Highlights and Company overview | |
Strategic report | |
Chairman’s statement | |
Chief Executive’s review | |
Financial review | |
Key statistics | |
Emerging and principal risks and uncertainties | |
Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement | |
Modern Slavery Act disclosure statement 2026 | |
Governance | |
Chairman’s statement on corporate governance report | |
Management of the Company | |
Report of the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee | |
Report of the Chair of the Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee | |
Report of the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee | |
Directors’ Remuneration Report | |
Directors’ Report | |
Company Information | |
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements | |
Consolidated financial statements and notes | |
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income | |
Consolidated statement of financial position | |
Consolidated statement of changes in equity | |
Consolidated statement of cash flows | |
Notes forming part of the financial statements | |
Independent auditors’ report to the members of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |
Additional information | |
Alternative performance measures (APMs) | |
Glossary of terms | |
Annual sustainability report F26 |
From Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries | |
Romania | 207 |
Poland | 200 |
Hungary | 77 |
Bulgaria | 55 |
Albania | 51 |
North Macedonia | 37 |
Serbia | 27 |
Moldova | 27 |
Slovakia | 22 |
Georgia | 20 |
Lithuania | 19 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 15 |
Montenegro | 14 |
Armenia | 11 |
From other European countries | |
Italy | 148 |
United Kingdom | 66 |
Cyprus | 14 |
From other countries | |
Israel | 3 |
Other (various) | 3 |
Market | Market share | Low-cost segment share | Low-cost market position |
Albania | 54% | 63% | 1 |
Armenia | 32% | 63% | 1 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 19% | 30% | 2 |
Bulgaria | 27% | 42% | 2 |
Cyprus | 13% | 24% | 2 |
Georgia | 22% | 48% | 1 |
Hungary | 37% | 51% | 1 |
Israel | 8% | 42% | 1 |
Italy | 9% | 15% | 2 |
Lithuania | 15% | 26% | 2 |
N. Macedonia | 58% | 82% | 1 |
Moldova | 31% | 39% | 1 |
Montenegro | 14% | 32% | 1 |
Poland | 25% | 40% | 2 |
Romania | 49% | 71% | 1 |
Serbia | 22% | 77% | 1 |
Slovakia | 24% | 33% | 2 |
United Kingdom | 4% | 7% | 4 |
CEE | 25% | 44% | 1 |
F26 | F25 | Change | |
Average jet fuel price ($/metric tonne, including SAF, into-plane premium and impact of effective hedges) | 890 | 919 | (3.2)% |
Average EUR/USD rate (including impact of effective hedges) | 1.13 | 1.08 | 4.6% |
Year-end EUR/USD rate | 1.15 | 1.08 | 6.1% |
€ million | F26 | F25 | Change |
Total revenue | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 | 8.0% |
Fuel costs | (1,764.0) | (1,797.6) | (1.9)% |
Operating expenses less other income and excluding fuel costs | (3,787.7) | (3,302.5) | 14.7% |
Total operating expenses | (5,551.7) | (5,100.1) | 8.9% |
Operating profit | 139.7 | 167.5 | (16.6)% |
Operating margin | 2.5% | 3.2% | (0.7)ppt |
Net financing expense | (112.7) | (147.8) | (23.7)% |
Profit before income tax | 27.0 | 19.7 | 37.1% |
Income tax (expense)/ credit | (25.7) | 194.2 | n.m. |
Profit for the year | 1.3 | 213.9 | (99.4)% |
Earnings per share, € (Note 12 ) | F26 | F25 | Change |
Basic earnings per share, € | 0.02 | 2.18 | (2.16) |
Diluted earnings per share, € | 0.03 | 1.78 | (1.75) |
F26 | F25 | ||||
Total (€ million) | Percentage of total revenue | Total (€ million) | Percentage of total revenue | Percentage change | |
Passenger ticket revenue1 | 3,161.4 | 55.5% | 2,917.0 | 55.4% | 8.4% |
Ancillary revenue1 | 2,530.0 | 44.5% | 2,350.6 | 44.6% | 7.6% |
Total revenue | 5,691.4 | 100.0% | 5,267.6 | 100.0% | 8.0% |
F26 | F25 | ||||||
Total (€ million) | Percentage of total operating expenses | Unit cost (€cts/ASK) | Total (€ million) | Percentage of total operating expenses | Unit cost (€cts/ ASK) | Percentage change of total cost | |
Staff costs | 655.9 | 11.8% | 0.50 | 564.9 | 11.1% | 0.46 | 16.1% |
Fuel costs | 1,764.0 | 31.8% | 1.34 | 1,797.6 | 35.2% | 1.48 | (1.9)% |
Distribution and marketing | 133.4 | 2.4% | 0.10 | 117.8 | 2.3% | 0.10 | 13.2% |
Maintenance, materials and repairs | 462.8 | 8.3% | 0.35 | 330.4 | 6.5% | 0.27 | 40.1% |
Airport, handling and en- route charges | 1,527.6 | 27.5% | 1.16 | 1,351.8 | 26.5% | 1.11 | 13.0% |
Depreciation and amortisation | 1,178.6 | 21.2% | 0.89 | 966.8 | 19.0% | 0.79 | 21.9% |
Other expenses | 371.2 | 6.7% | 0.28 | 466.6 | 9.1% | 0.38 | (20.4%) |
Other income | (541.8) | (9.8%) | (0.41) | (495.8) | (9.7%) | (0.41) | 9.3% |
Total operating expenses | 5,551.7 | 100.0% | 4.20 | 5,100.1 | 100.0% | 4.19 | 8.9% |
Net cost from financial income and expense* | 194.2 | 0.15 | 167.4 | 0.14 | 16.0% | ||
Total | 5,745.9 | 4.35 | 5,267.5 | 4.33 | 9.1% | ||
Total ex-fuel cost | 3,981.9 | 71.7% | 3.02 | 3,469.9 | 68.0% | 2.85 | 14.8% |
€ million | F26 | F25 | Change |
Net financial expense | (194.2) | (167.4) | 16.0% |
Net loss on derivative financial instruments | (20.6) | (6.4) | 221.9% |
Net foreign exchange gains | 102.1 | 26.0 | 292.7% |
Net financing expense | (112.7) | (147.8) | (23.7)% |
F26 | F25 | Change | |
ROCE | 2.5% | 3.3% | (0.8) ppt |
Leverage ratio | 3.7 | 4.4 | (0.6) |
Liquidity | 35.8% | 31.5% | 4.4 ppt |
€ million | F26 | F25 | Change |
Net cash generated by operating activities | 1,179.6 | 1,065.6 | 11% |
Net cash generated by/(used in) investing activities | 751.3 | (263.4) | n.m.* |
Net cash used in financing activities | (1,427.5) | (938.7) | 52% |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 503.4 | (136.5) | n.m.* |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 596.9 | 716.4 | (17)% |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | (16.7) | 17.0 | n.m.* |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 1,083.6 | 596.9 | 82% |
€ million | F26 | F25 | Change |
ASSETS | |||
Property, plant and equipment | 7,128.1 | 6,493.0 | 635.1 |
Restricted cash* | 87.7 | 78.3 | 9.4 |
Derivative financial instruments* | 584.1 | 12.1 | 572.0 |
Trade and other receivables* | 712.1 | 676.2 | 35.9 |
Cash deposits* | 952.8 | 1,060.2 | (107.4) |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,085.9 | 597.5 | 488.4 |
Other assets* | 719.2 | 718.1 | 1.1 |
Total assets | 11,269.9 | 9,635.4 | 1,634.5 |
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | |||
EQUITY | |||
Equity | 928.4 | 317.1 | 611.3 |
LIABILITIES | |||
Trade and other payables* | 1,404.6 | 1,108.3 | 296.3 |
Borrowings (incl. convertible debt)* | 6,980.2 | 6,614.0 | 366.2 |
Deferred income* | 1,384.0 | 1,179.8 | 204.2 |
Derivative financial instruments* | 55.3 | 42.6 | 12.7 |
Provisions* | 514.3 | 355.1 | 159.2 |
Other liabilities* | 3.1 | 18.6 | (15.5) |
Total liabilities | 10,341.5 | 9,318.3 | 1,023.2 |
Total equity and liabilities | 11,269.9 | 9,635.4 | 1,634.5 |
Period covered | F27 H1 | F27 H2 | F28 |
5 months | 6 months | 7 months | |
Exposure in metric tonnes (‘000) | 958.5 | 1,107.2 | 2,447.8 |
Coverage in metric tonnes (‘000) | 801.0 | 786.0 | 426.0 |
Hedge coverage for the period | 84% | 71% | 17% |
Blended capped rate | $825.6 | $818.6 | $861.0 |
Blended floor rate | $757.1 | $747.1 | $773.0 |
Period covered | F27 H1 | F27 H2 | F28 |
5 months | 6 months | 8 months | |
Exposure (million) | $824.1 | $938.3 | $2,110.2 |
Coverage (million) | $671.0 | $677.0 | $356.0 |
Hedge coverage for the period | 81% | 72% | 17% |
Weighted average ceiling | $1.1701 | $1.2048 | $1.2033 |
Weighted average floor | $1.1340 | $1.1683 | $1.1788 |
F26 | F25 | Change | |
Capacity | |||
Number of aircraft at end of period* | 262 | 231 | 13.4% |
Number of operating aircraft at end of period** | 224 | 186 | 20.4% |
Equivalent aircraft | 245.5 | 225.7 | 8.8% |
Equivalent operating aircraft** | 203.6 | 178.5 | 14.1% |
Utilisation (block hours per aircraft per day) | 9:36 | 9:51 | (2.5)% |
Utilisation (block hours per operating aircraft per day)** | 11:35 | 12:28 | (7.1)% |
Total block hours | 861,653 | 812,673 | 6.0% |
Total flight hours | 748,441 | 705,720 | 6.1% |
Revenue departures | 337,405 | 314,448 | 7.3% |
Average departures per day per aircraft | 3.77 | 3.82 | (1.4)% |
Average departures per day per operating aircraft** | 4.54 | 4.83 | (6.0)% |
Seat capacity | 76,878,622 | 69,546,340 | 10.5% |
Average aircraft stage length (km) | 1,717 | 1,749 | (1.8)% |
Total ASKs (’000 km) | 132,030,723 | 121,670,679 | 8.5% |
Operating data | |||
RPKs (revenue passenger kilometres) (’000 km) | 119,877,458 | 111,143,998 | 7.9% |
Load factor (%) | 90.7% | 91.2% | (0.5)% |
Number of passenger segments | 69,747,746 | 63,403,320 | 10.0% |
Fuel price (average $ per tonne, including SAF, hedging impact and into-plane premium) | 890 | 919 | (3.2)% |
Foreign exchange rate (USD/EUR including hedging impact) | 1.13 | 1.08 | 4.6% |
Disclosure requirement | Companies Act reference | Location in Sustainability Report |
Business model | s414CB(2)(a) | pp. 192 |
Environmental matters | s414CB(1)(a) | |
Social and Employee matters | s414CB(1)(b)(c) | |
Human rights | s414CB(1)(d) | |
Anti-bribery and anti-corruption matters | s414CB(1)(e) | |
Policies, due diligence, principal risks and KPIs | s414CB(2)(b)-(d) and s414C(4) | |
Climate-related financial disclosures | s414CB(2A) | TCFD section pp. 32 |
Diversity and gender representation | s414C(8)(c) | |
Section 172(1) Statement | s414CZA | pp. 42 |
Our Approach | Policy area | Due diligence | |
Environmental | Sustainability is embedded in our operations and strategic decision- making. We continuously strive to improve environmental performance through innovation, efficiency and responsible growth. From investing in the newest, most fuel-efficient aircraft to optimising flight operations and exploring alternative fuels, we are taking bold steps to minimise emissions and resource consumption. | ESG Policy - Wizz Air integrates ESG principles across all operations and governance structures – guided by CSRD, GRI and TCFD standards – through a company-wide policy overseen by the Sustainability and Culture Committee, resulting in improved stakeholder alignment and sustainability performance. Environmental Policy - Wizz Air’s Environmental Policy reflects its commitment to reducing carbon emissions and minimising environmental impact through fleet modernisation, operational reviews, employee training and stakeholder engagement, supporting innovation and compliance with high environmental standards and the transition to a net zero emissions economy. Sustainable Procurement Policy - The Sustainable Procurement Policy embeds environmental and social considerations into all procurement activities and supplier evaluations across the Wizz Air Group, fostering sustainable sourcing practices and continuous improvement in supply chain performance. Aspirational net zero roadmap - This strategy outlines our ambition for decarbonisation and calls on stakeholders and regulators to join us in ensuring the aviation industry achieves net zero. | The ESG Strategy responsibilities are embedded across all levels of the organisation, with oversight by the Sustainability and Culture Committee, operational implementation by cross- functional teams, annual policy reviews, and stakeholder engagement guided by frameworks such as CSRD, GRI and TCFD. For further details on the policies and Wizz Air Priority Programmes within Wizz Air’s Environmental Strategy, please refer to Wizz Air’s Sustainability The Aspirational Net Zero Roadmap can be found on |
Our Approach | Policy area | Due diligence | |
Social & Employee Matters | At Wizz Air, we believe that the strength of our organisation lies in the exceptional qualities of our people, and we are committed to attracting, developing and retaining top talent by fostering an inclusive, engaging and diverse workplace. We are committed to acting with integrity and responsibility – prioritising the well- being of our customers, employees, partners, communities and the environment. | Whistleblowing Policy - Wizz Air’s Whistleblowing Policy ensures employees and stakeholders can confidentially report concerns about misconduct or unethical behaviour without fear of retaliation, in line with applicable legal protections. Anti-Fraud Policy - Wizz Air’s Anti-Fraud Policy outlines preventive and corrective measures to detect, investigate and address fraudulent activities, supporting financial integrity and regulatory compliance. Health and Safety Policy and Initiatives - Wizz Air’s Health and Safety Policy ensures a safe working environment through rigorous operational standards, employee training and continuous monitoring aligned with aviation and workplace safety regulations. Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy - Wizz Air promotes diversity and inclusion through its Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy, ensuring that all employees are treated fairly regardless of gender, age, background or beliefs. Training and Development Policy - Wizz Air’s Training and Development Policy fosters continuous learning and upskilling, supporting employee growth through structured training programmes and career development opportunities. | Wizz Air values its workforce as key stakeholders and actively engages with them through regular feedback surveys and comprehensive training programmes that support skill development and career growth. The Company prioritises safety and responsibility, ensuring the well-being of both employees and passengers by maintaining high safety standards and continuously improving performance based on defined indicators. As a responsible corporate citizen, Wizz Air has consistently stepped up during challenging times – supporting local rescue efforts, swiftly organising emergency flights during natural disasters and political crises, and contributing to local communities and foundations – creating a positive impact that goes beyond providing air travel services. For more information on Wizz Air’s social policies and strategy, please see Wizz Air’s Sustainability Report |
Our Approach | Policy area | Due diligence | |
Human Rights | Wizz Air is committed to conducting its business with the highest standards of ethics and integrity, and we expect the same from our suppliers. We require our suppliers to uphold strong ethical practices within their own operations and supply chains, including compliance with applicable human rights regulations and obligations under the Modern Slavery Act. | Wizz Air has policies in place related to human rights principles, including our Anti- Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy. As well as this, our Code of Ethics, “The Wizz Way”, applies to every Company employee regardless of seniority. These, along with our Supplier Code of Conduct, Whistleblowing Policy, Sustainable Procurement Policy, Anti-Fraud Policy and Anti-Corruption Policy, help us maintain an effective compliance environment across our supply chain. Actions in relation to these policies are reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board. | We are committed to assessing any instance of non-compliance regarding modern slavery or human trafficking on a case-by- case basis. As part of our robust onboarding process, Wizz Air equips new employees with mandatory e-learning on business ethics and key policies. The Company enforces compliance with its Supplier Code of Conduct by integrating specific contractual clauses to prevent modern slavery. Additionally, Wizz Air partners with a third-party risk management firm to assess suppliers across environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria – ensuring effective risk identification and management throughout the procurement lifecycle. For more information, please see the Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement 2025 and Wizz Air’s Sustainability Report |
Anti-corruption and bribery | Wizz Air is committed to conducting business with honesty, integrity and in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations, as outlined in our Policy of Good Conduct. We prioritise ethical behaviour, transparency and accountability across all operations, with governance structures in place to uphold the highest standards for our Board of Directors and entire workforce. Our whistleblower protection programme encourages employees to report unethical behaviour without fear of retaliation. | Anti-Corruption Policy - This prohibits corrupt, improper practices and bribery. It applies to interactions between Wizz Air personnel and third parties. Policy of Good Conduct - This document outlines the expectations regarding Wizz Air employees’ behaviour at work, including their conduct towards colleagues, business partners and the organisation as a whole, focusing on issues such as corruption and bribery. Corporate Political Engagement Policy and Statement - outlines the principles and guidelines for engaging with political stakeholders. This policy ensures that all interactions are conducted transparently, ethically and in alignment with the Company’s values and regulatory requirements. | Wizz Air requires all employees and relevant third parties to complete mandatory e-learning on business ethics and key policies, including anti- corruption. High-risk roles receive additional targeted training. Suppliers must agree to the policy before contracting. Wizz Air conducts due diligence, monitors third-party activities, and allows concerns to be reported anonymously. Independent investigators handle all cases. For more information, please see Wizz Air’s Sustainability Report |
Governance | Disclose the organisation’s governance around climate-related risks and opportunities. | Companies Act reference |
Recommended disclosure a) Describe the board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. | s414CB(2A)(a) | |
Recommended disclosure b) Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. | ||
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. | ||
Strategy | Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning where such information is material. | Companies Act reference |
Recommended disclosure a) Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium and long term. | s414CB(2A)(d) | |
Recommended disclosure b) Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy and financial planning. | s414CB(2A)(e) | |
Recommended disclosure c) Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario. | Our climate strategy integrates climate risk assessments and is embedded in our short, medium and long-term planning process. Our climate scenario modelling processes include a qualitative and quantitative analysis with applicable risks under four different climate-related | S414CB(2A)(f) |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. | ||
Risk management | Disclose how the organisation identifies, assesses and manages climate-related risks. | Companies Act reference |
Recommended disclosure a) Describe the organisation’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks. | S414CB(2A)(b) | |
Recommended disclosure b) Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks. | S414CB(2A)(b) | |
Recommended disclosure c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management. | S414CB(2A)(c) | |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. We are constantly working on developing our ERM framework and the applicable internal risk management processes to ensure heightened resilience in the face of climate change. | ||
Metrics and targets | Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information is material. | Companies Act reference |
Recommended disclosure a) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process. | S414CB(2A)(h) | |
Recommended disclosure b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks. | We report extensively on Scope 1, Scope 2 | |
Recommended disclosure c) Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets. | S414CB(2A)(g) | |
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. We will continue to improve our greenhouse gas disclosure with increased data granularity regarding location-based emissions reporting in the short and medium term. | ||
“Wizz Air’s strategic direction is grounded in strong corporate governance principles, with the Board and its Committees playing a crucial role in maintaining and reinforcing this governance framework through their dedicated oversight and guidance.” William Franke Chairman of the Board of Directors |
THE BOARD | |
CHAIRMAN – WILLIAM A. FRANKE | • Chairs the Board and sets direction. • Ensures highest standard of corporate governance. • Responsibility for setting the agenda and strategic discussion. • Responsible for ensuring engagement with investors and stakeholders. |
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – JÓZSEF VÁRADI | • Accountable to the Board and the Chairman. • Responsible for the Group’s senior leadership team. • Responsible for the strategic, financial and operational performance of the Group. |
SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR – CHARLOTTE PEDERSEN | • Acts as a sounding board for the Chairman. • Acts as an intermediary for the other Directors. • Available to Shareholders to address concerns. |
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS – ANNA GATTI ANDREW S. BRODERICK ANTHONY RADEV BARRY ECCLESTON CHARLOTTE ANDSAGER CHARLOTTE PEDERSEN ENRIQUE DUPUY DE LOME CHAVARRI STEPHEN L. JOHNSON WILLIAM A. FRANKE PHIT LIAN CHONG | Responsible for key reserved matters: • overall strategy and management; • structure and capital; • financial reporting and controls; • internal control and risk management; • approval of significant or material contracts; • approval of Shareholder communication and communication relating to Board decisions; • Board membership and appointments; • determining the executive remuneration plan and incentive plans; • reviewing corporate governance matters; and • reviewing Group safety, security and operational compliance. |
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR – ANTHONY RADEV | • Acts as link between the workforce, the People Council and the Board. • Provides regular updates to the Board on employee engagement, incorporated into decisions. |
COMPANY SECRETARY – NÓRA VIKTÓRIA RABE | • Supports the Chairman, the Group Chief Executive Officer and Chairs of Committees in agenda-setting and minute-taking. • Liaison between senior management and the Directors and responsible for timely delivery of materials. • Advises the Board on corporate governance and is responsible for compliance with the Share Dealing Code. • Works with the Chairman on the Board training plan, Board reviews and corporate governance improvements. |
Board leadership and Company purpose |
Chairman’s Statement, p.4 |
Corporate culture, p.42 |
Investment in workforce, p.42 |
Board activities, p.42 |
Stakeholder interests, p.42 |
Board decisions, p.42 |
Section 172 Statement, p.42 |
Whistleblowing, p.34 |
Conflicts of interest, p.45 |
Division of responsibilities |
Board of Directors’ division of responsibilities, p.45 |
Directors’ independence, p.53 |
Governance framework, p.39 |
Board and Committee attendance, p.58 |
Board and Committee meetings, p.58 |
Composition, succession and evaluation |
Board composition, p.47 |
Appointment, re-election, resignation and removal of Directors, p.46 |
Nomination and Governance Committee Chairman’s Statement, p. 68 |
Board evaluation, p.46 |
Board biographies, p.47 |
Audit, risk and internal controls |
Audit and Risk Committee Report, p.59 |
Risk management and internal control, p.60 |
Confirmation and reassessment of emerging principal risks and uncertainties, p.60 |
Fair, balanced and understandable confirmation, p.60 |
Remuneration |
Directors’ Remuneration Report, p.70 |
Remuneration Committee Chairman’s Statement, p.70 |
Alignment with provisions of UK Corporate Governance Code, p.77 |
Shareholder | Reported shareholding | Reported number of shares |
Indigo Hungary LP | 10.9% | 11,273,604 |
Cobas Asset Management, SGIIC, SA | 7.5% | 7,770,174 |
Coronation Fund Managers Limited | 7.5% | 7,768,819 |
Causeway Capital Management LLC | 6.8% | 7,074,974 |
Pzena Investment Management, LLC | 3.9% | 4,006,860 |
Magallanes Value Investors, S.A., SGIIC | 3.8% | 3,890,554 |
Indigo Maple Hill LP | 3.3% | 3,411,291 |
Name | Position | Committee membership (as at 31 March 2026) |
Executive Director | ||
József Váradi | Chief Executive Officer | |
Non-Executive Directors | ||
William A. Franke | Chairman | Nomination and Governance Committee |
Stephen L. Johnson | Non-Executive Director and Deputy Chair | |
Barry Eccleston | Non-Executive Director | Nomination and Governance Committee, Remuneration Committee, Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
Charlotte Pedersen | Senior Independent Non- Executive Director | Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
Andrew S. Broderick | Non-Executive Director | Sustainability and Culture Committee, Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee, Financial Performance Committee |
Dr Anthony Radev | Non-Executive Director | Sustainability and Culture Committee, Remuneration Committee, INED overseeing employee engagement |
Charlotte Andsager | Non-Executive Director | Nomination and Governance Committee, Sustainability and Culture Committee |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | Non-Executive Director | Audit and Risk Committee, Nomination & Governance Committee, Financial Performance Committee |
Anna Gatti | Non-Executive Director | Remuneration Committee, Audit and Risk Committee |
Phit Lian Chong | Non-Executive Director | Audit and Risk Committee |
Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, SID and Chairman) | Number in executive management | Percentage of executive management | The data on gender and ethnic diversity of the Board and executive management was collected on a confidential and voluntary self-reporting basis. | ||
Men | 7 | 64% | 3 | 12 | 80% | ||
Women | 4 | 36% | 1 | 3 | 20% | ||
Other categories | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Not specified/prefer not to say | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board (CEO, SID and Chairman) | Number in executive management | Percentage of executive management | Wizz Air is fully committed to promoting equality and diversity to enhance decision making, which is crucial for the long-term success of Wizz Air and its stakeholders. The Company’s commitment to diversity is set out in the Sustainability Report. The Board is mindful of the Listing Rule requirements in relation to gender and ethnic diversity of the Board and executive management. The targets set out in LRs 9.8.6R (9)(a)(i), (ii) and (iii) have not been met in respect of gender diversity. Ethnic diversity has been met. While diversity criteria are taken into consideration during recruitment processes, decisions are subject to the principle of merit. Addressing diversity remains a priority for the Nomination and Governance Committee in F26. | ||
White British or other White (including minority White groups) | 10 | 91% | 3 | 14 | 93.33% | ||
Mixed/multiple ethnic groups | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Asian/Asian British | 1 | 9% | _ | 1 | _ | ||
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Other ethnic group, including Arab | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ||
Not specified/prefer not to say | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Name | Position |
Michael Delehant | Group Managing Director |
Ian Malin | Chief Commercial Officer |
Veronika Spanarova | Chief Financial Officer |
Owain Jones | Chief Corporate Officer |
Diarmuid O'Conghaile | Chief Operations Officer |
Silvia Mosquera | Commercial Officer |
Michael Berlouis | Financial Operations Officer |
Ervin Banyai | Digital Officer |
Nóra Viktória Rabe | Corporate and ESG Officer |
Piotr Trawka | Revenue Officer |
Roland Tischner | Managing Director |
Julia Brix | Supply Chain Officer |
Andras Szabo | Network Officer |
Marion Geoffroy | People Officer |
Name | Position |
Yvonne Moynihan | Managing Director |
Name | Position |
Mauro Peneda | Managing Director |
Board attended/total | Audit and Risk attended/ total | Remuneration attended/total | Nomination and Governance attended/total | Sustainability and Culture attended/total | Safety, Security and Operational Compliance attended/total | Financial Performance attended/ total | |
Executive Director | |||||||
József Váradi | 7/7* | 6/6* | 7/7* | 7/7* | 6/6* | 6/6* | 3/3 |
Non-Executive Directors | |||||||
William A. Franke | 6/7 | 7/7 | |||||
Stephen L. Johnson | 7/7 | 7/7 | 7/7 | 3/3 | |||
Barry Eccleston | 7/7 | 6/7 | 7/7 | 5/6 | |||
Andrew S. Broderick | 7/7 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 6/6 | 3/3 | ||
Charlotte Pedersen | 7/7 | 6/6 | |||||
Charlotte Andsager | 7/7 | 7/7 | 6/6 | ||||
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 7/7 | 6/6 | 6/7 | 3/3 | |||
Dr Anthony Radev | 7/7 | 7/7 | 6/6 | ||||
Anna Gatti | 7/7 | 5/6 | 6/7 | ||||
Phit Lian Chong | 7/7 | 6/6 |
“The Audit and Risk Committee ensures proper governance and oversight over the company risk environment, processes and controls, while maintaining high standards for the internal control environment.” Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee |
“Aviation safety is of utmost importance, particularly during periods when the industry is under heightened scrutiny. The Committee has actively promoted the sharing of knowledge and best practices.” Charlotte Pedersen Chair of the Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee |
“Over the past year, the Committee continued to play a key role in strengthening governance practices and supporting leadership development across the Group.” William A. Franke Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee |
“Management has implemented decisive strategic actions to strengthen the long-term positioning of the Group … Throughout the year the Company remained focused on improving operational resilience, maintaining financial discipline and allocating capital and capacity to those markets where Wizz Air’s ultra-low-cost model can generate sustainable returns.” Barry Eccleston Chair of the Remuneration Committee |
“The Committee will continue implementing the revised Long-Term Incentive Plan structure in F27 as well. This revised structure introduces a balanced mix of performance-based and restricted share awards, which the Committee believes appropriately balances the need to retain and motivate the executive leadership team while maintaining strong alignment with shareholder interests.” |
CEO remuneration | F26 earnings | F27 looking ahead | |
Base salary | €775,000 | €822,275 | |
Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP) | Maximum opportunity | 200% of base salary | |
Performance metrics (weightings) | Financial: Underlying Profit After Tax – 12.5% CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet leases) – 12.5% Non-financial: Utilisation – 12.5% Completion (without extraordinary events) – 12.5% Customer satisfaction – 12.5% Gender diversity – 12.5% Individual rating - 25% | Financial: Underlying Profit After Tax – 12.5% CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet leases) – 12.5% Non-financial: Utilisation – 12.5% Completion (without extraordinary events) – 12.5% Customer satisfaction – 12.5% Employee engagement – 12.5% Individual rating - 25% | |
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | Maximum opportunity | 500% of base salary (60% restricted shares and 40% performance shares) | 500% of base salary (60% restricted shares and 40% performance shares) |
Performance metrics (weightings) | 100% of performance shares portion of the award will be subject to Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) | 100% of performance shares portion of the award will be subject to Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) | |
Value Creation Plan (VCP) | Opportunity | One-off award granted in F22 – seven-year performance period with 40% vesting in year seven, and 20% vesting per year in years eight, nine and ten Maximum payment of £100 million for delivery of end share price of £119.34 Any value delivered under the VCP will be offset by the value of vested LTIP awards | |
Performance metrics (weightings) | Increase in share price (90%) ESG (10%) | ||
Share ownership guidelines | Holding requirement: 400% of base salary | ||
Post-cessation share ownership guidelines | Holding requirement: 100% of share ownership guideline for one year after leaving and 50% of share ownership guideline for the second year | ||
Clarity | Remuneration arrangements should be transparent and promote effective engagement with Shareholders and the workforce. | The Remuneration Committee has incorporated transparency into the design and delivery of our Remuneration Policy. We believe our remuneration structure is simple to understand, both for participants and Shareholders. We aim for disclosure of the policy and how it is implemented to be in a clear and succinct format. |
Simplicity | Remuneration structures should avoid complexity while their rationale and operation should be easy to understand. | Our remuneration arrangements for our Executive Director are simple and easy to understand, comprising fixed pay (base salary and benefits), a Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP), Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and a one-off long- term arrangement in the form of a Value Creation Plan (VCP). |
Risk | Remuneration arrangements should ensure reputational and other risks from excessive rewards, and behavioural risks that can arise from target-based incentive plans, are identified and mitigated. | The DRP includes a number of points to mitigate. Potential risks: • There are defined limits on the maximum opportunity levels under incentive plans. • Performance targets are calibrated at appropriately stretching but sustainable levels. • The Remuneration Committee has the ability to use discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. • Incentive plans, including the LTIP and VCP, include provisions to allow malus and clawback to be applied, where appropriate. • Recent introduction of in-employment and post- employment shareholding requirements ensures that there is an alignment of interests between our Executive Director and Shareholders that encourages sustainable performance. |
Predictability | The range of possible values of rewards to individual Directors and any other limits or discretion should be identified and explained at the time of approving the policy. | We believe our disclosure is clear to allow Shareholders to understand the range of potential values which may be earned under the remuneration arrangements. Our DRP clearly sets out relevant limits and potential for discretion. |
Proportionality | The link between individual awards, the delivery of strategy and the long-term performance of the Company should be clear. Outcomes should not reward poor performance. | A significant proportion of our Executive Director’s potential reward is linked to performance through the VCP and LTIP with a clear line of sight between business performance and the delivery of Shareholder value. The Remuneration Committee may adjust formulaic outcomes of incentive arrangements to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. |
Alignment to culture | Incentive schemes should drive behaviours consistent with Company purpose, values and strategy. | The incentive arrangements and the performance measures used are strongly aligned to those that the Board considers when determining the implementation success of the Company’s purpose, values and strategy. |
Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation and opportunity | Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
Base salary | To provide the core reward for the role. To attract, retain and motivate high-calibre executive management. | Salary is reviewed annually, with any increase being awarded at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee. The Remuneration Committee may take into account a number of factors in deciding whether an increase should be made, including benchmarking against selected comparator companies, the individual’s skills and experience, internal relativities, and the Executive’s personal performance contribution. | The Remuneration Committee considers the individual salary of the Executive Director at a meeting each year. |
Benefits | To attract, retain and motivate executive management without paying more than necessary. | The benefits to the Executive Director are in line with those provided to employees and those deemed necessary for the role or job taken. They include the following: The Executive Director is covered by the Company’s group personal accident and life assurance cover, which is in place for all employees (2x salary). Free return tickets usable on the route network of the Group, consistent with the number of free tickets made available for all employees. At its discretion, the Committee may provide reasonable support for costs associated with relocation where required at the Company’s request, and other benefits as deemed necessary by the Remuneration Committee. | |
Pension | Not applicable | Eligible to opt into the company-wide private pension contribution scheme. Under the scheme, the Company will, if requested by an employee, contribute an additional 1.5 per cent of that employee’s salary to a private pension scheme, provided the employee contributes the same amount. | Not applicable |
Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation and opportunity | Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP) | To incentivise the successful execution of the Company’s business strategy. To reward the achievement of annual financial and operational goals. | Payments under the STIP are made in cash and/or shares, subject to certain specified performance requirements as determined by the Remuneration Committee and up to a maximum STIP set as a percentage of base salary by the Remuneration Committee. The maximum payout is 200 per cent of base salary. A threshold level of performance is specified as 50 per cent of the at target bonus; if performance falls below this level, there will be no payout for that proportion of the award. | Performance requirements are determined by the Remuneration Committee. They are intended to align the performance of the Executive Director with the Group’s near-term objectives of delivering against its strategy. The Remuneration Committee may exercise its discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. The STIP is based on a combination of financial and non-financial measures as selected by the Remuneration Committee in any given year. Financial measures would typically represent no less than 50 per cent of the weighting. The annual STIP is subject to malus and/or clawback in the event of serious misconduct that could serve as a reason for terminating the employment for cause, or if the employee was involved in fraud, dishonesty or other types of illegal activity. The policy does not determine the time frame of the malus and/or clawback. |
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) | To align the Executive Director’s long-term interests with those of Shareholders. To reward strong financial performance. | Each year, performance shares and restricted shares may be granted. Awards vest over a three- year period. Performance shares are subject to the achievement of performance targets over those three years. The maximum face value of annual awards will be 500 per cent of base salary. For performance shares, typically 25 per cent of award value will vest for threshold performance with straight-line vesting to maximum performance. | Performance targets are determined by the Remuneration Committee and vesting of the performance shares is subject to performance targets being met over the performance period. The performance targets for the LTIP are based either solely on financial measures or on a combination of financial and non- financial measures and may include ESG measures as selected by the Remuneration Committee in any given year. Financial measures would typically represent no less than 50 per cent of the weighting. The Remuneration Committee may use its discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the Company and the experience of Shareholders. If a participant’s employment ends before the end of the performance period or, in the case of restricted shares, the vesting period, any vested and unvested options will normally lapse, save in certain “good leaver” scenarios, although the Remuneration Committee retains discretion to allow all shares to vest subject to performance conditions (as applicable). LTIP awards are subject to malus and/or clawback in the event of serious misconduct which could serve as a reason for terminating the employment for cause, or if the employee was involved in fraud, dishonesty or other types of illegal activity. |
Value Creation Plan (VCP) | To retain the Chief Executive Officer and deliver Shareholder value. | One-off award of shares granted in 2021. Award vests after a seven-year period (40 per cent of the overall award at the end of year seven and 20 per cent per year after years eight, nine and ten). The award is based on the following performance conditions: • 90 per cent share price; and • 10 per cent ESG (5 per cent based on CO2 emissions reduction goals; and 5 per cent based on gender diversity target). Maximum payout is capped at £100 mn. Threshold payment is £20 mn for delivery of share price £77.24. Award payout to be offset against LTIP award. ESG criteria are independent of share price growth criteria. Straight line vesting in between. The share price related portion of the VCP award will pay out at 100 per cent if the maximum share price is achieved during two consecutive quarters before end-date. | To ensure that vesting outcomes are consistent with superior Shareholder experience, the Remuneration Committee has the discretion to adjust the level of vesting downwards (including, for the avoidance of doubt, to nil) where it considers that the level of vesting resulting from applying a performance condition would not be a fair and accurate reflection of the performance of the Company, the Group, any Group member or the participant and/or such other factors as the Remuneration Committee may consider appropriate. If the participant ceases to be employed by reason of ill health, injury, disability, death, retirement with the agreement of the Remuneration Committee, or for any other reason at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, 40 per cent of the award will vest as soon as practicable after the cessation date and 20 per cent in each of the next three years, to the extent that the performance conditions have been met. The award will lapse in all other circumstances. Malus and clawback may be applied at any time before an award vests, or for three years after the seventh anniversary of the grant date in the following circumstances: material misstatement of the results of the Company, errors or inaccuracies or misleading information leading to an incorrect grant or vesting of the award, gross misconduct, material failure of risk management by the Company, corporate failure (e.g. administration or liquidation) or any other circumstance which, in the opinion of the Remuneration Committee, could have a significantly adverse impact on the Company's reputation. |
Element | Purpose and link to strategy | Operation and opportunity | Framework used to assess performance and provisions for the recovery of sums paid |
Fees | To remunerate Non-Executive Directors to reflect their level of responsibility. | Each Non-Executive Director receives an annual fee that is inclusive of one Committee fee. Additional fees are paid: for chairing Committees; to the Senior Independent Director; to the Vice Chair; to the Director responsible for employee engagement; and to the Committee Observers. Fees for Non- Executive Directors, other than the Chairman, are determined by the Chairman and the Executive members of the Board. Fees for the Chairman are determined by the Remuneration Committee without the Chairman being present. In both cases, there is flexibility to increase fee levels to ensure they reflect the experience of the individual, the time commitment of the role and the fee levels in comparable companies appropriately. Non-Executive Directors receive an additional fee for sitting on more than one Committee. The Non-Executive Directors will also be reimbursed for all proper and reasonable expenses incurred in performing their duties. Fees are paid in cash and/or shares which are not subject to performance. | Not applicable; there are no provisions for the recovery of sums paid or the withholding of any payment relating to fees. |
Details of provision | Executive Director | Non-Executive Directors |
Notice period | Six months’ notice by either party. | One month’s notice by either party. |
Termination payment | The employing company may terminate the Executive Director’s employment with immediate effect by payment in lieu of notice. The Executive Director will be paid a sum equal to six months’ base salary if the employing company chooses to enforce the restrictive covenants referenced below. Upon termination of employment other than for cause, the Executive Director is entitled to a severance payment equal to six months’ base salary in addition to any notice pay or payment in lieu of notice. | Fees and expenses accrued up to termination only. |
Post-termination covenants | Post-termination restrictive covenants apply for a period of one year following termination of employment. | Not applicable. |
Directors’ Remuneration Report | ||
Votes for | 16,713,439 | 72.63% |
Votes against | 6,299,725 | 27.37% |
Total votes | 23,013,165 | |
Votes withheld | 11,357 | |
József Váradi | |||||||||
Fees and salary € | Benefits € | STIP € | LTIP € | Other € | Pension € | Total € | Total fixed remuneration € | Total variable remuneration € | |
F26 | 775,000 | 25,919 | 946,120 | — | 2,325,0001 | 34,759 | 4,106,798 | 835,678 | 3,271,120 |
F25 | 775,000 | 22,291 | 770,727 | — | 2,325,000 | 1,570 | 3,894,588 | 798,861 | 3,095,727 |
Weighting | Performance indicators | Threshold (50% payout) | Target (100% payout) | Stretched (150% payout) | Maximum (200% payout) | Outcome | Formulaic outcome |
25% | Financial performance | ||||||
12.5% | Underlying Profit After Tax (in millions of EUR) | 209.00 | 246.00 | 258.33 | 283.00 | 1.25 | —% |
12.5% | CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet leases) | 3.10 | 2.95 | 2.90 | 2.80 | 3.02 | 9.58% |
75% | Non-financial performance | ||||||
12.5% | Utilisation | 12:20 | 12:30 | 12:35 | 12:40 | 11:35 | —% |
12.5% | Completion (without extraordinary events) | 99.39% | Straight line between min and max | 99.50% | 99.96% | 25.0% | |
12.5% | Customer Satisfaction | 69.00% | 70.50% | 71.50% | 72.00% | 77.60% | 25.0% |
12.5% | ESG (diversity) | 38.00% | 39.00% | 39.67% | 40.00% | 40.68% | 25.0% |
25% | Individual performance1,2 | ||||||
Individual performance rating | Rated A | Rated AA | Rated AAA | Rated 1 | AAA | 37.5% | |
Financial year | Executive Director | Single figure of total remuneration (€) | Performance STIP achieved against maximum possible | LTIP shares vesting against maximum possible |
F16 | József Váradi | 1,812,883 | 95% | n/a |
F17 | József Váradi | 1,240,812 | 48% | n/a |
F18 | József Váradi | 1,281,304 | 58% | n/a |
F19 | József Váradi | 4,056,438 | 26% | 100% |
F20 | József Váradi | 2,640,666 | 26% | 50% |
F21 | József Váradi | 1,620,409 | 0%1 | 50% |
F22 | József Váradi | 1,771,652 | 0%1 | 50% |
F23 | József Váradi | 1,266,511 | 41% | 0% |
F24 | József Váradi | 1,395,932 | 47% | 0% |
F25 | József Váradi | 3,894,588 2 | 50% | 0% |
F26 | József Váradi | 4,106,798 | 61% | 0% |
F26 | F25 | F24 | F23 | F22 | |||||||||||
Salary and fees | Benefits1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits 1 | Annual STIP | Salary and fees | Benefits 1 | Annual STIP | |
József Váradi | 0% | 16% | 23% | 9% | (3%) | 17% | 3% | 156% | 16% | 16% | 100% | 85% | 19% | 0% | (100)% |
William A. Franke | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 19% | 0% | 0% |
Stephen L. Johnson | (6%) | 0% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
Andrew S. Broderick | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
Barry Eccleston | 28% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 0% | |
Charlotte Pedersen | 10% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 60% | 0% | 0% |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 0% | 158% | 0% | 0% |
Charlotte Andsager | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 148% | 0% | 0% |
Dr Anthony Radev3 | 2% | 0% | 0% | (4%) | 0% | 0% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Anna Gatti 4 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 155% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Phit Lian Chong5 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Average pay based on all employees 2 | 2% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 0% | 6% | 20% | 0% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 84% | 30% | 0% | (100)% |
Date of award | Restricted options | Performance options | Face Value (€) | Share price at 5 June 2025 (£) | Vesting date | |
F26 LTIP | 06-Jun-25 | 162,172 | 108,115 | 3,875,000 | 12.07 | 06-Jun-28 |
Salary and fees € | ||
F26 | F25 | |
William A. Franke | 336,000 | 336,000 |
Stephen L. Johnson | 120,000 | 127,238 |
Andrew S. Broderick | 119,434 | 112,500 |
Barry Eccleston | 137,496 | 107,094 |
Charlotte Pedersen | 144,996 | 132,323 |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 128,469 | 125,000 |
Charlotte Andsager | 125,003 | 125,000 |
Dr Anthony Radev1 | 115,000 | 112,500 |
Phit Lian Chong3 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Anna Gatti 2 | 112,500 | 112,500 |
Total | 1,438,898 | 1,406,000 |
Direct ownership | Options (performance measures based) | Options (time restricted) | Interests1 | |||
Director | Number of Ordinary Shares | Vested, not exercised yet | Unvested2 | Unvested2 | Number of Ordinary Shares | Additional number of Ordinary Shares (if full principal of outstanding Convertible Notes is fully converted) |
William A. Franke | 212,917 | — | — | — | 14,759,645 | 24,246,715 |
József Váradi2 | 1,511,472 | — | 946,058 | 296,129 | 1,511,472 | — |
Stephen L. Johnson | 56,379 | — | — | — | — | — |
Anthony Radev | 17,300 | — | — | — | — | — |
Barry Eccleston | 5,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
Andrew S. Broderick | 4,691 | — | — | — | — | — |
Charlotte Andsager | 4,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
Charlotte Pedersen | 2,285 | — | — | — | — | — |
Phit Lian Chong | 1,761 | — | — | — | — | — |
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri | 1,421 | — | — | — | — | — |
Anna Gatti | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Method used | ||||
F26 | Option A | 149:1 | 110:1 | 60:1 |
F25 | Option A | 126:1 | 97:1 | 55:1 |
F24 | Option A | 49:1 | 40:1 | 23:1 |
F23 | Option A | 44:1 | 36:1 | 22:1 |
F22 | Option A | 80:1 | 59:1 | 29:1 |
P25 (lower quartile) | P50 (median) | P75 (upper quartile) | ||||
Financial year | Base pay | Total pay | Base pay | Total pay | Base pay | Total pay |
F26 | €22,042 | €27,566 | €25,704 | €37,230 | €33,936 | €67,958 |
F25 | €23,245 | €30,811 | €26,615 | €40,178 | €40,358 | €71,105 |
F24 | €21,711 | €28,526 | €24,881 | €34,544 | €34,963 | €60,857 |
F23 | €21,121 | €28,878 | €23,987 | €35,231 | €31,705 | €56,272 |
F22 | €13,479 | €24,981 | €15,670 | €34,022 | €43,101 | €70,413 |
Information required | Relevant disclosure | |
6.6.1 (1) | Interest capitalised by the Group | N/A |
6.6.1 (2) | Unaudited financial information as required (UKLR 6.2.23 R) | Unaudited financial information was published by the Group in its interim management statements (for Q1 and Q3), half-yearly results and preliminary announcement of results for the year. There have been no changes to the unaudited information previously published. |
6.6.1(3) | Long-term Incentive Schemes (LR 9.3.3 R) | See Directors’ Remuneration Report. |
6.6.1 (4) | Directors’ waivers of emoluments | See Directors’ Remuneration Report. |
6.6.1(5) | Directors’ waivers of future emoluments | See Directors’ Remuneration Report. |
6.6.1(6) | Non-pro-rata allotments of equity securities for cash (the Company) | See paragraph headed “Capital structure” in this report. |
6.6.1(7) | Non-pro-rata allotments of equity securities for cash (major subsidiaries) | N/A |
6.6.1(8) | Participation of parent undertaking in placings | N/A |
6.6.1(9) | Contracts of significance in which a Director or controlling shareholder was interested | N/A |
6.6.1 (10) | Contracts for the provision of services by a controlling shareholder | N/A |
6.6.1(11) | Waivers of dividends | N/A |
6.6.1(12) | Waivers of future dividends | N/A |
6.6.1(14) | Statements relating to controlling shareholders and ensuring company independence | See Corporate Governance Report. |
Note | 2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | ||
Passenger ticket revenue | 5,6 | ||
Ancillary revenue | 5,6 | ||
Total revenue | 5,6 | ||
Staff costs | 8 | ( | ( |
Fuel costs | ( | ( | |
Distribution and marketing | ( | ( | |
Maintenance, materials and repairs | ( | ( | |
Airport, handling and en-route charges | ( | ( | |
Depreciation and amortisation | ( | ( | |
Other expenses | ( | ( | |
Other income | |||
Total operating expenses | ( | ( | |
Operating profit | |||
Financial income | 10 | ||
Financial expenses | 10 | ( | ( |
Net loss on derivative financial instruments | 10 | ( | ( |
Net foreign exchange gains | 10 | ||
Net financing expense | 10 | ( | ( |
Share of net profit of associates | 18 | ||
Profit before income tax | |||
Income tax (expense)/ credit | 11 | ( | |
Profit for the year | |||
(Loss)/Profit for the year attributable to: | |||
Non-controlling interests | 17 | ( | ( |
Owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |||
Other comprehensive income/(expense) – items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss: | |||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedging reserve, net of tax | 28 | ( | |
Cash flow hedging reserve recycled to profit or loss | 28 | ( | |
Cost of hedging | 28 | ( | |
Currency translation differences | 28 | ||
Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year, net of tax | ( | ||
Total comprehensive income for the year | |||
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year attributable to: | |||
Non-controlling interests | 17 | ( | |
Owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |||
Basic earnings per share (€/share) | 12 | ||
Diluted earnings per share (€/share) | 12 |
Note | 31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | ||
ASSETS | |||
Non-current assets | |||
Property, plant and equipment | 13 | ||
Intangible assets | 14 | ||
Restricted cash | 22 | ||
Long-term cash deposits | |||
Deferred tax assets | 15 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 20 | ||
Investments in associates | 18 | ||
Investments in other entities | |||
Total non-current assets | |||
Current assets | |||
Inventories | 19 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 20 | ||
Current tax assets | |||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Restricted cash | 22 | ||
Short-term cash deposits | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||
Total current assets | |||
Total assets | |||
Equity attributable to owners of the parent | |||
Share capital | 28 | ||
Share premium | 28 | ||
Reorganisation reserve | 28 | ( | ( |
Equity part of convertible debt | 28 | ||
Cash flow hedging reserve | 28 | ( | |
Cost of hedging reserve | 28 | ( | |
Cumulative translation adjustments | 28 | ||
Retained earnings | |||
Capital and reserves attributable to the owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc | |||
Non-controlling interests | 17 | ( | ( |
Total equity | |||
Non-current liabilities | |||
Borrowings | 23 | ||
Convertible debt | 24 | ||
Deferred income | 26 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Trade and other payables | 25 | ||
Provisions for liabilities and charges | 29 | ||
Total non-current liabilities | |||
Current liabilities | |||
Trade and other payables | 25 | ||
Current tax liabilities | |||
Borrowings | 23 | ||
Convertible debt | 24 | ||
Derivative financial instruments | 21 | ||
Deferred income | 26 | ||
Provisions for liabilities and charges | 29 | ||
Total current liabilities | |||
Total liabilities | |||
Total equity and liabilities |
Share capital | Share premium | Reorganisation reserve | Equity part of convertible debt | Cash flow hedging reserve | Cost of hedging reserve | Cumulative translation adjustments | (Accumulated losses)/ Retained earnings | Total | Non- controlling interest | Total equity | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Note | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 17 | ||
Balance at 1 April 2025 | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Comprehensive income/ (expense): | |||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year | ( | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income/ (expense) | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income/ (expense) for the year | |||||||||||
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Change of NCI without a change in control (Note 23) | |||||||||||
Share-based payment charge (Note 27) | |||||||||||
Release on liquidation (Note 16) | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||
Total transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Balance at 31 March 2026 | ( | ( |
Share capital | Share premium | Reorganisation reserve | Equity part of convertible debt | Cash flow hedging reserve | Cost of hedging reserve | Cumulative translation adjustment | Retained earnings/ (Accumulated losses) | Total | Non- controlling interest | Total equity | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Note | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 17 | ||
Balance at 1 April 2024 | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||
Comprehensive income/(expense): | |||||||||||
Profit/(loss) for the year | ( | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive (expense)/income | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||||
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year | ( | ( | ( | ||||||||
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Share-based payment charge (Note 27) | |||||||||||
Total transactions with owners in their capacity as owners: | |||||||||||
Balance at 31 March 2025 | ( | ( | ( | ( |
