Historically these factors
have resulted in, among other things, valuation and impairment issues in
connection with our exposures to European sovereign debt and other
investments.
Any of these general developments in global financial and political
conditions could negatively impact our business, results and financial
condition in future periods.
Discontinuation of interest rate benchmarks may negatively affect our
business, results and financial condition.
Changes to major interest rate benchmarks may adversely affect our
business, including net interest revenue. Historically, financial markets
relied on Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs) such as LIBOR, EONIA, CDOR, and
EURIBOR. While some benchmarks like EURIBOR have been reformed and
remain in use, others such as EONIA, CDOR, and LIBOR have been
discontinued and replaced by alternative rates.
In Poland, the National Working Group has established a roadmap to
replace WIBOR with POLSTR (Polish Short-Term Rate), a risk-free overnight
benchmark based on actual transactions. POLSTR was selected in
December 2024 and began publication in June 2025, including
compounded 1-, 3-, and 6-month versions. Treasury bonds referencing
POLSTR were launched in late 2025, with broader adoption in loans and
mortgages expected in 2026. Full transition and WIBOR phase-out are
anticipated by the end of 2027
The discontinuation of benchmarks and adoption of new rates may create
legal, operational, and financial risks, including documentation changes,
conduct risks, and potential earnings volatility from contract modifications
and hedge accounting adjustments.
ING continues to monitor market developments and reform plans for other
rates to anticipate the impact on our customers and any related risks.
Market conditions, including those observed over the past few years,
may increase the risk of loans being impaired and have a negative effect
on our results and financial condition.
We are exposed to the risk that our borrowers (including sovereigns) may
not repay their loans according to their contractual terms and that the
collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient. We
may see adverse changes in the credit quality of our borrowers and
counterparties, for example, as a result of their inability to refinance their
indebtedness or in the case of a decline in financial performance. Adverse
changes in the credit quality of our borrowers and/or decreasing collateral
values would result in increased capital requirements and provisions, and
any deterioration of market conditions may lead to increasing
delinquencies, defaults and insolvencies across a range of sectors. This
may lead to impairment charges on loans and other assets, higher costs
and additions to loan loss provisions. A significant increase in the size of
our provision for loan losses could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results and financial condition.
ING manages concentration risk through a comprehensive framework of
limits on single names, countries, and sectors, supported by regular
monitoring and portfolio steering to ensure exposures remain within its
risk appetite. If we are significantly exposed to a concentrated set of
customers or counterparties, an adverse event affecting these parties
could lead to increased losses for the Group, and adversely affect our
business, results and financial condition.
We may incur losses due to failures of banks falling under the scope of
resolution funding or deposit schemes.
While prudential regulation is intended to minimise the risk of bank
failures, in the event such a failure occurs, given our size, we may incur
significant compensation payments to be made under the Dutch Deposit
Guarantee Scheme (DGS), which we may be unable to recover from the
bankrupt estate, and therefore the consequences of any future failure of
such a bank could be significant to ING. Such costs and the associated
costs to be borne by us may have a material adverse effect on our results
and financial condition. On the basis of the EU Directive on deposit
guarantee schemes, ING pays quarterly risk-weighted contributions into a
DGS-fund. The  Dutch DGS-fund reached its intended target size of 0.8
percent of all deposits guaranteed under the DGS, in July 2024. Further,
quarterly risk-weighted contributions are only required when individual
and / or collective covered deposits show an increase in a quarter. In case
of failure of a Dutch bank, depositor compensation is paid from the DGS-
fund. If the available financial means of the fund are insufficient, Dutch
banks, including ING, may be required to pay extraordinary ex-post
contributions not exceeding 0.5 percent of their covered deposits per
calendar year. In exceptional circumstances, and with the consent of the
competent authority, higher contributions may be required. However,
extraordinary ex-post contributions may be temporarily deferred if, and
for so long as, they would jeopardise the solvency or liquidity of a bank.
Depending on the size of the failed bank, the available financial means in
the DGS-fund, and the required additional financial means, the impact of
the extraordinary ex-post contributions on ING may be material.
Since 2015, the EU has been discussing the introduction of a pan-European
deposit guarantee scheme (EDIS), which would (partly) replace or
complement national compensation schemes. As of the date of this
report, negotiations regarding EDIS have stalled and no such scheme has
been introduced.
On 18 April 2023, the European Commission published its proposals for the
revision of the common framework for bank crisis management and
deposit insurance (CMDI) that focuses on small and medium-sized banks,
but will affect banks in the EU. The CMDI framework consists of the Bank
Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), the Single Resolution
Mechanism Regulation (SRMR) and the Deposit Guarantee Schemes
Directive (DGSD). The European Parliament adopted its first-reading reports
on the proposals in April 2024. The Council agreed on a negotiating
mandate for the revision of the CMDI on 19 June 2024. With this
agreement, the Council is ready to negotiate with the European
Parliament on the final form of this legislative proposal. On 25 June 2025,
the Council and the European Parliament reached a political agreement on
the reformed CMDI framework. The co-legislators are now expected to
finalise the legal text, after which the revised framework is expected to be
formally adopted and enter into force. The revision of the CMDI framework
is part of the debate on the completion of the Banking Union and in
particular its third and missing pillar EDIS.
Risks related to the regulation and supervision of the Group
Non-compliance with laws and/or regulations could result in fines and
other liabilities, penalties or consequences for us, which could materially
affect our business and reputation and reduce our profitability.
ING has faced, and in the future may continue to face, the consequences
of non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including the
potential initiation of regulatory investigations or legal proceedings. For
additional information on legal proceedings, see Note 40 ‘Legal
proceedings’ in the consolidated financial statements. There are potential
risks in areas where applicable regulations may be unclear, subject to
multiple interpretations or under development; where regulations may
conflict with one another; or where regulators revise their previous
guidance or courts overturn previous rulings. These could result in our
failure to comply with applicable standards. Regulators and other
authorities have the power to initiate investigations and/or administrative
or judicial proceedings against us, which may result, among other things,
in suspension or revocation of our licences, cease and desist orders, fines,
civil penalties, criminal penalties or other disciplinary measures, which
could materially harm our results and financial condition as well as ING’s
reputation. If we fail, or appear to fail to properly address, any of these
matters, our reputation may be harmed and we may be exposed to
additional legal risk, which in turn may increase the size and number of
claims and damages brought against us or subject us to enforcement
actions, fines and penalties.
Furthermore, as a financial institution, we are exposed to the risk of
unintentional involvement in criminal activity in connection with financial
economic crimes, including the circumvention of sanctions, money
laundering and the funding of terrorist and other criminal activities. The
failure or perceived failure by us to comply with legal and regulatory
requirements with respect to financial economic crimes may result in
adverse publicity, claims and allegations, litigation and regulatory
investigations and sanctions, which may have a material adverse effect on
our business, results, financial condition and/or prospects in any given
period. For further information on the impact of litigation, enforcement
proceedings, investigations or other regulatory actions with respect to
financial economic crimes, see 'We may be subject to litigation,
enforcement proceedings, investigations or other regulatory actions, and
adverse publicity' below.
Changes in laws and/or regulations governing financial services or
financial institutions or the application of such laws and/or regulations
may increase our operating costs and limit our business activities.
We are subject to detailed banking laws and financial regulations in the
jurisdictions in which we conduct business. The regulations governing the
industries in which we operate have become more extensive and complex,
while also attracting supervisory scrutiny. Compliance with current and
new laws and regulations is resource-intensive and may materially
increase our operating costs. Moreover, these regulations are designed to
protect our customers, markets and society as a whole and can limit or
redirect our activities, among others, through stricter net capital, market
conduct and transparency requirements and restrictions on the businesses
in which we can operate or invest.
