2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31iso4217:HKD2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-312HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-312HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-312HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-312HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31hbap:IssuedCapitalAndSharePremiumMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:OtherEquityInterestMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:RevaluationSurplusMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfGainsAndLossesOnFinancialAssetsMeasuredAtFairValueThroughOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:RevaluationSurplusMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfGainsAndLossesOnFinancialAssetsMeasuredAtFairValueThroughOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31hbap:IssuedCapitalAndSharePremiumMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherEquityInterestMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31hbap:IssuedCapitalAndSharePremiumMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherEquityInterestMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:RevaluationSurplusMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfGainsAndLossesOnFinancialAssetsMeasuredAtFairValueThroughOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31hbap:IssuedCapitalAndSharePremiumMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:OtherEquityInterestMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:RevaluationSurplusMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfGainsAndLossesOnFinancialAssetsMeasuredAtFairValueThroughOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572020-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:RevaluationSurplusMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfGainsAndLossesOnFinancialAssetsMeasuredAtFairValueThroughOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572021-01-012021-12-31ifrs-full:OtherReservesMemberxbrli:sharesiso4217:HKDxbrli:shares2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572022-01-012022-12-31ifrs-full:OtherEquityInterestMemberifrs-full:CurrencyInWhichSupplementaryInformationIsDisplayedMemberiso4217:USD2HI3YI5320L3RW6NJ9572023-02-142023-02-14
  The Hongkong and Shanghai
  Banking Corporation Limited
          Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Contents
Page
Certain defined terms
1
Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements
1
Chinese translation
1
Financial Highlights
2
Report of the Directors
3
Environmental, Social and Governance Review
9
Financial Review
16
Risk
20
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
73
Independent Auditor’s Report
74
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated income statement
79
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
80
Consolidated balance sheet
81
Consolidated statement of cash flows
82
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
83
Notes on the Consolidated Financial
Statements
1
Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies
85
2
Operating profit
95
3
Insurance business
97
4
Employee compensation and benefits
98
5
Tax
101
6
Dividends
102
7
Trading assets
103
8
Derivatives
103
9
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss
106
10
Loans and advances to customers
106
11
Financial investments
107
12
Assets pledged, assets transferred and collateral received
108
13
Investments in subsidiaries
109
14
Interests in associates and joint ventures
109
15
Goodwill and intangible assets
112
16
Property, plant and equipment
113
17
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets
114
18
Customer accounts
115
19
Trading liabilities
115
20
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
115
21
Debt securities in issue
115
22
Accruals and deferred income, other liabilities and provisions
115
23
Subordinated liabilities
116
24
Share capital
116
25
Other equity instruments
117
26
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities
117
27
Analysis of cash flows payable under financial liabilities by
remaining contractual maturities
120
28
Contingent liabilities, contractual commitments and guarantees
121
29
Other commitments
121
30
Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities
121
31
Segmental analysis
123
32
Related party transactions
124
33
Fair values of financial instruments carried at fair value
127
34
Fair values of financial instruments not carried at fair value
133
35
Structured entities
134
36
Bank balance sheet and statement of changes in equity
136
37
Business acquisitions
138
38
Legal proceedings and regulatory matters
138
39
Ultimate holding company
139
40
Events after the balance sheet date
139
41
Approval of financial statements
139
Additional information
140
Certain defined terms
This document comprises the Annual Report and Accounts 2022
for The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (‘the
Bank’) and its subsidiaries (together ‘the group’). References to
‘HSBC’, ‘the Group’ or ‘the HSBC Group’ within this document
mean HSBC Holdings plc together with its subsidiaries. Within this
document the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the
People’s Republic of China is referred to as ‘Hong Kong’. The
abbreviations ‘HK$m’ and ‘HK$bn’ represent millions and billions
(thousands of millions) of Hong Kong dollars respectively.
Cautionary statement regarding forward-
looking statements
This Annual Report and Accounts contains certain forward-looking
statements with respect to the financial condition, results of
operations and business of the group.
Statements that are not historical facts, including statements
about the Bank’s beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements. Words such as ‘expects’, ‘anticipates’, ‘intends’,
‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘potential’ and ‘reasonably
possible’, variations of these words and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements
are based on current plans, estimates and projections, and
therefore undue reliance should not be placed on them. Forward-
looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and it
should not be assumed that they have been revised or updated in
the light of new information or future events.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. Readers are cautioned that a number of factors
could cause actual results to differ, in some instances materially,
from those anticipated or implied in any forward-looking
statement.
Please see page 140 for the additional cautionary statement
regarding environmental, social and governance, as well as
climate-related data, metrics and forward-looking statements. 
Chinese translation
A Chinese translation of the Annual Report and Accounts 2022 is
available upon request from: Communications (Asia), Level 32,
HSBC Main Building, 1 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong. The
report is also available, in English and Chinese, on the Bank’s
website at www.hsbc.com.hk.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
1
Financial Highlights
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
For the year
Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
205,692
178,658
Profit before tax
97,611
86,563
Profit attributable to shareholders
78,245
67,348
At the year-end
Total shareholders’ equity
875,320
856,809
Total equity
941,263
923,511
Total capital1
607,312
590,478
Customer accounts
6,113,709
6,177,182
Total assets
10,324,152
9,903,393
Ratios
%
%
Return on average ordinary shareholders’ equity
9.3
8.0
Post-tax return on average total assets
0.8
0.7
Cost efficiency ratio
53.7
58.7
Net interest margin
1.67
1.37
Advances-to-deposits ratio
60.6
62.2
Capital ratios
Common equity tier 1 capital
15.3
15.4
Tier 1 capital
16.9
16.8
Total capital
18.8
18.7
1Capital is calculated in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules issued by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (‘HKMA’) under section 97C(1)
of the Banking Ordinance.
Established in Hong Kong and Shanghai in 1865, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited is the founding member of
the HSBC Group – one of the world’s largest banking and financial services organisations. It is the largest bank incorporated in Hong
Kong and one of Hong Kong’s three note-issuing banks. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc, the holding company of
the HSBC Group, which has an international network covering Europe, Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, North America and Latin
America.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Incorporated in the Hong Kong SAR with limited liability
Registered Office and Head Office: HSBC Main Building, 1 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong
Telephone: (852) 2822 1111Web: www.hsbc.com.hk.
Financial Highlights | Report of the Directors
2
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Report of the Directors
Principal Activities
The group provides a comprehensive range of domestic and
international banking and related financial services, principally in
the Asia–Pacific region.
Asia Strategy
Asia’s growth story remains at the heart of HSBC’s future. Based
on the region’s strong and sustained underlying fundamentals of
economic growth, trade, and wealth creation, HSBC’s strategy in
the region remains aligned to the biggest opportunities to create
further shareholder value. We are well positioned to further extend
the strengths of our leading Hong Kong franchise across the
Greater Bay Area, and in other key growth markets, including India
and Southeast Asian markets. By increasing investment in our
people and technology, we will further grow our top tier Asia
Wealth Management business, while maintaining our distinct
position as the leading international bank for our corporate and
commercial clients. We remain focused on connecting Asian
markets to each other and the world through HSBC’s global
network, supporting the ongoing transition to a low-carbon
economy with Sustainable Finance, continually streamlining our
organisation to realise greater operating efficiencies, and
improving service for our domestic, regional, and global clients
through our technology, talent, and 157 years of experience in the
region.
Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of the group are set out on
pages 79 to 139.
Subordinated Liabilities, Share Capital and Other
Equity Instruments
Details on subordinated liabilities issued by the group are set out
in Notes 23 and 32. Details on share capital and other equity
instruments of the Bank are set out in Notes 24 and 25 on the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Dividends
The interim dividends paid in respect of 2022 are set out in Note 6
on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Directors
The Directors at the date of this report are set out below:
Peter Tung Shun WONG, GBS, JP
Non-executive Chairman (since June 2021)
He is also an advisor to the Group Chairman and the Group Chief
Executive of HSBC Holdings plc, and Chairman and a non-executive
Director of HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited. He holds a Bachelor of
Arts, a Master of Business Administration and a Master of Science from
Indiana University.
Before his retirement as an HSBC employee in June 2021, he was an
executive Director, Chief Executive and Deputy Chairman of the Bank. He
was also a non-executive Director of Hang Seng Bank Limited.
David Gordon ELDON, GBS, CBE, JP
Non-executive Deputy Chairman (since June 2021)
He holds an Honorary Doctor of Business Administration from City
University of Hong Kong and is a Fellow of the UK Chartered Institute of
Bankers and the Hong Kong Institute of Bankers.
Before his retirement as an HSBC employee in 2005, he was an executive
Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Bank. He was also
non-executive Chairman of Hang Seng Bank Limited and a Director of
HSBC Holdings plc. He was non-executive Chairman of HSBC Bank
Middle East Limited from 2011 to 2021. He was non-executive Chairman
and a Director of Octopus Holdings Limited, Octopus Cards Limited and
Octopus Cards Client Funds Limited from 2016 until the end of 2022.
David Yi Chien LIAO
Co-Chief Executive Officer (since June 2021)
He is also a member of the Group Executive Committee of HSBC Holdings
plc and a non-executive Director of Hang Seng Bank Limited and Bank of
Communications Co., Ltd. He holds a Bachelor of Arts (major in Japanese
and Economics) from the University of London.
He has previously held a number of senior positions within the Group,
including the Head of Global Banking Coverage for Asia-Pacific and a
Director and Chief Executive Officer of HSBC Bank (China) Company
Limited.
Surendranath Ravi ROSHA
Co-Chief Executive Officer (since June 2021)
He is also a member of the Group Executive Committee of HSBC Holdings
plc and an executive Director of HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad. He holds a
Bachelor of Commerce from Sydenham College of Commerce &
Economics, Bombay University and a Master of Business Administration
from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
He has previously held a number of senior positions within the Group,
including the Chief Executive Officer of HSBC India and Regional Head of
Financial Institutions Group, Asia-Pacific.
Sonia Chi Man CHENG
Independent non-executive Director (since November 2020)
She is also the Chief Executive Officer of Rosewood Hotel Group. She is
the Vice-Chairman and executive Director of Chow Tai Fook Jewellery
Group Limited, an executive Director of New World Development
Company Limited and a Director of New World China Land Limited. She
holds a Bachelor of Arts with a field of concentration in Applied
Mathematics from Harvard University.
Yiu Kwan CHOI
Independent non-executive Director (since October 2017)
He holds a higher certificate in Accountancy from The Hong Kong
Polytechnic University and is a Fellow member of The Hong Kong Institute
of Bankers.
He was an independent non-executive Director of HSBC Bank (China)
Company Limited from December 2016 to December 2022. He was
Deputy Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (‘HKMA’) in
charge of Banking Supervision when he retired in January 2010. Before
this, he was Deputy Chief Executive of the HKMA in charge of Monetary
Policy and Reserves Management from June 2005 to August 2007 and
held various senior positions in the HKMA including Executive Director
(Banking Supervision), Head of Administration, and Head of Banking
Policy from 1993 to 2005.
Andrea Lisa DELLA MATTEA
Independent non-executive Director (since 11 March 2022)
She is also the Asia Pacific President of Microsoft Operations Pte Ltd. She
holds a Bachelor of Engineering and an Honorary Doctor of Engineering
from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia.
She has previously held senior leadership roles at Insight Enterprises, Inc
from 2007 to 2017, including Asia Pacific Managing Director, and at
Software Spectrum Inc from 1996 to 2006.
Rajnish KUMAR
Independent non-executive Director (since August 2021)
He is also non-executive Chairman of Resilient Innovations Pvt. Ltd., an
independent non-executive Director of Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited
and Ambuja Cements Limited, an advisor to Kotak Investment Advisors
Ltd., a Director of Lighthouse Communities Foundation, and a member of
the Board of Governors of the Management Development Institute in
India. He is also a senior advisor to Baring Private Equity Asia Pte Ltd. in
Singapore. He holds a Master of Science in Physics from Meerut
University and a Post Graduate Certificate in Business Management from
XLRI Jamshedpur in India. He is an Associate of the Indian Institute of
Bankers.
He was previously Chairman of the State Bank of India until he retired in
October 2020.
Beau Khoon Chen KUOK
Independent non-executive Director (since August 2020)
He is also Chairman and Managing Director of Kerry Group Limited. He
holds a Bachelor of Economics from Monash University. He was
previously Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shangri-La Asia
Limited, Chairman of Kerry Properties Limited, and a non-executive
Director of Wilmar International Limited.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
3
Irene Yun-lien LEE
Independent non-executive Director (since October 2013)
She is also executive Chairman of Hysan Development Company Limited.
She is also independent non-executive Chairman of Hang Seng Bank
Limited and an independent non-executive Director of Alibaba Group
Holding Limited. She holds a Bachelor of Arts (Distinction) in History of Art
from Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA. She is also a
member of the Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn, UK and a Barrister-at-
Law in England and Wales.
She was an independent non-executive Director of HSBC Holdings plc
from 2015 to 2022.
Victor Tzar Kuoi LI
Non-executive Director (since May 1992)
He is also Chairman and Managing Director of CK Asset Holdings Limited,
Chairman and a Group Co-Managing Director of CK Hutchison Holdings
Limited, Chairman of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited and CK Life
Sciences Int’l., (Holdings) Inc., a non-executive Director of Power Assets
Holdings Limited and HK Electric Investments Manager Limited, and a
non-executive Director and Deputy Chairman of HK Electric Investments
Limited. He is also Deputy Chairman of Li Ka Shing Foundation Limited, Li
Ka Shing (Global) Foundation and Member Deputy Chairman of Li Ka
Shing (Canada) Foundation. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil
Engineering and a Master of Science in Civil Engineering, both received
from Stanford University; and a Doctor of Laws, honoris causa (LL.D.)
from The University of Western Ontario.
Annabelle Yu LONG
Independent non-executive Director (since 17 August 2022)
She is also the Founding and Managing Partner of BAI Capital Fund I, L.P.
and a Group Management Committee Member of Bertelsmann SE & Co.
KGaA. She is an independent Director of Tapestry Inc., LexinFintech
Holdings Ltd., Nio Inc. and Linmon Media Limited. She holds a Master in
Business Administration from Stanford Graduate School of Business,
United States and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from
University of Electronic Science and Technology, China.
Kevin Anthony WESTLEY, BBS
Independent non-executive Director (since September 2016)
He is also an independent non-executive Director of Fu Tak Iam
Foundation Limited and a member of the investment committee of the
West Kowloon Cultural District Authority. He holds a Bachelor of Arts
(Hons) from the University of London (LSE) and is a Fellow of the Institute
of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
He was Chairman (from 1996) and Chief Executive (from 1992) of HSBC
Investment Bank Asia Limited (formerly named Wardley Limited) until his
retirement in 2000 and subsequently acted as an advisor to the Bank and
the Group in Hong Kong. He was an independent non-executive Director
of the Bank from 2013 to 2015 and rejoined the Board in September 2016.
During the year, Andrea Lisa Della Mattea and Annabelle Yu Long
were appointed independent non-executive Directors with effect
from 11 March and 17 August 2022 respectively. At the
conclusion of the 2022 Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’) held on
1 June 2022, Graham John Bradley, Christopher Wai Chee Cheng
and Francis Sock Ping Yeoh stepped down as Directors. Ewen
James Stevenson stepped down as Director with effect from     
25 October 2022. Save for the above, all the Directors served
throughout the year.
A list of the directors of the Bank’s subsidiary undertakings
(consolidated in the financial statements) during the period from
1 January 2022 to the date of this report will be available on the
Bank’s website www.hsbc.com.hk/legal/regulatory-disclosures/.
Secretary
Paul Stafford is the Corporation Secretary.
Permitted Indemnity Provision
The Bank’s Articles of Association provide that the Directors and
other officers of the Bank shall be indemnified out of the Bank’s
assets against any liability incurred by them or any of them as the
holder of any such office or appointment to a person other than
the Bank or an associated company of the Bank in connection
with any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust in
relation to the Bank or associated company. In addition, the
Bank’s ultimate holding company, HSBC Holdings plc, has
maintained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance providing
appropriate cover for the directors and officers within the Group,
including the Directors of the Bank and its subsidiaries.
Directors’ Interests in Transactions,
Arrangements or Contracts
Save as disclosed in Note 32 on the Consolidated Financial
Statements, no transactions, arrangements or contracts that were
significant in relation to the Bank’s business and in which a
Director or his or her connected entities had, directly or indirectly,
a material interest were entered into by or subsisted with the
Bank, its holding companies, its subsidiaries or subsidiaries of its
holding companies during the year.
Directors’ Rights to Acquire Shares or Debentures
To help align the interests of employees with shareholders,
executive Directors of the Bank and HSBC Holdings plc are eligible
to be granted conditional awards over ordinary shares in HSBC
Holdings plc by that company (being the ultimate holding
company) under the HSBC Share Plan 2011 and the HSBC
International Employee Share Purchase Plan.
Executive Directors of the Bank and HSBC Holdings plc are eligible
to receive an annual incentive award based on the outcome of the
performance measures (financial and non-financial) set out in their
annual performance scorecard. Annual incentive awards are
normally delivered in cash and/or shares, and these generally have
a deferral rate of 60% or 40% if the annual incentive award is
below GBP500,000. The period over which annual incentive
awards would be deferred is determined in accordance with the
requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’)
Remuneration Rules, i.e. seven years for Senior Managers
(individuals in PRA and Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’)
designated Senior Management Functions), five years for Risk
Managers, and four years for other Material Risk Takers (‘MRTs’).
From January 2017 onwards, all share awards granted to MRTs
are subject to a minimum retention period of one year as opposed
to six months previously. However, for certain individuals whose
variable pay awards will be deferred for at least five years and who
are not considered to be members of senior management, their
retention period may be kept at six months.
From 2022 to incentivise sustainable long-term performance and
alignment with shareholder interests, Senior Management of
Holdings plc including the Co-Chief Executives of the Bank are
eligible to receive Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Share Award. These
awards which have been made to executive Directors of Holdings
plc are subject to three-year forward-looking performance
measures and a seven-year vesting period with a one-year post-
vesting retention period, which is not accelerated on departure.
The weighted average holding period of an LTI award within HSBC
is therefore six years, in excess of the five-year holding period
typically implemented by FTSE-listed companies. When the
individual ceases employment, if they are treated as a good leaver
under our policy, any LTI awards granted will continue to be
released over a period of up to eight years, subject to the outcome
of performance conditions. For more details on the operation of
the plan, please refer to HSBC Holdings plc annual report and
accounts.
All unvested deferred awards made under the HSBC Share Plan
2011 are subject to the application of malus, i.e. the cancellation
and reduction of unvested deferred awards. All paid or vested
variable pay awards made to identified staff and MRTs will be
subject to clawback for a period of seven years from the date of
award. For Senior Managers, this may be extended to 10 years in
the event of an ongoing internal or regulatory investigation at the
end of the seven-year period.
Executive Directors and other senior executives of HSBC Holdings
plc are subject to Group minimum shareholding requirements.
Individuals are given five years from 2014 or (if later) their
appointment to build up the recommended levels of shareholding.
HSBC operates an anti-hedging policy for Group, sectorial and
local MRTs including executive Directors in accordance with the
PRA Rules, who are required to certify each year via the Bank's
Report of the Directors
4
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Global Personal Account Dealing system that they have not
entered into any personal hedging strategies in relation to their
holdings of HSBC shares as part of the Global Personal Account
Dealing Certification.
The HSBC International Employee Share Purchase Plan is an
employee share purchase plan offered to employees in Hong Kong
since 2013 and has been extended to further countries in the
HSBC Group from 2014. For every three shares in HSBC Holdings
plc purchased by an employee (‘Investment Shares’), a conditional
award to acquire one share is granted (‘Matching Shares’). The
employee becomes entitled to the Matching Shares subject to
continued employment with HSBC and retention of the Investment
Shares until the third anniversary of the start of the relevant plan
year. HSBC Holdings Savings-Related Share Option Plan (UK) is an
all employee share plan under which eligible employees may be
granted options to acquire HSBC Holdings ordinary shares.
Employees may make monthly contributions, up to a maximum
defined limit, over a period of three or five years and shares are
exercisable within six months following either the third or fifth
anniversary of the commencement. The exercise price is set at a
20% discount to the market value immediately preceding the date
of invitation.
During the year, Ewen Stevenson, Surendra Rosha and David Liao
acquired or were awarded shares of HSBC Holdings plc under the
terms of the HSBC Share Plan 2011. Peter Wong in his former
capacity as executive Director in 2021 received a 2021
performance year variable pay award in March 2022 to which part
of the award was made in share-linked instruments of HSBC
Holding plc.
Apart from these arrangements, at no time during the year was
the Bank, its holding companies, its subsidiaries or any fellow
subsidiaries a party to any arrangements to enable the Directors to
acquire benefits by means of the acquisition of shares in or
debentures of the Bank or any other body corporate.
Donations
Donations made by the Bank and its subsidiaries during the year
amounted to HK$439m (2021: HK$380m).
Compliance with the Banking (Disclosure) Rules
The Directors are of the view that the Annual Report and Accounts
2022 and Banking Disclosure Statements 2022 fully comply with
the Banking (Disclosure) Rules made under section 60A of the
Banking Ordinance and the Financial Institutions (Resolution)
(Loss-absorbing Capacity Requirements – Banking Sector) Rules
(‘LAC Rules’) made under section 19(1) of the Financial Institutions
(Resolution) Ordinance ('FIRO').
Auditor
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers (‘PwC’). A resolution to reappoint PwC
as auditor of the Bank will be proposed at the forthcoming AGM.
Corporate Governance
The Bank is committed to high standards of corporate governance.
As an Authorised Institution, the Bank is subject to and complies
with the HKMA Supervisory Policy Manual CG-1 ‘Corporate
Governance of Locally Incorporated Authorised Institutions’ ('SPM
CG-1') except that the membership of the Bank’s Nomination
Committee does not comprise a majority of independent non-
executive Directors. The Bank’s Nomination Committee currently
comprises an equal number of independent non-executive
Directors and non-executive Directors.
As a principal subsidiary of the HSBC Group, the Bank operates in
accordance with the Group’s Subsidiary Accountability Framework
including its responsibility for overseeing the implementation of
the framework for all Group companies in Asia-Pacific. The
Subsidiary Accountability Framework, which was refreshed in
2022, set out high-level principles to promote effective governance
and improve communications and connectivity between HSBC
Holding plc and its subsidiaries.
Board of Directors
The Board, led by the Chairman, provides entrepreneurial
leadership of the Bank within a framework of prudent and
effective controls which enables risks to be assessed and
managed. The Board is collectively responsible for the long-term
success of the Bank and delivery of sustainable value to
shareholders. The Board sets the strategy and risk appetite for the
group and approves capital and operating plans presented by
management for the achievement of the strategic objectives it has
set.
Directors
The Bank has a unitary Board. The authority of each Director is
exercised in Board meetings where the Board acts collectively. As
at the date of this report, the Board comprises: the non-executive
Chairman; the non-executive Deputy Chairman; two executive
Directors who are the co-Chief Executive Officers; one other non-
executive Director; and eight independent non-executive Directors.
Independent non-executive Directors
Independent non-executive Directors do not participate in the daily
business management of the Bank. They bring an external
perspective, constructively challenge and help develop proposals
on strategy, scrutinise the performance of management in
meeting agreed goals and objectives, and monitor the risk profile
and reporting of performance of the Bank. The independent non-
executive Directors bring experience from a number of industries
and business sectors, including the leadership of large complex
multinational enterprises. The Board has determined that there are
eight independent non-executive Directors. In making this
determination, it was agreed that there are no relationships or
circumstances likely to affect the judgement of the independent
non-executive Directors, with any relationships or circumstances
that could appear to do so not considered to be material.
Chairman and co-Chief Executive Officers
The roles of the Chairman and co-Chief Executive Officers are
separate and held respectively by an experienced non-executive
Director and two full-time employees of the HSBC Group. There is
a clear division of responsibilities between leading the Board and
the executive responsibility for running the Bank’s business.
The Chairman provides leadership to the Board in promoting the
overall effectiveness of the Bank, in particular the development of
strategy and monitoring of the execution and delivery of Board
approved strategies and plans by the co-Chief Executive Officers
and management. The Chairman’s role includes promoting an
open and inclusive culture on the Board to facilitate open and
critical discussion and challenge and leading the Board in setting
an appropriate ‘tone from the top’ and in the oversight of the
Bank’s corporate culture. The Chairman also leads an annual
evaluation of the performance of the Board, its Committees and
individual Directors. The role also involves maintaining external
relationships with key stakeholders and communicating their
views to the Board.
The co-Chief Executive Officers are responsible for ensuring
implementation of the strategy and policies as established by the
Board and the day-to-day running of operations. The co-Chief
Executive Officers are co-Chairmen of the Executive Committee.
The heads of Global Businesses and Global Functions and country/
territory Chief Executive Officers in Asia-Pacific report to the co-
Chief Executive Officers.
Role profiles for the Chairman and co-Chief Executive Officers
were approved by the Board in May 2021.
Deputy Chairman
The role of the Deputy Chairman is to deputise formally for the
Chairman of the Board in his absence and support the Chairman in
the exercise of his responsibilities. The Deputy Chairman also acts
as an intermediary for other non-executive Directors when
necessary and leads the non-executive directors in the annual
performance evaluation of the Chairman and in ensuring a clear
division of responsibility between the Chairman and co-Chief
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
5
Executive Officers. The role also involves maintaining external
relationships with key stakeholders and communicating their
views to the Board.
The role profile for the Deputy Chairman was approved by the
Board in April 2021.
Board Committees
The Board has established various committees consisting of
Directors and senior management. The committees include the
Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Risk Committee,
Nomination Committee, Remuneration Committee and Chairman's
Committee. The co-Chairmen of the Executive Committee and the
Chairman of each Board committee that includes independent
non-executive Directors report to each subsequent Board meeting
on the relevant committee’s proceedings.
The Board has also established an Asset, Liability and Capital
Management Committee and a Risk Management Meeting. The
Executive Committee has the delegated authority to approve any
changes in the membership and terms of reference of the Asset,
Liability and Capital Management Committee and the Risk
Management Meeting.
The Board and each Board committee have terms of reference to
document their responsibilities and governance procedures. The
key roles of the Board committees are described in the paragraphs
below.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee is responsible for the exercise of all of
the powers, authorities and discretions of the Board in so far as
they concern the management, operations and day-to-day running
of the group, in accordance with such policies and directions as
the Board may from time to time determine, with power to sub-
delegate. A schedule of items that require the approval of the
Board is maintained.
The Bank’s co-Chief Executive Officers, David Liao and
Surendranath Rosha, are co-Chairmen of the Committee. The
current members of the Committee are: Justin Chan (Head of
Markets & Securities Services, Greater China); Hitendra Dave
(Chief Executive Officer, India); Philip Fellowes (Chief of Staff,
Asia-Pacific); Darren Furnarello (Chief Compliance Officer, Asia-
Pacific); David Grimme (Chief Operating Officer, Asia-Pacific);
Martin Haythorne (Chief Risk Officer, Asia-Pacific); Gregory
Hingston (Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Global Insurance and
Partnerships and Interim Head of Wealth and Personal Banking,
South Asia); Ming Lau (Chief Financial Officer, Asia-Pacific and
Global Commercial Banking); Stuart Lea (Head of Global Banking,
South-Asia); Luanne Lim (Chief Executive Officer, Hong Kong);
Amanda Murphy (Head of Commercial Banking, Southeast Asia
and South Asia); Susan Sayers (Regional General Counsel, Asia-
Pacific); Antony Shaw (Chief Executive Officer, Australia); Omar
Siddiq (Chief Executive Officer, Malaysia); Monish Tahilramani
(Global Head of Markets & Securities Services Emerging Markets,
Japan, Australia); David Thomas (Regional Head of Human
Resources, Asia-Pacific); Mark Wang (President and Chief
Executive Officer China) and Kee Joo Wong (Chief Executive
Officer, Singapore). Paul Stafford (Corporation Secretary) is the
Committee Secretary. In attendance are: Astor Law (Head of
Global Internal Audit, Asia-Pacific) and Jessica Lee (Regional Head
of Communications, Asia-Pacific). The Committee met ten times in
2022. In between Committee meetings, there were periodic
‘check-in’ sessions held by the Committee co-Chairmen with
members to discuss urgent or important matters and to support
effective communication.
Asset, Liability and Capital Management
Committee
The Asset, Liability and Capital Management Committee (‘ALCO’)
is chaired by the Chief Financial Officer and is an advisory
committee to provide recommendations and advice to support the
Chief Financial Officer's individual accountability for the efficient
management of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and capital within the
constraints of liquidity and funding ratios, capital ratios, and key
balance sheet risks such as interest rate risk, market risk and
equity risk. The Committee also has responsibilities for the Bank's
recovery and resolution planning activities, and the oversight of
treasury sustainability related matters in support of the Group’s
sustainability objectives.
The Committee consists of Ming Lau (Chief Financial Officer, Asia-
Pacific and Global Commercial Banking), David Liao and
Surendranath Rosha (co-Chief Executive Officers), the Regional
Treasurer, Asia Pacific, the Regional Head of Asset and Liability
Management, Asia-Pacific, the Regional Head of Capital
Management, Asia-Pacific, the Head of Markets Treasury, Asia-
Pacific, and other senior executives of the Bank most of whom are
members of the Executive Committee. The Committee met ten
times in 2022.
Risk Management Meeting
The Risk Management Meeting is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer
and is a formal governance forum established to support the Chief
Risk Officer’s individual accountability for the oversight of
enterprise risk and provide recommendations and advice to the
Chief Risk Officer on enterprise-wide management of all risks,
including key policies and frameworks for the management of risk
within the Bank. The Risk Management Meeting consists of Martin
Haythorne (Chief Risk Officer, Asia-Pacific), David Liao and
Surendranath Rosha (co-Chief Executive Officers), the Head of
Global Internal Audit, Asia-Pacific, the Chief Executive Officer of
Hang Seng Bank Limited, the Head of Wholesale Credit and
Market Risk, Asia-Pacific and other senior executives of the Bank
most of whom are members of the Executive Committee. The Risk
Management Meeting met six times in 2022.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has non-executive responsibility for
oversight of and advice to the Board on matters relating to
financial reporting and internal financial controls. The current
members of the Committee are Kevin Westley (Chairman of the
Committee), Yiu Kwan Choi, David Eldon, Rajnish Kumar and Irene
Lee. Except for David Eldon, who is a non-executive Director, all
members are independent non-executive Directors. The
Committee met four times in 2022.
The Audit Committee monitors the integrity of the Consolidated
Financial Statements, banking disclosure statements, and
disclosures relating to financial performance, the effectiveness of
the internal audit function and the external audit process, and the
effectiveness of internal financial control systems. The Committee
reviews the adequacy of resources and expertise as well as
succession planning for the finance function. It reviews, and
considers changes to, the Bank’s accounting policies. The
Committee advises the Board on the appointment, re-
appointment, or removal of the external auditor and reviews and
monitors the external auditor’s independence and objectivity. The
Committee reviews matters escalated for its attention by
subsidiaries’ audit committees and receives minutes of meetings
of the ALCO.
Risk Committee
The Risk Committee has non-executive responsibility for oversight
of and advice to the Board on risk-related matters impacting the
Bank and its subsidiaries, including risk governance and internal
control systems (other than internal controls over financial
reporting). The current members of the Committee are Yiu Kwan
Choi (Chairman of the Committee), Sonia Cheng, David Eldon,
Rajnish Kumar, Irene Lee, Annabelle Long and Kevin Westley.
Except for David Eldon, who is a non-executive Director, all
members are independent non-executive Directors. The
Committee met four times in 2022.
All of the Bank’s activities involve, to varying degrees, the
identification, assessment, monitoring and management of risk or
combinations of risks. The Board, advised by the Risk Committee,
requires and encourages a strong risk culture which shapes the
Bank’s attitude to risk. The Bank’s risk governance is supported by
the Group’s risk management framework which provides a clear
policy of risk ownership and accountability of all staff for
identifying, assessing and managing risks within the scope of their
Report of the Directors
6
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
assigned responsibilities. This personal accountability, reinforced
by clear and consistent employee communication on risk that sets
the tone from senior leadership, the governance structure,
mandatory learning and remuneration policy, helps to foster a
disciplined and constructive culture of risk management and
control throughout the group.
The Board and the Risk Committee oversee the maintenance and
development of a strong risk management framework by
continually monitoring the risk environment, top and emerging
risks facing the group and mitigating actions planned and taken.
The Risk Committee reviews certain Group risk management
policies and procedures at least annually and advises the Board if
these are appropriate for the circumstances of the Bank. It also
reviews local risk management policies at least annually, and
approves or recommends any changes to the Board for approval.
The Committee reviews any revisions to the group’s risk appetite
statement twice a year and recommends any proposed changes to
the Board for approval. The Committee reviews management’s
assessment of risk against the risk appetite statement and
provides scrutiny of management’s proposed mitigating actions.
The Committee monitors the risk profiles for all of the risk
categories within the group’s business. The Committee also
monitors the effectiveness of the Bank’s risk management and
internal controls other than those over financial reporting. Regular
reports from the Risk Management Meeting are also presented at
each Risk Committee meeting to report on the ongoing
monitoring, assessment and management of the risk environment
and the effectiveness of the risk management framework. The
Committee reviews matters escalated for its attention by
subsidiaries’ risk committees and receives minutes of meetings of
the Risk Management Meeting.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee is responsible for leading the process
for Board appointments and for identifying and approving, or
nominating for the approval of the Board, candidates for
appointment to the Board and certain senior management roles.
Appointments to the Board and certain senior management roles
are subject to the approval of the HKMA. The Committee
considers plans for orderly succession to the Board and the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the
Board, and undertakes an annual review of the time commitment
and any potential conflicts of interests of each Director. The
Committee also reviews the board succession plans of certain
subsidiaries of the Bank and considers and endorses appointments
to boards of directors of specified subsidiaries.
The current members of the Committee are Beau Kuok (Chairman
of the Committee), Peter Wong (Chairman of the Board), David
Eldon (Deputy Chairman of the Board) and Kevin Westley. Beau
Kuok and Kevin Westley are independent non-executive Directors
and Peter Wong and David Eldon are non-executive Directors. The
Committee met seven times in 2022.
A rigorous selection process, overseen by the Nomination
Committee and based upon agreed requirements using an external
search consultancy when appropriate, is followed in relation to the
appointment of non-executive Directors. Before recommending an
appointment of a Director to the Board, the Committee evaluates
the Board composition including the balance of skills, knowledge
and experience, as well as diversity and the role and capabilities
required. In identifying suitable Board candidates, the Committee
considers candidates’ backgrounds, knowledge and experience to
promote diversity of views, and takes into account the required
time commitment and any potential conflicts of interest.
Chairman’s Committee
The Chairman’s Committee acts on behalf of the Board either in
accordance with authority delegated by the Board from time to
time or as specifically set out within its terms of reference. The
Committee meets with such frequency and at such times as it may
determine and can implement previously agreed strategic
decisions by the full Board, approve specified matters subject to
their prior review by the full Board, and act exceptionally on urgent
matters within its terms of reference.
The current members of the Committee comprise the Chairman of
the Board, the Deputy Chairman of the Board, the co-Chief
Executive Officers and the Chairmen of the Audit and Risk
Committees. The Committee met two times in 2022.
Remuneration Committee
The Group Remuneration Committee is responsible for setting the
principles, parameters and governance framework for the Group‘s
Remuneration Strategy applicable to all Group employees, which
is adopted by the Bank. The Remuneration Committee of the Bank
is responsible for the oversight of matters related to remuneration
impacting the Bank and its subsidiaries, in particular, overseeing
the implementation and operation of the Group’s Remuneration
Strategy and satisfying itself that the remuneration framework
complies with local laws, rules or regulations; is in line with the
risk appetite, business strategy, culture and values, and long-term
interests of the Bank; and is appropriate to attract, retain and
motivate employees to support the success of the Bank. The
current members of the Committee, all being independent non-
executive Directors, are Irene Lee (Chairman of the Committee),
Beau Kuok and Sonia Cheng.
The Committee met six times in 2022. The following is a summary
of the Committee's key activities during 2022:
Details of the Committee’s key activities
Senior Management*
•Reviewed and approved senior management's remuneration and pay
proposals
•Reviewed and approved the performance scorecards for the Co-Chief
Executive and Executive Committee members of the Bank
All employees
•Approved 2021/2022 performance year pay review matters
•Reviewed remuneration framework effectiveness
•Received updates on notable events and regulatory and corporate
governance matters
•Reviewed and approved 2022 Material Risk Taker (‘MRT’) identification
approaches and outcomes
•Reviewed attrition data and plans to address area of concerns
•Approved 2022 remuneration related regulatory submissions
*  Senior Management includes the Co-Chief Executives of the Bank,
Chief Executive of Hang Seng Bank Limited, Executive Committee
members, Alternate Chief Executives and Managers as registered
with HKMA.
Remuneration Strategy
Our performance and pay framework is underpinned by our
Group’s Remuneration Strategy and principles aims to
competitively reward long-term sustainable performance. Our goal
is to attract, motivate and retain the very best people, regardless
of gender, ethnicity, age, disability or any other factor unrelated to
performance or experience. This supports the long-term interests
of our stakeholders, which includes the customers and the
communities we serve, our shareholders and our regulators.
Our approach to performance and pay in 2022 for the broader
workforce was underpinned by the below principles designed to
support a fair and appropriate pay and performance approach,
whilst recognizing the need for flexibility in a hybrid workplace.
These include:
•Ensuring that the decisions made are fair, appropriate and free
from bias towards an individual’s ethnicity, gender, age, or any
other characteristic and making sure employees are fairly
rewarded and recognized. Managers are encouraged to
challenge their assessment by questioning whether they were
objective and based on facts;
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
7
•Rewarding and recognizing our people for sustainable
performance and values aligned behavior. As such, subject to
local law, employee receive a behavior rating as well as a
performance rating. Analytical reviews were also completed to
ensure there is a clear differentiation across both performance
and behavior ratings;
•Supporting a culture of continuous feedback through manager
and employee empowerment. Focusing to obtain feedback
from colleagues to learn what was going well, learn and
improve from experience and discover the skills and behavior
colleagues need to grow; and
•Delivering a balanced, simple and transparent total reward
package that supports employee well-being.
More details of the Bank’s remuneration strategy are contained
within the Annual Report and Accounts 2022 of HSBC Holdings
plc.
The Bank as an Authorised Institution under the Banking
Ordinance is required by HKMA Supervisory Policy Manual CG-5
'Guideline on a Sound Remuneration System' (the Guideline) to
assess whether their existing remuneration systems and policy are
in line with the principles in the Guideline, independently of
management and at least annually. The annual review for 2021
was commissioned externally to Deloitte LLP and the results were
approved by the Remuneration Committee in April 2022. The
review confirmed that the Bank’s remuneration strategy as
adopted from the Group is consistent with the principles set out in
the Guideline.
Recovery and Resolution Planning
The group is subject to recovery and resolution requirements in
many of the jurisdictions in which it operates.
Recovery
The group maintains recovery plans that are designed to outline
credible actions that could be implemented in the event of stress
in order to restore capital and its business to a stable and
sustainable condition. The Bank typically submits recovery plan on
an annual basis to the HKMA and submits local recovery plans to
other host regulators where local requirements are in place. The
Bank’s recovery plans are continually re-appraised to meet
regulatory and internal feedback, and this involves stress testing
and ‘fire drill’ tests.
Resolution
In general terms, resolution refers to the exercise of statutory
powers where a financial institution and/or its parent or other
group company is deemed by its regulators to be failing, or likely
to fail and it is not reasonably likely that recovery action could be
taken that would result in the institution recovering.
In view of HSBC Group’s corporate structure, which comprises a
group of locally regulated operating banks, the preferred
resolution strategy for the HSBC Group, as confirmed by its
regulators, is multiple point of entry (‘MPE’) bail-in strategy. This
provides flexibility for HSBC Group to be resolved either (i) through
a bail-in at the HSBC Holdings plc level, which enables the
recapitalisation of operating bank subsidiaries in the HSBC Group
(as required) while restructuring actions are undertaken, with the
HSBC Group remaining together; or (ii) at a local subsidiary level
pursuant to the application of statutory resolution powers by local
resolution authorities.
The group is part of the HSBC Group-wide Resolvability
Assessment Framework (‘RAF’) implementation along with
continued efforts to work bilaterally with the HKMA and the other
principal Asian regulators in addressing any identified
impediments to resolvability of the group, ensuring resolvability
capabilities being developed are in line with the local requirements
and regulatory expectations. The group is already compliant with
HKMA issued Financial Institutions (Resolution) (Loss-absorbing
Capacity Requirements – Banking Sector) Rules (‘LAC Rules’), and
in the process to comply with new policies on Operational
Continuity in Resolution (‘OCIR-1’), Financial Institutions
(Resolution) (Contractual Recognition of Suspension of
Termination Rights – Banking Sector) Rules (‘Stay Rules’) and
Liquidity and Funding in Resolution (‘LFIR-1’) within the regulatory
timeline.
As part of the RAF issued by the Bank of England ('BoE') and
Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’) which places the onus on
firms to demonstrate their own resolvability, HSBC Group,
including the group was required to have capabilities as of
1 January 2022 to achieve the resolvability outcomes: (i) have
adequate resources in resolution; (ii) be able to continue business
through resolution and restructuring; and (iii) be able to co-
ordinate its resolution and communicate effectively with
stakeholders. The RAF requires HSBC Group to prepare a report on
the assessment of its preparedness for resolution, which must be
submitted to the PRA on a biennial basis. HSBC Group submitted
its first such report to the BoE in October 2021 summarising the
progress in terms of BoE’s RAF, followed by an additional
addendum in February 2022. On 10 June 2022 HSBC Group made
its first public disclosure on its resolvability, which summarised
the key findings from its RAF self-assessment. Alongside this
report, the BoE publicly disclosed its own assessment of HSBC
Group’s resolvability. Certain shortcomings and areas of further
enhancement were identified under the first RAF cycle and HSBC
Group, including the group is currently addressing these to ensure
it meets the objectives of the RAF. Regular engagement with the
BoE and PRA will continue as HSBC Group prepares for the
second RAF cycle, whereby the Group’s next Self-assessment is
due in 2023.
Business Review
The Bank is exempt from the requirement to prepare a business
review under section 388(3) of the Companies Ordinance Cap. 622
since it is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings
plc.
On behalf of the Board
Peter Wong, Chairman
21 February 2023
Report of the Directors
8
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Environmental, Social and Governance
(unaudited)
The Group is on a journey to incorporate environmental, social and
governance ('ESG') principles throughout the organisation, and
has taken significant steps to embed sustainability into its purpose
and corporate strategy.
Approach to ESG Reporting
The information set out in the ESG Review, taken together with
other information relating to ESG issues included in the Annual
Report and Accounts 2022, provides key ESG information and data
relevant to the group’s operations for the year ended 31 December
2022. The data is compiled for the financial year 1 January to
31 December 2022 unless otherwise specified. Measurement
techniques and calculations are explained next to data tables
where necessary. The group is guided by the Group’s
consideration of material ESG topics. For Group’s material ESG
topics and how they decide what to measure, see the Group’s
Annual Report and Accounts 2022.
The group has considered its ‘comply or explain’ obligation under
the Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s ('HKMA') Supervisory Policy
Manual ('SPM') GS-1 on Climate Risk Management issued in
December 2021. The group has made disclosures consistent with
the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ('TCFD')
Recommendations and Recommended Disclosures, issued in July
2017 and its updated guidance in October 2021, in this Annual
Report and Accounts save for certain items, which are described
on pages 12 to 15. Further details have been included in this
section and the Risk Review section on pages 61 to 64. Our TCFD
disclosures are highlighted with the following symbol: TCFD
How ESG is governed TCFD
The Board takes overall responsibility for ESG and approved the
climate strategy in 2022, overseeing executive management in
developing the approach, execution and associated reporting. The
group’s developments in relation to its strategies was reviewed
through Board discussions at six meetings in 2022. In addition,
Board members received a training on global and regional
developments in climate and sustainability, as part of their
ongoing development. The 2022 annual incentive scorecards of
the Co-CEOs of Asia-Pacific and most of the Executive Committee
members include outcomes linked to realisation of different ESG
metrics such as customer satisfaction, employee sentiment,
carbon reduction and sustainable finance measures. Governance
structures exist to ensure executive oversight of the group’s
progress in ESG performance, including involvement of the group
Risk Committee (‘RC’). The RC reviews the effectiveness of the
group’s conduct framework, which is designed to deliver fair
outcomes for customers, and to preserve the orderly and
transparent operation of financial markets, as well as to oversee
and advise the Board on risk-related matters, including both
financial and non-financial risks. In addition, the Executive
Committee reviews an ESG dashboard including key metrics such
as sustainable finance and own operations emissions on a
quarterly basis.
The group Sustainability Committee and the group Climate Risk
Oversight Forum ('CROF') are governance forums established in
Asia-Pacific to support the Group’s climate ambition. The group
Sustainability Committee, chaired by the Co-CEOs of Asia-Pacific,
oversees the group’s contribution to the Group’s climate plan,
which was announced in October 2020. This includes overseeing
delivery across Asia-Pacific of the Group’s ambition to provide and
facilitate a share of the global target of between US$750bn and
US$1tn of sustainable finance and investment for its customers in
Asia-Pacific in their transition to net zero and a sustainable future
by 2030. The group CROF is a sub-committee of the Risk
Management Meeting. These committees, forums and meetings
govern the group's performance in Asia-Pacific and provide
oversight of all risk activities relating to the group’s approach to
climate and nature related risk management.
The group’s ESG governance approach is expected to continue to
develop, in line with its evolving approach to ESG matters and
stakeholder expectations.
Environmental - Transition to net zero TCFD
One of the Group’s strategic pillars is to support the transition to a
net zero global economy. The Group’s ambition is to align its
financed emissions to the Paris Agreement goal to achieve net
zero by 2050 or sooner. The Paris Agreement aims to limit the rise
in global temperatures to well below 2°C, preferably to 1.5°C,
above pre-industrial levels.
The transition to net zero is one of the biggest challenges for our
generation. Success will require governments, customers and
finance providers to work together. The Group’s global footprint
means that many of its clients operate in high-emitting sectors and
regions that face the greatest challenge in reducing emissions.
This means that the Group's transition will be challenging but is an
opportunity to make an impact.
The Group recognises that to achieve its climate ambition it needs
to be transparent on the opportunities, challenges, related risks
and progress it makes. To deliver on the ambition, it requires
enhanced processes and controls, and new sources of data. The
Group continues to invest in climate resources and skills, and
develop its business management process to integrate climate
impacts. Until systems, processes, controls and governance are
enhanced, certain aspects of the Group’s reporting will rely on
manual sourcing and categorisation of data. In 2023, the Group
will continue to review its approach to disclosures. Reporting will
need to evolve to keep pace with market developments.
Explaining scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions
To measure and manage the group’s greenhouse gas emissions,
the group follows the Greenhouse Gas Protocol global framework,
which identifies three scopes of emissions. Scope 1 represents the
direct emissions the group creates. Scope 2 represents the indirect
emissions resulting from the use of electricity and energy to run a
business. Scope 3 represents indirect emissions attributed to
upstream and downstream activities taking place to provide
services to customers. The group’s upstream activities include
business travel and emissions from its supply chain including
transport, distribution and waste. The group’s downstream
activities include those related to investments and financed
emissions.
Under the protocol, scope 3 emissions are broken down into 15
categories. The group provides reporting emissions data in relation
to business travel (category 6), an upstream activity. More
information in relation to the group’s greenhouse gas emissions is
set out on page 10.
Supporting customers through net zero transition TCFD
The group’s ability to steer financing for the transformation of
businesses and infrastructure will be key in helping to enable the
transition to a net zero global economy. The group, as a financial
institution, has a critical role to play in facilitating the transition to
net zero. The most significant contribution the group can make is
by mobilising finance to support its customers to enable
decarbonisation in the real economy.
Given the Group’s global presence and relationships with clients
across industries and client groups, it recognises the role it can
play to encourage the global transition to net zero. The Board
endorsed a climate strategy, which includes the ‘transition to net
zero’ strategic pillar and key enablers to support its
implementation, also highlights the Board’s continued role in
overseeing the implementation of the Group’s strategic climate
objectives in Asia-Pacific. For details of the Group’s climate
strategy, please refer to https://www.hsbc.com/who-we-are/our-
climate-strategy.
Mobilising sustainable finance and investments
The group’s sustainable finance ambition has contributed to
sustainable infrastructure and energy systems, promoted
decarbonisation efforts across the real economy, and enhanced
investor capital through sustainable investment. The group
continues to identify financing and investing opportunities and
prioritizes the themes necessary to support the net-zero transition.
These opportunities look to direct capital, financing solutions and
resource allocation towards the themes which will maximize
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
9
climate and commercial impact at scale. They are designed to
support clients in their transition journey and to address financing
needs to accelerate the infrastructure, technologies, and new
business models critical for industries to transition to net zero. The
group offers a broad suite of sustainable finance capabilities
across its global businesses, enabling customers to manage risk
and pursue ESG-related opportunities.
In 2022, the group continued to expand the horizons of
sustainable finance, channeling capital to enable emissions
reduction in the real economy. An example is the US$5bn Greater
Bay Area ('GBA') Sustainable Finance Scheme to support business
of all sizes, including manufacturing and real estate, to transition
to low carbon operations in the GBA. In addition, the group
initiated green mortgage offerings to retail customers in mainland
China, Hong Kong and India.
The Group was recognised by Euromoney as the Best Bank for
Sustainable Finance in Asia for the fifth time in 2022. It also
secured the Asia-Pacific Triple A: Sustainable Infrastructure
Awards 2022 for Export Credit Agency Coordinator Bank of the
Year, Asia-Pacific Loan Market Association for Green and
Sustainability advisor of the year, and FinanceAsia for Best
Sustainable Bank in Hong Kong.
The group’s sustainable finance and investment progress is set out
below, with detailed definitions available in the Group’s
Sustainable Finance and Investment Data Dictionary (see
www.hsbc.com/who-we-are/esg-and-responsible-business/esg-
reporting-centre). Green finance taxonomies are not consistent
globally, and evolving taxonomies and practices could result in
revisions in the Group's sustainable finance reporting going
forward. The Group recognises that there can be differing views of
external stakeholders in relation to these evolving taxonomies, and
will seek to align to enhanced industry standards as they are
further developed.
Sustainable finance summary – Asia-Pacific1
2022
HK$m
Balance sheet-related transactions provided
126,845
Capital markets/advisory (facilitated)
45,301
Total contribution
172,146
1  This table has been prepared in accordance with the Group’s
Sustainable Finance and Investment Data Dictionary 2022, which
includes green, social and sustainability activities. The amounts
provided and facilitated include: the limits agreed for balance sheet-
related transactions provided, the proportional share of facilitated
capital markets/advisory activities.
Working with customers
The Group’s net zero ambition is underpinned by its relationships
with customers. The Group is setting targets on a sector by sector
basis that are consistent with net zero outcomes by 2050. In
assessing financed emissions, the Group focuses on those parts of
the sector that are most material in terms of greenhouse gas
emissions, and where it believes engagement and climate action
have the greatest potential to effect change, taking into account
industry and scientific guidance. In 2021, the Group defined
targets for the oil and gas, and power and utilities sectors to be
achieved by 2030. The group will continue to request and assess
relevant client transition plans, and to unlock transition solutions
for its portfolio of customers. The group considers reporting and
emissions disclosure, level of ambition and targets set, detail of
plans to achieve targets and evidence of activities to achieve
objectives.
Our approach to our own operations TCFD
Part of the Group’s ambition to be a net zero bank is to achieve net
zero carbon emissions in its operations and supply chain by 2030
or earlier.
The Group has three elements to its strategy: reduce, replace and
remove. The first focus is to reduce carbon emissions from
consumption, and then subsequently replace remaining emissions
with low-carbon alternatives in line with the Paris Agreement.
Finally, the Group plans to remove the remaining emissions that
cannot be reduced or replaced by procuring, in accordance with
prevailing regulatory requirements, high-quality offsets at a later
stage.
In October 2020, the Group announced its ambition to reduce
energy consumption by 50% by 2030 against a 2019 baseline. This
will be achieved by optimising the utilisation of the Group’s real
estate portfolio, and strategically reducing office space and data
centres. In addition, the Group is adopting new technologies and
emerging products to make its spaces more energy efficient.
As part of the Group's ambition to achieve 100% renewable power
across its operations by 2030, it continues to look for opportunities
to procure green energy in each of its markets. A key challenge
remains the limited opportunity to pursue power purchase
agreements or green tariffs in key markets.
Business travel and employee commuting
The group’s travel emissions were relatively low in 2022, with
international travel restrictions in key markets limiting business
travel. The Group is closely managing the gradual resumption of
travel through internal reporting and review of emissions, and
through the introduction of internal carbon budgets, in line with its
aim to halve travel emissions by 2030, compared with pre-
pandemic levels. With hybrid working embedded across the
group, technology has reduced to some extent the need to travel
to meet with colleagues and customers face to face.
The group reports its emissions following the Greenhouse Gas
Protocol, which incorporates the scope 2 market-based emissions
methodology. The group reports greenhouse gas emissions
resulting from the energy used in its buildings and employees’
business travel. Due to the nature of the group's primary business,
carbon dioxide is the main type of greenhouse gas applicable to its
operations. While the amount is immaterial, the group's current
reporting also incorporates methane and nitrous oxide for
completeness. The group does not report employee home working
emissions in its scope 1 and 2 performance data. The
environmental data for the group’s own operations is based on a
12-month period to 30 September each year.
In 2022, the group collected data on energy use and business
travel for its own operations in 12 markets across the region,
which accounted for approximately 87% of its full-time equivalent
employees ('FTEs').
Greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes CO2e1,2
2022
Scope 1 - direct
915
Scope 2 - indirect
104,162
Scope 3 - indirect (upstream activities - business travel)
11,120
Total
116,197
Greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes CO2e per FTE
2.16
1  The data of the group's operations in some countries and territories
where it has operational control and a small presence may have not
been included due to the data collection challenges.
2  CO2e refers to carbon dioxide equivalent.
Engaging with supply chain
As the majority of the Group’s emissions are within its supply
chain, it is recognised that it cannot achieve the net zero goal
without its suppliers joining the journey. In 2020, the Group began
a three-year process of encouraging its largest suppliers to make
their own carbon commitments, and to disclose their emissions
via the CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) supply chain
programme. The Group will continue to engage with its supply
chain through CDP and direct supplier discussions on how they
can further support the Group’s transition to net zero.
Environmental, Social and Governance
10
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Approach to climate risk TCFD
Managing risk for stakeholders
Climate risk relates to the financial and non-financial impacts that
may arise from climate change and the move to a greener
economy. The group manages climate risk across all its
businesses and is taking into account climate considerations in its
risk taxonomy in line with the Group-wide risk management
framework. The group’s most material exposure to climate risk
relates to corporate and retail client financing activity within its
banking portfolio, and in its responsibilities in relation to asset
ownership by its insurance and asset management businesses.
In the table below, the group sets out its duties to its stakeholders
in the three most material roles. For further details of the group's
approach to climate risk, see Climate risks on page 61.
Banking
The group manages the climate risk in its banking
portfolios through its risk appetite and policies for
financial and non-financial risks.
Asset management
The group’s asset management operations’
investment solutions are increasingly considering
both physical and transition risks.
Insurance
The group’s insurance operations consider climate
risk in their portfolio of assets.
ê
ê
ê
Climate Risk
ê
ê
ê
This helps the group to identify opportunities to
support its customers, while continuing to meet
stakeholder expectations.
A key approach to managing climate risk is by
engaging with investees on topics related to climate
change.
HSBC Life has established an evolving ESG
programme to meet changing external expectations
and customer demands.
Banking
The group’s banking business is well positioned to support its
customers to manage their own climate risk through financing. For
wholesale customers, the group uses a transition and physical risk
questionnaire as part of its transition and physical risk framework
to understand their climate strategies and risk. The Group has set
out a suite of policies to guide the management of climate risk,
including the recently updated energy policy and thermal coal
phase-out policy (see page 62). Climate scenario analysis is used
as a risk assessment tool to provide insights on the long-term
effects of transition and physical risks across the Group’s
corporate and retail banking portfolios, as well as its own
operations.
Asset management
When assessing the impact of climate-related risk to its portfolios,
the group’s asset management operations are increasingly
considering both physical and transition risks. As a result, ESG and
climate analysis is integrated into the group's assessment of the
risks faced by investees throughout the investment decision-
making process. Investment teams use portfolio management
tools to assess, examine and determine the level of potential ESG
risks that could impact the current and future value of issuers.
In September 2022, the Group's asset management operations
published their thermal coal phase-out policy, which will not hold
listed securities of issuers with more than de minimis revenue
exposure to thermal coal in its actively managed portfolios beyond
2030 for EU and OECD markets, and 2040 for all other markets.
One of the key approaches for the group’s asset management
operations to manage climate risk is to engage with the
companies in which they invest. The HSBC Asset Management
Stewardship Plan outlines their approach to engaging with issuers,
including on the topic of climate change.
Insurance
The group’s insurance operations updated their sustainability
policy in 2022 to align with the Group’s thermal coal phase-out
policy. An ESG policy on corporate underwriting was also
introduced. Risk appetite was reviewed with respect to ESG risks,
and ESG standards were embedded into insurance product
development processes and operational capabilities.
Insights from scenario analysis TCFD
Introduction
Scenario analysis supports the Group’s strategy by assessing its
position under a range of climate scenarios. This helps to build the
Group’s awareness of climate change and future planning
including in the context of evolving regulatory requirements.
Following the first Group-wide climate change scenario analysis
and the pilot climate risk stress test for Hong Kong Monetary
Authority, the Group has performed stress tests for a number of
regulators in Asia-Pacific including the Monetary Authority of
Singapore in 2022.
The Group's scenario analysis considers separately:
•transition risk arising from the process of moving to a net zero
economy, including changes in policy, technology, customer
behaviour and stakeholder perception, which could each
impact borrowers’ operating income, financing requirements
and asset values; and
•physical risk arising from the increased frequency and severity
of weather events, such as hurricanes and floods, or chronic
shifts in weather patterns, which could impact property values
and repair costs and lead to business interruptions.
The Group will continue to enhance its climate scenario analysis to
enable a more comprehensive understanding of climate
headwinds, risks and opportunities that will support its strategic
planning and actions.
Our climate scenarios
In 2022, the Group undertook its internal climate scenario analysis
exercise using four bespoke scenarios that were designed to
articulate a view of the range of potential outcomes for global
climate change between the 2022 and 2050-time period.
These internal scenarios were formed with reference to external
publicly available climate scenarios, including those produced by
the Network for Greening the Financial System, the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the International
Energy Agency. The Group adapted these scenarios by
incorporating its unique climate risks and vulnerabilities to which
the organisation and customers across different global businesses
and geographies are exposed. This resulted in the following four
scenarios:
•Net Zero scenario, which aligns with the Group's net zero
strategy and is consistent with the Paris Agreement;
•Current Commitments scenario, which assumes that climate
action is limited to the current governmental commitments and
pledges;
•Downside Transition Risk scenario, which assumes that climate
action is delayed until 2030, but will be rapid enough to limit
global temperature by the end of the century; and
•Downside Physical Risk scenario, which assumes climate
action is limited to current governmental policies, leading to
extreme global warming.
The group follows the Group's four scenarios, which reflect
different levels of physical and transition risks, underpinned by
various assumptions of governmental climate policy changes,
macroeconomic factors and technological developments.
Developments in climate science, data, methodology, and
scenario analysis techniques will help further enhance the
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
11
approach in the future. Consequentially, the view of risk is
expected to change over time.
Analysing the outputs of the climate scenario analysis
Climate scenario analysis allows the Group to model how different
potential climate pathways may affect its customers and
portfolios, particularly in respect of credit losses. Climate-related
losses could be expected within sectors with higher carbon
emitting activities due to the possibility of carbon reduction
policies. These carbon reduction policies will help to dictate the
pace of the transition to net zero and will vary by geography and
sector. Customers' climate transition plans will help to mitigate the
group's climate and credit risks.
In terms of physical risk, the Group assessed perils that could
impact the value of properties in selected entities, including
tropical cyclones and related storm surges. The defaults within the
retail mortgage portfolio are expected to remain low through to
2050 in Hong Kong due to buildings being designed to withstand
high wind speeds and investment into sea defences. Similarly,
losses in Singapore were low in all the scenarios due to its
geographical location and strong sea defences.
The analysis generated insights of the underlying drivers of risk
and how the group can navigate through this complex and
evolving landscape. The group explored strategic responses to the
results of the climate scenario analysis, which allow it to identify
and prioritise the sectors and sub-sectors that require the greatest
support to transition. This also allows the group to test the impact
of actions that can support customers’ transition and its net zero
ambition.
Use of outputs and next steps
Climate scenario analysis informs the Group's strategy and
supports how opportunities are captured while minimising risks,
and enabling the Group to navigate through the climate transition.
The Group will continue to enhance its capabilities in relation to
climate scenario analysis and use the results for decision making,
particularly in respect of strategy, client engagement and risk
appetite.
Social matters
The Group aims to play an active role in opening up a world of
opportunity for its customers, colleagues and communities as it
brings the benefits of connectivity and the global economy to
more people around the world.
To achieve its purpose and deliver its strategy in a way that is
sustainable, the Group is guided by its values: we value difference;
we succeed together; we take responsibility; and we get it done.
Human rights
Details of the Group’s commitment to respecting human rights are
set out in the Group's Statement on Human Rights, which is
available on www.hsbc.com/our-approach/measuring-our-impact.
Anti-bribery and corruption policy
The Group requires compliance with all applicable anti-bribery and
corruption laws in all markets and jurisdictions in which it
operates. These include, but are not limited to, the UK Bribery Act,
the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Hong Kong Prevention
of Bribery Ordinance and France's 'Sapin II' law. The Group has a
global anti-bribery and corruption policy, which gives practical
effect to these laws and regulations, but also requires compliance
with the spirit of laws and regulations to demonstrate its
commitment to ethical behaviours and conduct as part of the
environmental, social and corporate governance approach.
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
(‘TCFD’) index table TCFD
The table below sets out the 11 TCFD recommendations and
summarises where additional information can be found.
Where the group has not included climate-related financial
disclosures consistent with all of the TCFD recommendations and
recommended disclosures, the reasons for this and steps being
undertaken are set out accordingly. The group will continue to
develop and refine its reporting and disclosures on ESG matters in
line with the group's obligations under the HKMA SPM GS-1.
With respect to the group's obligations under HKMA SPM GS-1 as
part of considering what to measure and publicly report, the group
performs an assessment to ascertain the appropriate level of detail
to be included in the TCFD that is set out in its Annual Report and
Accounts. The assessment takes into account factors such as the
level of the group's exposure to climate-related risks and
opportunities, the scope and objectives of its climate-related
strategy, transitional challenges, and the nature, size and
complexity of its business.
Recommendation
Response
Disclosure
location
Governance
a) Describe the Board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities
Process, frequency and training
The Board takes overall responsibility for ESG. The group’s developments in relation to its strategies was
reviewed through Board discussions at six meetings in 2022. In addition, Board members received a
training on global and regional developments in climate and sustainability, as part of their ongoing
development.
The Board is updated on wider topics in relation to the evolving climate agenda as appropriate.
Page 9
Sub-committee accountability,
processes and frequency
The group RC receives regular updates on the climate risk profile, top and emerging climate risks, and
climate risk programme.
Page 62
Examples of the Board and
relevant Board committees
taking climate into account
The Board approved the climate strategy in 2022, overseeing executive management in developing the
approach, execution, financial planning and associated reporting.
The 2022 annual incentive scorecards of the Co-CEOs of Asia-Pacific and of most of the Executive
Committee members include outcomes linked to the realisation of different ESG metrics such as customer
satisfaction, employee sentiment, carbon reduction and sustainable finance measures.
Page 62
Page 9
b) Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities
Environmental, Social and Governance
12
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ‘TCFD’ (continued)
Recommendation
Response
Disclosure
location
Who manages climate-related
risks and opportunities
The group Sustainability Committee, chaired by the Co-CEOs of Asia-Pacific, oversees the delivery of the
Group’s climate plan announced in October 2020 in Asia-Pacific.
The group CROF oversees all risk activities relating to climate risk management and escalation of climate
risks.
Page 9
How management reports to
the Board
The Co-CEOs of Asia-Pacific reported to the Board six times on ESG and climate matters during 2022.
Page 9
Processes used to inform
management
The Executive Committee reviews an ESG dashboard including key metrics such as sustainable finance
and own operations emissions on a quarterly basis.
Page 9
Strategy
a) Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium and long term
Processes used to determine
material risks and opportunities
For wholesale customers in the six high climate transition risk sectors, the group rolled out the transition
and physical risk questionnaire to assess and improve its understanding of the impact of climate changes
on certain customers' business models. Relationship managers worked with customers to record
questionnaire responses, which also help to identify potential business opportunities to support
customers’ transition.
The Group completed a detailed asset-level analysis of the retail mortgage business in Hong Kong,
Singapore and Australia which represent three of the group’s largest residential mortgage portfolios in
Asia-Pacific.
Page 62
Page 63
Relevant short, medium, and
long term time horizons
The group continues to contribute to the Group’s ambitions to achieve net zero in its financed emissions
by 2050, in its own operations and supply chain by 2030, and to provide and facilitate a share of the
global target of between US$750bn and US$1tn of sustainable finance and investment for its customers
in Asia-Pacific in their transition to net zero and a sustainable future by 2030.
The group aligns with the Group’s definition of short, medium, and long term time horizon: short term up
to 2025; medium term between 2026 to 2035; and long term between 2036 to 2050.
The group is part of the Group’s climate scenario analysis exercise and formed part of the Group’s result
of the expected credit losses and physical risk impacts on the Group’s premises between the 2022 and
2050 time period. For details, see the Group’s Annual Report and Account 2022.
Page 10
Page 11
Transition or physical climate-
related issues identified
Transition or physical climate-related risk, together with greenwashing risk exist across the Group’s risk
taxonomy.