2026 | 2025 | ||
Note | € million | € million | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |||
Profit before income tax | |||
Adjustments for: | |||
Depreciation | 13 | ||
Amortisation | 14 | ||
Financial income | 10 | ( | ( |
Financial expenses | 10 | ||
Unrealised fair value (gains)/losses on derivative financial instruments | ( | ||
Unrealised foreign currency gains | ( | ( | |
Realised non-operating foreign currency losses/(gains) | ( | ||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment | ( | ( | |
Share-based payment charges | 27 | ||
Other non-cash operating income | ( | ( | |
Changes in working capital | |||
Decrease in trade and other receivables | 20 | ||
(Increase)/decrease in inventory | 19 | ( | |
Increase in provisions | 29 | ||
Decrease in trade and other payables | 25 | ( | ( |
Increase in deferred income | 26 | ||
Cash generated by operating activities before tax | |||
Income taxes paid | ( | ( | |
Net cash generated by operating activities | |||
Purchase of aircraft maintenance assets | ( | ( | |
Purchase of tangible and intangible assets | ( | ( | |
Proceeds from the sale of tangible assets | |||
Advances paid for aircraft and spare engines | 13 | ( | ( |
Refund of advances paid for aircraft and spare engines | 13 | ||
Interest received | |||
Release of restricted cash | 22 | ||
Increase in restricted cash | 22 | ( | ( |
Release of cash deposits | |||
Increase in cash deposits | ( | ( | |
Payment for acquisition of investments | ( | ||
Net cash generated by/(used in) investing activities | ( | ||
Proceeds from new loans* | |||
Repayment of loans* | 23 | ( | ( |
Interest paid on loans* | 23 | ( | ( |
Repayment of unsecured debt | ( | ||
Interest paid on unsecured debt | ( | ( | |
Proceeds from secured debt | |||
Repayment of secured debt | ( | ||
Interest paid on secured debt | ( | ||
Transactions with non-controlling interests | 23 | ||
Repayment of other loan | 16 | ( | |
Other interest paid | ( | ( | |
Net cash used in financing activities | 30 | ( | ( |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year** | |||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents | ( | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year** |
Description in the statement of financial position | IFRS 9 category |
Non-current assets Restricted cash Long-term cash deposits Derivative financial instruments Trade and other receivables Investments in other entities | Financial assets measured at amortised cost Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through other comprehensive income |
Current assets Trade and other receivables Derivative financial instruments Restricted cash Short-term cash deposits Cash and cash equivalents Money market funds | Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss Financial assets measured at amortised cost Financial assets measured at amortised cost Financial assets measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss |
Non-current liabilities Borrowings Convertible debt Derivative financial instruments | Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss |
Current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Convertible debt Derivative financial instruments | Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost Fair value through profit or loss |
Buildings | 20 years |
Land and buildings – investments made on leased buildings | 3–5 years, being the shorter of the investment’s useful economic life and the lease term of the building |
Aircraft (A320neo and A321neo family) 1 | 12-14 years |
Aircraft (A320ceo)2 | 20 years |
Aircraft spare engines (V2500 and GTF) | 16-20 years (part of aircraft parts in Note 13) |
Aircraft and spare engines – prepaid maintenance | 4–10 years (part of aircraft assets in Note 13) |
Aircraft maintenance assets (for leased aircraft or spare engines) | 1–10 years, or 2,000–10,000 flight cycles in the case of aircraft engines, being the shorter of the useful economic life and the lease term |
Aircraft parts (other than engines) | 7 years |
Fixtures and fittings (incl. computer hardware) | 3–5 years |
Right-of-use assets (from leases) | The lease term over one year (typically 8–12 years for leased aircraft, which is significantly less than its estimated useful economic life) |
Software licences | 3–8 years |
Web and other software development costs | 3–5 years |
Airport landing rights | Indefinite |
EUR | USD | Other | Total | |
At 31 March 2026 | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | ||||
Trade and other receivables | 324.5 | 209.9 | 47.9 | 582.3 |
Investments in other entities | — | 3.7 | — | 3.7 |
Derivative financial assets | 10.7 | 573.4 | — | 584.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 239.6 | 752.6 | 93.7 | 1,085.9 |
Cash deposits | 30.0 | 922.8 | — | 952.8 |
Restricted cash | 12.0 | 71.6 | 4.1 | 87.7 |
Total financial assets | 616.8 | 2,534.1 | 145.7 | 3,296.6 |
Financial liabilities | ||||
Unsecured debt* | 2.3 | — | — | 2.3 |
Secured debt | 308.1 | — | — | 308.1 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 724.9 | 3,327.4 | — | 4,052.3 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 9.3 | — | 8.4 | 17.7 |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | 1,818.1 | 602.8 | 110.1 | 2,531.0 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | 43.0 | — | 43.0 |
Convertible debt | 25.8 | — | — | 25.8 |
Trade and other payables | 480.1 | 306.5 | 261.0 | 1,047.6 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 42.8 | 12.5 | — | 55.3 |
Deferred income | 5.5 | — | 2.1 | 7.6 |
Total financial liabilities | 3,416.9 | 4,292.2 | 381.6 | 8,090.7 |
Net financial liabilities | (2,800.1) | (1,758.1) | (235.9) | (4,794.2) |
EUR | USD | Other | Total | |
At 31 March 2025 | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | ||||
Trade and other receivables | 323.2 | 134.4 | 110.3 | 567.9 |
Investments in other entities | — | 3.7 | — | 3.7 |
Derivative financial assets | 0.5 | 11.6 | — | 12.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 254.4 | 236.8 | 106.3 | 597.5 |
Cash deposits | 215.0 | 845.2 | — | 1,060.2 |
Restricted cash | 1.3 | 73.8 | 3.2 | 78.3 |
Total financial assets | 794.4 | 1,305.5 | 219.8 | 2,319.7 |
Financial liabilities | ||||
Unsecured debt* | 500.9 | — | — | 500.9 |
Secured debt | 271.9 | — | — | 271.9 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 775.0 | 2,866.6 | — | 3,641.6 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 19.6 | — | 9.9 | 29.5 |
JOLCO and FTL lease liability | 1,520.1 | 488.6 | 122.0 | 2,130.7 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | 13.9 | — | 13.9 |
Convertible debt | 25.5 | — | — | 25.5 |
Trade and other payables | 463.4 | 114.6 | 236.5 | 814.5 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 7.1 | 35.5 | — | 42.6 |
Deferred income | 2.8 | — | 2.7 | 5.5 |
Total financial liabilities | 3,586.3 | 3,519.2 | 371.1 | 7,476.6 |
Net financial liabilities | (2,791.9) | (2,213.7) | (151.3) | (5,156.9) |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
(Loss)/gain recognised within fuel costs | ||
Effective cash flow hedge | (26.7) | 12.7 |
Total (loss)/gain recognised within fuel costs | (26.7) | 12.7 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Gain/(loss) recognised within fuel costs | ||
Effective hedge | 75.5 | (26.2) |
Total gain/(loss) recognised within fuel costs | 75.5 | (26.2) |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2026 | Notional amount US$ million | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net liability € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 1,240.0 | 1.6 | 8.0 | — | (10.1) | (0.6) |
Total foreign exchange hedges | 1,240.0 | 1.6 | 8.0 | — | (10.1) | (0.6) |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2025 | Notional amount US$ million | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net asset € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 1,147.0 | 0.1 | 8.1 | (3.6) | (4.2) | 0.4 |
Total foreign exchange hedges | 1,147.0 | 0.1 | 8.1 | (3.6) | (4.2) | 0.4 |
F27 | F28 | |
At 31 March 2026 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile of notional amount (million) | $1,044.0 | $196.0 |
Weighted average ceiling | $1.1840 | $1.1987 |
Weighted average floor | $1.1413 | $1.1722 |
F26 | F27 | |
At 31 March 2025 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile of notional amount (million) | $931.0 | $216.0 |
Weighted average ceiling | $1.1224 | $1.1016 |
Weighted average floor | $1.0792 | $1.0591 |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2026 | ‘000 metric tonnes | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net asset € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 1,600.0 | 29.6 | 534.2 | (2.4) | — | 561.5 |
Total fuel hedge | 1,600.0 | 29.6 | 534.2 | (2.4) | — | 561.5 |
Derivative financial instruments | ||||||
At 31 March 2025 | ‘000 metric tonnes | Non-current assets € million | Current assets € million | Non-current liabilities € million | Current liabilities € million | Net liability € million |
Effective cash flow hedge positions | 1,753.0 | 1.1 | 2.3 | (2.7) | (25.1) | (24.3) |
Total fuel hedge | 1,753.0 | 1.1 | 2.3 | (2.7) | (25.1) | (24.3) |
F27 | F28 | |
At 31 March 2026 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile (‘000 metric tonnes) | 1,334.0 | 266.0 |
Blended capped rate | $717.0 | $796.0 |
Blended floor rate | $651.0 | $717.0 |
F26 | F27 | |
At 31 March 2025 | 12 months | 6 months |
Maturity profile (‘000 metric tonnes) | 1,420.0 | 333.0 |
Blended capped rate | $786.0 | $745.0 |
Blended floor rate | $709.0 | $677.0 |
2026 | 2025 | |
Zero-cost collars | ||
Carrying amount net (liability)/asset (€ million) | (0.6) | 0.4 |
Notional amount (US$ million) | 1,240.0 | 1,147.0 |
Maturity date | April 2026– July 2027 | April 2025– August 2026 |
Hedge ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 |
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million) | (5.4) | (1.6) |
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million) | 5.4 | 1.6 |
2026 | 2025 | |
Zero-cost collars | ||
Carrying amount net asset/(liability) (€ million) | 561.5 | (24.5) |
Notional amount (‘000 metric tonnes) | 1,600.0 | 1,726.5 |
Maturity date | April 2026– August 2027 | April 2025– August 2026 |
Hedge ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 |
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million) | 565.6 | (8.7) |
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million) | (565.6) | 8.7 |
Swaps | ||
Carrying amount | — | 0.2 |
Notional amount (‘000 metric tonnes) | — | 26.5 |
Maturity date | — | April 2025– May 2025 |
Hedge ratio | — | 1:1 |
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million) | — | 0.2 |
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million) | — | (0.2) |
2026 | 2025 | |
Difference in profit before tax € million | Difference in profit before tax € million | |
Fuel price sensitivity | ||
Fuel price $100 higher per metric tonne Fuel price $100 lower per metric tonne | -165.6 +165.6 | -171.1 +171.1 |
FX rate sensitivity (USD/EUR) | ||
FX rate 0.05 higher (meaning EUR stronger) FX rate 0.05 lower | 216.4 -236.0 | 214.3 -235.3 |
FX rate sensitivity (GBP/EUR) | ||
FX rate 0.03 higher (meaning EUR stronger) FX rate 0.03 lower | -12.4 13.3 | -17.0 18.3 |
Interest rate sensitivity (EUR) | ||
Interest rate is higher by 100 bps Interest rate is lower by 100 bps | 19.3 -19.4 | 17.6 -17.7 |
2026 | 2025 | |
Difference € million | Difference € million | |
Fuel price sensitivity | ||
Fuel price $100 higher per metric tonne Fuel price $100 lower per metric tonne | 115.1 -115.1 | 163.3 -163.3 |
FX rate sensitivity (USD/EUR) | ||
FX rate 0.05 higher (meaning EUR stronger) FX rate 0.05 lower | 23.2 -23.2 | -1.1 1.1 |
Fuel volume sensitivity (metric tonnes) | ||
100,000 metric tonnes reduction in forecast fuel purchases 100,000 metric tonnes increase in forecast fuel purchases | 31.5 -31.5 | -0.8 0.8 |
At 31 March 2026 | Within three months € million | Between three months and one year € million | Between one and five years € million | More than five years € million | Total € million |
Financial assets | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 380.5 | 176.7 | 18.3 | 6.8 | 582.3 |
Derivative financial assets | 320.7 | 221.5 | 41.9 | — | 584.1 |
Cash deposits | 778.4 | — | 174.4 | — | 952.8 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,085.9 | — | — | — | 1,085.9 |
Restricted cash | 20.3 | 22.2 | 27.6 | 17.6 | 87.7 |
Total financial assets | 2,585.8 | 420.4 | 262.2 | 24.4 | 3,292.8 |
Financial liabilities | |||||
Unsecured debt | 2.3 | — | — | — | 2.3 |
Secured debt | — | — | 325.3 | — | 325.3 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 212.2 | 596.9 | 2,583.0 | 1,331.0 | 4,723.1 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 0.9 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 6.5 | 19.0 |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | 57.8 | 188.5 | 1,107.2 | 1,637.6 | 2,991.1 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | 43.0 | — | — | — | 43.0 |
Convertible debt | — | 1.1 | 24.7 | — | 25.8 |
Trade and other payables | 858.7 | 161.9 | 20.8 | 6.2 | 1,047.6 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 7.5 | 4.2 | 43.6 | — | 55.3 |
Deferred income | 7.6 | — | — | — | 7.6 |
Total financial liabilities | 1,190.0 | 954.6 | 4,114.2 | 2,981.3 | 9,240.1 |
Within three months € million | Between three months and one year € million | Between one and five years € million | More than five years € million | Total € million | |
At 31 March 2025 | |||||
Financial assets | |||||
Trade and other receivables | 519.7 | 2.5 | 45.7 | — | 567.9 |
Derivative financial assets | 3.2 | 7.1 | 1.8 | — | 12.1 |
Cash deposits | 361.1 | 699.1 | — | — | 1,060.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 597.5 | — | — | — | 597.5 |
Restricted cash | 21.0 | 20.7 | 31.5 | 5.1 | 78.3 |
Total financial assets | 1,502.5 | 729.4 | 79.0 | 5.1 | 2,316.0 |
Financial liabilities | |||||
Unsecured debt | 0.6 | 505.0 | — | — | 505.6 |
Secured debt | — | 284.7 | — | — | 284.7 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | 184.2 | 560.1 | 2,242.1 | 1,211.7 | 4,198.1 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 1.3 | 3.4 | 16.4 | 13.8 | 34.9 |
JOLCO and FTL lease liability | 45.4 | 151.7 | 915.7 | 1,443.0 | 2,555.8 |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | — | — | 13.9 | 13.9 |
Convertible debt | 0.3 | — | 25.2 | — | 25.5 |
Trade and other payables | 796.9 | 1.6 | 9.9 | 6.1 | 814.5 |
Derivative financial liabilities | 6.5 | 22.7 | 13.4 | — | 42.6 |
Deferred income | 5.5 | — | — | — | 5.5 |
Total financial liabilities | 1,040.7 | 1,529.2 | 3,222.7 | 2,688.5 | 8,481.1 |
A | A- | Other | Unrated | Total | |
At 31 March 2026 | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 993.5 | 80.7 | 5.2 | 6.6 | 1,085.9 |
Cash deposits | 644.0 | 308.8 | — | — | 952.8 |
Restricted cash | 77.6 | — | — | 10.0 | 87.7 |
Trade and other receivables | 4.5 | 1.9 | 28.2 | 547.6 | 582.2 |
Derivative financial assets | 584.1 | — | — | — | 584.1 |
Investments in other entities | — | — | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Total financial assets | 2,303.7 | 391.5 | 33.3 | 567.9 | 3,296.5 |
A | A- | Other | Unrated | Total | |
At 31 March 2025 | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million |
Financial assets | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 516.0 | 47.5 | 30.9 | 3.0 | 597.5 |
Cash deposits | 954.1 | 106.2 | — | — | 1,060.3 |
Restricted cash | 78.3 | — | — | — | 78.3 |
Trade and other receivables | 4.1 | 3.3 | 5.8 | 554.7 | 567.9 |
Derivative financial assets | 8.3 | 3.8 | — | — | 12.1 |
Investments in other entities | — | — | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Total financial assets | 1,560.8 | 160.8 | 36.7 | 561.4 | 2,319.8 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | |
Assets | ||||
Investments in other entities | — | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | 584.1 | — | 584.1 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 0.3 | — | — | 0.3 |
Liabilities | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | 55.3 | — | 55.3 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | |
Assets | ||||
Investments in other entities | — | — | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Derivative financial instruments | — | 12.1 | — | 12.1 |
Liabilities | ||||
Derivative financial instruments | — | 42.6 | — | 42.6 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Segment revenue | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 |
Segment operating expenses | (5,551.7) | (5,100.1) |
Segment operating profit | 139.7 | 167.5 |
Net financing expense | (112.7) | (147.8) |
Income tax (expense)/ credit | (25.7) | 194.2 |
Profit for the year | 1.3 | 213.9 |
2026 | 2025 | ||
€ million | € million | ||
Passenger ticket revenue | 3,161.4 | 2,917.0 | |
Ancillary revenue | 2,530.0 | 2,350.6 | |
Total segment revenue | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 |
2026 | 2025 | |
EU and EFTA countries | 4,101.4 | 3,638.3 |
UK | 566.2 | 547.6 |
Other (non-EU) | 1,023.8 | 1,081.7 |
Total revenue from external customers | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Wizz Air Hungary Limited | 1,928.1 | 2,226.3 |
Wizz Air Malta Limited | 1,770.8 | 1,913.7 |
Wizz Air Fleet Management Limited | 2,204.4 | 1,709.8 |
Wizz Air UK Limited | 405.4 | 407.7 |
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Limited | — | 44.1 |
Wizz Air Asset Solutions Limited | 1,432.8 | 696.5 |
Duna Irodaház Limited | 39.9 | — |
Other | 43.1 | 21.8 |
Total non-current assets | 7,824.5 | 7,019.9 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Revenue from contracts with passengers | 5,620.2 | 5,197.6 |
Revenue from contracts with other partners | 71.2 | 70.0 |
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of the consolidated financial statements | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Fees payable to the auditor and their associates for the audit of financial statements of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation | 1.4 | 1.3 |
Total fee for audit services | 2.5 | 2.3 |
Other audit-related services fees* | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Other non-audit services fees | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total fee for non-audit services | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Total remuneration of auditors | 2.8 | 2.6 |
Number of persons | ||
2026 | 2025 | |
Non-Executive Directors | 10 | 10 |
Crew and pilots | 8,379 | 7,481 |
Administration and other staff | 733 | 655 |
Total staff number | 9,122 | 8,146 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Wages and salaries | 542.9 | 473.3 |
Pension costs | 27.6 | 21.1 |
Social security costs other than pension | 55.6 | 46.4 |
Share-based payments | 17.1 | 11.5 |
Subtotal | 643.2 | 552.3 |
Subcontracted staff costs (rented pilots) | 12.7 | 12.6 |
Total staff costs | 655.9 | 564.9 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Salaries and other short-term benefits | 3.2 | 2.9 |
Social security costs | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Share-based payments | 5.4 | 4.4 |
Total Directors’ emoluments | 9.1 | 7.6 |
2026 | 2025 | |
Number of Directors receiving emoluments | 11 | 11 |
Number of Directors who in respect of their services received LTIP share options under long-term incentive schemes during the year | 1 | 1 |
2026 | 2025 | ||
€ million | € million | ||
Interest income | 73.6 | 82.1 | |
Financial income | 73.6 | 82.1 | |
Interest expenses on: | |||
Convertible debt | (2.2) | (1.9) | |
IFRS 16 lease liability | (168.2) | (156.7) | |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | (75.3) | (59.6) | |
Unsecured debt | (4.7) | (5.8) | |
Secured debt | (13.4) | (25.0) | |
Other | (4.0) | (0.5) | |
Financial expenses | (267.8) | (249.5) | |
Net loss on derivative financial instruments | (20.6) | (6.4) | |
Net foreign exchange gains | 102.1 | 26.0 | |
Net financing expense | (112.7) | (147.8) |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Current tax on profit for the year | 24.3 | 30.8 |
Adjustment for current tax of prior years | (4.3) | (13.8) |
Other income-based taxes for the year | 9.7 | 9.1 |
Adjustment for income-based taxes of prior years | — | (0.4) |
Total current tax expense | 29.7 | 25.7 |
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities | — | — |
Increase in deferred tax assets | (4.0) | (219.9) |
Total deferred tax credit | (4.0) | (219.9) |
Total tax charge/(credit) | 25.7 | (194.2) |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Profit before income tax | 27.0 | 19.7 |
Tax at the corporate tax rate of 14.7 per cent (2025: 14.7 per cent) | 4.0 | 2.9 |
Adjustment for current tax of prior years | (4.3) | (13.8) |
Adjustment for income-based taxes of prior years | — | (0.4) |
Adjustment for deferred tax of prior years | — | 22.5 |
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries versus the parent company | 20.3 | (207.7) |
Non-deductible expense | 4.4 | (0.7) |
Effect of newly recognised deferred tax assets | (14.5) | (6.1) |
Changes in estimates related to prior period | 6.1 | — |
Other income-based foreign tax | 9.7 | 9.1 |
Total tax charge / (credit) | 25.7 | (194.2) |
Effective tax rate | 95.4% | n/a* |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Deferred tax related to movements in cash flow hedging reserve | (52.6) | 5.4 |
Currency translation differences | (0.5) | — |
Total tax credit / (charge) | (53.1) | 5.4 |
2026 | 2025 | |
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company, € million | 2.2 | 225.8 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue | 103,417,477 | 103,379,218 |
Basic earnings per share, € | 0.02 | 2.18 |
Diluted earnings per share, € | 2026 | 2025 |
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company, € million | 2.2 | 225.8 |
Interest expense on convertible debt (net of tax), € million | 2.2 | 1.9 |
Profit used to determine diluted earnings per share, € million | 4.4 | 227.7 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue | 103,417,477 | 103,379,218 |
Adjustment for assumed conversion on convertible instruments (number) | 24,339,359 | 24,345,392 |
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares for diluted earnings per share | 127,756,836 | 127,724,610 |
Diluted earnings per share, € | 0.03 | 1.78 |
Land and buildings € million | Aircraft maintenance assets € million | Aircraft assets and parts ** € million | Fixtures and fittings € million | Advances paid for aircraft and spare engines* € million | Advances paid for aircraft maintenance assets € million | RoU assets – aircraft and spare engines € million | RoU assets – other € million | Total € million | |
Cost | |||||||||
At 1 April 2024 | 37.5 | 581.6 | 1,806.1 | 13.2 | 842.3 | 149.9 | 4,661.7 | 33.8 | 8,126.1 |
Additions | 10.0 | 249.1 | 806.1 | 2.4 | 426.8 | 71.4 | 536.2 | 9.6 | 2,111.6 |
Disposals | — | (102.8) | (213.3) | (0.2) | (303.9) | — | (277.7) | (3.0) | (900.9) |
Transfers | — | 110.1 | 39.0 | — | (39.0) | (110.1) | — | — | — |
FX translation | — | (2.9) | 3.9 | — | — | 1.2 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 9.0 |
At 31 March 2025 | 47.5 | 835.1 | 2,441.8 | 15.4 | 926.2 | 112.4 | 4,926.2 | 41.2 | 9,345.8 |
Additions | 49.1 | 414.3 | 683.9 | 3.5 | 463.7 | 69.8 | 880.9 | 3.7 | 2,568.9 |
Disposals | — | (213.1) | (245.0) | (2.7) | (508.3) | (11.6) | (459.8) | (13.0) | (1,453.5) |
Transfers | — | 65.4 | 42.6 | — | (42.6) | (65.4) | — | — | — |
FX translation | — | (5.8) | (10.3) | (0.1) | (14.0) | (0.3) | (11.7) | (0.3) | (42.5) |
At 31 March 2026 | 96.6 | 1,095.9 | 2,913.0 | 16.1 | 825.0 | 104.9 | 5,335.6 | 31.6 | 10,418.7 |
Accumulated depreciation | |||||||||
At 1 April 2024 | 7.4 | 226.9 | 216.7 | 10.2 | — | — | 1,841.1 | 8.8 | 2,311.1 |
Depreciation | 2.2 | 238.7 | 109.9 | 1.8 | — | — | 583.0 | 4.3 | 939.9 |
Disposals | — | (101.9) | (17.1) | (0.3) | — | — | (276.3) | (1.5) | (397.1) |
FX translation | — | (3.1) | 0.4 | — | — | — | 1.4 | 0.2 | (1.1) |
At 31 March 2025 | 9.6 | 360.6 | 309.9 | 11.7 | — | — | 2,149.2 | 11.8 | 2,852.8 |
Depreciation | 3.0 | 320.4 | 179.9 | 2.0 | — | — | 637.2 | 4.3 | 1,146.8 |
Disposals | 0.1 | (210.7) | (32.0) | (2.6) | — | — | (451.5) | (2.4) | (699.1) |
FX translation | — | (3.0) | (3.0) | — | — | — | (3.8) | (0.1) | (9.9) |
At 31 March 2026 | 12.7 | 467.3 | 454.8 | 11.1 | — | — | 2,331.1 | 13.6 | 3,290.6 |
Net carrying amount | |||||||||
At 31 March 2026 | 83.9 | 628.6 | 2,458.2 | 5.0 | 825.0 | 104.9 | 3,004.5 | 18.0 | 7,128.1 |
At 31 March 2025 | 37.9 | 474.5 | 2,131.9 | 3.7 | 926.2 | 112.4 | 2,777.0 | 29.4 | 6,493.0 |
2027 | 2028 | 2029 | |
Jet fuel price (USD per metric tonne) | 898.0 | 848.1 | 848.1 |
EUR/USD exchange rate | 1.148 | 1.148 | 1.148 |
Software € million | Licences € million | CIP intangible assets € million | Total € million | |
Cost | ||||
At 1 April 2024 | 100.9 | 36.8 | 10.2 | 147.8 |
Additions | — | — | 32.6 | 32.6 |
Transfers | 27.9 | — | (27.9) | — |
Disposals | (13.0) | (0.1) | — | (13.1) |
FX translation effect | — | 0.6 | — | 0.6 |
At 31 March 2025 | 115.8 | 37.3 | 14.9 | 167.9 |
Additions | — | — | 49.1 | 49.1 |
Transfers | 36.4 | 3.6 | (40.0) | — |
Disposals | (5.9) | — | — | (5.9) |
FX translation effect | — | (1.4) | — | (1.4) |
At 31 March 2026 | 146.3 | 39.5 | 24.0 | 209.7 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairment | ||||
At 1 April 2024 | 55.0 | 0.1 | — | 55.1 |
Amortisation charge for the year | 26.9 | — | — | 26.9 |
Disposals | (12.9) | (0.1) | — | (13.0) |
At 31 March 2025 | 69.0 | — | — | 69.0 |
Amortisation charge for the year | 31.8 | — | — | 31.8 |
Disposals | (5.9) | — | — | (5.9) |
At 31 March 2026 | 94.9 | — | — | 94.9 |
Net carrying amount | ||||
At 31 March 2026 | 51.4 | 39.5 | 24.0 | 114.8 |
At 31 March 2025 | 46.8 | 37.3 | 14.9 | 98.9 |
RoU assets | Lease liabilities | Provisions for other liabilities and charges | Property, plant and equipment | Tax loss carry- forwards | Hedge | Other | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
At 1 April 2024 | (127.2) | 172.9 | 14.6 | (18.9) | 27.4 | (3.3) | 43.7 | 109.2 |
Credited/(charged) to: | ||||||||
Profit or loss | (686.8) | 792.8 | 0.7 | 10.1 | (1.6) | — | 104.9 | 220.1 |
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | 5.4 | — | 5.4 |
At 31 March 2025 | (814.0) | 965.7 | 15.3 | (8.8) | 25.8 | 2.1 | 148.6 | 334.7 |
Deferred tax assets | (814.0) | 965.7 | 15.3 | (8.8) | 25.8 | 2.1 | 148.6 | 334.7 |
Deferred tax liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(Charged)/credited to: | ||||||||
Profit or loss | (93.0) | 79.4 | (0.6) | 23.8 | 17.8 | — | (23.4) | 4.0 |
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | — | (52.6) | (0.5) | (53.1) |
At 31 March 2026 | (907.0) | 1,045.1 | 14.7 | 15.0 | 43.6 | (50.5) | 124.7 | 285.6 |
Deferred tax assets | (907.0) | 1,045.1 | 14.7 | 15.0 | 43.6 | (50.5) | 124.7 | 285.6 |
Deferred tax liabilities | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Country of incorporation | Registered address | Principal activity | Class of shares held | Percentage held | Financial year end | |
Subsidiary undertakings | ||||||
Wizz Air Hungary Limited | Hungary | 1 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Cabin Crew Professionals Sp. Z.o.o. | Poland | 2 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Bosnia LLC | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3 | Crew company | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air Nederland Holding B.V. | The Netherlands | 4 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Dnieper Aviation LLC | Ukraine | 5 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air Ukraine LLC | Ukraine | 5 | Dormant | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Aviation Professionals S.R.L | Moldova | 6 | Crew company | Ordinary | 100 | 31 December |
Wizz Air UK Limited | UK | 7 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Finance Company B.V. | The Netherlands | 11 | Financing company | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Fleet Management Limited | Hungary | 1 | Aircraft leasing | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Limited | United Arab Emirates | 8 | Holding entity | Ordinary | 49 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC | United Arab Emirates | 9 | To be liquidated | Ordinary | 49 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Innovation Limited | Hungary | 1 | Service provider | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Malta Limited | Malta | 10 | Airline operator | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
WAM Ventures Holding Limited | Malta | 10 | Holding entity | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Asset Solutions Limited | Malta | 10 | Aircraft leasing | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Wizz Air Aviation Services LLC | Hungary | 1 | Aircraft engineering | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Duna Irodaház Limited | Hungary | 1 | Property Management | Ordinary | 100 | 31 March |
Country of incorporation | Registered address | Principal activity | Class of shares held | Percentage held | Financial year end | |
Firefly Green Fuels Limited | UK | 12 | SAF R&D | Ordinary | 25 | 31 December |
2026 | 2026 | 2026 | 2026 | |
€ million Abu Dhabi LLC | € million Abu Dhabi Limited | € million Intra-group eliminations | € million Abu Dhabi Consolidated | |
Summarised balance sheet | ||||
Non-current assets | — | — | — | — |