Our revenues and profitability and those of our industry have been and
continue to be affected by requirements relating to capital, additional loss-
absorbing capacity, leverage, minimum liquidity and long-term funding
levels, resolution and recovery planning requirements, derivatives clearing
and margin rules and levels of regulatory oversight, as well as restrictions
on which and, if permitted, how certain business activities may be carried
out by financial institutions.
We are subject to additional legal and regulatory risk in certain
countries with less developed or less predictable legal and regulatory
frameworks or the supervision thereof.
In certain countries where we operate or where our clients reside, judicial
and dispute resolution systems may be less effective. As a result, in the
event of a breach of contract, we have experienced in the past and may
continue to have difficulties in making and enforcing claims against
contractual counterparties and, if claims are made against us, we have
experienced in the past and may continue to encounter difficulties in
mounting a defence against such allegations. If we become party to legal
proceedings in a market with an insufficiently developed judicial system, it
could have an adverse effect on our operations and net results. For
additional information on legal proceedings, see Note 40 ‘Legal
proceedings’ in the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, as a result of our operations in certain countries, we are
subject to risks of possible nationalisation, expropriation, price controls,
exchange controls and other restrictive government actions, as well as the
outbreak of hostilities and/or war, in these markets. In particular, we have
wholesale banking activities in both Russia and Ukraine, as well as
investments in Russia, some of which are denominated in local currency.
Furthermore, the current economic environment in certain countries in
which we operate may increase the likelihood for regulatory initiatives to
enhance consumer protection or to protect homeowners from
foreclosures. Any such regulatory initiative could have an adverse impact
on our ability to protect our economic interest, for instance in the event of
defaults on residential mortgages.
We are subject to the regulatory supervision of the ECB and other
regulators and public bodies with extensive supervisory and
investigatory powers.
In its capacity as the principal prudential supervisor in the EU, the ECB has
extensive supervisory and investigatory powers, including the ability to
issue requests for information, to conduct regulatory investigations and
on-site inspections, and impose monetary and other sanctions. For
example, under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the relevant
(national) competent authorities, including the ECB, can conduct stress
tests and have the discretionary power to impose capital surcharges on
financial institutions for risks not otherwise recognised in risk-weighted
assets or other surcharges depending on the individual situation of the
bank, and take or require other measures, such as restrictions on or
changes to the Group’s business. Competent authorities may also prohibit
the Group from making dividend payments to shareholders or distributions
to holders of its regulatory capital instruments if the Group fails to comply
with regulatory requirements, in particular with regard to supervisory
measures, minimum capital requirements (including buffer requirements)
or with liquidity requirements, or if there are deficiencies in its governance
and risk management processes. A perceived failure to comply with
prudential or conduct regulations may have a material adverse effect on
the Group’s business, results and financial condition.
Failure to meet minimum capital and other prudential regulatory
requirements as applicable to us from time to time may have a material
adverse effect on our business, results and financial condition and on
our ability to make payments on certain of our securities.
ING is subject to a variety of regulations that require us to comply with
minimum requirements for capital (own funds) and additional loss-
absorbing capacity, as well as for liquidity, and to comply with leverage
restrictions. In addition, such capital, liquidity and leverage requirements
and their application and interpretation may change. Any changes may
require us to maintain more capital or to raise a different type of capital by
disqualifying existing capital instruments from continued inclusion in
regulatory capital, requiring replacement with new capital instruments
that meet the new criteria. Sometimes changes are introduced subject to
a transitional period during which the new requirements are being phased
in, gradually progressing to a fully phased-in, or fully-loaded, application of
the requirements.
Any failure to comply with these requirements, or to adapt to changes in
such requirements, may have a material adverse effect on our business,
results and financial condition, and may require us to seek additional
capital. Failures to meet minimum capital or other prudential
requirements may also result in ING being prohibited from making
payments on certain of our securities. Because implementation phases
and transposition into EU or national regulation where required may often
involve a lengthy period, the impact of changes in capital, liquidity and
leverage regulations on our business, results and financial condition, and
on our ability to make payments on certain of our securities, is often
unclear.
Our US commodities and derivatives business is subject to CFTC and SEC
regulation under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Our affiliate ING Capital Markets LLC is registered with the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a swap dealer and is subject to CFTC
regulation pursuant to Title VII of the US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). Operating as a swap dealer
requires compliance with CFTC regulatory requirements, which may be
burdensome, impose additional compliance costs and could adversely
affect the profitability of this business, as well as exposing ING to the risk of
non-compliance with these regulations.
ING Capital Markets LLC is also registered with the SEC as a security-based
swap dealer. Operating as a security-based swap dealer requires
compliance with SEC regulatory requirements, which may be burdensome,
impose additional compliance costs and could adversely affect the
profitability of this business, as well as exposing ING to the risk of non-
compliance with these regulations. While most of these SEC requirements
apply to ING Capital Markets LLC, in addition to its CFTC swap dealer
requirements, SEC rules have permitted an Alternative Compliance
Mechanism that allows for compliance, subject to eligibility requirements,
with CFTC capital and margin rules applying to swap dealers in lieu of SEC
capital and margin rules applying to security-based swap dealers. ING
Capital Markets LLC has elected to use the Alternative Compliance
Mechanism. However, should ING Capital Markets LLC in the future be
ineligible for the Alternative Compliance Mechanism, it would be subject to
SEC security-based swap dealer rules for margin, capital, and related
financial reporting instead of the CFTC swap dealer rules which could be
more capital- intensive.
Any of the foregoing factors, and any further regulatory developments
with respect to commodities and derivatives, could have a material impact
on our business, results and financial condition.
We are subject to the EU recovery and resolution regime and several
other bank recovery and resolution regimes that include statutory write-
down and conversion as well as other powers, which remains subject to
significant uncertainties as to scope and impact on us.
We are subject to several recovery and resolution regimes, including the
Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) and the Bank Recovery and Resolution
Directive (BRRD) as implemented in national legislation such as the Dutch
Financial Supervision Act. The SRM applies to banks that are supervised by
the ECB under the SSM, with the aim of ensuring an orderly resolution of
failing banks at minimum cost for taxpayers and the real economy. The
BRRD establishes a common framework for the recovery and resolution of
banks within the European Union, with the aim of providing supervisory
authorities and resolution authorities with common tools and powers to
address banking crises pre-emptively to safeguard financial stability and
minimise taxpayers’ exposure to losses. Any application of statutory write-
down and conversion or other powers would not be expected to constitute
an event of default under our securities entitling holders to seek
repayment. If any of these powers were to be exercised in respect of ING,
there could be a material adverse effect on both ING and on holders of ING
securities, including through a material adverse effect on credit ratings
and/or the price of our securities. Investors in our securities may lose their
investment if resolution measures are taken under current or future
regimes.
Risks related to litigation, enforcement proceedings and
investigations and to changes in tax laws
We may be subject to litigation, enforcement proceedings,
investigations or other regulatory actions, and adverse publicity.