The group is supporting its customers in their transition through its sustainable finance and investment
ambition. The Group's sustainable finance and investment data dictionary includes a detailed definition of
contributing activities.
Page 61
Page 10
Risks and opportunities by
sector and/or geography
Scenario analysis supports the group’s risks and opportunities under a range of climate scenarios. It helps
to build the group’s awareness of the impact of climate change and future planning.
The Group completed a detailed asset-level analysis of the retail mortgage business in Hong Kong,
Singapore and Australia, which represent three of the group’s largest residential mortgage portfolios in
Asia-Pacific.
The group does not currently fully disclose the impacts of transition and physical risk quantitatively by
sector/geography, due to transitional challenges including data limitations and evolving science and
methodologies. The group is working to address these challenges in the medium term.
Page 11
page 63
Concentrations of credit
exposure to carbon-related
assets (supplemental guidance
for banks)
The Group has identified six sectors where wholesale credit customers have the highest climate risk,
based on their carbon emissions. These are automotive, chemicals, construction and building materials,
metals and mining, oil and gas, and power and utilities. The group internally reports its exposure to the six
high transition risk sectors in the wholesale portfolio, and will further enhance its disclosure as more data
becomes available.
Page 62
Climate-related risks in lending
and other financial intermediary
business activities
(supplemental guidance for
banks)
The group’s material exposure to climate risk relates to corporate and retail client financing activity within
its banking portfolio, and in its responsibilities in relation to asset ownership by its insurance and asset
management businesses.
Page 11
b) Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning
Impact on strategy, business,
and financial planning
Transition to net zero represents one of the Group's four strategic pillars. The Group aims to be net zero in
its operations and supply chain by 2030 and in financed emissions by 2050.
The group does not currently fully disclose the impacts of climate-related issues on financial planning, and
particularly the impact of climate-related issues on its financial performance (for example, revenues and
costs) and financial position (for example, assets and liabilities), acquisitions/divestments or access to
capital, in each case due to lack of data and systems for compiling the relevant financial impacts. In 2022,
the group incorporated certain aspects of sustainable finance and financed emissions within its financial
planning process. This will be further enhanced in the medium term as more data is available.
Page 9
Impact on products and
services
The group supports the Group's ambition in helping its customers’ transition to net zero and a sustainable
future through providing and facilitating a share of the global target of between US$750bn and US$1tn of
sustainable finance and investment for its customers in Asia-Pacific by 2030.
Page 9
Impact on supply chain and/or
value chain
The group has started working with its largest suppliers to encourage them to make their own carbon
commitments, and to disclose their emissions. The Group’s third-party risk management process
incorporates climate-related risks.
Page 10
Impact on operations
The group is developing a deeper understanding of the risks to which its properties are subject, and
necessary mitigants to ensure ongoing operational resilience.
Page 63
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
13
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ‘TCFD’ (continued)
Recommendation
Response
Disclosure
location
Impact on adaptation and
mitigation activities
The Group announced its ambition to achieve 100% renewable power across its operations by 2030, and
continues to look for opportunities to procure green energy. The Group regularly reviews and enhances its
building selection process and global engineering standards to help ensure they reflect the potential
impacts of climate change.
Page 10
Impact on operations
The group is developing a deeper understanding of the risks to which its properties are subject, and
necessary mitigants to ensure ongoing operational resilience.
Page 63
Impact on investment in
research and development
The Group is working with the World Resources Institute and World Wide Fund For Nature, focusing its
collective efforts on climate-related innovation, nature-based solutions and energy efficiency initiatives in
Asia-Pacific.
Transition plan to a low-carbon
economy
The Group has committed to publish its own climate transition plan in 2023. The plan will outline, in one
place, not only the Group's commitments, targets and approach to net zero across the sectors and
markets that it serves, but also how the Group is transforming to embed net zero and help finance the
transition. The group will be guided by this transition plan once published.
c) Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario
Embedding climate into
scenario analysis
In 2022, the Group enhanced the approach to analysing climate scenarios and delivered the internal
climate scenario analysis ('ICSA') exercise applying four bespoke climate scenarios: Net Zero, Current
Commitments, Downside Transition Risk, and Downside Physical Risk. The four scenarios used in the
Group’s ICSA exercise were designed to articulate the Group’s view of the range of potential outcomes for
global climate change between the 2022 and 2050- time period. The relevant assumptions are detailed in
Group Annual Report and Accounts 2022.
Page 11
Key drivers of performance and
how these have been taken into
account
The ICSA scenarios reflect different levels of physical and transition risk and, underpinned by various
assumptions of governmental climate policy changes, macroeconomic factors and technological
developments.
Page 11
Scenarios used and how they
factored in government policies
The ICSA scenarios reflect external publicly available climate scenarios, including those produced by the
Network for Greening the Financial System, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the
International Energy Agency.
Page 11
How our strategies may change
and adapt
The Group will continue to enhance its capabilities for climate scenario analysis and use the results for
decision making, particularly in respect of strategy, client engagement and risk appetite.
Page 12
Risk management
a) Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks
Traditional banking risk types
considered
The Group's approach to identifying and assessing climate-related risks is initially focused on
understanding physical and transition impacts across five priority risk types: wholesale credit risk, retail
credit risk, resilience risk, regulatory compliance risk and reputational risk.
Page 61
Process
For wholesale customers, the group uses a transition and physical risk questionnaire as part of its
transition and physical risk framework to understand their climate strategies and risk. Climate scenario
analysis is used as a risk assessment tool to provide insights on the long-term effects of transition and
physical risks across the Group’s corporate and retail banking portfolios, as well as its own operations.
The group does not currently fully disclose the detailed impacts of transition and physical risk, due to
transitional challenges including data limitations and evolving science and methodologies.
Page 11
Integration into policies and
procedures
The Group is integrating climate risk into the policies, processes and controls across many of its global
businesses and functions, and will continue to enhance these as its climate risk management capabilities
mature. In 2022, the Group has published its updated energy policy, covering oil and gas, power and
utilities, hydrogen, renewables, nuclear and biomass sectors, as well as updating its thermal coal phase-
out policy after its initial publication in 2021.
Page 62
Consider climate-related risks in
traditional banking industry risk
categories (supplementary
guidance for banks)
In 2022, the Group broadened its climate risk approach to include all risk types (including treasury risk and
traded risk) in its risk taxonomy.
Page 64
b) Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks
Process and how we make
decisions
The group Risk Management Meeting and group RC receive regular updates on the climate risk profile,
and the top and emerging climate risks.
The group’s initial risk appetite has focused on the oversight and management of climate risks across the
five priority risk types, including exposure to high transition risk sectors in its wholesale portfolio and
physical risk exposures in retail portfolio. These metrics have been implemented at group level and locally
where appropriate.
The group continues to review its risk appetite regularly to capture the material climate risks and will
enhance its metrics over time.
Page 62
c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management
framework
How we have aligned and
integrated our approach
The group's approach to climate risk management is aligned to the Group-wide risk management
framework and three lines of defence model.
Page 61
How we take into account
interconnections between
entities, functions
The group’s dedicated climate risk programme drives the development of its climate risk management
capabilities, taking into account relevant interconnections within the group's businesses, functions and
entities.
Page 62
Metrics and targets
a) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risk and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process
Environmental, Social and Governance
14
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures ‘TCFD’ (continued)
Recommendation
Response
Disclosure
location
Metrics used to assess the
impact of climate-related risks
on our loan portfolio
The group monitors wholesale loan exposure to the Group's six highest climate risk sectors. In 2022, the
group developed new climate risk metrics to assess the impact of physical risk on its retail mortgage
portfolio in Hong Kong, as detailed on page 63.
The group’s climate risk management information dashboard incorporates key climate risk metrics, and is
reported to the group CROF.
Page 62
Metrics used to assess progress
against opportunities
The Group tracks its net zero progress using multiple metrics, tailoring methodologies to the specific
measures. The group contributes to the Group’s energy consumption, water consumption, waste
management, and land use. For details, see the Group’s Annual Report and Account 2022 and ESG Data
Pack.
The group disclosed its contribution in 2022 to the Group’s sustainable finance ambition of providing and
facilitating a share of the global target of between US$750bn to US$1tn for its customers in Asia-Pacific.
The group does not currently fully disclose the proportion of revenue or proportion of assets, capital
deployment or other business activities aligned with climate-related opportunities, including revenue from
products and services, internal carbon prices, forward-looking metrics consistent with its business or
strategic planning time horizons. In relation to sustainable finance revenue and assets, the Group is
disclosing certain elements. The group expects climate related metrics to be further integrated into
financial planning and forecasting as data and system limitations are addressed.
Page 9
Board or senior management
incentives
The 2022 annual incentive scorecards of the Co-CEOs of Asia-Pacific and most of the Executive
Committee members include outcomes linked to the realisation of different ESG metrics such as customer
satisfaction, employee sentiment, carbon reduction and sustainable finance measures.
Page 9
Metrics used to assess the
impact of climate risk on
lending and financial
intermediary business
(supplemental guidance for
banks)
The group does not fully disclose metrics used to assess the impact of physical and transition climate-
related risks on retail lending, wholesale lending and other business activities (specifically credit exposure,
equity and debt holdings, or trading positions, each broken down by industry, geography, credit quality,
average tenor). This is due to data and system limitations which the group is working to address.
b) Disclose scope 1, scope 2 and, if appropriate, scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions and the related risks
GHG emissions for lending and
financial intermediary business
(supplemental guidance for
Banks)
In relation to financed emissions, the Group has disclosed on-balance sheet financed emissions for certain
sectors. The Group does not fully disclose financed emissions data. Further disclosure on scope 3
financed emissions and related risks in relation to customers is reliant on the Group’s customers publicly
disclosing their carbon emissions and related risks.
The Group's approach to disclosure of financed emissions can be found on: www.hsbc.com/who-we-are/
esg-and-responsible-business/esg-reporting-centre.
c) Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets
Details of targets set and
whether they are absolute or
intensity based
The Group's ambition is to achieve net zero financed emissions by 2050 or sooner, and has set interim
2030 targets for on-balance sheet financed emissions for certain sectors. The Group aims to support its
customers’ transition to net zero through providing and facilitating a share of the global target of between
US$750bn and US$1tn of sustainable finance and investment for its customers in Asia-Pacific by 2030. In
addition, the Group targets to achieve net zero carbon emissions in its operations and supply chain by
2030 or sooner. In addition to the above mentioned, the group contributes to the Group’s other ambitions
such as land use, waste management, energy consumption and percentage of renewable electricity
sourced. For details of Group’s ambitions, please refer to the Group’s Annual Report and Accounts 2022.
The group does not currently disclose its targets used to measure and manage physical and transition
risk, or capital deployment, or climate-related opportunities due to transitional challenges such as data
and system limitations which the group is working to address in the medium term.
Taking into account the nature of its business, the group does not consider water usage to be a material
target for its business and, therefore, the group has not included a target in this year’s disclosure.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
15
Financial Review
Results for 2022
(Unaudited)
Profit before tax for 2022 reported by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (‘the Bank’) and its subsidiaries
(together ‘the group’) increased by HK$11,048m, or 13%, to HK$97,611m.
(Audited)
Wealth and
Personal
Banking
Commercial
Banking
Global
Banking
Markets and
Securities
Services
Corporate
Centre1
Other (GBM-
other)
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Year ended 31 Dec 2022
Net interest income/(expense)
71,397
43,087
18,703
4,370
(12,718)
2,013
126,852
Net fee income/(expense)
17,895
9,727
5,086
3,701
247
(56)
36,600
Net income/(expense) from financial instruments measured at
fair value through profit or loss
(9,603)
3,728
(110)
22,372
11,079
345
27,811
Gains less losses from financial investments
(34)
64
—
—
—
17
47
Net insurance premium income/(expense)
76,848
3,997
—
—
(430)
—
80,415
Other operating income/(expense)
2,329
(189)
369
1,208
315
(251)
3,781
Total operating income/(expense)
158,832
60,414
24,048
31,651
(1,507)
2,068
275,506
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in
liabilities to policyholders
(66,206)
(3,968)
—
—
360
—
(69,814)
Net operating income/(expense) before change in
expected credit losses and other credit impairment
charges
92,626
56,446
24,048
31,651
(1,147)
2,068
205,692
–  of which:  external
76,344
58,916
26,413
40,870
(8,191)
11,340
205,692
                  inter-segment
16,282
(2,470)
(2,365)
(9,219)
7,044
(9,272)
—
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment
charges
(1,326)
(11,953)
(3,070)
22
1
(39)
(16,365)
Net operating income/(expense)
91,300
44,493
20,978
31,673
(1,146)
2,029
189,327
Operating expenses
(52,773)
(20,972)
(10,513)
(13,897)
(9,521)
(2,832)
(110,508)
Operating profit/(loss)
38,527
23,521
10,465
17,776
(10,667)
(803)
78,819
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures
140
—
—
—
18,652
—
18,792
Profit/(loss) before tax
38,667
23,521
10,465
17,776
7,985
(803)
97,611
Balance sheet data at 31 Dec 2022
Loans and advances to customers (net)
1,536,664
1,231,972
880,581
40,563
1,403
13,966
3,705,149
Customer accounts
3,443,694
1,665,463
805,600
195,775
11
3,166
6,113,709
Year ended 31 Dec 2021
Net interest income/(expense)
50,632
29,106
15,070
3,497
(2,640)
2,448
98,113
Net fee income/(expense)
23,827
9,828
5,746
5,730
243
(78)
45,296
Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value
through profit or loss
22,195
3,551
39
19,363
214
513
45,875
Gains less losses from financial investments
956
368
—
—
—
343
1,667
Net insurance premium income/(expense)
58,645
3,499
—
—
(422)
—
61,722
Other operating income/(expense)
202
39
237
1,113
599
(157)
2,033
Total operating income/(expense)
156,457
46,391
21,092
29,703
(2,006)
3,069
254,706
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in
liabilities to policyholders
(72,658)
(3,743)
—
—
353
—
(76,048)
Net operating income/(expense) before change in expected
credit losses and other credit impairment charges
83,799
42,648
21,092
29,703
(1,653)
3,069
178,658
– of which: external
80,570
43,398
20,539
29,644
(2,284)
6,791
178,658
              inter-segment
3,229
(750)
553
59
631
(3,722)
—
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment
charges
(1,224)
(3,295)
(2,013)
(10)
(6)
9
(6,539)
Net operating income/(expense)
82,575
39,353
19,079
29,693
(1,659)
3,078
172,119
Operating expenses
(49,429)
(20,839)
(10,152)
(14,629)
(7,332)
(2,495)
(104,876)
Operating profit/(loss)
33,146
18,514
8,927
15,064
(8,991)
583
67,243
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures
137
—
—
—
19,183
—
19,320
Profit before tax
33,283
18,514
8,927
15,064
10,192
583
86,563
Balance sheet data at 31 Dec 2021
Loans and advances to customers (net)
1,544,449
1,315,961
927,542
49,887
1,540
1,560
3,840,939
Customer accounts
3,407,789
1,659,464
891,994
211,621
28
6,286
6,177,182
1  Includes inter-segment elimination.
Financial Review
16
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Financial Review
The commentary in this financial review compares the group's
financial performance for the year ended 31 December 2022 with
the year ended 31 December 2021.
Results Commentary
(Unaudited)
The group reported profit before tax of HK$97,611m, an increase
of HK$11,048m, or 13%. Net operating income before change in
expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
increased by HK$27,034m, or 15%, primarily driven by higher net
interest income. Operating expenses increased by HK$5,632m, or
5%, from investment in technology.
Net interest income increased by HK$28,739m, or 29%.
Excluding the unfavourable foreign exchange impact, net interest
income increased by HK$30,715m, or 32%, primarily driven by
Hong Kong with wider customer deposit spreads and higher
reinvestment yields as market interest rates increased, coupled
with balance sheet growth. Net interest income in Singapore also
increased, reflecting the favourable impact of the higher market
interest rates.
Net fee income decreased by HK$8,696m, or 19%. Excluding the
unfavourable foreign exchange impact, net fee income decreased
by HK$7,928m, or 18%, driven by Wealth and Personal Banking
('WPB') in Hong Kong with lower transaction volumes resulting in
decreases in unit trust income and brokerage income, coupled
with lower funds under management fees reflecting the
unfavourable market performance. To a lesser extent, net fee
income in Markets and Securities Services ('MSS') also decreased,
mainly from lower global custody and securities brokerage fees
coupled with a drop in underwriting fees.
Net income from financial instruments measured at fair
value through profit or loss decreased by HK$18,064m, or
39%.
Net income from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses,
including related derivatives, measured at fair value through profit
or loss decreased by HK$31,374m, mainly in Hong Kong and
driven from losses on the equity portfolio held to support
insurance and investment contracts, due to unfavourable equity
market performance. To the extent that these losses are
attributable to policyholders, there is an offsetting movement
reported under ‘Net insurance claims and benefits paid and
movement in liabilities to policyholders’.
Net income from financial instruments held for trading or
managed on a fair value basis increased by HK$13,315m, or 47%,
most notably in Hong Kong from higher gains on derivatives
principally benefitting from rising interest rates, partly offset by
lower equity trading income attributable to unfavourable market
conditions. Mainland China also increased due to the favourable
movement on foreign currency position held locally.
Net insurance premium income increased by HK$18,693m, or
30%, driven from higher sales volumes mainly in Hong Kong, and
in Singapore with the acquisition of AXA Insurance Pte Limited
('AXA Singapore') during 2022.
Other operating income increased by HK$1,748m, or 86%,
driven by the favourable movement in the present value of in-force
long-term insurance business ('PVIF') of HK$1,038m, reflecting
increases in Hong Kong from the value of new business written
and the one-off gain from a pricing update for policyholder funds
held on deposit to reflect the cost of provision of these services.
This was partly offset by adverse assumption changes and
experience variances in Hong Kong and Singapore, primarily due
to interest rates movements.
The net movement in PVIF was partly offset by a corresponding
movement in ‘Net insurance claims and benefits paid and
movement in liabilities to policyholders’ to the extent gains or
losses are attributable to the policy holders.
The overall increase also included a gain of HK$665m on
completion of our acquisition of AXA Singapore.
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in
liabilities to policyholders decreased by HK$6,234m, or 8%,
primarily due to a decline in returns on financial assets supporting
contracts where the policyholder is subject to part or all of the
investment risk, mainly in Hong Kong. This decrease was partially
offset by higher sales volumes in Hong Kong.
Change in expected credit losses and other credit
impairment charges increased by HK$9,826m, or 150%, notably
in Commercial Banking ('CMB') and to a lesser extent in Global
Banking ('GB'), mainly reflecting increases in allowances relating
to exposures to the mainland China commercial real estate ('CRE')
sector.
Total operating expenses increased by HK$5,632m, or 5%.
Excluding the favourable foreign exchange impact, operating
expenses increased by HK$7,459m, or 7%, reflecting an increase
in investment in technology, including our digital capabilities to
support business growth. Employee compensation and benefits
also increased, mainly from higher performance-related pay and
wage inflation.
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures decreased by
HK$528m, or 3%. Excluding the unfavourable foreign exchange
impact, the share of profit in associates and joint ventures
increased by HK$32m, mainly from Bank of Communications Co.,
Limited.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
17
Net interest income
(Unaudited)
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Net interest income
126,852
98,113
Average interest-earning assets
7,589,538
7,173,973
%
%
Net interest spread
1.55
1.32
Contribution from net free funds
0.12
0.05
Net interest margin
1.67
1.37
Net interest income (‘NII’) increased by HK$28,739m, or 29%.
Excluding the unfavourable foreign exchange impact, net interest
income increased by HK$30,715m, or 32%, primarily driven by
Hong Kong with wider customer deposit spreads and higher
reinvestment yields as market interest rates increased, coupled
with balance sheet growth. Net interest income in Singapore also
increased, reflecting the favourable impact of the higher market
interest rates.
Average interest-earning assets increased by HK$416bn, or
6%, driven by Hong Kong, from growth in financial investments
and reverse repurchase agreements.
Net interest margin ('NIM') increased by 30 basis points ('bps'),
with increases noted across the region, including Hong Kong,
Singapore and Malaysia with higher market interest rates
compared to the prior year.
As a result, the NIM at the Bank's operations in Hong Kong
increased by 34 bps to 1.09%, and at Hang Seng Bank, the NIM
increased by 30 bps to 1.89%.
Insurance manufacturing
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the results of our insurance manufacturing operations by income statement line item, and separately the
insurance distribution income earned by the group's bank channels.
Results of insurance manufacturing operations and insurance distribution income earned by the group's bank channels
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Insurance manufacturing operations1
Net interest income
17,701
16,527
Net fee expense
(4,272)
(3,617)
Net income/(expense) from financial instruments measured at fair value
(14,599)
18,036
Net insurance premium income
80,839
62,135
Change in present value of in-force long-term insurance business
(256)
(1,294)
Other operating income
887
719
Total operating income
80,300
92,506
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders
(70,170)
(76,361)
Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
10,130
16,145
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
(36)
(216)
Net operating income
10,094
15,929
Total operating expenses
(5,798)
(3,464)
Operating profit
4,296
12,465
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures
139
137
Profit before tax
4,435
12,602
Annualised new business premiums of insurance manufacturing operations
15,420
19,136
Distribution income earned by the group's bank channels
4,437
4,135
1The results presented for insurance manufacturing operations are shown before elimination of intercompany transactions with the group's non-
insurance operations.
Insurance manufacturing
Profit before tax from insurance manufacturing operations
decreased by HK$8,167m, or 65%, driven by unfavourable equity
markets in the year compared to favourable markets in 2021,
partially offset by higher new business volumes.
NII increased by 7% from growth in invested funds, reflecting net
new business and renewal premium inflows on life insurance
contracts.
Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value
decreased, mainly from losses on the equity portfolio held to
support insurance and investment contracts in Hong Kong, due to
the unfavourable equity markets.
Net insurance premium income increased from higher sales
volumes mainly in Hong Kong which included a higher proportion
of single premium business in its product mix, and in Singapore
following the acquisition of AXA Singapore during 2022.
The favourable movement of HK$1,038m in PVIF compared to
2021 reflected increases in Hong Kong from the value of new
business written and the one-off gain from a pricing update for
policyholder funds held on deposit to reflect the cost of provision
of these services. This was partly offset by the adverse assumption
changes and experience variances in Hong Kong and Singapore,
primarily due to interest rates movements.
To the extent losses are attributable to policyholders, there is an
offsetting movement reported under ‘Net insurance claims and
benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders'.
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities
to policyholders decreased by HK$6,191m, or 8%, primarily due to
a decline in returns on financial assets supporting contracts where
the policyholder is subject to part or all of the investment risk,
mainly in Hong Kong. This was partially offset by higher new
business volumes in Hong Kong.
Annualised new business premiums ('ANP') decreased by
HK$3,716m, or 19%, mainly in Hong Kong due to a change in
product mix towards single premium new business, partially offset
by higher ANP from business growth in mainland China and the
inclusion of the results of AXA Singapore.
Financial Review
18
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Balance sheet commentary compared with       
31 December 2021
(Unaudited)
The consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2022 is set out
in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Gross loans and advances to customers decreased by
HK$128bn, or 3%. Excluding the unfavourable foreign exchange
translation effects of HK$90bn, gross loans and advances to
customers decreased by HK$38bn. This was driven by a decrease
in corporate and commercial lending of HK$88bn, primarily in
Hong Kong, partly offset by increases in Australia, Japan and
mainland China. The residential mortgage book increased by
HK$35bn, mainly in Hong Kong and Australia, coupled with
increases in lending to non-bank financial institutions of HK$29bn
mainly in Korea, Hong Kong and India.
Total gross impaired loans and advances as a percentage of gross
loans and advances stood at 1.69% at the end of 2022 (2021:
1.11%). The change in expected credit losses as a percentage of
average gross customer advances was 0.40% for 2022 (2021:
0.18%), reflecting the impact of the deterioration in quality in the
mainland China CRE portfolio.
Interests in associates and joint ventures
At 31 December 2022, an impairment review on the group’s
investment in Bank of Communications Co., Ltd (‘BoCom’) was
carried out and it was concluded that the investment was not
impaired based on our value-in-use calculation (see Note 14 on the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details). As set out in
that note, in future periods, the value in use may increase or
decrease depending on the effect of changes to model inputs. It is
expected that the carrying amount will continue to increase due to
retained profits earned by BoCom. Impairment, if determined,
would be recognised in the income statement. The impact on
group’s common equity tier 1 ratio is expected to be minimal in
the event of an impairment, as the adverse impact on common
equity tier 1 capital from the impairment would be partly offset by
the favourable impact from a lower carrying amount. The group
would continue to recognise its share of BoCom’s profit or loss,
but the carrying amount would be reduced to equal the value in
use, with a corresponding reduction in the income statement. An
impairment review would continue to be performed at each
subsequent reporting period, with the carrying amount and
income adjusted accordingly.
Customer deposits decreased by HK$63bn, or 1%, to
HK$6,114bn. Excluding the unfavourable foreign exchange
translation effects of HK$110bn, customer deposits increased by
HK$47bn. The advances-to-deposits ratio was 60.6% at the end of
the year (2021: 62.2%).
Shareholders’ equity grew by HK$19bn to HK$875bn at
31 December 2022, mainly reflecting the current year’s profit, net
of dividend payments, coupled with the issuance of new ordinary
shares and additional tier 1 capital instruments. These were partly
offset by a decrease in foreign exchange reserves due to
depreciation of various foreign currencies against the Hong Kong
dollar.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
19
Risk
Our approach to risk
(Unaudited)
Our risk appetite
We recognise the importance of a strong culture, which refers to
our shared attitudes, beliefs, values and standards that shape
behaviours including those related to risk awareness, risk taking
and risk management. All our people are responsible for the
management of risk, with the ultimate accountability residing with
the Board.
We seek to build our business for the long term by balancing
social, environmental and economic considerations in the
decisions we make. Our strategic priorities are underpinned by our
endeavour to operate in a sustainable way. This helps us to carry
out our social responsibility and manage the risk profile of the
business. We are committed to managing and mitigating climate-
related risks, both physical and transition risks, and continue to
incorporate consideration of these into how we manage and
oversee risks internally and with our customers.
The following principles guide the group’s overarching appetite for
risk and determine how our businesses and risks are managed.
Financial position
•We aim to maintain a strong capital position, defined by
regulatory and internal capital ratios.
•We carry out liquidity and funding management for each
operating entity, on a stand-alone basis.
Operating model
•We seek to generate returns in line with our risk appetite and
strong risk management capability.
•We aim to deliver sustainable and diversified earnings and
consistent returns for shareholders.
Business practice
•We have no appetite for deliberately or knowingly causing
detriment to consumers, or incurring a breach of the letter or
spirit of regulatory requirements.
•We have no appetite for inappropriate market conduct by any
member of staff or by any group business.
•We are committed to managing the climate risks that have an
impact on our financial position, and delivering on our net zero
ambition.
•We consider and, where appropriate, mitigate reputational risk
that may arise from our business activities and decisions.
•We monitor non-financial risk exposure against risk appetite,
including inadequate or failed internal processes, people and
systems, or events that impact our customers or can lead to
sub-optimal returns to shareholders, censure, or reputational
damage.
Enterprise-wide application
Our risk appetite encapsulates the consideration of financial and
non-financial risks. We define financial risk as the risk of a
financial loss as a result of business activities. We actively take
these types of risks to maximise shareholder value and profits.
Non-financial risk is the risk to achieving our strategy or objectives
as the result of failed internal processes, people and systems or
from external events.
Our risk appetite is expressed in both quantitative and qualitative
terms and applied at the global business level and to material
banking entities. It continues to evolve and expand its scope as
part of our regular review process.
The Board reviews and approves the group’s risk appetite regularly
to make sure it remains fit for purpose. The group’s risk appetite is
considered, developed and enhanced through:
•an alignment with our strategy, purpose, values and customer
needs;
•trends highlighted in other group risk reports;
•communication with risk stewards on the developing risk
landscape;
•strength of our capital, liquidity and balance sheet;
•compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
•effectiveness of the applicable control environment to mitigate
risk, informed by risk ratings from risk control assessments;
•functionality, capacity and resilience of available systems to
manage risk; and
•the level of available staff with the required competencies to
manage risks.
We formally articulate our risk appetite through our risk appetite
statement (‘RAS’), which is approved by the Board on the
recommendation of the group Risk Committee ('RC'). Setting out
our risk appetite ensures that we agree a suitable level of risk for
our strategy. In this way, risk appetite informs our financial
planning process and helps senior management to allocate capital
to business activities, services and products.
The RAS is applied to the development of business line strategies,
strategic and business planning, and remuneration. At a group
level, performance against the RAS is reported to the group Risk
Management Meeting (‘RMM’) alongside key risk indicators to
support targeted insight and discussion on breaches of risk
appetite and any associated mitigating actions. This reporting
allows risks to be promptly identified and mitigated, and informs
risk-adjusted remuneration to drive a strong risk culture.
Most global businesses and material banking entities are required
to have their own RAS, which is monitored to help ensure it
remains aligned with the group’s RAS. Each RAS and business
activity is guided and underpinned by qualitative principles and/or
quantitative metrics.
Risk management
We recognise that the primary role of risk management is to
protect our customers, business, colleagues, shareholders and the
communities that we serve, while ensuring we are able to support
our strategy and provide sustainable growth. This is supported
through our three lines of defence model described on page 22.
The implementation of our business strategy remains a key focus.
As we implement change initiatives, we actively manage the
execution risks. We also perform periodic risk assessments,
including against strategies,to help ensure retention of key
personnel for our continued effective operation.
We aim to use a comprehensive risk management approach
across the organisation and across all risk types, underpinned by
the group's culture and values. This is outlined in our risk
management framework, including the key principles and
practices that we employ in managing material risks, both
financial and non-financial.
The framework fosters continual monitoring, promotes risk
awareness and encourages a sound operational and strategic
decision making and escalation process. It also supports a
consistent approach to identifying, assessing, managing and
reporting the risks we accept and incur in our activities, with clear
accountabilities. We actively review and enhance our risk
management framework and our approach to managing risk,
through our activities with regard to people and capabilities,
governance, reporting and management information, credit risk
management models and data.
Our risk management framework
The following diagram and descriptions summarise key aspects of
the risk management framework, including governance, structure,
risk management tools and our culture, which together help align
employee behaviour with risk appetite.
Risk
20
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Key components of our risk management framework
HSBC Values and risk culture
Risk governance
Non-executive risk governance
The Board approves the group's risk appetite, plans and performance
targets. It sets the ‘tone from the top’ and is advised by the group's Risk
Committee.
Executive risk governance
Our executive risk governance structure is responsible for the enterprise-
wide management of all risks, including key policies and frameworks for
the management of risk within the group.
Roles and
responsibilities
Three lines of defence model
Our ‘three lines of defence’ model defines roles and responsibilities for
risk management. An independent Risk and Compliance function helps
ensure the necessary balance in risk/return decisions.
Processes and tools
Risk appetite
The group has processes in place to identify/assess, monitor, manage
and report risks to help ensure we remain within our risk appetite.
Enterprise-wide risk management tools
Active risk management:
identification/assessment,
monitoring, management and reporting
Internal controls
Policies and procedures
Policies and procedures define the minimum requirements for the
controls required to manage our risks.
Control activities
Operational and resilience risk management defines minimum standards
and processes for managing operational risks and internal controls.
Systems and infrastructure
The group has systems and/or processes that support the identification,
capture and exchange of information to support risk management
activities.
Risk governance
The Board has ultimate responsibility for the effective
management of risk and approves our risk appetite. It is advised
on risk-related matters by the RC.
The group's Chief Risk Officer, supported by the RMM, holds
executive accountability for the ongoing monitoring, assessment
and management of the risk environment and the effectiveness of
the risk management framework.
The management of regulatory compliance risk and financial crime
risk resides with the group's Chief Compliance Officer. Oversight is
maintained by the group's Chief Risk Officer, in line with his
enterprise risk oversight responsibilities, through the RMM.
Day-to-day responsibility for risk management is delegated to
senior managers with individual accountability for decision
making. All our people have a role to play in risk management.
These roles are defined using the three lines of defence model,
which takes into account the group’s business and functional
structures as described in the following commentary, 'Our
responsibilities’.
We use a defined executive risk governance structure to help
ensure there is appropriate oversight and accountability of risk,
which facilitates reporting and escalation to the RMM. This
structure is summarised in the following table.
Governance structure for the management of risk
Authority
Membership
Responsibilities include:
Risk Management
Meeting of the group
group Chief Risk Officer
group General Counsel
group Co-Chief Executive Officers
group Chief Financial Officer
group Chief Compliance Officer
group Head of Internal Audit
Chief Executive Officer of Hang Seng Bank
Limited
All other group Executive Committee members
•Supporting the group Chief Risk Officer in exercising Board-delegated risk
management authority.
•Overseeing the implementation of risk appetite and the risk management
framework.
•Forward-looking assessment of the risk environment, analysing possible risk
impacts and taking appropriate action.
•Monitoring all categories of risk and determining appropriate mitigating
action.
•Promoting a supportive group culture in relation to risk management and
conduct.
Global business/Site
risk management
meetings
Global business/Site Chief Risk Officer
Global business/Site Chief Executive
Global business/Site Chief Financial Officer
Global business/Site heads of global functions
•Supporting the Chief Risk Officer in exercising Board-delegated risk
management authority.
•Forward-looking assessment of the risk environment, analysing the possible
risk impact and taking appropriate action.
•Implementation of risk appetite and the risk management framework.
•Monitoring all categories of risk and determining appropriate mitigating
actions.
•Embedding a supportive culture in relation to risk management and controls.
The Board committees with responsibility for oversight of risk-related matters are set out on page 6.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
21
Our responsibilities
All our people are responsible for identifying and managing risk
within the scope of their roles. Roles are defined using the three
lines of defence model, which takes into account our business and
functional structures as described below.
Three lines of defence
To create a robust control environment to manage risks, we use
an activity-based three lines of defence model. This model
delineates management accountabilities and responsibilities for
risk management and the control environment.
The model underpins our approach to risk management by
clarifying responsibility and encouraging collaboration, as well as
enabling efficient coordination of risk and control activities.
The three lines of defence are summarised below:
•The first line of defence owns the risks and is responsible for
identifying, recording, reporting and managing them in line
with risk appetite, and ensuring that the right controls and
assessments are in place to mitigate them.
•The second line of defence challenges the first line of defence
on effective risk management, and provides advice and
guidance in relation to the risk.
•The third line of defence is our Global Internal Audit function,
which provides independent assurance that our risk
management approach and processes are designed and
operating effectively.
Risk and Compliance function
The group’s Risk sub-function, headed by the group’s Chief Risk
Officer, is responsible for the group’s risk management
framework. This responsibility includes establishing and
monitoring of risk profiles, and identifying and managing forward-
looking risk. The group’s Risk sub-function is made up of sub-
functions covering all risks to our business. Forming part of the
second line of defence, the group's Risk sub-function is
independent from the global businesses, including sales and
trading functions, to provide challenge, appropriate oversight and
balance in risk/return decisions.
Responsibility for minimising both financial and non-financial risk
lies with our people. They are required to manage the risks of the
business and operational activities for which they are responsible.
We maintain adequate oversight of our risks through our various
specialist risk stewards and the collective accountability held by
our Chief Risk Officers at sites and global businesses.
We have continued to strengthen the control environment and our
approach to the management of non-financial risk, as set out in
our risk management framework. The management of non-
financial risk focuses on governance and risk appetite, and
provides a single view of the non-financial risks that matter the
most and the associated controls. It incorporates a risk
management system designed to enable the active management
of non-financial risk. Our ongoing focus is on simplifying our
approach to non-financial risk management, while driving more
effective oversight and better end-to-end identification and
management of non-financial risks. This is overseen by the
Operational and Resilience Risk sub-function, headed by the group
Head of Operational and Resilience Risk.
Stress testing and recovery planning
The group operates a wide-ranging stress testing programme that
is a key part of our risk management and capital and liquidity
planning. Stress testing provides management with key insights
into the impact of severely adverse events on the group, and
provides confidence to regulators on the group’s financial stability.
Our stress testing programme assesses our capital and liquidity
strength through a rigorous examination of our resilience to
external shocks. As well as undertaking regulatory-driven stress
tests, we conduct our own internal stress tests in order to
understand the nature and level of all material risks, quantify the
impact of such risks and develop plausible business-as-usual
mitigating actions.
Internal stress tests
Our internal capital assessment uses a range of stress scenarios
that explore risks identified by management. They include
potential adverse macroeconomic, geopolitical and operational
risk events, as well as other potential events that are specific to
the group.
The selection of stress scenarios is based upon the output of our
identified top and emerging risks and our risk appetite. Stress
testing analysis helps management understand the nature and
extent of vulnerabilities to which the group is exposed. Using this
information, management decides whether risks can or should be
mitigated through management actions or, if they were to
crystallise, be absorbed through capital and liquidity. This in turn
informs decisions about preferred capital and liquidity levels and
allocations.
In addition to the group-wide stress testing scenarios, each major
subsidiary and branch conducts regular macroeconomic and
event-driven scenario analysis specific to its region. They also
participate, as required, in the regulatory stress testing
programmes of the jurisdictions in which they operate, and the
stress tests required by the HKMA. Global functions and
businesses also perform bespoke stress testing to inform their
assessment of risks to potential scenarios.
We also conduct reverse stress tests each year at a group level
and, where required, at subsidiary entity level to understand
potential extreme conditions that would make our business model
non-viable. Reverse stress testing identifies potential stresses and
vulnerabilities we might face, and helps inform early warning
triggers, management actions and contingency plans designed to
mitigate risks.
The group stress testing programme is overseen by the RC and
results are reported, where appropriate, to the RMM and RC.
Recovery and resolution plans
Recovery and resolution plans form part of the integral framework
safeguarding the group’s financial stability. The group's recovery
plan, together with stress testing, helps us understand the likely
outcomes of adverse business or economic conditions and in the
identification of mitigating actions.
Risk
22
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Key developments in 2022
We actively manage the risks related to macroeconomic
uncertainties including inflation, fiscal and monetary policy, the
Russia-Ukraine war, broader geopolitical uncertainties, the
continued risks resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as
other key risks described in this section.
In addition, we enhanced our risk management in the following
areas:
•We continued to improve our risk governance decision making,
particularly with regard to the governance of treasury risk to
ensure senior executives have appropriate oversight and
visibility of macroeconomic trends around inflation and interest
rates.
•We adapted our interest rate risk management strategy as
market and official interest rates increased in reaction to
inflationary pressures.
•We began a process of enhancement of our country credit risk
management framework in order to strengthen our control of
risk tolerance and appetite at a country level.
•We continued to develop our approach to emerging risk
identification and management, including the use of forward-
looking indicators to support our analysis.
•We enhanced our enterprise risk reporting processes to place a
greater focus on our emerging risks, including by capturing the
materiality, oversight and individual monitoring of these risks.
•We further strengthened our third-party risk policy and
processes to improve control and oversight of our material third
parties to maintain our operational resilience, and to meet new
and evolving regulatory requirements.
•We made progress with our comprehensive regulatory
reporting programme to strengthen our global processes,
improve consistency, and enhance controls.
•We have progressed with the simplification and reshaping of
initiatives to ensure the we have a sustainable cost base, a
resilient control environment and the skills and capabilities to
support the global businesses.
•We continued to embed, the governance and oversight around
model adjustments and related processes for HKFRS 9 models
and Sarbanes-Oxley controls.
•We commenced a programme to enhance our framework for
managing the risks associated with machine learning and
artificial intelligence (‘AI’).
•Through our dedicated climate risk programme, we continued
to embed climate considerations throughout the organisation,
including updating the scope of our programme to cover all risk
types, expanding the scope of climate related training and
developing new climate risk metrics to monitor and manage
exposures, and the development of our internal climate
scenario exercise.
•We continued to improve the effectiveness of our financial
crime controls, deploying advanced analytics capabilities into
new markets. We are refreshing our financial crime policies,
ensuring they remain up-to-date and address changing and
emerging risks. We continue to monitor regulatory changes.
Top and emerging risks
(Unaudited)
We use a top and emerging risks process to provide a forward-
looking view of issues with the potential to threaten the execution
of our strategy or operations over the medium to long term.
We proactively assess the internal and external risk environment,
as well as review the themes identified across our region and
global businesses, for any risks that may require global escalation.
We update our top and emerging risks as necessary.
Our current top and emerging risks are as follows:
Externally driven
Geopolitical and macroeconomic risks
(Unaudited)
The Russia-Ukraine war has had far-reaching geopolitical and
economic implications. The group is monitoring the impacts of the
war and continues to respond to the extensive sanctions and trade
restrictions that have been imposed, noting the challenges that
arise in implementing the complex, novel and ambiguous aspects
of certain of these sanctions. Sanctions were targeted against
numerous Russian government officials and politically exposed
individuals. Russia has implemented certain countermeasures in
response. Further sanctions and counter sanctions in connection
with Russia may adversely affect the group, its customers and the
markets in which the group operates by creating regulatory,
reputational and market risks.
Global commodity markets have been significantly impacted by
the Russia-Ukraine war and localised Covid-19 outbreaks, leading
to continued supply chain disruptions. This has resulted in product
shortages appearing across several regions, and increased prices
for both energy and non-energy commodities, such as food. We
do not expect these to ease significantly in the near term. In turn,
this has had a significant impact on global inflation.
Rising global inflation has prompted central banks to tighten
monetary policy. The combined pressure of inflation and interest
rate rises may lead to pressures on customers and their ability to
repay debt. During 2022, the US Federal Reserve Board (‘FRB’)
delivered a cumulative 425 basis points (‘bps’) increase in the
Federal Funds rate. The Hong Kong dollar ('HKD') exchange rate
peg against the US dollar means that HKD interest rates are
expected to rise in line with respective US rates, yet HKD
interbank rates lagged increases in US dollar interest rates during
2022 as the supply of local currency remained strong. The spread
between the two is expected to narrow as the Hong Kong
Aggregate Balance, a gauge of local interbank liquidity, fell below
the HKD 100 billion mark. Interest-rate futures suggest an
expectation that the FRB will ease monetary policy slightly beyond
the six-month horizon. However, should central banks remain on a
trajectory of continued monetary tightening, a realignment of
market expectations could cause turbulence in financial asset
prices.
We continue to monitor our risk profile closely in the context of
uncertainty over global macroeconomic policies. Higher inflation
and interest rate expectations around the world, and the resulting
economic uncertainty, have had an impact on ECL. Our Central
scenario used to calculate credit impairment assumes low growth
and a higher inflation environment across many of our key
markets. However, there is a high degree of risk and uncertainty
associated with economic forecasts in the current environment.
The degree of uncertainty varies by market, depending on
exposure to commodity price increases, supply chain constraints,
the monetary policy response to inflation and the public health
policy response to the Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, our Central
scenario for impairment has not been assigned an equal likelihood
of occurrence across our key markets.
For further details of our Central and other scenarios, see
‘Measurement uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of ECL estimates’
on page 37.
Global tensions over trade, technology and ideology are
manifesting themselves in divergent regulatory standards and
compliance regimes, presenting long-term strategic challenges for
multinational businesses.
The US-China relationship remains complex, with divisions over a
number of critical issues. The US, the UK, the EU, Canada and
other countries have imposed various sanctions and trade
restrictions on Chinese persons and companies. These include the
freezing of assets of government officials, and the implementation
of investment and import/export restrictions targeting certain
Chinese companies.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
23
There is a continued risk of additional sanctions being imposed by
the US and other governments in relation to human rights and
other issues with China, and this could create a more complex
operating environment for the group and its customers.
China has in turn announced a number of its own sanctions and
trade restrictions that target, or provide authority to target, foreign
individuals and companies. China has also promulgated laws that
provide a legal framework for imposing further sanctions and
export restrictions.
These and any future measures and countermeasures that may be
taken by the US, China and other countries may affect the group,
its customers, and the markets in which we operate.
As the geopolitical landscape evolves, compliance by multinational
corporations with their legal or regulatory obligations in one
jurisdiction may be seen as supporting the law or policy objectives
of that jurisdiction over another, creating additional compliance,
reputational and political risks for the group. We maintain dialogue
with our regulators in various jurisdictions on the impact of legal
and regulatory obligations on our business and customers.
Expanding data privacy, national security and cybersecurity laws
in a number of markets could pose potential challenges to intra-
group data sharing. These developments could increase financial
institutions’ compliance burdens in respect of cross-border
transfers of personal information, and degrade our enterprise-wide
financial crime risk management capabilities.
Mitigating actions
•We closely monitor geopolitical and economic developments in
key markets and sectors and undertake scenario analysis where
appropriate. This helps us to take portfolio actions where
necessary, including enhanced monitoring, amending our risk
appetite and/or reducing limits and exposures.
•We stress test portfolios of particular concern to identify
sensitivity to loss under a range of scenarios, with management
actions being taken to rebalance exposures and manage risk
appetite where necessary.
•We regularly review key portfolios to help ensure that individual
customer or portfolio risks are understood and our ability to
manage the level of facilities offered through any downturn is
appropriate.
•We continue to manage sanctions and trade restrictions
through the use of, and enhancements to, our existing controls.
•We have taken steps, where necessary, to enhance physical
security in geographical areas deemed to be at high risk from
terrorism and military conflicts.
Technology and cyber security risk
(Unaudited)
We operate an extensive and complex technology landscape,
which must remain resilient in order to support customers, the
group and markets in the region. Risks arise where technology is
not understood, maintained, or developed appropriately. Together
with other organisations, we continue to operate in an increasingly
hostile cyber threat environment. These threats include potential
unauthorised access to customer accounts, attacks on our
systems or those of our third-party suppliers and require ongoing
investment in business and technical controls to defend against
them.
Mitigating actions
•We continue to invest in transforming how software solutions
are developed, delivered and maintained. We invest both to
improve system resilience and test service continuity. We
continue to ensure security is built into our software
development life cycle and improve our testing processes and
tools.
•We continue to upgrade our IT systems, simplify our service
provision and replace older IT infrastructure and publications.
•We continually evaluate threat levels for the most prevalent
cyber-attack types and their potential outcomes. To further
protect the group and our customers and help ensure the safe
expansion of our global businesses, we continue to strengthen
our controls to reduce the likelihood and impact of advanced
malware, data leakage, exposure through third parties and
security vulnerabilities.
•We continue to enhance our cybersecurity capabilities,
including Cloud security, identity and access management,
metrics and data analytics, and third-party security reviews. An
important part of our defence strategy is ensuring our
colleagues remain aware of cybersecurity issues and know how
to report incidents.
•We report and review cyber risk and control effectiveness at
executive and non-executive Board level. We also report across
our global businesses, functions and markets to help ensure
appropriate visibility and governance of the risk and mitigating
actions.
•The Group participates globally in industry bodies and working
groups to collaborate on tactics employed by cyber-crime
groups and to collaborate in defending, detecting and
preventing cyber-attacks on financial organisations.
Financial crime risk
(Unaudited)
Financial institutions remain under considerable regulatory
scrutiny regarding their ability to prevent and detect financial
crime which continues to evolve. Challenges include managing
conflicting laws and approaches to legal and regulatory regimes,
and implementing the unprecedented volume and diverse set of
sanctions notably as a result of the Russia-Ukraine war.
Amid rising inflation and increasing cost of living pressures, we
face increasing regulatory expectations with respect to increases
in internal and external fraud and the abuse of vulnerable
customers.
The digitisation of financial services continues to have an impact
on the payments ecosystem, including new market entrants and
payment mechanisms, not all of which are subject to the same
level of regulatory scrutiny or regulations as financial institutions.
This presents ongoing challenges in terms of maintaining required
levels of payment transparency, notably where financial
institutions serve as intermediaries. Developments around digital
assets and currencies have continued at pace, with an increasing
regulatory and enforcement focus.
Expectations with respect to the intersection of ESG issues and
financial crime as our organisation, customers and suppliers
transition to net zero, continue to increase, focused on potential
‘greenwashing’, human rights issues and environmental crimes. In
addition, climate change itself could heighten risks linked to
vulnerable migrant populations in countries where financial crime
is already more prevalent.
We also continue to face increasing challenges presented by
national data privacy requirements, which may affect our ability to
manage financial crime risks holistically and effectively.
Mitigating actions
•We continue to manage sanctions and trade restrictions
through the use of, and enhancements to, our existing controls.
•We are strengthening our fraud controls, and investing in next
generation capabilities to fight financial crime through the
application of advanced analytics and artificial intelligence.
•We are looking at the impact of a rapidly changing payments
ecosystem, as well as risks associated with direct and indirect
exposure to digital assets and currencies, in an effort to ensure
our financial crime controls remain appropriate.
•We are assessing our existing policies and control framework
in an effort to ensure that developments in the ESG space are
considered and the risks mitigated.
•We work with jurisdictions and relevant international bodies to
address data privacy challenges through international
standards, guidance, and legislation.
Risk
24
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Ibor transition
(Unaudited)
Interbank offered rates (‘Ibors’) have previously been used
extensively to set interest rates on different types of financial
transactions and for valuation purposes, risk measurement and
performance benchmarking.
The publication of sterling, Swiss franc, euro and Japanese yen
(JPY) London interbank offered rate ('Libor') interest rate
benchmarks, as well as Euro Overnight Index Average (‘Eonia’),
ceased from the end of 2021. Our Ibor transition programme,
which is tasked with the development of near risk-free
replacement rate (‘RFR’) products and the transition of legacy Ibor
products, has continued to support the transition of a limited
number of remaining contracts in sterling and JPY Libor, which
were published using a ‘synthetic’ interest rate methodology
during 2022. Following the publication of ‘synthetic’ JPY Libor
after 31 December 2022, and the announcements by the Financial
Conduct Authority ('FCA') in September and November 2022 that
‘synthetic’ sterling Libor rates will cease to be published on
31 March 2023 or 31 March 2024, depending on setting, we have
or are prepared to transition or remediate the remaining few
contracts outstanding as at 31 December 2022 in advance of
these dates.
For the cessation of the publication of US dollar Libor and other
regional rates demising at dates ('demising regional rates') from
30 June 2023, we have implemented the majority of required
processes, technology and RFR product capabilities in preparation
for upcoming market events, and continue to transition
outstanding legacy contracts through the first half of 2023. We
have completed the transition of the majority of our uncommitted
lending facilities and continue to make steady progress with the
transition of the outstanding legacy committed lending facilities.
Transition of our derivatives portfolio is progressing well with most
clients reliant on industry mechanisms to transition to RFRs. For
the limited number of bilateral derivatives trades where an
alternative transition path is required, client engagement is
continuing. For certain products and contracts, including bonds
and syndicated loans, we remain reliant on the continued support
of agents and third parties, but we continue to progress those
contracts requiring transition. We will continue to monitor
contracts that may be potentially more challenging to transition
and need to rely upon legislative solutions. Additionally, following
the FCA’s consultation in November 2022 proposing that US dollar
Libor is to be published using a 'synthetic' methodology for a
defined period, we will continue to work with our clients to
support them through the transition of their products if transition
is not completed by 30 June 2023.
For the group’s own debt securities issuances, we continue to
have non-capital loss absorbing capacity ('LAC') instruments in US
dollar and JPY where the terms provide for an Ibor benchmark to
be used to reset the coupon rate if the group chooses not to
redeem them on their call dates, the earliest of which is July 2023.
We remain mindful of the various factors that impact on the Ibor
remediation strategy for our non-capital LAC instruments,
including but not limited to timescales for cessation of relevant
Ibor rates, constraints relating to the governing law of outstanding
instruments, the potential relevance of legislative solutions and
industry best practice guidance.
For US dollar Libor, demising regional rates and other demising
Ibors, we continue to be exposed to, and actively monitor, risks
including:
•regulatory compliance and conduct risks, as the transition of
legacy contracts to RFRs or alternative rates, or sales of
products referencing RFRs, may not deliver fair client
outcomes;
•resilience and operational risks, as changes to manual and
automated processes, made in support of new RFR
methodologies, and the transition of large volumes of Ibor
contracts may lead to operational issues;
•legal risks, as issues arising from the use of legislative solutions
and from legacy contracts that the group is unable to transition
may result in unintended or unfavourable outcomes for clients
and market participants, which could potentially increase the
risk of disputes;
•model risk, as there is a risk that changes to our models to
replace Ibor-related data, adversely affect the accuracy of
model outputs; and
•market risk, because as a result of differences in Libor and
RFRs interest rates, we are exposed to basis risk resulting from
the asymmetric adoption of rates across assets, liabilities and
products.
We will monitor these risks through the remainder of the transition
of legacy contracts, with a focus on fair client outcomes. The level
of risk is diminishing in line with our process implementation and
continued transition of contracts. Throughout 2023, we continue
to be committed to engaging with our clients and investors to
complete an orderly transition of contracts that reference the
remaining demising Ibors.
Mitigating actions
•The Group's global Ibor transition programme, which is
overseen by the Group Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, will
continue to deliver IT and operational processes to meet its
objectives.
•We carry out extensive training, communication and client
engagement to facilitate appropriate selection of new rates and
products.
•We have dedicated teams in place to support the transition.
•We have actively transitioned legacy contracts and ceased new
issuance of Libor and demising regional rate based contracts,
other than those allowed under regulatory exemptions, with
implementation of associated monitoring and controls.
•We assess, monitor and dynamically manage risks arising from
Ibor transition, and implement specific mitigating controls
when required.
•We continue to actively engage with regulatory and industry
bodies to mitigate risks relating to 'tough legacy' contracts.
Financial instruments impacted by Ibor reform
(Audited)
Amendments to HKFRSs issued in October 2020 (Interest Rate
Benchmark Reform Phase 2) represent the second phase of the
project on the effects of interest rate benchmark reform,
addressing issues affecting financial statements when changes are
made to contractual cash flows and hedging relationships as a
result of reform.
Under these amendments, changes made to a financial instrument
measured at other than fair value through profit or loss that are
economically equivalent and required by interest rate benchmark
reform, do not result in the derecognition or a change in the
carrying amount of the financial instrument. Instead, they require
the effective interest rate to be updated to reflect the change in
the interest rate benchmark. In addition, hedge accounting will not
be discontinued solely because of the replacement of the interest
rate benchmark if the hedge meets other hedge accounting
criteria.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
25
(Audited)
Financial instruments yet to transition to alternative benchmarks, by main
benchmark
USD Libor
JPY Libor
Sibor
GBP Libor
Others1
At 31 Dec 2022
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Non-derivative financial assets2
172,370
—
30,338
938
4,474
Non-derivative financial liabilities
120,096
9,192
—
—
264
Derivative notional contract amount
8,506,925
—
—
—
435,263
At 31 Dec 2021
Non-derivative financial assets2
206,508
2,846
56,291
22,197
4,779
Non-derivative financial liabilities
147,198
10,930
—
—
—
Derivative notional contract amount
8,547,665
798,921
—
88,218
715,439
1Comprises financial instruments referencing other significant benchmark rates yet to transition to alternative benchmarks (Euro Libor, Swiss franc
Libor, Mumbai Interbank Forward Offer Rate ('MIFOR'), SGD Swap Offer Rate ('SOR') and Thai baht Interest Rate Fixing ('THBFIX')).
Announcements were made by regulators during 2022 on the cessation of the Canadian dollar offered rate (‘CDOR’) and Mexican Interbank
equilibrium interest rate (‘TIIE’), which will eventually transition to the Canadian overnight repo rate average (‘CORRA’) and a new Mexican
overnight fall-back rate respectively. Therefore, CDOR and TIIE are included in the current period.
2Gross carrying amount excluding allowances for expected credit losses.
The amounts in the above table relate to the group's main operating entities where the group has material exposures impacted by Ibor
reform including Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand, Australia, India and Japan. The amounts provide an indication of the extent of the
group's exposure to the Ibor benchmarks which are due to be replaced. Amounts are in respect of financial instruments that:
•contractually reference an interest rate benchmark that is planned to transition to an alternative benchmark;
•have a contractual maturity date beyond the date by which the reference interest rate benchmark is expected to cease; and
•are recognised on the group's consolidated balance sheet.
Environmental, social and governance risk
(Unaudited)
We are subject to financial and non-financial risks associated with
environmental, social and governance ('ESG') related matters. Our
current areas of focus are climate risk, nature-related risks and
human rights risks. These can impact us both directly and
indirectly through our business activities and relationships. For
details on how we govern ESG, see page 9.
Focus on climate-related risk continued to increase during 2022,
owing to the pace and volume of policy and regulatory changes
globally, particularly on climate risk management, stress testing
and scenario analysis and disclosures. If we fail to meet evolving
regulatory expectations or requirements on climate risk
management, this could have regulatory compliance and
reputational impacts.
We could face direct impact, owing to the increase in frequency
and severity of weather events and chronic shifts in weather
patterns, which could affect our ability to conduct our day-to-day
operations.
Our customers may find that their business models fail to align to
a net zero economy or face disruption to their operations or
deterioration to their assets as a result of extreme weather.
We face increased reputational, legal and regulatory risk as we
make progress towards our net zero ambition, with stakeholders
likely to place greater focus on our actions such as the
development of climate-related policies, our disclosures and
financing and investment decisions relating to our ambition.
We will face additional risks if we are perceived to mislead
stakeholders in respect of our climate strategy, the climate impact
of a product or service, or the commitments of our customers.
Climate risk may also impact model risk, as the uncertain impacts
of climate change and data and methodology limitations present
challenges to creating reliable and accurate model outputs.
We also face reporting risk in relation to our climate disclosures,
as any data, methodologies and standards we have used may
evolve over time in line with market practice, regulation or owing
to developments in climate science. The use of inaccurate/
incomplete data and models could result in sub optimal decision
making. Any changes could result in revisions to our internal
frameworks and reported data, and could mean that reported
figures are not reconcilable or comparable year on year. We may
also have to reevaluate our progress towards our climate-related
targets in future and this could result in reputational, legal and
regulatory risks.
There is increasing evidence that a number of nature-related risks
beyond climate change, which include risks that can be
represented more broadly by impact and dependence on nature,
can and will have significant economic impact. These risks arise
when the provision of natural services, such as water availability,
air quality, and soil quality, is compromised by overpopulation,
urban development, natural habitat and ecosystem loss,
ecosystem degradation arising from economic activity and other
environmental stresses beyond climate change. They can show
themselves in various ways, including through macroeconomic,
market, credit, reputational, legal and regulatory risks, for both the
group and our customers. We continue to engage with investors,
regulators and customers on nature-related risks to evolve our
approach and understand best practice risk mitigation.
Regulation and disclosure requirements in relation to human
rights, and to modern slavery in particular, are increasing.
Businesses are expected to be transparent about their efforts to
identify and respond to the risk of negative human rights impacts
arising from their business activities and relationships.
Mitigating actions
•We continue to deepen our understanding of the drivers of
climate risk. A dedicated Climate Risk Oversight Forum is
responsible for shaping and overseeing our approach and
providing support in managing climate risk. For further details
on the group’s ESG governance structure, see page 9.
•The Group climate risk programme continues to support the
development of our climate risk management capabilities
across four key pillars – governance and risk appetite, risk
management, stress testing and scenario analysis, and
disclosures. We are also enhancing our approach to
greenwashing risk management.
•In December, the Group published our updated energy policy,
covering the oil and gas, power and utilities and hydrogen
sectors, as well as expanded our thermal coal phase-out policy,
in which we committed to not provide new finance or advisory
services specifically for the conversion of existing coal-to-gas-
fired power plants, or new metallurgical coal mines (see page
11).
•Climate stress tests and scenarios are being used to further
improve our understanding of our risk exposures for use in risk
management and business decision making.
•In 2022, building on an earlier review which had identified
modern slavery and discrimination as priority human rights
issues, the Group conducted the first comprehensive review to
refresh our salient human rights issues, which are the human
Risk
26
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
rights at risk of the most severe negative impact through our
business activities and relationships. The review identified five
salient human rights issues, including the right to decent work
and the right to equality and freedom from discrimination,
amongst others. The Group incorporated additional human
rights elements into our existing procurement processes and
supplier code of conduct, and will continue to develop our in-
house capability on human rights. For further details refer to
ESG review on page 9.
•In 2021, the Group joined several industry working groups
dedicated to helping assess and manage nature-related risks,
such as the Taskforce on Nature-Related Financial Disclosure
(‘TNFD’). In 2022, the Group's asset management business also
published its biodiversity policy to publicly explain how the
Group's analysts address nature-related issues.
•We continue to engage with our customers and regulators
proactively on the management of ESG risks. The Group also
engages with initiatives, including the Climate Financial Risk
Forum, Equator Principles, Taskforce on Climate-related
Financial Disclosures and CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure
Project) to drive best practice for climate risk management.
For further details on our approach to climate risk management, see ‘Climate
Risk’ on page 61.
For further details on ESG risk management, see ‘Financial crime risk
environment‘ on page 24 .
Our ESG review can be found on page 9.
Digitalisation and technological advances
(Unaudited)
Developments in technology and changes to regulations are
enabling new entrants to the industry. This challenges the group
to continue innovating and taking advantage of new digital
capabilities so that we improve how we serve our customers, drive
efficiency and adapt our products to attract and retain customers.
As a result, we may need to increase our investment in our
business to adapt or develop products and services to respond to
our customer evolving needs. We also need to ensure that new
digital capabilities do not weaken our resilience.
Mitigating actions
•We continue to monitor this emerging risk, as well as the
advances in technology, and changes in customer behaviours
to understand how these changes may impact our business.
•We assess new technologies to develop appropriate controls
and maintain resilience.
•We closely monitor and assess financial crime and the impact
on payment transparency and architecture.
Internally driven
Risks associated with workforce capability, capacity
and environmental factors with potential impact on
growth
(Unaudited)
Our global businesses and functions in all of our markets are
exposed to risks associated with workforce capacity challenges,
including challenges to retain, develop and attract high-performing
employees in key labour markets, and compliance with
employment laws and regulations. Changed working
arrangements, and the residual impact of local Covid-19
restrictions and health concerns during the pandemic have also
affected employee mental health and well-being.
Mitigating actions
•We promote a diverse and inclusive workforce and provide
active health and well-being support. We continue to build our
speak-up culture through active campaigns.
•We monitor the size and shape of our workforce and levels of
employee attrition, and each business and function have
workforce plans in place to ensure effective hiring and
forecasting to meet business demands.
•We monitor people risks that could arise due to organisational
restructuring, helping to ensure we manage redundancies
sensitively and support impacted employees. We encourage
our people leaders to focus on talent retention at all levels, with
an empathetic mindset and approach, while ensuring the whole
proposition of working at HSBC is well understood.
•Our Future Skills curriculum helps provide critical skills that will
enable employees and the group to be successful in the future.
•We continue to develop succession plans for key management
roles, with actions agreed and reviewed on a regular basis by
the group Executive Committee.
Risks arising from the receipt of services from third
parties
(Unaudited)
We use third parties to provide a range of goods and services.
Risks arising from the use of third party providers and their supply
chain may be harder to identify. It is critical that we ensure we
have appropriate risk management policies, processes and
practices over the selection, governance and oversight of third
parties and their supply chain, particularly for key activities that
could affect our operational resilience. Any deficiency in the
management of risks associated with our third parties could affect
our ability to support our customers and meet regulatory
expectations.
Mitigating actions
•We continue to monitor the effectiveness of the controls
operated by our third-party through obtaining third-party
control reports. We have made further enhancements to our
framework to ensure risks associated with these arrangements
are understood and managed effectively by our global
businesses, global functions and regions.
•We continue to enhance the effective management of our intra-
group arrangements as we have for external third-party
arrangements using the same control standards.
•We are implementing the changes required by the new
regulations as defined by our regulators.
Model risk
(Unaudited)
Model risk arises whenever business decision making includes
reliance on models. We use models in both financial and non-
financial contexts, as well as in a range of business applications
such as customer selection, product pricing, financial crime
transaction monitoring, creditworthiness evaluation and financial
reporting. Assessing model performance is a continuous
undertaking. Models can need redevelopment as market
conditions change. Significant increases in global inflation and
interest rates have impacted the reliability and accuracy of both
credit and traded risk models, such as the value at risk model and
HKFRS 17 models.
We continued to prioritise the redevelopment of internal ratings-
based (‘IRB’) and internal model methods (‘IMM’) models, in
relation to counterparty credit, as part of the IRB repair and Basel
III programmes with a key focus on enhancing the quality of data
used as model inputs. A number of these models have been
submitted to the UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’), the
Hong Kong Monetary Authority ('HKMA') and other key regulators
for feedback and approval is in progress. Some IMM and internal
model approach (‘IMA’) models have been approved for use, and
feedback has been received for some IRB models. Climate risk
modelling is a key focus for the group as HSBC’s commitment to
sustainability has become a critical part of the group’s strategy.
Model risk remains a key area of focus as regulatory scrutiny in
this space remains strong with local regulatory exams taking place
in many jurisdictions and further developments in policy expected
from many regulators, including the PRA and HKMA.
Mitigating actions
•We have continued to embed the enhanced monitoring, review
and challenge of loss model performance through our Model
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
27
Risk Management sub-function as part of a broader quarterly
process to determine loss levels. The Model Risk Management
team aims to provide strong and effective review and challenge
of any future redevelopment of these models.
•Model Risk Management works closely with businesses to
ensure that IRB/IMM/IMA models in development meet risk
management, pricing and capital management needs. Global
Internal Audit provides assurance over the risk management
framework for models.
•Additional assurance work is performed by the model risk
governance teams, which act as second lines of defence. The
teams test whether controls implemented by model users
comply with model risk policy and if model risk standards are
adequate.
•The group engagement strategy was rolled out to enhance the
understanding of model inventory, model limitations and risk
controls across the region. Targeted briefing sessions were
conducted to strengthen the awareness of models used and the
engagement between the model user community and model
developing areas.
•Models using advanced machine learning techniques are
validated and monitored to ensure that risks that are
determined by the algorithms have adequate oversight and
review. A framework to manage the range of risks that are
generated by these advanced techniques is being developed
that recognises the multi-disciplinary nature of these risks.
Data risk
(Unaudited)
We use multiple systems and growing quantities of data to
support our customers. Risk arises if data is incorrect, unavailable,
misused, or unprotected. Along with other banks and financial
institutions, we need to meet external regulatory obligations and
laws that cover data, such as the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision's 239 guidelines ‘Principles for effective risk data
aggregation and risk reporting’ and the General Data Protection
Regulation (‘GDPR’).