Current assets | 118.6 | 359.2 | (359.2) | 118.6 |
Non-current liabilities | — | — | — | — |
Current liabilities | (89.0) | (177.2) | 174.8 | (91.4) |
Net assets/(liabilities) | 29.6 | 182.0 | (184.4) | 27.2 |
Net assets/(liabilities) attributable to NCI | 8.9 | 54.6 | (67.2) | (3.7) |
Revenue | 95.8 | — | — | 95.8 |
Net (loss)/profit for the year | (3.1) | — | (3.2) | (6.3) |
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax | 10.7 | 3.2 | — | 13.9 |
Total comprehensive income | 7.6 | 3.2 | (3.2) | 7.6 |
Net (loss)/profit for the year allocated to NCI | (0.9) | — | — | (0.9) |
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax allocated to NCI | 3.2 | 1.0 | — | 4.1 |
Cash flows from operating activities | 34.6 | — | — | 34.6 |
Cash flows from investment activities | — | — | — | — |
Cash flows used in financing activities (dividends to NCI: €nil) | (50.2) | — | — | (50.2) |
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | (15.6) | — | — | (15.6) |
2025 | 2025 | 2025 | 2025 | |
€ million Abu Dhabi LLC | € million Abu Dhabi Limited | € million Intra-group eliminations | € million Abu Dhabi Consolidated | |
Summarised balance sheet | ||||
Non-current assets | 247.4 | 46.3 | (46.3) | 247.4 |
Current assets | 106.3 | — | — | 106.3 |
Non-current liabilities | (232.4) | (46.3) | 43.7 | (235.0) |
Current liabilities | (283.8) | — | — | (283.8) |
Net assets/(liabilities) | (162.5) | — | (2.6) | (165.1) |
Net assets/(liabilities) attributable to NCI | (49.5) | — | — | (49.5) |
Revenue | 283.1 | — | — | 283.1 |
Net (loss)/profit for the year | (39.3) | — | 0.2 | (39.1) |
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year, net of tax | 0.2 | — | — | 0.2 |
Total comprehensive (expense)/income | (39.1) | — | 0.2 | (38.9) |
Net (loss)/profit for the year allocated to NCI | (11.9) | — | — | (11.9) |
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year, net of tax allocated to NCI | 0.1 | — | — | 0.1 |
Cash flows from operating activities | 23.1 | — | — | 23.1 |
Cash flows from investment activities | — | — | — | — |
Cash flows used in financing activities (dividends to NCI: €nil) | (4.0) | — | — | (4.0) |
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | 19.1 | — | — | 19.1 |
Firefly Green Fuels Limited € million | Firefly Green Fuels Limited € million | |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
Carrying amount of Firefly Green Fuels Limited | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Percentage ownership interest | 25.0% | 25.0% |
Share of net profit of associates | — | — |
Share in other comprehensive income from investments | — | — |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Aircraft consumables | 54.6 | 47.3 |
UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) allowances | 35.1 | 23.8 |
EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) allowances (refer to Note 23) | 216.0 | 200.8 |
Total inventories | 305.7 | 271.9 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current | ||
Receivables from lessors | 11.2 | 31.0 |
Other receivables | 13.9 | 14.7 |
Non-current trade and other receivables | 25.1 | 45.7 |
Current | ||
Trade receivables | 273.6 | 275.1 |
Receivables from lessors | 2.1 | 0.5 |
Receivables from non-controlling interests (refer to Note 23) | 43.3 | — |
Other receivables | 43.6 | 38.1 |
Total current other receivables | 89.0 | 38.6 |
Prepayments and deferred expenses | 88.1 | 71.4 |
Accrued income | 236.3 | 245.3 |
Current trade and other receivables | 687.0 | 630.4 |
Total trade and other receivables | 712.1 | 676.1 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Impaired receivables | ||
– trade receivables | (4.1) | (2.8) |
Allowances on impaired receivables | ||
– other receivables | (0.4) | (0.5) |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Assets | ||
Non-current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | 31.2 | 1.3 |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps | 10.7 | 0.5 |
Current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | 542.2 | 10.3 |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps | — | — |
Total derivative financial assets | 584.1 | 12.1 |
Liabilities | ||
Non-current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | (2.3) | (6.3) |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps | (41.3) | (7.1) |
Current derivatives | ||
Cash flow hedges | (10.1) | (29.2) |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps | (1.6) | — |
Total derivative financial liabilities | (55.3) | (42.6) |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current financial assets | 45.2 | 36.3 |
Current financial assets | 42.5 | 42.0 |
Total restricted cash | 87.7 | 78.3 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | ||
€ million | € million | ||
Lease liability under IFRS 16 | 584.4 | 605.7 | |
Unsecured debt | 2.3 | 500.9 | |
Secured debt | — | 271.9 | |
Loans from non-controlling interests | 43.0 | — | |
Liability related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts | 186.2 | 139.4 | |
Total current borrowings | 815.9 | 1,517.9 | |
Lease liability under IFRS 16 | 3,485.6 | 3,065.4 | |
Secured debt | 308.1 | — | |
Loans from non-controlling interests | — | 13.9 | |
Liability related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts | 2,344.8 | 1,991.3 | |
Total non-current borrowings | 6,138.5 | 5,070.6 | |
Total borrowings | 6,954.4 | 6,588.5 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | IFRS 16 other lease liability | JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | Unsecured debt | Secured debt | Loans from non- controlling interests | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Payments due: | |||||||
Within one month | 58.9 | 0.2 | 17.3 | 2.3 | — | 43.0 | 121.7 |
Between one and three months | 53.0 | 0.5 | 31.4 | — | — | — | 84.9 |
Between three months and one year | 469.8 | 2.0 | 137.5 | — | — | — | 609.3 |
Between one and two years | 567.2 | 2.9 | 181.5 | — | 308.1 | — | 1,059.7 |
Between two and three years | 529.0 | 2.4 | 187.0 | — | — | — | 718.4 |
Between three and four years | 528.1 | 1.9 | 310.3 | — | — | — | 840.3 |
Between four and five years | 516.0 | 1.9 | 206.3 | — | — | — | 724.2 |
More than five years | 1,330.4 | 5.8 | 1,459.7 | — | — | — | 2,795.9 |
Total borrowings | 4,052.4 | 17.6 | 2,531.0 | 2.3 | 308.1 | 43.0 | 6,954.4 |
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability | IFRS 16 other lease liability | JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | Unsecured debt | Secured debt | Loans from non- controlling interests | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Payments due: | |||||||
Within one month | 42.8 | 0.3 | 11.4 | 0.6 | — | — | 55.1 |
Between one and three months | 95.7 | 0.6 | 26.3 | — | — | — | 122.6 |
Between three months and one year | 463.7 | 2.6 | 101.7 | 500.3 | 271.9 | — | 1,340.2 |
Between one and two years | 558.5 | 3.1 | 143.9 | — | — | — | 705.5 |
Between two and three years | 480.0 | 3.3 | 148.1 | — | — | — | 631.4 |
Between three and four years | 433.8 | 3.3 | 152.6 | — | — | — | 589.7 |
Between four and five years | 426.5 | 3.3 | 281.9 | — | — | — | 711.7 |
More than five years | 1,140.6 | 13.0 | 1,264.8 | — | — | 13.9 | 2,432.3 |
Total borrowings | 3,641.6 | 29.5 | 2,130.7 | 500.9 | 271.9 | 13.9 | 6,588.5 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current convertible debt | 24.7 | 25.2 |
Current convertible debt | 1.1 | 0.3 |
Total convertible debt | 25.8 | 25.5 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Accrued expenses | 103.5 | 69.5 |
Other payables | 0.1 | — |
Non-current trade and other payables | 103.6 | 69.5 |
Current liabilities | ||
Trade payables | 276.0 | 230.7 |
Payables to passengers | 74.9 | 57.9 |
Other payables | 46.5 | 37.7 |
Accrued expenses | 903.6 | 712.5 |
Current trade and other payables | 1,301.0 | 1,038.8 |
Total trade and other payables | 1,404.6 | 1,108.3 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Deferred income | 203.9 | 166.5 |
Current liabilities | ||
Unearned revenue | 1,168.7 | 1,003.5 |
Other | 11.4 | 9.8 |
1,180.1 | 1,013.3 | |
Total deferred income | 1,384.0 | 1,179.8 |
All options | Performance options | |
Number of options | nil | nil |
Exercise price | nil | nil |
Vesting period | 7 years | |
Termination | 10 years |
All options | Performance options | |
Number of options | nil | nil |
Exercise price | nil | nil |
Vesting period | 5 years | |
Termination | 8 years |
All options | Restricted options | Performance options | |
Number of options | 1,533,960 | 922,382 | 611,578 |
Exercise price | nil | nil | nil |
Vesting period | 3 years | 3 years | |
Termination | 10 years | 10 years |
All options | Restricted options | Performance options | |
Outstanding at the beginning of the year | 2,536,098.0 | 993,382.0 | 1,542,716.0 |
Granted during the year | 1,533,960.0 | 922,382.0 | 611,578.0 |
Exercised during the year | (65,107.0) | (24,528.0) | (40,579.0) |
Forfeited during the year | (359,767.0) | (101,484.0) | (258,283.0) |
Outstanding at the end of the year | 3,645,184.0 | 1,789,752.0 | 1,855,432.0 |
Exercisable at the end of the year | 61,607.0 | 40,752.0 | 20,855.0 |
Number of shares | 31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 |
In issue at the beginning of the year | 103,396,078 | 103,360,705 |
Issued during the year | 65,107 | 35,373 |
In issue at the end of the year – fully paid | 103,461,185 | 103,396,078 |
Ordinary Shares | 103,461,185 | 103,396,078 |
2026 | 2026 | 2025 | 2025 | |
Value of shares | £‘000 | €‘000 | £‘000 | €‘000 |
Authorised | ||||
Equity: 170,000,000 (2025: 170,000,000) Ordinary Shares of £0.0001 each and 80,000,000 (2025: 80,000,000) non- voting, non-participating Convertible Shares of £0.0001 each | 25 | 34 | 25 | 34 |
Allotted, called up and fully paid | ||||
Equity: 103,461,185 (2025: 103,396,078) shares of £0.0001 each | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 |
Ordinary Shares | 10 | 13 | 10 | 13 |
Aircraft maintenance | Other | Total | |
€ million | € million | € million | |
At 1 April 2024 | 263.6 | 10.7 | 274.3 |
Non-current provisions | 144.2 | 0.1 | 144.3 |
Current provisions | 119.4 | 10.6 | 130.0 |
Capitalised within property, plant and equipment | 231.2 | — | 231.2 |
Charged to profit or loss | — | 19.7 | 19.7 |
Used during the year | (153.5) | (14.5) | (168.0) |
FX translation effect | (2.1) | — | (2.1) |
At 31 March 2025 | 339.2 | 15.9 | 355.1 |
Non-current provisions | 186.1 | 15.1 | 201.2 |
Current provisions | 153.1 | 0.8 | 153.9 |
Capitalised within property, plant and equipment | 322.9 | — | 322.9 |
Charged to profit or loss | — | 6.1 | 6.1 |
Used during the year | (151.6) | (4.8) | (156.4) |
FX translation effect | (13.4) | — | (13.4) |
At 31 March 2026 | 497.1 | 17.2 | 514.3 |
Non-current provisions | 262.8 | 16.3 | 279.1 |
Current provisions | 234.4 | 0.8 | 235.2 |
Carrying amount | Fair value | Carrying amount | Fair value | |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | € million | € million | |
Financial asset at fair value through other comprehensive income | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Trade and other receivables due after more than one year | 25.1 | 25.1 | 45.7 | 45.7 |
Restricted cash | 87.7 | 87.7 | 78.3 | 78.3 |
Derivative financial assets | 584.1 | 584.1 | 12.1 | 12.1 |
Trade and other receivables due within one year | 557.2 | 557.2 | 522.2 | 522.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,085.9 | 1,085.9 | 597.5 | 597.5 |
Cash deposits | 952.8 | 952.8 | 1,060.2 | 1,060.2 |
Trade and other payables due after more than one year | (27.0) | (27.0) | (16.0) | (16.0) |
Trade and other payables due within one year | (1,020.6) | (1,020.6) | (798.5) | (798.5) |
Derivative financial liabilities | (55.3) | (55.3) | (42.6) | (42.6) |
Convertible debt | (25.8) | (25.8) | (25.5) | (25.5) |
Borrowings | (6,644.0) | (6,338.9) | (5,815.7) | (5,674.4) |
Secured debt | (308.1) | (289.4) | (271.9) | (261.8) |
Unsecured debt | (2.3) | (2.3) | (500.9) | (489.7) |
Deferred income | (7.6) | (7.6) | (5.5) | (5.5) |
Net balance of financial instruments (liability) | (4,794.2) | (4,470.4) | (5,156.9) | (4,994.3) |
Carrying amount | Carrying amount | |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Derivative financial assets | 584.1 | 12.1 |
Total | 584.1 | 12.1 |
Carrying amount | Carrying amount | |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Derivative financial liabilities | 55.3 | 42.6 |
Total | 55.3 | 42.6 |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |||||||||||
Effective interest | Total | Within one year | Two to five years | Above five years | Effective interest | Total | Within one year | Two to five years | Above five years | |||
rate | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | rate | € million | € million | € million | € million | € million | |
Convertible Notes | 7.42% | 25.8 | 1.1 | 24.7 | 7.42% | 25.5 | 0.3 | 25.2 | — | — | ||
Unsecured debt | —% | 2.3 | 2.3 | — | — | — | 1.16% | 500.9 | 500.9 | — | — | — |
Secured debt | 3.73% | 308.1 | — | 308.1 | — | — | 5.12% | 271.9 | 271.9 | — | — | — |
IFRS 16 aircraft engine lease liability | 4.80% | 4,052.4 | 581.7 | 567.2 | 1,573.1 | 1,330.4 | 4.22% | 3,641.6 | 602.2 | 558.5 | 1,340.3 | 1,140.6 |
IFRS 16 other lease liability | 3.14% | 17.6 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 6.2 | 5.8 | 3.39% | 29.5 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 9.9 | 13.0 |
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability | 3.32% | 2,531.0 | 186.2 | 181.5 | 703.6 | 1,459.7 | 3.18% | 2,130.7 | 139.4 | 143.9 | 582.6 | 1,264.8 |
Total | 6,937.2 | 774.0 | 1,084.4 | 2,282.9 | 2,795.9 | 6,600.1 | 1,518.2 | 730.7 | 1,932.8 | 2,418.4 | ||
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Net borrowings at the beginning of the year* | 6,614.0 | 6,269.7 |
Proceeds from new loans | 79.2 | 245.6 |
Repayment of loans | (791.4) | (720.0) |
Repayment of unsecured debt | (500.0) | — |
Proceeds from secured debt | 22.8 | — |
Repayment of secured debt | — | (240.8) |
Transactions with non-controlling interests | 30.0 | — |
Paid interest | (244.5) | (223.5) |
Repayment of other loan | (23.6) | — |
Change in net borrowings from cash flows | (1,427.5) | (938.7) |
New non-cash borrowings | 1,702.4 | 1,059.7 |
Interest expense | 267.0 | 249.2 |
Exchange differences | (193.8) | (11.6) |
Other non-cash items | 18.3 | (14.3) |
Net borrowings at the end of the year* | 6,980.4 | 6,614.0 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits | 11.2 | 9.9 |
Social security costs | 1.6 | 1.2 |
Share-based payments | 13.6 | 9.6 |
Total key management compensation expense | 26.4 | 20.7 |
Key audit matter | How our audit addressed the key audit matter |
Accuracy of IFRS 16 “Leases” input data | |
The group recognised right-of-use (“RoU”) assets of €3,022.5 million and associated lease liabilities of €4,070.0 million at 31 March 2026. The RoU assets and lease liabilities largely relate to aircraft leases and are calculated based on discounted future lease payments. These calculations involve assumptions including, but not limited to, the determination of the lease payments, the expected lease term, consideration of extension options and the discount rate used to determine the liabilities. We focused on this area because input data errors for new leases or a failure to accurately capture changes in lease contracts in the year could materially impact the lease accounting given the value of an individual aircraft lease. There was also a new system implemented for IFRS 16 accounting in F26. Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2, note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in determining the IFRS 16 balances at 31 March 2026 and notes 13 and 23 which disclose the RoU assets and lease liability balances and movements, respectively. | We understood and evaluated the process followed by management to account for its leases under IFRS 16. We tested the integrity of management’s new system which was used to perform the lease liability and RoU asset calculations by testing that its IT general controls are operating effectively. We tested the accuracy of the underlying data used in management’s system calculation for new leases in the year to supporting lease documentation, as well as the transfer of data between old and new systems for existing leases. We also tested the appropriateness of the other significant assumptions used for lease additions in the year. This included the discount rates applied to future lease payments for lease additions. Where leases contained an option for early termination or extension, we considered management’s assessment of the likelihood of the option being exercised, based on the nature of the assets and the terms including changes in the period under option. Using a digital audit solution, we reperformed the calculation of the asset, liability, depreciation and interest entries relating to the accounting for leases under IFRS 16 and compared the results to the values generated by management’s system and found the difference to be within acceptable thresholds. We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in notes 2 and 4 in respect of the accounting policies and significant judgements and estimates involved in determining the IFRS 16 balances and the disclosures in notes 13 and 23 for leases. We did not identify any material uncorrected misstatements from our work on IFRS 16. |
Aircraft maintenance provisioning | |
The group operates aircraft which are held under lease arrangements and incurs liabilities for maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft in line with the terms of its aircraft leases. Under these lease agreements, the group is contractually committed to either return the aircraft in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor based on the actual condition of the aircraft and its major components upon return. The group uses the "strict obligation” method of accounting for such costs under which provision is made for the minimum unavoidable costs of specific future maintenance obligations created by the lease at the time when such obligations become certain. Maintenance provisions of €497.1 million for aircraft maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft are recorded in the financial statements at 31 March 2026 (refer to note 29 to the financial statements). At each balance sheet date, the calculation of the maintenance provision includes a number of variable factors and assumptions including the likely utilisation of the aircraft; the expected cost of the heavy maintenance check at the time it is expected to occur; the condition of the aircraft; and the lifespan of life-limited parts. We focused on this area because an inherent level of management judgement and estimation is required in determining the above variable factors and assumptions on an aircraft-by-aircraft basis. This includes a commercial decision on whether to perform future maintenance based on expected flying hours or to avoid this and pay compensation to the lessor at the end of the lease. There was also a new system implemented for maintenance accounting in F26. Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2 and note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in calculating the maintenance provisions required, as well as note 29 for specific disclosures relating to the maintenance provisions. | We understood and evaluated the process followed by management to determine its maintenance provision, including the input data, assumptions and significant judgements and estimates used. We tested the integrity of the new maintenance provision system used by management, by testing the effectiveness of its IT general controls and reviewing the code for specific automated calculations therein. We also assessed the process by which the variable factors used within the provision calculation were appropriately estimated by performing the following procedures: • Comparing the cost assumptions in the maintenance provision system with recent invoices; inspecting approved maintenance plans; as well as validating a sample of current flight hours and flight cycles to non-financial data sources. • Performing a look back test to assess the accuracy of past estimates. • Testing the input data through agreement to underlying lease contracts, focusing specifically on new and amended contracts in F26, as well as the transfer of data from old to new systems for existing leases, and considering whether the planned maintenance could be materially impacted by risks associated with climate change. • Understanding the planned maintenance schedule and discussing it with management’s expert who advises on maintenance requirements. • Testing material manual adjustments to the provision amount calculated by the maintenance provision system. • Re-performing calculations on a sample basis. We tested the short and long-term classification of the provision. We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in notes 2 and 4 in respect of the accounting policies and significant judgements and estimates involved in maintenance provisioning and the disclosures in note 29 for maintenance. We did not identify any material uncorrected misstatements from our work on maintenance provisions. |
Recoverability of deferred tax assets | |
Deferred tax assets can be recognised to the extent it is probable that there will be sufficient future taxable profits to utilise them. The group recognised deferred tax assets of €285.6 million at 31 March 2026. The recoverability of these deferred tax assets is based on a number of significant assumptions. The entity level forecasts of future taxable profits include a number of assumptions regarding the future and thus estimation uncertainty. They cover an extended period to demonstrate the reversal of timing differences giving rise to the deferred tax assets recognised. This period goes beyond the group’s normal three-year planning horizon and involves assumptions regarding revenue and operating cost levels and fleet utilisation. Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2 and note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, as well as note 11 for details of the deferred tax credit recognised in the year and note 15 for specific disclosures relating to the deferred tax asset balances. | We understood and evaluated management’s process of preparing deferred tax calculations. We tested the deferred tax calculations for arithmetic accuracy and validated input data. We evaluated management’s methodology for assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets. The recognition of a deferred tax asset is supported by the availability of sufficient probable taxable profits in future periods against which temporary tax-deductible differences can be utilised. We assessed the reasonableness of assumptions underpinning the future forecasts. In doing this, we considered whether the taxable profit growth assumed was supportable. Where applicable we assessed the consistency of the forecasts used to justify the recognition of deferred tax assets to those used elsewhere in the business, including for the going concern assessment and impairment assessment of the fleet cash generating unit. We also assessed the adequacy of disclosures over this area. We did not identify any material uncorrected misstatements from our audit work. |
Overall group materiality | €50,000,000 (2025: €46,000,000) |
How we determined it | Approximately 0.9% of total revenue |
Rationale for benchmark applied | We considered various potential benchmarks including profit before tax and revenue and concluded, using professional judgement, that total revenue (2025: total revenue) continues to be an appropriate benchmark for the current year audit and revenue continues to be a key performance metric for the group. |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Operating profit | 139.7 | 167.5 |
Depreciation and amortisation | 1,178.6 | 966.8 |
EBITDA | 1,318.3 | 1,134.3 |
Total revenue | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 |
EBITDA margin (%) | 23.2% | 21.5% |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,085.9 | 597.5 |
Short-term cash deposits | 778.4 | 1,060.2 |
Long-term cash deposits | 174.4 | — |
Total revenue | 5,691.4 | 5,267.6 |
Liquidity | 35.8% | 31.5% |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current liabilities | ||
Borrowings | 6,138.5 | 5,070.6 |
Convertible debt | 24.7 | 25.2 |
Current liabilities | ||
Borrowings | 815.9 | 1,517.9 |
Convertible debt | 1.1 | 0.3 |
Current assets | ||
Short-term cash deposits | 778.4 | 1,060.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,085.9 | 597.5 |
Non-current assets | ||
Long-term cash deposits | 174.4 | — |
Net debt | 4,941.5 | 4,956.3 |
EBITDA | 1,318.3 | 1,134.3 |
Leverage ratio | 3.7 | 4.4 |
2026 | 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Operating profit | 139.7 | 167.5 |
Average Shareholders’ equity | 622.8 | 231.4 |
Average borrowings and convertible debt | 6,797.1 | 6,441.8 |
Average cash and cash equivalents | (841.7) | (663.0) |
Average cash deposits | (1,006.5) | (905.7) |
Average capital employed | 5,571.6 | 5,104.6 |
ROCE (%) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
31 March 2026 | 31 March 2025 | |
€ million | € million | |
Non-current assets | ||
Restricted cash | 45.2 | 36.3 |
Long-term cash deposits | ||
Current assets | ||
Restricted cash | 42.5 | 42.0 |
Short-term cash deposits | 778.4 | 1,060.2 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,085.9 | 597.5 |
Total cash | 2,126.4 | 1,736.0 |
Report of the Chair of the Sustainability and Culture Committee | |
General information | |
Basis for preparation | |
Governance | |
Strategy | |
Impact, risk and opportunity management: disclosures on the double materiality assessment | |
Environmental information | |
Disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation) | |
[E1] Climate change | |
[E2] Pollution of air | |
Social information | |
[S1] Own workforce | |
[S2] Workers in the value chain | |
[S4] Consumers and end-users | |
Governance information | |
[G1] Business conduct | |
[G] Other governance information | |
ESRS Content index |
“Embedding sustainability across governance, strategy and culture remains central to Wizz Air’s long‑term resilience and performance.” Charlotte Andsager Chair of the Sustainability and Culture Committee |
Category | Male | Female | Total |
Number of Executive Members | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Number of Non-executive Members | 7 | 4 | 11 |
Board Gender Diversity (%) | 64% | 36% | 100% |
Number of Independent Non‑Executive Directors | 3 | 4 | 7 |
Percentage of Independent Board Members | - | - | 64% |
Responsibilities | Implementation |
Strategy | Reviewing and overseeing the implementation of Wizz Air’s sustainability strategy. |
Risk assessment | Examining extra-financial risks, particularly those related to environmental and societal issues. |
Reporting and benchmarks | Overseeing non-financial reporting processes, adhering to applicable legislation and international benchmarks. |
Culture and diversity | Beyond sustainability, evaluating the Company’s culture, ensuring that it promotes diversity across the workforce, and facilitating effective communication between management and employees. |
Employee engagement | Overseeing employee relations, ensuring that Wizz Air fosters a diverse and engaged workforce. |
SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE SUMMARY | |
Board of Directors Approval and supervision of strategic objectives | Sustainability and Culture Committee ▶ Objective: Aligns the Company’s sustainability strategic objectives with industry best-in- class standards. ▶ Frequency: Meets at least six times per year, with an additional session dedicated to in- depth training on sustainability and climate-related matters each year. Audit and Risk Committee ▶ Objective: Approval of the climate-risk universe (including the physical and transition risk analysis), risk appetite and action plan to address these risks. ▶ Frequency: Meets at least six times per year. |
Leadership Team Development and execution of strategies | Sustainability Council The driving force behind sustainable practices, ensuring they are embedded throughout the organisation’s operations and culture. ▶ Strategic alignment: Supports the Leadership Team in defining sustainability objectives and corresponding strategies. Ensures alignment with industry best practices. ▶ Execution and prioritisation: Drives execution across the organisation by prioritising and allocating resources. Focuses on key priorities, including fleet renewal, fuel efficiency, climate regulation advocacy and sustainable aviation fuels. ▶ Expertise hub: Serves as a centre of expertise on ESG, sustainability and climate matters. ▶ Integration and action: Integrates functional leaders to swiftly deploy guidance into operations. |
Core elements of due diligence | Paragraphs in the sustainability statement |
Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model | ESRS 2: GOV-1, GOV-2, GOV-3, SMB-3 Topical standards: S1-1, S2-1, S4-1, G1-1 |
Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due diligence | ESRS 2: SBM-2, IRO-1, GOV-2 Topical standards: E1-2, S1-2, S2-2, S4-2, G1-2 |
Identifying and assessing adverse impacts | ESRS 2: IRO-1, SBM-3, |