We are involved in governmental, regulatory, arbitration and legal
proceedings and investigations involving claims by and against us which
arise in the ordinary course of our businesses, including in connection with
our activities as financial services provider, employer, investor and
taxpayer. As a financial institution, we are subject to specific laws and
regulations governing financial services and/or financial institutions. See
'Changes in laws and/or regulations governing financial services or
financial institutions or the application of such laws and/or regulations
may increase our operating costs and limit our activities' and 'Our US
commodities and derivatives business is subject to CFTC and SEC
regulation under the Dodd-Frank Act' above. Financial reporting
irregularities involving other large and well-known companies, possible
findings of government authorities in various jurisdictions which are
investigating several processes, notifications made by whistleblowers,
increasing regulatory and law enforcement scrutiny of ‘know your
customer’ anti-money laundering regulations, tax evasion, prohibited
transactions with countries or persons subject to sanctions, and bribery or
other anti-corruption measures and anti-terrorist-financing procedures
and their effectiveness, regulatory investigations of the banking industry,
and litigation that arises from the failure or perceived failure by us to
comply with legal, regulatory, tax and compliance requirements could
result in adverse publicity and reputational harm. Such developments
could lead to increased regulatory supervision, affect our ability to attract
and retain customers and employees and maintain access to the capital
markets, result in cease and desist orders, claims, enforcement actions,
fines and civil and criminal penalties, other disciplinary action or have
other material adverse effects on us in ways that are not predictable. With
respect to sanctions, Russia’s continued occupation of Ukraine and the
associated conflict has seen successive significant sanctions packages
imposed and continued focus of the EU, US, and other governments on the
potential circumvention of sanctions against Russia, and the roles of third
countries and companies in facilitating the circumvention or undermining
of such sanctions' measures. The EU’s additional measures combating
sanctions circumvention has led to focus on several locations as potential
diversion hubs. While various sanctions include grace periods before full
compliance is required, there is no guarantee that ING will be able to
implement all required procedures within the applicable grace periods. In
addition, some claims and allegations may be brought by or on behalf of a
class and claimants may seek large or indeterminate amounts of
damages, including compensatory, liquidated, treble and punitive
damages. Our reserves for litigation liabilities may prove to be inadequate.
Claims and allegations, should they become public, need not be well
founded, true or successful to have a negative impact on our reputation. In
addition, press reports and other public statements that assert some form
of wrongdoing could result in inquiries or investigations by regulators,
legislators and law enforcement officials, and responding to these inquiries
and investigations, regardless of their ultimate outcome, is time
consuming and expensive. Adverse publicity claims and allegations,
litigation and regulatory investigations and sanctions have had in the past
and may continue to have in the future a material adverse effect on our
business, results, financial condition and/or prospects.
We are subject to different tax regulations in each of the jurisdictions
where we conduct business, and are exposed to changes in tax laws and
risks of non-compliance resulting in proceedings or investigations with
respect to tax laws.
Changes in tax laws (including case law) and tax treaties (including the
termination thereof) could increase our taxes and our effective tax rates
and could materially impact our tax receivables and liabilities as well as
deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results and financial condition. Changes in
tax laws could also make certain ING products less attractive, which could
have adverse consequences for our businesses and results.
Because of the geographic spread of its business, ING may be subject to
tax audits, investigations and procedures in numerous jurisdictions at any
point in time. Although we believe that we have adequately provided for
all our tax positions, the ultimate resolution of these audits, investigations
and procedures may result in liabilities which are different from the
amounts recognised. In addition, increased bank taxes in countries where
the Group is active result in increased taxes on ING’s banking operations,
which could negatively impact our operations, financial condition and
liquidity.
Our reputation could be harmed and we could be subject to enforcement
actions, fines and penalties if we fail to comply with our obligations
under tax laws and regulations.
Due to the nature of its business, ING is subject to various provisions of EU,
US, and other local tax laws in relation to its customers. These include,
amongst others, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), which
requires ING to provide certain information for the US Internal Revenue
Service (IRS); the Qualified Intermediary (QI) requirements, which require
withholding tax on certain US-source payments; and the Common
Reporting Standards (CRS) which requires ING to provide certain
information to local tax authorities. Failure to comply with these
requirements and regulations could harm our reputation and could subject
the Group to enforcement actions, fines and penalties, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, reputation, revenues, results,
financial condition and prospects.
ING is exposed to the risk of claims from customers or stakeholders who
feel misled or treated unfairly because of advice or information
received.
Our products and services, including banking products and advice services
for third-party products are exposed to claims from customers who might
allege that they have received insufficient advice or misleading
information from advisers (both internal and external) as to which
products were most appropriate for them, or that the terms and
conditions of the products, the nature of the products or the
circumstances under which the products were sold, were misrepresented
to them. When new financial products are brought to the market, it is
ING’s policy to engage in a multidisciplinary product approval process in
connection with the development and distribution of such products,
including production of appropriate marketing and communication
materials. Notwithstanding these processes, customers have made in the
past and may continue to make in the future claims against ING if the
products do not meet their expectations, either at the purchase/execution
of the product and/or through the life of the product. Customer protection
regulations, as well as changes in interpretation and perception by both
the public at large and governmental authorities of acceptable market
practices, influence customer expectations.
Products distributed through person-to-person sales forces have a higher
exposure to such claims as the sales forces may provide face-to-face
financial planning and advisory services. Complaints may also arise if
customers feel that they have not been treated reasonably or fairly, or
that the duty of care has not been complied with. While a considerable
amount of time and resources have been invested in reviewing and
assessing historical sales practices and products that were sold in the past,
and in the maintenance of risk management, legal and compliance
procedures to monitor current sales practices, there can be no assurance
that all of the issues associated with current and historical sales practices
have been or will be identified, nor that any issues already identified will
not be more widespread than presently estimated.
The negative publicity associated with any sales practices, any
compensation payable in respect of any such issues and regulatory
changes resulting from such issues, have had and could have a material
adverse effect on our reputation, business, results, financial condition and
prospects. For additional information regarding legal proceedings or
claims, see Note 40 ‘Legal proceedings’ to the consolidated financial
statements.
Risks related to the Group’s business and operations
ING may be unable to meet evolving expectations or requirements with
respect to ESG-related matters.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) is an area of significant and
increased public dialogue and focus for governments and regulators,
investors, ING’s customers and employees, and other stakeholders or third
parties (e.g. non-governmental organisations or NGOs). As a result, an
increasing number of laws, regulations and legislative actions have been
introduced to address ESG-related matters, including in relation to the
financial sector’s operations and strategy. Such ESG-related matters may
relate to climate change, sustainability, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)
or other ESG-related matters. Such recent regulations include the EU
Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), EU Taxonomy regulation
and EU Green Bond Standards, which broadly focus on disclosure
obligations, standardised definitions and classification frameworks for
environmentally sustainable activities, and the EU Corporate Sustainability
Reporting Directive (CSRD), which requires certain companies, including
ING, to disclose information on what they see as the risks and
opportunities arising from environmental, social and governance issues,
and on the impact of their activities on people and the environment.
Similarly, the State of California’s legislation requires broad disclosure of
greenhouse gas emissions and other climate-related information.
National or international regulatory actions or developments may also
result in financial institutions coming under increased pressure from
internal and external stakeholders regarding the management and
disclosure of their ESG risks and related lending and investment activities.
ING may regularly adopt or update ESG-related policies, frameworks or
disclosures in connection with the conduct of its business and operations.
However, these approaches may change regularly and, ultimately, there is
no guarantee that ING will be able to fully comply with all applicable
requirements within anticipated timeframes, or at all. Our ability to satisfy
evolving ESG-related laws, regulations, initiatives, targets, ambitions, aims
or expectations and to accurately report performance or developments
with respect to such matters is subject to numerous risks, many of which
are outside of our control, including the evolving legal environment,
regulatory requirements for the tracking and reporting of standards or
disclosures, the actions of suppliers, partners, and other third parties, and
data that is outside of ING’s control.
Our stakeholders may hold differing views on ESG-related matters,
including DEI, which may result in negative attention in traditional and
social media or a negative perception of our response to concerns
regarding these matters. In addition, we may also face potentially
conflicting supervisory directives as certain US regulatory and non-US
authorities have prioritized ESG-related issues while Congress and certain
US state governments have signaled pursuing potentially conflicting
priorities. These circumstances, among others, may result in pressure from
investors, unfavourable reputational impacts, including inaccurate
perceptions or a misrepresentation of our actual ESG-related practices and
diversion of management’s attention and resources. Any failure, or
perceived failure, by us to adhere to our public statements, comply fully
with developing interpretations of ESG-related laws and regulations,
including with respect to DEI-related matters, or meet evolving and varied
stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our
reputation or result in legal and enforcement proceedings against ING. For
instance, Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) has alleged that
ING has contributed to climate change and has initiated legal proceedings
against ING. For additional information on legal proceedings, including
climate related litigation, see Note 40 ‘Legal proceedings’ in the
consolidated financial statements.
