
Independent auditor’s report
Gresham Technologies plc
87
Annual Financial Report 2022
appropriately in accordance with the applicable
accounting standard.
Goodwill and intangible
asset impairment
As detailed in the
accounting policies on
page 99, and significant
estimates and
judgements on page 97
and as detailed in Note 2
and 97.
The carrying value of intangible
assets of £62,788k (2021:
£62,267k) is significant to the
Group.
Goodwill, capitalised development
costs and other intangible assets
are tested for impairment at least
annually through comparing the
recoverable amount of the cash-
generating unit, based on a value-
in-use calculation, to the carrying
value.
Furthermore, once available for use,
capitalised development costs are
tested for impairment where an
indicator of impairment arises.
The impairment assessments
require significant estimates relating
to forecasted growth of annual
recurring revenues and associated
margins. Management has to apply
judgement to determine if these
assets are impaired; hence there is
an opportunity for management bias
within the impairment model
assumptions and impairment
indicators for particular intangible
assets not being identified.
For these reasons we considered
goodwill and intangible impairment
to be a key audit matter.
We performed a review of the Group’s goodwill,
development costs and other intangible assets and
examined for indicators of impairment.
We assessed the impairment reviews prepared by
management, specifically the integrity of
management’s value-in-use model and, with the
assistance of our internal valuation experts, we
challenged the key inputs and assumptions, including
forecast growth rates, operating cash flows and the
discount rate.
Our procedures for the review of operating cash flows
and forecast growth rates included comparing the
forecast to recent financial performance and budgets
approved by the Board. We also ensured the
forecasts were consistent with those used in the
Group’s going concern assumptions. We used market
data to independently calculate a discount rate and
compared to that used by management.
We also performed a sensitivity analysis on the key
valuation inputs and evaluated the relevant
disclosures of management’s source of estimation
uncertainty.
Key observations:
Based on the procedures performed, we are satisfied
that the intangible assets are appropriately
recognised in the financial statements and that
appropriate disclosure has been made regarding the
estimation uncertainty in determining its recoverable
amount.
Revenue recognition
As detailed in the
accounting policies on
page 99.
The Group earns revenue from the
sale of software licenses, rendering
of services, subscriptions and
maintenance and solution sales.
Management exercises judgement
in the unbundling of multi- element
solution sales, with reference to the
estimated standalone selling prices
of the deemed performance
obligations, both of which determine
the recognition of revenue and
therefore presents a revenue
recognition existence risk.
In line with the requirements of
applicable accounting standards
management continue to exercise
judgement in determining whether
performance obligations of solution
We reviewed the revenue recognition principles
applied to significant new contracts written and
performed during the year and ensured that the
revenue recognition policies were in accordance with
the applicable accounting standards and the Group’s
accounting policy.
In particular, we checked a sample of solution sales
and assessed the appropriateness of unbundling
contract revenue into separate performance
obligations along with any judgements in the
allocation of the consideration across the
performance obligations based on estimated
standalone selling prices.
We assessed the
unbundling judgement through benchmarking with
reference to historic contracts executed by the Group
and external sources in relation to the sector.
DocuSign Envelope ID: B92A7465-54C5-4236-B0C5-93C23487FCF7