iso4217:EURiso4217:EURxbrli:shares213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31wizzair:ReorganisationReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfEquityComponentOfConvertibleInstrumentsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31wizzair:CostOfHedgingReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-03-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31wizzair:ReorganisationReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfEquityComponentOfConvertibleInstrumentsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31wizzair:CostOfHedgingReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852025-04-012026-03-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31wizzair:ReorganisationReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfEquityComponentOfConvertibleInstrumentsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31wizzair:CostOfHedgingReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852026-03-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31wizzair:ReorganisationReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfEquityComponentOfConvertibleInstrumentsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31wizzair:CostOfHedgingReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-03-31213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31wizzair:ReorganisationReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfEquityComponentOfConvertibleInstrumentsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfCashFlowHedgesMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31wizzair:CostOfHedgingReserveMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:ReserveOfExchangeDifferencesOnTranslationMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParentMember213800COXGZCORLJZA852024-04-012025-03-31ifrs-full:NoncontrollingInterestsMember
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 20261
WIZZ AIR
AT A GLANCE
Wizz Air is the fastest growing ultra-low-cost carrier and one of the most sustainable European airlines,
operating a fleet of 262 Airbus A320 and A321-family aircraft, and connecting close to 200 destinations
across 45 countries, as at 31 March 2026 . A team of dedicated aviation professionals delivers a superior
service and very low fares, making Wizz Air the preferred choice for over 69.7 million passengers in the
fiscal year ended March 2026. Wizz Air is listed on the London Stock Exchange under the ticker WIZZ.
CONTENTS
Highlights and Company overview
Strategic report
Chairman’s statement
Chief Executive’s review
Financial review
Key statistics
Emerging and principal risks and uncertainties
Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement
Modern Slavery Act disclosure statement 2026
Governance
Chairman’s statement on corporate governance report
Management of the Company
Report of the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee
Report of the Chair of the Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee
Report of the Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Directors’ Report
Company Information
Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements
Consolidated financial statements and notes
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Consolidated statement of financial position
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Consolidated statement of cash flows
Notes forming part of the financial statements
Independent auditors’ report to the members of Wizz Air Holdings Plc
Additional information
Alternative performance measures (APMs)
Glossary of terms
Annual sustainability report F26
References to “Wizz Air”, “Wizz”, “the Company”, “the Group”, “we” or “our” in this report are references to Wizz Air Holdings Plc, or to
Wizz Air Holdings Plc and its subsidiaries, as applicable.
F26 in this document refers to the financial year ended 31 March 2026. Equivalent terms are used for previous/future financial years.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 2
HIGHLIGHTS AND
COMPANY OVERVIEW
€ 5.7B REVENUE
50
€139.7M OPERATING PROFIT
89610197665417
4.31 EURO CENTS RASK
89610197665602
€2.1 B TOTAL CASH 1, 2
70
€1.3B EBITDA1
8796093023293
€1.3 M NET INCOME
106
3.02 EURO CENTS EX-FUEL CASK
156
3.7 LEVERAGE RATIO1
8796093023285
(117.7)
(120.0)
1. For definitions, refer to the Alternative performance measures (APMs) and Glossary of Terms sections on pages 175-180.
These measures incorporate certain non-financial information that management believes is useful when assessing the performance
of the Group.
2.  Total cash comprises cash and cash equivalents (€1,085.9 million), current and non-current cash deposits (€952.8 million) as well
as current and non-current restricted cash (€87.7 million).
The Company has a policy of rounding each amount and percentage individually from the fully accurate number to the figure disclosed
in the information presented. As a result, some amounts and percentages do not total – though such differences are all small.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 3
GEOGRAPHIES
We offer tickets for 1016 routes across
Europe and the Middle East
ALLROUTES.gif
Number of routes operated, as at 31 March 2026*:
From Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries
Romania
207
Poland
200
Hungary
77
Bulgaria
55
Albania
51
North Macedonia
37
Serbia
27
Moldova
27
Slovakia
22
Georgia
20
Lithuania
19
Bosnia and Herzegovina
15
Montenegro
14
Armenia
11
From other European countries
Italy
148
United Kingdom
66
Cyprus
14
From other countries
Israel
3
Other (various)
3
* Showing routes that are based in/originated from the respective countries.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 4
STRATEGIC REPORT
CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT
Dear fellow shareholders, colleagues, customers and partners,
Travel demand remained resilient throughout F26, demonstrating the aviation sector’s underlying strength
and Wizz Air’s enduring appeal and growing capacity. However, we were not immune to another year
marked by disruption and uncertainty for our industry.
The operating environment remains as complex as ever. Supply-chain constraints have persisted, while cost
inflation and geopolitical developments have continued to drive volatility, more recently with respect to jet
fuel pricing and availability. These factors, combined with ongoing pressures within the aviation sector more
broadly, have required continued adaptability from all industry participants.
As in the previous year, the Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbofan (GTF) engine issue was a defining challenge
for the Company in F26, although we saw improving trends with fewer aircraft grounded on average this
year and slightly better turnaround times on our engines. With that said, fleet groundings have continued to
affect capacity, utilisation and cost performance, creating structural headwinds largely beyond
management’s direct control.
It is important to recognise that many of the pressures we have faced are not a reflection of the underlying
strength of the business. Rather, they have showcased its resilience and as fleet availability improves over
time, plus geopolitical developments subside, we expect this strength to come to the fore.
Against this backdrop, Wizz Air responded decisively during the year, reshaping our strategy to maximise
our profitability in a sustainable way as we expand our fleet. Strategic decisions include the continued
realignment of the network towards core Central and Eastern European (CEE) markets, the exit from
operations that don’t align with this, and the optimisation of the aircraft delivery schedule with Airbus. These
decisions ensure that capacity is deployed where it can generate sustainable returns, take and maintain
market share, and that our expansion is aligned with operational realities.
The Board is closely engaged in overseeing these decisions, providing support and challenge as management
has adapted the business. While growth expectations have been moderated in the near and mid-term, the
opportunity in front of us and the long-term strategic direction of the Company remain unchanged.
Despite the challenges faced, passenger numbers increased, operational performance improved, and the
Company maintained a strong liquidity position.
We also made progress in strengthening the operational foundations of the business. Investments in
reliability, systems and processes have delivered improvements in completion rates, punctuality and
customer satisfaction. These are important indicators of the quality and sustainability of the operation.
The Board remains focused on ensuring that the Company maintains financial discipline. Liquidity has been
preserved, providing flexibility to manage ongoing uncertainty while continuing to invest in strategic
priorities, including fleet renewal and operational resilience.
In December 2025, we announced the creation of a new Board Committee, the Financial Performance
Committee, which provides more focused oversight of financial planning, financing and performance metrics
as the Company continues to grow while financial planning and capital management become increasingly
complex. This structural change to our governance has enhanced the Board’s ability to provide strategic
guidance and oversight in areas critical to the Company’s financial resilience and long-term value creation.
Employees
Colleagues, on behalf of the Board, I would like to express our sincere appreciation for your continued
dedication and professionalism, particularly in the face of elevated uncertainty. The past year has required
resilience and adaptability across all areas of the business, and your efforts have been instrumental in
maintaining operations and supporting our customers. Your commitment under challenging circumstances
has not gone unnoticed and is fundamental to the Company’s success.
Customers
Our customers remain at the heart of everything we do, as reflected in the continued execution of our
internal transformation programme, “Customer First”. We continue to focus on delivering low fares alongside
improving reliability, service quality and communication. Strengthening the customer experience remains a
key priority for the business.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 5
STRATEGIC REPORT
Environment
Sustainability is still one of Wizz Air’s core strengths. We remain one of the most emissions-efficient airlines
globally, supported by a young and fuel-efficient fleet. I am pleased to report that during the year we made
further progress in reducing CO2 emissions per revenue passenger kilometre.
While GTF-related disruptions have affected the pace of fleet renewal, our long-term trajectory remains
unchanged. The continued transition towards A321neo aircraft underpins our commitment to reducing Wizz
Air’s environmental impact. We remain fully compliant with sustainable aviation fuel requirements and
continue to support broader industry efforts towards decarbonisation through our ‘Flying Towards Net Zero’
initiative.
Communities
Wizz Air plays an important role in connecting communities and supporting economic activity across Europe
and beyond. We remain committed to engaging constructively with governments, regulators and local
stakeholders, and to contributing positively to the communities we serve.
The Board continues to oversee these efforts through its governance framework, including the Sustainability
and Culture Committee, ensuring that the Company’s growth is aligned with its broader responsibilities.
Looking ahead
Looking forward, the complex operating environment is expected to persist. Our recovery from GTF-related
disruptions is progressing, but will take time, and external factors such as cost inflation and geopolitical
uncertainty will continue to require careful management.
However, the Board retains its confidence in Wizz Air’s long-term prospects. We benefit from a highly
efficient operating model, an increasingly strong market position in CEE, a modern fleet and a substantial
order book that support future growth.
As fleet availability improves and the strategic actions taken during the year take full effect, the business is
well positioned to deliver enhanced performance. The challenges faced in recent years have reinforced the
resilience of the model and strengthened the Company’s ability to compete effectively in a demanding
industry.
On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank all our stakeholders for their continued support.
William A. Franke
Chairman of the Board of Directors
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 6
STRATEGIC REPORT
CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW
F26 has been a year of relentless focus on our strategy and aim to be the reliable travel partner of choice
across Central and Eastern Europe, and key markets across the whole European continent.
We have continued to grow and serve an increasing number of customers. Equally, the defining feature of
the year was the set of strategic decisions we made to position the business for long-term resilience and
competitiveness. This has proven to be the right direction – working well in a balanced environment as well
as at times of volatility, which the industry experienced towards the end of the financial year due to the
Middle East crisis.
Sustained demand across our network
Throughout a sustained period of global volatility, demand for our services remained strong this year. We
carried 69.7 million passengers, up 10 per cent year on year, reflecting sustained demand for low-fare travel
across our network. In January 2026, we celebrated a significant milestone, having flown 500 million
passengers since the start of Wizz Air’s operations.
Operational performance has been an area of clear progress. Throughout the year, we placed significant
emphasis on restoring reliability in on-time performance and improving the customer experience. As a
result, we have seen meaningful improvements in completion rates, departure punctuality and overall
customer satisfaction. These gains are the outcome of sustained investment in our systems, processes and
people, and they provide us with a stronger foundation for future growth.
Customer behaviour continues to evolve, with consumers more informed and selective, which places greater
emphasis on delivering value and flexibility. The Wizz Air model is well suited to this environment. Unit
revenues have been broadly stable, with some pressure in certain periods, but overall, the underlying
demand environment has proven resilient.
Reshaping our strategy
At the start of the year, we set out a clear strategic direction: to focus our operations on markets where we
can achieve meaningful scale in more cost-efficient, operationally stable environments.
We exited our Abu Dhabi joint venture, initiated the closure of our Vienna base, and accelerated the
reallocation of capacity towards Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and other core markets where we see
stronger structural advantages. Additional aircraft were allocated to Skopje, Sofia, Varna, Warsaw, Katowice,
Wroclaw, Gdansk, Tirana, Budapest, Bucharest and Chisinau. The non-CEE bases in London, Rome, Milan,
Venice, Naples and Catania were also adding aircraft as we record growing yield performance in these
markets.
These decisions allow us to concentrate management time, capital and capacity on parts of the network
where the business performs best and where we see the strongest long-term opportunity to gain and
maintain market share.
We opened a number of lower-cost bases, including in Bucharest (Baneasa), Bratislava, Podgorica, Suceava,
Targu Mures, Tuzla, Warsaw Modlin and Yerevan, strengthening our footprint where we believe we can
deliver superior returns over time.  Our CEE market share reached 25.3 per cent in the year, maintaining
our position as the largest CEE operator by seats. More recently we announced the opening of the new
Palermo and Turin bases in Italy.
We continue to monitor the geopolitical situation carefully, to be able to restore our network when the
security situation permits. We have plans in place to resume operations in Ukraine within weeks of any
ceasefire and opening of the airspace. We also remain committed to Israel, and are keen to develop the
market further to meet the growing demand for Wizz Air’s routes.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 7
STRATEGIC REPORT
Wizz market shares by country and region
Market
Market share
Low-cost segment share
Low-cost market position
Albania
54%
63%
1
Armenia
32%
63%
1
Bosnia and Herzegovina
19%
30%
2
Bulgaria
27%
42%
2
Cyprus
13%
24%
2
Georgia
22%
48%
1
Hungary
37%
51%
1
Israel
8%
42%
1
Italy
9%
15%
2
Lithuania
15%
26%
2
N. Macedonia
58%
82%
1
Moldova
31%
39%
1
Montenegro
14%
32%
1
Poland
25%
40%
2
Romania
49%
71%
1
Serbia
22%
77%
1
Slovakia
24%
33%
2
United Kingdom
4%
7%
4
CEE
25%
44%
1
Recalibrating our path to growth
This repositioning has been accompanied by a recalibration of our growth profile. While our long-term
ambition for Wizz Air remains unchanged, we have recognised that the current operating environment
requires a more measured approach. As a result, we have moderated our expected capacity growth to a
more sustainable level of around 10-12 per cent per annum over the medium term.
These decisions are closely aligned with changes to our fleet plan.
In November we reached an agreement with Airbus to adjust our delivery schedule through to the next
decade, including the deferment of a significant number of aircraft and the rebalancing of our order book
towards the A321neo after we converted the majority of our original A321XLR order to neos. This gives us
greater flexibility to match capacity growth with demand, while maintaining the benefits of scale and
efficiency that comes with our large and modern fleet. We have continued to increase the share of A321neo
aircraft in our fleet, reinforcing our position as one of the most efficient and lowest-emission airlines globally.
Wizz Air’s fleet has now surpassed 260 aircraft, with almost 75 per cent of these flying on neo technology.
The fleet is scheduled to be all-neo by calendar 2029.
GTF engine update
The Pratt & Whitney GTF engine issue continues to have an impact on our operation, although with
diminishing effects, as the return of engines into operation progresses. As previously communicated, we
expect this issue to persist in the current F27 fiscal year, with a full recovery in fleet availability expected by
the end of calendar year 2027, when we should not have any more engines undergoing powder metal
inspections.
However, I am pleased to report that there has been steady progress during the year, with the number of
grounded aircraft due to GTF engine-related inspections declining from 38 at the end of June 2025 to 30 at
the end of the financial year. We have continued to work closely with Pratt & Whitney to mitigate the impact
through additional engine access, operational adjustments and compensation arrangements. We expect
further gradual improvements with the size of the grounded fleet reaching roughly 15-20 aircraft by the end
of F27.
Resilient financial performance
Financially, the Group has demonstrated resilience. In the first half of the fiscal year, we achieved a
meaningful increase in EBITDA and operating profit, supported by stable revenues and improved cost
dynamics compared to the previous year. In the second half of the year, financial performance was affected
by seasonality to which we responded with more focused capacity deployment. We managed to deliver a
positive net income performance for the year despite expecting revenue and fuel cost pressures in March
from the outbreak of the conflict in the Gulf region.
Across the year, we maintained a solid financial position, supported by strong liquidity and disciplined capital
management. We increased our cash position compared to the previous year-end, and managed our debt
profile proactively, repaying our €500 million bond in January 2026.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 8
Further reduction in CO2 emissions
Beyond our financial performance, we continued to make progress in areas that are critical to our long-term
sustainability. We remain the most emissions-efficient airline in our peer group, and we have further
reduced our CO2 emissions per passenger kilometre. At the year-end, this stood at 50.6 grams per
passenger kilometre.
People
We have also continued to invest in our people, strengthening engagement, development and alignment
across the organisation. We continued gathering information and insights from all colleagues through
employee engagement feedback, incorporating ideas and actions into day-to-day life across the Company.
The team of talented and dedicated members on the People Council continued to engage in a wide range of
topics related to our employees across all countries where we operate.
In November 2025, we announced changes to our Senior Leadership Team, effective from 1 February 2026.
Ian Malin became Chief Commercial Officer after three years as CFO, and now leads the Group’s commercial
functions and revenue generation, applying his strong strategic and sector expertise to this new role. At the
same time, Veronika Špaňárová joined as CFO from Citi, following a 30-year international banking career
and prior experience supporting Wizz Air, bringing a fresh perspective to the business.
Outlook
The actions taken during F26 have further strengthened our resilience and the foundations of our business.
With a clear strategy, a highly efficient operating model, a young fleet and financial resilience we are well
positioned to deliver sustainable growth and create value over the long term.
The broader external environment remains complex. Geopolitical developments, including the outbreak of
war in the Gulf region, have required rapid operational adjustments. However, to date, these impacts have
been manageable, affecting only a limited portion of our capacity, and we have been able to reallocate
resources quickly to mitigate disruption. This reflects Wizz Air’s more resilient and adaptable operating
model than in previous years.
As we move into the next financial year, our priorities are clear. We will continue to focus on our core
markets, restore full fleet utilisation as engine availability improves, maintain discipline in capacity growth
and cost control, and further enhance the reliability and quality of our operations. In F27, we will continue to
invest in our fleet, our people and our commercial capabilities to support the long-term growth of Wizz Air.
József Váradi
Chief Executive Officer
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 9
STRATEGIC REPORT
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Wizz Air reported a net profit of €1.3 million (F25: net profit of €213.9 million), with EBITDA improving to
€1,318.3 million from €1,134.3 million in F25, showing the overall resilience of the business despite a
number of significant one-off headwinds in F26 that included the forced cancellation of Tel Aviv and other
Middle East routes during the 2025 peak summer period as well as the cancellation of Middle East and
Cyprus routes in March 2026. Whilst the Iran conflict in March 2026 had the risk of negatively impacting
earnings by an estimated €50m, this was largely mitigated by fuel hedges put in place prior to the conflict.
Total revenue increased by 8.0 per cent to €5,691.4 million (F25: €5,267.6 million) with seat capacity up by
10.5 per cent to 76.9 million seats and passengers reaching a record number of 69.7 million
(F25: 63.4 million). Total fuel expenses decreased by 1.9 per cent to €1,764.0 million
(F25: €1,797.6 million). Total operating expenses increased by 8.9 per cent to €5,551.7 million
(F25: €5,100.1 million), resulting in a lower operating profit of €139.7 million (F25: €167.5 million) and an
operating margin of 2.5 per cent (F25: 3.2 per cent). Net financing expense decreased to €112.7 million
(F25: €147.8 million). Profit before income tax was €27.0 million (F25: €19.7 million), while the tax expense
was €25.7 million (F25: tax credit €194.2 million) resulting in a net profit of €1.3 million (F25: profit after
tax of €213.9 million).
Passenger ticket revenue increased by 8.4 per cent to €3,161.4 million (F25: €2,917.0 million) and ancillary
revenue grew by 7.6 per cent to €2,530.0 million (F25: €2,350.6 million). The load factor declined by 0.5
percentage points to 90.7 per cent (F25: 91.2 per cent) due largely to the aftermath of the war with Iran.
Ancillary revenue was partly impacted by the closure of the Abu Dhabi base in September 2025 and the
reduction of flight volumes to the Middle East, as those longer flights generated higher than average
ancillary revenues per pax. At the same time, the Company saw higher demand year-on-year for its
reserved seating product and new ancillary initiatives like ‘All You Can Fly’.
While total fuel expenses decreased year-on-year, spending on Carbon Emission schemes such as EU and
UK ETS and CORSIA increased by 27.2 per cent to €273.3 million (F25: €214.8 million) and the Company
spent €56.5 million on SAF (sustainable aviation fuel) uplift in the first year of the EU mandate. Fuel
consumption per block hour, however, was reduced by 1.5 per cent to 2.2 metric tonnes, showing improved
fuel efficiency due to a greater share of the flying fleet comprising NEO aircraft.
Other major cost lines increased broadly in tandem with capacity growth and inflation. Certain unit costs
remained stable as the powder metal affected grounded fleet was systematically released back to service.
Airport, handling and en-route costs were higher, increasing by 13.0 per cent to €1,527.6 million (F25:
€1,351.8 million) due to rising Eurocontrol sector fees introduced at the start of 2025 and a larger volume of
flights. Crew costs were 16.1 per cent higher at €655.9 million (F25: €564.9 million) due to a greater
number of operated flights as well as salary and cost-of-living adjustments. Depreciation and amortisation
rose 21.9 per cent to €1,178.6 million (F25: €966.8 million), while maintenance, materials and repairs
increased to €462.8 million (F25: €330.4 million), up 40.1 per cent, as we maintained more aircraft and
spare engines during the year. Flight disruption costs fell to €136.7 million (F25: €166.5 million) owing to
the significantly improved operational stability and performance.
Income tax charged increased to €25.7 million (F25: €194.2 million credit) as F25 included a one-off credit
arising on the recognition of deferred tax assets that started to unwind as new aircraft are delivered.
Our fuel and FX rates during F26 were as follows:
F26
F25
Change
Average jet fuel price ($/metric tonne, including SAF, into-plane premium
and impact of effective hedges)
890
919
(3.2)%
Average EUR/USD rate (including impact of effective hedges)
1.13
1.08
4.6%
Year-end EUR/USD rate
1.15
1.08
6.1%
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 10
STRATEGIC REPORT
Financial overview
Summary consolidated statement of comprehensive income
€ million
F26
F25
Change
Total revenue
5,691.4
5,267.6
8.0%
Fuel costs
(1,764.0)
(1,797.6)
(1.9)%
Operating expenses less other income and excluding fuel costs
(3,787.7)
(3,302.5)
14.7%
Total operating expenses
(5,551.7)
(5,100.1)
8.9%
Operating profit
139.7
167.5
(16.6)%
Operating margin
2.5%
3.2%
(0.7)ppt
Net financing expense
(112.7)
(147.8)
(23.7)%
Profit before income tax
27.0
19.7
37.1%
Income tax (expense)/ credit
(25.7)
194.2
n.m.
Profit for the year
1.3
213.9
(99.4)%
*n.m.: not meaningful, as the variance is more than (-)100 per cent.
Earnings per share
Earnings per share, € (Note 12 )
F26
F25
Change
Basic earnings per share, €
0.02
2.18
(2.16)
Diluted earnings per share, €
0.03
1.78
(1.75)
Financial performance
Revenue
The following table sets out an overview of revenue streams for F26 and F25 and the percentage change in
those items:
F26
F25
Total
(€ million)
Percentage of
total revenue
Total
(€ million)
Percentage of
total revenue
Percentage
change
Passenger ticket revenue1
3,161.4
55.5%
2,917.0
55.4%
8.4%
Ancillary revenue1
2,530.0
44.5%
2,350.6
44.6%
7.6%
Total revenue
5,691.4
100.0%
5,267.6
100.0%
8.0%
1.For further definitions of non-financial measures presented, please refer to the Glossary of terms and Alternative performance
measures (APMs) sections of this document.
Total revenue increased by 8.0 per cent to €5,691.4 million in F26 from €5,267.6 million in F25, driven
mainly by the capacity increase year on year. Passenger ticket revenue increased by 8.4 per cent to
€3,161.4 million in F26 from €2,917.0 million in F25, and ancillary revenue increased by 7.6 per cent to
€2,530.0 million in F26 from €2,350.6 million in F25. RASK (Revenue per Available Seat Kilometre)
decreased by 0.4 per cent to 4.31 euro cents in F26 from 4.33 euro cents in F25. Ticket RASK decreased
by 0.1 per cent to 2.39 euro cents in F26 from 2.40 euro cents in F25, while Ancillary RASK decreased by
0.8 per cent to 1.92 euro cents from 1.93 euro cents in F25. The decrease in RASK was primarily driven by
structural network changes, closure of the Abu Dhabi operation and adverse geopolitical developments.
These included the ongoing effects of the Gaza conflict, which led to the partial cancellation of flights to and
from Tel Aviv, and the start of the Iran war in late February 2026.
Operating expenses
Total operating expenses increased by 8.9 per cent to €5,551.7 million in F26 from €5,100.1 million in F25.
Total CASK (Cost per Available Seat Kilometre) increased to 4.35 euro cents in F26 from 4.33 euro cents in
F25, out of which the ex-fuel CASK increase is 0.16 euro cents, up to 3.02 euro cents in F26 from 2.85 euro
cents in F25. F26 CASK was impacted by general price inflation in airport and navigation charges, alongside
higher maintenance costs and increased employee remuneration (across crew and office), and lower
compensation received from Pratt & Whitney mainly driven by reduced Aircraft-on-Ground exposure and unit
rates compared to the previous fiscal year. These cost increases were partially offset by improved
operational punctuality, resulting in fewer flight disruptions and lower passenger compensation expenses, as
well as enhanced fuel efficiency combined with favourable foreign exchange movements on fuel prices. A
further positive impact was seen from the increased number of sale‑and‑leaseback transactions, the
discontinuation of structural wet‑lease operations and the closure of the Abu Dhabi business unit and the
Vienna base.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 11
STRATEGIC REPORT
For F26 and F25 the following table sets out the expenses relevant for the CASK measures and the
percentage changes in those expenses:
F26
F25
Total
(€ million)
Percentage
of total
operating
expenses
Unit cost
(€cts/ASK)
Total
(€ million)
Percentage
of total
operating
expenses
Unit cost
(€cts/
ASK)
Percentage
change of
total cost
Staff costs
655.9
11.8%
0.50
564.9
11.1%
0.46
16.1%
Fuel costs
1,764.0
31.8%
1.34
1,797.6
35.2%
1.48
(1.9)%
Distribution and marketing
133.4
2.4%
0.10
117.8
2.3%
0.10
13.2%
Maintenance, materials and
repairs
462.8
8.3%
0.35
330.4
6.5%
0.27
40.1%
Airport, handling and en-
route charges
1,527.6
27.5%
1.16
1,351.8
26.5%
1.11
13.0%
Depreciation and
amortisation
1,178.6
21.2%
0.89
966.8
19.0%
0.79
21.9%
Other expenses
371.2
6.7%
0.28
466.6
9.1%
0.38
(20.4%)
Other income
(541.8)
(9.8%)
(0.41)
(495.8)
(9.7%)
(0.41)
9.3%
Total operating expenses
5,551.7
100.0%
4.20
5,100.1
100.0%
4.19
8.9%
Net cost from financial
income and expense*
194.2
0.15
167.4
0.14
16.0%
Total
5,745.9
4.35
5,267.5
4.33
9.1%
Total ex-fuel cost
3,981.9
71.7%
3.02
3,469.9
68.0%
2.85
14.8%
* Excluding net loss on derivative financial instruments and net foreign exchange gains.
Staff costs were €655.9 million in F26 , up by 16.1 per cent from €564.9 million in F25, reflecting a 12.0 per
cent increase in staff numbers and cost-of-living adjustments to salaries year on year, which was partially
offset by savings after the closure of the Abu Dhabi operation.
Fuel expenditures decreased by 1.9 per cent to €1,764.0 million in F26 from €1,797.6 million in F25, and
fuel CASK decreased by 9.6 per cent to 1.34 euro cents in F26 from 1.48 euro cents in F25. The average fuel
price, including sustainable aviation fuel, hedging impact and into-plane premium, decreased by 3.2 per cent
to $890 per metric tonne in F26 from $919 per metric tonne in F25. Beyond the impact of fuel price
fluctuations, fuel consumption measured in metric tonnes per block hours decreased by 1.5 per cent on a
year-on-year basis. This reduction is due to the higher proportion of fuel-efficient NEO aircraft within the
fleet, and a reduced number of fuel inefficient wet-leased flights. Collectively, these factors contributed to
the overall improvement in fuel efficiency and cost management during the period under review.
Distribution and marketing costs increased by 13.2 per cent to €133.4 million in F26 from € 117.8 million in
F25. Distribution costs increased broadly in line with revenue growth during the period, which includes the
establishment of a new call centre in Egypt to increase overall call-handling capacity. Marketing expenses
also rose, driven by targeted campaigns in Spain and Italy, as well as the commencement of a sponsorship
agreement with AS Roma football club.
Maintenance, materials and repair costs increased by 40.1 per cent to €462.8 million in F26 from
€330.4 million in F25, primarily due to significant one‑off cost savings recorded in F25. In addition, higher
operational volumes – reflected in increases in fleet size (+8.8 per cent), flight hours (+6.1 per cent) and
flight cycles (+7.4 per cent) – contributed to cost growth. The cost increase was further driven by higher
redelivery costs and a rise in base maintenance intensity associated with the phase‑out of the CEO fleet, as
well as continued fleet growth and the presence of older aircraft in the fleet. These effects were partly
mitigated by lower use of short‑term leased engines.
Airport, handling and en-route charges increased by 13.0 per cent to € 1,527.6 million in F26 from
€1,351.8 million in F25, reflecting the rise in passenger numbers (+10 per cent), departing flights (+7.4 per
cent), and the general increase in navigation unit rates.
Depreciation and amortisation charges increased by 21.9 per cent to €1,178.6 million in F26, up from
€966.8 million in F25. The increase reflects a higher number of CEO aircraft redeliveries compared to F25,
resulting in higher end‑of‑lease maintenance asset depreciation on engines and fleet growth following NEO
and XLR deliveries with higher asset values. Additional drivers include the increased depreciation associated
with GTF engine maintenance assets due to the short time between shop visits.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 12
STRATEGIC REPORT
Other expenses amounted to €371.2 million in F26, compared to €466.6 million in F25. Among the key
drivers, flight disruption cost, including compensation paid to customers, was € 136.7 million in F26, down
from €166.5 million in F25 due to significantly improved operational punctuality, wet lease expenses
decreased to €17.9 million in F26 from €113.0 million in F25 reflecting the termination of the structural wet
lease operations, non-direct administrative costs increased to €102.7 million in F26 from €97.2 million in
F25, while crew-related expenses increased to €77.4 million in F26 from €61.3 million in F25, driven by the
impact of general cost inflation.
Other income amounted to €541.8 million in F26, up from €495.8 million in F25. The increase was primarily
driven by higher gains from sale and leaseback transactions, which reached €255.9 million in F26 compared
to €121.3 million in F25. This growth reflects a rise in aircraft sale and leaseback financing (33 transactions
in F26 versus 16 in F25) as well as spare engine sale and leaseback transactions (18 in F26 versus 10 in
F25). These effects were partially offset by lower credits and compensation received from suppliers, which
amounted to €265.7 million in F26, compared to €353.6 million in F25.
Net financing income and expense
The following table sets out an overview of net financing expense for F26 and F25 and the percentage
change in those items:
€ million
F26
F25
Change
Net financial expense
(194.2)
(167.4)
16.0%
Net loss on derivative financial instruments
(20.6)
(6.4)
221.9%
Net foreign exchange gains
102.1
26.0
292.7%
Net financing expense
(112.7)
(147.8)
(23.7)%
Net financing expense decreased by 23.7 per cent to €112.7 million in F26 from €147.8 million in F25, of
which:
▶ Financial income posted a decrease of 10.4 per cent due to relatively lower deposit interest rates
observed in F26.
▶ Financial expenses increased by 7.3 per cent, where the rise in interest expense associated with lease
liabilities under IFRS 16 due to the expansion of the fleet was partly mitigated by ceasing PDP financing
present in F25, achieving a reduction in the REPO interest rate, and the repayment of €500m of bond
financing in January 2026.
▶ Net foreign exchange gains increased by 292.7 per cent, which was primarily attributable to a more
favourable EUR/USD exchange rate environment during the fiscal year. The unrealised component of the
foreign exchange gain, predominantly resulting from the revaluation of lease liabilities denominated in
US dollars, amounted to a €169.5 million gain in F26, as compared to a € 30.6 million gain in F25. The
realised component of the gain is principally attributable to the revaluation of cash balances, which are
chiefly denominated in US dollars and kept on deposit accounts.
▶ The net loss recognised on derivative financial instruments is attributable to the cross-currency swap
programme, implemented with the objective of mitigating Wizz Air’s exposure to foreign exchange risk,
which started in early 2025. Since then, the dollar has weakened against the euro and the accumulated
positions closed in a net loss at the end of the fiscal year. This programme is designed to manage
fluctuations in currency values that could adversely affect the Company’s financial position and results of
operations. By utilising such derivative instruments, Wizz Air seeks to achieve greater stability in its
financial performance by reducing the potential impact of unfavourable movements in exchange rates.
Taxation
The Group recorded an income tax expense of €25.7 million in F26 compared to the €194.2 million credit in
F25 . The effective rate for the Group in F26 was 95.2 per cent compared to a negative 985.8 per cent in
F25. The tax charges stem from differences in the standalone income levels of subsidiaries, differences in
statutory tax rates applicable for these subsidiaries, and movements in deferred taxes. Compared to F25,
the significant changes in income tax levels are due to one-off deferred tax credits that affected F25.
Profit for the year
The Group earned a net profit of €1.3 million in F26, compared to the net profit of €213.9 million in F25.
Other comprehensive income and expenses
In F26 the Group had other comprehensive income of €550.9 million compared to an expense of
€54.0 million in F25. The change is mainly attributable to the favourable impact of fair value movements on
the Group’s open hedge positions in F26.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 13
STRATEGIC REPORT
Return on capital employed and capital structure
Return on capital employed (ROCE)1 is a non-statutory performance metric commonly used to measure the
financial returns that a business achieves on the capital it uses. ROCE for F26 was 2.5 per cent, compared to
3.3 per cent for the previous year.
The Company’s leverage ratio1 was 3.7 at the end of the F26 financial year, a decrease of 0.6 yoy, while
liquidity1 increased to 35.8 per cent from 31.5 per cent at the end of the F26 financial year.
F26
F25
Change
ROCE
2.5%
3.3%
(0.8) ppt
Leverage ratio
3.7
4.4
(0.6)
Liquidity
35.8%
31.5%
4.4 ppt
1For definitions of non-financial measures presented, please refer to the Glossary of terms and Alternative performance measures
(APMs) sections of this document.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 14
STRATEGIC REPORT
Cash flows and financial position
Summary statement of cash flows
The following table sets out selected cash flow data and the Group’s cash and cash equivalents for F26
and F25:
€ million
F26
F25
Change
Net cash generated by operating activities
1,179.6
1,065.6
11%
Net cash generated by/(used in) investing activities
751.3
(263.4)
n.m.*
Net cash used in financing activities
(1,427.5)
(938.7)
52%
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
503.4
(136.5)
n.m.*
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
596.9
716.4
(17)%
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents
(16.7)
17.0
n.m.*
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
1,083.6
596.9
82%
*n.m.: not meaningful, as the variance is more than (-)100 per cent.
Cash flows from operating activities
The majority of Wizz Air’s cash inflows from operating activities are derived from the sale of passenger
tickets and ancillary services. Net cash flows from operating activities are also affected by movements in
working capital items.
Cash generated by operating activities increased from €1,065.6 million in F25 to €1,179.6 million in F26
primarily driven by the following factors:
▶ Operating cash flows before adjusting for changes in working capital decreased by €0.3 million year on
year, driven by an increase in fleet size and expansion.
▶ Changes in working capital resulted in higher cash inflows by €94.3 million.
Cash flows from investing activities
Investing activities resulted in €751.3 million of net cash generated in F26, compared to €263.4 million of
net cash used in F25, for the following reasons:
▶ The net cash flows from advances paid and refunded in relation to aircraft deliveries increased by
€285.2 million from a €58.9 million cash outflow in F25 to a €226.3 million cash inflow in F26.
▶ Cash outflows from placing cash deposits were €1,788.0 million in F26 compared to the cash outflow of
€1,466.0 million in F25. Cash inflows from maturing cash deposits were €1,851.6 million in F26
compared to the cash inflow from cash deposits of €1,136.3 million in F25.
▶ Net cash flows from the purchase and sale of tangible and intangible assets including sale and leaseback
transactions increased by €373.6 million from a €20.9 million cash inflow in F25 to a €394.5 million cash
inflow in F26.
Cash flows from financing activities
Net cash outflow from financing activities increased from €938.7 million (F25) to €1,427.5 million in F26.
The principal elements of the F26 outflow were as follows:
▶ Repayments of loans and other types of financing and interest on them amounting to €1,559.4 million
(F25: €1,391.4 million), which includes the interest and principal repayment on the bond of
€505.0 million (whereas in F25 the bond interest payment totalled €5.0 million). Proceeds from new
loans and other types of financing of €132.0 million (F25: €245.6 million) comprise aircraft and engine
financing of €79.2 million (F25: €245.6 million) and a borrowing secured with emission trading scheme
(ETS) units of €22.8 million (F25: €—).
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 15
STRATEGIC REPORT
Summary consolidated statement of financial position
The following table sets out summary statements of the financial position of the Group for F26 and F25 :
€ million
F26
F25
Change
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment
7,128.1
6,493.0
635.1
Restricted cash*
87.7
78.3
9.4
Derivative financial instruments*
584.1
12.1
572.0
Trade and other receivables*
712.1
676.2
35.9
Cash deposits*
952.8
1,060.2
(107.4)
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
597.5
488.4
Other assets*
719.2
718.1
1.1
Total assets
11,269.9
9,635.4
1,634.5
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Equity
928.4
317.1
611.3
LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables*
1,404.6
1,108.3
296.3
Borrowings (incl. convertible debt)*
6,980.2
6,614.0
366.2
Deferred income*
1,384.0
1,179.8
204.2
Derivative financial instruments*
55.3
42.6
12.7
Provisions*
514.3
355.1
159.2
Other liabilities*
3.1
18.6
(15.5)
Total liabilities
10,341.5
9,318.3
1,023.2
Total equity and liabilities
11,269.9
9,635.4
1,634.5
*Including both current and non-current asset and liability balances, respectively.
Property, plant and equipment increased by €635.1 million as at 31 March 2026 compared to
31 March 2025, primarily driven by the investment in JOLCO-financed aircraft, the sale-and-leaseback
financed aircraft right-of-use assets and acquisition of the Headquarters (see also Notes 13 and 14 to the
financial statements).
Restricted cash (current and non-current) increased by €9.4 million as at 31 March 2026 compared to the
year before. The majority of this balance is linked to Wizz Air’s aircraft lease contracts, being cash deposits
securing letters of credit issued by Wizz Air’s banks primarily for lease security deposits and maintenance
reserves.
Derivative financial assets (current and non-current) increased by € 572.0 million as at 31 March 2026
compared to 31 March 2025 (see also Notes 3 and 21 to the financial statements). These balances are
related to fuel and FX hedge instruments as well as cross currency interest rate swap contracts.
Trade and other receivables increased by €35.9 million as at 31 March 2026 compared to 31 March 2025 .
Cash and cash equivalents amounted to €1,085.9 million as at 31 March 2026 ( 2025: €597.5 million), and
cash deposits to €952.8 million as at 31 March 2026 (2025: € 1,060.2 million).
Borrowings (including convertible debt) increased by €366.2 million as at 31 March 2026 compared to
31 March 2025. The increase was primarily driven by liabilities related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts
recognised during the fiscal year (see Note 23 to the financial statements).
Deferred income increased by €204.2 million as at 31 March 2026 compared to 31 March 2025 (see Note 26
to the financial statements). This was primarily driven by an increase in unearned revenue and in deferred
supplier credits.
Derivative financial liabilities (current and non-current) increased by €12.7 million as at 31 March 2026
compared to 31 March 2025 (see Notes 3 and 21 to the financial statements). These balances are related to
fuel and FX hedge instruments and cross currency interest rate swap contracts.
Provisions increased by €159.2 million as at 31 March 2026 compared to 31 March 2025, in line with the
planned aircraft maintenance schedule (see Note 29 to the financial statements).
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 16
STRATEGIC REPORT
Hedging strategy
Wizz Air operates under a clear set of treasury policies approved by the Board and supervised by the Audit
and Risk Committee. The hedging policy’s objective is to establish a framework to identify, report and
manage foreign currency and fuel exposures aiming to provide greater certainty and protection to the value
of the Group’s net income, net equity and related cash flows that are exposed to possible adverse
movements in foreign currency exchange rates and jet fuel prices. This is achieved through disciplined
programmatic and discretionary layering for a set time horizon (18 months) with regular rollovers
maintaining hedge coverage levels.
The hedges under the hedging policy are rolled forward quarterly, 18 months out, with coverage levels over
time indicatively totalling 70 to 95 per cent for the first quarter of the hedging horizon and 20 to 45 per cent
for the last quarter of the hedging horizon. Hedging instruments are mostly zero-cost collars, but jet fuel
swaps are also used for shorter dated exposures. In line with the hedging policy, Wizz Air also hedges its
fuel consumption-related US dollar exposure in a similar fashion. Hedge coverages as at 29 May 2026 are
set out below:
Fuel hedge coverage
Period covered
F27 H1
F27 H2
F28
5 months
6 months
7 months
Exposure in metric tonnes (‘000)
958.5
1,107.2
2,447.8
Coverage in metric tonnes (‘000)
801.0
786.0
426.0
Hedge coverage for the period
84%
71%
17%
Blended capped rate
$825.6
$818.6
$861.0
Blended floor rate
$757.1
$747.1
$773.0
Foreign exchange hedge coverage
Period covered
F27 H1
F27 H2
F28
5 months
6 months
8 months
Exposure (million)
$824.1
$938.3
$2,110.2
Coverage (million)
$671.0
$677.0
$356.0
Hedge coverage for the period
81%
72%
17%
Weighted average ceiling
$1.1701
$1.2048
$1.2033
Weighted average floor
$1.1340
$1.1683
$1.1788
Balance sheet risk mitigation
Wizz Air uses USD cash and standard EUR-USD cross currency swaps to mitigate the profit & loss impact
stemming from the balance sheet revaluation of USD liabilities. As at 31 March 2026 we had a roughly
$4.5bn USD lease liability, and around $4.1bn across USD cash and cross currency swaps, leaving an
uncovered portion of about $0.4bn.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 17
STRATEGIC REPORT
Near-term and full-year outlook:
We are not giving guidance for F27 at this time of the year given the lack of visibility across our trading
seasons, uncertainty related to the ongoing conflict in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz:
▶ Capacity (ASKs): Q1 F27 +15% YoY, Q2 F27 +20% YoY;
▶ Capacity (Seats): Q1 F27 +25% YoY, Q2 F27 Up high twenties percent YoY;
▶ Load factor: Flat YoY across H1;
▶ RASK: Q1 F27 down mid-to-high single digit YoY, Q2 F27 flattish YoY;
▶ Ex-Fuel CASK: H1 flat to up low single digit YoY.
Certain information provided in this Annual Report pertains to forward-looking statements and is subject to
significant risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. It is not feasible to
enumerate all the factors and specific events that could impact the outlook and performance of an airline
group operating across Europe, the Middle East and beyond, as Wizz Air does. Some of the factors that are
susceptible to change and could notably influence Wizz Air’s anticipated results include demand for aviation
transport services, fuel costs, competition from both new and established carriers, availability of Pratt &
Whitney GTF engines, turnaround times at Engine Shops, expenses related to environmental, safety and
security measures, the availability of suitable insurance coverage, actions taken by governments and
regulatory agencies, disruptions caused by weather conditions, air traffic control strikes, revenue
performance and staffing issues, delivery delays of contracted aircraft, fluctuations in exchange and interest
rates, airport access and fees, labour relations, the economic climate within the industry, passengers’
inclination to travel, social and political factors, including global pandemics, and unforeseen security
incidents.
Veronika Spanarova
Chief Financial Officer
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 18
STRATEGIC REPORT
KEY STATISTICS
F26
F25
Change
Capacity
Number of aircraft at end of period*
262
231
13.4%
Number of operating aircraft at end of period**
224
186
20.4%
Equivalent aircraft
245.5
225.7
8.8%
Equivalent operating aircraft**
203.6
178.5
14.1%
Utilisation (block hours per aircraft per day)
9:36
9:51
(2.5)%
Utilisation (block hours per operating aircraft per day)**
11:35
12:28
(7.1)%
Total block hours
861,653
812,673
6.0%
Total flight hours
748,441
705,720
6.1%
Revenue departures
337,405
314,448
7.3%
Average departures per day per aircraft
3.77
3.82
(1.4)%
Average departures per day per operating aircraft**
4.54
4.83
(6.0)%
Seat capacity
76,878,622
69,546,340
10.5%
Average aircraft stage length (km)
1,717
1,749
(1.8)%
Total ASKs (’000 km)
132,030,723
121,670,679
8.5%
Operating data
RPKs (revenue passenger kilometres) (’000 km)
119,877,458
111,143,998
7.9%
Load factor (%)
90.7%
91.2%
(0.5)%
Number of passenger segments
69,747,746
63,403,320
10.0%
Fuel price (average $ per tonne, including SAF, hedging impact and
into-plane premium)
890
919
(3.2)%
Foreign exchange rate (USD/EUR including hedging impact)
1.13
1.08
4.6%
*Aircraft at end of period includes 3 aircraft in Ukraine.
**Equivalent operating aircraft excludes grounded aircraft. At the end of F26 there were 30 grounded aircraft due to GTF engine
inspections and 3 grounded aircraft in Ukraine, 4 A321XLRs with engine removals and 1 aircraft under long-term maintenance. At
the end of F25 there were 42 grounded aircraft due to GTF engine inspections and 3 grounded aircraft in Ukraine. Operating
utilisation is calculated based on the Equivalent operating aircraft and Block hours including wet-lease flights.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 19
STRATEGIC REPORT
EMERGING AND PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
This section of the Annual Report sets out our risk management process and provides an overview of the
emerging and principal risks that could affect Wizz Air’s future success, if not dealt with appropriately. Risk
management is a dynamic and ever-evolving area, and the Company is committed to identifying and
effectively managing risks proactively.
We continued integrating the lessons learned from the past few years, such as the ongoing war between
Ukraine and Russia that has caused high geopolitical instability, high fuel prices and high inflationary
pressure together with a volatile overall business environment. The experience gained helped us to handle
the Israeli and Iran conflict in a more effective and systematic way. In the meantime, Wizz Air has faced
continuous challenges due to the unscheduled Pratt & Whitney GTF engine inspections, causing the
grounding of aircraft from our fleet and requiring more rigorous risk monitoring.
The Company continued the periodic evaluation of environmental risks. Given the EU’s ambition to become
climate neutral by 2050, regulations on corporate sustainability are tightening, including the Corporate
Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). CSRD requires companies to perform a double materiality
assessment to identify sustainability topics material to the business. In addition, the Company takes into
account the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, which provide
guidance on the assessment and management of climate-related risks, including through scenario analysis.
Together, these frameworks are increasing expectations on Wizz Air to identify, assess and manage
sustainability-related risks and impacts, including those related to climate change and emissions reduction.
Our risk management process
The Board is responsible for the Group’s risk management and it has delegated to the Audit and Risk
Committee the task of monitoring the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s risk management systems.
The Group has a comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process to support the achievement of
business and strategic goals. As part of our ERM process, risks are identified and collected in our risk
universe and individual risks are organised into risk categories. Risks are analysed for likelihood and impact
using the qualitative approach. A risk response is determined depending on the risk category and risk
appetite, which can range from “averse” to “actively seeking”, depending on how much risk the Group
deems appropriate within our industry and business model.
The alteration in the Company’s risk appetite compared to the F26 mid-year review was minimal, and
predominantly attributable to shifts in macroeconomic and geopolitical landscapes, as well as disturbances
within supply chains. The majority of the Wizz Air risk categories have an “averse” risk appetite due to their
safety/compliance/regulatory nature. Similar to the previous year, in F26 we also assessed environmental,
social and governance (ESG)-related risks with an “averse” risk appetite to drive a deliberate agenda on
sustainability – with respect to climate and communities served by WIZZ, and corporate governance – as it
is becoming increasingly important to the Company. The risk categories where our risk appetite is
categorised as “cautious/open” are mostly risks related to growth and network expansion, where a healthy
level of risk-taking is part of the Group’s DNA to further our commercial agenda and deliver against our
Shareholder value creation goals (e.g. major strategic initiatives, network management or our aircraft
programme, and commodity and exchange-rate volatility).
As part of this process, the Group’s Leadership Team, as the ultimate risk owners and decision makers, and
the Senior Internal Audit Manager meet regularly (at least twice a year) to consider and update the
emerging and principal risks identified and the status of the response plans. The resulting risk report is then
reviewed with the Audit and Risk Committee and presented to the Board. The Board is therefore satisfied
that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the Group, including
those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity.
Risks relating to the Group
Introduction
The principal risks identified by the Group’s Leadership Team fall into nine broad groupings, which are
largely consistent with the groupings of F25 and include a deeper assessment of IT and cyber risks, external
factors, fleet development-related risks, global geopolitical risks and ESG. Additionally, environmental/
climate-related risks have been separated from social and governance risks, facilitating enhanced risk and
opportunity identification, as well as more effective action planning in each respective domain:
▶ information technology and cyber risk, including website availability, protection of our own and our
customers’ data, and ensuring the availability of operation-critical systems in a significantly escalating
threat landscape;
▶ external factors, ensuring the Company has the capabilities and resilience to deal with external risks,
such as geopolitical risks, inflation, elevated fuel costs, foreign exchange rates, tariffs, risk of higher
business costs, competition, general economic trends, and the default of a partner financial institution;
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 20
STRATEGIC REPORT
▶ fleet development, ensuring the Company has the right number of aircraft available at the right time to
take advantage of commercial opportunities and grow in a disciplined way without any supply chain
disruption;
▶ operations, including safety events and terrorist incidents as well as employee and passenger security;
▶ network development and scheduling, affirming we are making the best use of our capacity, driving
maximum utilisation and ensuring we have access to the right airport infrastructure at the right price so
that we can keep on delivering the superior Wizz Air service at low fares across an expanding network;
▶ regulatory risk, making sure that we remain compliant with regulations affecting our business and
operations – including compensating customers – and we remain agile to react to the changing
governmental actions due to a slowing economic landscape, ownership and control, loss of traffic rights,
and changing policies owing to sustainability (taxation, etc.);
▶ human resources, ensuring our ability to attract, hire and retain the right talent in the right numbers to
support our continued growth and operational excellence;
▶ social and governance risks, making sure we operate in accordance with our core values and our value
of integrity, respected throughout our business processes and deals, and providing transparency to all
our stakeholders through responsible reporting and disclosure; and
▶ environmental/climate-related risk, ensuring we are able to answer the growing need of environmental
protection and consciousness, mitigate the emerging transition and physical risks while working on
minimising our environmental impact.
Principal risks requiring the most attention in F27
The following principal risks will need the most attention in F27:
▶ Information technology and cyber risk – due to increasing IT dependence and the complexity of the IT
landscape, cybersecurity, data protection and security are highly critical elements of our operations, and
one of the areas also closely and regularly monitored by our Board and regulations. As cybersecurity is a
constantly evolving challenge, we have continued to invest in and strengthen the relevant processes,
systems and policies, a comprehensive and compulsory e-learning training programme for all colleagues
is maintained and the Company’s Cybersecurity team is made up of skilled professionals with extensive
experience in the field, focusing on the people, process and technology aspects of cyber by running
multiple workstreams based on a C-level approved Cyber Strategy.
▶ External factors – of which the most critical are changes in oil prices affecting fuel costs, as well as the
availability and security of jet fuel supply – together with adverse movements in the EUR/USD exchange
rate or in other currency pairs – continue to have a significant impact on Wizz Air’s financial
performance. Given the sustained volatility in commodity and currency markets, Wizz Air maintains its
fuel hedging policy aligned with peer practices, supported by a Board-approved systemic hedging
framework that rolls positions forward quarterly over an 18-month horizon. The policy framework has
also been extended to cover exposures arising from US dollar-denominated lease liabilities.
Geopolitical developments remain a key source of external risk. The ongoing war between Ukraine and
Russia continues to pose a demanding operating environment, further challenges and a hostile business
environment, requiring flight operations to adapt to restricted airspace and broader spillover effects
impacting air traffic. In addition, heightened instability in the Middle East has led to temporary
suspensions of operations to Tel Aviv (TLV) and selected destinations in the wider region, with dedicated
teams continuously monitoring Israeli and Middle Eastern airspace to ensure safety and security
considerations remain paramount.
More recently, the escalation of regional tensions involving Iran has further increased disruption risks in
the Middle East, resulting in additional airspace constraints and network adjustments. These
developments have contributed to a negative earnings impact, reflecting reduced capacity and higher
operational complexity in affected regions.
▶ Fleet development-related risks – these pose a temporary challenge to our long-term plans because of
the Pratt & Whitney GTF engine inspections, causing the grounding of aircraft from our fleet. Given the
prevailing challenges in achieving our main targets (like completion rate, aircraft utilisation, crew
productivity and on-time performance), we decided to follow a wide range of risk mitigation measures,
including increasing the number of spare engines and extending the leases of existing unaffected aircraft 
while closely monitoring year-on-year fleet development and adjusting accordingly if necessary. Aircraft
manufacturers still suffer supply chain related delays in production as a result of geopolitical material-
sourcing constraints. Wizz Air is in constant dialogue with Airbus, Pratt & Whitney and other main
suppliers ensuring sufficient capacity to deliver the planned growth.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 21
STRATEGIC REPORT
▶ Human resources risks – the Group’s ability to deliver its growth strategy depends on attracting,
developing and retaining suitably skilled talent, while ensuring leadership continuity and overall
workforce stability. Failure to maintain effective succession planning for senior executives and other key
roles could lead to leadership gaps and operational disruption. The Group continues to enhance its
succession planning and leadership development frameworks to ensure continuity in critical positions.
However, the highly competitive labour market presents ongoing challenges in sourcing and retaining
qualified office-based employees. Elevated employee turnover or constraints in talent availability could
adversely affect operational performance and strategic execution. These risks are mitigated through a
strong employer value proposition, targeted development programmes and internal career progression
opportunities. In addition, the Group regularly benchmarks its compensation structures against relevant
markets and maintains transparent, fair and performance-aligned reward practices.
▶ Environmental/climate-related risks – these require significant focus from the Company. Climate change
is acknowledged as a principal risk to Wizz Air, affecting our business in the short, medium and long
term due to physical and climate policy risks as well as the related reporting requirements. To develop
our climate risk assessment approach continuously, we have been working with expert sustainability
and climate consultants from external advisors who helped review and improve our existing climate
risk analysis approach. The methodology considered four different climate change scenarios, in
accordance with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Through a detailed
(supplemented) assessment, the main climate risks were identified, including those categorised as
high-impact risks in any time horizon, or those that have at least medium-risk impacts for each time
horizon.
Information technology and cyber risk
As in previous years, bookings were made directly on our website (wizzair.com) via our mobile app and via
our API in F26, and refunds were mostly handled through digital channels. We are therefore dependent on
our information technology systems to enable and manage ticket reservations and other payments, and we
need to handle and protect data in compliance with industry standards, NIS2, EASA Part-IS and GDPR
requirements. We leverage technology to check in passengers, manage our traffic network, perform flight
operations and engage in other critical business tasks. Our website and our mobile app are our shop
window, and therefore it is critical that they are functional, reliable and secure.
As cybersecurity is a constantly evolving challenge, we have continued to invest in and strengthen relevant
processes, systems and policies, and have cooperated with the Data Protection Officer to further increase
our security preparedness. Wizz Air follows a multi-layered approach to ensure stringent standards in both
cybersecurity and data protection matters. It involves safety mechanisms for prevention as the first line of
defence, and detection and response mechanisms as its second line of defence, while implementing robust
recovery procedures.
Besides employing an experienced internal IT and Cybersecurity team, we continue to involve external
cybersecurity experts and service providers. This option delivers a more stable cybersecurity capability,
which is more important to ensure continued progress on strengthening cybersecurity to protect
business-critical systems and data. Beyond Wizz Air, we focus on supplier processes and practices to
ensure all possible gaps are adequately identified and addressed where needed.
The IT Service Continuity Management (ITSCM) workstream acts as an enabler to achieve the Company’s
business continuity objectives via seamless integration into the organisation-wide Business Continuity
Management (BCM) Programme.
Cyber risk is a hugely important consideration for our business and is one of the areas closely monitored by
the Board. As external threats are emerging, the focus has been placed on detect and respond capabilities to
be able to take action against any attempted attacks at the earliest possible stage to minimise the loss of
customer confidence. In terms of handling customer card data, we successfully passed the annual PCI DSS
accreditation audit again in January 2026.
One of the key issues related to cybersecurity is our colleagues’ awareness of the risks and of the possible
ways in which our business could be attacked. Therefore, we have a comprehensive and compulsory e-
learning training programme for all colleagues that is enhanced for F27 due to the extra demand based on
EASA Part-IS requirements. We successfully passed its inaugural NIS2 cybersecurity audit with a final
consolidated score of 97%. This places the organisation in the highest possible category: “Compliant with
Negligible Risk”.
The NIS2 EU directive and the EASA Part-IS information security requirements triggered a thorough review
of our processes, capabilities and solutions, mainly focusing on cybersecurity. Hungarian legislation defined
the highest NIS2 requirements when it drew on NIST 800-53a, which ensures an industry best practice
control set if all is delivered. A project launched to address any possible deviations from the requirements is
on track, and we aim to pass the NIS2 audit in F26 as a regulatory mandate.
Regional conflicts during F26 further changed the cybersecurity landscape. The cybersecurity threat level
increased in all industries around the world. Threats include website attacks, end-user phishing, ransomware
attacks, compromises via a trusted third party, and many others.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 22
STRATEGIC REPORT
External factors
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has updated its global airline profitability outlook for the
calendar year 2026, projecting a combined net profit of $41 billion, with a net profit margin of 3.9 percent,
up from the previous forecast for 2025 and improving on the results achieved in 2024. Despite ongoing
challenges in the supply chain and cost pressures, this outcome reflects a stable improvement in industry
earnings.
According to the IATA forecast released on 9 December 2025, jet kerosene was expected to average
approximately $88 per barrel in 2026. During the first quarter of 2026, prices fluctuated around $90 per
barrel, however, following the escalation of tensions involving Iran in early 2026, fuel prices became
increasingly volatile and have trended above the projected average. While this exposure is partially and
temporarily mitigated by the Group’s hedging structure, the sustained volatility introduces continued
uncertainty and is expected to influence the Group’s fuel cost base for F27 over an uncertain period.
We are exposed to global political, economic and epidemic events as well as trends. A worldwide economic
downturn affects demand for air travel. Our business extends beyond the borders of the EU and into regions
including the Caucasus, North Africa, Central Asia and the Middle East.
The ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia not only closes two emerging markets for Wizz Air but also
borders other significant WIZZ base countries. Additionally, the ongoing war between the US-Israel and Iran
as well as Israel and Lebanon has resulted in operational disruption and a suspension of flights in the region.
The ongoing hostilities in the region further increased the extent of the conflict zones affecting Wizz Air’s
operational activities. The conflict activated crisis management protocols and a continuous and active
monitoring of the situation. Wizz Air operated a successful rescue flight from Oman to evacuate stranded
crew, employees and their family members from the UAE, fulfilling the Company’s duty of care
responsibilities. Employee and passenger security is of utmost importance for Wizz Air, and our Company
adjusts its internal protocols and policies to protect its employees and passengers while flying with Wizz Air.
Some of the other regions we operate in have experienced in the past, and may also in future be subject to,
further political and economic instability caused by changes in governments, political deadlock in the
legislative process, contested election results, tension, local, regional or international conflicts, corruption
among government officials, social and ethnic unrest and currency instability. We maintain close
relationships with local authorities, and as an organisation, we are able to react quickly to adverse events.
Given the sustained and ongoing volatility in commodity prices, Wizz Air decided to continue trading based
on the reinstated hedging policies that were aligned to those of its peers. These revised policies were
approved by the Board and are being rolled forward quarterly, 18 months out. As a result, the Company will:
1. maintain hedge coverage at broadly similar levels to its main peers; and
2. put jet fuel price caps in place, according to the policy limiting exposure for the Company should further
extreme volatility in jet fuel prices be observed in the market.
We are an international business and, while we report in euros, we transact in over 20 currencies. A large
proportion of our payments are denominated in US dollars. Any appreciation of the US dollar against the
euro may negatively impact results and margins. The Company’s hedging policies call for a similar hedging
of transactional US dollar exposure with regard to jet fuel. In all cases, hedging transactions are subject to
the approval of the Audit and Risk Committee. Additionally, risk stemming from US dollar lease liability
exposures are also covered using Cross Currency Interest Rate Swap contracts.
We believe that a strong cash position is a vital foundation for the Company’s continued aggressive growth
and its ability to capture commercial opportunities as they arise. Therefore, we actively manage the
safeguarding of our financial assets and monitor the viability of our banking and hedging counterparties. In
fact, all of the Company’s cash is invested in accordance with a Board-approved counterparty risk policy,
which assigns investment limits to each counterparty based on its credit rating.
During F26, fuel including ETS and into-plane premium (IPP) accounted for 32 percent of our total Group
operating costs and a rise in fuel prices will significantly affect our operating costs.
Competition is one of the key risks to our business. Our competitors continuously strive to protect or gain
share in the markets we operate in by offering discounted fares or more attractive schedules. States are
often large and/or majority shareholders in competing airlines. Competition can adversely affect our
revenues and so we constantly monitor our competitors’ actions and the performance of our route network
to ensure we take both reactive and proactive actions in a timely manner. Ultimately, our key competitive
strength is our commitment to driving our costs ever lower while delivering a superior service and building a
loyal customer base. We firmly believe that in tough market conditions, the lowest cost ultimately wins and
therefore we are relentlessly committed to the strictest cost discipline, day in day out.
Regardless of future discussions, we believe diversifying our network and markets is a key part of
a sustainable business strategy, and we remain confident that CEE, Western Europe, the Middle East and
their surrounding regions present large addressable markets which will continue to provide opportunities for
profitable growth.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 23
STRATEGIC REPORT
Network development and scheduling
During F26 the Wizz Air Group responded decisively to a challenging operating environment by reshaping its
network and scheduling strategy to support sustainable profitability, while continuing to expand its fleet.
Strategic decisions focused on deploying capacity where it can generate sustainable returns, including the
continued realignment towards core Central and Eastern European (CEE) markets, with network planning
also shaped by geopolitical developments. Demand remained strong, with passenger numbers rising by 10
per cent year on year. Looking ahead, Wizz Air aims to leverage its expanded fleet through enhanced
connectivity, new routes in high‑demand regions, and optimised scheduling to improve aircraft utilisation
and resilience, while effective fuel hedging supports cost stability and enables the Group to capitalise on
growth opportunities.
Fleet development
To support its growth plans, Wizz Air requires additional aircraft. Wizz Air lays emphasis on new aircraft, and
currently operates one of the youngest fleets in Europe with an average age of just 4.6 years. Having a
modern and reliable fleet means Wizz Air can utilise it for over twelve hours a day in normal circumstances.
For the business, this means lower unit operating costs, and for Wizz Air customers, lower prices. Since late
2019 the Company has taken delivery of “neo” aircraft only, and mostly operates these narrow-body aircraft
which boast the most efficient technology today and are likely to remain that way for many years to come.
As at 31 March 2026, Wizz Air’s delivery order book comprises a firm order for 250x A321neo and 4x
A321XLR aircraft, a total of 254 aircraft.
Aircraft deliveries continued materially during the pandemic, allowing Wizz Air to gain an advantage over
competitors. A large aircraft order is a significant financial commitment and requires financing. The new
aircraft delivered during F26 were financed by means of 33 sale and leaseback arrangements, 7 Japanese
Operating Leases with Call Options (JOLCOs) and 3 financial lease structures. To manage capacity, 3
A321neo were sold right after taking delivery. In the following years, Wizz Air will take delivery of a record
number of aircraft per year on average, and as a Company is focused on multiple possibilities to finance its
future fleet to ensure it secures the most cost-competitive terms. Given both the A320 family’s desirability
as a result of its superior operating economics and Wizz Air’s strong financial track record, Wizz Air is
confident that financing will be readily available on competitive terms for the foreseeable future.
Wizz Air has re-negotiated the remaining order book of 254 aircraft with Airbus, deferring deliveries from
2030 to 2032, reshaping the long-term fleet plan, with the renegotiation finalised in November 2025. Due to
the Pratt & Whitney GTF engine inspections in F28, Wizz Air negotiated to take 20-25% fewer deliveries than
usual to support the main strategy of lifting the grounded fleet and to maintain balanced operational fleet
growth following the initial plans of annual 13-15%.
Wizz Air has a compensation agreement in place with Pratt & Whitney to mitigate the financial impact of GTF
engine inspections on its operations. The compensation agreement was concluded in December 2024 and
remains effective until the end of December 2026. From January 2027, compensation is expected to be
provided under a spare engine support agreement signed in June 2025. To deepen the relationship with its
major supplier, Wizz Air has selected Pratt & Whitney’s GTF engines to power 177 new Airbus A321neo
aircraft, continuing to benefit from operating a unified fleet.
Regulatory risks
Aviation remains a highly regulated industry. The Wizz Air Group’s operations are reliant on the Air Operator
Certificates (AOCs) and operating licences (OLs) issued by competent national and EU-level authorities.
Wizz Air Hungary Limited was the first airline to obtain an AOC from the European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), while its OL was issued by the Hungarian Civil Aviation Authority. Wizz Air Malta Limited’s
AOC was also issued by the EASA, while its OL was granted by the Maltese Civil Aviation Directorate. Wizz
Air UK Limited’s AOC and OL were granted by the UK Civil Aviation Authority.
In each airline’s case, an AOC is needed to operate air services while observing the aeropolitical agreements
between the designating and destination country. In terms of traffic rights, the most common requirement
to be met is that the given airline’s substantial ownership and effective control are vested in the Contracting
Party designating the airline, or its nationals. In the European Union (EU), as long as the departing and
arriving points fall inside the EU’s borders, the airline is allowed to fly the desired frequencies.
Furthermore, the European Union is continuously engaging with third countries to negotiate and sign air
services agreements (so-called “open skies” or “horizontal” agreements). These agreements reduce some of
the administrative burdens when accessing a third country’s market; however, in some cases, the concept of
EASA AOC (Wizz Air as a “European airline”) can be challenging to get accepted. These EU agreements are
not applicable to the UK operation, as that airline’s operation is dependent on the bilateral air services
agreements (ASAs) of the respective countries.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 24
STRATEGIC REPORT
Due to increased scrutiny by authorities around EC261 passenger compensation and due to the increasing
EC261-related customer claim ratio, the regulatory risk related to EC261 compensation has become a
principal concern. As a main action, we have been reducing the impact of the root causes of compensations
and alongside many background developments, we launched and are continuing to implement our Customer
First Compass programme, which is guiding us towards a future where our commitment to punctuality,
affordability, innovation and service shapes every journey. This guiding framework places customers at the
centre. Our transformative approach is built on four key pillars: Product, Price, Service and Communication.
Operational risks
The Company’s Crisis Management team and several business continuity plans remain on alert due to the
conflict zones which fall under our spectrum of operation. One of the conflict zones under constant
monitoring is Russia’s war in Ukraine. The ongoing war has contributed to several principal risks for Wizz Air.
Therefore, the Company adjusted and revised its internal protocols and policies to ensure maximum
employee and passenger security, and minimise the damage of property and equipment as much as
possible. The Security team reviewed contingency planning, revised the scope and business intelligence
capabilities, and deployed the Group Security and Central Services department’s internal resources. Our
Security team also liaises closely with relevant authorities and intelligence experts to assess any potential
security or other threats to our operations. Any serious threats are escalated to senior management. Since
F24, we have also suspended operations to destinations where the safety of our passengers, crew and
aircraft could not be guaranteed.
Another conflict zone under constant monitoring is Israel. Tel Aviv (TLV) operations were suspended for
safety and security reasons. However, as operations stabilised for the TLV Ben Gurion Airport, we resumed
flights. We liaise closely with the relevant authorities and we receive support from intelligence providers.
Furthermore, risk assessments are updated according to geopolitical changes, complemented by
recommendations and mitigation actions. Particular focus is placed on the Middle East region due to the
Israel and US–Iran conflict, which has resulted in the temporary suspension of several routes, including
flights to Amman (AMM), Abu Dhabi (AUH), and Dubai (DXB).
Although operations to TLV resumed, we still refrain from operating from the northern part of the Gulf of
Aqaba, due to the ongoing military activities. Accidents, incidents or terrorist attacks can adversely affect an
airline’s reputation and customers’ willingness to travel with that airline.
Safety is our utmost priority at Wizz Air. We maintain a young and dependable aircraft fleet, partnering with
top-tier maintenance organisations, and fostering a robust safety culture. A dedicated safety council,
comprising both senior management and operational staff, convenes quarterly to address any issues from
the preceding three months and review corresponding actions taken. Furthermore, we meticulously collect
operational data to discern patterns, with biannual meetings held within our Operations department to
address identified trends. Our anonymous safety reporting system empowers our flight and cabin crew to
raise concerns confidently. We maintain rigorous entry standards for our operating crew, ensuring that all
pilots undergo training of the highest calibre through our Approved Training Organisation (ATO). As a
participant in the International Air Transport Association’s Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) programme, we
continuously uphold best-in-class airline safety management and control systems.
Human resources
Wizz Air is a people-focused organisation and remains committed to fostering an inclusive environment
where equal opportunities prevail. The Company supports its employees with the tools and environment
needed for professional growth, underpinned by robust anti-discrimination policies and a strong focus on
diversity and inclusion.
Wizz Air continues to prioritise the attraction, development and retention of top talent, ensuring the
organisation is equipped with the capabilities required to support its growth ambitions. Wizz Air:
- strengthens recruitment and talent attraction by focusing on hiring key experts within the aviation
sector, while also investing in early talent pipelines and employer branding initiatives. The Wizz
Management Trainee Programme remains a cornerstone in attracting and developing young talent into
full-time roles. In addition, the Company launched the Wizz Youth Challenge as a long-term investment in
employer brand awareness and attractiveness
- fosters employee development and leadership capability through a comprehensive and structured
learning ecosystem. The Company prioritises internal talent development, supported by coaching
programmes, and enhanced leadership development initiatives below Head level, as well as the Business
Leadership Programme for Heads
Wizz Air continues to expand its collaboration with leading universities across its key markets, including
Hungary, Poland and the United Kingdom, and has entered into a strategic partnership with Corvinus
University. The Company also maintains and develops flagship programmes such as the Pilot Academy
(WAPA), the “She Can Fly” initiative, and the Cabin Crew to Office Programme, supporting both external
talent attraction and internal career mobility.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 25
STRATEGIC REPORT
These efforts have been recognised externally, with Wizz Air receiving the ABSL Hungary awards for one
of the most visible employers in both the BSC sector (2nd place) and the overall market (3rd place) in
2026, as well as recognition for Best LinkedIn Strategy from an employer branding perspective. The
Company is also in the process of redefining its Employer Value Proposition (EVP), with a refreshed
framework to be launched later in 2026.
In partnership with Corvinus University, Wizz Air continues to offer an MBA programme with 50%
Company sponsorship, aimed at strengthening leadership capabilities at Head and above level.
Continuous learning is further supported by digital tools such as LinkedIn Learning, alongside internally
developed toolkits. Flight and cabin crew training is delivered by a dedicated in-house training team,
supported by a fully integrated digital Training Management System.
- drives performance and talent management through the annual People Cycle, which ensures alignment
between individual and organisational objectives via structured goal setting, performance evaluations and
talent reviews. These processes support effective succession planning and the identification and
development of high-potential employees.
- promotes diversity, equity and inclusion across the organisation, with employees representing 106
nationalities. The Company remains committed to increasing diversity at leadership levels and
successfully achieved its target of 40% female representation in management by 31 March 2026,
reaching 40.68%. Diversity objectives are embedded within management incentive structures, reinforcing
accountability and progress. Wizz Air continues to focus on improving gender diversity within its flight
crew, with the ambition to be an industry leader in this area.
- enhances employee engagement through multiple channels, including the WIZZ People Council, regular
engagement surveys, base visits, floor talks and ongoing communication via Workivo. Employee
engagement has shown positive development, improving from 7.0 in 2024 to 7.5 in 2025, reflecting the
impact of these initiatives and continued focus on employee experience. The WIZZ People Council
continues to deliver tangible outcomes, including the introduction of private pension plans, improvements
to duty compensation, updates to base change policies, enhancements to crew positioning practices,
partnerships with external service providers such as dental care, and oversight of supplier standards,
including uniform production audits.
- maintains competitive and fair remuneration practices by aligning compensation with industry
benchmarks and ensuring transparency and performance alignment. The annual salary review process
supports fairness and competitiveness, complemented by regular market benchmarking. For crew
members, remuneration remains closely linked to flight performance, while additional benefits, including
private pension schemes, support long-term employee wellbeing.
- improves processes and digital capabilities by continuously reviewing and enhancing internal systems to
support employee lifecycle management, career development and operational efficiency. The Company is
investing in advanced digital solutions to streamline recruitment, onboarding, talent management and
internal mobility processes.
Social and governance
At Wizz Air, we are committed to transparency. Our passengers trust us every day to operate a safe service
at the lowest cost to bring them to their desired destination. Equally, stakeholders trust Wizz Air to operate a
sustainable business model, not only from an environmental point of view, but also operating with high
integrity with regard to all other stakeholders, our passengers and how we treat them, communities of
people and how our service may affect their daily life, investors and how we make the most out of their
investments, and how we partner with suppliers and governmental bodies.
Our core values include integrity. We have strong governance for operations through our Board of Directors
and the Sustainability Council, established and led by the Corporate and ESG Officer. We continue to
strengthen our transparency as an organisation and have significantly enhanced our disclosures across
sustainability, environmental, social and governance matters. F26 marks the first time since the omnibus
change that Wizz Air has published its sustainability report in reference to the European Union’s
Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), ahead of the mandatory compliance requirement.
We have laid out mid and long-term targets and have incentivised management to deliver the highest
priority targets.
For more information, please see the dedicated Sustainability and Governance sections of our Annual
Report.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 26
STRATEGIC REPORT
Environment/climate
Climate change is one of our principal risks and it may impact our business in the short (0–1 years),
medium (1–5 years) and long (5–10 years) term. Risks identified in the climate scenario analysis were
compiled into materiality/likelihood heatmaps, following the logic and risk-ranking framework of our in-
house ERM. The methodology considered four different climate change scenarios, in accordance with the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). These scenarios are ~1.5°C, 2°C, 3°C and 4°C. The
four potential scenarios had previously been chosen as they cover a broad spectrum of outcomes.
The qualitative scenario analysis of transitional and physical risks considers relevant climate data and
pathways to provide additional insight into key risks across the Wizz Air network. The 1.5°C and 2°C
scenarios are based on an ambitious decarbonisation pathway with more stringent climate policies,
leading to increased transition risks. Since regulation and policy implementation is effective, these
scenarios would reduce the impacts of physical climate risks, but at the same time could lead to a
significant increase in transitional risks and higher operational costs for the Company. On the other hand,
in the 3°C and 4°C scenarios, the world falls short of achieving ambitious climate targets due to the less
efficient implementation of climate policies worldwide, causing more severe physical risks in the long run.
The potential physical and transition risks identified by Wizz Air are outlined in detail in the Sustainability
section of this Annual Report.
Environment/climate – transitional risks
Policy changes and new legislation by governments have been and will be implemented in order to price
and penalise GHG emissions. Adverse movements in carbon pricing (including ETS and CORSIA) might
have a negative impact on Wizz Air’s portfolio. A reform in tax policies to incentivise carbon-efficient
technologies would double the overall level of taxation in the mid-term. Increased taxation will slow
industry growth.
Emissions reduction regulations and varying national policies without a standardised approach may
increase operational costs, while differing timelines and reporting requirements across the network pose
risks to achieving adequate reductions. New fossil fuel and related taxes may impact overall taxation
costs in the medium and long term, especially considering the potential risk of double taxation through
national policies. Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) mandates will lead to higher operational and upstream
costs in the medium term. However, the technological and production scalability of SAF remains
uncertain, and even under higher temperature scenarios, supply may not meet the aviation industry’s
growing demand. As demand is expected to accelerate faster than production capacity can scale, this
may result in supply chain constraints, increased costs, and potential exposure to penalty charges for
non-compliance with SAF blending requirements, as well as higher costs under emissions trading systems
(ETS). The EU Emissions Trading System is also subject to regulatory uncertainty and price volatility, and
is expected to drive costs up over time due to the gradual phase-out of free allowances. Compliance with
new ESG-related reporting standards (for example the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive
(CSRD)) will require additional administrative capacities across various functions of Wizz Air. Since Wizz
Air operates in different geographic regions, evolving and fragmented reporting expectations may create
parallel reporting obligations with differing requirements. The rate at which low-carbon technologies are
adopted influences the competitiveness of airlines, the cost of operations and the value of assets.
Investments in capital expenditures (CapEx), research and development (R&D) and innovation must
balance risk and return. Failure to invest, or investing in the wrong technology, may lead to increased
costs and reduced competitiveness. In terms of market and reputation-related transition risks, potential
disinvestment could increase the Company’s cost of capital in the long term in the context of growing
green investor expectations.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 27
STRATEGIC REPORT
Environment – physical risks
While the potential impacts connected to physical risks carry more relevance the further we look into the
future, the awareness and careful analysis of such risks are key for the Company to guarantee continued
resilience and prepare for applicable risk mitigation plans in the long run.
The climate scenario analysis for physical risks reveals no high-impact physical risks to Wizz Air within
the evaluated time horizons, i.e. within ten years. Based on climate science and the current forecasts, the
implications of physical risks become more significant around 2050 and beyond. We anticipate no
substantial alterations in the next decade relative to current temperature or weather-pattern changes. If
the implementation of climate policy proves to be ineffective, physical risks could lead to increased
disruptions in operations, markets and supply chains, or cause damage to assets.
Extreme heatwaves may impact aircraft performance and flight operations, while airports can also lower
runway capacity due to damaged runway surfaces or taxiways. Based on the trend from past years, wildfires
may increasingly impact travel decisions, leading to flight cancellations and revenue losses. Severe storms
have the potential to disrupt airspace and airport operations, as well as cause damage to infrastructure,
while also leading to increased fuel consumption. Heavy rainfall and flooding could occur across all regions,
which have the potential to harm airport infrastructure and runways, causing reduced capacity, flight delays
or cancellations. Overall, significant changes in weather phenomena, in terms of frequency and intensity, are
likely in the long term; however, we expect no critical change within the next ten years. Rising sea levels
pose a threat to low-lying and coastal regions in the long term, as well as islands, especially at a higher
global warming level. Airports in such areas could be affected by flooding, potentially harming airport
infrastructure and runways, leading to reduced capacity, flight delays and network disruptions. The
temperature rise could also lead to a shift in destination preference, besides the operational risks of acute
heatwaves. We do not expect these changes to be critical within the next ten years.
Wizz Air is committed to reducing the environmental impact of its operations, while recognising that aviation
has a significant impact on climate change. This area remains a key focus, and the measures implemented
to date have been recognised through external awards (Wizz Air was named the world’s most emissions-
efficient airline by Cirium, and received the Sustainable Airline of the Year 2025 award from Airline
Economics). Reducing emissions is therefore a central element of our decarbonisation approach. We have
set a target of reducing emissions intensity to 43 grams per RPK by the end of the decade.
For more information, please see the detailed Sustainability section of our Annual Report. The Group’s
going concern and viability statements are included in the Directors’ Report.
József Váradi
Chief Executive Officer
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 28
STRATEGIC REPORT
NON-FINANCIAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INFORMATION
STATEMENT
This statement is prepared in accordance with Sections 414CA and 414CB of the UK Companies Act 2006.
It forms part of the Strategic Report and provides a summary of key non-financial and sustainability
matters material to our business. Further detailed disclosures, including full performance metrics and
initiatives, can be found in our Sustainability Report starting on page 181.
The table below sets out where the key content requirements of the Non-Financial and Sustainability
Information Statement are addressed within this document, as required by Sections 414CA and 414CB of
the UK Companies Act 2006.
Disclosure requirement
Companies Act reference
Location in Sustainability
Report
Business model
s414CB(2)(a)
pp. 192
Environmental matters
s414CB(1)(a)
pp. 217 - 248
Social and Employee matters
s414CB(1)(b)(c)
pp. 250 - 281 and 292
Human rights
s414CB(1)(d)
pp. 250 - 281
Anti-bribery and anti-corruption matters
s414CB(1)(e)
pp. 283 - 291
Policies, due diligence, principal risks
and KPIs
s414CB(2)(b)-(d) and
s414C(4)
These statutory requirements
are addressed across the
Sustainability Report and
principal risk sections starting
on page 181 and 19
Climate-related financial disclosures
s414CB(2A)
TCFD section pp. 32
Diversity and gender representation
s414C(8)(c)
pp. 250 - 268
Section 172(1) Statement
s414CZA
pp. 42
Business Model
Wizz Air is a rapidly growing ultra-low-cost carrier, operating a fleet of 262 Airbus A320 and A321-family
aircraft. As at 31 March 2026, we connect close to 200 destinations across 45 countries. Our team of
dedicated aviation professionals provides an excellent service and very low fares, making Wizz Air the
preferred choice for over 69 million passengers in the fiscal year ended 31 March 2026. At Wizz Air, our
vision is to make travel affordable for everyone. We remain committed to reducing our emissions
intensity through technology and innovation, with progress reflected in independent external
assessments. According to publicly available 2026 emissions‑intensity data and benchmarks such as
Cirium’s EmeraldSky review, Wizz Air is deemed one of the most emissions‑efficient airlines globally and
the highest ranked in Europe. The airline also received the Sustainable Airline of the Year 2025 award
from Airline Economics.
A full business model description is available in the Strategic Report, and in the Sustainability Report,
from page 192.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 29
STRATEGIC REPORT
Policies and Due Diligence
Our Approach
Policy area
Due diligence
Environmental
Sustainability is
embedded in our
operations and
strategic decision-
making. We
continuously strive to
improve environmental
performance through
innovation, efficiency
and responsible
growth. From investing
in the newest, most
fuel-efficient aircraft to
optimising flight
operations and
exploring alternative
fuels, we are taking
bold steps to minimise
emissions and resource
consumption.
ESG Policy - Wizz Air integrates
ESG principles across all
operations and governance
structures – guided by CSRD,
GRI and TCFD standards –
through a company-wide policy
overseen by the Sustainability
and Culture Committee,
resulting in improved
stakeholder alignment and
sustainability performance.
Environmental Policy - Wizz
Air’s Environmental Policy
reflects its commitment to
reducing carbon emissions and
minimising environmental
impact through fleet
modernisation, operational
reviews, employee training and
stakeholder engagement,
supporting innovation and
compliance with high
environmental standards and
the transition to a net zero
emissions economy.
Sustainable Procurement Policy
- The Sustainable Procurement
Policy embeds environmental
and social considerations into
all procurement activities and
supplier evaluations across the
Wizz Air Group, fostering
sustainable sourcing practices
and continuous improvement in
supply chain performance.
Aspirational net zero roadmap -
This strategy outlines our
ambition for decarbonisation
and calls on stakeholders and
regulators to join us in ensuring
the aviation industry achieves
net zero.
The ESG Strategy
responsibilities are
embedded across all levels
of the organisation, with
oversight by the
Sustainability and Culture
Committee, operational
implementation by cross-
functional teams, annual
policy reviews, and
stakeholder engagement
guided by frameworks such
as CSRD, GRI and TCFD.
For further details on the
policies and Wizz Air Priority
Programmes within Wizz
Air’s Environmental
Strategy, please refer to
Wizz Air’s Sustainability
Report on page 217.
The Aspirational Net Zero
Roadmap can be found on
page 226 .
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 30
STRATEGIC REPORT
Our Approach
Policy area
Due diligence
Social &
Employee
Matters
At Wizz Air, we believe
that the strength of our
organisation lies in the
exceptional qualities of
our people, and we are
committed to
attracting, developing
and retaining top talent
by fostering an
inclusive, engaging and
diverse workplace. We
are committed to
acting with integrity
and responsibility –
prioritising the well-
being of our customers,
employees, partners,
communities and the
environment.
Whistleblowing Policy - Wizz
Air’s Whistleblowing Policy
ensures employees and
stakeholders can confidentially
report concerns about
misconduct or unethical
behaviour without fear of
retaliation, in line with
applicable legal protections.
Anti-Fraud Policy - Wizz Air’s
Anti-Fraud Policy outlines
preventive and corrective
measures to detect, investigate
and address fraudulent
activities, supporting financial
integrity and regulatory
compliance.
Health and Safety Policy and
Initiatives - Wizz Air’s Health
and Safety Policy ensures a
safe working environment
through rigorous operational
standards, employee training
and continuous monitoring
aligned with aviation and
workplace safety regulations.