Any of these factors may have an adverse impact on ING’s reputation and
brand value, or on ING’s business, financial condition and operating results.
ING may be unable to adapt its products and services to meet changing
customer behaviour and demand, including as a result of ESG-related
matters.
Customers or other counterparties may increasingly assess sustainability
or other ESG-related matters in their economic decisions. For instance,
customers may choose investment products or services based on
sustainability or other ESG criteria or may look at a financial institution’s
ESG-related lending strategy when choosing to make deposits. At the
same time, market and stakeholder views, including those of regulatory or
governmental authorities, on ESG-related matters may vary across
jurisdictions and over time, and we have faced scrutiny, reputational risk,
product boycotts, lawsuits or market access restrictions from these parties
regarding our ESG-related policies, including with respect to DEI matters.
To remain competitive and to safeguard its reputation, ING is required to
continuously adapt its business strategy, products and services to respond
to emerging, increasing or changing sustainability and other ESG-related
demands from customers, investors and other stakeholders. However,
there is no guarantee that ING’s current or future products or services will
meet applicable ESG-related regulatory requirements, customer
preferences or investor expectations.
ING’s business and operations are exposed to transition risks related to
climate change.
The transition to a low-carbon or net-zero economy gives rise to risks and
uncertainties associated with climate change-related laws, regulations
and oversight, changing or new technologies, and shifting customer
sentiment. For instance, ING may be required to change its lending
portfolio to comply with new climate change-related regulations and other
ESG-related demands from customers, investors and other stakeholders.
Such changes could affect ING’s ability to continue or expand certain
customer relationships. This could result in claims or legal challenges
against ING. At the same time, market and stakeholder views, including
those of regulatory or governmental authorities, on ESG-related matters
may vary across jurisdictions and over time, and we may face scrutiny,
reputational risk, product boycotts, lawsuits or market access restrictions
from these parties regarding our ESG-related policies. This transition may
also adversely impact the business and operations of ING’s customers and
other counterparties. Further, there is a risk that changing community
standards and market expectations could lead to a reduction in demand
and a decline in valuations for certain assets, which may affect the value
of collateral we hold or the financial strength of certain of our portfolios. If
ING fails to adequately factor in such risks in its lending or other business
decisions, ING could be exposed to losses.
The low-carbon or net-zero transition may also require ING to modify or
implement new compliance systems, internal controls and procedures or
governance frameworks. The integration and automation of internal
governance, compliance, and disclosure and reporting frameworks across
ING could lead to increased operational costs for ING and other execution
and operational risks. The implementation cost of these systems may
especially be higher in the near term as ING seeks to adapt its business, or
address overlapping, duplicative or conflicting regulatory or other
requirements in this fast-developing area. Furthermore, ING’s ongoing aim
to implement appropriate systems, controls and frameworks increasingly
requires ING to develop adequate climate change-related risk assessment
and modelling capabilities (as there is currently no standard approach or
methodology available), and to collect customer, third-party or other data.
There are significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the development of
new risk modelling methodologies and the collection of data, potentially
resulting in systems or frameworks that could be inadequate, inaccurate,
incomplete or susceptible to incorrect customer, third-party or other data.
Any delay, change or failure in developing, implementing or meeting ING’s
climate change-related policies and complying with applicable regulatory
requirements may have a material adverse impact on our business,
financial condition, operating results and reputation, and lead to climate
change or ESG-related investigations, enforcement proceedings or
litigation.
ING’s business and operations are exposed to physical risks, including as
a direct result of climate change.
ING’s business and operations are exposed to the impacts of physical risks
arising from climate and weather-related events, including heatwaves,
droughts, flooding, storms, rising sea levels, other extreme weather events
or natural disasters, and to the impacts of physical risks arising from
environmental degradation, including the loss of biodiversity, water or
resource scarcity, pollution or waste management. Such physical risks
have disrupted in the past and could continue in the future to disrupt ING’s
business continuity and operations or impact ING’s premises or property
portfolio, as well as its customers’ property, business or other financial
interests. These risks could potentially result in impairing asset values,
financial losses, declining creditworthiness of customers and increased
defaults, delinquencies, write-offs and impairment charges in ING’s
portfolio, etc. In particular, changing climate patterns resulting in more
frequent and extreme weather events, such as the severe flooding that
occurred in Spain in October 2024 or the severe flooding in Germany in
mid-2024, could lead to unexpected business interruptions or losses for
ING or its customers.
Furthermore, ING’s ongoing aim to implement appropriate systems,
controls and frameworks increasingly requires ING to develop adequate
physical risk assessment and modelling capabilities (as there is currently
no standard approach or methodology available), and to collect customer,
third-party or other data. There are significant risks and uncertainties
inherent in the development of new risk modelling methodologies and the
collection of data, potentially resulting in systems or frameworks that
could be inadequate, inaccurate, incomplete or susceptible to incorrect
customer, third-party or other data.
For a description of physical risks to our operations and business other
than resulting from natural disasters as a result of climate change, see
'Operational and IT risks, such as system disruptions or failures, breaches
of security, cyber attacks, human error, changes in operational practices,
inadequate controls including in respect of third parties with which we do
business or outbreaks of communicable diseases may adversely impact
our reputation, business and results' below.
Operational and IT risks, such as systems disruptions or failures,
breaches of security, human error, changes in operational practices,
inadequate controls including in respect of third parties with which we
do business or outbreaks of communicable diseases may adversely
impact our reputation, business and results.
Operational and IT risks are inherent to our business. Our clients depend on
our ability to process and report a large number of transactions efficiently
and accurately. In addition, we routinely transmit, receive and store
personal, confidential and proprietary information electronically. Losses
can result from inadequately trained or skilled personnel, IT failures
(including due to a cyber attack), inadequate or failed internal control
processes and systems, regulatory breaches, human errors, employee
misconduct, (including fraud), or from natural disasters or other external
events that interrupt normal business operations. As the role of artificial
intelligence in the finance industry and in our business increases, losses
may also result from incomplete, inaccurate or otherwise flawed outputs
from the algorithms and data sets utilised. Such losses may adversely
affect our reputation, business and results.
We depend on the secure processing, storage and transmission of
confidential and other information in our IT systems and networks. The
equipment and software used in our computer systems and networks may
not always be capable of processing, storing or transmitting information
as expected. Despite our business continuity plans and procedures, certain
of our computer systems and networks may have insufficient recovery
capabilities in the event of a malfunction or loss of data. We are
consistently managing and monitoring our IT risk profile globally. ING is
subject to increasing regulatory requirements including EU General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) and EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2)
and the new Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) which  applies from
17 January 2025. Failure to appropriately manage and monitor our IT risk
profile could affect our ability to comply with these regulatory
requirements, to securely and efficiently serve our clients or to timely,
completely and accurately process, store and transmit information, and
may adversely affect our reputation, business and results. For further
description of the particular risks associated with cybercrime, which is a
specific risk to ING as a result of its strategic focus on technology and
innovation, see 'We are subject to increasing risks related to cybercrime
and compliance with cybersecurity regulation' below.
In addition, as the use of artificial intelligence in the financial services
industry increases, data protection and information security risks may also
increase. Our or our customers’ sensitive, proprietary, or confidential
information could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in
connection with our or our third-party providers’ use of generative or other
artificial intelligence technologies. Any such information input into a third-
party generative or other artificial intelligence or machine learning
platform could be revealed to others, including if information is used to
train the third party's artificial intelligence models. Additionally, where an
artificial intelligence model ingests personal information and makes
connections using such data, those technologies may reveal other
sensitive, proprietary, or confidential information generated by the model.