Mitigating actions
•Through our global data management framework, we
proactively monitor the quality, availability and security of data
that supports our customers and internal processes. We work
towards resolving any identified data issues in a timely manner.
•We have made improvements to our data policies. We are
implementing an updated control framework (including trusted
sources, data flows, and data quality) to enhance the end-to-
end management of data risk.
•The Group has established a global data utility and continue to
simplify and unify data management activities across the
Group.
•We protect customer data through our data privacy framework,
which establishes practices, design principles and guidelines
that enable us to demonstrate compliance with data privacy
laws and regulations.
•We continue to modernise our data and analytics infrastructure
through investments in Cloud technology, data visualisation,
machine learning and AI.
•We educate our employees on data risk and data management.
We delivered regular global mandatory training on how to
protect and manage data appropriately.
Change execution risk
(Unaudited)
We have continued investment in strategic change to support the
delivery of our strategic priorities and regulatory commitments.
This requires change to be executed safely and efficiently.
Mitigating actions
•In 2022, we added change execution risk to our risk taxonomy
and control library, so that it could be defined, managed,
reported and overseen in the same way as our other material
risks.
•The Group Transformation Oversight Executive Committee
oversees the prioritisation, strategic alignment and
management of execution risk for all change portfolios and
initiatives.
Areas of special interest
(Unaudited)
During 2022, a number of areas were identified and considered as
part of our top and emerging risks because of the effect they may
have on the group. While considered under the themes captured
under top and emerging risks, in this section we have placed a
particular focus on the Covid-19 pandemic and macroeconomic
outlook.
Risks related to Covid-19
Covid-19 remains a risk to our customers and organisation.
However, the policy for broad lockdowns and public health
restrictions has been eased following successful vaccine rollouts,
and as societies have adapted. Countries continue to differ to a
degree in their approach, although China has recently reversed
many restrictions on activity and mobility.
In most countries, high vaccination rates and acquired population
immunity have reduced the public health risks and the need for
restrictions. In mainland China and Hong Kong, however,
adherence to more stringent public health restrictions had adverse
economic implications through much of 2022. Government
imposed lockdowns of major cities in mainland China and
restrictions on travel, adversely affected global tourism and supply
chains.
With the relaxation of restrictions in December 2022, the prospect
of a sustained recovery has emerged, given the opportunity for the
persistent disruptions to activity to abate and for travel and
tourism to resume. Such a recovery would have global
implications given the size of the Chinese economy. Recovery in
China raises the prospect of stronger global growth, although that
could also lead to renewed inflationary pressures as demand for
commodities and other goods rises. There are still short term risks,
however, as the recent surge in infections may dampen
confidence and activity, while there are also fears that the surge in
infections risks giving opportunity for the emergence of a new
variant of the virus.
We continue to monitor the situation closely, and given the
continuing uncertainties related to the post-pandemic landscape,
additional mitigating actions may be required.
Mainland China real estate sector
The policy measures issued in the latter part of 2022 have
increased liquidity and the supply of credit to the mainland China
real estate sector. Recovery in the underlying domestic residential
demand and improved customer sentiment will be necessary to
support the ongoing health of the sector. We continue to monitor
the situation closely, notably the risk of further idiosyncratic real
estate defaults and associated impact on market, investor and
consumer sentiment.
Risk
28
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Our material banking risks
(Unaudited)
The material risk types associated with our banking and insurance manufacturing operations are described in the following tables:
Description of risks – banking operations
Risks
Arising from
Measurement, monitoring and management of risk
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a
customer or counterparty fails to meet an
obligation under a contract.
Credit risk arises principally from
direct lending, trade finance and
leasing business, but also from
certain other products such as
guarantees and derivatives.
Credit risk is:
•measured as the amount that could be lost if a customer or
counterparty fails to make repayments;
•monitored using various internal risk management measures and
within limits approved by individuals within a framework of
delegated authorities; and
•managed through a robust risk control framework, which outlines
clear and consistent policies, principles and guidance for risk
managers.
Treasury risk
Treasury risk is the risk of having
insufficient capital, liquidity or funding
resources to meet financial obligations
and satisfy regulatory requirements,
including the risk of adverse impact on
earnings or capital due to structural
foreign exchange exposures and changes
in market interest rates, together with
pension and insurance risk.
Treasury risk arises from changes to
the respective resources and risk
profiles driven by customer
behaviour, management decisions, or
the external environment.
Treasury risk is:
•measured through risk appetite and more granular limits, set to
provide an early warning of increasing risk, minimum ratios of
relevant regulatory metrics, and metrics to monitor the key risk
drivers impacting treasury resources;
•monitored and projected against appetites and by using operating
plans based on strategic objectives together with stress and scenario
testing; and
•managed through control of resources in conjunction with risk
profiles, strategic objectives and cash flows.
Market risk
Market risk is the risk of adverse financial
impact on trading activities arising from
changes in market parameters such as
interest rates, foreign exchange rates,
asset prices, volatilities, correlations and
credit spreads.
Exposure to market risk is separated
into two portfolios: trading portfolios
and non-trading portfolios.
Market risk for non-trading portfolios
is discussed in the Treasury risk
section on page 53.
Market risk exposures arising from
our insurance operations are
discussed on page 67.
Market risk is:
•measured using sensitivities, value at risk (‘VaR’) and stress testing,
giving a detailed picture of potential gains and losses for a range of
market movements and scenarios, as well as tail risks over specified
time horizons;
•monitored using VaR, stress testing and other measures; and
•managed using risk limits approved by the Board for the group and
the various global businesses.
Climate risk
Climate risk relates to the financial and
non-financial impacts that may arise as a
result of climate change and the move to
a greener economy.
Climate risk is likely to materialise
through:
•physical risk, which arises from the
increased frequency and severity of
weather events;
•transition risk, which arises from
the process of moving to a low-
carbon economy; and
•greenwashing risk, which arises
from the act of knowingly or
unknowingly misleading
stakeholders regarding our strategy
relating to climate, the climate
impact/benefit of a produce or
service, or the climate
commitments or performance of
our customers.
Climate risk is:
•measured using a variety of risk appetite metrics and Key
Management Indicators, which assess the impact of climate risk
across the risk taxonomy;
•monitored using stress testing; and
•managed through adherence to risk appetite thresholds and via
specific policies.
Resilience risk
Resilience risk is the risk of sustained and
significant business disruption, execution,
delivery or physical security or safety
events, causing the inability to provide
critical services to our customers,
affiliates and counterparties.
Resilience risk arises from failures or
inadequacies in processes, people,
systems or external events.
Resilience risk is:
•measured through a range of metrics with defined maximum
acceptable impact tolerances, and against our agreed risk appetite;
•monitored through oversight of enterprise processes, risks, controls
and strategic change programmes; and
•managed by continual monitoring and thematic reviews.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
29
Description of risks – banking operations (continued)
(Audited)
Risks
Arising from
Measurement, monitoring and management of risk
Regulatory compliance risk
Regulatory compliance risk is the risk
associated with breaching our duty to
clients and other counterparties,
inappropriate market conduct and
breaching related financial services
regulatory standards.
Regulatory compliance risk arises
from the failure to observe the
relevant laws, codes, rules and
regulations and can manifest itself in
poor market or customer outcomes
and lead to fines, penalties and
reputational damage to our business.
Regulatory compliance risk is:
•measured by reference to risk appetite, identified metrics, incident
assessments, regulatory feedback and the judgement and
assessment of our regulatory compliance teams;
•monitored against the first line of defence risk and control
assessments, the results of the monitoring and control assurance
activities of the second line of defence functions, and the results of
internal and external audits and regulatory inspections; and
•managed by establishing and communicating appropriate policies
and procedures, training employees in them, and monitoring activity
to help ensure their observance. Proactive risk control and/or
remediation work is undertaken where required.
Financial crime risk
Financial crime risk is the risk that
HSBC’s products and services will be
exploited for criminal activity. This
includes fraud, bribery and corruption, tax
evasion, sanctions and export control
violations, money laundering, terrorist
financing and proliferation financing.
Financial crime risk arises from day-
to-day banking operations involving
customers, third parties and
employees.
Financial crime risk is:
•measured by reference to risk appetite, identified metrics, incident
assessments, regulatory feedback and the judgement and
assessment of our financial crime risk teams;
•monitored against the first line of defence risk and control
assessments, the results of the monitoring and control assurance
activities of the second line of defence functions, and the results of
internal and external audits and regulatory inspections; and
•managed by establishing and communicating appropriate policies
and procedures, training employees in them and monitoring activity
to help ensure their observance. Proactive risk control and/or
remediation work is undertaken where required.
Model risk
Model risk is the risk of inappropriate or
incorrect business decisions arising from
the use of models that have been
inadequately designed, implemented or
used, or that the model does not perform
in line with expectations and predictions.
Model risk arises in both financial and
non-financial contexts whenever
business decision making includes
reliance on models.
Model risk is:
•measured by reference to model performance tracking and the
output of detailed technical reviews, with key metrics including
model review statuses and findings;
•monitored against model risk appetite statements, insight from the
independent review function, feedback from internal and external
audits, and regulatory reviews; and
•managed by creating and communicating appropriate policies,
procedures and guidance, training colleagues in their application,
and supervising their adoption to ensure operational effectiveness.
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries are regulated separately
from our banking operations. Risks in the insurance entities are
managed using methodologies and processes that are subject to
oversight at group level. Our insurance operations are also subject
to many of the same risks as our banking operations, and these
are covered by the group's risk management processes. However,
there are specific risks inherent to the insurance operations as
noted below.
Description of risks – insurance manufacturing operations
Risks
Arising from
Measurement, monitoring and management of risk
Financial risk
For insurance entities, financial risk
includes the risk of not being able to
match liabilities arising under insurance
contracts with appropriate investments
and that the expected sharing of
financial performance with
policyholders under certain contracts is
not possible.
Exposure to financial risk arises from:
•market risk affecting the fair values
of financial assets or their future
cash flows;
•credit risk; and
•liquidity risk of entities being unable
to make payments to policyholders
as they fall due.
Financial risk is:
•measured (i) for credit risk, in terms of economic capital and the
amount that could be lost if a counterparty fails to make repayments;
(ii) for market risk, in terms of economic capital, internal metrics and
fluctuations in key financial variables; and (iii) for liquidity risk, in
terms of internal metrics including stressed operational cash flow
projections;
•monitored through a framework of approved limits and delegated
authorities; and
•managed through a robust risk control framework, which outlines
clear and consistent policies, principles and guidance. This includes
using product design, asset liability matching and bonus rates.
Insurance risk
Insurance risk is the risk that, over time,
the cost of insurance policies written,
including claims and benefits, may
exceed the total amount of premiums
and investment income received.
The cost of claims and benefits can be
influenced by many factors, including
mortality and morbidity experience, as
well as lapse and surrender rates.
Insurance risk is:
•measured in terms of life insurance liabilities and economic capital
allocated to insurance underwriting risk;
•monitored through a framework of approved limits and delegated
authorities; and
•managed through a robust risk control framework which outlines
clear and consistent policies, principles and guidance. This includes
using product design, underwriting, reinsurance and claims-
handling procedures.
Risk
30
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Credit risk
Overview
(Audited)
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty
fails to meet an obligation under a contract. Credit risk arises
principally from direct lending, trade finance and leasing business,
but also from other products, such as guarantees and credit
derivatives.
Credit risk management
Key developments in 2022
(Unaudited)
We made need based changes to the policies and practices for the
management of credit risk in 2022 to manage evolving situations.
We continued to apply the requirements of HKFRS 9 'Financial
Instruments' within the Credit Risk sub-function. For certain retail
portfolios we enhanced the significant increase in credit risk
(‘SICR’) approach to capture relative movements in PD since
origination.
For our retail portfolios, we adopted the European Banking
Authority ‘Guidelines on the application of definition of default’
during 2022 and, for our wholesale portfolios, these guidelines
were adopted during 2021. Adoption of these guidelines did not
have a material impact on our portfolios and comparative
disclosures have not been restated.
We actively managed the risks related to macroeconomic
uncertainties, including inflation, fiscal and monetary policy, the
Russia-Ukraine war, broader geopolitical uncertainties, and the
continued risks resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic and
developments in the mainland China CRE sector.
Governance and structure
(Unaudited)
We have established credit risk management and related HKFRS 9
processes throughout the group. We continue to assess the
impact of economic developments in key markets on specific
customers, customer segments or portfolios. As credit conditions
change, we take mitigating action, including the revision of risk
appetites or limits and tenors, as appropriate. In addition, we
continue to evaluate the terms under which we provide credit
facilities within the context of individual customer requirements,
the quality of the relationship, local regulatory requirements,
market practices and our local market position.
Credit risk sub-function
(Audited)
Credit approval authorities are delegated by the Board to the
group Co-Chief Executives together with the authority to sub-
delegate them. The Credit Risk sub-function in Global Risk and
Compliance is responsible for the key policies and processes for
managing credit risk, which include formulating group credit
policies and risk rating frameworks, guiding the group’s appetite
for credit risk exposures, undertaking independent reviews and
objective assessment of credit risk, and monitoring performance
and management of portfolios.
The principal objectives of our credit risk management are:
•to maintain a strong culture of responsible lending, and robust
risk policies and control frameworks;
•to both partner and challenge our businesses in defining,
implementing and continually re-evaluating our risk appetite
under actual and scenario conditions; and
•to ensure there is independent, expert scrutiny of credit risks,
their causes and their mitigation.
Key risk management processes
HKFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' process
(Unaudited)
The HKFRS 9 process comprises three main areas: modelling and
data; implementation; and governance.
Modelling and data
(Unaudited)
We have established HKFRS 9 modelling and data processes in
various geographies, which are subject to internal model risk
governance including independent review of significant model
developments.
Implementation
(Unaudited)
A centralised impairment engine performs the expected credit
losses ('ECL') calculation using data, which is subject to a number
of validation checks and enhancements, from a variety of client,
finance and risk systems. Where possible, these checks and
processes are performed in a globally consistent and centralised
manner.
Governance
(Unaudited)
Management review forums are established in key sites and at
group level in order to review and approve the impairment results.
Management review forums have representatives from Credit Risk
and Finance. The key site and group approvals at the group
Impairment Committee are subsequently reported to the global
business impairment committee for final approval of the Group’s
ECL for the period.
Required members of the group Impairment Committee are the
group's Chief Risk Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Wealth and
Personal Banking Chief Risk Officer, as well as the group's Chief
Financial Officer and Financial Controller.
Concentration of exposure
(Audited)
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of
counterparties or exposures that have comparable economic
characteristics, or such counterparties, are engaged in similar
activities or operate in the same geographical areas or industry
sectors. As such, their collective ability to meet contractual
obligations is uniformly affected by changes in economic, political
or other conditions. We use a number of controls and measures to
minimise undue concentration of exposure in our portfolios across
industries, countries and global businesses. These include portfolio
and counterparty limits, approval and review controls, and stress
testing.
Credit quality of financial instruments
(Audited)
Our risk rating system facilitates the internal ratings-based
approach under the Basel framework adopted by the group to
support the calculation of our minimum credit regulatory capital
requirement. The five credit quality classifications encompass a
range of granular internal credit rating grades assigned to
wholesale and retail customers, and the external ratings attributed
by external agencies to debt securities.
For debt securities and certain other financial instruments, external
ratings have been aligned to the five quality classifications based
upon the mapping of related customer risk rating (‘CRR’) to
external credit rating.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
31
Wholesale lending
(Unaudited)
A CRR 10-grade scale summarises a more granular underlying 23-
grade scale of obligor probability of default (‘PD’). All corporate
customers are rated using the 10 or 23-grade scale, depending on
the degree of sophistication of the Basel approach adopted for the
exposure.
Each CRR band is associated with an external rating grade by
reference to long-run default rates for that grade, represented by
the average of issuer-weighted historical default rates. This
mapping between internal and external ratings is indicative and
may vary over time.
Retail lending
(Unaudited)
Retail lending credit quality is based on a 12-month point-in-time
probability-weighted PD.
Credit quality classification
(Unaudited)
Sovereign debt
securities
and bills
Other debt
securities
and bills
Wholesale lending
and derivatives
Retail lending
External credit
rating
External credit
rating
Internal credit
rating
12-month Basel
probability of
default %
Internal credit
rating
12 month
probability-
weighted PD %
Quality classification1, 2
Strong
BBB and above
A- and above
CRR 1 to CRR 2
0 – 0.169
Band 1 and 2
0.000 – 0.500
Good
BBB- to BB
BBB+ to BBB-
CRR 3
0.170 – 0.740
Band 3
0.501 – 1.500
Satisfactory
BB- to B and
unrated
BB+ to B and
unrated
CRR 4 to CRR 5
0.741 – 4.914
Band 4 and 5
1.501 – 20.000
Sub-standard
B- to C
B- to C
CRR 6 to CRR 8
4.915 – 99.999
Band 6
20.001 – 99.999
Credit impaired
Default
Default
CRR 9 to CRR 10
100
Band 7
100
1Customer risk rating (‘CRR’).
212-month Point-in-time ('PIT') Probability of Default ('PD').
Quality classification definitions
‘Strong’ exposures demonstrate a strong capacity to meet financial commitments, with negligible or low probability of default and/or low levels of
expected loss.
‘Good’ exposures require closer monitoring and demonstrate a good capacity to meet financial commitments, with low default risk.
‘Satisfactory’ exposures require closer monitoring and demonstrate an average-to-fair capacity to meet financial commitments, with moderate default risk.
‘Sub-standard’ exposures require varying degrees of special attention and default risk is of greater concern.
‘Credit-impaired’ exposures have been assessed as described in Note 1.2(i) on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Forborne loans and forbearance
(Audited)
Forbearance measures consist of concessions towards an obligor
that is experiencing or is about to experience difficulties in
meeting its financial commitments.
We continue to class loans as forborne when we modify the
contractual payment terms due to having significant concerns
about the borrowers’ ability to meet contractual payments when
they were due.
In 2022, we expanded our definition of forborne to capture non-
payment-related concessions, such as covenant waivers. For our
wholesale portfolio, we began identifying non-payment-related
concessions in 2021 when our internal policies were changed. For
our retail portfolios, we began identifying them during 2022.
For details of our policy on derecognised renegotiated loans, see
Note 1.2(i) on the financial statements.
Credit quality of forborne loans
(Unaudited)
For wholesale lending, where payment-related forbearance
measures result in a diminished financial obligation, or if there are
other indicators of impairment, the loan will be classified as credit
impaired if it is not already so classified. All facilities with a
customer, including loans that have not been modified, are
considered credit impaired following the identification of a
payment-related forborne loan. For retail lending, where a material
concession has been granted, the loan will be classified as credit
impaired. In isolation, non-payment forbearance measures may
not result in the loan being classified as credit impaired unless
combined with other indicators of credit impairment. These are
classed as performing forborne loans for both wholesale and retail
lending.
Wholesale and retail lending forborne loans are classified as
credit-impaired until there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate a
significant reduction in the risk of non-payment of future cash
flows, observed over a minimum one-year period, and there are no
other indicators of impairment. Any forborne loans not considered
credit impaired will remain forborne for a minimum of two years
from the date that credit impairment no longer applies. For
wholesale and retail lending, any forbearance measures granted
on a loan already classed as forborne results in the customer being
classed as credit impaired.
Forborne loans and recognition of expected credit losses
(Audited)
Forborne loans expected credit loss assessments reflect the higher
rates of losses typically experienced with these types of loans
such that they are in stage 2 and stage 3. The higher rates are
more pronounced in unsecured retail lending requiring further
segmentation. For wholesale lending, forborne loans are typically
assessed individually. Credit risk ratings are intrinsic to the
impairment assessments. The individual impairment assessment
takes into account the higher risk of the future non-payment
inherent in forborne loans.
Impairment assessment
(Audited)
For details of our impairment policies on loans and advances and
financial investments, see Note 1.2(i) on the financial statements.
Write-off of loans and advances
(Audited)
For details of our policy on the write-off of loans and advances,
see Note 1.2(i) on the financial statements.
Unsecured personal facilities, including credit cards, are generally
written off at between 150 and 210 days past due. The standard
period runs until the end of the month in which the account
becomes 180 days contractually delinquent. However, in
exceptional circumstances to achieve a fair customer outcome and
Risk
32
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
in line with regulatory expectations, they may be extended further.
For secured facilities, write-off should occur upon repossession of
collateral, receipt of proceeds via settlement, or determination that
recovery of the collateral will not be pursued.
Any secured assets maintained on the balance sheet beyond 60
months of consecutive delinquency-driven default require
additional monitoring and review to assess the prospect of
recovery.
There are exceptions in a few countries and territories where local
regulation or legislation constrains earlier write-off, or where the
realisation of collateral for secured real estate lending takes more
time. Write-off, either partially or in full, may be earlier when there
is no reasonable expectation of further recovery, for example, in
the event of a bankruptcy or equivalent legal proceedings.
Collection procedures may continue after write-off.
Summary of credit risk
The following disclosure presents the gross carrying/nominal amount of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in
HKFRS 9 are applied and the associated allowance for expected credit losses ('ECL').
Summary of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are applied
(Audited)
2022
2021
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance for
ECL1
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance for
ECL1
At 31 Dec
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost
3,745,113
(39,964)
3,872,956
(32,017)
Loans and advances to banks
519,068
(44)
432,286
(39)
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost
2,768,171
(681)
2,114,301
(639)
–  cash and balances at central banks
232,748
(8)
276,857
—
–  items in the course of collection from other banks
28,557
—
21,632
—
–  Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness
341,354
—
332,044
—
–  reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
927,976
—
803,775
—
–  financial investments
975,174
(465)
502,997
(433)
–  prepayments, accrued income and other assets2
262,362
(208)
176,996
(206)
Amounts due from Group companies
129,357
—
99,604
—
Total gross carrying amount on-balance sheet
7,161,709
(40,689)
6,519,147
(32,695)
Loans and other credit related commitments
1,892,401
(864)
1,826,335
(580)
Financial guarantee
35,646
(63)
34,302
(44)
Total nominal amount off-balance sheet3
1,928,047
(927)
1,860,637
(624)
9,089,756
(41,616)
8,379,784
(33,319)
Fair value
Allowance for
ECL
Fair value
Allowance for
ECL
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec
Debt instruments measured at Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (‘FVOCI’)4
1,239,527
(344)
1,541,909
(121)
1The total ECL is recognised in the loss allowance for the financial asset unless the total ECL exceeds the gross carrying amount of the financial
asset, in which case the ECL is recognised as a provision.
2Includes only those financial instruments that are subject to the impairment requirements of HKFRS 9. 'Prepayments, accrued income and other
assets', as presented within the consolidated balance sheet on page 81, which includes both financial and non-financial assets.
3Represents the maximum amount at risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and client defaults.
4Debt instruments measured at FVOCI continue to be measured at fair value with the allowance for ECL as a memorandum item. Change in ECL is
recognised in 'Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges' in the consolidated income statement.
The following table provides an overview of the group’s credit risk by stage and industry, and the associated ECL coverage. The financial
assets recorded in each stage have the following characteristics:
•Stage 1: These financial assets are unimpaired and without significant increase in credit risk on which a 12-month allowance for ECL
is recognised.
•Stage 2: A significant increase in credit risk has been experienced on these financial assets since initial recognition for which a lifetime
ECL is recognised.
•Stage 3: There is objective evidence of impairment and the financial assets are therefore considered to be in default or otherwise
credit impaired on which a lifetime ECL is recognised.
•POCI: Financial assets that are purchased or originated at a deep discount are seen to reflect the incurred credit losses on which a
lifetime ECL is recognised.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
33
Summary of credit risk (excluding debt instruments measured at FVOCI) by stage distribution and ECL coverage by industry sector
(Audited)
Gross carrying/nominal amount1
Allowance for ECL
ECL coverage %
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
%
%
%
%
%
Loans and
advances to
customers
3,219,645
462,083
62,763
622
3,745,113
(2,755)
(11,200)
(25,818)
(191)
(39,964)
0.1
2.4
41.1
30.7
1.1
–  personal
1,448,675
68,001
8,708
—
1,525,384
(1,080)
(2,830)
(1,459)
—
(5,369)
0.1
4.2
16.8
—
0.4
–  corporate2
1,492,792
370,199
53,141
620
1,916,752
(1,414)
(8,045)
(24,351)
(189)
(33,999)
0.1
2.2
45.8
30.5
1.8
–  financial
institutions3
278,178
23,883
914
2
302,977
(261)
(325)
(8)
(2)
(596)
0.1
1.4
0.9
100.0
0.2
Loans and
advances to
banks
516,934
2,134
—
—
519,068
(39)
(5)
—
—
(44)
0.0
0.2
—
—
0.0
Other
financial
assets
2,739,060
28,646
464
1
2,768,171
(391)
(231)
(59)
—
(681)
0.0
0.8
12.7
—
0.0
Loan and
other credit-
related
commitments
1,821,355
65,288
5,758
—
1,892,401
(427)
(397)
(40)
—
(864)
0.0
0.6
0.7
—
0.0
–  personal
1,321,908
22,721
4,940
—
1,349,569
(18)
(1)
—
—
(19)
0.0
0.0
—
—
0.0
–  corporate2
383,717
39,191
818
—
423,726
(394)
(389)
(40)
—
(823)
0.1
1.0
4.9
—
0.2
–  financial
institutions3
115,730
3,376
—
—
119,106
(15)
(7)
—
—
(22)
0.0
0.2
—
—
0.0
Financial
guarantee
30,738
4,840
68
—
35,646
(18)
(17)
(28)
—
(63)
0.1
0.4
41.2
—
0.2
–  personal
4,176
6
1
—
4,183
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  corporate2
24,093
4,483
67
—
28,643
(18)
(17)
(28)
—
(63)
0.1
0.4
41.8
—
0.2
–  financial
institutions3
2,469
351
—
—
2,820
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
At 31 Dec
2022
8,327,732
562,991
69,053
623
8,960,399
(3,630)
(11,850)
(25,945)
(191)
(41,616)
0.0
2.1
37.6
30.7
0.5
The above table does not include balances due from Group companies.
1Represents the maximum amount at risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default.
2Includes corporate and commercial.
3Includes non-bank financial institutions.
Unless identified at an earlier stage, all financial assets are
deemed to have suffered a significant increase in credit risk
when they are 30 days past due ('DPD') and are transferred
from stage 1 to stage 2. The following disclosure presents the
ageing of stage 2 financial assets by those less than 30 and
greater than 30 days past due and therefore presents those
amounts classified as stage 2 due to ageing (30 DPD) and those
identified at an earlier stage (less than 30 DPD).
Stage 2 days past due analysis for loans and advances to customers
(Audited)
Gross carrying amount
Allowance for ECL
ECL coverage %
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
of
which:
Stage 2
Up-to-
date
1 to 29
DPD1,2
30 and >
DPD1,2
Stage 2
Up-to-
date
1 to 29
DPD1,2
30 and >
DPD1,2
Stage 2
Up-to-
date
1 to 29
DPD
30 and
> DPD
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
%
%
%
%
At 31 Dec 2022
Loans and advances to
customers at amortised cost
462,083
450,189
8,816
3,078
(11,200)
(10,645)
(198)
(357)
2.4
2.4
2.2
11.6
–  personal
68,001
58,182
7,202
2,617
(2,830)
(2,308)
(172)
(350)
4.2
4.0
2.4
13.4
–  corporate and commercial
370,199
368,249
1,491
459
(8,045)
(8,012)
(26)
(7)
2.2
2.2
1.7
1.5
–  non-bank financial institutions
23,883
23,758
123
2
(325)
(325)
—
—
1.4
1.4
—
—
1Days past due ('DPD').
2The DPD amounts presented above are on a contractual basis and include the benefit of any customer relief payment holidays granted.
Risk
34
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Summary of credit risk (excluding debt instruments measured at FVOCI) by stage distribution and ECL coverage by industry sector
(continued)
(Audited)
Gross carrying/nominal amount1
Allowance for ECL
ECL coverage %
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
%
%
%
%
%
Loans and
advances to
customers
3,349,434
480,632
41,332
1,558
3,872,956
(2,603)
(9,426)
(19,654)
(334)
(32,017)
0.1
2.0
47.6
21.4
0.8
–  personal
1,461,358
60,795
10,158
—
1,532,311
(1,236)
(2,965)
(1,765)
—
(5,966)
0.1
4.9
17.4
—
0.4
–  corporate2
1,626,514
398,273
31,068
1,556
2,057,411
(1,131)
(6,384)
(17,859)
(332)
(25,706)
0.1
1.6
57.5
21.3
1.2
–  financial
institutions3
261,562
21,564
106
2
283,234
(236)
(77)
(30)
(2)
(345)
0.1
0.4
28.3
100.0
0.1
Loans and
advances to
banks
431,079
1,207
—
—
432,286
(36)
(3)
—
—
(39)
0.0
0.2
—
—
0.0
Other financial
assets
2,092,847
21,164
289
1
2,114,301
(482)
(140)
(17)
—
(639)
0.0
0.7
5.9
—
0.0
Loan and
other credit-
related
commitments
1,782,353
43,711
271
—
1,826,335
(260)
(295)
(25)
—
(580)
0.0
0.7
9.2
—
0.0
–  personal
1,245,694
6,976
154
—
1,252,824
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  corporate2
417,349
30,978
117
—
448,444
(247)
(288)
(25)
—
(560)
0.1
0.9
21.4
—
0.1
–  financial
institutions3
119,310
5,757
—
—
125,067
(13)
(7)
—
—
(20)
0.0
0.1
—
—
0.0
Financial
guarantee
30,214
4,048
40
—
34,302
(14)
(14)
(16)
—
(44)
0.0
0.3
40.0
—
0.1
–  personal
4,000
—
1
—
4,001
(1)
—
(1)
—
(2)
0.0
—
100.0
—
0.0
–  corporate2
22,995
4,011
39
—
27,045
(13)
(14)
(15)
—
(42)
0.1
0.3
38.5
—
0.2
–  financial
institutions3
3,219
37
—
—
3,256
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
At 31 Dec
2021
7,685,927
550,762
41,932
1,559
8,280,180
(3,395)
(9,878)
(19,712)
(334)
(33,319)
0.0
1.8
47.0
21.4
0.4
The above table does not include balances due from Group companies.
1Represents the maximum amount at risk should the contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default.
2Includes corporate and commercial.
3Includes non-bank financial institutions.
Stage 2 days past due analysis for loans and advances to customers (continued)
(Audited)
Gross carrying amount
Allowance for ECL
ECL coverage %
of which:
of which:
of which:
of which:
of which:
of which:
of which:
of which:
of which:
Stage 2
Up-to-
date
1 to 29
DPD1,2
30 and >
DPD1,2
Stage 2
Up-to-
date
1 to 29
DPD1,2
30 and >
DPD1,2
Stage 2
Up-to-
date
1 to 29
DPD
30 and >
DPD
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
%
%
%
%
At 31 Dec 2021
Loans and advances to customers at
amortised cost
480,632
471,298
6,788
2,546
(9,426)
(8,862)
(226)
(338)
2.0
1.9
3.3
13.3
–  personal
60,795
53,316
5,048
2,431
(2,965)
(2,460)
(173)
(332)
4.9
4.6
3.4
13.7
–  corporate and commercial
398,273
396,420
1,738
115
(6,384)
(6,325)
(53)
(6)
1.6
1.6
3.0
5.2
–  non-bank financial institutions
21,564
21,562
2
—
(77)
(77)
—
—
0.4
0.4
—
—
1Days past due ('DPD').
2The DPD amounts presented above are on a contractual basis and include the benefit of any customer relief payment holidays granted.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
35
Credit exposure
Maximum exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
This section provides information on the maximum exposure to credit risk associated with balance sheet items as well as loan and other
credit-related commitments.
‘Maximum exposure to credit risk’ table
The following table presents our maximum exposure to credit risk before taking account of any collateral held or other credit enhancements (unless such
enhancements meet accounting offsetting requirements). The table excludes financial instruments whose carrying amount best represents the net
exposure to credit risk, and it excludes equity securities as they are not subject to credit risk. For the financial assets recognised on the balance sheet, the
maximum exposure to credit risk equals their carrying amount and is net of allowance for ECL. For financial guarantees and other guarantees granted, it is
the maximum amount that we would have to pay if the guarantees were called upon. For loan commitments and other credit-related commitments, it is
generally the full amount of the committed facilities.
Other credit risk mitigants
There are arrangements in place that reduce our maximum
exposure to credit risk. These include a charge over collateral on
borrowers’ specific assets, such as residential properties,
collateral held in the form of financial instruments that are not
held on the balance sheet and short positions in securities. In
addition, for financial assets held as part of linked insurance/
investment contracts the risk is predominantly borne by the
policyholder.
Collateral available to mitigate credit risk is disclosed in the
Collateral section on pages 49-52.
Maximum exposure to credit risk before collateral held or other credit enhancements
(Audited)
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Cash and balances at central banks
232,739
276,857
Items in the course of collection from other banks
28,557
21,632
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness
341,354
332,044
Trading assets
435,358
478,030
Derivatives
502,771
365,167
Financial assets designated at fair value
39,495
33,274
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
927,976
803,775
Loans and advances to banks
519,024
432,247
Loans and advances to customers
3,705,149
3,840,939
Financial investments
2,214,236
2,044,473
Amounts due from Group companies
140,546
112,719
Other assets
267,972
180,757
Total on-balance sheet exposure to credit risk
9,355,177
8,921,914
Total off-balance sheet
3,587,491
3,506,253
Financial guarantees and other similar contracts
396,491
377,487
Loan and other credit-related exposure
3,191,000
3,128,766
At 31 Dec
12,942,668
12,428,167
Total exposure to credit risk remained broadly unchanged in 2022 with loans and advances continuing to be the largest element.
Credit deterioration of financial instruments
(Audited)
A summary of our current policies and practices regarding the identification, treatment and measurement of stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 (credit impaired) and POCI
financial instruments can be found in Note 1.2(i) on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Risk
36
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Measurement uncertainty and sensitivity analysis
of ECL estimates
(Audited)
Amid a deterioration in the economic and geopolitical
environment, management judgements and estimates continued
to be subject to a high degree of uncertainty in relation to
assessing economic scenarios for impairment allowances in 2022.
Inflation, economic contraction and high interest rates combined
with an unstable geopolitical environment and the effects of global
supply chain disruption contributed to elevated levels of
uncertainty during the year.
At 31 December 2022, as a result of this uncertainty, additional
stage 1 and 2 allowances have been recognised; while
management judgement and estimates continue to reflect a
degree of caution both in the selection of economic scenarios and
their weightings, and in the use of management judgemental
adjustments, described in more detail below.
The recognition and measurement of ECL involve the use of
significant judgement and estimation. We form multiple economic
scenarios based on economic forecasts, apply these assumptions
to credit risk models to estimate future credit losses, and
probability-weight the results to determine an unbiased ECL
estimate. Management judgemental adjustments are used to
address late-breaking events, data and model limitations, model
deficiencies and expert credit judgements.
Methodology
Four global economic scenarios are used to capture the current
economic environment and to articulate management’s view of
the range of potential outcomes. Scenarios produced to calculate
ECL are aligned to HSBC’s top and emerging risks.
Three of the scenarios are drawn from consensus forecasts and
distributional estimates. The Central scenario is deemed the ‘most
likely’ scenario, and usually attracts the largest probability
weighting, while the outer scenarios represent the tails of the
distribution, which are less likely to occur. The Central scenario is
created using the average of a panel of external forecasters.
Consensus Upside and Downside scenarios are created with
reference to distributions for select markets that capture
forecasters’ views of the entire range of outcomes. In the later
years of the scenarios, projections revert to long-term consensus
trend expectations. In the consensus outer scenarios, reversion to
trend expectations is done mechanically with reference to
historically observed quarterly changes in the values of
macroeconomic variables.
The fourth scenario, Downside 2, is designed to represent
management’s view of severe downside risks. It is a globally
consistent narrative-driven scenario that explores more extreme
economic outcomes than those captured by the consensus
scenarios. In this scenario, variables do not, by design, revert to
long-term trend expectations. They may instead explore alternative
states of equilibrium, where economic activity moves permanently
away from past trends.
The consensus Downside and the consensus Upside scenarios are
each constructed to be consistent with a 10% probability. The
Downside 2 is constructed with a 5% probability. The Central
scenario is assigned the remaining 75%. This weighting scheme is
deemed appropriate for the unbiased estimation of ECL in most
circumstances. However, management may depart from this
probability-based scenario weighting approach when the
economic outlook is determined to be particularly uncertain and
risks are elevated.
In light of ongoing risks, management deviated from this
probability weighting in all markets in the fourth quarter of 2022.
Description of economic scenarios
The economic assumptions presented in this section have been
formed by HSBC with reference to external forecasts and
estimates, specifically for the purpose of calculating ECL.
Global economic growth is slowing and economic forecasts for
our main markets deteriorated in the fourth quarter. In North
America and Europe, high inflation and rising interest rates are
reducing real household incomes and raising business costs,
dampening consumption and investment and lowering growth
expectations. The effects of higher interest rate expectations and
lower growth are also evident in asset price expectations and
house prices forecasts, in particular, have been lowered
significantly.
In Asia, economic forecasts have also been lowered, with
expectations for Hong Kong and mainland China trimmed
following weaker than expected third quarter GDP growth and
mainland China’s adherence to stringent pandemic-related public
health policy response. That policy saw an abrupt reversal during
December, but amid a very high degree of uncertainty, to both the
upside and downside, forecasts are slow to adjust. The increased
uncertainty caused by the lifting of restrictions has been reflected
in management’s assessment of scenario probabilities.
Economic forecasts remain subject to a high degree of
uncertainty. In the fourth quarter, risks to the economic outlook
included the persistence of inflation and the consequences that
has for monetary policy. Rapid changes to public policy also
increased forecast uncertainty. In Asia, the removal of Chinese
public health restrictions is a key source of potential upside risk,
but with significant near term uncertainty relating to the surge of
infection. This policy change could also have global implications.
Geopolitical risks also remain significant and include the possibility
of a prolonged and escalating Russia-Ukraine war, and continued
differences between the US and other countries with China over a
range of economic and strategic issues.
The scenarios used to calculate ECL in the Annual Report and
Accounts 2022 are described below.
The consensus Central scenario
HSBC’s Central scenario reflects a low growth and higher inflation
environment across many of our key markets. The scenario
features an initial period of below-trend GDP growth in most of
our main markets as higher inflation and tighter monetary policy
causes a squeeze on business margins and households’ real
disposable income. Growth returns to its long term expected trend
in later years as central banks bring inflation back to target.
There are two exceptions: in Hong Kong and mainland China, GDP
growth is expected to be stronger in 2023 relative to 2022
following several quarters of negative GDP growth and the
suspension of Covid-19 restrictions.
Our Central scenario assumes that inflation peaked in most of our
key markets at the end of 2022 but remains high through 2023
before moderating as energy prices stabilise and supply chain
disruptions abate. Central banks are expected to keep raising
interest rates until midway through 2023. Inflation is forecast to
revert to target in most markets, by early 2024.
Global GDP is expected to grow by 1.6% in 2023 in the Central
scenario and the average rate of global GDP growth is 2.5% over
the five-year forecast period. This is below the average growth
rate over the five-year period prior to the onset of the pandemic.
The key features of our Central scenario are:
•Economic activity in European and North American markets
continues to weaken. Most major economies are forecast to
grow in 2023, but at very low rates. Hong Kong and mainland
China are expected to see a recovery in activity from 2022 as
Covid19 restrictions are lifted.
•In most markets, unemployment rises moderately from historic
lows as economic activity slows. Labour markets remain fairly
tight across our key markets.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
37
•Inflation is expected to remain elevated across many of our key
markets driven by energy and food prices. Inflation is
subsequently expected to converge back towards central banks
target rate over the next two years of the forecast.
•Policy interest rates in key markets will continue to rise in the
near term but at a slower pace. Interest rates will stay elevated
but start to ease as inflation returns to target.
•The West Texas Intermediate oil price is forecast to average
$72 per barrel over the projection period.
The Central scenario was first created with forecasts available in
November, and reviewed continuously until late December.
Probability weights assigned to the Central scenario vary from
55% to 70% and reflect relative differences in risk and uncertainty
across markets.
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and
the probabilities assigned in the consensus Central scenario.
Central scenario 2023-2027
Hong Kong
Mainland China
%
%
GDP growth rate (annual average rate)
2023
2.7
4.6
2024
3.0
4.8
2025
2.7
4.7
5 Year average
2.7
4.6
Unemployment rate (annual average
rate)
2023
3.7
5.2
2024
3.5
5.1
2025
3.4
5.0
5 Year average
3.4
5.0
House price growth (annual average
rate)
2023
(10.0)
(0.1)
2024
(3.0)
2.9
2025
1.7
3.5
5 Year average
(1.0)
2.9
Inflation rate (annual average rate)
2023
2.1
2.4
2024
2.1
2.2
2025
2.0
2.2
5 Year average
2.1
2.2
Probability
55.0
55.0
The consensus Upside scenario
Compared with the Central scenario, the consensus Upside
scenario features stronger economic activity in the near term,
before converging to long-run trend expectations. It also
incorporates a faster pace of disinflation than incorporated in the
Central scenario.
The scenario is consistent with a number of key upside risk
themes. These include faster resolution of supply chain issues; a
rapid conclusion to the Russia-Ukraine war; de-escalation of
tensions between the US and China; and relaxation of Covid-19
policies in Asia.
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and
the probabilities assigned in the consensus Upside scenario.
Consensus Upside scenario ‘best outcome’
Hong Kong
Mainland China
%
%
GDP growth rate (annual average rate)
9.0 (3Q23)
10.3 (2Q23)
Unemployment rate (annual average rate)
3.0 (4Q23)
4.7 (3Q24)
House price growth (annual average rate)
1.4 (4Q24)
6.9 (4Q24)
Inflation rate (annual average rate)
(0.1) (4Q23)
0.8 (4Q23)
Probability
20.0
20.0
Note: Extreme point in the consensus Upside is ‘best outcome’ in the
scenario, for example the highest GDP growth and the lowest
unemployment rate etc, in first two years of the scenario. For inflation,
lower inflation is interpreted as the ‘best’ outcome.
Downside scenarios
Downside scenarios explore the intensification and crystallisation
of a number of key economic and financial risks.
High inflation and a stronger monetary policy response have
become key concerns for global growth. In the downside
scenarios, supply chain disruptions intensify, exacerbated by an
escalation in the spread of Covid-19 and rising geopolitical
tensions drive inflation higher.
There also remains a risk that energy and food prices rise further
due to the Russia-Ukraine war, exacerbating global inflation and
further pressuring household budgets and firm costs.
The risk of inflation expectations becoming detached from Central
bank targets also remains a risk. A wage-price spiral triggered by
higher inflation and pandemic related labour supply shortages
across could put sustained upward pressure on wages,
aggravating cost pressures and the squeeze on household real
incomes and corporate margins. In turn, it raises the risk of a more
forceful policy response from central banks, a steeper trajectory
for interest rates and ultimately, deep economic recession.
The risks relating to Covid-19 are centred on the emergence of a
new variant with greater vaccine resistance that necessitates the
imposition of stringent public health policies. In Asia, despite the
re-opening of China in December, management of Covid-19
remains a key source of uncertainty, with the rapid spread of the
virus posing a heightened risk of a new variant emerging.
The geopolitical environment also present risks, including:
•a prolonged Russia-Ukraine war with escalation beyond
Ukraine’s borders; and
•continued differences between the US and other countries with
China, which could affect sentiment and restrict global
economic activity.
The consensus Downside scenario
In the consensus Downside scenario, economic activity is
considerably weaker compared with the Central scenario. In this
scenario, GDP growth weakens below the Central scenario,
unemployment rates rise and asset prices fall. The scenario
features a temporary supply side shock that keeps inflation higher
than the baseline, before the effects of weaker demand begin to
dominate leading to a fall in commodity prices and to lower
inflation.
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and
the probabilities assigned in the consensus Downside scenario.
Consensus Downside scenario ‘worst outcome’
Hong Kong
Mainland China
%
%
GDP growth rate (annual average rate)
(2.2) (4Q23)
(1.2) (4Q23)
Unemployment rate (annual average rate)
5.2 (3Q24)
5.9 (4Q23)
House price growth (annual average rate)
(14.9) (2Q23)
(1.9) (1Q23)
Inflation rate (annual average rate) (min) 
0.3 (4Q24)
0.7 (4Q24)
Inflation rate (annual average rate) (max)
3.7 (4Q23)
4.0 (4Q23)
Probability
20.0
20.0
Note: Extreme point in the consensus Downside is ‘worst outcome‘ in
the scenario, for example lowest GDP growth and the highest
unemployment rate, in the first two years of the scenario. Due to the
nature of the shock to inflation in the downside scenarios, both the
lowest and the highest point is shown in the tables.
Downside 2 scenario
The Downside 2 scenario features a deep global recession and
reflects managements view of the tail of the economic
distribution. It incorporates the crystallisation of a number of risks
simultaneously, including further escalation of the Russia-Ukraine
war, worsening of supply chain disruptions and the emergence of
a vaccine-resistant Covid-19 variant that necessitates a stringent
public health policy response globally.
This scenario features an initial supply-side shock that pushes up
inflation and interest rates higher. This impulse is expected to
Risk
38
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
prove short lived as a large downside demand pressures causes
commodity prices to correct sharply and global price inflation to
fall as a severe and prolonged recession takes hold.
The following table describes key macroeconomic variables and
the probabilities assigned in the Downside 2 scenario.
Downside 2 scenario ‘worst outcome’
Hong Kong
Mainland China
%
%
GDP growth rate (annual average rate)
(9.2) (4Q23)
(6.9) (4Q23)
Unemployment rate (annual average rate)
5.8 (1Q24)
6.8 (4Q24)
House price growth (annual average rate)
(18.2) (1Q24)
(18.5) (4Q23)
Inflation rate (annual average rate) (min)
0.6 (4Q24)
1.0 (4Q24)
Inflation rate (annual average rate) (max)
4.3 (4Q23)
4.6 (4Q23)
Probability
5.0
5.0
Note: Extreme point in the Downside 2 is ‘worst outcome‘ in the
scenario, for example lowest GDP growth and the highest
unemployment rate, in the first two years of the scenario. Due to the
nature of the shock to inflation in the downside scenarios, both the
lowest and the highest point is shown in the tables.
Scenario weighting
In reviewing the economic conjuncture, the level of risk and
uncertainty, management has considered both global and country-
specific factors. This has led management to assign scenario
probabilities that are tailored to its view of uncertainty in individual
markets.
Key consideration in the fourth quarter around uncertainty
attached to the Central scenario projections focused on:
•the progression of the Covid-19 pandemic in Asian countries
and announcement of removal of Covid-19 measures and travel
restrictions in mainland China and Hong Kong;
•further tightening of monetary policy and impact on borrowing
costs in interest rate sensitive sectors, such as housing;
•the risks to gas supply security in Europe and subsequent
impact on inflation and commodity prices and growth; and
•The ongoing risks to global supply chains.
In mainland China and Hong Kong, the announcement of
relaxation of Covid-19 measures and travel restrictions has led to
increased uncertainty around the Central scenario projection. It
was managements view that easing of policy could increase risks
to the upside in the form of increased spending and travel.
However, the continuing risks to the downside were also
acknowledged given the incipient surge in Covid-19 infections and
the potential for a new variant. This led management to assign a
combined weighting of 75% to the consensus Upside and Central
scenarios in both markets.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The calculation of ECL under HKFRS 9 involves significant
judgements, assumptions and estimates. The level of estimation
uncertainty and judgement has remained elevated since 31
December 2021, including judgements relating to:
•the selection and weighting of economic scenarios, given
rapidly changing economic conditions and a wide distribution
of economic forecasts. There is judgement in making
assumptions about the effects of inflation and interest, global
growth, supply chain disruption; and
•estimating the economic effects of those scenarios on ECL,
particularly as the historical relationship between
macroeconomic variables and defaults might not reflect the
dynamics of current macroeconomic conditions.
How economic scenarios are reflected in of ECL
calculations
Models are used to reflect economic scenarios on ECL estimates.
As described above, modelled assumptions and linkages based on
historical information could not alone produce relevant information
under the conditions experienced in 2022, and management
judgemental adjustments were still required to support modelled
outcomes.
We have developed globally consistent methodologies for the
application of forward economic guidance into the calculation of
ECL for wholesale and retail credit risk. These standard
approaches are described below, followed by the management
judgemental adjustments approach.
For our wholesale portfolios, a global methodology is used for the
estimation of the term structure of probability of default (‘PD’) and
loss given default (‘LGD’). For PDs, we consider the correlation of
forward economic guidance to default rates for a particular
industry in a country. For LGD calculations we consider the
correlation of forward economic guidance to collateral values and
realisation rates for a particular country and industry. PDs and
LGDs are estimated for the entire term structure of each
instrument.
For impaired loans, LGD estimates take into account independent
recovery valuations provided by external consultants where
available, or internal forecasts corresponding to anticipated
economic conditions and individual company conditions. In
estimating the ECL on impaired loans that are individually
considered not to be significant, we incorporate forward economic
guidance proportionate to the probability-weighted outcome and
the Central scenario outcome for non-stage 3 populations.
For our retail portfolios, the impact of economic scenarios on PD is
modelled at a portfolio level. Historical relationships between
observed default rates and macroeconomic variables are
integrated into HKFRS 9 ECL estimates by using economic
response models. The impact of these scenarios on PD is modelled
over a period equal to the remaining maturity of the underlying
asset or assets. The impact on LGD is modelled for mortgage
portfolios by forecasting future loan-to-value (‘LTV’) profiles for the
remaining maturity of the asset by using national level forecasts of
the house price index and applying the corresponding LGD
expectation.
These models are based largely on historical observations and
correlations with default rates. Management judgemental
adjustments are described below.
Management judgemental adjustments
In the context of HKFRS 9, management judgemental adjustments
are short-term increases or decreases to the ECL at either a
customer, segment or portfolio level to account for late-breaking
events, model and data limitations and deficiencies, and expert
credit judgement applied following management review and
challenge.
This includes refining model inputs and outputs and using
adjustments to ECL based on management judgement and higher-
level quantitative analysis for impacts that are difficult to model.
The effect of management judgmental adjustments are considered
for balances and ECL when determining whether or not a
significant increase in credit risk has occurred and are attributed or
allocated to a stage as appropriate. This is in accordance with the
internal adjustments framework.
Management judgmental adjustments are reviewed under the
governance process for HKFRS 9 (as detailed in the section 'Credit
risk management' on page 31). Review and challenge focuses on
the rationale and quantum of the adjustments with further review
by the second line of defence where significant. For some
management judgemental adjustments, internal frameworks
establish the conditions under which these adjustments should no
longer be required and as such are considered as part of the
governance process. This internal governance process allows
management judgemental adjustments to be reviewed regularly
and, where possible, to reduce the reliance on these through
model recalibration or redevelopment, as appropriate.
The drivers of management judgemental adjustments continue to
evolve with the economic environment, and as new risks emerge.
At 31 December 2022, management judgement adjustments
reduced by HK$1bn compared with 31 December 2021.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
39
Adjustments related to Covid-19 and for sector specific risks were
reduced as scenarios and modelled outcomes better reflected
management expectations at 31 December 2022.
Management judgemental adjustments made in estimating the
scenario-weighted reported ECL at 31 December 2022 are set out
in the following table.
Management judgemental adjustments to ECL
as at 31 December 20221
Retail
Wholesale
Total
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
Banks, sovereigns government entities
and low-risk counterparties2
(0.2)
0.2
—
Corporate lending adjustments
3.1
3.1
Retail lending Inflation-related 
adjustments
0.1
0.1
Other macroeconomic-related
adjustments
0.4
0.4
Pandemic-related economic recovery
adjustments
—
—
Other retail lending adjustments
0.3
0.3
Total
0.6
3.3
3.9
Management judgemental adjustments to ECL
as at 31 December 20211
Retail
Wholesale
Total
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
Banks, sovereigns, government entities
and low-risk counterparties)2
0.1
(0.2)
(0.1)
Corporate lending adjustments
4.1
4.1
Retail lending inflation-related
adjustments
—
—
Other macroeconomic-related
adjustments3
(0.4)
(0.4)
Pandemic-related economic recovery
adjustments
0.6
0.6
Other retail lending adjustments3
0.7
0.7
Total
1.0
3.9
4.9
1Management judgemental adjustments presented in the table reflect
increases in ECL.
2Low-risk counterparties for Retail is comprised of adjustments
relating to WPB Insurance only.
3Retail lending probability of default adjustments are reported under
'Macroeconomic-related adjustments' and 'Other retail lending
adjustments'. Comparatives are re-presented to conform to the
current year's presentation.
Management judgemental adjustments at 31 December 2022
were an increase of ECL of HK$3.3bn for the wholesale portfolio
and an increase to ECL of HK$0.6bn for the retail portfolio.
At 31 December 2022, wholesale management judgemental
adjustments were an ECL increase of HK$3.3bn (31 December
2021: HK$3.9bn increase).
•Adjustments to corporate exposures increased ECL by
HK$3.1bn (31 December 2021: HK$4.1bn increase). These
principally reflected the outcome of management judgements
for high-risk and vulnerable sectors in some of our key markets.
This was supported by credit experts’ input, portfolio risk
metrics, short- to medium-term risks under each scenario,
model performance, quantitative analyses and benchmarks.
Considerations include risk of individual exposures under
different macroeconomic scenarios and sub-sector analyses.
The largest increase in ECL was observed in the real estate
sector, including material adjustments to reflect the uncertainty
of the higher-risk Chinese commercial real estate exposures,
booked in Hong Kong.
At 31 December 2022, retail management judgemental
adjustments were an ECL increase of HK$0.6bn (31 December
2021: HK$1.0bn increase):
•Retail lending Inflation-related adjustments increased ECL by
HK$0.1bn (31 December 2021: HK$0.0bn). These adjustments
addressed where increasing inflation and interest rates were
not fully captured by the modelled output.
•Other macroeconomic-related adjustments increased ECL by
HK$0.4bn (31 December 2021: HK$0.4bn decrease). These
adjustments were primarily in relation to country-specific risks
related to future macroeconomic conditions.
•Other retail lending adjustments increased ECL by HK$0.3bn 
(31 December 2021: $0.7bn increase), reflecting all other data
and model and judgemental adjustments.
•Material pandemic-related economic recovery adjustments
were removed during the year as scenarios stabilized.
Economic scenarios sensitivity analysis of ECL
estimates
Management considered the sensitivity of the ECL outcome
against the economic forecasts as part of the ECL governance
process by recalculating the ECL under each scenario described
above for selected portfolios, applying a 100% weighting to each
scenario in turn. The weighting is reflected in both the
determination of a significant increase in credit risk and the
measurement of the resulting ECL.
The ECL calculated for the Upside and Downside scenarios should
not be taken to represent the lower and upper limits of possible
ECL outcomes. The impact of defaults that might occur in the
future under different economic scenarios is captured by
recalculating ECL for loans at the balance sheet date.
There is a particularly high degree of estimation uncertainty in
numbers representing more severe risk scenarios when assigned a
100% weighting.
For wholesale credit risk exposures, the sensitivity analysis
excludes ECL and financial instruments related to defaulted (stage
3) obligors. It is generally impracticable to separate the effect of
macroeconomic factors in individual assessments of obligors in
default. The measurement of stage 3 ECL is relatively more
sensitive to credit factors specific to the obligor than future
economic scenarios, and loans to defaulted obligors are a small
portion of the overall wholesale lending exposure, even if
representing the majority of the allowance for ECL. Therefore, the
sensitivity analysis to macroeconomic scenarios does not capture
the residual estimation risk arising from wholesale stage 3
exposures.
For retail credit risk exposures, the sensitivity analysis includes
ECL for loans and advances to customers related to defaulted
obligors. This is because the retail ECL for secured mortgage
portfolios including loans in all stages is sensitive to
macroeconomic variables.
Wholesale and retail sensitivity
The wholesale and retail sensitivity analysis is stated inclusive of
management judgemental adjustments, as appropriate to each
scenario. The results tables exclude portfolios held by the
insurance business and small portfolios, and as such cannot be
directly compared to personal and wholesale lending presented in
other credit risk tables. In both the wholesale and retail analysis,
the comparative period results for additional and alternative
Downside scenarios are not directly comparable to the current
period, because they reflect different risks relative with the
consensus scenarios for the period end.
Risk
40
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Wholesale analysis
HKFRS 9 ECL sensitivity to future economic conditions1
Hong Kong
Mainland
China
ECL coverage of financial instruments
subject to significant measurement
uncertainty at 31 December 20222
HK$m
HK$m
Reported ECL
7,211
2,302
Consensus scenarios ECL
Central scenario
6,386
1,887
Upside scenario
4,616
1,123
Downside scenario
10,252
3,235
Alternative (Downside 2) scenario ECL
16,852
9,572
HKFRS 9 ECL sensitivity to future economic conditions1
Hong Kong
Mainland
China
ECL coverage of financial instruments subject
to significant measurement uncertainty at     
31 December 20212
HK$m
HK$m
Reported ECL
5,981
1,162
Consensus scenarios
Central scenario
5,085
881
Upside scenario
3,712
281
Downside scenario
7,674
1,684
Alternative scenarios
14,575
6,286
1Excludes ECL and financial instruments relating to defaulted obligors
because the measurement of ECL is relatively more sensitive to credit
factors specific to the obligor than future economic scenarios.
2Includes off-balance sheet financial instruments that are subject to
significant measurement uncertainty.
At 31 December 2022, the most significant level of ECL sensitivity
related to the judgements over the mainland China offshore
commercial real estate portfolio booked in Hong Kong.
Retail analysis
HKFRS 9 ECL sensitivity to future economic conditions1
Reported
ECL
Central
Scenario
Upside
Scenario
Downside
Scenario
Alternative
(Downside
2) scenario
ECL
ECL coverage of
loans and
advances to
customers
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 December
20222
Hong Kong
2,702
2,406
1,985
4,037
6,014
HKFRS 9 ECL sensitivity to future economic conditions1
Reported
ECL
Central
Scenario
Upside
Scenario
Downside
Scenario
Alternative
(Downside
2) scenario
ECL
ECL coverage of
loans and advances
to customers
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 December
20212
Hong Kong
2,554
2,395
1,884
2,802
4,198
1 ECL sensitivities exclude portfolios using less complex modelling
approaches.
2 ECL sensitivity includes only on-balance sheet financial instruments
to which HKFRS 9 impairment requirements are applied.
At 31 December 2022, Hong Kong mortgages had low levels of
reported ECL due to the credit quality of the portfolio. Credit cards
and other unsecured lending are more sensitive to economic
forecasts, and therefore reflected the highest level of ECL
sensitivity during 2022.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
41
Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/
nominal amount and allowances for loans and
advances to banks and customers, including loan
commitments and financial guarantees
(Unaudited)
The following disclosure provides a reconciliation by stage of the
group’s gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans
and advances to banks and customers, including loan
commitments and financial guarantees. Movements are calculated
on a quarterly basis and therefore fully capture stage movements
between quarters. If movements were calculated on a year-to-date
basis they would reflect only the opening and closing position of
the financial instrument.
The transfers of financial instruments represent the impact of
stage transfers upon the gross carrying/nominal amount and
associated allowance for ECL.
The net remeasurement of ECL arising from stage transfers
represents the increase or decrease due to these transfers, for
example, moving from a 12-month (stage 1) to a lifetime (stage 2)
ECL measurement basis. Net remeasurement excludes the
underlying customer risk rating ('CRR')/probability of default ('PD')
movements of the financial instruments transferring stage. This is
captured, along with other credit quality movements in the
‘changes in risk parameters – credit quality’ line item.
Changes in ‘New financial assets originated or purchased’, ‘assets
derecognised (including final repayments)’ and ‘changes to risk
parameters – further lending/repayments’ represent the impact
from volume movements within the group’s lending portfolio.
Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers, including
loan commitments and financial guarantees
(Audited)
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2022
5,589,480
(2,916)
529,597
(9,737)
41,639
(19,693)
1,558
(334)
6,162,274
(32,680)
Transfers of financial instruments:
(246,807)
(1,899)
204,008
7,046
42,799
(5,147)
—
—
—
—
–  transfers from stage 1 to stage 2
(725,814)
1,072
725,814
(1,072)
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  transfers from stage 2 to stage 1
483,955
(2,759)
(483,955)
2,759
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  transfers to stage 3
(7,041)
10
(39,526)
5,591
46,567
(5,601)
—
—
—
—
–  transfers from stage 3
2,093
(222)
1,675
(232)
(3,768)
454
—
—
—
—
Net remeasurement of ECL arising
from transfer of stage
—
1,391
—
(1,645)
—
(400)
—
—
—
(654)
New financial assets originated and
purchased
1,854,004
(1,209)
—
—
—
—
200
(18)
1,854,204
(1,227)
Assets derecognised (including final
repayments)
(1,180,100)
224
(186,273)
653
(6,023)
1,220
(764)
—
(1,373,160)
2,097
Changes to risk parameters –
further lending/repayment
(303,451)
80
9,824
701
(1,357)
768
(294)
20
(295,278)
1,569
Changes in risk parameters –  credit
quality
—
1,099
—
(8,822)
—
(10,412)
—
214
—
(17,921)
Changes to model used for ECL
calculation
—
(31)
—
11
—
(12)
—
—
—
(32)
Assets written off
—
—
—
—
(7,215)
7,215
(78)
78
(7,293)
7,293
Credit-related modifications that
resulted in derecognition
—
—
—
—
(241)
60
—
—
(241)
60
Foreign exchange
(126,786)
32
(22,811)
180
(1,024)
526
1
(1)
(150,620)
737
Others
4
(13)
—
(5)
3
(9)
—
(150)
7
(177)
At 31 Dec 2022
5,586,344
(3,242)
534,345
(11,618)
68,581
(25,884)
623
(191)
6,189,893
(40,935)
ECL income statement charge for
the year
(16,168)
Recoveries
880
Others
(543)
Total ECL income statement
charge for the year
(15,831)
At 31 Dec 2022
Year ended 31 Dec 2022
Gross carrying/
nominal amount
Allowance for ECL
ECL charge
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
As above
6,189,893
(40,935)
(15,831)
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost
2,768,171
(681)
(110)
Non-trading reverse repurchase agreement commitments
2,335
—
—
Performance and other guarantees not considered for HKFRS 9
N/A
N/A
(81)
Amounts due from Group companies
129,357
—
—
Summary of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in
HKFRS 9 are applied/Summary consolidated income statement
9,089,756
(41,616)
(16,022)
Debt instruments measured at FVOCI
1,239,527
(344)
(343)
Total allowance for ECL/total income statement ECL charge for the year
N/A
(41,960)
(16,365)
Risk
42
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Reconciliation of changes in gross carrying/nominal amount and allowances for loans and advances to banks and customers, including
loan commitments and financial guarantees (continued)
(Audited)
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
POCI
Total
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
Allowance
for ECL
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2021
5,254,097
(4,978)
567,753
(6,781)
35,984
(17,739)
855
(362)
5,858,689
(29,860)
Transfers of financial instruments:
(82,216)
(1,758)
62,505
3,758
19,711
(2,000)
—
—
—
—
–  transfers from stage 1 to stage 2
(790,973)
1,689
790,973
(1,689)
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  transfers from stage 2 to stage 1
716,431
(3,412)
(716,431)
3,412
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  transfers to stage 3
(9,067)
104
(14,911)
2,238
23,978
(2,342)
—
—
—
—
–  transfers from stage 3
1,393
(139)
2,874
(203)
(4,267)
342
—
—
—
—
Net remeasurement of ECL arising
from transfer of stage
—
1,686
—
(2,347)
—
(107)
—
—
—
(768)
New financial assets originated and
purchased
1,621,239
(1,183)
—
—
—
—
973
—
1,622,212
(1,183)
Assets derecognised (including final
repayments)
(1,086,986)
314
(120,885)
674
(5,745)
1,165
(9)
—
(1,213,625)
2,153
Changes to risk parameters – further
lending/repayment
(93,466)
1,078
19,540
87
(2,332)
998
(263)
25
(76,521)
2,188
Changes in risk parameters –  credit
quality
—
2,078
—
(4,768)
—
(6,612)
—
49
—
(9,253)
Changes to model used for ECL
calculation
—
(126)
—
(377)
—
7
—
—
—
(496)
Assets written off
—
—
—
—
(4,531)
4,531
—
—
(4,531)
4,531
Credit-related modifications that
resulted in derecognition
—
—
—
—
(973)
—
—
—
(973)
—
Foreign exchange
(23,231)
(28)
684
18
(478)
65
2
(1)
(23,023)
54
Others
43
1
—
(1)
3
(1)
—
(45)
46
(46)
At 31 Dec 2021
5,589,480
(2,916)
529,597
(9,737)
41,639
(19,693)
1,558
(334)
6,162,274
(32,680)
ECL income statement charge for
the year
(7,359)
Recoveries
1,011
Others
(169)
Total ECL income statement charge
for the year
(6,517)
At 31 Dec 2021
Year ended 31 Dec 2021
Gross carrying/nominal
amount
Allowance for ECL
ECL charge
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
As above
6,162,274
(32,680)
(6,517)
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost
2,114,301
(639)
(184)
Non-trading reverse repurchase agreement commitments
3,605
—
—
Performance and other guarantees not considered for HKFRS 9
N/A
N/A
145
Amounts due from Group companies
99,604
—
—
Summary of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are
applied/Summary consolidated income statement
8,379,784
(33,319)
(6,556)
Debt instruments measured at FVOCI
1,541,909
(121)
17
Total allowance for ECL/total income statement ECL charge for the year
N/A
(33,440)
(6,539)
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
43
Credit quality
Credit quality of financial instruments
(Audited)
We assess the credit quality of all financial instruments that are
subject to credit risk. The credit quality of financial instruments is
a point-in-time assessment of the probability of default of financial
instruments, whereas stages 1 and 2 are determined based on
relative deterioration of credit quality since initial recognition.