Taking actions to address those adverse impacts | ESRS 2: GOV-2, GOV-5 Topical standards: E1-3, S1-4, S2-4, S4-4, G1-2, G1-3 |
Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating | ESRS 2: GOV-2, GOV-5 Topical standards: E1-4, E1-5, E1-6, E1-7, E1-8, S1-5, S1-6, S1-7, S1-9, S1-11, S1-13, S1-14, S1-17, S2-4, S2-5,G1-3, G1-4, G1-5, G1-6 |
Region | Headcount |
Europe | 8,934 |
Other | 734 |
LEADING IN FLEET RENEWAL | From F26, 75% of the Company’s fleet now consists of new technology aircraft, reflecting its commitment to technology and innovation and its belief that fleet renewal is one of the most effective solutions currently available to reduce emissions per flight; the A321neo aircraft offers up to approximately 20 per cent lower fuel consumption and reduced noise and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions compared with previous-generation aircraft models under certain operating conditions, supporting the Company’s target to reduce carbon emissions intensity by 25 per cent by 2030. |
FUEL-EFFICIENT AIRCRAFT AND ENGINES | Wizz Air operates a relatively young fleet compared with many industry peers, which contributes to improved fuel efficiency and a lower emissions intensity per passenger kilometre. The Company continues to focus on a range of operational efficiency measures, including optimised aircraft utilisation and enhanced fuel management practices, as part of its approach to managing the environmental impact of its operations. As a result of these measures, in F26 Wizz Air achieved a 3% reduction in emissions intensity, decreasing from 52.2 to 50.6 g CO₂ per passenger kilometre, compared to the previous period. The Company’s approach to fleet modernity and operational efficiency has been recognised by independent industry sources such as Cirium, ch-aviation and World Finance, as well as through the Sustainable Airline of the Year 2025 award from Airline Economics, which collectively acknowledge the effectiveness of these emissions‑reduction measures. While such initiatives support reductions in emissions intensity, aviation remains a carbon‑intensive sector, and achieving reductions in absolute emissions is still a key challenge. |
HIGH SEAT CAPACITY – EMISSIONS PER PASSENGER | The Airbus A321neo aircraft’s 239-seat single-class configuration enables higher passenger capacity per flight, which can contribute to lower emissions intensity per passenger kilometre compared with lower-density configurations. Wizz Air incorporates fleet configuration and operational efficiency measures into its approach to managing the environmental impact of its operations. |
ESG PILLAR | KEY OBJECTIVE | LINKED SDGS |
ENVIRONMENT | Focus on reducing our CO₂ emissions intensity (grams per revenue passenger kilometre) through ongoing efficiency measures. | 7, 9, 12, 13 |
PEOPLE | Become an employer of choice, set an example for corporate citizenship. Retain and develop talent and provide a great customer experience. | 3, 4, 5, 10 |
ECONOMY | Contribute to the GDP growth of our destinations by enabling affordable connectivity. Create new jobs, drive tourism and business opportunities. | 17 |
GOVERNANCE | Put the proper organisational structure of sustainability management, systems and people in place to support our strategy and vision. | 8 |
COMPANY GOALS | STRATEGIC PRIORITIES | |
▶ Deliver an average of 10-12 per cent annual growth in capacity in the long term | ▶ A focused, ultra-low-cost, low-fare business model | |
▶ Deliver double-digit net income margin | ▶ Increasing and diversifying our geographical footprint | |
▶ Reduce our CO2 emissions intensity by 25 per cent by F30 (versus base year F20) | ▶ Delivering industry-leading sustainability in accordance with the Company’s ESG strategy | |
The main ESG-related metrics are integrated into our key performance measures year on year. | ▶ Enabling our business by creating the leading digital platform | |
▶ Continuing to run a highly engaged, agile and entrepreneurial organisation |
1. Leading on cost | 2. Increasing our geographical footprint | 3. Key ESG metrics | 4. Leading digital platform | 5. Highly engaged organisation |
1.1. CASK performance | 2.1. Market penetration | 3.1. CO2 emissions intensity | 4.1. Brand awareness | 5.1. Employee engagement |
1.2. Ancillary PAX revenue | 2.2. Market share | 3.2. Gender diversity | 4.2. Web/app visitors | 5.2. Staff attrition |
1.3. Cash | 4.3. Conversion | 5.3. Promotion from within |
Activity | Operational Scope | Key Stakeholders | Material ESRS Topics |
Flight operations | Operation of flights across network, including leased operations | Employees, technical service providers, regulators | E1; E2; S1; S4 |
On-board sales & catering | Onboard sale of goods and services | Catering suppliers, logistics providers, passengers | S2; S4 |
Distribution & partner sales | Sale of partner services via digital and commercial channels | Distribution partners, digital platform providers, customers | S4; G-Entity specific |
Flight scheduling | Fleet and route scheduling to optimise aircraft utilisation | Employees, regulators | E1; S1 |
Crew management | Crew rostering, standby management and operational staffing | Employees | S1 |
Activity | Operational Scope | Key Stakeholders | Material ESRS Topics |
Catering & onboard goods supply | Procurement of food, beverages and onboard retail goods | Catering suppliers, logistics providers | S2; G1 |
Aircraft delivery & fleet integration | Aircraft acquisition, manufacturing and integration into fleet | Aircraft manufacturers (OEMs), lessors | E1; S2; G1 |
Fuel supply management | Jet fuel and SAF sourcing and supply at network destinations | Fuel suppliers | E1; E2; S2; G1 |
Spare parts procurement | Procurement of aircraft components and spare parts | OEM part manufacturers, MRO supply chain workforce | E2; S2; G1 |
Maintenance (heavy maintenance) | Major aircraft overhaul and technical servicing | MRO providers, certified technicians, contracted maintenance suppliers | E2; S2; G1 |
Ground logistics (F&B and goods) | Logistics and ground transport of onboard goods | Third-party logistics providers | S2; G1 |
Planning (F&B & ancillary services) | Internal planning of onboard goods and service volumes | Employees, partners/suppliers | S1; G1 |
Activity | Operational Scope | Key Stakeholders | Material ESRS Topics |
Ticket sales & distribution | Sale of tickets and ancillary services via direct and indirect channels | Customers, travel agencies, distribution partners | S4; G1; S2; G- Entity specific |
Marketing & promotions | Advertising campaigns, sponsorships and brand communication | Customers, regulators, marketing agencies, creative partners | S4; G1; S2 |
Customer services (after-sales) | Complaint handling, rebooking, refunds and passenger support | Customers, outsourced customer service providers | S4; S2 |
Waste management (onboard & service waste) | Collection and disposal of waste generated from onboard services | Waste contractors, airport operators, contracted cleaning staff | S2 |
Stakeholder | Why they matter to us | What matters to them (views and interests)* | |
Our customers | Customers are fundamental to the success and continuity of our business model. Their trust and loyalty support revenue growth and market competitiveness. Meeting customer expectations while maintaining a competitive cost structure is central to our strategy. | Customers seek a reliable, safe and affordable travel experience, with high service quality, transparent pricing, environmental responsibility and a seamless digital journey, including efficient handling of complaints and feedback. | |
Our investors | Investor confidence is essential to sustaining our business model and funding growth initiatives. Their support enables long-term investment in fleet, innovation and sustainability while delivering shareholder returns. | Investors expect strong financial performance delivered in a responsible and sustainable manner. They value robust governance, effective risk management, resource efficiency, leading carbon intensity performance and credible climate transition plans. | |
Sustainability and Culture Committee of the Board of Directors | The Committee provides oversight of sustainability strategy and governance, ensuring alignment with regulatory requirements and long-term corporate objectives. Its role is critical in embedding sustainability into strategic decision-making. | The Committee focuses on integrating environmental and social considerations into corporate strategy, ensuring compliance, monitoring performance against sustainability targets and strengthening accountability and transparency. | |
Our people (employees) | Employees are the face of the Company and a key driver of service quality and operational performance. High engagement and retention contribute directly to customer satisfaction and business efficiency. | Employees expect a safe, inclusive and respectful working environment, opportunities for development and career progression as well as meaningful engagement. | |
Our partners and suppliers | Partners enable the delivery of our “lowest- cost-done-right” operating model and support operational resilience and scalability. Long- term relationships enhance agility and performance. | Partners seek fair and transparent commercial relationships, timely payments, mutual trust and opportunities for long-term collaboration, innovation and value creation. | |
Our communities | The Company contributes to regional connectivity, economic development and employment in the communities in which it operates. Maintaining positive community relations supports our social licence to operate. | Communities expect the Company to generate local economic opportunities, minimise environmental impacts, act responsibly and contribute to sustainable growth and social well-being. | |
Regulators and policymakers | Regulatory frameworks shape the operating environment of the aviation sector. Constructive engagement supports compliance, innovation and a fair transition towards sustainable aviation. | Regulators and policymakers expect compliance with laws and standards, transparent reporting and leadership in supporting a socially fair and environmentally responsible transition to a low-carbon economy. | |
Wizz Air Sustainability Team | The Sustainability Team drives the integration of sustainability principles into operations, culture and strategy across the organisation. | The team prioritises effective implementation of sustainability initiatives, measurable progress against targets, cross-functional collaboration and continuous improvement in environmental and social performance. | |
Operational management / ESG representatives | Operational teams translate sustainability commitments into daily practices and ensure alignment between strategy and execution across departments. | These teams value clear strategic direction, practical tools, training and stakeholder feedback to support effective implementation of sustainability objectives within their operational responsibilities. |
Sub-topic | ESRS Pillar | Impact Materiality | Financial Materiality |
Climate change adaptation | E1 – Climate change | — | ✔ |
Climate change mitigation | E1 – Climate change | ✔ | — |
Energy | E1 – Climate change | — | ✔ |
Pollution of air | E2 – Pollution | ✔ | — |
Working conditions (Own workforce) | S1 – Own workforce | ✔ | — |
Equal treatment & opportunities | S1 – Own workforce | ✔ | ✔ |
Working conditions (Value chain) | S2 – Value chain workers | ✔ | ✔ |
Information-related impacts (Consumers/end- users) | S4 – Consumers & end-users | ✔ | ✔ |
Personal safety (Consumers/end-users) | S4 – Consumers & end-users | ✔ | ✔ |
Social inclusion (Consumers/end-users) | S4 – Consumers & end-users | ✔ | ✔ |
Corporate culture | G1 – Business conduct | ✔ | ✔ |
Protection of whistleblowers | G1 – Business conduct | ✔ | — |
Political engagement | G1 – Business conduct | ✔ | — |
Supplier relationships & payment practices | G1 – Business conduct | — | ✔ |
Corruption and bribery | G1 – Business conduct | ✔ | — |
Cybersecurity & data protection | Entity-specific Governance | ✔ | ✔ |
Community programmes & charitable support | Entity-specific Governance | ✔ | — |
ENVIRONMENT | |||||
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon /Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
E1 - Climate change | |||||
ESRS E1 – CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material negative impact is concentrated in our own operations | The impact is negative, actual. Greenhouse gas emissions generated by air transport activities contribute to climate change, which is associated with rising global temperatures, shifts in weather patterns, and sea-level increases Our climate strategy includes challenging objectives and ambitious targets to address climate risks across our operations. | Wizz Air is dedicated to mitigating climate change impacts through a comprehensive strategy that includes renewing our aircraft fleet, continuously improving operational efficiency, and investing in sustainable aviation fuels. Furthermore, we actively collaborate with industry partners to ensure emissions reductions across our supply chain and broader operations. The strategy is described in more detail in the ESRS E1 chapter. | Sustainability is integrated into Wizz Air’s core strategy. Wizz Air has implemented measures and set targets to reduce GHG emissions by investing in sustainable and alternative fuels, renewing its fleet, and enhancing fuel efficiency initiatives. | Currently, there are limited significant financial costs related to climate change mitigation. However, in the near future, we anticipate increased operational costs due to emission reduction regulations. Operating in the EU and UK adds compliance complexity. Additional costs will come from the UK and EU ETS, higher carbon prices, and new fossil fuel taxes. The financial impact could be higher with parallel carbon taxes, leading to double taxation. Increased SAF blending volumes will also raise operational costs. |
ESRS E1 – CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our upstream value chain | The impact is negative, actual. Emissions generated in the upstream such as those caused by the manufacture of kerosene also contribute to climate change. | Wizz Air is investing in sustainable aviation fuel research and development companies, holding MOUs with several providers while fully complying with current regulations and mandates, such as ReFuelEU Aviation. | Sustainability is integrated into Wizz Air’s core strategy. Wizz Air has implemented measures and set targets to reduce GHG emissions by investing in sustainable and alternative fuels, renewing its fleet, and enhancing fuel efficiency initiatives. | Currently, there are limited significant financial costs related to climate change mitigation. However, in the near future, we anticipate increased operational costs due to emission reduction regulations, higher carbon prices, new fossil fuel taxes, and the rising volumes of SAF blending. |
ESRS E1 – CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION (Raw material extraction and processing - manufacturing material) | Negative impact Time horizon: Long The material impact is concentrated in our upstream value chain | The impact is negative, actual. Upstream emissions from kerosene production and energy-intensive raw material extraction and aircraft manufacturing contribute to climate change through embedded greenhouse gas emissions. | Upstream embedded emissions arise from energy-intensive raw material extraction and aircraft manufacturing processes. Over time, industrial decarbonisation and lower-carbon material transition are expected to influence supplier practices and aircraft manufacturing cost structures. | Wizz Air addresses this impact through long-term fleet planning, engagement with aircraft manufacturers, investment in next- generation aircraft technologies and participation in industry decarbonisation initiatives. Progress is monitored through fleet strategy reviews, supplier engagement and sustainability performance monitoring over medium- and long- term planning horizons. | Currently there is no material direct financial impact. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS E1 - CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our own operations | Primarily financial and operational risk, with potential indirect environmental and societal effects through operational disruption. Physical risks may affect infrastructure availability, operational continuity and asset integrity. | No high-impact physical risks have been identified within the current planning horizon. However, increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events may disrupt operations, markets and supply chains or cause damage to assets over the long term. Climate-related atmospheric phenomena may affect flight planning, routing and scheduling, potentially leading to revenue loss or higher operating costs. | Physical climate risks are monitored through the Enterprise Risk Management framework and reviewed through the Audit and Risk Committee. An annual TCFD- consistent climate risk assessment is also conducted. Operational resilience is supported through flight planning procedures, operational risk monitoring and scenario-based climate risk analysis. | Currently, no material financial impacts have been identified. Over the long term, increasing physical climate risks may lead to higher operating costs, asset protection or replacement costs and potential revenue volatility due to operational disruption. Impacts are expected to be managed through operational planning, risk management processes and long- term resilience planning. |
ESRS E1 - ENERGY | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our upstream value chain | Changes in fuel regulation or supply availability may require adjustments to operational planning and fuel sourcing, potentially increasing operating costs. Fuel supply disruptions, particularly at airports with limited supplier alternatives, may negatively affect flight operations, schedule reliability and service delivery. | External events may disrupt fuel supply availability at specific locations, potentially leading to real-time flight cancellations, diversions or operational adjustments. This may directly affect schedule reliability and revenue generation. | Fuel supply risks are managed through supplier monitoring, fuel procurement strategy, operational fuel efficiency measures and contingency planning. Risks are monitored by relevant teams, with a focus on short- term operational resilience. | Fuel supply disruption may directly affect revenue generation and operating costs through flight cancellations, diversions or fuel sourcing changes. While the likelihood is considered reasonably possible, preventive measures are in place. |
E2 - Pollution | |||||
ESRS E2 – POLLUTION OF AIR | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | The impact is negative, actual. Negative actual impact through non- CO₂ air pollutants and aircraft noise affecting local air quality and noise exposure levels, particularly for communities living near airports. Livelihoods and human health may be marginally affected. Impacts occur across multiple regions and are difficult to fully reverse. | Aircraft operations generate non-CO₂ emissions and noise, particularly during take-off, landing and ground operations. Increasing regulatory scrutiny and stakeholder expectations are expected to continue. Over time, fleet renewal and technological improvements are expected to reduce noise and air pollutant intensity per flight. | Wizz Air integrates noise and air pollution reduction into its fleet and sustainability strategy by operating one of the youngest fleets in Europe and acquiring next- generation aircraft with improved noise and emissions performance. All aircraft comply with ICAO Chapter 4 noise standards, with most already meeting the more stringent Chapter 14 standard and full compliance expected by 2029. Progress is continuously monitored through fleet planning, manufacturer engagement and regulatory oversight. | Currently, pollution mitigation requirements have limited direct impact on operating costs. Over the medium and long term, mitigation is expected to require higher capital expenditure due to the acquisition of newer, quieter and more efficient aircraft, which may increase aircraft acquisition costs but support long-term operational efficiency. |
SOCIAL | |||||
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
S1 - Own workforce | |||||
ESRS S1 - SECURE EMPLOYMENT | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Wizz Air is committed to providing secure employment through comprehensive, indefinite-term contracts and enhanced employee support programmes. Our operations create direct and indirect job opportunities, from pilots and cabin crew to ground staff and maintenance personnel, contributing to job growth in the countries where we operate. | Wizz Air’s continued growth supports direct job creation and long-term employment opportunities across operational and corporate roles. Expansion of internal capabilities and recruitment programmes support workforce stability. Employee support initiatives provide additional financial and wellbeing security. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS S1 - SECURE EMPLOYMENT | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Positive actual social impact through employment creation and income opportunities across the aviation ecosystem and local labour markets. | Growth in operations supports continued demand for value chain workforce services and employment opportunities across operational partners. Expansion of operations may further support job creation across the aviation ecosystem. | No change planned. | No direct material financial effects are identified for Wizz Air beyond normal operational and supplier cost structures. |
ESRS S1 - HEALTH AND SAFETY | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Aviation operations involve specific working environments that may present occupational health and safety challenges, including fatigue management, exposure to noise, temperature variations and operational stress factors. These impacts are primarily relevant to specific operational and technical employee groups. | Occupational health and safety considerations are inherent to aviation operations. With appropriate management and monitoring, risks are mitigated; however, without effective controls they could lead to injuries, health issues or operational disruption. | Wizz Air manages occupational health and safety through structured health monitoring programmes, regular medical examinations, safety procedures, training and employee wellbeing initiatives. Employee Assistance Programmes support mental health and crisis situations. Performance is monitored continuously through health and safety governance, operational risk monitoring and internal review processes. | Occupational health and safety mainly involves ongoing costs for training, monitoring, compliance and employee wellbeing programmes. Since we already have strong preventive measures in place, current financial impacts are low. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS S1 - TRAINING AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT | Positive impact Time horizon: Medium The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | The impact is positive, and actual. At Wizz Air we are dedicated to recruiting top talent and providing them with essential tools, offering dynamic development opportunities through a specially tailored programme for all levels within the organisation. | Wizz Air provides structured training programmes through dedicated training facilities, regulatory training programmes and development initiatives across operational and corporate functions. Continued investment in training and onboarding supports workforce capability and talent development as operations grow. | No change planned. | Training and development programmes represent ongoing operational expenditure and strategic workforce investment. These investments support operational performance, workforce capability and long-term talent availability, with expected benefits through productivity, operational safety and employee retention. |
ESRS S1 - TRAINING AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT | Risk Time horizon: short The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Primarily financial and operational risk. Insufficient workforce skills or capability gaps may affect service quality, operational reliability and safety performance, and may affect employee workload and stress levels. | Aviation operations require continuous regulatory and technical competence. Workforce capability gaps or higher turnover may require increased training intensity and recruitment activity. Without effective training and workforce planning, skills shortages could affect operational performance and competitiveness. | Wizz Air mitigates skills risks through structured training programmes, training-to- proficiency standards, onboarding programmes, recurrent training and workforce planning. | Training and workforce capability programmes represent ongoing operational expenditure. Skills gaps or higher turnover could increase recruitment, training and onboarding costs. Continued investment in training is expected as part of normal operational and workforce planning expenditure. |
ESRS S1 - TRAINING AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT (skills gap risk due to disruption) | Risk Time horizon: short The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Primarily financial and operational risk. Training disruption may affect crew availability, scheduling flexibility and operational continuity, potentially leading to delays, cancellations or reduced capacity utilisation. | Aviation operations depend on continuous training and certification processes. Disruption in training capacity, simulator access, training provider availability or workforce availability may affect operational flexibility and scheduling reliability, particularly during periods of operational growth. | Wizz Air manages training continuity through workforce planning, structured training scheduling, coordination with training providers and oversight of training systems. The Company also works with external training partners and maintains internal training capability to support operational continuity. | Training disruption may lead to short- term operational inefficiencies, increased operating costs and potential revenue constraints if crew certification availability limits aircraft utilisation. Preventive workforce and training planning measures are in place to mitigate potential financial exposure. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS S1 – DIVERSITY | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Wizz Air's approach to diversity and inclusion aligns with its mission to make air travel affordable to all. The airline expects its workforce to follow its diversity and inclusion principles. | Wizz Air maintains policies and procedures supporting diversity and equal opportunity and monitors workforce diversity indicators. Continued focus on inclusive recruitment, development opportunities and fair treatment is expected to support workforce satisfaction and organisational performance. | No change planned. | No significant financial impact. |
S2 - Workers in the value chain | |||||
ESRS S2 - SECURE EMPLOYMENT | Risk Time horizon: Medium The Risk impact is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Potential social and financial risk where supplier non- compliance with labour laws or fair employment practices could affect worker job security and create reputational or compliance exposure for Wizz Air. | Supplier labour non- compliance incidents could lead to reputational impact, stakeholder scrutiny or contractual and operational challenges. | Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct. Wizz Air requires its partners to comply with ethical business practices, social and labour standards, and legal compliance. | Although Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct, risks can still arise on the supplier side, such as improper treatment of workers or non-compliance with laws. Even with an immediate contract termination, these issues may slightly affect Wizz Air's market activity, potentially leading to a bad reputation, reduced market demand, and financial consequence. |