Equal Opportunities and Fair
Treatment Policy - Wizz Air
promotes diversity and
inclusion through its Equal
Opportunities and Fair
Treatment Policy, ensuring that
all employees are treated fairly
regardless of gender, age,
background or beliefs.
Training and Development
Policy - Wizz Air’s Training and
Development Policy fosters
continuous learning and
upskilling, supporting employee
growth through structured
training programmes and
career development
opportunities.
Wizz Air values its workforce
as key stakeholders and
actively engages with them
through regular feedback
surveys and comprehensive
training programmes that
support skill development
and career growth. The
Company prioritises safety
and responsibility, ensuring
the well-being of both
employees and passengers
by maintaining high safety
standards and continuously
improving performance
based on defined indicators.
As a responsible corporate
citizen, Wizz Air has
consistently stepped up
during challenging times –
supporting local rescue
efforts, swiftly organising
emergency flights during
natural disasters and
political crises, and
contributing to local
communities and
foundations – creating a
positive impact that goes
beyond providing air travel
services.
For more information on
Wizz Air’s social policies and
strategy, please see Wizz
Air’s Sustainability Report
starting on page 181.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 31
STRATEGIC REPORT
Our Approach
Policy area
Due diligence
Human Rights
Wizz Air is committed
to conducting its
business with the
highest standards of
ethics and integrity,
and we expect the
same from our
suppliers. We require
our suppliers to uphold
strong ethical practices
within their own
operations and supply
chains, including
compliance with
applicable human
rights regulations and
obligations under the
Modern Slavery Act.
Wizz Air has policies in place
related to human rights
principles, including our Anti-
Slavery and Human Trafficking
Policy. As well as this, our Code
of Ethics, “The Wizz Way”,
applies to every Company
employee regardless of
seniority. These, along with our
Supplier Code of Conduct,
Whistleblowing Policy,
Sustainable Procurement
Policy, Anti-Fraud Policy and
Anti-Corruption Policy, help us
maintain an effective
compliance environment across
our supply chain. Actions in
relation to these policies are
reviewed by the Audit and Risk
Committee of the Board.
We are committed to
assessing any instance of
non-compliance regarding
modern slavery or human
trafficking on a case-by-
case basis.
As part of our robust
onboarding process, Wizz
Air equips new employees
with mandatory e-learning
on business ethics and key
policies. The Company
enforces compliance with its
Supplier Code of Conduct by
integrating specific
contractual clauses to
prevent modern slavery.
Additionally, Wizz Air
partners with a third-party
risk management firm to
assess suppliers across
environmental, social and
governance (ESG) criteria –
ensuring effective risk
identification and
management throughout
the procurement lifecycle.
For more information,
please see the Modern
Slavery Act Disclosure
Statement 2025 and Wizz
Air’s Sustainability Report
on pages 34 and 250.
Anti-corruption
and bribery
Wizz Air is committed
to conducting business
with honesty, integrity
and in full compliance
with applicable laws
and regulations, as
outlined in our Policy of
Good Conduct. We
prioritise ethical
behaviour,
transparency and
accountability across all
operations, with
governance structures
in place to uphold the
highest standards for
our Board of Directors
and entire workforce.
Our whistleblower
protection programme
encourages employees
to report unethical
behaviour without fear
of retaliation.
Anti-Corruption Policy - This
prohibits corrupt, improper
practices and bribery. It applies
to interactions between Wizz
Air personnel and third parties.
Policy of Good Conduct - This
document outlines the
expectations regarding Wizz Air
employees’ behaviour at work,
including their conduct towards
colleagues, business partners
and the organisation as a
whole, focusing on issues such
as corruption and bribery.
Corporate Political Engagement
Policy and Statement - outlines
the principles and guidelines
for engaging with political
stakeholders. This policy
ensures that all interactions are
conducted transparently,
ethically and in alignment with
the Company’s values and
regulatory requirements.
Wizz Air requires all
employees and relevant
third parties to complete
mandatory e-learning on
business ethics and key
policies, including anti-
corruption. High-risk roles
receive additional targeted
training. Suppliers must
agree to the policy before
contracting. Wizz Air
conducts due diligence,
monitors third-party
activities, and allows
concerns to be reported
anonymously. Independent
investigators handle all
cases.
For more information,
please see Wizz Air’s
Sustainability Report
starting on page 283.
Principal Risks and Risk Management
The Emerging and Principal Risks chapter, starting on page 19, outlines our risk management process
and provides an overview of both emerging and principal risks. Environmental/Climate risks are now
presented separately from social and governance risks, enabling a clearer identification of risks and
opportunities and more targeted action planning in each area. Transition and physical risks to assets and
operations are identified through climate-scenario modelling, consistent with the requirements of the
TCFD framework.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 32
STRATEGIC REPORT
Key Non-Financial Performance Indicators (KPIs)
All relevant non-financial KPIs are presented within their respective sections of Wizz Air’s Sustainability
Report. These KPIs are integrated into each chapter to provide clear visibility of performance and
progress against strategic objectives in their specific context. Key indicators within the Environmental
pillar can be found from page 235, Social from page 258, and Governance from page 283.
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Our disclosures are consistent with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial
Disclosures (TCFD) and the climate-related financial disclosure requirements set out in Section
414CB(2A) of the UK Companies Act 2006. A full TCFD disclosure is included in our Sustainability Report,
as summarised below:
Governance
Disclose the organisation’s
governance around climate-related
risks and opportunities.
Companies Act reference
Recommended disclosure a) Describe
the board’s oversight of climate-related
risks and opportunities.
Board-level oversight is with the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chairman of the
Board, as well as the Sustainability and
Culture Committee. See pages 188 - 191.
s414CB(2A)(a)
Recommended disclosure b) Describe
management’s role in assessing and
managing climate-related risks and
opportunities.
Management defines strategies and drives
progress through the Corporate and ESG
Officer and the cross-functional
Sustainability Council. See pages 188 -
191 .
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework.
Strategy
Disclose the actual and potential
impacts of climate-related risks and
opportunities on the organisation’s
businesses, strategy and financial
planning where such information is
material.
Companies Act reference
Recommended disclosure a) Describe
the climate-related risks and
opportunities the organisation has
identified over the short, medium and
long term.
The ongoing development of our risk
register including climate-related risks is
integrated into the ERM process (see page
19), but is independently researched and
supported via our sustainability
consultants as outlined further on pages
217 - 226.
s414CB(2A)(d)
Recommended disclosure b) Describe
the impact of climate-related risks and
opportunities on the organisation’s
businesses, strategy and financial
planning.
Addressed through our comprehensive
climate strategy; see pages 219 - 226,
where we have outlined how climate risk
analysis and risk management are
embedded in our financial planning for
short and medium-term risks and
opportunities.
s414CB(2A)(e)
Recommended disclosure c) Describe
the resilience of the organisation’s
strategy, taking into consideration
different climate-related scenarios,
including a 2°C or lower scenario.
Our climate strategy integrates climate
risk assessments and is embedded in our
short, medium and long-term planning
process. Our climate scenario modelling
processes include a qualitative and
quantitative analysis with applicable risks
under four different climate-related
scenarios. Please refer to pages 217 - 226.
S414CB(2A)(f)
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework.
Risk management
Disclose how the organisation
identifies, assesses and manages
climate-related risks.
Companies Act reference
Recommended disclosure a) Describe
the organisation’s processes for
identifying and assessing climate-related
risks.
Climate-related risks are identified as part
of our ERM process (page 19 ), based on
cross-functional alignments and
independently reviewed by third-party
climate risk assessment experts (pages
217 - 219).
S414CB(2A)(b)
Recommended disclosure b) Describe
the organisation’s processes for
managing climate-related risks.
By integrating sustainability and climate as
the key focus area of our corporate
strategies, we intend to be a pioneer on all
relevant climate-related areas for the
Company. See pages 226 and 228, and
229 - 237.
S414CB(2A)(b)
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 33
STRATEGIC REPORT
Recommended disclosure c) Describe
how processes for identifying, assessing
and managing climate-related risks are
integrated into the organisation’s overall
risk management.
We manage climate-related and ESG risks
through our corporate ERM framework.
The Company’s risk register identifies a
wide array of ESG-related risks, a sub-
group of which includes climate risks. See
pages 218 and 19.
S414CB(2A)(c)
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. We are constantly working on developing our ERM framework
and the applicable internal risk management processes to ensure heightened resilience in the face of climate change.
Metrics and targets
Disclose the metrics and targets used
to assess and manage relevant
climate-related risks and
opportunities where such information
is material.
Companies Act reference
Recommended disclosure a) Disclose the
metrics used by the organisation to
assess climate-related risks and
opportunities in line with its strategy and
risk management process.
See pages 192 and 229 - 237 for our
environmental metrics and targets.
S414CB(2A)(h)
Recommended disclosure b) Disclose
Scope 1, Scope 2, and if appropriate,
Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions, and the related risks.
We report extensively on Scope 1, Scope 2
and Scope 3 emissions on page 238.
Recommended disclosure c) Describe
the targets used by the organisation to
manage climate-related risks and
opportunities and performance against
targets.
See page 70 regarding the Directors’
Remuneration Report and pages 190 and
78 for climate-related metrics in CEO
incentives.
S414CB(2A)(g)
Our disclosure is consistent with the TCFD framework. We will continue to improve our greenhouse gas disclosure
with increased data granularity regarding location-based emissions reporting in the short and medium term.
Diversity and Gender Representation
Wizz Air is committed to fostering an inclusive and diverse workplace, where all employees have equal
opportunities to thrive, regardless of gender, background or personal characteristics. As part of our
commitment to transparency, we disclose the gender breakdown of our workforce, senior management
and Board of Directors in the Social section of the Sustainability Report from pages 259 to 262.
Section 172(1) Statement
The Directors have had regard to the matters set out in Section 172(1) of the UK Companies Act 2006,
including the interests of stakeholders, the impact of decisions on the community and environment, and
the long-term success of the Company. The Board’s approach to these duties is detailed further in the
Section 172(1) Statement on page 42 of this report.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 34
STRATEGIC REPORT
MODERN SLAVERY ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 2026
This statement is made pursuant to Section 54(1) of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and pertains to the
fiscal year ended 31 March 2026. This statement is made by Wizz Air Holdings Plc, the parent of all four
operating airlines, Wizz Air Hungary Limited, Wizz Air UK Limited, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC and Wizz Air Malta
Limited, on behalf of the Group (hereinafter collectively referred to as: “Wizz Air”, “we”).
Wizz Air is committed to acting ethically and with integrity in our business dealings. Wizz Air expects its
suppliers to conduct themselves in this manner too. Wizz Air is committed to improving its practices to
combat slavery and human trafficking and seek out where such exists in our dealings with third parties and
suppliers, and in our supply chain, in order to meet our commitments. As defined by the UK Modern Slavery
Act 2015, “modern slavery” includes the offences of “slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour”, as
well as “human trafficking”.
In accordance with Section 54 of the Act, in this statement we refer to the following:
1. organisational structure and supply chain;
2. policies;
3. due diligence;
4. risk assessment;
5. our effectiveness in combatting slavery and human trafficking; and
6. training.
1. Organisational structure and supply chain
a) WIZZ
Wizz Air offers low-cost, low-fare passenger air transportation services on scheduled short-haul and
medium-haul point-to-point routes across Europe and to a number of destinations in the Middle East, as well
as North Africa and Northwest Asia. A team of dedicated aviation professionals delivers a superior service,
making Wizz Air the preferred choice for 69.7 million passengers in the F26 financial year ended
31 March 2026. Its fleet consists of 262 aircraft and its network spans more than 1,016 routes across
45 countries. Wizz Air employs over 9,000 people across a network of close to 40 bases. Our Company is
incorporated in Jersey. Wizz Air Holdings Plc has four airline subsidiaries: Wizz Air Hungary Limited, Wizz Air
UK Limited, Wizz Air Malta Limited and Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC. For further details about Wizz Air’s
subsidiaries and corporate structure, please see page 148.
b) Our supply chain
Wizz Air expects its suppliers to adhere to the highest standards of business, internally and in relation to
their respective supply chains, and comply with their own human rights regimes and Modern Slavery Act
obligations. Wizz Air operates in a highly regulated sector and our supply chain is predominantly service
based within Europe. Our suppliers have to conform to the necessary aviation safety standards and
certification. However, we recognise that we play a part in helping reduce occurrences of modern slavery
and human trafficking.
Whilst we have received no reports of incidents, we take steps to identify and detect human trafficking. We
recognise that we need to update our processes to detect such incidents. Our Anti-Slavery and Human
Trafficking Policy assists us in doing this. The policy applies to all persons working for us, or on our behalf, in
any capacity, including employees at all levels, Directors, Officers, agency workers, seconded workers,
volunteers, interns, agents, contractors, external consultants, third-party representatives and business
partners.
2. Policies
We are committed to assessing any instance of non-compliance regarding modern slavery or human
trafficking on a case-by-case basis. We have policies in place related to human rights principles, including
our Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy. As well as this, our Code of Ethics, “The Wizz Way”, applies
to every Company employee regardless of seniority. These, along with our Supplier Code of Conduct,
Whistleblowing Policy, Sustainable Procurement Policy, Anti-Fraud Policy and Anti-Corruption Policy, help us
maintain an effective compliance environment across our supply chain. Actions in relation to these policies
are reviewed by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board.
These policies are part of the employees’ onboarding programme, and are also accessible via the Company’s
intranet. New or revised policies are published on Wizz Air’s internal Workvivo site to raise awareness. Our
Supplier Code of Conduct is included in all tenders and requires acknowledgement and acceptance as a
prerequisite for all candidates.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 35
STRATEGIC REPORT
3. Due diligence
Due diligence processes include managing compliance with our Supplier Code of Conduct and making sure
that the Company’s Purchasing department incorporates dedicated contractual clauses into agreements,
ensuring the prevention of slavery. Wizz Air also partners with a company specialised in third-party risk
management; its solution allows assessments across various environmental, social and governance topics
and enables a thorough analysis of our supplier base, to identify and successfully manage risks during
tender evaluations and after contracting as well.
4. Risk assessment
Risk assessments are undertaken as part of our whistleblowing processes and Supplier Code of Conduct
compliance. Our Whistleblowing Policy covers any report made via whistleblowing channels of any
infringement of the Wizz Air Code of Conduct or the laws of any jurisdiction where a Wizz Air entity is
established, or in the European Union. Wizz Air believes that to ensure the continued integrity of its
business, there must be an effective reporting line for its employees. If employees suspect any breach of
Company policies, they can raise their concerns and report this to the relevant personnel anonymously via
the whistleblowing programme, as detailed in the policy.
5. Our effectiveness in combatting slavery and human trafficking
We are committed to ensuring that these measures, taken collectively, will help us combat modern slavery
and human trafficking. However, we recognise that we need to measure our effectiveness through use of
KPIs, and we will be looking to use indicators such as vetting procedures, supplier screening measures,
subcontractor inspections (particularly in known at-risk countries), whistleblowing reports, percentage of
staff trained, and any remedial action taken following reports or incidents of slavery or human trafficking in
the near future.
As part of our ongoing commitment to combatting modern slavery and human trafficking, we will continue to
review and develop our processes.
6. Training
Wizz Air delivers online compliance training related to its Code of Ethics for every staff member. In addition,
we provide anti-slavery training for every crew member as part of their annual security training sessions.
Furthermore, employees are encouraged to raise legal or ethical concerns through various channels, such as
their managers or any member of the management team or Human Resources. This is a key feature of our
Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy as well as our Whistleblowing Policy.
The above statement has been approved by the Board of Wizz Air Holdings Plc.
József Váradi
Chief Executive Officer
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 36
GOVERNANCE
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 37
GOVERNANCE
MicrosoftTeams-image (87).png
“Wizz Air’s strategic direction is
grounded in strong corporate
governance principles, with the
Board and its Committees
playing a crucial role in
maintaining and reinforcing this
governance framework through
their dedicated oversight and
guidance.”
William Franke
Chairman of the Board of Directors
CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT ON
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT
Introduction
Dear Shareholders,
On behalf of the Board I am
pleased to present the Corporate
Governance Report for the year
ended 31 March 2026. This
report outlines Wizz Air’s
approach to corporate
governance and shows how the
management team, with the
Board’s support, has successfully
guided the Company through the
fiscal year.
The Board and I commend the
Company’s ability to deliver
profitability, despite the ongoing
challenges of global political and
economic uncertainty and the
impact of unexpected supply-
chain and fuel disruptions. I
would like to express my
appreciation to the Directors and
management team for
maintaining robust corporate
oversight and demonstrating
adaptive leadership in navigating
shifting circumstances, all while
safeguarding the Group’s
operational integrity.
Wizz Air’s strategic direction is
grounded in strong corporate
governance principles, with the
Board and its Committees
playing a crucial role in
maintaining and reinforcing this
governance framework through
their dedicated oversight and
guidance.
Since its initial public offering
(IPO) in 2015, Wizz Air has
significantly strengthened its
liquidity position, expanded its
fleet from 54 to over 260
aircraft, and increased passenger
numbers from 19 million to over
68 million annually. The airline
group’s listing has played a
critical role in its evolution,
providing access to one of the
world’s largest and most
sophisticated capital markets.
With a decade of strong
performance on the London
Stock Exchange, Wizz Air is
poised for its next phase of
growth, underpinned by strong
financial discipline, an
unmatched order book,
sustainability investments and
strategic market expansion. The
Board of Directors is confident
that Wizz Air’s agility and
disciplined execution will
continue to deliver value for
investors, employees, customers
and society.
Activities in F26
Strategy
During F26, the Company
continued its strategic growth in
its core Eastern European
markets, despite the continued
grounding of aircraft due to
engine manufacturing defects
beyond the Company’s control.
The fleet continued to expand,
with capacity growth being
primarily directed towards
increased flight frequencies on
existing routes. Our choice of
fleet continues to be a strategic
driver, with 72% of the
Company’s fleet now fuel-
efficient Airbus A320neo family
aircraft with an average age of
4.6 years. The renewal of older
generation aircraft with Airbus
A321neo aircraft, of which WIZZ
is now the world’s largest
operator, brings both economic
and sustainability benefits.
The Company’s commitment to
sustainability remains a central
pillar of its long-term strategy.
This year, focus was placed on
advancing the implementation of
its decarbonisation strategy and
further embedding sustainability
across the business.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 38
GOVERNANCE
The Company focused on
improved network design and
operational robustness, the
result of which saw a significant
improvement in completion rate
and utilisation. The Board
expressed strong support for the
Company’s strategic initiative to
enhance its consumer offering
through the launch of the
Customer First Compass – a
comprehensive transformation
programme focused on four key
customer touchpoints: product,
price, service and
communications. This initiative
reflects Wizz Air’s commitment
to a customer-centric culture and
was commended by the Board as
a significant step towards
achieving the Company’s long-
term strategic objectives.
People and culture
Wizz Air has a diverse and
inclusive culture, and these
values are embedded within the
Company. The Company reached
its target of 40 per cent female
representation in management in
the fiscal year 2026. Last year
we appointed Charlotte Pedersen
as the Senior Independent Non-
Executive Director, and she is
also Chair of the Safety, Security
and Operational Compliance
Committee. In addition,
Charlotte Andsager is Chair of
the Sustainability and Culture
Committee. We were likewise
pleased that Phit Lian Chong
joined the board earlier and her
experience has provided further
diversity in accordance with the
Parker Review and targets set by
the UK Listing Rules.
In terms of engagement, a
number of Non-Executive
Directors embarked on
engagement activities with
employees across the Group,
including from corporate,
customer and operational
functions, in addition to
interactions with crew and the
People Council.
The Board maintained regular
communication with the
Employee Engagement Director
and People Officer and Chief
Corporate Officer, actively
integrating employee feedback
into decisions related to
remuneration outcomes for F26
in the Directors’ Remuneration
Report. The Board thoughtfully
considers the employee
experience and the views of key
stakeholders when determining
executive compensation. Its
strong commitment to ongoing
workforce investment supports
the Company’s competitiveness
and appeal in the market. In all
remuneration decisions, the
Board maintains a balanced and
responsible approach.
Board composition
There were no changes to the
overall composition of the Board
during the year. Further
information can be found on
pages 47–52.
Board performance
As always, Wizz Air is committed
to corporate governance that is
in line with the Code. The
Company engaged Lintstock to
facilitate an evaluation of the
performance of the Board, its
Committees, the Chairman and
individual Directors. Lintstock is
an advisory firm that specialises
in board reviews and provides no
other services to the Company.
The Nomination and Governance
Committee oversaw the
evaluation. Further detail is
provided on page 46.
Stakeholders and
investors
The Board remains committed
to upholding rigorous corporate
governance standards and
actively engaging with
stakeholders and investors. In its
decision-making process, the
Board carefully assesses the
implications for the workforce,
customers, suppliers, society
and Shareholders.
The Board has direct
engagement with investors, and
as Chairman I have had several
meetings and exchanges with
Shareholders on matters
concerning ESG, remuneration,
governance and strategy.
A statement on how the
Directors have considered the
issues outlined in Section 172 of
the UK Companies Act 2006 can
be found on page 40.
The subsequent pages of the
Corporate Governance Report
detail Board and management
composition, the governance
framework as well as Board and
Committee activities during
the year.
On behalf of the Board, I would
also like to extend my heartfelt
thanks to the Wizz Air workforce,
investors as well as my fellow
Board members for their
steadfast support of the
Company and their enduring
commitment to upholding the
highest standards of corporate
governance over the past 22
years.
On behalf of the Board
Nóra Viktória Rabe
Corporate Secretary
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 39
GOVERNANCE
GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK
THE BOARD
CHAIRMAN –
WILLIAM A. FRANKE
• Chairs the Board and sets direction.
• Ensures highest standard of corporate governance.
• Responsibility for setting the agenda and strategic discussion.
• Responsible for ensuring engagement with investors and
stakeholders.
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER –
JÓZSEF VÁRADI
• Accountable to the Board and the Chairman.
• Responsible for the Group’s senior leadership team.
• Responsible for the strategic, financial and operational
performance of the Group.
SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR –
CHARLOTTE PEDERSEN
• Acts as a sounding board for the Chairman.
• Acts as an intermediary for the other Directors.
• Available to Shareholders to address concerns.
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS –
ANNA GATTI
ANDREW S. BRODERICK
ANTHONY RADEV
BARRY ECCLESTON
CHARLOTTE ANDSAGER
CHARLOTTE PEDERSEN
ENRIQUE DUPUY DE LOME CHAVARRI
STEPHEN L. JOHNSON
WILLIAM A. FRANKE
PHIT LIAN CHONG
Responsible for key reserved matters:
• overall strategy and management;
• structure and capital;
• financial reporting and controls;
• internal control and risk management;
• approval of significant or material contracts;
• approval of Shareholder communication and communication
relating to Board decisions;
• Board membership and appointments;
• determining the executive remuneration plan and incentive plans;
• reviewing corporate governance matters; and
• reviewing Group safety, security and operational compliance.
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT DIRECTOR –
ANTHONY RADEV
• Acts as link between the workforce, the People Council and the
Board.
• Provides regular updates to the Board on employee engagement,
incorporated into decisions.
COMPANY SECRETARY –
NÓRA VIKTÓRIA RABE
• Supports the Chairman, the Group Chief Executive Officer and
Chairs of Committees in agenda-setting and minute-taking.
• Liaison between senior management and the Directors and
responsible for timely delivery of materials.
• Advises the Board on corporate governance and is responsible for
compliance with the Share Dealing Code.
• Works with the Chairman on the Board training plan, Board
reviews and corporate governance improvements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 40
GOVERNANCE
BOARD COMMITTEES
Nomination & Governance; Audit & Risk; Remuneration; Sustainability & Culture; Safety, Security & Operational
Compliance; Financial Performance
SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM
Led by the Group Chief Executive Officer and responsible for leadership and day-to -ay management of the
business
Statement of Compliance with UK Corporate Governance Code
The Directors support high standards of corporate governance and it is the policy of the Company to comply
with current best practice in UK corporate governance to the extent appropriate for a company of its size.
The Company welcomed the publication by the Financial Reporting Council of its new UK Corporate
Governance Code 2024 and its focus on the themes of corporate and board culture, stakeholder engagement
and sustainability, which are critical factors for us as we partner with our stakeholders to build an enduring
business. The Corporate Governance Code is available for review on the Financial Reporting Council’s
website: www.frc.org.uk. The Board complied with the requirements of the Corporate Governance Code
during the financial year. The only exception to this is that William A. Franke, the Chairman, does not meet
the independence criteria set out in the Corporate Governance Code (Provision 10), given that he is the
Managing Partner of Indigo. In addition, he has also exceeded the nine-year limit imposed by the Code
(Provision 19). However, Mr Franke has unrivalled knowledge of developing ultra-low-cost airlines such as
the Company and has exceptionally broad experience of the airline industry from both executive and
non‑executive roles across many regions of the world. As the Company continues to grow and expand into
different geographic regions, the Board believes that Mr Franke should continue as Chairman, given his
recognised experience in the airline industry and his alignment with the interests of Shareholders. The Board
is of the view that Mr Franke’s role in no way compromises his independence of judgement and character.
Application of the principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code
Board leadership and Company purpose
Chairman’s Statement, p.4
Corporate culture, p.42
Investment in workforce, p.42
Board activities, p.42
Stakeholder interests, p.42
Board decisions, p.42
Section 172 Statement, p.42
Whistleblowing, p.34
Conflicts of interest, p.45
Division of responsibilities
Board of Directors’ division of responsibilities, p.45
Directors’ independence, p.53
Governance framework, p.39
Board and Committee attendance, p.58
Board and Committee meetings, p.58
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 41
GOVERNANCE
Composition, succession and evaluation
Board composition, p.47
Appointment, re-election, resignation and removal of
Directors, p.46
Nomination and Governance Committee Chairman’s
Statement, p. 68
Board evaluation, p.46
Board biographies, p.47
Audit, risk and internal controls
Audit and Risk Committee Report, p.59
Risk management and internal control, p.60
Confirmation and reassessment of emerging
principal risks and uncertainties, p.60
Fair, balanced and understandable confirmation,
p.60
Remuneration
Directors’ Remuneration Report, p.70
Remuneration Committee Chairman’s Statement,
p.70
Alignment with provisions of UK Corporate
Governance Code, p.77
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 42
GOVERNANCE
1. Board leadership and
Company purpose
The Board plays a crucial role in
setting the Company’s strategic
direction and ensuring alignment
with long-term value creation.
It actively participates in the
development, review and
approval of corporate strategies,
business plans and major
initiatives.
The Board upholds the highest
standards of corporate
governance and provides
effective leadership and
oversight for the Group. Our
values – integrity, dedication,
inclusivity, positivity and
sustainability – guide our
decisions.
The Company’s purpose revolves
around providing no-frills travel
that is accessible to everyone,
everywhere, at the lowest price
possible, while maintaining a
strong commitment to
environmental consciousness.
The Board continually reviews its
strategic decisions to align with
this mission.
Corporate culture
Culture is a core focus of the
Board and the Sustainability
and Culture Committee. Our
corporate culture nurtures
engagement and excellence.
The Board closely monitors
employee engagement
feedback, including the results
of surveys and action plans.
Our employee engagement is a
dynamic strategy that evolves
with our changing needs and
aspirations.
Our Company’s purpose is
simple yet profound: no-frills
travel for everyone, everywhere,
at the lowest price possible and
with the lowest emissions
possible. We’re democratising
the skies, making adventure
accessible.
Investment in workforce
The Board’s commitment
extends beyond strategy and
governance – it reaches the very
heart of our organisation: our
people. The Board works to
ensure fair terms and conditions
for employees, in addition to
relevant training and
development. Through the Board
Committees, the Board ensures
Wizz Air remains an attractive
and competitive employer.
We don’t settle for mediocrity.
Our commitment to diversity,
inclusion and sustainability sets
us apart.
Stakeholders
The Board engages with both
Shareholders and investors and
the workforce. The Chairman
and Chair of the Remuneration
Committee have ongoing
dialogue with investors. The
Board receives regular updates
from the Employee Engagement
Director, who is a link between
the Board and the workforce
and People Council. There was
further engagement with other
Directors and the workforce
during the year.
Board activities
The Board met on seven
occasions during the year.
The agenda for each meeting is
agreed with the Chairman, the
Chief Executive Officer and the
Company Secretary. Regular
updates are provided by the
Group Managing Director, the
Chief Commercial Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief
Operations Officer and Chief
Corporate Officer. The Board
reviewed and approved
a number of significant and
material contracts.
The Board receives updates
from the Committee Chairs
throughout the year.
Furthermore, it deliberates on a
number of matters of strategic
importance to the Company. In
addition, all meetings include an
agenda item to cover a private
executive session for Non-
Executive Directors.
The Company Secretary keeps
minutes of the Board and
Committee meetings and
reviews all minutes with the
Chairman and Chairs of the
Committees.
Section 172 Statement
Section 172(1) of the UK
Companies Act 2006 provides
that “a director of a company
must act in the way he
considers, in good faith, would
be most likely to promote the
success of the company for the
benefit of its members as a
whole, and in doing so have
regard (amongst other matters)
to:
• the likely consequences of any
decision in the long term;
• the interests of the company’s
employees;
• the need to foster the
company’s business
relationships with suppliers,
customers and others;
• the impact of the company’s
operations on the community
and the environment;
• the desirability of the company
maintaining a reputation for
high standards of business
conduct; and
• the need to act fairly as
between members of the
company”.
The Company has multiple
stakeholders. The Board
considers the most significant
stakeholder groups to be
employees, customers,
Shareholders and investors,
suppliers, governments and
regulators, including the
European Union institutions.
As part of their induction, the
Directors of the Company are
briefed on their duties and can
access professional advice about
them as appropriate. Input from
stakeholders received by
different business units
contributes to the decision-
making process overseen by
the Board.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 43
GOVERNANCE
Section 172 considerations
included:
• Shareholder engagement:
Over the course of the past
year, the Company’s Investor
Relations department has
arranged a number of
roadshows, timed around the
release of financial results, as
well as other meetings with
investors. This included a
dedicated Capital Markets Day
held in Budapest. Ahead of the
2025 Annual General Meeting,
the Chairman, the Senior
Independent Non-Executive
Director as well as the Chairs
of the Audit and Risk
Committee and of the
Remuneration Committee
were available to answer
questions from investors. At
the Company AGM held on 23
July 2025 all resolutions
proposed were approved by
the Shareholders.
• Community and environment:
The Board received regulator
reports from the Corporate
and ESG Officer and Chief
Corporate Officer highlighting
key policy and government
affairs issues and engagement
with authorities. The Board
considered ESG positions and
strategy, and investment
decisions were taken
considering the impact on the
environment.
• Safety: The Board received
regular updates on discussions
with safety regulators and
authorities regarding the war
in Ukraine and the potential
restart of operations in case of
a ceasefire, the restart of
operations into Israel in a
controlled environment as well
as operational ramp-up and
disruption matters.
• Employee interest: The Board
reviewed and received regular
updates on employee
engagement and consideration
of remuneration and incentive
plans. The Board was updated
and deliberated on actions
taken through People Council
initiatives and general culture
topics. There were relevant
discussions about
organisational changes in
senior management and talent
succession.
• Customers: The Board was
updated about the Company’s
Customer First Compass
framework, putting customers
at the heart of its business and
decision making. There was
ongoing consideration of the
customer proposition, in
particular with respect to
customer care handling,
operational reliability and
transparent communications
on new products, such as All
You Can Fly subscription, and
sustainability communications.
The Board was updated about
relevant discussions and
engagement with authorities,
regulators and government
officials.
Our key Shareholders
As at 31 March 2026, the Company was notified pursuant to DTR 5 of the Financial Conduct Authority’s
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTRs) that the following Shareholders held more than
3.00 per cent of the Company’s issued Ordinary Shares:
Shareholder
Reported shareholding
Reported number of shares
Indigo Hungary LP
10.9%
11,273,604
Cobas Asset Management, SGIIC, SA
7.5%
7,770,174
Coronation Fund Managers Limited
7.5%
7,768,819
Causeway Capital Management LLC
6.8%
7,074,974
Pzena Investment Management, LLC
3.9%
4,006,860
Magallanes Value Investors, S.A., SGIIC
3.8%
3,890,554
Indigo Maple Hill LP
3.3%
3,411,291
Between 1 April and 15 May 2026 Cobas Asset Management bought 773,437 shares, Causeway Capital
Management LLC bought 741,903 shares, Coronation Fund Managers Limited sold 1,017,101 shares,
Pzena Investment Management LLC bought 53,521 shares and Magallanes Value Investors sold 96,820
shares.
Changes in interests that have been notified to the Company pursuant to DTR 5 of the DTRs can be
found in the Regulatory News section of the Investor Relations page of the Company’s corporate website:
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 44
GOVERNANCE
Our relationship with Indigo
As at 31 March 2026, Indigo
(Indigo Hungary LP and Indigo
Maple Hill LP together) held
14.2 per cent of the Company’s
issued Ordinary Shares. Indigo
holds a number of Convertible
Notes that may be converted
into Ordinary Shares, provided
the Company’s ownership
remains compliant with EU
ownership and control rules.
On a fully converted basis Indigo
would have 30.7 per cent of the
Company’s Ordinary Shares
following the sale of 10,000,000
shares (9.7 per cent of the
issued shares) on 27 February
2026.
The terms of these Convertible
Notes are governed by a note
purchase agreement dated
24 February 2015 and entered
into between the Company,
Wizz Air Hungary Limited and
Indigo. Our Chairman, William
A. Franke, is the Managing
Partner of Indigo.
According to the Financial
Conduct Authority’s Listing Rules
(“the Listing Rules”), any person
who exercises or controls the
exercise, on their own or
together with any person with
whom they are acting in concert,
of 30 per cent or more of the
votes able to be cast on all or
substantially all matters at
general meetings of a company
are known as “controlling
shareholders”. During its
preparation for its initial public
offering in February 2015, the
Company discussed with the
UK Listing Authority that, in
the circumstances, Indigo would
be treated as a controlling
shareholder of the Company
for these purposes. The Listing
Rules require companies with
controlling shareholders to enter
into a written and legally binding
agreement, which is intended
to ensure that the controlling
shareholder complies with
certain independence provisions.
The agreement must contain
undertakings that:
▶ transactions and
arrangements with the
controlling shareholder (and/
or any of its associates) will
be conducted at arm’s length
and on normal commercial
terms;
▶ neither the controlling
shareholder nor any of its
associates will take any
action that would have the
effect of preventing the
listed company from
complying with its
obligations under the
Listing Rules; and
▶ neither the controlling
shareholder nor any of its
associates will propose or
procure the proposal of a
Shareholder resolution which
is intended or appears to be
intended to circumvent the
proper application of the
Listing Rules.
Wizz Air entered into a
relationship agreement with
Indigo dated 24 February 2015.
The key terms of this
relationship agreement
are set out below.
Independence
Indigo has undertaken to
exercise its voting powers in
relation to the Company to
ensure that the Company is
capable of operating and making
decisions for the benefit of the
Shareholders of the Company as
a whole, and independently of
Indigo, at all times. In addition,
Indigo has undertaken that it will
not, and will procure that none
of its associates will: (a) take
any action that would have the
effect of preventing the
Company from complying with
its obligations under the Listing
Rules; and (b) propose or
procure the proposal of a
Shareholder resolution which is
intended or appears to be
intended to circumvent the
proper application of the
Listing Rules.
Board
Indigo may nominate: (a) three
Directors to the Board if Indigo
and its associates hold in excess
of 30 per cent of the fully
converted share capital of the
Company (i.e. assuming the
conversion in full of all
Convertible Notes); (b) two
Directors to the Board if Indigo
and its associates hold in excess
of 20 per cent of the fully
converted share capital; or
(c) one Director to the Board if
Indigo and its associates hold in
excess of 10 per cent of the fully
converted share capital (each
an “Indigo Director”). If Indigo
and/or its associates no longer
hold at least 30, 20 or 10 per
cent, respectively, of the fully
converted share capital of the
Company, then Indigo has
agreed to procure, insofar as it
is legally able to do so, that the
appropriate number of Indigo
Directors resigns from the
Board unless a majority of the
independent Directors resolve
that any Indigo Director should
remain on the Board.
As Indigo maintained holdings in
excess of 30 per cent of the fully
converted share capital of the
Company following their
10,000,000 share sale, there
was no change in their rights to
nominate Directors.
Indigo may not nominate any
person to be an Indigo Director
whose re-election has been
proposed to, but not approved
by, the holders of Ordinary
Shares in a general meeting,
or who has been removed from
office by a resolution of the
holders of Ordinary Shares.
The Board shall manage the
Company independently of
Indigo in accordance with the
articles of association, the Listing
Rules and applicable law. The
parties have also agreed that at
least half of the Board (excluding
the Chairman) shall comprise
independent Non-Executive
Directors, the Nomination and
Governance Committee shall
consist of a majority of
independent Directors, and the
Remuneration and Audit and
Risk Committees shall consist
only of independent Directors.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 45
GOVERNANCE
The Board confirms that since
the entry into the relationship
agreement on 24 February 2015,
the Company and Indigo have
complied with the independence
provisions provided in the
relationship agreement.
Arm’s length transactions
All transactions and relationships
between the Company and
Indigo or any of their associates
shall be conducted at arm’s
length, on a normal commercial
basis and in accordance with the
related party transaction rules
set out in Chapter 11 of the
Listing Rules.
Provision of information and
confidentiality
Indigo shall, subject to the
Company’s obligations under
all applicable laws (including,
without limitation, the Listing
Rules and the DTRs), be
provided with financial,
management and/or other
information relating to any
member of the Group as Indigo
(or any of its associates) may
reasonably require for the
purposes of any internal or
external reporting requirements
which the relevant party is
bound by internal compliance,
law or regulation to satisfy.
Indigo may disclose any such
financial, management and/or
other information to its
associates provided that: (a)
Indigo will (and will procure that
any associate to whom any
information is passed will)
keep confidential any such
information; (b) such
information does not include
information relating to any
transaction between the
Company and Indigo or any of
their associates obtained as a
result of an Indigo Director’s
position as a Director;
(c) disclosure would not result
in a breach by the Company
of the DTRs or require the
Company to make a public
announcement; and (d) the
name of such persons to whom
information is disclosed is added
to the Company’s insider list.
Annual General Meeting
The AGM was held in Geneva
on 23 July 2025. All resolutions
put to the Shareholders were
passed. There were some
resolutions that were opposed by
more than 20 per cent of voting
Shareholders. This resulted in
further consultations with
Shareholders regarding the low
votes and subsequent reporting
on the matter to the market.
Further information can be found
in the Directors’ Remuneration
Report on page 70.
2. Division of
responsibilities
Roles
The role of the Board is to
uphold the highest standards
of corporate governance and
ensure effective leadership and
oversight of the Group’s strategy
and performance.
The Board retains a Schedule of
Reserved Matters which sets
out the Board’s responsibilities.
The Board has delegated the
day-to-day management of the
Company to the Chief Executive
and the senior leadership team.
Matters in the Schedule which
the Board considers suitable for
delegation to its Committees
are contained in the terms of
reference of its Committees.
The Board has five Committees
comprising Non-Executive
Directors and, in the case of the
Nomination and Governance
Committee, the Chairman. At
each Board meeting, Committee
Chairs report to the Board in
relation to the Committee
meetings and decisions. The
Committee activities are referred
to in the individual Committee
Chair reports.
The roles of the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer are
clearly separated. The Chairman
is responsible for maintaining the
efficient performance of the
Board. The Chief Executive
Officer and the senior leadership
team are responsible for the
day-to-day management of the
Group and the implementation
of its strategy.
Board meetings and attendance
The total number of Board
meetings held during the year
was seven. A number of key
strategic and commercial
decisions require Board approval
and, as and when any such
decision is needed outside the
scheduled meeting cycle, an ad
hoc Board meeting may be
arranged. The Board also took
part in a number of dinners and
extra curricular activities with
the senior leadership team.
Prior to Board meetings, each
Director receives an information
pack containing a comprehensive
review of the Company’s
business as well as detailed
proposals for approval of
transactions and developments
falling within the Board’s remit.
The Company believes that
this enables each Director to
discharge his or her
responsibilities properly. At each
Board meeting, Directors who
have a conflict of interest in any
agenda item declare that interest
and are not entitled to vote on
that agenda item.
At each Board meeting, the
Board approves the minutes of
the previous Board meeting. At
the end of each Board meeting,
there is a private session for
Non-Executive Directors to meet
with the Chairman to discuss any
relevant matters.
Directors are encouraged to
attend all Board and Committee
meetings, but in certain
circumstances meetings are
called at short notice, and due to
prior business commitments and
time differences Directors may
be unable to attend. If a Director
is unable to attend a meeting
because of exceptional
circumstances, they continue
to receive the papers in advance
of the meeting and have the
opportunity to discuss with the
relevant Chairman or the
Company Secretary any matters
on the agenda which they
wish to raise.
The Board and Committee
attendance can be found on
page 58.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 46
GOVERNANCE
External appointments
In accordance with the UK
Corporate Governance Code,
Non-Executive Directors
are required to seek approval
for additional external
appointments. The Directors’
external appointments are
outlined in the Board
biographies.
3. Composition,
succession and evaluation
The Nomination and Governance
Committee has responsibility for
all appointments to the Board.
The selection and appointment
process is detailed in the
Nomination and Governance
Committee Report. The
Committee approved a change
in the term of appointment
from one year to three years,
in line with the UK Corporate
Governance Code
recommendation. Appointments
and re-appointments are subject
to annual performance reviews
and AGM re-election.
There were no new
appointments of Directors to the
Board during the financial year.
There were a number of changes
to the composition of the Board
Committees, which are outlined
on page 52.
Upon appointment, new
Non‑Executive Directors follow
an induction process to ensure
an overview of the strategy and
business environment, and to
become familiar with the key
areas of business. The induction
process also includes meetings
with relevant stakeholders
across the business, and training
on handling of inside information
and share dealing.
Re-election
All Directors will offer themselves
for re-election at the Company’s
next AGM. This is in line with the
Company’s articles of association
and is subject to satisfactory
performance.
Training
All Directors are offered training
in accordance with their needs.
During the year training
opportunities were provided
through workshops and seminars
where internal and external
advisers participated. During the
year there was a focus on ESG
for the entire Board.
The Company has adopted a
Share Dealing Policy. As a
consequence, the Directors are
continually reminded time-to
time of their obligations in
accordance with this policy.
Face-to-face training on handling
inside information and
obligations in relation to the
Listing Rules was also provided
to the Board by the Corporate
Secretary.
Board performance
In line with the Code, the
Company engaged Lintstock to
facilitate an evaluation of the
performance of the Board, its
Committees, the Chairman and
individual Directors. Lintstock is
an advisory firm that specialises
in board reviews and provides no
other services to the Company.
The evaluation comprises the
preparation and completion of
questionnaires and the collation
of responses, followed by
interviews if necessary. Once
all stages of the review are
completed, the Board reviews
the findings and implements
any relevant actions. Lintstock
was invited to the Board meeting
to present its findings and
answer any questions from
the Board members.
Support materials were made
available and provided by the
Company Secretary, including
minutes and supporting Board
and Committee materials.
The Chairman discussed
the main conclusions of the
evaluation with the Evaluation
team and subsequently with
the Board.
The overall conclusion of the
evaluation was positive and that
the Board and the Committees
satisfactorily fulfilled their
duties and responsibilities
and adequately addressed
the strategic priorities of
the Company. The key
recommendations from
the evaluation were:
(I) general feedback:
• Board satisfaction with the
composition, expertise and
performance of the Board; and
• opportunity for reduction in
materials and less focus on
past performance;
(II) composition:
• continue focus on diversity
and inclusion;
(III) strategy:
• continue focus on planning;
and
• increase focus on the customer
proposition; and
(IV) Company Secretariat:
• improved support; and
• focus on high-quality material.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 47
GOVERNANCE
MANAGEMENT OF THE COMPANY
BOARD COMPOSITION
Board of Directors
membership
Effective oversight of Wizz Air’s
business is the main function of
the Board. Key to this oversight
is the approval of the Company’s
long-term strategy and
commercial objectives, and these
matters are reserved to the
Board along with the approval
of annual operating and capital
expenditure budgets and any
changes thereto.
Other key areas reserved to the
Board include financial reporting
and controls, internal controls,
the review and approval of key
contracts, Board membership,
the remuneration of Directors
and senior executive employees,
corporate governance including
ESG matters and the review of
safety issues.
Wizz Air’s Board currently
comprises one Executive and
ten Non-Executive Directors.
The current Directors bring a
wealth of experience from both
the worldwide aviation industry
and other international
industries, and so collectively
bring an appropriate breadth,
depth and balance of skills,
knowledge, experience and
expertise to the Company.
The Directors who have served
during F26 and since year-end
are as follows:
Name
Position
Committee membership (as at 31 March 2026)
Executive Director
József Váradi
Chief Executive Officer
Non-Executive Directors
William A. Franke
Chairman
Nomination and Governance Committee
Stephen L. Johnson
Non-Executive Director
and Deputy Chair
Barry Eccleston
Non-Executive Director
Nomination and Governance Committee,
Remuneration Committee, Safety, Security and
Operational Compliance Committee
Charlotte Pedersen
Senior Independent Non-
Executive Director
Safety, Security and Operational Compliance
Committee
Andrew S. Broderick
Non-Executive Director
Sustainability and Culture Committee, Safety,
Security and Operational Compliance Committee,
Financial Performance Committee
Dr Anthony Radev
Non-Executive Director
Sustainability and Culture Committee,
Remuneration Committee, INED overseeing
employee engagement
Charlotte Andsager
Non-Executive Director
Nomination and Governance Committee,
Sustainability and Culture Committee
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri
Non-Executive Director
Audit and Risk Committee, Nomination &
Governance Committee, Financial Performance
Committee
Anna Gatti
Non-Executive Director
Remuneration Committee, Audit and Risk
Committee
Phit Lian Chong
Non-Executive Director
Audit and Risk Committee
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 48
GOVERNANCE
Board competency matrix
Board diversity, Matrix.png
Conditions for indicating competence in the table: qualifications, certification of training and/or
professional background and experience.
*Strong knowledge base and understanding of the entire ESG spectrum, including aviation’s climate impact, the physical and
transition risks of the various climate pathways and how the Company will be affected.
Board gender diversity, ethnic diversity and tenure
1563
1564
1565
Board nationalities
Matrix.png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 49
GOVERNANCE
William A. Franke
Chairman
William A. Franke.jpg
Nationality: US
Appointed: 2015
Key skills:
Airlines, finance, legal and
regulatory
Current external
appointments:
Chair, Frontier Airlines Holdings,
Inc.; Chair, JetSMART Airlines
SpA; Chair, APiJET LLC.
Relevant experience:
Founder and Managing Partner
of Indigo Partners LLC, a
private equity fund focused
on investments in air
transportation, including
Wizz Air.
Served as Chair and Chief
Executive Officer of America
West Airlines from 1993 to 2001,
as Chair of Spirit Airlines Inc.
from 2006 to 2013 and as Chair
of Tiger Aviation Pte. Limited, a
Singapore-based airline, from
2004 to 2009. He was a Director
of Volaris (Concesionaria Vuela
Compañía de Aviación S.A.B. de
C.V.), a Mexican airline, from
2012 to 2023. He remains an
advisor to Volaris, Cebu Pacific
Airlines (Philippines) and
CycloKinetics (a sustainable
aviation fuel company).
József Váradi
CEO
József Váradi.jpg
Nationality: Hungarian
Appointed: 2015
Key skills:
Airlines, sales and marketing,
finance
Current external
appointments:
Board Member, JetSMART
Airlines; Trustee, Corvinus
University of Budapest.
Relevant experience:
One of the founders of Wizz Air
in 2003.
Worked at Procter & Gamble
between 1991 and 2001 and
became Sales Director for global
customers, where he was
responsible for major clients
throughout eleven EU countries.
Served as Chief Commercial
Officer and Chief Executive
Officer of Malev Airlines from
2001 to 2003. He also held
board memberships with
companies such as Lufthansa
Technik Budapest (Supervisory
Board, 2001–2003) and Mandala
Airlines in Indonesia (Board of
Commissioners, 2007–2011).
Stephen L. Johnson
Deputy Chair
Stephen L. Johnson.jpg
Nationality: US
Appointed: 2011
Key skills:
Airlines, legal and regulatory
Current external
appointments:
Vice Chair and Chief Strategy
Officer, American Airlines Inc;
Board Member, Executive
Advisory Board, University
of Berkeley Center for Law
and Business.
Relevant experience:
Mr. Johnson is Vice Chair and
Chief Strategy Officer of
American Airlines leading the
design and development of
strategies across the airline. He
collaborates with senior
leadership on key markets and
competition issues, and provides
counsel to the CEO and board of
directors. Mr Johnson served as
Executive Vice President of
Corporate Affairs from 2009 to
2022. From 2003 to 2009, he
was a Partner at Indigo Partners
LLC, a private equity firm
specialising in investments in the
airline industry.
Between 1995 and 2003, he held
positions at America West
Airlines, including Executive Vice
President of Corporate. Prior to
that, Steve served as Senior Vice
President and General Counsel
at GPA Group PLC and practised
law at the Seattle-based law firm
Bogle & Gates.
Mr. Johnson earned his MBA and
Juris Doctor from the University
of California, Berkeley.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 50
GOVERNANCE
Charlotte Pedersen
Senior Independent
Director
Charlotte Pedersen.jpg
Nationality: Danish/
Luxembourgish
Appointed: 2020
Key skills:
Aviation, safety, regulatory, ESG
Current external
appointments:
CEO/Owner, Pegasus Consilium
SarL; Board Member, Alpha
Trains Group SarL; Board
Member and Chair of the Safety
and Strategy Committee, Air
Greenland A/S; Board member
Air Greenland ATO A/S; Senior
Advisor Swiss Life Asset
Managers.
Relevant experience:
Ms Pedersen began her career as
an officer and helicopter Search
and Rescue pilot in the Royal
Danish Air Force, graduating
from U.S. Navy flight school on
the Commodore’s List with
Distinction. Following 17 years of
military service, she joined
Luxembourg’s Civil Aviation
Authority as a Flight Operations
Inspector, contributing to early
EASA safety and human factors
initiatives.
She later joined Luxaviation,
becoming Group COO in 2014
before leading its global
helicopter division as CEO.
Today, Ms Pedersen works full-
time as a portfolio Non-Executive
Director.
Ms Pedersen holds an MBA with
honours and is a certified
director through INSEAD, ECODA
and the Institut Luxembourgeois
des Administrateurs. A Fellow of
the Royal Aeronautical Society,
she actively champions women
in aviation, maritime and
motorsport, and was awarded
the INSEAD IDN Excellence in
Governance Award in 2023.
Barry Eccleston
Non-Executive Director
Barry Eccleston.jpg
Nationality: British/US
Appointed: 2018
Key skills:
Aviation, safety, manufacturing
Current external
appointments:
Advisor to JetZero Inc.
Relevant experience:
Previously Chief Executive Officer
of Airbus Americas Inc., where
he was responsible for all
aspects of Airbus’ commercial
aeroplane business in North
America, a position he held from
2005 to 2017. Prior to this, Mr
Eccleston was VP/GM for
Honeywell’s Propulsion Systems
Enterprise and had earlier served
as Honeywell’s VP Commercial
Aerospace, EMEA.
Before joining Honeywell in
2002, he was Executive VP of
Fairchild Dornier Corporation,
a provider of regional aircraft.
He started his career with Rolls-
Royce where he held several
senior positions, culminating
as CEO of International Aero
Engines, a joint venture with
Pratt & Whitney. He is a former
Chairman of the British-American
Business Association in
Washington DC, and former
President of The Wings Club
of New York, as well as being
appointed an OBE in 2019 by
Her Majesty the Queen.
Andrew S. Broderick
Non-Executive Director
Andrew Broderick.jpg
Nationality: US
Appointed: 2019
Key skills:
Airlines, finance
Current external
appointments:
Board Member, JetSMART
Airlines SpA; Board Member,
Frontier Airlines Holdings Inc.;
Board Member, APiJET LLC;
Board Member, Controladora
Vuela Compañía de Aviación,
S.A.B. de C.V; CycloKinetics Inc.
Relevant experience:
Joined Indigo Partners LLC, a
private equity fund focused on
air transportation, in 2008 and
has served as Managing Director
since 2019. Has served on the
board of directors of Frontier
Airlines Holdings, Inc., an airline
based in the United States, since
January 2018; JetSMART Airlines
SpA, an airline based in Chile,
since September 2018; APiJET,
LLC, a software company
focused on providing real-time
cost-saving analytics to airlines,
since November 2020; and
Controladora Vuela Compañía
de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.,
an airline based in Mexico
doing business as Volaris,
since April 2023; CycloKinetics,
Inc., a specialised biofuels
company based in the United
States, since May 2023.
Prior to joining Indigo,
Mr Broderick was employed at a
macroeconomic hedge fund and
a stock-option valuation firm.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 51
GOVERNANCE
Anthony Radev
Non-Executive Director
Anthony Radev.jpg
Nationality: Bulgarian/
Hungarian
Appointed: 2021
Key skills:
Listed company, finance
Current external
appointments:
Board Member, MOL Hungarian
Oil and Gas PLC; Board Member
Budapest Technical University;
Board Member, DSK Bank PLC.
Relevant experience:
For over 20 years, Dr Radev has
been involved with McKinsey &
Co. in various roles, the last one
culminating in a Senior Partner
role from 2001 until 2013. His
engagement has spanned many
sectors of the economy, and
included leading McKinsey’s
financial institutions practice in
Central and Eastern Europe as
well as being a member of the
senior leadership team in
European banking practice.
Today, Dr Radev is a Director
Emeritus of McKinsey (honorary
membership).
From 2018 until 2023 Mr. Radev
served as Executive President of
Corvinus University Budapest
In 2014, Dr Radev founded the
School for Executive Education
and Development (SEED) in
Budapest to serve the needs of
Central and Eastern European
companies.
Charlotte Andsager
Non-Executive Director
IMG_5234.jpg
Nationality: Danish
Appointed: 2020
Key skills:
Airlines, aviation, regulatory
Current external
appointments:
None.
Relevant experience:
Ms Andsager has held multiple
regulatory roles within the
Ministry of Transport and
Communications of Norway as
well as Telenor, the Norwegian
majority state-owned
multinational
telecommunications company.
In 2005, Ms Andsager served as
Vice President, European and
US Public Affairs for SAS Group.
In this capacity, Ms Andsager
advised SAS Group on European
and US public affairs and
maintained contacts with the
European institutions and the
US Administration.
In 2010, Ms Andsager joined
Rolls-Royce Plc as Vice President
EU Affairs where she served until
2014. Prior to joining the Wizz
Air Board, Ms Andsager served
six years as an independent
Director on the board of Avinor
Flysikring AS, the state-owned
air navigation services provider
in Norway.
Enrique Dupuy de Lome
Chavarri
Non-Executive Director
IMG_5233.jpg
Nationality: Spanish
Appointed: 2020
Key skills:
Airlines, finance
Current external
appointments:
Board Member, Solarig SA;
Senior Adviser, A.T. Kearney;
Senior Adviser, Blue Peak
Aviation; Board Member, Mobico
Group plc.
Previous experience:
Served as Finance Director, and
ultimately Chief Financial Officer,
at Iberia. He also played a key
role in the merger of Iberia with
British Airways in 2011 and the
creation of the International
Airlines Group (IAG). He became
Chief Financial Officer at IAG, a
position he held until he retired
in June 2019.
During his time at IAG, Mr.
Dupuy led the financial
strengthening and expansion of
IAG, driving a significant
improvement in its market
capitalisation, profitability and
returns. He also played a critical
role in the Group’s acquisitions of
BMI, Vueling and Aer Lingus and
the creation of Level.
As well as chairing the Audit &
Risk Committee at Wizz Air, Mr.
Dupuy is head of the Audit
Committee at Mobico Group plc.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 52
GOVERNANCE
Anna Gatti
Non-Executive Director
Anna Gatti.jpg
Nationality: Italian/US
Appointed: 2021
Key skills:
Digital, consumer, sales and
marketing
Current external
appointments:
Board Member, Intesa Sanpaolo
S.p.A; Board Member, WiZink
Bank S.L.
Previous experience:
Served as digital sales,
operations and product executive
driving customer success at scale
for companies such as Google,
YouTube and Skype. She worked
at launching YouTube in more
than 22 countries and she built
an entirely new advertising
product business for Skype that
laid the foundation for the
company’s planned IPO and
eventual sale to Microsoft.
Ms Gatti is also an active angel
investor. In Silicon Valley, where
she has been living for over
20 years, she co-founded two
start-ups leveraging artificial
intelligence applied to big data.
Prior to her career in technology,
Ms Gatti spent years in research
and public policy, working at the
World Health Organization and
at the University of Berkeley,
California, Goldman School of
Public Policy.
Phit Lian Chong
Non-Executive Director
image.png
Nationality: Singaporean
Appointed: 2023
Key skills:
Airlines, aviation, manufacturing,
lifestyle and leisure
Current external
appointments:
Board Member, Rokt Pte Ltd,
Rokt Sg Pte Ltd, Rokt
Intermediate Pte Ltd,  Singapore
Science Centre Global Pte Ltd,
Mandai Global Pte Ltd; China
Singapore Guangzhou
Knowledge City Development
and Construction Co.
Previous experience:
Ms Chong has held multiple
senior roles in organisations of
several industries including
precision engineering, aviation,
travel, supply chain
management and logistics. Ms
Chong was the CEO of award-
winning low-cost carriers Jetstar
Asia Airways and ValuAir from
2006 to 2012. Ms Chong also
served as an independent Board
Director on the board of Tiger
Airways Limited, a low-cost
subsidiary of Singapore Airlines.
Other previous commercial roles
included CEO/Board Member of
Singapore Mint, Safe Enterprises
Group, Avis Car Rental, Pacific
Internet and SingBridge
Corporate.
Ms Chong holds an Honours
Degree in Production Engineering
and Manufacturing Technology
and an Honorary Doctorate of
Science. She also pursued a
Master’s in Business
Administration and Advance
Management Programme as part
of an Organisation Leadership
Development programme.
Changes to the Board
during F26
The Nomination and Governance
Committee, acting on behalf of
the Board, conducts a regular
review of the Board’s
composition. During this review,
it identifies areas where skills,
experience and knowledge can
be further strengthened.
The Committee gives due
consideration to all aspects of
diversity, including gender,
ethnicity, age, sexual
orientation, disability, education,
professional backgrounds, socio-
economic backgrounds and
personal strengths.
During the fiscal year there were
no new appointments to the
Board. In December 2025, the
Company established the
Financial Performance
Committee to provide more
focused oversight of financial
planning, financing and
performance metrics.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 53
GOVERNANCE
Independence
The UK Corporate Governance
Code recommends that at least
half the members (excluding
the chairman) of the board of
directors of a company with a
premium listing should be
non‑executive directors,
determined by the board to be
independent in character and
judgement and free from
relationships or circumstances
which are likely to affect, or
could appear to affect, their
judgement.
The Board has considered the
independence of the Company’s
Non-Executive Directors and has
concluded that:
a) William A. Franke, the
Chairman, does not meet the
independence criteria set out in
the Corporate Governance Code,
given that he is the Managing
Partner of Indigo (a significant
Shareholder). However, given
the benefits to the Company of
his recognised experience in the
airline industry, the Board
believes that it is in the
Company’s best interest that
Mr Franke should continue as
Chairman of Wizz Air;
b) Stephen L. Johnson is not
considered to be an independent
Non-Executive Director given his
past position with Indigo; and
c) Andrew S. Broderick, who was
appointed effective from 16 April
2019, is not considered to be an
independent Non-Executive
Director as he is a Managing
Director of Indigo.
In all cases, the Board is
assured that the roles of the
aforementioned Non-Executive
Directors are in no way
compromised of independence
of judgement and character.
Other than William A. Franke,
Andrew S. Broderick and Stephen
L. Johnson, the Company regards
all of its Non-Executive Directors
who are currently serving or have
served on the Board during F26,
Barry Eccleston, Charlotte
Pedersen, Charlotte Andsager,
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri,
Anthony Radev, Phit Lian Chong
and Anna Gatti, as independent
Non-Executive Directors within
the meaning of “independent”
as defined in the Corporate
Governance Code, and free from
any business or other relationship
that could materially interfere
with the exercise of their
independent judgement.
Accordingly, as an absolute
majority of the Directors are
independent Non-Executive
Directors, the Company complies
with the requirement of the
Corporate Governance Code that
at least half of the board
(excluding the chairman) of a
company with a premium listing
should comprise independent
non-executive directors.
Senior Independent
Non‑Executive Director
The Corporate Governance Code
recommends that the Board
should appoint one of its
independent Non-Executive
Directors as the Senior
Independent Non-Executive
Director. The Senior
Independent Non-Executive
Director should be available to
Shareholders if they have
concerns that contact through
the normal channels of the
Chairman or Chief Executive
Officer has failed to resolve a
matter, or where such contact is
inappropriate. In September
2024, Charlotte Pedersen was
appointed as the Company’s
Senior Independent
Non‑Executive Director on an
interim basis following a leave of
absence by Barry Eccleston. On
14 March 2025, Ms. Pedersen
was appointed as Senior
Independent Non-Executive
Director on a permanent basis.
Independent
Non‑Executive Director
overseeing engagement
with employees
To strengthen workforce
engagement, Wizz Air decided
to appoint an independent
Non‑Executive Director to
oversee engagement with
employees.
The key purpose of the role is to
ensure that the employee voice
reaches the boardroom. The
relevant Non-Executive Director
is expected to engage
independently of management
with the Company’s employees
and to report back to the Board
any issues arising which could
affect employees’ ongoing
engagement with the Company.
Dr Anthony Radev was appointed
as the Company’s independent
Non-Executive Director
overseeing engagement with
employees. In that role, Dr
Radev also sits on and reports
regularly to the Sustainability
and Culture Committee. During
F26, Dr Radev attended a
number of engagement events
with employees, as well as
engaging through the Wizz Air
People Council members.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 54
GOVERNANCE
Data on the diversity of the Board and executive management for the year ended 31 March 2026
Gender diversity
Number
of Board
members
Percentage
of the Board
Number
of senior
positions on
the Board
(CEO, SID
and
Chairman)
Number in
executive
management
Percentage
of executive
management
The data on gender and ethnic
diversity of the Board and
executive management was
collected on a confidential and
voluntary self-reporting basis.
Men
7
64%
3
12
80%
Women
4
36%
1
3
20%
Other categories
_
_
_
_
_
Not specified/prefer not to say
_
_
_
_
_
Ethnic background
Number
of Board
members
Percentage
of the Board
Number
of senior
positions on
the Board
(CEO, SID
and
Chairman)
Number in
executive
management
Percentage
of executive
management
Wizz Air is fully committed to
promoting equality and
diversity to enhance decision
making, which is crucial for the
long-term success of Wizz Air
and its stakeholders. The
Company’s commitment to
diversity is set out in the
Sustainability Report. The
Board is mindful of the Listing
Rule requirements in relation
to gender and ethnic diversity
of the Board and executive
management. The targets set
out in LRs 9.8.6R (9)(a)(i), (ii)
and (iii) have not been met in
respect of gender diversity.
Ethnic diversity has been met.
While diversity criteria are
taken into consideration during
recruitment processes,
decisions are subject to the
principle of merit. Addressing
diversity remains a priority for
the Nomination and
Governance Committee in F26.
White British or other White
(including minority White
groups)
10
91%
3
14
93.33%
Mixed/multiple ethnic groups
_
_
_
_
_
Asian/Asian British
1
9%
_
1
_
Black/African/Caribbean/Black
British
_
_
_
_
_
Other ethnic group, including
Arab
_
_
_
_
_
Not specified/prefer not to say
_
_
_
_
_
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 55
GOVERNANCE
Senior management team
The Group Chief Executive Officer and the senior management team are responsible for managing the
Group’s business and implementing the Group’s strategy on a day-to-day basis.
As at 1 April 2026, the Group’s senior management team, in addition to the Group Chief Executive Officer,
comprises:
Wizz Air Hungary Limited*:
Name
Position
Michael Delehant
Group Managing Director
Ian Malin
Chief Commercial Officer
Veronika Spanarova
Chief Financial Officer
Owain Jones
Chief Corporate Officer
Diarmuid O'Conghaile
Chief Operations Officer
Silvia Mosquera
Commercial Officer
Michael Berlouis
Financial Operations Officer
Ervin Banyai
Digital Officer
Nóra Viktória Rabe
Corporate and ESG Officer
Piotr Trawka
Revenue Officer
Roland Tischner
Managing Director
Julia Brix
Supply Chain Officer
Andras Szabo
Network Officer
Marion Geoffroy
People Officer
*The above officer positions are all group-level positions. They are listed under Wizz Air Hungary Limited corresponding to the headquarters
location.
Wizz Air UK Limited:
Name
Position
Yvonne Moynihan
Managing Director
Wizz Air Malta Limited:
Name
Position
Mauro Peneda
Managing Director
Michael Delehant, Group Managing Director
Mr Delehant joined Wizz Air in April 2021 as Chief Operations Officer. Mr Delehant has a Bachelor’s degree in
Psychology from the University of Michigan, and obtained his MBA from Southern Methodist University in
Dallas. He brings two decades of executive airline experience and a long track record of leadership, strategy
and corporate transformation. After a long career at Southwest Airlines in the US, he joined Wizz Air from
Vueling in Europe. In his last role at Vueling, Mr Delehant was the Chief Strategy and Network Officer.
During the fiscal year, Mr. Delehant was promoted to Group Managing Director. He has responsibility for
Wizz Air Group’s operational and commercial activities.
Veronika Spanarova, Chief Financial Officer
Ms Spanarova joined Wizz Air as Chief Financial Officer in February 2026 following a 30-year international
career at Citi. She worked in multiple leadership roles across corporate and retail banking in a number of
countries including the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Brazil and Hungary where she was Citi's Managing Director
and Citi Country Officer. Veronika holds a Master’s Degree in Economics from Charles University in Prague,
Czech Republic.
Ian Malin, Chief Commercial Officer
Mr Malin joined Wizz Air in 2022 with over 24 years of finance experience. Most recently, he served as the
Chief Strategy and Commercial Officer of Unical Aviation in Los Angeles, after ten years as Chief Financial
Officer for the UK-based AJW Group, where he directed overall financial strategy and corporate
development. He also served as CEO of AJW Leasing, the Group’s aircraft, engine and component leasing
platform. Prior to the AJW Group, Ian served as a Senior Vice President at Seabury Aviation & Aerospace
Asia Limited, an investment bank based in Hong Kong, where he opened and developed the firm’s first office
in Asia. Ian also spent eight years in asset finance with the Allco Finance Group of Australia, having joined it
as a tax manager from KPMG. Ian attended New York Law School where he earned his Juris Doctorate and
holds a Bachelor’s degree from Middlebury College in Vermont. Mr Malin has oversight of commercial
activities.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 56
GOVERNANCE
Diarmuid O’Conghaile, Chief Operations Officer
Mr O’Conghaile joined Wizz Air as Managing Director of Wizz Air Malta Limited on 1 November 2022. In July
2024 Diarmuid was promoted to Chief Operating Officer to oversee the Group’s operational activities and
performance. Mr O’Conghaile has a long background in aviation, having served as Chief Executive of the
Irish Aviation Regulator, 2021–2022, and with Ryanair from 2016–2021 as Chief Executive of Malta Air
(Ryanair Group) and before that Director of Public Affairs. Mr O’Conghaile was General Manager of Strategy,
Pricing & Economic Regulation with the Dublin Airport Authority from 2011–2016. He holds BA Mod, MA and
MLitt degrees from Trinity College Dublin in Economics and a postgraduate diploma in EU Competition Law
from King’s College London. Prior to entering the aviation sector, he worked in a number of industry and
government positions, including with the European Commission and the Irish Department of Finance.
Owain Jones, Chief Corporate Officer
Mr Jones joined Wizz Air as General Counsel in September 2010. He was promoted to Chief Corporate
Officer in June 2014 before becoming Managing Director of Wizz Air UK Limited in September 2018 and
Development Officer in September 2021. In his current role from February 2023 he has oversight of
corporate and people matters, together with supply chain, fleet procurement and fleet finance. Mr Jones is a
Solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales. Having trained at Nicholson Graham and Jones (1994 to
1996), Mr Jones joined Wilde Sapte (now Dentons LLP) in 1996 as a Solicitor in its aviation group,
specialising in finance and regulatory matters. He spent time in the firm’s Paris and Hong Kong offices before
being appointed a Partner in 2006, following which he spent three years in the firm’s Abu Dhabi office,
becoming acting Managing Partner there. He left the firm in 2009 to spend 18 months training for a frozen
air transport pilot’s licence with CTC Aviation Training. Mr Jones holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from
University College London.
Michael Berlouis, Financial Operations Officer
Mr Berlouis holds a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from the University of Manchester and a Master’s degree
in Finance and Economics from the London School of Economics and Political Science. He has over 16 years
of management experience in aviation and financial services roles including executive management, financial
management, planning and controlling, transformation, labour and union negotiations, redundancy, debt
renegotiation and stakeholder management. Michael joined Wizz Air in 2021 as Managing Director of Wizz
Air Abu Dhabi, later moving to the position of Head of Strategic projects, Interim Head of Financial Planning
and Controlling and was recently promoted to Financial Operations Officer from 1 July 2024. Prior to Wizz
Air, Mr Berlouis was the CFO of Air Seychelles as well as Senior Manager Corporate Strategy at Etihad. Since
last year, Michael sits on the board of Firefly Green Fuels Limited.
Silvia Mosquera, Commercial Officer
Silvia Mosquera holds the role of Commercial Officer. She joined Wizz in July 2023 from her then position as
Chief Commercial and Revenue Officer at TAP Air Portugal. Silvia is a seasoned executive with over 20 years
of experience in the airline industry and consulting for airlines, with leadership roles across commercial
functions including network, revenue management, sales, marketing and customer experience. She started
at Clickair and moved through various commercial roles in the IAG Group (Clickair, Vueling and Iberia
Express), culminating in CCO of Iberia Express. From there, she moved to Avianca, and then most recently
to TAP Air Portugal where she was the Chief Commercial and Revenue Officer responsible for the commercial
area, including pricing and revenue management, distribution, sales, branding and marketing, ancillaries,
customer service and the loyalty programme. She holds a Chemical Engineering degree from Santiago de
Compostela University and postgraduate certifications from APICS (The Educational Society for Resource
Management) and IESE Business School – University of Navarra.
Ervin Banyai, Group Digital Officer
Mr Banyai joined Wizz Air in February 2024 as a Digital Officer, responsible for e-commerce, data analytics
and automation, IT innovation and infrastructure and cybersecurity functions, reporting to the Company’s
Executive Vice President and Group Chief Financial Officer. Mr Banyai was formerly a member of the
managing board of Raiffeisen Bank Hungary responsible for IT and operations. Prior to this role, Mr Banyai
worked in executive IT roles at various multinational companies including GE Budapest Bank, OTP and
Citibank.
Piotr Trawka, Network Officer
Mr Trawka holds a Master’s degree in Quantitative Methods in Economics and Information Systems from
SGH Warsaw School of Economics. He started his career as Route Network Analyst at EUROLOT, followed by
a Network Planning Specialist at LOT Polish Airlines. He joined Wizz Air in 2016 as Network Development and
Scheduling Manager. In 2018 he was promoted to Senior Network Development Manager and one year later
to Head of Network Development. Since then, he has taken on multiple leadership roles, the most recent
being Network Officer from 1 October 2024.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 57
GOVERNANCE
Roland Tischner, Managing Director Wizz Air Hungary Limited.
Mr Tischner joined Wizz Air as Head of Human Resources in November 2011. Between 1998 and 2009
Mr Tischner held various human resource leadership roles at General Electric in Hungary and in the United
States. In 2009 he joined NBC Universal in the United Kingdom as Vice President of Human Resources.
At Wizz Air, following the human resource role, he was appointed to Head of Cabin Operations in 2016, and
four years later to Head of Ground Operations. He was named Officer Wizz Air Hungary Limited Operations
in June 2022, responsible for flight, cabin and ground operations, crew training, continuing airworthiness
management organisation as well as safety and compliance. Mr Tischner holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in
Business Studies from Oxford Brookes University.
Marion Geoffroy, People Officer
Ms Geoffroy joined Wizz Air as Head of Legal and General Counsel in March 2015. Between 2000 and 2011,
Ms Geoffroy held senior leadership roles in the Legal department of Air France-KLM. In 2011, she joined
Verlingue Insurance Brokers where she served as General Counsel for four years. She was appointed Chief
Corporate Officer of Wizz Air in September 2018 overseeing the Legal, Data Protection and Health and
Safety departments. Ms Geoffroy holds a Master of Laws (LLM) from Paris XI University (France), a Lawyer-
Linguist Master from ISIT (Paris, France), a law degree from Philipps University (Marburg, Germany) and a
Master of Laws (LLM) from McGill University Institute of Air and Space Law (Montreal, Canada). She was
appointed as People Officer in 2025.
András Szabó, Network Officer
Mr. Szabó joined Wizz Air in 2016 and currently holds the position of Network Officer, overseeing the
Group’s Network strategy and development, Scheduling, Slots and Airport development functions. During his
tenure at Wizz Air he held various commercial and financial roles, including Head of Fleet Acquisition and
Head of Network. Before joining Wizz Air he gained experience at Deloitte Central Europe in the fields of
M&A Advisory and Corporate finance. Mr. Szabó holds a Master’s degree in Finance, as well as Bachelor’s
degrees in International Relations and in International Business, each from Corvinus University of Budapest.
Julia Brix, Supply Chain Officer
Ms. Brix joined Wizz Air in 2020 as Head of Technical Services bringing with her more than 15 years of MRO
aviation experience. She was appointed to Supply Chain Officer in 2025, overseeing Fleet Acquisition, Asset
Financing, Technical, Fuel and General Procurement. She trained as a German Economist prior to joining
Wizz Air. Since 2024, she has worked as Head of Fleet Acquisition, designing and executing the fleet
strategy and financing aircraft and major components. Prior to joining Wizz Air, she held various positions at
Lufthansa Technik AG in Controlling, Business Development and Sales in Germany, USA and Singapore. Ms
Brix holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the Hamburg School of Business Administration.
Nóra Viktória Rabe, Corporate and ESG Officer
Ms Rabe joined Wizz Air in 2022 as General Counsel, managing the airline’s legal and regulatory functions.
Prior to joining Wizz Air, she spent 11 years at HungaroControl - Hungarian Air Navigation Services, initially
as Head of the Legal and Regulatory Unit and Deputy to the Chief Legal Officer, and later as Chief Legal
Officer. Earlier in her career, she gained professional experience at Malév Hungarian Airlines as legal
counsel. Ms Rabe holds degrees from Pázmány Péter Catholic University and Corvinus University of
Budapest. The legal, government affairs, corporate communications and ESG teams have reported directly
to Ms. Rabe since February 2026. In addition to leading those teams, she performs the role of Corporate
Secretary to the Board of Directors.
Yvonne Moynihan, Managing Director of Wizz Air UK
Ms Moynihan joined Wizz Air in July 2022 as Corporate Officer and Corporate Secretary to the Board of
Directors, leading the Legal, Regulatory and Government Affairs functions. She took over ESG in March 2023
and Corporate Communications in July 2024. Ms Moynihan is an Irish lawyer with Law degrees from
University College Cork and The Honourable Society of Kings Inns. She has practised as a litigator in the
Irish Courts and held roles as a researcher for the Irish Superior Courts and the European Court of Justice.
Ms Moynihan pivoted into aviation and has a track record in the low-cost industry, having held legal roles in
Ryanair and Vueling, where she held the position of General Counsel and Board Secretary.
Mauro Peneda, Managing Director of Wizz Air Malta
Mr Peneda joined Wizz Air in 2022 as Head of OCC, and was promoted to Managing Director of Wizz Air
Malta Limited from 1 October 2024. Before joining Wizz Air, he served seven years at the LATAM Airlines
Group, where he was most recently the Airports Director of LATAM Brazil. Prior to his time at LATAM, he held
positions with consultancy companies. Mauro holds an MSc in Civil Engineering Instituto Superior Técnico,
Lisbon and an MSc in Complex Transport Infrastructure Systems jointly from Instituto Superior Técnico,
Lisbon and MIT and a Postgraduate Degree in Business Administration from Fundação Dom Cabral, São
Paulo, Brazil.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 58
GOVERNANCE
Attendance at Board meetings
The following table sets out the attendance by Directors at the Board and Committee meetings held during
the 2026 financial year. For completeness, the total for each Director represents the total number of
meetings during the year.
Board
attended/total
Audit and
Risk
attended/
total
Remuneration
attended/total
Nomination
and
Governance
attended/total
Sustainability
and Culture
attended/total
Safety, Security
and Operational
Compliance
attended/total
Financial
Performance
attended/
total
Executive Director
József Váradi
7/7*
6/6*
7/7*
7/7*
6/6*
6/6*
3/3
Non-Executive
Directors
William A. Franke
6/7
7/7
Stephen L. Johnson
7/7
7/7
7/7
3/3
Barry Eccleston
7/7
6/7
7/7
5/6
Andrew S.
Broderick
7/7
6/6
6/6
6/6
3/3
Charlotte Pedersen
7/7
6/6
Charlotte Andsager
7/7
7/7
6/6
Enrique Dupuy de
Lome Chavarri
7/7
6/6
6/7
3/3
Dr Anthony Radev
7/7
7/7
6/6
Anna Gatti
7/7
5/6
6/7
Phit Lian Chong
7/7
6/6
*The Executive Director was invited to attend these various Committee meetings to discuss certain matters, but did not have a
vote. Occasionally, Non-Executive Directors also attend meetings of Committees they are not a member of – these cases are
not reflected in this table.
IMG_5232.jpg
Wizz Air Board of Directors
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 59
GOVERNANCE
REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
IMG_5233.jpg
“The Audit and Risk Committee ensures
proper governance and oversight over the
company risk environment, processes and
controls, while maintaining high standards
for the internal control environment.”
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri
Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee
Introduction
Dear Shareholder,
I am pleased to present the
Audit and Risk Committee (ARC)
Report for the financial year
ended 31 March 2026 .
F26 was a year focusing
continuously on delivering
sustainable financial results, with
focus on the control
environment. We continued to
grow the number of passengers,
made further steps in un-
grounding the fleet as scheduled,
as well as protecting revenue
and market share in our key
geographic areas. We focused on
optimising the business by
delivering higher asset
utilisation, cost control as well as
further enhancements to our 
hedging policy to accomplish this
result. We continued to deliver
on the strategy set in the
previous year, which is focused
on the Central and Eastern
Europe as our core region, as
well as providing connectivity
with key Western European
markets. This strategy and focus
have proven our resilience, as
evidenced in our response to the
Middle East crisis that started at
the end of February 2026.
Main functions of the
Audit and Risk Committee
The Audit and Risk Committee
focuses on developing leading
financial policies, practices,
internal controls and risk
management systems,
consistently evolving to improve
performance and controls as the
Company expands its fleet over
the next decade. Key recurring
topics that the Committee is
focused on are liquidity
management, hedging
strategies, financing,
counterparty risk, cyber risk
management, finance systems,
oversight of Internal Audit, Risk
Map covering key risks and
controls within the Company,
and our relationship with the
external auditors. These are
discussed bi-monthly in the Audit
and Risk Committee meetings,
after which I always provide a
Board update on the key issues
discussed in our meetings. In
addition to the members of the
Audit and Risk Committee, our
meetings are routinely attended
by the Group Chief Financial
Officer, Finance Operations
Officer, Digital Officer, Senior
Internal Audit Manager, the
Senior Audit Partner and other
senior members of the External
Audit team from our auditors,
PwC. In addition, other senior
executives are invited to attend
meetings, as required, to provide
the Committee with a deeper
level of insight on relevant
matters.
Membership, meetings
and attendance
The Committee consists of three
Non-Executive Directors,
appointed by the Board
according to experience,
commitment and capacity. The
Company Secretary acts as
Secretary to the Committee and
relevant members of the senior
leadership team are invited to
attend meetings.
The Corporate Governance Code
recommends that the Audit and
Risk Committee should comprise
at least three members, who
should all be independent
Non‑Executive Directors, and
that at least one member should
have recent and relevant
financial experience. During the
financial year ended
31 March 2026, the membership
of the Committee comprised
three members. Committee
Members and their attendance in
Audit and Risk Committee
meetings (attended / total) are
listed below:
a) Enrique Dupuy de Lome
Chavarri (Chairman).
Attendance: 7/7
b) Anna Gatti. Attendance: 6/7
c) Phit Lian Chong.
Attendance: 7/7
Stephen L. Johnson and Andrew
Broderick attend the Committee
as observers. The terms of
reference of the Committee are
available at:
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 60
GOVERNANCE
All the members are independent
Non-Executive Directors, have
appropriate knowledge and
understanding of financial
matters, and have commercial
expertise gained in industries
with similar characteristics,
giving the ARC as a whole
competence relevant to the
sector in which the Group
operates. No members of the
Committee have links to the
Company’s external auditors.
The Company therefore
considers that it complies with
the Corporate Governance Code
recommendation regarding the
composition of the Committee.
Activities
Risk management
Details of our governance
structure can be found in the
Emerging and Principal Risks and
Uncertainties section of this
Annual Report. While the Board
is responsible for the Group’s
risk management, the Audit and
Risk Committee supports the
Board by monitoring the
adequacy and effectiveness of
the Group’s systems and controls
to ensure they are effective and
operate as intended. This
Committee carries out the review
on behalf of the Board ensuring
that the Board maintains
effective oversight of financial
reporting and risk management
and that it deems the internal
controls to be sufficient and
effective, ensuring the long-term
integrity and viability of the
business. The day-to-day
management of risk is delegated
to the Leadership Team, which is
responsible for implementing risk
management procedures,
ensuring compliance with these
procedures and reporting back to
the Committee on risk exposures
and mitigation activities.
The Group’s comprehensive
Enterprise Risk Management
(ERM) process, which identifies
and collects risks within our risk
universe and groups them into
risk categories, allows risks to be
analysed for likelihood and
impact. In particular:
▶ each risk identified was
considered in detail in terms
of the inherent risk, existing
mitigating measures and
residual risk, along with a
determination of how each
risk should be dealt with in
accordance with the
Company’s risk appetite;
▶ the resulting risk register
was then used to prepare a
Principal Risk Report. Each
risk owner is required to
review each risk at least
semi-annually;
▶ key members of the
Company’s senior leadership
team review the risk register
as well as the emerging and
principal risks and
uncertainties report at least
semi-annually, and share
them with the Board;
▶ the Committee, among other
things, approves changes to
the emerging and principal
risks and uncertainties
report, including updates
and consequent mitigating
actions; and
▶ the principal risk report,
once approved by the
Committee, is delivered to
the Board as a whole for
approval.
The Committee reviews the
Company’s risk register twice a
year and assesses whether its
risk management systems align
with the Financial Reporting
Council’s (FRC) Guidance on Risk
Management, Internal Control
and Related Financial and
Business Reporting.
Both at the half-year and at the
year end the Committee
concluded that the Company’s
risk management and internal
control systems are in
accordance with applicable
guidance. No significant failings
or weaknesses were identified in
the review process.
Climate risks
The Company’s financial
disclosures follow the
recommendations established by
the Task Force on Climate-
related Financial Disclosures
(TCFD), for use by companies in
providing information to
investors and other stakeholders
about their climate-related
financial risks and opportunities.
Since F21, the Company’s
disclosures have been consistent
with the TCFD recommendations
and during F26 we further
improved our disclosures. These
improvements versus last year
include, amongst others:
▶ the continuous development
of our climate risk
assessment approach and its
effectiveness in supporting
the organisation’s resilience.
We continue to work with
expert sustainability and
climate consultants from
KPMG Hungary who support
our materiality and heat
mapping processes. Climate
risk assessment is a
recurring exercise, and
based on updated scientific
forecasts or new policies, the
risks and their impact
evaluation were revised.