Accordingly, for non-credit-impaired financial instruments, there is
no direct relationship between the credit quality assessment and
stages 1 and 2, though typically the lower credit quality bands
exhibit a higher proportion in stage 2.
The five credit quality classifications each encompass a range of
granular internal credit rating grades assigned to wholesale and
retail lending businesses and the external ratings attributed by
external agencies to debt securities, as shown in the table on page
32.
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality at 31 December 2022
(Audited)
Gross carrying/notional amount
Allowance
for ECL
Net
Strong
Good
Satisfactory
Sub-
standard
Credit
impaired
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
In-scope for HKFRS 9 impairment
Loans and advances to customers held at
amortised cost
2,093,077
773,808
737,137
77,706
63,385
3,745,113
(39,964)
3,705,149
–  personal
1,290,517
144,757
76,102
5,300
8,708
1,525,384
(5,369)
1,520,015
–  corporate and commercial
641,317
545,533
604,724
71,417
53,761
1,916,752
(33,999)
1,882,753
–  non-bank financial institutions
161,243
83,518
56,311
989
916
302,977
(596)
302,381
Loans and advances to banks
504,751
9,461
1,368
3,488
—
519,068
(44)
519,024
Cash and balances at central banks
226,479
6,047
222
—
—
232,748
(8)
232,740
Items in the course of collection from other
banks
28,557
—
—
—
—
28,557
—
28,557
Hong Kong Government certificates of
indebtedness
341,354
—
—
—
—
341,354
—
341,354
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
503,956
132,390
291,608
—
22
927,976
—
927,976
Financial investments held at amortised cost
856,621
109,105
9,446
2
—
975,174
(465)
974,709
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets
169,517
57,958
33,648
796
443
262,362
(208)
262,154
Debt instruments measured at fair value through
other comprehensive income1
1,192,017
52,361
17,234
1,030
39
1,262,681
(344)
1,262,337
Out-of-scope for HKFRS 9 impairment
—
—
Trading assets
335,477
65,188
32,910
788
999
435,362
—
435,362
Other financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value through
profit or loss
30,724
3,166
1,050
—
—
34,940
—
34,940
Derivatives
269,923
52,467
11,351
823
5
334,569
—
334,569
Total gross carrying amount on-balance
sheet
6,552,453
1,261,951
1,135,974
84,633
64,893
9,099,904
(41,033)
9,058,871
Percentage of total credit quality
72%
14%
12%
1%
1%
100%
Loan and other credit related commitments
1,924,469
744,111
484,054
29,892
7,934
3,190,460
(864)
3,189,596
Financial guarantee and similar contracts
171,761
133,701
62,022
5,459
553
373,496
(293)
373,203
Total nominal off-balance sheet amount
2,096,230
877,812
546,076
35,351
8,487
3,563,956
(1,157)
3,562,799
The above table does not include balances due from Group companies.
1For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss
allowance. As such the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the balance sheet as it excludes
fair value gains and losses.
Risk
44
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Distribution of financial instruments by credit quality at 31 December 2021 (continued)
(Audited)
Gross carrying/notional amount
Allowance for
ECL
Net
Strong
Good
Satisfactory
Sub-
standard
Credit
impaired
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
In-scope for HKFRS 9 impairment
Loans and advances to customers held at
amortised cost
2,076,114
876,388
838,222
39,342
          42,890
3,872,956
(32,017)
3,840,939
–  personal
1,290,946
136,390
91,809
3,008
          10,158
1,532,311
(5,966)
1,526,345
–  corporate and commercial
648,930
653,853
685,887
36,117
          32,624
2,057,411
(25,706)
2,031,705
–  non-bank financial institutions
136,238
86,145
60,526
217
              108
283,234
(345)
282,889
Loans and advances to banks
423,839
5,750
2,611
86
                  —
432,286
(39)
432,247
Cash and balances at central banks
269,108
7,663
86
—
                  —
276,857
—
276,857
Items in the course of collection from other
banks
21,632
—
—
—
                  —
21,632
—
21,632
Hong Kong Government certificates of
indebtedness
332,044
—
—
—
                  —
332,044
—
332,044
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
530,900
144,373
128,502
—
                  —
803,775
—
803,775
Financial investments held at amortised cost
406,588
88,765
7,644
—
                  —
502,997
(433)
502,564
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets
95,520
45,945
34,642
599
              290
176,996
(206)
176,790
Debt instruments measured at fair value
through other comprehensive income1
1,438,300
72,697
30,085
—
                  —
1,541,082
(121)
1,540,961
Out-of-scope for HKFRS 9 impairment
—
—
Trading assets
389,531
65,272
21,676
518
            1,033
478,030
—
478,030
Other financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value through
profit or loss
25,738
2,386
900
—
                  —
29,024
—
29,024
Derivatives
161,471
49,735
5,222
45
                  —
216,473
—
216,473
Total gross carrying amount on-balance sheet
6,170,785
1,358,974
1,069,590
40,590
          44,213
8,684,152
(32,816)
8,651,336
Percentage of total credit quality
71%
16%
12%
—%
1%
100%
Loan and other credit related commitments
1,732,590
699,474
491,037
19,400
              983
2,943,484
(580)
2,942,904
Financial guarantee and similar contracts
135,199
151,565
64,012
3,647
              456
354,879
(204)
354,675
Total nominal off-balance sheet amount
1,867,789
851,039
555,049
23,047
            1,439
3,298,363
(784)
3,297,579
The above table does not include balances due from Group companies.
1For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss
allowance. As such the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the balance sheet as it excludes
fair value gains and losses.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
45
Distribution of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are applied, by credit quality and stage
allocation
(Audited)
Gross carrying/notional amount
Allowance
for ECL
Net
Strong
Good
Satisfactory
Sub-
standard
Credit
impaired
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Loans and advances to banks
504,751
9,461
1,368
3,488
—
519,068
(44)
519,024
–  stage 1
503,622
8,731
1,338
3,243
—
516,934
(39)
516,895
–  stage 2
1,129
730
30
245
—
2,134
(5)
2,129
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost
2,093,077
773,808
737,137
77,706
63,385
3,745,113
(39,964)
3,705,149
–  stage 1
2,062,100
656,962
489,798
10,785
—
3,219,645
(2,755)
3,216,890
–  stage 2
30,977
116,846
247,339
66,921
—
462,083
(11,200)
450,883
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
62,763
62,763
(25,818)
36,945
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
622
622
(191)
431
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost
2,126,484
305,500
334,924
798
465
2,768,171
(681)
2,767,490
–  stage 1
2,120,755
289,904
328,161
240
—
2,739,060
(391)
2,738,669
–  stage 2
5,729
15,596
6,763
558
—
28,646
(231)
28,415
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
464
464
(59)
405
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
1
1
—
1
Loan and other credit-related commitments
1,421,125
312,185
142,824
10,509
5,758
1,892,401
(864)
1,891,537
–  stage 1
1,414,708
284,689
116,144
5,814
—
1,821,355
(427)
1,820,928
–  stage 2
6,417
27,496
26,680
4,695
—
65,288
(397)
64,891
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
5,758
5,758
(40)
5,718
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Financial guarantees
14,274
11,643
8,649
1,012
68
35,646
(63)
35,583
–  stage 1
13,938
9,994
6,627
179
—
30,738
(18)
30,720
–  stage 2
336
1,649
2,022
833
—
4,840
(17)
4,823
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
68
68
(28)
40
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
At 31 Dec 2022
6,159,711
1,412,597
1,224,902
93,513
69,676
8,960,399
(41,616)
8,918,783
Debt instruments at FVOCI1
–  stage 1
1,191,560
52,146
17,178
—
—
1,260,884
(67)
1,260,817
–  stage 2
457
215
56
1,030
—
1,758
(277)
1,481
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
39
39
—
39
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
At 31 Dec 2022
1,192,017
52,361
17,234
1,030
39
1,262,681
(344)
1,262,337
The above table does not include balances due from Group companies.
1For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss
allowance. As such the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the balance sheet as it excludes
fair value gains and losses.
Risk
46
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Distribution of financial instruments to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are applied, by credit quality and stage
allocation (continued)
(Audited)
Gross carrying/notional amount
Allowance
for ECL
Net
Strong
Good
Satisfactory
Sub-
standard
Credit
impaired
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Loans and advances to banks
423,839
5,750
2,611
86
—
432,286
(39)
432,247
–  stage 1
423,561
5,241
2,244
33
—
431,079
(36)
431,043
–  stage 2
278
509
367
53
—
1,207
(3)
1,204
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost
2,076,114
876,388
838,222
39,342
42,890
3,872,956
(32,017)
3,840,939
–  stage 1
2,034,725
732,858
577,785
4,066
—
3,349,434
(2,603)
3,346,831
–  stage 2
41,389
143,530
260,437
35,276
—
480,632
(9,426)
471,206
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
41,332
41,332
(19,654)
21,678
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
1,558
1,558
(334)
1,224
Other financial assets measured at amortised cost
1,655,792
286,746
170,874
599
290
2,114,301
(639)
2,113,662
–  stage 1
1,651,199
278,343
163,190
115
—
2,092,847
(482)
2,092,365
–  stage 2
4,593
8,403
7,684
484
—
21,164
(140)
21,024
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
289
289
(17)
272
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
1
1
—
1
Loan and other credit-related commitments
1,347,783
311,803
162,448
4,030
271
1,826,335
(580)
1,825,755
–  stage 1
1,344,540
297,202
138,722
1,889
—
1,782,353
(260)
1,782,093
–  stage 2
3,243
14,601
23,726
2,141
—
43,711
(295)
43,416
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
271
271
(25)
246
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Financial guarantees
11,350
12,188
9,883
841
40
34,302
(44)
34,258
–  stage 1
11,127
10,890
8,038
159
—
30,214
(14)
30,200
–  stage 2
223
1,298
1,845
682
—
4,048
(14)
4,034
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
40
40
(16)
24
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
At 31 Dec 2021
5,514,878
1,492,875
1,184,038
44,898
43,491
8,280,180
(33,319)
8,246,861
Debt instruments at FVOCI1
–  stage 1
1,438,161
72,697
30,085
—
—
1,540,943
(121)
1,540,822
–  stage 2
139
—
—
—
—
139
—
139
–  stage 3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
–  POCI
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
At 31 Dec 2021
1,438,300
72,697
30,085
—
—
1,541,082
(121)
1,540,961
The above table does not include balances due from Group companies.
1For the purposes of this disclosure, gross carrying value is defined as the amortised cost of a financial asset, before adjusting for any loss
allowance. As such the gross carrying value of debt instruments at FVOCI as presented above will not reconcile to the balance sheet as it excludes
fair value gains and losses.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
47
Mainland China commercial real estate
The following table presents the group's exposure to borrowers classified in the CRE sector where the ultimate parent is based in
mainland China, as well as all CRE exposures booked on mainland China balance sheets. The exposures at 31 December 2022 are split by
country/territory and credit quality including allowances for ECL by stage.
Mainland China CRE exposure
At 31 Dec 2022
Hong Kong
Mainland China
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Total
(audited)1
(audited)1
(unaudited)1
(unaudited)1
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Loans and advances to customers2
71,148
44,843
3,570
119,561
Guarantees issued and others3
1,957
5,884
268
8,109
Total mainland China CRE exposure
73,105
50,727
3,838
127,670
Distribution of mainland China CRE exposure by
credit quality
–  Strong
11,105
16,510
638
28,253
–  Good
5,431
8,475
2,543
16,449
–  Satisfactory
9,896
17,521
168
27,585
–  Sub-standard
22,509
6,072
349
28,930
–  Credit Impaired
24,164
2,149
140
26,453
73,105
50,727
3,838
127,670
Allowance for ECL by credit quality
–  Strong
—
(39)
—
(39)
–  Good
(2)
(60)
(5)
(67)
–  Satisfactory
(153)
(637)
(3)
(793)
–  Sub-standard
(3,570)
(326)
(14)
(3,910)
–  Credit Impaired
(9,884)
(816)
—
(10,700)
(13,609)
(1,878)
(22)
(15,509)
Allowance for ECL
ECL Stage 1
(6)
(69)
(4)
(79)
ECL Stage 2
(3,719)
(993)
(18)
(4,730)
ECL Stage 3
(9,884)
(816)
—
(10,700)
(13,609)
(1,878)
(22)
(15,509)
ECL coverage %
18.6
3.7
0.6
12.1
At 31 Dec 2021
Hong Kong (restated)4
Mainland China
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Total
(audited)1
(audited)1
(unaudited)1
(unaudited)1
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Loans and advances to customers2
89,646
53,116
658
143,420
Guarantees issued and others3
1,207
18,533
127
19,867
Total mainland China CRE exposure
90,853
71,649
785
163,287
Distribution of mainland China CRE exposure by
credit quality
–  Strong
27,630
30,141
239
58,010
–  Good
20,681
18,357
—
39,038
–  Satisfactory
26,384
22,263
546
49,193
–  Sub-standard
12,245
94
—
12,339
–  Credit Impaired
3,913
794
—
4,707
90,853
71,649
785
163,287
Allowance for ECL by credit quality
–  Strong
(116)
(53)
—
(169)
–  Good
(292)
(78)
—
(370)
–  Satisfactory
(849)
(154)
(15)
(1,018)
–  Sub-standard
(2,320)
(8)
—
(2,328)
– Credit Impaired
(794)
(86)
—
(880)
(4,371)
(379)
(15)
(4,765)
Allowance for ECL
ECL Stage 1
(17)
(84)
(4)
(105)
ECL Stage 2
(3,560)
(209)
(11)
(3,780)
ECL Stage 3
(794)
(86)
—
(880)
(4,371)
(379)
(15)
(4,765)
ECL coverage %
4.8
0.5
1.9
2.9
1Disclosures in respect of mainland China CRE exposures in Hong Kong and mainland China form part of the scope of the audit of the group's
Annual Report. Amounts disclosed for mainland China CRE exposures elsewhere in the group have not been audited but are provided for
completeness.
2  Amounts represent gross carrying amount.
3  Amounts represent nominal amount for guarantees and other contingent liabilities.
4  Comparative balances have been restated to reflect an exposure re-classification from "guarantees and others" to "loans and advances to
customers", which better reflects the nature of product.
Risk
48
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
(Unaudited)
CRE financing refers to lending that focuses on commercial
development and investment in real estate and covers
commercial, residential and industrial assets. CRE financing can
also be provided to a corporate or financial entity for the purchase
or financing of a property which supports the overall operations of
the business.
The exposures in the table are related to companies whose
primary activities are focused on residential, commercial and
mixed-use real estate activities. Lending is generally focused on
tier 1 and 2 cities.
The exposures in the table above had 57% (31 December 2021:
89%) of exposure booked with a credit quality of ‘satisfactory’ or
above. This deterioration reflects increased funding risks and
weaker sales performance for a number of our customers over the
period.
Facilities booked in Hong Kong are exposures which represent
relatively higher risk within the mainland China CRE portfolio. This
portfolio had 36% (31 December 2021: 82%) of exposure booked
with a credit quality of ‘satisfactory’ or above, reflecting sustained
credit deterioration in this book over the course of the year. At
31 December 2022, the group had allowances for ECL of
HK$13,609m (31 December 2021: HK$4,371m) held against
mainland China CRE exposures booked in Hong Kong.
Over one third of the unimpaired exposure in the Hong Kong
portfolio reflects lending to state owned enterprises, and much of
the remaining is to relatively strong privately owned enterprises.
This is reflected in the relatively low ECL allowance in this part of
the portfolio.
Regulatory and policy developments in the latter part of 2022
appear to have stabilised the sector. Sustained liquidity support
and improved domestic residential demand will be necessary to
support a recovery.
The group has additional exposures to mainland China CRE as a
result of lending to multinational corporates which is not
incorporated in the table above.
Credit-impaired loans
(Audited)
We determine that a financial instrument is credit impaired and in
stage 3 by considering relevant objective evidence, primarily
whether:
•contractual payments of either principal or interest are past due
for more than 90 days;
•there are other indications that the borrower is unlikely to pay,
such as when a concession has been granted to the borrower
for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s
financial condition; and
•the loan is otherwise considered to be in default. If such
unlikeliness to pay is not identified at an earlier stage, it is
deemed to occur when an exposure is 90 days past due, even
where regulatory rules permit default to be defined based on
180 days past due. Therefore, the definitions of credit impaired
and default are aligned as far as possible so that stage 3
represents all loans that are considered defaulted or otherwise
credit impaired.
Collateral and other credit enhancements
(Audited)
Although collateral can be an important mitigant of credit risk, it is
the group’s practice to lend on the basis of the customer’s ability
to meet their obligations out of cash flow resources rather than
placing primary reliance on collateral and other credit risk
enhancements. Depending on the customer’s standing and the
type of product, facilities may be provided without any collateral
or other credit enhancements. For other lending, a charge over
collateral is obtained and considered in determining the credit
decision and pricing. In the event of default, the bank may utilise
the collateral as a source of repayment.
Depending on its form, collateral can have a significant financial
effect in mitigating our exposure to credit risk. Where there is
sufficient collateral, an expected credit loss is not recognised. This
is the case for reverse repurchase agreements and for certain
loans and advances to customers where the loan to value (‘LTV’) is
very low.
Mitigants may include a charge on borrowers’ specific assets,
such as real estate or financial instruments. Other credit risk
mitigants include short positions in securities and financial assets
held as part of linked insurance/investment contracts where the
risk is predominantly borne by the policyholder.
Additionally, risk may be managed by employing other types of
collateral and credit risk enhancements, such as second charges,
other liens and unsupported guarantees. Guarantees are normally
taken from corporates and export credit agencies. Corporates
would normally provide guarantees as part of a parent/subsidiary
relationship and span a number of credit grades. The export credit
agencies will normally be investment grade.
Certain credit mitigants are used strategically in portfolio
management activities. While single name concentrations arise in
portfolios managed by Global Banking and Corporate Banking, it is
only in Global Banking that their size requires the use of portfolio
level credit mitigants. Across Global Banking, risk limits and
utilisations, maturity profiles and risk quality are monitored and
managed proactively. This process is key to the setting of risk
appetite for these larger, more complex, geographically distributed
customer groups. While the principal form of risk management
continues to be at the point of exposure origination, through the
lending decision-making process, Global Banking also utilises loan
sales and credit default swap (‘CDS’) hedges to manage
concentrations and reduce risk. These transactions are the
responsibility of a dedicated Global Banking portfolio management
team. Hedging activity is carried out within agreed credit
parameters, and is subject to market risk limits and a robust
governance structure. Where applicable, CDSs are entered into
directly with a central clearing house counterparty. Otherwise, our
exposure to CDS protection providers is diversified among mainly
banking counterparties with strong credit ratings.
CDS mitigants are held at portfolio level and are not reported in
the presentation below.
Collateral on loans and advances
(Audited)
The collateral measured in the following tables consists of
fixed first charges on real estate, and charges over cash and
marketable financial instruments. The values in the tables
represent the expected market value on an open market basis; no
adjustment has been made to the collateral for any expected costs
of recovery. Marketable securities are measured at their fair value.
Other types of collateral such as unsupported guarantees and
floating charges over the assets of a customer’s business are not
measured in the following tables. While such mitigants have value,
often providing rights in insolvency, their assignable value is not
sufficiently certain and they are therefore assigned no value for
disclosure purposes.
The LTV ratios presented are calculated by directly associating
loans and advances with the collateral that individually and
uniquely supports each facility. When collateral assets are shared
by multiple loans and advances, whether specifically or, more
generally, by way of an all monies charge, the collateral value is
pro-rated across the loans and advances protected by the
collateral.
For credit-impaired loans, the collateral values cannot be directly
compared with impairment allowances recognised. The LTV
figures use open market values with no adjustments.
Impairment allowances are calculated on a different basis, by
considering other cash flows and adjusting collateral values for
costs of realising collateral.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
49
Personal lending
(Unaudited)
The following table provides a quantification of the value of fixed
charges we hold over specific assets where we have a history of
enforcing, and are able to enforce, collateral in satisfying a debt in
the event of the borrower failing to meet its contractual
obligations, and where the collateral is cash or can be realised by
sale in an established market.
The collateral valuation excludes any adjustments for obtaining
and selling the collateral and, in particular, loans shown as not
collateralised or partially collateralised may also benefit from other
forms of credit mitigants.
Residential mortgages including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
2022
2021
Gross carrying/
nominal
amount
ECL
coverage
Gross carrying/
nominal
amount
ECL
coverage
HK$m
%
HK$m
%
Stage 1
Fully collateralised
1,147,024
0.0
1,201,044
0.0
LTV ratio:
–  less than 70%
918,527
0.0
1,004,531
0.0
–  71% to 90%
147,785
0.0
169,824
0.0
–  91% to 100%
80,712
0.0
26,689
0.0
Partially collateralised (A):
50,317
0.0
256
0.0
–  collateral value on A
48,009
242
Total
1,197,341
0.0
1,201,300
0.0
Stage 2
Fully collateralised
33,972
0.2
23,758
0.4
LTV ratio:
–  less than 70%
24,401
0.1
20,691
0.3
–  71% to 90%
8,730
0.4
2,860
1.0
–  91% to 100%
841
0.5
207
2.4
Partially collateralised (B):
425
0.7
28
3.6
–  collateral value on B
401
23
Total
34,397
0.2
23,786
0.4
Stage 3
Fully collateralised
5,696
4.3
5,113
5.2
LTV ratio:
–  less than 70%
3,935
3.6
4,153
4.5
–  71% to 90%
1,270
5.6
827
7.7
–  91% to 100%
491
6.3
133
14.3
Partially collateralised (C):
113
40.7
104
29.8
–  collateral value on C
95
91
Total
5,809
5.0
5,217
5.7
At 31 Dec
1,237,547
0.0
1,230,303
0.0
Other personal lending
(Unaudited)
Other personal lending consists primarily of personal loans, overdrafts and credit cards, all of which are generally unsecured, except
lending to private banking customers which are generally secured.
Risk
50
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Commercial real estate loans and advances
(Unaudited)
The value of commercial real estate collateral is determined by
using a combination of external and internal valuations and
physical inspections. For commercial real estate, where the facility
exceeds regulatory threshold requirements, group policy requires
an independent review of the valuation at least every three years,
or more frequently as the need arises. In Hong Kong, market
practice is typically for lending to major property companies to be
either secured by guarantees or unsecured.
Commercial real estate loans and advances including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
2022
2021
Gross
carrying
nominal
amount
ECL
coverage
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
ECL
coverage
HK$m
%
HK$m
%
Stage 1
Not collateralised
240,133
0.0
268,397
0.0
Fully collateralised
263,119
0.1
315,939
0.1
Partially collateralised (A):
13,898
0.1
14,260
0.1
–  collateral value on A
7,292
7,790
Total
517,150
0.1
598,596
0.0
Stage 2
Not collateralised
51,128
7.7
68,871
5.8
Fully collateralised
85,421
1.9
69,438
0.7
Partially collateralised (B):
7,941
2.0
7,626
2.2
–  collateral value on B
4,692
3,159
Total
144,490
4.0
145,935
3.2
Stage 3
Not collateralised
16,725
57.2
1,541
35.8
Fully collateralised
8,724
11.1
3,085
11.3
Partially collateralised (C):
982
36.2
21
33.3
–  collateral value on C
697
14
Total
26,431
41.2
4,647
19.5
POCI
Not collateralised
—
—
—
—
Fully collateralised
—
—
764
—
Partially collateralised (D):
145
—
—
—
–  collateral value on D
65
—
Total
145
—
764
—
At 31 Dec
688,216
2.5
749,942
0.8
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
51
Other corporate, commercial and non-bank financial institutions
lending
(Unaudited)
Other corporate, commercial and financial (non-bank) loans are
analysed separately in the following table. For financing activities
in other corporate and commercial lending, collateral value is not
strongly correlated to principal repayment performance.
Collateral values are generally refreshed when an obligor’s general
credit performance deteriorates and we have to assess the likely
performance of secondary sources of repayment should it prove
necessary to rely on them.
Accordingly, the following table reports values only for customers
with CRR 8–10, recognising that these loans and advances
generally have valuations that are comparatively recent.
Other corporate, commercial and non-bank financial institutions loans and advances including loan commitments by level of collateral
(Audited)
2022
2021
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
ECL coverage
Gross
carrying/
nominal
amount
ECL coverage
HK$m
%
HK$m
%
Stage 1
Not collateralised
2,155,095
0.1
2,044,385
0.0
Fully collateralised
379,471
0.1
431,547
0.1
Partially collateralised (A):
246,654
0.1
262,118
0.0
–  collateral value on A
97,058
108,645
Total
2,781,220
0.1
2,738,050
0.0
Stage 2
Not collateralised
314,140
0.5
314,470
0.4
Fully collateralised
128,648
1.0
113,991
0.7
Partially collateralised (B):
55,804
0.6
37,862
0.4
–  collateral value on B
22,737
15,205
Total
498,592
0.6
466,323
0.4
Stage 3
Not collateralised
14,373
68.2
17,171
80.2
Fully collateralised
5,689
7.2
2,551
17.3
Partially collateralised (C):
8,956
37.0
7,621
36.8
–  collateral value on C
4,480
4,102
Total
29,018
46.6
27,343
62.2
POCI
Not collateralised
138
1.4
351
47.6
Fully collateralised
183
92.9
442
37.8
Partially collateralised (D):
156
12.2
—
—
–  collateral value on D
125
—
Total
477
40.0
793
42.1
At 31 Dec
3,309,307
0.6
3,232,509
0.6
Other credit risk exposures
(Unaudited)
In addition to collateralised lending described above, other credit
enhancements are employed and methods used to mitigate credit
risk arising from financial assets. These are summarised below:
•Some securities issued by governments, banks and other
financial institutions may benefit from additional credit
enhancements provided by government guarantees that cover
the assets.
•Debt securities issued by banks and financial institutions
include asset-backed securities (‘ABSs’) and similar
instruments, which are supported by underlying pools of
financial assets. Credit risk associated with ABSs is reduced
through the purchase of credit default swap (‘CDS’) protection.
•The group’s maximum exposure to credit risk includes financial
guarantees and similar contracts granted, as well as loan and
other credit-related commitments. Depending on the terms of
the arrangement, we may use additional credit mitigation if a
guarantee is called upon or a loan commitment is drawn and
subsequently defaults.
Derivatives
(Unaudited)
We participate in transactions exposing us to counterparty credit
risk. Counterparty credit risk is the risk of financial loss if the
counterparty to a transaction defaults before satisfactorily settling
it. It arises principally from over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivatives
and securities financing transactions and is calculated in both the
trading and non-trading books. Transactions vary in value by
reference to a market factor such as an interest rate, exchange
rate or asset price.
The counterparty risk from derivative transactions is taken into
account when reporting the fair value of derivative positions. The
adjustment to the fair value is known as the credit value
adjustment (‘CVA’).
Risk
52
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Treasury Risk
Overview
(Unaudited)
Treasury risk is the risk of having insufficient capital, liquidity or
funding resources to meet financial obligations and satisfy
regulatory requirements, including the risk to our earnings or
capital due to structural foreign exchange exposures and changes
in market interest rates, together with pension and insurance risk.
Treasury risk arises from changes to the respective resources and
risk profiles driven by customer behaviour, management decisions
or the external environment.
Approach and policy
(Unaudited)
The main objective in the management of treasury risk is to
maintain appropriate levels of capital, liquidity, funding, foreign
exchange and market risk to support business strategy, and meet
regulatory and stress testing-related requirements.
The approach to treasury management is driven by our strategic
and organisational requirements, taking into account the
regulatory, economic and commercial environment. We aim to
maintain a strong capital and liquidity base to support the risks
inherent in our business and invest in accordance with our
strategy, meeting both consolidated and local regulatory
requirements at all times.
Our policy is underpinned by our risk management framework, our
internal capital adequacy assessment process (‘ICAAP’) and our
internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (‘ILAAP’). The risk
framework incorporates a number of measures aligned to our
assessment of risks for both internal and regulatory purposes.
Treasury risk management
Key developments in 2022
(Unaudited)
•We continued to build our second line of defence capabilities,
providing independent oversight of treasury activities across
capital risk, liquidity and funding risk, interest rate risk in the
banking book ('IRRBB') and recovery and resolution planning in
Asia-Pacific sites during 2022.
•The Board approved risk appetite for IRRBB for the group was
further enhanced in 2022 to include NII sensitivity metric to
monitor impact of 100bps interest rate shock on forecasted
earnings of the Bank over next 1 year against the Board
approved Risk Appetite.
•During the periods of high market volatility in the first half of
2022, we enhanced monitoring and forecasting of our capital
positions. The mark-to-market movement in financial
instruments that impacted our capital ratio arose from the
portfolio of high-quality liquid assets (‘HQLA’) held by our
Markets Treasury for liquidity risk management and as
economic hedges of net interest income. This portfolio was
largely accounted for at fair value through other comprehensive
income (‘FVOCI’), together with any hedge derivative held to
offset the duration risk of the assets. During the year, we took
steps to reduce the duration risk of this portfolio to minimise
the capital impact from higher interest rates. As a result of
these measures, the hold-to-collect-and-sell stressed value at
risk (‘VaR’) exposure reduced from -HK$10.bn at the end of
2021 to -HK$3.7bn at the end of 2022.
•We implemented a new hold-to-collect business model, which
will involve our portfolio of hold-to-collect assets forming a
material part of our liquid asset buffer as well as a hedge to our
structural interest rate risk. This will allow more flexibility in
managing the hold-to-collect-and-sell portfolio to optimise
returns from market movements while safeguarding the group
capital and future earnings.
Governance and structure
(Unaudited)
The Board approves the policy and risk appetite for capital risk,
liquidity and funding risk, and IRRBB. It is supported and advised
by the Risk Committee (‘RC’).
The Global Treasury sub-function manages capital, liquidity and
funding risk and structural foreign exchange risk on an on-going
basis and provides support to the Asset and Liability Management
Committee (‘ALCO’), and is overseen by the Treasury Risk
Management sub-function ('TRM') and the Risk Management
Meeting (‘RMM’).
The Global Treasury sub-function also manages interest rate risk in
the banking book, maintaining the transfer pricing framework and
informing the regional and local ALCOs of the group and site’s
overall banking book interest rate exposure. Banking book interest
rate positions may be transferred to be managed by the Global
Treasury business, within the market risk limits approved by the
RMM.
Pension risk is managed through a network of local governance
forums. The regional Pension Risk Management Meeting oversees
all pension plans sponsored by HSBC in Asia-Pacific, and is
chaired by the Regional Head of Traded and Treasury Risk
Management.
The Treasury Risk Management sub-function carries out
independent review, challenge and assurance of the
appropriateness of the risk management activities undertaken by
Global Treasury. Internal Audit provides independent assurance
that risk is managed effectively.
Capital risk
Capital management
(Audited)
Our approach to capital management is driven by our strategic
and organisational requirements, taking into account the
regulatory, economic and commercial environment in which we
operate.
It is our objective to maintain a strong capital base to support the
risks inherent in our business, to invest in accordance with our
strategy and to meet regulatory capital requirements at all times.
To achieve this, our policy is to hold capital in a range of different
forms and all capital raising is agreed with major subsidiaries as
part of their individual and the group’s capital management
processes.
The policy on capital management is underpinned by a capital
management framework and our ICAAP. The framework
incorporates key capital risk appetites for CET1, Tier1, Total
Capital, Loss Absorbing Capacity ('LAC') and Leverage Ratio,
which enables us to manage our capital in a consistent manner.
Regulatory capital and economic capital are the two primary
measures used for the management and control of capital.
Capital measures:
•regulatory capital is the capital which we are required to hold in
accordance with the rules established by regulators; and
•economic capital is the internally calculated capital requirement
to support risks to which we are exposed and forms a core part
of the ICAAP.
ICAAP is an assessment of the group’s capital position, outlining
both regulatory and internal capital resources and requirements
resulting from our business model, strategy, risk profile,
performance and planning, and the findings arising from stress
testing. Our assessment of capital adequacy is driven by an
assessment of risks that include credit, market, operational,
pension, insurance, structural foreign exchange and interest rate
risk in the banking book. Climate risk is also considered as part of
the ICAAP, and we are continuing to develop our approach for
climate risk management.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
53
The group’s ICAAP supports the determination of the capital risk
appetite and target ratios, as well as enables the assessment and
determination of capital requirements by regulators. Banking
subsidiaries prepare ICAAPs in line with global guidance, while
considering their local regulatory regimes to determine their own
risk appetites and ratios.
Our capital management process is articulated in our annual
capital plan which is approved by the Board. The plan is drawn up
with the objective of maintaining both an appropriate amount of
capital and an optimal mix between the different components of
capital. Capital and Risk-Weighted Assets ('RWAs') are monitored
and managed against the plan, with capital forecasts reported to
relevant governance committees. Each subsidiary manages its
own capital to support its planned business growth and meet its
local regulatory requirements within the context of the approved
annual group capital plan. In accordance with our capital
management objectives, capital generated by subsidiaries in
excess of planned requirements is returned to the Bank, normally
by way of dividends.
The Bank is the primary provider of capital to its subsidiaries and
these investments are substantially funded by the Bank’s own
capital issuance and profit retention. As part of its capital
management process, the Bank seeks to maintain a prudent
balance between the composition of its capital and that of its
investment in subsidiaries.
The principal forms of capital are included in the following
balances on the consolidated balance sheet: share capital, other
equity instruments, retained earnings, other reserves and
subordinated liabilities.
Regulatory capital requirements
(Audited)
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (‘HKMA’) supervises the
group on both a consolidated and solo-consolidated basis and
therefore receives information on the capital adequacy of, and sets
capital requirements for, the group as a whole and on a solo-
consolidated basis. Individual banking subsidiaries and branches
are directly regulated by their local banking supervisors, who set
and monitor their capital adequacy requirements. In most
jurisdictions, non-banking financial subsidiaries are also subject to
the supervision and capital requirements of local regulatory
authorities.
The group uses the advanced internal ratings-based approach to
calculate its credit risk for the majority of its non-securitisation
exposures. For collective investment scheme exposures, the group
uses the look-through approach and mandate-based approach to
calculate the risk-weighted amount. For securitisation exposures,
the group uses the securitisation internal ratings-based approach,
securitisation external ratings-based approach, securitisation
standardised approach or securitisation fall-back approach to
determine credit risk for its banking book securitisation exposures.
For counterparty credit risk, the group uses both the standardised
(counterparty credit risk) approach and the internal models
(counterparty credit risk) approach to calculate its default risk
exposures for derivatives, and the comprehensive approach for
securities financing transactions. For market risk, the group uses
an internal models method approach ('IMM') to calculate its
general market risk for the risk categories of interest rate and
foreign exchange (including gold) exposures, and equity
exposures. The group also uses an IMM approach to calculate its
market risk in respect of specific risk for interest rate exposures
and equity exposures. The group uses the standardised (market
risk) approach for calculating other market risk positions, as well
as trading book securitisation exposures, and the standardised
(operational risk) approach to calculate its operational risk.
During the year, the group issued various capital and LAC
instruments in order to operate above required levels, including
buffers.
Basel III
(Unaudited)
The Basel III capital rules set out the minimum CET1 capital
requirement of 4.5% and total capital requirement of 8%. At
31 December 2022, the capital buffers applicable to the group
include the Capital Conservation Buffer (‘CCB’), the
Countercyclical Capital Buffer (‘CCyB’) and the Higher Loss
Absorbency (‘HLA’) requirement for Domestic Systemically
Important Banks (‘D-SIB’). The CCB is 2.5% and is designed to
ensure banks build up capital outside periods of stress. The CCyB
is set on an individual country/territory basis and is built up during
periods of excess credit growth to protect against future losses.
The CCyB for Hong Kong and the list of D-SIB are regularly
reviewed and last announced by the HKMA on 8 February 2023
and 30 December 2022 respectively. In its latest announcement,
the HKMA maintained the CCyB for Hong Kong at 1.0% and
maintained the D-SIB designation as well as HLA requirement at
2.5% for the group.
The group is classified as a material subsidiary under the Financial
Institutions (Resolution) (Loss-absorbing Capacity Requirements –
Banking Sector) Rules (‘LAC Rules’) and therefore is subject to the
LAC requirements to maintain its internal LAC risk-weighted ratio
and the internal LAC leverage ratio at or above specified
minimums.
Leverage ratio
(Unaudited)
Basel III introduces a simple non risk-based leverage ratio as a
complementary measure to the risk-based capital requirements. It
aims to constrain the build-up of excess leverage in the banking
sector, introducing additional safeguards against model risk and
measurement errors. The ratio is a volume-based measure
calculated as tier 1 capital divided by total exposures (both on-
balance sheet and off-balance sheet).
At
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
%
%
Leverage ratio
5.9
5.8
Capital and leverage ratio exposure
measure
HK$m
HK$m
Tier 1 capital
545,572
530,701
Total exposure measure
9,301,363
9,192,814
The increase in the leverage ratio from 31 December 2021 to
31 December 2022 was mainly due to the increase in Tier 1
capital, partly offset by the rise in the exposure measure.
Further details regarding the group’s leverage position can be
viewed in the Banking Disclosure Statement at 31 December
2022, which will be available in the Regulatory Disclosure Section
of our website: www.hsbc.com.hk.
Capital adequacy at 31 December 2022
(Unaudited)
The following tables show the capital ratios, RWAs and capital
base as contained in the ‘Capital Adequacy Ratio’ return submitted
to the HKMA on a consolidated basis under the requirements of
section 3C(1) of the Banking (Capital) Rules.
The basis of consolidation for financial accounting purposes is
described in Note 1 on the Consolidated Financial Statements and
differs from that used for regulatory purposes. Further information
on the regulatory consolidation basis and a full reconciliation
between the group’s accounting and regulatory balance sheets
can be viewed in the Banking Disclosure Statement 2022.
Subsidiaries not included in the group's consolidation for
regulatory purposes are securities and insurance companies and
the capital invested by the group in these subsidiaries is deducted
from regulatory capital, subject to threshold.
The Bank and its banking subsidiaries maintain regulatory reserves
to satisfy the provisions of the Banking Ordinance and local
regulatory requirements for prudential supervision purposes.
Risk
54
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
At 31 December 2022, the effect of this regulatory reserve
requirement is to reduce the amount of reserves which can be
distributed to shareholders by HK$16,413m (31 December 2021:
HK$18,587m).
We closely monitor and consider future regulatory change and
continue to evaluate the impact upon our capital requirements of
regulatory developments. This includes the Basel III Reforms
package, which is currently scheduled for implementation by the
HKMA no earlier than 1 January 2024. We continue to participate
in consultations and monitor progress on the implementation.
Based on the results of the latest HKMA consultations, we foresee
a positive impact on our capital ratios on initial application. The
risk-weighted asset ('RWA') output floor under the Basel III
Reforms will commence once implemented, with an expected five-
year transitional provision. Any impact from the output floor would
be towards the end of the transition period. We are expecting the
issuance of final rules in 2023 which will enable us to better
estimate the impact.
Capital ratios
(Unaudited)
At
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
%
%
Common equity tier 1 (‘CET1’) capital ratio
15.3
15.4
Tier 1 capital ratio
16.9
16.8
Total capital ratio
18.8
18.7
Risk-weighted assets by risk type
(Unaudited)
At
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Credit risk
2,589,633
2,497,803
Counterparty credit risk
133,290
148,188
Market risk
160,533
172,831
Operational risk
337,004
337,731
Sovereign concentration risk
1,708
—
Total
3,222,168
3,156,553
Risk-weighted assets by reportable segments
(Unaudited)
At
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Wealth and Personal Banking
640,626
621,757
Commercial Banking
1,209,888
1,157,241
Global Banking
562,404
566,587
Markets and Securities Services
410,401
410,599
Corporate Centre
338,254
334,450
Other (GBM-other)
60,595
65,919
Total
3,222,168
3,156,553
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
55
Capital base
(Unaudited)
The following table sets out the composition of the group’s capital base under Basel III at 31 December 2022.
Capital base
(Unaudited)
At
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Common equity tier 1 (‘CET1’) capital
Shareholders’ equity
727,880
714,139
– shareholders’ equity per balance sheet
875,320
856,809
– revaluation reserve capitalisation issue
(1,454)
(1,454)
– other equity instruments
(52,386)
(44,615)
– unconsolidated subsidiaries
(93,600)
(96,601)
Non-controlling interests
30,106
28,730
– non-controlling interests per balance sheet
65,943
66,702
– non-controlling interests in unconsolidated subsidiaries
(11,365)
(11,800)
– surplus non-controlling interests disallowed in CET1
(24,472)
(26,172)
Regulatory deductions to CET1 capital
(266,424)
(258,215)
– valuation adjustments
(2,376)
(1,834)
– goodwill and intangible assets
(32,064)
(28,883)
– deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities
(3,688)
(3,353)
– cash flow hedging reserve
233
(60)
– changes in own credit risk on fair valued liabilities
(3,494)
1,322
– defined benefit pension fund assets
(27)
(18)
– significant Loss-absorbing capacity (‘LAC’) investments in unconsolidated financial sector entities
(140,987)
(139,239)
– property revaluation reserves1
(67,608)
(67,563)
– regulatory reserve
(16,413)
(18,587)
Total CET1 capital
491,562
484,654
Additional tier 1 (‘AT1’) capital
Total AT1 capital before regulatory deductions
54,019
46,073
– perpetual subordinated loans
52,386
44,615
– allowable non-controlling interests in AT1 capital
1,633
1,458
Regulatory deductions to AT1 capital
(9)
(26)
– significant LAC investments in unconsolidated financial sector entities
(9)
(26)
Total AT1 capital
54,010
46,047
Total tier 1 capital
545,572
530,701
Tier 2 capital
Total tier 2 capital before regulatory deductions
68,118
67,802
– perpetual subordinated debt2
—
3,119
– term subordinated debt
19,505
14,972
– property revaluation reserves1
31,078
31,057
– impairment allowances and regulatory reserve eligible for inclusion in tier 2 capital
16,008
17,471
– allowable non-controlling interests in tier 2 capital
1,527
1,183
Regulatory deductions to tier 2 capital
(6,378)
(8,025)
– significant LAC  investments in unconsolidated financial sector entities
(6,378)
(8,025)
Total tier 2 capital
61,740
59,777
Total capital
607,312
590,478
1Includes the revaluation surplus on investment properties which is reported as part of retained earnings and adjustments made in accordance with
the Banking (Capital) Rules issued by the HKMA.
2This Tier 2 capital instrument is grandfathered under Basel III and has been phased out in full after 31 December 2021.
A detailed breakdown of the group’s CET1 capital, AT1 capital, Tier 2 capital and regulatory deductions can be viewed in the Banking
Disclosure Statement 2022.
Risk
56
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Non-trading book foreign exchange exposures
Structural foreign exchange exposures
(Unaudited)
A Structural foreign exchange exposure arises from the capital
invested or net assets in a foreign operation together with any
associated hedging. A foreign operation is defined as a subsidiary,
associate, joint arrangement or branch, the activities of which are
conducted in a currency other than that of the reporting entity. An
entity's functional reporting currency is normally that of the
primary economic environment in which the entity operates.
Exchange differences on structural exposures are recognised in
other comprehensive income ('OCI’). The group uses Hong Kong
dollar as our presentation currency in our consolidated financial
statements. Therefore, our consolidated balance sheet is affected
by exchange differences between Hong Kong dollar and all the
non-Hong Kong dollar functional currencies of foreign operation.
Our structural foreign exchange exposures are managed with the
primary objective of ensuring, where practical, that our
consolidated capital ratios and the capital ratios of individual
banking subsidiaries are largely protected from the effect of
changes in exchange rates.
We hedge structural foreign exchange positions where it is capital
efficient to do so, and subject to approved limits. Hedging
positions are monitored and rebalanced periodically to manage
RWA or downside risks associated with group’s foreign currency
investments.
The group had the following net structural foreign currency
exposures that were greater than 10% of the total net structural
foreign currency exposures:
Local Currency (m)
HK$ equivalent (m)
At 31 Dec 2022
Renminbi
241,134
272,709
US dollars
10,891
84,902
At 31 Dec 2021
Renminbi
221,207
271,421
US dollars
10,224
79,731
Transactional foreign exchange exposures
(Unaudited)
Transactional foreign exchange exposures arise from transactions
in the banking book generating profit and loss or OCI reserves in a
currency other than the reporting currency of the operating entity.
Transactional foreign exchange exposure generated through profit
and loss is periodically transferred to Markets and Securities
Services and managed within limits with the exception of limited
residual foreign exchange exposure arising from timing differences
or for other reasons. Transactional foreign exchange exposure
generated through OCI reserves is managed by the Global
Treasury sub-function within an agreed limit framework.
Liquidity and funding risk
Overview
(Audited)
Liquidity risk is the risk that we do not have sufficient financial
resources to meet our obligations as they fall due. Liquidity risk
arises from mismatches in the timing of cash flows. Funding risk is
the risk that we cannot raise funding or can only do so at
excessive cost.
The group has comprehensive policies, metrics and controls,
which aim to allow us to withstand severe but plausible liquidity
stresses. The group manages liquidity and funding risk at an
operating entity level to make sure that obligations can be met in
the jurisdiction where they fall due, generally without reliance on
other parts of the group.
Operating entities are required to meet internal minimum
requirements and any applicable regulatory requirements at all
times. These requirements are assessed through the Internal
Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process ('ILAAP'), which ensures
that operating entities have robust strategies, policies, processes
and systems for the identification, measurement, management
and monitoring of liquidity and funding risk. The ILAAP informs
the validation of risk tolerance and the setting of risk appetite. It
also assesses the capability to manage liquidity and funding
effectively in each operating entity. Liquidity and funding risk
metrics are set and managed locally but are subject to robust
global review and challenge to ensure consistency of approach
and application of the Group’s policies and controls.
Framework
(Unaudited)
Global Treasury sub-function is responsible for the application of
policies and controls at a local operating entity level. The elements
of liquidity and funding risk management framework are
underpinned by a robust governance framework, with the two
major elements being:
•Asset and Liability Management Committees (‘ALCOs’) at the
group and entity level; and
•annual ILAAP used to validate risk tolerance and set risk
appetite.
All operating entities are required to prepare an ILAAP document
at appropriate frequency. Compliance with liquidity and funding
requirements is monitored and reported to ALCO, RMM and
Executive Committee on a regular basis.
Liquidity and Funding Risk management processes include:
•maintaining compliance with relevant regulatory requirements
of the operating entity;
•projecting cash flows under various stress scenarios and
considering the level of liquid assets necessary in relation
thereto;
•monitoring liquidity and funding ratios against internal and
regulatory requirements;
•maintaining a diverse range of funding sources with adequate
back-up facilities;
•managing the concentration and profile of term funding;
•managing contingent liquidity commitment exposures within
predetermined limits;
•maintaining debt financing plans;
•monitoring of depositor concentration in order to avoid undue
reliance on large individual depositors and ensuring a
satisfactory overall funding mix; and
•maintaining liquidity and funding contingency plans. These
plans identify early indicators of stress conditions and describe
actions to be taken in the event of difficulties arising from
systemic or other crises, while minimising adverse long-term
implications for the business.
Management of liquidity and funding risk
(Audited)
Funding and liquidity plans form part of the financial resource plan
that is approved by the Board. The Board-level risk appetite
measures are the liquidity coverage ratio (‘LCR’) and net stable
funding ratio (‘NSFR’). An internal liquidity metric ('ILM') is used to
supplement these regulatory metrics. An appropriate funding and
liquidity profile is managed through a wider set of measures:
•a minimum LCR requirement;
•a minimum NSFR requirement or other appropriate metric;
•an ILM requirement;
•a legal entity depositor concentration limit;
•cumulative term funding maturity concentrations limit;
•liquidity metrics to monitor minimum requirement by currency;
•intra-day liquidity;
•the application of liquidity funds transfer pricing; and
•forward-looking funding assessments.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
57
Sources of funding
(Unaudited)
Our primary sources of funding are customer current accounts,
customer savings deposits payable on demand or at short notice
and term deposits. We issue wholesale securities (secured and
unsecured) to supplement our customer deposits and change the
currency mix, maturity profile or location of our liabilities.
Currency mismatch
(Unaudited)
Group policy requires all operating entities to monitor material
single currency ILM and LCR. Limits are set to ensure that
outflows can be met, given assumptions on stressed capacity in
the FX swap markets.
Additional collateral obligations
(Unaudited)
Under the terms of our current collateral obligations of derivative
contracts (which are International Swaps and Derivatives
Association ('ISDA') compliant credit support annex ('CSA')
contracts), the additional collateral required to post in the event of
one-notch and two-notch downgrade in credit ratings is
immaterial.
Liquidity and funding risk in 2022
(Unaudited)
The group is required to calculate its LCR and NSFR on a
consolidated basis in accordance with rule 11(1) of The Banking
(Liquidity) Rules ('BLR'), and is required to maintain both LCR and
NSFR of not less than 100%.
The average LCR of the group for the period are as follows:
Quarter ended
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
%
%
Average LCR
157.8
154.3
The average LCR increased by 3.5 percentage points from 154.3%
for the quarter ended 31 December 2021 to 157.8% for the quarter
ended 31 December 2022.
The majority of high quality liquid assets ('HQLA') included in the
LCR are Level 1 assets as defined in the BLR, which consist mainly
of government debt securities.
The total weighted amount of HQLA of the group for the period
are as follows:
Weighted amount (average
value) at quarter ended
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Level 1 assets
1,744,471
1,767,933
Level 2A assets
80,348
79,368
Level 2B assets
61,184
64,106
Total
1,886,003
1,911,407
The NSFR of the group for the period are as follows:
Quarter ended
31 Dec
31 Dec
2022
2021
%
%
Net stable funding ratio
152.3
151.9
The NSFR increased by 0.4 percentage points from 151.9% for the
quarter ended 31 December 2021 to 152.3% for the quarter ended
31 December 2022.
Interdependent assets and liabilities included in the group's NSFR
are certificates of indebtedness held and legal tender notes issued.
Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book
(Unaudited)
Assessment and risk appetite
Interest rate risk in the banking book is the risk of an adverse
impact to earnings or capital due to changes in market interest
rates. It is generated by our non-traded assets and liabilities,
specifically loans, deposits and financial instruments that are not
held for trading intent or in order to hedge positions held with
trading intent. Interest rate risk that can be economically hedged
may be transferred to the Global Treasury sub-function. Hedging is
generally executed through interest rate derivatives or fixed-rate
government bonds. Any interest rate risk that Global Treasury sub-
function cannot economically hedge is not transferred and will
remain within the global business where the risks originate.
The Global Treasury sub-function uses a number of measures to
monitor and control interest rate risk in the banking book,
including:
•net interest income sensitivity; and
•economic value of equity sensitivity; and
•hold-to-collect-and-sell value at risk.
Net interest income sensitivity
A principal part of our management of non-traded interest rate risk
is to monitor the sensitivity of expected net interest income (‘NII’)
under varying interest rate scenarios (i.e. simulation modelling),
where all other economic variables are held constant. This
monitoring is undertaken at an entity level, where entities
calculate both one-year and five-year NII sensitivities across a
range of interest rate scenarios.
NII sensitivity figures represent the effect of pro forma movements
in projected yield curves based on a static balance sheet size and
structure. The exception to this is where the size of the balances or
repricing is deemed interest rate sensitive, for example, early
prepayment of mortgages. These sensitivity calculations do not
incorporate actions that would be taken by Markets Treasury or in
the business that originates the risk to mitigate the effect of
interest rate movements.
The NII sensitivity calculations assume that interest rates of all
maturities move by the same amount in the ‘up-shock’ scenario.
The sensitivity calculations in the ‘down-shock’ scenarios reflect
no floors to the shocked market rates. However, customer
product-specific interest rate floors are recognised where
applicable.
Economic value of equity sensitivity
Economic value of equity (‘EVE’) represents the present value of
the future banking book cash flows that could be distributed to
equity holders under a managed run-off scenario. This equates to
the current book value of equity plus the present value of future
NII in this scenario. EVE can be used to assess the economic
capital required to support interest rate risk in the banking book.
An EVE sensitivity represents the expected movement in EVE due
to pre-specified interest rate shocks, where all other economic
variables are held constant. Operating entities are required to
monitor EVE sensitivities as a percentage of capital resources.
Further details of HSBC’s risk management of interest rate risk in
the banking book can be found in the Pillar 3 Disclosures at
31 December 2022.
Pension Risk
(Unaudited)
Our global pensions strategy is to move from defined benefit to
defined contribution plans, where local law allows and it is
considered competitive to do so.
In defined contribution pension plans, the contributions that HSBC
is required to make are known, while the ultimate pension benefit
will vary, typically with investment returns achieved by investment
choices made by the employee. While the market risk to HSBC of
defined contribution plans is low, the group is still exposed to
operational and reputational risk.
Risk
58
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
In defined benefit pension plans, the level of pension benefit is
known. Therefore, the level of contributions required by HSBC will
vary due to a number of risks, including:
•investments delivering a return below that required to provide
the projected plan benefits;
•the prevailing economic environment leading to corporate
failures, thus triggering write-downs in asset values (both
equity and debt);
•a change in interest rate expectations, causing an increase in
the value of plan liabilities; and
•plan members living longer than expected (known as longevity
risk).
Pension risk is assessed using an economic capital model that
takes into account potential variations in these factors. The impact
of these variations on both pension assets and pension liabilities is
assessed using a 1-in-200-year stress test. Scenario analysis and
other stress tests are also used to support pension risk
management, including the review of de-risking opportunities. To
fund the benefits associated with defined benefit plans,
sponsoring group companies make regular contributions in
accordance with advice from actuaries and in consultation with
the plan’s fiduciaries where relevant. These contributions are
normally set to ensure that there are sufficient funds to meet the
cost of the accruing benefits for the future service of active
members. However, higher contributions are required when plan
assets are considered insufficient to cover the existing pension
liabilities. Contribution rates are typically revised annually or once
every three years, depending on the plan.
The defined benefit plans invest contributions in a range of
investments designed to limit the risk of assets failing to meet a
plan’s liabilities. Any changes in expected returns from the
investments may also change future contribution requirements. In
pursuit of these long-term objectives, an overall target allocation is
established between asset classes of the defined benefit plan. In
addition, each permitted asset class has its own benchmarks, such
as stock-market indices. The target allocations are reviewed
regularly, typically once every three to five years, and more
frequently if required by local legislation or circumstances. The
process generally involves an asset and liability review.
Market Risk
Overview
(Unaudited)
Market risk is the risk of adverse financial impact on trading
activities arising from changes in market parameters such as
interest rates, foreign exchange rates, asset prices, volatilities,
correlations and credit spreads.
Market risk management
Key developments in 2022
(Unaudited)
There were no material changes to our policies and practices for
the management of market risk in 2022.
Governance and structure
(Unaudited)
The following diagram summarises the main business areas where
trading market risks reside, and the market risk measures used to
monitor and limit exposures.
Risk types
Trading risk
•Foreign exchange and commodities
•Interest rates
•Credit spreads
•Equities
Global business
GBM
Risk measure
Value at risk | Sensitivity | Stress Testing
.
The objective of our risk management policies and measurement
techniques is to manage and control market risk exposures to
optimise return on risk while maintaining a market profile
consistent with our established risk appetite.
Market risk is managed and controlled through limits approved by
the group's Board of Directors. These limits are allocated across
business lines and to the group’s legal entities. The group has an
independent market risk management and control sub-function,
which is responsible for measuring, monitoring and reporting
market risk exposures against limits on a daily basis. Each
operating entity is required to assess the market risks arising in its
business and to transfer them either to its local Markets and
Securities Services or Market Treasury for management, or to
separate books managed under the supervision of the local ALCO.
The Traded Risk sub-function enforces the controls around trading
in permissible instruments approved for each site as well as
changes that follow completion of the new product approval
process. Trading Risk also restricts trading in the more complex
derivatives products to offices with appropriate levels of product
expertise and robust control systems.
Key risk management processes
Monitoring and limiting market risk exposures
(Audited)
Our objective is to manage and control market risk exposures
while maintaining a market profile consistent with our risk
appetite.
We use a range of tools to monitor and limit market risk exposures
including sensitivity analysis, value at risk (‘VaR’) and
stress testing.
Sensitivity analysis
(Unaudited)
Sensitivity analysis measures the impact of individual market
factor movements on specific instruments or portfolios, including
interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. We use
sensitivity measures to monitor the market risk positions within
each risk type. Granular sensitivity limits are set for trading desks
with consideration of market liquidity, customer demand and
capital constraints, among other factors.
Value at risk
(Audited)
VaR is a technique for estimating potential losses on risk positions
as a result of movements in market rates and prices over a
specified time horizon and to a given level of confidence. The use
of VaR is integrated into market risk management and calculated
for all trading positions regardless of how we capitalise them.
Where we do not calculate VaR explicitly, we use alternative tools
as summarised in the ‘Stress testing’ section below.
Our models are predominantly based on historical simulation that
incorporates the following features:
•historical market rates and prices, which are calculated with
reference to foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, interest
rates, equity prices and the associated volatilities;
•potential market movements that are calculated with reference
to data from the past two years; and
•calculations to a 99% confidence level and using a one-day
holding period.
The models also incorporate the effect of option features on the
underlying exposures. The nature of the VaR models means that
an increase in observed market volatility will lead to an increase in
VaR without any changes in the underlying positions.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
59
VaR model limitations
(Audited)
Although a valuable guide to risk, VaR is used with awareness of
its limitations. For example:
•the use of historical data as a proxy for estimating future
market moves may not encompass all potential market events,
particularly those that are extreme in nature.
•the use of a one-day holding period for risk management
purposes of trading books assumes that this short period is
sufficient to hedge or liquidate all positions.
•the use of a 99% confidence level by definition does not take
into account losses that might occur beyond this level of
confidence.
•VaR is calculated on the basis of exposures outstanding at the
close of business and therefore does not reflect intra-day
exposures.
Risk not in VaR framework
(Unaudited)
The risks not in VaR (‘RNIV’) framework captures and capitalises
material market risks that are not adequately covered in the VaR
model.
Risk factors are reviewed on a regular basis and are either
incorporated directly in the VaR models, where possible, or
quantified through either the VaR-based RNIV approach or a stress
test approach within the RNIV framework. While VaR-based RNIVs
are calculated by using historical scenarios, stress-type RNIVs are
estimated on the basis of stress scenarios whose severity is
calibrated to be in line with the capital adequacy requirements.
The outcome of the VaR-based RNIV approach is included in the
overall VaR calculation but excluded from the VaR measure used
for regulatory back-testing. In addition, the stressed VaR measure
also includes risk factors considered in the VaR-based RNIV
approach. Stress-type RNIVs include a de-peg risk measure to
capture risk to pegged and heavily managed currencies.
Stress testing
(Unaudited)
Stress testing is an important procedure that is integrated into our
market risk management framework to evaluate the potential
impact on portfolio values of more extreme, although plausible,
events or movements in a set of financial variables. In such
scenarios, losses can be much greater than those predicted by
VaR modelling.
Stress testing is implemented at legal entity, regional and overall
Group levels. A set of scenarios is used consistently across all
regions within the Group. The risk appetite around potential stress
losses for the group is set and monitored against a referral limit.
Market risk reverse stress tests are designed to identify
vulnerabilities in our portfolios by looking for scenarios that lead to
loss levels considered severe for the relevant portfolio. These
scenarios may be quite local or idiosyncratic in nature, and
complement the systematic top-down stress testing.
Stress testing and reverse stress testing provide senior
management with insights regarding the ‘tail risk’ beyond VaR, for
which our appetite is limited.
Trading portfolios
(Audited)
Trading portfolios comprise positions held for client servicing and
market-making, with the intention of short-term resale and/or to
hedge risks resulting from such positions.
Back-testing
(Audited)
We routinely validate the accuracy of our VaR models by back-
testing the VaR metric against both actual and hypothetical profit
and loss. Hypothetical profit and loss excludes non-modelled items
such as fees, commissions and revenue of intra-day transactions.
The number of hypothetical loss back-testing exceptions, together
with a number of other indicators, are used to assess model
performance and to consider whether enhanced internal
monitoring of a VaR model is required.
We back-test our VaR at set levels of our group entity hierarchy.
Market risk in 2022
(Unaudited)
During 2022, financial markets were driven by concerns over high
inflation and recession risks, against the backdrop of the Russia-
Ukraine conflict and continued Covid-19 pandemic restrictions in
Asia. Throughout the year, major central banks tightened their
monetary policies at a faster pace than previously anticipated in
order to counter rising inflation. As a result, bond markets sold off
sharply and bond yields rose to multi-year highs. Equity valuations
saw pronounced volatility and fell across most market sectors due
to recession risks and tighter liquidity conditions. Foreign
exchange markets were largely dominated by a strong US dollar,
as a result of global geopolitical instability and the relatively fast
pace of monetary tightening by the US Federal Reserve. Investors
sentiment remained fragile in credit markets, with credit spreads
in investment-grade and high-yield debt benchmarks reaching
their widest levels since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The
Chinese property sector was underperforming in 2022, continuing
the wave of defaults and debt restructuring from 2021.
We continued to manage market risk prudently during 2022.
Sensitivity exposures and VaR remained within appetite as the
business pursued its core market-making activity in support of our
customers. Market risk was managed using a complementary set
of risk measures and limits, including stress and scenario analysis.
Trading portfolios
(Audited)
Value at risk of the trading portfolios
Trading VaR was predominantly generated by the Markets and
Securities Services business. Trading VaR was higher as at
31 December 2022 compared to 31 December 2021, mainly driven
by increase in VaR exposed to interest rate risk and foreign
exchange risk, partially offset by reduction in VaR from equity risk
and credit spread risk.
Risk
60
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
The trading VaR for the year is shown in the table below.
Trading value at risk, 99% 1 day1
(Audited)
Foreign
exchange and
commodity
Interest
rate
Equity
Credit
spread
Portfolio
diversification2
Total3
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Year end
95
195
48
18
(154)
202
Average
55
172
55
24
208
Maximum
99
272
98
42
357
At 31 Dec 2021
Year end
36
135
60
31
(74)
188
Average
49
158
77
34
177
Maximum
78
218
108
62
241
1Trading portfolios comprise positions arising from the market-making and warehousing of customer-derived positions.
2Portfolio diversification is the market risk dispersion effect of holding a portfolio containing different risk types. It represents the reduction in
unsystematic market risk that occurs when combining a number of different risk types, for example, interest rate, equity and foreign exchange,
together in one portfolio. It is measured as the difference between the sum of the VaR by individual risk type and the combined total VaR. A
negative number represents the benefit of portfolio diversification. As the maximum and minimum occur on different days for different risk types,
it is not meaningful to calculate a portfolio diversification benefit for these measures.
3The total VaR is non-additive across risk types due to diversification effects.
Climate risk (unaudited) TCFD
Overview
Climate risk relates to the financial and non-financial impacts that
may arise as a result of climate change. Climate risk can
materialise through:
•physical risk, which arises from the increased frequency and
severity of weather events, such as typhoons and floods, or
chronic shifts in weather patterns;
•transition risk, which arises from the process of moving to a
low-carbon economy, including changes in government or
public policy, technology and end-demand; and
•greenwashing risk, which arises from the act of knowingly or
unknowingly misleading stakeholders regarding the group’s
strategy relating to climate, the climate impact/benefits of a
product or service, or the climate commitments or performance
of its customers.
Approach and policy
The group is affected by climate risks either directly or indirectly
through its relationships with its customers, resulting in both
financial and non-financial impacts.
The group may face direct exposure to the physical impacts of
climate change, which could negatively affect its day-to-day
operations. Any detrimental impact to its customers from climate
risk could negatively impact the group either through credit losses
on its loan book or losses on trading assets. The group may also
be impacted by reputational concerns related to the climate action
or inaction of its customers. In addition, if the group is perceived
to mislead stakeholders on its business activities or if it is
perceived to fail to achieve its stated net zero ambitions, it could
face greenwashing risk resulting in significant regulatory and legal
risks.
The group has integrated climate risk into its existing risk
taxonomy, and incorporated it within the risk management
framework through the policies and controls for existing risks
where appropriate.
The group’s climate risk approach is aligned to the Group-wide
risk management framework and three lines of defence model,
which sets out how the group identifies, assesses, and manages
its risks. This approach ensures the group and senior management
have visibility and oversight of the group’s key climate risks.
The first line of defence has ultimate accountability for managing
climate risk in line with risk appetite and owns the related
controls.
The second line of defence sets policies and minimum control
standards, provides subject matter expertise and reviews and
challenges to first line activities to ensure actions relating to
climate are appropriate. Risk Stewards in the existing risk
taxonomy are responsible for the oversight of climate risk impacts
on their risk types.
The third line of defence provides independent assurance to
management that climate risk management, governance and
control processes are designed and operating effectively.
The group’s approach to managing climate risk is currently
focused on understanding physical and transition impacts across
five priority risk types: wholesale credit risk, retail credit risk,
resilience risk, regulatory compliance risk and reputational risk.
On climate risk impact assessment, the group rely on the Group's
high-level materiality rating on how climate risk may impact risk
types within the Group’s taxonomy over a 12-month horizon, and
how the level of risk may increase over longer time horizons.
However, the group observes that the pace of transition in Asia-
Pacific varies market by market.
The group considers greenwashing to be an important risk that is
likely to increase over time, as the group looks to develop
capabilities and products to achieve its net zero ambition, and
work with its clients to help them transition to a low-carbon
economy. To reflect this, the group’s climate risk approach has
been updated to include greenwashing risk, and guidance has
been provided to the first and second lines of defence on the key
risk indicators, and how it should be managed.
The tables below provide an overview of the climate risk drivers
considered within the Group's climate risk framework. Primary risk
drivers refer to risk drivers aligned to the Financial Stability Board's
TCFD, which sets a framework to help public companies and other
organisations disclose climate-related risks and opportunities.
Thematic risk drivers are bespoke to the group's internal climate
risk framework.
The following table provides an overview of the physical and
transition climate risk drivers.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
61
Climate risk – primary risk
drivers
Details
Potential Impacts
Physical
Acute
Increased frequency and severity of weather events causing
disruption to business operations
•Decreased real estate values
•Decreased household income and wealth
•Increased costs of legal and compliance
•Increased public scrutiny
•Decreased profitability
•Lower asset performance
Chronic
Longer-term shifts in climate patterns (e.g. sustained higher
temperatures) that may cause sea level rise or chronic heat waves
Transition
Policy and legal
Mandates on, and regulation of, existing products and services.