The EU AI Act entered into force in 2024. Certain prohibitions and AI-
literacy requirements apply from February 2025, governance and GPAI
model provisions from August 2025, and obligations for high-risk system
are expected to phase in during 2026 and 2027. We are implementing AI
governance and model risk controls to comply with these requirements.
Widespread of communicable diseases (including pandemics or other
large scale public health emergencies) may impact the health of our
employees, increasing absenteeism, or may cause a significant increase in
the utilisation of health benefits offered to our employees, and may also
disrupt broader economic activity and cross border operations, either or
both of which could adversely impact our business. Further, a significant
portion of our staff continue to work from home on a full- or part-time
basis, which may raise operational risks, including with respect to
information security, data protection, availability of key systems and
infrastructure integrity. In addition, other events including unforeseeable
and/or catastrophic events can lead to an abrupt interruption of activities
and cause operational losses. Losses can result from destruction or
impairment of property, financial assets, trading positions, and the loss of
key personnel.
If our business continuity plans are implemented effectively or, do not
sufficiently take such events into account, losses may increase further.
We are subject to increasing risks related to cybercrime and compliance
with cybersecurity regulation.
Like other financial institutions and global companies, we are regularly the
target of cyber attacks, which are a specific risk to ING as a result of its
strategic focus on technology and innovation. In particular, threats from
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), targeted attacks (also called
Advanced Persistent Threats) and ransomware have intensified worldwide,
and attempts to gain unauthorised access and the sophistication of
techniques used for such attacks is increasing. Cyber threats are
constantly evolving and the techniques used in these attacks change,
develop and evolve rapidly, including the use of emerging technologies,
such as advanced forms of artificial intelligence and quantum computing.
The new cyber risks introduced by these changes in technology require us
to devote significant attention to the identification, assessment and
analysis of the risks and the implementation of corresponding
preventative measures. We have faced, and expect to continue to face, an
increasing number of cyber attacks (both successful and unsuccessful) as
we have further digitalised. This includes the continuing expansion of our
mobile- and other internet-based products and services, as well as our
usage and reliance on cloud technology.
A substantial majority of our customers interact with us primarily through
digital channels. This increased reliance on digital banking and remote
working may increase the risk of cybersecurity breaches, loss of personal
data and related reputational risk. If any of these risks were to materialise
that may adversely affect our business, results and financial condition.
Cybersecurity, the use and safeguarding of customer data and data
privacy have become the subject of increasing legislative and regulatory
focus. The EU’s second Payment Services Directive (PSD2), GDPR, DORA,
NIS2 and the Cyber Resilience Act are examples of such regulations. The
EU Cyber Resilience Act entered into force on 10 December 2024. Certain
vulnerability and incident reporting obligations apply from 11 September
2026, with full obligations applicable from 11 December 2027. In 2024, the
ECB conducted its first cyber resilience stress test to assess banks’ ability
to respond to and recover from a severe cyber incident. The results,
reflected in the 2024 SREP, identified areas for improvement in our
response and recovery capabilities, leading to enhancements in our cyber
resilience measures. In certain locations where ING is active, there are
additional local regulatory requirements and legislation on top of EU
regulations that must be followed for business conducted in that
jurisdiction. Some of these legislations and regulations may be conflicting
due to local regulatory interpretations. We may become subject to new
legislation or regulation concerning cybersecurity, security of customer
data in general or the privacy of information we may store or maintain.
Compliance with such new legislation or regulation could increase the
Group’s compliance cost. Failure to comply with applicable laws or
regulation could harm our reputation and could subject the Group to
enforcement actions, fines and penalties.
ING may be exposed to the risks of misappropriation, unauthorised access,
including through malware (such as ransomware), other malicious code,
cyber attacks and internal breaches for purposes of misappropriating
assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or impairing operational
performance, each of which could have a security impact. These events
could also jeopardise our confidential information or that of our clients or
our counterparties. These events can potentially result in financial loss and
harm to our reputation, hinder our operational effectiveness, result in
regulatory censure, compensation costs or fines resulting from regulatory
investigations and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
reputation, revenues, results, financial condition and prospects. Even when
we are successful in defending against cyber attacks, such defence may
consume significant resources or impose significant additional costs on
ING.
Because we operate in highly competitive markets, including our home
market, we may not be able to increase or maintain our market share,
which may have an adverse effect on our results.
There is substantial competition in the Netherlands and the other
countries in which we do business for the types of wholesale banking,
retail banking, investment banking and other products and services we
provide. Customer loyalty and retention can be influenced by several
factors, including brand recognition, reputation, relative service levels, the
prices and attributes of products and services, scope of distribution, credit
ratings and actions taken by existing or new competitors (including non-
bank or financial technology competitors). A decline in our competitive
position as to one or more of these factors could adversely impact our
ability to maintain or further increase our market share, which would
adversely affect our results. Such competition is most pronounced in our
more mature markets of the Netherlands, Belgium, the rest of Western
Europe and Australia. In recent years, however, competition in emerging
markets, such as Asia and Central and Eastern Europe, has also increased
as large financial services companies from more developed countries have
sought to establish themselves in markets which are perceived to offer
higher growth potential, and as local institutions have become more
sophisticated and competitive and proceeded to form alliances, mergers
or strategic relationships with some of our competitors. The Netherlands is
our largest market. Our main competitors in the banking sector in the
Netherlands are ABN AMRO Bank and Rabobank.
Competition could also increase due to new entrants (including non-bank
and financial technology competitors) in the markets that may have new
operating models that are not burdened by potentially costly legacy
operations and that are subject to reduced regulation. Competitive
dynamics continue to evolve as a result of platform-based players and
fintechs, regulatory changes affecting payments and data access, and
accelerated cloud-native operating models, which may intensify price and
service-level pressure across retail and wholesale. New entrants may rely
on new technologies, advanced data and analytic tools, lower cost to
serve, less extensive oversight from regulators compared to the
frameworks established in respect of traditional banks and/or faster
processes to challenge traditional banks. Developments in technology
have also accelerated the use of new business models, and ING may not
be successful in adapting to this pace of change or may incur significant
costs in adapting its business and operations to meet such changes. For
example, new business models have been observed in retail payments,
consumer and commercial lending (such as peer-to-peer lending), foreign
exchange and low-cost investment advisory services. In particular, the
emergence of disintermediation in the financial sector resulting from new
banking, lending and payment solutions offered by rapidly evolving
incumbents, challengers and new entrants, in particular with respect to
payment services and products, and the introduction of disruptive
technology may impede our ability to grow or retain our market share and
impact our revenues and profitability.
Increasing competition in the markets in which we operate (including from
non-banks and financial technology competitors) may significantly impact
our results if we are unable to match the products and services offered by
our competitors. Future economic turmoil may accelerate additional
consolidation activity. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services
industry have become more concentrated, as institutions involved in a
broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into
other firms or have declared bankruptcy. These developments could result
in our competitors gaining greater access to capital and liquidity,
expanding their ranges of products and services, or gaining geographic
diversity. We may experience pricing pressures as a result of these factors
in the event that some of our competitors seek to increase market share
by reducing prices, which may have a material adverse impact on our
business, results and financial condition.
We may not always be able to protect our intellectual property
developed in our products and services and may be subject to
infringement claims, which could adversely impact our core business,
inhibit efforts to monetise our internal innovations and restrict our
ability to capitalise on future opportunities.
In the conduct of our business, we rely on a combination of contractual
rights with third parties and copyright, trademark, trade name, patent and
trade secret laws to establish and protect our intellectual property, which
we develop in connection with our products and services. Third parties
may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property. We may have to
litigate to enforce and protect our copyrights, trademarks, trade names,
patents, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their scope, validity
or enforceability. In that event, we may be required to incur significant
costs, and our efforts may not prove successful. The inability to secure or
protect our intellectual property assets could have an adverse effect on
our core business and our ability to compete, including through the
monetisation of our internal innovations.
