
AMALA FOODS PLC
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT: YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2022
11
We also agreed to report to the Audit Committee any other differences below that threshold that we believe warranted
reporting on qualitative grounds.
Our approach to the audit
In designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.
In particular we looked at areas involving significant accounting estimates and judgements by the directors and considered
future events that are inherently uncertain, such as the recoverable value of loan receivables and the fair value assigned to
warrants issued in the year. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other
matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due
to fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources
in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of
the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these
matters. In addition to the matter described in the Material uncertainty related to going concern section we have determined
the matters described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
How our scope addressed this matter
Carrying value of loan receivables
During the year the company advanced $125k
(£95k) to the acquisition target Terra Rara UK Ltd,
a company conducting exploration for rare earth
metals in Africa.
There is a risk that the amounts advanced may
not have been classified or correctly accounted
for in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial
Instruments and thus given the significant
carrying value, the financial statements may be
materially misstated.
As the target is an exploration company there is
also risk that the loan receivable may not be fully
recoverable and thus materially overstated.
Additionally, significant judgement is required by
the Directors in assessing whether any expected
credit losses are required to be recognised.
In addition, during the year a loan receivable was
settled via the receipt of shares in the Company
previously held by the borrower. There is a risk
that the settlement of this loan and receipt of the
Company’s own shares has not been accounted
for in accordance with IAS 32 and IFRS 9.
See note 9, 10 & 18 for further details in respect of
these balances and the post-year end termination
of the proposed transaction and note 3.2 for the
judgements made by the directors when
conducting their expected credit loss model
review.
Our work in respect of this risk included, but was not
limited to:
Obtaining the loan agreement with Terra Rara
UK Ltd and reviewing to ascertain the key terms
of the agreement;
Ensuring that that loan receivable has been
correctly classified in accordance with IFRS 9;
Vouching the advance of funds to Terra Rara to
bank statements;
Ensuring that any interest income earned in
respect of both loans has been correctly
accounted for;
Obtain management’s IFRS 9 expected credit
loss model assessment in respect of both loan
receivables. Review and challenge the key
assumptions and judgements made and consider
the accuracy and completeness of any such
charge recognised; and
In relation to the loan with Poppyflower
Investments Ltd, obtaining the settlement
agreement, vouching the receipt of shares and
ensuring that the settlement has been treated in
accordance with IAS 32 and IFRS 9.
The directors assessed at the year-end that the loan
receivable is recoverable in full owing to the fact that
the directors did not identify any events or
developments that took place in the month between
the advancing of funds and 31 March 2022 that
reduced their confidence in the likelihood of full
recovery. In addition, it was noted that repayment of
the loan was not called upon on or prior to 31 March