Litigation from parties who have suffered from the effects of climate
change
Technology
Replacement of existing products with lower emission options
End-demand
(market)
Changing consumer demand from individuals and corporates
Reputational
Increased scrutiny following a change in stakeholder perceptions and
expectations of climate-related action or inaction
The table below provides an overview of the drivers of greenwashing risk, which is considered to be a thematic risk driver within the
Group's framework.
Climate risk – thematic risk drivers
Details
Greenwashing
Firm
Failure to be accurate and transparent in communicating the group’s progress against its net zero ambition
Product
Not taking steps to ensure the group’s ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’ products are developed and marketed appropriately
Client
Failing to check the group’s products are being used for ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’ business activity and assessing the
credibility of its customers’ climate commitments and/or progress against key performance indicators
Climate risk management (unaudited)
Key developments in 2022
The group’s dedicated climate risk programme continues to
support the development of its climate risk management
capabilities. The key developments in 2022 included:
•The Board approved the group climate strategy.
•The Group updated its climate risk approach to include all risk
types in its risk taxonomy.
•The group provided a climate-related training for the Board, and
expanded training to employees covering additional role-
specific topics, as well as increasing the availability of training
to the wider workforce.
•The group developed new climate risk metrics to assess the
impact of physical risk on the group’s retail mortgage portfolio
in Hong Kong.
•The Group enhanced its transition and physical risk
questionnaire and scoring tool, which helps the group to assess
and improve its understanding of the impact of transition and
physical risk on its customers' business models, and used them
for certain corporate clients in high climate transition risk
sectors.
•The Group developed its first internal climate scenario exercise,
where it used bespoke scenarios that were designed to
articulate a view of the range of potential outcomes for global
climate change. For further details of the internal climate
scenario analysis, see page 11.
Governance and structure
The Board takes overall responsibility for the group’s climate
strategy, overseeing executive management in developing the
execution and associated reporting.
The group Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the management of
climate-related risks, including responsibility for governance, risk
management, stress testing and scenario analysis.
The group CROF oversees all risk activities relating to climate risk
management and escalation of climate risks.
The group Risk Management Meeting and the group Risk
Committee receive regular updates on the climate risk profile, top
and emerging climate risks, and progress of the climate risk
programme.
A working group was established to coordinate the regional
implementation of climate risk-related enhancements across the
Compliance sub-function.
Risk appetite
The group’s climate risk appetite supports the oversight and
management of the financial and non-financial risks from climate
change, and supports the business to deliver its climate ambition
in a safe and sustainable way. The group’s initial risk appetite
focuses on the oversight and management of climate risks across
the five priority areas, including exposure to high transition risk
sectors in its wholesale portfolio and physical risk exposures in its
retail portfolio. These metrics have been implemented at group
level and locally where appropriate. The group continues to review
its risk appetite regularly to capture the most material climate risks
and will enhance its metrics over time.
Policies, processes and controls
The group is integrating climate risk into the policies, processes
and controls across many areas of its organisations, and the group
will continue to update these as its climate risk management
capabilities mature over time.
In 2022, the group incorporated climate considerations into new
money request processes for its wholesale business. The group
also continued to enhance its climate risk scoring tool, which will
enable the group to assess its customers' exposures to climate
risk.
The Group also published and updated the energy policy, covering
oil and gas, power and utilities, hydrogen, renewables, nuclear
and biomass sectors and it updated the thermal coal phase-out
policy after its initial publication in 2021.
Wholesale credit risk
Identification and assessment
The Group has identified six sectors where its wholesale credit
customers have the highest climate risk, based on their carbon
emissions. These are automotive, chemicals, construction and
building materials, metals and mining, oil and gas, and power and
utilities. In these sectors, the Group has a transition and physical
risk questionnaire to help assess and improve its understanding of
the impact of climate changes on its customers' business models
and any related transition strategies. Relationship managers work
with customers to record questionnaire responses, which also help
to identify potential business opportunities to support customers’
transition. The questionnaire is also being completed for the
Group’s largest customers in the agriculture, industrials, real
estate and transportation sectors.
The Group intends to continue increasing the scope of the
questionnaire in 2023 by including more customers.
Risk
62
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Management
In 2022, the Group updated its credit policy to require relationship
managers to comment on climate risk factors in credit applications
for new money requests. The Group continues to use a climate
risk scoring tool, which provides a climate risk score for each
customer based on the questionnaire responses. The climate risk
score is used to inform portfolio level management decisions and
is made available to relationship management and credit risk
managements teams. The scoring tool will be enhanced and
refined over time as more data becomes available.
In 2023, the Group aims to further embed climate risk
considerations in its credit risk management processes.
Aggregation and reporting
The group internally reports its exposure and RWAs to the six high
transition risk sectors in the wholesale portfolio. The group also
reports the proportion of questionnaire responses that have a
board policy or management plan for transition risk. These are
included as part of the regular risk profile paper presented at the
group CROF which is held quarterly.
Retail credit risk
Identification and assessment
The Group continues to improve its identification and assessment
of climate risk within its retail mortgage portfolio, with increased
investments in physical risk data and enhancements to its internal
risk assessment capabilities. The Group prioritised applying these
improvements to its largest mortgage markets to understand its
physical risk exposure based on centrally available data. The
Group has also started to identify and monitor potential physical
risk in the remainder of its mortgage markets, using locally
available data.
In 2022, the Group undertook a stress test exercise for Singapore
at the behest of the Monetary Authority of Singapore. In addition,
a Group-wide internal climate stress testing exercise was
undertaken to further its understanding and assessment of the
potential impact of physical risk to its mortgage portfolios. The
Group completed a detailed asset-level analysis for Hong Kong,
Singapore and Australia which represent three of the group’s
largest residential mortgage portfolios in Asia-Pacific.
Management
The Group continues to review and update its retail credit risk
management policies and processes to further embed climate risk,
whilst also monitoring local regulatory developments to ensure
compliance.
Aggregation and reporting
The Group manages and monitors the integration of climate risk
across Wealth and Personal Banking through the CROF.
The Group assesses the progress of the implementation of its
strategic climate risk plans and ensures that operational processes
and risk management frameworks are updated as its data and
understanding of climate risk evolves.
How we are starting to measure climate risk
In 2022, the group implemented physical risk exposure
assessment across mortgage portfolios in Asia-Pacific. For Hong
Kong and Singapore, the assessment is based on property level
peril data.
For other markets, locally relevant data sources were used to
identify properties or areas with potentially heightened climate
risk. These climate risk exposure metrics are in the early stages of
development and the underlying data and methodologies may
require refinement in the future, although they provide an
indicative view.
Resilience risk
Identification and assessment
The group’s Operational and Resilience Risk sub-function is
responsible for overseeing the identification and assessment of
physical and transition climate risks that may impact on its
operational and resilience capabilities.
The group is developing a deeper understanding of the risks to
which its properties are subject, and assess the mitigants to
ensure ongoing operational resilience.
Management
Operational and Resilience Risk policies are reviewed and
enhanced periodically so they remain relevant to evolving risks,
including those linked to climate change. The capability of our
colleagues is enhanced through training, periodic communications
and dedicated guidance.
Aggregation and reporting
With its ambition to achieve net zero in its own operations, the
Group is particularly focused on developing measures to facilitate
proactive risk management and assess progress against this
strategic target.
Operational and Resilience Risk is represented at the group's
CROF.
Regulatory compliance risk
Identification and assessment
The Compliance sub-function continues to prioritise the
identification and assessment of compliance risks that may arise
from climate risk.
Throughout 2022, focus remained on greenwashing, particularly
with regard to the development and ongoing governance of new,
changed or withdrawn climate and ESG products and services,
and ensuring sales practices and marketing materials were clear,
fair and not misleading.
To support the ongoing management and mitigation of
greenwashing, the Compliance sub-function worked across all
business lines to enhance the group’s product controls. This
improved the group’s ability to identify, assess and manage
product-related greenwashing risks throughout the product
governance lifecycle. Examples of ongoing enhancements include:
•integrating the consideration and mitigation of climate and ESG
risks within the group’s existing product governance
framework;
•enhancing the group’s product templates and forms to ensure
climate risk is actively considered and documented by the
business within product review and creation; and
•clarifying and improving product governance policies,
associated guidance and key governance terms of reference to
ensure new climate and ESG products, as well as climate- and
ESG-related amendments to existing products, comply with
both internal and external standards, and are subject to robust
governance.
Management
The Group policies continue to set the Group-wide standards that
are required to manage the risk of breaches of its regulatory duty
to customers, including those related to climate risk, ensuring fair
customer outcomes are achieved. The Group’s product and
customer lifecycle policies have been enhanced to ensure they
take climate into consideration. They are reviewed on a periodic
basis to ensure they remain relevant and up to date.
The Compliance sub-function continues to focus on improving the
capability of colleagues through training, communications and
dedicated guidance, with a particular focus on ensuring colleagues
remain up to date with changes in the evolving regulatory
landscape.
Aggregation and reporting
The Compliance sub-function continues to operate an ESG and
Climate Risk Working Group at a Group level to track and monitor
the integration and embedding of climate risk within the
management of regulatory compliance risks. The working group
also continues to monitor ongoing regulatory and legislative
changes across the ESG and climate risk agenda. In Asia-Pacific, a
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
63
working group was established in February 2022 to coordinate the
regional implementation of climate risk-related enhancements
across the Compliance sub-function.
The Group has continued to develop its key climate risk-related
metrics and indicators, aligned to the broader focus on regulatory
compliance risks, to continually improve its risk monitoring
capability. This has included the development of a climate-specific
risk profile, which is produced at a Group level and regularly
disseminated and reviewed at regional level, alongside the
introduction and improvement of existing metrics and indicators.
The Compliance sub-function continues to be represented at the
Group’s and the group's CROF.
Reputational risk
Identification and assessment
The Group implements sustainability risk policies, including the
Equator Principles as part of its broader reputational risk
framework. The Group focuses on sensitive sectors that may have
a high adverse impact on people or the environment, and in which
the Group has a significant number of customers. A key area of
focus is high-carbon emission sectors, which include oil and gas,
power generation, mining, agricultural commodities and forestry.
In 2022, the Group published an updated energy policy, covering
oil and gas, power and utilities, hydrogen, renewables, nuclear
and biomass. It has also updated its thermal coal phase-out policy
after its initial publication in 2021.
Management
As the primary point of contact for customers, the group’s
relationship managers are responsible for checking that customers
meet policies aimed at reducing carbon emissions. The group's
network in Asia-Pacific of more than 20 sustainability risk
managers provides local policy support and expertise to
relationship managers. A regional Sustainability Risk team
provides a higher level of guidance and is responsible for the
oversight of policy compliance and implementation over wholesale
banking activities.
Aggregation and reporting
The Sustainability Risk Oversight Forum provides a group-wide
forum for senior members of the group's Risk, Compliance and
global business management to support the management of
sustainability risks. It also oversees the development and
implementation of sustainability risk policies. Cases involving
complex sustainability risk issues related to customers,
transactions or third parties are managed through the reputational
risk and client selection governance process. The Group reports
annually on its implementation of the Equator Principles and the
corporate loans, project-related bridge loans and advisory
mandates completed under the principles.
For the latest report, see: www.hsbc.com/who-we-are/our-climate-
strategy/sustainability-risk/equator-principles.
Other risks
The following section outlines key developments that the Group
made to embed climate considerations within other risk types in
its risk taxonomy. All risk taxonomies, including those not
referenced below, are assessed to determine the potential
materiality of the impact of climate risk on their risk framework.
Treasury risk
The Group established a treasury risk-specific climate risk
governance forum to provide oversight over climate-related topics
that may impact Treasury. The plan in 2023 is to update relevant
treasury risk policies to strengthen its climate risk guidance and
requirements pertaining to treasury risk.
Traded risk
The Group established a climate stress testing-focused working
group to coordinate the implementation of climate stress testing,
and support the delivery of internal climate scenario analysis.
Risk
64
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Resilience risk
(Unaudited)
Overview
Resilience risk is the risk of sustained and significant business
disruption, execution, delivery or physical security or safety
events, causing the inability to provide critical services to our
customers, affiliates, and counterparties. Resilience risk arises
from failures or inadequacies in processes, people, systems or
external events.
Resilience risk management
Key developments in 2022
The Operational and Resilience Risk sub-function provides robust
Risk Steward oversight of the management of resilience risk by
the group businesses, functions and legal entities. This includes
effective and timely independent challenge and expert advice.
During the year, we carried out a number of initiatives to keep
pace with geopolitical, regulatory and technology changes and to
strengthen the management of resilience risk:
•We focused on enhancing our understanding of our risk and
control environment, by updating our risk taxonomy and
control libraries, and refreshing risk and control assessments.
•We implemented heightened monitoring and reporting of
cyber, third party, business continuity and payment/sanctions
risks resulting from the Russia/Ukraine war, and enhanced
controls and key processes where needed.
•We provided analysis and easy-to-access risk and control
information and metrics to enable management to focus on
non-financial risks in their decision-making and appetite
setting.
•We further strengthened our non-financial risk governance and
senior leadership, and improved our coverage and Risk
Steward Oversight for data privacy and change execution.
We prioritise our efforts on material risks and areas undergoing
strategic growth, aligning our location strategy to this need.
Governance and structure
The Operational and Resilience Risk target operating model
provides a globally consistent view across resilience risks,
strengthening our risk management oversight while operating
effectively as part of a simplified non-financial risk structure. We
view resilience risk across nine sub-risk types related to: failure to
manage third parties; technology and cybersecurity; transaction
processing; failure to protect people and places from physical
malevolent acts; business interruption and incident risk; data risk;
change execution risk; building unavailability; and workplace
safety.
Risk appetite and key escalations for resilience risk are reported to
the group Risk Management Meeting, chaired by the group Chief
Risk Officer, with an escalation path to the Group Risk Non-
Financial Risk Management Board (NFRMB), chaired by the Group
Chief Risk and Compliance Officer.
Key risk management processes
Operational resilience is our ability to anticipate, prevent, adapt,
respond to, recover and learn from operational disruption while
minimising customer and market impact. Resilience is determined
by assessing whether we are able to continue to provide our most
important services, within an agreed level. This is achieved via
day-to-day oversight, periodic and ongoing assurance, such as
deep dive reviews and controls testing, which may result in
challenges being raised to the business by Risk Stewards. Further
challenge is also raised in the form of quarterly Risk Steward
opinion papers to formal governance. We accept we will not be
able to prevent all disruption but we prioritise investment to
continually improve the response and recovery strategies for our
most important business services.
Regulatory compliance risk
(Unaudited)
Overview
Regulatory compliance risk is the risk associated with breaching
our duty to clients and other counterparties, inappropriate market
conduct and breaching related financial services regulatory
standards. Regulatory compliance risk arises from the failure to
observe relevant laws, codes, rules and regulations and can
manifest itself in poor market or customer outcomes and lead to
fines, penalties and reputational damage to our business.
Regulatory compliance risk management
Key developments in 2022
The dedicated programme to embed our updated purpose-led
conduct approach has concluded. Work to map applicable
regulations to our risks and controls continues in 2023 alongside
adoption of new tools to support enterprise-wide horizon scanning
for new regulatory obligations and to manage our regulatory
reporting inventories. Climate risk has been integrated into
regulatory compliance policies and processes, with enhancements
made to the product governance framework and controls in order
to ensure the effective consideration of climate and in particular
Greenwashing risks.
Governance and structure
The group Chief Compliance Officer reports to the Group Head of
Risk and Compliance and group Co-Chief Executive at an entity
level. They attend the RMM and the Risk Committee. The structure
of the Compliance sub-function is substantively unchanged and
the Group Regulatory Conduct capability and Group Financial
Crime capability both continue to work closely with the Country/
Markets Chief Compliance Officers and their respective teams to
help them identify and manage regulatory and financial crime
compliance risks across the region. They also work together, and
with all relevant stakeholders, to ensure we achieve good conduct
outcomes and provide enterprise-wide support on the Compliance
risk agenda in collaboration with the Risk sub-function.
Key risk management processes
The Group Regulatory Conduct capability is responsible for setting
global policies, standards and risk appetite to guide the Group’s
management of regulatory compliance risk. It also devises the
required frameworks, support processes and tools to protect
against regulatory compliance risks. The Group capability provides
oversight, review and challenge to the local Chief Compliance
Officers and their teams to help them identify, assess and mitigate
regulatory compliance risks, where required. The Group's
regulatory compliance risk policies are regularly reviewed. Global
Policies and Procedures require the prompt identification and
escalation of actual or potential regulatory breaches, and relevant
reportable events are escalated to the RMM and the Risk
Committee, as appropriate.
Financial crime risk
(Unaudited)
Overview
Financial crime risk is the risk that HSBC’s products and services
will be exploited for criminal activity. This includes fraud, bribery
and corruption, tax evasion, sanctions and export control
violations, money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation
financing. Financial crime risk arises from day-to-day banking
operations involving customers, third parties and employees.
Financial crime risk management
Key developments in 2022
We regularly review the effectiveness of our financial crime risk
management framework, which includes consideration of the
complex and dynamic nature of sanctions compliance risk. In
2022, we adapted our policies, procedures and controls to respond
to the unprecedented volume and diverse set of sanctions and
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
65
trade restrictions imposed against Russia following its invasion of
Ukraine.
We also continued to make progress with several key financial
crime risk management initiatives, including:
•We enhanced our screening and non-screening controls to aid
the identification of potential sanctions risk related to Russia, as
well as risk arising from export control restrictions.
•We deployed a key component of our intelligence-led, dynamic
risk assessment capabilities for customer account monitoring in
Singapore for Wealth and Private Banking (WPB) and
Commercial Banking (CMB).
•We reconfigured our transaction screening capability in
readiness for the global change to payment systems formatting
under ISO20022 requirements, and enhanced transaction
screening capabilities by implementing automated alert
discounting.
•We to strengthened the first party lending fraud framework,
reviewed and published an updated fraud policy and associated
control library, and continued to develop fraud detection tools.
Governance and structure
The structure of the Financial Crime sub-function remained
substantively unchanged in 2022, although we continued to
review the effectiveness of our governance framework to manage
financial crime risk. The group Head of Financial Crime and group
Money Laundering Reporting Officer reports to the group Chief
Compliance Officer, while the group Risk Committee retains
oversight of matters relating to fraud, bribery and corruption, tax
evasion, sanctions and export control breaches, money
laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing.
Key risk management processes
We will not tolerate knowingly conducting business with
individuals or entities believed to be engaged in criminal activity.
We require everybody in HSBC to play their role in maintaining
effective systems and controls to prevent and detect financial
crime. Where we believe we have identified suspected criminal
activity or vulnerabilities in our control framework, we will take
appropriate mitigating action.
We manage financial crime risk because it is the right thing to do
to protect our customers, shareholders, staff, the communities in
which we operate, as well as the integrity of the financial system
on which we all rely. We operate in a highly regulated industry in
which these same policy goals are codified in laws and
regulations. We are committed to complying with the law and
regulation of all the markets in which we operate and applying a
consistently high financial crime standard globally.
We continue to assess the effectiveness of our end-to-end
financial crime risk management framework on an ongoing basis,
and invest in enhancing our operational control capabilities and
technology solutions to deter and detect criminal activity. We have
simplified our framework by streamlining and de-duplicating policy
requirements. We also strengthened our financial crime risk
taxonomy and control libraries, improved our investigative and
monitoring capabilities through technology deployments, as well
as developed more targeted metrics. We have also enhanced
governance and reporting.
We are committed to working in partnership with the wider
industry and the public sector in managing financial crime risk and
we participate in numerous public-private partnerships and
information-sharing initiatives around the world. In 2022, our focus
remained on measures to improve the overall effectiveness of the
global financial crime framework, notably by providing input into
legislative and regulatory reform activities. We did this by
contributing to the development of responses to consultation
papers focused on how financial crime risk management
frameworks can deliver more effective outcomes in detecting and
deterring criminal activity, including tackling evolving criminal
behaviour such as fraud. Through our work with the Wolfsberg
Group and the Institute of International Finance, we supported the
efforts of the global standard setter, the Financial Action Task
Force, on the use of technology and data pooling to advance
information sharing, as well as their work to strengthen beneficial
ownership standards. In addition, we participated in a number of
public events related to tackling forestry crimes, wildlife trafficking
and human trafficking.
Independent Reviews
In August 2022, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System terminated the 2012 cease-and-decist order, with
immediate effect. The order was the final regulatory enforcement
action that HSBC entered into in 2012. In June 2021, the UK
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) had already determined that no
further Skilled Person work was required under section 166 of the
Financial Services and Markets Act. The Group Risk Committee
retains oversight of matters relating to financial crime, including
any remaining remedial activity not yet completed as part of
previous recommendations.
Model risk
(Unaudited)
Overview
Model risk is the risk of inappropriate or incorrect business
decisions arising from the use of models that have been
inadequately designed, implemented or used, or from models that
do not perform in line with expectations and predictions.
Model risk arises in both financial and non-financial contexts
whenever business decision making includes reliance on models.
Key developments in 2022
In 2022, we continued to make improvements in our model risk
management processes amid regulatory changes in model
requirements.
Initiatives during the year included:
•Redeveloped, independently validated and submitted our
models to the PRA and HKMA in response to regulatory capital
changes, including the internal ratings-based (‘IRB’) approach
for credit risk, internal model method (‘IMM’) for counterparty
credit risk and internal model approach (‘IMA’) for market risk.
These new models have been built to enhanced standards
using improved data as a result of investment in processes and
systems.
•Redeveloped and validated models impacted by the changes to
the alternative rate setting mechanisms due to the IBOR
transition.
•Embedded changes to our control framework for our Sarbanes-
Oxley models. These changes were made to address control
weaknesses that emerged as a result of significant increases in
adjustments and overlays that were applied to compensate for
the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and the subsequent
volatility due to the effects of the rise in global interest rates on
the ECL models.
•Businesses and Functions continued to be more involved in the
development and management of models, and hiring
colleagues with strong model risk skills. Enhanced focus was
also placed on key model risk drivers such as data quality and
model methodology.
•Enhanced the reporting that supports the model risk appetite
measures, to support our Businesses and Functions in
managing model risk more effectively.
•Rolled out our HBAP regional engagement strategy in response
to the growing maturity of model risk management and
demand, and enhanced the awareness of model inventory,
model limitations and risk controls across the Region.
•Conducted targeted briefing sessions across the Region to
strengthen the awareness of models used and the engagement
between the model user community and model developing
areas.
•Continued the transformation of the Model Risk Management
team, with further enhancements to the independent model
Risk
66
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
validation processes, including new systems and working
practises.
•Climate Risk, HKFRS 17 Insurance models and models using
advanced analytics and machine learning, have become critical
areas of focus that will grow in importance in 2023 and
beyond. The model risk teams were enhanced with specialist
skills to manage the increased model risk in these areas.
Governance
The group Model Risk Committee (MRC) provides oversight of
models used in HBAP and focuses on local delivery and
requirements. The Committee is chaired by the group's Chief Risk
Officer and the Regional Heads of Businesses, senior executives
from Risk, Finance and Compliance participate in these meetings.
Authorised sub-forums operating under the remit of the HBAP
MRC, oversee model risk management activities based on
associated model categories.
Key risk management processes
A variety of modelling approaches, including regression,
simulation, sampling, machine learning and judgemental
scorecards for a range of business applications were used. These
activities include customer selection, product pricing, financial
crime transaction monitoring, creditworthiness evaluation and
financial reporting.
Our model risk management policies and procedures were
regularly reviewed, and required the First Line of Defence to
demonstrate comprehensive and effective controls based on a
library of model risk controls provided by Model Risk
Management.
Model Risk Management also reports on model risk to senior
management and the group Risk Committee on a regular basis
through the use of the risk map, risk appetite and regular key
updates.
The effectiveness of these processes, including the Regional
model oversight committee structure, were regularly reviewed to
ensure clarity in authority, coverage and escalations and that
appropriate understanding and ownership of model risk continued
to be embedded in the Businesses and Functions.
Insurance manufacturing operations risk
Overview
(Unaudited)
The key risks for our insurance manufacturing operations are
market risks, in particular interest rate and equity, credit risks and
insurance underwriting. These have a direct impact on the
financial results and capital positions of the insurance operations.
Liquidity risk, whilst significant in other parts of the group, is
relatively minor for our insurance operations.
HSBC’s Insurance business
(Unaudited)
We sell insurance products through a range of channels including
our branches, insurance salesforces, direct channels and third-
party distributors. The majority of sales are through an integrated
bancassurance model that provides insurance products principally
for customers with whom we have a banking relationship,
although the proportion of sales through other sources such as
independent financial advisers, tied agents and digital is
increasing.
For the insurance products we manufacture, the majority of sales
are of savings, universal life and protection contracts.
We choose to manufacture these insurance products in HSBC
subsidiaries based on an assessment of operational scale and risk
appetite. Manufacturing insurance allows us to retain the risks and
rewards associated with writing insurance contracts by keeping
part of the underwriting profit and investment income within the
group.
We have life insurance manufacturing operations in Hong Kong,
Singapore and mainland China. We also have a life insurance
manufacturing associate in India.
Where we do not have the risk appetite or operational scale to be
an effective insurance manufacturer, we engage with a small
number of leading external insurance companies in order to
provide insurance products to our customers. These arrangements
are generally structured with our exclusive strategic partners and
earn the group a combination of commissions, fees and a share of
profits.
Insurance products are sold predominantly by WPB and CMB
through our branches and direct channels.
Insurance manufacturing operations risk
management
Key developments in 2022
(Unaudited)
The insurance manufacturing subsidiaries follow the group’s risk
management framework. In addition, there are specific policies
and practices relating to the risk management of insurance
contracts, which have not changed materially over 2022. There
has been continued market volatility observed over 2022 across
interest rates, equity markets and foreign exchange rates. This has
been predominantly driven by geopolitical factors and wider
inflationary concerns. One area of key risk management focus
over 2022 was the implementation of the new accounting
standard, HKFRS 17 Insurance Contracts. Given the fundamental
nature of the impact of the accounting standard on insurance
accounting, this presents additional financial reporting and model
risks for the group. Another area of focus has been the acquisition
early in 2022 of an insurance business in Singapore and the
subsequent integration of that business into the group’s risk
management framework.
Governance and structure
(Unaudited)
Insurance risks are managed to a defined risk appetite, which is
aligned to the group's risk appetite and risk management
framework, including the group’s ‘Three lines of defence’ model.
The Global Insurance Risk Management Meeting oversees the risk
and control framework for insurance business in the group.
The monitoring of the risks within our insurance operations is
carried out by insurance risk teams. The Bank’s risk stewardship
sub-functions support the insurance risk teams in their respective
areas of expertise.
Stress and scenario testing
(Unaudited)
Stress testing forms a key part of the risk management framework
for the insurance business. We participate in local and group-wide
regulatory stress tests, as well as internally developed stress and
scenario tests, including Group internal stress test exercises. The
results of these stress tests and the adequacy of management
action plans to mitigate these risks are considered in the group
ICAAP and the entities’ regulatory Own Risk and Solvency
Assessments ('ORSAs') which are produced by all material
entities.
Key risk management processes
Market risk
(Audited)
All our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries have market risk
mandates that specify the investment instruments in which they
are permitted to invest and the maximum quantum of market risk
that they may retain. They manage market risk by using, among
others, some or all of the techniques listed below, depending on
the nature of the contracts written:
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
67
•We are able to adjust bonus rates to manage the liabilities to
policyholders for products with discretionary participating
features (‘DPF’). The effect is that a significant portion of the
market risk is borne by the policyholder;
•We use asset and liability matching where asset portfolios are
structured to support projected liability cash flows. The group
manages its assets using an approach that considers asset
quality, diversification, cash flow matching, liquidity, volatility
and target investment return. We use models to assess the
effect of a range of future scenarios on the values of financial
assets and associated liabilities, and ALCOs employ the
outcomes in determining how best to structure asset holdings
to support liabilities;
•We use derivatives to protect against adverse market
movements; and
•We design new products to mitigate market risk, such as
changing the investment return sharing portion between
policyholders and the shareholder.
Credit risk
(Audited)
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries also have credit risk
mandates and limits within which they are permitted to operate,
which consider the credit risk exposure, quality and performance
of their investment portfolios. Our assessment of the
creditworthiness of issuers and counterparties is based primarily
upon internationally recognised credit ratings and other publicly
available information.
Stress testing is performed on investment credit exposures using
credit spread sensitivities and default probabilities.
We use a number of tools to manage and monitor credit risk.
These include a credit report containing a watch-list of
investments with current credit concerns, primarily investments
that may be at risk of future impairment or where high
concentrations to counterparties are present in the investment
portfolio. Sensitivities to credit spread risk are assessed and
monitored regularly.
Capital and liquidity risk
(Audited)
Capital risk for our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries is
assessed in the ICAAP based on their financial capacity to support
the risks to which they are exposed. Capital adequacy is assessed
on both the group’s economic capital basis, and the relevant local
insurance regulatory basis.
Risk appetite buffers are set to ensure that the operations are able
to remain solvent, allowing for business-as-usual volatility and
extreme but plausible stress events. In certain cases, entities use
reinsurance to manage capital risk.
Liquidity risk is relatively minor for the insurance business. It is
managed by cash flow matching and maintaining sufficient cash
resources, investing in high credit-quality investments with deep
and liquid markets, monitoring investment concentrations and
restricting them where appropriate, and establishing committed
contingency borrowing facilities.
Insurance manufacturing subsidiaries complete quarterly liquidity
risk reports and an annual review of the liquidity risks to which
they are exposed.
Insurance underwriting risk
(Unaudited)
Our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries primarily use the
following frameworks and processes to manage and mitigate
insurance underwriting risks:
•a formal approval process for launching new products or
making changes to products;
•a product pricing and profitability framework which requires
initial and ongoing assessment of the adequacy of premiums
charged on new insurance contracts to meet the risks
associated with them;
•a framework for customer underwriting;
•reinsurance, which cedes risks to third party reinsurers to keep
risks within risk appetite, reduce volatility and improve capital
efficiency; and
•oversight of expense and reserving risks by entity Financial
Reporting Committees.
Insurance manufacturing operations risk in 2022
Measurement
(Unaudited)
The tables below show the composition of assets and liabilities by
contract type. 89% (2021: 91%) of both assets and liabilities are
derived from Hong Kong.
Risk
68
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Balance sheet of insurance manufacturing subsidiaries by type of contract
(Audited)
Non-linked
Unit-linked
Shareholders'
assets
and liabilities
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Financial assets
702,897
34,632
43,822
781,351
–  financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or
loss
183,423
33,533
1,569
218,525
–  derivatives
1,322
—
12
1,334
–  financial investments measured at amortised cost
482,271
328
37,177
519,776
–  financial investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
5,977
—
734
6,711
–  other financial assets1
29,904
771
4,330
35,005
Reinsurance assets
35,320
17
—
35,337
PVIF2
—
—
65,537
65,537
Other assets and investment properties
14,564
9
6,370
20,943
Total assets
752,781
34,658
115,729
903,168
Liabilities under investment contracts designated at fair value
25,693
7,338
—
33,031
Liabilities under insurance contracts
679,567
21,299
700,866
Deferred tax3
559
—
10,665
11,224
Other liabilities
—
—
38,942
38,942
Total liabilities
705,819
28,637
49,607
784,063
Total equity
—
—
119,105
119,105
Total equity and liabilities
705,819
28,637
168,712
903,168
Balance sheet of insurance manufacturing subsidiaries by type of contract
(Audited)
Non-linked
Unit-linked
Shareholders'
assets
and liabilities
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2021
Financial assets
637,317
37,382
46,971
721,670
–  financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or
loss
160,555
35,906
457
196,918
–  derivatives
631
6
3
640
–  financial investments measured at amortised cost
432,733
479
37,734
470,946
–  financial investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
5,780
—
592
6,372
–  other financial assets1
37,618
991
8,185
46,794
Reinsurance assets
28,874
6
—
28,880
PVIF2
—
—
63,765
63,765
Other assets and investment properties
13,626
4
5,304
18,934
Total assets
679,817
37,392
116,040
833,249
Liabilities under investment contracts designated at fair value
28,397
7,030
—
35,427
Liabilities under insurance contracts
608,590
29,645
—
638,235
Deferred tax3
9
—
10,579
10,588
Other liabilities
—
—
35,269
35,269
Total liabilities
636,996
36,675
45,848
719,519
Total equity
—
—
113,730
113,730
Total equity and liabilities
636,996
36,675
159,578
833,249
1Comprise mainly loans and advances to banks, cash and inter-company balances with other non-insurance legal entities.
2Present value of in-force long-term insurance business.
3‘Deferred tax’ includes the deferred tax liabilities arising on recognition of Present Value of In-force ('PVIF').
4Balance sheet of insurance manufacturing operations are shown before elimination of inter-company transactions with HSBC non-insurance
operations.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
69
Key risk types
Market risk
(Audited)
Description and exposure
Market risk is the risk of changes in market factors affecting
capital or profit. Market factors include interest rates, equity and
growth assets and foreign exchange rates.
Our exposure varies depending on the type of contract issued. Our
most significant life insurance products are contracts with
discretionary participating features (‘DPF’). These products
typically include some form of capital guarantee or guaranteed
return on the sums invested by the policyholders, to which
discretionary bonuses are added if allowed by the overall
performance of the funds. These funds are primarily invested in
fixed interest assets, with a proportion allocated to other asset
classes to provide customers with the potential for enhanced
returns.
DPF products expose the group to the risk of variation in asset
returns, which will impact our participation in the investment
performance. In addition, in some scenarios the asset returns can
become insufficient to cover the policyholders' financial
guarantees, in which case the shortfall has to be met by the group.
Reserves are held against the cost of such guarantees.
The cost of such guarantees is accounted for as a deduction from
the present value of in-force 'PVIF' asset, unless the cost of such
guarantees is already explicitly allowed for within the insurance
contracts liabilities.
For unit-linked contracts, market risk is substantially borne by the
policyholders, but some market risk exposure typically remains as
fees earned are related to the market value of the linked assets.
Sensitivities
(Unaudited)
Where appropriate, the effects of the sensitivity tests on profit
after tax and total equity incorporate the impact of the stress on
the PVIF. The relationship between the profit and total equity and
the risk factors is non-linear; therefore the results disclosed should
not be extrapolated to measure sensitivities to different levels of
stress. For the same reason, the impact of the stress is not
symmetrical on the upside and downside. The sensitivities reflect
the established risk sharing mechanism with policyholders for
participating products, and are stated before allowance for
management actions which may mitigate the effect of changes in
the market environment. The sensitivities presented allow for
adverse changes in policyholders’ behaviour that may arise in
response to changes in market rates.
The following table illustrates the effects of selected interest rate,
equity price and foreign exchange rate scenarios on our profit for
the year and the total equity of our insurance manufacturing
subsidiaries.
The differences between the impacts on profit after tax and equity
are driven by the changes in value of the bonds measured at fair
value through other comprehensive income, which are only
accounted for in equity.
Risk
70
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Sensitivity of the group’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries to market risk factors
(Audited)
31 Dec 2022
31 Dec 2021
Effect on profit
after tax
Effect on total
equity
Effect on profit
after tax
Effect on total
equity
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
+100 basis points parallel shift in yield curves
(1,079)
(1,872)
(1,257)
(2,036)
-100 basis points parallel shift in yield curves
698
1,490
1,201
1,980
10% increase in equity prices
2,438
2,438
2,388
2,388
10% decrease in equity prices
(2,647)
(2,647)
(2,426)
(2,426)
10% increase in USD exchange rate compared to all currencies
767
767
635
635
10% decrease in USD exchange rate compared to all currencies
(767)
(767)
(635)
(635)
Credit risk
(Audited)
Description and exposure
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty
fails to meet their obligation under a contract. It arises in two main
areas for our insurance manufacturers:
•risk associated with credit spread volatility and default by debt
security counterparties after investing premiums to generate a
return for policyholders and shareholders; and
•risk of default by reinsurance counterparties and non-
reimbursement for claims made after ceding insurance risk.
The amounts outstanding at the balance sheet date in respect of
these items are shown in the table on page 69.
The credit quality of the reinsurers’ share of liabilities under
insurance contracts is assessed as ‘strong’ or ‘good’ (as defined
on page 32), with 100% of the exposure being neither past due nor
impaired (2021: 100%).
Credit risk on assets supporting unit-linked liabilities is
predominantly borne by the policyholders. Therefore our exposure
is primarily related to liabilities under non-linked insurance and
investment contracts and shareholders’ funds. The credit quality of
insurance financial assets is included in the table on page 44. The
risk associated with credit spread volatility is to a large extent
mitigated by holding debt securities to maturity, and sharing a
degree of credit spread experience with policyholders.
Liquidity risk
(Audited)
Description and exposure
Liquidity risk is the risk that an insurance operation, though
solvent, either does not have sufficient financial resources
available to meet its obligations when they fall due, or can secure
them only at excessive cost. Liquidity risk may be able to be
shared with policyholders for products with DPF.
The following table shows the expected undiscounted cash flows
for insurance liabilities at 31 December 2022.
The profile of the expected maturity of insurance contracts at
31 December 2022 remained comparable with 2021.
The remaining contractual maturity of investment contract
liabilities is included in the table on page 118.
Expected maturity of insurance contract liabilities
(Audited)
Expected cash flows (undiscounted)
Within 1 year
1-5 years
5-15 years
Over 15 years
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Non-linked insurance contracts
55,359
198,209
348,404
940,565
1,542,537
Unit-linked
4,865
10,047
11,978
4,898
31,788
60,224
208,256
360,382
945,463
1,574,325
At 31 Dec 2021
Non-linked insurance contracts
53,098
187,589
324,654
662,058
1,227,399
Unit-linked
8,073
14,353
14,852
8,115
45,393
61,171
201,942
339,506
670,173
1,272,792
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
71
Insurance underwriting risk
Description and exposure
(Unaudited)
Insurance underwriting risk is the risk of loss through adverse
experience, in either timing or amount, of insurance underwriting
parameters (non-economic assumptions). These parameters
include mortality, morbidity, longevity, lapses and expense rates.
Lapse risk exposure on products with premium financing has
increased over the year as rising interest rates have led to an
increase in the cost of financing for customers.
The principal risk we face is that, over time, the cost of the
contract, including claims and benefits may exceed the total
amount of premiums and investment income received.
The table on page 69 analyses our life insurance risk exposures by
type of contract.
The insurance risk profile and related exposures remain largely
consistent with those observed at 31 December 2021.
Sensitivities
(Audited)
The table below shows the sensitivity of profit and total equity to
reasonably possible changes in non-economic assumptions across
all our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries. Mortality and
morbidity risk is typically associated with life insurance contracts.
The effect on profit of an increase in mortality or morbidity
depends on the type of business being written.
Sensitivity to lapse rates depends on the type of contracts being
written. An increase in lapse rates typically has a negative effect
on profit due to the loss of future income on the lapsed policies.
However, some contract lapses have a positive effect on profit due
to the existence of policy surrender charges.
Expense rate risk is the exposure to a change in the allocated cost
of administering insurance contracts. To the extent that increased
expenses cannot be passed on to policyholders, an increase in
expense rates will have a negative effect on our profits. The risk is
generally greater for Singapore and mainland China than for Hong
Kong because these entities have smaller portfolios over which to
spread costs.
Sensitivity analysis
(Audited)
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Effect on profit after tax and total equity at 31 Dec
10% increase in mortality and/or morbidity rates
(561)
(637)
10% decrease in mortality and/or morbidity rates
569
650
10% increase in lapse rates
(549)
(606)
10% decrease in lapse rates
535
680
10% increase in expense rates
(372)
(368)
10% decrease in expense rates
372
359
Risk
72
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The following statement, which should be read in conjunction with the Auditor’s statement of their responsibilities set out in their report
on pages 74-78, is made with a view to distinguishing for shareholders the respective responsibilities of the Directors and of the Auditor
in relation to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Directors of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (‘the Bank’) are responsible for the preparation of the Bank’s
Annual Report and Accounts, which contains the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bank and its subsidiaries (together ‘the
group’), in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
The Hong Kong Companies Ordinance requires the Directors to prepare for each financial year the consolidated financial statements for
the group and the balance sheet for the Bank.
The Directors are responsible for ensuring adequate accounting records are kept that are sufficient to show and explain the group’s
transactions, such that the group’s consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view.
The Directors are responsible for preparing the consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view and are in accordance with
Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (‘HKFRSs’) issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The Directors
have elected to prepare the Bank’s balance sheet on the same basis.
The Directors as at the date of this report, whose names and functions are set out in the ‘Report of the Directors’ on pages 3-8 of this
Annual Report and Accounts, confirm to the best of their knowledge that:
•the Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with HKFRSs and in accordance with the applicable
set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the group; and
•the management report represented by the Financial Review, the Risk and Capital Reports includes a fair review of the development
and performance of the business and the position of the group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that
the group faces.
On behalf of the Board
Peter Wong
Chairman
21 February 2023
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
73
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Shareholder of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited     
(incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability)
Opinion
What we have audited
The consolidated financial statements of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (the 'Bank’) and its subsidiaries (the
'group’), which are set out on pages 79 to 139, comprise:
•the consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2022;
•the consolidated income statement for the year then ended;
•the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
•the consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year then ended;
•the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and
•the notes1 on the consolidated financial statements, which include significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
1Certain required disclosures as described in Note 1.1(d) on the consolidated financial statements have been presented elsewhere in the Annual
Report and Accounts 2022, rather than in the notes on the consolidated financial statements. These are cross-referenced from the consolidated
financial statements and are identified as audited.
Our opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the group as at
31 December 2022, and of its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance
with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (‘HKFRSs’) issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (‘HKICPA’)
and have been properly prepared in compliance with the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Hong Kong Standards on Auditing (‘HKSAs’) issued by the HKICPA. Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements
section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We are independent of the group in accordance with the HKICPA’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (‘the Code’), and we have
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matters identified in our audit are summarised as follows:
•Allowances for expected credit losses on loans and advances to customers
•Impairment assessment of investment in associate – Bank of Communications Co., Limited (‘BoCom’)
•The present value of in-force long-term insurance business (‘PVIF’) and liabilities under non-linked life insurance contracts
•Disclosure of the impact of adoption of HKFRS 17, Insurance contracts
Independent Auditor’s Report
74
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Allowances for expected credit losses on loans and advances to customers
Nature of the Key Audit Matter
How our audit addressed the Key Audit Matter
At 31 December 2022, the group recorded allowances for expected credit
losses (‘ECL’) on loans and advances to customers of HK$40.0bn.
The determination of the ECL on non-credit-impaired loans and advances to
customers requires the use of complex credit risk methodologies that are
applied in models using the group’s historic experience of the correlations
between defaults and losses, borrower creditworthiness, segmentation of
customers or portfolios and economic conditions.
It also requires the determination of assumptions which involve estimation
uncertainty. The assumptions used for ECL that we focused on for non-
credit-impaired loans and advances to customers included those with
greater levels of management judgement and for which variations have the
most significant impact on ECL on loans and advances to customers.
Specifically, these included economic scenarios and their likelihood, as well
as customer risk ratings. Likewise, there is inherent uncertainty with the
consensus economic forecast data from external economists.
Impacts from the Covid-19 infection rates in Asia, particularly in mainland
China, ongoing developments related to the mainland China commercial real
estate sector, the geopolitical landscape and certain other current
macroeconomic conditions impact the inherent risk and estimation
uncertainty involved in determining the ECL on loans and advances to
customers. Management judgemental adjustments to ECL on non-credit-
impaired loans and advances to customers therefore continue to be made.
This includes judgemental adjustments to the ECL for unsecured offshore
mainland China Commercial Real Estate exposures.
The above ongoing developments have also resulted in significant credit-
impaired corporate exposures related to the unsecured offshore mainland
China Commercial Real Estate sector. The assumptions with the most
significant impact here are those applied in estimating the recoverability of
these exposures.
We tested controls in place over the methodologies, their application,
significant assumptions and data used to determine the ECL on loans and
advances to customers. These included controls over:
•Model development, validation and monitoring;
•Approval of economic scenarios;
•Approval of the probability weightings assigned to economic scenarios;
•Assigning customer risk ratings;
•Approval of management judgemental adjustments; and
•Review of input and assumptions applied in estimating the recoverability
of credit-impaired wholesale exposures.
We performed substantive audit procedures over the compliance of ECL
methodologies with the requirements of HKFRS 9. We engaged
professionals with experience in ECL modelling to assess the
appropriateness of changes to models during the year, and for a sample of
those models, independently reperformed the modelling for certain aspects
of the ECL calculation. We also assessed the appropriateness of
methodologies and related models that did not change during the year.
We further performed the following to assess the significant assumptions
and data:
•We challenged the appropriateness of the significant assumptions;
•We involved our economic experts in assessing the reasonableness of the
severity and likelihood of certain economic scenarios;
•We tested a sample of customer risk ratings assigned to wholesale
exposures;
•We tested a sample of critical data used to determine ECL; and
•We have independently assessed other significant assumptions and
obtained corroborating evidence.
For a sample of management judgemental adjustments and credit-impaired
wholesale exposures, we challenged the appropriateness of these and
assessed the ECL determined.
We further considered whether the judgements made in selecting the
significant assumptions, as well as determining the management
judgemental adjustments and credit-impaired wholesale exposures, would
give rise to indicators of possible management bias.
We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in relation to ECL on loans and
advances to customers made in the consolidated financial statements in the
context of the applicable financial reporting framework.
Matters discussed with the Audit Committee
We discussed the appropriateness of the methodologies, their application,
significant assumptions and related disclosures with the Audit Committee,
giving consideration to the current macroeconomic conditions. This included
economic scenarios and their likelihood, management judgemental
adjustments made to derive the ECL on loans and advances to customers,
and future recoverability of certain significant credit-impaired wholesale
exposures. We further discussed certain controls over the process in
determining ECL on loans and advances to customers.
Relevant references in the consolidated financial statements
Risk: Credit Risk, as cross-referenced from the consolidated financial statements (only information identified as audited), page 31-52
Note 1.2 (i) on the consolidated financial statements: Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies – Summary of significant accounting policies
- Impairment of amortised cost and FVOCI financial assets, page 90-93
Note 2 (e) on the consolidated financial statements: Operating profit – Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges, page 97
Note 10 on the consolidated financial statements: Loans and advances to customers, page 106-107
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
75
Impairment assessment of investment in associate – Bank of Communications Co., Limited (‘BoCom’)
Nature of the Key Audit Matter
How our audit addressed the Key Audit Matter
At 31 December 2022, the fair value of the investment in BoCom, based on
the share price, was HK$118.8bn lower than the carrying value ('CV') of
HK$182.3bn. This is an indicator of potential impairment. An impairment
test was performed by management, with supporting sensitivity analysis,
using a value in use ('VIU') model. The VIU was HK$0.7bn in excess of the
CV. On this basis, no impairment was recorded.
The methodology applied in the VIU model is dependent on various
assumptions, both short term and long term in nature. These assumptions,
which are subject to estimation uncertainty, are derived from a combination
of management’s judgement, analysts’ forecasts, market data or other
relevant information.
The assumptions that we focused our audit on were those with greater
levels of management judgement and subjectivity, and for which variations
had the most significant impact on the VIU. Specifically, these included the
discount rate, operating income growth rate, long-term profit and asset
growth rates, cost-income ratio, expected credit losses as a percentage of
customer advances, long-term effective tax rate, capital requirements –
capital adequacy ratio, capital requirements – tier 1 capital adequacy ratio
and risk-weighted assets as a percentage of total assets.
We tested controls in place over significant assumptions, the methodology
and its application used to determine the VIU. We assessed the
appropriateness of the methodology used, its application, and the
mathematical accuracy of the calculations. In respect of the significant
assumptions, we performed the following:
•Challenged the appropriateness of the significant assumptions and, where
relevant, their interrelationships;
•Obtained corroborating evidence for data supporting significant
assumptions which as relevant included past experience, external market
information, third-party sources including analyst reports, information
from BoCom management and historical publicly available BoCom
financial information;
•Determined a reasonable range for the discount rate assumption, with the
assistance of our valuation experts, and compared it to the discount rate
used by management; and
•Assessed whether the judgements made in selecting the significant
assumptions would give rise to indicators of possible management bias.
We observed meetings between management and BoCom management,
held specifically to identify facts and circumstances impacting significant
assumptions relevant to the determination of the VIU.
Representations were obtained from the Bank that assumptions used were
consistent with information currently available to the Bank.
We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in relation to BoCom made in
the consolidated financial statements in the context of the applicable
financial reporting framework.
Matters discussed with the Audit Committee
We discussed the appropriateness of the methodology, its application and
significant assumptions with the Audit Committee. We also discussed the
disclosures made in relation to BoCom, including the use of sensitivity
analysis to explain estimation uncertainty and the changes in certain
assumptions that would result in the VIU being equal to the CV.
Relevant references in the consolidated financial statements
Note 1.2 (a) on the consolidated financial statements: Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies – Summary of significant accounting policies
- Consolidation and related policies, page 87
Note 14 on the consolidated financial statements: Interests in associates and joint ventures, page 109-112
The present value of in-force long-term insurance business (‘PVIF’) and liabilities under non-linked life insurance contracts
Nature of the Key Audit Matter
How our audit addressed the Key Audit Matter
At 31 December 2022, the group has recorded an asset for PVIF of
HK$65.5bn and liabilities under non-linked life insurance contracts of
HK$679.5bn.
The determination of these balances requires the use of complex actuarial
methodologies that are applied in models and involves judgement about
future outcomes. Specifically, judgement is required in deriving the
economic and non-economic assumptions. These assumptions are subject to
estimation uncertainty, both for PVIF asset and the liabilities under non-
linked life insurance contracts.
We tested controls in place over the methodologies, their application,
significant assumptions and data for PVIF asset and the liabilities under non-
linked life insurance contracts. Specifically, these included controls over:
•policy data reconciliations from the policyholder administration system to
the actuarial valuation system;
•assumptions setting;
•review and determination of methodologies used, and their application in
models; and
•results aggregation and analysis processes.
With the assistance of our actuarial experts, we performed the following
audit procedures to assess the methodologies used, their application,
significant assumptions, data and disclosures:
•We assessed the appropriateness of the methodologies used, their
application and the mathematical accuracy of the calculations;
•We challenged the appropriateness of the judgements made in selecting
significant assumptions and , where relevant, their interrelationships. We
have independently assessed these assumptions and obtained relevant
corroborating evidence. We further considered whether the judgements
made in selecting the significant assumptions would give rise to
indicators of possible management bias;
•We performed substantive audit procedures over critical data used in the
determination of these balances to ensure these are relevant and reliable;
and
•We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in relation to the asset for
PVIF and liabilities under non-linked life insurance contracts made in the
consolidated financial statements in the context of the applicable financial
reporting framework.
Matters discussed with the Audit Committee
We discussed the appropriateness of the methodologies, their application,
significant assumptions and related disclosures with the Audit Committee. In
relation to assumptions, we focused on those for which variations had the
most significant impact on the valuation of PVIF and liabilities under non-
linked life insurance contracts carrying value.
Relevant references in the consolidated financial statements
Risk: Insurance manufacturing operations risk as cross-referenced from the consolidated financial statements (only information identified as audited), page
67-72
Note 1.2 (j) on the consolidated financial statements: Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies - Summary of significant accounting policies -
Insurance contracts, page 93-94
Note 3 on the consolidated financial statements: Insurance business, page 97-98
Note 15 on the consolidated financial statements: Goodwill and intangible assets, page 112-113
Independent Auditor’s Report
76
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Disclosure of the impact of adoption of HKFRS 17, Insurance Contracts
Nature of the Key Audit Matter
How our audit addressed the Key Audit Matter
HKFRS 17 ‘Insurance contracts’ sets out the requirements that an entity
should apply in accounting for insurance contracts it issues, reinsurance
contracts it holds and investment contracts with discretionary participating
features it issues. The group will adopt the standard retrospectively from 1
January 2023, with comparatives restated from 1 January 2022. As part of
the transition to HKFRS 17, the group intends to apply the option under
HKFRS 9 to re-designate holdings of financial assets held to support
insurance liabilities currently measured at amortised cost, to fair value under
HKFRS 9. The group has estimated and disclosed that the adoption will
reduce the opening group equity as at 1 January 2022 by HK$75.4bn. In the
consolidated financial statements it is disclosed that this estimate is based
on accounting policies, assumptions, judgements and estimation techniques
that remain subject to change.
This is a new and complex standard and determining the impact as at         
1 January 2022 requires judgement and interpretation in its implementation.
This includes the selection of accounting policies and the use of complex
actuarial methodologies that are applied in models and overlay adjustments
to models. The selection and application of appropriate methodology
requires significant professional judgement. It also requires the
determination of assumptions which involve estimation uncertainty.
We tested controls in place over accounting policies, methodologies, their
application, significant assumptions and data used in determining the
estimated reduction of the opening group equity as at 1 January 2022
disclosed. Specifically, these included controls over:
•  Selection and approval of the accounting policies;
•  Policy data reconciliations from the policyholder administration systems to
the actuarial valuation models;
•  Assumption setting; and
•  Review and determination of methodologies used, and their application in
the models, including model development, validation and monitoring.
With the assistance of our actuarial professionals, we performed the
following substantive audit procedures to assess the accounting policies,
methodologies, their application, significant assumptions, data and
disclosures:
•  We assessed the adherence of the accounting policies with the
requirements in HKFRS 17;
•  We assessed the appropriateness of the methodologies used, their
application in models and overlay adjustments to models and the
mathematical accuracy of the calculations;
•  We challenged the appropriateness of the judgements made in selecting
significant assumptions and, where relevant, their interrelationships. We
have independently assessed these assumptions and obtained relevant
corroborating evidence. We further considered whether the judgements
made in selecting the significant assumptions would give risk to
indicators of susceptibility to management bias;
•  We performed substantive audit procedures over critical data used to
ensure these are relevant and reliable;
•  We performed substantive audit procedures over the re-designation of
financial assets held to support insurance liabilities; and
•  We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in the context of the
applicable financial reporting framework.
Matters discussed with the Audit Committee
Status updates were provided during the year. We discussed the
appropriateness of the accounting policies, methodologies, their application,
significant assumptions and the disclosures related to the impact of the
coming adoption of HKFRS 17 with the Audit Committee. Perspectives were
also shared on the control environment over the disclosures of the impact of
adopting HKFRS 17.
Relevant references in the consolidated financial statements
Note 1.1 (b) on the consolidated financial statements: Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies - Basis of preparation - Future accounting
developments, page 85-86
Other Information
The directors of the Bank are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises all of the information included in the
Annual Report and Accounts 2022, Banking Disclosure Statement as at 31 December 2022 and List of the directors of the Bank's
subsidiary undertakings (during the period from 1 January 2022 to 21 February 2023) other than the consolidated financial statements
and our auditor’s report thereon. We have obtained some of the other information including Certain defined terms, Cautionary statement
regarding forward-looking statements, Chinese translation, Financial Highlights, Report of the Directors, Environmental, Social and
Governance Review, Financial Review, Risk, Statement of Directors' Responsibilities and Additional information sections of the Annual
Report and Accounts 2022 prior to the date of this auditor’s report. The remaining other information, including Banking Disclosure
Statement as at 31 December 2022 and List of the directors of the Bank's subsidiary undertakings (during the period from 1 January
2022 to 21 February 2023), is expected to be made available to us after that date. The other information does not include the specific
information presented therein that is identified as being an integral part of the consolidated financial statements and, therefore, covered
by our audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information and we do not and will not express any form
of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our
knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed on the other information that we obtained prior to the date of this auditor’s report, we conclude
that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this
regard.
When we read the remaining other information, if we conclude that there is a material misstatement therein, we are required to
communicate the matter to the Audit Committee and take appropriate action considering our legal rights and obligations.
Responsibilities of Directors and the Audit Committee for the Consolidated Financial Statements
The directors of the Bank are responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in
accordance with HKFRSs issued by the HKICPA and the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance, and for such internal control as the directors
determine is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the group’s ability to continue as a going
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors
either intend to liquidate the group or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the group’s financial reporting process.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
77
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. We report our opinion solely to
you, as a body, in accordance with Section 405 of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance and for no other purpose. We do not assume
responsibility towards or accept liability to any other person for the contents of this report. Reasonable assurance is a high level of
assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with HKSAs will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably
be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with HKSAs, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the
audit. We also:
•Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design
and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as
fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
•Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the group's internal control.
•Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures
made by the directors.
•Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence
obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the group’s ability to
continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s
report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions
may cause the group to cease to continue as a going concern.
•Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and
whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair
presentation.
•Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the group to
express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the
group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the Audit Committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant
audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide the Audit Committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding
independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our
independence, and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with the Audit Committee, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of
the consolidated financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our
auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we
determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor’s report is Lars Christian Jordy Nielsen.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Certified Public Accountants
Hong Kong, 21 February 2023
Independent Auditor’s Report
78
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated income statement
for the year ended 31 December
2022
2021
Notes
HK$m
HK$m
Net interest income
2a
126,852
98,113
–  interest income
180,097
121,382
–  interest expense
(53,245)
(23,269)
Net fee income
2b
36,600
45,296
–  fee income
50,622
57,819
–  fee expense
(14,022)
(12,523)
Net income from financial instruments held for trading or managed on a fair value basis
2c
41,674
28,359
Net income/(expense) from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses, including related derivatives, measured at fair
value through profit or loss
2c
(13,194)
18,180
Changes in fair value of designated debts issued and related derivatives
2c
(703)
(639)
Changes in fair value of other financial instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
2c
34
(25)
Gains less losses from financial investments
47
1,667
Net insurance premium income
3
80,415
61,722
Other operating income
2d
3,781
2,033
Total operating income
275,506
254,706
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders
3
(69,814)
(76,048)
Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
205,692
178,658
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
2e
(16,365)
(6,539)
Net operating income
189,327
172,119
Employee compensation and benefits
4
(40,662)
(39,261)
General and administrative expenses
2f
(54,549)
(52,327)
Depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment
2g
(9,157)
(8,891)
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets
(6,140)
(4,397)
Total operating expenses
(110,508)
(104,876)
Operating profit
78,819
67,243
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures
18,792
19,320
Profit before tax
97,611
86,563
Tax expense
5
(15,507)
(14,015)
Profit for the year
82,104
72,548
Attributable to:
–  ordinary shareholders of the parent company
75,506
64,633
–  other equity holders
2,739
2,715
–  non-controlling interests
3,859
5,200
Profit for the year
82,104
72,548
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
79
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 December
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Profit for the year
82,104
72,548
Other comprehensive income/(expense)
Items that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss when specific conditions are met:
Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
(13,675)
(4,009)
–  fair value losses
(17,077)
(3,907)
–  fair value gains transferred to the income statement
(139)
(1,276)
–  expected credit (recoveries)/losses recognised in the income statement
342
(17)
–  income taxes
3,199
1,191
Cash flow hedges
(1,965)
(700)
–  fair value gains
5,851
7,038
–  fair value gains reclassified to the income statement
(8,228)
(7,850)
–  income taxes
412
112
Share of other comprehensive income/(expense) of associates and joint ventures
(1,964)
596
Exchange differences
(32,051)
3,973
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Property revaluation
3,863
4,771
–  fair value gains
4,683
5,643
–  income taxes
(820)
(872)
Equity instruments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income
865
(3,480)
–  fair value gains/(losses)
868
(3,478)
–  income taxes
(3)
(2)
Changes in fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value upon initial recognition arising from changes in own credit risk
4,588
522
–  before income taxes
5,461
631
–  income taxes
(873)
(109)
Remeasurement of defined benefit asset/liability
185
724
–  before income taxes
232
885
–  income taxes
(47)
(161)
Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year, net of tax
(40,154)
2,397
Total comprehensive income for the year
41,950
74,945
Attributable to:
–  ordinary shareholders of the parent company
36,360
67,148
–  other equity holders
2,739
2,715
–  non-controlling interests
2,851
5,082
Total comprehensive income for the year
41,950
74,945
Consolidated Financial Statements
80
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Consolidated balance sheet
at 31 December
2022
2021
Notes
HK$m
HK$m
Assets
Cash and balances at central banks
232,740
276,857
Items in the course of collection from other banks
28,557
21,632
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness
341,354
332,044
Trading assets
7
699,805
777,450
Derivatives
8
502,771
365,167
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
9
226,451
202,399
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
927,976
803,775
Loans and advances to banks
519,024
432,247
Loans and advances to customers
10
3,705,149
3,840,939
Financial investments
11
2,221,361
2,051,575
Amounts due from Group companies
32
140,546
112,719
Interests in associates and joint ventures
14
185,898
188,485
Goodwill and intangible assets
15
102,419
95,181
Property, plant and equipment
16
130,926
129,827
Deferred tax assets
5
3,856
3,353
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets
17
355,319
269,743
Total assets
10,324,152
9,903,393
Liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
341,354
332,044
Items in the course of transmission to other banks
33,073
25,701
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
351,093
255,374
Deposits by banks
198,908
280,310
Customer accounts
18
6,113,709
6,177,182
Trading liabilities
19
142,453
92,723
Derivatives
8
551,745
355,791
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
20
167,743
138,965
Debt securities in issue
21
100,909
67,364
Retirement benefit liabilities
4
1,655
1,890
Amounts due to Group companies
32
398,705
356,233
Accruals and deferred income, other liabilities and provisions
22
238,726
219,206
Liabilities under insurance contracts
3
700,758
638,145
Current tax liabilities
6,002
2,378
Deferred tax liabilities
5
32,937
32,522
Subordinated liabilities
23
3,119
4,054
Total liabilities
9,382,889
8,979,882
Equity
Share capital
24
180,181
172,335
Other equity instruments
25
52,386
44,615
Other reserves
109,235
151,804
Retained earnings
533,518
488,055
Total shareholders’ equity
875,320
856,809
Non-controlling interests
65,943
66,702
Total equity
941,263
923,511
Total liabilities and equity
10,324,152
9,903,393
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
81
Consolidated statement of cash flows
for the year ended 31 December
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Profit before tax
97,611
86,563
Adjustments for non-cash items:
Depreciation and amortisation
15,297
13,288
Net (gain)/loss from investing activities
128
(1,890)
Share of profits in associates and joint ventures
(18,792)
(19,320)
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries, businesses, associates and joint ventures
(4)
(4)
Gain on acquisition of subsidiary
(665)
—
Change in expected credit losses gross of recoveries and other credit impairment charges
17,245
7,549
Provisions
592
607
Share-based payment expense
843
913
Other non-cash items included in profit before tax
(1,507)
5,416
Elimination of exchange differences
36,982
8,024
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Change in net trading securities and derivatives
185,431
(159,767)
Change in loans and advances to banks and customers
77,973
(172,484)
Change in reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
(166,542)
(174,643)
Change in financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
4,728
(23,439)
Change in other assets
(91,989)
43,706
Change in deposits by banks and customer accounts
(144,875)
297,468
Change in repurchase agreements – non-trading
95,719
119,217
Change in debt securities in issue
33,545
(12,055)
Change in financial liabilities designated at fair value
26,028
(28,048)
Change in other liabilities
101,882
129,710
Dividends received from associates
6,003
5,525
Contributions paid to defined benefit plans
(345)
(356)
Tax paid
(11,463)
(12,648)
Net cash from operating activities
263,825
113,332
Purchase of financial investments
(1,256,919)
(1,233,472)
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of financial investments
1,093,359
1,193,780
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
(2,802)
(2,718)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale
73
96
Proceeds from disposal of customer loan portfolios
1,449
2,267
Net investment in intangible assets
(11,771)
(10,835)
Net cash outflow on purchase of subsidiaries
(4,166)
(13)
Net cash from investing activities
(180,777)
(50,895)
Issue of ordinary share capital and other equity instruments
15,617
—
Purchase of non-controlling interest
(1,548)
—
Subordinated loan capital issued1
81,014
57,764
Subordinated loan capital repaid1
(22,367)
(24,102)
Dividends paid to shareholders of the parent company and non-controlling interests
(37,666)
(63,523)
Net cash from financing activities
35,050
(29,861)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
118,098
32,576
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 Jan
1,055,084
1,047,807
Exchange differences in respect of cash and cash equivalents
(51,487)
(25,299)
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 Dec2
1,121,695
1,055,084
Cash and cash equivalents comprise
–  cash and balances at central banks
232,740
276,857
–  items in the course of collection from other banks
28,557
21,632
–  loans and advances to banks of one month or less
368,946
326,691
–  net settlement accounts and cash collateral
58,473
34,580
–  reverse repurchase agreements with banks of one month or less
286,100
306,241
–  treasury bills, other bills and certificates of deposit less than three months
179,952
114,784
–  less: items in the course of transmission to other banks
(33,073)
(25,701)
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 Dec2
1,121,695
1,055,084
Interest received was HK$181,301m (2021: HK$133,964m), interest paid was HK$50,873m (2021: HK$26,553m) and dividends received
were HK$6,971m (2021: HK$5,592m).
1  Changes in subordinated loan capital (including those issued to group companies) during the year included amounts from issuance and
repayments as presented above, and non-cash changes from foreign exchange loss of HK$1,991m in 2022 (2021: exchange loss of HK$494m)
and fair value loss after hedging of HK$25,579m in 2022 (2021: HK$7,768m loss). These balances are presented under ‘Amounts due to Group
companies’ in the consolidated balance sheet.
2  At 31 December 2022, HK$161,252m (2021: HK$128,756m) was not available for use by the group, of which HK$65,026m (2021: HK$67,340m)
related to mandatory deposits at Central banks.