Following qualitative scenario
analysis, based on TCFD
recommendations, the key
risks retained were also
quantified;
▶ the cooperation with third-
party sustainability
consultants Climate Partner
to assess Wizz Air’s
greenhouse gas inventory
and calculate its emissions
(Scope 1, 2 and 3) based on
recognised standards; and
▶ the appointment of a third
party, PwC Hungary, for the
limited assurance of the
Company’s carbon footprint
and greenhouse gas
emissions reporting for F26.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 61
GOVERNANCE
Cyber Risks Review
The Committee continued to
review regular updates from
management on the Company’s
position with respect to
cybersecurity and on the actions
implemented or planned to
mitigate cyber risks, even more
so given a continued rise in
cyber activity in the industry and
in the Company’s supply chain.
The Digital Officer provides an
update on cybersecurity at each
Committee meeting, with ad hoc
updates as needed. These
reports provide the Committee
with information on compliance
progress, cyber monitoring and
any notable incidents.
Internal Audit and effectiveness
The purpose of Wizz Air’s
Internal Audit function is to
provide independent, objective
assurance and internal
consulting services designed to
add value and improve the
operations of all the entities and
functions within the Group. The
Senior Internal Audit Manager is
responsible for the proper
operation of Wizz Air’s Internal
Audit function and actively
involves outsourced service
provider(s) to perform mainly
assurance projects, and to a
limited extent consulting
services.
The Internal Audit Plan
The Senior Internal Audit
Manager prepares a risk-based
plan of internal audits for the
upcoming year, which is
approved by the Audit and Risk
Committee.
This Internal Audit Plan covers:
▶ internal audits over
operational processes;
▶ fraud-specific audits to be
performed by the designated
Anti-fraud and Investigations
Manager under the
supervision of the Senior
Internal Audit Manager; and
▶ a periodic review of the
Internal Controls over
Financial Reporting (ICFR)
improvement project. The
plan is supervised by the
Senior Internal Audit
Manager, who reports
directly to the Chairman of
the Committee as well as
having an administrative
reporting line to the
Company’s Chief Financial
Officer.
Each audit and project is
preceded by a detailed scoping
and resource planning exercise,
which forms the basis of the
procedures. Following the
completion of an internal audit or
a fraud-specific audit, a report is
compiled which sets out the
findings, makes
recommendations for process
improvements and presents the
improvement actions already
undertaken by management.
These reports are submitted and
presented to the Audit and Risk
Committee for discussion, input
and approval. The Chairman
subsequently provides the Board
with details of the internal audit
and fraud investigation reports
completed.
Internal Audit tracks and verifies
that any recommendations as a
result of the Internal Audit Plan
or the external audit work are
being implemented, and reports
back to the Audit and Risk
Committee on the status of such
implementation.
To broaden the perspective of
the Internal Audit function, Wizz
Air has been a member of the
International Association of
Airline Internal Auditors (IAAIA)
since January 2024, to exchange
information on challenges and
best practices. The association
offers many benefits with the
membership, such as an audit
tool licence, benchmarks specific
to the airline industry, key
Internal Audit department
initiatives across education,
automation and methodology
pillars, and audit plan priorities.
Based on all the interactions with
the Senior Internal Audit
Manager and the reviews of the
internal audit work, the
Committee concluded that the
Company’s Internal Audit
function is effective in the
context of the Company’s overall
risk management system.
Anti-Fraud
Wizz Air’s Anti-Fraud function
continued developing its anti-
fraud framework to be aligned
with international anti-fraud
requirements and good
practices.
The Anti-Fraud and
Investigations Manager functions
as the second line of defence
while monitoring and supporting
other Wizz Air personnel and
departments in ensuring that
business operations and
operational tasks are performed
in alignment with the established
anti-fraud programme and
policy.
To complement the development
of our anti-fraud framework, we
decided to enter the European
Airlines Fraud Prevention Group
and the Anti-Fraud and
Investigations Manager
increased her involvement in the
UK Airlines Fraud Forum as well
to exchange information on
challenges and best practices.
The regular meetings focus on
discussing fraud trends and
exploring methods to counter or
prevent emerging fraudulent
activities.
Reporting procedures and
controls
Management is responsible for
internal controls over financial
reporting for the Group. Each
month a summary of the Group’s
financial results (actual and
forecast) is shared. At least
annually, the Board reviews the
strategic plan for the Company
and, following that strategic
review, conducts an assessment
of the mid-term financial plan for
the Company separately.
The controls over the integrity of
financial reports include,
amongst others, reconciliation of
key balances, variance analysis
to forecast and previous-year
results, as well as review
meetings within the Finance and
Accounting team and with the
respective business owners,
including the Leadership Team.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 62
GOVERNANCE
The Annual Report is produced
by the Group Accounting team
based on the reports from
several departments across the
Company, including Investor
Relations, Financial Planning and
Controlling, Treasury, Internal
Audit, Legal, HR, Corporate
Office, Commercial and
Customer Experience,
Sustainability and Operations.
Their submissions are reviewed
thoroughly prior to inclusion,
independently validated by the
Accounting team and reviewed
by the respective Officers.
The Company has continued
working to improve its financial
reporting operation with a focus
on digitalising manual
transactions allowing a higher
pixelation of data and shorter
lead times, leveraging the
opportunities highlighted as part
of the Company’s ICFR
improvement project and some
of the best technology available.
During F26, designing of the
main elements of the ICFR and
Material Controls policy –
including Roles and
Responsibilities, control self-
assessment, issue reporting and
tracking – was completed.
Implementation of the roles and
self-assessment process is in
progress. The advisor (KPMG)
completed the design
documentation of the ICFR
controls identified during the
process interviews, and review of
the controls is in progress by
Management. During F27, KPMG
will continue to provide
consultancy services regarding
the ongoing ICFR improvement
and Material Controls project
supporting management and the
Audit and Risk Committee to
maintain effective oversight on
financial reporting, risk
management and effective
internal controls, and to prepare
for and adopt the improved FRC
internal control, assurance and
resilience requirements over the
course of F27.
Financial information flow
An annual operating plan (OP) is
produced and monthly results
are reported against this. The OP
is prepared using a bottom-up
approach, determined by a high-
level assessment of market and
economic conditions. The Audit
and Risk Committee reviews the
OP and provides comments and
recommendations to the Board
from the perspective of accuracy
and appropriate financial and
market risks.
Management performs a Group
consolidation monthly with a
month-end pack that includes
the income statement, balance
sheet analysis along with key
performance indicators and a
cash flow statement for every
quarter end, which are reviewed
by the Leadership Team and the
Board. Actual results are
compared against the Group’s
plan and a monthly forecast is
prepared and compared against
both the plan and the prior
forecast. A narrative is provided
by management to explain
significant variances.
The Audit and Risk Committee
reviews and approves all interim
and annual financial statements,
as well as the content of the
Company’s Annual Report. The
Company’s external auditors
provide the Audit and Risk
Committee with a briefing on
any issues arising during their
audit. The Committee also
reviews and approves any
regulatory announcements that
are made in connection with
such financial information. It is
only after the Committee’s
approval that statements are put
to the Board as a whole for
approval.
With regard to our reporting
procedures and the financial
controls over these procedures,
the Committee concludes that
the Company produces
comprehensive financial
statements and other financial
reporting and disclosures,
leveraging adequate and
effective reporting processes,
systems and controls.
Assess the Group’s going
concern and viability statements
The Directors must satisfy
themselves as to the Group’s
viability and confirm that they
have a reasonable expectation it
will continue to operate and
meet its liabilities as they fall
due. The period over which the
Directors have determined it is
appropriate to assess the
prospects of the Group has been
defined as three years, aligned
with the mid-term plan. In
addition, the Directors must
consider if the going concern
assumption remains appropriate.
The Committee reviewed
management’s schedules
supporting the going concern
assessment and viability
statement.
These included the Group’s Mid-
Term Plan (MTP) and cash flow
forecasts for the period to March
2029. The Committee discussed
with management the
appropriateness of the three-
year period, and discussed the
correlation with the Group’s
principal risks and uncertainties
as disclosed on pages 19 to 27.
The feasibility of mitigating
actions and the potential speed
of implementation to achieve any
flexibility required were
discussed. Scenarios covering
events that could adversely
impact the Group were
considered. The Committee
evaluated the conclusions over
going concern and viability and
the proposed disclosures, and
satisfied itself that the Annual
Report and Accounts
appropriately reflect the
conclusions.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 63
GOVERNANCE
Relationship with external
auditors
With the completion of the F26
audit, PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP have been the auditors of
the Company for 19 years
uninterrupted, covering the
years ended 31 March 2008 to
31 March 2026. The Committee
carefully considered the
performance of the external
auditors and the quality and
effectiveness of the external
audit process. In line with the
FRC’s Audit Quality Practice Aid
for audit committees, the
Committee reviewed materials
from independent sources,
including the Adviser Rankings
Guide, to gain additional insights
into the effectiveness and quality
of the external auditors.
As a normal responsibility of the
Audit and Risk Committee, we
have regular correspondence
and discussions with the
engagement partner of the
Group’s external auditors, Mr
Jason Burkitt, of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(PwC), outside the formal cycle
of Committee meetings.
External audit plan and fees
The Committee approved the
fees to be paid and the external
audit plan for the F26 financial
year, and reviewed the reports
of the auditors on the half-year
review and annual audit.
The audit of the F26 financial
statements and the review of the
half-year financial statements
were all completed on time and
to a high standard, and
addressed the key issues arising
from the Company’s business
that could have a material
impact on the financial
statements.
The Committee had a number of
interactions with PwC during the
audit process and obtained
feedback from the Group Finance
team on their performance.
Based on this the Committee
noted that PwC’s focus was
aligned to their audit plan, which
the Committee had previously
approved. The Committee is
satisfied that PwC appropriately
challenged management during
the audit process, robustly but
constructively, and remained
sceptical in their approach as
well as reporting their findings
transparently to the Committee.
External audit non-audit
services and independence
A primary focus of the
Committee is to ensure the
independence of the Company’s
external auditors. The
Committee reviewed the
independence letter of the
auditors and considered, in
particular, the non-audit services
performed and the non-audit
fees paid to the external auditors
during the year (see Note 7 to
the financial statements). The
Audit and Risk Committee was
satisfied that non-audit services
and fees did not compromise the
objectivity and independence of
the auditors. Furthermore, non-
audit fees have been on a
declining trend for several years,
both in terms of their absolute
amount and as a proportion to
audit fees. As a result, non-audit
fees earned by PwC in F26 were
materially less than the audit
fees. Details of non-audit fees
paid to the auditors are set out
on page 139.
The last external audit services
tender was conducted in the
summer of 2017, when
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
were re-appointed to perform
the external audit for five years
(2018–2022). The Company
confirms compliance with the
provisions of the Statutory Audit
Services for Large Companies
Market Investigation Order 2014
relating to tendering. The
Company tested the market
early again in 2021 and
concluded that PwC will be
proposed to remain as auditors
until F27 and the next tender
process will be scheduled during
calendar year 2026, to award
the auditors in charge for the
year ending 31 March 2028. This
tender process is currently in
progress.
Significant matters relating to
the Annual Report
In the course of preparing the
Company’s financial statements,
the following issues, among
others, were considered by the
Committee, relying on its
professional and industry
experience, and constantly
challenging management’s
judgement:
▶ The continued uncertainty
around the geopolitical
situation including the
impact on commodity
markets required a review of
the going concern
assumptions and the viability
statement. The Committee
participated in reviews and
analysis of the assumptions
and methodologies used by
management in undertaking
the work required to provide
the forecasts to underpin the
going concern and viability
statements.
As a result of the
assumptions, methodology
review and discussions with
the management, the
Committee determined that
the positions adopted by
management on these issues
were appropriate.
▶ The review of the hedging
policy for jet fuel purchases
and associated USD foreign
exchange exposure for the
Company. The Board
approved a reinstatement of
its hedging policy in F23 and
this remains in effect. The
Committee is briefed each
time management proposes
adding additional hedges,
including the details of such
hedges, the conformity of
these hedges with policy and
the achieved outcome of any
prior approved hedge
requests. The policy and its
efficacy are reviewed at each
Committee meeting. The
policy and established
process have proven to be
efficient and important at a
time of increased fuel and FX
volatility caused by the
Middle East crisis towards
the end of F26.
▶ The review of cross currency
interest rate swap contracts
that are used to manage
currency risk stemming from
USD lease liability exposure,
following the Board’s
approval in October 2024 of
a USD Lease Liabilities
Economic Hedging Policy.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 64
GOVERNANCE
▶ Capital commitments and
financing: the Committee
undertook a detailed review
of the Company’s capital
commitments. The
Committee and the Board of
Directors reviewed in detail
the working capital
assessment led by the
Company and noted that
management had secured,
or will generate, sufficient
trading cash flow over the
term covered by the going
concern period to meet its
obligations as they fall due.
▶ The Committee reviewed
treasury risk management
policies and suggested
enhancements around
controls over counterparty
credit limits.
▶ The Committee reviews the
status of the Company’s
tax returns and tax audits
in the key jurisdictions it
operates in.
▶ The impact of the latest
Middle East crisis: The
Committee increased its
scrutiny towards the Group’s
financial forecasts, execution
of hedging policy steps and
discipline in cash flow
preservation.
The Committee also considered
whether the Annual Report, as
written by the respective
business or subject-matter
owners, taken as a whole, was
fair, balanced and
understandable, and whether it
provided the necessary
information for Shareholders to
assess the Company’s financial
position, performance, business
model and strategy. In reaching
its judgement the Committee
reviewed all the issues that had
been raised by both
management and the external
auditors during the audit process
and at other times during the
year, and debated whether they
had been fully, fairly and clearly
disclosed and discussed in the
Annual Report. The Committee
also considered whether
appropriate emphasis was placed
on each issue. At the conclusion
of this process the Committee,
together with Company
Management and Board of
Directors, determined that the
Annual Report taken as a whole
is indeed fair, balanced and
understandable, and
recommended it to the Board for
approval.
Other matters considered and
monitored during the year
▶ The Company repaid its EUR
bond in January 2026.
▶ The Company renewed the
Euro Medium Term Note
Program with the total
amount of EUR 3bn, for the
possibility of future EUR
Bond issuance in December
2025.
▶ The Company’s revised
aircraft delivery and PDP
payment profile with Airbus.
▶ The Company’s credit rating
with Fitch was downgraded
to BB, and the credit rating
by Moody’s to Ba2.
▶ Work continues on anti-fraud
and ICFR matters, as well as
Provision 29 Compliance,
identifying and implementing
further defense processes
and framework in these
matters. The anti-fraud
framework focuses on
further strengthening the IT
solutions in prevention and
identification of fraud (e.g.
payment systems and card
fraud prevention). The Audit
and Risk Committee was
presented regularly with
progress in this matter.
▶ Cyber Security – compliance
with NIS2 framework,
introduction of new controls
and processes under Cyber
Security programs. Specific
controls related to access
management, software
development lifecycle,
vulnerability management
have been added and are
monitored, strengthening the
Company’s Cyber defense
mechanism. The Committee
receives regular reports on
the progress made in this
area.
▶ Future UK Code framework
(Material Risk and Control
concept) – material risk
identification, through
aggregation of risks collected
in the ERM cycle, was
performed. The focus has
been placed on developing a
detailed plan outlining the
roadmap and key
deliverables to achieve
compliance with Provision 29
of the UK Corporate
Governance Code.
▶ The Committee was
regularly briefed on matters
pertaining to Pratt & Whitney
engine performance
challenges and agreements
negotiated to mitigate the
costs to the Company.
Enrique Dupuy de Lome
Chavarri
Chairman of the Audit
and Risk Committee
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 65
GOVERNANCE
REPORT OF THE CHAIR OF THE SAFETY, SECURITY AND
OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
Charlotte Pedersen.jpg
“Aviation safety is of utmost importance,
particularly during periods when the industry is
under heightened scrutiny. The Committee has
actively promoted the sharing of knowledge and
best practices.”
Charlotte Pedersen
Chair of the Safety, Security and
Operational Compliance Committee
Dear Shareholder,
I am pleased to present the
report of the Wizz Air Safety,
Security and Operational
Compliance Committee for the
year ended 31 March 2026. This
report outlines the various tasks
and initiatives undertaken by the
Committee throughout the year.
The Wizz Air Group comprises
three airlines and Aircraft
Operator Certificates (AOCs)
with individual safety
responsibilities, regulatory
frameworks and reporting
obligations. There is also a newly
established central organisation
(Wizz Air Aviation Services
(WAAS)), which provides CAMO,
Engineering, Maintenance &
Technical services to Wizz Air
Hungary and Wizz Air Malta, and
support services to Wizz Air UK,
which operates its own CAMO
function.
The respective AOCs are
regulated by the European Union
Aviation Safety Agency and the
UK Civil Aviation Authority. The
Committee reviews the Group’s
safety management systems and
standards in respect of AOC
structures, which include a
rigorous focus on aviation safety
and security, ensuring
compliance with all regulatory
frameworks and maintaining the
highest standards of operational
integrity.
Ensuring safety is central to Wizz
Air’s operations and stands as
our utmost priority. In the
current fiscal year, Wizz Air was
proud to be recognised as one of
the safest airlines in the world by
AirlineRatings.com – ranking
among the top ten safest low-
cost airlines globally, and within
the top three in Europe. Wizz Air
was also awarded the prestigious
IOSA SEMS certification,
achieving the highest possible
entry level.
At Wizz Air, safety remains our
foremost commitment. The
Committee recognises the
Group’s mature safety culture,
underpinned by well developed
Safety Management Systems
across all  Group Airlines. It
further acknowledges the active
sharing of knowledge and best
practices within the Group, in
alignment with leading industry
standards, as well as the
systematic review of external
aviation events occurring during
the reporting period to identify
opportunities for continuous
improvements.
The robust reporting practices
within the organisation reflect a
strong commitment to aviation’s
Just Culture, enhancing our
confidence in the Company’s
safety management system. This
has been evident from the
standing reports of the AOC
Managing Directors of the
Company at each Committee
meeting.
The Company continued to
navigate operational disruptions
arising from ongoing geopolitical
tensions across its network. In
particular, conflicts in the Middle
East necessitated periodic
adjustments to flight operations
to ensure the safety of
passengers and crew. While
these disruptions were managed
proactively, they underscored
the persistent challenges posed
by regional instability and the
importance of agile and
responsive operational planning.
The Committee, in collaboration
with the Group Managing
Director, Chief Operations
Officer, Central Operations
Officer, Safety, Security and
Compliance Managers, and the
Managing Directors of the AOCs,
plays an important supporting
role in maintaining the Group’s
strong safety record. The
Committee supports the Board
by focusing on the Group’s
policies, practices, objectives and
performance in relation to
safety, security and operational
compliance. This focus is
particularly valuable during
periods of geopolitical instability,
and in the context of significant
change projects, e.g. network
expansion, volume growth,
system changes, AOC closure,
introduction of new aircraft type,
namely the Airbus A321NEO XLR
aircraft, which was inducted into
the airline in May 2025.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 66
GOVERNANCE
In my capacity as Chair, I ensure
the Board receives regular
updates and that all Directors
are equipped with relevant
safety-related materials and
information. This supports
informed oversight and facilitates
robust knowledge sharing across
key areas including safety,
security, regulatory compliance
and the performance of the
Group’s Safety Management
System, encompassing
Compliance Monitoring.
Membership, meetings
and attendance
• Charlotte Pedersen (Chair)
• Barry Eccleston
• Andrew S. Broderick
The Committee consists of
three Non-Executive Directors,
appointed by the Board
according to experience,
expertise and capacity.
The Company Secretary acts
as Secretary to the Committee
and relevant members of the
senior leadership team, and the
different AOCs are invited to
attend meetings.
The terms of reference of the
Committee are available at:
The Committee convened six
times during the year focusing
on the following key activities:
• received regular updates on
risks related to airspace
security and geopolitical
matters;
• received regular updates on
the measures implemented to
mitigate the impact of aircraft
groundings resulting from the
Pratt & Whitney engine recall;
• reviewed the risk management
framework associated with the
implementation of new
operational systems;
• reviewed the safety objectives’
achievements for F25 and the
plan for F26, encompassing
growth risk management,
winter performance and the
CAMO organisation;
• received regular reports on
safety performance, audit
findings and incidents; and
• received regular updates from
the AOC Managing Directors.
Key activities
Operational stability
The Committee was pleased to
oversee significant
improvements in the stability of
the Group’s operations, which
contributed to robust operational
results and ultimately reduced
disruption for its valued
customers. Notable
improvements were recorded in
both completion rates and on-
time performance. The
Committee commended the
Company’s internal initiatives to
drive operational performance,
such as Every Minute Matters
and the newly established
ground-handling academy.
The Company continues to face a
unique operational challenge
arising from the engine recall by
its engine supplier, Pratt &
Whitney, resulting in the
grounding of a number of
aircraft. The management of
engine removals and inspections,
together with the mitigations
introduced to ensure the
continued safety of operations,
remains a standing agenda item
at each Committee meeting. The
Committee also directed
attention towards operational
readiness for growth, in
anticipation of the resolution of
the Pratt & Whitney engine
supply issues.
Risk management
The Committee received regular
updates on safety risks and
incidents, including how these
were addressed by the Group
and the respective AOCs. It also
assessed the effectiveness of
risk-mitigation strategies and the
corrective actions implemented
in response to audit findings.
The Committee’s recognition of
the strong reporting levels to the
Board reflects the Company’s
dedication to safety,
transparency, and a culture of
continuous improvement. It
further demonstrates the
collective commitment to
building a safer and more
resilient aviation environment
across the Group.
Security challenges
The Committee received regular
updates on the ongoing
monitoring and risk management
efforts concerning physical
security threats, particularly in
light of the Group’s network
proximity to active conflict
zones. During the reporting
period, operations to a number
of affected destinations in the
Middle East were temporarily
suspended as a precautionary
measure. Throughout the period
of suspension, management
consistently briefed the
Committee on security
evaluations and actively
coordinated with the relevant
safety and regulatory authorities.
The Committee was fully assured
that the safety of Wizz Air’s
crews and passengers remains
the foremost priority across all
operations.
The Company continued to
monitor developments in Ukraine
closely, where the airspace
remains closed as at the date of
reporting. The Committee was
briefed on the Company’s
contingency plans for a potential
ceasefire scenario. Engagement
with key Ukrainian stakeholders
– including airport authorities,
the civil aviation authority,
relevant ministries and air
navigation service providers –
remained ongoing. The
Committee also received regular
updates on security assessments
and operational reviews to
support a safe and timely return
to service when conditions
permit.
Going forward
The Committee will maintain its
focus on the development and
implementation of policies,
standards and processes aligned
with global best practices in the
airline industry, particularly in
view of the Group’s continued
expansion into new regions
characterised by diverse
regulatory environments.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 67
GOVERNANCE
In the forthcoming financial year,
the Committee will continue to
provide oversight of safety and
security risks, particularly in light
of ongoing geopolitical
developments. In addition, the
Committee intends to assess the
operational and compliance risks
associated with the anticipated
acceleration of growth following
the resolution of the Pratt &
Whitney engine supply issue.
In closing, I would like to
express my sincere gratitude to
the exceptional people of Wizz
Air, whose dedication and
professionalism continue to be
the foundation of our success. In
particular, I wish to recognise
the Group Operations team, the
Training Department, and AOC
management whose unwavering
commitment to operational
excellence and safety has been
instrumental in delivering a safe
and reliable service to our
customers. Their resilience and
dedication in navigating the
significant challenges posed by
engineering disruptions and
geopolitical developments, is a
testament to the outstanding
calibre of our people and the
strength of our safety culture.
Charlotte Pedersen
Chair of the Safety,
Security and Operational
Compliance Committee
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 68
GOVERNANCE
REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
William A. Franke.jpg
“Over the past year, the Committee continued
to play a key role in strengthening governance
practices and supporting leadership
development across the Group.”
William A. Franke
Chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee
Introduction
Dear Shareholder,
I am pleased to present the
Nomination and Governance
Committee Report for the
financial year ended 31 March
2026. Over the past year, the
Committee continued to play a
key role in strengthening
governance practices and
supporting leadership
development across the Group.
While there were no changes to
the overall composition of the
Board during the year, the
Committee approved several
important enhancements to
Board roles and senior leadership
structure.
The Nomination and Governance
Committee assists the Board in
fulfilling its responsibilities
related to Board and senior
management composition. This
includes evaluating the balance
of skills, experience and
knowledge; reviewing Board
structure and effectiveness; and
overseeing succession planning
and appointments. The
Committee makes informed
recommendations to ensure
strong, diverse and future-ready
leadership.
We are satisfied that the
composition of the Board aligns
with the gender diversity and
ethnic representation objectives
outlined in the UK Listing Rules,
the FTSE Women Leaders
Review, and the Parker Review.
The Committee conducted an
internal evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Board, its
Committees, members and
processes in accordance with
corporate governance standards.
Further details of the reviews,
conclusions and
recommendations can be found
on page 46.
Membership, meetings
and attendance
• William A. Franke (Chairman)
• Charlotte Andsager
• Barry Eccleston
• Enrique Dupuy
The Committee consists of four
Non-Executive Directors with
three of the Directors being
independent. Stephen L. Johnson
attends the Committee as an
observer. The Company
Secretary acts as Secretary to
the Committee and relevant
members of the senior
leadership team are invited to
attend meetings.
The terms of reference of the
Committee can be found at:
The Committee had seven
meetings during the year
and focused on the following
activities:
• reviewed and approved
changes to the Board
Committees;
• approved changes to the
senior leadership team and
new Officer appointments;
• commenced an annual Board
review process; and
• considered talent, succession
planning and diversity of the
senior leadership team.
Key activities
Board composition
In accordance with the UK
Corporate Governance Code, the
Committee considered and
proposed the establishment of a
non-statutory Financial
Performance Committee to the
Board. Andrew S. Broderick was
appointed as member and Chair,
while Enrique Dupuy de Lome
Chavarri was appointed as a
member of the Financial
Performance Committee.
Stephen L. Johnson was
appointed as an observer of the
Financial Performance
Committee.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 69
GOVERNANCE
Management changes
During the year, the Committee
oversaw a number of changes
within the senior leadership
team, combining internal
mobility with targeted external
recruitment. Ian Malin
transitioned from Chief Financial
Officer to Chief Commercial
Officer, and was succeeded by
Veronika Spanarova, who joined
the Company as Chief Financial
Officer. Marion Geoffroy moved
from her role as Managing
Director of Wizz Air UK to People
Officer. Yvonne Moynihan,
previously Corporate & ESG
Officer, was appointed as
Managing Director of Wizz Air
UK, while Nóra Viktória Rabe was
promoted from Head of Legal
and General Counsel to
Corporate & ESG Officer. Julia
Brix was promoted from Head of
Fleet Acquisition to the newly
established Supply Chain Officer
role. Andras Szabó advanced
from Head of Network East to
Commercial Officer for Central
and Eastern Europe and the
Middle East, and later in the year
assumed the role of Network
Officer. Piotr Trawka transitioned
from Commercial Officer Western
Europe to Revenue Officer.
Re-election
In accordance with the UK
Corporate Governance Code and
the Company’s articles, each
Director is required to retire by
rotation and seek election or re-
election annually at the
Company’s AGM. The Board,
with the support of the
Committee, recommends the re-
election of all Non-Executive
Directors at the upcoming AGM.
The Committee and Board are
satisfied that the Non-Executive
Directors have discharged their
duties effectively and
demonstrate the requisite mix of
skills and time commitment
relevant.
External appointments
After a Director is appointed, any
proposed additional external
roles are subject to review by
the Committee. The purpose is
to ensure that these additional
responsibilities will not hinder a
Director’s ability to fulfil their
role within the Company.
The Board also regularly
assesses Directors’ interests and
commitments during Board
meetings. Based on this
evaluation, it has determined
that each Non-Executive Director
has adequate time to fulfil their
duties, considering their external
appointments and commitments. 
Induction and training
Our standard induction
procedures for newly appointed
Directors involve personalised
meetings with senior executives.
Additionally, Directors visit the
headquarters in Budapest.
The induction programmes are
customised to align with each
Director’s unique background
and experience. These
procedures complement existing
practices, where Non-Executive
Directors engage in relevant
business activities such as
employee interactions, and
participation in brand events.
Diversity and inclusion
Consistent with the Company’s
Diversity and Inclusion Policy,
the Board and Committee are
committed to improving diversity
on the Board as well as
supporting female representation
on the Board and senior
leadership team. Due
consideration is afforded to all
aspects of diversity, including
gender and social and ethnic
backgrounds. The Committee is
mindful of the recommendations
of the Financial Conduct
Authority, the UK FTSE Women
Leaders Review and the Parker
Review. In line with the
Company’s policy on diversity,
new appointments to the Board
will track best practice
guidelines.
The Board has 36 per cent
female representation, two of
whom are Chairs of the
Sustainability and Culture
Committee and the Safety,
Security and Operational
Compliance Committee,
respectively. The Senior
Independent Non-Executive
Director is also a female. The
Board also complies with the
requirement to have at least one
Director reflecting ethnic
diversity. The Committee is
pleased to confirm the latter
objective has been met with the
appointment of Phit Lian Chong.
Diversity and inclusion are
embedded in the senior
management’s incentive
programme; the Committee
recognises the value of broader
diversity including nationality.
With over 100 nationalities
already working for the Company
– and with eight nationalities
represented on the Board and
eleven on the Company’s strong
Leadership Team – the
Committee will continue to
ensure that the Company
remains a diverse organisation
that represents the communities
both within the Company and
those we serve.
In March 2026, to celebrate
International Women’s Day, the
Company continued its Women
on Air event, to promote gender
diversity in the aviation industry
and to support and thank the
accomplished female leaders in
various roles within Wizz Air. The
event underscores Wizz Air’s
broader commitment to fostering
diversity and inclusion.
William A. Franke
Chairman of the Nomination
and Governance Committee
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 70
GOVERNANCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
photo (3).png
“Management has implemented decisive
strategic actions to strengthen the long-term
positioning of the Group …  Throughout the
year the Company remained focused on
improving operational resilience, maintaining
financial discipline and allocating capital and
capacity to those markets where Wizz Air’s
ultra-low-cost model can generate
sustainable returns.”
Barry Eccleston
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
Introduction
Dear Shareholder,
I am pleased to present the Directors’ Remuneration Report (“DRR”) for the financial year ended
31 March 2026 (F26). This report includes a detailed account of how we implemented the Company’s
Remuneration Policy over the past financial year and the planned policy implementation for the financial year
ending on 31 March 2027 (F27). For ease of reference, the Remuneration Policy as it was presented and
approved by Shareholders at the 2024 AGM held on 25 September 2024 is also included in full.
Over the past twelve months, management has implemented decisive strategic actions to strengthen the
long-term positioning of the Group while navigating the operational constraints that have affected the
aviation industry more broadly. Throughout the year the Company remained focused on improving
operational resilience, maintaining financial discipline and allocating capital and capacity to those markets
where Wizz Air’s ultra-low-cost model can generate sustainable returns.
A number of important strategic decisions were communicated to investors during the year. In July 2025,
the Company announced the decision to cease operations of its Middle Eastern joint venture, Wizz Air Abu
Dhabi, with flights ending on 1 September 2025. The decision followed a review of the operating
environment in the region, which had become increasingly challenging due to geopolitical instability,
regulatory constraints and operational factors that limited the long-term viability of the low-cost model in
that market. Management concluded that resources would be better deployed in the Company’s core
European markets, where the Group continues to see stronger structural growth opportunities.
The year also saw continued optimisation of the Company’s European network. In September 2025,
following a strategic review of the Austrian market, the Company announced the phased closure of its base
at Vienna, with operations gradually winding down between October 2025 and March 2026. The decision
reflected rising operating costs and intense competition in the market and forms part of the Company’s
broader strategy of redeploying aircraft into markets where the Company’s cost advantage and network
strength provide greater long-term potential.
At the same time, the Group continued to expand its footprint in several high-growth regions. During the
year, Wizz Air opened new bases in Yerevan, Bratislava and Tuzla, strengthening the Company’s presence in
Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. The launch of the Yerevan base in particular represented an
important step in expanding connectivity between the region and Western Europe, with the base supporting
multiple new routes and increased seat capacity.
Operationally, the year continued to be shaped by the industry-wide supply-chain constraints and engine
maintenance requirements that have affected the Airbus A320neo family across multiple airlines. As
previously communicated to investors, a portion of the Group’s fleet remained temporarily grounded due to
ongoing maintenance requirements associated with the geared turbofan engines, although the number of
aircraft grounded has continued to decrease year-on-year.
Against this backdrop, the Company also achieved several important milestones. During the year the Group
welcomed the delivery of its 250th aircraft, further reinforcing Wizz Air’s position as one of Europe’s fastest-
growing airlines with one of the youngest and most fuel-efficient fleets in the industry. Fleet modernisation
remains a key component of the Company’s strategy, supporting both cost leadership and sustainability
objectives.
Wizz Air continued to demonstrate the resilience of its ultra-low-cost business model, maintaining strong
liquidity and balance sheet strength while carefully managing capacity growth.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 71
GOVERNANCE
The Committee considered this context carefully when assessing remuneration outcomes for the year. The
Committee believes that the actions taken by management over the past twelve months have strengthened
the foundations of the business and positioned Wizz Air to benefit from future growth opportunities in its
core markets. As in previous years, the Company’s remuneration framework remains strongly aligned with
the principle of pay for performance. A substantial proportion of executive remuneration remains variable
and linked to a balanced scorecard of financial, operational and strategic metrics, ensuring alignment
between Management incentives and shareholder outcomes.
As previously approved by Shareholders, the Committee will continue implementing the revised Long-Term
Incentive Plan structure in F27 as well. This revised structure introduces a balanced mix of performance-
based and restricted share awards, which the Committee believes appropriately balances the need to retain
and motivate the executive leadership team while maintaining strong alignment with shareholder interests.
Key activities
“The Committee will continue implementing the revised Long-Term
Incentive Plan structure in F27 as well. This revised structure
introduces a balanced mix of performance-based and restricted share
awards, which the Committee believes appropriately balances the
need to retain and motivate the executive leadership team while
maintaining strong alignment with shareholder interests.”
Workforce engagement
The Company’s operational performance continues to be underpinned by the commitment, resilience and
professionalism of its workforce, particularly in navigating ongoing geopolitical and supply‑chain
challenges. As the Company continues to grow strongly and progresses towards its WIZZ500 vision,
Management recognises the importance of attracting, motivating and retaining talented employees across
the network. The Committee reflected this priority in its oversight of all remuneration‑related matters
during the year.
Feedback from the employee engagement survey highlighted the importance of predictability and stability
in working arrangements, including rostering practices and compensation mechanisms when such
predictability is disrupted. The Committee reviewed these findings and supported Management’s efforts to
strengthen the overall employee experience through enhancements to the broader reward framework. To
reinforce this focus and ensure that employee sentiment is reflected more directly in the Company’s
performance measures, the Committee also supported Management’s intention to incorporate employee
engagement metrics into the STIP scorecard for F27.
In July 2025, the Company introduced a voluntary occupational pension scheme across the Wizz Air
network in countries where third‑pillar pension products are available. Under the scheme, Wizz Air
contributes 1.5 per cent of monthly gross salary, matched by an equivalent employee contribution.
Participation is voluntary and open to all employees.
The Committee also oversaw the transition of the All Employee Bonus Plan to a more structured
framework. From F26, the Plan is assessed using the Management’s STIP scorecard, replacing the
previous reliance on discretionary awards.
Shareholder engagement
At the 2025 Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on 23 July 2025, all resolutions were approved by
Shareholders. Although the Remuneration Report received majority support (72.63 per cent), the
Company undertook a post‑AGM consultation exercise to gather further shareholder feedback.
During these consultations, the Company recognised that some Shareholders felt the Remuneration
Committee had not fully addressed concerns ahead of the 2024 AGM, where the Directors’ Remuneration
Policy was approved by 65.58 per cent. The Committee had nevertheless consulted extensively on the
changes needed to retain and incentivise the CEO, reflected in the 99.52 per cent vote for his re-election
at the 2025 AGM. The Board believes the voting split reflects long-standing differences in shareholder
views on quantum and incentive design.
The Board also considered feedback on the partial F25 STIP payout. As disclosed, no payout was made in
relation to the financial metrics, but strong operational improvements resulted in a formula-based partial
award below target, which the Committee viewed as aligned with performance.
The Board remains committed to incentive structures that support talent retention, drive shareholder
value, and reflect broader stakeholder and business performance. It thanks Shareholders for their
continued engagement.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 72
GOVERNANCE
Remuneration outcomes for F26
The Committee considered the impact of inflation, recruitment and retention needs, attrition levels and
the growth trajectory of the Wizz Air Group airlines, alongside market benchmark data across the
Company’s operating regions. Based on this assessment, the Committee endorsed the implementation of
several actions, including:
• Wider workforce
The Committee endorsed an average 2.1 per cent salary adjustment for the wider workforce effective
from 1 April 2026, depending on regional context, with additional adjustments reflecting individual roles
and pay bands. In carrying out the salary review, we consistently assess external market benchmarks
within and beyond aviation to ensure our employees are rewarded fairly and competitively. We also
consider internal factors, including career progression frameworks and pay structures, alongside external
influences such as inflation and broader economic conditions.
• Pilots and Flight Attendants
In addition to the annual salary review, and in recognition of the loyalty and expertise of long‑serving
Cabin Crew members, the Company extended and enhanced its Cabin Crew Seniority Bonus Scheme.
This initiative is designed to reward Senior Cabin Crew members with more than five years of service,
further strengthening retention and acknowledging sustained commitment.
For Flight Crew members, a decision was taken in F26 to extend the Captain Seniority Increment with
effect from 1 April 2026. Captains with more than 14,000 flight hours will be eligible for increased
remuneration based on total hours flown. The Captain Seniority Increment will be extended up to 20,000
flight hours, thereby further recognising the experience and dedication of senior Flight Crew members.
• All Employee Bonus Plan
Historically, the All Employee Bonus Plan operated with performance conditions linked to share price
performance. In periods where these conditions were not achieved, the Committee exercised discretion to
determine appropriate outcomes, having regard to overall business performance and affordability. In
practice, award levels under the Plan broadly aligned with average outcomes under the Management STIP.
From F26, Management implemented a revised approach to provide a clearer and more consistent basis for
determining this award. Under the new framework, the All Employee Bonus Plan is assessed using the same
scorecard applied under the Management’s STIP scheme, without including any individual performance
criteria. Applying this methodology for F26 resulted in a payout of 109.58 per cent. The on target (100 per
cent) value of the All Employee Bonus is equal to 1/12 of the annual qualifying earning during the Financial
Year.
The Plan continues to apply only to employees below Head level; the CEO, Senior Management and
Head‑level employees do not participate.
• Company-wide pension (including CEO and Senior Management)
In July 2025, the Company introduced a voluntary occupational pension scheme across the Wizz Air network
countries. The programme is based on a unified structure, whereby Wizz Air contributes 1.5 per cent of the
employee’s monthly gross salary, matched by an equivalent 1.5 per cent employee contribution. Local
pension providers are engaged in those base countries where third‑pillar pension products are available.
Participation in these local pension plans is voluntary and open to all Wizz Air employees.
The previous Directors’ Remuneration Policy did not allow for the executive directors to participate in the
scheme (as the policy only provided for the statutory minimum employer contribution), and as such, at the
2025 AGM, Shareholders were asked to approve the initial opt-in to the scheme by the CEO. The resolution
was approved by 99.85 per cent of Shareholders.
• CEO and senior management STIP
For the CEO, the F26 STIP was subject to a balanced scorecard where 25 per cent of the STIP award was
subject to financial performance, measuring underlying profit after tax and CASK excluding fuel. A further 50
per cent was subject to non-financial performance, measuring utilisation, completion, customer satisfaction
and delivery against ESG objectives. In addition, 25 per cent was subject to an individual performance
rating. The bonus payout as a percentage of the on-target amount was 109.58 per cent. The Committee did
not believe it necessary to exercise discretion on the STIP, and therefore the formulaic outcome was
followed.
The Group Managing Director, Chief Officers, Officers and Heads participated in the F26 STIP under the
same performance criteria as the CEO. Again, the Committee did not make any discretionary adjustments to
the payout of these awards.
• CEO and senior management LTIP
The F23 LTIP which vested during F26 was granted in 2022 to members of the senior leadership team,
including the Group Managing Director, Chief Officers, Officers and Heads. The CEO was not eligible for the
award due to his participation in the VCP. For Heads, the F23 LTIP was structured with a 50% weighting to
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 73
GOVERNANCE
restricted shares and 50% to performance measures. The performance element was assessed against 90%
share price performance and 10% non‑financial ESG metrics, resulting in a 50% vesting outcome. For the
Group Managing Director, Chief Officers and Officers, the F23 LTIP was fully performance‑based, with 90%
of the award linked to share price performance and 10% to non‑financial ESG metrics. As the performance
conditions were not met, the award lapsed in full and 0% vested for these participants.
In F26, the CEO, Group Managing Director, Chief Officers, Officers and Heads were granted LTIP awards
structured as 40 per cent performance shares and 60 per cent restricted shares. The performance options
portion of the award is subject to a 100 per cent Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) against selected
European airline peers, while the restricted shares portion of the award is subject solely to continued service.
In line with the Remuneration Policy, any value ultimately realised by the CEO under the LTIP will be offset
against potential future payouts under the VCP.
As Shareholders will recall, the VCP is a long‑term, share price‑driven incentive introduced in 2022 to align
the CEO’s interests closely with sustained shareholder value creation over an extended period. Following
Shareholder approval at the 2023 AGM, the performance period was extended, with vesting now aligned to
2028 (previously 2026). Under the revised structure, the share price performance conditions are met if the
relevant share price thresholds are achieved at any point during the performance period. ESG metrics under
the VCP, however, remained subject to their original performance period ending in F26.
At the end of F26, the ESG component of the VCP was assessed. Of the two measures (carbon emissions
and gender diversity), the gender diversity target was achieved, with representation reaching 40.7 per cent
against a target of 40 per cent. This outcome results in vesting of 5 per cent of the VCP award in 2028. In
accordance with the approved Policy, any value attributable to this vesting will be subject to offset against
future LTIP vestings.
Remuneration implementation – F27
• CEO base salary
Following an increase in F25, the Committee decided that the CEO would not receive a base salary increase
during F26.
The Committee aims to maintain a competitive salary for the CEO in a dynamic market whilst considering
the current economic climate, broader stakeholder perspectives, as well as feedback from investors and
proxy advisers.
As a result, in F27 the CEO will receive a 6.1 per cent base salary increase on his F26 salary. The adjustment
reflects relevant comparator data and recognises the materially increased breadth and complexity of the role
during a period of heightened external uncertainty, while remaining within the Committee’s desired market
positioning.
• CEO and senior management STIP
The Committee intends to maintain the STIP structure for the CEO and senior management in F27 and
continue emphasis on the delivery of strategic measures that will create value for Shareholders in the long
term, and individual performance, which together will represent 75 per cent of the STIP. Financial outcomes
– Underlying Profit after Tax and CASK ex-fuel – will continue as metrics and represent 25 per cent of the
award.
• CEO VCP and LTIP as well as senior management LTIP
The Committee has reviewed its approach to an LTIP grant for F27, to be made to the CEO, Group Managing
Director, Chief Officers, Officers and Heads. It has concluded that it will continue with the approach adopted
for the F26 LTIP, namely a split between performance shares and time vested restricted shares, in a 40/60
ratio. The performance options portion of the award will be subject to 100 per cent Relative Total
Shareholder Return (TSR) against selected European airline peers with the restricted shares portion of the
award subject only to continued service conditions.
The award for the CEO would be offset against any future VCP payouts.
• Chair and Non-Executive Director fees
Chair and Non‑Executive Director (NED) fees were last reviewed in F23. Following a review of external
benchmarking commissioned by the Committee, and taking account of cumulative inflation and market
developments since that time, the Committee recommended to the Chair and the Chief Executive Officer
that Board remuneration should be updated with effect from 1 April 2026.
The benchmarking exercise indicated that, while certain Board leadership roles were appropriately
positioned, the basic NED fee had fallen below market levels and the overall fee structure no longer fully
reflected the scale, complexity and regulatory demands of the Company, nor the increased workload placed
on the Board. The Committee also considered it important to maintain coherence across the governance
framework by aligning NED fee developments with changes proposed to executive remuneration, including
the CEO’s salary adjustment.
On the basis of the Committee’s recommendation, the Chair and CEO approved the proposed fee increases.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 74
GOVERNANCE
For F27:
• The basic Non‑Executive Director fee will be €110,000.
• Committee Chairs will receive an additional €27,500.
• Secondary committee membership will attract an additional fee of €13,759.
• The Senior Independent Director will receive an additional €22,000.
• The Director responsible for employee engagement will receive €2,750 per physical employee event
attended.
• The Deputy Chair will receive an additional fee of €25,000.
The Chair of the Board, William A. Franke, will receive an all‑inclusive annual fee of €369,600 in F27,
reflecting the scope and responsibilities of the role.
Historically, Committee Observers have not received any compensation. Given the increasing level of
engagement and time commitment associated with observer roles, a fee of €2,750 per event attended has
been introduced with effect from F27. This level is aligned with the fee paid for employee engagement
activities, ensuring internal consistency and fairness.
Non‑Executive Directors will continue to be reimbursed for all reasonable and proper expenses incurred in
the performance of their duties.
Next steps
We strive for our DRR to be straightforward and transparent when explaining the implementation of our
Remuneration Policy during F26 and our intended implementation for F27. We also remain committed to
continued dialogue with Shareholders, including the investor feedback received following the 2025 AGM. We
trust that we have provided the information our Shareholders need to be able to support this DRR at the
Company’s 2026 AGM.
Our ongoing dialogue with Shareholders and other stakeholders is greatly valued, and as always, we
welcome your feedback on this DRR.
Barry Eccleston
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 75
GOVERNANCE
Membership, meetings and attendance
• Barry Eccleston (Chairman) (6/7)
• Anthony Radev (7/7)
• Anna Gatti (6/7)
• Stephen L. Johnson (observer) (7/7)
The Committee comprises three Non-Executive Directors, appointed by the Board according to experience,
dedication and capacity. The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the Committee, and relevant members
of the senior leadership team are invited to attend meetings.
The Committee had seven meetings during the year and focused on the following activities:
• engaging with Shareholders with regard to low vote outcomes for remuneration resolutions at the 2025
AGM;
• reviewing and recommending base salary increases for management, CEO and Non-Executive Directors
for F27;
• reviewing and approving the performance measures for the F26 Short-term Incentive Plan (STIP);
• reviewing and approving the performance measures for the F26 Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP);
• assessing the performance of each in-flight LTIP and finalising vesting outcomes of the LTIP granted
during the financial year ended March 2023;
• considering and recommending the conditions of the F27 STIP for the CEO, Group Managing Director,
Chief Officers, Officers and Heads;
• considering and recommending the conditions of the F27 LTIP for the CEO, Group Managing Director,
Chief Officers, Officers and Heads;
• reviewing compliance with the EU Pay Transparency Directive; and
• considering and approving remuneration packages for new Officer and Chief Officer appointments.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 76
GOVERNANCE
Remuneration at a glance
CEO remuneration
F26 earnings
F27 looking ahead
Base salary
€775,000
€822,275
Short-term
Incentive Plan
(STIP)
Maximum
opportunity
200% of base salary
Performance
metrics
(weightings)
Financial:
Underlying Profit After Tax – 12.5%
CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet
leases) – 12.5%
Non-financial:
Utilisation – 12.5%
Completion (without extraordinary
events) – 12.5%
Customer satisfaction – 12.5%
Gender diversity – 12.5%
Individual rating - 25%
Financial:
Underlying Profit After Tax – 12.5%
CASK ex-fuel (normalised for wet
leases) – 12.5%
Non-financial:
Utilisation – 12.5%
Completion (without extraordinary
events) – 12.5%
Customer satisfaction – 12.5%
Employee engagement – 12.5%
Individual rating - 25%
Long-term
Incentive Plan
(LTIP)
Maximum
opportunity
500% of base salary (60% restricted
shares and 40% performance shares)
500% of base salary (60% restricted
shares and 40% performance shares)
Performance
metrics
(weightings)
100% of performance shares portion of
the award will be subject to Relative
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
100% of performance shares portion of
the award will be subject to Relative
Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
Value Creation
Plan (VCP)
Opportunity
One-off award granted in F22 – seven-year performance period with 40% vesting
in year seven, and 20% vesting per year in years eight, nine and ten
Maximum payment of £100 million for delivery of end share price of £119.34
Any value delivered under the VCP will be offset by the value of vested LTIP
awards
Performance
metrics
(weightings)
Increase in share price (90%)
ESG (10%)
Share ownership guidelines
Holding requirement: 400% of base salary
Post-cessation share ownership
guidelines
Holding requirement: 100% of share ownership guideline for one year after
leaving and 50% of share ownership guideline for the second year
What our CEO earned
image.png
Performance versus peers (TSR)
image.png
How our CEO is aligned with Shareholders
image.png
Actual shareholding calculated using number of Ordinary Shares
and a one-year share price average at 31 December 2025.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 77
GOVERNANCE
Remuneration Policy
This Directors’ Remuneration Policy ("DRP") was approved by Shareholders at the Company’s AGM in
September 2024 and is intended to be in place for a period of three years from the 2024 AGM.
How our Remuneration Policy addresses the factors set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code
Clarity
Remuneration
arrangements should be
transparent and promote
effective engagement with
Shareholders and the
workforce.
The Remuneration Committee has incorporated transparency
into the design and delivery of our Remuneration Policy. We
believe our remuneration structure is simple to understand,
both for participants and Shareholders. We aim for disclosure
of the policy and how it is implemented to be in a clear and
succinct format.
Simplicity
Remuneration structures
should avoid complexity
while their rationale and
operation should be easy to
understand.
Our remuneration arrangements for our Executive Director
are simple and easy to understand, comprising fixed pay
(base salary and benefits), a Short-term Incentive Plan
(STIP), Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and a one-off long-
term arrangement in the form of a Value Creation Plan (VCP).
Risk
Remuneration
arrangements should
ensure reputational and
other risks from excessive
rewards, and behavioural
risks that can arise from
target-based incentive
plans, are identified and
mitigated.
The DRP includes a number of points to mitigate.
Potential risks:
• There are defined limits on the maximum opportunity
levels under incentive plans.
• Performance targets are calibrated at appropriately
stretching but sustainable levels.
• The Remuneration Committee has the ability to use
discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is
achieved, taking into account the overall performance of
the Company and the experience of Shareholders.
• Incentive plans, including the LTIP and VCP, include
provisions to allow malus and clawback to be applied,
where appropriate.
• Recent introduction of in-employment and post-
employment shareholding requirements ensures that there
is an alignment of interests between our Executive Director
and Shareholders that encourages sustainable
performance.
Predictability
The range of possible
values of rewards to
individual Directors and any
other limits or discretion
should be identified and
explained at the time of
approving the policy.
We believe our disclosure is clear to allow Shareholders to
understand the range of potential values which may be
earned under the remuneration arrangements. Our DRP
clearly sets out relevant limits and potential for discretion.
Proportionality
The link between individual
awards, the delivery of
strategy and the long-term
performance of the
Company should be clear.
Outcomes should not
reward poor performance.
A significant proportion of our Executive Director’s potential
reward is linked to performance through the VCP and LTIP
with a clear line of sight between business performance and
the delivery of Shareholder value. The Remuneration
Committee may adjust formulaic outcomes of incentive
arrangements to ensure that a fair and balanced outcome is
achieved, taking into account the overall performance of the
Company and the experience of Shareholders.
Alignment to culture
Incentive schemes should
drive behaviours consistent
with Company purpose,
values and strategy.
The incentive arrangements and the performance measures
used are strongly aligned to those that the Board considers
when determining the implementation success of the
Company’s purpose, values and strategy.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 78
GOVERNANCE
Executive Director Remuneration
The Chief Executive Officer is currently the Company’s sole Executive Director. The Remuneration
Committee believes that the Company’s DRP supports the Company’s ultra-low-cost, high-growth business
model by incentivising senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer, to continue striving to
increase the Company’s cost advantage while improving customer experience.
In deciding appropriate remuneration levels, the Remuneration Committee takes into account, among other
things, the levels paid at UK FTSE-listed companies, competitor global low-cost carriers and selected fast-
growing companies across Europe. The Remuneration Committee also continues to be cognisant of wider
employee pay in the organisation.
Over the past year, the CEO and management have continued to strengthen employee engagement through
a programme of scheduled floor talks, local base visits, fly‑arounds and regular meetings with the People
Council, an elected body of employee representatives from across the Company. These engagements
provide a structured forum for open dialogue, including discussion of remuneration and broader reward
principles. Feedback received through these channels is considered as part of management’s ongoing
approach to aligning remuneration practices with the Company’s values and performance culture.
Policy table: Executive Director
Element
Purpose and link
to strategy
Operation and
opportunity
Framework used to assess performance
and provisions for the recovery of
sums paid
Base salary
To provide the core
reward for the role.
To attract, retain and
motivate high-calibre
executive
management.
Salary is reviewed annually,
with any increase being
awarded at the discretion of
the Remuneration
Committee.
The Remuneration
Committee may take into
account a number of factors
in deciding whether an
increase should be made,
including benchmarking
against selected comparator
companies, the individual’s
skills and experience,
internal relativities, and the
Executive’s personal
performance contribution.
The Remuneration Committee considers the
individual salary of the Executive Director at a
meeting each year.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 79
GOVERNANCE
Benefits
To attract, retain and
motivate executive
management without
paying more than
necessary.
The benefits to the
Executive Director are in
line with those provided to
employees and those
deemed necessary for the
role or job taken. They
include the following:
The Executive Director is
covered by the Company’s
group personal accident
and life assurance cover,
which is in place for all
employees (2x salary).
Free return tickets usable
on the route network of the
Group, consistent with the
number of free tickets
made available for all
employees.
At its discretion, the
Committee may provide
reasonable support for
costs associated with
relocation where required at
the Company’s request, and
other benefits as deemed
necessary by the
Remuneration Committee.
Pension
Not applicable
Eligible to opt into the
company-wide private
pension contribution
scheme. Under the scheme,
the Company will, if
requested by an employee,
contribute an additional 1.5
per cent of that employee’s
salary to a private pension
scheme, provided the
employee contributes the
same amount.
Not applicable
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 80
GOVERNANCE
Element
Purpose and link
to strategy
Operation and
opportunity
Framework used to assess performance
and provisions for the recovery of
sums paid
Short-term
Incentive Plan
(STIP)
To incentivise the
successful execution
of the Company’s
business strategy.
To reward the
achievement of
annual financial and
operational goals.
Payments under the STIP
are made in cash and/or
shares, subject to certain
specified performance
requirements as determined
by the Remuneration
Committee and up to a
maximum STIP set as a
percentage of base salary
by the Remuneration
Committee. The maximum
payout is 200 per cent of
base salary. A threshold
level of performance is
specified as 50 per cent of
the at target bonus; if
performance falls below this
level, there will be no
payout for that proportion
of the award.
Performance requirements are determined by
the Remuneration Committee. They are
intended to align the performance of the
Executive Director with the Group’s near-term
objectives of delivering against its strategy.
The Remuneration Committee may exercise its
discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced
outcome is achieved, taking into account the
overall performance of the Company and the
experience of Shareholders.
The STIP is based on a combination of
financial and non-financial measures as
selected by the Remuneration Committee in
any given year. Financial measures would
typically represent no less than 50 per cent of
the weighting.
The annual STIP is subject to malus and/or
clawback in the event of serious misconduct
that could serve as a reason for terminating
the employment for cause, or if the employee
was involved in fraud, dishonesty or other
types of illegal activity. The policy does not
determine the time frame of the malus and/or
clawback.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 81
GOVERNANCE
Long-term 
Incentive Plan
(LTIP)
To align the
Executive Director’s
long-term interests
with those of
Shareholders. To
reward strong
financial
performance.
Each year, performance
shares and restricted
shares may be granted.
Awards vest over a three-
year period. Performance
shares are subject to the
achievement of
performance targets over
those three years.
The maximum face value of
annual awards will be 500
per cent of base salary. For
performance shares,
typically 25 per cent of
award value will vest for
threshold performance with
straight-line vesting to
maximum performance.
Performance targets are determined by the
Remuneration Committee and vesting of the
performance shares is subject to performance
targets being met over the performance
period. The performance targets for the LTIP
are based either solely on financial measures
or on a combination of financial and non-
financial measures and may include ESG
measures as selected by the Remuneration
Committee in any given year. Financial
measures would typically represent no less
than 50 per cent of the weighting.
The Remuneration Committee may use its
discretion to ensure that a fair and balanced
outcome is achieved, taking into account the
overall performance of the Company and the
experience of Shareholders.
If a participant’s employment ends before the
end of the performance period or, in the case
of restricted shares, the vesting period, any
vested and unvested options will normally
lapse, save in certain “good leaver” scenarios,
although the Remuneration Committee retains
discretion to allow all shares to vest subject to
performance conditions (as applicable).
LTIP awards are subject to malus and/or
clawback in the event of serious misconduct
which could serve as a reason for terminating
the employment for cause, or if the employee
was involved in fraud, dishonesty or other
types of illegal activity.
Value Creation
Plan (VCP)
To retain the Chief
Executive Officer and
deliver Shareholder
value.
One-off award of shares
granted in 2021. Award
vests after a seven-year
period (40 per cent of the
overall award at the end of
year seven and 20 per cent
per year after years eight,
nine and ten).
The award is based on the
following performance
conditions:
• 90 per cent share price;
and
• 10 per cent ESG (5 per
cent based on CO2
emissions reduction
goals; and 5 per cent
based on gender diversity
target).
Maximum payout is capped
at £100 mn. Threshold
payment is £20 mn for
delivery of share price
£77.24. Award payout to be
offset against LTIP award.
ESG criteria are
independent of share price
growth criteria.
Straight line vesting in
between.
The share price related
portion of the VCP award
will pay out at 100 per cent
if the maximum share price
is achieved during two
consecutive quarters before
end-date.
To ensure that vesting outcomes are
consistent with superior Shareholder
experience, the Remuneration Committee has
the discretion to adjust the level of vesting
downwards (including, for the avoidance of
doubt, to nil) where it considers that the level
of vesting resulting from applying a
performance condition would not be a fair and
accurate reflection of the performance of the
Company, the Group, any Group member or
the participant and/or such other factors as
the Remuneration Committee may consider
appropriate.
If the participant ceases to be employed by
reason of ill health, injury, disability, death,
retirement with the agreement of the
Remuneration Committee, or for any other
reason at the discretion of the Remuneration
Committee, 40 per cent of the award will vest
as soon as practicable after the cessation date
and 20 per cent in each of the next three
years, to the extent that the performance
conditions have been met. The award will
lapse in all other circumstances.
Malus and clawback may be applied at any
time before an award vests, or for three years
after the seventh anniversary of the grant
date in the following circumstances: material
misstatement of the results of the Company,
errors or inaccuracies or misleading
information leading to an incorrect grant or
vesting of the award, gross misconduct,
material failure of risk management by the
Company, corporate failure (e.g.
administration or liquidation) or any other
circumstance which, in the opinion of the
Remuneration Committee, could have a
significantly adverse impact on the Company's
reputation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 82
GOVERNANCE
Targets for the STIP and LTIP are continually reviewed to ensure they are appropriate and stretching. The
Remuneration Committee takes into consideration the expected performance of individuals, the current
business environment and other external reference points. The measures used in the STIP are selected to
reflect the Group’s near-term objectives of delivering against its strategy. With regard to the LTIP,
performance targets are determined regularly by the Remuneration Committee to ensure they align well
with the Company’s long-term strategy and Shareholder interests. Both the STIP and LTIP are subject to
malus and clawback provisions. These allow the Remuneration Committee to reduce or recover awards in
circumstances such as material misstatement, misconduct, or significant risk or reputational failure. LTIP
awards are subject to clawback for up to three years post‑vesting, which the Committee considers
appropriate given the long‑term nature of the plan. No malus or clawback was applied during the reporting
period.
Scenario chart
An illustration of how much the CEO could earn under the Remuneration Policy’s approved LTIP is
demonstrated in the chart below.
image.png
The chart above illustrates the application of the Executive Directors’ Remuneration Policy for F27 at the
minimum, threshold and maximum levels as well as maximum with 50% share price growth. The one-off
300% award granted in October 2024 has been excluded.
Fixed pay in the chart above utilises the forward-looking base salary of €822,275 and assumptions for
benefits and pensions, with pensions based on the standard company contribution rate. The figure for
benefits aligns with the single-figure amount received during F26.
At a maximum, the Short-Term Incentive is presented as 200 per cent of base salary, 50 per cent of
maximum for target, and 25 per cent of maximum for threshold.
The scenario chart excludes the VCP, as the likelihood of any vesting is negligible, and in any case the value
under the LTIP awards is offset against the VCP value on a pound-for-pound basis should it in fact vest. The
annual LTIP award for F27 will be 500 per cent of base salary and the chart above demonstrates both the
restricted shares (60 per cent of the award) and performance shares (40 per cent). Restricted shares
represent 300 per cent of base salary, for threshold, target and maximum the value is consistent as there
are no associated performance conditions. Performance shares represent 200 per cent of base salary at
maximum; threshold is 0 per cent of maximum (no vesting for performance below median), and target is 25
per cent of maximum, equating to 50 per cent of base salary (vesting at median performance), with 100 per
cent vesting for performance at or above the upper quartile.
Wider workforce remuneration
How the organisation considered wider workforce pay when developing new Policy for Executive Directors
Wizz Air aims to treat the wider workforce and Executive Directors in the same way, and implement an
aligned philosophy from top to bottom. Remuneration for the Company’s senior management team and
wider employee base have all been aligned to the same goals as the CEO under the STIP and LTIP. The
amounts of the components and vehicles granted vary for the individuals and the levels of positions, but the
intended performance is mirrored from the top to the bottom of the organisation. In relation to the
remuneration of the Executive Directors, employees have had the opportunity to provide feedback through
the People Council.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 83
GOVERNANCE
Non-Executive Director remuneration
The Non-Executive Directors are only paid fees.
Element
Purpose and
link to strategy
Operation and opportunity
Framework used to
assess performance and
provisions for the recovery
of sums paid
Fees
To remunerate
Non-Executive
Directors to
reflect their level
of responsibility.
Each Non-Executive Director receives an annual fee
that is inclusive of one Committee fee. Additional
fees are paid: for chairing Committees; to the
Senior Independent Director; to the Vice Chair; to
the Director responsible for employee engagement;
and to the Committee Observers. Fees for Non-
Executive Directors, other than the Chairman, are
determined by the Chairman and the Executive
members of the Board. Fees for the Chairman are
determined by the Remuneration Committee
without the Chairman being present. In both cases,
there is flexibility to increase fee levels to ensure
they reflect the experience of the individual, the
time commitment of the role and the fee levels in
comparable companies appropriately. Non-Executive
Directors receive an additional fee for sitting on
more than one Committee. The Non-Executive
Directors will also be reimbursed for all proper and
reasonable expenses incurred in performing their
duties.
Fees are paid in cash and/or shares which are not
subject to performance.
Not applicable; there are no
provisions for the recovery of
sums paid or the withholding
of any payment relating to
fees.
Other Policy items
Recruitment remuneration
On the recruitment of a new Executive Director, the Remuneration Committee seeks to pay no more than is
necessary to attract and retain the best candidate available, within the limits of the approved DRP. The
remuneration package for an incoming Executive Director would reflect the principles set out above,
although the Remuneration Committee believes it serves the interests of the Shareholders to retain an
element of flexibility in its approach to recruitment, to enable it to attract the best candidates. That said, this
flexibility is limited.
The Remuneration Committee may find it necessary to compensate a new recruit for forfeiture of payments
for leaving prior employment. There is no limit to the value of such a buy-out award; however, the
Remuneration Committee will seek to link rewards to performance wherever possible, and mirror the award
being forfeited by the new recruit. The Remuneration Committee may introduce a one-off arrangement as
permitted under Listing Rule 9.3.2.
For the appointment of a new Chairman or Non-Executive Director, fee arrangements will be made in line
with the policy as set out above.
Policy on payment for loss of office
In the event of termination of a service contract or letter of appointment of a Director, contractual
obligations will be honoured in accordance with the service contract or letter of appointment. The CEO has a
fixed-term seven-year contract, in all other cases there are no fixed terms on service contracts. The
Remuneration Committee will take into consideration the circumstances and reasons for departure, health,
length of service and performance. Under this policy, the Remuneration Committee will make any statutory
payments it is required to make. In addition, the Remuneration Committee may agree to pay outplacement
counselling costs and disbursements (such as legal costs) if considered to be appropriate and depending on
the circumstances of departure.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 84
GOVERNANCE
There are no pre-determined contractual provisions for Directors regarding compensation in the event of loss
of office, save for those listed in the table below.
Details of provision
Executive Director
Non-Executive Directors
Notice period
Six months’ notice by either party.
One month’s notice by either party.
Termination payment
The employing company may
terminate the Executive Director’s
employment with immediate effect by
payment in lieu of notice. The
Executive Director will be paid a sum
equal to six months’ base salary if the
employing company chooses to
enforce the restrictive covenants
referenced below.
Upon termination of employment
other than for cause, the Executive
Director is entitled to a severance
payment equal to six months’ base
salary in addition to any notice pay or
payment in lieu of notice.
Fees and expenses accrued up to
termination only.
Post-termination covenants
Post-termination restrictive covenants
apply for a period of one year
following termination of employment.
Not applicable.
Under the LTIP and STIP, if an Executive Director leaves, the default position is that no payment will be
made. The Executive Director will be treated as a good leaver in certain circumstances, including ill health,
redundancy, retirement (with agreement of the Company) or death, and other circumstances as determined
by the Committee at their discretion. Executive Directors leaving with good-leaver status will receive a pro-
rated bonus payment as determined under the STIP, and awards under the LTIP will vest on a pro-rated
basis, unless the Remuneration Committee decides otherwise. The pro-rata bonus and LTIP awards shall be
calculated based on the actual period of active employment in the relevant financial year(s). The
achievement of targets shall be reviewed and assessed by, and at the discretion of, the Remuneration
Committee. If good-leaver status is not granted to an Executive Director, all outstanding awards made to
them under the LTIP will lapse.
Discretion, flexibility and judgement of the Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee operates under the DRP, which includes flexibility in a number of areas. These
include:
• the timing of awards and payments;
• the size of an award, within the maximum limits;
• the participants of the plan;
• the performance requirements and maximum percentages of salary to be used for the Short-term
Incentive Plan and the Long-term Incentive Plan from year to year;
• the performance conditions, performance periods and vesting periods for awards under the Long-term
Incentive Plan from year to year;
• the assessment of whether performance requirements and/or conditions have been met;
• the treatment to be applied for a change of control or significant restructuring of the Group;
• the determination of a good/bad leaver for incentive plan purposes and the treatment of awards thereof;
and
• the adjustments, if any, required in certain circumstances (e.g. rights issues, corporate restructuring,
corporate events and special dividends).
Legacy arrangements
The Committee may approve remuneration payments and payments for loss of office on terms that differ to
the terms in the Policy where the terms of the payment were agreed before the Policy came into effect, or
were agreed at a time when the relevant individual was not a Director of the Company. This includes the
exercise of any discretion available to the Committee in connection with such payments.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 85
GOVERNANCE
Annual Report on Remuneration
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for setting the Remuneration Policy for all Executive Directors
and the Chairman, including pension rights and any compensation payments, and recommending and
monitoring the remuneration of the senior managers.
A summary of the Remuneration Committee’s terms of reference can be found on our corporate website.
Further details about the Remuneration Committee are set out on pages 37 to 38 of the Corporate
Governance Report.
Barry Eccleston (Chairman), who joined the Committee in September 2020 in the position of Chairman,
remains in post. Stephen L. Johnson was appointed interim Chair on 4 September 2024 and stepped down
as interim chair on 14 March 2025; he continues to serve the Committee as an Observer. Both Anthony
Radev (effective from 1 September 2022) and Anna Gatti (effective from 28 January 2022) remained
Committee members during F26.
To monitor the consistency between the remuneration of the CEO and his direct reports, the Remuneration
Committee is frequently updated and consulted on any remuneration changes. All external hires and internal
promotions to senior-level positions require the prior approval of the Remuneration Committee on their
future remuneration package. Only after the approval is received can the offer be extended to the candidate.
The Remuneration Committee is also consulted on, and needs to approve, remuneration changes for existing
Senior Executives. This includes salary revisions linked to new market benchmark information as well as
revisions arising from internal organisational changes. József Váradi, Chief Executive Officer, Marion
Geoffroy, People Officer, Owain Jones, Chief Corporate Officer, and Nóra Viktória Rabe, Corporate & ESG
Officer and Company Secretary, attended meetings in F26 by invitation, and assist the Remuneration
Committee in its deliberations as appropriate, though they are not present when their own compensation is
discussed.
The Remuneration Committee is advised by WTW, as appointed by the Remuneration Committee. WTW was
re-contracted as remuneration consultant following a competitive tender process in 2020. It attends
Committee meetings as and when required. During F26, WTW received fees based on time and materials
totalling £180,600 for advice to the Remuneration Committee related to the Remuneration Policy,
governance, developments in Executive pay, benchmarking and performance analysis. Besides support on
remuneration advice, no other services were provided by WTW to the Company in F26.
WTW is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and, as such, operates voluntarily under the
Remuneration Consultants Group Code of Conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the
UK. The Remuneration Committee is satisfied that WTW offers independent, impartial and objective advice
and brings a high degree of expertise to the Remuneration Committee’s discussions.
Shareholders’ vote on remuneration
At the 2025 AGM the Directors’ Remuneration Report was supported by 72.63 per cent of Shareholders.
AGM 2025 (during F26) – Directors’ Remuneration Report voting results:
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Votes for
16,713,439
72.63%
Votes against
6,299,725
27.37%
Total votes
23,013,165
Votes withheld
11,357
The Company received Shareholder approval for our Remuneration Report at the AGM on 23 July 2025. The
Company’s Remuneration Policy was approved by Shareholders at the 2024 AGM held on 25 September
2024.
Executive Director’s remuneration
Full details of the Chief Executive Officer’s remuneration for F26 and F25 are set out below (in euros):
Single total figure of remuneration table (audited)
József Váradi
Fees and
salary
€
Benefits
€
STIP
€
LTIP
€
Other
€
Pension
€
Total
€
Total fixed
remuneration
€
Total variable
remuneration
€
F26
775,000
25,919
946,120
—
2,325,0001
34,759
4,106,798
835,678
3,271,120
F25
775,000
22,291
770,727
—
2,325,000
1,570
3,894,588
798,861
3,095,727
1. The value in the ‘Other’ column for F26 reflects the fully restricted portion of the CEO’s F26 LTIP Award (60% of the Award, equal
to 300% of base salary) granted during the year, which vests based solely on continued service. The performance‑linked portion
(40% of the award, equal to 200% of base salary) will be disclosed in the single total figure upon vesting.
There was no increase to this figure during F26, and the Chief Executive Officer’s salary remained at
€775,000.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 86
GOVERNANCE
Short-term Incentive Plan F26 – audited
The Committee implemented a balanced scorecard methodology for F26 STIP targets, which incorporates a
healthy ratio between financial, operational, commercial and people metrics. This mix ensures alignment
with the strategic priorities and holistic performance evaluation. A total of 6 KPIs were introduced to
emphasise the delivery of strategic measures that would create value for Shareholders in the long term. This
is in addition to the individual rating – weighted at 25 per cent of the total award – which is aimed at
rewarding individual performance and acting in line with the values of the Company. As part of this balanced
scorecard, financial outcomes – underlying profit after tax margin and CASK ex-fuel – represented 25 per
cent of the award. In addition, 25 per cent was weighted towards operational performance against
utilisation and completion rates. 12.5 per cent of the total STIP was based on customer-related indicators
serving as a solid baseline for business performance. The remaining 12.5 per cent – based on ESG and
the percentage of women in Management positions – demonstrates the Company’s commitment to
promoting diversity among the management team.
The entire bonus (both financial and non-financial portions) is subject to a minimum achievement of an
“A” individual rating. More information on the target and achievement result can be found in the table
below.
At target, the STIP pays out the annual base salary of the CEO (i.e. 100 per cent of salary). Threshold
payout is 50 per cent of target and maximum payout is 200 per cent of target. As per the Policy, payout
for performance between threshold and target and between target and stretched, stretched and
maximum has been calculated by using linear interpolation (straight-line percentage performance). For
individual performance, threshold payout is provided for performance rating “A”, target payout for
performance rating “AA”, 150 per cent payout for performance rating “AAA” and maximum payout for
performance rating “1”.
Weighting
Performance
indicators
Threshold
(50% payout)
Target
(100% payout)
Stretched
(150% payout)
Maximum
(200% payout)
Outcome
Formulaic
outcome
25%
Financial performance
12.5%
Underlying Profit
After Tax
(in millions of
EUR)
209.00
246.00
258.33
283.00
1.25
—%
12.5%
CASK ex-fuel
(normalised for
wet leases)
3.10
2.95
2.90
2.80
3.02
9.58%
75%
Non-financial performance
12.5%
Utilisation
12:20
12:30
12:35
12:40
11:35
—%
12.5%
Completion
(without
extraordinary
events)
99.39%
Straight line between min and max
99.50%
99.96%
25.0%
12.5%
Customer
Satisfaction
69.00%
70.50%
71.50%
72.00%
77.60%
25.0%
12.5%
ESG (diversity)
38.00%
39.00%
39.67%
40.00%
40.68%
25.0%
25%
Individual performance1,2
Individual
performance
rating
Rated A
Rated AA
Rated AAA
Rated 1
AAA
37.5%
1. The CEO’s performance is assessed by the Nomination and Governance Committee (between 0 per cent and 200 per cent) and the
payout is approved by the Remuneration Committee. See below this table for details on why the CEO received an “AAA” rating in
F26.
2. Threshold payout requires a performance rating of “A”.
As part of our sustainability commitment, we want to comply as a minimum with the Hampton-Alexander
Review guidelines calling for the need for one-third female Board members and a 40 per cent to 60 per cent
gender split by the end of F26 at management level (Head level and above). As per the current status, we
have 36 per cent female representation among the Board of Directors and 40.7 per cent female
representation at management level. The number of employed nationalities continued to grow, reaching 112
nationalities at the Company level, which Wizz Air is rightly proud of.
The evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s personal performance during F26 has primarily been
measured against his response and leadership throughout another challenging year. In F26, Wizz Air
continued to face operational challenges, including the ongoing grounding of a number of aircraft due to
Pratt & Whitney engine issues and geopolitical disruptions affecting key markets. Despite these hurdles, CEO
József Váradi demonstrated effective leadership via a renewed focus on key strategic objectives, including
the decision to close the Company’s joint venture subsidiary Wizz Air Abu Dhabi, securing significant
agreements with key suppliers Airbus SAS and Pratt & Whitney to deliver an adjusted target growth rate of
10-12% per year over the coming 6 years, as well as, in the case of Pratt & Whitney, continued commercial
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 87
GOVERNANCE
support in relation to operational engine issues, maintaining a focus on operational efficiency and a renewed
network strategy building on the Company’s leadership position in Central and Eastern Europe.
Importantly, throughout this period of heightened uncertainty, the Chief Executive Officer maintained a
disciplined approach to capital allocation and liquidity management, ensuring that the Company retained a
strong and resilient balance sheet. This financial strength has been critical in enabling Wizz Air to withstand
external shocks, including geopolitical disruptions and supply chain challenges, while preserving strategic
flexibility to respond quickly to emerging risks and opportunities. The robustness of the balance sheet
remains a key differentiator for the Company and provides a solid foundation for long-term sustainable
growth, particularly in times of crisis when financial resilience is paramount.
Towards the end of F26, the CEO ensured that the Company reacted quickly and successfully in mitigating
the effects of the Middle East conflict. Under his guidance, the airline achieved a record 69.7 million
passengers in F26 and maintained a strong load factor of 90.7 per cent. While the Company revised its net
income forecast to €1.3 million due to the Middle East conflict, the Chief Executive Officer’s emphasis on
adaptability and strategic planning ensured that Wizz Air remained resilient, positioning the Company for
future growth despite ongoing industry challenges.
Based on the individual performance demonstrated above, the Chief Executive Officer received a
performance rating of “AAA” and therefore achieved 150 per cent of the target against the individual
performance measure, which has a weighting of 25 per cent under the Short-term Incentive Plan. This,
combined with the financial performance set out above, resulted in a 122.08 per cent annual salary payout
(61.04 per cent of maximum).
Benefits (audited)
The Company covered certain accommodation expenses of Mr Váradi, such as rent and utilities, amounting
to €25,919 and €22,291 in F26 and F25 respectively.
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) vested during F26 (audited)
Under the previous Remuneration Policy, when the VCP was introduced in F22 the Chief Executive Officer
was not eligible to receive an LTIP award. As such, there were no awards due to vest in F26 for the Chief
Executive Officer.
Pensions (audited)
Following shareholder approval at the 2025 AGM, the CEO participates in the Company’s voluntary
occupational pension scheme on the same basis as the wider workforce. For F25, the pension value reflects
the statutory minimum employer contribution required under UK law.
Payments to past Directors (audited)
No payments were made to past Directors.
Payments for loss of office (audited)
No payments were made for loss of office.
Historical TSR performance1 – value of hypothetical £100 holding
The following performance graph shows the Company’s total shareholder return compared to the FTSE 250
index and the FTSE 100 index, as well as a selection of airlines for the past 10 financial years. TSR is defined
as share price growth plus reinvested dividends.
image.png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 88
GOVERNANCE
1. Growth in the value of a hypothetical £100 holding over ten years, in comparison to the FTSE 250, the airline peer group used for
measurement of relative TSR and the FTSE 100. Data based on one-month average of trading day values. Source: S&P Capital IQ.
This graph is re-based to 100 at the start of the relevant period. As a constituent of the FTSE 250, this index
represents an appropriate reference point for the Company. To provide Shareholders with additional context
we have also included a “TSR Airlines Average” reflecting the TSR of the comparator group used for the TSR
measurement under the LTIP awards, including easyJet, Ryanair, Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, Finnair and
IAG. Information is also included on a comparison to the FTSE 100, given that Wizz Air’s fully diluted market
capitalisation would place it within the FTSE 100 index.
In the tables below we provide a ten-year overview of the Chief Executive Officer’s remuneration and the
change in the Chief Executive Officer’s remuneration compared to that of all employees.
Ten-year overview of Chief Executive Officer remuneration
Financial
year
Executive
Director
Single figure of total
remuneration (€)
Performance STIP
achieved against
maximum possible
LTIP shares vesting
against maximum
possible
F16
József Váradi
1,812,883
95%
n/a
F17
József Váradi
1,240,812
48%
n/a
F18
József Váradi
1,281,304
58%
n/a
F19
József Váradi
4,056,438
26%
100%
F20
József Váradi
2,640,666
26%
50%
F21
József Váradi
1,620,409
0%1
50%
F22
József Váradi
1,771,652
0%1
50%
F23
József Váradi
1,266,511
41%
0%
F24
József Váradi
1,395,932
47%
0%
F25
József Váradi
3,894,588 2
50%
0%
F26
József Váradi
4,106,798
61%
0%
1. There were no options vesting in F16–F18 under either the old (ESOP) or the new (LTIP) share option plan. In F21, although
targets were achieved in three out of the four quarters based on the cash targets, management’s recommendation and the
discretionary decision of the Remuneration Committee was to pay no STIP for F21 to the Chief Executive Officer or any other
employee eligible for the scheme. This voluntary decision of the management was in line with the overall industry and Company
performance for the twelve-month relevant period which was heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the significant drop
in air traffic.
2. For F25, the increase to the single figure of total remuneration versus F24, is due to the introduction of the one-off LTIP award
granted to the Chief Executive Officer in F25 (valued at 300% of salary with no performance conditions or underpins attached) as
well as the implementation of the increase in the CEO’s base salary. The F25 single figure of total remuneration value disclosed in
last year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report was misstated, as it reflected only the variable remuneration component (€3,095,727)
and excluded the total fixed remuneration. The figure has been corrected in the table above.
Change in the remuneration of the Directors compared to that of all other employees
The table below shows the year-on-year percentage change in salary, benefits and annual STIP for the
Directors, compared to the average earnings of all other Wizz Air employees. This is provided for F26,
between the year ended 31 March 2025 and the year ended 31 March 2026, as well as for F25, F24, F23
and F22.
F26
F25
F24
F23
F22
Salary
and
fees
Benefits1
Annual
STIP
Salary
and
fees
Benefits1
Annual
STIP
Salary
and fees
Benefits1
Annual
STIP
Salary
and
fees
Benefits
1
Annual
STIP
Salary
and
fees
Benefits
1
Annual
STIP
József Váradi
0%
16%
23%
9%
(3%)
17%
3%
156%
16%
16%
100%
85%
19%
0%
(100)%
William A. Franke
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
38%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
Stephen L. Johnson
(6%)
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
Andrew S. Broderick
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
28%
0%
0%
Barry Eccleston
28%
0%
0%
(32%)
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
35%
0%
0%
32%
0%
0%
Charlotte Pedersen
10%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
24%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
Enrique Dupuy de
Lome Chavarri
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
21%
0%
0%
26%
0%
0%
158%
0%
0%
Charlotte Andsager
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
31%
0%
0%
21%
0%
0%
148%
0%
0%
Dr Anthony Radev3
2%
0%
0%
(4%)
0%
0%
30%
0%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Anna Gatti 4
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
28%
0%
0%
155%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Phit Lian Chong5
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Average pay based
on all employees 2
2%
0%
0%
11%
0%
6%
20%
0%
22%
22%
0%
84%
30%
0%
(100)%
1. Benefit value change from F25 to F26 for the CEO is explained on page 84. For employees, benefits represent an insignificant part
of the total compensation. The Non-Executive Directors do not receive any benefits.
2. The average employee figures are based on the average earnings of Group-level employees as Wizz Air Holdings Plc has no
employees.
3. Joined as of 13 April 2021.
4. Joined as of 4 November 2021.
5. Joined as of 6 July 2023.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 89
GOVERNANCE
In F26; the CEO did not receive any salary increase. The STIP payment for F26 increased by 21 per cent
compared with the previous financial year, driven by higher scorecard achievement across financial and non-
financial metrics, as well as his ‘AAA’ personal performance rating.
During F21, in line with the Company’s commitment to cost restraint and alignment with stakeholder
experience, the Non‑Executive Directors (NEDs) took no fees for April 2020 and reduced all fees by 15 per
cent between 1 May 2020 and 31 March 2021. A further 7.5 per cent reduction applied during F22. At the
start of F23, the Committee reinstated fees to contracted levels, and later in F23 approved a revised NED fee
structure effective from 1 September 2022. During F26, the Committee undertook a further review of
Non‑Executive Director remuneration in light of the Company’s continued growth in scale and complexity,
sustained inflationary pressures, and the increasing regulatory and governance demands placed on the
Board. Following consideration of market benchmarking and the evolving expectations of the role, the
Committee recommended a series of adjustments to the Non‑Executive Director fee framework, effective
from 1 April 2026. These changes include a 10 per cent increase to all NED fees, an increase in the Deputy
Chairman fee from EUR 20,000 to EUR 25,000, and the introduction of a EUR 2,750 per‑event fee for
Committee Observers. The Committee also recommended updated compensation arrangements for the
Financial Performance Committee. These adjustments ensure that the overall fee structure remains
competitive, fair and reflective of the responsibilities and workload of the Board, while maintaining alignment
with the broader governance and remuneration framework.
Similar COVID-19 pay-cuts were taken by the wider employee population. The salaries of cabin crew and
office employees (Heads of Functions and below) were restored to pre-reduction levels in January 2021, and
the pilot salary reduction was reversed to the original pre-COVID-19 levels in October 2021. To tackle the
difficult business environment represented by high inflation and the shortage of talent, the management
recommended and got approval for a modest adjustment to base salaries of 5.4 per cent on average across
Group Managing Director, Chief Officers, Officers and Heads, and implemented a salary increase for office
staff of 13 per cent on average in F23. In F24, following market movements and taking into account job
levels and pay bands, salary increases of 3-12 per cent were implemented. In F25, average salary increases
of 0-10 per cent were applied across the wider workforce, varying by region and role. The same principles
were followed in F26, with an average salary increase of 2.1 per cent implemented for the wider workforce.
Relative importance of spend on pay
There were no dividends or share buybacks in either F26 or F25, and therefore there is no disclosure of
“relative importance of spend on pay”.