ESRS S2 - ADEQUATE WAGES | Risk Time horizon: Medium The risk is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Potential social and financial risk where inadequate compensation practices at suppliers could lead to labour disputes, reputational exposure or compliance-related risks. | Wage-related labour disputes or regulatory non- compliance at suppliers could lead to reputational exposure, supplier instability or operational disruption. | Wizz Air addresses these risks through Supplier Code of Conduct requirements, supplier onboarding and risk-based supplier review processes. Labour standard expectations are integrated into supplier governance and procurement processes. | Although Wizz Air only partners with suppliers who share our values and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct, risks can still arise on the supplier side, such as improper treatment of workers or non-compliance with laws. Even with an immediate contract termination, these issues may slightly affect Wizz Air's market activity, potentially leading to a bad reputation, reduced market demand, and financial consequence. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS S2 - HEALTH AND SAFETY | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Potential negative social impact where working conditions, fatigue management and grievance mechanisms are primarily managed by third-party providers. As a procuring airline, Wizz Air has limited direct influence over day-to-day workforce management but may influence expectations through supplier selection, contractual requirements and engagement. | Flight operations rely on specialised external technical providers. Differences in provider health and safety practices, workforce management or operational pressure could contribute to workforce fatigue or safety risk exposure in parts of the value chain. | Wizz Air addresses these risks through supplier selection, contractual requirements, Supplier Code of Conduct expectations and engagement with critical technical partners. Performance is reviewed through procurement processes, safety governance and risk oversight structures. | Potential supplier workforce or safety issues could result in operational disruption, supplier replacement costs or contractual management costs. These risks are managed through normal supplier management and operational risk processes and are not expected to result in standalone material financial impacts under normal operating conditions. |
ESRS S2 - SOCIAL DIALOGUE | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Potential financial and social risk where inadequate social dialogue, labour practices or grievance mechanisms at suppliers could lead to workforce disputes, operational disruption or reputational exposure. As a procuring airline, Wizz Air has limited direct influence over internal workforce representation structures but may influence expectations through supplier governance and engagement. | Failure of suppliers to maintain appropriate labour standards, worker engagement mechanisms or ethical conduct could lead to supply chain disruption, contractual issues or reputational exposure. | Wizz Air addresses these risks through Supplier Code of Conduct requirements and risk-based supplier review processes. Critical and high- value suppliers are subject to enhanced review and monitoring through procurement governance and internal oversight structures. | Currently, no material direct financial impacts have been identified. However, inadequate social dialogue or labour governance at supplier level could lead to operational disruption, compliance-related costs, contractual impacts or reputational exposure over time. |
S4 - Consumers and end-users | |||||
ESRS S4 - FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ( complaints management) | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations and downstream value chain. | Positive social impact by providing consumers with accessible channels to express feedback, raise concerns and seek resolution. Effective complaints management supports consumer trust, transparency and service accessibility. | Wizz Air has consumer complaints management processes and customer support channels in place that are designed to enable timely feedback handling and issue resolution. Continued digitalisation and process improvements are expected to further support accessibility and responsiveness. | Consumer feedback and complaints processes are managed through customer service operations, customer experience functions and internal monitoring processes. Customer feedback and service performance are reviewed continuously to support service improvements and consumer communication quality. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS S4 - HEALTH AND SAFETY OF PASSENGERS (accidents) | Negative Impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential negative social impact where aviation accidents or serious safety incidents could result in passenger injury or long-term health impacts. Aviation operations are highly regulated and subject to strict operational and technical safety standards. | Despite strict regulatory compliance, safety management systems and operational controls, aviation operations inherently carry residual safety risks. Unforeseen operational, technical or external factors could result in safety incidents. Regulatory and industry focus on passenger safety is expected to remain high. | At Wizz Air, safety is of the utmost importance. Wizz Air manages passenger safety through comprehensive Safety Management Systems, regulatory compliance, operational training, maintenance standards and continuous safety monitoring. Safety performance is overseen through executive management, safety governance structures and regulatory oversight. | Safety incidents could result in operational disruption, liability or insurance-related costs and reputational impacts. Due to strict regulatory frameworks and safety management systems, such events are considered to have a low likelihood but a potentially high impact. |
ESRS S4 - ACCESS TO QUALITY INFORMATION | Risk Time horizon: Medium The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential social and financial risk where inaccurate or incomplete consumer information could affect consumer decision-making and lead to customer dissatisfaction or claims. | Increasing regulatory and consumer expectations require accurate, transparent and timely consumer information. Failures in information accuracy could result in compensation claims, regulatory scrutiny or reputational exposure. | Wizz Air manages these risks through legal review, compliance processes, marketing and commercial governance as well as customer communication controls. | Inaccurate or delayed consumer information could result in compensation costs, regulatory penalties, increased customer service costs and reputational impacts, potentially affecting demand and customer acquisition costs. |
ESRS S4 - HEALTH AND SAFETY OF PASSENGERS ( compliance risk) | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Potential social and financial risk where safety or regulatory non-compliance could lead to safety incidents, affecting passenger health and safety and consumer trust. Aviation operations are subject to strict regulatory and technical safety standards. | Aviation safety remains subject to continuous regulatory oversight and technical monitoring. Non- compliance at operational or supplier level could lead to operational disruption, regulatory action or reputational exposure. | At Wizz Air, safety is of the utmost importance. Wizz Air manages these risks through Safety Management Systems, regulatory compliance monitoring, supplier qualification and oversight as well as continuous safety performance monitoring. | Safety or regulatory non-compliance could result in operational disruption, regulatory penalties, liability costs or reputational impacts. Due to strict safety governance and regulatory oversight, such events are considered to have a low likelihood but potentially high impact. |
ESRS S4 - ACCESS TO PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AND INFORMATION | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Wizz Air is committed to making travel more affordable for everyone. The highly efficient operational framework allows us to provide affordable, safe and reliable air travel to more and more people every day. | By providing air travel at an affordable price, Wizz Air connects people from diverse backgrounds. Wizz Air’s low-cost operating model and transparent pricing structure support broader access to air travel. Ongoing service improvements, digitalisation and accessibility measures are expected to further support access to services and reduce cost and service barriers. | Accessibility and affordability are embedded in Wizz Air’s business model and customer experience strategy. Customer feedback, accessibility needs and service performance indicators are monitored to support continuous improvement of access and service usability. | No significant financial impact. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS S4 – RESPONSIBLE MARKETING | Risk Time horizon: Medium The risk is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Potential social and financial risk where misleading or unclear marketing communication could affect consumer trust, decision- making and brand credibility. | Increasing regulatory scrutiny and stakeholder expectations regarding sustainability claims increase the importance of transparent and evidence-based communication. Allegations of misleading marketing could result in reputational exposure, legal claims or regulatory scrutiny. | Wizz Air prioritises responsible and ethical marketing by ensuring that consumer-facing information is accurate, timely and evidence-based. The Company applies internal review, legal oversight and marketing governance processes to ensure that claims and product information are truthful, transparent and not misleading. Compliance and communication practices are monitored on an ongoing basis to support regulatory alignment and consumer trust. | Miscommunication and greenwashing can lead to reputational and financial losses. Wizz Air has already introduced sustainability practices, while guidelines and policies related to marketing and communications have been established. |
ESRS S4 – DATA PRIVACY | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential social and financial risk where cyber incidents or data protection failures could result in unauthorised access to personal data, affecting consumer privacy rights and trust. | Data protection and cybersecurity risks remain dynamic due to evolving threat landscapes and regulatory expectations. Data incidents could lead to regulatory investigation, customer claims or reputational exposure. | Wizz Air manages these risks through cybersecurity controls, data protection governance, system monitoring and Board-level oversight. Risk monitoring is performed continuously through IT security and data protection functions. | Data privacy breaches could result in regulatory fines, legal costs, customer remediation costs and reputational impacts. These risks are actively monitored and mitigated through cybersecurity and data protection controls. |
ESRS S4 – SECURITY OF A PERSON | Risk Time horizon: Medium The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential social and financial risk where failure to comply with safety or security regulations could affect passenger safety, consumer trust and operational continuity. Aviation operations are subject to strict regulatory and technical safety frameworks. | Aviation safety and security requirements remain subject to continuous regulatory development and oversight. Non- compliance could lead to operational restrictions, regulatory action or reputational exposure. | Wizz Air manages these risks through Safety Management Systems, compliance monitoring programmes, operational training and continuous regulatory oversight. Safety governance is embedded across operational and executive management structures. | Safety or regulatory non-compliance could result in operational disruption, regulatory penalties, liability costs and reputational impacts. Due to strong safety governance and regulatory oversight, such events are considered to have a low likelihood but potentially high impact. |
GOVERNANCE | |||||
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
G1 - Business conduct | |||||
ESRS G1 - CORPORATE CULTURE | Positive impact Time horizon: Medium The material risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Wizz Air’s Board of Directors and the entire workforce are expected to act with integrity and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations at all times. The ethics and integrity of Wizz Air have a far-reaching and positive impact on society by fostering trust, promoting responsible practices, addressing social and environmental challenges, and contributing to economic growth and development. | Through the application of its Supplier Code of Conduct and business ethics framework, Wizz Air seeks to promote responsible conduct among downstream partners. These standards may contribute to improved service quality, transparency and fair treatment practices beyond the Company’s direct operations. | Ethical conduct expectations are embedded in Wizz Air’s governance framework and Supplier Code of Conduct. Partner selection, onboarding and monitoring processes incorporate compliance with business ethics standards. | A lack of ethics, integrity and independence can increase the likelihood of financial risks arising from misconduct, legal issues and damaged relationships with stakeholders. However, due to Wizz Air’s robust internal risk management, compliance processes and quality assurance measures, the likelihood of such financial costs occurring is very low. |
ESRS G1 - CORPORATE CULTURE | Risk Time horizon: Medium The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Negative governance impact, where misconduct, lack of integrity or regulatory breaches may affect stakeholder trust, employee morale and corporate reputation. | Non-compliance with competition law, reporting obligations or other regulatory frameworks may result in investigations, fines or reputational exposure. | Wizz Air promotes a culture of integrity through the Policy of Good Conduct, compliance frameworks, internal controls and legal oversight. Ethical alignment with partners and transparency in financial and non- financial reporting are regularly reviewed. | Potential financial effects include regulatory fines, litigation costs, reputational damage and operational disruption. Governance frameworks are designed to mitigate these risks through structured oversight and compliance processes. |
ESRS G1 - PROTECTION OF WHISTLEBLOWERS | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential negative social impact, where employees may experience psychological, professional or fairness-related harm if reporting mechanisms are ineffective or if retaliation occurs. This could also discourage disclosure of misconduct and weaken organisational integrity. | In the absence of trusted reporting mechanisms, unresolved misconduct and workplace stress could arise. Regulatory expectations regarding whistleblower protection and internal reporting safeguards remain high. | Wizz Air operates whistleblowing and reporting mechanisms designed to enable confidential and anonymous reporting of concerns. Policies governing non- retaliation, confidentiality and misconduct reporting are embedded in the Policy of Good Conduct and Whistleblowing Policy. The effectiveness of these mechanisms is overseen by Legal, Internal Audit and relevant governance functions. | Failures in whistleblower protection could lead to legal claims, regulatory scrutiny, reputational damage or internal investigation costs. Governance controls are designed to mitigate these risks through structured oversight and monitoring processes. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS G1 - POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT | Negative impact Time horizon: Medium The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential governance and societal impact where non- transparent or politically aligned engagement could affect public trust, regulatory fairness and stakeholder confidence. | Increasing scrutiny of corporate political engagement heightens expectations for transparency and neutrality. Perceived misalignment or insufficient disclosure could result in reputational exposure or regulatory attention. | Wizz Air maintains political neutrality in sponsorship and communication activities and at the same time commits to transparent and ethical political engagement and is registered in the EU Transparency Register. Engagement activities are governed by internal policies, including the Corporate Political Engagement Policy, and are overseen by relevant governance functions. | Inadequate transparency in political engagement could lead to reputational impacts, regulatory scrutiny or stakeholder trust erosion, potentially affecting market perception and investor confidence. Existing governance controls are in place to mitigate these risks through defined policies, monitoring and oversight mechanisms. |
ESRS G1 - MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our upstream and downstream value chain. | Governance and financial risk, where supplier misconduct, contractual non- compliance or data protection incidents may affect operational continuity, customer trust and regulatory compliance. | Supplier non- compliance may result in contractual disputes, operational disruption or reputational exposure. Data protection incidents involving partners may create regulatory or financial consequences. | Wizz Air manages supplier-related risks through the Supplier Code of Conduct, Sustainable Procurement Policy, contractual safeguards, supplier screening and cross- functional monitoring involving all relevant departments. | Although Wizz Air is committed to partnering only with suppliers who share our commitments to environmental sustainability, commercial sustainability, ethical business practices and data protection, and are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of Conduct, risks can still arise if a supplier inadvertently or misleadingly fails to comply with our regulations; this can pose financial risks. |
ESRS G1 - CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential negative governance and societal impact, where corruption or bribery could undermine market integrity, fair competition and stakeholder trust. | In the absence of effective anti- corruption controls, business operations may be exposed to misconduct, conflicts of interest or unethical practices. Regulatory enforcement and stakeholder expectations regarding anti- corruption compliance remain strong. | Wizz Air applies Anti- Corruption, Anti- Fraud and Code of Conduct policies, supported by training, monitoring and whistleblowing mechanisms. Internal Audit and Legal functions oversee compliance, conflict of interest management and prevention activities. | Corruption-related incidents could result in regulatory penalties, contractual consequences, legal costs, reputational damage and operational disruption. Preventive controls reduce likelihood but cannot entirely eliminate exposure. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS G1 - CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY (Incidents) | Negative impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Potential negative governance impact, where corruption or bribery incidents may undermine ethical business conduct, stakeholder trust and fair market practices. | While no systemic incidents are identified, isolated cases could lead to reputational exposure, regulatory scrutiny and internal disciplinary measures. The Company monitors conflict-of-interest risks and compliance through established internal procedures and audit mechanisms. | Wizz Air addresses corruption and bribery risks through its Anti-Corruption Policy, Code of Conduct, internal audit oversight and conflict-of-interest monitoring processes. These risks are managed through established governance frameworks, internal controls and ongoing oversight. | Incidents could result in legal expenses, regulatory penalties, reputational impacts and potential loss of business opportunities, although preventive controls aim to reduce financial exposure. |
ESRS G1 - MANAGEMENT OF THE GOVERNING BODY | Risk Time horizon: Medium The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Governance arrangements, including board composition and decision-making structures, may influence investment attractiveness. Perceived weaknesses or misalignment with investor expectations could affect market confidence or cost of capital. | Wizz Air’s Board of Directors and workforce are expected to act with integrity and comply with all laws and regulations. While a lack of ethics and integrity can lead to financial risks from misconduct and legal issues, our internal risk and compliance processes minimise this likelihood. Effective management of the governing bodies impacts corporate culture and investor confidence. | Governance practices are overseen by the Board. The Company maintains defined governance policies (e.g. Share Dealing Policy) and engages with investors through structured Investor Relations processes. | Wizz Air is not party to any third-party collective bargaining agreements which some investors may perceive as a potential risk. Wizz Air’s approach to employee engagement is one of innovative direct dialogue, which is the most effective way to safeguard and promote: (i) the right to freedom of expression; (ii) the right to obtain or impart information necessary to make an informed choice on matters relevant to the workplace; and (iii) the right to protection against interference with privacy, family, home, correspondence or reputation. Our approach is based on cooperation by relying on face-to- face interaction and communication through innovative technologies. Our approach offers a modern alternative to outdated third- party practices. We rely on our People Council for management- employee discussions and have an independent Board member overseeing employee engagement. Feedback is regularly shared with the Board and translated into actions on remuneration and work-life balance. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS G ENTITY- SPECIFIC - CYBERSECURITY AND DATA PROTECTION (Data leak) | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our own operations. | Negative governance and social impact, where unauthorised access to sensitive personal or operational data may affect customers, employees and business partners, potentially leading to identity misuse, fraud or loss of trust. | A data breach could trigger regulatory investigations, legal claims, fines, reputational harm and possible revenue loss. As systems become more interconnected, maintaining strong cyber resilience is increasingly important. Misuse of leaked data could also create additional financial or operational impacts. | Wizz Air manages data protection risks through structured cybersecurity governance, continuous monitoring, penetration testing, access controls, vulnerability management and GDPR oversight. The IT Operations and Data Protection teams supervise these activities, with regular reporting to management and the Board. | Possible financial impacts include regulatory fines, legal costs, customer compensation, remediation expenses and reputational damage that could affect demand. Wizz Air applies strong monitoring and preventive controls to reduce exposure as effectively as possible, while continuing to enhance cybersecurity measures. |
ESRS G ENTITY- SPECIFIC - CYBERSECURITY AND DATA PROTECTION | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations. | Positive governance and social impact through the secure handling of personal data, protecting customers and employees and supporting operational continuity. | Cybersecurity, data protection and overall security are crucial aspects of Wizz Air's operations and are areas that the Board of Directors monitors closely and regularly. Wizz Air complies with EU standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as well as with relevant international and national regulations and guidelines. Responsible and ethical conduct, along with advancements in data protection, ensures that the personal data of Wizz Air employees and customers is managed securely. | Wizz Air maintains structured cybersecurity governance, including IT security testing, access controls, patch management, disaster recovery audits and legal oversight of GDPR compliance. Continuous monitoring and system enhancements support operational resilience. | Effective cybersecurity reduces exposure to regulatory fines, litigation costs, operational disruption and reputational damage that could otherwise arise from data breaches or system failures. |
ESRS G ENTITY- SPECIFIC – CYBERSECURITY AND DATA PROTECTION (cyber attack / platform / scheduling failure) | Risk Time horizon: Short The risk is concentrated in our own operations and upstream/ downstream value chain. | Potential financial and operational impact affecting passengers, employees and partners through flight disruptions, booking failures, crew misallocation and reduced service availability. | A failure or cyberattack on core systems (ticketing, crew management, scheduling, operational control) could result in immediate business interruption, revenue blockage, network- wide cancellations, compensation exposure and customer dissatisfaction. Increasing digitalisation and interconnectivity heighten dependency on system resilience. | Wizz Air manages digital resilience through continuous cybersecurity monitoring, penetration testing, access control management, disaster recovery planning, system redundancy, vendor oversight and GDPR governance. Critical IT infrastructure and third-party providers are subject to regular monitoring and resilience testing. | A major system outage or cyber incident could lead to immediate revenue loss, passenger compensation costs, regulatory exposure, reputational damage and operational recovery expenses. While strong monitoring and controls reduce the probability and duration of disruption, digital operational continuity remains critical to revenue generation. |
ESRS standard and topic | IRO and time horizon/ Allocation of value chain | Impact on people or environment | Current and anticipated effects | Response and evaluation time perspective | Current and anticipated financial effects |
ESRS G1 – SUPPLIER DISRUPTION | Risk Time horizon: Short and medium The risk is concentrated in our own operations and upstream value chain. | Primarily financial and operational impact, with indirect effects on passengers through cancellations, reduced seat capacity, schedule instability and service degradation. | Disruptions in engine servicing, spare parts supply or OEM‑related technical issues can lead to Aircraft‑ on‑Ground (AOG) events and lower fleet utilisation. Delays in aircraft delivery or certification can limit capacity growth and network expansion. Ground handling or airport logistics problems may impact on‑ time performance and ancillary revenues. High dependence on a few suppliers or a single provider increases operational vulnerability. | Wizz Air manages supplier‑related risks through long‑term agreements with OEMs and MROs, ongoing performance monitoring, strong contractual safeguards, diversification where possible, and operational contingency planning. | Significant supplier disruption could result in grounded aircraft, reduced seat capacity, revenue loss per aircraft day, increased compensation and wet-lease costs, delayed growth plans and margin pressure. While contractual frameworks and operational planning mitigate exposure, supplier concentration and industry-wide capacity constraints remain material operational dependencies. |
ESRS G ENTITY- SPECIFIC - COMMUNITY PROGRAMMES AND CHARITABLE SUPPORT | Positive impact Time horizon: Short The material impact is concentrated in our own operations and upstream value chain. | Through the WIZZ Foundation, Wizz Air supports many community programmes. | Wizz Air provides crisis support, charitable activities through the WIZZ Foundation and community-based initiatives such as event sponsorships and donations. These initiatives enhance social cohesion and brand credibility in local communities. | Community programmes are implemented through structured initiatives and partnerships, with oversight from relevant functions. The Company evaluates opportunities to extend support geographically and functionally over time. | No significant financial impact. |
Horizon | Definition |
Short | 0–1 years |
Medium | 1–5 years |
Long | 5–10 years |
Scenario | Physical risks | Transition risks |
Low-emission scenario | SSP1-1.9 - SSP1-2.6 (~1.5–2°C) | IEA Net Zero Emissions (NZE) by 2050 |
High-emission scenario | SSP3-7.0 - SSP5-8.5 (~3–4°C) | IEA Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS) |
Risk type and estimated significance | Risk description | Financial impacts | Mitigation measures |
More extreme heatwaves (acute) | Extreme heat can impact aircraft performance and flight operations because it can reduce efficiency and limit engine lifecycle, and may result in rescheduling departures for heavier aircraft or having to reduce the weight of the aircraft. As a result of heatwaves, airports can also decrease runway capacity due to the less dense warm air that is able to damage runway surfaces or taxiways. In addition, higher temperatures may increase fire risks associated with fuel venting, reduce the effectiveness of noise insulation as residents are more likely to keep windows open, and create operational and human resource challenges, including heat-related strain on ground handling staff and thermal discomfort for passengers and employees. | Disruption of regular revenue streams and increased operating costs | Ongoing climate-scenario analysis, consistent with the TCFD framework, allows the Company to evaluate risks and implement mitigation strategies in collaboration with the Operational and Commercial teams. Advancements in forecasting technologies, which track historical disruption causes and locations, will enhance our operational planning in response to evolving weather patterns. Long-term planning also considers potential market change, such as shifting demand for traditionally warm destinations due to more frequent extreme heat days. Key mitigation measures are also implemented by Wizz Air’s airport operator partners, supported in Europe by the guidance of the European Plan for Aviation Safety. |
