
SECTION FOUR
To fulfil its responsibility regarding the independence of the
external auditor, the Audit and Risk Committee reviewed:
• EY’s determination that they would not be independent for
the 2021 audit. As such, the Audit Committee accepted
EY’s resignation and recommended to the Board that
the successful audit firm from the RFP process for the
2022 audit appointment, KPMG Bermuda, be appointed
to perform the 2021 audit;
• the overall extent of non-audit services provided by the
external auditor. Non-audit services were provided in
2021, before EY resigned as the Company’s auditor and
before the RFP process to appoint a new auditor, by
KPMG Bermuda. As part of the RFP process and due
diligence performed by KPMG, any potential impairments
to independence and the management of those were
discussed and it was concluded by both parties that these
non-audit services did not impact KPMG’s independence;
• the external auditor plan for 2021, noting the role of the
audit partner who signs the audit report and who, in
accordance with professional rules, has not held office
for more than five years and any changes in key audit
staff; and
• a report from the external auditor describing their
arrangements to identify, report and manage any conflicts
of interest.
After discussion with the external auditor and
Ocean Wilsons (OWHL) management, it was determined
that the key risks of misstatement in the Group’s 2021
financial statements relate to:
•
Provisions
– Legal claims against the Brazilian operations
comprise civil and environmental cases, tax cases
and labour claims. The reporting risk relates to the
completeness of claims recorded and the estimation of
the provisions held against these exposures. There remain
a significant number of contingent liabilities, particularly
concerning labour and taxation claims. Provisions are
based on prior experience, Wilson Sons’ management’s
best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances
and expert legal advice relative to each case. The
Committee questioned Wilson Sons’ management on
their assumptions used in determining provisions and the
procedure for classification of legal liabilities as probable,
possible or remote loss by the external lawyers. The
Committee reviewed legal reports from Wilson Sons’
management on contingencies and asked questions on
the background and progress of material claims. The
Committee evaluated the current level of provisions in light
of historical trends and claim history to ensure provisions
were adequate. The committee further ensured that
adequate resources are allocated to recording, evaluating
and monitoring legal claims to ensure the completeness
of claims recorded and provisions made. The Committee
also discusses potential risks surrounding legal claims
with the external auditor and reviewed their audit findings.
•
Impairment Risk to Wilsons Sons Brasco cash
generating unit
– The Group has significant property
plant and equipment and intangibles balances within
the Brasco cash generating unit. The reporting risk is
that these balances may be overstated. Wilson Sons’
management perform impairment reviews for property,
plant and equipment and intangibles as required by
IAS 36,
Impairment of Assets
. The impairment test is
performed by comparing the carrying value of property,
plant and equipment and intangibles to its value in use,
calculated using the discounted cash flow forecasts under
the principles of IAS 36. The committee examined and
challenged Wilson Sons’ management’s key assumptions
used in the impairment tests to understand their impact
on the recoverable amounts. The Committee was satisfied
that the significant assumptions used were appropriate
and sufficiently robust. The Committee was further
satisfied with the impairment disclosures in the financial
statements. The Committee also discusses potential risks
surrounding impairment risk with the external auditor and
reviewed their audit findings.
•
Revenue recognition
– The revenue recognition risk
could arise from inappropriate revenue recognition
policies, incorrect application of policies or cut-off
errors surrounding year end or management override/
manipulation of revenue. The Committee considered
the Group’s revenue recognition policies and the level
of transactions compared to previous periods. The
Committee received quarterly Wilson Sons’ management
reports on revenue and financial performance with
comparisons to budget and prior year. The Committee
reviewed and questioned Wilson Sons’ management
explanations for variances and revenue performance.
The Committee also discussed potential risks surrounding
revenue recognition with the external auditor and reviewed
their audit findings. The Committee was satisfied with
management’s explanations of variances and application
of the presented policies relating to revenue recognition.
•
Investment valuation
– The investment valuation risk
arises from the valuation of the Level 3 investments
which requires significant judgements and estimates by
Ocean Wilsons Holdings Limited 2021 Annual Report24