Consolidated Financial Statements
82
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 December
Other reserves
Share
capital1
Other
equity
instru-
ments
Retained
earnings
Property
revaluation
reserve
Financial
assets at
FVOCI
reserve
Cash
flow
hedge
reserve
Foreign
exchange
reserve
Other3
Total
share-
holders’
equity
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
equity
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2022
172,335
44,615
488,055
64,990
3,869
153
(7,130)
89,922
856,809
66,702
923,511
Profit for the year
—
—
78,245
—
—
—
—
—
78,245
3,859
82,104
Other comprehensive income/(expense)
(net of tax)
—
—
4,772
3,646
(14,774)
(1,639)
(31,351)
200
(39,146)
(1,008)
(40,154)
–  debt instruments at fair value
through other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
(13,364)
—
—
—
(13,364)
(311)
(13,675)
–  equity instruments designated at fair
value through other comprehensive
income
—
—
—
—
745
—
—
—
745
120
865
–  cash flow hedges
—
—
—
—
—
(1,639)
—
—
(1,639)
(326)
(1,965)
–  changes in fair value of financial
liabilities designated at fair value
upon initial recognition arising from
changes in own credit risk
—
—
4,590
—
—
—
—
—
4,590
(2)
4,588
–  property revaluation
—
—
—
3,646
—
—
—
—
3,646
217
3,863
–  remeasurement of defined benefit
asset/liability
—
—
191
—
—
—
—
—
191
(6)
185
–  share of other comprehensive
income/(expense) of associates and
joint ventures
—
—
(9)
—
(2,155)
—
—
200
(1,964)
—
(1,964)
–  exchange differences
—
—
—
—
—
—
(31,351)
—
(31,351)
(700)
(32,051)
Total comprehensive income/
(expense) for the year
—
—
83,017
3,646
(14,774)
(1,639)
(31,351)
200
39,099
2,851
41,950
Shares issued1
7,846
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,846
—
7,846
Other equity instruments issued2
—
7,771
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,771
—
7,771
Dividends to shareholders4
—
—
(34,821)
—
—
—
—
—
(34,821)
(2,845)
(37,666)
Movement in respect of share-based
payment arrangements
—
—
135
—
—
—
—
(137)
(2)
13
11
Transfers and other movements5
—
—
(2,868)
(3,488)
43
(1)
—
4,932
(1,382)
(778)
(2,160)
At 31 Dec 2022
180,181
52,386
533,518
65,148
(10,862)
(1,487)
(38,481)
94,917
875,320
65,943
941,263
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
83
Consolidated statement of changes in equity (continued)
for the year ended 31 December
Other reserves
Share
capital1
Other
equity
instruments
Retained
earnings
Property
revaluation
reserve
Financial
assets at
FVOCI
reserve
Cash
flow
hedge
reserve
Foreign
exchange
reserve
Other3
Total
share-
holders’
equity
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
equity
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2021
172,335
44,615
478,903
63,793
9,883
772
(10,688)
85,740
845,353
66,178
911,531
Profit for the year
—
—
67,348
—
—
—
—
—
67,348
5,200
72,548
Other comprehensive income/
(expense) (net of tax)
—
—
1,160
4,359
(5,992)
(619)
3,558
49
2,515
(118)
2,397
–  debt instruments at fair value
through other comprehensive
income
—
—
—
—
(3,775)
—
—
—
(3,775)
(234)
(4,009)
–  equity instruments designated at
fair value through other
comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
(2,737)
—
—
—
(2,737)
(743)
(3,480)
–  cash flow hedges
—
—
—
—
—
(619)
—
—
(619)
(81)
(700)
–  changes in fair value of financial
liabilities designated at fair value
upon initial recognition arising
from changes in own credit risk
—
—
521
—
—
—
—
—
521
1
522
–  property revaluation
—
—
—
4,359
—
—
—
—
4,359
412
4,771
–  remeasurement of defined
benefit asset/liability
—
—
612
—
—
—
—
—
612
112
724
–  share of other comprehensive
income of associates and joint
ventures
—
—
27
—
520
—
—
49
596
—
596
–  exchange differences
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,558
—
3,558
415
3,973
Total comprehensive income/
(expense) for the year
—
—
68,508
4,359
(5,992)
(619)
3,558
49
69,863
5,082
74,945
Dividends to shareholders4
—
—
(59,105)
—
—
—
—
—
(59,105)
(4,418)
(63,523)
Movement in respect of share-
based payment arrangements
—
—
131
—
—
—
—
(173)
(42)
(2)
(44)
Transfers and other movements5
—
—
(382)
(3,162)
(22)
—
—
4,306
740
(138)
602
At 31 Dec 2021
172,335
44,615
488,055
64,990
3,869
153
(7,130)
89,922
856,809
66,702
923,511
1Ordinary share capital includes preference shares which have been redeemed or bought back via payments out of distributable profits in previous
years. During 2022, 3,138.4m new ordinary shares were issued at an issue price of HK$2.5 each.
2During 2022, an additional tier 1 capital instrument was issued amounted to US$1,000m on which there were US$10m issue costs.
3The other reserves mainly comprise share of associates’ other reserves, purchase premium arising from transfer of business from fellow
subsidiaries, property revaluation reserve relating to transfer of properties to a fellow subsidiary and the share-based payment reserve. The share-
based payment reserve is used to record the amount relating to share awards and options granted to employees of the group directly by HSBC
Holdings plc.
4Including distributions paid on perpetual subordinated loans classified as equity under HKFRS.
5The movements include transfers from retained earnings to other reserves in associates according to local regulatory requirements, and from the
property revaluation reserve to retained earnings in relation to depreciation of revalued properties.
Consolidated Financial Statements
84
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
1
Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies
1.1Basis of preparation
(a)Compliance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards
The consolidated financial statements of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (‘the Bank’) and its subsidiaries
(together ‘the group’) have been prepared in accordance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (‘HKFRSs’) as issued by the
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (‘HKICPA’) and accounting principles generally accepted in Hong Kong. These
consolidated financial statements also comply with the requirements of the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) which are
applicable to the preparation of the financial statements.
Standards adopted during the year ended 31 December 2022
There were no new accounting standards or interpretations that had a significant effect on the group in 2022. Accounting policies have
been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
(b)Future accounting developments
Minor amendments to HKFRSs
The HKICPA has published a number of minor amendments to HKFRSs that are effective from 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024. The
group expects they will have an insignificant effect, when adopted, on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
New HKFRSs
HKFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’
HKFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’ is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023 and is applied
retrospectively.
HKFRS 17 sets out the requirements that the group will apply in accounting for insurance contracts it issues, reinsurance contracts it
holds, and investment contracts with discretionary participation features.
The group is at an advanced stage in the implementation of HKFRS 17, having put in place accounting policies, data and models, and
made progress with preparing 2022 comparative data. Below are set out our expectations of the impact of HKFRS 17 compared with our
current accounting policy for insurance contracts, which is set out in policy 1.2(j) on page 93.
Under HKFRS 17, no present value of in-force business (‘PVIF’) asset is recognised. Instead, the measurement of the insurance contracts
liability is based on groups of insurance contracts and will include fulfilment cash flows, as well as the contractual service margin
(‘CSM’), which represents the unearned profit.
To identify groups of insurance contracts, individual contracts subject to similar dominant risk and managed together are identified as a
portfolio of insurance contracts. Each portfolio is further separated by profitability group and issue date into periodic cohorts.
The fulfilment cash flows comprise:
•the best estimates of future cash flows, including amounts expected to be collected from premiums and payouts for claims, benefits
and expenses, which are projected using assumptions based on demographic and operating experience;
•an adjustment for the time value of money and financial risks associated with the future cash flows; and
•an adjustment for non-financial risk that reflects the uncertainty about the amount and timing of future cash flows.
In contrast to the group’s HKFRS 4 accounting where profits are recognised upfront, the CSM will be systematically recognised in
revenue, as services are provided over the expected coverage period of the group of contracts without any change to the overall profit of
the contracts. Losses resulting from the recognition of onerous contracts are recognised in the income statement immediately.
The CSM is adjusted depending on the measurement model of the group of insurance contracts. While the general measurement model
(‘GMM’) is the default measurement model under HKFRS 17, the Group expects that the majority of its contracts will be accounted for
under the variable fee approach (‘VFA’), which is mandatory to apply for insurance contracts with direct participation features upon
meeting the eligibility criteria.
HKFRS 17 requires entities to apply HKFRS 17 retrospectively as if HKFRS 17 had always been applied, using the full retrospective
approach ('FRA') unless it is impracticable. When FRA is impracticable such as when there is a lack of sufficient and reliable data, an
entity has an accounting policy choice to use either the modified retrospective approach (‘MRA’) or the fair value approach (‘FVA’). The
group will apply the FRA for new business from 2018 at the earliest, subject to practicability, and FVA for the majority of contracts for
which FRA is impracticable. Where the FVA is used, the measurement takes into account the cost of capital that a market participant
within the jurisdiction would be expected to hold based on the asset and liability positions on the transition date.
The group will make use of the option to re-designate eligible financial assets held to support insurance liabilities currently measured at
amortised cost, as financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss. Following re-designation, interest income earned on
these financial assets will no longer be shown in 'net interest income', and will instead form part of ‘net income/(expense) from assets
and liabilities of insurance businesses, including related derivatives, measured at fair value through profit or loss’ in accordance with the
group’s income and expense policy set out in Note 1.2(b) on page 87.
The group will also make use of the risk mitigation option for a number of economic offsets between the VFA contracts and reinsurance
contracts held that meet the requirements.
Impact of HKFRS 17
Changes to equity on transition are driven by the elimination of the PVIF asset, the re-designation of certain eligible financial assets in the
scope of HKFRS 9, the remeasurement of insurance liabilities and assets under HKFRS 17, and the recognition of the CSM.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
85
HKFRS 17 requires the use of current market values for the measurement of insurance liabilities. The shareholder’s share of the
investment experience and assumption changes will be absorbed by the CSM and released over time to profit or loss under VFA. For
contracts measured under GMM, the shareholder’s share of the investment volatility is recorded in profit or loss as it arises. Under
HKFRS 17, operating expenses will be lower as directly attributable costs will be incorporated in the CSM and recognised in the
insurance service result.
While the profit over the life of an individual contract will be unchanged, its emergence will be later under HKFRS 17.
All of these impacts will be subject to deferred tax.
Estimates of the opening balance sheet as at 1 January 2022 have been calculated and are presented below, showing separately the
impact on the total assets, liabilities and equity of our insurance manufacturing operations and group equity. These estimates are based
on accounting policies, assumptions, judgements and estimation techniques that remain subject to change.
Impact of transition to HKFRS 17, at 1 January 2022
Insurance manufacturing operations
group
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Equity
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
Balance sheet values at 1 January 2022 under HKFRS 4
833.2
719.5
113.7
923.5
Removal of PVIF*
(63.8)
—
(63.8)
(63.8)
Replacement of HKFRS 4 liabilities with HKFRS 17
(3.4)
57.8
(61.2)
(64.3)
–  Removal of HKFRS 4 liabilities and recording of HKFRS 17 fulfilment cash
(3.1)
(5.7)
2.6
2.7
–  HKFRS 17 contractual service margin
(0.3)
63.5
(63.8)
(67.0)
Remeasurement effect of HKFRS 9 re-designations
38.1
—
38.1
38.1
Tax effect*
3.6
(10.5)
14.1
14.6
Estimated balance sheet values at 1 January 2022 under HKFRS 17
807.7
766.8
40.9
848.1
*    PVIF of HK$63.8bn less deferred tax of HK$10.5bn constitute the overall estimated reduction in intangible assets, after tax, of HK$53.3bn on
transition to HKFRS 17.
The group's accounting for insurance contracts considers a broader set of cash flows than those arising within the insurance
manufacturing entities. This includes the effect of eliminating intra-group fees associated with distribution of policies through the group's
banking channel and directly attributable costs incurred by other group entities. These factors lead to an increase to the group CSM after
inclusion of distribution activities of approximately HK$3.2bn, with a consequential reduction to group equity of approximately HK$2.6bn
after the inclusion of deferred tax.
(c)    Foreign currencies
Items included in each of the group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates (the ‘functional currency’). The group’s consolidated financial statements are presented in Hong Kong dollars.
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange on the date of the transaction. Assets and liabilities denominated
in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date except non-monetary assets and liabilities measured
at historical cost which are translated using the rate of exchange at the initial transaction date. Exchange differences are included in other
comprehensive income (‘OCI’) or in the income statement depending on where the gain or loss on the underlying item is recognised.
In the Consolidated Financial Statements, the assets, liabilities and results of foreign operations whose functional currency is not Hong
Kong dollars are translated into the group’s presentation currency at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date, while their results
are translated into Hong Kong dollars at the average rates of exchange for the reporting period. Exchange differences arising are
recognised in OCI. On disposal of a foreign operation, exchange differences previously recognised in OCI are reclassified to the income
statement.
(d)Presentation of information
Certain disclosures required by HKFRSs have been included in the sections marked as ('Audited') in this Annual Report and Accounts as
follows:
•Consolidated income statement and balance sheet data by reportable segments are included in the 'Financial Review' on page 16 as
specified as ‘Audited’.
•Disclosures on 'Financial instruments impacted by IBOR reform' are included in the 'Top and Emerging Risks' section on page 25 as
specified as 'Audited'.
•Disclosures concerning the nature and extent of risks relating to banking and insurance activities are included in the ‘Risk' section on
pages 31 to 61 and pages 68 to 72 as specified as ‘Audited’.
•Capital disclosures are included in the ‘Treasury Risk’ section on pages 53 to 54 as specified as ‘Audited’.
In accordance with the group’s policy to provide disclosures that help stakeholders understand the group’s performance, financial
position and changes to them, the information provided in the Risk section goes beyond the minimum levels required by accounting
standards, statutory and regulatory requirements. In addition, the group assesses good practice recommendations issued from time to
time by relevant regulators and standard setters and will assess the applicability and relevance of such guidance, enhancing disclosures
where appropriate.
(e)Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The preparation of financial information requires the use of estimates and judgements about future conditions. In view of the inherent
uncertainties and the high level of subjectivity involved in the recognition or measurement of items highlighted as the critical accounting
estimates and judgements in Note 1.2 below, it is possible that the outcomes in the next financial year could differ from those on which
management’s estimates are based. This could result in materially different estimates and judgements from those reached by
management for the purposes of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management’s selection of the group’s accounting policies that
contain critical estimates and judgements reflects the materiality of the items to which the policies are applied and the high degree of
judgement and estimation uncertainty involved.
Management has considered the impact of climate-related risks on the group's financial position and performance. While the effects of
climate change are a source of uncertainty, as at 31 December 2022 we do not consider there to be a material impact on our critical
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
86
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
judgements and estimates from the physical, transition and other climate-related risks in the short to medium term. In particular
management has considered the known and observable potential impact of climate-related risks of associated judgements and estimates
in our value in use calculations.
(f)Segmental analysis
The group’s chief operating decision-maker is the Executive Committee, which operates as a general management committee under the
direct authority of the Board. Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the
Executive Committee.
Measurement of segmental assets, liabilities, income and expenses is in accordance with the group’s accounting policies. Segmental
income and expenses include transfers between segments and these transfers are conducted at arm’s length. Shared costs are included
in segments on the basis of the actual recharges made.
(g)Going concern
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared on a going concern basis, as the Directors are satisfied that the group and parent
company have the resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. In making this assessment, the Directors have considered
a wide range of information relating to present and future conditions, including future projections of profitability, cash flows, capital
requirements and capital resources. These considerations include stressed scenarios that reflect the uncertainty in structural changes
from the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, disrupted supply chains globally, slower Chinese economic activity, climate change
and other top and emerging risks, as well as from the related impacts on profitability, capital and liquidity.
1.2Summary of significant accounting policies
(a)Consolidation and related policies
Investments in subsidiaries
Where an entity is governed by voting rights, the group consolidates when it holds, directly or indirectly, the necessary voting rights to
pass resolutions by the governing body. In all other cases, the assessment of control is more complex and requires judgement of other
factors, including having exposure to variability of returns, power to direct relevant activities and whether power is held as agent or
principal.
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The amount of non-controlling interest is measured either at fair
value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. This election is made for each
business combination.
The Bank’s investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less impairment losses.
Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units (‘CGU’) for the purpose of impairment testing, which is undertaken at the lowest level at
which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Impairment testing is performed at least once a year, or whenever there
is an indication of impairment, by comparing the recoverable amount of a CGU with its carrying amount.
Interests in associates
The group classifies investments in entities over which it has significant influence, and that are neither subsidiaries nor joint
arrangements, as associates.
Investments in associates are recognised using the equity method. The attributable share of the results and reserves of associates is
included in the consolidated financial statements of the group based on either financial statements made up to 31 December or amounts
adjusted for any material transactions or events occurring between the date the financial statements are available and
31 December.
Investments in associates are assessed at each reporting date and tested for impairment when there is an indication that the investment
may be impaired. Goodwill on acquisitions of interests in associates is not tested separately for impairment but is assessed as part of the
carrying amount of the investment.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The most significant critical accounting estimates relate to the assessment of impairment of our investment in Bank of Communications Co. Limited
(‘BoCom’), which involves estimations of value in use.
Judgements
Estimates
•The VIU calculation uses discounted cash flow projections based on management’s
best estimates of future earnings available to ordinary shareholders prepared in
accordance with HKAS 36.
•Key assumptions are used in estimating BoCom’s value in use, the sensitivity of the
value in use calculations to different assumptions and a sensitivity analysis that
shows the changes in key assumptions that would reduce the excess of value in use
over the carrying amount (the ‘headroom’) to nil are described in Note 14.
(b)Income and expense
Operating income
Interest income and expense
Interest income and expense for all financial instruments, excluding those classified as held for trading or designated at fair value are
recognised in ‘Interest income’ and ‘Interest expense’ in the income statement using the effective interest method. However, as an
exception to this, interest on debt instruments issued by the group for funding purposes that are designated under the fair value option to
reduce an accounting mismatch and on derivatives managed in conjunction with those debt instruments is included in interest expense.
Interest on credit impaired financial assets is recognised using the rate of interest used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose
of measuring the impairment loss.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
87
Non-interest income and expense
The group generates fee income from services provided at a fixed price over time, such as account service and card fees, or when the
group delivers a specific transaction at a point in time such as broking services and import/export services. With the exception of certain
fund management and performance fees, all other fees are generated at a fixed price. Fund management and performance fees can be
variable depending on the size of the customer portfolio and the group’s performance as fund manager. Variable fees are recognised
when all uncertainties are resolved. Fee income is generally earned from short term contracts with payment terms that do not include a
significant financing component.
The group acts as principal in the majority of contracts with customers, with the exception of broking services. For brokerage trades
where the group acts as an agent in the transaction it recognises broking income net of fees payable to other parties in the arrangement.
The group recognises fees earned on transaction-based arrangements at a point in time when it has fully provided the service to the
customer. Where the contract requires services to be provided over time, income is recognised on a systematic basis over the life of the
agreement.
Where the group offers a package of services that contains multiple non-distinct performance obligations, such as those included in
account service packages, the promised services are treated as a single performance obligation. If a package of services contains distinct
performance obligations, such as those including both account and insurance services, the corresponding transaction price is allocated to
each performance obligation based on the estimated stand-alone selling prices.
Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established. This is the ex-dividend date for listed equity securities,
and usually the date when shareholders approve the dividend for unlisted equity securities.
Net income/(expense) from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss includes the following:
•‘Net income from financial instruments held for trading or managed on a fair value basis’. This comprises net trading income, which
includes all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities held for trading and other
financial instruments managed on a fair value basis, together with the related interest income, expense and dividends, excluding the
effect of changes in the credit risk of liabilities managed on a fair value basis. It also includes all gains and losses from changes in the
fair value of derivatives that are managed in conjunction with financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value through profit or
loss.
•‘Net income/(expense) from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses, including related derivatives, measured at fair value through
profit or loss’. This includes interest income, interest expense and dividend income in respect of financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value through profit or loss; and those derivatives managed in conjunction with the above that can be separately
identifiable from other trading derivatives.
•‘Changes in fair value of designated debt instruments and related derivatives’. Interest paid on debt instruments and interest cash
flows on related derivatives is presented in interest expense where doing so reduces an accounting mismatch.
•‘Changes in fair value of other financial instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss’. This includes interest
on instruments that fail the solely payments of principal and interest ('SPPI') test. See (d) below.
The accounting policies for insurance premium income are disclosed in Note 1.2(j).
(c)Valuation of financial instruments
All financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of a financial instrument
on initial recognition is generally its transaction price (that is, the fair value of the consideration given or received). However, if there is a
difference between the transaction price and the fair value of financial instruments whose fair value is based on a quoted price in an
active market or a valuation technique that uses only data from observable markets, the group recognises the difference as a trading gain
or loss at inception (‘a day 1 gain or loss’). In all other cases, the entire day 1 gain or loss is deferred and recognised in the income
statement over the life of the transaction until the transaction matures, is closed out, the valuation inputs become observable or the
group enters into an offsetting transaction.
The fair value of financial instruments is generally measured on an individual basis. However, in cases where the group manages a group
of financial assets and liabilities according to its net market or credit risk exposure, the fair value of the group of financial instruments is
measured on a net basis but the underlying financial assets and liabilities are presented separately in the Consolidated Financial
Statements, unless they satisfy the HKFRSs offsetting criteria.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The majority of valuation techniques employ only observable market data, which is assumed to include the potential effects of a variety of factors including
climate-related risks. However, certain financial instruments are classified on the basis of valuation techniques that feature one or more significant market
inputs that are unobservable, and for them, the measurement of fair value is more judgemental.
Judgements
Estimates
•An instrument in its entirety is classified as valued using significant unobservable
inputs if, in the opinion of management, a significant proportion of the instrument’s
inception profit or greater than 5% of the instrument’s valuation is driven by
unobservable inputs.
•‘Unobservable’ in this context means that there is little or no current market data
available from which to determine the price at which an arm’s length transaction
would be likely to occur. It generally does not mean that there is no data available
at all upon which to base a determination of fair value (consensus pricing data
may, for example, be used).
•Details on the group’s level 3 financial instruments and the
sensitivity of their valuation to the effect of applying reasonably
possible alternative assumptions in determining their fair value
are set out in Note 33.
(d)Financial instruments measured at amortised cost
Financial assets that are held to collect the contractual cash flows and which contain contractual terms that give rise on specified dates
to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest are measured at amortised cost. Such financial assets include most loans
and advances to banks and customers and some debt securities. In addition, most financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
88
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
The group accounts for regular way amortised cost financial instruments using trade date accounting. The carrying value of these
financial assets at initial recognition includes any directly attributable transactions costs.
The group may commit to underwriting loans on fixed contractual terms for specified periods of time. When the loan arising from the
lending commitment is expected to be sold shortly after origination, the commitment to lend is recorded as a derivative. When the group
intends to hold the loan, the loan commitment is included in the impairment calculations set out below.
Non-trading reverse repurchase, repurchase and similar agreements
When debt securities are sold subject to a commitment to repurchase them at a predetermined price (‘repos’), they remain on the
balance sheet and a liability is recorded in respect of the consideration received. Securities purchased under commitments to resell
(‘reverse repos’) are not recognised on the balance sheet and an asset is recorded in respect of the initial consideration paid. Non-trading
repos and reverse repos are measured at amortised cost. The difference between the sale and repurchase price, or between the purchase
and resale price, is treated as interest and recognised in net interest income over the life of the agreement.
Contracts that are economically equivalent to reverse repo or repo agreements (such as sales or purchases of debt securities entered into
together with total return swaps with the same counterparty) are accounted for similarly to, and presented together with, reverse repo or
repo agreements.
(e)Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (‘FVOCI’)
Financial assets held for a business model that is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling and which contain
contractual terms that give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest are measured at FVOCI.
These comprise primarily debt securities. They are recognised on the trade date when the group enters into contractual arrangements to
purchase and are normally derecognised when they are either sold or redeemed. They are subsequently remeasured at fair value and
changes therein (except for those relating to impairment, interest income and foreign currency exchange gains and losses) are
recognised in OCI until the assets are sold. Upon disposal, the cumulative gains or losses in OCI are recognised in the income statement
as ‘Gains less losses from financial instruments’. Financial assets measured at FVOCI are included in the impairment calculations set out
below and impairment is recognised in the income statement.
(f)Equity securities measured at fair value with fair value movements presented in OCI
The equity securities for which fair value movements are shown in OCI are business facilitation and other similar investments where the
group holds the investments other than to generate a capital return. Gains or losses on the derecognition of these equity securities are
not transferred to the income statement. Dividend income is recognised in the income statement.
(g)Financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss
Financial instruments, other than those held for trading, are classified in this category if they meet one or more of the criteria set out
below and are so designated irrevocably at inception:
•The use of the designation removes or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch.
•A group of financial assets and liabilities or a group of financial liabilities is managed and its performance is evaluated on a fair value
basis, in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy.
•The financial liability contains one or more non-closely related embedded derivatives.
Designated financial assets are recognised when the group enters into contracts with counterparties, which is generally on trade date,
and are normally derecognised when the rights to the cash flows expire or are transferred.
Designated financial liabilities are recognised when the group enters into contracts with counterparties, which is generally on settlement
date, and are normally derecognised when extinguished. Subsequent changes in fair values are recognised in the income statement in
‘Net income from financial instruments held for trading or managed on a fair value basis’ or ‘Net income/(expense) from assets and
liabilities of insurance businesses, including related derivatives, measured at fair value through profit or loss’ or ‘Changes in fair value of
designated debt and related derivatives’ except for the effect of changes in the liabilities' credit risk which is presented in OCI, unless that
treatment would create or enlarge an accounting mismatch in profit or loss.
Under the above criterion, the main classes of financial instruments designated by the group are:
•Debt instruments for funding purposes that are designated to reduce an accounting mismatch. The interest and/or foreign exchange
exposure on certain fixed rate debt securities issued has been matched with the interest and/or foreign exchange exposure on certain
swaps as part of a documented risk management strategy.
•Financial assets and financial liabilities under unit-linked and non-linked investment contracts. A contract under which the group does
not accept significant insurance risk from another party is not classified as an insurance contract, other than investment contracts
with discretionary participation features (‘DPF’), but is accounted for as a financial liability. Customer liabilities under linked and
certain non-linked investment contracts issued by insurance subsidiaries are determined based on the fair value of the assets held in
the linked funds. If no fair value designation was made for the related assets, at least some of the assets would otherwise be
measured at either fair value through OCI or amortised cost. The related financial assets and liabilities are managed and reported to
management on a fair value basis. Designation at fair value of the financial assets and related liabilities allows changes in fair values
to be recorded in the income statement and presented in the same line.
•Financial liabilities that contain both deposit and derivative components: These financial liabilities are managed and their performance
evaluated on a fair value basis.
(h)Derivatives
Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from the price of underlying items such as equities, interest rates or other
indices. Derivatives are recognised initially and are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Derivatives are classified as
assets when their fair value is positive or as liabilities when their fair value is negative. This includes embedded derivatives in financial
liabilities which are bifurcated from the host contract when they meet the definition of a derivative on a stand-alone basis.
Where the derivatives are managed with debt securities issued by the group that are designated at fair value where doing so reduces an
accounting mismatch, the contractual interest is shown in ‘Interest expense’ together with the interest payable on the issued debt.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
89
Hedge accounting
When derivatives are not part of fair value designated relationships, if held for risk management purposes they are designated in hedge
accounting relationships where the required criteria for documentation and hedge effectiveness are met. The group uses these
derivatives or, where allowed, other non-derivative hedging instruments in fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net
investments in foreign operations as appropriate to the risk being hedged.
Fair value hedge
Fair value hedge accounting does not change the recording of gains and losses on derivatives and other hedging instruments, but results
in recognising changes in the fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities attributable to the hedged risk that would not otherwise be
recognised in the income statement. If a hedge relationship no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, hedge accounting is
discontinued and the cumulative adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item is amortised to the income statement on a
recalculated effective interest rate, unless the hedged item has been derecognised, in which case it is recognised in the income
statement immediately.
Cash flow hedge
The effective portion of gains and losses on hedging instruments is recognised in OCI and the ineffective portion of the change in fair
value of derivative hedging instruments that are part of a cash flow hedge relationship is recognised immediately in the income
statement within ‘Net income from financial instruments held for trading or managed on a fair value basis’. The accumulated gains and
losses recognised in OCI are reclassified to the income statement in the same periods in which the hedged item affects profit or loss.
When a hedge relationship is discontinued, or partially discontinued, any cumulative gain or loss recognised in OCI remains in equity until
the forecast transaction is recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in OCI is immediately reclassified to the income statement.
Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Non-qualifying hedges are derivatives entered into as economic hedges of assets and liabilities for which hedge accounting was not
applied.
(i)Impairment of amortised cost and FVOCI financial assets
Expected credit losses (‘ECL’) are recognised for loans and advances to banks and customers, non-trading reverse repurchase
agreements, other financial assets held at amortised cost, debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
('FVOCI'), and certain loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts. At initial recognition, an allowance (or provision in the case of
some loan commitments and financial guarantees) is required for ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12
months (or less, where the remaining life is less than 12 months) (’12-month ECL’). In the event of a significant increase in credit risk, an
allowance (or provision) is required for ECL resulting from all possible default events over the expected life of the financial instrument
(‘lifetime ECL’). Financial assets where 12-month ECL is recognised are considered to be ‘stage 1’; financial assets that are considered to
have experienced a significant increase in credit risk are in ‘stage 2’; and financial assets for which there is objective evidence of
impairment so are considered to be in default or otherwise credit-impaired are in ‘stage 3’. Purchased or originated credit-impaired
financial assets (‘POCI’) are treated differently as set out below.
Credit-impaired (stage 3)
The group determines that a financial instrument is credit-impaired and in stage 3 by considering relevant objective evidence, primarily
whether contractual payments of either principal or interest are past due for more than 90 days, there are other indications that the
borrower is unlikely to pay such as that a concession has been granted to the borrower for economic or legal reasons relating to the
borrower’s financial condition, or the loan is otherwise considered to be in default.
If such unlikeliness to pay is not identified at an earlier stage, it is deemed to occur when an exposure is 90 days past due, even where
regulatory rules permit default to be defined based on 180 days past due. Therefore, the definitions of credit-impaired and default are
aligned as far as possible so that stage 3 represents all loans that are considered defaulted or otherwise credit-impaired.
Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate to the amortised cost amount, i.e. gross carrying amount less ECL
allowance.
Write-off
Financial assets (and the related impairment allowances) are normally written off, either partially or in full, when there is no realistic
prospect of recovery. Where loans are secured, this is generally after receipt of any proceeds from the realisation of security. In
circumstances where the net realisable value of any collateral has been determined and there is no reasonable expectation of further
recovery, write-off may be earlier.
Forbearance
Loans are identified as forborne and classified as either performing or non-performing when the group modifies the contractual terms
due to financial difficulty of the borrower. Non-performing forborne loans are stage 3 and classified as non-performing until they meet the
cure criteria, as specified by applicable credit risk policy (for example, when the loan is no longer in default and no other indicators of
default have been present for at least 12 months). Any amount written off as a result of any modification of contractual terms upon
entering forbearance would not be reversed.
In 2022, the group adopted the EBA Guidelines on the application of definition of default for our retail portfolios, which affects credit risk
policies and our reporting in respect of the status of loans as credit impaired principally due to forbearance (or curing thereof). Further
details are provided under ‘Forborne loans and advances’ on page 32.
Performing forborne loans are initially stage 2 and remain classified as forborne until they meet applicable cure criteria (for example, they
continue to not be in default and no other indicators of default are present for a period of at least 24 months). At this point, the loan is
either stage 1 or stage 2 as determined by comparing the risk of a default occurring at the reporting date (based on the modified
contractual terms) and the risk of a default occurring at initial recognition (based on the original, unmodified contractual terms).
A forborne loan is derecognised if the existing agreement is cancelled and a new agreement is made on substantially different terms, or if
the terms of an existing agreement are modified such that the forborne loan is a substantially different financial instrument. Any new
loans that arise following derecognition events in these circumstances would generally be classified as POCI and will continue to be
disclosed as forborne.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
90
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Loan modifications other than forborne loans
Loan modifications that are not identified as forborne are considered to be commercial restructurings. Where a commercial restructuring
results in a modification (whether legalised through an amendment to the existing terms or the issuance of a new loan contract) such
that the group’s rights to the cash flows under the original contract have expired, the old loan is derecognised and the new loan is
recognised at fair value. The rights to cash flows are generally considered to have expired if the commercial restructure is at market rates
and no payment-related concession has been provided. Modifications of certain higher credit risk wholesale loans are assessed for
derecognition having regard to changes in contractual terms that either individually or in combination are judged to result in a
substantially different financial instrument. Mandatory and general offer loan modifications that are not borrower specific, for example
market-wide customer relief programmes, generally do not result in derecognition, but their stage allocation is determined considering all
available and supportable information under our ECL impairment policy. Changes made to these financial instruments that are
economically equivalent and required by interest rate benchmark reform do not result in the derecognition or a change in the carrying
amount of the financial instrument, but instead require the effective interest rate to be updated to reflect the change of the interest rate
benchmark.
Significant increase in credit risk (stage 2)
An assessment of whether credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition is performed at each reporting period by
considering the change in the risk of default occurring over the remaining life of the financial instrument. The assessment explicitly or
implicitly compares the risk of default occurring at the reporting date compared with that at initial recognition, taking into account
reasonable and supportable information, including information about past events, current conditions and future economic conditions. The
assessment is unbiased, probability-weighted, and to the extent relevant, uses forward-looking information consistent with that used in
the measurement of ECL. The analysis of credit risk is multifactor. The determination of whether a specific factor is relevant and its
weight compared with other factors depends on the type of product, the characteristics of the financial instrument and the borrower, and
the geographical region. Therefore, it is not possible to provide a single set of criteria that will determine what is considered to be a
significant increase in credit risk and these criteria will differ for different types of lending, particularly between retail and wholesale.
However, unless identified at an earlier stage, all financial assets are deemed to have suffered a significant increase in credit risk when
30 days past due. In addition, wholesale loans that are individually assessed, which are typically corporate and commercial customers,
and included on a watch or worry list are included in stage 2.
For wholesale portfolios, the quantitative comparison assesses default risk using a lifetime probability of default (‘PD’) which
encompasses a wide range of information including the obligor’s customer risk rating ('CRR'), macroeconomic condition forecasts and
credit transition probabilities. For origination CRRs up to 3.3, significant increase in credit risk is measured by comparing the average PD
for the remaining term estimated at origination with the equivalent estimation at the reporting date. The quantitative measure of
significance varies depending on the credit quality at origination as follows:
Origination CRR
Significance trigger – PD to increase by
0.1–1.2
15bps
2.1–3.3
30bps
For CRRs greater than 3.3 that are not impaired, a significant increase in credit risk is considered to have occurred when the origination
PD has doubled. The significance of changes in PD was informed by expert credit risk judgement, referenced to historical credit
migrations and to relative changes in external market rates.
For loans originated prior to the implementation of HKFRS 9, the origination PD does not include adjustments to reflect expectations of
future macroeconomic conditions since these are not available without the use of hindsight. In the absence of this data, origination PD
must be approximated assuming through-the-cycle PDs and through-the-cycle migration probabilities, consistent with the instrument’s
underlying modelling approach and the CRR at origination. For these loans, the quantitative comparison is supplemented with additional
CRR deterioration based thresholds as set out in the table below:
Origination CRR
Additional significance criteria – number of CRR grade notches deterioration
required to identify as significant credit deterioration (stage 2) (> or equal to)
0.1
5 notches
1.1–4.2
4 notches
4.3–5.1
3 notches
5.2–7.1
2 notches
7.2–8.2
1 notch
8.3
0 notch
Further information about the 23-grade scale used for CRR can be found on page 32.
For retail portfolios, default risk is assessed using a reporting date 12-month PD derived from credit scores, which incorporate all
available information about the customer. This PD is adjusted for the effect of macroeconomic forecasts for periods longer than 12
months and is considered to be a reasonable approximation of a lifetime PD measure. Retail exposures are first segmented into
homogenous portfolios, generally by country, product and brand. Within each portfolio, the stage 2 accounts are defined as accounts
with an adjusted 12-month PD greater than the average 12-month PD of loans in that portfolio 12 months before they become 30 days
past due. The expert credit risk judgement is that no prior increase in credit risk is significant. This portfolio-specific threshold therefore
identifies loans with a PD higher than would be expected from loans that are performing as originally expected and higher than that
which would have been acceptable at origination. It therefore approximates a comparison of origination to reporting date PDs.
As additional data becomes available, the retail transfer criteria approach continues to be refined to utilise a more relative approach for
certain portfolios. These enhancements take advantage of the increase in origination related data in the assessment of significant
increases in credit risk by comparing remaining lifetime PD to the comparable remaining term lifetime PD at origination based on
portfolio-specific origination segments. These enhancements resulted in significant migrations of loans to customers gross carrying
amounts from stage 1 to stage 2, but did not have a significant impact on the overall ECL for these portfolios in 2022 due to low loan-to-
value ratios.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
91
Unimpaired and without significant increase in credit risk – (stage 1)
ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months is recognised for financial instruments that remain in
stage 1.
Purchased or originated credit-impaired (‘POCI’)
Financial assets that are purchased or originated at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses are considered to be POCI.
This population includes new financial instruments recognised in most cases following the derecognition of forborne loans. The amount
of change in lifetime ECL for a POCI loan is recognised in profit or loss until the POCI loan is derecognised, even if the lifetime ECL are
less than the amount of ECL included in the estimated cash flows on initial recognition.
Movement between stages
Financial assets can be transferred between the different categories (other than POCI) depending on their relative increase in credit risk
since initial recognition. Financial instruments are transferred out of stage 2 if their credit risk is no longer considered to be significantly
increased since initial recognition based on the assessments described above. In the case of non-performing forborne loans, such
financial instruments are transferred out of stage 3 when they no longer exhibit any evidence of credit impairment and meet the curing
criteria as described above.
Measurement of ECL
The assessment of credit risk, and the estimation of ECL, are unbiased and probability-weighted, and incorporate all available information
which is relevant to the assessment including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable
forecasts of future events and economic conditions at the reporting date. In addition, the estimation of ECL should take into account the
time value of money and considers other factors such as climate-related risks.
In general, the group calculates ECL using three main components, a probability of default, a loss given default ('LGD') and the exposure
at default (‘EAD’).
The 12-month ECL is calculated by multiplying the 12-month PD, LGD, and EAD. Lifetime ECL is calculated using the lifetime PD instead.
The 12-month and lifetime PDs represent the probability of default occurring over the next 12 months and the remaining maturity of the
instrument respectively.
The EAD represents the expected balance at default, taking into account the repayment of principal and interest from the balance sheet
date to the default event together with any expected drawdowns of committed facilities. The LGD represents expected losses on the EAD
given the event of default, taking into account, among other attributes, the mitigating effect of collateral value at the time it is expected
to be realised and the time value of money.
The group makes use of the Basel II IRB framework where possible, with recalibration to meet the differing HKFRS 9 requirements as set
out in the following table:
Model
Regulatory capital
HKFRS 9
PD
•Through the cycle (represents long-run average PD throughout a
full economic cycle).
•The definition of default includes a backstop of 90+ days past
due.
•Point in time (based on current conditions, adjusted to take into
account estimates of future conditions that will impact PD).
•Default backstop of 90+ days past due for all portfolios.
EAD
•Cannot be lower than current balance.
•Amortisation captured for term products.
LGD
•Downturn LGD (consistent losses expected to be suffered during
a severe but plausible economic downturn).
•Regulatory floors may apply to mitigate risk of underestimating
downturn LGD due to lack of historical data.
•Discounted using cost of capital.
•All collection costs included.
•Expected LGD (based on estimate of loss given default including
the expected impact of future economic conditions such as
changes in value of collateral).
•No floors.
•Discounted using the original effective interest rate of the loan.
•Only costs associated with obtaining/selling collateral included.
Other
•Discounted back from point of default to balance sheet date.
While 12-month PDs are recalibrated from Basel models where possible, the lifetime PDs are determined by projecting the 12-month PD
using a term structure. For the wholesale methodology, the lifetime PD also takes into account credit migration, i.e. a customer migrating
through the CRR bands over its life.
The ECL for wholesale stage 3 is determined on an individual basis using a discounted cash flow (‘DCF’) methodology. The expected
future cash flows are based on the credit risk officer’s estimates as of the reporting date, reflecting reasonable and supportable
assumptions and projections of future recoveries and expected future receipts of interest.
Collateral is taken into account if it is likely that the recovery of the outstanding amount will include realisation of collateral based on the
estimated fair value of collateral at the time of expected realisation, less costs for obtaining and selling the collateral.
The cash flows are discounted at a reasonable approximation of the original effective interest rate. For significant cases, cash flows under
four different scenarios are probability-weighted by reference to the economic scenarios applied more generally by the group and the
judgement of the credit risk officer in relation to the likelihood of the work-out strategy succeeding or receivership being required. For
less significant cases, the effect of different economic scenarios and work-out strategies is approximated and applied as an adjustment to
the most likely outcome.
Period over which ECL is measured
ECL is measured from the initial recognition of the financial asset. The maximum period considered when measuring ECL (be it 12-month
or lifetime ECL) is the maximum contractual period over which the group is exposed to credit risk. However, where the financial
instrument includes both a drawn and undrawn commitment and the contractual ability to demand repayment and cancel the undrawn
commitment does not serve to limit the group’s exposure to credit risk to the contractual notice period, the contractual period does not
determine the maximum period considered. Instead, ECL is measured over the period the group remains exposed to credit risk that is not
mitigated by credit risk management actions. This applies to retail overdrafts and credit cards, where the period is the average time taken
for stage 2 exposures to default or close as performing accounts, determined on a portfolio basis and ranging from between two and six
years. In addition, for these facilities it is not possible to identify the ECL on the loan commitment component separately from the
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
92
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
financial asset component. As a result, the total ECL is recognised in the loss allowance for the financial asset unless the total ECL
exceeds the gross carrying amount of the financial asset, in which case the ECL is recognised as a provision. For wholesale overdraft
facilities, credit risk management actions are taken no less frequently than on an annual basis.
Forward-looking economic inputs
The group applies multiple forward-looking global economic scenarios determined with reference to external forecast distributions
representative of its view of forecast economic conditions. This approach is considered sufficient to calculate unbiased expected loss in
most economic environments. In certain economic environments, additional analysis may be necessary and may result in additional
scenarios or adjustments, to reflect a range of possible economic outcomes sufficient for an unbiased estimate. The detailed
methodology is disclosed in ‘Measurement uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of ECL estimates’ on pages 37 to 41.
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The calculation of the group’s ECL under HKFRS 9 requires the group to make a number of judgements, assumptions and estimates. The most significant
are set out below:
Judgements
Estimates
•Defining what is considered to be a significant increase in credit risk.
•Determining the lifetime and point of initial recognition of overdrafts and credit cards.
•Selecting and calibrating the PD, LGD and EAD models, which support the calculations,
including making reasonable and supportable judgements about how models react to current
and future economic conditions.
•Selecting model inputs and economic forecasts, including determining whether sufficient and
appropriately weighted economic forecasts are incorporated to calculate unbiased expected
loss.
•Making management adjustments to account for late breaking events, model and data
limitations and deficiencies, and expert credit judgements.
•Selecting applicable recovery strategies for certain wholesale credit-impaired loans.
•The sections ‘Measurement uncertainty and
sensitivity analysis of ECL estimates’ marked as
audited from pages 37 to 41, set out the assumptions
used in determining ECL and provide an indication of
the sensitivity of the result to the application of
different weightings being applied to different
economic assumptions.
(j)Insurance contracts
A contract is classified as an insurance contract where the group accepts significant insurance risk from another party by agreeing to
compensate that party on the occurrence of a specified uncertain future event. An insurance contract may also transfer financial risk, but
is accounted for as an insurance contract if the insurance risk is significant. In addition, the group issues investment contracts with
discretionary participation features ('DPF') which are also accounted for as insurance contracts as required by HKFRS 4 ‘Insurance
Contracts’.
Net insurance premium income
Premiums for life insurance contracts are accounted for when receivable, except in unit-linked insurance contracts where premiums are
accounted for when liabilities are established.
Reinsurance premiums are accounted for in the same accounting period as the premiums for the direct insurance contracts to which they
relate.
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movements in liabilities to policyholders
Gross insurance claims for life insurance contracts reflect the total cost of claims arising during the year, including claim handling costs
and any policyholder bonuses allocated in anticipation of a bonus declaration.
Maturity claims are recognised when due for payment. Surrenders are recognised when paid or at an earlier date on which, following
notification, the policy ceases to be included within the calculation of the related insurance liabilities. Death claims are recognised when
notified.
Reinsurance recoveries are accounted for in the same period as the related claim.
Future profit participation on insurance contracts with DPF
Where contracts provide discretionary profit participation benefits to policyholders, liabilities for these contracts include provisions for the
future discretionary benefits to policyholders. These provisions reflect the actual performance of the investment portfolio to date and
management’s expectation of the future performance of the assets backing the contracts, as well as other experience factors such as
mortality, lapses and operational efficiency, where appropriate. The benefits to policyholders may be determined by the contractual
terms, regulation, or past distribution policy.
Investment contracts with DPF
While investment contracts with DPF are financial instruments, they continue to be treated as insurance contracts as required by
HKFRS 4. The group therefore recognises the premiums for these contracts as revenue and recognises as an expense the resulting
increase in the carrying amount of the liability.
In the case of net unrealised investment gains on these contracts, whose discretionary benefits principally reflect the actual performance
of the investment portfolio, the corresponding increase in the liabilities is recognised in either the income statement or OCI, following the
treatment of the unrealised gains on the relevant assets. In the case of net unrealised losses, a deferred participating asset is recognised
only to the extent that its recoverability is highly probable. Movements in the liabilities arising from realised gains and losses on relevant
assets are recognised in the income statement.
Liabilities under insurance contracts and present value of in-force long-term insurance business
Liabilities under non-linked life insurance contracts are calculated by each life insurance operation based on local actuarial principles.
Liabilities under unit-linked life insurance contracts are at least equivalent to the surrender or transfer value, which is calculated by
reference to the value of the relevant underlying funds or indices.
The group recognises the value placed on insurance contracts and investment contracts with DPF, which are classified as long-term and
in-force at the balance sheet date, as an asset. The PVIF asset is presented gross of attributable tax in the balance sheet and movements
in the PVIF asset are included in ‘Other operating income’ on a gross of tax basis.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
93
Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The valuation of the PVIF and insurance contract liabilities are dependent on economic assumptions (e.g. future investment returns) and non-economic
assumptions (e.g. related to policyholder behaviour or demographics).
Judgements
Estimates
•The PVIF asset represents the value of the equity holders’ interest in the issuing insurance
companies’ profits expected to emerge from these contracts written at the balance sheet
date. It is determined by discounting those expected future profits using appropriate
assumptions in assessing factors such as future mortality, lapse rates, investment returns and
levels of expenses, and a risk discount rate that reflects the risk premium attributable to the
respective contracts. The PVIF incorporates allowances for both non-market risk and the value
of financial options and guarantees.
•Insurance contract liabilities are set in accordance with local actuarial principles in each
market, aligned with local regulatory measurement frameworks. Core judgements made in
applying these frameworks include demographic and behavioural assumptions, expense
assumptions and investment return assumptions.
•The assumptions are reassessed at each reporting
date and changes in the estimates which affect the
value of PVIF and Insurance contract liabilities are
reflected in the income statement. More information
is included in Note 15 for PVIF and Note 3 for
liabilities under insurance contracts.
•The sections marked as audited on pages 68 to 72,
‘Insurance manufacturing operations risk
management’ provide an indication of the sensitivity
of the result to the application of different weightings
being applied to different economic and non-
economic assumptions.
(k)Property
Land and buildings
Land and buildings held for own use are carried at their revalued amount, being the fair value at the date of the revaluation less any
subsequent accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Revaluations are performed by professional qualified valuers, on a market basis, with sufficient regularity to ensure that the net carrying
amount does not differ materially from the fair value. Surpluses arising on revaluation are credited firstly to the income statement, to the
extent of any deficits arising on revaluation previously charged to the income statement in respect of the same land and buildings, and
are thereafter taken to the ‘Property revaluation reserve’. Deficits arising on revaluation are first set off against any previous revaluation
surpluses included in the ‘Property revaluation reserve’ in respect of the same land and buildings, and are thereafter recognised in the
income statement.
Leasehold land and buildings are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the unexpired terms of the leases or the
remaining useful lives.
The Government of Hong Kong owns all the land in Hong Kong and permits its use under leasehold arrangements. Similar arrangements
exist in mainland China. The group accounts for its interests in own use leasehold land and land use rights in accordance with HKFRS 16
but discloses these as owned assets when the right of use are considered sufficient to constitute control.
Investment properties
The group holds certain properties as investments to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, or both, and those investment properties are
included on balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value being recognised in the income statement.
(l)Employee compensation and benefits
Post-employment benefit plans
The group operates a number of pension schemes including defined benefit, defined contribution, and post-employment benefit
schemes.
Payments to defined contribution schemes are charged as an expense as the employees render service.
Defined benefit pension obligations are calculated using the projected unit credit method. The net charge to the income statement mainly
comprises the service cost and the net interest on the net defined benefit asset or liability, and is presented in operating expenses.
Remeasurements of the net defined benefit asset or liability, which comprise actuarial gains and losses, return on plan assets excluding
interest and the effect of the asset ceiling (if any, excluding interest), are recognised immediately in OCI. The net defined benefit asset or
liability represents the present value of defined benefit obligations reduced by the fair value of plan assets, after applying the asset ceiling
test, where the net defined benefit surplus is limited to the present value of available refunds and reductions in future contributions to the
plan.
(m)Tax
Income tax comprises current tax and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except to the extent that it relates
to items recognised in OCI or directly in equity, in which case the tax is recognised in the same statement as the related item appears.
Current tax is the tax expected to be payable on the taxable profit for the year and on any adjustment to tax payable in respect of
previous years. The group provides for potential current tax liabilities that may arise on the basis of the amounts expected to be paid to
the tax authorities.
Deferred tax is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet, and the
amounts attributed to such assets and liabilities for tax purposes. Deferred tax is calculated using the tax rates expected to apply in the
periods in which the assets will be realised or the liabilities settled.
In assessing the probability and sufficiency of future taxable profit, management considers the availability of evidence to support the
recognition of deferred tax assets. taking into account the inherent risks in long-term forecasting, including climate change-related, and
drivers of recent history of tax losses where applicable. Management also considers the future reversal of existing taxable temporary
differences and tax planning strategies, including corporate reorganisations.
Current and deferred tax are calculated based on tax rates and laws enacted, or substantively enacted, by the balance sheet date.
(n)Provisions, contingent liabilities and guarantees
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle a present legal or
constructive obligation that has arisen as a result of past events and for which a reliable estimate can be made.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
94
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Contingent liabilities and guarantees
Contingent liabilities
Contingent liabilities, which include certain guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security, and contingent liabilities related
to legal proceedings or regulatory matters, are not recognised in the Consolidated Financial Statements but are disclosed unless the
probability of settlement is remote.
Financial guarantee contracts
Liabilities under financial guarantee contracts that are not classified as insurance contracts are recorded initially at their fair value, which
is generally the fee received or present value of the fee receivable.
The Bank has issued financial guarantees and similar contracts to other group entities. The group elects to account for certain guarantees
as insurance contracts in the Bank's financial statements, in which case they are measured and recognised as insurance liabilities. This
election is made on a contract-by-contract basis, and is irrevocable.
(o)Impairment of non-financial assets
Software under development is tested for impairment at least annually. Other non-financial assets such as property, plant and equipment,
intangible assets (excluding goodwill) and right-of-use assets are tested for impairment at the individual asset level when there is
indication of impairment at that level, or at the CGU level for assets that do not have a recoverable amount at the individual asset level. In
addition, impairment is also tested at the CGU level when there is indication of impairment at that level. For this purpose, CGUs are
considered to be the principal operating legal entities and branches divided in a similar manner as the group's operating segments.
Impairment testing compares the carrying amount of the non-financial asset or CGU with its recoverable amount, which is the higher of
the fair value less costs of disposal or the value in use. The carrying amount of a CGU comprises the carrying value of its assets and
liabilities, including non-financial assets that are directly attributable to it and non-financial assets that can be allocated to it on a
reasonable and consistent basis. Non-financial assets that cannot be allocated to an individual CGU are tested for impairment at an
appropriate grouping of CGUs. The recoverable amount of the CGU is the higher of the fair value less costs of disposal of the CGU, which
is determined by independent and qualified valuers where relevant, and the value in use, which is calculated based on appropriate inputs.
When the recoverable amount of a CGU is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised in the income statement to the
extent that the impairment can be allocated on a pro-rata basis to the non-financial assets by reducing their carrying amounts to the
higher of their respective individual recoverable amount or nil. This impairment is not allocated to financial assets within a CGU.
Impairment loss recognised in prior periods for non-financial assets is reversed when there has been a change in the estimate used to
determine the recoverable amount. The impairment loss is reversed to the extent that the carrying amount of the non-financial assets
would not exceed the amount that would have been determined (net of amortisation or depreciation) had no impairment loss been
recognised in prior periods.
2
Operating profit
(a)Net interest income
Net interest income includes:
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Interest income recognised on impaired financial assets
821
315
Interest income recognised on financial assets measured at amortised cost
158,552
106,916
Interest income recognised on financial assets measured at FVOCI
21,563
14,461
Interest expense on financial instruments, excluding interest on financial liabilities held for trading or designated or otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value1
(47,525)
(20,907)
1Includes interest expenses on lease liabilities of HK$265m (2021: HK$374m).
(b)  Net fee income
Net fee income by reportable segments
Wealth and
Personal
Banking
Commercial
Banking
Global
Banking
Markets and
Securities
Services
Corporate
Centre1
Other (GBM-
other)
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Account services
807
979
366
75
—
—
2,227
Funds under management
4,894
592
16
1,824
—
—
7,326
Cards
7,826
257
52
—
—
—
8,135
Credit facilities
332
1,303
1,186
25
—
—
2,846
Broking income
3,513
53
—
737
—
—
4,303
Imports/exports
—
2,465
667
—
—
—
3,132
Unit trusts
4,534
112
2
—
—
—
4,648
Underwriting
—
—
325
237
—
—
562
Remittances
264
1,902
723
3
—
—
2,892
Global custody
858
39
32
3,174
—
—
4,103
Insurance agency commission
1,434
107
5
—
—
—
1,546
Other
3,132
2,638
2,322
3,240
(2,214)
(216)
8,902
Fee income
27,594
10,447
5,696
9,315
(2,214)
(216)
50,622
Fee expense
(9,699)
(720)
(610)
(5,614)
2,461
160
(14,022)
Year ended 31 Dec 2022
17,895
9,727
5,086
3,701
247
(56)
36,600
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
95
Net fee income by reportable segments (continued)
Wealth and
Personal
Banking
Commercial
Banking
Global
Banking
Markets and
Securities
Services
Corporate
Centre1
Other (GBM-other)
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Account services
809
929
367
70
—
—
2,175
Funds under management
5,927
639
16
2,028
—
—
8,610
Cards
7,559
207
40
—
—
—
7,806
Credit facilities
409
1,371
1,304
62
—
—
3,146
Broking income
5,477
69
—
869
—
—
6,415
Imports/exports
—
2,462
594
—
—
—
3,056
Unit trusts
7,373
176
1
—
—
—
7,550
Underwriting
1
1
869
683
—
—
1,554
Remittances
255
1,843
715
—
—
—
2,813
Global custody
976
50
47
3,414
—
—
4,487
Insurance agency commission
1,326
114
1
—
—
—
1,441
Other
2,329
2,675
2,497
3,413
(2,156)
8
8,766
Fee income
32,441
10,536
6,451
10,539
(2,156)
8
57,819
Fee expense
(8,614)
(708)
(705)
(4,809)
2,399
(86)
(12,523)
Year ended 31 Dec 2021
23,827
9,828
5,746
5,730
243
(78)
45,296
1Includes inter-segment elimination.
Net fee income includes:
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Fees earned on financial assets that are not at fair value through profit and loss (other than amounts included in determining the
effective interest rate)
9,286
9,742
–  fee income
14,867
15,173
–  fee expense
(5,581)
(5,431)
Fee earned on trust and other fiduciary activities
8,961
11,242
–  fee income
11,290
12,801
–  fee expense
(2,329)
(1,559)
(c)Net income from financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Net income/(expense) arising on:
Net trading activities
43,138
29,888
Other instruments managed on a fair value basis
(1,464)
(1,529)
Net income from financial instruments held for trading or managed on a fair value basis
41,674
28,359
Financial assets held to meet liabilities under insurance and investment contracts
(15,075)
17,837
Liabilities to customers under investment contracts
1,881
343
Net income/(expense) from assets and liabilities of insurance businesses, including related derivatives, measured at
fair value through profit or loss
(13,194)
18,180
Change in fair value of designated debt issued and related derivatives1
(703)
(639)
Changes in fair value of other financial instruments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
34
(25)
Year ended 31 Dec
27,811
45,875
1Includes debt instruments which are issued for funding purposes and are designated under the fair value option to reduce an accounting
mismatch.
(d)Other operating income
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Movement in present value of in-force insurance business
(256)
(1,294)
Gains/(losses) on investment properties
(133)
277
Losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale
(42)
(54)
Gain on acquisition of subsidiary1
665
—
Gains on disposal of subsidiaries, associates and business portfolios
4
4
Rental income from investment properties
437
393
Dividend income
233
198
Other
2,873
2,509
Year ended 31 Dec
3,781
2,033
1Represents a gain of HK$665m from the acquisition of AXA Insurance Pte Limited. Details are included in Note 37 'Business acquisitions'.
There was a gain on disposal of loans and receivables of HK$84m in the year (2021: HK$77m). There was no gain or loss on disposal of
financial liabilities measured at amortised cost (2021: loss of HK$136m).
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
96
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
(e)Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
Change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges arising from the following asset categories:
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Loans and advances to banks and customers
15,503
7,055
–  new allowances net of allowance releases
16,383
8,065
–  recoveries of amounts previously written off
(880)
(1,010)
Loan commitments and guarantees
409
(683)
Other financial assets
453
167
Year ended 31 Dec
16,365
6,539
Change in expected credit losses as a percentage of average gross customer advances was 0.40% for 2022 (2021: 0.18%).
(f)General and administrative expenses
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Premises and equipment
2,956
2,867
Marketing and advertising expenses
2,622
2,417
Other administrative expenses1
48,971
47,043
Year ended 31 Dec
54,549
52,327
1  Include recharges from fellow group entities. Further details are set out in Note 32.
Included in operating expenses were direct operating expenses of HK$47m (2021: HK$37m) arising from investment properties that
generated rental income in the year. Direct operating expenses arising from investment properties that did not generate rental income
amounted to HK$9m (2021: HK$4m).
(g)Depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Owned property, plant and equipment
6,569
6,019
Other right-of-use assets
2,588
2,872
Year ended 31 Dec
9,157
8,891
(h)Auditors’ remuneration
Auditors’ remuneration amounted to HK$172m (2021: HK$152m).
3
Insurance business
Net insurance premium income1
Non-linked
insurance
Unit-linked
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Gross insurance premium income
88,141
1,302
89,443
Reinsurers’ share of gross insurance premium income
(9,002)
(26)
(9,028)
Year ended 31 Dec 2022
79,139
1,276
80,415
Gross insurance premium income
62,937
2,398
65,335
Reinsurers’ share of gross insurance premium income
(3,594)
(19)
(3,613)
Year ended 31 Dec 2021
59,343
2,379
61,722
1The group's net insurance premium income is presented after elimination of inter-company transactions between our insurance manufacturing
operations and other group entities.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
97
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders1
Non-linked
insurance
Unit-linked
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Gross claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders
83,114
(4,162)
78,952
–  claims, benefits and surrenders paid
29,275
3,800
33,075
–  movement in liabilities
53,839
(7,962)
45,877
Reinsurers’ share of claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities
(9,107)
(31)
(9,138)
–  claims, benefits and surrenders paid
(7,418)
(30)
(7,448)
–  movement in liabilities
(1,689)
(1)
(1,690)
Year ended 31 Dec 2022
74,007
(4,193)
69,814
Gross claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders
78,159
1,898
80,057
–  claims, benefits and surrenders paid
18,573
6,735
25,308
–  movement in liabilities
59,586
(4,837)
54,749
Reinsurers’ share of claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities
(4,013)
4
(4,009)
–  claims, benefits and surrenders paid
(2,048)
(39)
(2,087)
–  movement in liabilities
(1,965)
43
(1,922)
Year ended 31 Dec 2021
74,146
1,902
76,048
1The group's net insurance claims and benefits paid and movement in liabilities to policyholders is presented after elimination of inter-company
transactions between our insurance manufacturing operations and other group entities.
Liabilities under insurance contracts
2022
2021
Gross
Reinsurers’
share2
Net
Gross
Reinsurers’
share2
Net
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Non-linked insurance
At 1 Jan
608,500
(27,361)
581,139
547,058
(25,361)
521,697
Claims and benefits paid
(29,275)
7,418
(21,857)
(18,573)
2,048
(16,525)
Increase/(decrease) in liabilities to policyholders
83,114
(9,107)
74,007
78,159
(4,013)
74,146
Exchange differences and other movements1
17,120
(3,084)
14,036
1,856
(35)
1,821
At 31 Dec
679,459
(32,134)
647,325
608,500
(27,361)
581,139
Unit-linked
At 1 Jan
29,645
(5)
29,640
34,348
(4)
34,344
Claims and benefits paid
3,800
(30)
3,770
(6,735)
39
(6,696)
Increase/(decrease) in liabilities to policyholders
(4,162)
(31)
(4,193)
1,898
4
1,902
Exchange differences and other movements1
(7,984)
49
(7,935)
134
(44)
90
At 31 Dec
21,299
(17)
21,282
29,645
(5)
29,640
Total liabilities to policyholders
700,758
(32,151)
668,607
638,145
(27,366)
610,779
1'Exchange differences and other movements’ includes movements in liabilities arising from net unrealised investment gains recognised in other
comprehensive income.
2Amounts recoverable from reinsurance of liabilities under insurance contracts are included in the consolidated balance sheet in ‘Prepayment,
accrued income and other assets’.
The key factors contributing to the movement in liabilities to policyholders included movements in the market value of assets supporting
policyholder liabilities, death claims, surrenders, lapses, liabilities to policyholders created at the initial inception of the policies, the
declaration of bonuses and other amounts attributable to policyholders.
4
Employee compensation and benefits
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Wages and salaries1
37,053
35,736
Social security costs
1,384
1,344
Post-employment benefits
2,225
2,181
–  defined contribution pension plans
1,758
1,651
–  defined benefit pension plans
467
530
Year ended 31 Dec
40,662
39,261
1'Wages and salaries’ includes the effect of share-based payments arrangements of HK$890m (2021: HK$951m).
Post-employment benefit plans
The group operates a number of post-employment benefit plans for its employees. Some of these plans are defined benefit plans, of
which the largest plan is The HSBC Group Hong Kong Local Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme (the 'Principal Plan’).
The group's balance sheet includes the net surplus or deficit, being the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the
discounted value of scheme liabilities at the balance sheet date for each plan. Surpluses are only recognised to the extent that they are
recoverable through reduced contributions in the future or through potential future refunds from the schemes. In assessing whether a
surplus is recoverable, the group has considered its current right to obtain a future refund or a reduction in future contributions.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
98
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Defined benefit pension plans
Net asset/(liability) under defined benefit pension plans
Fair value of
plan assets
Present value of
defined benefit
obligations
Net defined
benefit liability
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2022
10,075
(11,945)
(1,870)
Service cost
—
(429)
(429)
–  current service cost
—
(434)
(434)
–  past service cost and gains from settlements
—
5
5
Net interest income/(expense) on the net defined benefit asset/(liability)
162
(197)
(35)
Re-measurement effects recognised in other comprehensive income
(841)
1,073
232
–  return on plan assets (excluding interest income)
(841)
—
(841)
–  actuarial gains
—
1,073
1,073
Contributions by the group
345
—
345
Benefits paid
(1,414)
1,487
73
Exchange differences and other movements
(61)
122
61
At 31 Dec 2022
8,266
(9,889)
(1,623)
Retirement benefit liabilities recognised on the balance sheet
(1,655)
Retirement benefit assets recognised on the balance sheet (within ‘Prepayment, accrued income and other
assets’)
32
At 1 Jan 2021
10,453
(13,140)
(2,687)
Service cost
—
(475)
(475)
–  current service cost
—
(492)
(492)
–  past service cost and gains from settlements
—
17
17
Net interest income/(expense) on the net defined benefit asset/(liability)
79
(125)
(46)
Re-measurement effects recognised in other comprehensive income
500
385
885
–  return on plan assets (excluding interest income)
500
—
500
–  actuarial gains
—
385
385
Contributions by the group
356
—
356
Benefits paid
(1,340)
1,407
67
Exchange differences and other movements
27
3
30
At 31 Dec 2021
10,075
(11,945)
(1,870)
Retirement benefit liabilities recognised on the balance sheet
(1,890)
Retirement benefit assets recognised on the balance sheet (within ‘Prepayment, accrued income and other
assets’)
20
Fair value of plan assets by asset classes
At 31 Dec 2022
At 31 Dec 2021
Value
Quoted market
price in active
market
Thereof HSBC
Value
Quoted market
price in active
market
Thereof HSBC
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Fair value of plan assets
8,266
8,266
195
10,075
10,075
257
–  equities
1,078
1,078
—
1,232
1,232
—
–  bonds
4,622
4,622
—
5,676
5,676
—
–  alternative investments
2,112
2,112
—
2,490
2,490
—
–  other1
454
454
195
677
677
257
1  Other mainly consists of cash and cash deposits.
The Principal Plan
In Hong Kong, the HSBC Group Hong Kong Local Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme, the Principal Plan, covers employees of the group
and HSBC Global Services (Hong Kong) Limited (the 'ServCo'), which is a fellow subsidiary of the group set up in Hong Kong as part of
the recovery and resolution planning to provide functional support services to the group, as well as certain other local employees of the
Group. The Principal Plan comprises a funded defined benefit scheme (which provides a lump sum benefit on retirement and is now
closed to new members) and a defined contribution scheme. The latter was established on 1 January 1999 for new employees, and the
group has been providing defined contribution plans to all new employees. Since the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan is a
final salary lump sum scheme, its exposure to longevity risk and interest rate risk is limited compared to a scheme that provides annuity
payments.