Increase in the frequency and magnitude of wildfires | In the future, wildfires may increasingly impact travel decisions, leading to more frequent cancellations and revenue losses. Attractive summer holiday destinations could be affected by these fires, particularly in Southern Europe. Additionally, wildfire smoke may disrupt operations by reducing visibility due to particulate matter, while gusty winds, turbulence and wind shear can further impact flight stability, leading to delays or cancellations. Prolonged exposure to airborne dust and smoke may also accelerate corrosion, affecting airworthiness and increasing maintenance requirements. | Potential revenue loss and higher operating costs due to disruptions that cannot be prevented, avoided or planned for. | Ensuring operational readiness by following established procedures and policies for managing disruptions, including wildfires. Additionally, advancements in forecasting technologies, which track historical disruption causes and locations better will enhance our operational planning in response to wildfire events. For wildfire risk, mitigation measures of airport operators are essential; in Europe this is supported by the guidance of the European Plan for Aviation Safety. |
Increase in frequency of more intensive storms | Severe storms have the potential to disrupt airspace and airport operations, cause damage to infrastructure and can also result in heightened safety risks due to wind shear and turbulence. Additionally, they may lead to increased fuel consumption. Northern, North Western and Central Europe are likely to see a rise in severe storms. Meanwhile, in the Mediterranean, cyclone frequency may decrease, but their intensity could increase. | Lost revenue and increased operating and fuel costs. | Continuous forecasting and risk assessment by Operational and Commercial teams to ensure operational preparedness for intense storms and related asset and infrastructure damage. Key mitigation measures are also implemented by Wizz Air’s airport operator partners; in Europe, these are supported by a regulatory framework informed by the European Plan for Aviation Safety. |
Acute flooding | Heavy rainfall and pluvial flooding could occur across all regions. Flooding has the potential to harm airport infrastructure and runways, leading to reduced capacity, flight delays, cancellations and financial losses. Additionally, intense precipitation and flash floods may become more frequent at global warming levels exceeding 1.5°C, except in the Mediterranean. These weather events could disrupt ground operations and cause damage to airport facilities, resulting in flight disruptions. | Lost revenue and increased operating costs. | Ensuring operational readiness by following established procedures and policies for managing disruptions, including flooding. Continuous forecasting and risk assessment by Operational and Commercial teams for flooding and related disruptions. Airports’ adaptation plans are key to flood-risk mitigation; in Europe, these are developed within a broader regulatory and strategic context informed in part by the European Plan for Aviation Safety. |
Change in weather patterns (general) | Significant changes in weather phenomena (frequency and intensity) are likely in the long term (e.g. by 2050 and beyond); however, we assume no critical change within the next ten years. Droughts may lead to significant crop failures, potentially affecting the availability of feedstocks for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production. Changes in crosswind patterns at European airports may increase operational complexity during take-off and landing, occasionally rendering runways unusable and causing delays or diversions. In addition, shifts in jet streams can alter flight durations, increasing travel times for westbound flights while shortening eastbound journeys, with implications for scheduling and fuel planning. | Potential revenue loss and higher operating costs due to disruptions that cannot be prevented, avoided or planned for. | Ongoing climate-scenario analysis consistent with the TCFD framework allows the Company to evaluate risks and implement mitigation strategies in collaboration with the Operational and Commercial teams. Additionally, advancements in forecasting technologies, which track historical disruption causes and locations better, as well as incorporating changing crosswind patterns in scheduling and fuel planning will enhance our operational planning in response to evolving weather patterns. |
Chronic change in temperature and sea levels | Rising sea levels pose a threat to low- lying and coastal regions in the long term (e.g. by 2050 and beyond), as well as islands, especially at a higher global warming level. Airports in such areas could be affected by flooding, potentially harming airport infrastructure and runways, leading to reduced capacity, flight delays and network disruptions. The temperature rise could also lead to a shift in destination preferences, besides the operational risks of acute heatwaves. We do not expect these changes to be critical within the next ten years. | Lost revenue and increased operating costs. | Continuous forecasting and risk assessment by Operational and Commercial teams – incorporating airport resilience assessment – to ensure operational preparedness for flooding and related disruptions. Integration of climate-scenario analysis into business planning to consider changing customer demand for routes impacted by the chronic changes in temperature in Wizz Air’s relevant markets. |
Risk type and estimated significance | Risk description | Financial impacts | Mitigation measures |
Emissions- reduction regulations | In a 1.5-2°C scenario, Wizz Air may face strict policies across the network to reduce emissions. However, varying national policies without a standardised approach bears the risk of non-compliance due to regulatory complexities. Decarbonisation efforts, including fossil fuel taxation, aim to reduce carbon emissions, but they may increase operational costs. Additionally, differing timelines and reporting requirements as well as the changing regulatory environment pose risks to achieving adequate reductions. | Increased operational costs and possible penalties in the medium and long term, in the event of failure to comply with the complex set of requirements in our operating environment. | Maintain strong emphasis on evaluating and ensuring compliance with tax and regulatory requirements related to emissions regulations (this involves cross-functional coordination to guarantee a full review across the organisation). Additionally, we actively engage with government bodies, the European Union, and other essential stakeholders to establish a cohesive approach across different regions. Continuously monitoring the changing regulatory environment is also essential. |
EU ETS – carbon price increase and decrease of free allowances | In a 1.5-2°C scenario, carbon price hikes are likely to occur in the medium and long term. The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is subject to significant regulatory uncertainty amid high price volatility due to emerging geopolitical risks in the spring of 2026. However, our baseline expectation is that EU ETS will surpass existing policy mandates significantly in the long term, particularly after phase IV (ending by 2030). Consequently, operational and upstream expenses will rise sharply due to the elevated carbon prices, resulting in more substantial costs. These price increases are expected due to the gradual elimination of free carbon allowances by the EU, with forecasts indicating that the EU ETS will exceed current policy requirements over the long term. | Additional compliance costs under UK and EU ETS. Operational costs will increase due to higher carbon prices per unit, and the elimination of free allowances. | Maintaining an effective carbon allowance/offset purchasing strategy to mitigate price volatility. To strengthen resilience against rising carbon prices and related cost increases, Wizz Air continuously forecasts ETS prices and uses the ETS as an internal carbon price to support budgeting and risk management decisions. Wizz Air would also rely on the EU’s SAF-related support mechanisms, including free ETS allowances and/or lower annual carbon cost due to the use of SAF. |
Energy taxation – introduction of kerosene tax in the EU | The EU intends to impose a mandatory tax on kerosene of roughly €0.4 per litre, as part of the ongoing revision of the Energy Taxation Directive. The proposal allows Member States to introduce even higher tax rates under specific conditions. Originally planned for 2024, the approval and implementation have faced negotiation deadlock in the EU; however, the approval is expected later on to ensure compliance with the EU’s ambitious climate package, if it wants to maintain alignment with 1.5-2°C climate pathways. | New fossil fuel and related taxes may impact overall taxation costs in the medium and long term. The financial impact would be even higher if the EU and its Member States introduced carbon taxes in parallel, leading to double taxation. | Continuously and accurately assessing changes in tax legislation in Wizz Air’s network is crucial. Advocacy measures to ensure a standardised approach globally, avoiding double taxation of emissions – via carbon pricing and kerosene and carbon taxes – putting additional burdens on operators. |
SAF mandates (ReFuelEU regulation) | Regulations requiring the use of SAFs in aviation fuel are already operational in some countries. A mandate was also implemented in the EU in 2025 (mandatory SAF blend in departing flights: 2% in 2025, 6% in 2030, 20% in 2035 and 70% in 2050 as per the ReFuelEU aviation regulation), while similar trends are anticipated in other regions. The UK government also announced SAF targets, the mandate started in 2025 at 2% of total UK jet fuel demand, increasing linearly to 10% in 2030 and then to 22% in 2040. | Higher operational and upstream costs in the medium term due to the increase in minimum SAF blending volumes in aviation fuel. Non-compliance and continued dependence on fossil fuels could lead to penalties. | Wizz Air has allocated resources to advocacy regarding the book and claim mechanism. Wizz Air remained compliant and submitted the required data as mandated. |
Uncertainties regarding the changing landscape of ESG reporting obligations | Compliance with new ESG-related reporting standards (for example the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive – CSRD, and the UK SRS) will require additional administrative capacities at various functions of Wizz Air, and investments in new processes and systems may be needed to satisfy all emerging transparency requirements. As Wizz Air operates in different geographic areas, the new and changing reporting expectations create parallel reporting obligations. | Ensuring compliance with emerging reporting requirements can increase administrative costs and tie up capacity to otherwise implement strategic and value-adding transitional actions for the climate. Non-compliance with mandatory reporting requirements can result in penalties and reputational damage. | Competent teams at Wizz Air are working with various sustainability and ESG professionals to ensure continued compliance with all relevant transparency requirements. The relevant working group has been established to prepare for upcoming reporting needs. A software solution has been implemented for an improved ESG supplier risk assessment and management process, while further initiatives are in progress. |
Disruptive aviation innovation | The rate at which low-carbon technologies are embraced influences the competitiveness of airlines, the cost of operations and the value of assets. Investments in capital expenditures (CapEx), research and development (R&D) and innovation need to strike a balance between risk and reward, fostering innovations that are both sustainable and profitable. Attracting talent is also essential for the success of innovation. | Failure to invest in the appropriate technology, or investing in unsuitable technology, can introduce significant risks, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced competitiveness. Additionally, the inability to retain and attract talent may hinder the successful implementation of new technologies. | Wizz Air signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Airbus in 2022 to explore the potential for hydrogen-powered aircraft operations. We have also joined the EU’s Alliance for Zero Emission Aviation (AZEA) to pave the way for next-generation sustainable aircraft. Based on the current understanding, zero-emission aircraft large enough to fit our business model (above 200 seats) are not feasible in the near future. While we are waiting for technical improvements, we continue to look into opportunities to accelerate the ramp-up of the European SAF market – as the most efficient short-term tool for the decarbonisation of the aviation sector. |
Technological feasibility issues of SAF production | Regarding the technological feasibility of SAF, forecasts indicate that even in scenarios where temperatures exceed 2°C, the production capacity of SAF may fall short of meeting the aviation industry’s demand. A decade may not provide enough time to improve the technology significantly, as demand is accelerating faster than supply capacity can currently scale, resulting in potential supply chain challenges and penalty charges for non-compliance with SAF blending regulations, as well as higher ETS costs (carbon pricing mechanisms). | Higher operational and upstream costs due to the increase in SAF prices, amplified by the limited SAF availability. Since SAF use is mandatory, suppliers possess significant bargaining power, making long-term SAF purchase agreements more costly. | An appropriate policy framework and strategic investments could ensure a sufficient supply of SAF in the medium to long term. Wizz Air took a significant step by investing in SAF companies, firstly Firefly then CleanJoule, and partnering with various SAF suppliers via long-term agreements, ensuring a reliable long-term supply chain. Procurement efforts will continue to focus on ensuring compliance with current and future SAF mandates. |
Growing green investor sentiment | In the long term, investors may begin to withdraw from carbon- intensive sectors. | Such disinvestment is likely to result in higher capital costs for Wizz Air. | A robust environmental strategy including fleet renewal with the best available technology, and fuel efficiency initiatives. SAF strategy execution (including investments in R&D) to ensure a steady supply of alternative fuels, helping to achieve our targets. Wizz Air is committed to continued transparency regarding the transition planning. |
Opportunity | Analysis |
EU ETS – phasing out free allowances – competitive advantage: | Although the phasing out of free carbon allowances poses a risk, it also offers a competitive advantage in the short and medium term. Wizz Air’s total free allowances, relative to its emissions, have been significantly lower than most of its peers in the sector. This grants Wizz Air additional resilience, as the resulting cost increase will be much smaller compared to many airline competitors that currently benefit from higher volumes of free allowances. |
Sustainable aviation fuel investments: | Wizz Air invests strategically in research and development (R&D) projects to secure its own sources of SAF. These investments ensure a reliable supply chain in the longer term, allowing us to meet future blending mandates effectively. As an example, Firefly (the Company’s first equity investment) has pioneered an integrated technology pathway for SAF production using sewage sludge as a feedstock – which is a sustainable and highly abundant source. This proactive approach to SAF investments ensures a sustainable and resilient fuel supply due to the higher SAF volumes provided by one producer, at a preferential price. The cost-efficient SAF access is expected to support our competitive position amid significantly increasing ETS prices. |
Sustainability- conscious customers: | Wizz Air currently strives (and will continue in the future) towards maintaining the lowest reported emissions intensity per passenger kilometre, compared to other major airlines in its network. Additionally, while there are still misconceptions about the ultra-low-cost, low-fare business model, with the growing transparency on emissions per passenger and per flight, climate change awareness is projected to shift consumer sentiment to favour ULCC more than traditional airlines. In terms of a low-carbon strategy, flying more efficient aircraft and maximising the passenger numbers in the cabin are crucial, and the preferences of climate-focused consumers (who cannot avoid flying) will shift towards more fuel-efficient flights and airlines. Consequently, this change could impact traditional airlines negatively, while carriers already efficient would benefit from it. |
Industry collaboration opportunities in various geographic areas: | Wizz Air, operating across diverse geographic areas, faces varying legal jurisdictions and climate- related demands. Within the EU, including Malta and Hungary, and the UK (where the three Wizz Air airlines are headquartered) and other third countries, the airline encounters a range of approaches towards achieving net zero emissions and the related decarbonisation strategies. This exposure allows Wizz Air to learn from diverse technological innovations and national strategies, leveraging them to its advantage. |
Enhanced ESG supplier risk assessment and management processes: | As a result of new climate-related transparency requirements, Wizz Air is already working on improving its third-party risk assessment and management approach, with a special focus on ESG topics, including environmental and climate-related programmes of its business partners and vendors. Through the enhanced process, the Company will be able to receive more detailed information on its main suppliers’ environment and climate-related initiatives, which will provide opportunities for better cooperation in the future. The focused risk assessment will also help the Company identify potential climate and environmental risks during the tender phase with prospective service providers. |
Regulatory and capital market incentives – competitive advantage: | Wizz Air’s leading role in the decarbonisation of the aviation industry makes it more resilient to climate regulation risks than its competitors, and strengthens its capital market position among green/transition investors. Wizz Air’s favourable risk profile among airlines as regards climate risks and associated financial risks enhances its standing among traditional investors as well. |
ESRS Requirement | Material Topic | Policy Coverage |
E1 – Climate Change | Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Energy | • ESG Policy • Environmental Policy • Sustainable Procurement Policy |
PRIORITY PROGRAMME | GOALS AND KEY LEVERS | |
1. 1. FOCUS ON CARBON INTENSITY (CO2/RPK) REDUCTION RESOURCE EFFICIENCY | Our most important environmental commitment is to reduce the emissions intensity generated by flight operations gradually and radically through: ▶ 1.a fleet renewal; and ▶ 1.b fuel efficiency. | |
2. SUSTAINABLE AVIATION FUELS | ▶ Qualify a SAF supply chain. ▶ Invest strategically in SAF R&D. ▶ Partnerships and calls to action. | |
3. INDUSTRY COLLABORATION | ▶ Qualify future technology building blocks and industry partnerships for innovation and cooperation, to enable decarbonisation. |
Airline | Wizz Air | Ryanair | EasyJet | AF-KLM | IAG | LH | SAS |
Average fleet age | 4.57 | 10.0 | 10.9 | 11.5 | 12.6 | 14.4 | 7.9 |
Initiative | Efficiency gain | Total fuel saving | Total carbon saving |
Sharklets | 0.50% | 9,030 tonnes | 28,701 tonnes |
Lighter Seats | 0.53% | 9,500 tonnes | 30,194 tonnes |
Reduced take-off flap configuration | 0.23% | 4,070 tonnes | 12,936 tonnes |
Fuel Efficiency Pilot App | 0.21% | 3,820 tonnes | 12,141 tonnes |
Calculated Reserve Fuel | 0.19% | 3,440 tonnes | 10,934 tonnes |
Fuel Efficiency Platform | 0.19% | 3,390 tonnes | 10,775 tonnes |
Idle reverse thrust | 0.16% | 2,940 tonnes | 9,344 tonnes |
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) | 0.08% | 1,360 tonnes | 4,323 tonnes |
Contingency Fuel | 0.07% | 1,220 tonnes | 3,878 tonnes |
Performance/idle factors | 0.07% | 1,190 tonnes | 3,878 tonnes |
Zero Fuel Weight Optimisation | 0.07% | 1,190 tonnes | 3,782 tonnes |
Statistical Taxi Fuel | 0.07% | 1,230 tonnes | 3,909 tonnes |
Single engine taxi-in | 0.04% | 790 tonnes | 2,511 tonnes |
CONF 3 landing | 0.11% | 2,020 tonnes | 6,420 tonnes |
Lighter Aircraft Brakes | 0.02% | 320 tonnes | 1,017 tonnes |
Focus Area | Commitment | Target Year | Status | Progress / Commentary |
Carbon Intensity | Reduce CO₂/RPK by 25% vs F20 baseline | 2030 | Partially on track | Wizz Air was named the world’s most emissions‑efficient airline by Cirium, received the Sustainable Airline of the Year 2025 award from Airline Economics, and was also assessed by Cirium as the highest‑ranked emissions‑efficient airline in Europe. |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | Qualify SAF supply chain | 2030 | On track | Two equity investments in SAF research; supplier partnerships established. Targeting an aspirational 10% SAF blend by 2030. |
Decarbonisation | Enable decarbonisation through future technologies and partnerships | 2050 | Ongoing | Board-led oversight with Sustainability Council implementation. Key projects projects. |
F22 | F23 | F24 | F25 | F26 | |
CO2 per RPK (in grams) | 60.7 | 53.8 | 52 | 52.2 | 50.6 |
Energy consumption and mix | Unit | F25 | F26 |
(1) Fuel consumption from coal and coal products | MWh | 0 | 0 |
(2) Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products | MWh | 22,359,983 | 22,996,705 |
(3) Fuel consumption from natural gas | MWh | 0 | 17 |
(4) Fuel consumption from other fossil sources | MWh | 0 | 0 |
(5) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from fossil sources | MWh | 1,001 | 1,169 |
(6) Total fossil energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 1 to 5) | MWh | 22,360,984 | 22,997,891 |
Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption | % | 100 | 98 |
(7) Consumption from nuclear sources | MWh | 657 | 788 |
Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption | % | 0 | 0.00 |
(8) Fuel consumption for renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) | MWh | 0 | 364,479 |
(9) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources | MWh | 164 | 222 |
(10) Consumption of self-generated non- fuel renewable energy | MWh | 0 | 0 |
(11) Total renewable energy consumption (calculated as the sum of lines 8 to 10) | MWh | 164 | 364,701 |
Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption | % | 0 | 2 |
Total energy consumption (calculated as the sum of points 6,7 and 11) | MWh | 22,361,805 | 23,363,380 |
Energy production | |||
Non-renewable energy production | (MWh) | 22,359,983 | 22,996,722 |
Renewable energy production | (MWh) | 0 | 364,479 |
High climate impact sector disclosures | |||
Energy intensity from activities in high climate impact sectors | MWh/ € | 0 | 0 |
Total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors | MWh | 22,361,805 | 23,363,380 |
High climate impact sectors used to determine energy intensity | - | Transportation and Storage (NACE Section H) | Transportation and Storage (NACE Section H) |
Energy intensity per net revenue | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Disclosure of reconciliation to relevant line item or notes in financial statements of net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors | - | Annual report / main chapter Financial Review / sub-chapter Financial performance | Annual report / main chapter Financial Review / sub-chapter Financial performance |
Net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors | €M | 5267.6 | 5691.4 |
Net revenue from activities other than in high climate impact sectors | €M | 0 | 0 |
Total net revenue (Financial statements) | €M | 5267.6 | 5691.4 |
Area | Unit | F25 | F26 |
CO2/RPK | g/RPK | 52.2 | 50.6 |
Scope 1 GHG emissions | |||
Stationary Combustion | |||
Heating | tCO₂eq | — | 3.51 |
Mobile Combustion | |||
Jet Fuel | |||
CO2e Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 5,834,826 | 6,000,979 |
CO2 Scope 1 | tCO₂ | 5,782,148 | 5,946,801 |
CH4 Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 4,030 | 4,145 |
N2O Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | 48,649 | 50,034 |
Sustainable aviation fuel | |||
CO2e Scope 1 | tCO₂eq | — | 77.46 |
Total Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | — | 6,001,060 |
Scope 2 GHG emissions | |||
Gross location-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions | tCO₂eq | 376 | 516 |
Gross market-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions | tCO₂eq | 490 | 583 |
Scope 3 GHG emissions | |||
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 2,126,990 | 1,946,578.08 |
Percentage of Gross Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions | % | 18 | 16 |
3.1 Purchased goods and services | tCO₂eq | 549,108 | 409,791 |
3.2 Capital goods | tCO₂eq | 313,378 | 222,015 |
3.3 Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2) | tCO₂eq | 1,215,126 | 1,272,301 |
3.4 Upstream transportation and distribution | tCO₂eq | 18,991 | 16,945 |
3.5 Waste generated in operations | tCO₂eq | 7,793 | 4,956 |
3.6 Business travel | tCO₂eq | 6,741 | 5,986 |
3.7 Employee commuting | tCO₂eq | 9,263 | 9,891 |
3.8 Upstream leased assets | tCO₂eq | 1,506 | 1,701 |
3.9 Downstream transportation | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.10 Processing of sold products | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.11 Use of sold products | tCO₂eq | 26 | 159 |
3.12 End-of-life treatment of sold products | tCO₂eq | 252 | 133 |
3.13 Downstream leased assets | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.14 Franchises | tCO₂eq | n/a | n/a |
3.15 Investments | tCO₂eq | 4,807 | 2,700 |
Total GHG emissions | |||
Total GHG emissions (location-based) | tCO₂eq | 7,962,194 | 7,948,154 |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) | tCO₂eq | 7,962,308 | 7,948,222 |
Area | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (EU/UK ETS) | % | 41 | 64 |
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (CORSIA) | % | 37 | 36 |
Area | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from the combustion or bio- degradation of biomass not included in Scope 1 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 0 | 93,042 |
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from combustion or bio- degradation of biomass not included in Scope 2 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 49 | 48 |
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from combustion or bio- degradation of biomass that occur in value chain not included in Scope 3 GHG emissions | tCO₂eq | 62 | 1,692 |
Total Biogenic Emissions | tCO₂eq | 111 | 94,782 |
GHG intensity by net revenue | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Net revenue | €M | 5,267.6 | 5,691.4 |
Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue | tCO2eq/mEUR | 0.0023 | 0.0021 |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue | tCO2eq/mEUR | 0.0023 | 0.0021 |
CO2 [t CO2e] | Total [t CO2e] |
With RFI-Factor 1.7 (incl. SAF) | 10,201,796 |
No RFI-Factor (incl. SAF) | 6,001,057 |
Primary Data share for Scope 3 | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Percentage of GHG Scope 3 calculated using primary [activity] data | % | 57 | 64 |
Percentage of GHG Scope 3 calculated using primary [intensity] data | % | 0 | 0 |
Tonnes of CO2 offset: | F25 | F26 |
Scope 1 CO 2 emissions with EU/UK ETS offsets | 2,385,443 | 3,899,857 |
Scope 1 CO 2 emissions with CORSIA offsets | 2,162,878 | 2,194,521 |
Scope 1 CO 2 emissions without offset | 1,238,761 | 454 |
ESRS Requirement | Material Topic | Policy Coverage |
E2 - Pollution | Air pollution and noise emission | • ESG Policy • Environmental Policy |
EPNdB | Lateral | Flyover | Approach | vs Chapter 4 | vs Chapter 14 |
A320neo | 86.6 | 79.7 | 92.3 | -20 | -13 |
A321neo | 87.8 | 83.1 | 94.5 | -15.6 | -8.6 |
Boeing 737-8 | 88.5 | 82.6 | 94.2 | -14.9 | -7.9 |
Emissions sources | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Carbon Monoxide (CO) | tCO₂eq | 13,785 | 14,430 |
Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOC) | tCO₂eq | 1,947 | 2,057 |
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) | tCO₂eq | 20,828 | 21,785 |
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) | tCO₂eq | 1,861 | 1,947 |
Particulate Matter (PM) | tCO₂eq | 30 | 33 |
