
Board appointment criteria are considered automatically as part of
the Committee’s approach on succession planning. The Committee
believes that limited tenure and the subsequent enforced retirement
of directors is not always appropriate for sound business leadership.
Accordingly, matters of director tenure are viewed on a case-by-case
basis. The Committee will monitor the balance of skills, knowledge,
experience and diversity of the Hays plc Board, and lead succession
planning for appointments to the Board and the Executive Board;
itwill promote diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds,
cognitive and personal strengths as part of succession planning,
recruitment and promotion.
When Paul Venables notified the Company of his intention to retire
from full-time employment, the Committee began the process for
the identification of a new Group Finance Director. A candidate profile
was developed to ensure any potential candidate would have the
required balance of skills and experience relevant to Hays plc.
As part of its ongoing succession planning, the Committee was aware
of the strength of an internal candidate, James Hilton, Group Financial
Controller, who had previously been European Finance Director,
UK&IFinancial Controller and Head of Investor Relations within Hays.
As a consequence, Odgers Berndtson, which has no other connection
with the Group, was engaged to put James through a thorough
andrigorous assessment process. In addition, a review of external
candidates was undertaken and a list provided to the Committee.
Inparallel with the external assessment process, James underwent
interviews with the Chairman, Chief Executive and Audit Committee
Chair. Following conclusion of the interviews and the assessment
process, feedback was provided to and discussed by the Committee.
A final meeting was held in February 2022 for the Committee to
discuss their views and agree a recommendation to the Board.
Following approval by the Board, on 24 February 2022 it was
announced that James Hilton would be appointed as the Company’s
new Group Finance Director from 1 October 2022. Paul and James are
working closely on a thorough handover process ahead of James’s
formal succession to the role. More information about James, his
experience and previous roles can be found at haysplc.com.
Tenure of non-executive directors
Appointments to the Board are made for initial terms not exceeding
three years and are ordinarily limited to three such terms in office.
Each director stands for re-election annually.
Director performance
Having reviewed the independence and contribution of directors,
the Committee confirms that the performance of each of the directors
standing for election or re-election at the 2022 AGM continues to
be effective and demonstrates commitment to their roles, including
independence of judgment, commitment of time for Board and
Committee meetings and any other duties.
Accordingly, the Committee has recommended to the Board that all
current directors of the Company be proposed for election/re-election
at the forthcoming AGM.
Board induction and development
On appointment, each director takes part in a tailored and
comprehensive induction programme which is designed to give him
or her a deep understanding of the Group’s business, governance
and stakeholders. You can read more about Joe Hurd’s thoughts
on his induction programme on page 92.
The Chairman, in conjunction with the Company Secretary, ensures
that directors are provided with updates on changes in the legal and
regulatory environment in which the Group operates. These are
incorporated into the annual agenda of the Board’s activities along
with wider business and industry updates; the Chairman also keeps
under review the individual training needs of Board members.
The Group’s principal external advisers provide updates to the Board,
at least annually, on the latest developments in their respective fields,
and relevant update sessions are included in the Board’s strategy
meetings. The Company Secretary presents corporate governance
reports to the Board as appropriate, together with any relevant
technical directives issued by the Group’s auditor. In this way, each
director keeps their skills and knowledge current so they remain
competent in fulfilling their role both on the Board and on any
Committee of which they are a member.
Board evaluation
During FY22, in accordance with Code Provision 21, the effectiveness
of the Board was assessed through a Board evaluation process,
conducted externally.
The evaluation was conducted by EquityCulture Ltd, which has no
other connection with the Company. One-to-one meetings were held
between the evaluators (the Evaluator) and the Directors and the
Company Secretary. During the meetings, six broad topic areas were
considered, and the Evaluator ensured that pre-defined constituent
elements of each topic were covered to ensure consistency in the
evaluation. The topic areas covered included Board meetings,
Board composition, diversity and culture, succession planning,
strategy, and risk. Committee effectiveness was also assessed
in accordance with Code requirements.
Results were reported to the Board by the Evaluator and areas for
improved operation identified (Action Points). The outcome of the
evaluation indicated that the Board appears to be a good one and is
both well led and well supported, and members enjoy being part of it.
The report noted that the relationship between the executive and
non-executive members was stronger now than perhaps it had been
during the Covid lockdown period but could be further improved
with greater contact between members outside of the Board meeting
schedule. Unanimously there was a strong sense of wanting to achieve
the best for the Company in how the Board functions.
The Board has a clear understanding of its role, relative to the
business, and is alive to the growing responsibilities placed upon it and
the landscape within which they are framed, in areas such as ESG and
Equity, Diversity & Inclusion, and certain Action Points around this
aspect were identified to further enhance the Board’s performance.
While the profile of the Board was felt to contain a reasonable mix of
gender, ethnicity, and diversity of experience, it was acknowledged
that it could perhaps be further enhanced by greater non-UK
experience; the merits of a female in a senior Board position were
also acknowledged and are already feeding into conversations
around succession plans.
Encouragingly, as part of the evaluation process, some good practice
within certain parts of the business and the merits of replicating such
models elsewhere were identified by respondents. The benefits of
data-driven decision-making, around diversity in particular, are
something the Board is keen to work with the business on to
enhance what is in place already, for example around gender targets.
While not without some minor related Action Points, Risk and
Strategy were considered to be well managed generally. Similarly,
the operation of the Board Committees was felt to be effective,
with an acceptance of the model of all non-executives sitting on all
Committees (with the exception of the Company Chair), but also an
acknowledgement that such a model can place an increased burden
on the Committee Chairs.
91
Strategic Report Governance Financial Statements Shareholder Information