
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 134
Revenue from contracts with customers, including
cut-off and accrual of revenue and onerous con-
tracts
Revenue from contracts is recognised as the ser-
vices are rendered to the customers. Some con-
tracts require the Group to incur significant tran-
sition and mobilisation costs at contract inception
which are capitalised and amortised over a multi-
annual contract term. Accordingly, appropriate
cut-off and accrual of revenue and capitalisation
and amortisation of transition and mobilisation
costs is critical and involve management judge-
ment, especially in relation to the more inte-
grated and complex facility service contracts. Fur-
ther, the assessment of whether a contract may
be considered onerous involves management
judgement in making accounting estimates about
future contract profitability, including the deter-
mination of the total contract revenue, contract
period and the unavoidable costs of meeting the
obligations under the contract.
Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in the
cut off and accrual of revenue, the assessment of
whether transition and mobilisation costs meet
the criteria to be capitalised and the determina-
tion of the contract period and the future con-
tract profitability, we considered the accounting
for revenue from contracts with customers, in-
cluding cut-off and accrual of revenue and oner-
ous contracts, to be a key audit matter.
For details on revenue from contracts with cus-
tomers, transition and mobilisation costs and
provisions for onerous contracts, reference is
made to notes 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 and 2.5 in the consoli-
dated financial statements.
In response to the identified risks, our audit pro-
cedures included, among others:
• Test on a sample basis of accrued revenue (un-
billed receivables) to supporting documentation,
including procedures such as: Inspection of
proof of work done, review of contracts with
customers, comparison of amounts accrued to
subsequent invoices and cash receipts.
• Test on a sample basis of capitalised transition
and mobilisation costs, including procedures
such as: Inspection of proof of costs incurred,
review of contracts with customers, evaluation
of management’s assessment of costs meeting
the criteria to be recognised.
• Evaluation of management’s process to identify
and quantify onerous contracts. Our evaluation
included inquiries to local management respon-
sible for carrying out the identification process
at country level, review of documentation of
management’s analysis as well as our own ana-
lytical procedures over contract margins.
• Test on a sample of provisions for onerous con-
tracts, including procedures such as: Review of
the relevant contract and management’s esti-
mate of the future contract revenue and una-
voidable cost, assessment of the assumptions
applied by management to estimate the future
contract revenue including termination and ex-
tension options and unavoidable cost, compari-
son of the revenue assumptions used to the ser-
vices and fees specified in the contract, compari-
son of unavoidable cost assumptions used to
underlying cost projections and actual costs in-
curred historically as well as testing the com-
pleteness and accuracy of the underlying cost
projections.
Valuation of investments in and receivables from
subsidiaries
The carrying amounts of goodwill and customer
contracts related to prior years’ business combina-
tions comprise a significant part of the consolidated
statement of financial position. The cash-generating
units in which goodwill and customer contracts are
included are impairment tested by Management on
an annual basis. The impairment tests are based on
Management’s estimates of among others future
profitability, long-term growth and discount rate.
Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in deter-
mining the net present value of future cash flows,
we considered these impairment tests to be a key
audit matter.
For details on the impairment tests performed by
Management reference is made to notes 3.1 and
3.2 in the consolidated financial statements and
note 8 in the parent financial statements.
In response to the identified risks, our audit proce-
dures included, among others, testing the mathe-
matical accuracy of the discounted cash flow model
and comparing forecasted profitability to board ap-
proved financial forecasts. We evaluated the as-
sumptions and methodologies used in the dis-
counted cash flow model, in particular those relat-
ing to the forecasted revenue growth and operating
margin, including comparing with historical growth