Area | Unit | F25 | F26 |
Noise regulation compliance | Chapt.14 | 82% | 85% |
ESRS Requirement | Material topic | Related policies |
S1 - Own workforce | Secure employment Health and Safety Diversity Training and development skills | Business conduct policies and corporate culture) Business conduct policies and corporate culture) Business conduct policies and corporate culture) • Conflict of Interest Policy • Health and Safety Policy and initiatives • Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy • Remote Working Location Policy • Training and Development Policy |
Council Pillars | Strategy |
Term and continuity | The Representatives serve for two years. After their mandate expires they can continue their term for another two-year period if re-elected by the local community. |
Committees and focus areas | The Council’s work revolves around two major areas: reward/recognition, and work patterns/ rosters. Two dedicated committees – each led by two chairs appointed by the President – delve into a spectrum of topics, challenges and strategic initiatives. These committees convene twice a month to deliberate and shape policies. |
Facilitating effective communication | Besides meetings with senior management, Wizz Air has a dedicated Board member, Dr Anthony Radev, responsible for overseeing engagement with employees. These interactions foster open dialogue, enabling the Council to fulfil its core objective, bridging the gap between management and employees through robust two-way channels. |
Informed decision making and transparency | The Council provides critical insights on matters impacting the entire Wizz Air community. Every action and decision arising from monthly meetings is shared with employees by their appointed representatives. |
Topic/subtopic | Key programmes and connected actions |
Working conditions: | • Safety management initiatives aimed at maintaining a safe working environment for employees. • Employee engagement mechanisms, including the People Council, enabling regular dialogue between employees and management. • Annual remuneration reviews based on market benchmarks to ensure competitive base salaries and benefits. |
Secure employment | • Crew to Office Programme, enabling flight and cabin crew to transition to office roles (19 employees participated during F26). • Employee retention initiatives aimed at reducing attrition and improving workforce stability. • Continuous monitoring of employee engagement survey results and implementation of improvement actions. |
Health and safety | • Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) providing confidential support for mental health and personal challenges. • Employee Emergency Funding initiative providing financial assistance to employees facing urgent medical or personal emergencies. |
Equal treatment and opportunities for all: | • Recruitment and talent development programmes designed to attract and retain qualified employees. • Diversity and inclusion initiatives aimed at promoting equal opportunities across the organisation. |
Training and skills development | • Comprehensive training programmes supporting employee capability development, including: – Training for flight and cabin crew – Wizz Air Pilot Academy (WAPA) Programme – Office workforce development programmes – Leadership training programmes – Digital learning solutions. • Regular performance and talent review processes supporting employee development and career progression. |
Diversity | • Implementation of diversity programmes aimed at increasing representation in operational roles, including: – She Can Fly Programme – Internal Cadet Programme – Cabin Crew to Captain Programme – Self-Sponsored Cadet Programme. – Initiatives supporting gender diversity and inclusive workplace culture. • The Company’s objective of achieving 40% gender diversity in management was achieved. |
Focus Area | Commitment | Target Year | Status | Process/commentary |
Safety | Continue to put safety first, in everything we do. | Ongoing | On target | Our Safety Review Board meets four times a year. Dedicated Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee of the Board. See |
Gender Diversity | Further improve gender diversity in the Board, management and flight deck to achieve: 1. 33 per cent female gender diversity in the Board of Directors; 2. 40 per cent female gender diversity in the management team by F26; and 3. 7 per cent female gender diversity in the flight deck by F30. | Board: target achieved Management: target achieved Flight deck: F30 | Board: Achieved Management: Achieved Flight deck: Ongoing | 1. Board of Directors: 36 per cent – target reached. 2. Management team: 41 per cent -target reached. 3. Flight deck: 6 per cent. diversity metrics for more details. |
Employee engagement | Improve employee engagement survey participation rate by 5% annually. The target remains ongoing. | Ongoing | Ongoing | In F26, participation increased to 63% (F25: 55%). The KPI was refined in F26 to focus specifically on participation rate as a more accurate measure of employee engagement. More on employee engagement |
Gender | Number of employees (headcount) |
Female | 4,641 |
Male | 5,027 |
Not reported | 0 |
Total | 9,668 |
Country | Number of employees (headcount) |
Romania | 1,776 |
Poland | 1,693 |
Hungary | 1,246 |
Italy | 1,098 |
United Kingdom | 582 |
Other (less then 10% of total headcount) | 3,273 |
Total | 9,668 |
Age group | Headcount | Percentage |
Distribution of employees under 30 years old | 5,487 | 57% |
Distribution of employees between 30 and 50 years old | 3,411 | 35% |
Distribution of employees over 50 years old | 770 | 8% |
Gender distribution at top management level | Headcount | Percentage |
Female | 6 | 32% |
Male | 13 | 68% |
Not reported | 0 | 0 |
Total | 19 | 100% |
Cabin crew | |
National diversity ratio: | |
Romanian | 23% |
Polish | 19% |
Italian | 11% |
Hungarian | 8% |
Albanian | 5% |
Bulgarian | 5% |
Ukrainian | 3% |
British | 5% |
Others (with 3% share or less) | 21% |
Office | |
National diversity ratio: | |
Hungarian | 59% |
Romanian | 4% |
Indian | 12% |
Others (with 3% share or less) | 25% |
Management (Head and above) | |
National diversity ratio: | |
Hungarian | 45% |
British | 7% |
Romanian | 7% |
Bulgarian | 3% |
Irish | 3% |
Polish | 3% |
Portuguese | 3% |
Spanish | 5% |
Swedish | 2% |
Others (with 2% share or less) | 22% |
Flight crew | |
National diversity ratio: | |
Polish | 18% |
Hungarian | 12% |
Italian | 14% |
Romanian | 12% |
British | 9% |
Bulgarian | 4% |
Others (with 3% share or less) | 31% |
Female | Male | Total | |
Percentage of employees and (or) non-employees that participated in regular performance and career development reviews | 34% | 73% | 54% |
Average number of training hours per employee and/or non-employee | |||
Office employees | 23.31 | 19.24 | 21.28 |
Cabin crew | 99.9 | 94.2 | 97.05 |
Flight deck | 101.1 | 111.1 | 106.1 |
Total | 94.83 | 96.66 | 95.78 |
Health and Safety metrics | F25 | F26 |
The number of employees who are covered by health and safety management system in head count based on legal requirements and (or) recognised standards or guidelines | 8,816 | 9,668 |
Percentage of own workers who are covered by health and safety management system based on legal requirements and (or) recognised standards or guidelines | 100% | 100% |
Number of fatalities in own workforce as result of work-related injuries and work-related ill health | 0 | 0 |
Number of fatalities as result of work-related injuries and work- related ill health of other workers working on undertaking's sites | 0 | 0 |
Number of recordable work-related accidents for own workforce | 51 | 48 |
Rate of recordable work-related accidents for own workforce | 3.83 | 3.62 |
Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health of own workforce | 0 | 0 |
Number of days lost to work-related injuries and fatalities from work- related accidents, work-related ill health, and fatalities from ill health | 493 | 425 |
Total hours worked by people in own workforce | 13,304,943 | 17,396,846 |
Metrics related to working rights and human rights impacts | F25 | F26 |
Number of incidents of discrimination | 3 | 6 |
Number of complaints filed through channels for own workers to raise concerns | 10 | 6 |
Number of complaints filed to National Contact Points for OECD Multinational Enterprises | 0 | 0 |
Amount of material fines, penalties, and compensation for damages as result of violations regarding social and human rights factors | 0 | 0 |
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own workforce | 0 | 0 |
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own workforce that are violations of UN Global Compact Principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises | 0 | 0 |
Amount of material fines, penalties, and compensation for severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own workforce | 0 | 0 |
Number of severe human rights cases where undertaking played role securing remedy for those affected | 0 | 0 |
ESRS Requirement | Material Topic | Policy Coverage |
S2 - Workers in the value chain | Secure Employment Adequate wages Social dialogue Health and Safety | • Supplier Code of Conduct • Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement • Sustainable Procurement Policy • Purchasing Policy • Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy (please see [S1-1] own workforce policies) • Anti-Fraud Policy (please see [G1-1] business conduct policies and corporate culture) |
ESRS Requirement | Material topic | Related policies |
S4 - Customers and end-users | Freedom of expression Health and safety Security of a person Access to products and services Privacy Access to quality information Responsible marketing practices | • Internal Data Protection Regulation and Customer Privacy Notice • General Conditions of Carriage of Passengers and Baggage • Terms and conditions of services offered • Rules on delays, cancellations and refunds • Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy (please see [S1-1] Policies related to own workforce) • Safety compliance |
High-risk functions / business activities | Mitigating measures |
Functions that select and do business with third-party suppliers can be at a higher risk of corruption and bribery. | Supplier due diligence, contractual provisions on anti- corruption principles, monitoring of third-party activities. |
Functions with interactions with Government Officials and Other Covered Parties. Aviation is a highly regulated sector where interactions between Government Officials and Other Covered Parties and market participants are unavoidable. | To mitigate risks from interactions, two methods are recommended: ▶ Long-term Relationships: Report these to the anti- corruption compliance officer, who will document and include them in the risk assessment process. ▶ Ad Hoc Relationships: Document meetings to ensure transparency. |
Group-level operation. Wizz Air established the compliance framework at Group level; however, individual member companies operate in different market environments and face different corruption risks. | To ensure robust compliance at the Group level, we establish a unified and effective compliance framework, including anti- corruption measures based on consistent principles and methods. Additionally, we tailor this framework to address the specific corruption risks of each member company, ensuring proper management both at the Group level and within each individual company. |
Csodalámpa Foundation | Fundacja Mam Marzenie | When You Wish Upon A Star | Total | |
Country of operation | Hungary | Poland | United Kingdom | |
Number of wishes granted | 24 | 16 | 12 | 52 |
Number of flights impacted | 11 | 10 | 11 | 32 |
Number of tickets gifted | 63 | 40 | 43 | 146 |
ESRS | Disclosure requirement | Page | Comment |
ESRS 2 | General Information | ||
Basis for preparation | |||
BP-1 | General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement | ||
BP-2 | Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | ||
Governance | |||
GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ||
GOV-2 | Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ||
GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability- related performance in incentive schemes | ||
GOV-4 | Statement on due diligence | ||
GOV-5 | Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | ||
Strategy | |||
SBM-1 | Strategy, business model and value chain | The disclosure requirement has not been applied, as the relevant Commission Delegated Act – which would specify the application date for ESRS 2 SBM-1 paragraph 40(b) (breakdown of total revenue by significant ESRS sector) and 40(c) (list of additional significant ESRS sectors) – has not yet been adopted pursuant to Article 29b(1), third subparagraph, point (ii), of Directive 2013/34/EU. | |
SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
Impact, risk, and opportunity management Disclosures on the double materiality assessment | |||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks, and opportunities | ||
IRO-2 | Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement | ||
E | Environmental information | ||
E1 | Climate change |
GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability- related performance in incentive schemes | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities | ||
E1-1 | Transition plan for climate change mitigation | ||
E1-2 | Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | ||
E1-3 | Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | ||
E1-4 | Targets related to climate change mitigation | ||
E1-5 | Energy consumption & mix | ||
E1-6 | Gross scopes 1, 2, 3, and total GHG emissions - the Consolidated GHG statement | ||
E1-7 | GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits | - | Determined not material |
E1-8 | Internal carbon pricing | ||
E1-9 | Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate- related opportunities | - | Determined not material |
E2 | Pollution | ||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities | ||
E2-1 | Policies related to pollution | ||
E2-2 | Actions and resources related to pollution | ||
E2-3 | Targets related to pollution | ||
E2-4 | Pollution of air, water and soil | Air pollution is considered a material topic in line with the outcomes of the double materiality assessment (DMA). | |
E2-5 | Substances of concern and substances of very high concern | - | Determined not material |
E2-6 | Anticipated financial effects from pollution-related impacts, risks, and opportunities | ||
EU Taxonomy | |||
S | Social information | ||
S1 | Own workforce | ||
SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
S1-1 | Policies related to own workforce | ||
S1-2 | Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts |
S1-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns | ||
S1-4 | Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions | ||
S1-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | ||
S1-6 | Characteristics of the Undertaking’s Employees | ||
S1-7 | Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce | In line with ESRS 1 Appendix C, Wizz Air has chosen to omit reporting on all datapoints in this Disclosure Requirement for this reporting year. | |
S1-9 | Diversity metrics | ||
S1-11 | Social protection | In accordance with the phase-in provisions defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements, Appendix C, Wizz Air has partly omitted the following Disclosure Requirement in the reporting period: S1-11 Social protection. In applying the transitional relief available under ESRS 1 on a voluntary basis, Wizz Air provided a brief description for this topic instead of the full set of disclosure requirements outlined in the relevant ESRS. This included the identification of these as material matters, as well as a summary of how its business model and strategy consider the related impacts; any time-bound targets and progress made; relevant policies and actions taken; and, where available, applicable metrics. | |
S1-13 | Training and skills development metrics | In accordance with the phase-in provisions defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements, Appendix C, Wizz Air has partly omitted the following Disclosure Requirement during the reporting period: S1-13 Training and skills development metrics. As part of the voluntary application of the transitional provisions under ESRS 1, Wizz Air provided a brief description for this topic instead of the full disclosures required by the relevant ESRS. This included the identification of these as material matters, together with a summary of related impacts, strategy considerations, targets, actions, policies and, where available, applicable metrics. | |
S1-14 | Health and safety metrics | ||
S1-17 | Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | ||
S2 | Workers in the value chain | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
S2-1 | Policies related to value chain workers | ||
S2-2 | Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts | ||
S2-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns |
S2-4 | Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions | ||
S2-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | ||
S4 | Consumers and end-users | ||
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | ||
S4-1 | Policies related to consumers and end-users | ||
S4-2 | Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts | ||
S4-3 | Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns | ||
S4-4 | Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end- users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end- users, and effectiveness of those actions | ||
S4-5 | Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities | ||
G | Governance information | ||
G1 | Business conduct | ||
GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, supervisory and management bodies | ||
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | ||
G1-1 | Business conduct policies and corporate culture | ||
G1-2 | Management of relationships with suppliers | ||
G1-3 | Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery | ||
G1-4 | Incidents of corruption or bribery | ||
G1-5 | Political influence and lobbying activities | ||
G1-6 | Payment practices | ||
G | Other governance information |
Disclosure Requirement and related datapoint | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU Climate Law Reference | Page Reference |
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's gender diversity paragraph 21 (d) | Indicator number 13 of Table #1 of Annex 1 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 188 | ||
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Percentage of board members who are independent, paragraph 21 (e) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 188 | |||
ESRS 2 GOV-4 Statement on due diligence, paragraph 30 | Indicator number 10, Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 190 | |||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities, paragraph 40 (d) i | Indicators number 4 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Article 449a of Directive (EU) No. 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 (6), Table 1: Qualitative information on environmental risk, and Table 2: Qualitative information on social risk | Pg. 192 | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to chemical production, paragraph 40 (d) ii | Indicator number 9, Table #2 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons, paragraph 40 (d) iii | Indicator number 14, Table #1 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (7), Article 12, Paragraph 1 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco, paragraph 40 (d) (i) | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 12, Paragraph 1 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | |||
ESRS E1-1 Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050, paragraph 14 | Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1) | Pg. 226 | |||
ESRS E1-1 Undertakings excluded from Paris- aligned benchmarks paragraph 16 (g) | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: Banking book Climate Change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, emissions and residual maturity | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article12.1 (d) to (g), and Article 12.2 | Pg. 226 |
ESRS E1-4 GHG emission reduction targets, paragraph 34 | Indicator number 4 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 6 | Pg. 235 | |
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors), paragraph 38 | Indicator number 5 Table #1 and Indicator number 5 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Pg. 237 | |||
ESRS E1-5 Energy consumption and mix, paragraph 37 | Indicator number 5 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 237 | |||
ESRS E1-5 Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors, paragraphs 40 to 43 | Indicator number 6 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 237 | |||
ESRS E1-6 Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions, paragraph 44 | Indicators number 1 and 2 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Article 449a; Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 1: | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 5(1), 6 and 8(1) | Pg. 238 | |
ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG emissions intensity, paragraphs 53 to 55 | Indicators number 3 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 Template 3: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: alignment metrics | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Article 8(1) | Pg. 238 | |
ESRS E1-7 GHG removals and carbon credits, paragraph 56 | Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, Article 2(1) | Not material | |||
ESRS E1-9 Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks, paragraph 66 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material |
ESRS E1-9 Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk, paragraph 66 (a) ESRS E1-9 Location of significant assets at material physical risk, paragraph 66 (c). | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 paragraphs 46 and 47; Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk. | Not Material | |||
ESRS E1-9 Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy efficiency classes, paragraph 67 (c). | Article 449a Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Paragraph 34; Template 2: Banking book – Climate change transition risk: Loans collateralised by immovable property – Energy efficiency of the collateral | Not Material | |||
ESRS E1-9 Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities, paragraph 69 | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II | Not Material | |||
ESRS E2-4 Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the EPRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil, paragraph 28 | Indicator umber 8 Table #1 of Annex 1 Indicator number 2 Table #2 of Annex 1 Indicator number 1 Table #2 of Annex 1 Indicator number 3 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Water and marine resources, paragraph 9 | Indicator number 7 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy, paragraph 13 | Indicator number 8 Table 2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas, paragraph 14 | Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-4 Total water recycled and reused, paragraph 28 (c) | Indicator number 6.2 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E3-4 Total water consumption in m3 per net revenue on own operations, paragraph 29 | Indicator number 6.1 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4, paragraph 16 (a) i | Indicator number 7 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 199 | |||
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4, paragraph 16 (b) | Indicator number 10 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Pg. 199 | |||
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4, paragraph 16 (c) | Indicator number 14 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Pg. 199 | |||
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies, paragraph 24 (b) | Indicator number 11 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material |
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies, paragraph 24 (c) | Indicator number 12 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E4-2 Policies to address deforestation, paragraph 24 (d) | Indicator number 15 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled waste, paragraph 37 (d) | Indicator number 13 Table #2 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS E5-5 Hazardous waste and radioactive waste, paragraph 39 | Indicator number 9 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of forced labour, paragraph 14 (f) | Indicator number 13 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 201 | |||
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk of incidents of child labour, paragraph 14 (g) | Indicator number 12 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 201 | |||
ESRS S1-1 Human rights policy commitments, paragraph 20 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex I | Pg. 250 | |||
ESRS S1-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8, paragraph 21 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 250 | |||
ESRS S1-1 Processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings, paragraph 22 | Indicator number 11 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 250 | |||
ESRS S1-1 Workplace accident prevention policy or management system, paragraph 23 | Indicator number 1 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 250 | |||
ESRS S1-3 Grievance/ complaints handling mechanisms, paragraph 32 (c) | Indicator number 5 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 256 | |||
ESRS S1-14 Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents, paragraph 88 (b) and (c) | Indicator number 2 Table #3 of Annex I | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 265 | ||
ESRS S1-14 Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness, paragraph 88 (e) | Indicator number 3 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 265 | |||
ESRS S1-16 Unadjusted gender pay gap, paragraph 97 (a) | Indicator number 12 Table #1 of Annex I | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Not Material | ||
ESRS S1-16 Excessive CEO pay ratio, paragraph 97 (b) | Indicator number 8 Table #3 of Annex I | Not Material | |||
ESRS S1-17 Incidents of discrimination, paragraph 103 (a) | Indicator number 7 Table #3 of Annex I | Pg. 268 | |||
ESRS S1-17 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD, paragraph 104 (a) | Indicator number 10 Table #1 and Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex I | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 Art 12 (1) | Pg. 268 | ||
ESRS 2- SBM3 – S2 Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain, paragraph 11 (b) | Indicators number 12 and n. 13 Table #3 of Annex I | Not Material |
ESRS S2-1 Human rights policy commitments, paragraph 17 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 270 | |||
ESRS S2-1 Policies related to value chain workers, paragraph 18 | Indicator number 11 and n. 4 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 270 | |||
ESRS S2- 1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines, paragraph 19 | Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) | Pg. 270 | ||
ESRS S2-1 Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8, paragraph 19 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II | Pg. 270 | |||
ESRS S2-4 Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain, paragraph 36 | Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 272 | |||
ESRS S3-1 Human rights policy commitments, paragraph 16 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 of Annex 1 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS S3-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles and/or OECD guidelines, paragraph 17 | Indicator number 10 Table #1 Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) | Not Material | ||
ESRS S3-4 Human rights issues and incidents paragraph 36 | Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Not Material | |||
ESRS S4-1 Policies related to consumers and end-users, paragraph 16 | Indicator number 9 Table #3 and Indicator number 11 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Pg. 275 | |||
ESRS S4-1 Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines, paragraph 17 | Indicator number 10 Table #1 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Art 12 (1) | Pg. 275 | ||
ESRS S4-4 Human rights issues and incidents, paragraph 35 | Indicator number 14 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 279 | |||
ESRS G1-1 United Nations Convention against Corruption, paragraph 10 (b) | Indicator number 15 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 284 | |||
ESRS G1-1 Protection of whistleblowers, paragraph 10 (d) | Indicator number 6 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 284 | |||
ESRS G1-4 Fines for violation of anti- corruption and anti- bribery laws, paragraph 24 (a) | Indicator number 17 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II) | Pg. 289 | ||
ESRS G1-4 Standards of anti-corruption and anti- bribery, paragraph 24 (b) | Indicator number 16 Table #3 of Annex 1 | Pg. 289 |