Scheme interests (audited)
The CEO received an LTIP award on 6 June 2025 with a face value equal to 500 per cent of salary. The
award was granted in line with the Remuneration Policy approved by Shareholders at the 2024 AGM and
reflects the Committee’s decision to return to a balanced long‑term incentive structure for F26.
Date of award
Restricted
options
Performance
options
Face Value (€)
Share price at 5
June 2025 (£)
Vesting date
F26 LTIP
06-Jun-25
162,172
108,115
3,875,000
12.07
06-Jun-28
The award was delivered as a combination of performance share options and time‑vested restricted share
options in a 40/60 ratio. The performance element is subject to a 100 per cent Relative Total Shareholder
Return (TSR) condition measured against a defined group of European airline peers. The restricted share
element is subject to continued service over the vesting period.
The face value of the award was calculated using the closing share price on the day prior to granting. For
reporting purposes, the award value has been converted from EUR to GBP using the spot exchange rate of 1
EUR = 0.8419 GBP as at 5 June 2025.
Non-Executive Director remuneration
The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors are only paid Directors’ fees. The full details of the annual
compensation of the Non-Executive Directors are set out below:
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 90
GOVERNANCE
Single total figure of remuneration table – audited
Salary and fees
€
F26
F25
William A. Franke
336,000
336,000
Stephen L. Johnson
120,000
127,238
Andrew S. Broderick
119,434
112,500
Barry Eccleston
137,496
107,094
Charlotte Pedersen
144,996
132,323
Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri
128,469
125,000
Charlotte Andsager
125,003
125,000
Dr Anthony Radev1
115,000
112,500
Phit Lian Chong3
100,000
100,000
Anna Gatti 2
112,500
112,500
Total
1,438,898
1,406,000
1. Joined as of 13 April 2021.
2. Joined as of 4 November 2021.
3. Joined as of 6 July 2023.
The Committee recommended in F23 that the basic Non-Executive Director fee would be €100,000 and
that all Committee Chairs would receive an additional €25,000. For secondary Committee membership an
additional fee of €12,500 would be paid. The Senior Independent Director and Vice Chair would receive
an additional €20,000 and the Director responsible for employee engagement would receive €2,500 per
physical employee event attended. The Committee also agreed that fees would be paid quarterly.
During F23 the Committee also reviewed the Chairman fee and agreed that going forward, as Chairman,
William A. Franke would receive a fee of €336,000 (all inclusive) per annum for taking on that role.
In F26, the fees of the Non-Executive Directors remained unchanged.
Total Directors’ remuneration (Executive and Non-Executive)
Total remuneration of Directors for F26 was €5,545,696 (2025: €5,284,743). This is the sum of the total
Chief Executive Officer’s compensation and the total fees paid out to the Non-Executive Directors.
Our conflict of interest policy prohibits any other employment (for all employees) on top of their
employment at Wizz Air. Therefore, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, any additional directorship
would require specific permission of the Chairman of the Board. The Chief Executive Officer joined the
board of JetSMART SpA in March 2018 as a Non-Executive Director, with the approval of the Board. The
Chief Executive Officer does not receive any fee for his role as a Non-Executive Director of JetSMART.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 91
GOVERNANCE
Statement of Directors’ shareholdings and share interests (audited)
For Executive Directors, the shareholding requirement is equivalent to 400 per cent of base salary. The
Chief Executive Officer holds a significant shareholding in the Company through a family trust and is also
eligible to participate in the Company’s Value Creation Plan. Wizz Air considers the shareholding
requirement to have been met.
The Company therefore believes that the interests of the Directors are well aligned with those of the
Shareholders. Full details of the Directors’ and their connected persons’ interests in the Company’s shares
as at 31 March 2026 are set out below:
Direct
ownership
Options (performance
measures based)
Options (time
restricted)
Interests1
Director
Number of
Ordinary
Shares
Vested, not
exercised
yet
Unvested2
Unvested2
Number of
Ordinary
Shares
Additional number of
Ordinary Shares (if full
principal of outstanding
Convertible Notes is fully
converted)
William A. Franke
212,917
—
—
—
14,759,645
24,246,715
József Váradi2
1,511,472
—
946,058
296,129
1,511,472
—
Stephen L. Johnson
56,379
—
—
—
—
—
Anthony Radev
17,300
—
—
—
—
—
Barry Eccleston
5,000
—
—
—
—
—
Andrew S. Broderick
4,691
—
—
—
—
—
Charlotte Andsager
4,000
—
—
—
—
—
Charlotte Pedersen
2,285
—
—
—
—
—
Phit Lian Chong
1,761
—
—
—
—
—
Enrique Dupuy de
Lome Chavarri
1,421
—
—
—
—
—
Anna Gatti
—
—
—
—
—
—
1. Mr Franke is deemed to have an interest in all of the Ordinary Shares held by Indigo Hungary LP, Indigo Maple Hill LP, Indigo
Hungary Management LLC and Bigfork Partners LLC for the purposes of Section 96B of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000. Indigo Hungary LP and Indigo Maple Hill LP also hold Convertible Notes that, subject to certain conditions, are convertible to
Ordinary Shares of the Company.
2. Mr Váradi has 837,943 options under the VCP, 133,957 options under the LTIP2024 and 270,287 options under the LTIP2025. The
remaining vesting period of the LTIP2024 options counted from the financial year-end is 1 year and 6 months, while that of the
LTIP2025 options is 2 years and 2 months. Out of the VCP options, 335,176 options have a remaining vesting period of 2 years
and 4 months, while the rest of the options are split into three parts, with the first part having a one-year longer vesting period,
the second part a two-year longer vesting period, and the third part, a three-year longer vesting period.
During F23 the Board began recommending that Non-Executive Directors should invest in the Company
and show support through holding shares in the Company to encourage alignment with Shareholder
values. The recommendation is that Non-Executive Directors should build up their share ownership in
Wizz Air over a three-year period, equal in value to one year’s basic fee. The CEO already has a
significant number of shares over and above the normal requirement.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 92
GOVERNANCE
Application of the Remuneration Policy in F27
Application of the policy: Chief Executive Officer
a) Chief Executive Officer’s base salary
There is a 6.1 per cent increase planned to the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary for F27. The base salary
will rise from €775,000 to €822,275.
b) Short-term Incentive Plan
The Chief Executive Officer is eligible to receive a cash bonus of up to 200 per cent of base salary for F27.
The amount payable will depend on the achievement of the Balanced Scorecard:
▶ Financial measures will represent a 25 per cent weighting of the award:
• underlying profit after tax (12.5 per cent); and
• CASK ex-fuel normalised for wet leases (12.5 per cent).
▶ Non-financial measures will represent a 75 per cent weighting of the award:
• utilisation – percentage of how many hours an AC flies per day (12.5 per cent);
• completion (extraordinary circumstances excluded as per EC 261 Regulation) – percentage of
operated flights compared to total number of scheduled flights (12.5 per cent);
• customer satisfaction (12.5 per cent);
• employee engagement (12.5 per cent); and
• individual rating (25 per cent).
Payout will be calculated based on the performance against the above measures, requiring at least an “A”
individual performance rating or higher for payment to be made under the plan. Targets are set on a
yearly basis and were decided at the start of the performance period; they are not yet disclosed due to
commercial sensitivity, but will be disclosed retrospectively in next year’s Remuneration Report alongside
the outcome.
c) Long-term incentive awarded to Chief Executive Officer
The Chief Executive Officer is eligible to receive an LTIP of up to 500 per cent of base salary for F27.
▶ 60 per cent of the total LTIP award will be Restricted Options
• The restricted options portion of the award are not subject to performance conditions or underpins.
▶ 40 per cent of the total LTIP award will be Performance Options
• The performance options portion of the award will be subject to Relative Total Shareholder Return
(TSR). The peer group to measure Wizz Air’s performance against will be selected European airline
peers.
• The TSR group will consist of the following entities: Ryanair and EasyJet (50 per cent weighting);
AirFrance-KLM, Deutsche Lufthansa, Finnair and IAG (50 per cent weighting). 25 per cent of the
Performance Options will vest for median performance and 100 per cent of them will vest for
performance equal to or exceeding the upper quartile. There will be no vesting for performance below
median, and linear interpolation will apply for performance between the median and upper quartile.
d) VCP awarded to Chief Executive Officer
As referenced in the policy, the one-off VCP award was made during F22 and included an award of
837,943 shares. Any value delivered under the VCP will be offset by the value of vested LTIP awards
granted from F25 onwards.
e) Chairman and Non-Executive Directors’ fees
For F27, the Committee recommended that the basic Non-Executive Director fee would be €110,000 and
that all Committee Chairs would receive an additional €27,500. For secondary Committee membership an
additional fee of €13,759 will be paid.
The Senior Independent Director will receive an additional €22,000 and the Director responsible for
employee engagement receives €2,750 per physical employee event attended.
The Chair of the Board, William A. Franke, will receive an all‑inclusive annual fee of €369,600 in F27,
reflecting the scope and responsibilities of the role.
Historically, Committee Observers have not received any compensation. Given the increasing level of
engagement and time commitment associated with observer roles, a fee of €2,750 per event attended
has been introduced with effect from F27. This level is aligned with the fee paid for employee
engagement activities, ensuring internal consistency and fairness.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 93
GOVERNANCE
Non‑Executive Directors will continue to be reimbursed for all reasonable and proper expenses incurred in
the performance of their duties.
Application of the policy: wider workforce
a) Short-term Incentive Plan (F27)
The performance criteria under the F27 STIP for Heads, Officers, Chief Officers and Group Managing
Director are aligned to that of the CEO.
All employees below Head level are eligible for an annual award in cash under the All-Employee Bonus
scheme with on target value equal to 1/12 of the annual qualifying earning of the Participant during the
Financial Year.
b) Long-term Incentive Plan (F27)
To ensure consistency of the F27 LTIP across all senior leadership roles, the Committee approved the same
split of 60 per cent restricted shares and 40 per cent performance shares for Head, Officer and Chief Officer
and Group Managing Director, in line with that of the Chief Executive Officer.
As the purpose of the LTIP is to prioritise creating long-term shareholder value, for the performance portion
of the award, the Committee has approved a single performance indicator, Relative Total Shareholder Return
(TSR), against select European airlines. This is consistent with the LTIP measure for the Chief Executive
Officer.
c) Senior Leadership Growth Plan (F27)
Officers, Chief Officers and Group Managing Director are no longer eligible to receive a one-off award in
shares under the SLGP, which was first granted in 2021.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 94
GOVERNANCE
Other disclosures
Chief Executive pay ratio
The table below sets out the Chief Executive Officer to worker pay ratios for the year ended March 2026. The
ratios compare the single total figure of remuneration of the Chief Executive with the equivalent figures for
the lower quartile (P25), median (P50) and upper quartile (P75) UK employees.
We have used the Option A methodology as at 31 March 2026 for the Chief Executive Officer and employees
over the financial year to provide the most accurate comparison. The total FTE remuneration paid during the
year for each employee was calculated on the same basis as the information set out in the “single figure”
table for the Chief Executive on page 85.
In calculating the figures, the following considerations were made:
▶ the single total figure of remuneration of our colleagues was calculated using a year’s worth of
remuneration up to and including the March 2026 payroll;
▶ where employees joined part way through the reporting period, pay was pro-rated to determine the
full‑year equivalent; and
▶ this data then identified the employees at the 25th (lower quartile), 50th (median) and 75th (upper
quartile) percentile points.
Pay ratio
Financial year
Method used
P25 (lower quartile)
P50 (median)
P75 (upper quartile)
F26
Option A
149:1
110:1
60:1
F25
Option A
126:1
97:1
55:1
F24
Option A
49:1
40:1
23:1
F23
Option A
44:1
36:1
22:1
F22
Option A
80:1
59:1
29:1
The table below summarises the identified employees in 2026:
P25 (lower quartile)
P50 (median)
P75 (upper quartile)
Financial year
Base pay
Total pay
Base pay
Total pay
Base pay
Total pay
F26
€22,042
€27,566
€25,704
€37,230
€33,936
€67,958
F25
€23,245
€30,811
€26,615
€40,178
€40,358
€71,105
F24
€21,711
€28,526
€24,881
€34,544
€34,963
€60,857
F23
€21,121
€28,878
€23,987
€35,231
€31,705
€56,272
F22
€13,479
€24,981
€15,670
€34,022
€43,101
€70,413
The CEO’s total remuneration continues to be more sensitive to individual performance outcomes and
long‑term incentive vesting than that of the wider workforce, and the ratios may therefore vary from year to
year. In F26, reported employee remuneration decreased marginally. This reflects the fact that
remuneration is reported in EUR, while employees are paid in GBP, and the appreciation of GBP during the
year reduced the translated EUR amounts.
The CEO pay ratio increased modestly, primarily due to a higher‑than‑average individual performance
outcome for the CEO, resulting in above‑target total variable remuneration. The Remuneration Committee
considers the median ratio to remain an appropriate and representative indicator of pay and progression
practices across the Company.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 95
GOVERNANCE
Directors’ service agreements and letters of appointment
Executive Director
Since 2 August 2023, Mr Váradi has had a contract with Wizz Air UK Limited. This contract expires on 6
August 2028. The Company has the right to terminate Mr Váradi’s employment with immediate effect by
payment in lieu of notice. The service agreement contains post-termination restrictive covenants preventing
Mr Váradi from competing with the Company or any of its business partners in the EU as well as those non-
EU countries where the Wizz Air Group operates, for a period of one year following the termination of his
employment. Mr Váradi will be paid a sum equal to six months’ base salary if the Company chooses to
enforce these restrictive covenants. Upon termination of employment other than for cause, Mr Váradi is
entitled to a severance payment equal to six months’ salary, in addition to any notice pay or payment in lieu
of notice.
Non-Executive Directors
The Company entered into letters of appointment for each Director. Directors are appointed for an initial
term of three years. The Directors must retire by rotation.
Each Non-Executive Director’s appointment may be terminated by the Company or the Non-Executive
Director with one month’s written notice. Continuation of the appointment is contingent on continued
satisfactory performance and re-election at the Company’s Annual General Meetings and the appointment
will terminate automatically on the termination of the appointment by the Shareholders or, where
Shareholder approval is required for the appointment to continue, the withholding of approval by the
Shareholders. Re-appointment will be reviewed annually by the Nomination and Governance Committee.
In accordance with the terms of the letters of appointment, each of the Non-Executive Directors is required
to allocate sufficient time to discharge their responsibilities effectively. Each letter of appointment contains
obligations of confidentiality that have effect both during the appointment and after termination.
On behalf of the Board
Nóra Viktória Rabe
Corporate Secretary
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 96
GOVERNANCE
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors present their report and the audited consolidated financial statements for Wizz Air Holdings Plc
(“the Company”) and its subsidiaries (“the Group”) for the year ended 31 March 2026.
Results and dividend
The results for the year are shown on page 105.
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend ( 2025: € nil). The Directors consider that the
existing reserves of the Group can currently best be utilised in supporting the significant planned future
growth of the Group.
Directors
The Directors of the Company who were in office during the year and at the date of signing the financial
statements are listed below:
▶ József Váradi;
▶ William A. Franke;
▶ Stephen L. Johnson;
▶ Barry Eccleston;
▶ Charlotte Pedersen;
▶ Andrew S. Broderick;
▶ Charlotte Andsager;
▶ Enrique Dupuy de Lome Chavarri;
▶ Dr Anthony Radev;
▶ Anna Gatti; and
▶ Phit Lian Chong.
Going concern
Basis of Preparation and Assessment Period
Wizz Air’s business activities, financial performance and financial position, together with factors likely to
affect its future development and performance, are described in the Strategic Report on pages 4 to 27.
Emerging and principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group are described on pages 19 to 27. Note 3 to
the financial statements sets out the Group’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing its capital and
liquidity and provides details of the risks related to financial instruments held by the Group.
The Directors have reviewed the Group’s latest financial forecasts for a period of 18 months from the date of
approval of the financial statements. This includes considering the Group’s available committed financing for
aircraft and its plans to finance committed future aircraft deliveries (see Note 32 ) due within this period that
are currently unfinanced and takes into account forecast aircraft groundings given our GTF engine related
supply chain issues, associated compensation to mitigate these issues and likely scenarios associated with
the Iran conflict, closure of the Strait of Hormuz and availability of jet fuel supplies.
Financial Position and Liquidity
At 31 March 2026, the Group held total cash of €2,126.4 million (including cash and cash equivalents of
€1,085.9 million, €952.8 million in cash deposits and €87.7 million in restricted cash), while net current
liabilities totalled €102.7 million (including deferred income of €1,180.1 million) and net assets amounted to
€928.4 million.
The Group’s contractual undiscounted external borrowings comprise: €308.1 million in ETS financing from
Standard Chartered Bank repayable in September 2027; and convertible debt with a balance of €25.8
million. In addition, borrowings include a carrying amount of €6,601.0 million from lease contracts
accounted for under IFRS 16 and liabilities related to JOLCO, FTL and Finance Lease contracts (see Note 23).
None of these borrowings contain any financial covenants and the €500.0 million, 1.00 per cent Eurobond
was repaid in January 2026 out of free cash. Two ratings agencies, Fitch and Moody’s, issued updates during
the fourth quarter with Fitch updating Wizz Air’s credit rating to BB with a stable outlook, while Moody’s
issued a Ba2 rating with a negative outlook.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 97
GOVERNANCE
Aircraft Financing and Planning Horizon
The Group operates using a three-year planning cycle. Aircraft deliveries represent the Group’s primary
capital expenditure over the going concern period, which the Group intends to finance through various forms
of sale and leaseback or other fleet-financing arrangements, consistent with its past practices. While such
financing remains partially uncommitted, the vendor additionally offers committed backstop financing. This
backstop financing would cover a substantial portion, though not all, of the expenditure if the Group chooses
to utilise it.
Forecasting Approach
The Directors’ enquiries and testing included the review of a base case model projecting the Group’s cash
flows. The base case model is derived from our contracted fleet plan. This was adjusted to reflect aircraft
availability constraints from GTF engine supply chain issues, based on forecasts prepared by the operations
team.
The resulting available fleet was overlaid with a utilisation assumption consistent with actual levels observed
in F26. A network plan was then applied to which revenue, cost, compensation, working capital and
financing assumptions were layered to develop the base case cash flows.
Downside Scenario
This base case was then flexed to produce a downside forecast that assumes lower demand leading to a
3 per cent reduction in RASK in F27, a 5 per cent reduction in RASK in F28 and a 10 per cent higher fuel cost
per metric tonne. We also increased operating costs by +2% allowing for inflation. These assumptions were
modelled cumulatively across the full going concern period. The downside case also excludes any assumed
financing for our currently unfinanced aircraft deliveries (see Note 32). Mitigating actions in relation to the
unfinanced aircraft and an assumed sale of owned spare engines were also considered in the preparation of
the downside case.
Key Risk Considerations
In preparing both base and downside forecasts, the Directors considered the emerging and principal risks
identified, including:
▶ Card acquirer risk: The Group receives payments for ticket and ancillary revenue in advance through
arrangements with various card acquirers, which are subject to typical capacity and security limits.
These limits were considered in the forecast models.
▶ Geopolitical and operational disruption: The impact of conflicts in Ukraine, Israel and Iran was
considered, including the three stranded aircraft in Ukraine (see Note 13) and restriction in Jet A1
supplies from the Middle East. Whilst the Group’s plans include continued operations to Israel, the
potential for reallocating capacity to other routes was assessed and considered manageable.
▶ Climate and regulatory risk: The Directors considered the impact of higher pricing for ETS levied in
Europe and the UK, as well as Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation
(CORSIA) implementation costs. These were reflected in forecast assumptions through higher carbon
and fuel pricing. The use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) was also considered as part of increased
average jet fuel cost assumptions.
The Directors concluded that no material adverse impact on future cash flows is likely to result from these
items. Furthermore, it was assumed that there will be no further significant disruption of the magnitude
experienced in recent financial years.
Conclusion
In this downside scenario, whilst there was a significant reduction in liquidity, headroom on the security
levels of the card acquirer contracts was maintained. After making enquiries and testing the assumptions
against different forecast scenarios, including a severe but plausible downside case, the Directors have
satisfied themselves that the Group is expected to be able to meet its commitments and obligations as they
fall due for a period of at least the next twelve months from the date the Annual Report and Accounts are
approved. Accordingly, the Directors consider it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting
in preparing the financial statements.
Subsequent events
Based on the assessment conducted, no material subsequent events have been identified that would
necessitate disclosure in the financial statements for the reporting period.
Viability
In accordance with Provision 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, the Directors have assessed
the prospects and the viability of the Group over a three-year period to March 2029. The Directors have
determined that a three-year period is appropriate because the Group’s strategic planning process
traditionally covers three years.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 98
GOVERNANCE
Assessment of prospects
The Group’s prospects are assessed by management and the Board primarily through the strategic planning
process. This three-year plan takes into account the current position of the Group, includes a detailed
“bottom-up” annual operating plan for the financial year starting in April of that year, and then, based on
that plan, builds a sufficiently detailed forecast for a further two financial years. The Board reviews and
analyses a base plan and a downside plan scenario with sensitivities that vary key parameters around key
principal risks. The scenarios also take account of the volatility of the current macroeconomic environment
and competitive dynamics, and align on the most plausible base plan. The scenarios are also used to
generate risk mitigation plans to deal with any downside, and acceleration plans to capture the upside.
Assessment of viability
The plan considers the existing aircraft order book of the Group and the aircraft deliveries falling due over
the three-year plan period together with their financing. This order book underpins the Group’s planned
growth for several years ahead. The Directors believe that the growth in the fleet can be absorbed by strong
demand in existing and new markets despite short term volatility brought about by the Iran conflict based
on the Company’s strengths in terms of: 1) the majority of the Group’s customers being drawn from the
younger demographic segments; 2) leveraging the historical strength of a faster growing Central and
Eastern Europe, where travel for work or to visit family and friends is becoming an increasingly essential
feature of life, but at the same time complementing this with a more focused footprint in the West and
expansion further to the Middle East, with this diversification key to buffer demand shocks in part of the
network with the rest of the network; 3) a low cost base offering a sustainable competitive advantage and
allowing the Company to sustain low fares to stimulate demand; and 4) the agility of the business model
designed to allow the airline to adapt its operations rapidly and flexibly and to serve the most financially and
strategically attractive point-to-point connections.
Although the strategic plan reflects management’s and the Directors’ best estimate of the future prospects of
the business, they have also tested the resilience of the business to unfavourable deviations of certain key
variables from the base case scenario. In defining these scenarios, the Directors considered the emerging
and principal risks that could prevent the Group from delivering on its strategy and financial targets, as
summarised on pages 19 to 27 in the Strategic Report.
The Directors concluded that the same trading-related sensitivities to RASK and fuel price that were applied
cumulatively in the going concern assessment were also appropriate to stress test the business in the
context of the viability statement. The basis for this conclusion was that a majority of the emerging and
principal risks identified would result in lower revenues or higher costs, and this combination of sensitivities
appropriately targeted the most material of these areas. Applying the sensitivities cumulatively also
assumed many of these risks could present at the same time, which was considered an appropriate
approach to the stress test.
As part of their stress testing for the viability statement, the Directors have assumed that the Group will be
able to continue financing its aircraft deliveries as they fall due, have access to its Eurobond programme –
which was extended in early 2026 – as well as have access to other financial products available to the
Group. The results of this stress testing show that the Group will be able to withstand the impact of the
assumptions used in the stress testing.
Viability statement
Based on this assessment, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to
continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period to March 2029.
For further information on emerging and principal risks and longer-term viability please refer to pages 19
to 27.
Financial risks
The exposure of the Company to financial risks is explained in Note 3 to the financial statements. The
Group’s financial risk management objectives and policies are described on pages 125 to 134.
Environmental matters
The aviation industry has a responsibility to take steps to minimise its impact on the environment. The
Company’s ultimate goal is to ensure that by choosing to fly with Wizz Air, our customers are making a
sustainable choice of air travel. The Company’s business model is to assess and implement innovative
technologies on an ongoing basis that decrease our environmental footprint. Further details on
environmental matters are outlined on pages 216 to 248.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 99
GOVERNANCE
Employee matters
Committing to diversity and equal opportunities
The Company treats its existing and potential employees fairly, regardless of anything not related to their
professional abilities and irrespective of their race, gender or age. During the recruitment and selection
process, we evaluate professional factors including experience and qualifications in light of the relevant job
requirements and this principle remains throughout employment with the Company. We expect all of our
colleagues to adhere to these same principles, which are set out in The Wizz Way and our Code of Ethics,
along with the expected standards of behaviour for every member of the WIZZ team.
Employee involvement
The Company places great value on the contributions of its employees and seeks to promote their
involvement in the business wherever possible. The Company keeps employees informed by written
communications and meetings on matters affecting them as employees and on the various factors affecting
the performance of Wizz Air. Employees are encouraged to share feedback.
Further details of employee matters are set out on pages 249 to 281.
Stakeholder engagement
Details of stakeholder engagement can be found on pages 197 to 198.
Disclosure of information to auditors
At the approval date of the financial statements, the Directors confirm that, as far as they are aware, there
is no relevant audit information the Company’s auditors are unaware about, and they have taken all the
steps they ought to have taken as Directors to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information
and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information.
Independent auditors
A resolution for the appointment of the auditors of the Company for the financial year ending 31 March 2027
is to be proposed by the Directors at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Indemnities
The Company maintains Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance. This insurance provides coverage for the
Directors and Officers protecting them from claims that may be brought against them arising from their
decisions taken when exercising their duties.
Political donations and expenditure
Wizz Air works constructively with all levels of government across its network, regardless of political
affiliation. Wizz Air believes in the right of individuals to engage in the democratic process. However, Wizz
Air itself does not make any political donations and does not incur any political expenditure.
Capital structure
On 29 December 2020, Wizz Air Holdings Plc announced its decision to treat as Restricted Shares certain
Ordinary Shares held by Non-Qualifying Nationals and to issue Restricted Share Notices to such shareholders
(“Disenfranchisement”). This is because from 1 January 2021 UK nationals were no longer treated as
Qualifying Nationals with regard to European airline ownership requirements, notwithstanding the UK-EU
Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Therefore, the Board has resolved to exercise its power under the
articles to serve Restricted Share Notices on Non-Qualifying National Shareholders specifying that, from 1
January 2021, in respect of their Restricted Shares they cannot attend or speak or vote at any general
meetings of the Company. The rights to attend (whether in person or by proxy) or to speak at the general
meeting of the Company or to vote on a poll in respect of the Restricted Shares shall vest in the Chairman of
such meeting, who will be a Director who is a Qualifying National. Each such Director will give an irrevocable
undertaking not to vote any such Restricted Shares.
The Board has determined, pursuant to the articles, that the fairest and most appropriate method to
implement the Disenfranchisement is for the same proportion of each Non-Qualifying National’s (including
each UK national’s) shareholding to be designated as Restricted Shares:
▶ a “Qualifying National” includes: (i) EEA nationals; (ii) nationals of Switzerland; and (iii) in respect of
any undertaking, an undertaking which satisfies the conditions as to nationality of ownership and control
of undertakings granted an operating licence contained in Article 4(f) of Regulation (EC) No. 1008/2008
of the European Commission, as such conditions may be amended, varied, supplemented or replaced
from time to time, or as provided for in any agreement between the EU and any third country (whether
or not such undertaking is itself granted an operating licence); and
▶ a “Non-Qualifying National” includes: any person who is not a Qualifying National in accordance with
the definition above.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 100
GOVERNANCE
To protect the EU airline operating licence of Wizz Air Hungary Limited and Wizz Air Malta Limited
(subsidiaries of the Company), the Board has resolved to continue to apply a disenfranchisement of Ordinary
Shares held by non-EEA Shareholders in the capital of the Company. This will continue to be done on the
basis of a “Permitted Maximum” of 45 per cent pursuant to the Company’s articles of association (“the
Permitted Maximum”). In preparation for the 2025 Annual General Meeting (AGM), on 24 July 2025 the
Company sent a Restricted Share Notice to Non-Qualifying registered Shareholders, informing them of the
number of Ordinary Shares that will be treated as Restricted Shares.
As at 31 March 2026, the Company had 103,461,185 Ordinary Shares of £0.0001 each in issue, each with
one vote. There were no shares held in treasury at that date. The rights and obligations attached to the
Company’s shares are set out in the articles of association. Holders of Ordinary Shares have the following
rights:
a) subject to any rights or restrictions as to voting attached to any Ordinary Shares, on a show of hands,
each Shareholder present in person shall have one vote, and on a poll each Shareholder present in
person or by proxy shall have one vote for every Ordinary Share he/she holds;
b) a certificated share may be transferred by means of an instrument in writing, either by the usual
transfer form or in any other form that the Board approves, signed by or on behalf of the person
transferring the Ordinary Shares and, unless the Ordinary Shares are fully paid, by or on behalf of the
person acquiring the Ordinary Shares. Ordinary Shares in uncertificated form may be transferred by
means of the relevant system;
c) the right to receive dividends on a pari passu basis; and
d) upon a winding-up, the liquidator may divide amongst the members in specie the whole or any part of
the assets of the Company.
During the 2026 financial year 65,107 new Ordinary Shares were allotted for cash, all on a non-pre-emptive
basis. These were allotted pursuant to the exercise of share options by the employees of the Group.
The aggregate nominal value of the Ordinary Shares allotted for cash in the 2026 financial year was £13.13.
The aggregate cash consideration received by the Company for the allotment of the Ordinary Shares was
£854,744.
Corporate Governance Statement
The Corporate Governance Statement, prepared in accordance with rule 7.2 of the UK Listing Authority’s
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules sourcebook, can be found in the Wizz Air Holdings Plc
Corporate Governance Report on page 36. The Wizz Air Holdings Plc Corporate Governance Report forms
part of this Wizz Air Holdings Plc Directors’ Report and is incorporated into it by this reference.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 101
GOVERNANCE
Information required by UK Listing Rule 6.6.1
In compliance with Listing Rule 6.6.1, the Company discloses the following information:
UK Listing
Rule
Information required
Relevant disclosure
6.6.1 (1)
Interest capitalised by the Group
N/A
6.6.1 (2)
Unaudited financial information as required (UKLR 6.2.23 R)
Unaudited financial information was
published by the Group in its interim
management statements (for Q1 and
Q3), half-yearly results and
preliminary announcement of results
for the year. There have been no
changes to the unaudited information
previously published.
6.6.1(3)
Long-term Incentive Schemes (LR 9.3.3 R)
See Directors’ Remuneration Report.
6.6.1 (4)
Directors’ waivers of emoluments
See Directors’ Remuneration Report.
6.6.1(5)
Directors’ waivers of future emoluments
See Directors’ Remuneration Report.
6.6.1(6)
Non-pro-rata allotments of equity securities for cash (the
Company)
See paragraph headed “Capital
structure” in this report.
6.6.1(7)
Non-pro-rata allotments of equity securities for cash (major
subsidiaries)
N/A
6.6.1(8)
Participation of parent undertaking in placings
N/A
6.6.1(9)
Contracts of significance in which a Director or controlling
shareholder was interested
N/A
6.6.1 (10)
Contracts for the provision of services by a controlling
shareholder
N/A
6.6.1(11)
Waivers of dividends
N/A
6.6.1(12)
Waivers of future dividends
N/A
6.6.1(14)
Statements relating to controlling shareholders and ensuring
company independence
See Corporate Governance Report.
For and on behalf of the Board
József Váradi
Chief Executive Officer
11 June 2026
Registered number: 103356
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 102
GOVERNANCE
COMPANY INFORMATION
Registered number
103356
Registered office
44 Esplanade
St Helier
Jersey
JE4 9WG
Secretary
CSC Corporate Services (Jersey) Limited
44 Esplanade
St Helier
Jersey
JE4 9WG
Independent auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
1 Embankment Place
London
WC2N 6RH
United Kingdom
Principal bankers
Citibank
Citigroup Centre
25 Canada Square
Canary Wharf
London
E14 5LB
United Kingdom
Share registrar
Computershare Investor Services
(Jersey) Limited
13 Castle Street
St Helier
Jersey
JE1 1ES
Financial public relations
MHP Group
60 Great Portland Street
London
W1W 7RT
United Kingdom
Joint corporate brokers
Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc
25 Cabot Square
Canary Wharf
London
E114 4QA
United Kingdom
J.P. Morgan Cazenove
25 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London
E14 5JP
United Kingdom
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 103
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES IN RESPECT
OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts in accordance with applicable
law and regulation.
The Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 requires the Directors to prepare consolidated financial statements for
each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the Group financial statements in
accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union.
Under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, the Directors must not approve the consolidated financial
statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group
and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the
Directors are required to:
▶ select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
▶ state whether applicable IFRS as adopted by the European Union have been followed, subject to any
material departures disclosed and explained in the consolidated financial statements;
▶ make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and
▶ prepare the consolidated financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to
presume that the Group will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps
for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are also responsible for keeping proper accounting records that are sufficient to show and
explain the Group’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of
the Group and enable them to ensure that the consolidated financial statements comply with the Companies
(Jersey) Law 1991 and the Directors’ Remuneration Report complies with the UK Companies Act 2006 as if
the Company was a UK quoted company.
The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Group’s website. Legislation in the
United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of consolidated financial statements may differ
from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Directors’ confirmations
The Directors consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and
understandable and provides the information necessary for Shareholders to assess the Group’s financial
position and performance, business model and strategy.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Directors’ Report confirm that, to the best
of their knowledge:
▶ the Group financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the
European Union, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of
the Group; and
▶ the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the
position of the Group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.
In the case of each Director in office at the date the Directors’ Report is approved:
▶ so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information the Group’s auditors are unaware;
and
▶ they have taken all the steps they ought to have taken as a Director to make themselves aware of any
relevant audit information and to establish that the Group’s auditors are aware of that information.
On behalf of the Board
József Váradi
Director
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 104
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
AND NOTES
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 105
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2026
Note
2026
2025     
€ million
€ million
Passenger ticket revenue
5,6
3,161.4
2,917.0
Ancillary revenue
5,6
2,530.0
2,350.6
Total revenue
5,6
5,691.4
5,267.6
Staff costs
8
(655.9)
(564.9)
Fuel costs
(1,764.0)
(1,797.6)
Distribution and marketing
(133.4)
(117.8)
Maintenance, materials and repairs
(462.8)
(330.4)
Airport, handling and en-route charges
(1,527.6)
(1,351.8)
Depreciation and amortisation
(1,178.6)
(966.8)
Other expenses
(371.2)
(466.6)
Other income
541.8
495.8
Total operating expenses
(5,551.7)
(5,100.1)
Operating profit
139.7
167.5
Financial income
10
73.6
82.1
Financial expenses
10
(267.8)
(249.5)
Net loss on derivative financial instruments
10
(20.6)
(6.4)
Net foreign exchange gains
10
102.1
26.0
Net financing expense
10
(112.7)
(147.8)
Share of net profit of associates
18
—
—
Profit before income tax
27.0
19.7
Income tax (expense)/ credit
11
(25.7)
194.2
Profit for the year
1.3
213.9
(Loss)/Profit for the year attributable to:
Non-controlling interests
17
(0.9)
(11.9)
Owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc
2.2
225.8
Other comprehensive income/(expense) – items that may be
subsequently reclassified to profit or loss:
Change in fair value of cash flow hedging reserve, net of tax
28
564.6
(35.4)
Cash flow hedging reserve recycled to profit or loss
28
(48.8)
13.6
Cost of hedging
28
16.5
(32.8)
Currency translation differences
28
18.6
0.6
Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year, net of tax
550.9
(54.0)
Total comprehensive income for the year
552.2
159.9
Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the year attributable to:
Non-controlling interests
17
3.2
(11.8)
Owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc
549.0
171.7
Basic earnings per share (€/share)
12
0.02
2.18
Diluted earnings per share (€/share)
12
0.03
1.78
The Notes on pages 110 to 165 are an integral part of these financial statements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 106
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AT 31 MARCH 2026
Note
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
13
7,128.1
6,493.0
Intangible assets
14
114.8
98.9
Restricted cash
22
45.2
36.3
Long-term cash deposits
174.4
—
Deferred tax assets
15
285.6
334.7
Derivative financial instruments
21
41.9
1.8
Trade and other receivables
20
25.1
45.7
Investments in associates
18
5.7
5.7
Investments in other entities
3.7
3.7
Total non-current assets
7,824.5
7,019.9
Current assets
Inventories
19
305.7
271.9
Trade and other receivables
20
687.0
630.4
Current tax assets
3.7
3.2
Derivative financial instruments
21
542.2
10.3
Restricted cash
22
42.5
42.0
Short-term cash deposits
778.4
1,060.2
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
597.5
Total current assets
3,445.4
2,615.5
Total assets
11,269.9
9,635.4
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
Share capital
28
—
—
Share premium
28
381.2
381.2
Reorganisation reserve
28
(193.0)
(193.0)
Equity part of convertible debt
28
8.3
8.3
Cash flow hedging reserve
28
507.8
(8.0)
Cost of hedging reserve
28
2.7
(13.8)
Cumulative translation adjustments
28
17.8
3.3
Retained earnings
207.3
188.6
Capital and reserves attributable to the owners of Wizz Air Holdings Plc
932.1
366.6
Non-controlling interests
17
(3.7)
(49.5)
Total equity
928.4
317.1
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
23
6,138.5
5,070.6
Convertible debt
24
24.7
25.2
Deferred income
26
203.9
166.5
Derivative financial instruments
21
43.6
13.4
Trade and other payables
25
103.6
69.5
Provisions for liabilities and charges
29
279.1
201.2
Total non-current liabilities
6,793.4
5,546.3
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
25
1,301.0
1,038.8
Current tax liabilities
3.1
18.6
Borrowings
23
815.9
1,517.9
Convertible debt
24
1.1
0.3
Derivative financial instruments
21
11.7
29.2
Deferred income
26
1,180.1
1,013.3
Provisions for liabilities and charges
29
235.2
153.9
Total current liabilities
3,548.1
3,772.0
Total liabilities
10,341.5
9,318.3
Total equity and liabilities
11,269.9
9,635.4
The Notes on pages 110 to 165 are an integral part of these financial statements.
The financial statements on pages 105 to 165 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for
issue on 11 June 2026 , and were signed on behalf of the Board by:
József Váradi
Chief Executive Officer
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 107
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2026
Share
capital
Share
premium
Reorganisation
reserve
Equity part of
convertible
debt
Cash flow
hedging
reserve
Cost of
hedging
reserve
Cumulative
translation
adjustments
(Accumulated
losses)/
Retained
earnings
Total
Non-
controlling
interest
Total
equity
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Note
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
17
Balance at 1
April 2025
—
381.2
(193.0)
8.3
(8.0)
(13.8)
3.3
188.6
366.6
(49.5)
317.1
Comprehensive
income/
(expense):
Profit/(loss) for
the year
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
2.2
(0.9)
1.3
Other
comprehensive
income/
(expense)
—
—
—
—
515.8
16.5
14.5
—
546.8
4.1
550.9
Total
comprehensive
income/
(expense) for
the year
—
—
—
—
515.8
16.5
14.5
2.2
549.0
3.2
552.2
Transactions
with owners in
their capacity
as owners:
Change of NCI
without a change
in control (Note
23)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
42.6
42.6
Share-based
payment charge
(Note 27)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17.1
17.1
—
17.1
Release on
liquidation
(Note 16)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(0.6)
(0.6)
—
(0.6)
Total
transactions
with owners in
their capacity
as owners:
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16.5
16.5
42.6
59.1
Balance at
31 March 2026
—
381.2
(193.0)
8.3
507.8
2.7
17.8
207.3
932.1
(3.7)
928.4
The Notes on pages 110 to 165 are an integral part of these financial statements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 108
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2025
Share
capital
Share
premium
Reorganisation
reserve
Equity part of
convertible
debt
Cash flow
hedging
reserve
Cost of
hedging
reserve
Cumulative
translation
adjustment
Retained
earnings/
(Accumulated
losses)
Total
Non-
controlling
interest
Total
equity
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Note
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
17
Balance at 1 April
2024
—
381.2
(193.0)
8.3
13.8
19.0
2.8
(48.7)
183.4
(37.7)
145.7
Comprehensive
income/(expense):
Profit/(loss) for the
year
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
225.8
225.8
(11.9)
213.9
Other
comprehensive
(expense)/income
—
—
—
—
(21.8)
(32.8)
0.5
—
(54.1)
0.1
(54.0)
Total
comprehensive
income/(expense)
for the year
—
—
—
—
(21.8)
(32.8)
0.5
225.8
171.7
(11.8)
159.9
Transactions with
owners in their
capacity as owners:
Share-based payment
charge (Note 27)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
11.5
11.5
—
11.5
Total transactions
with owners in
their capacity as
owners:
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
11.5
11.5
—
11.5
Balance at 31
March 2025
—
381.2
(193.0)
8.3
(8.0)
(13.8)
3.3
188.6
366.6
(49.5)
317.1
The Notes on pages 110 to 165 are an integral part of these financial statements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 109
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2026
2026
2025
Note
€ million
€ million
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before income tax
27.0
19.7
Adjustments for:
Depreciation
13
1,146.8
939.9
Amortisation
14
31.8
26.9
Financial income
10
(73.6)
(82.1)
Financial expenses
10
267.8
249.5
Unrealised fair value (gains)/losses on derivative financial instruments
(62.8)
11.6
Unrealised foreign currency gains
(170.2)
(31.5)
Realised non-operating foreign currency losses/(gains)
84.7
(6.5)
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment
(261.0)
(121.3)
Share-based payment charges
27
17.1
11.5
Other non-cash operating income
(8.8)
(19.1)
998.8
998.6
Changes in working capital
Decrease in trade and other receivables
20
61.0
17.8
(Increase)/decrease in inventory
19
(25.8)
67.8
Increase in provisions
29
1.3
3.4
Decrease in trade and other payables
25
(2.6)
(198.0)
Increase in deferred income
26
166.5
215.1
200.4
106.1
Cash generated by operating activities before tax
1,199.2
1,104.7
Income taxes paid
(19.6)
(39.1)
Net cash generated by operating activities
1,179.6
1,065.6
Purchase of aircraft maintenance assets
(41.6)
(23.9)
Purchase of tangible and intangible assets
(366.5)
(258.8)
Proceeds from the sale of tangible assets
802.6
303.6
Advances paid for aircraft and spare engines
13
(245.0)
(362.8)
Refund of advances paid for aircraft and spare engines
13
471.3
303.9
Interest received
80.3
75.9
Release of restricted cash
22
57.0
37.7
Increase in restricted cash
22
(70.4)
(7.2)
Release of cash deposits
1,851.6
1,136.3
Increase in cash deposits
(1,788.0)
(1,466.0)
Payment for acquisition of investments
—
(2.1)
Net cash generated by/(used in) investing activities
751.3
(263.4)
Proceeds from new loans*
79.2
245.6
Repayment of loans*
23
(791.4)
(720.0)
Interest paid on loans*
23
(234.7)
(207.1)
Repayment of unsecured debt
(500.0)
—
Interest paid on unsecured debt
(5.0)
(5.0)
Proceeds from secured debt
22.8
—
Repayment of secured debt
—
(240.8)
Interest paid on secured debt
—
(9.5)
Transactions with non-controlling interests
23
30.0
—
Repayment of other loan
16
(23.6)
—
Other interest paid
(4.8)
(1.9)
Net cash used in financing activities
30
(1,427.5)
(938.7)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
503.4
(136.5)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year**
596.9
716.4
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents
(16.7)
17.0
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year**
1,083.6
596.9
*    Mostly JOLCO, FTL, FL and IFRS 16, ‘Leases’ repayments and interest payments. See Note 23 for cash payments for lease.
**Cash and cash equivalents at 31 March 2026 include €516.0 million (31 March 2025: €525.3 million; 31 March 2024: €359.4
million) of cash at bank and €569.7 million (31 March 2025: €72.2 million; 31 March 2024: €145.6 million) of cash deposits
maturing within three months of inception, €0.3 million in money market funds (31 March 2025: €nil million; 31 March 2024:
€223.4 million) and overdrafts (repayable on demand) of € 2.3 million (31 March 2025: €0.6 million; 31 March 2024: €12.0 million),
which are an integral part of cash management activities.
The Notes on pages 110 to 165 are an integral part of these financial statements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 110
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General information
Wizz Air Holdings Plc (“the Company”) is a public limited company incorporated in Jersey , registered at 44
The Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE4 9WG. The Company is managed from Route François-Peyrot 12, 1218
Le Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland. The Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as “the
Group” or “Wizz Air”) provide low-cost, low-fare passenger air transportation services on scheduled short-
haul and medium-haul point-to-point routes across Europe and the Middle East. The Company’s Ordinary
Shares are listed in the equity shares for commercial companies (“ESCC”) category of the Official List of the
Financial Conduct Authority and admitted to the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange.
2. Material accounting policies
The material accounting policies applied in the presentation of these consolidated financial statements are
set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise
stated.
Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements combine the financial information of the Company and its
subsidiaries. The audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared and approved by the
Directors in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European
Union (“Adopted IFRS”) and IFRS Interpretations Committee guidance.
Based on the exemption provided for in Article 105 (11) of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, the Company
does not present its separate financial statements and related notes.
The financial statements are presented in euros (EUR or €).
The Company rounds each amount and percentage individually from the fully accurate number to the figure
disclosed in the financial statements. As a result, some amounts and percentages do not total – though such
differences are all trivial.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, modified by
the revaluation of financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value
through profit or loss.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with the adopted IFRS requires the
use of certain critical accounting estimates, and for management to exercise judgements in the process of
applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a high degree of judgement or complexity, or
areas where assumptions and estimates involving significant uncertainty carry a risk of causing material
adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the coming year, are disclosed in Note 4.
New standards, amendments and interpretations
a) Standards, amendments and interpretations adopted by the EU, effective for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2025 and adopted by the Group
The Group applied the following amended standards effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2025 for the first time for its annual reporting period commencing on 1 April 2025:
▶ Amendments to IAS 21, ‘The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates’: Lack of Exchangeability
The Group has not identified any transactions for which spot rates are unavailable, therefore the
amendments have no significant effect on the Group’s financial statements.
b) Standards, amendments and interpretations effective and not adopted by the Group
There are no effective standards, amendments and interpretations that are not adopted by the Group.
c) Standards early adopted by the Group
There are no standards early adopted by the Group.
d) Interpretations and standards that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the Group
New standards and amendments adopted by the EU, effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January
2026:
▶ Annual Improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards - Volume 11, contains amendments to the
following standards: IFRS 1, ‘First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards’, IFRS 7,
‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, IFRS 9, ‘Financial Instruments’, IFRS 10, ‘Consolidated Financial
Statements’ and IAS 7, ‘Statement of Cash Flows’.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 111
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
▶ Amendments to the Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 9
and IFRS 7).
▶ Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity (Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7).
▶ IFRS 18, ‘Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements’: The IASB issued IFRS 18 on 9 April
2024. The new standard will give investors more transparent and comparable information about
companies’ financial performances. IFRS 18 introduces three sets of new requirements to improve
companies’ reporting of financial performance and give investors a better basis for analysing and
comparing companies: three defined categories for income and expenses – operating, investing and
financing – to improve the structure of the income statement, and requiring all companies to provide
new defined subtotals, including operating profit; explanations of the company-specific measures that
are related to the income statement, referred to as management-defined performance measures
(MPMs); and enhanced guidance on how to organise information and whether to provide it in the
primary financial statements or in the notes. IFRS 18 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning
on or after 1 January 2027, with earlier application permitted.
IFRS 18 is applicable for the Group, therefore an analysis of the impact of IFRS 18, particularly with respect
to the structure of the Group’s statement of comprehensive income, the statement of cash flows and
additional disclosures required for management-defined performance measures, is in progress.
New standards and amendments not yet adopted by the EU, effective for periods beginning on or after 1
January 2027:
▶ The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates: Translation to a Hyperinflationary Presentation
Currency (Amendments to IAS 21)
▶ IFRS 19, ‘Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures
▶ Amendments to IFRS 19 Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures
▶ IFRS 20 Regulatory Assets and Regulatory Liabilities
The new accounting standard and amendments above, other than IFRS 18, are not expected to have a
material impact on the Group in the current or future reporting periods. An analysis of the impact of IFRS
18, particularly with respect to the structure of the Group’s statement of comprehensive income, the
statement of cash flows and additional disclosures required for management-defined performance measures,
is in progress.
Basis of consolidation
The Company controls an entity when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement
with the entity, and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The Company
controls an entity if it has all of the following:
▶ power over the entity;
▶ exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the entity; and
▶ the ability to use its power over the entity to affect the amount of its returns from the entity.
Generally, there is a presumption that a majority of voting rights results in control. To support this
presumption, and when the Group has less than a majority of the voting or similar rights of an investee, the
Group considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee,
including:
▶ the contractual arrangement(s) with the other vote holders of the investee;
▶ rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and
▶ the Group’s voting rights and potential voting rights.
The Group re-assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there
are changes to one or more of the three elements of control.
Non-controlling interests (NCIs) in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the statement of changes in equity and the statement of
financial position respectively. NCIs are measured initially at their proportionate share of the acquiree’s
identifiable net assets at the date of acquisition. Changes in the Group’s interest in a subsidiary that do not
result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.
Subsidiaries are all entities that are deemed controlled by the Company from an IFRS perspective. The
financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date when
control commences until the date when control ceases, or when a subsidiary becomes dormant having
results and balances not material to the Group. The results of the subsidiaries (including their branches) are
consolidated up to 31 March, which is the financial year-end of the Company. Intra-group balances, and any
unrealised gains and losses or income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated
when preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 112
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Going concern
Basis of Preparation and Assessment Period
Wizz Air’s business activities, financial performance and financial position, together with factors likely to
affect its future development and performance, are described in the Strategic Report on pages 4 to 35.
Emerging and principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group are described on pages 19 to 27. Note 3 to
the financial statements sets out the Group’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing its capital and
liquidity and provides details of the risks related to financial instruments held by the Group.
The Directors have reviewed the Group’s latest financial forecasts for a period of 18 months from the date of
approval of the financial statements. This includes considering the Group’s available committed financing for
aircraft and its plans to finance committed future aircraft deliveries (see Note 32) due within this period that
are currently unfinanced and takes into account forecast aircraft groundings given our GTF engine related
supply chain issues, associated compensation to mitigate these issues and likely scenarios associated with
the Iran conflict, closure of the Strait of Hormuz and availability of jet fuel supplies.
Financial Position and Liquidity
At 31 March 2026, the Group held total cash of €2,126.4 million (including cash and cash equivalents of
€1,085.9 million, €952.8 million in cash deposits and €87.7 million in restricted cash), while net current
liabilities totalled €102.7 million (including deferred income of €1,180.1 million) and net assets amounted to
€928.4 million.
The Group’s contractual undiscounted external borrowings comprise: €308.1 million in ETS financing from
Standard Chartered Bank repayable in September 2027; and convertible debt with a balance of €25.8
million. In addition, borrowings include a carrying amount of €6,601.0 million from lease contracts
accounted for under IFRS 16 and liabilities related to JOLCO, FTL and Finance Lease contracts (see Note 23).
None of these borrowings contain any financial covenants and the €500.0 million, 1.00 per cent Eurobond
was repaid in January 2026 out of free cash. Two ratings agencies, Fitch and Moody’s, issued updates during
the fourth quarter with Fitch updating Wizz Air’s credit rating to BB with a stable outlook, while Moody’s
issued a Ba2 rating with a negative outlook.
Aircraft Financing and Planning Horizon
The Group operates using a three-year planning cycle. Aircraft deliveries represent the Group’s primary
capital expenditure over the going concern period, which the Group intends to finance through various forms
of sale and leaseback or other fleet-financing arrangements, consistent with its past practices. While such
financing remains partially uncommitted, the vendor additionally offers committed backstop financing. This
backstop financing would cover a substantial portion, though not all, of the expenditure if the Group chooses
to utilise it.
Forecasting Approach
The Directors’ enquiries and testing included the review of a base case model projecting the Group’s cash
flows. The base case model is derived from our contracted fleet plan. This was adjusted to reflect aircraft
availability constraints from GTF engine supply chain issues, based on forecasts prepared by the operations
team.
The resulting available fleet was overlaid with a utilisation assumption consistent with actual levels observed
in F26. A network plan was then applied to which revenue, cost, compensation, working capital and
financing assumptions were layered to develop the base case cash flows.
Downside Scenario
This base case was then flexed to produce a downside forecast that assumes lower demand leading to a
3 per cent reduction in RASK in F27, a 5 per cent reduction in RASK in F28 and a 10 per cent higher fuel cost
per metric tonne. We also increased operating costs by +2% allowing for inflation. These assumptions were
modelled cumulatively across the full going concern period. The downside case also excludes any assumed
financing for our currently unfinanced aircraft deliveries (see Note 32). Mitigating actions in relation to the
unfinanced aircraft and an assumed sale of owned spare engines were also considered in the preparation of
the downside case.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 113
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Key Risk Considerations
In preparing both base and downside forecasts, the Directors considered the emerging and principal risks
identified, including:
▶ Card acquirer risk: The Group receives payments for ticket and ancillary revenue in advance through
arrangements with various card acquirers, which are subject to typical capacity and security limits.
These limits were considered in the forecast models.
▶ Geopolitical and operational disruption: The impact of conflicts in Ukraine, Israel and Iran was
considered, including the three stranded aircraft in Ukraine (see Note 13) and restriction in Jet A1
supplies from the Middle East. Whilst the Group’s plans include continued operations to Israel, the
potential for reallocating capacity to other routes was assessed and considered manageable.
▶ Climate and regulatory risk: The Directors considered the impact of higher pricing for ETS levied in
Europe and the UK, as well as Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation
(CORSIA) implementation costs. These were reflected in forecast assumptions through higher carbon
and fuel pricing. The use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) was also considered as part of increased
average jet fuel cost assumptions.
The Directors concluded that no material adverse impact on future cash flows is likely to result from these
items. Furthermore, it was assumed that there will be no further significant disruption of the magnitude
experienced in recent financial years.
Conclusion
In this downside scenario, whilst there was a significant reduction in liquidity, headroom on the security
levels of the card acquirer contracts was maintained. After making enquiries and testing the assumptions
against different forecast scenarios, including a severe but plausible downside case, the Directors have
satisfied themselves that the Group is expected to be able to meet its commitments and obligations as they
fall due for a period of at least the next twelve months from the date the Annual Report and Accounts are
approved. Accordingly, the Directors consider it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting
in preparing the financial statements.
Foreign currency
The Group’s presentation currency is the euro (EUR). The functional currency of Wizz Air Hungary Limited
and Wizz Air Malta Limited generating the vast majority of the Group’s revenues is the euro. The other
airline companies’ functional currency differs by entity. The functional currency of Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC is
the United Arab Emirates dirham (AED), and the functional currency of Wizz Air UK Limited is the British
pound (GBP or £). Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the given functional currency at the
exchange rate prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated into euros at the exchange rate prevailing as at that
date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the statement of comprehensive
income under net foreign exchange gain/loss within net financial income/expense. Non-monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, and which are recognised at cost, are translated into euros at
the exchange rate as at the transaction date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies, and which are stated at fair value, are translated into euros at the exchange rates prevailing on
the dates the fair value was determined.
The results and financial position of all the Group entities that have a different functional currency from the
presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
▶ assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate
on the date of that statement of financial position;
▶ equity is translated at the historical rate (except for the cash flow hedging reserve within equity);
▶ income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at monthly average
exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the
rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rates
on the transaction dates); and
▶ all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity (cumulative
translation adjustments).
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 114
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial assets and liabilities
The Group classifies its financial assets and liabilities – in line with IFRS 9, ‘Financial Instruments’ – into the
following categories:
Description in the statement of financial position
IFRS 9 category
Non-current assets
Restricted cash
Long-term cash deposits
Derivative financial instruments
Trade and other receivables
Investments in other entities
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Fair value through other comprehensive income
Current assets
Trade and other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Restricted cash
Short-term cash deposits
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market funds
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Financial assets measured at amortised cost
Fair value through profit or loss
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
Convertible debt
Derivative financial instruments
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Fair value through profit or loss
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Convertible debt
Derivative financial instruments
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
Fair value through profit or loss
The classification of financial assets depends on the business model for managing the financial assets and
the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets determined by management at initial
recognition.
a) Financial assets measured at amortised cost
These are non-derivative financial assets held by the Group to collect contractual cash flows, and the
contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of
principal, and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
The Group’s financial assets measured at amortised cost comprise trade and other receivables excluding
prepayments, cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in the statement of financial position. They are
included in current assets, except for maturities greater than twelve months after the reporting date, which
are classified as non-current assets. The Group primarily invests excess cash in short-term time deposits,
which are also measured at amortised cost.
b) Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
These are non-derivative financial assets held by the Group both to collect contractual cash flows and sell
the financial assets. The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows
that are solely payments of principal, and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
c) Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets not valued either at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income are
valued at fair value through profit or loss. Derivatives are measured at fair value through profit or loss.
d) Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
All financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost unless they are measured at fair value through profit
or loss. The Group’s other financial liabilities comprise trade and other payables and interest-bearing loans
and borrowings (including convertible debt) in the statement of financial position. They are included in
current liabilities, except for maturities greater than twelve months after the reporting date, which are
classified as non-current liabilities.
e) Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss
Derivatives are measured at fair value through profit or loss by the Group. The recognition and
measurement criteria for each class of asset and liability are described in the relevant section of the
accounting policies.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 115
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Derivative financial instruments and hedging
Derivative financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value. The gain or loss on remeasurement to
fair value is recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income within net gain/loss on
derivative financial instruments. However, where derivatives qualify for hedge accounting, the recognition of
any resultant gain or loss depends on the nature of the item being hedged (see below). Derivatives can only
be entered into with counterparties that have investment-grade credit ratings.
Cash flow hedges
The Group uses zero-cost collars to hedge jet fuel price and foreign exchange risks related to highly probable
future cash flows.
The Group designates only the intrinsic value of the options as hedging instruments. Changes in time value
are accumulated in the cost of hedging reserve, within other comprehensive income, and are recycled into
profit or loss – within fuel cost – in the months when the hedged transactions take place.
Where a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge of the variability in cash flows of a
recognised asset or liability, or a highly probable forecast transaction, the effective part of any unrealised
gain or loss on the derivative financial instrument is recognised directly in the hedging reserve within other
comprehensive income. Any ineffective portion of the hedge is recognised immediately in the statement of
comprehensive income as an exceptional income or expense in the respective operating expense line.
The associated cumulative gain or loss on the effective part is removed from other comprehensive income
and recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in the respective operating expense line(s) in the
same period or periods as the hedged forecast transaction.
The Group considers a hedge relationship to be effective if:
▶ there is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument, and an
expectation that the value of the hedging instrument and the value of the hedged item will move in the
opposite direction as a result of the common underlying or hedged risk;
▶ the credit risk effect does not dominate the value changes associated with the hedged risk; and
▶ the hedge ratio is aligned with the requirements of the Group’s risk management strategy.
In line with IFRS 9, as long as the risk management objectives are met, the Group does not de-designate
and thereby discontinue a hedging relationship that still meets the risk management objective and continues
to meet all other qualifying criteria (after taking any rebalancing into account, if applicable).
The hedge ratio applied by the Group is always 100 per cent. The hedge ratio is defined as the relationship
between the quantity of the hedging instrument and the quantity of the hedged item.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, the cumulative gain or loss at that
point remains in other comprehensive income and is recognised in accordance with the above policy when
the hedged transaction is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income. If the hedged transaction is
no longer expected to take place, from an accounting point of view the hedging relationship is discontinued
and the cumulative unrealised gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income is immediately
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.
Before expiry, the fair value of an option comprises: (i) its intrinsic value, being a function of the difference
between the contracted and market (or spot) prices; and (ii) its time value, being the difference between the
fair value and the intrinsic value at any point in time. Subject to hedge effectiveness, any increase or
decrease in the fair value of the hedging instrument is taken to equity within other comprehensive income or
expense.
Accordingly:
▶ initial recognition: the open position on the derivative hedging instrument is recorded as an asset or
liability in the statement of financial position at fair value;
▶ subsequent remeasurement of unexpired options: (i) the effective portion of changes in the fair value is
recorded in other comprehensive income; and (ii) the ineffective or discontinued portions, if any, are
recorded in the statement of comprehensive income; and
▶ the realised gains or losses on the hedging instrument, to the extent not previously classified as
ineffective or discontinued, are recorded against the respective operating expense line(s) in the
statement of comprehensive income.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 116
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The qualitative technique to test the hedge effectiveness of a hedging relationship is the critical terms match
method. Hedge effectiveness testing is performed at inception, at each reporting date, and upon a significant
change in the circumstances affecting the hedge effectiveness requirements. Such significant change can
occur as follows:
▶ changes in payment timing of the hedged item;
▶ reduction in the total amount or price of the hedged item;
▶ location differences; and
▶ a significant change in the credit risk of either party to the hedging relationship.
The ineffective part of changes in fair value, if any, is recorded in the statement of comprehensive income as
operating income or expense.
Trade and other receivables
▶ Subsequent to initial recognition, trade and other receivables are measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest rate method less impairment losses.
▶ The carrying amount of the asset is reduced by recognising the impact of impairment losses in the
statement of comprehensive income within other expenses. Subsequent recoveries of amounts
previously written off are credited against other expenses in the statement of comprehensive income.
▶ Other receivables include amounts receivable from aircraft and spare engine lessors (in the form of
security deposits and maintenance reserves paid) and also prepayments, deferred expenses and accrued
income (see Note 20 ). The accrued income within other receivables also comprises insurance claims
related to events that are covered by insurance contracts. The Group recognises the income in the
financial statements only from insurance claims which, based on management’s judgement, are virtually
certain to be received by the Group.
Impairment policy of trade and other receivables
Management reviewed the Group’s different customer payment channels and the receivables from these
channels. The most significant component is ticket sales and the various forms of payment for tickets. The
vast majority of tickets are paid either by bank card or by bank transfer, and prior to the flights. Given their
nature, no impairment is required for these. The other, less significant components involving credit risk are
commissions receivable from non-ticket revenue partners and marketing support receivables from airports
and other parties.
In accordance with IFRS 9 requirements on expected credit loss recognition, management reviewed
historical payment and impairment statistics for transactions in these channels. The historical loss rates were
adjusted to reflect current and forward-looking information on macroeconomic factors affecting customers’
ability to settle receivables. Based on this analysis, management concluded that the impairment of
receivables in these channels does not have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements, in
compliance with IFRS 9.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise bank balances on current accounts and on deposit accounts, as well as
equity investments made to money market funds that are readily convertible into cash without there being
any significant risk of a change in value to the Group. Cash and cash equivalents do not include restricted
cash.
The money market funds are held at fair value through profit or loss, with the remaining balance of cash and
cash equivalents carried at amortised cost.
Cash pooling arrangements
The Group entered into a physical cash pooling arrangement and applies zero balancing cash pool
arrangement across multiple currency accounts to optimise liquidity and efficiently manage cash resources
across participating subsidiaries within the Group. The Group discloses the balances of the main accounts as
cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated financial statements of the Group.
Cash deposits
Long-term cash deposits comprise cash deposits maturing after twelve months from the reporting period
end, the balance of which was €174.4 million as at 31 March 2026 (2025: €nil).
Short-term cash deposits comprise cash deposits maturing within three to approximately twelve months of
inception, the balance of which was €778.4 million as at 31 March 2026 (2025: €1,060.2 million).
Restricted cash
Restricted cash represents cash deposits held by the banks that cover letters of credit, issued by the same
bank, to certain suppliers. Restricted cash is split between non-current and current assets depending on the
maturity period of the underlying letters of credit.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 117
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value when the Group becomes party to the
contractual provisions of the instrument, and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest rate method. Trade and other payables comprise balances payable to suppliers, authorities and
employees.
Interest-bearing borrowings
Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs.
Subsequent to initial recognition, interest-bearing borrowings are stated at amortised cost with any
difference between cost and redemption value being recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
as a financial expense over the period of the borrowings on an effective-interest-rate basis. Financial
expenses also include withholding tax paid on the interest if – according to the loan agreement – the Group
is liable to pay withholding tax.
Convertible debt
Convertible debt instruments that can be converted to share capital at the option of the holder, where the
number of shares issued does not vary with changes in their fair value, are accounted for as compound
instruments. Transaction costs that relate to the issue of a compound instrument are allocated to the liability
and equity components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds. The liability component is recognised
initially at the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an equity conversion option. The equity
component of the compound instrument is calculated as the excess of the issue proceeds over the value of
the liability component.
Classification of compound instruments issued by the Group
Compound instruments issued by the Group are only treated as equity (i.e. forming part of Shareholders’
funds) if they meet the following two conditions:
a) they include no contractual obligations upon the Company (or the Group as the case may be) to deliver
cash or other financial assets, or to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another party,
under conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the Company (or the Group); and
b) where the instrument will or may be settled in the Company’s own equity instruments, it is either a
non‑derivative that includes no obligation to deliver a variable number of the Company’s own equity
instruments, or it is a derivative that will be settled by the Company exchanging a fixed amount of cash
or other financial assets for a fixed number of its own equity instruments.
If this definition is not met, the issue proceeds are classified as a financial liability measured at amortised
cost. Where the instrument so classified takes the legal form of the Company’s own shares, the amounts
presented in these financial statements for called-up share capital and the share premium account exclude
amounts in relation to those shares.
Where a compound instrument contains both equity and financial liability components, these components
are separated by recognising the liability at fair value and accounted for individually under the above policy.
The finance cost on the financial liability component is correspondingly higher over the life of the instrument.
Finance payments associated with financial liabilities are dealt with as part of finance expenses. Finance
payments associated with compound instruments classified in equity are dividends, and are recorded directly
in equity.
Impairment of financial assets
The Group considers the probability of default upon initial recognition of a financial asset, and whether there
has been a significant increase in credit risk on an ongoing basis throughout each reporting period. To
assess whether there is a significant increase in credit risk, the Group compares the risk of a default
occurring on the financial asset as at the reporting date with the risk of default as at the date of initial
recognition.
At each reporting date, the Group measures the loss allowance for financial assets at an amount equal to the
lifetime expected credit loss; if there is a significant increase in credit risk or the financial assets are not
settled in accordance with the terms stipulated in the agreements, management considers these financial
assets to be underperforming or non-performing, and thus impaired.
The historical loss rates are estimated based on the historical credit losses experienced over the expected
life of the receivables and are adjusted to reflect current and forward-looking information on macroeconomic
factors affecting the ability of the counterparties to settle the receivables.
A loss allowance is recognised on financial assets carried at amortised cost or fair value through other
comprehensive income for expected credit losses. When management considers that there is no reasonable
expectation of recovery, the financial assets are written off.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 118
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
If, at the reporting date, the credit risk on a financial asset has not increased significantly since initial
recognition, the Group measures the loss allowance for that asset at an amount equal to the 12-month
expected credit loss.
If the Group has measured the loss allowance for a financial instrument at an amount equal to the lifetime
expected credit loss in the previous reporting period, but determines at the current reporting date that the
credit risk on a financial asset has not increased significantly since initial recognition, the Group measures
the loss allowance at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit loss at the current reporting date.
The Group recognises in profit or loss, as an impairment gain or loss, the amount of expected credit loss (or
reversal) that is required to adjust the loss allowance at the reporting date to the amount that must be
recognised in accordance with IFRS 9.
Current trade and other receivables are discounted where the effect is material.
Non-financial assets and liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
Assets received free of charge
In certain cases, the Group receives assets free of charge. These items are classified as non-cash items in
the statement of cash flows. The Group recognises these as assets and connected deferred income. Both the
assets and the deferred income are systematically amortised over the assets’ useful life. Consequently, the
transaction does not affect comprehensive income. Exceptions are assets received as compensation for costs
already incurred or financial losses. In these cases, the fair value of the assets is recognised immediately as
other income in the financial statements.
Useful economic life and residual value
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
Where parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for
as separate items of property, plant and equipment.
Depreciation is charged to the statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis to write off cost
to residual value over the estimated useful economic lives of each part of an item of property, plant and
equipment. In the case of certain aircraft maintenance assets, the useful economic life of the asset can be
defined in terms of flight hours or flight cycles, and in this case the depreciation charge is determined based
on the actual number of flight hours or flight cycles.
The estimated useful lives of the relevant asset categories, reflecting the Group’s intention for the period of
use in the business, are as follows:
Buildings
20 years
Land and buildings – investments made on
leased buildings
3–5 years, being the shorter of the investment’s useful economic life
and the lease term of the building
Aircraft (A320neo and A321neo family) 1
12-14 years
Aircraft (A320ceo)2
20 years
Aircraft spare engines (V2500 and GTF)
16-20 years (part of aircraft parts in Note 13)
Aircraft and spare engines – prepaid
maintenance
4–10 years (part of aircraft assets in Note 13)
Aircraft maintenance assets (for leased
aircraft or spare engines)
1–10 years, or 2,000–10,000 flight cycles in the case of aircraft
engines, being the shorter of the useful economic life and the lease
term
Aircraft parts (other than engines)
7 years
Fixtures and fittings (incl. computer
hardware)
3–5 years
Right-of-use assets (from leases)
The lease term over one year (typically 8–12 years for leased aircraft,
which is significantly less than its estimated useful economic life)
1. Having considered the impact of climate change, the full expected useful life of these aircraft types is determined to be 28 years
based on the Original Equipment Manufacturers’ (OEMs) airworthiness guidelines and our estimated future annual aircraft
utilisation. However, based on the current business model we apply a 12-14 year useful life and an estimated residual value of the
asset based on an aircraft-by-aircraft assessment of its market value assuming an unencumbered single transaction for the asset’s
highest and best use.
2. The useful life of aircraft assets that were first leased and then purchased by the Group is estimated based on the date of the major
overhaul events that are no longer economical to perform. Within the current aircraft fleet, the maximum estimated useful life of
A320ceo aircraft is 20 years.
The residual values and useful lives are reassessed annually.
Leases
The Group leases most of its aircraft and spare engines. Other than aircraft and spare engines, the Group
has only a limited number of leases related to offices, flight training simulator buildings (formerly also
equipment) and maintenance hangars.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 119
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Group elected to use the following practical expedients permitted by IFRS 16:
▶ lease payments associated with short-term leases (contracts with a duration of twelve months or less)
and with leases for which the underlying asset is of low value (defined by the Group as below €5,000)
are recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term; and
▶ it did not reassess whether a contract that the Group entered into before the date of initial application
was a lease or contained a lease – that is, IFRS 16 has only been applied to contracts that were
previously classified as leases.
The Group has short-term lease rentals from F26 and related expenses are recognised in the aircraft rentals
line. The Group does not apply IFRS 16 to other leases of intangible assets. Some lease contracts contain
variable payment terms that are linked to floating market interest rates.
The Group chose to treat compensation expected to be payable to lessors, either in the form of recurring
maintenance reserve payments or compensation payable at lease end, as “non-lease components” under
IFRS 16. These payments are therefore not included in the measurement of the lease liability. Contractual
maintenance obligations which are not dependent on the use of the aircraft or spare engine are recognised
in full on commencement of the lease.
Lease extension options
Some of the Group’s lease contracts contain lease extension options. The extension option is only taken into
account in the measurement of the lease liability when the Group is reasonably certain that it will later
exercise the option. Such judgement is relevant both at inception, for the initial measurement of the lease
liability, and also for a subsequent remeasurement of the lease liability if the initial judgement is revised at a
later date.
Sale and leaseback transactions
The existing aircraft and spare engine lease contracts were all entered into by the Group through sale and
leaseback transactions.
Most of these contracts do not include a repurchase option for Wizz Air. On such contracts, where sale
proceeds received are judged to reflect the aircraft’s fair value, the gain or loss arising on the disposal is
directly recognised as other income in the statement of comprehensive income to the extent that it relates
to the rights that have been transferred to the lessor, while the gain or loss that relates to the rights that
have been retained by the Group are included in the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset recognised at
commencement of the lease. With regard to gains and losses arising from these sale and leaseback
agreements, the determination of the amounts to be deferred and to be recognised immediately,
respectively, requires estimating the fair value of these assets at the date of the transaction. In determining
fair values, the Group relies on independent third-party valuation reports prepared by specialist aircraft and
engine valuation experts. The Group has not sold any aircraft above fair value.
Some sale and leaseback contracts include a repurchase option for Wizz Air. These leases relate to some of
the aircraft that arrived after 1 April 2019 and are commonly referred to as JOLCO (special Japanese Tax
Lease) contracts. Such contracts do not meet the definition of a sale under IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from
Contracts with Customers’, and are not accounted for as a lease contract under IFRS 16. As a result,  such
contracts are treated by Wizz (as the lessee) by: (i) retaining the asset as aircraft assets and parts (as if
there were no sale at all); and (ii) recognising a liability under IFRS 9 (as if the sale proceeds received from
the lessor were receipts from debt financing).
Foreign exchange
The lease liability (being a monetary liability) is revalued on a monthly basis to reflect the changes in
currency exchange rates where the currency of the future lease payments differs from the functional
currency of the legal entity having the lease liability. In this respect, the relevant currency pairs for the
Group are currently USD to EUR and USD to GBP, as most future payments under the aircraft lease
contracts of the Group are defined in US dollars, while the functional currency for Wizz Air Hungary Limited
and Wizz Air Malta Limited is the euro and for Wizz Air UK Limited it is the British pound.
Discount rate
For lease contracts entered into on or after 30 September 2025, the Group determines the discount rate in
accordance with IFRS 16.26. The interest rate implicit in the lease is used to discount lease payments when
it can be readily determined from the lease contract. Only when the implicit rate cannot be readily
determined does the Group use the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate. The determination of the discount
rate is therefore lease‑specific and not an accounting policy election, and reflects the contractual terms and
underlying economics of each lease.
The discount rate is determined based on the contractual lease payments, the initial fair value of the
underlying asset, and the unguaranteed residual value at the end of the lease term. For the purposes of this
calculation, the initial direct costs of the lessor are considered to be immaterial.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 120
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The initial fair value of the underlying asset is based on the actual sale price, while unguaranteed residual
values are derived from valuations performed by independent aviation consultancy firms. The interest rates
are calculated on an asset‑by‑asset basis, reflecting the specific terms and conditions of each lease and are
derived using observable market inputs, where available.
Right-of-use assets and depreciation
With respect to depreciation, the requirements of IAS 16, ’Property, Plant and Equipment’ are also applicable
to the right-of-use assets (“RoU assets”) recognised under IFRS 16. Therefore, in the case of aircraft and
spare engines, component accounting is required for the RoU assets, similar to that applicable to owned
aircraft or spare engine assets. The RoU assets associated with aircraft and spare engine lease contracts are
split into asset components on the basis of value proportions that could be observed on an owned aircraft of
the same type and age.
The useful economic life of the asset components that represent the maintenance condition of the aircraft
and of its key components is estimated to last until the respective aircraft component no longer meets the
return conditions defined in the lease contract (at which point the lease-related asset component is
derecognised and a maintenance asset is recognised – also see below). The useful economic life of the
residual asset component (which is not related to the maintenance condition of the underlying asset) is the
lease term.
The asset components related to maintenance conditions are depreciated either on a straight-line basis or
based on usage, depending on their nature.
Variable lease payments
In some of the extended lease agreements, the Group applies a power-by-the-hour lease payment scheme.
The minimum payable amount in such agreements is included in the measurement of lease liabilities. In
agreements of this nature, the maximum amount is not deemed in substance to be an unavoidable, fixed
lease payment according to management’s best estimates. Consequently, it is categorised as a variable
lease payment, and thus, it is not factored into the calculation of lease liabilities.
Finance leases
Under these financing arrangements the legal title to the aircraft will be transferred back to the Group upon
repayment of the loan. Such contracts do not meet the definition of a sale under IFRS 15, and are not
accounted for as a lease contract under IFRS 16. The asset is recognised under aircraft assets and parts
within PPE, in accordance with IAS 16, and a liability is recognised as debt financing under IFRS 9. Options
to repurchase the aircraft before the end of the full lease term are not taken into account unless the Group is
reasonably certain that such options will be exercised.
French Tax Leases
The Group started to apply an additional aircraft financing method in F21, namely French Tax Leases (FTL).
Since these financing arrangements are special forms of structured asset financing, which provide local tax
benefits for French investors, from an accounting point of view they are “in-substance purchases”, not
leases; therefore, IFRS 16 lease accounting is not applicable. The related liability is considered a financial
debt under IFRS 9, while the asset is an aeronautical asset according to IAS 16.
Component accounting
For aircraft and spare engines purchased, an element of the total cost of the asset is attributed to its service
potential upon acquisition, reflecting its maintenance condition. Such “prepaid maintenance” asset is
recognised separately because it has a shorter useful economic life than that of the underlying aircraft or
spare engine. The prepaid maintenance asset is depreciated until the estimated date of the first heavy
maintenance event that will restore the service condition to the original level (and thus enhance future
periods). Such “subsequent costs” are capitalised as aircraft maintenance assets and depreciated over the
length of the period benefiting from these enhancements.
The residual cost of the acquisition of the aircraft or spare engine, representing the part of the total asset
value that is independent from the service condition of the asset, is depreciated until the end of the
estimated useful economic life of the asset.
Advances paid for aircraft – pre-delivery payments (PDPs)
PDPs are paid by the Group to aircraft and engine manufacturers to finance the production of the ordered
aircraft or spare engine as determined by the contractual terms. Such advance payments for aircraft or
spare engines are recognised at cost and classified as property, plant and equipment in the statement of
financial position. PDPs, when paid, are recorded at the historical exchange rate at the date of payment.
Since these payments are made in US dollars by entities within the Group that have the euro as their
functional currency, when PDPs are refunded this can result in a realised foreign exchange gain or loss. The
Group has started converting PDP payment obligations to euros to reduce the exposure to the EUR/USD
foreign currency exchange rate significantly in the years ahead. There are no other gains or losses incurred
in relation to PDPs. The amount is not depreciated.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 121
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Group usually enters into sale and leaseback arrangements with lessors to finance future aircraft or
spare engine deliveries. These arrangements are structured such that the right and the commitment to
purchase the aircraft or spare engine are assigned to the lessor only on the date of delivery (“delivery date
assignment”); as such, the recognition and classification of the PDP balance does not change when the sale
and leaseback contracts are signed. Upon the delivery of the aircraft or spare engine, the lessor pays the full
purchase price of the asset to the manufacturer, and the Group receives from the manufacturer a refund of
the PDPs paid. At this moment, the fixed asset is derecognised from the statement of financial position, and
any gain or loss is transferred to the statement of comprehensive income as an operating income or
expense.
Advances paid for aircraft maintenance assets – engine flight hour agreements (FHAs)
Advances paid for aircraft maintenance assets represent advance payments made in relation to heavy
maintenance scheduled for the future (for the definition of heavy maintenance see the section of the
accounting policies on maintenance). Such advance payments are particularly made by the Group to the
engine maintenance service provider under FHAs. Such advance payments are recognised at cost and
classified under property, plant and equipment in the statement of financial position. This amount is not
depreciated.
The balance of such assets is re-categorised into aircraft maintenance assets within property, plant and
equipment when the aircraft maintenance asset is recognised in respect of the same component and the
same heavy maintenance event. This is when the component no longer meets the conditions set out in the
lease agreement. Advances paid for aircraft maintenance are not depreciated.
In the statement of cash flows, the FHA payments are shown under the purchase of maintenance assets line
together with other aircraft maintenance asset purchases.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets acquired by the Group are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment
losses.
Web development costs are capitalised to the extent they are expected to generate future economic benefits
and meet the other criteria described in IAS 38, ‘Intangible Assets’.
Subsequent expenditure on capitalised intangible assets is capitalised only when it increases the future
economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. All other expenditure is expensed
as incurred.
Amortisation is charged to the statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful economic lives of intangible assets, except where the asset is expected to have an
indefinite useful economic life. Intangible assets are amortised from the date they are available for use. The
estimated useful lives are as follows:
Software licences
3–8 years
Web and other software development costs
3–5 years
Airport landing rights
Indefinite
Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually
for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be
impaired.
Landing and take-off rights are recognised at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. They are
recorded as intangible assets with an indefinite useful life based on an analysis of all the relevant factors;
there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the assets are expected to generate net cash inflows
for the entity, provided minimum utilisation requirements are observed. They are not amortised; however,
their value in use is tested for impairment (in accordance with IAS 36) at each reporting date together with
the fleet of aircraft as a single CGU, or where there is any indication of impairment.
Inventories
Inventory of the Group consists mainly of aircraft spare parts for aircraft maintenance and Emissions Trading
Scheme (ETS) allowances.
Aircraft spare parts
Parts are purchased for internal use and are stated at cost unless impaired. Spare parts which might be sold
are stated at net realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price less the estimated selling
expense. Cost is based on the weighted average price method and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring
the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition.
Emissions Trading Scheme
The Group is subject to Emissions Trading Schemes (ETS) in both the European Union (EU) and the United
Kingdom. It is required to formally report its annual carbon emissions to the relevant authorities and
surrender ETS allowances equivalent to the emissions.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 122
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ETS allowances are recognised as inventory in the statement of financial position. A decreasing portion of
the allowances are received for free and recognised at nil cost. Purchased allowances are recognised at cost.
Both types of allowance are incorporated into the total weighted average cost of the inventory.
In accordance with actual carbon emissions, a liability is recognised within trade and other payables and a
corresponding expense within fuel cost based on the expected weighted average cost of the allowances that
will be surrendered. This calculation includes the allowances already purchased and the forward transactions
that mature before the surrender. If further allowances need to be purchased to meet the surrender
requirement, their value is factored in at the prevailing market price.
The inventory and the liability are derecognised at the time of the surrender.
In F24, F25 and F26, the Group entered into ETS repurchase financing agreements according to which EU
allowances were sold with a repurchase commitment. According to IFRS 15, this is not a sale transaction.
The units are not derecognised from inventory and no income is accounted for. The consideration received is
recognised as a financial liability within borrowings. The difference between the sale price and the
repurchase price is recognised as interest expense over the period between the sale date and the repurchase
date.
Impairment of non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Group’s assets are reviewed at each reporting date, or earlier if there is an
impairment trigger, to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication
exists, the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair
value less costs of disposal and value in use. An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying
amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.
Employee benefits
Share-based payment transactions
The Group operates an equity-settled share option programme that allows Group employees to acquire
shares in the Company. The options are granted by the Company. The fair value of options granted is
recognised as an employee expense within staff costs with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value
is measured at the grant date and spread over the period during which the employees become
unconditionally entitled to the options. The fair value of the granted options is measured using an option
valuation model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. The
amount recognised as an expense is adjusted at any measurement date so the cumulative expense to date
reflects the actual number of share options that are expected to vest (except where the number of shares to
vest depends on the share price performance of the Company, which is a market condition under IFRS 2 and
is therefore not updated).
Provisions
A provision is recognised in the statement of financial position when the Group has a present legal or
constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will
be required to settle the obligation.
If the effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-
tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money, and where appropriate, the
risks specific to the liability (for further details about aircraft maintenance provisions see the section of the
accounting policies on maintenance).
Revenue
The Group’s revenue disaggregation differs from the requirements under IFRS 15, ‘Revenue from Contracts
with Customers’. The revenue is disaggregated into two main categories: passenger ticket revenues
(representing the invoiced value of flight seats) and ancillary revenues. Any compensation payable to
passengers for delays and cancellations is deducted from the revenue up to the level of the original revenue,
in accordance with IFRS 15. Any excess compensation beyond the original revenue is accounted for as an
expense. This treatment is consistent with the principle under IFRS 15 that revenue should only be
recognised to the extent it is highly probable that a significant reversal of revenue recognised will not occur
when uncertainties are resolved.