We may also be subject to claims made by third parties for (i) patent,
trademark or copyright infringement, (ii) breach of copyright, trademark or
licence usage rights, or (iii) misappropriation of trade secrets. Any such
claims and any resulting litigation could result in significant expense and
liability for damages. If we were found to have infringed or
misappropriated a third-party patent or other intellectual property right
(including where we or a third party have used generative artificial
intelligence outputs based on data for which the generative model may
not have had consent), we could in some circumstances be enjoined from
providing certain products or services to our customers or from utilising
and benefiting from certain methods, processes, copyrights, trademarks,
trade secrets or licences. Alternatively, we could be required to enter into
costly licensing arrangements with third parties or to implement a costly
workaround. Any of these scenarios could have a material adverse effect
on our business and results and could restrict our ability to pursue future
business opportunities.
The inability of counterparties to meet their financial obligations or our
inability to fully enforce our rights against counterparties could have a
material adverse effect on our results.
Third parties that have payment obligations to ING, or obligations to return
money, securities or other assets, may not pay or perform under their
obligations. These parties include the issuers and guarantors (including
sovereigns) of securities we hold, borrowers under loans originated,
reinsurers, customers, trading counterparties, securities lending and
repurchase counterparties, counterparties under swaps, credit default and
other derivative contracts, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses
and other financial intermediaries. Defaults by one or more of these
parties on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity,
downturns in the economy or real estate values, volatile oil or other
commodity prices, operational failure or other factors, or even rumours
about potential defaults by one or more of these parties or regarding a
severe distress of the financial services industry generally, could have a
material adverse effect on our results, financial condition and liquidity.
Given the high level of interdependence between financial institutions, we
are and will continue to be subject to the risk of deterioration of the
commercial and financial soundness, or perceived soundness, of
sovereigns and other financial services institutions. This is particularly
relevant to our franchise as an important and large counterparty in equity,
fixed income and foreign exchange markets, including related derivatives.
We routinely execute a high volume of transactions, such as unsecured
debt instruments, derivative transactions and equity investments with
counterparties and customers in the financial services industry, including
brokers and dealers, commercial and investment banks, mutual and hedge
funds, insurance companies, institutional clients, futures clearing
merchants, swap dealers, and other institutions, resulting in large periodic
settlement amounts, which may result in us having significant credit
exposure to one or more of such counterparties or customers. As a result,
we could face concentration risk with respect to liabilities or amounts we
expect to collect from specific counterparties and customers. We are
exposed to increased counterparty risk as a result of past financial
institution failures and weakness and will continue to be exposed to the
risk of loss if counterparty financial institutions fail or are otherwise unable
to meet their obligations. As a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and
related international response measures, including sanctions and capital
controls, we may be exposed to an increased risk of default of
counterparties located in Russia and Ukraine, counterparties of which the
ultimate parent is located in Russia or may be considered effectively
controlled or influenced through Russian involvement, and other
counterparties in sectors affected by the response measures. Also,
liquidity or currency controls enforced by the Russian central bank may
impact Russian companies’ ability to pay. In addition, we have
counterparty exposure to Russian entities in connection with foreign
exchange derivatives for future receipt of foreign currencies against the
Russian rouble (RUB). Remaining at risk for ING at year-end 2025 is €600
million of credit exposures booked outside of Russia and €550 million with
clients in Ukraine. A default by, or even concerns about the
creditworthiness of, one or more of these counterparties or customers or
other financial services institutions could therefore have an adverse effect
on our results or liquidity.
With respect to secured transactions, our credit risk may be exacerbated
when the collateral held by us cannot be liquidated or is liquidated at
prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative
exposure due to us. We also have exposure to a number of financial
institutions in the form of unsecured debt instruments, derivative
transactions and equity investments. For example, we hold certain hybrid
regulatory capital instruments issued by financial institutions which permit
the issuer to cancel coupon payments on the occurrence of certain events
or at their option. Pursuant to regulatory powers and resolution
frameworks, the ECB has indicated that, in certain circumstances, it may
require these financial institutions to cancel payment. If this were to
happen, we expect that such instruments may experience ratings
downgrades and/or a drop in value and we may have to treat them as
impaired, which could result in significant losses. There is no assurance
that losses on these assets would not materially and adversely affect our
business, results or financial condition.
In addition, we are subject to the risk that our rights against third parties
may not be enforceable in all circumstances, including sanction risk. The
deterioration or perceived deterioration in the credit quality of third parties
whose securities or obligations we hold could result in losses and/or
adversely affect our ability to rehypothecate or otherwise use those
securities or obligations for liquidity purposes. A significant downgrade in
the credit ratings of our counterparties could also have a negative impact
on our income and risk weighting, leading to increased capital
requirements. While in many cases we are permitted to require additional
collateral from counterparties that experience financial difficulty, disputes
may arise as to the amount of collateral we are entitled to receive and the
value of pledged assets. Collateral valuation is performed in accordance
with internal policies aligned with market data hierarchies; however,
disputes may still occur under stress. Also in this case, our credit risk may
also be exacerbated when the collateral we hold cannot be liquidated at
prices sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative
exposure due to us, which is most likely to occur during periods of
illiquidity and depressed asset valuations, such as those experienced
during the financial crisis of 2008. The termination of contracts and the
foreclosure on collateral may subject us to claims. Bankruptcies,
downgrades and disputes with counterparties as to the valuation of
collateral tend to increase in times of market stress and illiquidity. Any of
these developments or losses could materially and adversely affect our
business, results, financial condition, and/or prospects.
Ratings are important to our business for a number of reasons, and a
downgrade or a potential downgrade in our credit ratings could have an
adverse impact on our results and net results.
Credit ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding an
entity’s ability to repay its indebtedness. Our credit ratings are important
to our ability to raise capital and funding through the issuance of debt and
to the cost of such financing. In the event of a downgrade, the cost of
issuing debt will increase, having an adverse effect on our net results.
Certain institutional investors may also be obliged to withdraw their
deposits from ING following a downgrade, which could have an adverse
effect on our liquidity. They can also have lower risk appetite for our debt
notes, leading to lower purchases of (newly issued) debt notes. We have
credit ratings from S&P, Moody’s, Fitch and Scope. Each of the rating
agencies reviews its ratings and rating methodologies on a recurring basis
and may decide on a downgrade at any time.
As rating agencies continue to evaluate the financial services industry, it is
possible that rating agencies will heighten the level of scrutiny that they
apply to financial institutions, increase the frequency and scope of their
credit reviews, request additional information from the companies that
they rate and potentially adjust upward the capital and other
requirements employed in the rating agency models for maintenance of
certain ratings levels. It is possible that the outcome of any such review of
us would have additional adverse ratings consequences, which could have
a material adverse effect on our results and financial condition. We may
need to take actions in response to changing standards or capital
requirements set by any of the rating agencies, which could cause our
business and operations to suffer. We cannot predict what additional
actions rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in
response to the actions of rating agencies.
Furthermore, ING’s assets are risk-weighted. Downgrades of these assets
could result in a higher risk-weighting, which may result in higher capital
requirements. This may impact net earnings and the return on capital, and
may have an adverse impact on our competitive position.
An inability to retain or attract key personnel may affect our business
and results.
ING Group relies to a considerable extent on the quality of its senior
management, such as members of the executive committee, and
management in the jurisdictions which are material to ING’s business and
operations. The success of ING Group’s operations is dependent, among
other things, on its ability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel.
Competition for key personnel in most countries in which ING Group
operates, and globally for senior management, is intense. ING Group’s
ability to attract and retain key personnel, in senior management and in
particular areas such as technology and operational management, client
relationship management, finance, risk and product development, is
dependent on a number of factors, including prevailing market conditions
and compensation packages offered by companies competing for the
same talent.