The Principal Plan is a funded plan with assets which are held in trust funds separate from the group. The investment strategy of the
defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan is to hold the majority of assets in fixed income investments, with a smaller portion in
equities. The target asset allocation for the portfolio is as follows: Fixed income investments 75% and Equity 25%. Each investment
manager has been assigned a benchmark applicable to their respective asset class. The actuarial funding valuation of the Principal Plan is
conducted at least on a triennial basis in accordance with the local practice and regulations. The actuarial assumptions used to conduct
the actuarial funding valuation of the Principal Plan vary according to the economic conditions.
The trustee, which is a subsidiary of the Bank, assumes the overall responsibility for the Principal Plan and the group has established a
management committee and a number of sub-committees to broaden the governance and manage the concomitant issues.
Both the group and ServCo participate in the Principal Plan that shares risks between the entities which are under common control of the
Group. As agreed between the group and ServCo, the net defined benefit cost of the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan shall be
charged separately. Details on the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan are disclosed below.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
99
Net asset/(liability) under the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan
Included within the group
Included within ServCo
Fair value
of plan
assets
Present
value of
defined
benefit
obligations
Net
defined
benefit
liability
Fair value
of plan
assets
Present
value of
defined
benefit
obligations
Net
defined
benefit
liability
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2022
4,424
(4,915)
(491)
3,945
(4,191)
(246)
Service cost
—
(162)
(162)
—
(141)
(141)
–  current service cost
—
(162)
(162)
—
(141)
(141)
Net interest income/(expense) on the net defined benefit asset/(liability)
56
(61)
(5)
50
(52)
(2)
Re-measurement effects recognised in other comprehensive income
(409)
566
157
(364)
537
173
–  return on plan assets (excluding interest income)
(409)
—
(409)
(364)
—
(364)
–  actuarial gains
—
566
566
—
537
537
Contributions
191
—
191
123
—
123
Benefits paid
(737)
737
—
(515)
515
—
Exchange differences and other movements
60
(67)
(7)
(69)
67
(2)
At 31 Dec 2022
3,585
(3,902)
(317)
3,170
(3,265)
(95)
Retirement benefit liabilities recognised on the balance sheet
(317)
(95)
At 1 Jan 2021
4,486
(5,330)
(844)
4,288
(5,001)
(713)
Service cost
—
(179)
(179)
—
(171)
(171)
–  current service cost
—
(179)
(179)
—
(171)
(171)
Net interest income/ (expense) on the net defined benefit asset/(liability)
22
(26)
(4)
21
(24)
(3)
Re-measurement effects recognised in other comprehensive income
265
118
383
250
240
490
–  return on plan assets (excluding interest income)
265
—
265
250
—
250
–  actuarial gains
—
118
118
—
240
240
Contributions
166
—
166
149
—
149
Benefits paid
(585)
585
—
(682)
682
—
Exchange differences and other movements
70
(83)
(13)
(81)
83
2
At 31 Dec 2021
4,424
(4,915)
(491)
3,945
(4,191)
(246)
Retirement benefit liabilities recognised on the balance sheet
(491)
(246)
The group expects to make HK$180m of contributions to the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan during 2023 (during 2022:
HK$160m) and ServCo expects to make HK$116m contributions to the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan during 2023 (during
2022: HK$136m). These expected contributions are determined separately by the group and ServCo by reference to the actuarial funding
valuation carried out by the Principal Plan's local actuary.
Benefits expected to be paid from the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan over each of the next five years, and in aggregate for
the five years thereafter, are as follows:
Benefits expected to be paid from the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan1
Within one year
One to two years
Two to three
years
Three to four
years
Four to five
years
Five to ten
years
As at 31 December 2022 as reported by:
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
–  The group
292
373
382
371
396
1,892
–  ServCo
187
299
340
271
338
1,825
As at 31 December 2021 as reported by:
–  The group
381
467
383
362
396
1,896
–  ServCo
286
284
333
365
287
1,785
1The duration of the defined benefit obligation is six years for the Principal Plan under the disclosed assumptions (2021: seven years).
Fair value of plan assets of the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan by asset classes
At 31 Dec 2022
At 31 Dec 2021
Value
Quoted market
price in active
market
Thereof HSBC
Value
Quoted market
price in active
market
Thereof HSBC
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Fair value of plan assets
6,755
6,755
51
8,369
8,369
76
–  equities
1,581
1,581
—
1,839
1,839
—
–  bonds
3,725
3,725
—
4,731
4,731
—
–  alternative investments
1,398
1,398
—
1,723
1,723
—
–  other1
51
51
51
76
76
76
1Other mainly consists of cash and cash deposits.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
100
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
The Principal Plan’s key actuarial financial assumptions
The group and ServCo determine the discount rate to be applied to the defined benefit scheme's obligations in consultation with the
Principal Plan’s local actuary, on the basis of the current average yields of Hong Kong Government Bonds and Hong Kong Exchange
Fund Notes, with maturities consistent with that of the defined benefit obligations.
The key actuarial assumptions used to calculate the group’s obligations for the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan for the
year, and used as the basis for measuring the expenses were as follows:
Key actuarial assumptions for the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan
Discount rate
Rate of pay increase
% p.a.
% p.a.
At 31 Dec 2022
3.50
3.50% p.a. for 2023 and
3.00% p.a. thereafter
At 31 Dec 2021
1.30
3.00
Actuarial assumption sensitivities
The discount rate and rate of pay increase are sensitive to changes in market conditions arising during the reporting period. The
following table shows the financial impact of assumption changes on the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan at year end:
The effect of changes in key assumptions on the defined benefit scheme of the Principal Plan
Impact on HSBC Group Hong Kong Local Staff Retirement Benefit
Scheme obligation
Financial impact of increase
Financial impact of decrease
2022
2021
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Discount rate – increase/decrease of 0.25%
(111)
(158)
114
162
Rate of pay increase – increase/decrease of 0.25%
115
160
(112)
(157)
Directors’ emoluments
The aggregate emoluments of the Directors of the Bank disclosed pursuant to section 4 of the Companies (Disclosure of Information
about Benefits of Directors) Regulation were HK$111m (2021: HK$131m). This comprises fees (which represent the aggregate
emoluments paid to or receivable by directors in respect of their services as a director) of HK$37m (2021: HK$30m) and other
emoluments of HK$74m (2021: HK$101m) which includes contributions to pension schemes of HK$3m (2021: HK$1m). Non-cash
benefits which are included in other emoluments mainly relate to share-based payment awards, and the provision of housing and
furnishings.
Details on loans to directors are set out in Note 32.
5
Tax
The Bank and its subsidiaries in Hong Kong have provided for Hong Kong profits tax at the rate of 16.5% (2021: 16.5%) on the profits for
the year assessable in Hong Kong. Overseas branches and subsidiaries have similarly provided for tax in the countries in which they
operate at the appropriate rates of tax in force in 2022. Deferred taxation is provided for in accordance with the group’s accounting policy
in Note 1.2(m).
Tax expense
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Current tax
14,839
12,489
–  Hong Kong taxation – on current year profit
5,072
5,719
–  Hong Kong taxation – adjustments in respect of prior years
(492)
(158)
–  overseas taxation – on current year profit
10,692
7,151
–  overseas taxation – adjustments in respect of prior years
(433)
(223)
Deferred tax
668
1,526
–  origination and reversal of temporary differences
128
1,209
–  effect of changes in tax rates
—
9
–  adjustments in respect of prior years
540
308
Year ended 31 Dec
15,507
14,015
Tax reconciliation
The tax charged to the income statement differs from the tax charge that would apply if all profits had been taxed at the applicable tax
rates in the countries concerned as follows:
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
101
Reconciliation between taxation charge and accounting profit at applicable tax rates
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Profit before tax
97,611
86,563
Notional tax on profit before tax, calculated at the rates applicable to profits in the countries concerned
19,832
17,463
Effects of profits in associates and joint ventures
(3,100)
(3,186)
Non-taxable income and gains
(3,591)
(3,181)
Local taxes and overseas withholding taxes
1,848
2,695
Permanent disallowables
747
577
Others
(229)
(353)
Year ended 31 Dec
15,507
14,015
Movements of deferred tax assets and liabilities
Accelerated
capital
allowances
Insurance
business
Expense
provisions
Impairment
allowance on
financial
instruments
Revaluation
of properties
Other2
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Assets
176
—
1,557
2,680
—
2,106
6,519
Liabilities
(580)
(10,428)
(18)
—
(14,985)
(9,677)
(35,688)
At 1 Jan 2022
(404)
(10,428)
1,539
2,680
(14,985)
(7,571)
(29,169)
Exchange and other adjustments
(15)
(544)
(157)
(312)
215
(396)
(1,209)
Charge/(credit) to income statement
(43)
158
(229)
1,002
759
(2,315)
(668)
Charge/(credit) to other comprehensive
income
6
—
10
—
(812)
2,761
1,965
At 31 Dec 2022
(456)
(10,814)
1,163
3,370
(14,823)
(7,521)
(29,081)
Assets1
146
—
1,193
3,370
—
4,550
9,259
Liabilities1
(602)
(10,814)
(30)
—
(14,823)
(12,071)
(38,340)
Assets
102
—
1,294
2,676
—
3,088
7,160
Liabilities
(358)
(10,662)
—
—
(14,645)
(9,167)
(34,832)
At 1 Jan 2021
(256)
(10,662)
1,294
2,676
(14,645)
(6,079)
(27,672)
Exchange and other adjustments
(6)
2
(42)
(75)
(1)
(11)
(133)
Charge/(credit) to income statement
(142)
232
286
80
524
(2,506)
(1,526)
Charge/(credit) to other comprehensive
income
—
—
1
(1)
(863)
1,025
162
At 31 Dec 2021
(404)
(10,428)
1,539
2,680
(14,985)
(7,571)
(29,169)
Assets1
176
—
1,557
2,680
—
2,106
6,519
Liabilities1
(580)
(10,428)
(18)
—
(14,985)
(9,677)
(35,688)
1 After netting off balances within countries, the balances as disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements are as follows: deferred tax assets
HK$3,856m (2021: HK$3,353m); and deferred tax liabilities HK$32,937m (2021: HK$32,522m).
2Other included deferred tax of HK$5,847m (2021: HK$5,523m) provided in respect of distributable reserves or post-acquisition reserves of
associates that, on distribution or sale, would attract withholding tax.
The amount of unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognised in the balance sheet is HK$4,537m (2021: HK$3,130m). Of
this amount, HK$1,536m (2021: HK$733m) has no expiry date and the remaining will expire within 10 years.
Deferred tax is not recognised in respect of the group‘s investments in subsidiaries and branches where remittance or other realisation is
not probable, and for those associates and interests in joint ventures where it has been determined that no additional tax will arise.
6
Dividends
Dividends to shareholders of the parent company
2022
2021
HK$ per share
HK$m
HK$ per share
HK$m
Dividends paid on ordinary shares
In respect of previous year:
–  fourth interim dividend
0.23
10,584
0.47
21,665
In respect of current year:
–  first interim dividend paid
0.17
7,761
0.26
12,211
–  second interim dividend paid
0.12
5,887
0.24
11,153
–  third interim dividend paid
0.16
7,850
0.24
11,361
Total
0.68
32,082
1.21
56,390
Distributions on other equity instruments
2,739
2,715
Dividends to shareholders
34,821
59,105
On 14 February 2023, the Directors declared a fourth interim dividend in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2022 of
HK$0.27 per ordinary share (HK$13,500m) (2021: HK$0.23 per ordinary share (HK$10,584m)). No liability was recorded in the financial
statements in respect of the fourth interim dividend for 2022.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
102
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Total coupons on other equity instruments
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
US$900m Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan (interest rate fixed at 6.510%)
460
456
US$900m Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan (interest rate fixed at 6.030%)
426
422
US$1,000m Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan (interest rate fixed at 6.090%)
477
474
US$1,200m Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan (interest rate fixed at 6.172%)
580
576
US$600m Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan (interest rate fixed at 5.910%)
278
275
US$1,100m Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan (interest rate fixed at 6.000%)
518
512
Total
2,739
2,715
7
Trading assets
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Treasury and other eligible bills
132,737
132,104
Debt securities
231,601
274,508
Equity securities
264,447
299,420
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending1
59,398
63,519
Other1,2
11,622
7,899
At 31 Dec
699,805
777,450
1  Further product details have been included to reconcile to Note 30 'Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities' with effect from
31 December 2022.
2  'Other' includes term lending and other accounts with banks and customers.
8
Derivatives
Notional contract amounts and fair values of derivatives by product contract type
Notional contract amount
Fair value – Assets
Fair value – Liabilities
Trading
Hedging
Trading
Hedging
Total
Trading
Hedging
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Foreign Exchange
19,574,143
34,877
263,215
3,226
266,441
281,468
14
281,482
Interest rate
32,534,469
456,741
529,327
12,416
541,743
575,665
3,326
578,991
Equity
785,281
—
18,363
—
18,363
14,017
—
14,017
Credit
462,180
—
2,386
—
2,386
2,708
—
2,708
Commodity and other
159,242
—
3,230
—
3,230
3,939
—
3,939
Gross total
53,515,315
491,618
816,521
15,642
832,163
877,797
3,340
881,137
Offset
(329,392)
(329,392)
At 31 Dec 2022
502,771
551,745
Foreign Exchange
17,721,333
74,732
155,110
3,401
158,511
150,034
523
150,557
Interest rate
30,392,783
218,885
368,523
4,321
372,844
372,342
1,406
373,748
Equity
845,058
—
18,611
—
18,611
14,800
—
14,800
Credit
413,340
—
3,446
—
3,446
4,437
—
4,437
Commodity and other
146,377
—
1,884
—
1,884
2,378
—
2,378
Gross total
49,518,891
293,617
547,574
7,722
555,296
543,991
1,929
545,920
Offset
(190,129)
(190,129)
At 31 Dec 2021
365,167
355,791
The notional contract amounts of derivatives held for trading purposes and derivatives designated in hedge accounting relationships
indicate the nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date. They do not represent amounts at risk.
Use of derivatives
The group transacts derivatives for three primary purposes: to create risk management solutions for clients, to manage the portfolio risk
arising from client business, and to manage and hedge the group’s own risks. Derivatives (except for derivatives which are designated as
effective hedging instruments) are held for trading. Within the held for trading classification are two types of derivative instruments:
those used in sales and trading activities, and those used for risk management purposes but which for various reasons do not meet the
qualifying criteria for hedge accounting. The second category includes derivatives managed in conjunction with financial instruments
designated at fair value. These activities are described more fully below.
The group’s derivative activities give rise to significant open positions in portfolios of derivatives. These positions are managed constantly
to ensure that they remain within acceptable risk levels. When entering into derivative transactions, the group employs the same credit
risk management framework to assess and approve potential credit exposures that it uses for traditional lending.
Trading derivatives
Most of the group’s derivative transactions relate to sales and trading activities. Sales activities include the structuring and marketing of
derivative products to customers to enable them to take, transfer, modify or reduce current or expected risks. Trading activities include
market-making and risk management. Market-making entails quoting bid and offer prices to other market participants for the purpose of
generating revenues based on spread and volume. Risk management activity is undertaken to manage the risk arising from client
transactions, with the principal purpose of retaining client margin. Other derivatives classified as held for trading include non-qualifying
hedging derivatives.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
103
Derivatives valued using models with unobservable inputs
Any initial gain or loss on financial instruments where the valuation is dependent on unobservable parameters is deferred over the life of
the contract or until the instrument is redeemed, transferred or sold or the fair value becomes observable. All derivatives that are part of
qualifying hedging relationships have valuations based on observable market parameters.
The aggregate unobservable inception profit yet to be recognised in the income statement is immaterial.
Hedge accounting derivatives
The group applies hedge accounting to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risk. The group uses derivatives (principally interest
rate and currency swaps) for hedging purposes in the management of its own asset and liability portfolios and structural positions. This
enables the group to optimise its overall costs of accessing debt capital markets, and to mitigate the market risk which would otherwise
arise from structural imbalances in the maturity and other profiles of its assets and liabilities. The accounting treatment of hedging
transactions varies according to the nature of the instrument hedged and the type of hedging transaction. Derivatives may qualify as
hedges for accounting purposes if they are fair value hedges, or cash flow hedges.
Hedged risk components
The group designates a portion of cash flows of a financial instrument or a group of financial instruments for a specific interest rate or
foreign currency risk component in a fair value or cash flow hedge. The designated risks and portions are either contractually specified or
otherwise separately identifiable components of the financial instrument that are reliably measurable. Risk-free or benchmark interest
rates generally are regarded as being both separately identifiable and reliably measurable, except for the Ibor reform transition where the
group designates alternative benchmark rates as the hedged risk which may not have been separately identifiable upon initial
designation, provided the group reasonably expects it will meet the requirement within 24 months from the first designation date. The
designated risk component accounts for a significant portion of the overall changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged item(s).
Fair value hedges
The group enters into to fixed-for-floating-interest-rate swaps to manage the exposure to changes in fair value due to movements in
market interest rates on certain fixed rate financial instruments which are not measured at fair value through profit or loss, including debt
securities held and issued.
HSBC hedging instrument by hedged risk
Hedging instrument
Carrying amount
Notional amount1
Assets
Liabilities
Balance sheet
presentation
Change in fair value2
Hedged risk
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Interest rate
309,450
11,761
2,281
Derivatives
6,130
At 31 Dec 2022
309,450
11,761
2,281
6,130
Interest rate
203,871
4,148
1,387
Derivatives
2,488
At 31 Dec 2021
203,871
4,148
1,387
2,488
1The notional contract amounts of derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships indicate the nominal value of transactions
outstanding at the balance sheet date. They do not represent amounts at risk.
2Used in effectiveness testing, which uses the full fair value change of the hedging instrument not excluding any component.
HSBC hedged item by hedged risk
Hedged item
Ineffectiveness
Carrying amount
Accumulated fair value hedge adjustments included in
carrying amount2
Change in fair
value1
Recognised
in profit and
loss
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Balance sheet presentation
Profit and loss
presentation
Hedged risk
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Interest rate
257,126
(10,312)
Financial investments
measured at fair value
through other
comprehensive income
(10,716)
(237)
Net income from
financial instruments
held for trading or
managed on a fair
value basis
5,755
(435)
Loans and advances to
customers
(351)
1,161
—
Debt securities in issue
8
33,113
(2,260)
Subordinated liabilities3
4,692
At 31 Dec 2022
262,881
34,274
(10,747)
(2,260)
(6,367)
(237)
Interest rate
162,769
116
Financial investments
measured at fair value through
other comprehensive income
(4,930)
(77)
Net income from
financial instruments
held for trading or
managed on a fair
value basis
6,465
(72)
Loans and advances to
customers
(110)
1,269
9
Debt securities in issue
3
37,783
2,413
Subordinated liabilities3
2,472
At 31 Dec 2021
169,234
39,052
44
2,422
(2,565)
(77)
1Used in effectiveness testing, which comprise an amount attributable to the designated hedged risk that can be a risk component.
2The accumulated amount of fair value adjustments remaining in the statement of financial position for hedged items that have ceased to be
adjusted for hedging gains and losses were assets of HK$143m (2021: HK$164m) for FVOCI assets and assets of HK$1,243m (2021: nil) for
subordinated liabilities.
3Represents Loss Absorbing Capacity (‘LAC’) instruments issued by the Bank to HSBC Asia Holdings Limited, the balance of which is included in
"amounts due to Group companies".
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
104
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Sources of hedge ineffectiveness may arise from basis risk including but not limited to the discount rates used for calculating the fair
value of derivatives, hedges using instruments with a non-zero fair value and notional and timing differences between the hedged items
and hedging instruments.
The interest rate risk of the group's fixed rate debt securities issued is managed in a non-dynamic risk management strategy.
Cash flow hedges
The group’s cash flow hedging instruments consist principally of interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps that are used to manage
the variability in future interest cash flows of non-trading financial assets and liabilities, arising due to changes in market interest rates
and foreign-currency basis.
The group applies macro cash flow hedging for interest-rate risk exposures on portfolios of replenishing current and forecasted issuances
of non-trading assets and liabilities that bear interest at variable rates, including rolling such instruments. The amounts and timing of
future cash flows, representing both principal and interest flows, are projected for each portfolio of financial assets and liabilities on the
basis of their contractual terms and other relevant factors, including estimates of prepayments and defaults. The aggregate cash flows
representing both principal balances and interest cash flows across all portfolios are used to determine the effectiveness and
ineffectiveness. Macro cash flow hedges are considered to be dynamic hedges.
The group also hedges the variability in future cash-flows on foreign-denominated financial assets and liabilities arising due to changes in
foreign exchange market rates with cross-currency swaps; these are considered non-dynamic hedges.
Hedging instrument by hedged risk
Hedging instrument
Hedged item
Ineffectiveness
Carrying amount
Change in fair
value2
Change in fair value3
Recognised in
profit and loss
Profit and loss
presentation
Notional
amount1
Assets
Liabilities
Balance sheet
presentation
Hedged risk
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Foreign currency
34,877
3,226
14
Derivatives
5,461
5,461
—
Net income from
financial instruments
held for trading or
managed on a fair
value basis
Interest rate
147,291
655
1,045
Derivatives
(448)
(448)
—
At 31 Dec 2022
182,168
3,881
1,059
5,013
5,013
—
Foreign currency
74,732
3,401
523
Derivatives
6,062
6,062
—
Net income from
financial instruments
held for trading or
managed on a fair
value basis
Interest rate
15,014
173
19
Derivatives
140
140
—
At 31 Dec 2021
89,746
3,574
542
6,202
6,202
—
1The notional contract amounts of derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships indicate the nominal value of transactions
outstanding at the balance sheet date. They do not represent amounts at risk.
2Used in effectiveness testing; comprising the full fair value change of the hedging instrument not excluding any component.
3Used in effectiveness assessment; comprising amount attributable to the designated hedged risk that can be a risk component.
Sources of hedge ineffectiveness may arise from basis risk, including but not limited to timing differences between the hedged items and
hedging instruments, and hedges using instruments with a non-zero fair value.
Reconciliation of equity and analysis of other comprehensive income by risk type
Interest rate
Foreign currency
HK$m
HK$m
Cash flow hedging reserve at 1 Jan 2022
108
45
Fair value gains/(losses)
(448)
5,461
Fair value (gains) reclassified from the cash flow hedge reserve to the income statement in respect of:
Hedged items that have affected profit or loss
(109)
(6,891)
Income taxes
112
236
Others
(1)
—
Cash flow hedging reserve at 31 Dec 2022
(338)
(1,149)
Cash flow hedging reserve at 1 Jan 2021
35
737
Fair value gains
140
6,062
Fair value (gains) reclassified from the cash flow hedge reserve to the income statement in respect of:
Hedged items that have affected profit or loss
(30)
(6,886)
Income taxes
(37)
132
Others
—
—
Cash flow hedging reserve at 31 Dec 2021
108
45
Interest rate benchmark reform
At 31 December 2022, HK$157,460m (2021: HK$99,608m) of the notional amounts of interest rate derivatives designated in hedge
accounting relationships are expected to be directly affected by market-wide Ibors reform and in scope of HKFRS Interest Rate
Benchmark Reform Phase 1 amendments. They do not represent the extent of the risk exposure managed by the group.
Further details regarding the impact of the market-wide benchmarks reform is set out in the 'Top and emerging risks' section on page
25-26 as specified as 'Audited'.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
105
9
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit
or loss
2022
2021
Designated at
fair value
Mandatorily
measured at
fair value
Total
Designated at
fair value
Mandatorily
measured at
fair value
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Treasury and other eligible bills
—
743
743
—
241
241
Debt securities
18,754
10,492
29,246
12,847
11,066
23,913
Equity securities
—
186,955
186,955
—
169,125
169,125
Reverse repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending1
—
1,764
1,764
—
777
777
Other1,2
—
7,743
7,743
—
8,343
8,343
At 31 Dec
18,754
207,697
226,451
12,847
189,552
202,399
1Further product details have been included to reconcile to Note 30 'Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities' with effect from 31
December 2022.
2‘Other’ includes term lending to banks and customers, and default fund contribution.
10
Loans and advances to customers
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Gross loans and advances to customers
3,745,113
3,872,956
Expected credit loss allowances
(39,964)
(32,017)
At 31 Dec
3,705,149
3,840,939
The following table provides an analysis of gross loans and advances to customers by industry sector based on the Statistical
Classification of economic activities in the European Community (‘NACE’).
Analysis of gross loans and advances to customers
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Residential mortgages
1,177,614
1,167,487
Credit card advances
92,023
89,005
Other personal
255,747
275,819
Total personal
1,525,384
1,532,311
Real estate
570,370
635,217
Wholesale and retail trade
377,359
428,785
Manufacturing
372,060
410,033
Transportation and storage
106,172
111,388
Other
490,791
471,988
Total corporate and commercial
1,916,752
2,057,411
Non-bank financial institutions
302,977
283,234
At 31 Dec
3,745,113
3,872,956
By geography1
Hong Kong
2,332,813
2,447,799
Rest of Asia Pacific
1,412,300
1,425,157
1The geographical information shown above is classified by the location of the principal operations of the subsidiary or the branch responsible for
advancing the funds.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
106
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Finance lease receivables and hire purchase contracts
The group leases a variety of assets to third parties under finance leases. At the end of lease terms, assets may be sold to third parties or
leased for further terms. Rentals are calculated to recover the cost of assets less their residual value, and earn finance income. Loans and
advances to customers include receivables under finance leases and hire purchase contracts having the characteristics of finance leases.
Net investment in finance leases and hire purchase contracts
2022
2021
Total future
minimum
payments
Unearned
finance
income
Present value
Total future
minimum
payments
Unearned
finance
income
Present value
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Amounts receivable
–  within one year
2,971
(783)
2,188
4,205
(1,213)
2,992
–  one to two years
2,538
(724)
1,814
3,543
(1,051)
2,492
–  two to three years
2,287
(677)
1,610
2,757
(912)
1,845
–  three to four years
2,226
(644)
1,582
2,357
(762)
1,595
–  four to five years
2,172
(619)
1,553
2,200
(647)
1,553
–  after five years
24,585
(4,729)
19,856
22,133
(3,203)
18,930
36,779
(8,176)
28,603
37,195
(7,788)
29,407
Expected credit loss allowances
(309)
(378)
At 31 Dec
28,294
29,029
11
Financial investments
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Financial investments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
1,246,652
1,549,011
–  treasury and other eligible bills
612,990
653,245
–  debt securities
626,537
888,664
–  equity securities
7,125
7,102
Debt instruments measured at amortised cost
974,709
502,564
–  treasury and other eligible bills
135,216
6,900
–  debt securities
839,493
495,664
At 31 Dec
2,221,361
2,051,575
Equity instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
2022
2021
Fair value
Dividends
recognised
Fair value
Dividends
recognised
Type of equity instruments
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Business facilitation
6,615
217
6,540
189
Investments required by central institutions
404
3
420
3
Others
106
—
142
6
At 31 Dec
7,125
220
7,102
198
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
107
12
Assets pledged, assets transferred and collateral received
Assets pledged
Financial assets pledged to secure liabilities
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Treasury bills and other eligible securities
121,131
57,631
Loans and advances to banks
4,372
3,211
Loans and advances to customers
22,512
30,975
Debt securities
149,687
134,747
Equity securities
34,388
47,453
Cash collateral included in other assets
129,025
75,951
Assets pledged at 31 Dec
461,115
349,968
Amount of liabilities secured
354,146
275,815
The table above shows assets where a charge has been granted to secure liabilities on a legal and contractual basis. These transactions
are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to collateralised transactions including repurchase agreements, securities
lending, derivative margining, and include assets pledged to cover short positions and to facilitate settlement processes with clearing
houses as well as swaps of equity and debt securities. The group places both cash and non-cash collateral in relation to derivative
transactions.
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation are secured by the deposit of funds in respect of which the Hong Kong Government certificates
of indebtedness are held.
Financial assets pledged as collateral which the counterparty has the right to sell or repledge was HK$193,461m (2021: HK$85,162m).
Assets transferred
Transferred financial assets not qualifying for full derecognition and associated financial liabilities
2022
2021
Carrying amount of:
Carrying amount of:
Transferred
assets
Associated
liabilities
Transferred
assets
Associated
liabilities
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Repurchase agreements
167,260
151,677
135,994
124,663
Securities lending agreements
70,036
3,644
44,171
282
237,296
155,321
180,165
124,945
The assets pledged include transfers to third parties that do not qualify for derecognition, notably secured borrowings such as debt
securities held by counterparties as collateral under repurchase agreements and equity securities lent under securities lending
agreements, as well as swaps of equity and debt securities. For secured borrowings, the transferred asset collateral continues to be
recognised in full while a related liability, reflecting the group’s obligation to repurchase the assets for a fixed price at a future date, is
also recognised on the balance sheet. Where securities are swapped, the transferred asset continues to be recognised in full. There is no
associated liability as the non-cash collateral received is not recognised on the balance sheet. The group is unable to use, sell or pledge
the transferred assets for the duration of the transaction, and remains exposed to interest rate risk and credit risk on these pledged
assets.
Collateral received
Assets accepted as collateral relate primarily to standard securities borrowing, reverse repurchase agreements, swaps of securities and
derivative margining. The group is obliged to return equivalent securities. These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual
and customary to standard securities borrowing, reverse repurchase agreements and derivative margining.
Fair value of collateral accepted as security for assets
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Fair value of collateral permitted to sell or repledge in the absence of default
1,337,822
1,134,296
Fair value of collateral actually sold or repledged
520,756
377,117
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
108
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
13
Investments in subsidiaries
Main subsidiaries of the Bank
Place of incorporation
Principal activity
The group’s interest in
issued share capital/
registered or charter capital
Hang Seng Bank Limited
Hong Kong
Banking
62.14%
HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited
mainland China
Banking
100%
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad
Malaysia
Banking
100%
HSBC Bank Australia Limited1
Australia
Banking
100%
HSBC Bank (Taiwan) Limited1
Taiwan
Banking
100%
HSBC Bank (Singapore) Limited
Singapore
Banking
100%
HSBC Life (International) Limited1
Bermuda
Retirement benefits and
life insurance
100%
1Held indirectly.
All of the above subsidiaries are included in the group’s consolidated financial statements. These subsidiaries make their financial
statements up to 31 December.
The principal places of business are the same as the places of incorporation except for HSBC Life (International) Limited which operates
mainly in Hong Kong.
The proportion of voting rights held is the same as the proportion of ownership interest held.
The main subsidiaries are regulated banking and insurance entities in the Asia-Pacific region and, as such, are required to maintain
certain minimum levels of capital and liquid assets to support their operations. The effect of these regulatory requirements is to limit the
extent to which the subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Bank in the form of repayment of shareholder loans or cash dividends.
Subsidiary with significant non-controlling interest
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Hang Seng Bank Limited
Proportion of ownership interests and voting rights held by non-controlling interests
37.86%
37.86%
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests
3,835
5,272
Accumulated non-controlling interests of the subsidiary
65,237
65,431
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests
2,823
4,415
Summarised financial information (before intra-group eliminations):
–  total assets
1,893,805
1,820,185
–  total liabilities
1,709,844
1,635,769
–  net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other credit impairment charges
33,864
33,265
–  profit for the year
10,151
13,946
–  other comprehensive expense for the year, net of tax
(2,446)
(357)
–  total comprehensive income for the year
7,705
13,589
14
Interests in associates and joint ventures
Associates and joint ventures
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Share of net assets
182,137
184,402
Goodwill
3,815
4,141
Impairment
(54)
(58)
At 31 Dec
185,898
188,485
As 31 December 2022, the group’s interests in associates amounted to HK$185,888m (2021: HK$188,485m).
Principal associate
Place of incorporation
The group’s interest in issued share capital
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd
mainland China
19.03%
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. is listed on recognised stock exchanges. The fair value represents valuation based on the quoted
market price of the shares held (Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy) and amounted to HK$63,469m at 31 December 2022
(2021: HK$66,579m).
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd (‘BoCom’)
The group’s investment in BoCom is classified as an associate. Significant influence in BoCom was established with consideration of all
relevant factors, including representation on BoCom’s Board of Directors and participation in a resource and experience sharing
agreement (‘RES’). Under the RES, HSBC staff have been seconded to assist in the maintenance of BoCom’s financial and operating
policies. Investments in associates are recognised using the equity method of accounting in accordance with HKAS 28, whereby the
investment is initially recognised at cost and adjusted thereafter for the post-acquisition change in the group’s share of BoCom’s net
assets. An impairment test is required if there is any indication of impairment.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
109
Impairment testing
At 31 December 2022, the fair value of the group’s investment in BoCom had been below the carrying amount for approximately eleven
years. As a result, the group performed an impairment test on the carrying amount, which confirmed that there was no impairment at 31
December 2022 as the recoverable amount as determined by a value-in-use (‘VIU’) calculation was higher than the carrying value.
At
31 Dec 2022
31 Dec 2021
VIU
Carrying
value
Fair
value
VIU
Carrying
value
Fair
value
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
HK$bn
BoCom
183.0
182.3
63.5
193.0
184.8
66.6
The headroom, which is defined as the extent to which the VIU exceeds the carrying value decreased by HK$7.5bn compared with
31 December 2021. The decrease in headroom was principally due to revisions to management's best estimates of BoCom's future
earnings in the short to medium term, and the impact from BoCom's actual performance.
In future periods, the VIU may increase or decrease depending on the effect of changes to model inputs. The main model inputs are
described below and are based on factors observed at period-end. The factors that could result in a change in the VIU and an impairment
include a short-term underperformance by BoCom, a change in regulatory capital requirements or an increase in uncertainty regarding
the future performance of BoCom resulting in a downgrade of the forecast of future asset growth or profitability. An increase in the
discount rate could also result in a reduction of VIU and an impairment.
If the group did not have significant influence in BoCom, the investment would be carried at fair value rather than the current carrying
value.
Basis of recoverable amount
The impairment test was performed by comparing the recoverable amount of BoCom, determined by a VIU calculation, with its carrying
amount. The VIU calculation uses discounted cash flow projections based on management’s best estimates of future earnings available
to ordinary shareholders prepared in accordance with HKAS 36. Significant management judgement is required in arriving at the best
estimate.
There are two main components to the VIU calculation. The first component is management’s best estimate of BoCom’s earnings.
Forecast earnings growth over the short to medium term are lower than recent (within the last five years) historical actual growth and
reflect the uncertainty arising from the current economic outlook. Reflecting management's intent to continue to retain its investment,
earnings beyond the short to medium term are then extrapolated into perpetuity using a long-term growth rate to derive a terminal value,
which comprises the majority of the VIU. The second component is the capital maintenance charge (‘CMC’), which is management’s
forecast of the earnings that need to be withheld in order for BoCom to meet capital requirements over the forecast period, meaning that
CMC is deducted when arriving at management’s estimate of future earnings available to ordinary shareholders. The principal inputs to
the CMC calculation include estimates of asset growth, the ratio of risk-weighted assets to total assets and the expected capital
requirements. An increase in the CMC as a result of a change to these principal inputs would reduce VIU. Additionally, management
considers other qualitative factors, to ensure that the inputs to the VIU calculation remain appropriate.
Key assumptions in value-in-use calculation
We used a number of assumptions in our VIU calculation, in accordance with the requirements of HKAS 36:
•Long-term profit growth rate: 3% (2021: 3%) for periods after 2026, which does not exceed forecast GDP growth in mainland China
and is similar to forecasts by external analysts.
•Long-term asset growth rate: 3% (2021: 3%) for periods after 2026, which is the rate that assets are expected to grow to achieve long-
term profit growth of 3%.
•Discount rate: 10.04% (2021: 10.03%), which is based on a capital asset pricing model (‘CAPM’), using market data. The discount rate
used is within the range of 8.4% to 10.4% (2021: 8.7% to 10.1%) indicated by the CAPM. While the CAPM range sits at the lower end
of the range adopted by selected external analysts of 8.8% to 13.5% (2021: 9.9% to 13.5%), we continue to regard the CAPM range as
the most appropriate basis for determining this assumption.
•Expected credit losses ('ECL') as a percentage of customer advances: ranges from 0.99% to 1.05% (2021: 0.98% to 1.12%) in the short
to medium term, reflecting reported credit experience through the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic in mainland China followed by an
expected reversion to recent historical levels. For periods after 2026, the ratio is 0.97% (2021: 0.97%), which is higher than BoCom’s
average ECL as a percentage of customer advances in recent years prior to the pandemic.
•Risk-weighted assets as a percentage of total assets: ranges from 61.0% to 64.4% (2021: 61.0% to 62.4%) in the short to medium
term, reflecting higher risk-weights in the short term followed by an expected reversion to recent historical levels. For periods after
2026, the ratio is 61.0% (2021: 61.0%), which is similar to BoCom’s actual results in recent years.
•Operating income growth rate: ranges from 1.9% to 7.7% (2021: 5.1% to 6.2%) in the short to medium term, is lower than BoCom’s
actual results in recent years and is similar to the forecasts disclosed by external analysts. This reflects BoCom’s most recent actual
results, global trade tensions and industry developments in mainland China.
•Cost-income ratio: ranges from 35.5% to 36.3% (2021: 35.5% to 36.1%) in the short to medium term. These ratios are similar to
BoCom's actual results in recent years and forecasts disclosed by external analysts.
•Effective tax rate (‘ETR’): ranges from 4.4% to 15.0% (2021: 6.8% to 15.0%) in the short to medium term, reflecting BoCom’s actual
results and an expected increase towards the long-term assumption through the forecast period. For periods after 2026, the rate is
15.0% (2021: 15.0%), which is higher than the recent historical average, and aligned to the minimum tax rate as proposed by the
OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.
•Capital requirements: capital adequacy ratio of 12.5% (2021: 12.5%) and tier 1 capital adequacy ratio of 9.5% (2021: 9.5%), based on
BoCom’s capital risk appetite and capital requirements respectively.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
110
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
The following table shows the change to each key assumption in the VIU calculation that on its own would reduce the headroom to nil:
Key assumption
Changes to key assumption to reduce headroom to nil
•Long-term profit growth rate
•Long-term asset growth rate
•Discount rate
•Expected credit losses as a percentage of customer advances
•Risk-weighted assets as a percentage of total assets
•Operating income growth rate
•Cost-income ratio
•Long-term effective tax rate
•Capital requirements – capital adequacy ratio
•Capital requirements – tier 1 capital adequacy ratio
•Decrease by 2 basis points
•Increase by 2 basis points
•Increase by 3 basis points
•Increase by <1 basis points
•Increase by 14 basis points
•Decrease by 3 basis points
•Increase by 9 basis points
•Increase by 26 basis points
•Increase by 3 basis points
•Increase by 173 basis points
The following table further illustrates the impact on VIU of reasonably possible changes to key assumptions. This reflects the sensitivity
of the VIU to each key assumption on its own and it is possible that more than one favourable and/or unfavourable change may occur at
the same time. The selected rates of reasonably possible changes to key assumptions are based on external analysts’ forecasts, statutory
requirements and other relevant external data sources, which can change period to period.
Sensitivity of VIU to reasonably possible changes in key assumptions
Favourable change
Unfavourable change
Increase in
VIU
VIU
Decrease in
VIU
VIU
bps
HK$bn
HK$bn
bps
HK$bn
HK$bn
At 31 December 2022
Long-term profit growth rate1
+75
28.1
211.1
-71
(21.1)
161.9
Long-term asset growth rate1
-71
24.2
207.2
+75
(31.8)
151.2
Discount rate
-164
54.3
237.3
+136
(28.7)
154.3
Expected credit losses as a percentage of customer advances
2022 to 2026: 95         
2027 onwards: 91
14.9
197.9
2022 to 2026: 120
2027 onwards: 104
(22.5)
160.5
Risk-weighted assets as a percentage of total assets
-118
0.6
183.6
+239
(17.5)
165.5
Operating income growth rate
+44
10.5
193.5
-83
(19.3)
163.7
Cost-income ratio
-122
8.1
191.1
+174
(16.5)
166.5
Long-term effective tax rate
-426
11.8
194.8
+1000
(27.7)
155.3
Capital requirements – capital adequacy ratio
—
—
183.0
+191
(48.8)
134.2
Capital requirements – tier 1 capital adequacy ratio
—
—
183.0
+266
(24.8)
158.2
At 31 December 2021
Long-term profit growth rate1
+87
33.1
226.1
-69
(20.5)
172.5
Long-term asset growth rate1
-69
22.9
215.9
+87
(36.2)
156.8
Discount rate
-133
42.2
235.2
+207
(40.8)
152.2
Expected credit losses as a percentage of customer advances
2021 to 2025: 103           
2026 onwards: 91
11.9
204.9
2021 to 2025: 121
2026 onwards: 105
(21.0)
172.0
Risk-weighted assets as a percentage of total assets
-111
2.2
195.2
+280
(15.8)
177.2
Operating income growth rate
+37
8.2
201.2
-58
(13.6)
179.4
Cost-income ratio
-152
13.6
206.6
+174
(12.7)
180.3
Long-term effective tax rate
-104
2.9
195.9
+1000
(27.4)
165.6
Capital requirements – capital adequacy ratio
—
—
193.0
+325
(77.6)
115.4
Capital requirements – tier 1 capital adequacy ratio
—
—
193.0
+364
(50.0)
143.0
1  The reasonably possible ranges of the long-term profit growth rate and long-term asset growth rate assumptions reflect the close relationship
between these assumptions, which would result in offsetting changes to each assumption.
Considering the interrelationship of the changes set out in the table above, management estimates that the reasonably possible range of
VIU is HK$131.9bn to HK$223.9bn (2021: HK$148.3bn to HK$228.4bn). The range is based on impacts set out in the table above arising
from the favourable/unfavourable change in the earnings in the short to medium term, the long-term expected credit losses as a
percentage of customer advances and a 50bps increase/decrease in the discount rate. All other long-term assumptions, and the basis of
the CMC have been kept unchanged when determining the reasonably possible range of the VIU. Impairment, if determined, would be
recognised in the income statement. The impact on group’s CET1 ratio is expected to be minimal in the event of an impairment, as the
adverse impact on CET1 capital from the impairment would be partly offset by the favourable impact from a lower carrying value.
Selected financial information of BoCom
The statutory accounting reference date of BoCom is 31 December. For the year ended 31 December 2022, the group included the
associate’s results on the basis of financial statements made up for the 12 months to 30 September 2022, but taking into account the
financial effect of significant transactions or events in the period from 1 October 2022 to 31 December 2022.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
111
Selected balance sheet information of BoCom
At 30 Sep
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Cash and balances with central banks
891,754
960,732
Due from and placements with banks and other financial institutions
778,032
771,522
Loans and advances to customers
7,968,993
7,751,362
Other financial assets
4,282,704
4,223,488
Other assets
438,653
375,073
Total assets
14,360,136
14,082,177
Due to and placements from banks and other financial institutions
2,160,865
2,238,612
Deposits from customers
8,920,656
8,572,625
Other financial liabilities
1,851,657
1,779,110
Other liabilities
277,086
312,486
Total liabilities
13,210,264
12,902,833
Total equity
1,149,872
1,179,344
Reconciliation of BoCom’s net assets to carrying amount in the group’s consolidated financial statements
At 30 Sep
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
The group’s share of ordinary shareholders' equity
178,526
180,738
Goodwill
3,728
4,044
Carrying amount
182,254
184,782
Selected income statement information of BoCom
For the 12 months ended 30 Sep
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Net interest income
198,218
191,076
Net fee and commission income
53,667
55,735
Credit and impairment losses
(76,046)
(75,402)
Depreciation and amortisation
(18,406)
(17,851)
Tax expense
(4,681)
(8,119)
–  profit for the year
106,352
110,370
–  other comprehensive expense
(1,921)
(2,861)
Total comprehensive income
104,431
107,509
Dividends received from BoCom
5,881
5,386
Using the latest period for which BoCom has disclosed this information (at 30 June 2022), the group's share of associate's contingent liabilities was
HK$442,884m (2021: HK$432,259m).
15
Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill and intangible assets include goodwill arising on business combinations, the present value of in-force long-term insurance
business, and other intangible assets.
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Goodwill
6,795
7,116
Present value of in-force long-term insurance business
65,537
63,765
Other intangible assets1
30,087
24,300
At 31 Dec
102,419
95,181
1Included within other intangible assets is internally generated software with a net carrying value of HK$27,209m (2021: HK$21,670m). During the
year, capitalisation of internally generated software was HK$11,570m (2021: HK$10,681m), amortisation charge was HK$5,610m (2021:
HK$4,115m) and impairment charge was HK$332m (2021: HK$184m).
The present value of in-force long-term insurance business
When calculating the present value of in-force long-term ('PVIF') insurance business, expected cash flows are projected after adjusting
for a variety of assumptions made by each insurance operation to reflect local market conditions and management’s judgement of future
trends, and uncertainty in the underlying assumptions is reflected by applying margins (as opposed to a cost of capital methodology).
Variations in actual experience and changes to assumptions can contribute to volatility in the results of the insurance business.
Financial Reporting Committees of each key insurance entity meet on a quarterly basis to review and approve PVIF assumptions. All
changes to non-economic assumptions, economic assumptions that are not observable and model methodology must be approved by
the Financial Reporting Committee.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
112
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Movements in PVIF
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan
63,765
65,052
Acquisition
2,114
Changes in PVIF of long-term insurance business
(256)
(1,294)
–  value of new business written during the year
9,213
7,381
–  expected return1
(5,326)
(5,950)
–  assumption changes and experience variances (see below)
(3,967)
(2,873)
–  other adjustments
(176)
148
Exchange differences and other
(86)
7
At 31 Dec
65,537
63,765
1‘Expected return’ represents the unwinding of the discount rate and reversal of expected cash flows for the period.
Assumption changes and experience variances
Included within this line item are:
•HK$(6,896)m (2021: HK$440m) decrease in PVIF due to rising interest rates, which is directly offset within the valuation of liabilities
under insurance contracts.
•HK$(564)m (2021: HK$(2,519)m), reflecting the future expected sharing of returns with policyholders on contracts with discretionary
participation features (‘DPF’), to the extent this sharing is not already included in liabilities under insurance contracts.
•HK$3,493m (2021: HK$(794)m), driven by other assumptions changes and experience variances.
Key assumptions used in the computation of PVIF for the main life insurance operations
Economic assumptions are set in a way that is consistent with observable market values. The valuation of PVIF is sensitive to observed
market movements. The following are the key long-term assumptions used in the computation of PVIF for Hong Kong insurance entities,
being the main life insurance operations:
2022
2021
%
%
Weighted average risk free rate
3.85
1.40
Weighted average risk discount rate
7.33
5.20
Expense inflation
3.00
3.00
Sensitivity to changes in economic assumptions
The group sets the risk discount rate applied to the PVIF calculation by starting from a risk-free rate curve and adding explicit allowances
for risks not reflected in the best-estimate cash flow modelling. Where the insurance operations provide options and guarantees to
policyholders, the cost of these options and guarantees is an explicit reduction to PVIF, unless it is already allowed for as an explicit
addition to the technical provisions required by regulators. See page 71 for further details of these guarantees and the impact of changes
in economic assumptions on our insurance manufacturing subsidiaries.
Sensitivity to changes in non-economic assumptions
Policyholder liabilities and PVIF are determined by reference to non-economic assumptions, including mortality and/or morbidity, lapse
rates and expense rates. See page 72 for further details on the impact of changes in non-economic assumptions on our insurance
manufacturing operations.
16
Property, plant and equipment
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Owned property, plant and equipment1
123,491
121,072
Other right-of-use assets
7,435
8,755
At 31 Dec
130,926
129,827
1Included leasehold land and buildings of HK$112,591m (2021: HK$110,458m) for which the right of use are considered sufficient to constitute
control. They are therefore presented as owned assets.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
113
Movement in owned property, plant and equipment
2022
2021
Land and
buildings
Investment
properties
Equipment
Total
Land and
buildings
Investment
properties
Equipment
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Cost or valuation
At 1 Jan
102,367
13,465
15,747
131,579
100,791
13,167
15,266
129,224
Exchange and other adjustments
(797)
8
(679)
(1,468)
(67)
16
(112)
(163)
Additions
3,183
324
2,253
5,760
667
2
2,049
2,718
Disposals
(55)
—
(680)
(735)
(58)
—
(1,456)
(1,514)
Transfers
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Elimination of accumulated depreciation on
revalued land and buildings
(5,105)
—
—
(5,105)
(4,633)
—
—
(4,633)
Surplus/(deficit) on revaluation
4,683
(133)
—
4,550
5,643
277
—
5,920
Reclassifications
(2,849)
2,535
—
(314)
24
3
—
27
At 31 Dec
101,427
16,199
16,641
134,267
102,367
13,465
15,747
131,579
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 Jan
87
—
10,420
10,507
90
—
10,387
10,477
Exchange and other adjustments
(42)
—
(533)
(575)
30
—
(46)
(16)
Charge for the year
5,151
—
1,418
6,569
4,645
—
1,374
6,019
Disposals
—
—
(620)
(620)
(45)
—
(1,295)
(1,340)
Transfers
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Elimination of accumulated depreciation on
revalued land and buildings
(5,105)
—
—
(5,105)
(4,633)
—
—
(4,633)
At 31 Dec
91
—
10,685
10,776
87
—
10,420
10,507
Net book value at 31 Dec
101,336
16,199
5,956
123,491
102,280
13,465
5,327
121,072
The carrying amount of land and buildings, had they been stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, would have been as follows:
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Cost less accumulated depreciation
18,584
17,121
Valuation of land and buildings and investment properties
The group’s land and buildings and investment properties were revalued as at 31 December 2022. The basis of valuation for land and
buildings and investment properties was open market value. The resultant values are Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values for
land and buildings are determined by using a direct comparison approach which values the properties in their respective existing states
and uses, assuming sale with immediate vacant possession and by making reference to comparable sales evidence. The valuations take
into account the characteristics of the properties (unobservable inputs) which include the location, size, shape, view, floor level, year of
completion and other factors collectively. The premium or discount applied to the characteristics of the properties is within minus 20%
and plus 20%. In determining the open market value of investment properties, expected future cash flows have been discounted to their
present values. The net book value of ‘Land and buildings’ includes HK$6,839m (2021: HK$6,854m) in respect of properties which were
valued using the depreciated replacement cost method.
Valuation of land and buildings and investment properties in Hong Kong, Macau and mainland China were largely carried out by
Cushman & Wakefield Limited, who have recent experience in the location and type of properties and who are members of the Hong
Kong Institute of Surveyors. This represents 93% by value of the group’s properties subject to valuation. Other properties were valued by
different independent professionally qualified valuers.
17
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Prepayments and accrued income
32,604
24,986
Bullion
50,253
52,986
Acceptances and endorsements
57,118
55,789
Reinsurers’ share of liabilities under insurance contracts (Note 3)
32,151
27,366
Current tax assets
2,144
2,674
Settlement accounts
38,621
24,577
Cash collateral and margin receivables
94,850
44,177
Other assets
47,578
37,188
At 31 Dec
355,319
269,743
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets included HK$267,972m (2021: HK$180,757m) of financial assets, the majority of which
were measured at amortised cost.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
114
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
18
Customer accounts
Customer accounts by country/territory
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Hong Kong
4,229,531
4,284,719
Singapore
479,241
448,976
Mainland China
443,954
462,187
Australia
222,222
220,233
India
176,466
191,116
Malaysia
124,792
128,673
Taiwan
119,400
120,744
Indonesia
45,529
46,938
Other
272,574
273,596
At 31 Dec
6,113,709
6,177,182
19
Trading liabilities
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Net short positions in securities
80,564
85,627
Repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending1
61,404
6,703
Customer accounts
485
393
At 31 Dec
142,453
92,723
1    Further product details have been included to reconcile to Note 30 'Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities' with effect from 31
December 2022.
20
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Deposits by banks and customer accounts
89,258
59,611
Debt securities in issue
45,454
43,928
Liabilities to customers under investment contracts
33,031
35,426
At 31 Dec
167,743
138,965
The carrying amount of financial liabilities designated at fair value was HK$370m lower than the contractual amount at maturity
(2021: HK$1,385m lower). The cumulative gain in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was HK$138m (2021: HK$62m loss).
21
Debt securities in issue
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Bonds and medium-term notes
78,537
79,852
Other debt securities in issue
67,826
31,440
Total debt securities in issue
146,363
111,292
Included within:
–  financial liabilities designated at fair value (Note 20)
(45,454)
(43,928)
At 31 Dec
100,909
67,364
22
Accruals and deferred income, other liabilities and provisions
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Accruals and deferred income
32,779
23,020
Acceptances and endorsements
57,210
55,824
Settlement accounts
33,536
26,158
Cash collateral and margin payables
58,919
53,541
Share-based payment liability to HSBC Holdings plc
1,564
1,431
Lease liabilities
7,850
9,165
Other liabilities1
44,957
48,668
Provisions for liabilities and charges
1,911
1,399
At 31 Dec
238,726
219,206
1  Mainly includes marginal deposit on letter of credit and credit card settlement account.
Accruals and deferred income, other liabilities and provisions included HK$227,840m (2021: HK$209,441m) of financial liabilities which
were measured at amortised cost.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
115
Movement in provisions
Restructuring
costs
Other
Total
Provisions (excluding contractual commitments)
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2021
148
466
614
Additions
468
243
711
Amounts utilised
(307)
(174)
(481)
Unused amounts reversed
(35)
(84)
(119)
Exchange and other movements
(3)
30
27
At 31 Dec 2022
271
481
752
Contractual commitments1
At 31 Dec 2021
785
Net change in expected credit loss provision and other movements
374
At 31 Dec 2022
1,159
Total Provisions at 31 Dec 2022
1,911
At 31 Dec 2020
116
419
535
Additions
357
333
690
Amounts utilised
(309)
(258)
(567)
Unused amounts reversed
(59)
(24)
(83)
Exchange and other movements
43
(4)
39
At 31 Dec 2021
148
466
614
Contractual commitments
At 31 Dec 2020
1,257
Net change in expected credit loss provision and other movements
(472)
At 31 Dec 2021
785
Total Provisions at 31 Dec 2021
1,399
1  Contractual commitments include provisions for contingent liabilities measured under HKFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ in respect of financial
guarantees and expected credit loss provisions in relation to off-balance sheet guarantees and commitments.
23
Subordinated liabilities
Subordinated liabilities to third parties measured at amortised cost consist of undated primary capital notes and other capital loan having
an original term to maturity of five years or more. Subordinated liabilities to Group entities are not included in the table below.
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
US$400m
Undated floating rate primary capital notes
3,119
3,119
MYR500m
Fixed rate (5.050%) subordinated bonds due 2027, callable from 20221
—
935
At 31 Dec
3,119
4,054
1These securities were called in 2022.
24
Share capital
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Paid up share capital in HK$
123,949
116,103
Paid up share capital in US$1
56,232
56,232
At 31 Dec
180,181
172,335
Ordinary shares issued and fully paid
2022
2021
HK$m
Number
HK$m
Number
At 1 Jan
172,335
46,440,991,798
172,335
46,440,991,798
Shares issued during the year
7,846
3,138,400,000
—
—
At 31 Dec
180,181
49,579,391,798
172,335
46,440,991,798
1  Paid up share capital in US$ represents preference shares which were redeemed or bought back via payment out of distributable profits and for
which the amount was transferred from retained earnings to share capital in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Ordinance.
3,138.4m new ordinary shares were issued during 2022 (2021: nil) at an issue price of HK$2.5 each for general corporate purposes and to
further strengthen the capital base. The holder of the ordinary shares is entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time, rank
equally with regard to the Bank’s residual assets and are entitled to one vote per share at shareholder meetings of the Bank.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
116
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
25
Other equity instruments
Other equity instruments comprise additional tier 1 capital instruments in issue which are accounted for as equity.
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
US$1,000m  Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from Mar 20251
7,834
7,834
US$900m    Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from Sep 20262
7,063
7,063
US$700m    Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from Mar 20253
5,467
5,467
US$500m    Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from Mar 20253
3,905
3,905
US$600m    Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from May 20274
4,685
4,685
US$900m    Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from Sep 20245
7,044
7,044
US$1,100m  Fixed rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from  Jun 20246
8,617
8,617
US$1,000m  Floating rate perpetual subordinated loan, callable from  May 20277
7,771
—
At 31 Dec
52,386
44,615
1Interest rate fixed at 6.090%.
2Interest rate fixed at 6.510%.
3Interest rate fixed at 6.172%.
4Interest rate fixed at 5.910%.
5Interest rate fixed at 6.030%.
6  Interest rate fixed at 6.000%.
7  Interest rate at compounded SOFR plus 5.090%.
The additional tier 1 capital instruments are perpetual subordinated loans on which coupon payments may be cancelled at the sole
discretion of the Bank. The subordinated loans will be written down at the point of non-viability on the occurrence of a trigger event as
defined in the Banking (Capital) Rules. They rank higher than ordinary shares in the event of a wind-up.
26
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities
The following tables provide an analysis of consolidated total assets and liabilities by residual contractual maturity at the balance sheet
date. These balances are included in the maturity analysis as follows:
•Trading assets and liabilities (including trading derivatives but excluding reverse repos, repos and debt securities in issue) are included
in the ‘Due not more than 1 month’ time bucket, because trading balances are typically held for short periods of time.
•Financial assets and liabilities with no contractual maturity (such as equity securities) are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time
bucket. Undated or perpetual instruments are classified based on the contractual notice period which the counterparty of the
instrument is entitled to give. Where there is no contractual notice period, undated or perpetual contracts are included in the ‘Due over
5 years’ time bucket.
•Non-financial assets and liabilities with no contractual maturity are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time bucket.
•Liabilities under insurance contracts are irrespective of contractual maturity included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time bucket in the
maturity table provided below. An analysis of the expected maturity of liabilities under insurance contracts based on undiscounted
cash flows is provided on page 71. Liabilities under investment contracts are classified in accordance with their contractual maturity.
Undated investment contracts are included in the ‘Due over 5 years’ time bucket, however, such contracts are subject to surrender
and transfer options by the policyholders.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
117
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities
Due not
more than
1 month
Due over
1 month
but not
more than
3 months
Due over
3 months
but not
more than
6 months
Due over
6 months
but not
more than
9 months
Due over
9 months
but not
more than
1 year
Due over
1 year but
not more
than 2
years
Due over
2 years but
not more
than 5
years
Due over
5 years
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Financial assets
Cash and balances at central banks
232,740
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
232,740
Items in the course of collection from other
banks
28,557
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
28,557
Hong Kong Government certificates of
indebtedness
341,354
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
341,354
Trading assets
691,744
1,764
3,089
—
163
3,045
—
—
699,805
Derivatives
495,785
691
205
142
474
1,840
2,556
1,078
502,771
Financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value through
profit or loss
6,334
662
2,334
809
306
3,644
13,130
199,232
226,451
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
585,333
256,887
54,039
7,679
7,172
13,402
3,464
—
927,976
Loans and advances to banks
321,807
99,229
39,705
6,132
13,686
16,445
22,020
—
519,024
Loans and advances to customers
567,455
370,175
301,012
151,506
146,803
441,860
632,986
1,093,352
3,705,149
Financial investments
313,122
516,476
135,636
71,865
73,234
217,677
391,288
502,063
2,221,361
Amounts due from Group companies
101,287
4,652
4,356
716
2,696
10,236
7,729
19
131,691
Accrued income and other financial assets
193,219
40,300
21,535
3,864
4,077
796
675
3,506
267,972
Financial assets at 31 Dec 2022
3,878,737
1,290,836
561,911
242,713
248,611
708,945
1,073,848
1,799,250
9,804,851
Non-financial assets
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
519,301
519,301
Total assets at 31 Dec 2022
3,878,737
1,290,836
561,911
242,713
248,611
708,945
1,073,848
2,318,551
10,324,152
Financial liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
341,354
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
341,354
Items in the course of transmission to other
banks
33,073
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33,073
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
335,467
2,173
2,557
—
5,027
5,869
—
—
351,093
Deposits by banks
193,147
1,249
3,513
811
176
12
—
—
198,908
Customer accounts
5,050,054
540,611
304,705
81,349
85,465
22,028
29,490
7
6,113,709
Trading liabilities
142,432
21
—
—
—
—
—
—
142,453
Derivatives
550,741
4
62
60
157
175
489
57
551,745
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
35,661
35,229
12,142
10,593
8,957
20,585
11,436
33,140
167,743
Debt securities in issue
13,723
13,266
24,251
13,388
1,054
9,674
22,382
3,171
100,909
Amounts due to Group companies
129,641
12,841
808
272
842
70,332
49,935
133,987
398,658
Accruals and other financial liabilities
138,862
41,883
22,569
5,525
7,098
5,566
5,228
1,109
227,840
Subordinated liabilities1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3,119
3,119
Total financial liabilities at 31 Dec 2022
6,964,155
647,277
370,607
111,998
108,776
134,241
118,960
174,590
8,630,604
Non-financial liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
752,285
752,285
Total liabilities at 31 Dec 2022
6,964,155
647,277
370,607
111,998
108,776
134,241
118,960
926,875
9,382,889
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
118
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities (continued)
Due not
more than1
month
Due over 1
month but
not more
than 3
months
Due over 3
months but
not more
than 6
months
Due over 6
months but
not more
than 9
months
Due over 9
months but
not more
than 1 year
Due over 1
year but not
more than 2
years
Due over 2
years but
not more
than 5 years
Due over 5
years
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Financial assets
Cash and balances at central banks
276,857
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
276,857
Items in the course of collection from other
banks
21,632
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21,632
Hong Kong Government certificates of
indebtedness
332,044
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
332,044
Trading assets
768,376
7,082
208
431
—
815
538
—
777,450
Derivatives
361,447
1,079
466
769
131
441
713
121
365,167
Financial assets designated and otherwise
mandatorily measured at fair value through
profit or loss
5,880
172
1,636
884
1,561
3,781
11,244
177,241
202,399
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
528,832
223,041
34,435
5,081
1,865
9,384
1,137
—
803,775
Loans and advances to banks
277,060
80,547
20,767
7,667
7,532
20,248
17,908
518
432,247
Loans and advances to customers
605,216
402,921
312,336
177,577
171,989
410,594
731,226
1,029,080
3,840,939
Financial investments
247,163
405,109
187,038
107,329
118,029
232,350
307,753
446,804
2,051,575
Amounts due from Group companies
84,688
1,302
1,189
2,227
2,441
6,138
5,857
17
103,859
Accrued income and other financial assets
119,499
31,449
19,062
3,708
2,034
805
750
3,450
180,757
Financial assets at 31 Dec 2021
3,628,694
1,152,702
577,137
305,673
305,582
684,556
1,077,126
1,657,231
9,388,701
Non-financial assets
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
514,692
514,692
Total assets at 31 Dec 2021
3,628,694
1,152,702
577,137
305,673
305,582
684,556
1,077,126
2,171,923
9,903,393
Financial liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
332,044
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
332,044
Items in the course of transmission to other
banks
25,701
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
25,701
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
231,463
4,713
368
—
1,104
7,570
2,904
7,252
255,374
Deposits by banks
269,405
2,140
6,780
1,019
526
440
—
—
280,310
Customer accounts
5,722,470
272,462
88,483
34,813
32,417
11,792
14,741
4
6,177,182
Trading liabilities
92,723
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
92,723
Derivatives
354,567
304
74
212
79
241
274
40
355,791
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
32,086
21,849
11,059
4,967
5,574
8,789
18,899
35,742
138,965
Debt securities in issue
4,304
5,509
17,363
12,374
3,963
9,320
12,324
2,207
67,364
Amounts due to Group companies
114,388
17,504
1,401
222
223
21,699
66,205
134,534
356,176
Accruals and other financial liabilities
124,346
40,286
24,070
5,135
3,820
4,802
5,197
1,785
209,441
Subordinated liabilities1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,054
4,054
Financial liabilities at 31 Dec 2021
7,303,497
364,767
149,598
58,742
47,706
64,653
120,544
185,618
8,295,125
Non-financial liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
684,757
684,757
Total liabilities at 31 Dec 2021
7,303,497
364,767
149,598
58,742
47,706
64,653
120,544
870,375
8,979,882
1The maturity for subordinated liabilities is based on the earliest date on which the group is required to pay, i.e. the callable date.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
119
27
Analysis of cash flows payable under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities
Due not more
than 1 month
Due over 1
month but not
more than 3
months
Due between
3 and
12 months
Due between
1 and 5 years
Due after
5 years
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
341,354
—
—
—
—
341,354
Items in the course of transmission to other banks
33,073
—
—
—
—
33,073
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
335,951
2,194
7,708
5,877
—
351,730
Deposits by banks
193,748
1,250
4,542
14
—
199,554
Customer accounts
5,053,321
552,623
481,006
55,739
16
6,142,705
Trading liabilities
142,453
—
—
—
—
142,453
Derivatives
551,094
67
253
603
60
552,077
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
37,062
36,310
32,404
33,198
33,170
172,144
Debt securities in issue
13,917
14,305
40,630
34,698
3,400
106,950
Amounts due to Group companies
129,728
14,509
11,396
155,038
170,299
480,970
Other financial liabilities
135,664
38,584
31,237
9,967
1,128
216,580
Subordinated liabilities
—
36
108
577
4,561
5,282
6,967,365
659,878
609,284
295,711
212,634
8,744,872
Loan and other credit-related commitments
3,191,864
—
—
—
—
3,191,864
Financial guarantees
41,991
—
—
—
—
41,991
10,201,220
659,878
609,284
295,711
212,634
11,978,727
Proportion of cash flows payable in period
85%
6%
5%
2%
2%
At 31 Dec 2021
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
332,044
—
—
—
—
332,044
Items in the course of transmission to other banks
25,701
—
—
—
—
25,701
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
231,531
4,714
1,517
10,530
7,289
255,581
Deposits by banks
269,681
2,140
8,341
451
—
280,613
Customer accounts
5,723,441
273,282
157,735
28,638
4
6,183,100
Trading liabilities
92,723
—
—
—
—
92,723
Derivatives
354,584
416
384
621
40
356,045
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
33,288
22,323
21,903
28,536
35,768
141,818
Debt securities in issue
4,336
5,667
34,629
22,632
2,370
69,634
Amounts due to Group companies
113,944
19,523
7,301
108,035
147,000
395,803
Other financial liabilities
123,460
39,607
31,486
10,630
1,854
207,037
Subordinated liabilities
—
15
44
236
4,207
4,502
7,304,733
367,687
263,340
210,309
198,532
8,344,601
Loan and other credit-related commitments
2,945,560
—
—
—
—
2,945,560
Financial guarantees
41,843
—
—
—
—
41,843
10,292,136
367,687
263,340
210,309
198,532
11,332,004
Proportion of cash flows payable in period
91%
3%
2%
2%
2%
The balances in the above tables incorporate all cash flows relating to principal and future coupon payments on an undiscounted basis.