Passenger ticket revenue arises from the sale of flight seats and is recognised net of government taxes in
the period in which the service is provided, i.e. when the aircraft departed. Where charges levied by airports
or government authorities on a per passenger basis represent a government tax in fact or in substance, then
such amounts are presented on a net basis in the statement of comprehensive income (netted between the
lines of revenue and airport, handling and en-route charges). Unearned revenue represents flight seats sold
but not yet flown, and is included in deferred income. Refunds made to passengers are recorded as
reductions in revenue. Refunds are measured at the initial transaction price, excluding non‑refundable
services.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 123
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Ancillary revenue arises from the sale of other services made by the Group and from commissions earned in
relation to services sold on behalf of other parties where the Group is the agent rather than the principal in
the relationship. For details of the main ancillary revenue categories, see Note 5. Commission revenue arises
in relation to the sale of on-board catering, where the Group is an agent, as well as in connection with
accommodation, car rental, travel insurance, bus transfers, premium calls and co-branded credit cards.
Ancillary revenues are recognised as revenue when the performance obligations have been satisfied (i.e. all
the benefits associated with the performance obligation have been transferred to the customer). Depending
on the type of service, this can be the date of sale, the date of the flight, or in the case of membership fees,
the period when customers benefit from a paid membership.
The Group considers if it is a principal or an agent in relation to contracts with other partners. Wizz
recognises revenue on a gross basis if it is the principal in the arrangement, and on a net basis if it is the
agent. The Group recognises revenue from contracts with other partners as an agent if it is the other
partners that:
▶ enter into contracts with the passengers/customers and bear the liability towards customers for
delivering the products and services;
▶ define the majority of the product portfolio, manage the inventory, are responsible for product
availability/outage, have title to the inventory and, the effect of the profit share notwithstanding, bear
the risk of loss; and
▶ have the discretion in establishing the prices.
The disaggregation of revenues into passenger ticket revenues and ancillary revenues, as applied in
the statement of comprehensive income, is a non-IFRS measure (or alternative performance measure).
The existing revenue presentation is considered relevant for the users of the financial statements because:
(i) it is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker for evaluating financial performance; and
(ii) it mirrors disclosures presented outside of the financial statements.
Revenues under IFRS 15 are disaggregated into revenues from contracts with passengers and with other
business partners, respectively. These two categories represent revenues that are distinct from a nature,
timing and risk point of view. This split, as required under IFRS 15, is presented in Note 6.
Accounting for membership fees
The Group operates the Wizz Discount Club (WDC) loyalty programme for its customers. Under this
programme, customers can pay an annual membership fee, with the key benefit being that during most of
the twelve-month membership period they get access to special fares that are lower than the standard ticket
prices.
The Group recognises the revenue from membership fees following the pattern of customers utilising
benefits from the programme. This pattern is determined by management once a year, on the basis of the
actual distribution of member flights in the preceding twelve months, and then applied prospectively as an
estimate for the future. A material change in the pattern within one year is unlikely because the underlying
fact patterns (for customers to buy a membership, buy tickets, and then fly with those tickets) are
reasonably stable.
Maintenance
Aircraft maintenance provisions
For aircraft held under lease agreements, the Group is contractually committed to either return the aircraft
in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor based on the actual condition of the aircraft and its major
components upon return. If the condition defined in the lease contract can only be met by performing
maintenance, then provision is made for the minimum unavoidable costs of the future maintenance
obligation at the time when such obligation becomes certain. This is when the respective aircraft component
no longer meets the lease re-delivery conditions. The provision is used through the completion of a
maintenance event enabling the component to meet the re-delivery conditions again. If it is probable that
compensation will be payable to the lessor upon returning the aircraft, because maintenance is not or is no
longer planned, then the Group accrues for such obligation in line with the compensation rates defined in the
lease contract and recognises the respective expense within operating expenses (maintenance materials and
repairs) in the statement of comprehensive income.
Aircraft maintenance assets
Heavy maintenance relates to the overhaul of engines and associated components, the replacement of life-
limited parts, the replacement of landing gears and the non-routine airframe inspection and rectification
works. Under normal operating conditions, heavy maintenance relates to work expected to be performed no
more frequently than every two years.
The cost of heavy maintenance is capitalised and recognised as a tangible fixed asset (and classified under
“aircraft maintenance assets”) at the earlier of: (a) the time the lease re-delivery condition is no longer met
(see above under aircraft maintenance provisions); or (b) when maintenance, including enhancement, is
carried out. Other maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 124
ACCOUNTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Such maintenance assets are depreciated over the period the Group benefits from the asset, which is the
shorter of: (a) the estimated period until the next date the lease re-delivery condition is no longer met; or
(b) the end of the asset’s operational life; or (c) the end of the lease.
For engines and associated components, depreciation is charged on the basis of flight hours or cycles, while
for other aircraft maintenance assets, depreciation is charged evenly over the period the Group expects to
derive benefit from the asset.
Components of newly leased aircraft such as life-limited parts and engines are not accounted for as separate
assets, and the inherent benefit of these assets, which are utilised in the period from inception of the lease
until the time the assets no longer meet the lease re-delivery condition, is reflected in the payments made to
the lessor over the life of the lease.
Aircraft maintenance assets are non-monetary items. Non-euro amounts are translated to euros on
inception, and are not retranslated.
The recognition of aircraft maintenance assets against provisions for other liabilities and charges in the
statement of financial position is a transaction not involving cash flows. In the statement of cash flows, the
spending on these assets is presented under “purchase of aircraft maintenance assets” in the period when
cash actually flows out of the Group. This can happen either before or after the recognition of the asset,
depending on the exact facts and circumstances associated with the relevant asset or assets.
Please also refer to the property, plant and equipment section of the accounting policies.
Other receivables from lessors – maintenance reserve
Payments for aircraft and engine maintenance, as stipulated in the respective lease agreements, are made
to certain lessors as security for the performance of future heavy maintenance works. The payments are
recorded as receivables from the lessors until the respective maintenance event occurs and the
reimbursement with the lessor is finalised. Any payment that is not expected to be reimbursed by the lessor
is recognised under operating expenses (maintenance materials and repairs) in the statement of
comprehensive income.
Other
The Group enters into agreements with maintenance service providers that guarantee the maintenance of
major components at a rate defined in the contract, the prime example being FHAs for aircraft engines. Such
FHAs cover the cost of both scheduled and unscheduled engine overhauls. FHA payments are accounted for
as follows:
▶ payments for scheduled maintenance work are recognised as advances paid for aircraft maintenance
assets until the maintenance asset for the respective engine overhaul is created. After this point, any
further FHA payments are either used to settle previously established aircraft maintenance provisions (to
the extent a provision for the respective FHA contract exists) or, in the absence of a provision, are added
to the amount previously capitalised under property, plant and equipment as advances paid for aircraft
maintenance assets; and
▶ payments that are made to provide guaranteed coverage for the performance of unscheduled
maintenance events are considered insurance payments and are expensed as incurred.
Please refer to the property, plant and equipment section of the accounting policies.
Supplier credits and compensation
In certain cases, the concessions receivable from a component manufacturer are linked to the Group’s
commitment to purchase a number of new aircraft with the manufacturer’s components installed on those.
In such cases, in substance, the Group earns the right to the concessions via the delivery of the respective
aircraft. In certain cases, the concessions might be delivered by the component manufacturer later than the
date when the respective aircraft delivery is taken by the Group.
Cash credits received in connection with the acquisition of aircraft and major aircraft parts are applied to
reduce the acquisition cost of that asset. If the asset is then financed with a sale and leaseback transaction,
the lower acquisition cost will translate into a higher gain (or smaller loss) on the sale and leaseback
transaction.
Credits that can be used for the purchase of goods and services are accounted for as other income at the
time of the purchase.
Credits received in connection with liquidated damage clauses in our contracts for the acquisition of aircraft
and engines that are not available when promised and expected to be utilised are recognised as other
income over the period that the circumstance exists, where these credits are to compensate for loss of
income and/or incremental operating costs. This includes Original Equipment Manufacturer compensation to
mitigate the financial impact of grounded aircraft or delayed deliveries.
Other expenses
Other expenses mainly relate to compensation to customers (Note 25) as well as crew and overhead-related
expenses.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 125
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Other income
Other income mainly relates to credits and compensation received from suppliers (see above and Note 20)
and gains on sale and leaseback transactions (see above and Note 13).
Net financing expense
Net financing expense comprises interest payable, finance charges on finance and operating (under IFRS 16)
leases, interest receivable on funds invested, gains and losses on derivative financial instruments and
foreign exchange gains and losses that are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.
Interest income and interest payable are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income using the
effective interest method.
Non-cash elements of financial income and expenses are eliminated from the statement of cash flows as an
adjusting item, whereas cash elements, e.g. realised foreign exchange gains and losses, are included in the
statement of cash flows.
Share capital
Ordinary Shares are classified as equity. Qualifying transaction costs directly attributable to the issue of new
shares are debited to equity, reducing the share premium arising on the issue of shares.
Taxation
Taxation on the profit or loss for the year comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in
the statement of comprehensive income except to the extent it relates to items recognised directly in equity,
in which case it is recognised in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted at the
reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary
differences are not provided for: the initial recognition of goodwill, and differences relating to investments in
subsidiaries, to the extent they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future. The amount of deferred
tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets
and liabilities, using applicable tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent it is probable that sufficient future taxable profits will be
available against which the asset can be utilised.
Segment reporting
Operating and reportable segments
The Group is managed as a single business unit that provides point-to-point, low-cost, low-fare passenger
air transportation services using a fleet of single-aisle aircraft. The Group has only one reportable segment,
its entire route network.
Management information is provided to the senior management team, which (in the context of IFRS 8,
‘Operating Segments’) is the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM). Resource allocation decisions
are made by the CODM for the benefit of the route network as a whole, rather than for individual routes
within the network. The performance of the network is assessed primarily based on the operating profit or
loss for the period.
3. Financial risk management
Financial risk factors
The Group is exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and
currency exchange rates. The objective of financial risk management at Wizz Air is to minimise the impact of
commodity price, interest rate and foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the Group’s earnings, cash flows
and equity. To manage commodity and foreign exchange risks, Wizz Air uses foreign currency and jet fuel
zero-cost collar contracts, jet fuel swaps and Cross Currency Interest Rate Swaps.
Risk management is carried out by the treasury department under policies approved by the Board of
Directors. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as written policies
covering specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, fuel price risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial
instruments, adherence to hedge accounting, and hedge coverage levels. The Board has mandated the Audit
and Risk Committee of the Board to supervise the hedging activity of the Group and compliance with the
policies approved by the Board.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 126
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Risk analysis
Market risks
Wizz Air operates under a clear set of treasury policies approved by the Board and supervised by the Audit
and Risk Committee.
Given the sustained and ongoing volatility in commodity prices, Wizz Air kept its systematic jet fuel hedging
policy and maintained hedge coverage in line with the policy and its peers. The hedges under the hedge
policy will be rolled forward quarterly, 18 months out, with coverage levels over time indicatively reaching
between 70 to 95 per cent for the first quarter of the hedging horizon and 20 to 45 per cent for the last
quarter of the hedging horizon. In line with the hedging policy, Wizz Air also hedges its fuel consumption-
related US dollar exposure in a similar fashion.
Foreign currency risk
The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk on sales, purchases and commitments that are denominated
in a currency other than the functional currency of its operating entities. The foreign currency exposure of
the Group is predominantly attributable to the following: (i) only a small portion of the Group’s revenues are
denominated in, or linked to, the US dollar, while a significant portion of the Group’s expenses are USD-
denominated, including fuel and aircraft leases; and (ii) there are various currencies in which the Group has
significantly more revenues than expenses, primarily the British pound (GBP) and – to a lesser extent – the
Polish zloty (PLN) and the Romanian leu (RON).
The EUR/USD foreign currency rate is the most significant underlying foreign currency exposure for the
Group. In October 2024, the Wizz Air Board approved a USD Lease Liabilities Economic Hedging Policy
covering a large portion of foreign exchange risks related to aircraft lease financing denominated in US
dollars. The Group maintains a significant cash reserve in US dollars as a natural hedge, and builds a
coverage ratio of 50-85% entering into Cross Currency Interest Rate Swap (CCS) contracts. These CCS
contracts have 3-year contract break clauses and are executed with fixed US dollar and fixed euro legs. At
the end of the 2026 financial year, out of our net USD exposure (USD lease liabilities – USD cash and cash
deposits), 83% were covered.
The table below analyses the financial instruments by the currency of future receipts and payments:
EUR
USD
Other
Total
At 31 March 2026
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Financial assets
Trade and other receivables
324.5
209.9
47.9
582.3
Investments in other entities
—
3.7
—
3.7
Derivative financial assets
10.7
573.4
—
584.1
Cash and cash equivalents
239.6
752.6
93.7
1,085.9
Cash deposits
30.0
922.8
—
952.8
Restricted cash
12.0
71.6
4.1
87.7
Total financial assets
616.8
2,534.1
145.7
3,296.6
Financial liabilities
Unsecured debt*
2.3
—
—
2.3
Secured debt
308.1
—
—
308.1
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability
724.9
3,327.4
—
4,052.3
IFRS 16 other lease liability
9.3
—
8.4
17.7
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability
1,818.1
602.8
110.1
2,531.0
Loans from non-controlling interests
—
43.0
—
43.0
Convertible debt
25.8
—
—
25.8
Trade and other payables
480.1
306.5
261.0
1,047.6
Derivative financial liabilities
42.8
12.5
—
55.3
Deferred income
5.5
—
2.1
7.6
Total financial liabilities
3,416.9
4,292.2
381.6
8,090.7
Net financial liabilities
(2,800.1)
(1,758.1)
(235.9)
(4,794.2)
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 127
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EUR
USD
Other
Total
At 31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Financial assets
Trade and other receivables
323.2
134.4
110.3
567.9
Investments in other entities
—
3.7
—
3.7
Derivative financial assets
0.5
11.6
—
12.1
Cash and cash equivalents
254.4
236.8
106.3
597.5
Cash deposits
215.0
845.2
—
1,060.2
Restricted cash
1.3
73.8
3.2
78.3
Total financial assets
794.4
1,305.5
219.8
2,319.7
Financial liabilities
Unsecured debt*
500.9
—
—
500.9
Secured debt
271.9
—
—
271.9
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease liability
775.0
2,866.6
—
3,641.6
IFRS 16 other lease liability
19.6
—
9.9
29.5
JOLCO and FTL lease liability
1,520.1
488.6
122.0
2,130.7
Loans from non-controlling interests
—
13.9
—
13.9
Convertible debt
25.5
—
—
25.5
Trade and other payables
463.4
114.6
236.5
814.5
Derivative financial liabilities
7.1
35.5
—
42.6
Deferred income
2.8
—
2.7
5.5
Total financial liabilities
3,586.3
3,519.2
371.1
7,476.6
Net financial liabilities
(2,791.9)
(2,213.7)
(151.3)
(5,156.9)
*Unsecured debt represents the European Mid Term Note and bank overdrafts.
Trade and other receivables in this table, and also in the other disclosures in this Note, exclude balances that
are not financial instruments, such as prepayments, deferred expenses and part of other receivables (see
Note 20). Similarly, trade and other payables and deferred income in this table, and also in the other
disclosures in this Note, exclude balances that are not financial instruments, such as part of accruals and
other payables (see Note 25 ).
Commodity risks
One of the most significant costs for the Group is jet fuel. The price of jet fuel can be volatile and can directly
impact the Group’s financial performance. See further details regarding jet fuel at market risks and hedge
transactions within this Note.
The Group is also exposed to price risks related to Emissions Trading System (ETS) schemes. To comply
with regulations, ETS allowances must be purchased and surrendered on a yearly basis. To reduce the
exposure to price volatility and inflation, the Group enters into spot and forward purchase transactions. As at
31 March 2026, all requirements for the calendar year 2025 and 100 per cent of the total forecast
requirements for the calendar year 2026 were covered. This coverage includes forward purchase
agreements to the value of €384.2 million. These forward purchase agreements qualify for the own use
exemption, and therefore are not accounted for as a financial instrument under IFRS 9.
Interest rate risk
The Group’s objective is to reduce cash flow risk arising from the fluctuation of interest rates on financing.
The Group has a small portion of future commitments under certain lease contracts that are based on
floating interest rates. The PDP refinancing credit facility (see Note 23) is a variable rate loan, which was
fully repaid during F25. The floating nature of these interest charges exposes the Group to interest rate risk.
Interest rates charged on Eurobond, convertible debt liabilities and on the majority of the leases to finance
the aircraft are not sensitive to interest rate movements as they are fixed until maturity.
The Group did not use financial derivatives to hedge its interest rate risk during the year.
The Group has floating rate instruments within restricted cash, but given their short-term maturity (within
three months), the interest rates are not expected to move significantly during this short period.
Hedge transactions during the year
The Group uses zero-cost collar instruments and swaps to hedge its jet fuel-related foreign exchange
exposures and jet fuel price exposures. To ensure an economic relationship, the Group enters into hedge
relationships where the critical terms of the hedging instrument match exactly those of the hedged item.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 128
ACCOUNTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The gains and losses arising from hedge transactions during the year were as follows:
Foreign exchange hedge:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
(Loss)/gain recognised within fuel costs
Effective cash flow hedge
(26.7)
12.7
Total (loss)/gain recognised within fuel costs
(26.7)
12.7
Fuel hedge:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Gain/(loss) recognised within fuel costs
Effective hedge
75.5
(26.2)
Total gain/(loss) recognised within fuel costs
75.5
(26.2)
Year-end open hedge positions
The Group measures its derivative financial instruments at fair value, as calculated by management using an
independent derivative valuation platform. Such fair values might change materially within the near future,
yet these changes would not arise from assumptions made by management or other sources of estimation
uncertainty at the end of the period, but from movements in market prices. The fair value calculation is most
sensitive to movements in the jet fuel and foreign currency spot prices, their implied volatility and respective
yields.
At the end of the year, the Group had the following open hedge positions:
Foreign exchange hedges with derivatives:
Derivative financial instruments
At 31 March 2026
Notional
amount
US$ million
Non-current
assets
€ million
Current
assets
€ million
Non-current
liabilities
€ million
Current
liabilities
€ million
Net
liability
€ million
Effective cash flow hedge positions
1,240.0
1.6
8.0
—
(10.1)
(0.6)
Total foreign exchange hedges
1,240.0
1.6
8.0
—
(10.1)
(0.6)
Derivative financial instruments
At 31 March 2025
Notional
amount
US$ million
Non-current
assets
€ million
Current
assets
€ million
Non-current
liabilities
€ million
Current
liabilities
€ million
Net
asset
€ million
Effective cash flow hedge positions
1,147.0
0.1
8.1
(3.6)
(4.2)
0.4
Total foreign exchange hedges
1,147.0
0.1
8.1
(3.6)
(4.2)
0.4
For the movements in other comprehensive income, please refer to the consolidated statement of
changes in equity.
The open foreign currency cash flow hedge positions at year-end can be analysed according to the maturity
periods and price ranges of the underlying hedge instruments as follows:
EUR/USD foreign exchange hedge:
F27
F28
At 31 March 2026
12 months
6 months
Maturity profile of notional amount (million)
$1,044.0
$196.0
Weighted average ceiling
$1.1840
$1.1987
Weighted average floor
$1.1413
$1.1722
F26
F27
At 31 March 2025
12 months
6 months
Maturity profile of notional amount (million)
$931.0
$216.0
Weighted average ceiling
$1.1224
$1.1016
Weighted average floor
$1.0792
$1.0591
Foreign exchange hedge with non-derivatives:
Non-derivatives, such as cash, are existing financial assets or liabilities that hedge highly probable foreign
currency cash flows in the future and therefore act as a natural hedge.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 129
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fuel hedge with derivatives:
Derivative financial instruments
At 31 March 2026
‘000
metric
tonnes
Non-current
assets
€ million
Current
assets
€ million
Non-current
liabilities
€ million
Current
liabilities
€ million
Net
asset
€ million
Effective cash flow hedge positions
1,600.0
29.6
534.2
(2.4)
—
561.5
Total fuel hedge
1,600.0
29.6
534.2
(2.4)
—
561.5
Derivative financial instruments
At 31 March 2025
‘000
  metric
tonnes
Non-current
assets
€ million
Current
assets
€ million
Non-current
liabilities
€ million
Current
liabilities
€ million
Net
liability
€ million
Effective cash flow hedge positions
1,753.0
1.1
2.3
(2.7)
(25.1)
(24.3)
Total fuel hedge
1,753.0
1.1
2.3
(2.7)
(25.1)
(24.3)
For the movements in other comprehensive income, please refer to the consolidated statement of changes
in equity.
The fuel hedge positions at year end can be analysed according to the maturity periods and price ranges of
the underlying hedge instruments as follows:
F27
F28
At 31 March 2026
12 months
6 months
Maturity profile (‘000 metric tonnes)
1,334.0
266.0
Blended capped rate
$717.0
$796.0
Blended floor rate
$651.0
$717.0
F26
F27
At 31 March 2025
12 months
6 months
Maturity profile (‘000 metric tonnes)
1,420.0
333.0
Blended capped rate
$786.0
$745.0
Blended floor rate
$709.0
$677.0
Effects of hedge accounting on financial position and performance
The effects of the foreign exchange hedges on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:
2026
2025
Zero-cost collars
Carrying amount net (liability)/asset (€ million)
(0.6)
0.4
Notional amount (US$ million)
1,240.0
1,147.0
Maturity date
April 2026–
July 2027
April 2025–
August 2026
Hedge ratio
1:1
1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million)
(5.4)
(1.6)
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million)
5.4
1.6
The effects of the fuel hedges on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:
2026
2025
Zero-cost collars
Carrying amount net asset/(liability) (€ million)
561.5
(24.5)
Notional amount (‘000 metric tonnes)
1,600.0
1,726.5
Maturity date
April 2026–
August 2027
April 2025–
August 2026
Hedge ratio
1:1
1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million)
565.6
(8.7)
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million)
(565.6)
8.7
Swaps
Carrying amount
—
0.2
Notional amount (‘000 metric tonnes)
—
26.5
Maturity date
—
April 2025–
May 2025
Hedge ratio
—
1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments (€ million)
—
0.2
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedge effectiveness (€ million)
—
(0.2)
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 130
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Hedge effectiveness
The effectiveness of hedges is tested prospectively to determine the appropriate accounting treatment of
open positions. Prospective testing of open hedges requires making certain estimates, the most significant
one being for the future expected level of the business activity (primarily the utilisation of fleet capacity) of
the Group. Building on these estimations of the future, management makes a judgement on the accounting
treatment of open hedging instruments. Hedge accounting for jet fuel and foreign currency cash flow hedges
is discontinued where the “highly probable” forecast criterion is not met in accordance with the requirements
of IFRS 9.
There was no discontinued hedging relationship during the financial year ending on 31 March 2026 or during
the financial year ending on 31 March 2025.
None of the hedge counterparties had a material change in their credit status that would have influenced the
effectiveness of the hedging transactions.
Sensitivity analysis
The table below shows the sensitivity of the Group’s profits to various market risks for the current and the
previous year, excluding any hedge impacts.
2026
2025
Difference in
profit before tax
€ million
Difference in
profit before tax
€ million
Fuel price sensitivity
Fuel price $100 higher per metric tonne
Fuel price $100 lower per metric tonne
-165.6
+165.6
-171.1
+171.1
FX rate sensitivity (USD/EUR)
FX rate 0.05 higher (meaning EUR stronger)
FX rate 0.05 lower
216.4
-236.0
214.3
-235.3
FX rate sensitivity (GBP/EUR)
FX rate 0.03 higher (meaning EUR stronger)
FX rate 0.03 lower
-12.4
13.3
-17.0
18.3
Interest rate sensitivity (EUR)
Interest rate is higher by 100 bps
Interest rate is lower by 100 bps
19.3
-19.4
17.6
-17.7
The Group is primarily exposed to changes in the EUR/USD foreign exchange rate. The sensitivity of profit or
loss to changes in the exchange rates arises mainly from US dollar lease liabilities and jet fuel-related US
dollar exposure.
The interest rate sensitivity calculation above considers the effects of varying interest rates on the interest
income on bank deposits, current account balances and floating rate leases.
The table below shows the sensitivity of the Group’s other comprehensive income to various market risks for
the current and the previous year. These sensitivities relate to the impact of market risks on the balance of
the cash flow hedging reserve (which includes gains and losses related to open cash flow hedges both for
foreign exchange rates and the jet fuel price).
2026
2025
Difference
€ million
Difference
€ million
Fuel price sensitivity
Fuel price $100 higher per metric tonne
Fuel price $100 lower per metric tonne
115.1
-115.1
163.3
-163.3
FX rate sensitivity (USD/EUR)
FX rate 0.05 higher (meaning EUR stronger)
FX rate 0.05 lower
23.2
-23.2
-1.1
1.1
Fuel volume sensitivity (metric tonnes)
100,000 metric tonnes reduction in forecast fuel purchases
100,000 metric tonnes increase in forecast fuel purchases
31.5
-31.5
-0.8
0.8
The sensitivity analyses above for 2026 were performed with reference to the following market rates, as the
base case:
▶ for profits, annual average rates: jet fuel price $791 per metric tonne; EUR/USD FX rate 1.16; EUR/GBP
FX rate 0.86; and
▶ for other comprehensive income, year-end spot rates: jet fuel price $1726 per metric tonne; EUR/USD
FX rate 1.15.
Liquidity risks
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 131
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and the availability of funding. The
financial year 2026 had significant price fluctuations, influenced by geopolitical tensions, changes in interest
rates and economic uncertainties. These challenges impacted our supply chain, operational capacity and the
liquidity position of the Group. In response, a number of actions are being taken to improve costs and
liquidity, the most important ones being:
▶ continuing to ensure that operated flights deliver positive cash contributions;
▶ securing nearly all lease financing for aircraft delivery positions until March 2027 (Note 32);
▶ working with suppliers to reduce contracted rates and improve payment terms;
▶ reducing discretionary spending and suspending non-essential capital expenditures;
▶ extended the EMTN programme in December 2025 and repaid the outstanding four-year €500 million
bond that matured in January 2026;
▶ rolled over the ETS sale and repurchase agreement with a balance of €307.5 million;
▶ working with acquiring banks to expand our ticket sales capacity. These banks will share a portion of the
credit risk for paid tickets that have not been flown, without needing to provide collateral.
As a result of these measures, the Group is confident in its ability to maintain sufficient liquidity in the case
of further unexpected events or increases in commodity prices. For further notes, please refer to the going
concern assessment under Note 2.
The Group invested excess cash primarily in US dollar- and euro-denominated short-term time deposits with
bank counterparties with minimum “A” credit ratings.
The table below analyses the Group’s financial assets and liabilities (receivable or payable either in cash or
net settled in the case of certain derivative financial assets and liabilities) in relevant maturity groupings
based on the period to the contractual maturity date as remaining at the reporting date.
The amounts disclosed in the table below are the contractual undiscounted cash flows, except for derivatives
where fair values are presented. Therefore, for certain asset and liability categories the amounts presented
in this table are different from the respective amounts presented in the statement of financial position.
At 31 March 2026
Within three
months
€ million
Between three
months
and one year
€ million
Between one
and five years
€ million
More than five
years
€ million
Total
€ million
Financial assets
Trade and other receivables
380.5
176.7
18.3
6.8
582.3
Derivative financial assets
320.7
221.5
41.9
—
584.1
Cash deposits
778.4
—
174.4
—
952.8
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
—
—
—
1,085.9
Restricted cash
20.3
22.2
27.6
17.6
87.7
Total financial assets
2,585.8
420.4
262.2
24.4
3,292.8
Financial liabilities
Unsecured debt
2.3
—
—
—
2.3
Secured debt
—
—
325.3
—
325.3
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease
liability
212.2
596.9
2,583.0
1,331.0
4,723.1
IFRS 16 other lease liability
0.9
2.0
9.6
6.5
19.0
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability
57.8
188.5
1,107.2
1,637.6
2,991.1
Loans from non-controlling interests
43.0
—
—
—
43.0
Convertible debt
—
1.1
24.7
—
25.8
Trade and other payables
858.7
161.9
20.8
6.2
1,047.6
Derivative financial liabilities
7.5
4.2
43.6
—
55.3
Deferred income
7.6
—
—
—
7.6
Total financial liabilities
1,190.0
954.6
4,114.2
2,981.3
9,240.1
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 132
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Within three
months
€ million
Between three
months
and one year
€ million
Between one
and five years
€ million
More than five
years
€ million
Total
€ million
At 31 March 2025
Financial assets
Trade and other receivables
519.7
2.5
45.7
—
567.9
Derivative financial assets
3.2
7.1
1.8
—
12.1
Cash deposits
361.1
699.1
—
—
1,060.2
Cash and cash equivalents
597.5
—
—
—
597.5
Restricted cash
21.0
20.7
31.5
5.1
78.3
Total financial assets
1,502.5
729.4
79.0
5.1
2,316.0
Financial liabilities
Unsecured debt
0.6
505.0
—
—
505.6
Secured debt
—
284.7
—
—
284.7
IFRS 16 aircraft and engine lease
liability
184.2
560.1
2,242.1
1,211.7
4,198.1
IFRS 16 other lease liability
1.3
3.4
16.4
13.8
34.9
JOLCO and FTL lease liability
45.4
151.7
915.7
1,443.0
2,555.8
Loans from non-controlling interests
—
—
—
13.9
13.9
Convertible debt
0.3
—
25.2
—
25.5
Trade and other payables
796.9
1.6
9.9
6.1
814.5
Derivative financial liabilities
6.5
22.7
13.4
—
42.6
Deferred income
5.5
—
—
—
5.5
Total financial liabilities
1,040.7
1,529.2
3,222.7
2,688.5
8,481.1
The Group has obligations under financial guarantee contracts as detailed in Note 31. The most significant
financial guarantee contracts relate to aircraft leases, hedging and Convertible Notes. For these items, the
respective underlying liabilities are reflected in the appropriate line of the financial liabilities part of the table
above (for leases, the liability is presented under borrowings). Since the liability itself is already reflected in
the table, it would not be appropriate to include the financial guarantee provided by another Group entity for
the same obligation as well.
Management does not expect that any payment under these guarantee contracts will be required by the
Company.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument
fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Group’s exposure to credit risk from individual customers is
limited as most of the payments for flight tickets are collected before the service is provided.
However, the Group has significant banking, hedging, aircraft manufacturer and card-acquiring relationships
that represent counterparty credit risk. The Group analysed the creditworthiness of the relevant business
partners to assess the likelihood of non-performance of liabilities and therefore assets due to the Group. The
credit quality of the Group’s financial assets is assessed by reference to external credit ratings (published by
Standard & Poor’s or similar institutions) of the counterparties as follows:
A
A-
Other
Unrated
Total
At 31 March 2026
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
993.5
80.7
5.2
6.6
1,085.9
Cash deposits
644.0
308.8
—
—
952.8
Restricted cash
77.6
—
—
10.0
87.7
Trade and other receivables
4.5
1.9
28.2
547.6
582.2
Derivative financial assets
584.1
—
—
—
584.1
Investments in other entities
—
—
—
3.7
3.7
Total financial assets
2,303.7
391.5
33.3
567.9
3,296.5
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 133
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A
A-
Other
Unrated
Total
At 31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
516.0
47.5
30.9
3.0
597.5
Cash deposits
954.1
106.2
—
—
1,060.3
Restricted cash
78.3
—
—
—
78.3
Trade and other receivables
4.1
3.3
5.8
554.7
567.9
Derivative financial assets
8.3
3.8
—
—
12.1
Investments in other entities
—
—
—
3.7
3.7
Total financial assets
1,560.8
160.8
36.7
561.4
2,319.8
Within the unrated category of trade and other receivables, the Group has €7.9 million (2025:
€25.1 million) in receivables from different aircraft lessors in respect of maintenance reserves and lease
security deposits paid (see also Note 20). However, given that the Group physically possesses the aircraft
owned by the lessors and the Group has significant future lease payment obligations towards the same
lessors, management does not consider the credit risk on maintenance reserve receivables to be material.
Most of the remaining balance in this category in both years relates to ticket sales receivables from
customers and non-ticket revenue receivables from business partners. These balances are spread between a
significant number of counterparties and the credit performance in these channels has historically been
good.
Based on the information above, management does not consider the counterparty risk of any of the
counterparties to be material, and therefore no fair value adjustment was applied to the respective cash or
receivable balances.
Fair value estimation
The Group classifies its financial instruments based on the technique used for determining fair value into the
following categories:
Level 1: Fair value is determined based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities.
Level 2: Fair value is determined based on inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Fair value is determined based on inputs that are not based on observable market data (that is, on
unobservable inputs).
The following table presents the Group’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as at
31 March 2026:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Assets
Investments in other entities
—
—
3.7
3.7
Derivative financial instruments
—
584.1
—
584.1
Cash and cash equivalents
0.3
—
—
0.3
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
—
55.3
—
55.3
The following table presents the Group’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as at
31 March 2025:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Assets
Investments in other entities
—
—
3.7
3.7
Derivative financial instruments
—
12.1
—
12.1
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments
—
42.6
—
42.6
The Group measures its derivative financial instruments at fair value, calculated by a third-party front office
system or determined by the financial institutions issuing the respective derivative that falls into the Level 2
category. The front office platform provides comprehensive risk management capabilities, using generally
accepted valuation techniques, principally the Black-Scholes model and discounted cash flow models. The
fair value of investments in other entities is estimated using Level 3 methodology.
All the other financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 134
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Capital management
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are: (i) to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a
going concern in order to provide returns for Shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders; (ii) to secure
funds at competitive rates for its future aircraft acquisition commitments (see Note 32); and (iii) to maintain
an optimal capital structure to reduce the overall cost of capital.
The current sources of capital for the Group are equity as presented in the statement of financial position,
bonds and other borrowings (see Note 23), as well as, to a lesser extent, convertible debt (see Note 24 ).
Wizz Air’s strategy is to hold significant cash and liquid funds to mitigate the impact of potential business
disruption events and to invest in opportunities as they come along in an increasingly volatile market
environment. Accordingly, the Group has so far retained all profits and paid no dividends and financed all its
aircraft and most of its spare engine acquisitions through sale and leaseback agreements. The Group
furthered its financing options through the establishment in January 2021 of a €3.0 billion European Mid
Term Note (EMTN) programme and issuance of its debut bond by Wizz Air Finance Company B.V.,
unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by Wizz Air Holdings Plc. Wizz Air renewed the EMTN programme
without a new issuance in December 2025 and repaid the outstanding four-year €500 million bond that
matured in January 2026. In addition, the Group entered into a repurchasing agreement utilising its large
inventory of ETS units.
The existing aircraft orders of the Group create a need for raising significant amounts of capital in the
coming years. The strategy of the Group is to ensure that it has access to various forms of long-term
financing, which in turn allows the Group to further reduce its cost of capital and the cost of ownership of its
aircraft fleet.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 135
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. Critical accounting estimates and judgements made in applying the Group’s
accounting policies
a) Maintenance policy
The estimations and judgements applied in the context of the maintenance accounting policy of the Group
impact the balance of: (i) property, plant and equipment (and, within that, aircraft maintenance assets, as
detailed in Note 13); and (ii) aircraft maintenance provisions (as detailed in Note 29).
Estimate: For aircraft held under lease agreements, provision is made for the minimum unavoidable costs of
specific future maintenance obligations required by the lease at the time when such obligation becomes
certain. The amount of the provision involves making estimates of the cost of the heavy maintenance work
required to discharge the obligation, including any end-of-lease costs. A 5 per cent increase in the planned
costs of heavy maintenance works at the 31 March 2026 year-end would increase the balance of both
aircraft maintenance assets and aircraft maintenance provisions by €24.4 million.
Estimate: The cost of heavy maintenance is capitalised and recognised as a tangible fixed asset (and
classified as an “aircraft maintenance asset”) at the earlier of: (a) the time the lease re-delivery condition is
no longer met; or (b) when maintenance, including enhancement, is carried out. The calculation of the
depreciation charge on such assets involves making estimates primarily for the future utilisation of the
aircraft. A 15 per cent change in the F27 forecast aircraft utilisation would result in the same average
utilisation as in F26. This would cause a €5.1 million decrease in the balance of aircraft maintenance assets.
The basis for these estimates is reviewed annually at least, and also when information becomes available
that is capable of causing a material change to an estimate, such as the renegotiation of end-of-lease return
conditions, increased or decreased utilisation of the assets, or changes in the cost of heavy maintenance
services.
Judgement: On a lease-by-lease basis, the Group makes a judgement on whether or not it would perform
future maintenance that would impact the condition of the respective aircraft or spare engine asset in a way
that eliminates the need for paying compensation to the lessor on the re-delivery of the leased asset. When
such maintenance is not expected to be performed, then an accrual is made for the compensation due to the
lessor in line with the terms of the respective lease contract. The change in the balance of accrued expenses
included a release of €83.4 million on 31 March 2025 based on the judgement that the Group will perform
future maintenance that eliminates the need to pay compensation to the lessor on the re-delivery of the
leased asset. The related credit was recognised in the statement of comprehensive income within
maintenance, materials and repairs. In the current fiscal year there was no significant release in connection
with the accrued expenses of lessor compensation.
Judgement: The policy adopted by the Group, as summarised above, is only one of the policies available
under IFRS in accounting for heavy maintenance for aircraft held under lease agreements. A principal
alternative policy involves recognising provisions for future maintenance obligations in accordance with
hours flown or similar measures, and not only when lease re-delivery conditions are not met. In the
judgement of the Directors, the policy adopted by the Group, whereby provisions for maintenance are
recognised only when lease re-delivery conditions are not met, provides the most reliable and relevant
information about the Company’s obligations to incur major maintenance expenditure on leased aircraft, and
at the same time it best reflects the fact that an aircraft has lower maintenance requirements in the early
years of its operation. The average age of the Group’s aircraft fleet as at 31 March 2026 was 4.6 years
(31 March 2025: 4.5 years). Given the adopted policy, we currently do not consider that climate change has
a material impact on the maintenance provision.
b) Hedge and derivative accounting
Estimate: The asset and liability balances at year end related to open hedge instruments can be material.
The fair value of derivatives is estimated by a third-party front office system as per industry practice. As
required, the fair values ascribed to those instruments are also verified by management using high-level
models. Such fair values might change materially within the next financial year but these changes would not
stem from assumptions made by management or other sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the
year, but from the movement of market prices. The fair value calculation is most sensitive to movements in
the jet fuel and foreign currency spot prices, their implied volatility and respective yields. A sensitivity
analysis for the jet fuel price and for the FX rate on most relevant currency pairs is included in Note 3.
Estimate and judgement: The effectiveness of hedges is evaluated prospectively to ascertain the suitable
accounting treatment for hedge gains and losses. Additionally, designated hedging relationships undergo
retrospective assessment for ineffectiveness, with any ineffective portion subsequently recognised in the
Statement of comprehensive income. Prospective testing of open hedges requires making certain estimates,
the most significant one being for the future expected level of the business activity (primarily the utilisation
of fleet capacity) of the Group, which is supported by the models used to prepare going concern
assessments.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 136
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Building on these estimations of the future, management exercises judgement on the appropriate
accounting treatment, considering the alignment of hedge instruments with the Group’s risk management
objectives and strategies. Hedge accounting for jet fuel and foreign currency cash flow hedges is
discontinued where the “highly probable” forecast criterion was not met in accordance with the requirements
of IFRS 9.
None of the hedge counterparties had a material change in their credit status that would have influenced the
effectiveness of the hedging transactions.
c) Accounting for aircraft and spare engine assets
Judgement: When the Group acquires new aircraft and spare engines, it applies the following critical
judgements in determining the acquisition cost of these assets:
▶ engine contracts typically include the selection of an engine type to be installed on future new aircraft, a
commitment to purchase a certain number of spare engines, and lump-sum (i.e. not per engine)
concessions from the manufacturer. Management recalculates the unit cost of engines by allocating
lump-sum credits over all engines ordered and by adjusting costs between installed and spare engines in
a way that ensures that identical physical assets have an equal acquisition cost; and
▶ aircraft acquisition costs are recalculated to reflect the impacts of: (i) any adjustment to the cost of
installed engines (as above); and (ii) concessions received from the manufacturers of other aircraft
components under selection agreements. Such acquisition cost also has relevance for leased aircraft
when calculating the amount of total gain or loss on the respective sale and leaseback agreement.
d) Accounting for leases
Judgement: Some of the Group’s lease contracts contain options to extend the lease term for a period of one
to two years. The extension option is taken into account in the measurement of the lease liability only when
the Group is reasonably certain that it would later exercise the option. Such judgement is made lease by
lease, and is relevant both at inception, for the initial measurement of the lease liability, and also for a
subsequent remeasurement of the lease liability if the initial judgement is revised at a later date.
Judgement: The Group determines the discount rate for leases in accordance with IFRS 16.26 and assesses,
on a lease‑by‑lease basis, whether the interest rate implicit in the lease can be readily determined from the
contractual terms. Where it can be readily determined, the implicit rate is applied to discount lease
payments; otherwise, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate. This determination requires
judgement, is not an accounting policy election, and reflects the specific contractual terms and underlying
economics of each lease.
The estimations made by management in accounting for leases do not materially impact the asset and
liability balances of the Group. The majority of aircraft and spare engine assets are leased, and as such their
period of depreciation is the shorter of their useful economic lives and lease duration. As these assets are
new at the inception of the lease and typically have a useful economic life of at least twice the duration of
the lease, no further estimation has been required.
e) Revenue from contracts with other partners
As explained in Note 6, revenue from contracts with other partners relates to commissions on the sale of
onboard catering, accommodation, car rental, travel insurance, bus transfers, premium calls and co‑branded
cards.
Judgement: The Group considers that it is an agent (as opposed to a principal) in relation to all its contracts
with other partners. Accordingly, Wizz Air recognises revenue from these contracts on a net (commission)
basis.
The provision of onboard catering services is the most significant in value of these contracts, and it is also
the most complex from the perspective of making the “agent versus principal” assessment/judgement. The
Company’s judgement that it is an agent is based on the fact that it is the partner that: (i) enters into
contracts with the passengers/customers and bears the liability towards them for delivering the products and
services; (ii) defines the majority of the product portfolio, manages the inventory, is responsible for product
availability/outage, has title to the inventory and bears the risk of loss; and (iii) has discretion in establishing
prices. The difference on this contract between gross sales and net commission revenue (as recognised in
the statement of comprehensive income) was €61.1 million (2025: €57.1 million).
f) Recoverability of deferred tax assets
Estimate: The change in the Group’s deferred tax assets and the resulting deferred tax income amounts to
€ 4.0 million (2025: €219.9 million). The main components of such changes are detailed in Note 15.
Management prepared an estimation of future taxable profits against which the deductible temporary
differences and tax loss carryforwards giving rise to deferred tax assets can be utilised. This assessment was
based on the medium-term plan approved by the Board for the following three financial years up to and
including March 2029. The risk of significant adverse changes in cash flows were taken into account by
calculating and weighting management’s base case approved plan with a downside scenario that is
consistent with that used in the Group’s going concern assessment. Projected results were extrapolated
beyond to mid-term plan period to assess recoverability of all deferred tax assets. Based on its estimates,
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 137
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
management considered that all deferred tax assets presented in the Group’s consolidated statement of
financial position as at 31 March 2026 are recoverable.
5. Segment information
Reportable segment information
The Chief Operating Decision Maker of the Group, as defined in IFRS 8, ‘Operating Segments’, is the senior
management team of the Group.
During F26, the Group had only one reportable segment, being its entire route network. All segment revenue
was derived wholly from external customers, and as the Group had a single reportable segment, inter‑segment
revenue was zero.
Reconciliation of reportable segment revenue and operating profit to consolidated profit after income tax:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Segment revenue
5,691.4
5,267.6
Segment operating expenses
(5,551.7)
(5,100.1)
Segment operating profit
139.7
167.5
Net financing expense
(112.7)
(147.8)
Income tax (expense)/ credit
(25.7)
194.2
Profit for the year
1.3
213.9
Entity-wide disclosures
Products and services
Revenue from external customers can be analysed by groups of similar services as follows:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Passenger ticket revenue
3,161.4
2,917.0
Ancillary revenue
2,530.0
2,350.6
Total segment revenue
5,691.4
5,267.6
These categories are non-IFRS categories meaning they are not necessarily distinct from a nature, timing
and risk point of view; however, management believes that these categories provide clarity over the
revenue profile of the Group to the readers of the financial statements and they are in line with airline
industry practice. The categories as per the definition of IFRS 15 are disclosed in Note 6 .
Ancillary revenue arises mainly from baggage charges, booking/payment currency conversion charges,
airport check-in fees, fees for various convenience services (e.g. priority boarding, extended legroom and
reserved seats), loyalty programme membership fees, commission on the sale of onboard catering,
accommodation, car rental, travel insurance, bus transfers, premium calls, co-branded cards and charters.
Geographic areas
Segment revenue can be analysed by geographic area as follows:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
EU and EFTA countries
4,101.4
3,638.3
UK
566.2
547.6
Other (non-EU)
1,023.8
1,081.7
Total revenue from external customers
5,691.4
5,267.6
In the table above, other (non-EU) comprises a number of non-EU geographic areas that are all individually
less than 10 per cent of the total revenue.
Revenue was allocated to geographic areas based on the location of the first departure airport on each
ticket booking.
The Company’s revenue from external customers within the EU is mainly generated by Italy at €754.3 million
(2025: €671.8 million), Romania at €608.5 million (2025: €561.7 million) and Poland at €565.9 million
( 2025: €482.3 million).
The physical location of non-current assets is not disclosed by geographic area. This is because: (i) by value,
most assets are associated either with aircraft not yet received (pre-delivery payments) or with existing
leased aircraft and spare engines (RoU and maintenance assets), the location of which changes regularly
following aircraft capacity allocation decisions; and (ii) the value of the remaining asset categories (land and
buildings, fixtures and fittings) is not material within total non-current assets.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 138
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The distribution of non-current assets between the key operating entities of the Group is as follows:
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Wizz Air Hungary Limited
1,928.1
2,226.3
Wizz Air Malta Limited
1,770.8
1,913.7
Wizz Air Fleet Management Limited
2,204.4
1,709.8
Wizz Air UK Limited
405.4
407.7
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Limited
—
44.1
Wizz Air Asset Solutions Limited
1,432.8
696.5
Duna Irodaház Limited
39.9
—
Other
43.1
21.8
Total non-current assets
7,824.5
7,019.9
No revenue or non-current asset of the Group was recognised in Jersey, the Company’s country of domicile
for the year ended 31 March 2026 (2025: €nil).
The Group acquired 100% of the share capital of Duna Irodaház Limited, obtaining control of the entity in
F26. See further details in Note 16.
Major customers
The Group derives the vast majority of its revenues from its passengers and sells most of its tickets directly
to passengers as final customers, rather than through corporate intermediaries (tour operators, travel
agents or similar).
6. Revenue
The split of total revenue presented in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, being
passenger ticket revenue and ancillary revenue, is a non-IFRS measure (or alternative performance
measure). The existing revenue presentation is considered relevant for users of the financial statements
because: (i) it mirrors disclosures presented outside of the financial statements; and (ii) it is regularly
reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker for evaluating financial performance of the (Group’s single)
operating segment.
Revenue from contracts with customers can be disaggregated as follows based on IFRS 15:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Revenue from contracts with passengers
5,620.2
5,197.6
Revenue from contracts with other partners
71.2
70.0
Total revenue from contracts with customers
5,691.4
5,267.6
These two categories represent revenues that are distinct from a nature, timing and risk point of view.
Revenue from contracts with other partners relates to commissions on the sale of onboard catering,
accommodation, car rental, travel insurance, bus transfers, premium calls and co-branded cards, where the
Group acts as an agent.
The contract costs reported at 31 March 2026 as part of trade and other receivables amounted to
€ 9.4 million (31 March 2025: €8.9 million) and the contract liabilities (unearned revenues) reported as
part of deferred income were €1,168.7 million (31 March 2025: €1,003.5 million). Out of the €5,620.2
million revenue from contracts with passengers recognised in F26 ( F25: €5,197.6 million), €1,003.5 million
(F25: €790.3 million) was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the year (see
unearned revenue in Note 26).
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 139
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. Auditors’ remuneration
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of the consolidated
financial statements
1.1
1.0
Fees payable to the auditor and their associates for the audit of financial statements
of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation
1.4
1.3
Total fee for audit services
2.5
2.3
Other audit-related services fees*
0.2
0.2
Other non-audit services fees
0.1
0.1
Total fee for non-audit services
0.3
0.3
Total remuneration of auditors
2.8
2.6
*  Other audit-related services fees comprise fees for the interim review of the consolidated financial statements.
8. Staff numbers and costs
The monthly average number of persons employed during the year, including Non-Executive Directors but
excluding inactive employees and subcontracted staff such as rented pilots, analysed by category, was as
follows:
Number of persons
2026
2025
Non-Executive Directors
10
10
Crew and pilots
8,379
7,481
Administration and other staff
733
655
Total staff number
9,122
8,146
The aggregate compensation of these persons was as follows:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Wages and salaries
542.9
473.3
Pension costs
27.6
21.1
Social security costs other than pension
55.6
46.4
Share-based payments
17.1
11.5
Subtotal
643.2
552.3
Subcontracted staff costs (rented pilots)
12.7
12.6
Total staff costs
655.9
564.9
9. Directors’ emoluments
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Salaries and other short-term benefits
3.2
2.9
Social security costs
0.5
0.3
Share-based payments
5.4
4.4
Total Directors’ emoluments
9.1
7.6
2026
2025
Number of Directors receiving emoluments
11
11
Number of Directors who in respect of their services received LTIP share options
under long-term incentive schemes during the year
1
1
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 140
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. Net financing income and expense
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Interest income
73.6
82.1
Financial income
73.6
82.1
Interest expenses on:
Convertible debt
(2.2)
(1.9)
IFRS 16 lease liability
(168.2)
(156.7)
JOLCO, FTL and FL liability
(75.3)
(59.6)
Unsecured debt
(4.7)
(5.8)
Secured debt
(13.4)
(25.0)
Other
(4.0)
(0.5)
Financial expenses
(267.8)
(249.5)
Net loss on derivative financial instruments
(20.6)
(6.4)
Net foreign exchange gains
102.1
26.0
Net financing expense
(112.7)
(147.8)
Interest income and expenses include interest on financial instruments. Interest income is earned on cash
and cash equivalents, deposits and restricted cash.
Net loss on derivative financial instruments includes the realised and unrealised result on the cross currency
interest rate swap contracts.
During F26, the EUR/USD exchange rate increased from 1.08 at 31 March 2025 to 1.15 at 31 March 2026.
This resulted in a foreign exchange gain on remeasuring liabilities denominated in USD, including a €129.4
million gain (2025: €40.9 million gain) related to IFRS 16 leases, a €37.7 million gain (2025: €3.9 million
gain) related to JOLCO, FTL and FL liabilities and a foreign exchange gain of €11.5 million (2025: €25.0
million loss) on remeasured cash and equivalents, cash deposits and restricted cash in foreign currencies.
The gains were partially offset by a loss of €67.5 million (2025: €nil) realised on bank deposits with a
maturity over 3 months.
11. Income tax charge/(credit)
Recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Current tax on profit for the year
24.3
30.8
Adjustment for current tax of prior years
(4.3)
(13.8)
Other income-based taxes for the year
9.7
9.1
Adjustment for income-based taxes of prior years
—
(0.4)
Total current tax expense
29.7
25.7
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities
—
—
Increase in deferred tax assets
(4.0)
(219.9)
Total deferred tax credit
(4.0)
(219.9)
Total tax charge/(credit)
25.7
(194.2)
The Company, Wizz Air Holdings Plc, has a local corporate tax rate of 14.7 per cent (2025: 14.7 per cent).
The tax rate relates to Switzerland, where the Company is tax resident, but does not have any commercial
operations. The tax charges stem from differences in the standalone income levels of subsidiaries,
differences in statutory tax rates applicable for these subsidiaries and movements in deferred taxes. The
increase in tax charges compared to the previous period is attributable to the lack of significant deferred tax
credits that affected F25.
The deferred tax credit includes tax losses generated at Wizz Air Holdings Plc due to the closure of
operations in Abu Dhabi. The recognition of new deferred tax assets and liabilities are explained in Note 15.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 141
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reconciliation of effective tax rate
The tax credit for the year (including both current and deferred tax charges and credits) is different to the
Company’s standard rate of corporate tax of 14.7 per cent (2025: 14.7 per cent). The difference is explained
below.
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Profit before income tax
27.0
19.7
Tax at the corporate tax rate of 14.7 per cent (2025: 14.7 per cent)
4.0
2.9
Adjustment for current tax of prior years
(4.3)
(13.8)
Adjustment for income-based taxes of prior years
—
(0.4)
Adjustment for deferred tax of prior years
—
22.5
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries versus the parent company
20.3
(207.7)
Non-deductible expense
4.4
(0.7)
Effect of newly recognised deferred tax assets
(14.5)
(6.1)
Changes in estimates related to prior period
6.1
—
Other income-based foreign tax
9.7
9.1
Total tax charge / (credit)
25.7
(194.2)
Effective tax rate
95.4%
n/a*
*the % value is not interpretable
The Group paid €19.6 m illion of tax in the year (2025: €39.1 million).
Other income-based foreign tax represents the local business tax and the “innovation contribution” payable
in Hungary in F26 and F25 by the Hungarian subsidiaries of the Group, primarily Wizz Air Hungary Limited.
Hungarian local business tax and innovation contribution are levied on an adjusted profit basis.
The effect of different tax rates on subsidiaries is a combination of impacts primarily in Hungary, the UK and 
Malta relating to the subsidiaries of the Group.
Global minimum tax
Most of the major jurisdictions in which the Group operated in F26, including Switzerland, Hungary, the
United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates and the Netherlands have implemented the OECD Pillar Two
rules, introducing a global minimum effective tax rate of 15 per cent for multinational enterprises with
consolidated revenues exceeding €750 million. While Malta has enacted the EU Global Minimum Tax
Directive, the domestic minimum tax is not yet effective; however, the income of the Group’s Maltese
subsidiaries falls within the scope of Pillar Two through the application of Income Inclusion Rules in
Switzerland.
Management is continuously assessing the detailed and developing minimum tax interpretations. In F26, the
income of the Group’s Hungarian, Maltese, UK, UAE and Dutch subsidiaries were within the scope of Pillar
Two, but no material additional tax liability arose as the entities met the applicable transitional safe harbour
conditions.
In line with the exception introduced by a 2023 amendment of IAS 12, ‘Income Taxes’, the Group does not
account for deferred taxes on “Pillar Two income taxes” but will account for such taxes as a current tax when
incurred in the future. Therefore, the minimum tax rules had no impact on the recognition and measurement
of deferred tax balances as at 31 March 2026, and hence on the total tax credit in the year.
Recognised in the statement of other comprehensive income
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Deferred tax related to movements in cash flow hedging reserve
(52.6)
5.4
Currency translation differences
(0.5)
—
Total tax credit / (charge)
(53.1)
5.4
Interpretation 23, ‘Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments’ (IFRIC 23)
The Group has open tax periods in a number of jurisdictions involving uncertainties of a different nature and
materiality. The Group assessed the impact of uncertainty of each of its open tax positions in line with the
requirements of IFRIC 23. The outcome of this assessment was that the Group has not identified any
material uncertain tax positions for F26. The Group concluded it was probable that the tax authority would
accept the uncertain tax treatment that has been taken or is expected to be taken in those tax returns, and
therefore accounted for income taxes consistently with that tax treatment. The final liabilities, as later
assessed by the tax authorities, are not expected to vary materially from the amounts recognised by the
Group.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 142
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
12. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings or loss per share is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to equity holders of
the Company by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue during each year.
2026
2025
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company, € million
2.2
225.8
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue
103,417,477
103,379,218
Basic earnings per share, €
0.02
2.18
There were no Convertible Shares in issue at 31 March 2026 (2025: nil) (see Note 28).
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in
issue with the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares that could have been issued in the respective
period as a result of converting the following convertible instruments of the Group:
▶ Convertible Shares;
▶ Convertible Notes ; and
▶ Employee share options (vested share options are included in the calculation).
The profit for the year was adjusted for the purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share in respect of
the interest charge relating to the debt which could have been converted into shares.
Diluted earnings  per share, €
2026
2025
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company, € million
2.2
225.8
Interest expense on convertible debt (net of tax), € million
2.2
1.9
Profit used to determine diluted earnings per share, € million
4.4
227.7
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue
103,417,477
103,379,218
Adjustment for assumed conversion on convertible instruments (number)
24,339,359
24,345,392
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares for diluted earnings per share
127,756,836
127,724,610
Diluted earnings per share, €
0.03
1.78
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 143
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. Property, plant and equipment
Land and
buildings
€ million
Aircraft
maintenance
assets
€ million
Aircraft
assets and
parts **
€ million
Fixtures
and
fittings
€ million
Advances
paid
for aircraft
and spare
engines*
€ million
Advances
paid
for aircraft
maintenance
assets
€ million
RoU assets –
aircraft and
spare
engines
€ million
RoU assets –
other
€ million
Total
€ million
Cost
At 1 April 2024
37.5
581.6
1,806.1
13.2
842.3
149.9
4,661.7
33.8
8,126.1
Additions
10.0
249.1
806.1
2.4
426.8
71.4
536.2
9.6
2,111.6
Disposals
—
(102.8)
(213.3)
(0.2)
(303.9)
—
(277.7)
(3.0)
(900.9)
Transfers
—
110.1
39.0
—
(39.0)
(110.1)
—
—
—
FX translation
—
(2.9)
3.9
—
—
1.2
6.0
0.8
9.0
At 31 March 2025
47.5
835.1
2,441.8
15.4
926.2
112.4
4,926.2
41.2
9,345.8
Additions
49.1
414.3
683.9
3.5
463.7
69.8
880.9
3.7
2,568.9
Disposals
—
(213.1)
(245.0)
(2.7)
(508.3)
(11.6)
(459.8)
(13.0)
(1,453.5)
Transfers
—
65.4
42.6
—
(42.6)
(65.4)
—
—
—
FX translation
—
(5.8)
(10.3)
(0.1)
(14.0)
(0.3)
(11.7)
(0.3)
(42.5)
At 31 March 2026
96.6
1,095.9
2,913.0
16.1
825.0
104.9
5,335.6
31.6
10,418.7
Accumulated
depreciation
At 1 April 2024
7.4
226.9
216.7
10.2
—
—
1,841.1
8.8
2,311.1
Depreciation
2.2
238.7
109.9
1.8
—
—
583.0
4.3
939.9
Disposals
—
(101.9)
(17.1)
(0.3)
—
—
(276.3)
(1.5)
(397.1)
FX translation
—
(3.1)
0.4
—
—
—
1.4
0.2
(1.1)
At 31 March 2025
9.6
360.6
309.9
11.7
—
—
2,149.2
11.8
2,852.8
Depreciation
3.0
320.4
179.9
2.0
—
—
637.2
4.3
1,146.8
Disposals
0.1
(210.7)
(32.0)
(2.6)
—
—
(451.5)
(2.4)
(699.1)
FX translation
—
(3.0)
(3.0)
—
—
—
(3.8)
(0.1)
(9.9)
At 31 March 2026
12.7
467.3
454.8
11.1
—
—
2,331.1
13.6
3,290.6
Net carrying
amount
At 31 March 2026
83.9
628.6
2,458.2
5.0
825.0
104.9
3,004.5
18.0
7,128.1
At 31 March 2025
37.9
474.5
2,131.9
3.7
926.2
112.4
2,777.0
29.4
6,493.0
*Disposals represent the refunds upon delivery of asset advances previously paid.
**  Additions are net of credits and compensation received from suppliers.
The Group entered into various financing arrangements to finance aircraft, including sale and leaseback,
Japanese Operating Lease with Call Option (JOLCO), French Tax Lease (FTL) structures and Finance Lease
(FL) structures. Some of these arrangements include Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV) in the financing
structure, and in accordance with IFRS 10, where the Group has control of these entities, these are
consolidated in the Group balance sheet. Aircraft assets and parts leased under JOLCO as part of sale and
leaseback arrangements are not classified as leases under IFRS 16 and are treated as aircraft assets and
parts (as if there were no sale at all) (Note 2).
Other right-of-use (RoU) assets include leased buildings and simulator equipment. Please refer to Note 23
for details on lease liabilities.
Additions to aircraft maintenance assets (2026 : €414.3 million; 2025: € 249.1 million) were fixed assets
created primarily against provisions for maintenance, as the Group’s aircraft or their main components no
longer met the relevant return conditions under lease contracts.
Additions to “advances paid to aircraft maintenance assets” primarily reflect the advance payments made by
the Group to the engine maintenance service provider under power-by-the-hour agreements.
Additions to “advances paid for aircraft” represent PDPs made in the year, while disposals in the same
category represent PDP refunds received from the manufacturer where the respective aircraft or spare
engine was delivered to the Group. During F26, in the statement of cash flows the cash inflow was a
€471.3 million “refund of advances paid for aircraft” and the cash outflow was €245.0 million in “advances
paid for aircraft”.
Additions to “land and buildings” represent the acquisition of the Wizz Air Headquarters building in Budapest,
acquired through the purchase of Duna Irodaház Limited. A s a result, land and buildings increased on 30
January 2026 by €40.8 million. Management has determined the asset’s useful life to be 20 years, with a
residual value of €nil.
Before the acquisition in January 2026 , the Group leased its headquarters from Duna Irodaház Limited. This
relationship was effectively settled with the acquisition, resulting in the derecognition of other RoU assets in
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 144
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
the amount of €11.3 million and a corresponding lease liability of €10.6 million. For further details on the
acquisition see Note 16.
The Group reviewed the expected useful lives attributed to its leased aircraft fleet financed through
operating leases, and notes that the duration of its leases is significantly shorter than the current expected
economic life of an aircraft. The useful economic life estimates for aircraft financed under JOLCO, FTL or FL
are aligned to the manufacturer or EASA certificates. No climate risk that may impact these assets during
their expected useful economic lives has been identified. Given this, no change to the expected useful life is
considered necessary as a result of climate change.
The Group recognised €255.9 million as a gain on sale and leaseback transactions in the period (2025:
€121.3 million).
Short-term wet-lease expenses of € 17.9 million were recognised in the period (2025: €113.0 million).
Impairment assessment
An impairment assessment was performed for the Group’s assets, which comprises a single cash generating
unit (CGU) that includes virtually all property, plant and equipment, the whole aircraft fleet, as well as the
intangible assets of the Group. The recoverable amount of that CGU was estimated by a fair value less cost
of disposal calculation based on cash flows derived from the medium-term plan approved by the Board for
the following three financial years up to and including March 2029.
The medium-term plan includes the contracted fleet growth, management’s assessment of future trends,
trading, and other assumptions - such as passenger numbers, load factors, commodity prices, foreign
exchange rates - based on external and internal inputs. Climate change related impacts - such as cost
related to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)  and emission trading schemes (ETS) - were considered based on
known legal requirements and estimated future prices.
Key assumptions for the jet fuel price and USD exchange rate were the following:
2027
2028
2029
Jet fuel price (USD per metric tonne)
898.0
848.1
848.1
EUR/USD exchange rate
1.148
1.148
1.148
Cash flow projections of the approved plan were extrapolated until March 2030. For the periods subsequent
to that, a terminal value was calculated by applying a growing perpetuity formula. The growth rate assumed
was 2% (2025: 2%). The risk of significant adverse changes in cash flows were taken into account by
calculating and weighting management’s base case approved plan with a downside scenario that is
consistent with that used in the Group’s going concern assessment. Long term and climate change related
risks that cannot be estimated with sufficient reliability are excluded from the projections. It was assumed
that incremental costs affecting the industry as whole - such as increase fuel cost due to SAF requirements
or higher jet fuel prices - are recovered through increased ticket revenue.
The cash flows were discounted by the Group’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC), which is 9.4%
(2025: 9.1%).
Sensitivity analysis was performed on reasonably possible changes to assumptions that result in a long term
decrease to operating cash flows without management being able to mitigate the impact. These changes
include 5% decrease in ticket prices, $200 increase in a fuel price per metric tonne, 1% increase in WACC,
no growth beyond the mid-term forecast horizon.
Management did not identify any reasonable scenario that would cause impairment.
Aircraft in Ukraine
In February 2022, as a consequence of the geopolitical conflict in Ukraine, the airspace of Ukraine, Russia
and Moldova was closed until further notice. As a result, four of Wizz Air’s aircraft were stranded in Ukraine,
with one aircraft located in Lviv and three aircraft located in Kyiv.
The aircraft in Lviv, together with all six engines from the aircraft located in Kyiv, were successfully
repatriated. Following the completion of airframe structural checks and engine inspections, the repatriated
aircraft and engines returned to service without the need for significant additional repair work.
The airframes remaining in Kyiv are assessed to be in good condition and free from damage, based on
available photographic evidence and information provided by local personnel. Preservation maintenance has
been performed, and parking and storage procedures in line with industry standards are in place.
The total net carrying amount of the stranded assets as at the reporting date is €11.1 million. As these
assets are not currently generating cash inflows, management performed an impairment assessment.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 145
ACCOUNTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management evaluated various scenarios, including successful repatriation to the fleet, the feasibility of
commencing operations in Ukraine in case of peace, the prospect of recovery under insurance
arrangements, selling the assets in full or in part to third parties, and continued grounding with no recovery
prospects. The scenarios considered range between full recovery and complete loss of the asset values.
Based on the weighted probability assessment, management considers the carrying amount of the aircraft to
be recoverable from the cash flows generated through the various scenarios assessed.
14. Intangible assets
Software
€ million
Licences
€ million
CIP intangible
assets
€ million
Total
€ million
Cost
At 1 April 2024
100.9
36.8
10.2
147.8
Additions
—
—
32.6
32.6
Transfers
27.9
—
(27.9)
—
Disposals
(13.0)
(0.1)
—
(13.1)
FX translation effect
—
0.6
—
0.6
At 31 March 2025
115.8
37.3
14.9
167.9
Additions
—
—
49.1
49.1
Transfers
36.4
3.6
(40.0)
—
Disposals
(5.9)
—
—
(5.9)
FX translation effect
—
(1.4)
—
(1.4)
At 31 March 2026
146.3
39.5
24.0
209.7
Accumulated amortisation and impairment
At 1 April 2024
55.0
0.1
—
55.1
Amortisation charge for the year
26.9
—
—
26.9
Disposals
(12.9)
(0.1)
—
(13.0)
At 31 March 2025
69.0
—
—
69.0
Amortisation charge for the year
31.8
—
—
31.8
Disposals
(5.9)
—
—
(5.9)
At 31 March 2026
94.9
—
—
94.9
Net carrying amount
At 31 March 2026
51.4
39.5
24.0
114.8
At 31 March 2025
46.8
37.3
14.9
98.9
Licences are mainly related to landing slots purchased at London Luton Airport and at London Gatwick
Airport. As these landing slots have no expiry date and are expected to be used in perpetuity, they are
considered to have an indefinite life and are accordingly not amortised.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 146
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
15. Tax assets and liabilities
Deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised
RoU assets
Lease
liabilities
Provisions for
other
liabilities and
charges
Property,
plant and
equipment
Tax loss
carry-
forwards
Hedge
Other
Total
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
At 1 April 2024
(127.2)
172.9
14.6
(18.9)
27.4
(3.3)
43.7
109.2
Credited/(charged)
to:
Profit or loss
(686.8)
792.8
0.7
10.1
(1.6)
—
104.9
220.1
Other
comprehensive
income
—
—
—
—
—
5.4
—
5.4
At 31 March 2025
(814.0)
965.7
15.3
(8.8)
25.8
2.1
148.6
334.7
Deferred tax
assets
(814.0)
965.7
15.3
(8.8)
25.8
2.1
148.6
334.7
Deferred tax
liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(Charged)/credited
to:
Profit or loss
(93.0)
79.4
(0.6)
23.8
17.8
—
(23.4)
4.0
Other
comprehensive
income
—
—
—
—
—
(52.6)
(0.5)
(53.1)
At 31 March
2026
(907.0)
1,045.1
14.7
15.0
43.6
(50.5)
124.7
285.6
Deferred tax
assets
(907.0)
1,045.1
14.7
15.0
43.6
(50.5)
124.7
285.6
Deferred tax
liabilities
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Assets: + / Liabilities: -
The total balance of deferred taxes is a €285.6 million asset (2025: €334.7 million asset) that only consists
of deferred tax assets.
The €138.1 million net deferred tax asset recognised in relation to IFRS 16 RoU assets (€907.0 million) and
lease liabilities (€ 1,045.1 million) is driven by the fact that certain subsidiaries of the Group recognise
leasing fees in their income tax returns in line with contracts, on a straight-line basis, which differs from the
timing of recognition under the IFRS 16 rules. Under IFRS 16, the lease-related expenses are forward
loaded, i.e. at the beginning of the lease period, the Group IFRS financial statements cumulatively include
more expense and a lower profit (or higher loss) than the tax returns.
The € 14.7 million deferred tax asset was recognised in relation to provisions (e.g. for the carbon quota
submission obligation in the EU Emissions Trading System) that are not deductible for tax purposes. This
temporary difference will be reversed when the Company makes payments to settle the related liability and
receives the tax deductions.
The €15.0 million net deferred tax liability was recognised in connection to property, plant and equipment,
which is mainly driven by the different depreciation or capital allowance derived from the tax rules compared
to the accounting depreciation of the assets. As part of the net balance, a deferred tax liability of €21.2
million (2025: €22.5 million) was recognised on the temporary difference related to a development reserve
formed according to Hungarian corporate income tax rules. The development reserve formed at Wizz Air
Hungary Limited is for future purchases of property, plant and equipment, and is deductible for tax purposes
when it was formed, but no accounting depreciation will be tax deductible on the assets purchased in the
future using the development reserve. During F26, property, plant and equipment were acquired utilising the
development reserve, which resulted in a reduction of the reserve balance. Accordingly, this change affected
the amount of the related deferred tax liability recognised.
The deferred tax assets of €43.6 million on tax loss carry-forwards are mainly attributable to the tax losses
generated by Wizz Air UK Limited, Wizz Air Holdings Plc. in the current and previous years. Following the
closure of operations in Abu Dhabi, Wizz Air Holdings Plc recognised impairment losses, resulting in tax
losses available to be carried forward to future periods, which generated a deferred tax asset in F26.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 147
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On the acquisition date of Duna Irodaház Limited, a taxable temporary difference of €21.9 million and a
deductible temporary difference of €2.2 million were identified in relation to Duna Irodaház Limited’s assets
and liabilities acquired. As the acquisition did not qualify as a business combination and management
considered that all other conditions of the initial recognition exemption in IAS 12 were met, no deferred
taxes were recognised for the temporary differences on the date of acquisition and on the reporting date.
For further details on the acquisition, see Note 16.
The majority of the deferred tax asset relating to other temporary differences and amounting to €124.7
million (2025: €148.6 million) is attributable to an intra-group sale of rights to purchase aircraft.
Unrecognised deferred tax liabilities
At 31 March 2026, the aggregate amount of temporary differences in respect of investment subsidiaries,
branches and interest in associates is approximately €622.4 million (2025: €528.7 million). However, this
liability was not recognised because the Group controls the dividend policy of its subsidiaries - i.e. the Group
controls the timing of reversing related taxable temporary differences and the management is satisfied that
they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The local tax rate of the parent for the received dividend and
capital gain is zero percent, so the unrecognised deferred tax liability would be nil.
Unrecognised deferred tax asset from tax loss carry forward
The tax loss carry forward for which the Group had not recognised a deferred tax asset as at 31 March 2026
amounted to €82.1 million ( 2025: €118.5 million). The tax losses for which no deferred tax asset was
recognised do not expire.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 148
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
16. Subsidiaries and associates
The Group had the following subsidiaries as at 31 March 2026:
Country of
incorporation
Registered
address
Principal
activity
Class of
shares held
Percentage
held
Financial
year end
Subsidiary undertakings
Wizz Air Hungary Limited
Hungary
1
Airline
operator
Ordinary
100
31 March
Cabin Crew Professionals Sp. Z.o.o.
Poland
2
Dormant
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Bosnia LLC
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
3
Crew
company
Ordinary
100
31 December
Wizz Air Nederland Holding B.V.
The
Netherlands
4
Dormant
Ordinary
100
31 March
Dnieper Aviation LLC
Ukraine
5
Dormant
Ordinary
100
31 December
Wizz Air Ukraine LLC
Ukraine
5
Dormant
Ordinary
100
31 December
Wizz Aviation Professionals S.R.L
Moldova
6
Crew
company
Ordinary
100
31 December
Wizz Air UK Limited
UK
7
Airline
operator
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Finance Company B.V.
The
Netherlands
11
Financing
company
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Fleet Management Limited
Hungary
1
Aircraft
leasing
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Limited
United Arab
Emirates
8
Holding
entity
Ordinary
49
31 March
Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC
United Arab
Emirates
9
To be
liquidated
Ordinary
49
31 March
Wizz Air Innovation Limited
Hungary
1
Service
provider
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Malta Limited
Malta
10
Airline
operator
Ordinary
100
31 March
WAM Ventures Holding Limited
Malta
10
Holding
entity
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Asset Solutions Limited
Malta
10
Aircraft
leasing
Ordinary
100
31 March
Wizz Air Aviation Services LLC
Hungary
1
Aircraft
engineering
Ordinary
100
31 March
Duna Irodaház Limited
Hungary
1
Property
Management
Ordinary
100
31 March
The Group had the following associate as at 31 March 2026:
Country of
incorporation
Registered
address
Principal activity
Class of
shares held
Percentage
held
Financial
year end
Firefly Green Fuels Limited
UK
12
SAF R&D
Ordinary
25
31 December
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 149
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Registered offices
1. 1095 Budapest, Lechner Ödön fasor 6, Hungary
2. ul. Wolnosci 90, 42-625 Pyrzowice, Poland
3. Dubrave Gornje bb, putnički terminal JP Medjunarodni aerodrome Tuzla d.o.o. prvi sprat, kancelarija 2
Živinice, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4. Kraijenhoffstraat 137 A, 1018RG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5. Bulv. Tarasa Shevchenko 33-B, 3rd floor, 01032 Kyiv, Ukraine
6. MD-2005, str. Alexandr Puşkin, 47/1-5a, mun. Chişinău, Republic of Moldova
7. Percival House, 134 Percival Way, London Luton Airport Roundabout, Luton LU2 9NU, United Kingdom
8. 2426 ResCo-work06, 24, Al Sila Tower, Abu Dhabi Global Market Square, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates
9. Business Park 01, Plot P6, Office number 208, Abu Dhabi International Airport, Abu Dhabi, United Arab
Emirates
10. Skyparks Business Centre, Level 2, Malta International Airport, Luqa LQA 4000, Malta
11. Herikerbergweg 238, Luna ArenA, 1101CM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
12. Temple Studios, Temple Gate, Bristol, BS1 6QA, United Kingdom
On 30 January 2026, and for cash, the Group acquired 100% of the shares and obtained control in Duna
Irodaház Limited, the owner of the property that is partly leased by the Group as its headquarters.
Substantially all of the other parts of the property are leased out to third-party tenants. From the acquisition
date, Duna Irodaház Limited has been fully consolidated in the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
Management assessed whether the transaction was a business combination by applying the so-called
’concentration test’, which is an optional simplified assessment of whether an acquired set of activities and
assets is not a business. The concentration test was met as substantially all of the fair value of the gross
assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, i.e. the property. Therefore, management
concluded that the acquisition was not a business combination but an acquisition of a set of assets and
liabilities not constituting a business.
On the date of the acquisition, the Group paid Duna Irodaház Limited’s intercompany loan to the financing
company in the group of Duna Irodaház Limited’s former owners. The cash outflow from the payment is
presented as cash used in financing activities in the statement of cash flows and the purchase price paid is
presented as investing cash flow in the same statement.
The cash purchase price is subject to adjustments based on the audited 31 January 2026 local GAAP
accounts of Duna Irodaház Limited.
WA Pilot Academy Sp. Z.o.o. was liquidated on 31 December 2025.
Except for the above changes, there were no changes to the Group structure from 31 March 2025.
The Group entered into various financing arrangements to finance aircraft, including sale and leaseback,
Japanese Operating Lease with Call Option (JOLCO), French Tax Lease (FTL) and Finance Lease (FL)
structures. Some of these arrangements include Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV) in the financing structure,
and in accordance with IFRS 10, where the Group has control of these entities, they are consolidated in the
Group statement of financial position.
Certain subsidiaries have a financial year-end that differs from the Group’s financial year-end due to the
requirements of local legislation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 150
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
17. Non-controlling interests
The following table summarises the information relating to Wizz Air Abu Dhabi Limited and Wizz Air Abu
Dhabi LLC that has material NCI, before and after any intra-group eliminations.
2026
2026
2026
2026
€ million
Abu Dhabi
LLC
€ million
Abu Dhabi
Limited
€ million
Intra-group
eliminations
€ million
Abu Dhabi
Consolidated
Summarised balance sheet
Non-current assets
—
—
—
—
Current assets
118.6
359.2
(359.2)
118.6
Non-current liabilities
—
—
—
—
Current liabilities
(89.0)
(177.2)
174.8
(91.4)
Net assets/(liabilities)
29.6
182.0
(184.4)
27.2
Net assets/(liabilities) attributable to NCI
8.9
54.6
(67.2)
(3.7)
Revenue
95.8
—
—
95.8
Net (loss)/profit for the year
(3.1)
—
(3.2)
(6.3)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
10.7
3.2
—
13.9
Total comprehensive income
7.6
3.2
(3.2)
7.6
Net (loss)/profit for the year allocated to NCI
(0.9)
—
—
(0.9)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
allocated to NCI
3.2
1.0
—
4.1
Cash flows from operating activities
34.6
—
—
34.6
Cash flows from investment activities
—
—
—
—
Cash flows used in financing activities (dividends to NCI:
€nil)
(50.2)
—
—
(50.2)
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
(15.6)
—
—
(15.6)
2025
2025
2025
2025
€ million
Abu Dhabi LLC
€ million
Abu Dhabi
Limited
€ million
Intra-group
eliminations
€ million
Abu Dhabi
Consolidated
Summarised balance sheet
Non-current assets
247.4
46.3
(46.3)
247.4
Current assets
106.3
—
—
106.3
Non-current liabilities
(232.4)
(46.3)
43.7
(235.0)
Current liabilities
(283.8)
—
—
(283.8)
Net assets/(liabilities)
(162.5)
—
(2.6)
(165.1)
Net assets/(liabilities) attributable to NCI
(49.5)
—
—
(49.5)
Revenue
283.1
—
—
283.1
Net (loss)/profit for the year
(39.3)
—
0.2
(39.1)
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year, net of
tax
0.2
—
—
0.2
Total comprehensive (expense)/income
(39.1)
—
0.2
(38.9)
Net (loss)/profit for the year allocated to NCI
(11.9)
—
—
(11.9)
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year, net of
tax allocated to NCI
0.1
—
—
0.1
Cash flows from operating activities
23.1
—
—
23.1
Cash flows from investment activities
—
—
—
—
Cash flows used in financing activities (dividends to NCI:
€nil)
(4.0)
—
—
(4.0)
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
19.1
—
—
19.1
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 151
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
18. Summarised financial information for investments in associates
Wizz Air has an interest in one individually immaterial associate, Firefly Green Fuels Limited (“Firefly”).
Firefly is an SAF research and development company that operates in the UK.
In 2023, fulfilling its investment commitments stipulated in the investment agreement concluded
between Wizz Air and other owners of Firefly in two tranches, Wizz Air invested a total of £5.0 million
(€5.7 million) into Firefly, resulting in 25 per cent ownership. Wizz Air has no investment commitment
going forward.
As Wizz Air has had significant representation (20 per cent) on the board of directors of Firefly since April
2023, Wizz Air concluded that it has significant influence over Firefly and therefore has applied the equity
method of accounting for Firefly since April 2023.
The following table shows the carrying amount and Wizz Air’s share of the net result and other
comprehensive income of Firefly:
Firefly Green Fuels
Limited
€ million
Firefly Green Fuels
Limited
€ million
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
Carrying amount of Firefly Green Fuels Limited
5.7
5.7
Percentage ownership interest
25.0%
25.0%
Share of net profit of associates
—
—
Share in other comprehensive income from investments
—
—
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 152
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
19. Inventories
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Aircraft consumables
54.6
47.3
UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) allowances
35.1
23.8
EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) allowances (refer to Note 23)
216.0
200.8
Total inventories
305.7
271.9
During the year, remnant stock with a carrying amount of €1.1 million was written off to maintenance
expenses (2025: €0.4 million). There was no write back in either year of any previous write-down of
inventory.
Inventories totalling €34.7 million were recognised as maintenance materials and repair expenses in the
year ( 2025: €27.6 million).
20. Trade and other receivables
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current
Receivables from lessors
11.2
31.0
Other receivables
13.9
14.7
Non-current trade and other receivables
25.1
45.7
Current
Trade receivables
273.6
275.1
Receivables from lessors
2.1
0.5
Receivables from non-controlling interests (refer to Note 23)
43.3
—
Other receivables
43.6
38.1
Total current other receivables
89.0
38.6
Prepayments and deferred expenses
88.1
71.4
Accrued income
236.3
245.3
Current trade and other receivables
687.0
630.4
Total trade and other receivables
712.1
676.1
Receivables from lessors (both current and non-current) represent the deposits provided by the Group to
lessors as security in relation to the lease contracts and in relation to the funding of future maintenance
events.
Trade receivables included €193.1 million in receivables from contracts with customers ( 31 March 2025:
€202.1 million). The amount consists mainly of credit card sales not yet transferred to the Group by the card
acquirer, receivables from travel agencies and group bookings.
Credits received in the amount of €265.7 million are rel ated to incentives and compensation from Original
Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and other suppliers (2025: €353.6 million). These credits and
compensations are accounted for as other income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
Total trade and other receivables as at 31 March 2026 included finan cial instruments in the amount of
€ 582.3 million (31 March 2025: €567.9 million).
Impairment of trade and other receivables
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Impaired receivables
– trade receivables
(4.1)
(2.8)
Allowances on impaired receivables
– other receivables
(0.4)
(0.5)
The Group recorded €2.1 million of receivables from Warsaw Modlin Airport during 2013 as compensation for
damages, which was immediately impaired in full. However, the Group is legally claiming the full amount in
court. The compensation claimed by the Group, plus interest, was awarded by the District Court of Warsaw
in June 2018. However, the airport appealed against the decision, which is currently pending. There was no
development regarding this receivable in this financial year.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 153
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
21. Derivative financial instruments
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Assets
Non-current derivatives
Cash flow hedges
31.2
1.3
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
10.7
0.5
Current derivatives
Cash flow hedges
542.2
10.3
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
—
—
Total derivative financial assets
584.1
12.1
Liabilities
Non-current derivatives
Cash flow hedges
(2.3)
(6.3)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
(41.3)
(7.1)
Current derivatives
Cash flow hedges
(10.1)
(29.2)
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
(1.6)
—
Total derivative financial liabilities
(55.3)
(42.6)
Derivative financial instruments represent cash flow hedges and cross-currency interest rate swaps (see
Note 3). In the case of cash flow hedges, the full value of a hedging derivative is classified as a current asset
or liability if the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than a year. In the case of cross-currency
interest rate swaps, the full value of the derivative is classified as a current asset or liability if the remaining
maturity of the deal is less than a year.
The changes in the net position of assets and liabilities in respect of open cash flow hedges are detailed in
the consolidated statement of changes in equity.
The mark-to-market gains (cash flow hedges) were generated on gains on call options bought (as part of zero-
cost collar instruments) that were in the money at year-end.
The mark-to-market losses (cash flow hedges) were generated on losses on put options sold (as part of zero-
cost collar instruments) that were out of the money at year-end.
22. Restricted cash
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current financial assets
45.2
36.3
Current financial assets
42.5
42.0
Total restricted cash
87.7
78.3
Restricted cash is not accessible by the Group. It comprises cash in bank against which there are letters of
credit issued or other restrictions in place governing the use of that cash, resulting from agreements with
aircraft lessors or other business partners. Restricted cash is excluded from cash and cash equivalents in the
cash flow statement.