The increasing restrictions on, and public and political scrutiny of,
remuneration (especially in the Netherlands), may continue to have an
impact on existing ING Group remuneration policies and individual
remuneration packages for personnel. For example, under the EU’s
amended Shareholder Rights Directive, known as SRD II, which came into
effect on 10 June 2019, ING is required to hold a shareholder binding vote
on ING’s Executive Board remuneration policy and Supervisory Board
remuneration policy at least every four years. Furthermore, the
shareholders have an advisory vote on ING’s remuneration report
annually. This may restrict our ability to offer competitive compensation
compared with companies (financial and/or non-financial) that are not
subject to such restrictions and it could adversely affect ING Group’s ability
to retain or attract key personnel, which, in turn, may affect our business
and results.
We may incur further liabilities in respect of our defined benefit
retirement plans if the value of plan assets is not sufficient to cover
potential obligations, including as a result of differences between actual
results and underlying actuarial assumptions and models.
ING Group companies operate various defined benefit retirement plans
covering the post-employment benefits of a number of our employees.
The liability recognised in our consolidated balance sheet in respect of our
defined benefit plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligations
at the balance sheet date, less the fair value of each plan’s assets,
together with adjustments for unrecognised actuarial gains and losses and
unrecognised past service costs. We determine our defined benefit plan
obligations based on internal and external actuarial models and
calculations using the projected unit credit method. Inherent in these
actuarial models are assumptions, including discount rates, rates of
increase in future salary and benefit levels, mortality rates and the
consumer price index. These assumptions are based on available market
data and are updated annually. Nevertheless, the actuarial assumptions
may differ significantly from actual results due to changes in market
conditions, economic and mortality trends and other assumptions. Any
changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on our
present and future liabilities and costs associated with our defined benefit
plans.
Risks related to the Group’s risk management practices
Risks relating to our use of quantitative models to model client
behaviour for the purposes of our calculations may adversely impact our
results and reputation.
We use quantitative methods, systems or approaches that apply
statistical, economic, financial, or mathematical theories, techniques and
assumptions to process input data into quantitative estimates. Errors in
the development, implementation, use or interpretation of such models, or
from incomplete or incorrect data, can lead to inaccurate, noncompliant or
misinterpreted model outputs, which may adversely impact our results
and reputation. In addition, we use assumptions to model client behaviour
for risk calculations in our banking books. Assumptions are used to
determine the interest rate risk profile of savings and current accounts and
to estimate the embedded option risk in loans and investment portfolios.
Assumptions based on past client behaviour may not always be a reliable
indicator of future behaviour. The use of different assumptions to
determine client behaviour could have a material adverse effect on the
calculated risk figures and, ultimately, our future results or reputation.
Furthermore, we may be subject to risks related to changes in laws and
regulations (e.g. with reference to client rates, prepayment compensation,
etc.) governing the risk management practices of financial institutions. For
more information, see 'Risks related to the regulation and supervision of
the Group – Changes in laws and/or regulations governing financial
services or financial institutions or the application of such laws and/or
regulations may increase our operating costs and limit our activities'
above. As noted there, regulation of the industries in which we operate is
becoming increasingly more extensive and complex, while also attracting
supervisory scrutiny. Compliance failures may lead to changes in the laws
and regulations governing the risk management practices and materially
increase our operating costs.
We may be unable to manage our risks successfully through derivatives.
We employ various economic hedging strategies with the objective of
mitigating the market risks that are inherent in our business and
operations. These risks include currency fluctuations, changes in the fair
value of our investments, the impact of interest rates, equity markets and
credit spread changes, the occurrence of credit defaults and changes in
client behaviour. We seek to control these risks by, among other things,
entering into a number of derivative instruments, such as swaps (e.g. CCY,
IR, etc.), options, futures and forward contracts, including, from time to
time, macro hedges for parts of our business, either directly as a
counterparty or as a credit support provider to affiliate counterparties.
Developing an effective strategy for dealing with these risks is complex,
and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with
those fluctuations. Our hedging strategies also rely on assumptions and
projections regarding our assets, liabilities, general market factors and the
creditworthiness of our counterparties that may prove to be incorrect or
prove to be inadequate. Accordingly, our hedging activities may not have
the desired beneficial impact on our results or financial condition. Poorly
designed strategies or improperly executed transactions could actually
increase our risks and losses. Hedging strategies involve transaction costs
and other costs, and if we terminate a hedging arrangement, we may also
be required to pay additional costs, such as transaction fees or breakage
costs. There have been periods in the past, and it is likely that there will be
periods in the future, during which we have incurred or may incur losses
on transactions, possibly significant, after taking into account our hedging
strategies. Further, the nature and timing of our hedging transactions
could actually increase our risk and losses. Hedging instruments we use to
manage product and other risks might not perform as intended or
expected, which could result in higher realised or unrealised losses, such as
credit value adjustment risks or unexpected P&L effects, and unanticipated
cash needs to collateralise or settle such transactions. Adverse market
conditions can limit the availability and increase the costs of hedging
instruments, and such costs may not be recovered in the pricing of the
underlying products being hedged. In addition, hedging counterparties
may fail to perform their obligations, resulting in unhedged exposures and
losses on positions that are not collateralised. As such, our hedging
strategies and the derivatives that we use or may use may not adequately
mitigate or offset the risks they intend to cover, and our hedging
transactions may result in losses.
Our hedging strategy additionally relies on the assumption that hedging
counterparties remain able and willing to provide the hedges required by
our strategy. Increased regulation, market shocks, worsening market
conditions, and/or other factors that affect or are perceived to affect the
financial condition, liquidity and creditworthiness of ING may reduce the
ability and/or willingness of such counterparties to engage in hedging
contracts with us and/or other parties, affecting our overall ability to
hedge our risks and adversely affecting our business, results and financial
condition.
Risks related to the Group’s liquidity and financing activities
We depend on the capital and credit markets, as well as customer
deposits, to provide the liquidity and capital required to fund our
operations, and adverse conditions in the capital and credit markets, or
significant withdrawals of customer deposits, may negatively impact
our liquidity, borrowing and capital positions, as well as increase the
cost of liquidity, borrowings and capital.
Adverse capital market conditions may negatively impact our cost of
borrowed funds and our ability to borrow on a secured and unsecured
basis, thereby impacting our ability to support and/or grow our businesses.
From a liquidity perspective, central banks have continued its path of
quantitative tightening by decreasing its balance sheet, which may reduce
the liquidity provided to the financial system. Consequently, banks have
significantly increased debt issuance and heightened competition for
client deposits is observed.
We require liquidity to fund new and ongoing business, to pay our
operating expenses and interest on our debt as well as dividends on our
capital stock, maintain our securities lending activities and replace
maturing liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, we will be forced to curtail
our operations and our business will suffer. The principal sources of our
funding include a variety of short- and long-term instruments, including
deposit funds, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, medium- and
long-term debt, subordinated debt securities, capital securities and
shareholders’ equity.
In addition, as we rely on customer deposits to fund our business and
operations, the confidence of customers in financial institutions may be
tested in a manner that may adversely impact our liquidity and capital
position. Consumer confidence in financial institutions may, for example,
decrease due to ING’s or our competitors’ failure to communicate to
customers the terms of, and the benefits and risks to customers of,
complex or high-fee financial products. Reduced customer confidence
could have an adverse effect on our liquidity and capital position through
the withdrawal of deposits, as well as on our revenues and total financial
results. As a significant percentage of our customer deposit base is
originated via internet banking, a loss of customer confidence may result
in a rapid withdrawal of deposits over the internet.