Trading liabilities and trading derivatives have been included in the ‘On demand’ time bucket as they are typically held for short periods
of time. The undiscounted cash flows payable under hedging derivative liabilities are classified according to their contractual maturity.
Investment contract liabilities have been included in financial liabilities designated at fair value, whereby the policyholders have the
options to surrender or transfer at any time, and are reported in the ‘Due after 5 years’ time bucket. A maturity analysis prepared on the
basis of the earliest possible contractual repayment date (assuming that all surrender and transfer options are exercised) would result in
all investment contracts being presented as falling due within one year or less. The undiscounted cash flows potentially payable under
loan commitments and financial guarantee contracts are classified on the basis of the earliest date they can be called. Cash flows
payable in respect of customer accounts are primarily contractually repayable on demand or at short notice.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
120
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
28
Contingent liabilities, contractual commitments and guarantees
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Guarantees and contingent liabilities:
–  financial guarantees1
41,991
41,843
–  performance and other guarantees2
354,794
335,849
–  other contingent liabilities
1,222
1,751
At 31 Dec
398,007
379,443
Commitments3:
–  documentary credits and short-term trade-related transactions
26,324
32,284
–  forward asset purchases and forward forward deposits placed
48,560
40,745
–  undrawn formal standby facilities, credit lines and other commitments to lend
3,116,980
2,872,531
At 31 Dec
3,191,864
2,945,560
1Financial guarantees are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss incurred because a
specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the original or modified terms of a debt instrument.
2Performance and other guarantees include re-insurance letters of credit related to particular transactions, trade-related letters of credit issued
without provision for the issuing entity to retain title to the underlying shipment, performance bonds, bid bonds, standby letters of credit and other
transaction-related guarantees.
3Includes HK$1,892,401m of commitments at 31 December 2022 (2021: HK$1,826,335m) to which the impairment requirements in HKFRS 9 are
applied where the group has become party to an irrevocable commitment.
The above table discloses the nominal principal amounts of commitments (excluding other commitments as disclosed in Note 29),
guarantees and other contingent liabilities, which represent the amounts at risk should contracts be fully drawn upon and clients default.
The amount of the commitments shown above reflects, where relevant, the expected level of take-up of pre-approved facilities. As a
significant proportion of guarantees and commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total of the nominal
principal amounts is not representative of future liquidity requirements.
It also reflects the group’s maximum exposure under a large number of individual guarantee undertakings. The risks and exposures from
guarantees are captured and managed in accordance with HSBC’s overall credit risk management policies and procedures. Guarantees
are subject to an annual credit review process.
Other contingent liabilities at 31 December 2022 included amounts in relation to legal and regulatory matters as set out in Note 38.
29
Other commitments
Capital commitments
At 31 December 2022, capital commitments, mainly related to the commitment for purchase of properties, were HK$3,834m
(2021: HK$4,826m).
30
Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable
right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realise the asset and settle the liability
simultaneously (‘the offset criteria’).
The ‘Amounts not set off in the balance sheet’ include transactions where:
•the counterparty has an offsetting exposure with the group and a master netting or similar arrangement is in place with a right to set
off only in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy, or the offset criteria are otherwise not satisfied; and
•cash and non-cash collateral (debt securities and equities) has been received/pledged for derivatives and reverse repurchase/
repurchase, stock borrowing/lending and similar agreements to cover net exposure in the event of default or other predetermined
events.
The effect of over-collateralisation is excluded.
‘Amounts not subject to enforceable master netting agreements’ include contracts executed in jurisdictions where the rights of set off
may not be upheld under the local bankruptcy laws, and transactions where a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the right of offset
may not have been sought, or may have been unable to obtain.
For risk management purposes, the net amounts of loans and advances to customers are subject to limits, which are monitored and the
relevant customer agreements are subject to review and updated, as necessary, to ensure that the legal right to set off remains
appropriate.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
121
Offsetting of financial assets and financial liabilities
Amounts subject to enforceable netting arrangements
Amounts not offset in the
balance sheet
Gross
amounts
Amounts
offset
Net
amounts
reported in
the balance
sheet
Financial
instruments,
including
non-cash
collateral
Cash
collateral
Net
amount
Amounts not
subject to
enforceable
netting
arrange-
ments1
Balance
sheet total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Financial assets2
Derivatives
795,828
(329,392)
466,436
(397,121)
(39,022)
30,293
36,335
502,771
Reverse repos, stock borrowing and similar agreements
classified as:4
–  trading assets
57,505
—
57,505
(57,273)
(227)
5
4,177
61,682
–third party
55,221
—
55,221
(54,994)
(227)
—
4,177
59,398
–amounts due from Group companies
2,284
—
2,284
(2,279)
—
5
—
2,284
–  reverse repurchase agreements - non-trading
932,272
(29,470)
902,802
(901,205)
(1,597)
—
63,031
965,833
–third party
891,131
(26,186)
864,945
(863,840)
(1,105)
—
63,031
927,976
–amounts due from Group companies
41,141
(3,284)
37,857
(37,365)
(492)
—
—
37,857
–  financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss
–third party
1,764
—
1,764
(1,764)
—
—
—
1,764
1,787,369
(358,862)
1,428,507
(1,357,363)
(40,846)
30,298
103,543
1,532,050
Financial liabilities3
Derivatives
849,582
(329,392)
520,190
(390,421)
(70,825)
58,944
31,555
551,745
Repos, stock lending and similar agreements classified
as:4
–  trading liabilities
61,437
—
61,437
(61,436)
(1)
—
22
61,459
–third party
61,382
—
61,382
(61,381)
(1)
—
22
61,404
–amounts due to Group companies
55
—
55
(55)
—
—
—
55
–  repurchase agreements - non-trading
403,019
(29,470)
373,549
(373,126)
(352)
71
37,064
410,613
–third party
340,215
(26,186)
314,029
(313,747)
(256)
26
37,064
351,093
–amounts due to Group companies
62,804
(3,284)
59,520
(59,379)
(96)
45
—
59,520
1,314,038
(358,862)
955,176
(824,983)
(71,178)
59,015
68,641
1,023,817
At 31 Dec 2021
Financial assets2
Derivatives
524,603
(190,129)
334,474
(279,958)
(36,005)
18,511
30,693
365,167
Reverse repos, stock borrowing and similar agreements
classified as:4
–  trading assets
60,417
(79)
60,338
(59,771)
(552)
15
7,393
67,731
–third party
56,205
(79)
56,126
(55,561)
(552)
13
7,393
63,519
–amounts due from Group companies
4,212
—
4,212
(4,210)
—
2
—
4,212
–  reverse repurchase agreements - non-trading
806,403
(71,333)
735,071
(733,647)
(197)
1,228
82,854
817,925
–third party
776,145
(55,224)
720,921
(720,662)
(197)
62
82,854
803,775
–amounts due from Group companies
30,258
(16,109)
14,149
(12,985)
—
1,166
—
14,149
–  financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss
–third party
777
—
777
(777)
—
—
—
777
1,392,200
(261,541)
1,130,659
(1,074,153)
(36,754)
19,752
120,940
1,251,599
Financial liabilities3
Derivatives
516,525
(190,129)
326,396
(277,624)
(27,837)
20,935
29,395
355,791
Repos, stock lending and similar agreements classified
as:4
–  trading liabilities
6,807
(79)
6,728
(6,721)
—
7
—
6,728
–third party
6,782
(79)
6,703
(6,697)
—
6
—
6,703
–amounts due to Group companies
25
—
25
(24)
—
1
—
25
–  repurchase agreements - non-trading
323,559
(71,333)
252,226
(251,802)
(3)
421
68,664
320,890
–third party
241,934
(55,224)
186,710
(186,338)
(3)
369
68,664
255,374
–amounts due to Group companies
81,625
(16,109)
65,516
(65,464)
—
52
—
65,516
846,891
(261,541)
585,350
(536,147)
(27,840)
21,363
98,059
683,409
1These exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the group may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion
evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.
2Include balances due from Group companies of HK$208,343m (2021: HK$167,054m).
3  Include balances due to Group companies of HK$213,726m (2021: HK$217,572m).
4  Further product details have been included with effect from 31 December 2022.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
122
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
31
Segmental analysis
The Executive Committee (‘EXCO’) is considered the Chief Operating Decision Maker ('CODM') for the purpose of identifying the group’s
operating segments. Operating segment results are assessed by the CODM on the basis of performance measured in accordance with
HKFRSs. Although the CODM reviews information on a number of bases, business performance is assessed and capital resources are
allocated by operating segments, and the segmental analysis is presented based on reportable segments as assessed under HKFRS 8
'Operating Segments'.
Our operations are closely integrated and, accordingly, the presentation of data includes internal allocations of certain items of income
and expenses. These allocations include the costs of certain support services and global functions to the extent that they can be
meaningfully attributed to operational business lines and geographical regions. While such allocations have been made on a systematic
and consistent basis, they necessarily involve a degree of subjectivity. Costs which are not allocated to other operating segments are
included in the ‘Corporate Centre’.
Where relevant, income and expense amounts presented include the results of inter-segment funding along with inter-company and
inter-business line transactions. All such transactions are undertaken on arm’s length terms. The intra-group elimination items for the
operating segments are presented in the Corporate Centre.
Our global businesses and reportable segments
The group provides a comprehensive range of banking and related financial services to our customers in our global businesses: Wealth
and Personal Banking (‘WPB’), Commercial Banking (‘CMB’) and Global Banking and Markets ('GBM'). The products and services offered
to customers are organised by these global businesses.
•WPB provides a full range of retail banking and wealth products to our customers from personal banking to ultra high net worth
individuals. Typically, customer offerings include retail banking products, such as current and savings accounts, mortgages and
personal loans, credit cards, debit cards and local and international payment services. We also provide wealth management services,
including insurance and investment products, global asset management services, investment management and Private Wealth
Solutions for customers with more sophisticated and international requirements.
•CMB offers a broad range of products and services to serve the needs of our commercial customers, including small and medium-
sized enterprises, mid-market enterprises and corporates. These include credit and lending, international trade and receivables
finance, treasury management and liquidity solutions (payments and cash management and commercial cards), commercial insurance
and investments. CMB also offers its customers access to products and services offered by other global businesses, such as GBM,
which include foreign exchange products, raising capital on debt and equity markets and advisory services.
•GBM comprises of two separate reportable segments: Global Banking ('GB') and Markets and Securities Services ('MSS'). GB provides
tailored financial solutions to major government, corporate and institutional clients and private investors worldwide. The client-focused
business lines deliver a full range of banking capabilities including financing, advisory and transaction services. MSS provides services
in credit, rates, foreign exchange, equities, money markets and securities services, and principal investment activities.
•Corporate Centre includes strategic investments such as our investment in BoCom, Central Treasury revenue, and costs which are not
allocated to global businesses, mainly in relation to investments in technology.
•Other (GBM-other) mainly comprises other business activities which are jointly managed by GB and MSS.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
123
Performance by reportable segments is presented in the ‘Financial Review’ on page 16 as specified as 'Audited'.
Information by geographical region
Hong Kong
Rest of
Asia-Pacific
Intra-segment
elimination
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
For the year ended 31 Dec 2022
Total operating income
184,065
90,536
905
275,506
Profit before tax
43,153
54,458
—
97,611
At 31 Dec 2022
Total assets
7,450,156
3,898,235
(1,024,239)
10,324,152
Total liabilities
6,954,421
3,452,707
(1,024,239)
9,382,889
Credit commitments and contingent liabilities (contract amounts)
1,894,046
1,695,824
—
3,589,870
For the year ended 31 Dec 2021
Total operating income
174,859
79,067
780
254,706
Profit before tax
41,043
45,520
—
86,563
At 31 Dec 2021
Total assets
7,035,497
3,696,064
(828,168)
9,903,393
Total liabilities
6,559,271
3,248,779
(828,168)
8,979,882
Credit commitments and contingent liabilities (contract amounts)
1,792,675
1,532,328
—
3,325,003
Information by country/territory
Revenue1
Non-current assets2
For the year ended 31 Dec
At 31 Dec
2022
2021
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Hong Kong
121,031
106,966
138,717
134,400
Mainland China
21,965
19,381
196,844
196,477
Australia
7,815
7,351
1,691
1,837
India
11,708
10,614
2,426
2,534
Indonesia
3,188
3,242
3,289
3,584
Malaysia
5,790
5,174
1,981
2,022
Singapore
15,473
10,671
3,453
2,933
Taiwan
3,823
3,124
2,473
2,802
Other
14,899
12,135
2,833
3,140
Total
205,692
178,658
353,707
349,729
1Revenue (defined as ‘Net operating income before change in expected credit losses and other impairment charges') is attributable to countries
based on the location of the principal operations of the branch, subsidiary, associate or joint venture.
2Non-current assets consist of property, plant and equipment, goodwill, other intangible assets, interests in associates and joint ventures and
certain other assets.
32
Related party transactions
The group’s related parties include the parent, fellow subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, post-employment benefit plans for the
group’s employees, Key Management Personnel (‘KMP’) as defined by HKAS 24, close family members of KMP and entities that are
controlled or jointly controlled by KMP or their close family members.
Particulars of transactions with related parties are set out below.
(a)Inter-company
The group is wholly owned by HSBC Asia Holdings Limited, which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC Holdings plc
(incorporated in England).
The group entered into transactions with its fellow subsidiaries in the normal course of business, including the acceptance and placement
of interbank deposits, correspondent banking transactions and off-balance sheet transactions. The Bank also acted as agent for the
distribution of retail investment funds for fellow subsidiaries and paid professional fees for services provided by fellow subsidiaries.
The group shared the costs of certain IT projects and also used certain processing services of fellow subsidiaries. These costs are
reported under ‘General and administrative expenses – other administrative expenses in the income statement.
The aggregate amount of income and expenses arising from these transactions during the year and the balances of amounts due to and
from the relevant parties at the year end were as follows:
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
124
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
2022
2021
Immediate
holding company
Ultimate holding
company
Fellow
subsidiaries
Immediate
holding company
Ultimate holding
company
Fellow
subsidiaries
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Income and expenses for the year
Interest income
—
50
1,276
—
—
220
Interest expense1
8,364
33
1,216
6,773
(651)
(286)
Fee income
—
17
2,246
—
—
2,538
Fee expense
—
8
1,739
—
1
1,428
Net income/(losses) from financial instruments held
for trading or managed on a fair value basis
1,106
—
(374)
—
1
(19)
Net insurance premium income
—
—
238
—
—
249
Other operating income
—
120
1,913
—
129
1,770
Net insurance claims and benefits paid and
movement in liabilities to policyholders
—
—
(204)
—
—
(179)
General and administrative expenses2
—
67
49,891
—
(141)
47,842
At 31 Dec
Assets
24
3,403
305,321
9
1,147
260,256
–  trading assets3,7
—
33
2,300
—
22
4,232
–  derivative assets
—
2
168,200
—
989
147,704
–  other assets3,6,8
24
3,368
134,821
9
136
108,320
Liabilities
256,031
3,804
293,021
223,565
1,069
283,630
–  trading liabilities3,9
—
—
55
—
—
25
–  financial liabilities designated at fair value3,4
183,760
—
6
175,655
—
7
–  derivative liabilities
—
3,677
150,474
—
18
152,013
–  other liabilities3,6,10
1,842
64
142,486
1,388
980
131,585
–  subordinated liabilities3,5,6
70,429
63
—
46,522
71
—
Guarantees
—
—
23,289
—
—
22,815
Commitments
—
—
1,405
—
—
2,076
1The amount includes interest expenses on debt instruments issued by the group for funding purposes that are designated under the fair value
option to reduce an accounting mismatch, and interest expenses/(income) on derivatives managed in conjunction with those debt instruments.
2This includes reimbursement of amount from ultimate holding company in accordance to the billing arrangement of the Group.
3These balances are presented under ‘Amounts due from/to Group companies’ in the consolidated balance sheet.
4The balance at 31 December 2022 included capital and loss-absorbing capacity ('LAC') instruments of HK$183,760m (2021: HK$175,655m).
During the year, there were repayment of HK$21,512m (2021: HK$4,437) and issuance of HK$51,579m (2021: HK$54,460m). The carrying
amount of financial liabilities designated at fair value was HK$13,593m lower than the contractual amount at maturity (2021: HK$7,211m higher).
The cumulative gain in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was HK$3,456m (2021: HK$1,815m loss). The balances are under Level 2.
5The balance at 31 December 2022 included subordinated liabilities of HK$70,429m to meet TLAC requirements (2021: HK$46,522m). During the
year, there were no repayment (2021: HK$19,665m) and issuance of HK$29,435m (2021: HK$3,304m).
6The fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities at amortised cost are under level 2 and the fair value has no material difference with carrying value.
7Includes trading reverse repo agreements and other similar secured lending of HK$2,284m (2021: HK$4,212m).
8 Includes non-trading reverse repo agreements and other similar secured lending of HK$37,857m (2021: HK$14,149m).
9Includes trading repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending of HK$55m (2021: HK$25m).
10Includes non-trading repurchase agreements and other similar secured lending of HK$59,520m (2021: HK$65,516m).
The above outstanding balances arose in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and security, as for comparable transactions with third-party counterparties.
(b)Share option and share award schemes
The group participates in various share option and share plans operated by HSBC whereby share options or shares of HSBC are granted
to employees of the group. The group recognises an expense in respect of these share options and share awards. The cost borne by the
ultimate holding company in respect of share options is treated as a capital contribution and is recorded within ‘Other reserves’. In
respect of share awards, the group recognises a liability to the ultimate holding company over the vesting period. This liability is
measured at the fair value of the shares at each reporting date, with changes since the award dates adjusted through the capital
contribution account within ‘Other reserves’. The balances of the capital contribution and the liability at 31 December 2022 amounted to
HK$3,299m and HK$1,564m respectively (2021: HK$3,436m and HK$1,431m respectively).
(c)Post-employment benefit plans
At 31 December 2022, HK$7.7bn (2021: HK$9.2bn) of the group’s post-employment plan assets were under management by group
companies, earning management fees of HK$59m in 2022 (2021: HK$65m). At 31 December 2022, the group’s post-employment benefit
plans had placed deposits of HK$735m (2021: HK$783m) with its banking subsidiaries, earning interest payable to the schemes of
HK$1.1m (2021: HK$0.5m). The above outstanding balances arose from the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same
terms, including interest rates and security, as comparable transactions with third-party counterparties.
(d)Associates and joint ventures
The group provides certain banking and financial services to associates and joint ventures, including loans, overdrafts, interest and non-
interest bearing deposits and current accounts. Details of interests in associates and joint ventures are set out in Note 14.
The disclosure of the year-end balance and the highest amounts outstanding during the year is considered to be the most meaningful
information to represent the amount of transactions and outstanding balances during the year.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
125
Transactions and balances during the year with associates and joint ventures
2022
2021
Highest balance
during the year
Balance at
31 December
Highest balance
during the year
Balance at
31 December
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Amounts due from associates – unsubordinated1
57,513
51,402
35,643
32,632
Amounts due to associates1
19,862
10,099
27,237
8,786
Amounts due to joint ventures
40
16
—
—
Fair value of derivative assets with associates2
9,394
6,559
7,299
3,644
Fair value of derivative liabilities with associates2
33,673
28,440
5,424
4,450
Guarantees and Commitments2
1,769
287
4,897
1,654
1  Comparatives have been re-presented to incorporate certain balances previously not included.
2  With effect from 31 Dec 2022, derivatives assets and liabilities and guarantees provided are included in the disclosure. Comparatives have been
re-presented to conform to the current year’s presentation.
The above outstanding balances arose in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and security, as comparable transactions with third‑party counterparties.
(e)Key Management Personnel
Key Management Personnel are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the
activities of the Bank and the group. It includes members of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the Bank and the Board
of Directors and Group Executive Committee members of HSBC Holdings plc.
Compensation of Key Management Personnel
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Salaries and other short-term benefits
320
314
Post employment benefits
12
9
Termination benefits
2
5
Share-based payments
87
123
Total
421
451
Transactions, arrangements and agreements involving Key Management Personnel
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
During the year
Highest average assets1
97,366
107,317
Highest average liabilities1
81,323
71,516
Contribution to group‘s profit before tax
1,858
1,510
At the year end
Guarantees
12,007
13,263
Commitments
12,186
13,624
1The disclosure of the highest average balance during the year is considered the most meaningful information to represent transactions during the
year.
Transactions, arrangements and agreements are entered into by the group with companies that may be controlled by Key Management
Personnel of the group and their immediate relatives. These transactions are primarily loans and deposits, and were entered into in the
ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and security, as comparable transactions with
persons or companies of a similar standing or, where applicable, with other employees. The transactions did not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavourable features. Change in expected credit losses recognised for the year, and expected
credit loss allowances against balances outstanding at the end of the year, in respect of Key Management Personnel were insignificant
(2021: insignificant).
On 8 October 2019, the group acted as Joint Global Co-ordinator and Underwriter on aggregated EUR4.25bn and GBP800m Senior Note
issuances for CK Hutchison Group Telecom Finance S.A. in 6 tranches, with tenors of 4 to 15 years and coupon rates of 0.375% to
2.625%. CK Hutchison Group Telecom Finance S.A. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an associated body corporate (CK Hutchison
Holdings Limited) of Mr Victor Li, a non-executive Director of the Bank.
(f)Loans to directors
Directors are defined as the Directors of the Bank, its ultimate holding company, HSBC Holdings plc and intermediate holding
companies. Loans to directors also include loans to companies that are controlled by, and entities that are connected with these
directors. Particulars of loans to directors disclosed pursuant to section 17 of the Companies (Disclosure of Information about Benefits of
Directors) Regulation are as follows:
Aggregate amount outstanding at
31 Dec
Maximum aggregate amount
outstanding during the year
2022
2021
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
By the Bank
1,483
3,755
2,769
3,967
By subsidiaries
12
13
14
14
1,495
3,768
2,783
3,981
These amounts include principal and interest, and the maximum liability that may be incurred under guarantees.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
126
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
33
Fair values of financial instruments carried at fair value
Control framework
Fair values are subject to a control framework designed to ensure that they are either determined, or validated, by a function independent
of the risk taker.
Where fair values are determined by reference to externally quoted prices or observable pricing inputs to models, independent price
determination or validation is utilised. For inactive markets, the group sources alternative market information, with greater weight given
to information that is considered to be more relevant and reliable. Examples of the factors considered are price observability, instrument
comparability, consistency of data sources, underlying data accuracy and timing of prices.
Fair value of investment funds are sourced from the underlying fund managers which are based upon an assessment of the underlying
investees’ financial positions, results, risk profile and prospects.
For fair values determined using valuation models, the control framework includes development or validation by independent support
functions of the model logic, inputs, model outputs and adjustments. Valuation models are subject to a process of due diligence before
becoming operational and are calibrated against external market data on an ongoing basis.
Changes in fair value are generally subject to a profit and loss analysis process and are disaggregated into high-level categories including
portfolio changes, market movements and other fair value adjustments.
The majority of financial instruments measured at fair value are in MSS and Insurance. The group's fair value governance structure
comprises its Finance function and Valuation Committees. Finance is responsible for establishing procedures governing valuation and
ensuring fair values are in compliance with accounting standards. The fair values are reviewed by the group's relevant Valuation
Committees, which consist of independent support functions and consider all material subjective valuations. Within MSS and Insurance,
these Committees are overseen by the Group's Valuation Committee Review Group and the Group Insurance Valuation and Impairment
Committee respectively.
Financial liabilities measured at fair value
In certain circumstances, the group records its own debt in issue at fair value, based on quoted prices in an active market for the specific
instrument. When quoted market prices are unavailable, the own debt in issue is valued using valuation techniques, the inputs for which
are either based on quoted prices in an inactive market for the instrument or are estimated by comparison with quoted prices in an active
market for similar instruments. In both cases, the fair value includes the effect of applying the credit spread which is appropriate to the
group's liabilities. The change in fair value of issued debt securities attributable to the group’s own credit spread is computed as follows:
for each security at each reporting date, an externally verifiable price is obtained or a price is derived using credit spreads for similar
securities for the same issuer. Then, using discounted cash flow, each security is valued using a Libor-based discount curve. The
difference in the valuations is attributable to the group’s own credit spread. This methodology is applied consistently across all securities.
Structured notes issued and certain other hybrid instruments are included within ‘Financial liabilities designated at fair value’ and are
measured at fair value. The credit spread applied to these instruments is derived from the spreads at which the group issues structured
notes.
Gains and losses arising from changes in the credit spread of liabilities issued by the group, recorded in other comprehensive income,
reverse over the contractual life of the debt, provided that the debt is not repaid at a premium or a discount.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
127
Fair value hierarchy
Fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined according to the following hierarchy:
•Level 1 – valuation technique using quoted market price. These are financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments
in active markets that the group can access at the measurement date.
•Level 2 – valuation technique using observable inputs. These are financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models
where all significant inputs are observable.
•Level 3 – valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs. These are financial instruments valued using valuation techniques
where one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
Financial instruments carried at fair value and bases of valuation
Fair Value Hierarchy
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Third-party
total
Inter-
company2
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Assets
Trading assets1
486,547
203,975
9,283
699,805
—
699,805
Derivatives
1,018
330,250
3,301
334,569
168,202
502,771
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss
100,917
34,139
91,395
226,451
—
226,451
Financial investments
962,261
280,083
4,308
1,246,652
—
1,246,652
Liabilities
Trading liabilities1
74,201
68,246
6
142,453
—
142,453
Derivatives
2,425
393,457
1,712
397,594
154,151
551,745
Financial liabilities designated at fair value1
—
133,009
34,734
167,743
—
167,743
At 31 Dec 2021
Assets
Trading assets1
537,816
236,388
3,246
777,450
—
777,450
Derivatives
440
212,740
3,294
216,474
148,693
365,167
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily
measured at fair value through profit or loss
93,544
34,203
74,652
202,399
—
202,399
Financial investments
1,153,521
391,816
3,674
1,549,011
—
1,549,011
Liabilities
Trading liabilities1
73,647
19,076
—
92,723
—
92,723
Derivatives
963
200,667
2,130
203,760
152,031
355,791
Financial liabilities designated at fair value1
—
118,516
20,449
138,965
—
138,965
1Amounts with HSBC Group entities are not reflected here.
2Derivatives balances with HSBC Group entities are largely under ‘Level 2’.
Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair values
Assets
Liabilities
Financial
investments
Trading
assets
Designated
and otherwise
mandatorily
measured at
fair value
Derivatives
Trading
liabilities
Designated at
fair value
Derivatives
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Transfers from Level 1 to Level 2
29,781
23,312
5,825
—
132
—
—
Transfers from Level 2 to Level 1
60,104
36,025
9,493
—
1,443
—
—
At 31 Dec 2021
Transfers from Level 1 to Level 2
57,471
29,852
1,970
802
1,012
—
1,652
Transfers from Level 2 to Level 1
36,073
20,948
1,679
—
3,452
—
—
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to occur at the end of each quarter. Transfers into and out of levels of the
fair value hierarchy are primarily attributable to changes in observability of valuation inputs and price transparency.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
128
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Fair value adjustments
We adopt the use of fair value adjustments when we take into consideration additional factors not incorporated within the valuation
model that would otherwise be considered by a market participant. We classify fair value adjustments as either ‘risk-related’ or ‘model-
related’. The majority of these adjustments relate to MSS. Movements in the level of fair value adjustments do not necessarily result in
the recognition of profits or losses within the income statement. For example, as models are enhanced, fair value adjustments may no
longer be required. Similarly, fair value adjustments will decrease when the related positions are unwound, but this may not result in
profit or loss.
Bid-offer
HKFRS 13 requires use of the price within the bid-offer spread that is most representative of fair value. Valuation models will typically
generate mid-market values. The bid-offer adjustment reflects the extent to which bid-offer costs would be incurred if substantially all
residual net portfolio market risks were closed using available hedging instruments or by disposing of, or unwinding the position.
Uncertainty
Certain model inputs may be less readily determinable from market data, and/or the choice of model itself may be more subjective. In
these circumstances, an adjustment may be necessary to reflect the likelihood that market participants would adopt more conservative
values for uncertain parameters and/or model assumptions, than those used in the group’s valuation model.
Credit valuation adjustment (‘CVA’) and debit valuation adjustment (‘DVA’)
The CVA is an adjustment to the valuation of over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivative contracts to reflect the possibility that the counterparty
may default and the group may not receive the full market value of the transactions.
The DVA is an adjustment to the valuation of OTC derivative contracts to reflect the possibility that the group may default, and that the
group may not pay the full market value of the transactions.
The group calculates a separate CVA and DVA for each legal entity, and for each counterparty to which the entity has exposure. With the
exception of central clearing parties, all third-party counterparties are included in the CVA and DVA calculations, and these adjustments
are not netted across group entities.
The group calculates the CVA by applying the probability of default (‘PD’) of the counterparty, conditional on the non-default of the
group, to the group’s expected positive exposure to the counterparty and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the event of
default. Conversely, the group calculates the DVA by applying the PD of the group, conditional on the non-default of the counterparty, to
the expected positive exposure of the counterparty to the group and multiplying the result by the loss expected in the event of default.
Both calculations are performed over the life of the potential exposure.
For most products the group uses a simulation methodology, which incorporates a range of potential exposures over the life of the
portfolio, to calculate the expected positive exposure to a counterparty. The simulation methodology includes credit mitigants, such as
counterparty netting agreements and collateral agreements with the counterparty.
The methodologies do not, in general, account for ‘wrong-way risk’. Wrong-way risk is an adverse correlation between the counterparty’s
probability of default and the mark-to-market value of the underlying transaction. The risk can either be general, perhaps related to the
currency of the issuer country, or specific to the transaction concerned. When there is significant wrong-way risk, a trade-specific
approach is applied to reflect this risk in the valuation.
Funding fair value adjustment (‘FFVA’)
The FFVA is calculated by applying future market funding spreads to the expected future funding exposure of any uncollateralised
component of the OTC derivative portfolio. The expected future funding exposure is calculated by a simulation methodology, where
available and is adjusted for events that may terminate the exposure, such as the default of the group or the counterparty. The FFVA and
DVA are calculated independently.
Model limitation
Models used for portfolio valuation purposes may be based upon a simplifying set of assumptions that do not capture all current and
future material market characteristics. In these circumstances, model limitation adjustments are adopted.
Inception profit (Day 1 profit or loss reserves)
Inception profit adjustments are adopted when the fair value estimated by a valuation model is based on one or more significant
unobservable inputs.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
129
Fair value valuation bases
Financial instruments measured at fair value using a valuation technique with significant unobservable inputs – Level 3
Assets
Liabilities
Financial
investments
Trading
assets
Designated
and
otherwise
mandatorily
measured at
fair value
through
profit or
loss
Derivatives
Total
Trading
liabilities
Designated
at fair value
Derivatives
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Private equity and related
investments
3,742
16
90,767
—
94,525
6
—
—
6
Structured notes
—
—
—
—
—
—
34,734
—
34,734
Others
566
9,267
628
3,301
13,762
—
—
1,712
1,712
At 31 Dec 2022
4,308
9,283
91,395
3,301
108,287
6
34,734
1,712
36,452
Private equity and related
investments
3,121
4
74,295
—
77,420
—
—
—
—
Structured notes
—
—
—
—
—
—
20,449
—
20,449
Others
553
3,242
357
3,294
7,446
—
—
2,130
2,130
At 31 Dec 2021
3,674
3,246
74,652
3,294
84,866
—
20,449
2,130
22,579
Private equity and related investments
The fair value of a private equity investment (including private equity, infrastructure and private credit, primarily held to support our
Insurance business, and strategic investments) is estimated on the basis of an analysis of the investee’s financial position and results, risk
profile, prospects and other factors; by reference to market valuations for similar entities quoted in an active market; the price at which
similar companies have changed ownership; or from published net asset values (‘NAVs’) received. If necessary, adjustments are made to
the NAV of funds to obtain the best estimate of fair value.
Structured notes
The fair value of Level 3 structured notes is derived from the fair value of the underlying debt security, and the fair value of the embedded
derivative is determined as described in the paragraph below on derivatives. These structured notes comprise principally equity-linked
notes issued by HSBC, which provide the counterparty with a return linked to the performance of equity securities and other portfolios.
Examples of the unobservable parameters include long-dated equity volatilities and correlations between equity prices, and interest and
foreign exchange rates.
Derivatives
OTC derivative valuation models calculate the present value of expected future cash flows, based upon ‘no arbitrage’ principles. For
many vanilla derivative products, the modelling approaches used are standard across the industry. For more complex derivative products,
there may be some differences in market practice. Inputs to valuation models are determined from observable market data wherever
possible, including prices available from exchanges, dealers, brokers or providers of consensus pricing. Certain inputs may not be
observable in the market directly, but can be determined from observable prices via model calibration procedures or estimated from
historical data or other sources.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
130
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Reconciliation of fair value measurements in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy
Movement in Level 3 financial instruments
Assets
Liabilities
Financial
investments
Trading
assets
Designated
and otherwise
mandatorily
measured at
fair value
through profit
or loss
Derivatives
Trading
liabilities
Designated
at fair value1
Derivatives
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2022
3,674
3,246
74,652
3,294
—
20,449
2,130
Total gains/(losses) recognised in profit or loss
—
(952)
1,545
669
3
(851)
214
–  net income/(losses) from financial instruments held for
trading or managed on a fair value basis
—
(952)
—
669
3
—
214
–  changes in fair value of other financial instruments
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
—
—
1,545
—
—
(851)
—
–  gains less losses from financial investments at fair value
through other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total gains recognised in other comprehensive income (‘OCI’)
676
(81)
(37)
(25)
—
(1,001)
(83)
–  financial investments: fair value gains/(losses)
812
—
—
—
—
(5)
—
–  exchange differences
(136)
(81)
(37)
(25)
—
(996)
(83)
Purchases
1,670
6,480
28,304
—
—
—
—
New issuances
—
—
—
—
—
5,936
—
Sales
(71)
(644)
(71)
—
—
—
—
Settlements
(1,641)
(4,742)
(12,809)
(557)
—
12,130
(553)
Transfers out
—
(772)
(289)
(394)
—
(2,671)
(190)
Transfers in
—
6,748
100
314
3
742
194
At 31 Dec 2022
4,308
9,283
91,395
3,301
6
34,734
1,712
Unrealised gains/(losses) recognised in profit or loss relating
to assets and liabilities held at 31 Dec 2022
—
(734)
(1,615)
2,631
—
(19)
(78)
–  net income/(losses) from financial instruments held for
trading or managed on a fair value basis
—
(734)
—
2,631
—
—
(78)
–  changes in fair value of other financial instruments
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
—
—
(1,615)
—
—
(19)
—
At 1 Jan 2021
6,635
1,237
49,534
1,028
—
20,484
3,538
Total gains/(losses) recognised in profit or loss
(7)
(2,211)
11,700
4,002
—
(3,207)
3,082
–  net income/(losses) from financial instruments held for
trading or managed on a fair value basis
—
(2,211)
—
4,002
—
—
3,082
–  changes in fair value of other financial instruments
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
—
—
11,700
—
—
(3,207)
—
–  gains less losses from financial investments at fair value
through other comprehensive income
(7)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total gains/(losses) recognised in other comprehensive
income (‘OCI’)
(3,013)
10
11
18
—
386
23
–  financial investments: fair value (losses)
(3,002)
—
—
—
—
(3)
—
–  exchange differences
(11)
10
11
18
—
389
23
Purchases
1,383
5,082
22,232
—
—
—
—
New issuances
—
—
—
—
—
9,196
—
Sales
(35)
(561)
(6)
—
—
—
—
Settlements
(1,289)
(87)
(7,898)
(1,247)
—
(7,165)
(4,060)
Transfers out
—
(691)
(921)
(614)
—
(2,895)
(878)
Transfers in
—
467
—
107
—
3,650
425
At 31 Dec 2021
3,674
3,246
74,652
3,294
—
20,449
2,130
Unrealised gains/(losses) recognised in profit or loss relating
to assets and liabilities held at 31 Dec 2021
—
(2,278)
11,236
2,686
—
113
(34)
–  net income/(losses) from financial instruments held for
trading or managed on a fair value basis
—
(2,278)
—
2,686
—
—
(34)
–  changes in fair value of other financial instruments
mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
—
—
11,236
—
—
113
—
1Includes structured deposits where the settlement balance represents the net of matured and new deposits.
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to occur at the end of each quarter. Transfers into and out of levels of the
fair value hierarchy are primarily attributable to observability of valuation inputs and price transparency.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
131
Effect of changes in significant unobservable assumptions to reasonably possible alternatives
Sensitivity of fair values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions
2022
2021
Reflected in profit or loss
Reflected in OCI
Reflected in profit or loss
Reflected in OCI
Favourable
changes
Un-
favourable
changes
Favourable
changes
Un-
favourable
changes
Favourable
changes
Un-
favourable
changes
Favourable
changes
Un-
favourable
changes
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Derivatives, trading assets and trading
liabilities1
242
(308)
—
—
158
(162)
—
—
Financial assets and liabilities designated and
otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value
through profit or loss
4,580
(4,580)
—
—
3,741
(3,742)
—
—
Financial investments
—
—
187
(187)
—
—
157
(157)
At 31 Dec
4,822
(4,888)
187
(187)
3,899
(3,904)
157
(157)
1  ‘Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities’ are presented as one category to reflect the manner in which these instruments are risk-
managed.
The sensitivity analysis aims to measure a range of fair values consistent with the application of a 95% confidence interval.
Methodologies take account of the nature of the valuation technique employed, as well as the availability and reliability of observable
proxy and historical data.
When the fair value of a financial instrument is affected by more than one unobservable assumption, the above table reflects the most
favourable or the most unfavourable change from varying the assumptions individually.
Key unobservable inputs to Level 3 financial instruments
The following table lists key unobservable inputs to Level 3 financial instruments and provides the range of those inputs at 31 December
2022.
Quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs in Level 3 valuations
Fair value
2022
2021
Assets
Liabilities
Valuation
techniques
Key unobservable
inputs
Full range
of inputs
Full range
of inputs
HK$m
HK$m
Lower
Higher
Lower
Higher
Private equity and related investments
94,525
6
See below
See below
Structured notes
—
34,734
–  equity-linked notes
—
12,917
Model – Option model
Equity volatility
6%
142%
6%
90%
Model – Option model
Equity correlation
38%
98%
22%
97%
–  FX-linked notes
—
20,972
Model – Option model
FX volatility
4%
37%
2%
36%
–  other
—
845
Others1
13,762
1,712
At 31 Dec 2022
108,287
36,452
1‘Others’ includes a range of smaller asset holdings.
Private equity and related investments
Given the bespoke nature of the analysis in respect of each holding, it is not practical to quote a range of key unobservable inputs. The
key unobservable inputs would be price and correlation. The valuation approach includes using a range of inputs that include company
specific financials, traded comparable companies multiples, published net asset values and qualitative assumptions, which are not
directly comparable or quantifiable.
Volatility
Volatility is a measure of the anticipated future variability of a market price. It varies by underlying reference market price, and by strike
and maturity of the option. Certain volatilities, typically those of a longer-dated nature, are unobservable and are estimated from
observable data. The range of unobservable volatilities reflects the wide variation in volatility inputs by reference market price.
Correlation
Correlation is a measure of the inter-relationship between two market prices and is expressed as a number between minus one and one.
It is used to value more complex instruments where the payout is dependent upon more than one market price. There is a wide range of
instruments for which correlation is an input, and consequently a wide range of both same-asset correlations and cross-asset correlations
is used. In general, the range of same-asset correlations will be narrower than the range of cross-asset correlations.
Unobservable correlations may be estimated based upon a range of evidence, including consensus pricing services, group's trade prices,
proxy correlations and examination of historical price relationships. The range of unobservable correlations quoted in the table reflects
the wide variation in correlation inputs by market price pair.
Inter-relationships between key unobservable inputs
Key unobservable inputs to Level 3 financial instruments may not be independent of each other. As described above, market variables
may be correlated. This correlation typically reflects the manner in which different markets tend to react to macroeconomic or other
events. Furthermore, the effect of changing market variables on the group's portfolio will depend on the group’s net risk position in
respect of each variable.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
132
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
34
Fair values of financial instruments not carried at fair value
Fair values of financial instruments not carried at fair value and bases of valuation
Fair Value Hierarchy
Carrying
amount
Quoted
market price
Level 1
Observable
inputs
Level 2
Significant
unobservable
inputs
Level 3
Total
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 31 Dec 2022
Assets1
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
927,976
—
927,190
—
927,190
Loans and advances to banks
519,024
—
514,524
4,452
518,976
Loans and advances to customers
3,705,149
—
56,130
3,628,504
3,684,634
Financial investments – at amortised cost
974,709
455,444
448,341
1,960
905,745
Liabilities1
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
351,093
—
349,133
—
349,133
Deposits by banks
198,908
—
198,905
—
198,905
Customer accounts
6,113,709
—
6,114,290
—
6,114,290
Debt securities in issue
100,909
—
101,414
—
101,414
Subordinated liabilities
3,119
—
2,191
—
2,191
At 31 Dec 2021
Assets1
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
803,775
—
802,881
947
803,828
Loans and advances to banks
432,247
—
424,175
8,356
432,531
Loans and advances to customers
3,840,939
—
65,268
3,765,148
3,830,416
Financial investments – at amortised cost
502,564
89,050
449,284
2,142
540,476
Liabilities1
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
255,374
—
255,366
—
255,366
Deposits by banks
280,310
—
280,408
—
280,408
Customer accounts
6,177,182
—
6,177,676
—
6,177,676
Debt securities in issue
67,364
—
67,842
—
67,842
Subordinated liabilities
4,054
—
3,864
—
3,864
1  Amounts with HSBC Group entities are not reflected here. Further details are set out in Note 32.
The fair values above are stated at a specific date and may be significantly different from the amounts which will actually be paid on the
maturity or settlement dates of the instruments. In many cases, it would not be possible to realise immediately the estimated fair values
given the size of the portfolios measured. Accordingly, these fair values do not represent the value of these financial instruments to the
group as a going concern.
Other financial instruments not carried at fair value are typically short term in nature or re-priced to current market rates frequently.
Accordingly, their carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value. They include cash and balances at central banks, items in
the course of collection from and transmission to other banks, Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness, Hong Kong currency
notes in circulation, other financial assets and other financial liabilities, all of which are measured at amortised cost.
Valuation
Fair value is an estimate of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. It does not reflect the economic benefits and costs that the group expects to flow from an
instrument’s cash flow over its expected future life. Our valuation methodologies and assumptions in determining fair values for which no
observable market prices are available may differ from those of other companies.
Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
Fair values approximate carrying amounts as these balances are generally short dated.
Loans and advances to banks and customers
To determine the fair value of loans and advances to banks and customers, loans are segregated, as far as possible, into portfolios of
similar characteristics. Fair values are based on observable market transactions, when available. When they are unavailable, fair values
are estimated using valuation models incorporating a range of input assumptions. These assumptions may include: value estimates from
third-party brokers reflecting over-the-counter trading activity; forward-looking discounted cash flow models, taking account of expected
customer prepayment rates, using assumptions that the group believes are consistent with those that would be used by market
participants in valuing such loans; new business rates estimates for similar loans; and trading inputs from other market participants
including observed primary and secondary trades. From time to time, we may engage a third-party valuation specialist to measure the
fair value of a pool of loans.
The fair value of loans reflects expected credit losses at the balance sheet date and estimates of market participants’ expectations of
credit losses over the life of the loans, and the fair value effect of repricing between origination and the balance sheet date. For credit
impaired loans, fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows over the time period they are expected to be recovered.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
133
Financial investments
The fair values of listed financial investments are determined using bid market prices. The fair values of unlisted financial investments are
determined using valuation techniques that incorporate the prices and future earnings streams of equivalent quoted securities.
Deposits by banks and customer accounts
The fair values of on-demand deposits are approximated by their carrying value. For deposits with longer-term maturities, fair values are
estimated using discounted cash flows, applying current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities
Fair values are determined using quoted market prices at the balance sheet date where available, or by reference to quoted market prices
for similar instruments.
35
Structured entities
The group is involved with both consolidated and unconsolidated structured entities through the securitisation of financial assets,
conduits and investment funds, established either by the group or a third party.
Consolidated structured entities
The group uses consolidated structured entities to securitise customer loans and advances it originates to diversify its sources of funding
for asset origination and capital efficiency purposes. The loans and advances are transferred by the group to the structured entities for
cash or synthetically through credit default swaps, and the structured entities issue debt securities to investors. The group's transactions
with these entities are not significant.
Unconsolidated structured entities
The term ‘unconsolidated structured entities’ refers to all structured entities not controlled by the group. The group enters into
transactions with unconsolidated structured entities in the normal course of business to facilitate customer transactions and for specific
investment opportunities.
Nature and risks associated with the group’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities
Securitisations
HSBC
managed funds
Non-HSBC
managed funds
Other
Total
Total asset values of the entities (HK$bn)
0–4
55
92
271
27
445
4–15
7
42
173
—
222
15–39
—
12
98
—
110
39–196
—
3
59
—
62
196+
—
1
11
—
12
Number of entities at 31 Dec 2022
62
150
612
27
851
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Total assets in relation to the group's interests in the unconsolidated
structured entities
17,564
34,071
109,351
5,245
166,231
–  trading assets
—
2,527
—
82
2,609
–  financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair
value through profit or loss
—
31,544
109,351
—
140,895
–  derivatives
—
—
—
10
10
–  loans and advances to customers
17,564
—
—
5,070
22,634
–  other assets
—
—
—
83
83
Total liabilities in relation to the group's interests in the unconsolidated
structured entities
—
—
—
223
223
–  derivatives
—
—
—
223
223
Other off balance sheet commitments
1,395
11,753
30,862
11,342
55,352
The group’s maximum exposure at 31 Dec 2022
18,959
45,824
140,213
16,364
221,360
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
134
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Nature and risks associated with the group’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities (continued)
Securitisations
HSBC
managed funds
Non-HSBC
managed funds
Other
Total
Total asset values of the entities (HK$bn)
0–4
65
65
114
21
265
4–15
11
37
130
—
178
15–39
—
15
91
—
106
39–196
—
1
50
—
51
196+
—
1
3
—
4
Number of entities at 31 Dec 2021
76
119
388
21
604
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
Total assets in relation to the group's interests in the unconsolidated
structured entities
35,225
32,223
86,044
10,140
163,632
–  trading assets
—
1,041
—
432
1,473
–  financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair
value through profit or loss
—
31,182
86,044
—
117,226
–  derivatives
—
—
—
—
—
–  loans and advances to customers
35,225
—
—
9,625
44,850
–  other assets
—
—
—
83
83
Total liabilities in relation to the group's interests in the unconsolidated
structured entities
—
—
—
60
60
–  derivatives
—
—
—
60
60
Other off balance sheet commitments
402
6,999
26,246
5,939
39,586
The group's maximum exposure at 31 Dec 2021
35,627
39,222
112,290
16,019
203,158
The maximum exposure to loss from the group’s interests in unconsolidated structured entities represents the maximum loss it could
incur as a result of its involvement with these entities regardless of the probability of the loss being incurred.
•For commitments, guarantees and written credit default swaps, the maximum exposure to loss is the notional amount of potential
future losses.
•For retained and purchased investments in and loans to unconsolidated structured entities, the maximum exposure to loss is the
carrying value of these interests at the balance sheet reporting date.
The maximum exposure to loss is stated gross of the effects of hedging and collateral arrangements entered into to mitigate the group’s
exposure to loss.
Securitisations
The group has interests in unconsolidated securitisation vehicles through holding notes issued by these entities.
HSBC managed funds
The group establishes and manages money market funds and non-money market investment funds to provide customers with
investment opportunities. The group, as fund manager, may be entitled to receive management and performance fees based on the
assets under management. The group may also retain units in these funds.
Non-HSBC managed funds
The group purchases and holds units of third-party managed funds in order to facilitate business and meet customer needs.
Other
The group has established structured entities in the normal course of business, such as structured credit transactions for customers, to
provide finance to public and private sector infrastructure projects, and for asset and structured finance transactions. In addition to the
interest disclosed above, the group enters into derivative contracts, reverse repos and stock borrowing transactions with structured
entities. These interests arise in the normal course of business for the facilitation of third-party transactions and risk management
solutions.
Structured entities sponsored by the group
The amount of assets transferred to and income received from such sponsored entities during 2022 and 2021 were not significant.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
135
36
Bank balance sheet and statement of changes in equity
Bank balance sheet at 31 December 2022
2022
2021
HK$m
HK$m
Assets
Cash and balances at central banks
169,595
203,988
Items in the course of collection from other banks
22,886
17,825
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness
341,354
332,044
Trading assets
587,760
647,625
Derivatives
481,979
346,937
Financial assets designated and otherwise mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss
5,431
3,246
Reverse repurchase agreements – non-trading
468,799
488,312
Loans and advances to banks
298,225
230,592
Loans and advances to customers
1,951,155
1,984,297
Financial investments
947,830
893,848
Amounts due from Group companies
720,765
544,587
Investments in subsidiaries
109,211
101,535
Interests in associates and joint ventures
39,830
39,830
Goodwill and intangible assets
23,659
19,226
Property, plant and equipment
71,555
72,312
Deferred tax assets
1,304
1,275
Prepayments, accrued income and other assets
214,624
145,729
Total assets
6,455,962
6,073,208
Liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
341,354
332,044
Items in the course of transmission to other banks
26,601
19,101
Repurchase agreements – non-trading
307,661
175,476
Deposits by banks
155,423
224,650
Customer accounts
3,740,697
3,816,715
Trading liabilities
95,097
46,585
Derivatives
532,325
337,010
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
49,396
36,397
Debt securities in issue
26,584
25,393
Retirement benefit liabilities
898
1,098
Amounts due to Group companies
563,368
482,995
Accruals and deferred income, other liabilities and provisions
132,141
120,846
Current tax liabilities
3,537
481
Deferred tax liabilities
9,267
9,339
Subordinated liabilities
3,119
3,119
Total liabilities
5,987,468
5,631,249
Equity
Share capital
180,181
172,335
Other equity instruments
52,386
44,615
Other reserves
3,143
19,218
Retained earnings
232,784
205,791
Total equity
468,494
441,959
Total equity and liabilities
6,455,962
6,073,208
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
136
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
Bank statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2022
Other reserves
Share
capital1
Other
equity
instruments
Retained
earnings
Property
revaluation
reserve
Financial
assets at
FVOCI
reserve
Cash
flow
hedge
reserve
Foreign
exchange
reserve
Other3
Total
equity
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
HK$m
At 1 Jan 2022
172,335
44,615
205,791
36,900
1,524
63
(15,369)
(3,900)
441,959
Profit for the year
—
—
54,987
—
—
—
—
—
54,987
Other comprehensive income/(expense) (net
of tax)
—
—
4,600
2,948
(10,829)
(993)
(4,999)
—
(9,273)
–  debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
(11,369)
—
—
—
(11,369)
–  equity instruments designated at fair value
through other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
540
—
—
—
540
–  cash flow hedges
—
—
—
—
—
(993)
—
—
(993)
–  changes in fair value of financial liabilities
designated at fair value upon initial
recognition arising from changes in own
credit risk
—
—
4,432
—
—
—
—
—
4,432
–  property revaluation
—
—
—
2,948
—
—
—
—
2,948
–  remeasurement of defined benefit asset/
liability
—
—
168
—
—
—
—
—
168
–  exchange differences
—
—
—
—
—
—
(4,999)
—
(4,999)
Total comprehensive income/(expense)
for the year
—
—
59,587
2,948
(10,829)
(993)
(4,999)
—
45,714
Shares issued1
7,846
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,846
Other equity instruments issued2
—
7,771
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,771
Dividends to shareholders4
—
—
(34,821)
—
—
—
—
—
(34,821)
Movement in respect of share-based
payment arrangements
—
—
127
—
—
—
—
(127)
—
Transfers and other movements5
—
—
2,100
(2,080)
2
—
—
3
25
At 31 Dec 2022
180,181
52,386
232,784
37,768
(9,303)
(930)
(20,368)
(4,024)
468,494
At 1 Jan 2021
172,335
44,615
221,300
35,196
6,364
605
(12,679)
(3,760)
463,976
Profit for the year
—
—
40,815
—
—
—
—
—
40,815
Other comprehensive income/(expense) (net
of tax)
—
—
912
3,453
(4,834)
(542)
(2,690)
—
(3,701)
–  debt instruments at fair value through
other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
(3,289)
—
—
—
(3,289)
–  equity instruments designated at fair value
through other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
(1,545)
—
—
—
(1,545)
–  cash flow hedges
—
—
—
—
—
(542)
—
—
(542)
–  changes in fair value of financial liabilities
designated at fair value upon initial
recognition arising from changes in own
credit risk
—
—
524
—
—
—
—
—
524
–  property revaluation
—
—
—
3,453
—
—
—
—
3,453
–  remeasurement of defined benefit asset/
liability
—
—
388
—
—
—
—
—
388
–  exchange differences
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,690)
—
(2,690)
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the
year
—
—
41,727
3,453
(4,834)
(542)
(2,690)
—
37,114
Dividends to shareholders4
—
—
(59,105)
—
—
—
—
—
(59,105)
Movement in respect of share-based
payment arrangements
—
—
115
—
—
—
—
(140)
(25)
Transfers and other movements5
—
—
1,754
(1,749)
(6)
—
—
—
(1)
At 31 Dec 2021
172,335
44,615
205,791
36,900
1,524
63
(15,369)
(3,900)
441,959
1Ordinary share capital includes preference shares which have been redeemed or bought back via payments out of distributable profits in previous
years. During 2022, 3,138.4m new ordinary shares were issued at an issue price of HK$2.5 each.
2During 2022, an additional tier 1 capital instrument was issued amounted to US$1,000m on which there were US$10m issue costs.
3The other reserves mainly comprise purchase premium arising from transfer of business from fellow subsidiaries, property revaluation reserve
relating to transfer of properties to a fellow subsidiary and the share-based payment reserve. The share-based payment reserve is used to record
the amount relating to share awards and options granted to employees of the group directly by HSBC Holdings plc.
4Including distributions paid on perpetual subordinated loans classified as equity under HKFRS.
5The movements include transfers from the property revaluation reserve to retained earnings in relation to depreciation of revalued properties.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
137
37
Business acquisitions
The following acquisitions form part of our strategy to become a market leader in Asian wealth management:
•On 28 January 2022, HSBC Insurance (Asia-Pacific) Holdings Limited, a subsidiary of the group, notified the shareholders of Canara
HSBC Life Insurance Company Limited (‘Canara HSBC’) of its intention to increase its shareholding in Canara HSBC up to 49%. The
group currently has a 26% shareholding which is accounted for as an associate. Any increase in shareholding is subject to agreement
with other shareholders in Canara HSBC, as well as internal and regulatory approvals. Established in 2008, Canara HSBC is a life
insurance company based in India.
•On 11 February 2022, HSBC Insurance (Asia-Pacific) Holdings Limited completed the acquisition of 100% of AXA Insurance Pte
Limited ('AXA Singapore') for HK$4.1bn. A gain on acquisition of HK$665m was recorded, reflecting the excess of the fair value of net
assets acquired (gross assets of HK$35.6bn and gross liabilities of HK$30.8bn) over the acquisition price. The legal integration of AXA
Singapore with HSBC’s pre-existing insurance operations in the country concluded on 1 February 2023.
•On 6 April 2022, the Bank announced it had increased its shareholding in HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited, a partially-owned
subsidiary, from 51% to 90%.
•On 23 June 2022, HSBC Insurance (Asia) Limited, a subsidiary of the group, acquired the remaining 50% equity interest in HSBC Life
Insurance Company Limited. Headquartered in Shanghai, HSBC Life Insurance Company Limited offers a comprehensive range of
insurance solutions covering annuity, whole life, critical illness and unit-linked insurance products.
38
Legal proceedings and regulatory matters
The group is party to legal proceedings and regulatory matters in a number of jurisdictions arising out of its normal business operations.
Apart from the matters described below, the group considers that none of these matters are material. The recognition of provisions is
determined in accordance with the accounting policies set out in Note 1.2(n). While the outcomes of legal proceedings and regulatory
matters are inherently uncertain, management believes that, based on the information available to it, appropriate provisions have been
made in respect of these matters as at 31 December 2022. Any provision recognised does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing or
legal liability. It is not practicable to provide an aggregate estimate of potential liability for our legal proceedings and regulatory matters
as a class of contingent liabilities.
Anti-money laundering and sanctions-related matters
In December 2012, HSBC Holdings plc ('HSBC Holdings') entered into a number of agreements, including an undertaking with the UK
Financial Services Authority (replaced with a Direction issued by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’) in 2013 and again in 2020) as
well as a cease-and-desist order with the US Federal Reserve Board (‘FRB’), both of which contained certain forward-looking anti-money
laundering (‘AML’) and sanctions-related obligations. For several years thereafter, HSBC retained a Skilled Person under section 166 of
the Financial Services and Markets Act and an Independent Consultant, under the FRB cease-and-desist order to produce periodic
assessments of the Group’s AML and sanctions compliance programme. The Skilled Person completed its engagement in the second
quarter of 2021, and the FCA determined that no further Skilled Person work is required. Separately, the Independent Consultant's
engagement is now complete and, in August 2022, the FRB terminated its cease-and-desist order.
Singapore Interbank Offered Rate (‘Sibor’) and Singapore Swap Offer Rate (‘SOR’)
In 2016, the Bank and other panel banks were named as defendants in a putative class action filed in the New York District Court on
behalf of persons who transacted in products related to the Sibor and SOR benchmark rates. The complaint alleged, among other things,
misconduct related to these benchmark rates in violation of US antitrust, commodities and racketeering laws, and state law.
In October 2021, the Bank reached a settlement-in-principle with the plaintiffs to resolve this action, the agreement for which was
executed in May 2022. The court granted final approval of the settlement in November 2022.
Other regulatory investigations, reviews and litigation
The Bank and/or certain of its affiliates are subject to a number of other investigations and reviews by various regulators and competition
and law enforcement authorities, as well as litigation, in connection with various matters relating to the firm’s businesses and operations,
including investigations by tax administration, regulatory and law enforcement authorities in India and elsewhere in connection with
allegations of tax evasion or tax fraud, money laundering and unlawful cross-border banking solicitation.
There are many factors that may affect the range of outcomes, and the resulting financial impact, of these matters, which could be
significant.
Notes on the Consolidated Financial Statements
138
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
39
Ultimate holding company
The ultimate holding company of the Bank is HSBC Holdings plc, which is incorporated in England.
The largest group in which the accounts of the Bank are consolidated is that headed by HSBC Holdings plc. The consolidated accounts of
HSBC Holdings plc are available to the public on the HSBC Group’s website at www.hsbc.com or may be obtained from 8 Canada
Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom.
40
Events after the balance sheet date
There have been no events after the balance sheet date that would require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
41
Approval of financial statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 21 February 2023.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
139
Additional cautionary statement regarding ESG
and climate-related data, metrics and forward-
looking statements
The Annual Report and Accounts 2022 contains a number of
forward-looking statements (as defined above) with respect to the
Group’s (including the group’s) ESG targets, commitments,
ambitions, climate-related scenarios or pathways and the
methodologies the Group uses to assess the Group’s progress in
relation to these (“ESG-related forward-looking statements”).
In preparing the ESG-related information contained in the Annual
Report and Accounts 2022, the group has relied on a number of
key judgements, estimations and assumptions of the Group and
the processes and issues involved are complex. The Group has
used ESG and climate data, models and methodologies that it
considers, as of the date on which they were used, to be
appropriate and suitable to understand and assess climate change
risk and its impact, to analyse financed emissions - and
operational and supply chain emissions, to set ESG-related targets
and to evaluate the classification of sustainable finance and
investments. However, these data, models and methodologies are
new, are rapidly evolving and are not of the same standard as
those available in the context of other financial information, nor
are they subject to the same or equivalent disclosure standards,
historical reference points, benchmarks or globally accepted
accounting principles. In particular, it is not possible to rely on
historical data as a strong indicator of future trajectories, in the
case of climate change and its evolution. Outputs of models,
processed data and methodologies are also likely to be affected by
underlying data quality, which can be hard to assess and the
Group expects industry guidance, market practice, and regulations
in this field to continue to change. In light of the highly uncertain
nature of the evolution of climate change and its impact, the
Group (including the group) may have to re-evaluate its progress
towards its ESG ambitions, commitments and targets in the future,
update the methodologies it uses or alter its collective approach to
ESG and climate analysis and may be required to amend, update
and recalculate its ESG disclosures and assessments in the future,
as market practice and data quality and availability develops
rapidly. The ESG-related forward-looking statements and metrics
discussed in the Annual Report and Accounts 2022 therefore carry
an additional degree of inherent risk and uncertainty.
No assurance can be given by or on behalf of the group as to the
likelihood of the achievement or reasonableness of any
projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, commitments,
ambitions, prospects or returns contained herein. Readers are
cautioned that a number of factors, both external and those
specific to the Group (including the group), could cause actual
achievements, results, performance or other future events or
conditions of the group to differ, in some cases materially, from
those stated, implied and/or reflected in any ESG-related forward-
looking statements or metrics due to a variety of risks,
uncertainties and other factors (including without limitation those
referred to below):
•Climate change projection risk: this includes, for example, the
evolution of climate change and its impacts, changes in the
scientific assessment of climate change impacts, transition
pathways and future risk exposure and limitations of climate
scenario forecasts;
•Changes in the ESG regulatory landscape: this involves
changes in government approach and regulatory treatment in
relation to ESG disclosures and reporting requirements, and the
current lack of a single standardised regulatory approach to
ESG across all sectors and markets;
•Variation in reporting standards: ESG reporting standards are
still developing and are not standardised or comparable across
all sectors and markets, new reporting standards in relation to
different ESG metrics are still emerging 
•Data availability, accuracy, verifiability and data gaps: the
Group’s disclosures are limited by the availability of high quality
data needed to calculate financed emissions. Where data is not
available for all sectors or consistently year on year, there may
be an impact to the Group’s data quality scores. Whilst the
Group expects its data quality scores to improve over time, as
companies continue to expand their disclosures to meet
growing regulatory and stakeholder expectations, there may be
unexpected fluctuations within sectors year on year, and/or
differences between the data quality scores between sectors.
Any such changes in the availability and quality of data over
time could result in revisions to reported data going forward,
including on financed emissions, meaning that such data may
not be reconcilable or comparable year-on year;
•Developing methodologies: the methodologies the Group
(including the group) uses to assess financed emissions and set
ESG-related targets may develop over time in line with market
practice, regulation and/or developments in science, where
applicable. Any such developments in methodologies could
result in revisions to reported data going forward, including on
financed emissions meaning that data outputs may not be
reconcilable or comparable year-on year. In addition, climate
scenarios and the models that analyse them have limitations
that are sensitive to key assumptions and parameters, which
are themselves subject to some uncertainty, and cannot fully
capture all of the potential effects of climate, policy and
technology driven outcomes; and
•Risk management capabilities: governments’, customers’, and
the Group’s (including the group’s) actions may not be effective
in supporting the global transition to net zero carbon emissions
and in managing and mitigating ESG risks, including in
particular climate risk, nature-related risks and human rights
risks, each of which can impact the Group (including the group)
both directly and indirectly through its customers, and which
may result in potential financial and non-financial impacts to
the Group (including the group). In particular:
–the Group (including the group) may not be able to achieve
its ESG targets, commitments and ambitions (including with
respect to the commitments set forth in the Group’s thermal
coal phase-out policy, energy policy and targets to reduce
on-balance sheet financed emissions in its portfolio of
selected high-emitting sectors), which may result in its
failure to achieve any of the expected benefits of its
strategic priorities; and
–the Group (including the group) may not be able to develop
sustainable finance and climate-related products consistent
with the evolving expectations of its regulators, and its
capacity to measure the climate impact from its financing
activity may diminish (including as a result of data and
model limitations and changes in methodologies), which
may affect its ability to achieve its climate ambition, its
targets to reduce its on-balance sheet financed emissions in
its portfolio of selected high-emitting sectors and the
commitments set forth in the Group’s thermal coal phase-
out policy and energy policy, and increase the risk of
greenwashing.
The group makes no commitment to revise or update any ESG
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
occurring or existing after the date of any ESG forward-looking
statements. Written and/or oral ESG-related forward-looking
statements may also be made in its periodic reports to its
regulators, public offering or disclosure documents, press releases
and other written materials, and in oral statements made by its
Directors, officers or employees to third parties, including financial
analysts.
The Group’s data dictionaries and methodologies for preparing the
above ESG-related metrics and third-party limited assurance
reports can be found on: www.hsbc.com/who-we-are/esg-and-
responsible-business/esg-reporting-centre.
Additional Information
140
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Annual Report and Accounts 2022
© The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited 2023
Printed by Asia One Printing Limited, Hong Kong, on
Nautilus SuperWhite board and Super White
Recycling paper using vegetable oil-based inks.  Made
in Austria, the stocks comprise 100% de-inked post-
consumer waste.  Pulps used are totally chlorine-free.
The FSC™ recycled label means that the materials
used for this product come from recycled material
certified in accordance with the rules of the Forest
Stewardship Council®.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
HSBC Main Building
1 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong
Telephone: (852) 2822 1111
www.hsbc.com.hk