23. Borrowings
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Lease liability under IFRS 16
584.4
605.7
Unsecured debt
2.3
500.9
Secured debt
—
271.9
Loans from non-controlling interests
43.0
—
Liability related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts
186.2
139.4
Total current borrowings
815.9
1,517.9
Lease liability under IFRS 16
3,485.6
3,065.4
Secured debt
308.1
—
Loans from non-controlling interests
—
13.9
Liability related to JOLCO, FTL and FL contracts
2,344.8
1,991.3
Total non-current borrowings
6,138.5
5,070.6
Total borrowings
6,954.4
6,588.5
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 154
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unsecured debt
On 19 January 2022, Wizz Air Finance Company B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Wizz Air Holdings Plc,
issued a €500.0 million, 1.00 per cent Eurobond, fully and irrevocably guaranteed by the Company, under
the €3,000.0 million EMTN programme. The Eurobond was fully repaid in January 2026. The EMTN
programme was renewed in December 2025.
Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and are an integral part of cash management activities are
included within unsecured debt in the amount of €2.3 million (31 March 2025: €0.6 million).
Secured debt
In December 2023, the Group entered into an ETS sale and repurchase agreement according to which EU
allowances were sold for €253.6 million with a commitment to repurchase them in September 2024. In
September 2024, the parties decided to extend the repurchase date to March 2026. In November 2025, the
parties agreed to enter into a new agreement according to which EU allowances were sold for €307.5 million
in March 2026 with a commitment to repurchase them in September 2027. The consideration received is
recognised as a financial liability within secured debt. The difference between the sale price and the
repurchase price is recognised as interest expense over the period between the sale date and the repurchase
date. The facility does not contain any financial covenants.
Loans from non-controlling interests
On 14 July 2025, Wizz Air announced that it would cease Wizz Air Abu Dhabi's operations effective from 1
September 2025, and the intention to initiate a process of winding down the business primarily due to a
strategic realignment of the Wizz Air Group. In August 2025, the non-controlling interests of Wizz Air Abu
Dhabi increased the subscribed capital by €42.6 million (see in statement of changes in equity) of Wizz Air
Abu Dhabi Limited and provided a cash loan of €30.0 million to help settle relevant Wizz Air Abu Dhabi third-
party liabilities. The loan is repayable on demand.
This loan, together with a €13.0 million (2025: €13.9 million) loan provided in previous years totalling €43.0
million overall will be settled with a promissory note issued by the non-controlling interests to Wizz Air Abu
Dhabi Limited in the same amount, in exchange for shares.
Short-term and variable lease payments
The Group recognise d a €9.4 million expense relating to short-term leases ( 2025: €3.0 million) and a €nil
expense relating to variable lease payments in the period (2025: €nil).
The maturity profile of borrowings as at 31 March 2026 is as follows:
IFRS 16
aircraft and
engine lease
liability
IFRS 16
other lease
liability
JOLCO, FTL
and FL
liability
Unsecured
debt
Secured
debt
Loans from
non-
controlling
interests
Total
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Payments due:
Within one month
58.9
0.2
17.3
2.3
—
43.0
121.7
Between one and
three months
53.0
0.5
31.4
—
—
—
84.9
Between three
months and one
year
469.8
2.0
137.5
—
—
—
609.3
Between one and
two years
567.2
2.9
181.5
—
308.1
—
1,059.7
Between two and
three years
529.0
2.4
187.0
—
—
—
718.4
Between three and
four years
528.1
1.9
310.3
—
—
—
840.3
Between four and
five years
516.0
1.9
206.3
—
—
—
724.2
More than five years
1,330.4
5.8
1,459.7
—
—
—
2,795.9
Total borrowings
4,052.4
17.6
2,531.0
2.3
308.1
43.0
6,954.4
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 155
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The maturity profile of borrowings as at 31 March 2025 is as follows:
IFRS 16
aircraft and
engine lease
liability
IFRS 16
other lease
liability
JOLCO, FTL
and FL
liability
Unsecured
debt
Secured
debt
Loans from
non-
controlling
interests
Total
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Payments due:
Within one month
42.8
0.3
11.4
0.6
—
—
55.1
Between one and three
months
95.7
0.6
26.3
—
—
—
122.6
Between three months and
one year
463.7
2.6
101.7
500.3
271.9
—
1,340.2
Between one and two years
558.5
3.1
143.9
—
—
—
705.5
Between two and three years
480.0
3.3
148.1
—
—
—
631.4
Between three and four years
433.8
3.3
152.6
—
—
—
589.7
Between four and five years
426.5
3.3
281.9
—
—
—
711.7
More than five years
1,140.6
13.0
1,264.8
—
—
13.9
2,432.3
Total borrowings
3,641.6
29.5
2,130.7
500.9
271.9
13.9
6,588.5
The total cash outflow for leases during F26 was €812.3 million (2025 : € 761.3 million) and €213.7 million
( 2025: €165.8 million) for JOLCO, FTL and FL.
See details on right-of-use assets in Note 13.
24. Convertible debt
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current convertible debt
24.7
25.2
Current convertible debt
1.1
0.3
Total convertible debt
25.8
25.5
Convertible debt comprises Convertible Notes held by Indigo Hungary LP and Indigo Maple Hill LP (“Indigo”).
The principal and any accrued interest on the Convertible Notes are convertible into Ordinary Shares in Wizz
Air Holdings Plc at conversion factors in the range of €1.0–€1.5 for one share as an option for Indigo. Such
Ordinary Shares issued as a result of conversion in certain cases might be subject to restrictions on voting
and dividend rights. Until the Notes are converted, interest on the Notes is payable in cash with a coupon
rate of interest of 8 per cent per annum, twice a year in February and in August.
Convertible Notes are guaranteed by Wizz Air Hungary Limited – see Note 31.
For more information about the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk, see Note 3.
25. Trade and other payables
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current liabilities
Accrued expenses
103.5
69.5
Other payables
0.1
—
Non-current trade and other payables
103.6
69.5
Current liabilities
Trade payables
276.0
230.7
Payables to passengers
74.9
57.9
Other payables
46.5
37.7
Accrued expenses
903.6
712.5
Current trade and other payables
1,301.0
1,038.8
Total trade and other payables
1,404.6
1,108.3
Payables to passengers include refunds made in credits that can be used by customers for re-booking tickets
for later dates or can be requested by customers for refunding by the Group in cash and other liabilities
towards customers. Credits not eligible for a cash refund are classified as deferred income.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 156
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accrued expenses mainly include accruals for operating expenses such as airport and ground handling, fuel,
ETS allowances, en-route and navigation, crew and maintenance-related expenses and liabilities for
Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004 (EC261) compensation to customers in the amount of €16.7 million
(31 March 2025: €13.0 million).
Based on the terms of the new ETS sale and repurchase agreement (please see Note 23), the Group
recognised a one‑off impact, resulting in a reduction of €23.0 million in the ETS surrender‑related liability
and the corresponding expense for F26.
The Group recognised a liability of €136.7 million for Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004 (EC261) and other flight
disruption related compensation to customers in the period ( 2025: €166.5 million).
Total trade and other payables as at 31 March 2026 included financial instruments in the amount of
€1,047.6 million ( 31 March 2025: €814.5 million).
26. Deferred income
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current liabilities
Deferred income
203.9
166.5
Current liabilities
Unearned revenue
1,168.7
1,003.5
Other
11.4
9.8
1,180.1
1,013.3
Total deferred income
1,384.0
1,179.8
Non-current deferred income represents the value of the benefit for the Group derived from credits and free
aircraft components received from manufacturers and component suppliers, which will be recognised as a
credit (a decrease in aircraft-related expenses) over the useful life of the respective asset.
The other category of the current deferred income mainly relates to other incentives and compensation from
manufacturers.
Unearned revenue represents the value of tickets paid by passengers for which the flight service is yet to be
performed, the value of membership fees paid but not yet recognised, the current part of the value of
supplier credits received and credits provided to passengers with no cash conversion option in the amount of
€8.0 million (31 March 2025: €32.5 million). Unearned revenue increased due to higher demand and ticket
bookings made further in advance.
Unearned revenue of € 1,168.7 million as at 31 March 2026 (31 March 2025: €1,003.5 million) will become
revenue during F27 (subject to any cancellations that might happen after the year end).
27. Employee benefits
Share-based payments
The share-based payment charge in the financial statements for the year relates to employee share options
issued during 2021–2025 under the Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP), Senior Leadership Growth Plan (SLGP)
and Value Creation Plan (VCP) of the Group. The expenses (other than social security) recognised in relation
to these instruments totalled €17.1 million (2025: €11.6 million).
The options are classified as equity-settled share-based payments. The Company issues new shares for any
options exercised, irrespective of the exercise method. The fair value of the awards and options is
recognised as staff cost over the estimated vesting period with a corresponding charge to equity.
The Group announced on 6 August 2021 that it had signed a new long-term service agreement with József
Váradi, the Group’s founding Chief Executive Officer. The contract term is for five years and the terms of his
service agreement are materially the same as his previous agreement, with the exception of a new long-
term incentive arrangement, the Value Creation Plan (VCP), which targets a 20 per cent CAGR in the Group’s
share price over the next five years.
The fair value of the awards was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. This model simulates the share
price of Wizz Air over the performance period, based on a number of assumptions, to calculate the
proportion of an award which might vest and the value at the vesting date. By averaging the results of
thousands of simulations, a robust valuation can be calculated adjusted to the volatility assumption used for
the impact of COVID-19 on the Wizz Air share price. To account for the exclusion of the seven-month
COVID-19 period, the date ranges have been expanded to ensure a full period of three or five years is
covered. Had there not been a global pandemic, the assumptions would likely be three or five years to date
of granting; however, COVID-19 caused significant volatility, particularly within the industry in which Wizz
Air operates.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 157
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The reason behind the assumptions on volatility is to make an estimate about the future; as a base
principle, we apply the same volatility assumptions for the awards made on the same day. IFRS 2 states
that historical levels should be observed for the same length of time as we look ahead to model the awards
being valued, and this is the approach that was taken in these valuations.
Risk-free rates used to determine initial grant date fair values:
▶ F23 LTIP – yield on a zero-coupon UK government bond over three years: 1.83 per cent; and
▶ SLGP – yield on a zero-coupon UK government bond over five years: 1.91 per cent.
In accordance with IFRS 2, the resulting cost is charged to staff costs in the statement of comprehensive
income and a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period of the awards. The total amount is
determined by reference to the fair value of the awards granted, including any market performance
conditions, which are based on the Wizz Air share price, and that the individual must remain an employee
over a specified period. The Group plans to settle the awards on vesting in equity. Non‑market-based
performance conditions in general are not incorporated into the fair value per share at the date of granting.
Instead, the value recognised is adjusted at each reporting date to take account of current expectations
regarding the number of shares due to vest. At the end of the performance period, this value is trued up to
reflect the actual vesting level. The number of shares to be forfeited during the vesting period is based on an
assumed level of management rotation at the start of the programme. This assumption is then regularly
updated based on actual rotation of participants.
Modifications of share-based payment arrangements
In August 2023, the Group modified both the VCP and SLGP that were granted in August 2021.
Key modifications to the VCP are as follows:
▶ Both the performance period and vesting period were extended by two years (from five to seven years)
▶ Market performance conditions were modified to be expressed in absolute thresholds of share prices
instead of share-price growth rates
▶ The ESG performance condition was also de-linked from the share price performance such that there is
no longer a requirement for the threshold share price target to be met in order for the ESG element to
vest
Key modifications to the SLGP are as follows:
▶ Both the performance period and vesting period were extended by two years (from five to seven years)
▶ Market performance conditions were modified to be expressed in absolute thresholds of share prices
instead of share-price growth rates
▶ The share price threshold under which no awards will vest was lowered from £96.46 to £77.24
The fair value of the options at the date of the modification was determined to be £6.27 and £4.44 for the
VCP and SLGP, respectively. The incremental fair value of the VCP and SLGP at £4.78 and £2.69,
respectively, will be recognised as an expense over the period from the modification date to the end of the
extended vesting period. The expense for the original option grant will continue to be recognised as if the
terms had not been modified. The fair value of the modified options was determined using the same models
and principles.
The modifications for the VCP and SLGP were approved by Shareholders at the AGM dated 2 August 2023.
On 30 May 2024, new restricted share awards (share options) were granted to senior leaders under the
LTIP. The only vesting condition attached to those awards is a three-year service condition, i.e. employees
concerned have to remain in the employment of Wizz Air until 30 May 2027. Due to the 100 per cent time-
vested nature, the fair value of the options at the grant date was determined based on the spot share price
as at that date, being £21.38 per share.
On 6 June 2025, new share awards (share options) were granted to senior leaders under the LTIP. The
share awards are made up of a restricted (60%) and a performance (40%) part. The vesting period is three
years. The vesting condition attached to both parts is to remain employed by Wizz Air until the vesting date,
5 June 2028. The additional vesting condition attached to the performance part is based on total shareholder
returns during the vesting period measured against a peer group of European airlines. The fair value of
restricted share options is £12.07, while that of performance share options is £7.76.
As approved by shareholders at the 25 September 2024 AGM, there were changes to the incentive plan of
the CEO József Váradi as follows, to retain the incentive power of his share-based payment package:
▶ As a one-off grant, restricted share awards (share options) were granted at 300 per cent of his salary,
on the same basis as the above mentioned LTIP awards granted on 30 May 2024, i.e. 100 percent time
vested, with a vesting (service) period from 1 October 2024 to 1 October 2027.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 158
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
▶ From May 2025, further LTIP share awards (share options) were granted at 500 per cent of his salary,
with both a three-year service condition and performance condition attached to them.
▶ The above mentioned VCP continues to operate, however, any value that vests under the above and
future LTIP awards for the CEO will be netted off against any value vesting and payable under the VCP.
Value Creation Plan (VCP)
Share options issued during the financial year
Terms and conditions:
All options
Performance options
Number of options
nil
nil
Exercise price
nil
nil
Vesting period
7 years
Termination
10 years
Senior Leadership Growth Plan (SLGP)
Share options issued during the financial year
Terms and conditions:
All options
Performance options
Number of options
nil
nil
Exercise price
nil
nil
Vesting period
5 years
Termination
8 years
Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
Share options issued during the financial year
Terms and conditions:
All
options
Restricted
options
Performance
options
Number of options
1,533,960
922,382
611,578
Exercise price
nil
nil
nil
Vesting period
3 years
3 years
Termination
10 years
10 years
Share price at grant date: £12.07.
Share options in issue
The number of VCP, SLGP and LTIP share options in issue at year-end is as follows:
All
options
Restricted
options
Performance
options
Outstanding at the beginning of the year
2,536,098.0
993,382.0
1,542,716.0
Granted during the year
1,533,960.0
922,382.0
611,578.0
Exercised during the year
(65,107.0)
(24,528.0)
(40,579.0)
Forfeited during the year
(359,767.0)
(101,484.0)
(258,283.0)
Outstanding at the end of the year
3,645,184.0
1,789,752.0
1,855,432.0
Exercisable at the end of the year
61,607.0
40,752.0
20,855.0
The weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options in issue at 31 March 2026 was seven
years and eight months (seven years and seven months at 31 March 2025). The weighted average share
price of the exercised options during F26 was £13.13 ( F25 was £13.37).
Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP)
Share options issued during the financial years
There were no share options issued either during the year or in the previous year. The last options under the
ESOP were issued in January 2015, and therefore by January 2018 all open options vested.
There are no individual performance conditions set for the employees to exercise their vested options other
than the employees must be employed by one of the Group entities until and on the date the options are
exercised.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 159
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Share options in issue
At the end of the 2025 and 2026 financial years, there were no outstanding options.
Taxation
Under the terms of both programmes, all taxes payable on share options are the liability of the recipients of
these benefits. However, in certain cases the Company or its subsidiaries have a legal obligation to pay the
employer social security on the income realised by the recipients. To the extent the additional social security
obligations can be estimated, the Group already makes a provision for these during the vesting period of
the instruments.
28. Capital and reserves
Share capital
Number of shares
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
In issue at the beginning of the year
103,396,078
103,360,705
Issued during the year
65,107
35,373
In issue at the end of the year – fully paid
103,461,185
103,396,078
Ordinary Shares
103,461,185
103,396,078
2026
2026
2025
2025
Value of shares
£‘000
€‘000
£‘000
€‘000
Authorised
Equity: 170,000,000 (2025: 170,000,000) Ordinary Shares
of £0.0001 each and 80,000,000 (2025: 80,000,000) non-
voting, non-participating Convertible Shares of £0.0001
each
25
34
25
34
Allotted, called up and fully paid
Equity: 103,461,185 (2025: 103,396,078) shares of
£0.0001 each
10
13
10
13
Ordinary Shares
10
13
10
13
During both F26 and F25, the increase in the total number of issued shares was due to the exercise of
certain employee share options.
Ordinary Shares
The holders of Ordinary Shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared, and are entitled to one vote per
share at meetings of the Company.
Convertible Shares
In March 2015, in relation to the listing of the Company’s shares on the London Stock Exchange, certain
convertible loans and notes (including accrued interest) were converted into non-voting, non-participating
Convertible Shares of the Company. There were no Convertible Shares in issue at 31 March 2026 (2025: nil
shares). The Company informed Indigo Hungary LP and Indigo Maple Hill LP (together “Indigo”) on 1 June 2021
that the Company had elected to convert Indigo’s entire holding of 17,377,203 Convertible Shares of
£0.0001 each in the capital of the Company (“Convertible Shares”) into Ordinary Shares of £0.0001 each in
the capital of the Company (“Ordinary Shares”), on a one-for-one basis, in accordance with the Company’s
articles of association.
Share premium
The share premium has two main components. €207.2 million was recognised as a result of the Group
reorganisation in October 2009. It represents the estimated fair value of the Group at the date of the
transaction. The remaining €174.0 million (as at 31 March 2026) was recognised as a result of new share
issues made since October 2009. These new share issues comprised the primary offering on the initial public
offering of the Company’s shares on the London Stock Exchange in March 2015, the conversion of previously
issued convertible debt instruments into shares and the conversion of certain employee share options into
shares. During F26, €nil (2025: €nil) was recorded in the share premium, all related to the conversion of
employee share options.
Reorganisation reserve
A reorganisation reserve of €193.0 million was recognised as a result of the Group reorganisation in
October 2009. It is equal to the difference between the fair value of the Group at the date of reorganisation,
€209.0 million, and the share capital of the Group at the same date (€16.0 million).
Equity part of convertible debt
The equity part of convertible debt comprises the equity component of compound instruments issued by the
Company. The amount of the convertible debt classified as equity of €8.3 million (2025: € 8.3 million) is net
of attributable transaction costs of €8.3 million.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 160
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Share-based payment charge
The share-based payment balance of € 64.3 million credit (2025: € 47.2 million credit) corresponds to the
recognised cumulative charges of share options and share awards provided to the employees and Directors
under long-term incentive schemes. This balance is recognised directly in retained earnings.
Cash flow hedging reserve
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative unrealised net change in the fair value
of cash flow hedging instruments related to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.
The gross amount of unrealised change in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments was a €617.2
million gain ( 2025: €40.8 million loss), while the deferred tax effect was a €52.6 million loss (2025: €5.4
million gain). A €48.8 million gain (2025: €13.6 million loss) was recycled to profit or loss related to cash
flow hedging instruments. For more information, please see Note 3.
Cost of hedging reserve
The hedging reserve comprises the time value of the cumulative unrealised net change in the fair value of
cash flow hedging instruments related to hedged transactions that have not yet occurred.
The cost of hedging was a €16.5 million gain (2025: € 32.8 million loss). No cost of hedging was recycled to
profit or loss (2025: €nil). For more information, please see Note 3.
Cumulative translation adjustments
Cumulative translation adjustments included currency translation differences amounting to a €18.6 million
gain (2025 : €0.6 million gain), from which a €4.1 million gain related to non-controlling interests (2025:
€ 0.1 million gain).
Retained earnings
There were no dividends paid or declared in F26 or F25. Share-based payments are charged to retained
earnings.
29. Provisions for other liabilities and charges
Aircraft
maintenance
Other
Total
€ million
€ million
€ million
At 1 April 2024
263.6
10.7
274.3
Non-current provisions
144.2
0.1
144.3
Current provisions
119.4
10.6
130.0
Capitalised within property, plant and equipment
231.2
—
231.2
Charged to profit or loss
—
19.7
19.7
Used during the year
(153.5)
(14.5)
(168.0)
FX translation effect
(2.1)
—
(2.1)
At 31 March 2025
339.2
15.9
355.1
Non-current provisions
186.1
15.1
201.2
Current provisions
153.1
0.8
153.9
Capitalised within property, plant and equipment
322.9
—
322.9
Charged to profit or loss
—
6.1
6.1
Used during the year
(151.6)
(4.8)
(156.4)
FX translation effect
(13.4)
—
(13.4)
At 31 March 2026
497.1
17.2
514.3
Non-current provisions
262.8
16.3
279.1
Current provisions
234.4
0.8
235.2
Non-current provisions mainly relate to future aircraft maintenance obligations of the Group on leased
aircraft and spare engines, falling due typically between one and five years from the reporting date. Current
aircraft maintenance provisions relate to heavy maintenance obligations expected to be fulfilled in the
coming financial year. The provision amount reflects management’s estimates of the cost of heavy
maintenance work that will be required in the future to discharge obligations under the Group’s lease
agreements (see Note 4). Maintenance provisions in relation to engines and APUs covered by power-by-the-
hour agreements are netted off with the prepayments made to the maintenance service provider under such
agreements in respect of the same group of engines and APUs.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 161
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
30. Financial instruments
Fair values
The fair values of the financial instruments of the Group together with their carrying amounts shown in the
statement of financial position are as follows:
Carrying
amount
Fair value
Carrying amount
Fair value
31 March 2026
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Financial asset at fair value through other
comprehensive income
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
Trade and other receivables due after more
than one year
25.1
25.1
45.7
45.7
Restricted cash
87.7
87.7
78.3
78.3
Derivative financial assets
584.1
584.1
12.1
12.1
Trade and other receivables due within one
year
557.2
557.2
522.2
522.2
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
1,085.9
597.5
597.5
Cash deposits
952.8
952.8
1,060.2
1,060.2
Trade and other payables due after more than
one year
(27.0)
(27.0)
(16.0)
(16.0)
Trade and other payables due within one year
(1,020.6)
(1,020.6)
(798.5)
(798.5)
Derivative financial liabilities
(55.3)
(55.3)
(42.6)
(42.6)
Convertible debt
(25.8)
(25.8)
(25.5)
(25.5)
Borrowings
(6,644.0)
(6,338.9)
(5,815.7)
(5,674.4)
Secured debt
(308.1)
(289.4)
(271.9)
(261.8)
Unsecured debt
(2.3)
(2.3)
(500.9)
(489.7)
Deferred income
(7.6)
(7.6)
(5.5)
(5.5)
Net balance of financial instruments
(liability)
(4,794.2)
(4,470.4)
(5,156.9)
(4,994.3)
The fair value of the Eurobonds is estimated using quoted prices (Level 1), derivatives (Note 3 ) and lease
liabilities are valued using Level 2 methodology, and the fair value of all other financial assets and financial
liabilities is estimated using Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss:
Carrying amount
Carrying amount
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Derivative financial assets
584.1
12.1
Total
584.1
12.1
Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss:
Carrying amount
Carrying amount
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Derivative financial liabilities
55.3
42.6
Total
55.3
42.6
Where available, the fair values of financial instruments were determined by reference to observable market
prices, where the instruments are traded. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an
active market (such as long-term deposits among non-current other receivables) is determined by estimated
discounted cash flows.
The carrying amount less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables is assumed to approximate
their fair values due to the short-term nature of trade receivables and payables. Long-term financial assets
and liabilities which are classified as at fair value through profit and loss are recognised at fair value.
Trade and other receivables due after more than one year are almost exclusively maintenance reserves, with
an average term of approximately four years. The fair value of these assets is determined by discounting at
a rate of interest of the four-year US dollar swap rate prevailing on the last day of the financial year. The
carrying amount of the Level 3 instruments within trade and other receivables is considered to be the fair
value, as discounting has an immaterial effect.
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is either estimated by a third-party front office system as
per their industry practice or determined by the financial institutions that issued the respective derivative.
Both the third-party front office system, as well as the financial institutions, use generally accepted valuation
techniques, principally the Black-Scholes model and discounted cash flow models.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 162
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The fair value of lease liabilities is determined by discounting the future contractual cash flows with the
discount rate (incremental borrowing rate) prevailing at the year end.
Gains and losses
The following net realised FX gains or losses were recognised in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income in relation to the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortised cost:
▶ during the year, €7.3 million loss (2025: €19.5 million gain) on cash and cash equivalents;
▶ during the year, €67.5 million loss ( 2025: €nil) on cash deposits; and
▶ no material realised FX on restricted cash and trade and other receivables.
See Note 10 for details of interest income recognised in F26 and F25.
Effective interest rates analysis
Interest-bearing financial liabilities
The following table indicates the effective interest rate of the interest-bearing liabilities of the Group on
the reporting date and the periods in which they mature. Lease liability and secured debt are mainly
denominated in US dollars, while unsecured debt and convertible debt are denominated in euros
(see Note 3).
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
Effective
interest
Total
Within
one year
One to
two
years
Two to
five years
Above five
years
Effective
interest
Total
Within
one year
One to
two
years
Two to
five years
Above
five years
rate
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
rate
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
€ million
Convertible
Notes
7.42%
25.8
1.1
24.7
7.42%
25.5
0.3
25.2
—
—
Unsecured
debt
—%
2.3
2.3
—
—
—
1.16%
500.9
500.9
—
—
—
Secured debt
3.73%
308.1
—
308.1
—
—
5.12%
271.9
271.9
—
—
—
IFRS 16
aircraft
engine lease
liability
4.80%
4,052.4
581.7
567.2
1,573.1
1,330.4
4.22%
3,641.6
602.2
558.5
1,340.3
1,140.6
IFRS 16 other
lease liability
3.14%
17.6
2.7
2.9
6.2
5.8
3.39%
29.5
3.5
3.1
9.9
13.0
JOLCO, FTL
and FL liability
3.32%
2,531.0
186.2
181.5
703.6
1,459.7
3.18%
2,130.7
139.4
143.9
582.6
1,264.8
Total
6,937.2
774.0
1,084.4
2,282.9
2,795.9
6,600.1
1,518.2
730.7
1,932.8
2,418.4
Interest earning financial assets
The Group invested excess cash primarily in euro- and US dollar-denominated short-term time deposits at
market rates at major banking groups.
Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
The following table includes changes in net borrowings (including convertible debt) reconciled with their
effects on the consolidated statement of cash flows.
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Net borrowings at the beginning of the year*
6,614.0
6,269.7
Proceeds from new loans
79.2
245.6
Repayment of loans
(791.4)
(720.0)
Repayment of unsecured debt
(500.0)
—
Proceeds from secured debt
22.8
—
Repayment of secured debt
—
(240.8)
Transactions with non-controlling interests
30.0
—
Paid interest
(244.5)
(223.5)
Repayment of other loan
(23.6)
—
Change in net borrowings from cash flows
(1,427.5)
(938.7)
New non-cash borrowings
1,702.4
1,059.7
Interest expense
267.0
249.2
Exchange differences
(193.8)
(11.6)
Other non-cash items
18.3
(14.3)
Net borrowings at the end of the year*
6,980.4
6,614.0
* At 31 March 2026, €2.3 million (31 March 2025: €0.6 million) is related to overdrafts. In the consolidated statement of cash flows,
this amount was included within cash and cash equivalents, decreasing its total balance, instead of presenting it separately.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 163
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
31. Financial guarantees
The Company has provided parent guarantees to certain lessors of its aircraft fleet, to guarantee the
performance of its airline subsidiaries under the respective lease contracts.
In April 2018, the Company provided a parent guarantee to the UK Civil Aviation Authority, to guarantee
the performance of Wizz Air UK Limited in the context of the UK operating licence application process of
Wizz Air UK Limited.
The note purchase agreement (for Convertible Notes) contains a guarantee and indemnity, pursuant to
which Wizz Air Hungary Limited, inter alia, guarantees for Indigo Hungary LP and Indigo Maple Hill LP the
punctual performance by the Company of its obligations under the note purchase agreement.
32. Capital commitments
At 31 March 2026, the Group had the following contracted capital commitments:
▶ A commitment to purchase 254 Airbus aircraft of the A320 family in the period 2026–2032 . The total
commitment is valued at $38.5 billion (€33.6 billion) based on list prices last published in 2018 and
escalated annually until the reporting date based on contract terms (2025: $46.2 billion (€42.6 billion)
to purchase 300 Airbus aircraft of the A320 family in the period 2025–2030). At 29 May 2026, out of the
254 aircraft, 33 are subject to delivery in F27 while financing is already contracted for 27 aircraft. The
Group uses various financing arrangements to finance aircraft, including Sale and Leaseback, Japanese
Operating Lease with Call Option (JOLCO), French Tax Lease (FTL) and Finance Lease (FL) structures. In
addition, Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) backstop financing may also be available,
supplemented by a partial self-contribution.
▶ The Wizz Air Group has committed to purchasing 45 IAE “neo” (GTF) spare engines in the period
2026-2028 valued at $1.0 billion (€904.6 million) based on 2026 list prices. This follows a previous
commitment in 2025 valued at $22.3 million (€20.6 million), based on 2025 list prices, to acquire one
IAE “neo” (GTF) spare engine in 2025. At 29 May 2026, out of the 45 engines, 19 are subject to delivery
in F27, however, none of them are covered by financing contracts.
33. Contingent liabilities
Legal disputes
European Commission state aid investigations
Between 2011 and 2015, the European Commission initiated state aid investigations with respect to certain
arrangements between Wizz Air and the following airports: Timişoara, Cluj-Napoca, Târgu Mureş, Beauvais
and Girona. In the context of these investigations, Wizz Air has submitted its legal observations and
supporting economic analyses of the relevant arrangements to the European Commission, which are
currently under review. The European Commission has given notice that the state aid investigations
involving Wizz Air will be assessed on the basis of the new “EU guidelines on state aid to airports and
airlines”, which were adopted by the European Commission on 20 February 2014. Where relevant, Wizz Air
has made further submissions to the European Commission in response to this notification. In relation to the
Timişoara arrangements, the European Commission confirmed on 24 February 2020 that the arrangements
did not constitute state aid. We are awaiting decisions in relation to the other airport arrangements
mentioned herein above. Ultimately, an adverse decision by the European Commission could result in a
repayment order for the recovery from Wizz Air of any amount determined by the European Commission to
constitute illegal state aid. None of these ongoing investigations are expected to lead to exposure that is
material to the Group.
No provision has been made by the Group in relation to these issues because there is currently no reason to
believe that the Group will incur charges from these cases.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 164
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
34. Related parties
Identity of related parties
Related parties are:
▶ Indigo Hungary LP and Indigo Maple Hill LP (collectively referred to as “Indigo” here), because of its
shareholding (see Note 24 and 28) and the appointment of two Directors to the Board of Directors (all in
service at 31 March 2026); and
▶ key management personnel (Directors and Officers).
Indigo, Directors and Officers collectively held 16.0 per cent of the Ordinary Shares of the Company as at
31 March 2026 (2025: 25.7 per cent).
Transactions with related parties
Transactions with Indigo and its affiliates
At 31 March 2026, Indigo held 14,759,645 Ordinary Shares, equal to 14.3 per cent of the Company’s issued
share capital (2025: 24,684,895 Ordinary Shares, 23.9 per cent).
Indigo has an interest in convertible debt instruments issued by the Company (see Note 24). The Company’s
liability to Indigo, including principal and accrued interest, was €25.8 million as at 31 March 2026 (2025:
€25.5 million).
During the year ended 31 March 2026, the Company entered into the following transactions:
▶ The Company recognised interest expense on convertible debt instruments held by Indigo in the amount
of €2.2 million (2025: €1.9 million).
▶ To modulate its near-term fleet growth, the Group took delivery of and immediately sold three aircraft to
an aircraft lessor for onward leasing to a related airline in exchange for a right to be assigned three
future deliveries from that airline. This resulted in a net gain of €2.3 million recognised in other income.
Transactions with key management personnel
Officers (members of executive management) and Directors of the Board are considered to be key
management personnel. The compensation of key management personnel, including Non-Executive
Directors, is as follows:
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Salaries and other short-term employee benefits
11.2
9.9
Social security costs
1.6
1.2
Share-based payments
13.6
9.6
Total key management compensation expense
26.4
20.7
There were no termination benefits paid to any key management personnel in the year or the previous year.
The CEO participates in the voluntary pension scheme, which was introduced for the wider workforce in F26.
There were no post-employment benefits or other long-term benefits provided to any key management
personnel in the year or the previous year.
There were no material transactions with related parties during the financial year, except as indicated below.
The Group has contracted with companies that are related to the CEO. The total paid for such goods and
services in F26 was €3.8 million (2025: €3.6 million). The main service purchased was to provide machine-
learning capabilities with regard to ticket and ancillary pricing, revenue forecasting and operational
disruption management. The amount paid for this service in F26 was €3.7 million (2025: €3.5 million),
which in the judgement of the Board was not material. On 31 March 2026, the outstanding amount payable
to the related party was €0.9 million (31 March 2025: €0.7 million).
35. Subsequent events
Based on the assessment conducted, no material subsequent events have been identified that would
necessitate disclosure in the financial statements for the reporting period.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 165
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
36. Ultimate controlling party
In the opinion of the Directors, there is no individual controlling party in relation to the Company’s issued
Ordinary Shares.
On 29 December 2020, Wizz Air Holdings Plc announced its decision to treat as Restricted Shares certain
Ordinary Shares held by Non-Qualifying Nationals and to issue to such shareholders Restricted Share Notices
(“Disenfranchisement”). This is because from 1 January 2021, UK nationals were no longer to be treated as
Qualifying Nationals with regard to European airline ownership requirements, notwithstanding the UK–EU
Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Therefore, the Board resolved to exercise its power under the articles to
serve Restricted Share Notices on Non-Qualifying National Shareholders, specifying that, from 1 January
2021, in respect of their Restricted Shares they cannot attend or speak or vote at any general meetings of
the Company. The rights to attend (whether in person or by proxy), to speak and to demand and vote on a
poll in respect of the Restricted Shares shall vest in the Chairman of such meeting, who will be a Director
who is a Qualifying National. Each such Director will give an irrevocable undertaking not to vote with any
such Restricted Shares.
The Board has determined, pursuant to the articles, that the fairest and most appropriate method to
implement the Disenfranchisement is for the same proportion of each Non-Qualifying National’s (including
each UK national’s) shareholding to be designated as Restricted Shares.
▶ A “Qualifying National” includes: (i) EEA nationals; (ii) nationals of Switzerland; and (iii) in respect of
any undertaking, an undertaking which satisfies the conditions as to nationality of ownership and control
of undertakings granted an operating licence contained in Article 4(f) of Regulation (EC) No. 1008/2008
of the European Commission, as such conditions may be amended, varied, supplemented or replaced
from time to time, or as provided for in any agreement between the EU and any third country (whether
or not such undertaking is itself granted an operating licence).
▶ A “Non-Qualifying National” includes: any person who is not a Qualifying National in accordance with
the definition above.
To protect the EU airline operating licence of Wizz Air Hungary Limited and Wizz Air Malta Limited
(subsidiaries of the Company), the Board has resolved to continue to apply a disenfranchisement of Ordinary
Shares held by non-EEA Shareholders in the capital of the Company. This will continue to be done on the
basis of a “Permitted Maximum” of 45 per cent pursuant to the Company’s articles of association (“the
Permitted Maximum”). In preparation for the 2025 Annual General Meeting (AGM), on 23 July 2025 the
Company sent a Restricted Share Notice to Non-Qualifying registered Shareholders, informing them of the
number of Ordinary Shares that will be treated as Restricted Shares. We will provide further details
simultaneously with the notice of the 2026 Annual General Meeting.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 166
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Opinion
In our opinion, Wizz Air Holdings Plc’s group financial statements:
▶ give a true and fair view of the state of the group’s affairs as at 31 March 2026 and of its profit and cash
flows for the year then ended;
▶ have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as
adopted by the European Union; and
▶ have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991.
We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Accounts F26 (the “Annual
Report”), which comprise:
▶ the Consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 March 2026;
▶ the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year then ended;
▶ the Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year then ended;
▶ the Consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended; and
▶ the notes to the financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other
explanatory information.
Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee. 
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK)”) and
applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities for
the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We remained independent of the group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our
audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the Financial Reporting Council’s (“FRC”) Ethical
Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities in accordance with the requirements of the Crown
Dependencies' Audit Rules and Guidance for market-traded companies, and we have fulfilled our other
ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical
Standard were not provided.
Other than those disclosed in note 7, we have provided no non-audit services to the company or its
controlled undertakings in the period under audit.
Our audit approach
Overview
Audit scope
▶ The group financial statements are a consolidation of Wizz Air Holdings Plc, its main trading subsidiaries
(Wizz Air Hungary Limited, Wizz Air UK Limited, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC and Wizz Air Malta Limited),
plus a number of insignificant intermediate holding and smaller trading companies, and companies that
are dormant.
▶ The accounting for these entities and the group consolidation is centralised in Budapest, Hungary.
▶ Whilst the consolidated results are derived from a number of legal entities, due to the internal reporting
process and centralised maintenance of accounting records, our audit approach is to audit the
consolidated results as one component.
Key audit matters
▶ Accuracy of IFRS 16 “Leases” input data
▶ Aircraft maintenance provisioning
▶ Recoverability of deferred tax assets
Materiality
▶ Overall materiality: €50,000,000 (2025: €46,000,000) based on approximately 0.9% of total revenue.
▶ Performance materiality: €37,500,000 (2025: €34,000,000).
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 167
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in
the financial statements.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance
in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks
of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had
the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the
efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our
procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and
in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.
The key audit matters below are consistent with last year.
Key audit matter
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
Accuracy of IFRS 16 “Leases” input data
The group recognised right-of-use (“RoU”) assets
of €3,022.5 million and associated lease liabilities
of €4,070.0 million at 31 March 2026.
The RoU assets and lease liabilities largely relate to
aircraft leases and are calculated based on
discounted future lease payments. These
calculations involve assumptions including, but not
limited to, the determination of the lease payments,
the expected lease term, consideration of extension
options and the discount rate used to determine the
liabilities.
We focused on this area because input data errors
for new leases or a failure to accurately capture
changes in lease contracts in the year could
materially impact the lease accounting given the
value of an individual aircraft lease. There was also
a new system implemented for IFRS 16 accounting
in F26.
Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2,
note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant
judgements and estimates involved in determining
the IFRS 16 balances at 31 March 2026 and notes
13 and 23 which disclose the RoU assets and lease
liability balances and movements, respectively.
We understood and evaluated the process followed
by management to account for its leases under
IFRS 16.
We tested the integrity of management’s new
system which was used to perform the lease liability
and RoU asset calculations by testing that its IT
general controls are operating effectively.
We tested the accuracy of the underlying data used
in management’s system calculation for new leases
in the year to supporting lease documentation, as
well as the transfer of data between old and new
systems for existing leases.
We also tested the appropriateness of the other
significant assumptions used for lease additions in
the year. This included the discount rates applied to
future lease payments for lease additions.
Where leases contained an option for early
termination or extension, we considered
management’s assessment of the likelihood of the
option being exercised, based on the nature of the
assets and the terms including changes in the
period under option.
Using a digital audit solution, we reperformed the
calculation of the asset, liability, depreciation and
interest entries relating to the accounting for leases
under IFRS 16 and compared the results to the
values generated by management’s system and
found the difference to be within acceptable
thresholds.
We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in notes 2
and 4 in respect of the accounting policies and
significant judgements and estimates involved in
determining the IFRS 16 balances and the
disclosures in notes 13 and 23 for leases.
We did not identify any material uncorrected
misstatements from our work on IFRS 16.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 168
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
Aircraft maintenance provisioning
 
The group operates aircraft which are held under
lease arrangements and incurs liabilities for
maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft in
line with the terms of its aircraft leases.
Under these lease agreements, the group is
contractually committed to either return the aircraft
in a certain condition or to compensate the lessor
based on the actual condition of the aircraft and its
major components upon return.
The group uses the "strict obligation” method of
accounting for such costs under which provision is
made for the minimum unavoidable costs of specific
future maintenance obligations created by the lease
at the time when such obligations become certain.
Maintenance provisions of €497.1 million for aircraft
maintenance costs in respect of leased aircraft are
recorded in the financial statements at 31 March
2026 (refer to note 29 to the financial statements).
At each balance sheet date, the calculation of the
maintenance provision includes a number of
variable factors and assumptions including the likely
utilisation of the aircraft; the expected cost of the
heavy maintenance check at the time it is expected
to occur; the condition of the aircraft; and the
lifespan of life-limited parts.
We focused on this area because an inherent level
of management judgement and estimation is
required in determining the above variable factors
and assumptions on an aircraft-by-aircraft basis.
This includes a commercial decision on whether to
perform future maintenance based on expected
flying hours or to avoid this and pay compensation
to the lessor at the end of the lease. There was also
a new system implemented for maintenance
accounting in F26.
Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2 and
note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant
judgements and estimates involved in calculating
the maintenance provisions required, as well as note
29 for specific disclosures relating to the
maintenance provisions.
We understood and evaluated the process followed
by management to determine its maintenance
provision, including the input data, assumptions
and significant judgements and estimates used.
We tested the integrity of the new maintenance
provision system used by management, by testing
the effectiveness of its IT general controls and
reviewing the code for specific automated
calculations therein.
We also assessed the process by which the variable
factors used within the provision calculation were
appropriately estimated by performing the following
procedures:
• Comparing the cost assumptions in the
maintenance provision system with recent
invoices; inspecting approved maintenance plans;
as well as validating a sample of current flight
hours and flight cycles to non-financial data
sources.
• Performing a look back test to assess the accuracy
of past estimates.
• Testing the input data through agreement to
underlying lease contracts, focusing specifically on
new and amended contracts in F26, as well as the
transfer of data from old to new systems for
existing leases, and considering whether the
planned maintenance could be materially impacted
by risks associated with climate change.
• Understanding the planned maintenance schedule
and discussing it with management’s expert who
advises on maintenance requirements.
• Testing material manual adjustments to the
provision amount calculated by the maintenance
provision system.
• Re-performing calculations on a sample basis.
We tested the short and long-term classification of
the provision.
We assessed the adequacy of disclosures in notes 2
and 4 in respect of the accounting policies and
significant judgements and estimates involved in
maintenance provisioning and the disclosures in
note 29 for maintenance.
We did not identify any material uncorrected
misstatements from our work on maintenance
provisions.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 169
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
Recoverability of deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets can be recognised to the extent
it is probable that there will be sufficient future
taxable profits to utilise them. The group recognised
deferred tax assets of €285.6 million at 31 March
2026. The recoverability of these deferred tax
assets is based on a number of significant
assumptions.
The entity level forecasts of future taxable profits
include a number of assumptions regarding the
future and thus estimation uncertainty. They cover
an extended period to demonstrate the reversal of
timing differences giving rise to the deferred tax
assets recognised. This period goes beyond the
group’s normal three-year planning horizon and
involves assumptions regarding revenue and
operating cost levels and fleet utilisation.
Refer to the Material accounting policies note 2 and
note 4 for management’s disclosures of the relevant
judgements and estimates involved in assessing the
recoverability of deferred tax assets, as well as note
11 for details of the deferred tax credit recognised in
the year and note 15 for specific disclosures relating
to the deferred tax asset balances.
We understood and evaluated management’s
process of preparing deferred tax calculations.
We tested the deferred tax calculations for
arithmetic accuracy and validated input data.
We evaluated management’s methodology for
assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets.
The recognition of a deferred tax asset is supported
by the availability of sufficient probable taxable
profits in future periods against which temporary
tax-deductible differences can be utilised.
We assessed the reasonableness of assumptions
underpinning the future forecasts. In doing this, we
considered whether the taxable profit growth
assumed was supportable. Where applicable we
assessed the consistency of the forecasts used to
justify the recognition of deferred tax assets to
those used elsewhere in the business, including for
the going concern assessment and impairment
assessment of the fleet cash generating unit.
We also assessed the adequacy of disclosures over
this area.
We did not identify any material uncorrected
misstatements from our audit work.
 
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 170
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion
on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the group, the accounting
processes and controls, and the industry in which it operates.
The group consists of one reporting segment, being the airline business. It includes the results of the legal
entities of Wizz Air Holdings Plc and its trading subsidiaries, the main ones being Wizz Air Hungary Limited,
Wizz Air UK Limited, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC and Wizz Air Malta Limited, together with branch operations.
Whilst the consolidated results consist of a number of legal entities, due to the internal reporting process and
maintenance of centralised entity and consolidated general ledgers for the group, our audit approach is to
audit the consolidated results as one component. The accounting for these entities and the group
consolidation is centralised in Budapest, Hungary.
The group audit is performed by a single engagement team comprising individuals based in the UK and in
Hungary together with an offshore support function, tax and treasury specialists and valuation experts. The
operations are audited by applying our collective knowledge and understanding of the group and its financial
reporting processes and controls.
The audit work is largely performed by members of our engagement team based in Hungary who are
directed and supervised by the UK team members both virtually and during their visits to Hungary. The UK
team members attended all Audit and Risk Committee meetings, either in person or virtually. This gave us
the evidence we required for our opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole.
The impact of climate risk on our audit
The Sustainability Report within the Annual Report describes the group’s strategy to reduce carbon
emissions and explains how climate change could impact the group’s business but also provides a number of
opportunities. The group has publicly set out its commitment to reducing carbon emission intensity by 25%
by 2030 relative to F20 levels and has a strategy aligned to meeting this including the use of sustainable
aviation fuel (“SAF”) and investments in SAF production and supply companies. A number of financial risks
could arise from both the transitional and physical risks associated with climate change. Management,
assisted by external experts, has evaluated these as disclosed in the Sustainability Report. This has then
informed the evaluation of financial risks that have been reflected by management in the preparation of the
financial statements to the extent that they can be forecast at present or conclusions as to why no material
impact is expected. The future financial impacts of climate change are clearly uncertain given the timeframe
involved and how Governments, global markets, corporations and society respond.
As part of our audit we have made enquiries of management to understand the work performed by
management and its experts to assess the potential impacts of climate change on the group and leading to
the disclosures in the Annual Report, which includes the group’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial
Disclosures (“TCFD”) disclosures, and the resultant impact on the financial statements. We have used this
information and understanding to assess the impact on the financial statements and our audit thereof. We
have also considered the consistency of this assessment with the communications of climate related impacts
both in the Annual Report and other sources such as the group’s website and its public submission to the
Carbon Disclosure Project.
Overall management has concluded, having considered both the physical and transition risks arising from
climate change, that there is currently no material impact that it can forecast impacting the F26 results or
financial position. The key areas of the financial statements where the potential impact of climate was
considered are as follows:
▶ The accounting for emission trading scheme (“ETS”) allowances used by the group to meet its
obligations under the EU and UK ETS schemes (see note 2);
▶ The group’s going concern assessment covering a period of at least 12 months from the date of signing
of the financial statements (see note 2 and the Conclusions relating to going concern section below);
▶ The useful economic lives and residual value of aircraft and spare engines, maintenance assets and parts
and associated depreciation of these assets (see note 2);
▶ The impact on the impairment assessment of the group’s aircraft fleet (see note 13);
▶ The impact on the recoverability of deferred tax assets recognised (see notes 4 and 15 of the financial
statements and key audit matter above); and
▶ The impact on maintenance provisioning (see notes 4 and 29 of the financial statements and key audit
matter above).
Our procedures did not identify any material impact in the context of our audit of the financial statements as
a whole for the year ended 31 March 2026. The future estimated financial impacts of climate risk are clearly
uncertain given the medium to long term timeframes involved and their dependency on how Governments,
global markets, corporations and society respond to the issue of climate change and the speed of
technological advancements that may be necessary in the sector. Accordingly, the financial statements
cannot capture all possible future outcomes as these are not yet known.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 171
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative
thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope
of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement
line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate
on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as
follows:
Overall group materiality
€50,000,000 (2025: €46,000,000)
How we determined it
Approximately 0.9% of total revenue
Rationale for benchmark applied
We considered various potential benchmarks including profit before
tax and revenue and concluded, using professional judgement, that
total revenue (2025: total revenue) continues to be an appropriate
benchmark for the current year audit and revenue continues to be a
key performance metric for the group.
We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of
uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance
materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account
balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance
materiality was 75% (2025: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to €37,500,000 (2025: €34,000,000)
for the group financial statements.
In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of
misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that
an amount at the upper end of our normal range was appropriate.
We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during
our audit above €2,500,000 (2025: €2,250,000) as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our
view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.
Conclusions relating to going concern
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the group's ability to continue to adopt the going concern
basis of accounting included:
▶ Understanding and testing the model used for management’s going concern assessment, which is
primarily a liquidity assessment given there are no financial covenants in its committed debt facilities.
▶ Management’s base case forecasts are taken from its normal forecasting process. We understood and
assessed this process including the assumptions used for F27 and F28 and whether there was adequate
support for these assumptions. We also considered the reasonableness of the monthly phasing of cash
flows. A similar assessment was performed of the downside cash flows, including by comparison of
actual monthly cash flows experienced in F26 and by comparison of assumed flying levels relative to
those experienced in prior periods.
▶ We understood and assessed the reasonableness of the adjustments made to the base case forecasts to
arrive at the downside forecasts.
▶ We read and understood the key terms of any committed debt facilities to understand any terms,
covenants or undertakings that may impact the availability of the facility. We also understood the impact
of the base and downside forecasts on security levels in the card acquirer contracts of the group, which
generally require a level of liquidity to be held by the business.
▶ We understood the schedule of committed aircraft and engine deliveries over the next eighteen months
and assessed management’s assessment of how these would be financed based on their available
committed financing and other plans to finance future aircraft and engine deliveries.
▶ Using our knowledge from the audit and assessment of previous forecasting accuracy, we considered
whether additional sensitivities should be applied to management’s downside cash flow forecasts to
arrive at our own view of management’s downside forecasts.
▶ We considered the potential mitigating actions that management may have available to it to reduce
costs, manage cash flows or raise additional financing and assessed whether these were within the
control of management and possible during the period of the assessment.
▶ We commented on draft disclosures of the Group’s going concern assessment seeking changes to clarify
aspects of it and assessed the adequacy of the final disclosures in the Going concern statement in note 2
of the group financial statements and the Going concern statement in the Directors’ Report and found
that these appropriately reflect the key areas of uncertainty identified and assumptions made.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 172
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events
or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the group's ability to continue as
a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for
issue.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of
accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as
to the group's ability to continue as a going concern.
In relation to the directors’ reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have
nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in the financial
statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of
accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in
the relevant sections of this report.
Reporting on other information
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial
statements and our auditors’ report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our
opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express
an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance
thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we
identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures
to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement
of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based
on these responsibilities.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’ statements in relation to going concern, longer-term
viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the company’s compliance with the
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with
respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the Reporting on other
information section of this report.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements
of the corporate governance statement, included within the Corporate Governance Report is materially
consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing
material to add or draw attention to in relation to:
▶ The directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal
risks;
▶ The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to
identify emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;
▶ The directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to
adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material
uncertainties to the group’s ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the
date of approval of the financial statements;
▶ The directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the group's prospects, the period this assessment
covers and why the period is appropriate; and
▶ The directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be
able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment,
including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.
Our review of the directors’ statement regarding the longer-term viability of the group was substantially less
in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process
supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the
UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial
statements and our knowledge and understanding of the group and its environment obtained in the course
of the audit.
In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following
elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and
our knowledge obtained during the audit:
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 173
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
▶ The directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and
understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the group’s position,
performance, business model and strategy;
▶ The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and
internal control systems; and
▶ The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit and Risk Committee.
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors’ statement relating to
the company’s compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of
the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.
Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in respect of the financial statements,
the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable
framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The directors are also responsible for
such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going
concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the group or to cease operations,
or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate,
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities,
including fraud, is detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the group and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-
compliance with laws and regulations related to the regulations of aviation authorities such as the European
Union Aviation Safety Agency, and UK Civil Aviation Authority, and General Data Protection Regulation, and
we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements.
We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as
the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, the Listing Rules of the UK Financial Conduct Authority, relevant
corporate tax compliance regulations, the Air Passengers Rights Regulation 2004 (Regulation (EC) No
261/2004) and, EU and UK Emissions Trading System. We evaluated management’s incentives and
opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of
controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries and
management bias in accounting estimates such as aircraft maintenance provisions. Audit procedures
performed by the engagement team included:
▶ Discussions throughout the year with the Audit and Risk Committee, management, Internal Audit and
the group's internal counsel, including consideration of known or suspected instances of fraud or non-
compliance with laws and regulation;
▶ Understanding and evaluating controls designed to prevent and detect irregularities and fraud;
▶ Reviewing legal expense accounts to identify significant legal spend that may be indicative of non-
compliance with laws and regulations;
▶ Reviewing whistleblowing reports;
▶ Identifying and testing journal entries, in particular journal entries posted with unusual account
combinations;
▶ Reading the minutes of Board and Committee meetings to identify any inconsistencies with other
information provided by management; and
▶ Challenging significant subjective judgements and accounting estimates used by the directors that
involve making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain in the
preparation of the financial statements, including those relating to revenue, maintenance provisions,
hedge accounting, aircraft and spare engine assets, deferred tax assets and lease accounting, together
with the disclosure of these items. 
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 174
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF WIZZ
AIR HOLDINGS PLC
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware
of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and
transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due
to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate
concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly
using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing,
rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on
their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion
about the population from which the sample is selected.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s
website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report.
Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company’s members as a body in
accordance with Article 113A of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 and for no other purpose. We do not, in
giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom
this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in
writing.
OTHER REQUIRED REPORTING
Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 exception reporting
Under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
▶ we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
▶ proper accounting records have not been kept by the company, or proper returns adequate for our audit
have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
▶ the financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.
We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.
Appointment
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee (now the Audit and Risk Committee), we were
appointed by the members on 15 August 2007 to audit the consolidated financial statements of the previous
parent company of the Wizz Air group. Following the company’s incorporation in 2009, we were appointed to
audit the consolidated financial statements of the company for the period ended 31 March 2010 and
subsequent financial periods. Our period of total uninterrupted engagement for the group (comprising the
previous parent company and now the company, and their subsidiaries) is 19 years, covering the years
ended 31 March 2008 to 31 March 2026 and for the company is 17 years, covering the years ended 31
March 2010 to 31 March 2026.
VOLUNTARY REPORTING
The company voluntarily prepares a Directors’ Remuneration Report. The directors requested that we audit
the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report specified by the UK Companies Act 2006 to be audited as if
the company were a UK quoted company. In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the UK Companies Act 2006.
OTHER MATTER
The company is required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules to
include these financial statements in an annual financial report prepared under the structured digital format
required by DTR 4.1.15R - 4.1.18R and filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the Financial Conduct
Authority. This auditors’ report provides no assurance over whether the structured digital format annual
financial report has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.
Jason Burkitt
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants and Recognized Auditor
London
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 175
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Alternative performance measures (APMs)
Alternative performance measures are non-IFRS standard performance measures aiming to introduce the
Company’s performance in line with management’s requirements. The existing presentation is considered
relevant for the users of the financial statements because: (i) it mirrors disclosures presented outside of the
financial statements; and (ii) it is regularly reviewed by the senior management team of the Group for
evaluating the financial performance of its single operating segment.
Ancillary revenue: generated revenue from ancillaries (including other ancillary revenue-related items).
Rationale – Key financial indicator for the separation of different revenue lines.
Average capital employed: average capital employed is the sum of the annual average equity and
interest-bearing borrowings (including convertible debt), less annual average cash and cash equivalents, and
cash deposits. Rationale – This key financial indicator is integral for evaluating the profitability and
effectiveness of capital utilisation.
Calculation: average equity + interest-bearing borrowings (including convertible debt) - cash and cash
equivalents - cash deposits.
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA): EBITDA represents the profit
or loss before accounting for net financing costs or gains, income tax expenses or credits, and depreciation
and amortisation. Rationale – This measure serves as a key financial indicator for the Company, providing
insights into operational profitability.
Calculation: operating profit/(loss) + depreciation and amortisation.
EBITDA margin %: EBITDA margin % is computed by dividing EBITDA by total revenue in millions of
euros. Rationale – This metric presents EBITDA as a percentage of total net revenue and offers valuable
financial insights for the Company’s performance assessment.
Calculation: EBITDA/total revenue (€ million) x 100
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Operating profit
139.7
167.5
Depreciation and amortisation
1,178.6
966.8
EBITDA
1,318.3
1,134.3
Total revenue
5,691.4
5,267.6
EBITDA margin (%)
23.2%
21.5%
Leverage ratio: leverage ratio is computed by dividing net debt by the last twelve months’ EBITDA.
Rationale – It serves as a crucial key financial indicator for the Group, facilitating an assessment of the
organisation’s financial leverage and debt management.
Calculation: please see the table under the definition of net debt.
Liquidity: liquidity represents cash, cash equivalents and cash deposits, expressed as a percentage of the
last twelve months’ revenue. Rationale – This key financial indicator offers a comprehensive view of the
Group’s cash position and financial stability.
Calculation: please see the table below.
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
597.5
Short-term cash deposits
778.4
1,060.2
Long-term cash deposits
174.4
—
Total revenue
5,691.4
5,267.6
Liquidity
35.8%
31.5%
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 176
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Net debt: net debt is defined as interest-bearing borrowings (including convertible debt) less cash and cash
equivalents. Rationale – plays a pivotal role as a key financial indicator, offering valuable information
regarding the Group’s financial liquidity and leverage position.
Calculation: please see the table below.
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
6,138.5
5,070.6
Convertible debt
24.7
25.2
Current liabilities
Borrowings
815.9
1,517.9
Convertible debt
1.1
0.3
Current assets
Short-term cash deposits
778.4
1,060.2
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
597.5
Non-current assets
Long-term cash deposits
174.4
—
Net debt
4,941.5
4,956.3
EBITDA
1,318.3
1,134.3
Leverage ratio
3.7
4.4
Passenger ticket revenue: generated revenue from ticket sales (including other ticket revenue related
items). Rationale – Key financial indicator for the separation of different revenue lines.
Return on capital employed (ROCE): operating profit or loss before tax divided by average capital
employed, expressed as a percentage. Rationale – ROCE is a key financial indicator that facilitates an
assessment of the Group’s profitability and the efficiency of capital utilisation.
Calculation: please see the range below.
2026
2025
€ million
€ million
Operating profit
139.7
167.5
Average Shareholders’ equity
622.8
231.4
Average borrowings and convertible debt
6,797.1
6,441.8
Average cash and cash equivalents
(841.7)
(663.0)
Average cash deposits
(1,006.5)
(905.7)
Average capital employed
5,571.6
5,104.6
ROCE (%)
2.5%
3.3%
Total cash: non-statutory financial performance measure and comprises/is calculated from cash and cash
equivalents, long-term cash deposits, short-term cash deposits and total current and non-current restricted
cash. Rationale – This key financial indicator offers a comprehensive view of the Group’s cash position and
financial stability.
Calculation: please see the table below.
31 March 2026
31 March 2025
€ million
€ million
Non-current assets
Restricted cash
45.2
36.3
Long-term cash deposits
174.4
—
Current assets
Restricted cash
42.5
42.0
Short-term cash deposits
778.4
1,060.2
Cash and cash equivalents
1,085.9
597.5
Total cash
2,126.4
1,736.0
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 177
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Total revenue: total ticket and ancillary revenue for the given period. The split of total revenue presented
in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Rationale – Key financial indicator for the
Company.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 178
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Glossary of terms
Aircraft utilisation/utilisation: the number of hours one aircraft is in operation on one day. Rationale –
Key performance indicator in aviation business, measurement for one day of aircraft productivity.
Calculation (for one month): monthly aircraft utilisation equals total block hours divided by number of days
in the month divided by the equivalent aircraft number divided by 24 hours. Calculation (for a longer period
than one month): the given period aircraft utilisation equals the weighted average of monthly aircraft
utilisation based on the month-end fleet counts.
Ancillary revenue per passenger: ancillary revenue divided by the number of passengers (PAX) in the
given period, which gives the ancillary performance per passenger. Rationale – Key performance indicator
for revenue performance measurement.
Calculation: ancillary revenue / PAX
Available seat kilometres (ASK)/total ASKs: the number of seats available for scheduled passengers
multiplied by the number of kilometres those seats were flown. Rationale – Key performance indicator for
capacity measurement.
Calculation: seats on aircraft x stage length
Average aircraft stage length (km): average distance that an aircraft flies between the departure and
arrival airport. Rationale – Key performance indicator for measurement of capacity and productivity.
Calculation: average stage length of the revenue sectors in the given period (ASKs / capacity)
Average departures per aircraft per day: the number of departures one aircraft performs in a day in the
given period. Rationale – Key performance indicator for revenue generation / utilisation of assets.
Calculation: total number of revenue sectors per number of days (in the given period) per equivalent aircraft
number
CASK (total unit cost): total cost per ASK, where cost is defined as operating expenses and financial
expenses net of financial income. Rationale – Key performance indicator for divisional cost control.
Calculation: total operating expenses + financial income + financial expenses / total ASKs (km) x 100
Completion factor or rate: per cent of operated flights compared to scheduled flights. Rationale – Key
performance indicator for commercial planning and controlling, measurement for operational performance.
Calculation: number of operated flights / number of scheduled flights
Equivalent aircraft or average aircraft count: the average number of aircraft available to Wizz Air within
a period. The count includes spare aircraft, aircraft under maintenance and parked aircraft. Rationale – Key
performance indicator in aviation business for the measurement of average aircraft available for flying and
capacity.
Calculation (for one month): average from the daily fleet count in a given month which includes/excludes
deliveries and redeliveries. Calculation (for a longer period than one month): weighted average of the
monthly equivalent aircraft numbers based on the number of days in the given period.
Equivalent operating aircraft or average operating aircraft count: the average number of operating
aircraft available to Wizz Air within a period. The count includes all aircraft except those parked. Rationale –
Key performance indicator in aviation business for the measurement of average fleet and capacity.
Calculation (for one month): average from the daily operating fleet count in the given month which
includes / excludes deliveries and redeliveries. Calculation (for a longer period than one month): weighted
average of the monthly equivalent operating aircraft numbers based on the number of days in the given
period.
Ex-fuel CASK (ex-fuel unit costs): this measure is computed by dividing the total ex-fuel cost by the total
ASKs within a given timeframe. Ex-fuel CASK defines the unit ex-fuel cost for each kilometre flown per seat
in Wizz Air’s fleet. Note: total ex-fuel cost consists of total operating expenses and net cost from financial
income and expense, but does not contain fuel costs. Rationale – It serves as an essential performance
indicator for overseeing divisional cost control. The rationale for employing this metric is rooted in its ability
to gauge and manage non-fuel operating expenses effectively.
Calculation: total ex-fuel cost (euro) / total ASKs (km) x 100
Foreign exchange rate: average foreign exchange rate, plus any hedge deal for the given period,
calculated with a weighted average method. Rationale – Key performance indicator for fuel control and
treasury teams.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 179
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Fuel CASK (fuel unit cost): this metric is calculated by dividing the total fuel costs (plus additional fuel
consumption related costs) by the sum of Available Seat Kilometres (ASKs) during a specific reporting
period. Rationale – Fuel CASK provides an insightful unit fuel cost measurement, representing the cost
incurred for flying one kilometre per seat within Wizz Air’s fleet. The rationale behind the use of this measure
lies in its effectiveness as a critical performance indicator for the control and management of fuel expenses.
Calculation: total fuel cost (euro)/total ASKs (km) x 100.
Fuel price (average US dollar per tonne): average fuel price within a period, calculated as fuel cost
(including other fuel cost related items) divided by the consumption. Rationale – Key performance indicator
for fuel cost controlling.
Gauge: the average seat capacity per aircraft.
JOLCO (Japanese Tax Lease) and French Tax Lease: special forms of structured asset financing,
involving local tax benefits for Japanese and French investors, respectively. Rationale – These measures are
employed to encapsulate specific lease contracts that facilitate enhanced cash utilisation strategies.
Load factor (%): the number of seats sold (PAX) divided by the number of seats available on the aircraft
(capacity). Rationale – Key performance indicator for commercial and revenue controlling.
Calculation: the number of seats sold divided by the number of seats available.
Net fare (total revenue per passenger): average revenue per passenger calculated by total revenue
divided by the number of passengers (PAX) during a specified period. Rationale – This metric is a crucial
performance indicator for commercial control, offering insights into the overall revenue generated per
passenger.
Calculation: total revenue / PAX
Operating aircraft utilisation: the number of hours that one operating aircraft is in operation on one day.
Rationale – Key performance indicator in aviation business, measurement for one-day aircraft productivity.
Calculation (for one month): average daily operating aircraft utilisation in a month equals total monthly
block hours divided by number of days in the month divided by the equivalent operating aircraft number
divided by 24 hours. Calculation (for a longer period than one month): the given period operating aircraft
utilisation equals the weighted average of monthly operating aircraft utilisation based on the month-end
operating aircraft counts.
Passengers (alternative names: passengers carried, PAX): passengers who bought a ticket (thus
making revenue for the Company) for a revenue sector. Rationale – Key performance indicator for
commercial controlling team.
Calculation: sum of number of passengers of all revenue sectors.
PDP: PDP refers to the pre-delivery payments made under the Group’s aircraft purchase agreements. These
payments signify contractual commitments designed to support fleet expansion and growth.
Period-end fleet size or number of aircraft at end of period: the number of aircraft that Wizz Air has in
its fleet and that are leased or owned at the end of the given period. The count contains spare aircraft as
well as aircraft under maintenance. Rationale – Key performance indicator in aviation business for the
measurement of fleet.
Calculation: sum of aircraft at the end of the given period.
Period-end operating aircraft: the number of operating aircraft that Wizz Air has in its fleet and that are
leased and/or owned at the end of the given period. The count includes all aircraft except those parked.
Rationale – Key performance indicator in aviation business for the measurement of operating aircraft at a
period end.
Calculation: sum of operating aircraft at the end of the given period.
RASK: RASK is determined by dividing total revenue by total ASK. This measure characterises the unit net
revenue performance for each kilometre flown per seat within Wizz Air’s fleet. Rationale – It serves as a
pivotal performance indicator for commercial control, providing insights into revenue generation efficiency.
Calculation: total revenue (euro) / total ASKs (km) x 100
Revenue departures or sectors: flight between departure and arrival airport where Wizz Air generates
revenue from ticket sales. Rationale – Key performance indicator in revenue generation controlling.
Calculation: sum of departures of all sectors.
Revenue passenger kilometres (RPK): the number of seat kilometres flown by passengers who paid for
their tickets. Rationale – Key performance indicator for revenue measurement.
Calculation: number of passengers x stage length.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 180
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Seat capacity / capacity: the total number of available (flown) seats on aircraft for Wizz Air within a given
period (revenue sectors only). Rationale – Key performance indicator for capacity measurement.
Calculation: sum of capacity of all revenue sectors.
Stage length: the length of the flight from take-off to landing in a single leg.
Calculation: sum of kilometres flown during a flight.
Ticket revenue per passenger: passenger ticket revenue divided by the number of passengers (PAX) in
the given period. Rationale – Key performance indicator for measurement of revenue performance.
Calculation: passenger ticket revenue / PAX
Total block hours: each hour from the moment an aircraft’s brakes are released at the departure airport’s
parking place for the purpose of starting a flight until the moment the aircraft’s brakes are applied at the
arrival airport’s parking place. Rationale – Key performance indicator in aviation business, measurement for
aircraft’s block hours.
Calculation: sum of block hours of all sectors (in the given period).
Total flight hours: each hour from the moment the aircraft takes off from the runway for the purposes of
flight until the moment the aircraft lands at the runway of the arrival airport. Rationale – Key performance
indicator in the airline business for the measurement of capacity and flown flight hours by aircraft.
Calculation: sum of flight hours of all sectors (in the given period).
Yield: represents the total revenue generated per Revenue Passenger Kilometre (RPK). Rationale – This
measure is integral for assessing and controlling commercial performance by quantifying the revenue
derived from each kilometre flown by paying passengers.
Calculation: total revenue / RPK
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 181
STRATEGIC REPORT
Optimized for Today. Mindful of Tomorrow. (1).png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 182
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Table of Contents
Report of the Chair of the Sustainability and Culture Committee
General information
Basis for preparation
Governance
Strategy
Impact, risk and opportunity management: disclosures on the double materiality
assessment
Environmental information
Disclosures pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation)
[E1] Climate change
[E2] Pollution of air
Social information
[S1] Own workforce
[S2] Workers in the value chain
[S4] Consumers and end-users
Governance information
[G1] Business conduct
[G] Other governance information
ESRS Content index
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 183
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
REPORT OF THE CHAIR OF THE SUSTAINABILITY AND CULTURE COMMITTEE
Charlotte Andsager 2.jpg
“Embedding sustainability across
governance, strategy and culture
remains central to Wizz Air’s long‑term
resilience and performance.”
Charlotte Andsager
Chair of the Sustainability and Culture Committee
Dear Shareholder,
As we reflect on the past
financial year, I am
pleased to report the
continued strengthening of
Wizz Air’s sustainability
governance, performance
and long‑term
decarbonisation efforts.
Throughout the year, the
Committee oversaw the
maturing of the
Company’s sustainability
framework, ensuring that
governance structures,
reporting processes and
internal controls remain
robust, future-proof and
aligned with the
expectations of European
regulators, investors and
stakeholders. The
Company continues to
operate with one of the
lowest CO₂ emissions
intensities among
European airlines,
recording 50.6 grams of
CO₂ per RPK in the
financial year 2026,
reflecting the sustained
impact of fleet renewal,
disciplined operational
practices and a
long‑standing commitment
to resource efficiency.
The financial year ended
31 March 2026 marked
further progress in
embedding the
requirements of the
Corporate Sustainability
Reporting Directive
(CSRD) into Wizz Air’s
internal processes and
disclosures. Building on
initial efforts related to
CSRD requirements in the
prior cycle, the Company
focused this year on
strengthening
methodological
consistency with reference
to the European
Sustainability Reporting
Standards (ESRS) and
related standards,
enhancing data
governance, and preparing
its systems and controls
for future assurance
requirements. The
Committee also monitored
preparations for
anticipated amendments
under the Omnibus
Directive, with the
objective of aligning the
Company with evolving
European sustainability
reporting standards. These
efforts reinforce the
credibility, comparability
and reliability of the
Company’s disclosures as
the regulatory
environment continues to
mature.
The Group’s F26
Sustainability Report is
presented on pages 181 to
296 and has been
prepared in accordance
with the basis of
preparation on page 186.
During the year, Wizz Air
received further
recognition for its
sustainability progress.
The Company ranked first
in Europe and second
globally in Cirium’s 2025
EmeraldSky Annual
Review, was named
Sustainable Airline of the
Year 2025 at the Airline
Economics Sustainability
Awards, and was
recognised as Most
Sustainable Low‑Cost
Airline 2025 by World
Finance for the fifth
consecutive year. These
acknowledgements reflect
independent assessments
of the Company’s
operational performance,
governance transparency
and sustained progress in
reducing carbon intensity.
From an organisational
culture perspective, the
Committee continued to
oversee efforts to
strengthen employee
engagement and build
leadership capability. The
Women on Air initiative
once again highlighted the
Company’s commitment to
developing diverse
leadership. The
Sustainability
Ambassadors Programme
successfully concluded its
second term and launched
a third, further embedding
sustainability
considerations across
functions and supporting
internal cultural alignment.
With more than 2700 new
colleagues joining the
Company during the year,
the Committee monitored
efforts to support
workforce integration,
leadership development
and capability building.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 184
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The Committee
contributed to the
Company’s overall
progress by providing
governance oversight,
ensuring alignment
between the sustainability
agenda, strategic priorities
and organisational culture.
Membership, Meetings
and Attendance
▶ Charlotte Andsager 
▶ Anthony Radev
▶ Andrew Broderick
The Committee comprises
three Non-Executive
Directors, including the
Employee Engagement
Director, appointed by the
Board based on
experience, dedication and
capacity. The Corporate
and ESG Officer serves as
Secretary, and senior
members of management
attend meetings by
invitation.
Further information is
available at: https://
During the year, the
Committee met six times
and focused on the
following activities:
▶ Approval of the
Company’s updated
double materiality
assessment in
reference to CSRD
requirements
▶ Oversight of the
Group’s ESG and
Sustainable Aviation
Fuel (SAF) strategy
and ReFuelEU reporting
▶ Review of ESG ratings
(Sustainalytics, CDP,
S&P Global Corporate
Sustainability
Assessment)
▶ Monitoring of the
Sustainability
Ambassador’s
Programme
▶ Review of the Group’s
annual sustainability
report
▶ Monitoring of progress
on CO2 and diversity
targets
▶ Review of employee
engagement survey
results and action
plans
▶ Reports from the
Employee Engagement
Director 
In addition, the Committee
facilitated a training
session for all Directors on
the evolving strategic
importance of ESG and
Sustainable Aviation Fuel
in shaping the Company’s
decarbonisation trajectory
and market positioning,
while also providing the
Board with updates on the
Sustainability
Ambassadors’ Programme,
reaffirming its role in
internal cultural alignment.
Key Activities
Reporting and Disclosure 
During the financial year,
the Committee oversaw
the continuation and
strengthening of the
Company’s ambition
towards CSRD‑aligned
reporting, building on the
first cycle of
ESRS‑referenced
disclosures published in
F25. This included refining
internal controls,
enhancing data quality and
methodologies, and
approving the updated
double materiality
assessment, in support of
alignment with emerging
CSRD expectations. These
activities support future
assurance readiness and
reinforce the Company’s
commitment to
transparent, credible
reporting.
Transition Planning
The Committee continued
oversight of the
Company’s long‑term
transition strategy, as
outlined in the Net Zero
Plan, which prioritises
near‑term, proven
technologies. Sustainable
aviation fuel remains the
most significant long‑term
lever within this plan. In
accordance with the
RefuelEU Aviation
Regulation, the Company
achieved the required 2%
SAF uptake across
applicable EU airports
during the year.
The Committee also
monitored ongoing
partnerships and
investments that support
the future scaling of SAF,
including equity
investments in Firefly
Green Fuels and
involvement in the
CleanJoule consortium.
These initiatives help
mitigate long‑term supply
and cost constraints
through early participation
in the development of
emerging SAF pathways.
Advocacy and Stakeholder
Engagement
During the year, the
Company continued its
engagement with policy
and industry partners
through participation in
the Renewable and
Low‑Carbon Fuels Value
Chain Industrial Alliance
(RLCF), which plays an
important role in
facilitating the scale‑up of
renewable and low‑carbon
fuels in Europe.
The Company also
convened key stakeholders
at its Beyond the Runway
event in January 2026,
reinforcing the importance
of collaborative action
across manufacturers,
airports and suppliers in
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 185
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
supporting aviation’s
transition to net zero.
Ratings and Awards
The Committee reviewed
the Company’s position
within key ESG rating
frameworks. The Company
maintained a “B” rating
with the Carbon Disclosure
Project, reflecting
improved performance
across multiple categories.
Progress in the S&P Global
Corporate Sustainability
Assessment continued,
and the results were
broadly aligned with the
peer average. The
Company remained within
the medium‑risk category
in the Sustainalytics ESG
Risk Rating.
Recognition from external
bodies, including Airline
Economics, World Finance
and Cirium, further
reinforced the Company’s
operational and
environmental
achievements.
Diversity, Culture and
Employee Engagement
The Committee regularly
monitored progress
against the Company’s
diversity objectives and is
pleased to note that the
Company exceeded its
target of 40% gender
diversity at management
level (Heads of Function,
Officers and CEO level),
reaching 41%. The
Women on Air event once
again highlighted the
strength and diversity of
the Company’s leadership.
The Committee also
monitored developments
in leadership training and
the integration of new
employees during the
year. Regular updates
from the Employee
Engagement Director and
continued reporting from
the People Council ensured
the Committee remained
informed of employee
sentiment and
engagement activities.
Finally, I would like to
express my sincere
appreciation to the Wizz
Air management and ESG
teams for their continued
dedication to upholding
transparency,
strengthening our
sustainability governance,
and advancing the
Company’s long-term
environmental objectives.
Their commitment remains
essential to ensuring the
Company’s resilience and
continued leadership in
operational and
environmental
performance.
Charlotte Andsager
Chair of the Sustainability
and Culture Committee
11 June 2026
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 186
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION
Basis for preparation
[BP-1] GENERAL BASIS FOR PREPARATION OF SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENTS
This report is the annual Sustainability Report of Wizz Air Holdings Plc (hereinafter referred to as “the
Company” or “Wizz Air”), presenting its strategies and practices within the framework of environmental,
social and governance (ESG) management, its stance on climate change and its decarbonisation efforts.
This report covers the period from 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026 (hereinafter referred to as “F26”).
Wizz Air continues to strengthen its ESG disclosures in preparation for the upcoming regulatory
requirements. In the run-up to the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD),
the Company has voluntarily prepared its F26 Sustainability Report ahead of the mandatory timeline for the
second consecutive year, with reference to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), enacted
in December 2023.
In 2025, the European Union adopted Omnibus amendments to the CSRD, introducing a two‑year deferral
for certain reporting waves and narrowing the scope of obligated entities. As a result, Wizz Air is now
expected to fall within the scope of mandatory CSRD reporting from the calendar year 2027, corresponding
to the financial year 2028.
This Sustainability Report has been prepared on a consolidated basis unless otherwise stated. The scope of
consolidation for sustainability reporting is the same as the scope applied in the Group’s consolidated
financial statements for F26.
The report includes all operating entities under the Company, including Wizz Air Hungary Limited, Wizz Air
UK Limited, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC (operations suspended from 1 September 2025), Wizz Air Malta Limited,
and all related subsidiaries. No subsidiary undertakings included in the consolidation are exempted from
individual or consolidated sustainability reporting pursuant to Articles 19a(9) or 29a(8) of Directive 2013/34/
EU.
This Sustainability Report covers Wizz Air’s value chain. The identification and assessment of material
impacts, risks and opportunities considered relevant upstream and downstream activities. Policies, actions,
targets and metrics generally focus on Wizz Air’s own operations and consolidated subsidiaries, unless
explicitly stated otherwise in the relevant ESRS disclosures.
Omission of sensitive information and exemption for impending developments
No information corresponding to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovation has been
omitted from the sustainability statement. Nor has the Company exempted from disclosure any impending
developments or matters that are currently in the course of negotiation.
Reporting guidelines
This Sustainability Report is consistent with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and references the CSRD European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
enacted in December 2023.
Detailed indices with relevant page numbers and external disclosure references can be found at the end of
this Sustainability Report.
This report was reviewed and approved by Wizz Air's responsible Officer and the Sustainability and Culture
Committee of the Board of Directors.
[BP-2] DISCLOSURES IN RELATION TO SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES
Time horizons
The Company defines reporting timelines as short-term (0–1 years), medium-term (1–5 years) and long-
term (5–10 years). These timeframes align with the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
framework, climate risk analysis and financial planning horizons. No deviations from these definitions were
applied in F26.
Value chain estimations
Where primary data from value chain partners was not available, Wizz Air applied reasonable estimates
based on recognised methodologies and sector-based proxies. Such estimations were necessary due to
limitations in the availability, completeness or quality of primary data obtained from suppliers, contractors
and other business partners across the value chain.
Certain quantitative metrics disclosed in this Sustainability Report therefore include estimated upstream
and/or downstream value chain data. This applies in particular to Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, as well
as to selected indicators relating to suppliers.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 187
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Where primary data is unavailable, estimates are derived using sector- and country-specific average data,
recognised emission factors and established calculation methodologies. Greenhouse gas emissions are
calculated in accordance with the GHG Protocol, and the methodologies applied are consistent with its
guidance. Further information on the methodological approach, estimation techniques and the specific
metrics subject to estimation is provided in the calculation methods section and, where relevant, alongside
the respective disclosures.
Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty
Metrics that involve estimation or measurement uncertainty, arising from assumptions, approximations or
the use of indirect data, are disclosed alongside the relevant indicators. Climate‑related and
energy‑transition impacts are assessed using scenario analysis, which inherently involves uncertainty due to
the forward‑looking assumptions applied.
The degree of uncertainty varies by metric and reflects current data availability across the value chain. No
quantitative metrics were identified as having high measurement or outcome uncertainty in the reporting
year. Measures to enhance data accuracy include continued supplier engagement, refinement of
methodologies and gradual incorporation of additional primary data.
Estimates and assumptions used in the previous reporting period were reviewed during the current reporting
cycle, and no material changes were identified.
Changes in preparation or presentation
During the reporting period, no material changes were made to the overall preparation or presentation of
sustainability information. The underlying methodologies, assumptions, assessment criteria and calculation
approaches applied remain consistent with those used in the previous reporting period. As a result, no
restatements of previously reported metrics were required, except where explicitly noted below.
During this reporting cycle, Wizz Air enhanced and refined its double materiality assessment (DMA) to
increase the rigour and transparency of its application. This included an expanded value-chain analysis
covering upstream, own operations and downstream activities, enabling a more comprehensive identification
of key stakeholders and a more systematic mapping of dependencies across value-chain segments. These
refinements further informed the assessment of how such dependencies shape Wizz Air’s material impacts,
risks and opportunities (IROs). Across all ESG pillars, the reassessment did not fundamentally alter the
Company’s overall materiality profile. Changes primarily relate to (i) sub-topics that were already included in
the previous year’s long list but have now been reassessed as material, and (ii) increased granularity
through the identification of additional IROs within existing topics. In addition, certain topics previously
assessed but not considered material have been reassessed as material in the current reporting period. The
outcomes of the assessment informed the identification and approval of the Company’s material
sustainability topics. The DMA is reviewed annually, with the next update scheduled for F27; the results are
presented in [IRO-1] – Results of the double materiality assessment.
In F26, the employee engagement KPI was revised under [S1-5]. Previously, engagement was measured
using an overall engagement score derived from the annual employee survey. It is now defined based on
employee participation rates in engagement‑related initiatives for a better reflection of actual employee
involvement.
Reporting errors
No material previous-period errors were identified that would require correction in F26. Any errors identified
in future reporting periods would be disclosed in [BP-2] – Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
and the relevant topic-specific section of the Sustainability Report.
Disclosures from other legislation and standards
Some information in this Sustainability Report is prepared in accordance with other legislation and generally
accepted sustainability reporting standards or frameworks. Where applied, the relevant framework or
standard is referenced in the methodology or topic-specific sections of the report.
Incorporation of assurance
This year, we engaged PwC Hungary to provide limited assurance on Wizz Air’s greenhouse gas (GHG)
metrics that are disclosed on pages 238-244, for which the limited assurance report is available on page
305. The sections covered by this assurance are marked with a blue △ symbol at the beginning and a pink △
symbol at the end, on pages 238-244.
Incorporation by reference
Certain ESRS disclosure requirements are addressed through cross-references to other sections of this
Annual Report. Where this approach is used, the relevant ESRS datapoints are incorporated by reference
and are identified in the ESRS index. In preparing this Sustainability Statement, no references to documents
outside of this Annual Report were used to fulfil ESRS disclosure requirements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 188
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Use of phase-in provisions
In accordance with the transitional provisions defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements Appendix C, and
given that the Company is applying the ESRS voluntarily, the transitional (phase‑in) period has not yet
commenced pursuant to ESRS 1.122. Accordingly, the Company has omitted the following Disclosure
Requirements in this voluntary reporting cycle: SMB‑1 paragraphs 40(b) and 40(c), S1‑7 Characteristics of
non‑employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce, S1‑11 Social protection, and S1‑13 Training and
skills development metrics. For the listed topics, the Company provides a brief description of the identified
material matters, including how the business model and strategy take into account the associated impacts;
any time‑bound targets set and progress made towards them; relevant policies; actions undertaken to
address actual or potential adverse impacts and the results thereof; as well as any available metrics, where
applicable. The Company intends to utilise the transitional reliefs available for the first mandatory year of
ESRS reporting once it becomes subject to the CSRD requirements. The list of sustainability subtopics for
which adequate quality information is not yet available in this voluntary reporting period can be found in the
“ESRS Content Index” table starting on page 296.
Governance
[GOV-1] ROLE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE, MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY BODIES
Board of Directors
Wizz Air’s governance model is built on a clear, layered structure that combines high‑level supervision with
dedicated internal oversight. At the top, the Board of Directors plays a central role in shaping the airline’s
long‑term direction. It works closely with the Chief Executive Officer to evaluate major strategic proposals,
approve corporate priorities, and ensure that the Company’s activities remain consistent with its mission,
values and obligations – including those related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
performance. The Board’s decisions are informed by recommendations from the executive leadership,
enabling a coordinated approach to planning and accountability.
