
Responsibilities for the financial
statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the Directors for the
financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’
Responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements in accordance
with the applicable framework and for being satisfied
that they give a true and fair view. The Directors are also
responsible for such internal control as they determine
is necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are
responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless
the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the
Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic
alternative but to do so.
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the
financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error,
and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is
not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance
with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement
when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or
error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence
the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined
above, to detect material misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our
procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the Group and industry,
we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance
with laws and regulations related to compliance with
the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) status Part 12 of
the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and the UK regulatory
principles, such as those governed by the Financial
Conduct Authority, and we considered the extent to
which non-compliance might have a material effect on
the financial statements. We also considered those laws
and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial
statements such as the Companies Act 2006.
We evaluated management’s incentives and
opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial
statements (including the risk of override of controls),
and determined that the principal risks were related
to posting inappropriate journal entries to increase
revenue or reduce expenditure, and management bias
in accounting estimates, in particular the valuation of
investment properties. Audit procedures performed by the
engagement team included:
●
Discussions with management, including
consideration of known or suspected instances of
non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud,
and review of the reports made by management;
●
Understanding of management’s internal controls
designed to prevent and detect irregularities;
●
Assessment of matters, if any, reported to the Audit
and Management Engagement Committee;
●
Reviewing relevant meeting minutes, including
those of the Board of Directors and the Audit and
Management Engagement Committee;
●
Review of tax compliance with the involvement of our
tax specialists in the audit;
●
Designing audit procedures to incorporate
unpredictability over the nature, timing and extent of
our testing of expenses;
●
Procedures relating to the valuation of investment
properties described in the related key audit matter
above; and
●
Identifying and testing journal entries, in particular
any journal entries posted with unusual account
combinations and words.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures
described above. We are less likely to become aware of
instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations
that are not closely related to events and transactions
reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not
detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher
than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error,
as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for
example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or
through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete
populations of certain transactions and balances,
possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it
typically involves selecting a limited number of items for
testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will
often seek to target particular items for testing based on
their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will
use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion
about the population from which the sample is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the
audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s
website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This
description forms part of our auditors’ report.
Independent Auditors’ Report to the members
of Civitas Social Housing PLC
continued
86
CIVITAS SOCIAL HOUSING PLC
REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2022