In the event that our current resources do not satisfy our liquidity
requirements, we may need to seek additional financing. The availability of
additional financing will depend on a variety of factors, such as market
conditions, the general availability of credit, the volume of trading
activities, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry,
our credit rating and credit capacity, as well as the possibility that
customers or lenders could develop a negative perception of our long- or
short-term financial prospects. See also under the heading 'Ratings are
important to our business for a number of reasons, and a downgrade or a
potential downgrade in our credit ratings could have an adverse impact on
our results and net results'. Similarly, our access to funding may be limited
if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against
us. If our internal sources of liquidity prove to be insufficient, there is a risk
that we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on
favourable terms, or at all. Any actions we might take to access financing
may, in turn, cause rating agencies to re-evaluate our ratings.
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may
also limit our access to capital. Such market conditions may in the future
limit our ability to raise additional capital to support business growth, to
counterbalance the consequences of losses, or to meet increased
regulatory capital and rating agency capital requirements. This could force
us to (i) delay raising capital, (ii) reduce, cancel or postpone payment of
dividends on our shares, (iii) reduce, cancel or postpone interest payments
on our other securities, (iv) issue capital of different types or under
different terms than we would otherwise, or (v) incur a higher cost of
capital than in a more stable market environment. This would have the
potential to decrease both our profitability and our financial flexibility. Our
results, financial condition, cash flows, regulatory capital and rating
agency capital positions could be materially adversely affected by
disruptions in the financial markets.
Furthermore, regulatory liquidity requirements in certain jurisdictions in
which we operate remain stringent, undermining our efforts to maintain
centralised management of our liquidity. This may continue to cause
trapped pools of liquidity and capital, resulting in inefficiencies in the cost
of managing our liquidity and solvency, and hinder our efforts to integrate
our balance sheet. An example of such trapped liquidity includes our
operations in Germany where German regulations impose separate
liquidity requirements that restrict ING’s ability to move a liquidity surplus
out of the German subsidiary.
Disclaimer
Certain of the statements contained herein are not historical facts,
including, without limitation, certain statements made of future
expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on
management’s current views and assumptions and involve known and
unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results,
performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied
in such statements. Actual results, performance or events may differ
materially from those in such statements due to a number of factors,
including, without limitation: (1) changes in general economic conditions
and customer behaviour, in particular economic conditions in ING’s core
markets, including changes affecting currency exchange rates and the
regional and global economic impact of the invasion of Russia into Ukraine
and related international response measures (2) changes affecting interest
rate levels (3) any default of a major market participant and related
market disruption (4) changes in performance of financial markets,
including in Europe and developing markets (5) fiscal uncertainty in Europe
and the United States (6) discontinuation of or changes in ‘benchmark’
indices (7) inflation and deflation in our principal markets (8) changes in
conditions in the credit and capital markets generally, including changes in
borrower and counterparty creditworthiness (9) failures of banks falling
under the scope of state compensation schemes (10) non-compliance with
or changes in laws and regulations, including those concerning financial
services, financial economic crimes and tax laws, and the interpretation
and application thereof (11) geopolitical risks, political instabilities and
policies and actions of governmental and regulatory authorities, including
in connection with the invasion of Russia into Ukraine, other existing or
emerging military conflicts, the risk of further military escalation,
geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions and the related international
response measures (12) legal and regulatory risks in certain countries with
less developed legal and regulatory frameworks (13) prudential
supervision and regulations, including in relation to stress tests and
regulatory restrictions on dividends and distributions (also among
members of the group) (14) ING’s ability to meet minimum capital and
other prudential regulatory requirements (15) changes in regulation of US
commodities and derivatives businesses of ING and its customers (16)
application of bank recovery and resolution regimes, including write-down
and conversion powers in relation to our securities (17) outcome of current
and future litigation, enforcement proceedings, investigations or other
regulatory actions, including claims by customers or stakeholders who feel
misled or treated unfairly, and other conduct issues (18) changes in tax
laws and regulations and risks of non-compliance or investigation in
connection with tax laws, including FATCA (19) operational and IT risks,
such as system disruptions or failures, breaches of security, cyber-attacks,
human error, changes in operational practices or inadequate controls
including in respect of third parties with which we do business and
including any risks as a result of incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise
flawed outputs from the algorithms and data sets utilized in artificial
intelligence (20) risks and challenges related to cybercrime including the
effects of cyberattacks and changes in legislation and regulation related to
cybersecurity and data privacy, including such risks and challenges as a
consequence of the use of emerging technologies, such as advanced
forms of artificial intelligence and quantum computing (21) changes in
general competitive factors, including ability to increase or maintain
market share (22) inability to protect our intellectual property and
infringement claims by third parties (23) inability of counterparties to
meet financial obligations or ability to enforce rights against such
counterparties (24) changes in credit ratings (25) business, operational,
regulatory, reputation, transition and other risks and challenges in
connection with climate change, diversity, equity and inclusion and other
ESG-related matters, including data gathering and reporting and also
including managing the conflicting laws and requirements of
governments, regulators and authorities with respect to these topics (26)
inability to attract and retain key personnel (27) future liabilities under
defined benefit retirement plans (28) failure to manage business risks,
including in connection with use of models, use of derivatives, or
maintaining appropriate policies and guidelines (29) changes in capital and
credit markets, including interbank funding, as well as customer deposits,
which provide the liquidity and capital required to fund our operations, and
(30) the other risks and uncertainties detailed in the most recent annual
report of ING Bank N.V. (including the Risk Factors contained therein) and
ING’s more recent disclosures, including press releases, which are available
on ing.com.
This document may contain ESG-related material that has been prepared
by ING on the basis of publicly available information, internally developed
data and other third-party sources believed to be reliable. ING has not
sought to independently verify information obtained from public and
third-party sources and makes no representations or warranties as to the
accuracy, completeness, reasonableness or reliability of such information.
This document may also discuss one or more specific transactions and/or
contain general statements about ING’s ESG approach. The approach and
criteria referred to in this document are intended to be applied in
accordance with applicable law. Due to the fact that there may be
different or even conflicting laws, the approach, criteria or the application
thereof, could be different.
Materiality, as used in the context of ESG, is distinct from, and should not
be confused with, such term as defined in the Market Abuse Regulation or
as defined for Securities and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) reporting
purposes. Any issues identified as material for purposes of ESG in this
annual report are therefore not necessarily material as defined in the
Market Abuse Regulation or for SEC reporting purposes. In addition, there is
currently no single, globally recognized set of accepted definitions in
assessing whether activities are “green” or “sustainable”. Without limiting
any of the statements contained herein, we make no representation or
warranty as to whether any of our securities constitutes a green or
sustainable security or conforms to present or future investor expectations
or objectives for green or sustainable investing. For information on
characteristics of a security, use of proceeds, a description of applicable
project(s) and/or any other relevant information, please reference the
offering documents for such security.
This annual report may contain inactive textual addresses to internet
websites operated by us and third parties. Reference to such websites is
made for information purposes only, and information found at such
websites is not incorporated by reference into this annual report. ING does
not make any representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or
completeness of, or take any responsibility for, any information found at
any websites operated by third parties. ING specifically disclaims any
liability with respect to any information found at websites operated by
third parties. ING cannot guarantee that websites operated by third parties
remain available following the publicaton of this annual report or that any
information found at such websites will not change following the
publication of this annual report. Many of those factors are beyond ING’s
control.
This document is the PDF version of the 2025 Annual Report of ING made
available on ing.com. Another version of this document has been prepared
in the European single electronic reporting format (ESEF) and such ESEF
reporting package is also available on ing.com. In the event of any
discrepancies between this PDF version and the ESEF reporting package,
the ESEF reporting package governs.
Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of ING speak only
as of the date they are made, and ING assumes no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information or for any other reason.
This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an
offer to purchase, any securities in the United States or any other
jurisdiction.