The Directors who have served during F26 and since the end of the year are:
Category
Male
Female
Total
Number of Executive Members
1
0
1
Number of Non-executive Members
7
4
11
Board Gender Diversity (%)
64%
36%
100%
Number of Independent Non‑Executive Directors
3
4
7
Percentage of Independent Board Members
-
-
64%
For more detailed information on the composition of Wizz Air’s Board of Directors please see page 47.
Sustainability and Culture Committee responsibilities
Complementing the Board oversight is the Sustainability and Culture Committee, a Board‑level body
dedicated to embedding sustainability into the Company’s core objectives. Its purpose is to help steer Wizz
Air towards long‑term value creation by ensuring that environmental and social considerations are integrated
into strategic discussions. The Committee reviews progress, provides guidance on emerging sustainability
priorities, and advises the Board on how these factors should influence corporate direction, ensuring that
responsible business practices remain at the forefront of decision‑making.
Responsibilities
Implementation
Strategy
Reviewing and overseeing the implementation of Wizz Air’s sustainability strategy.
Risk assessment
Examining extra-financial risks, particularly those related to environmental and societal issues.
Reporting and
benchmarks
Overseeing non-financial reporting processes, adhering to applicable legislation and
international benchmarks.
Culture and diversity
Beyond sustainability, evaluating the Company’s culture, ensuring that it promotes diversity
across the workforce, and facilitating effective communication between management and
employees.
Employee engagement
Overseeing employee relations, ensuring that Wizz Air fosters a diverse and engaged
workforce.
Audit and Risk Committee responsibilities
The Audit and Risk Committee plays a central role in overseeing the Company’s risk assessment processes.
Its responsibilities include approving the processes that underpin the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
framework and the annual assessment of climate‑related risks and opportunities that is integrated within it.
In addition to the regular bi‑monthly risk updates provided to the Board, the Committee receives detailed
briefings on principal risks, reviews the Company’s risk appetite and assesses the adequacy of
management’s proposed mitigation and action plans.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 189
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Board training and sustainability expertise
In F26, Wizz Air continued its practice of engaging key stakeholders on emerging climate‑related issues. The
Board of Directors and its Committees have access to sustainability expertise through a structured
programme of annual training and ongoing briefings, complemented by regular engagement with external
advisors and subject‑matter experts. This year, the focus was on providing an overview of the evolving value
of ESG in today’s world and the role of sustainable aviation fuel (hereinafter: SAF) in aviation’s net‑zero
future. Attendees included members of the Board and the Sustainability and Culture Committee, key
members of Wizz Air’s senior management (Leadership Team) and the responsible Heads. This sustainability
workshop, conducted by experts from JP Morgan and FireFly in January 2026, further advanced the Board’s
understanding of the financial, technological and strategic drivers shaping the transition to net‑zero aviation.
The Board is confident in its understanding of climate change and recognises the need to remain informed
about emerging themes across jurisdictions and technologies on the path to decarbonisation.
The Board of Directors remains committed to supporting the projects and innovations that help reduce Wizz
Air’s environmental impact. Throughout F26, the Sustainability and Culture Committee continued to oversee
how the Company’s sustainability strategy is put into practice and ensured that the Company’s work stays
aligned with the relevant ESG standards. The Board reviewed key ESG topics at each of its six meetings held
during the reporting year.
This process is supported by the Corporate and ESG Officer, who also serves as Board Secretary and leads
the internal Sustainability Council, helping to keep sustainability work coordinated across the organisation.
Leadership Team and Sustainability Council
The Sustainability Council, chaired by the Corporate and ESG Officer, continued its work throughout F26 by
means of its regular working groups. These groups coordinated key sustainability topics such as the SAF
strategy, ESG reporting and emerging regulatory developments, and monitored projects supporting the
Company’s decarbonisation pathway.
The operational oversight of the Council, whose activity is carried out through its working groups, is
embodied by the Head of Government Affairs and Sustainability, with overall accountability residing within
the Corporate function through the Corporate and ESG Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer. The working
groups bring together senior leaders and experts from across the organisation, including the Chief Financial
Officer, People Officer, Commercial Officer, Managing Directors of airline subsidiaries and Heads of Function.
Its membership spans Corporate and ESG, Finance, Government and Public Affairs, Investor Relations,
Group Operations, Fleet Acquisition, Flight Operations, Supply Chain, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering,
Cabin Operations, Retail, Facility Management, Organisational Development, Recruitment, Human
Resources, Crew Resources and Planning, Group Training, People Council, Customer Experience,
Communications and Marketing, Legal and Internal Audit. Together, they drive the Company’s sustainability
strategy and ensure its implementation across all functions. The Council’s cross‑functional working groups
will continue to track progress against strategic sustainability priorities and report to the Leadership Team.
Sustainability-related goals, strategies and performance are reviewed on a quarterly basis by senior
management. Where relevant, proposed changes are discussed and agreed at this level, with escalation to
the full Leadership Team as appropriate. The Board’s Sustainability and Culture Committee is updated
bimonthly on progress and future plans.
SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE SUMMARY 
Board of Directors
Approval and
supervision of
strategic objectives
Sustainability and Culture Committee
▶ Objective: Aligns the Company’s sustainability strategic objectives with industry best-in-
class standards.
▶ Frequency: Meets at least six times per year, with an additional session dedicated to in-
depth training on sustainability and climate-related matters each year.
Audit and Risk Committee
▶ Objective: Approval of the climate-risk universe (including the physical and transition
risk analysis), risk appetite and action plan to address these risks.
▶ Frequency: Meets at least six times per year.
Leadership Team
Development and
execution of
strategies
Sustainability Council
The driving force behind sustainable practices, ensuring they are embedded throughout the
organisation’s operations and culture.
▶ Strategic alignment: Supports the Leadership Team in defining sustainability objectives
and corresponding strategies. Ensures alignment with industry best practices.
▶ Execution and prioritisation: Drives execution across the organisation by prioritising and
allocating resources. Focuses on key priorities, including fleet renewal, fuel efficiency,
climate regulation advocacy and sustainable aviation fuels.
▶ Expertise hub: Serves as a centre of expertise on ESG, sustainability and climate
matters.
▶ Integration and action: Integrates functional leaders to swiftly deploy guidance into
operations.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 190
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[GOV-2] INFORMATION PROVIDED TO AND SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS ADDRESSED BY THE
UNDERTAKING’S ADMINISTRATIVE, MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISORY BODIES
The Sustainability and Culture Committee meets bimonthly to ensure that the Company’s strategic
objectives are aligned with sustainability principles and to remain informed about sustainability matters
through regular briefings and detailed reports. The Committee receives comprehensive updates from the
Sustainability function on key sustainability initiatives, regulatory developments and performance metrics,
including ESG reporting, the SAF strategy and transition planning. These matters are addressed through the
approval of resources for sustainability projects, reporting and assurance activities, and through ongoing
monitoring of progress against established key performance indicators (KPIs).
In exercising its oversight, the Sustainability and Culture Committee considers material sustainability
impacts, risks and opportunities when reviewing the Company’s sustainability strategy, transition planning
and the integration of sustainability-related risks into the Enterprise Risk Management framework.
During the reporting period, the Sustainability and Culture Committee reviewed and approved a revised
double materiality assessment on 27 January 2026.
[GOV-3] INTEGRATION OF SUSTAINABILITY-RELATED PERFORMANCE IN INCENTIVE SCHEMES
Sustainable, profitable and organic growth supported by an industry-leading cost base has been a core
element of the Company’s strategy since the start of its operations. In support of this strategy,
sustainability-related performance is integrated into the incentive arrangements of senior executive
management.
A long-term incentive scheme for the Chief Executive Officer was approved by shareholders at the 2021
Annual General Meeting. The scheme, referred to as the Value Creation Plan (VCP), was launched in F22 and
includes both financial and sustainability-related performance conditions. Sustainability objectives account
for 10% of the total performance conditions under the VCP, comprising climate-related targets linked to CO₂
emissions reduction and diversity-related targets linked to gender diversity. The remaining portion of the
VCP is linked to financial performance.
In addition, diversity-related sustainability objectives are included in the short-term incentive plan (STIP) for
the Chief Executive Officer and the wider Management Team, including Officers and Heads of Function. This
integration ensures that senior management are directly accountable for the delivery of near-term
sustainability priorities aligned with the Company’s strategic objectives.
Performance against sustainability-related targets is assessed as part of the overall evaluation of variable
remuneration outcomes. The design of both the long-term and short-term incentive schemes is governed by
formal policies, which are reviewed on an annual basis to ensure continued alignment with the Company’s
strategy and material sustainability matters. The terms of the incentive schemes, including performance
measures and targets, are approved and periodically updated by the Board of Directors through its
Remuneration Committee, within the framework of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy approved by
shareholders.
[GOV-4] STATEMENT ON DUE DILIGENCE
Wizz Air applies a structured due diligence process to identify, assess, manage and report on sustainability
impacts, risks and opportunities across its operations and value chain. The approach follows the steps
outlined in ESRS 1, Chapter 4, and ensures that sustainability matters are integrated into the Company’s
governance, strategy and operational decision-making.
The following table maps the main aspects of Wizz Air’s due diligence process to the corresponding
disclosures in the F26 Sustainability Report, providing transparency on how the process is applied in
practice.
Core elements of due diligence
Paragraphs in the sustainability statement
Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy
and business model
ESRS 2: GOV-1, GOV-2, GOV-3, SMB-3
Topical standards: S1-1, S2-1, S4-1, G1-1
Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key
steps of the due diligence
ESRS 2: SBM-2, IRO-1, GOV-2
Topical standards: E1-2, S1-2, S2-2, S4-2, G1-2
Identifying and assessing adverse impacts
ESRS 2: IRO-1, SBM-3,
Taking actions to address those adverse impacts
ESRS 2: GOV-2, GOV-5
Topical standards: E1-3, S1-4, S2-4, S4-4, G1-2,
G1-3
Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and
communicating
ESRS 2: GOV-2, GOV-5
Topical standards: E1-4, E1-5, E1-6, E1-7, E1-8,
S1-5, S1-6, S1-7, S1-9, S1-11, S1-13, S1-14,
S1-17, S2-4, S2-5,G1-3, G1-4, G1-5, G1-6
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 191
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[GOV-5] RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
Governance via the Enterprise Risk Management Framework
The Sustainability and Culture Committee has overall oversight of the sustainability reporting process and
the related risk management arrangements. Certain responsibilities are delegated to the Audit and Risk
Committee, including oversight of the quality and integrity of sustainability reporting and the effectiveness of
related risk management systems. The Audit and Risk Committee reports on its work to the Board as part of
the regular governance cycle.
Within this governance structure, Wizz Air’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework provides the
foundation for identifying, assessing and managing sustainability-related risks, including those related to
the environment and climate change. The ERM framework undergoes a semi-annual review by the Board
of Directors. The risk identification process, which involves recognising, acknowledging and describing
risks that could impede Wizz Air’s objectives, is essential for updating the Company’s risk universe and
risk appetite every six months. This process employs various methods such as meetings, interviews,
group discussions, historical data and market information. Once identified, risks are analysed and
evaluated based on their impact and likelihood.
The ERM framework includes various ESG risks, such as those related to climate change. Primary and
secondary risk owners are designated based on their functional expertise and are responsible for
accurately assessing risks and providing relevant information to the Internal Audit function during the
annual risk assessment process. As part of the Company’s going concern and viability assessments,
management maps principal risks to the planning horizons for going concern and viability, which
correspond to short-term and medium-term risks, respectively. This same methodology is applied to
climate risks, with assessments documented for short-, medium- and long-term horizons for each
identified climate risk, including both transition and physical risks. Where applicable, the quantified
impact of these assessments is integrated into the Company’s going concern and viability modelling.
Wizz Air is committed to consistently predicting and mitigating the effects of climate-related phenomena on
the environment, communities and the business. Climate considerations are integrated into financial
planning and controlling processes. Each year, when preparing the financial operating plan for the following
year and medium-term forecasts, key risks are gathered from the Heads of Function, indicating the potential
financial impact of these risks. This information is incorporated into financial planning to support
preparedness and resilience by identifying the most significant risks and their potential financial implications.
The sustainability reporting process is coordinated by the ESG function in cooperation with the Finance
function and relevant business units. Business units are responsible for providing sustainability-related data
and information within their areas of responsibility, while the ESG function provides subject-matter expertise
and supports reporting against the ESRS disclosure requirements. The ESG team is responsible for compiling
the sustainability information, while the Finance function supports by reviewing data linkages and ensuring
alignment and consistency with financial reporting processes.
To support the governance of the sustainability reporting process, sustainability-related data is collected and
managed through an ESG data management platform, which defines roles and responsibilities for data
ownership, data input and validation, and ensures that the appropriate functions are involved at the relevant
stages of the reporting process.
Findings from the risk assessment and sustainability reporting process are reported through the governance
structure to the Sustainability and Culture Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee, and are
subsequently reported to the Board as part of the regular governance and risk reporting cycle.
Mitigation of Environmental and Climate Change-Related Risks
Compliance with environmental and sustainability regulations is a key component of the Company’s climate
risk mitigation strategy. This includes compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks such as emissions
reporting obligations, the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme
for International Aviation (CORSIA), as well as consideration of forthcoming frameworks, including the
Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and potential future environmental taxation
requirements.
Dedicated cross-functional working groups monitor regulatory developments and ensure timely
implementation of necessary systems, processes and controls. The Company continues to strengthen its
sustainability governance at both management and Board level through regular reviews of regulatory
obligations and reporting requirements. Responsibility for each environmental and sustainability matter is
clearly assigned to designated functions within the organisation. These functions report identified risks and
mitigation measures to the Leadership Team, which, in turn, provides oversight updates to the Board of
Directors.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 192
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Strategy
[SBM-1] STRATEGY, BUSINESS MODEL AND VALUE CHAIN
Wizz Air is a rapidly growing ultra-low-cost carrier, operating a fleet of 262 Airbus A320 and A321-family
aircraft. As at 31 March 2026, we connect over 200 destinations across more than 45 countries. Our team
of dedicated aviation professionals provides an excellent service and very low fares, making Wizz Air the
preferred choice for over 69.7 million passengers in the fiscal year ended 31 March 2026.
The Company’s vision is to make travel affordable for everyone while maintaining a low unit cost base and
a strong focus on reducing carbon intensity across its operations. This business model supports profitable
growth and value creation for shareholders and stakeholders, while integrating sustainability considerations
into operational decisions.
Key elements of the Company’s sustainability strategy include continued fleet renewal, with further
progress achieved between F25 and F26, resulting in 75% of the fleet now comprising new‑technology
aircraft; ongoing fuel‑efficiency improvements; increased investment in and use of sustainable aviation fuel
(SAF), with 27,606 tonnes of SAF uplifted in compliance with ReFuelEU; and continued operational
optimisation. These initiatives underpin Wizz Air’s aspirational decarbonisation pathway towards its long-
term ambition of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Supporting this transition, the Company
has an interim target to reduce carbon emissions intensity by 25% by 2030 compared to the F20 base
year.
Main products, services and customer groups
Wizz Air’s main products and services consist of short- and medium-haul point-to-point passenger air
transport services, complemented by ancillary services including baggage services, seat selection, priority
boarding, on-board sales and subscription-based travel products.
The Company’s primary customer groups include leisure travellers and visiting-friends-and-relatives (VFR),
passengers seeking affordable and reliable air travel solutions.
Wizz Air has a significant operational presence in several countries, including Hungary, Romania, Italy,
Poland, the United Kingdom and Malta, and operates across Europe, Central Asia, the Middle East and
Africa.
During the reporting period, the Company made changes to the markets served, including the
discontinuation of operations in Abu Dhabi around the middle of the financial year. No other significant
changes to the main product portfolio or customer groups occurred. Wizz Air does not provide products or
services that are banned in any of the markets in which it operates.
Distribution of employees by region*
Wizz Air is a global company with a significant employee presence across multiple countries, including
Hungary, Romania, Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom and Malta.
Region
Headcount
Europe
8,934
Other
734
* The data disclosed is based on the regions of deployment as at 31 March 2026
Revenue by ESRS sector
The Company’s revenue is almost entirely generated from passenger air transport and related services,
which fall under the ESRS sector Transportation and Storage (NACE H).
Where operating segments are reported under IFRS 8, revenue from the passenger air transport segment
is reported by reference to the ESRS Transportation and Storage classification. No other ESRS sector
represents a significant share of total revenue for the reporting period.
The Company is also linked to other ESRS sectors through intercompany activities and its value chain,
including aircraft manufacturing, fuel and sustainable aviation fuel supply, airport and ground handling
services, as well as digital and IT services. These sectors were considered in the materiality assessment
due to their environmental and social impacts related to flight operations, fuel use and supply-chain labour
conditions.
Wizz Air does not engage in activities related to the exploration, storage or transportation of fossil fuels,
chemical production, the trade of controversial weapons, or the cultivation and production of tobacco, and
does not generate revenues from these sectors. The Company’s transport services currently rely on fossil-
based aviation fuel, which results in greenhouse gas emissions and represents a key transition challenge
for its business model.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 193
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Sustainability Objectives and Alignment of the Business
By 2030, Wizz Air plans to reduce its carbon emissions intensity by 25 per cent compared to the base year
F20. This commitment to environmental performance is embedded into day-to-day operations, from every
take-off to every landing.
Wizz Air’s ultra-low-cost, low-fare business model aligns with key elements of a low-carbon strategy. This
synergy, combined with a highly efficient operational framework, enables the Company to provide
affordable, safe and reliable air travel while implementing initiatives to support its environmental
objectives. Wizz Air’s efforts to enhance sustainability, including fuel-efficient operations, also respond to
evolving customer and regulatory expectations regarding the environmental impact of air travel.
LEADING IN FLEET
RENEWAL
From F26, 75% of the Company’s fleet now consists of new technology
aircraft, reflecting its commitment to technology and innovation and its
belief that fleet renewal is one of the most effective solutions currently
available to reduce emissions per flight; the A321neo aircraft offers up to
approximately 20 per cent lower fuel consumption and reduced noise and
nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions compared with previous-generation aircraft
models under certain operating conditions, supporting the Company’s target
to reduce carbon emissions intensity by 25 per cent by 2030.
FUEL-EFFICIENT
AIRCRAFT AND
ENGINES
Wizz Air operates a relatively young fleet compared with many industry
peers, which contributes to improved fuel efficiency and a lower emissions
intensity per passenger kilometre. The Company continues to focus on a
range of operational efficiency measures, including optimised aircraft
utilisation and enhanced fuel management practices, as part of its approach
to managing the environmental impact of its operations. As a result of these
measures, in F26 Wizz Air achieved a 3% reduction in emissions intensity,
decreasing from 52.2 to 50.6 g CO₂ per passenger kilometre, compared to
the previous period. The Company’s approach to fleet modernity and
operational efficiency has been recognised by independent industry sources
such as Cirium, ch-aviation and World Finance, as well as through the
Sustainable Airline of the Year 2025 award from Airline Economics, which
collectively acknowledge the effectiveness of these emissions‑reduction
measures.
While such initiatives support reductions in emissions intensity, aviation
remains a carbon‑intensive sector, and achieving reductions in absolute
emissions is still a key challenge.
HIGH SEAT CAPACITY
–  EMISSIONS PER
PASSENGER
The Airbus A321neo aircraft’s 239-seat single-class configuration enables
higher passenger capacity per flight, which can contribute to lower
emissions intensity per passenger kilometre compared with lower-density
configurations. Wizz Air incorporates fleet configuration and operational
efficiency measures into its approach to managing the environmental
impact of its operations.
Wizz Air’s Sustainability Strategy
At Wizz Air, our mission is to provide travel opportunities that enrich lives and foster global connections.
We believe in bringing nationalities, cultures and businesses together through affordable air travel. Our
commitment extends beyond transportation; we strive to set high standards in safety, customer
experience, corporate citizenship and reliability.
Wizz Air recognises that climate change presents operational, regulatory and market-related challenges for
the aviation sector. The Company therefore considers environmental impact management as part of its
broader business and operational strategy. Its approach is organised around four focus areas:
environment, people, economy and governance.
ESG PILLAR
KEY OBJECTIVE
LINKED SDGS
ENVIRONMENT
Focus on reducing our CO₂ emissions intensity (grams per revenue
passenger kilometre) through ongoing efficiency measures.
7, 9, 12, 13
PEOPLE
Become an employer of choice, set an example for corporate citizenship.
Retain and develop talent and provide a great customer experience.
3, 4, 5, 10
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 194
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ECONOMY
Contribute to the GDP growth of our destinations by enabling affordable
connectivity. Create new jobs, drive tourism and business opportunities.
17
GOVERNANCE
Put the proper organisational structure of sustainability management,
systems and people in place to support our strategy and vision.
8
In the environmental pillar, the Company has set the objective of reducing carbon emissions intensity by
25% by 2030 compared to the F20 base year, and also seeks to maintain competitive CO₂ emissions
intensity per revenue passenger kilometre relative to industry peers.
To ensure alignment between business activities and sustainability objectives, the Company has assessed
its significant products and services and its main markets and customer groups in relation to these
objectives. Passenger air transport services remain the core activity and the main source of environmental
impact. The assessment indicates that the current business model and geographical footprint are
compatible with the Company’s sustainability objectives, while continued improvements in operational
efficiency and the gradual integration of lower-carbon technologies remain necessary to achieve long-term
targets.
The Company’s Strategic Priorities
Opportunity, consistent resource efficiency and customer service are the cornerstone of Wizz Air’s success,
and today this still inspires Wizz Air’s mission and its key strategies. Delivering value to Shareholders and
stakeholders remains a primary objective, with a dedication to maintaining strong financial performance
while addressing the unique challenges of the aviation industry. As part of our long-term vision, the
Company supports industry efforts aimed at decarbonising the aviation sector. We continuously explore
innovative opportunities to facilitate this transition, including fleet modernisation, operational efficiency
improvements and the gradual integration of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), as well as engagement with
partners across the value chain. The Company’s approach extends beyond environmental considerations
and includes operational, economic and governance-related priorities. Wizz Air focuses on operational
efficiency and cost management to support low fares while continuing to invest in fleet renewal, fuel-
efficiency initiatives and operational optimisation measures. The Company also places great emphasis on
customer experience by seeking to provide reliable and affordable air travel supported by ongoing
operational and service improvements.
COMPANY GOALS
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
▶ Deliver an average of 10-12 per cent annual
growth in capacity in the long term
▶ A focused, ultra-low-cost, low-fare business
model
▶ Deliver double-digit net income margin
▶ Increasing and diversifying our geographical
footprint
▶ Reduce our CO2 emissions intensity by 25 per
cent by F30 (versus base year F20)
▶ Delivering industry-leading sustainability in
accordance with the Company’s ESG strategy
The main ESG-related metrics are integrated into
our key performance measures year on year.
▶ Enabling our business by creating the leading
digital platform
▶ Continuing to run a highly engaged, agile and
entrepreneurial organisation
ESG-related metrics (indicated in pink) are integrated into our key performance measures, year on year:
1. Leading on
cost
2. Increasing our
geographical
footprint
3. Key ESG
metrics
4. Leading digital
platform
5. Highly engaged
organisation
1.1. CASK
performance
2.1. Market
penetration
3.1. CO2 emissions
intensity
4.1. Brand
awareness
5.1. Employee
engagement
1.2. Ancillary PAX
revenue
2.2. Market share
3.2. Gender
diversity
4.2. Web/app
visitors
5.2. Staff attrition
1.3. Cash
4.3. Conversion
5.3. Promotion from
within
Business model inputs, outputs and outcomes
The Company’s business model relies on key inputs including aircraft and engines, aviation fuel and
sustainable aviation fuel, airport and air traffic infrastructure, digital systems and a skilled workforce.
These inputs are secured through a combination of long-term aircraft purchase and leasing agreements,
contractual arrangements with fuel and service providers, partnerships with airports and ground handling
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 195
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
companies, as well as recruitment and training programmes for flight and office personnel. Digital
platforms and information systems support flight operations, sales and customer services. Building on
these inputs and operational activities, the primary outputs of the Company’s business are short- and
medium-haul passenger air transport services and ancillary products such as baggage services, seat
selection, priority boarding and onboard sales.
The outcomes of these activities include affordable connectivity for customers, economic links between
regions served, employment and skills development for employees. These outcomes are achieved
alongside environmental and social impacts, which are addressed through the integration of sustainability
considerations into the business model and strategy.
Wizz Air’s Value Chain Mapping
Wizz Air defines its value chain as encompassing all upstream, own operations and downstream activities
necessary to deliver passenger air transport services. This includes, among others, aircraft procurement
and leasing, fuel and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) supply, airport and ground handling services,
maintenance and repair operations, digital platforms, ticket sales and distribution channels, on-board
services and partner-related activities.
The value chain mapping has been undertaken to ensure that the Company’s sustainability reporting
accurately reflects where material environmental and social impacts, risks and opportunities (“IROs”) arise
across its business activities and business relationships. The assessment covers activities under direct
operational control as well as those performed by suppliers, contractors and commercial partners, where
impacts may occur indirectly through the Company’s value chain.
Material environmental impacts arise primarily from aviation fuel production and flight operations, including
greenhouse gas emissions (E1) and noise and other pollution-related effects (E2). Social impacts are most
significant in relation to workforce health and safety and working conditions (S1), labour conditions within
the supply chain (S2), customer safety, accessibility and data protection (S4). Governance-related risks
(G1) relate to compliance, business conduct and responsible commercial practices across operations and
partnerships.
The Company’s key dependencies include reliable access to aircraft and engines, jet fuel and SAF supply,
airport infrastructure, digital systems and cybersecurity resilience, as well as a skilled and available
workforce. These dependencies may give rise to financial risks or strategic opportunities and are therefore
integrated into the Company’s double materiality assessment. This value chain overview forms the basis
for Wizz Air’s double materiality assessment and supports the identification and assessment of material
IROs disclosed under SBM-3 and IRO-1. It also informs the development of the Company’s sustainability
strategy and related actions by identifying where targeted management measures, contractual safeguards
and stakeholder engagement are most relevant across the value chain.
The table below presents an overview of Wizz Air’s value chain activities and business relationships,
structured across upstream activities, own operations and downstream activities. This structure reflects the
Company’s comprehensive approach to its double materiality assessment (DMA), which considers impacts,
risks, opportunities and dependencies across the entire value chain. Accordingly, the Company’s primary
business activity, passenger air transport (including ticket sales and ancillary revenues), is assessed across
the full value chain from the extraction of raw materials and manufacturing of aircraft and related
components, through aircraft and fuel procurement and flight operations, to ticket sales and customer
services. This approach ensures that upstream activities, including aircraft manufacturing, are duly
considered given their relevance to Wizz Air’s operations, dependencies and associated impacts.
On-board sales and catering activities are reflected across upstream procurement (including production
and supply of goods), onboard service delivery, and related supporting functions within own operations.
Revenue from partners and commissions is primarily generated in downstream activities, including
distribution, marketing and customer-facing services, supported by upstream supplier relationships and
operational processes.
OWN OPERATIONS
The underlying value chain activities remain consistent with the previous year. The current presentation
introduces a more granular and streamlined structure, with certain activities disaggregated and
reorganised across categories. In particular, activities such as flight scheduling and crew management,
previously included within broader operational categories, are now presented separately. This change
represents a refinement in presentation only, and does not reflect any change in the Group’s underlying
value chain structure.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 196
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Activity
Operational Scope
Key Stakeholders
Material ESRS
Topics
Flight operations
Operation of flights across
network, including leased
operations
Employees, technical service
providers, regulators
E1; E2; S1; S4
On-board sales &
catering
Onboard sale of goods and
services
Catering suppliers, logistics
providers, passengers
S2; S4
Distribution &
partner sales
Sale of partner services via
digital and commercial
channels
Distribution partners, digital
platform providers, customers
S4; G-Entity
specific
Flight scheduling
Fleet and route scheduling to
optimise aircraft utilisation
Employees, regulators
E1; S1
Crew
management
Crew rostering, standby
management and operational
staffing
Employees
S1
UPSTREAM OPERATIONS
Activity
Operational Scope
Key Stakeholders
Material ESRS
Topics
Catering &
onboard goods
supply
Procurement of food,
beverages and onboard retail
goods
Catering suppliers, logistics
providers
S2; G1
Aircraft delivery &
fleet integration
Aircraft acquisition,
manufacturing and integration
into fleet
Aircraft manufacturers (OEMs),
lessors
E1; S2; G1
Fuel supply
management
Jet fuel and SAF sourcing and
supply at network destinations
Fuel suppliers
E1; E2; S2; G1
Spare parts
procurement
Procurement of aircraft
components and spare parts
OEM part manufacturers, MRO
supply chain workforce
E2; S2; G1
Maintenance
(heavy
maintenance)
Major aircraft overhaul and
technical servicing
MRO providers, certified
technicians, contracted
maintenance suppliers
E2; S2; G1
Ground logistics
(F&B and goods)
Logistics and ground transport
of onboard goods
Third-party logistics providers
S2; G1
Planning (F&B &
ancillary services)
Internal planning of onboard
goods and service volumes
Employees, partners/suppliers
S1; G1
DOWNSTREAM OPERATIONS
Activity
Operational Scope
Key Stakeholders
Material ESRS
Topics
Ticket sales &
distribution
Sale of tickets and ancillary
services via direct and indirect
channels
Customers, travel agencies,
distribution partners
S4; G1; S2; G-
Entity specific
Marketing &
promotions
Advertising campaigns,
sponsorships and brand
communication
Customers, regulators,
marketing agencies, creative
partners
S4; G1; S2
Customer services
(after-sales)
Complaint handling, rebooking,
refunds and passenger support
Customers, outsourced customer
service providers
S4; S2
Waste
management
(onboard &
service waste)
Collection and disposal of
waste generated from onboard
services
Waste contractors, airport
operators, contracted cleaning
staff
S2
Value chain activities are carried out across the Company’s AOC locations (referring to the airlines
operating in the United Kingdom, Malta and Hungary), base locations and wider network, including
upstream and outsourced activities.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 197
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[SBM-2] INTERESTS AND VIEWS OF STAKEHOLDERS
Understanding and integrating the interests and expectations of stakeholders is essential to ensuring the
long-term resilience and sustainability of the Company’s strategy and business model. Stakeholders
provide valuable perspectives on the impacts, risks and opportunities associated with our activities and
play a key role in shaping our environmental, social and governance (ESG) priorities.
The Company has identified its key stakeholder groups based on their influence on its activities and the
impacts of its operations on them. The views and interests of these stakeholders are regularly assessed
through structured engagement mechanisms and are integrated into strategic planning, risk management
and business model development. This ensures that the Company’s long-term strategy reflects both
economic objectives and broader societal and environmental expectations.
Stakeholder
Why they matter to us
What matters to them (views and interests)*
Our customers
Customers are fundamental to the success
and continuity of our business model. Their
trust and loyalty support revenue growth and
market competitiveness. Meeting customer
expectations while maintaining a competitive
cost structure is central to our strategy.
Customers seek a reliable, safe and affordable
travel experience, with high service quality,
transparent pricing, environmental
responsibility and a seamless digital journey,
including efficient handling of complaints and
feedback.
Our investors
Investor confidence is essential to sustaining
our business model and funding growth
initiatives. Their support enables long-term
investment in fleet, innovation and
sustainability while delivering shareholder
returns.
Investors expect strong financial performance
delivered in a responsible and sustainable
manner. They value robust governance,
effective risk management, resource
efficiency, leading carbon intensity
performance and credible climate transition
plans.
Sustainability and
Culture
Committee of the
Board of Directors
The Committee provides oversight of
sustainability strategy and governance,
ensuring alignment with regulatory
requirements and long-term corporate
objectives. Its role is critical in embedding
sustainability into strategic decision-making.
The Committee focuses on integrating
environmental and social considerations into
corporate strategy, ensuring compliance,
monitoring performance against sustainability
targets and strengthening accountability and
transparency.
Our people
(employees)
Employees are the face of the Company and a
key driver of service quality and operational
performance. High engagement and retention
contribute directly to customer satisfaction
and business efficiency.
Employees expect a safe, inclusive and
respectful working environment, opportunities
for development and career progression as
well as meaningful engagement.
Our partners and
suppliers
Partners enable the delivery of our “lowest-
cost-done-right” operating model and support
operational resilience and scalability. Long-
term relationships enhance agility and
performance.
Partners seek fair and transparent commercial
relationships, timely payments, mutual trust
and opportunities for long-term collaboration,
innovation and value creation.
Our communities
The Company contributes to regional
connectivity, economic development and
employment in the communities in which it
operates. Maintaining positive community
relations supports our social licence to
operate.
Communities expect the Company to generate
local economic opportunities, minimise
environmental impacts, act responsibly and
contribute to sustainable growth and social
well-being.
Regulators and
policymakers
Regulatory frameworks shape the operating
environment of the aviation sector.
Constructive engagement supports
compliance, innovation and a fair transition
towards sustainable aviation.
Regulators and policymakers expect
compliance with laws and standards,
transparent reporting and leadership in
supporting a socially fair and environmentally
responsible transition to a low-carbon
economy.
Wizz Air
Sustainability
Team
The Sustainability Team drives the integration
of sustainability principles into operations,
culture and strategy across the organisation.
The team prioritises effective implementation
of sustainability initiatives, measurable
progress against targets, cross-functional
collaboration and continuous improvement in
environmental and social performance.
Operational
management /
ESG
representatives
Operational teams translate sustainability
commitments into daily practices and ensure
alignment between strategy and execution
across departments.
These teams value clear strategic direction,
practical tools, training and stakeholder
feedback to support effective implementation
of sustainability objectives within their
operational responsibilities.
*The information presented reflects Wizz Air’s current understanding of stakeholder expectations, based on experience,
ongoing engagement and market practice.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 198
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Stakeholder Engagement Approach
Throughout F26, we maintained regular and constructive engagement with our key stakeholders through
targeted communication across multiple channels, including meetings, online surveys, social media
platforms and newsletters. While the double materiality assessment (DMA) process represented a key
structured engagement activity during the year, the Company remained committed to continuous dialogue
with customers, employees, investors, policymakers and regulators beyond the DMA framework.
Engagement with investors was conducted through our Investor Relations function and dedicated bilateral
meetings, with a particular focus on ESG topics, climate change and sustainability priorities. These
interactions support transparency and enable the Company to understand investor expectations better
regarding long-term value creation and responsible business practices. Customers are engaged through
well-established and structured feedback mechanisms, enabling the Company to monitor satisfaction
levels, address concerns and continuously improve service quality and the overall customer experience.
Employees are engaged through annual engagement surveys and regular CEO floor talks, which provide
opportunities for open dialogue, feedback and the sharing of ideas and concerns. These channels support a
culture of inclusion and continuous improvement across the organisation. Engagement with policymakers
and regulators takes place through formal consultation processes and participation in working groups,
ensuring constructive dialogue on regulatory developments. In addition, the Company collaborates closely
with its business partners to exchange best practices, support key initiatives and foster sustainable
innovation across its value chain. Through these structured and ongoing engagement activities, the
Company gains valuable insights into stakeholder expectations, and uses this feedback to inform its
strategy, operational priorities and sustainability initiatives.
Influence of Stakeholder Engagement on Strategy and Business Model
As part of the DMA, Wizz Air involved internal subject-matter experts representing key stakeholder groups
in the identification and validation of material sustainability topics. These experts were selected based on
their in-depth knowledge of ESG matters, the Company’s business model and their understanding of
stakeholder perspectives. A structured and targeted engagement approach was applied. Prior to each
engagement phase, information sessions were held to explain the DMA methodology and the concept of
double materiality, ensuring a common understanding and consistency of inputs. This process formalised
stakeholder-related insights and strengthened the quality and robustness of the assessment outcomes.
In F26, the DMA methodology was further enhanced through deeper dependency and value chain impact
analyses. In particular, key partners within the value chain, including those related to fleet, engines and
maintenance were directly engaged to establish a shared understanding of material topics and associated
impacts and risks. This strengthened the Company’s ability to reflect external dependencies and
operational realities in its materiality conclusions.
The outcomes of the DMA process, including the identification and prioritisation of material topics, are
subject to oversight by the Board of Directors, in particular through the Sustainability and Culture
Committee. The Committee provides strategic guidance on the integration of DMA results into corporate
strategy, reviews progress against sustainability objectives, and ensures alignment with stakeholder
expectations and evolving regulatory and industry standards.
Insights derived from stakeholder engagement and the DMA directly inform the Company’s strategic
priorities, risk management processes and business model development. This enables Wizz Air to address
key sustainability risks and opportunities, support long-term resilience and guide investment and
operational decisions in areas such as fleet renewal, environmental performance and employee
engagement.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 199
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Impact, Risk and Opportunity Management: Disclosures on the Double Materiality
Assessment
[IRO-1] DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSES TO IDENTIFY AND ASSESS MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND
OPPORTUNITIES
Following the first voluntary reporting with reference to ESRS, Wizz Air revised its double materiality
assessment (DMA) and assessed its dependencies within the value chain more deeply, while the main
methodology for identifying impacts, risks and opportunities remained unchanged.
Wizz Air conducted a DMA with reference to ESRS 1 Chapter 3 in order to identify and assess its material
impacts, risks and opportunities for the reporting period F26. The objective of the process is to provide a
structured basis for determining the sustainability matters to be disclosed in Wizz Air’s sustainability
statement and to support the integration of sustainability considerations into business strategy and risk
management. The assessment covers Wizz Air’s own operations as well as its key business relationships
across the value chain, including main value chain segments, e.g. fuel suppliers, aircraft manufacturers,
ground handling providers, etc. Based on the findings from a contextual analysis, Wizz Air identified a set of
actual and potential negative and positive impacts and risks on people and the environment it is involved in
through its own operations or its business relationships across the value chain.
The contextual analysis considered:
• internal and external data sources,
• previous materiality assessments,
• regulatory developments,
• stakeholder expectations, and
• industry benchmarks.
Wizz Air assessed the key elements of its value chain, including the main operational inputs and outputs, the
relevant supplier categories, and the facilities, services and assets required to support its operations. Some
of the identified impacts were assessed as giving rise to associated sustainability-related risks and
opportunities and also to result in current or anticipated financial effects. In addition, certain risks were
identified as stemming from regulatory and systemic developments, such as changes in climate,
environmental and social legislation, which may affect the availability of resources on which Wizz Air
depends, require capital expenditure, or result in operational or reputational impacts.
Our approach to the double materiality assessment
The Company employed a six-step approach to conduct its double materiality assessment.
image.png
Step 1 – Scoping and stakeholder mapping
Step 1 involved mapping the relevant stakeholders. During this process, the scope of the value chain was
defined, and subsidiaries, joint ventures and associated companies were identified. Wizz Air Holdings Plc’s
most significant subsidiaries include Wizz Air Hungary Limited, Wizz Air UK Limited, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi
(operations suspended from 1 September 2025) and Wizz Air Malta Limited. To gain a comprehensive
understanding, we reviewed competitor benchmarks and the results of previous years’ materiality
assessments. Following the first step, the information gathered was used as an input for the next step,
namely the development of the long list of ESG topics to be assessed in the materiality analysis.
The process focused in particular on activities, business relationships and geographies that present
heightened risks of adverse impacts, including flight operations, fuel sourcing, ground handling and
maintenance activities, subcontracted services and operations in regions exposed to elevated regulatory,
environmental or social risks.
Steps 2 and 3 – Identification of sustainability matters and IROs
The long list of Wizz Air’s potentially relevant sustainability matters was developed based on the ESRS list of
topics, sub-topics and sub-sub-topics (ESRS 1, AR 16). This list was complemented through a benchmark
analysis, including a review of selected industry peers’ material topics, relevant sector standards and the
results of Wizz Air’s previous-year double materiality assessment. The potential relevance of each topic was
then evaluated based on its representation in these sources.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 200
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
As a result of this review and validation process, the initial long list was refined into a focused shortlist of
sustainability topics, which served as the basis for the subsequent identification and assessment of impacts,
risks and opportunities. Topics assessed as not relevant at this stage were not carried forward for further
evaluation.
In steps 2 and 3, potential sustainability topics were identified. This process involved identifying potential
impacts, risks and opportunities through input from internal stakeholders, in collaboration with operational
department leaders.
▶ Identification of impacts (impact materiality): The process included the identification of impacts related
to key sustainability issues, followed by an assessment to determine whether these impacts could also
lead to financial risks and opportunities.
▶ Identification of risks and opportunities (financial materiality): The identification of sustainability-related
risks and opportunities that could significantly influence the Group's financial performance, position or
cash flows. This includes assessing the impacts of past and future events, as well as the Group's
dependency on natural, human and social resources, which may pose financial risks or create
opportunities.
The assessment considered impacts arising from Wizz Air’s own operations as well as impacts connected to
its business relationships across the value chain, including suppliers, subcontractors and commercial
partners.
As part of the contextual analysis, Wizz Air conducted a structured dependency check and value chain
assessment to identify the key natural, human and social resources on which its business depends and to
understand how these dependencies give rise to potential impacts, risks and opportunities across its own
operations and business relationships. This assessment mapped the main stages of the value chain,
including upstream suppliers, operational activities and downstream services, and supported the
identification of sustainability topics with heightened exposure to adverse or positive impacts. For this
purpose, workshops were held with relevant internal stakeholders across the Company to gather operational
insights and validate the mapping of value chain activities. Connections between identified impacts and
dependencies and the related sustainability-related risks and opportunities were analysed in order to
determine how adverse or positive impacts could translate into sustainability-related risks and opportunities
with potential financial effects for the Company.
Step 4 – Assessment and prioritisation methodology
In step 4, the identified impacts and risks were evaluated using objective scoring criteria. The scoring was
performed in collaboration with external advisory, based on a structured methodology, and was reviewed
and validated by Wizz Air to ensure alignment with the Company’s operations and professional judgement.
For each impact, we assigned ratings across three dimensions: Scale (ranging from none to very high),
Scope (from none to global), and Irremediable character (from none to irreversible), each measured on a
scale of 0 to 5. Additionally, Likelihood was evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, spanning from unlikely to
reasonably certain. These ratings were then combined to produce a total score. Based on this score, each
ESG topic was categorised as one of the following: Not Material, Not Material but Worth Monitoring, or
Material.
Threshold values facilitated both financial and impact materiality, above which a particular impact, risk or
opportunity was deemed significant, or material, to Wizz Air operations. The threshold for the impact
materiality assessment was set based on Wizz Air's ESG team's professional judgement and the previous
year's materiality assessment, while the financial materiality assessment threshold was established with the
support of Wizz Air's finance team to ensure that the outcomes accurately reflect relevant and significant
matters.
Negative impacts were prioritised based on their relative severity (scale, scope and irremediable character)
and likelihood, while positive impacts were assessed based on their scale, scope and likelihood. Qualitative
and quantitative thresholds were applied to determine which sustainability matters are material for reporting
purposes.
Risks and opportunities were assessed from a financial materiality perspective based on their potential
magnitude of financial impact and likelihood of occurrence. The overall financial materiality score was
determined by combining these two dimensions. The magnitude of financial impacts was assessed using
predefined financial ranges, calibrated to Wizz Air’s revenue scale and historical expenditure levels. This
approach ensures that the assessment is aligned with Wizz Air’s financial structure and allows for a
consistent and meaningful evaluation of the relative significance of sustainability-related risks and
opportunities.
Step 5 – Validation and decision-making
In step 5, selected internal stakeholders were engaged in the validation process. External stakeholders were
engaged on a targeted basis. In particular, the Company engaged directly with selected suppliers to validate
and establish a shared understanding of the impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) identified in connection
with the Company’s dependencies on the services they provide. These included key upstream partners such
as aircraft and engine manufacturers, whose products and services are critical to the Company’s operations
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 201
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
and environmental performance. Following validation by relevant internal subject-matter experts and
selected external partners, the results were consolidated and finalised. The result of the double materiality
assessment was approved by Wizz Air’s Sustainability and Culture Committee in January 2026.
The decision-making process includes defined internal control procedures to ensure consistency, accuracy
and completeness of inputs. These include review by subject-matter experts, coordination by the
Sustainability Team and formal approval by the Sustainability and Culture Committee.
Integration into risk management and management processes
The process to identify, assess and manage sustainability-related impacts and risks is integrated into Wizz
Air’s overall risk management framework and contributes to the evaluation of the Group’s overall risk profile.
Sustainability-related risks are prioritised alongside other strategic, operational and financial risks using
existing risk-assessment tools and methodologies.
The identification and assessment of sustainability-related opportunities is integrated into Wizz Air’s overall
management and strategic planning processes, supporting business decision-making and long-term value
creation. Please refer to [GOV-5] for more information on risk management.
Changes compared to previous period
The double materiality assessment process was initially developed in F25 to pursue alignment with ESRS
requirements. In F26, the assessment was revisited and applied with increased granularity across the value
chain, including a more comprehensive mapping of upstream, own operations and downstream activities.
This included a more structured linkage of stakeholders through targeted engagement with key groups such
as ground handlers, aircraft OEMs, and engine OEMs. Dedicated discussions were used to validate identified
impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs), assess partnership dependencies, clarify links to value chain
activities, and better define entities in scope for data collection and assessment. The underlying
methodology, assessment criteria and thresholds remained unchanged. These enhancements reflect a more
detailed application of the existing framework rather than a change in approach. The double materiality
assessment is planned to be reviewed and updated on an annual basis.
[SBM-3] MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH STRATEGY
AND BUSINESS MODEL
Outcomes of double materiality assessment
Through the double materiality assessment, Wizz Air identified key material topics relevant to its operations,
business model, value chain and stakeholders, as well as the related impacts and risks. No material
opportunities were identified as part of the assessment. In addition to the ESRS topics, Wizz Air also
identified entity-specific topics such as cybersecurity, data protection, community programmes and
charitable support.
Within the environmental pillar, climate change adaptation and energy under E1, as well as pollution under
E2, were identified as additional material topics and/or subtopics. No material environmental topics or
subtopics previously identified were reassessed as non-material.
Within the social pillar, minor refinements were made. New financially material risks, including training and
development, were identified, and one topic previously “under observation” was reclassified as a material
risk. From an impact materiality perspective, existing topics were primarily updated, with working conditions
identified as a new subtopic under S2. The subtopic “Personal safety of consumers and/or end-users” under
S4 now meets the materiality threshold. The sub-subtopic “working hours” did not meet the materiality
threshold following reassessment, informed by paragraph 36 of the revised July 2025 draft of ESRS 1. In line
with this guidance, Wizz Air did not consider compliance with applicable working time regulations as
evidence of a positive impact. Instead, the reassessment focused on whether working hours give rise to
significant impacts, risks or opportunities beyond the baseline established by legal and regulatory
requirements, and no material impacts, risks or opportunities were identified. This represents a refinement
compared to the previous year’s assessment, where compliance considerations contributed to the topic
being identified as material.
Within the governance pillar, analysis of ESRS G1 identified new financially material risks (primarily related
to supply chain disruption and cyber security/data protection), and refined impact material risks previously
identified, with enhanced identification of direct risk drivers. New financially material risks comprise supplier
disruptions (engine servicing, fleet, spare parts, F&B logistics, single-provider dependency), cyber risks (data
leakage, cyber attack), platform outage as well as scheduling system failure. Impact materiality was
predominantly updated rather than expanded, with limited additions including corporate culture,
whistleblower protection, political engagement as well as corruption and bribery. The following topics and/or
subtopics did not meet the materiality threshold following reassessment: supplier relationship management
(including payment practices), corruption and bribery, corporate culture, whistleblower protection and
political engagement.
The material impacts identified by Wizz Air include both positive and negative effects on people and the
environment, as well as related financial risks. Negative environmental impacts primarily arise from
greenhouse gas emissions, noise generated by flight operations, as well as from certain upstream activities
such as fuel production, aircraft manufacturing and maintenance. Additional negative impacts may arise
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 202
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
from supply chain dependencies, data protection incidents or governance-related non-compliance, which can
indirectly affect stakeholders and market trust. At the same time, Wizz Air generates positive impacts
through job creation, skills development and training programmes, secure and safe working conditions,
diversity and inclusion initiatives, improved connectivity and affordable access to air travel. The Company’s
community programmes and charitable support initiatives further contribute to social inclusion. These
impacts are closely linked to Wizz Air’s ultra-low-cost carrier business model and growth strategy, which
depend on operational efficiency, high aircraft utilisation, digital resilience and strategic supplier
relationships. Accordingly, the Company is also exposed to material financial risks, including regulatory and
carbon pricing exposure, supplier disruption and fleet availability risks, digital system outages and data
breaches.
Wizz Air’s sustainability and governance frameworks are designed to manage and mitigate material negative
impacts, reinforce positive contributions and address associated financial risks, while supporting the
Company’s broader strategic focus on climate change mitigation, operational efficiency, digital resilience and
long-term value creation.
The assessment of the resilience of Wizz Air’s strategy and business model with regard to its material
climate-related risks is currently informed by the Company’s TCFD-consistent scenario analysis, which
evaluates physical and transition risks across short-, medium- and long-term time horizons and supports
strategic planning and capital allocation decisions. However, a comprehensive resilience analysis of the
overall strategy and business model, as defined under ESRS requirements, has not yet been formally
conducted. Further development and explanation of resilience considerations may therefore be required in
future reporting periods as methodologies and internal processes continue to evolve.
Sub-topic
ESRS Pillar
Impact
Materiality
Financial
Materiality
Climate change adaptation
E1 – Climate change
—
✔
Climate change mitigation
E1 – Climate change
✔
—
Energy
E1 – Climate change
—
✔
Pollution of air
E2 – Pollution
✔
—
Working conditions (Own workforce)
S1 – Own workforce
✔
—
Equal treatment & opportunities
S1 – Own workforce
✔
✔
Working conditions (Value chain)
S2 – Value chain workers
✔
✔
Information-related impacts (Consumers/end-
users)
S4 – Consumers & end-users
✔
✔
Personal safety (Consumers/end-users)
S4 – Consumers & end-users
✔
✔
Social inclusion (Consumers/end-users)
S4 – Consumers & end-users
✔
✔
Corporate culture
G1 – Business conduct
✔
✔
Protection of whistleblowers
G1 – Business conduct
✔
—
Political engagement
G1 – Business conduct
✔
—
Supplier relationships & payment practices
G1 – Business conduct
—
✔
Corruption and bribery
G1 – Business conduct
✔
—
Cybersecurity & data protection
Entity-specific Governance
✔
✔
Community programmes & charitable support
Entity-specific Governance
✔
—
List of Wizz Air’s material topics
The table provides a detailed description of the material IROs, including those associated with each material
sustainability topic and their placement within our value chain across various time horizons. This report will
further elaborate on our goals, strategies and results related to these issues and opportunities.
Please note, this Sustainability Report covers all the material topics listed below, as discussed under the
relevant ESG pillar disclosures, to ensure added transparency and detail on the topics most essential to our
stakeholders.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 203
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ENVIRONMENT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon /Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
E1 - Climate change
ESRS E1 –
CLIMATE CHANGE
MITIGATION
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material
negative impact is
concentrated in our
own operations
The impact is
negative, actual.
Greenhouse gas
emissions generated
by air transport
activities contribute
to climate change,
which is associated
with rising global
temperatures, shifts
in weather patterns,
and sea-level
increases
Our climate strategy
includes challenging
objectives and
ambitious targets to
address climate risks
across our
operations.
Wizz Air is dedicated
to mitigating climate
change impacts
through a
comprehensive
strategy that
includes renewing
our aircraft fleet,
continuously
improving
operational
efficiency, and
investing in
sustainable aviation
fuels. Furthermore,
we actively
collaborate with
industry partners to
ensure emissions
reductions across our
supply chain and
broader operations.
The strategy is
described in more
detail in the ESRS E1
chapter.
Sustainability is
integrated into Wizz
Air’s core strategy.
Wizz Air has
implemented
measures and set
targets to reduce
GHG emissions by
investing in
sustainable and
alternative fuels,
renewing its fleet,
and enhancing fuel
efficiency initiatives.
Currently, there are
limited significant
financial costs
related to climate
change mitigation.
However, in the near
future, we anticipate
increased operational
costs due to emission
reduction
regulations.
Operating in the EU
and UK adds
compliance
complexity.
Additional costs will
come from the UK
and EU ETS, higher
carbon prices, and
new fossil fuel taxes.
The financial impact
could be higher with
parallel carbon taxes,
leading to double
taxation. Increased
SAF blending
volumes will also
raise operational
costs.
ESRS E1 –
CLIMATE CHANGE
MITIGATION
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our upstream value
chain
The impact is
negative, actual.
Emissions generated
in the upstream such
as those caused by
the manufacture of
kerosene also
contribute to climate
change.
Wizz Air is investing
in sustainable
aviation fuel research
and development
companies, holding
MOUs with several
providers while fully
complying with
current regulations
and mandates, such
as ReFuelEU
Aviation.
Sustainability is
integrated into Wizz
Air’s core strategy.
Wizz Air has
implemented
measures and set
targets to reduce
GHG emissions by
investing in
sustainable and
alternative fuels,
renewing its fleet,
and enhancing fuel
efficiency initiatives.
Currently, there are
limited significant
financial costs
related to climate
change mitigation.
However, in the near
future, we anticipate
increased operational
costs due to emission
reduction
regulations, higher
carbon prices, new
fossil fuel taxes, and
the rising volumes of
SAF blending.
ESRS E1 –
CLIMATE CHANGE
MITIGATION (Raw
material extraction
and processing -
manufacturing
material)
Negative impact
Time horizon: Long
The material impact
is concentrated in
our upstream value
chain
The impact is
negative, actual.
Upstream emissions
from kerosene
production and
energy-intensive raw
material extraction
and aircraft
manufacturing
contribute to climate
change through
embedded
greenhouse gas
emissions.
Upstream embedded
emissions arise from
energy-intensive raw
material extraction
and aircraft
manufacturing
processes. Over
time, industrial
decarbonisation and
lower-carbon
material transition
are expected to
influence supplier
practices and aircraft
manufacturing cost
structures.
Wizz Air addresses
this impact through
long-term fleet
planning,
engagement with
aircraft
manufacturers,
investment in next-
generation aircraft
technologies and
participation in
industry
decarbonisation
initiatives. Progress
is monitored through
fleet strategy
reviews, supplier
engagement and
sustainability
performance
monitoring over
medium- and long-
term planning
horizons.
Currently there is no
material direct
financial impact.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 204
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS E1 - 
CLIMATE CHANGE
ADAPTATION
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations
Primarily financial
and operational risk,
with potential
indirect
environmental and
societal effects
through operational
disruption. Physical
risks may affect
infrastructure
availability,
operational
continuity and asset
integrity.
No high-impact
physical risks have
been identified within
the current planning
horizon. However,
increasing frequency
and severity of
extreme weather
events may disrupt
operations, markets
and supply chains or
cause damage to
assets over the long
term. Climate-related
atmospheric
phenomena may
affect flight planning,
routing and
scheduling,
potentially leading to
revenue loss or
higher operating
costs.
Physical climate risks
are monitored
through the
Enterprise Risk
Management
framework and
reviewed through the
Audit and Risk
Committee. An
annual TCFD-
consistent climate
risk assessment is
also conducted.
Operational resilience
is supported through
flight planning
procedures,
operational risk
monitoring and
scenario-based
climate risk analysis.
Currently, no
material financial
impacts have been
identified. Over the
long term, increasing
physical climate risks
may lead to higher
operating costs,
asset protection or
replacement costs
and potential
revenue volatility
due to operational
disruption. Impacts
are expected to be
managed through
operational planning,
risk management
processes and long-
term resilience
planning.
ESRS E1 - ENERGY
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
upstream value chain
Changes in fuel
regulation or supply
availability may
require adjustments
to operational
planning and fuel
sourcing, potentially
increasing operating
costs. Fuel supply
disruptions,
particularly at
airports with limited
supplier alternatives,
may negatively affect
flight operations,
schedule reliability
and service delivery.
External events may
disrupt fuel supply
availability at specific
locations, potentially
leading to real-time
flight cancellations,
diversions or
operational
adjustments. This
may directly affect
schedule reliability
and revenue
generation.
Fuel supply risks are
managed through
supplier monitoring,
fuel procurement
strategy, operational
fuel efficiency
measures and
contingency
planning. Risks are
monitored by
relevant teams, with
a focus on short-
term operational
resilience.
Fuel supply
disruption may
directly affect
revenue generation
and operating costs
through flight
cancellations,
diversions or fuel
sourcing changes.
While the likelihood
is considered
reasonably possible,
preventive measures
are in place.
E2 - Pollution
ESRS E2 –
POLLUTION OF
AIR
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
The impact is
negative, actual.
Negative actual
impact through non-
CO₂ air pollutants
and aircraft noise
affecting local air
quality and noise
exposure levels,
particularly for
communities living
near airports.
Livelihoods and
human health may
be marginally
affected. Impacts
occur across multiple
regions and are
difficult to fully
reverse.
Aircraft operations
generate non-CO₂
emissions and noise,
particularly during
take-off, landing and
ground operations.
Increasing regulatory
scrutiny and
stakeholder
expectations are
expected to
continue. Over time,
fleet renewal and
technological
improvements are
expected to reduce
noise and air
pollutant intensity
per flight.
Wizz Air integrates
noise and air
pollution reduction
into its fleet and
sustainability
strategy by operating
one of the youngest
fleets in Europe and
acquiring next-
generation aircraft
with improved noise
and emissions
performance. All
aircraft comply with
ICAO Chapter 4 noise
standards, with most
already meeting the
more stringent
Chapter 14 standard
and full compliance
expected by 2029.
Progress is
continuously
monitored through
fleet planning,
manufacturer
engagement and
regulatory oversight.
Currently, pollution
mitigation
requirements have
limited direct impact
on operating costs.
Over the medium
and long term,
mitigation is
expected to require
higher capital
expenditure due to
the acquisition of
newer, quieter and
more efficient
aircraft, which may
increase aircraft
acquisition costs but
support long-term
operational
efficiency.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 205
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
SOCIAL
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
S1 - Own workforce
ESRS S1 - SECURE
EMPLOYMENT
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Wizz Air is
committed to
providing secure
employment through
comprehensive,
indefinite-term
contracts and
enhanced employee
support
programmes. Our
operations create
direct and indirect
job opportunities,
from pilots and cabin
crew to ground staff
and maintenance
personnel,
contributing to job
growth in the
countries where we
operate.
Wizz Air’s continued
growth supports
direct job creation
and long-term
employment
opportunities across
operational and
corporate roles.
Expansion of internal
capabilities and
recruitment
programmes support
workforce stability.
Employee support
initiatives provide
additional financial
and wellbeing
security.
No change planned.
No significant
financial impact.
ESRS S1 - SECURE
EMPLOYMENT
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Positive actual social
impact through
employment creation
and income
opportunities across
the aviation
ecosystem and local
labour markets.
Growth in operations
supports continued
demand for value
chain workforce
services and
employment
opportunities across
operational partners.
Expansion of
operations may
further support job
creation across the
aviation ecosystem.
No change planned.
No direct material
financial effects are
identified for Wizz Air
beyond normal
operational and
supplier cost
structures.
ESRS S1 - HEALTH
AND SAFETY
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Aviation operations
involve specific
working
environments that
may present
occupational health
and safety
challenges, including
fatigue management,
exposure to noise,
temperature
variations and
operational stress
factors. These
impacts are primarily
relevant to specific
operational and
technical employee
groups.
Occupational health
and safety
considerations are
inherent to aviation
operations. With
appropriate
management and
monitoring, risks are
mitigated; however,
without effective
controls they could
lead to injuries,
health issues or
operational
disruption.
Wizz Air manages
occupational health
and safety through
structured health
monitoring
programmes, regular
medical
examinations, safety
procedures, training
and employee
wellbeing initiatives.
Employee Assistance
Programmes support
mental health and
crisis situations.
Performance is
monitored
continuously through
health and safety
governance,
operational risk
monitoring and
internal review
processes.
Occupational health
and safety mainly
involves ongoing
costs for training,
monitoring,
compliance and
employee wellbeing
programmes. Since
we already have
strong preventive
measures in place,
current financial
impacts are low.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 206
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS S1 -
TRAINING AND
SKILLS
DEVELOPMENT
Positive impact
Time horizon:
Medium
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
The impact is
positive, and actual.
At Wizz Air we are
dedicated to
recruiting top talent
and providing them
with essential tools,
offering dynamic
development
opportunities
through a specially
tailored programme
for all levels within
the organisation.
Wizz Air provides
structured training
programmes through
dedicated training
facilities, regulatory
training programmes
and development
initiatives across
operational and
corporate functions.
Continued
investment in
training and
onboarding supports
workforce capability
and talent
development as
operations grow.
No change planned.
Training and
development
programmes
represent ongoing
operational
expenditure and
strategic workforce
investment. These
investments support
operational
performance,
workforce capability
and long-term talent
availability, with
expected benefits
through productivity,
operational safety
and employee
retention.
ESRS S1 -
TRAINING AND
SKILLS
DEVELOPMENT
Risk
Time horizon: short
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Primarily financial
and operational risk.
Insufficient
workforce skills or
capability gaps may
affect service quality,
operational reliability
and safety
performance, and
may affect employee
workload and stress
levels.
Aviation operations
require continuous
regulatory and
technical
competence.
Workforce capability
gaps or higher
turnover may require
increased training
intensity and
recruitment activity.
Without effective
training and
workforce planning,
skills shortages could
affect operational
performance and
competitiveness.
Wizz Air mitigates
skills risks through
structured training
programmes,
training-to-
proficiency
standards,
onboarding
programmes,
recurrent training
and workforce
planning.
Training and
workforce capability
programmes
represent ongoing
operational
expenditure. Skills
gaps or higher
turnover could
increase recruitment,
training and
onboarding costs.
Continued
investment in
training is expected
as part of normal
operational and
workforce planning
expenditure.
ESRS S1 -
TRAINING AND
SKILLS
DEVELOPMENT
(skills gap risk due to
disruption)
Risk
Time horizon: short
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Primarily financial
and operational risk.
Training disruption
may affect crew
availability,
scheduling flexibility
and operational
continuity,
potentially leading to
delays, cancellations
or reduced capacity
utilisation.
Aviation operations
depend on
continuous training
and certification
processes. Disruption
in training capacity,
simulator access,
training provider
availability or
workforce availability
may affect
operational flexibility
and scheduling
reliability,
particularly during
periods of
operational growth.
Wizz Air manages
training continuity
through workforce
planning, structured
training scheduling,
coordination with
training providers
and oversight of
training systems.
The Company also
works with external
training partners and
maintains internal
training capability to
support operational
continuity.
Training disruption
may lead to short-
term operational
inefficiencies,
increased operating
costs and potential
revenue constraints
if crew certification
availability limits
aircraft utilisation.
Preventive workforce
and training planning
measures are in
place to mitigate
potential financial
exposure.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 207
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS S1 –
DIVERSITY
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Wizz Air's approach
to diversity and
inclusion aligns with
its mission to make
air travel affordable
to all. The airline
expects its workforce
to follow its diversity
and inclusion
principles.
Wizz Air maintains
policies and
procedures
supporting diversity
and equal
opportunity and
monitors workforce
diversity indicators.
Continued focus on
inclusive
recruitment,
development
opportunities and fair
treatment is
expected to support
workforce
satisfaction and
organisational
performance.
No change planned.
No significant
financial impact.
S2 - Workers in the value chain
ESRS S2 - SECURE
EMPLOYMENT
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The Risk impact is
concentrated in our
upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Potential social and
financial risk where
supplier non-
compliance with
labour laws or fair
employment
practices could affect
worker job security
and create
reputational or
compliance exposure
for Wizz Air.
Supplier labour non-
compliance incidents
could lead to
reputational impact,
stakeholder scrutiny
or contractual and
operational
challenges.
Wizz Air only
partners with
suppliers who share
our values and are
expected to comply
with our Supplier
Code of Conduct.
Wizz Air requires its
partners to comply
with ethical business
practices, social and
labour standards,
and legal
compliance.
Although Wizz Air
only partners with
suppliers who share
our values and are
expected to comply
with our Supplier
Code of Conduct,
risks can still arise
on the supplier side,
such as improper
treatment of workers
or non-compliance
with laws. Even with
an immediate
contract termination,
these issues may
slightly affect Wizz
Air's market activity,
potentially leading to
a bad reputation,
reduced market
demand, and
financial
consequence.
ESRS S2 -
ADEQUATE WAGES
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Potential social and
financial risk where
inadequate
compensation
practices at suppliers
could lead to labour
disputes,
reputational
exposure or
compliance-related
risks.
Wage-related labour
disputes or
regulatory non-
compliance at
suppliers could lead
to reputational
exposure, supplier
instability or
operational
disruption.
Wizz Air addresses
these risks through
Supplier Code of
Conduct
requirements,
supplier onboarding
and risk-based
supplier review
processes. Labour
standard
expectations are
integrated into
supplier governance
and procurement
processes.
Although Wizz Air
only partners with
suppliers who share
our values and are
expected to comply
with our Supplier
Code of Conduct,
risks can still arise
on the supplier side,
such as improper
treatment of workers
or non-compliance
with laws. Even with
an immediate
contract termination,
these issues may
slightly affect Wizz
Air's market activity,
potentially leading to
a bad reputation,
reduced market
demand, and
financial
consequence.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 208
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS S2 - HEALTH
AND SAFETY
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Potential negative
social impact where
working conditions,
fatigue management
and grievance
mechanisms are
primarily managed
by third-party
providers. As a
procuring airline,
Wizz Air has limited
direct influence over
day-to-day workforce
management but
may influence
expectations through
supplier selection,
contractual
requirements and
engagement.
Flight operations rely
on specialised
external technical
providers.
Differences in
provider health and
safety practices,
workforce
management or
operational pressure
could contribute to
workforce fatigue or
safety risk exposure
in parts of the value
chain.
Wizz Air addresses
these risks through
supplier selection,
contractual
requirements,
Supplier Code of
Conduct expectations
and engagement
with critical technical
partners.
Performance is
reviewed through
procurement
processes, safety
governance and risk
oversight structures.
Potential supplier
workforce or safety
issues could result in
operational
disruption, supplier
replacement costs or
contractual
management costs.
These risks are
managed through
normal supplier
management and
operational risk
processes and are
not expected to
result in standalone
material financial
impacts under
normal operating
conditions.
ESRS S2 - SOCIAL
DIALOGUE
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Potential financial
and social risk where
inadequate social
dialogue, labour
practices or
grievance
mechanisms at
suppliers could lead
to workforce
disputes, operational
disruption or
reputational
exposure. As a
procuring airline,
Wizz Air has limited
direct influence over
internal workforce
representation
structures but may
influence
expectations through
supplier governance
and engagement.
Failure of suppliers to
maintain appropriate
labour standards,
worker engagement
mechanisms or
ethical conduct could
lead to supply chain
disruption,
contractual issues or
reputational
exposure.
Wizz Air addresses
these risks through
Supplier Code of
Conduct
requirements and
risk-based supplier
review processes.
Critical and high-
value suppliers are
subject to enhanced
review and
monitoring through
procurement
governance and
internal oversight
structures.
Currently, no
material direct
financial impacts
have been identified.
However, inadequate
social dialogue or
labour governance at
supplier level could
lead to operational
disruption,
compliance-related
costs, contractual
impacts or
reputational
exposure over time.
S4 - Consumers and end-users
ESRS S4 -
FREEDOM OF
EXPRESSION
( complaints
management)
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations
and downstream
value chain.
Positive social impact
by providing
consumers with
accessible channels
to express feedback,
raise concerns and
seek resolution.
Effective complaints
management
supports consumer
trust, transparency
and service
accessibility.
Wizz Air has
consumer complaints
management
processes and
customer support
channels in place
that are designed to
enable timely
feedback handling
and issue resolution.
Continued
digitalisation and
process
improvements are
expected to further
support accessibility
and responsiveness.
Consumer feedback
and complaints
processes are
managed through
customer service
operations, customer
experience functions
and internal
monitoring
processes. Customer
feedback and service
performance are
reviewed
continuously to
support service
improvements and
consumer
communication
quality.
No significant
financial impact.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 209
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS S4 - HEALTH
AND SAFETY OF
PASSENGERS
(accidents)
Negative Impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Potential negative
social impact where
aviation accidents or
serious safety
incidents could result
in passenger injury
or long-term health
impacts. Aviation
operations are highly
regulated and
subject to strict
operational and
technical safety
standards.
Despite strict
regulatory
compliance, safety
management
systems and
operational controls,
aviation operations
inherently carry
residual safety risks.
Unforeseen
operational, technical
or external factors
could result in safety
incidents. Regulatory
and industry focus on
passenger safety is
expected to remain
high.
At Wizz Air, safety is
of the utmost
importance. Wizz Air
manages passenger
safety through
comprehensive
Safety Management
Systems, regulatory
compliance,
operational training,
maintenance
standards and
continuous safety
monitoring. Safety
performance is
overseen through
executive
management, safety
governance
structures and
regulatory oversight.
Safety incidents
could result in
operational
disruption, liability or
insurance-related
costs and
reputational impacts.
Due to strict
regulatory
frameworks and
safety management
systems, such events
are considered to
have a low likelihood
but a potentially high
impact.
ESRS S4 - ACCESS
TO QUALITY
INFORMATION
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Potential social and
financial risk where
inaccurate or
incomplete consumer
information could
affect consumer
decision-making and
lead to customer
dissatisfaction or
claims.
Increasing regulatory
and consumer
expectations require
accurate, transparent
and timely consumer
information. Failures
in information
accuracy could result
in compensation
claims, regulatory
scrutiny or
reputational
exposure.
Wizz Air manages
these risks through
legal review,
compliance
processes, marketing
and commercial
governance as well
as customer
communication
controls.
Inaccurate or
delayed consumer
information could
result in
compensation costs,
regulatory penalties,
increased customer
service costs and
reputational impacts,
potentially affecting
demand and
customer acquisition
costs.
ESRS S4 - HEALTH
AND SAFETY OF
PASSENGERS
( compliance risk)
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Potential social and
financial risk where
safety or regulatory
non-compliance
could lead to safety
incidents, affecting
passenger health and
safety and consumer
trust. Aviation
operations are
subject to strict
regulatory and
technical safety
standards.
Aviation safety
remains subject to
continuous
regulatory oversight
and technical
monitoring. Non-
compliance at
operational or
supplier level could
lead to operational
disruption,
regulatory action or
reputational
exposure.
At Wizz Air, safety is
of the utmost
importance. Wizz Air
manages these risks
through Safety
Management
Systems, regulatory
compliance
monitoring, supplier
qualification and
oversight as well as
continuous safety
performance
monitoring.
Safety or regulatory
non-compliance
could result in
operational
disruption,
regulatory penalties,
liability costs or
reputational impacts.
Due to strict safety
governance and
regulatory oversight,
such events are
considered to have a
low likelihood but
potentially high
impact.
ESRS S4 - ACCESS
TO PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES, AND
INFORMATION
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Wizz Air is
committed to making
travel more
affordable for
everyone. The highly
efficient operational
framework allows us
to provide affordable,
safe and reliable air
travel to more and
more people every
day.
By providing air
travel at an
affordable price, Wizz
Air connects people
from diverse
backgrounds. Wizz
Air’s low-cost
operating model and
transparent pricing
structure support
broader access to air
travel. Ongoing
service
improvements,
digitalisation and
accessibility
measures are
expected to further
support access to
services and reduce
cost and service
barriers.
Accessibility and
affordability are
embedded in Wizz
Air’s business model
and customer
experience strategy.
Customer feedback,
accessibility needs
and service
performance
indicators are
monitored to support
continuous
improvement of
access and service
usability.
No significant
financial impact.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 210
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS S4 –
RESPONSIBLE
MARKETING
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Potential social and
financial risk where
misleading or unclear
marketing
communication could
affect consumer
trust, decision-
making and brand
credibility.
Increasing regulatory
scrutiny and
stakeholder
expectations
regarding
sustainability claims
increase the
importance of
transparent and
evidence-based
communication.
Allegations of
misleading marketing
could result in
reputational
exposure, legal
claims or regulatory
scrutiny.
Wizz Air prioritises
responsible and
ethical marketing by
ensuring that
consumer-facing
information is
accurate, timely and
evidence-based. The
Company applies
internal review, legal
oversight and
marketing
governance
processes to ensure
that claims and
product information
are truthful,
transparent and not
misleading.
Compliance and
communication
practices are
monitored on an
ongoing basis to
support regulatory
alignment and
consumer trust.
Miscommunication
and greenwashing
can lead to
reputational and
financial losses. Wizz
Air has already
introduced
sustainability
practices, while
guidelines and
policies related to
marketing and
communications
have been
established.
ESRS S4 – DATA
PRIVACY
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Potential social and
financial risk where
cyber incidents or
data protection
failures could result
in unauthorised
access to personal
data, affecting
consumer privacy
rights and trust.
Data protection and
cybersecurity risks
remain dynamic due
to evolving threat
landscapes and
regulatory
expectations. Data
incidents could lead
to regulatory
investigation,
customer claims or
reputational
exposure.
Wizz Air manages
these risks through
cybersecurity
controls, data
protection
governance, system
monitoring and
Board-level
oversight. Risk
monitoring is
performed
continuously through
IT security and data
protection functions.
Data privacy
breaches could result
in regulatory fines,
legal costs, customer
remediation costs
and reputational
impacts. These risks
are actively
monitored and
mitigated through
cybersecurity and
data protection
controls.
ESRS S4 –
SECURITY OF A
PERSON
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Potential social and
financial risk where
failure to comply
with safety or
security regulations
could affect
passenger safety,
consumer trust and
operational
continuity. Aviation
operations are
subject to strict
regulatory and
technical safety
frameworks.
Aviation safety and
security
requirements remain
subject to continuous
regulatory
development and
oversight. Non-
compliance could
lead to operational
restrictions,
regulatory action or
reputational
exposure.
Wizz Air manages
these risks through
Safety Management
Systems, compliance
monitoring
programmes,
operational training
and continuous
regulatory oversight.
Safety governance is
embedded across
operational and
executive
management
structures.
Safety or regulatory
non-compliance
could result in
operational
disruption,
regulatory penalties,
liability costs and
reputational impacts.
Due to strong safety
governance and
regulatory oversight,
such events are
considered to have a
low likelihood but
potentially high
impact.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 211
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
GOVERNANCE
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
G1 - Business conduct
ESRS G1 -
CORPORATE
CULTURE
Positive impact
Time horizon:
Medium
The material risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Wizz Air’s Board of
Directors and the
entire workforce are
expected to act with
integrity and in
accordance with all
applicable laws and
regulations at all
times. The ethics and
integrity of Wizz Air
have a far-reaching
and positive impact
on society by
fostering trust,
promoting
responsible
practices, addressing
social and
environmental
challenges, and
contributing to
economic growth and
development.
Through the
application of its
Supplier Code of
Conduct and
business ethics
framework, Wizz Air
seeks to promote
responsible conduct
among downstream
partners. These
standards may
contribute to
improved service
quality, transparency
and fair treatment
practices beyond the
Company’s direct
operations.
Ethical conduct
expectations are
embedded in Wizz
Air’s governance
framework and
Supplier Code of
Conduct. Partner
selection, onboarding
and monitoring
processes
incorporate
compliance with
business ethics
standards.
A lack of ethics,
integrity and
independence can
increase the
likelihood of financial
risks arising from
misconduct, legal
issues and damaged
relationships with
stakeholders.
However, due to
Wizz Air’s robust
internal risk
management,
compliance
processes and quality
assurance measures,
the likelihood of such
financial costs
occurring is very low.
ESRS G1 -
CORPORATE
CULTURE
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Negative governance
impact, where
misconduct, lack of
integrity or
regulatory breaches
may affect
stakeholder trust,
employee morale
and corporate
reputation.
Non-compliance with
competition law,
reporting obligations
or other regulatory
frameworks may
result in
investigations, fines
or reputational
exposure.
Wizz Air promotes a
culture of integrity
through the Policy of
Good Conduct,
compliance
frameworks, internal
controls and legal
oversight. Ethical
alignment with
partners and
transparency in
financial and non-
financial reporting
are regularly
reviewed.
Potential financial
effects include
regulatory fines,
litigation costs,
reputational damage
and operational
disruption.
Governance
frameworks are
designed to mitigate
these risks through
structured oversight
and compliance
processes.
ESRS G1 -
PROTECTION OF
WHISTLEBLOWERS
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Potential negative
social impact, where
employees may
experience
psychological,
professional or
fairness-related harm
if reporting
mechanisms are
ineffective or if
retaliation occurs.
This could also
discourage disclosure
of misconduct and
weaken
organisational
integrity.
In the absence of
trusted reporting
mechanisms,
unresolved
misconduct and
workplace stress
could arise.
Regulatory
expectations
regarding
whistleblower
protection and
internal reporting
safeguards remain
high.
Wizz Air operates
whistleblowing and
reporting
mechanisms
designed to enable
confidential and
anonymous reporting
of concerns. Policies
governing non-
retaliation,
confidentiality and
misconduct reporting
are embedded in the
Policy of Good
Conduct and
Whistleblowing
Policy. The
effectiveness of
these mechanisms is
overseen by Legal,
Internal Audit and
relevant governance
functions.
Failures in
whistleblower
protection could lead
to legal claims,
regulatory scrutiny,
reputational damage
or internal
investigation costs.
Governance controls
are designed to
mitigate these risks
through structured
oversight and
monitoring
processes.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 212
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS G1 -
POLITICAL
ENGAGEMENT
Negative impact
Time horizon:
Medium
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Potential governance
and societal impact
where non-
transparent or
politically aligned
engagement could
affect public trust,
regulatory fairness
and stakeholder
confidence.
Increasing scrutiny
of corporate political
engagement
heightens
expectations for
transparency and
neutrality. Perceived
misalignment or
insufficient disclosure
could result in
reputational
exposure or
regulatory attention.
Wizz Air maintains
political neutrality in
sponsorship and
communication
activities and at the
same time commits
to transparent and
ethical political
engagement and is
registered in the EU
Transparency
Register.
Engagement
activities are
governed by internal
policies, including the
Corporate Political
Engagement Policy,
and are overseen by
relevant governance
functions.
Inadequate
transparency in
political engagement
could lead to
reputational impacts,
regulatory scrutiny
or stakeholder trust
erosion, potentially
affecting market
perception and
investor confidence.
Existing governance
controls are in place
to mitigate these
risks through defined
policies, monitoring
and oversight
mechanisms.
ESRS G1 -
MANAGEMENT OF
RELATIONSHIPS
WITH SUPPLIERS
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
upstream and
downstream value
chain.
Governance and
financial risk, where
supplier misconduct,
contractual non-
compliance or data
protection incidents
may affect
operational
continuity, customer
trust and regulatory
compliance.
Supplier non-
compliance may
result in contractual
disputes, operational
disruption or
reputational
exposure. Data
protection incidents
involving partners
may create
regulatory or
financial
consequences.
Wizz Air manages
supplier-related risks
through the Supplier
Code of Conduct,
Sustainable
Procurement Policy,
contractual
safeguards, supplier
screening and cross-
functional monitoring
involving all relevant
departments.
Although Wizz Air is
committed to
partnering only with
suppliers who share
our commitments to
environmental
sustainability,
commercial
sustainability, ethical
business practices
and data protection,
and are expected to
comply with our
Supplier Code of
Conduct, risks can
still arise if a supplier
inadvertently or
misleadingly fails to
comply with our
regulations; this can
pose financial risks.
ESRS G1 -
CORRUPTION AND
BRIBERY
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Potential negative
governance and
societal impact,
where corruption or
bribery could
undermine market
integrity, fair
competition and
stakeholder trust.
In the absence of
effective anti-
corruption controls,
business operations
may be exposed to
misconduct, conflicts
of interest or
unethical practices.
Regulatory
enforcement and
stakeholder
expectations
regarding anti-
corruption
compliance remain
strong.
Wizz Air applies Anti-
Corruption, Anti-
Fraud and Code of
Conduct policies,
supported by
training, monitoring
and whistleblowing
mechanisms.
Internal Audit and
Legal functions
oversee compliance,
conflict of interest
management and
prevention activities.
Corruption-related
incidents could result
in regulatory
penalties, contractual
consequences, legal
costs, reputational
damage and
operational
disruption.
Preventive controls
reduce likelihood but
cannot entirely
eliminate exposure.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 213
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS G1 -
CORRUPTION AND
BRIBERY
(Incidents)
Negative impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Potential negative
governance impact,
where corruption or
bribery incidents
may undermine
ethical business
conduct, stakeholder
trust and fair market
practices.
While no systemic
incidents are
identified, isolated
cases could lead to
reputational
exposure, regulatory
scrutiny and internal
disciplinary
measures. The
Company monitors
conflict-of-interest
risks and compliance
through established
internal procedures
and audit
mechanisms.
Wizz Air addresses
corruption and
bribery risks through
its Anti-Corruption
Policy, Code of
Conduct, internal
audit oversight and
conflict-of-interest
monitoring
processes. These
risks are managed
through established
governance
frameworks, internal
controls and ongoing
oversight.
Incidents could result
in legal expenses,
regulatory penalties,
reputational impacts
and potential loss of
business
opportunities,
although preventive
controls aim to
reduce financial
exposure.
ESRS G1 -
MANAGEMENT OF
THE GOVERNING
BODY
Risk
Time horizon:
Medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Governance
arrangements,
including board
composition and
decision-making
structures, may
influence investment
attractiveness.
Perceived
weaknesses or
misalignment with
investor expectations
could affect market
confidence or cost of
capital.
Wizz Air’s Board of
Directors and
workforce are
expected to act with
integrity and comply
with all laws and
regulations. While a
lack of ethics and
integrity can lead to
financial risks from
misconduct and legal
issues, our internal
risk and compliance
processes minimise
this likelihood.
Effective
management of the
governing bodies
impacts corporate
culture and investor
confidence.
Governance practices
are overseen by the
Board.
The Company
maintains defined
governance policies
(e.g. Share Dealing
Policy) and engages
with investors
through structured
Investor Relations
processes.
Wizz Air is not party
to any third-party
collective bargaining
agreements which
some investors may
perceive as a
potential risk. Wizz
Air’s approach to
employee
engagement is one
of innovative direct
dialogue, which is
the most effective
way to safeguard
and promote: (i) the
right to freedom of
expression; (ii) the
right to obtain or
impart information
necessary to make
an informed choice
on matters relevant
to the workplace;
and (iii) the right to
protection against
interference with
privacy, family,
home,
correspondence or
reputation. Our
approach is based on
cooperation by
relying on face-to-
face interaction and
communication
through innovative
technologies. Our
approach offers a
modern alternative
to outdated third-
party practices. We
rely on our People
Council for
management-
employee discussions
and have an
independent Board
member overseeing
employee
engagement.
Feedback is regularly
shared with the
Board and translated
into actions on
remuneration and
work-life balance.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 214
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS G ENTITY-
SPECIFIC -
CYBERSECURITY
AND DATA
PROTECTION (Data
leak)
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations.
Negative governance
and social impact,
where unauthorised
access to sensitive
personal or
operational data may
affect customers,
employees and
business partners,
potentially leading to
identity misuse,
fraud or loss of trust.
A data breach could
trigger regulatory
investigations, legal
claims, fines,
reputational harm
and possible revenue
loss. As systems
become more
interconnected,
maintaining strong
cyber resilience is
increasingly
important. Misuse of
leaked data could
also create additional
financial or
operational impacts.
Wizz Air manages
data protection risks
through structured
cybersecurity
governance,
continuous
monitoring,
penetration testing,
access controls,
vulnerability
management and
GDPR oversight. The
IT Operations and
Data Protection
teams supervise
these activities, with
regular reporting to
management and the
Board.
Possible financial
impacts include
regulatory fines,
legal costs, customer
compensation,
remediation
expenses and
reputational damage
that could affect
demand. Wizz Air
applies strong
monitoring and
preventive controls
to reduce exposure
as effectively as
possible, while
continuing to
enhance
cybersecurity
measures.
ESRS G ENTITY-
SPECIFIC -
CYBERSECURITY
AND DATA
PROTECTION
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations.
Positive governance
and social impact
through the secure
handling of personal
data, protecting
customers and
employees and
supporting
operational
continuity.
Cybersecurity, data
protection and
overall security are
crucial aspects of
Wizz Air's operations
and are areas that
the Board of
Directors monitors
closely and regularly.
Wizz Air complies
with EU standards
such as the General
Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR)
as well as with
relevant international
and national
regulations and
guidelines.
Responsible and
ethical conduct,
along with
advancements in
data protection,
ensures that the
personal data of Wizz
Air employees and
customers is
managed securely.
Wizz Air maintains
structured
cybersecurity
governance,
including IT security
testing, access
controls, patch
management,
disaster recovery
audits and legal
oversight of GDPR
compliance.
Continuous
monitoring and
system
enhancements
support operational
resilience.
Effective
cybersecurity
reduces exposure to
regulatory fines,
litigation costs,
operational
disruption and
reputational damage
that could otherwise
arise from data
breaches or system
failures.
ESRS G ENTITY-
SPECIFIC –
CYBERSECURITY
AND DATA
PROTECTION
(cyber attack /
platform / scheduling
failure)
Risk
Time horizon: Short
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations and
upstream/
downstream value
chain.
Potential financial
and operational
impact affecting
passengers,
employees and
partners through
flight disruptions,
booking failures,
crew misallocation
and reduced service
availability.
A failure or
cyberattack on core
systems (ticketing,
crew management,
scheduling,
operational control)
could result in
immediate business
interruption, revenue
blockage, network-
wide cancellations,
compensation
exposure and
customer
dissatisfaction.
Increasing
digitalisation and
interconnectivity
heighten dependency
on system resilience.
Wizz Air manages
digital resilience
through continuous
cybersecurity
monitoring,
penetration testing,
access control
management,
disaster recovery
planning, system
redundancy, vendor
oversight and GDPR
governance. Critical
IT infrastructure and
third-party providers
are subject to
regular monitoring
and resilience
testing.
A major system
outage or cyber
incident could lead to
immediate revenue
loss, passenger
compensation costs,
regulatory exposure,
reputational damage
and operational
recovery expenses.
While strong
monitoring and
controls reduce the
probability and
duration of
disruption, digital
operational
continuity remains
critical to revenue
generation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 215
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS standard
and topic
IRO and time
horizon/ Allocation
of value chain
Impact on people
or environment
Current and
anticipated effects
Response and
evaluation time
perspective
Current and
anticipated
financial effects
ESRS G1 –
SUPPLIER
DISRUPTION
Risk
Time horizon: Short
and medium
The risk is
concentrated in our
own operations and
upstream value
chain.
Primarily financial
and operational
impact, with indirect
effects on
passengers through
cancellations,
reduced seat
capacity, schedule
instability and
service degradation.
Disruptions in engine
servicing, spare parts
supply or
OEM‑related
technical issues can
lead to
Aircraft‑ on‑Ground
(AOG) events and
lower fleet utilisation.
Delays in aircraft
delivery or
certification can limit
capacity growth and
network expansion.
Ground handling or
airport logistics
problems may
impact on‑ time
performance and
ancillary revenues.
High dependence on
a few suppliers or a
single provider
increases operational
vulnerability.
Wizz Air manages
supplier‑related risks
through long‑term
agreements with
OEMs and MROs,
ongoing performance
monitoring, strong
contractual
safeguards,
diversification where
possible, and
operational
contingency
planning.
Significant supplier
disruption could
result in grounded
aircraft, reduced seat
capacity, revenue
loss per aircraft day,
increased
compensation and
wet-lease costs,
delayed growth plans
and margin pressure.
While contractual
frameworks and
operational planning
mitigate exposure,
supplier
concentration and
industry-wide
capacity constraints
remain material
operational
dependencies.
ESRS G ENTITY-
SPECIFIC -
COMMUNITY
PROGRAMMES AND
CHARITABLE
SUPPORT
Positive impact
Time horizon: Short
The material impact
is concentrated in
our own operations
and upstream value
chain.
Through the WIZZ
Foundation, Wizz Air
supports many
community
programmes.
Wizz Air provides
crisis support,
charitable activities
through the WIZZ
Foundation and
community-based
initiatives such as
event sponsorships
and donations. These
initiatives enhance
social cohesion and
brand credibility in
local communities.
Community
programmes are
implemented through
structured initiatives
and partnerships,
with oversight from
relevant functions.
The Company
evaluates
opportunities to
extend support
geographically and
functionally over
time.
No significant
financial impact.
[IRO-2] DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ESRS COVERED BY THE UNDERTAKING’S SUSTAINABILITY
STATEMENT
During the preparation of the sustainability report, the list of disclosure requirements based on the results of
the double materiality assessment will be presented in the ESRS Content Index at the end of this report,
starting on page 296, while the list of datapoints derived from other EU regulations can be found on page
Topics identified as non-material through the double materiality assessment are considered less significant
for the Company at this stage. These topics are subject to ongoing monitoring and are managed where
relevant to ensure compliance with applicable requirements and regulations. Please see page 199 for the use
of thresholds and the methodology applied to identify material information to be reported.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 216
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Optimized for Today. Mindful of Tomorrow. (2).png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 217
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
Disclosures Pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation)
Due to ongoing regulatory developments and uncertainties surrounding the implementation of the EU
Taxonomy framework, especially the application of the “Do No Significant Harm” criteria, we have opted not
to include the EU Taxonomy disclosure in our current annual report. We recognise the importance of
alignment with evolving EU regulations and are actively monitoring and working on the progress of their
implementation. Once Wizz Air Holdings Plc is fully in scope and the regulatory landscape is clarified, we will
incorporate it in future reports to ensure full transparency and compliance.
E1 - Climate Change
[GOV-3] INTEGRATION OF SUSTAINABILITY-RELATED PERFORMANCE IN INCENTIVE SCHEMES
Detailed information related to the integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes is
presented in the Governance chapter, in the [GOV-3] subchapter starting on page 190, and in the [E1-4]
subchapter on page 235.
[ SBM-3] MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH STRATEGY
AND BUSINESS MODEL
Wizz Air’s climate-related governance, risk management, and scenario analysis are consistent with the
recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Detailed information is
provided in the TCFD section of this report. No separate ESRS-specific resilience analysis has been
performed beyond the TCFD-consistent assessment.
Detailed information on the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities in the environmental pillar is
presented in the chapter on impact, risk and opportunity management: disclosures on the double materiality
assessment, subsection [SBM-3], starting on page 201.
[IRO-1] DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSES TO IDENTIFY AND ASSESS MATERIAL CLIMATE-RELATED
IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities
Wizz Air identifies climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities through its formal double materiality
assessment (DMA), conducted with reference to ESRS requirements. As part of this process, both climate
change mitigation and climate change adaptation were assessed from an impact and financial materiality
perspective across short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. The assessment involved relevant internal
subject-matter experts and considered stakeholder input. The results were reviewed and validated by senior
management and the Board.
In relation to climate change mitigation, Wizz Air assesses transition risks and opportunities arising from
regulatory developments, carbon pricing mechanisms, technological change, market dynamics and evolving
stakeholder expectations. These are evaluated through Wizz Air’s TCFD-consistent climate scenario analysis
and are integrated into the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework, considering potential financial
and strategic impacts under different transition pathways.
In relation to climate change adaptation, Wizz Air assesses exposure to physical climate risks across its own
operations and along the value chain. This includes identification of acute risks, such as extreme weather
events, and chronic risks, such as long-term changes in temperature and weather patterns. The assessment
considers operational locations, infrastructure exposure, supply chain dependencies and potential business
disruption.
Climate-related risks and opportunities are monitored through the ERM framework and embedded into
strategic planning. Oversight is exercised at management and Board level. Further detail on governance and
scenario analysis is provided in the TCFD section of this report below.
TCFD-based climate risk analysis
As an airline, we recognise our environmental impact and the aviation industry’s objective to achieve
decarbonisation by 2050. We are committed to reducing our environmental impacts while continuing to
provide affordable air travel to our customers and the communities we serve. As our understanding of
climate mitigation continues to evolve, we remain focused on regularly assessing and managing the impacts
of climate change on our operations.
Climate change is recognised as a material risk to Wizz Air, with potential impacts across the short, medium,
and long term. These risks are integrated into our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework, as
detailed in the Annual Report section on Emerging and Principal Risks and Uncertainties. The Audit and Risk
Committee reviews climate-related risks throughout the year as part of its regular assessment of principal
risks, as further outlined in the Annual Report.
Since F21, Wizz Air has reported in line with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related
Financial Disclosures (TCFD). We continuously review and enhance our disclosures in accordance with TCFD
guidance, relevant industry recommendations (such as Eurocontrol’s guidance on risk assessment and
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 218
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
adaptation), and evolving internal sustainability practices. This annual process ensures the inclusion of
relevant, industry-specific metrics, including fleet fuel consumption, the proportion of sustainable aviation
fuels, total emissions, and risk mitigation measures related to fleet modernisation, as well as research and
development initiatives supporting the scale-up of renewable fuel production.
Our disclosures are consistent with the TCFD recommendations, including the all-sector guidance and the
supplemental guidance for non-financial groups within the transportation sector, as well as relevant UK
Listing Rules. In parallel, Wizz Air has initiated preparations for the forthcoming UK Sustainability Reporting
Standards (UK SRS). In F25, Wizz Air completed its first climate transition plan and established a roadmap
for its further development. Progress during the period focused primarily on core decarbonisation levers,
including fleet renewal, the use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), and operational efficiency improvements
(see page 226). Additional measures are being explored, but remain at an early stage and have not yet
made material progress.
Defining qualitative substantive impact for climate-related risks
Wizz Air categorises climate-related risks across three time horizons: short term (0–1 years), medium term
(1–5 years), and long term (5–10 years). This classification is aligned with the Company’s Enterprise Risk
Management (ERM) framework, climate risk assessment
processes, and financial planning cycles. Risks identified
Horizon
Definition
Short
0–1 years
Medium
1–5 years
Long
5–10 years
through scenario analysis are assessed using materiality and
likelihood heatmaps, in accordance with our internal ERM
methodology and risk-ranking framework. This approach
enables a structured evaluation of the potential impacts of
climate-related risks. Risks are considered substantive where
they demonstrate a high impact within any single time horizon
or at least a medium impact consistently across all time
horizons.
To enhance our understanding of potential climate-related impacts, Wizz Air has assessed four global
warming scenarios, evaluating their implications for our business, including our current fleet strategy and
WIZZ500 ambitions. The assessment was supported by external sustainability and climate experts,
strengthening the robustness of our climate risk analysis methodology. The scenarios are aligned with those
developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and represent warming pathways of
approximately 1.5°C, 2°C, 3°C and 4°C. These scenarios were selected to capture a broad range of potential
future outcomes and are grouped into low-emission (well below 1.5°C) and high-emission (3°C to 4°C)
pathways. This analysis supports the identification of both risks and opportunities associated with different
climate trajectories.
The scenario analysis considers key transition risk drivers, including policy and regulation, technological
developments, market and consumer behaviour, and access to green financing. In parallel, it evaluates
physical climate risks such as extreme weather events, rise in sea levels, changing precipitation patterns,
and wildfire exposure. For transition risks, Wizz Air applies the International Energy Agency Net Zero
Emissions by 2050 (NZE) and Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS). For physical risks, the analysis is based on
Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP), including SSP1-RCP1.9, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5, while
acknowledging the inherent uncertainties associated with long-term climate projections.
Scenario
Physical risks
Transition risks
Low-emission
scenario
SSP1-1.9 - SSP1-2.6
(~1.5–2°C)
IEA Net Zero Emissions (NZE) by 2050
High-emission
scenario
SSP3-7.0 - SSP5-8.5
(~3–4°C)
IEA Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS)
Based on a heat-mapping process as part of the qualitative risk assessment, and taking into account the
aforementioned materiality threshold, Wizz Air identified the main climate risks and categorised them
based on Wizz Air’s ERM framework: low impact (accept risk); medium impact (action plan); and high
impact (avoid, reduce or transfer risk).
The quantitative risk assessment was based on Wizz Air’s business projections, current climate legislation
and proposals, as well as up-to-date industry-specific reports and forecasts from EASA, ICAO, IATA and
Climate-ADAPT (Copernicus Climate Data Store) sources. The assessment also included benchmarking the
projections for key variables considering the evolving market conditions in the spring of 2026. As risk
calculations involve assumptions and estimates, and since the financial impact of risks is dynamically
changing, it is crucial for the Company to have effective risk management processes to review and adjust
the financial impact estimations frequently to the changing circumstances or policy environment. 
ERM framework and climate-related risks
For climate-related risks, Wizz Air complements its Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) approach with an
initial qualitative assessment, based on two dimensions: (i) impact (low, medium, high) and (ii) likelihood
(low, medium, high). This assessment results in a risk classification under the TARA (Transfer, Avoid,
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 219
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Reduce, Accept) framework, which supports decision-making on appropriate risk responses, including
whether risks can be accepted, require mitigation through action plans, or should be reduced, avoided or
transferred. The Company and the Board have defined a risk-averse appetite for climate-related risks,
implying that all climate-related risks identified require an associated action plan.
In line with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD),
material climate-related risks are subsequently quantified and incorporated into key financial
assessments, including going concern evaluations, viability planning and asset impairment analyses.
The ERM framework is overseen by the Internal Audit function and operationally managed through
continuous engagement with Management. It provides a comprehensive and structured process covering
both principal and emerging risks across the full scope of the business, including all subsidiaries. The ERM
process reports to the Board’s Audit and Risk Committee and operates on a rolling basis to ensure the
timely identification and assessment of material risks, including those related to climate change. Material
climate-related risks are reviewed by Management and reported to the Audit and Risk Committee and the
Board, ensuring robust governance and oversight. Management maps principal climate-related risks to
defined planning horizons, aligned with short-term (going concern) and medium-term (viability)
timeframes. This alignment enables the Company to assess the potential impacts of climate-related risks
on operational resilience and long-term viability.
Climate-related risks and their significance and mitigation measures
Wizz Air has identified the main climate risks through a heat-mapping process. The tables below describe
the primary physical (acute and chronic) and transitional climate risks, their potential effects on Wizz Air,
and the mitigation strategies and actions implemented by the responsible departments.
The risk assessment tables align with the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management framework, using
colour-coding to indicate risk impact categories. Green signifies a low-risk impact (risk acceptance),
yellow indicates a medium impact (requiring an action plan), and red represents a high impact
(necessitating risk avoidance, reduction or transfer). The visualisation of risk impact over the short,
medium and long term shows how the severity of the same type of risk can change over time,
transitioning from green to yellow or red. As the climate risk assessment is conducted annually, based on
updated scientific forecasts or changing circumstances, the climate risks and their impact ratings are
reviewed and revised as needed.
Overall results and findings
Our comprehensive risk assessment included high-impact risks across all time horizons, as well as those
with at least a medium impact for each timeframe. When considering global warming scenarios, the most
severe potential impacts were taken into account for each risk category, specifically 1.5-2°C for
transitional risks and 3.0-4.0°C for physical risks.
The results of the climate scenario assessment imply that under a high-emissions scenario the Company
would incur revenue loss and increased fuel costs. This is due to physical risks, such as more frequent
and severe weather events, which could disrupt our operations. For instance, extreme weather might
damage infrastructure, cause supply-chain disruptions, and increase the frequency of flight delays or
cancellations. Conversely, in the low-emission scenario, where efforts to reduce emissions are more
successful, the Company would face different challenges, including increased operational costs due to
carbon pricing and offsetting mechanisms, the need to use greater volumes of renewable fuels and the
adoption of disruptive low-carbon technology.
Despite these challenges, Wizz Air considers itself resilient and well-prepared for both low- and high-
emission scenarios, thanks to strategic investments in SAF, its transition to a modern fleet and robust
financial planning. The analysis also suggests that transitional and physical risks are inversely related. If
climate policies prove to be ineffective, this could lead to scenarios of 3°C and 4°C, where physical risks
would become more pronounced. Based on our assessment considering Climate-ADAPT projections, these
physical risks would pose a moderate risk within our defined time horizons, with severe physical impacts
expected after 2050. Conversely, effective regulation and policy implementation would reduce physical
risks but could lead to a significant increase in transition risks, and therefore higher compliance costs for
the Company.
Physical risks – detailed disclosure
The assessment below indicates that no high-impact physical risks were identified within the evaluated
time frame. However, the significance of physical risks increases as we look further into the future (2050
and beyond). While we continuously adapt our operations to changes in temperature and weather
patterns, we anticipate minimal changes over the next decade. If climate policies are ineffective, physical
risks could disrupt operations, markets and supply chains, or cause damage to assets.
The most critical climate-related physical risks identified in this year’s assessment are detailed as follows:
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 220
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Risk type
and estimated
significance
Risk description
Financial impacts
Mitigation measures
More extreme
heatwaves
(acute)
image.png
Extreme heat can impact aircraft
performance and flight operations
because it can reduce efficiency and
limit engine lifecycle, and may result in
rescheduling departures for heavier
aircraft or having to reduce the weight
of the aircraft.
As a result of heatwaves, airports can
also decrease runway capacity due to
the less dense warm air that is able to
damage runway surfaces or taxiways.
In addition, higher temperatures may
increase fire risks associated with fuel
venting, reduce the effectiveness of
noise insulation as residents are more
likely to keep windows open, and create
operational and human resource
challenges, including heat-related strain
on ground handling staff and thermal
discomfort for passengers and
employees.
Disruption of regular
revenue streams and
increased operating
costs
Ongoing climate-scenario
analysis, consistent with the
TCFD framework, allows the
Company to evaluate risks and
implement mitigation strategies
in collaboration with the
Operational and Commercial
teams.
Advancements in forecasting
technologies, which track
historical disruption causes and
locations, will enhance our
operational planning in
response to evolving weather
patterns.
Long-term planning also
considers potential market
change, such as shifting
demand for traditionally warm
destinations due to more
frequent extreme heat days.
Key mitigation measures are
also implemented by Wizz Air’s
airport operator partners,
supported in Europe by the
guidance of the European Plan
for Aviation Safety.
Increase in the
frequency and
magnitude of
wildfires
In the future, wildfires may increasingly
impact travel decisions, leading to more
frequent cancellations and revenue
losses. Attractive summer holiday
destinations could be affected by these
fires, particularly in Southern Europe.
Additionally, wildfire smoke may disrupt
operations by reducing visibility due to
particulate matter, while gusty winds,
turbulence and wind shear can further
impact flight stability, leading to delays
or cancellations. Prolonged exposure to
airborne dust and smoke may also
accelerate corrosion, affecting
airworthiness and increasing
maintenance requirements.
Potential revenue loss
and higher operating
costs due to
disruptions that
cannot be prevented,
avoided or planned
for. 
Ensuring operational readiness
by following established
procedures and policies for
managing disruptions,
including wildfires.
Additionally, advancements in
forecasting technologies, which
track historical disruption
causes and locations better will
enhance our operational
planning in response to wildfire
events.
For wildfire risk, mitigation
measures of airport operators
are essential; in Europe this is
supported by the guidance of
the European Plan for Aviation
Safety.
Increase in
frequency of
more intensive
storms
Severe storms have the potential to
disrupt airspace and airport operations,
cause damage to infrastructure and can
also result in heightened safety risks
due to wind shear and turbulence.
Additionally, they may lead to increased
fuel consumption. Northern, North
Western and Central Europe are likely to
see a rise in severe storms. Meanwhile,
in the Mediterranean, cyclone frequency
may decrease, but their intensity could
increase.
Lost revenue and
increased operating
and fuel costs.
Continuous forecasting and
risk assessment by
Operational and Commercial
teams to ensure operational
preparedness for intense
storms and related asset and
infrastructure damage.
Key mitigation measures are
also implemented by Wizz Air’s
airport operator partners; in
Europe, these are supported by
a regulatory framework
informed by the European Plan
for Aviation Safety.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 221
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Acute flooding
Heavy rainfall and pluvial flooding could
occur across all regions. Flooding has
the potential to harm airport
infrastructure and runways, leading to
reduced capacity, flight delays,
cancellations and financial losses.
Additionally, intense precipitation and
flash floods may become more frequent
at global warming levels exceeding
1.5°C, except in the Mediterranean.
These weather events could disrupt
ground operations and cause damage to
airport facilities, resulting in flight
disruptions.
Lost revenue and
increased operating
costs.
Ensuring operational readiness
by following established
procedures and policies for
managing disruptions,
including flooding.
Continuous forecasting and risk
assessment by Operational and
Commercial teams for flooding
and related disruptions.
Airports’ adaptation plans are
key to flood-risk mitigation; in
Europe, these are developed
within a broader regulatory and
strategic context informed in
part by the European Plan for
Aviation Safety.
Change in
weather
patterns
(general)
Significant changes in weather
phenomena (frequency and intensity)
are likely in the long term (e.g. by 2050
and beyond); however, we assume no
critical change within the next ten years.
Droughts may lead to significant crop
failures, potentially affecting the
availability of feedstocks for sustainable
aviation fuel (SAF) production. Changes
in crosswind patterns at European
airports may increase operational
complexity during take-off and landing,
occasionally rendering runways
unusable and causing delays or
diversions. In addition, shifts in jet
streams can alter flight durations,
increasing travel times for westbound
flights while shortening eastbound
journeys, with implications for
scheduling and fuel planning.
Potential revenue loss
and higher operating
costs due to
disruptions that
cannot be prevented,
avoided or planned
for. 
Ongoing climate-scenario
analysis consistent with the
TCFD framework allows the
Company to evaluate risks and
implement mitigation strategies
in collaboration with the
Operational and Commercial
teams.
Additionally, advancements in
forecasting technologies, which
track historical disruption
causes and locations better, as
well as incorporating changing
crosswind patterns in
scheduling and fuel planning
will enhance our operational
planning in response to evolving
weather patterns.
Chronic change
in temperature
and sea levels
Rising sea levels pose a threat to low-
lying and coastal regions in the long
term (e.g. by 2050 and beyond), as well
as islands, especially at a higher global
warming level. Airports in such areas
could be affected by flooding, potentially
harming airport infrastructure and
runways, leading to reduced capacity,
flight delays and network disruptions.
The temperature rise could also lead to
a shift in destination preferences,
besides the operational risks of acute
heatwaves. We do not expect these
changes to be critical within the next ten
years. 
Lost revenue and
increased operating
costs.
Continuous forecasting and
risk assessment by
Operational and Commercial
teams – incorporating airport
resilience assessment – to
ensure operational
preparedness for flooding and
related disruptions.
Integration of climate-scenario
analysis into business planning
to consider changing customer
demand for routes impacted by
the chronic changes in
temperature in Wizz Air’s
relevant markets.
Image_0.png
Transitional risks – detailed disclosure
▶ Policy – Emissions reduction regulation in general terms
▶ Policy – ETS carbon price increase and decrease in free allowances
▶ Policy – EU ETS Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) regulation and increase in aircraft and
manufacturing costs
▶ Policy – Energy taxation and the introduction of kerosene tax in the EU
▶ Policy – Sustainable aviation fuel mandate
▶ Policy – CORSIA and offsetting
▶ Policy – Uncertainties regarding the changing landscape of ESG reporting obligations
▶ Technology – Disruptive aviation innovation
▶ Technology – Technological feasibility issues of SAF production
▶ Market – High price elasticity of demand
▶ Market – Reduced demand due to increasing number of ESG-conscious customers
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 222
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
▶ Market – Growing green investor sentiment
▶ Liability– Emissions and climate damage litigation
▶ Reputation – Brand reputation
The most critical climate-related transitional risks identified in this year’s assessment are the following:
Risk type
and estimated
significance
Risk description
Financial impacts
Mitigation measures
Emissions-
reduction
regulations
In a 1.5-2°C scenario, Wizz Air
may face strict policies across the
network to reduce emissions.
However, varying national policies
without a standardised approach
bears the risk of non-compliance
due to regulatory complexities.
Decarbonisation efforts, including
fossil fuel taxation, aim to reduce
carbon emissions, but they may
increase operational costs.
Additionally, differing timelines
and reporting requirements as
well as the changing regulatory
environment pose risks to
achieving adequate reductions.
Increased operational costs
and possible penalties in the
medium and long term, in
the event of failure to comply
with the complex set of
requirements in our operating
environment.
Maintain strong emphasis on
evaluating and ensuring
compliance with tax and
regulatory requirements
related to emissions
regulations (this involves
cross-functional coordination
to guarantee a full review
across the organisation).
Additionally, we actively
engage with government
bodies, the European Union,
and other essential
stakeholders to establish a
cohesive approach across
different regions. 
Continuously monitoring the
changing regulatory
environment is also essential.
EU ETS – carbon
price increase
and decrease of
free allowances
In a 1.5-2°C scenario, carbon
price hikes are likely to occur in
the medium and long term.
The EU Emissions Trading System
(EU ETS) is subject to significant
regulatory uncertainty amid high
price volatility due to emerging
geopolitical risks in the spring of
2026. However, our baseline
expectation is that EU ETS will
surpass existing policy mandates
significantly in the long term,
particularly after phase IV (ending
by 2030).
Consequently, operational and
upstream expenses will rise
sharply due to the elevated carbon
prices, resulting in more
substantial costs.
These price increases are
expected due to the gradual
elimination of free carbon
allowances by the EU, with
forecasts indicating that the EU
ETS will exceed current policy
requirements over the long term.
Additional compliance costs
under UK and EU ETS.
Operational costs will
increase due to higher carbon
prices per unit, and the
elimination of free
allowances.
Maintaining an effective
carbon allowance/offset
purchasing strategy to
mitigate price volatility.
To strengthen resilience
against rising carbon prices
and related cost increases,
Wizz Air continuously
forecasts ETS prices and uses
the ETS as an internal carbon
price to support budgeting
and risk management
decisions.
Wizz Air would also rely on
the EU’s SAF-related support
mechanisms, including free
ETS allowances and/or lower
annual carbon cost due to the
use of SAF.
Red.png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 223
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Energy taxation
– introduction of
kerosene tax in
the EU
The EU intends to impose a
mandatory tax on kerosene of
roughly €0.4 per litre, as part of
the ongoing revision of the Energy
Taxation Directive. The proposal
allows Member States to introduce
even higher tax rates under
specific conditions.
Originally planned for 2024, the
approval and implementation have
faced negotiation deadlock in the
EU; however, the approval is
expected later on to ensure
compliance with the EU’s
ambitious climate package, if it
wants to maintain alignment with
1.5-2°C climate pathways. 
New fossil fuel and related
taxes may impact overall
taxation costs in the medium
and long term. The financial
impact would be even higher
if the EU and its Member
States introduced carbon
taxes in parallel, leading to
double taxation.
Continuously and accurately
assessing changes in tax
legislation in Wizz Air’s
network is crucial. Advocacy
measures to ensure a
standardised approach
globally, avoiding double
taxation of emissions – via
carbon pricing and kerosene
and carbon taxes – putting
additional burdens on
operators.
SAF mandates
(ReFuelEU
regulation)
image (14).png
Regulations requiring the use of
SAFs in aviation fuel are already
operational in some countries. A
mandate was also implemented in
the EU in 2025 (mandatory SAF
blend in departing flights: 2% in
2025, 6% in 2030, 20% in 2035
and 70% in 2050 as per the
ReFuelEU aviation regulation),
while similar trends are
anticipated in other regions.
The UK government also
announced SAF targets, the
mandate started in 2025 at 2% of
total UK jet fuel demand,
increasing linearly to 10% in 2030
and then to 22% in 2040.
Higher operational and
upstream costs in the
medium term due to the
increase in minimum SAF
blending volumes in aviation
fuel. Non-compliance and
continued dependence on
fossil fuels could lead to
penalties.
Wizz Air has allocated
resources to advocacy
regarding the book and claim
mechanism.
Wizz Air remained compliant
and submitted the required
data as mandated.
Uncertainties
regarding the
changing
landscape of ESG
reporting
obligations
Compliance with new ESG-related
reporting standards (for example
the EU’s Corporate Sustainability
Reporting Directive – CSRD, and
the UK SRS) will require additional
administrative capacities at
various functions of Wizz Air, and
investments in new processes and
systems may be needed to satisfy
all emerging transparency
requirements. As Wizz Air
operates in different geographic
areas, the new and changing
reporting expectations create
parallel reporting obligations.
Ensuring compliance with
emerging reporting
requirements can increase
administrative costs and tie
up capacity to otherwise
implement strategic and
value-adding transitional
actions for the climate.
Non-compliance with
mandatory reporting
requirements can result in
penalties and reputational
damage.
Competent teams at Wizz Air
are working with various
sustainability and ESG
professionals to ensure
continued compliance with all
relevant transparency
requirements. The relevant
working group has been
established to prepare for
upcoming reporting needs.
A software solution has been
implemented for an improved
ESG supplier risk assessment
and management process,
while further initiatives are in
progress.
floatingImage_8.jpg
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 224
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Disruptive
aviation
innovation
The rate at which low-carbon
technologies are embraced
influences the competitiveness of
airlines, the cost of operations and
the value of assets. Investments
in capital expenditures (CapEx),
research and development (R&D)
and innovation need to strike a
balance between risk and reward,
fostering innovations that are both
sustainable and profitable.
Attracting talent is also essential
for the success of innovation.
Failure to invest in the
appropriate technology, or
investing in unsuitable
technology, can introduce
significant risks, potentially
leading to increased costs
and reduced competitiveness.
Additionally, the inability to
retain and attract talent may
hinder the successful
implementation of new
technologies. 
Wizz Air signed a
Memorandum of
Understanding with Airbus in
2022 to explore the potential
for hydrogen-powered
aircraft operations. We have
also joined the EU’s Alliance
for Zero Emission Aviation
(AZEA) to pave the way for
next-generation sustainable
aircraft. Based on the current
understanding, zero-emission
aircraft large enough to fit
our business model (above
200 seats) are not feasible in
the near future. While we are
waiting for technical
improvements, we continue
to look into opportunities to
accelerate the ramp-up of the
European SAF market – as
the most efficient short-term
tool for the decarbonisation
of the aviation sector.   
Technological
feasibility issues
of SAF
production
image.png
Regarding the technological
feasibility of SAF, forecasts
indicate that even in scenarios
where temperatures exceed 2°C,
the production capacity of SAF
may fall short of meeting the
aviation industry’s demand.
A decade may not provide enough
time to improve the technology
significantly, as demand is
accelerating faster than supply
capacity can currently scale,
resulting in potential supply chain
challenges and penalty charges for
non-compliance with SAF blending
regulations, as well as higher ETS
costs (carbon pricing
mechanisms).
Higher operational and
upstream costs due to the
increase in SAF prices,
amplified by the limited SAF
availability. Since SAF use is
mandatory, suppliers possess
significant bargaining power,
making long-term SAF
purchase agreements more
costly.
An appropriate policy
framework and strategic
investments could ensure a
sufficient supply of SAF in the
medium to long term.
Wizz Air took a significant
step by investing in SAF
companies, firstly Firefly then
CleanJoule, and partnering
with various SAF suppliers via
long-term agreements,
ensuring a reliable long-term
supply chain. Procurement
efforts will continue to focus
on ensuring compliance with
current and future SAF
mandates.
Growing green
investor
sentiment
image.png
In the long term, investors may
begin to withdraw from carbon-
intensive sectors.
Such disinvestment is likely
to result in higher capital
costs for Wizz Air.
A robust environmental
strategy including fleet
renewal with the best
available technology, and fuel
efficiency initiatives.
SAF strategy execution
(including investments in
R&D) to ensure a steady
supply of alternative fuels,
helping to achieve our
targets. Wizz Air is
committed to continued
transparency regarding the
transition planning.
floatingImage_9.jpg
More information on lower-impact transitional risks (not included in the detailed risk table):
▶ CBAM regulation: Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), introduced to reduce the
risk of carbon leakage, imports of carbon-intensive materials such as iron, steel and aluminium will be
subject to carbon pricing linked to the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) from 2026 onwards. While
aircraft are not currently covered directly by the mechanism, manufacturers may face indirect impacts
through increased costs of CBAM-regulated materials used in aircraft production. The transitional phase
of CBAM has already commenced, and its economic and operational impacts are expected to become
increasingly evident over the next five to ten years across different climate transition scenarios.
▶ CORSIA: The CORSIA-related offsetting obligation will result in increased operational and upstream
costs, albeit only in the medium term. However, CORSIA and the EU ETS currently coexist in parallel,
with a partial overlap in international EEA flights. The European Commission will reassess CORSIA in
2026 to determine whether it aligns sufficiently with the Paris Agreement. If not, the EU may extend the
ETS to departing international flights and reduce reliance on CORSIA.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 225
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
▶ Modal shift of short-haul aviation: The transition from aviation to alternative transportation for short-
distance travel is becoming more probable as passenger rail networks expand and EU Member States
implement measures to tax or ban short-haul flights. However, the current legislative initiatives
targeting short-haul aviation, such as the 500km limit in Belgium and the 2.5-hour rail alternative in
France, do not significantly impact Wizz Air’s operations.
▶ Price elasticity of demand: In a strict policy scenario, Wizz Air’s unit costs would rise due to carbon
pricing, SAF and carbon taxes. Despite these increased costs, Wizz Air’s ultra-low-cost model would still
offer more affordable options for customers. Such airlines would also pass on these additional costs to
their customers, resulting in higher fares. Therefore, Wizz Air would maintain its competitive advantage
in terms of affordability.
▶ Reduced demand due to ESG-conscious customers: Wizz Air’s ongoing investment in fleet renewal and
new aircraft technologies ensures the airline remains a leader in emissions efficiency per passenger
kilometre. This commitment makes Wizz Air an attractive choice for travellers who need to fly but wish
to minimise their environmental footprint.
▶ Brand reputation: Our ambitious fleet-renewal plan by 2030, coupled with ongoing advancements in fuel
efficiency projects and our SAF strategy, will enable us to differentiate our brand through demonstrated
leadership and meet public expectations.
▶ Emissions and climate-damage litigation: Due to the carbon-intensive nature of the aviation industry,
the Company may encounter regulatory scrutiny, potentially resulting in liability-related expenses.
Nonetheless, Wizz Air has consistently demonstrated transparency in emissions reporting to both
regulatory authorities and the public.
Quantitative risk analysis
Wizz Air’s qualitative climate risk assessment identified the most critical climate risks for Wizz Air’s
business planning. From the physical and transitional climate risks listed above, the following most critical
risks were selected for the quantitative analysis. The ETS, SAF and kerosene tax-related risks were
chosen because of their high-impact risk rating on the medium and long-term time horizons (excluding
the emission-reduction regulations where clear forecasts on applicable taxes and costs are not available),
while the weather-pattern changes were selected to ensure that physical risks are also reviewed in the
quantitative review:
▶ ETS (carbon price increase);
▶ SAF mandate-related additional fuel cost;
▶ introduction of kerosene tax in the EU; and
▶ weather-pattern changes and their impact on operations (flight cancellation compensations,
disruption costs).
The quantitative risk assessment was conducted using Wizz Air’s latest business projections, current
climate legislation and proposals, and the most recent industry-specific reports and forecasts from EASA,
ICAO, IATA, Climate-ADAPT (Copernicus Climate Data Store) and other reputable third-party sources.
Given that medium-term climate-risk calculations often involve assumptions and estimates, and the
financial impact of these risks is continuously evolving, it is essential for the Company to maintain robust
risk management processes. These processes allow for frequent reviews and adjustments to cost
assessments in response to changing external conditions and policy environments. Therefore, key
variables were compared to market benchmarks, and findings from the quantitative risk assessment were
integrated into Wizz Air’s financial planning processes. This year, we quantified the potential financial
impact of the most critical climate risks up to F31. By focusing on this time horizon, we gained a clearer
understanding of the potential medium-term risks the Company may face.
Complementary disclosures
The detailed results of the F26 quantitative risk assessment will be disclosed in the Company’s upcoming
Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) submission, the public version of which will be available next year. To
note, Wizz Air’s CDP disclosure from 2025 is already public (and also available on the Company’s
sustainability website), including a breakdown of the minimum and maximum financial impact, and
potential impact calculation logic (section C3). This disclosure reflects the results of the F25 assessment.
Wizz Air considers the outcome of the potential financial impact assessment based on future scenarios as
being separate from financial reporting, and as such, complementary information.
Opportunity analysis
Initiatives related to climate change mitigation can often contribute to opportunities for companies. Such
climate-related opportunities will vary based on the industry, sector and level of the organisation in terms
of the status of their decarbonisation roadmap. The following list includes the opportunities identified by
Wizz Air, potentially bringing competitive or cost-related benefits in the short and medium term. Long-
term opportunities, such as those related to zero-emission operations, will be evaluated at a later stage
due to the lack of clarity regarding capital costs, timelines, and the adoption rate of disruptive
technologies.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 226
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Opportunity
Analysis
EU ETS – phasing out
free allowances –
competitive
advantage:
Although the phasing out of free carbon allowances poses a risk, it also offers a competitive
advantage in the short and medium term. Wizz Air’s total free allowances, relative to its emissions,
have been significantly lower than most of its peers in the sector. This grants Wizz Air additional
resilience, as the resulting cost increase will be much smaller compared to many airline competitors
that currently benefit from higher volumes of free allowances.
Sustainable aviation
fuel investments:
Wizz Air invests strategically in research and development (R&D) projects to secure its own sources
of SAF. These investments ensure a reliable supply chain in the longer term, allowing us to meet
future blending mandates effectively. As an example, Firefly (the Company’s first equity
investment) has pioneered an integrated technology pathway for SAF production using sewage
sludge as a feedstock – which is a sustainable and highly abundant source. This proactive approach
to SAF investments ensures a sustainable and resilient fuel supply due to the higher SAF volumes
provided by one producer, at a preferential price. The cost-efficient SAF access is expected to
support our competitive position amid significantly increasing ETS prices. 
Sustainability-
conscious customers:
Wizz Air currently strives (and will continue in the future) towards maintaining the lowest reported
emissions intensity per passenger kilometre, compared to other major airlines in its network.
Additionally, while there are still misconceptions about the ultra-low-cost, low-fare business model,
with the growing transparency on emissions per passenger and per flight, climate change
awareness is projected to shift consumer sentiment to favour ULCC more than traditional airlines.
In terms of a low-carbon strategy, flying more efficient aircraft and maximising the passenger
numbers in the cabin are crucial, and the preferences of climate-focused consumers (who cannot
avoid flying) will shift towards more fuel-efficient flights and airlines. Consequently, this change
could impact traditional airlines negatively, while carriers already efficient would benefit from it.
Industry collaboration
opportunities in
various geographic
areas:
Wizz Air, operating across diverse geographic areas, faces varying legal jurisdictions and climate-
related demands. Within the EU, including Malta and Hungary, and the UK (where the three Wizz
Air airlines are headquartered) and other third countries, the airline encounters a range of
approaches towards achieving net zero emissions and the related decarbonisation strategies. This
exposure allows Wizz Air to learn from diverse technological innovations and national strategies,
leveraging them to its advantage.
Enhanced ESG
supplier risk
assessment and
management
processes:
As a result of new climate-related transparency requirements, Wizz Air is already working on
improving its third-party risk assessment and management approach, with a special focus on ESG
topics, including environmental and climate-related programmes of its business partners and
vendors. Through the enhanced process, the Company will be able to receive more detailed
information on its main suppliers’ environment and climate-related initiatives, which will provide
opportunities for better cooperation in the future. The focused risk assessment will also help the
Company identify potential climate and environmental risks during the tender phase with
prospective service providers.
Regulatory and
capital market
incentives –
competitive
advantage:
Wizz Air’s leading role in the decarbonisation of the aviation industry makes it more resilient to
climate regulation risks than its competitors, and strengthens its capital market position among
green/transition investors. Wizz Air’s favourable risk profile among airlines as regards climate risks
and associated financial risks enhances its standing among traditional investors as well.
[E1-1] TRANSITION PLAN FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Aviation is a key enabler of economic and social development across Europe, supporting GDP growth,
employment, connectivity and tourism. At the same time, the sector must reduce its environmental footprint
in line with the European Union’s climate ambitions. Within this context, Wizz Air recognises its responsibility
as a major European airline and is fully committed to long-term decarbonisation. Our commitment is
reflected in an aspirational decarbonisation roadmap to 2050, focused on measurable carbon intensity
reductions and aligned with evolving EU climate policy and sectoral transition pathways.
Flying Towards Net Zero – our aspirational transition plan towards 2050
Wizz Air’s ultra-low-cost model is built on high aircraft utilisation, strong seat density and disciplined cost
efficiency. These operational characteristics result in lower emissions intensity per passenger kilometre
relative to less efficient operating models. While this structural efficiency does not remove the sector’s
dependence on jet fuel, it provides a strong foundation for carbon intensity reduction within our direct
operational control. The decarbonisation of aviation is an industry-wide transition that depends on the
development and large-scale deployment of enabling technologies, fuel supply and supportive policy
frameworks. The pace of emissions reduction is influenced by the availability and lifecycle performance of
sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), advancements in aircraft and engine technologies, and supportive regulatory
frameworks. While global net-zero commitments are clear, SAF supply remains limited and technological
breakthroughs have progressed more gradually than anticipated.
Therefore, Wizz Air remains realistic about current technology and capabilities, adopting a conservative
approach in our analysis of potential emissions reductions. Our transition plan emphasises realistic carbon
emissions reductions and the feasibility of meeting our near-term intensity reduction targets. At Wizz Air, we
recognise that emissions from the combustion of jet fuel are the most significant component of our GHG
footprint, accounting for approximately 92 per cent of our total Group emissions in F26. Our strategic priority
is to leverage all available measures to reduce these emissions.
1 According to publicly available 2026 emissions‑intensity data and independent benchmarks such as Cirium’s EmeraldSky review, Wizz Air is assessed as one of
the most emissions‑efficient airlines globally and the highest‑ranked in Europe. Wizz Air was also named the world’s most emissions‑efficient airline by Cirium and
received the Sustainable Airline of the Year 2025 award from Airline Economics
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 227
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Wizz Air supports the objectives of the Paris Agreement and the global ambition to limit the increase in
average global temperatures to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. While the Company has established near-
term carbon intensity reduction targets and an aspirational net-zero ambition by 2050, a formal quantitative
assessment of alignment with a 1.5°C scenario, including scenario modelling consistent with recognised
climate pathways (e.g. IEA or IPCC scenarios), has not yet been completed. The Company acknowledges
that further analytical work is required to assess the full compatibility of its GHG emission reduction targets
with a 1.5°C pathway. Wizz Air intends to further develop its methodology in future reporting periods as
data availability, sector-specific guidance and regulatory clarity evolve.
Flights. Fuel. Footprint - Call for radical change
Wizz Air supports the aviation sector’s net-zero ambition. However, the current pace of change across the
industry remains insufficient to align fully with long-term climate objectives. Progress depends on
coordinated advances in aircraft and engine technologies, large-scale SAF production, supportive policy
frameworks and timely infrastructure development. These factors introduce uncertainty regarding the speed
and scale at which absolute emissions reductions can be achieved.
In this context, Wizz Air has established an aspirational decarbonisation roadmap to 2050, supported by
near-term carbon intensity reduction targets (as disclosed under [E1-4] and defined mitigation actions (as
disclosed under [E1-3]. Our transition plan is built on three primary levers:
▶ Flights: Fleet renewal and next-generation aircraft technology
▶ Fuel: The progressive scale-up of SAF
▶ Footprint: Operational efficiency improvements, including airspace and air management modernisation
Scope 1 emissions carbon reduction roadmap
image.png
Flights – Aviation innovation must move faster
In the short term, we recognise new aircraft technology and intra-generational advancements - along with
fleet renewal - as pivotal elements in reducing our Scope 1 emissions. These efforts are complemented by
operational efficiency measures. Wizz Air is committed to investing in cutting-edge aircraft and engine
technology, continuously replacing older models with state-of-the-art aircraft. This strategy has contributed
to maintaining a young and fuel-efficient fleet and one of lowest CO₂ emissions per passenger kilometre
compared to major European airlines. 1 However, to advance decarbonisation efforts further, the future of
aviation hinges on radical innovation. It is crucial to prepare aircraft for SAF blends that exceed the current
regulatory maximum of 50 per cent. Substantial government support for research and development is
essential to drive progress in engine and aircraft technology.
Looking beyond 2030, the Company will continue to integrate sustainability considerations into our fleet
expansion plans and invest in next-generation advancements in aircraft design. Our dedicated fuel and
operational efficiency team is actively engaged in designing and implementing fuel efficiency initiatives
across the business, positioning us to leverage all available mechanisms to minimise our fuel consumption
per flight.
Fuel – SAF must scale now
In the medium term, we recognise SAF as a pivotal element in our decarbonisation strategy. Wizz Air has
proactively invested in SAF production, supporting innovative technology pathways and securing offtake
agreements. We endorse legislative mandates and aim to power 10 per cent of our flights with SAF by 2030.
This aspiration is subject to second-generation SAF being available at competitive prices and remains
dependent on SAF availability, cost developments and regulatory conditions. We anticipate that 53 per cent
of our emissions reductions will be driven by SAF by 2050, given its potential to reduce lifecycle emissions
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 228
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
by up to at least 65 per cent. However, current SAF production is limited, and prices remain challenging,
particularly for a low-cost business model. To effectively scale SAF production, it is essential to establish a
long-term policy framework that promotes SAF adoption. Additionally, introducing incentives to bridge the
price gap between SAF and conventional jet fuel will be crucial.
Footprint - Implementing infrastructure reform
In the longer term, Wizz Air is committed to exploring various avenues to reduce Scope 1 emissions. These
include enhancing operational efficiencies and supporting the modernisation of European airspace. However,
our decarbonisation strategy will increasingly rely on advancements in aircraft technology, with a particular
emphasis on adhering to the evolving UK and EU SAF blending mandates. Additionally, we remain open to
the potential of zero-emissions technologies, such as hydrogen, although we acknowledge the current
uncertainties surrounding these innovations; therefore, we have not yet integrated them into our immediate
roadmap.
Locked-In Emissions and Transition Risk
Potential locked-in GHG emissions primarily arise from Scope 1 activities, reflecting the aviation sector’s
reliance on conventional jet fuel and long-lived aircraft assets. While industry-wide efforts are underway to
scale SAF and advance next-generation propulsion technologies, current supply constraints, infrastructure
requirements and technology maturity limit rapid, large-scale deployment. Structural dependencies may also
influence Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions. Leased facilities can constrain direct control over energy sourcing
and building efficiency, while Scope 3 emissions are shaped by airport infrastructure, supply chain dynamics
and the pace of local grid decarbonisation - factors largely beyond the Company’s direct operational control.
These constraints reflect broader sectoral transition dynamics rather than company-specific barriers. Wizz
Air considers them manageable within its decarbonisation pathway, supported by continuous fleet renewal,
operational efficiency improvements, SAF engagement and collaboration with fuel suppliers, airports and
other infrastructure stakeholders.
While current technological and market constraints may result in a degree of emissions lock-in across
aviation assets and fuel infrastructure, Wizz Air does not currently assess these factors as jeopardising the
achievement of its stated carbon intensity reduction targets; however, delays in SAF scale-up, regulatory
implementation or aircraft technology innovation could increase transition risk over the medium to long
term.
Integration with Strategy and Financial Planning
Wizz Air’s transition plan is integrated with its overall business strategy and financial planning, focusing on
sustainability and operational efficiency. Sustainability measures are intertwined with key performance
indicators year on year, ensuring a cohesive approach to achieving their goals.
Capital expenditure related to fleet renewal and fuel efficiency improvements forms a core component of
Wizz Air’s transition plan. During the reporting period, investments primarily related to aircraft acquisitions
and associated efficiency-enhancing technologies. However, a detailed quantification of the proportion of
these investments directly attributable to climate change mitigation objectives has not yet been formally
separated and tracked within internal financial reporting systems.
At present, Wizz Air has not established a dedicated CapEx plan explicitly structured around Taxonomy
alignment targets. The Company intends to enhance its internal tracking and reporting capabilities further in
order to identify and quantify investments supporting the implementation of its transition plan more
precisely. During the reporting period, Wizz Air did not make significant capital expenditures related to coal,
oil or gas exploration, extraction, refining or related infrastructure activities as defined under [E1-1].
Governance, Oversight and Monitoring
Wizz Air has not conducted a formal assessment of its eligibility for inclusion in or exclusion from EU Paris-
Aligned Benchmarks as defined under Regulation (EU) 2019/2089. Accordingly, potential exclusion criteria
have not been determined. The Company may evaluate this in future reporting cycles as part of the
continued development of its climate governance framework.
Sustainability considerations, including climate-related risks, are integrated into Wizz Air’s risk management
framework and governance processes. The transition plan was approved by the Sustainability and Culture
Committee on 11 March 2025.
Progress in implementing the transition plan, including mitigation actions and associated resources, is
disclosed in chapter [E1-3] Actions and Resources in Relation to Climate Change Policies.
Wizz Air’s decarbonisation roadmap remains aspirational and subject to ongoing monitoring and review as
technological, regulatory and market conditions evolve. While dedicated financial resources were not
allocated separately in the current reporting year, the Company is committed to enhancing transparency
regarding resources supporting climate change mitigation in future reporting periods.
[E1-2] POLICIES RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION
Climate change mitigation and adaptation were identified as material topics in the Company’s double
materiality assessment. These topics are addressed through the ESG Policy, Environmental Policy and
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 229
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Sustainable Procurement Policy. The ESG and Environmental Policies set out the Company’s commitment to
reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving energy efficiency and supporting the transition to a net-zero
emissions economy. Climate adaptation is addressed through the integration of climate-related physical risks
into the Company’s governance and Enterprise Risk Management framework, in line with TCFD principles.
Physical risks, including extreme weather events, are considered in strategic planning and business
continuity processes.
While the Company does not maintain a standalone climate adaptation policy, adaptation considerations are
embedded within existing governance, risk management and operational resilience processes.
ESRS Requirement
Material Topic
Policy Coverage
E1 – Climate Change
Climate Change Mitigation &
Adaptation
Energy
• ESG Policy
• Environmental Policy
• Sustainable Procurement Policy
ESG Policy
The purpose of Wizz Air’s Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Policy is to set out the Company’s
commitment to sustainable and responsible operations and to integrate ESG considerations into business
decisions and long-term strategy. The policy is informed by the requirements of the Corporate Sustainability
Reporting Directive (CSRD) and is informed by recognised frameworks, including GRI and TCFD. The policy
applies to Wizz Air Holdings Plc and all subsidiaries, ensuring consistent implementation across the Group.
Oversight is provided by the Sustainability and Culture Committee, which supports the Board in aligning
strategic objectives with sustainability principles. Operational responsibility for implementation lies with the
ESG function and relevant internal stakeholders. The policy is reviewed annually to ensure continued
relevance and alignment with regulatory developments.
Environmental Policy
Wizz Air’s Environmental Policy reflects the Company’s commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions
and minimising environmental impacts across its operations. Recognising the environmental footprint of
aviation, the policy supports the transition to a net-zero emissions economy through technological
innovation, efficiency improvements and compliance with applicable environmental legislation. The policy
requires ongoing assessment of operational activities to identify opportunities to reduce environmental
impact and improve performance. It applies across all operations and is communicated to employees and
relevant stakeholders.
Sustainable Procurement Policy
Wizz Air is committed to minimising the environmental impact of our operations and demonstrating
leadership by integrating environmental considerations into its supply-chain strategy and business practices.
The Sustainable Procurement policy emphasises ongoing research and efforts to adopt new sustainability
practices, incorporating sustainability criteria in tender evaluations, and requiring suppliers to include
sustainability factors in their procurement and daily operations. This policy applies to all Wizz Air subsidiaries
and companies, covering all procurement activities.
Key aspects of the approach include compliance with relevant legislation and regulatory requirements,
setting objectives and action plans to support the policy, and continuously improving sustainable
procurement practices. For further information, please refer to Chapter [S1-4] - Workers in the value chain].
[E1-3] ACTIONS AND RESOURCES IN RELATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES
Priority programmes in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
Wizz Air has implemented three environmental programmes focused on operational and resource-efficiency
measures intended to support the management of climate-related impacts associated with our operations.
These ongoing initiatives focus on lowering emissions intensity, implementing fuel and operational efficiency
programmes, and establishing a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) supply chain to support our efforts in
decarbonising aviation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 230
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
PRIORITY PROGRAMME
GOALS AND KEY LEVERS
1. 1. FOCUS ON CARBON INTENSITY
(CO2/RPK) REDUCTION
RESOURCE EFFICIENCY
Our most important environmental commitment is to reduce
the emissions intensity generated by flight operations gradually
and radically through:
▶ 1.a fleet renewal; and
▶ 1.b fuel efficiency.
2. SUSTAINABLE
AVIATION FUELS
▶ Qualify a SAF supply chain.
▶ Invest strategically in SAF R&D.
▶ Partnerships and calls to action.
3. INDUSTRY COLLABORATION
▶ Qualify future technology building blocks and industry
partnerships for innovation and cooperation, to enable
decarbonisation.
The next section of the Sustainability Statement provides detailed information about these integral elements
of Wizz Air’s environmental pillar. In addition to its decarbonisation and carbon intensity reduction initiatives,
Wizz Air recognises the importance of climate change adaptation. While mitigation efforts focus on reducing
the Company’s greenhouse gas emissions, adaptation measures address the potential physical impacts of
climate change on flight operations, infrastructure and supply chains. Climate resilience considerations are
therefore embedded within the Company’s fleet planning, operational management and risk governance
processes.
1. Focus on Carbon Intensity (CO2/RPK) Reduction and Resource Efficiency
The most substantial portion of Wizz Air’s carbon footprint comes from Scope 1 CO2 emissions during flight
operations. Therefore, the Company places significant emphasis on managing carbon efficiency and
implementing programmes that support its commitment to improving this efficiency. Currently, no fuel
sources are entirely devoid of any environmental impact throughout their lifecycle. Consequently, Wizz Air
uses the intensity of carbon emissions as its primary environmental indicator. The intensity metric, CO2
emissions per revenue passenger kilometre, quantifies emissions from a specific amount of activity, allowing
for objective comparisons between companies of various sizes and business models. Changes in emissions
intensity are a critical indicator of a Company's resource efficiency, whereas total emissions primarily reflect
changes in economic performance. A decrease in total emissions could simply stem from reduced economic
activity, without any real improvements in efficiency or related processes. This distinction is relevant when
comparing emissions intensity across airlines, as CO₂ emissions per revenue passenger kilometre is a
commonly used industry metric for assessing operational efficiency relative to passenger transport activity.
Carbon efficiency is directly tied to the energy efficiency of aviation operations, given that CO2 emissions are
a direct result of the fuel consumed during flights. According to international conversion standards, burning
one tonne of fuel results in the emission of approximately 3.15 tonnes of CO2. Therefore, focusing on
emissions intensity rather than total emissions offers a clearer picture of an airline’s commitment to
improving its environmental performance and resource efficiency.
medium-20190307_FA_3613.jpg
While carbon intensity reduction remains the
primary environmental performance metric, the
Company also considers how operational efficiency
contributes to resilience under increasingly volatile
climate conditions. Fuel-efficiency initiatives, fleet
modernisation and digital optimisation tools form
part of the Company’s operational strategy and
may support both emissions-intensity
management and operational resilience during
weather-related or infrastructure-related
disruptions.
1/a. Fleet Renewal - Main Pillar of Carbon
Intensity Decrease
Fleet modernisation represents the most significant
short- to medium-term lever for reducing Wizz
Air’s carbon intensity (carbon emissions per passenger kilometre).
Wizz Air is the largest operator of the Airbus A321neo in Europe. Since the introduction of the Airbus
A321neo into the fleet in 2019, the Company has progressively replaced older-generation aircraft (“ceo”
variants) with new-generation “neo” aircraft as part of its decarbonisation strategy. The Airbus A321neo is
equipped with Pratt & Whitney Geared Turbofan engines and Airbus Sharklet™ wingtip devices. Compared to
the Airbus A321ceo, the A321neo delivers up to 20 per cent lower fuel burn per seat, depending on
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 231
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
configuration and operating conditions. The aircraft is configured with 239 seats in a single-class layout,
contributing to lower emissions intensity per passenger kilometre.
As at the end of the reporting period:
▶ The fleet comprised 262 Airbus A320/A321 family aircraft (neo and ceo variants).
▶ 75 per cent of the fleet consisted of new technology aircraft;
▶ The average fleet age was 4.57 years;
The industry average fleet age is approximately ten years. Comparative average fleet ages among selected
European airline groups are presented below.
Airline
Wizz Air
Ryanair
EasyJet
AF-KLM
IAG
LH
SAS
Average fleet age
4.57
10.0
10.9
11.5
12.6
14.4
7.9
Source: Based on the latest publicly available information at the time of report publication.
In November 2021, Wizz Air signed an agreement with Airbus for additional Airbus A321 aircraft, including
A321neo and A321XLR models. Deliveries are scheduled over the coming years and support the Company’s
fleet-transition plan. By the end of the decade, Wizz Air intends to operate approximately 500 aircraft, with
100 per cent of the fleet consisting of A320/A321neo family aircraft equipped with the most fuel-efficient
engine technology available at the time of delivery.
Beyond emissions reduction, fleet modernisation enhances operational resilience. New-generation aircraft
offer improved reliability, performance efficiency in higher temperature conditions and reduced maintenance
volatility, which supports continuity of operations in the context of increasing climate-related stress factors.
Maintaining a young fleet reduces technical disruption risk and strengthens the Company’s ability to respond
to operational irregularities.
Fleet renewal is a central component of the Company’s strategy to improve Scope 1 greenhouse gas
emissions intensity towards its 2030 target. The progressive replacement of older-generation aircraft with
Airbus A321neo models is expected to improve fuel efficiency per passenger kilometre relative to legacy
aircraft. The aircraft are also certified to operate with sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) blends of up to 50 per
cent, although broader SAF adoption remains dependent on fuel availability, infrastructure as well as and
regulatory development. While these measures support the Company’s longer-term decarbonisation
objectives, future emissions outcomes will also depend on operational growth, technology developments and
wider industry transition factors.
Fleet renewal represents a significant capital expenditure programme. Aircraft-related capital expenditure is
reported in the consolidated financial statements within this report (see Note [13]).
Fleet disposal information
Wizz Air operates a modern fleet, being the initial operator of all its aircraft, which are delivered brand new
by Airbus. The Company leases its aircraft from reputable global lessors and typically returns them when
they are relatively young, averaging between eight and twelve years old. Due to the aircraft’s young age and
optimal performance at the end of their lease term with Wizz Air, lessors have the opportunity to lease these
assets to other operators before they reach their end of life. Wizz Air is contractually obligated to return the
aircraft in a specified condition, ensuring their continued value. Additionally, lessors may choose to resell the
aircraft to other owners, thereby extending their financial utility. Consequently, the post-lease handling of
the aircraft is beyond Wizz Air’s control.
1/b. Fuel Saving and Efficiency Initiatives
In addition to fleet renewal, Wizz Air implements and actively operates targeted operational fuel-efficiency
measures across all flight phases as part of its climate mitigation strategy. These initiatives are designed to
reduce fuel burn per flight through procedural optimisation, data-driven decision-making and continuous
performance monitoring. During the reporting period, the Company expanded the use of AI-driven digital
solutions in the flight deck to support real-time operational decision-making. Currently, around 45 fuel-
efficiency initiatives are in place across key operational phases, including fuel policy, ground operations,
departure, cruise and descent. In addition, AI tools are increasingly used to enhance operational decision-
making further.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 232
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Emissions-reduction impact of internal fuel-saving initiatives during main flight stages
Fuel efficiency.png
The infographic illustrates the reduction of the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) achieved through internally implemented fuel-saving and
efficiency initiatives, excluding AI solutions across different flight stages in F26. Based on our fuel-saving estimates, in F26 a total of
144,647 tonnes of CO2e emissions were avoided. While carbon dioxide (CO2) refers specifically to the greenhouse gas CO2, CO2e includes
not only CO2 but also other greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide, converted into the equivalent amount of CO2 based on their
global warming potential.
Wizz Air’s most impactful fuel-efficiency initiative
In total, we have been deploying the following high-impact, fuel-efficiency initiatives that, on an ongoing
basis, are reducing consumption by 2.5 per cent.
Initiative
Efficiency gain
Total fuel saving
Total carbon saving
Sharklets
0.50%
9,030 tonnes
28,701 tonnes
Lighter Seats
0.53%
9,500 tonnes
30,194 tonnes
Reduced take-off flap configuration
0.23%
4,070 tonnes
12,936 tonnes
Fuel Efficiency Pilot App
0.21%
3,820 tonnes
12,141 tonnes
Calculated Reserve Fuel
0.19%
3,440 tonnes
10,934 tonnes
Fuel Efficiency Platform
0.19%
3,390 tonnes
10,775 tonnes
Idle reverse thrust
0.16%
2,940 tonnes
9,344 tonnes
Electronic Flight Bag (EFB)
0.08%
1,360 tonnes
4,323 tonnes
Contingency Fuel
0.07%
1,220 tonnes
3,878 tonnes
Performance/idle factors
0.07%
1,190 tonnes
3,878 tonnes
Zero Fuel Weight Optimisation
0.07%
1,190 tonnes
3,782 tonnes
Statistical Taxi Fuel
0.07%
1,230 tonnes
3,909 tonnes
Single engine taxi-in
0.04%
790 tonnes
2,511 tonnes
CONF 3 landing
0.11%
2,020 tonnes
6,420 tonnes
Lighter Aircraft Brakes
0.02%
320 tonnes
1,017 tonnes
Note: the savings are calculated against a fuel-efficiency scenario where the Company does not implement
the initiatives. On top of the measures listed above, which have the highest impact on fuel efficiency, there
are various other initiatives and policies applied on an ongoing basis to ensure the most efficient fuel
consumption during operations. 
For a comprehensive understanding of the Company’s individual initiatives towards fuel efficiency, please see
below and refer to pages 36–38 of our F23 Annual Report and page 225 of our F25 Annual Report.
Fuel data analytics – StorkJet cooperation
Collaboration with StorkJet further enhanced the analytical review of flight operations data, uncovering
additional optimisation opportunities, including in areas previously considered optimised. These initiatives
are implemented through structured operational procedures and continuously monitored to assess their
impact on fuel consumption and emissions intensity.
During the reporting period, the Company expanded the use of AI-driven digital solutions in the flight deck
to support real-time operational decision-making. In particular, tools such as StorkJet’s Flight Path
Optimisation solution are actively used by pilots across the fleet, providing data-driven recommendations on
optimal speeds and altitudes throughout all flight phases, from climb to cruise and descent. These
recommendations are generated using machine-learning models that analyse aircraft performance and real-
time operational data, and are delivered directly to pilots to support in-flight decision-making. In parallel, the
integration of advanced weather intelligence tools provides real-time, route-specific insights on wind
conditions, turbulence and other atmospheric factors, enabling continuous optimisation of flight profiles
during operations. Together, these AI-enabled systems allow for dynamic adjustments during flight,
improving operational efficiency. Initial deployment has demonstrated measurable benefits, including
incremental fuel and CO₂ savings per flight, with further gains expected as adoption and data‑driven
optimisation continue to scale. In operational testing, pilots were able to avoid unnecessary CO₂ emissions,
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 233
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
and after more than 10,000 test flights, Wizz Air achieved fuel and CO₂ reductions of approximately 0.5% to
1% per flight without any compromise to safety.
Besides these initiatives, during the last reporting year Wizz Air implemented the StorkJet Taxi Fuel API,
which uses historical Quick Access Recorder (QAR) data and machine-learning models to predict taxi fuel
consumption accurately for each operation. Accurate taxi fuel planning remains a common challenge in the
aviation industry due to variability in airport operations, weather conditions, seasonality and air traffic
control procedures. Overestimating taxi fuel leads to unnecessary costs and increased emissions due to
additional weight carried, while underestimating may pose risks to operational safety. These inefficiencies
affect airlines globally. To address this challenge, Wizz Air partnered with StorkJet to develop an advanced,
data-driven solution. When applied across all flights, the Taxi Fuel API delivers an average fuel saving of
approximately 4 kg per flight. Across the Wizz Air fleet, this translates into annual savings of around 1,200
tonnes of fuel and a reduction of more than 3,000 tonnes of CO₂ emissions.
2. Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) refers to non-conventional jet fuel produced from renewable or waste-
derived feedstocks rather than crude oil. It is the aviation industry’s standard term for alternative aviation
fuels and includes fuels derived from biological resources (e.g. waste oils, fats, agricultural residues and
non-food crops) as well as fuels synthesised from renewable energy sources through certified technological
processes such as Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) or Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Although
SAF produces similar carbon dioxide emissions to conventional jet fuel when combusted, its lifecycle
emissions are significantly lower. Lifecycle emissions from feedstock cultivation, processing and transport
are included in the overall assessment. Depending on the production pathway, SAF can reduce lifecycle CO₂
emissions by up to 65 per cent compared to conventional jet fuel. SAF also contains lower levels of sulphur
and aromatic compounds, contributing to reduced sulphur dioxide and particulate matter emissions. SAF has
chemical and physical properties comparable to conventional jet fuel and can be blended and used within
existing aircraft engines and fuelling infrastructure without modification. As a certified “drop-in” fuel, it can
be integrated into current airport supply systems.
Wizz Air recognises SAF as a critical lever for aviation decarbonisation. However, global SAF production
remains limited relative to projected demand, and the price premium compared to conventional jet fuel
remains significant. Scaling production will require long-term regulatory certainty, supportive policy
frameworks and investment across the value chain. Wizz Air’s SAF approach includes engagement with
suppliers, participation in research and development initiatives and preparation for increased SAF uptake as
supply becomes available.
Strategic Role of SAF
Wizz Air views SAF as an essential tool for reducing aviation emissions and a central element of its long-term
climate transition strategy. However, global production remains insufficient to meet anticipated demand,
while costs continue to exceed those of conventional jet fuel.
Scaling SAF will require:
• long-term regulatory certainty,
• supportive policy frameworks, and
• substantial investment across the value chain.
The Company’s approach to SAF includes:
• engagement with suppliers,
• participation in research and development initiatives, and
• preparation for increased SAF uptake as supply becomes available.
Regulatory Framework and Governance – SAF
Wizz Air is subject to the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation, which establishes a harmonised SAF blending
mandate across the European Union. The regulation requires a minimum SAF share of 2% from 2025 and
6% from 2030, with progressively increasing targets thereafter, including a dedicated sub-mandate for
synthetic aviation fuels (e-fuels). In response, Wizz Air has established internal processes and governance
structures to ensure compliance with these obligations. SAF-related activities are overseen by cross-
functional internal working groups comprising Finance, Operations, Fuel Procurement, Sustainability and EU
Affairs.
These groups are responsible for:
• monitoring compliance with RefuelEU Aviation and EU ETS requirements,
• coordinating SAF procurement and supplier engagement,
• managing fuel uplift and allocation across the network, and
• ensuring consistency and accuracy in related reporting and disclosures.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 234
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
This governance framework supports both regulatory compliance and strategic planning for SAF uptake,
aligned with the Company’s broader decarbonisation objectives.
During the 2025 calendar year, 27,606 tonnes of SAF were uplifted in line with applicable regulatory
requirements, and the 2% SAF blending requirement at EU airports under the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation
was met.
Subject to second-generation SAF being available at competitive prices; Wizz Air has set an aspirational
target to achieve a 10% SAF blend across its operations by 2030, exceeding the minimum 6% requirement
under ReFuelEU Aviation. Achieving this target remains dependent on SAF availability, cost developments
and regulatory conditions.
Our Strategic SAF Investments
▶ Firefly
medium-PRD_1663.jpg
In April 2023, Wizz Air invested £5.0 million in Firefly, a
UK-based SAF technology developer. Firefly is developing
a SAF production pathway using sewage sludge as
feedstock, targeting ASTM qualification. The agreement
anticipates SAF supply to Wizz Air’s UK operations from
2028. Over a 15-year period, Firefly may deliver up to
525,000 tonnes of SAF. The production pathway is
expected to achieve lifecycle GHG emission reductions of
approximately 90% compared to conventional jet fuel,
subject to certification and final production outcomes.
Independent testing has indicated lifecycle reduction
potential above 90%.
▶ CleanJoule
Wizz Air participated in a USD 50 million investment round in CleanJoule, a US-based SAF technology
company, alongside Indigo Partners LLC and other airline investors. Participating airlines have entered into
binding agreements to purchase up to 90 million gallons of SAF. CleanJoule is developing CycloSAF, a fuel
designed to be more energy-dense than conventional Jet A and capable of reducing non-CO₂ emissions
through lower aromatic content. While currently US-based, the technology is intended for future scalability,
including potential European production.
SAF Supply Agreements (MoUs)
Wizz Air has entered into memoranda of understanding with several SAF suppliers to secure medium- and
long-term supply access, including:
• Mabanaft/P2X Europe (synthetic SAF, planned from 2026)
• OMV (access to up to approximately 185,000 metric tonnes of HEFA SAF between 2023–2030)
• Neste (supply opportunities across the European and UK network)
• Cepsa (SAF supply option supporting Spanish operations)
These agreements support supply diversification but remain subject to production scale-up and market
conditions.
SAF-related investments are recognised within Investments in associates of this financial report (see Note
[18]).
medium-BAR-5695.jpg
medium-BAR-5898.jpg
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 235
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
3. Future Technology Building Blocks – Industry Collaboration
While operational efficiency and fleet renewal remain central to Wizz Air’s decarbonisation strategy, industry
collaboration plays an important enabling role. The transition to net-zero aviation requires coordinated action
across airlines, airports, manufacturers, fuel producers and regulators. Through targeted partnerships, Wizz
Air supports the development and deployment of lower-emission technologies and fuels. 
Sustainability event
In 2026, Wizz Air co-organised the “Beyond the Runway” event together with industry partners to address
one of the central challenges facing the sector: aviation cannot decarbonise in isolation. Achieving
meaningful emissions reductions requires coordinated action across the entire aviation value chain. The
event convened representatives from aircraft manufacturing, airport operations, materials innovation and
cabin equipment, including Airbus, London Luton Airport, GenPhoenix, Geven and Firefly. Discussions
focused on the structural barriers to aviation decarbonisation, including technology development timelines,
infrastructure readiness, regulatory alignment and the limited availability of SAF. The dialogue reinforced the
need for shared responsibility between airlines, manufacturers, airports, fuel producers and policymakers. 
Wizz Air’s decarbonisation roadmap reflects this systems-based approach. The Company prioritises
measures that deliver measurable emissions reductions within its operational control, including operating
one of the youngest and most fuel-efficient fleets in the industry, continued investment in new-generation
aircraft technology, ongoing optimisation of operational efficiency across the network and support for the
scale-up of SAF through targeted engagement and investment initiatives. 
Electrification of Ground Operations
• In 2023, Wizz Air completed fully electric aircraft turnarounds at Rome Fiumicino Airport (with
Aeroporti di Roma and Aviation Services) and at Budapest Airport (with Menzies Aviation).
• Electric ground handling equipment – including baggage tractors, belt loaders, passenger steps,
ground power units and pushback vehicles – reduced emissions from the turnaround process by
approximately 80–85% per aircraft compared to diesel-powered alternatives. These projects
demonstrate the emissions reduction potential of coordinated airport-level action. 
European Industry Engagement
• Wizz Air contributes to broader aviation decarbonisation initiatives through participation in:
▪ The Alliance for Zero Emission Aviation (AZEA), supporting readiness for hydrogen and
electric aircraft
▪ The Renewable and Low-Carbon Fuels Value Chain Industrial Alliance (RLCF), aimed at
improving SAF availability and affordability
Sustainable Aviation Fuel and Future Aircraft
To support long-term decarbonisation:
• Wizz Air conducted an operational SAF trial with Airbus on selected European routes to test
integration and regulatory readiness.
• The Company has strategic partnerships with Firefly and CleanJoule to secure future SAF supply.
• A Memorandum of Understanding with Airbus under the ZEROe programme explores operational
requirements for hydrogen-powered aircraft. 
Through these initiatives, Wizz Air supports sector-wide innovation while continuing to focus on improving
emissions intensity and preparing for long-term technological transition. 
[E1-4] TARGETS RELATED TO CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
Wizz Air has established a quantified climate change mitigation target focused on improving the carbon
efficiency of its flight operations. The Company has not established standalone quantitative targets related
specifically to climate change adaptation.
Physical climate risks – including extreme weather events, airspace disruption, supply-chain volatility and
infrastructure constraints – are assessed and managed through the Enterprise Risk Management framework
and operational resilience planning processes. Adaptation is therefore embedded within risk mitigation and
business continuity planning rather than expressed through dedicated numerical targets.
Focus Area
Commitment
Target
Year
Status
Progress / Commentary
Carbon Intensity
Reduce CO₂/RPK by
25% vs F20
baseline
2030
Partially on track
Wizz Air was named the world’s most
emissions‑efficient airline by Cirium,
received the Sustainable Airline of the
Year 2025 award from Airline Economics,
and was also assessed by Cirium as the
highest‑ranked emissions‑efficient airline
in Europe.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 236
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Sustainable
Aviation Fuel
Qualify SAF supply
chain
2030
On track
Two equity investments in SAF research;
supplier partnerships established.
Targeting an aspirational 10% SAF blend
by 2030.
Decarbonisation
Enable
decarbonisation
through future
technologies and
partnerships
2050
Ongoing
Board-led oversight with Sustainability
Council implementation. Key projects
underway. See section [E1-3] for key
projects.
The Company aims to reduce carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions per revenue passenger kilometre (CO₂/RPK) by
25% by the financial year 2030 compared to a financial year 2020 baseline of 57.2 grams CO₂/RPK. This
corresponds to a 2030 target of 42.6 grams CO₂/RPK.
The target applies to CO₂ emissions from jet fuel combustion in flight operations. These emissions constitute
the substantial majority of the Company’s Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Other Scope 1
emission sources, including ground fuel consumption and refrigerants, are not included in the intensity
target and represent a minor proportion of total Scope 1 emissions. The target therefore covers substantially
all flight-related Scope 1 CO₂ emissions, expressed as a carbon intensity metric.
The target applies to Scope 1 CO₂ emissions from flight operations only. No quantitative reduction targets
have been established for Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions. Scope 2 emissions are calculated and reported in
accordance with the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance using both market-based and location-based
methodologies. The Company continues to assess the development of potential Scope 2 targets. Although
the target is expressed as an intensity metric, the Company monitors and discloses absolute Scope 1
emissions. Due to anticipated fleet growth and increased passenger volumes, absolute emissions may
increase over the target period even as carbon intensity declines.
The baseline year for the target is the 2020 financial year. The representativeness of this baseline was
assessed in light of COVID-19-related operational disruptions. As the target is expressed as an intensity ratio
(CO₂/RPK), the metric was considered suitable for measuring fleet fuel efficiency performance over time
without requiring normalisation adjustments.
The baseline value and reporting boundary have not been changed since the target was established in 2021.
Any future recalculation resulting from significant structural or methodological changes will be disclosed in a 
transparent manner. In reference with ESRS requirements, the Company will reassess and update its base
year no later than 2030 and at least every five years thereafter, if necessary. Therefore, the Company
remains committed to achieving the 2030 glidepath target of 42.6 grams CO₂/RPK.
In the financial year 2026, Wizz Air reported a carbon intensity of 50.6 grams CO₂/RPK, reflecting a 3%
improvement compared to F25, when carbon intensity was 52.2 grams
Progress against the intensity reduction pathway forms part of the management incentive framework for the
Group CEO and senior officers.
F22
F23
F24
F25
F26
CO2 per RPK (in grams)
60.7
53.8
52
52.2
50.6
As at the reporting date, the Company has not conducted a quantitative assessment of its 2030 carbon
intensity target against a sector-specific or cross-sector greenhouse gas emission pathway aligned with
limiting global warming to 1.5°C, nor has it calculated a 1.5°C reference target value.
The aviation sector’s decarbonisation trajectory is highly dependent on the development and industrialisation
of enabling technologies and systemic infrastructure changes. In particular, meaningful long-term alignment
with a 1.5°C pathway requires:
▶ large-scale availability and affordability of SAF;
▶ the commercial deployment of next-generation or zero-emission aircraft technologies;
▶ continued improvements in propulsion efficiency; and
▶ structural reform of air traffic management systems to reduce inefficiencies in European airspace.
While Wizz Air continues to monitor scientific, regulatory and technological developments, current market
and technology constraints limit the ability to establish a fully science-aligned long-term decarbonisation
pathway at this stage. The Company remains committed to improving carbon intensity through fleet
modernisation and operational efficiency, while reassessing future target ambitions as enabling technologies
and infrastructure mature.
Within this context, Wizz Air’s decarbonisation strategy by 2030 is focused on measures that are
operationally and technologically viable today, while supporting the transition to lower-carbon aviation over
the longer term.
The Company’s carbon intensity reduction pathway is underpinned by three principal levers: fleet renewal,
fuel and operational efficiency measures, and SAF. The Company continues to engage with suppliers and
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 237
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
monitor market developments to facilitate progressive SAF uptake over time. The Company has not
quantified the individual contribution of each decarbonisation lever to the 2030 carbon intensity target.
However, fleet modernisation, operational efficiency and SAF adoption collectively form the basis of the
current reduction pathway.
[E1-5] ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND MIX
As a global airline, energy consumption is a key contributor to our overall environmental footprint, with
aviation fuel comprising the majority of our energy use. With reference to the ESRS framework, this section
discloses our energy consumption and energy mix, covering both renewable and non-renewable sources. We
report only the energy consumed from processes owned or controlled by Wizz Air, applying the same
reporting perimeter used for GHG Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. This ensures consistency and
transparency in tracking our energy use and supports our broader decarbonisation strategy.
In the current reporting year, a key development is the increased use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF),
driven by ReFuelEU requirements. As a result, our fuel consumption now includes renewable energy sources,
such as biomass-derived fuels. In addition, the Company has acquired the Budapest HQ building, leading to
the inclusion of natural gas consumption within Scope 1 emissions.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 238
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Energy consumption and mix
Unit
F25
F26
(1) Fuel consumption from coal and coal
products
MWh
0
0
(2) Fuel consumption from crude oil and
petroleum products
MWh
22,359,983
22,996,705
(3) Fuel consumption from natural gas
MWh
0
17
(4) Fuel consumption from other fossil
sources
MWh
0
0
(5) Consumption of purchased or acquired
electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from
fossil sources
MWh
1,001
1,169
(6) Total fossil energy consumption
(calculated as the sum of lines 1 to 5)
MWh
22,360,984
22,997,891
Share of fossil sources in total energy
consumption
%
100
98
(7) Consumption from nuclear sources
MWh
657
788
Share of consumption from nuclear sources
in total energy consumption
%
0
0.00
(8) Fuel consumption for renewable
sources, including biomass (also comprising
industrial and municipal waste of biologic
origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.)
MWh
0
364,479
(9) Consumption of purchased or acquired
electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from
renewable sources
MWh
164
222
(10) Consumption of self-generated non-
fuel renewable energy
MWh
0
0
(11) Total renewable energy consumption
(calculated as the sum of lines 8 to 10)
MWh
164
364,701
Share of renewable sources in total energy
consumption
%
0
2
Total energy consumption (calculated as the
sum of points 6,7 and 11)
MWh
22,361,805
23,363,380
Energy production
Non-renewable energy production
(MWh)
22,359,983
22,996,722
Renewable energy production
(MWh)
0
364,479
High climate impact sector disclosures
Energy intensity from activities in high
climate impact sectors
MWh/
€
0
0
Total energy consumption from activities in
high climate impact sectors
MWh
22,361,805
23,363,380
High climate impact sectors used to
determine energy intensity
-
Transportation and
Storage (NACE Section
H)
Transportation and
Storage (NACE Section
H)
Energy intensity per net revenue
Unit
F25
F26
Disclosure of reconciliation to relevant line
item or notes in financial statements of net
revenue from activities in high climate impact
sectors
-
Annual report /
main chapter
Financial Review /
sub-chapter
Financial
performance
Annual report /
main chapter
Financial Review /
sub-chapter
Financial
performance
Net revenue from activities in high climate
impact sectors
€M
5267.6
5691.4
Net revenue from activities other than in high
climate impact sectors
€M
0
0
Total net revenue (Financial statements)
€M
5267.6
5691.4
[E1-6] GROSS SCOPES 1, 2, 3, AND TOTAL GHG EMISSIONS -  THE CONSOLIDATED GHG STATEMENT
Understanding and disclosing our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the value chain is fundamental to
our climate strategy. Wizz Air’s emissions mainly stem from Scope 1 GHG emissions, from jet fuel
combustion, while Scope 2 emissions arise from purchased electricity at our rented facilities, and Scope 3
includes indirect emissions such as those from our supply chain and customer travel-related activities. This
section provides a comprehensive overview of our gross GHG emissions across Scopes 1, 2 and 3. The
Greenhouse gas report and inventory were prepared and aligned with the GHG Protocol and ISO
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 239
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
14064-1:2018. △ Wizz Air’s chosen reporting boundary is operational control. Under the operational control
approach, Wizz Air accounts for 100 per cent of emissions from all operations under which it or one of its
subsidiaries (Wizz Air Hungary Ltd., Wizz Air UK Limited, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi LLC (operations suspended
from 1 September 2025), Wizz Air Malta Ltd. and other legal subsidiaries)) has operational control, which
means that it has the authority to introduce and implement its operating policies.
Area
Unit
F25
F26
CO2/RPK
g/RPK
52.2
50.6
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Stationary Combustion
Heating
tCO₂eq
—
3.51
Mobile Combustion
Jet Fuel
CO2e Scope 1 
tCO₂eq
5,834,826
6,000,979
CO2 Scope 1
tCO₂
5,782,148
5,946,801
CH4 Scope 1
tCO₂eq
4,030
4,145
N2O Scope 1
tCO₂eq
48,649
50,034
Sustainable aviation fuel
CO2e Scope 1
tCO₂eq
—
77.46
Total Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions
tCO₂eq
—
6,001,060
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Gross location-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas
emissions
tCO₂eq
376
516
Gross market-based Scope 2 greenhouse gas
emissions
tCO₂eq
490
583
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions
tCO₂eq
2,126,990
1,946,578.08
Percentage of Gross Scope 3 greenhouse gas
emissions
%
18
16
3.1 Purchased goods and services
tCO₂eq
549,108
409,791
3.2 Capital goods
tCO₂eq
313,378
222,015
3.3 Fuel and energy-related activities (not
included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)
tCO₂eq
1,215,126
1,272,301
3.4 Upstream transportation and distribution
tCO₂eq
18,991
16,945
3.5 Waste generated in operations
tCO₂eq
7,793
4,956
3.6 Business travel
tCO₂eq
6,741
5,986
3.7 Employee commuting
tCO₂eq
9,263
9,891
3.8 Upstream leased assets
tCO₂eq
1,506
1,701
3.9 Downstream transportation
tCO₂eq
n/a
n/a
3.10 Processing of sold products
tCO₂eq
n/a
n/a
3.11 Use of sold products
tCO₂eq
26
159
3.12 End-of-life treatment of sold products
tCO₂eq
252
133
3.13 Downstream leased assets
tCO₂eq
n/a
n/a
3.14 Franchises
tCO₂eq
n/a
n/a
3.15 Investments
tCO₂eq
4,807
2,700
Total GHG emissions
Total GHG emissions (location-based)
tCO₂eq
7,962,194
7,948,154
Total GHG emissions (market-based)
tCO₂eq
7,962,308
7,948,222
△
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 240
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Area
Unit
F25
F26
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated
emission trading schemes (EU/UK ETS)
%
41
64
Percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated
emission trading schemes (CORSIA)
%
37
36
For more information on carbon regulation frameworks and compliance markets please see page 244.
(Excluded from the limited assurance engagement.)
△ GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to
determine emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.
This reporting year (F26) represents the second year in which the Company discloses biogenic CO₂e
emissions associated with combustion activities. Biogenic CO₂ is excluded from the reported carbon footprint,
as it is part of the natural carbon cycle and assumed to be reabsorbed by biomass. However, biogenic non-
CO₂ gases, such as methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), are included, as they contribute to the
greenhouse effect. These are incorporated into emission factors in line with Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change guidance. Where available, biogenic CO₂ emissions are disclosed separately; where not, they
are considered immaterial. △ For further details, please refer to the table below.
Biogenic emissions increased compared to the previous year, reflecting the Company’s higher uptake of SAF
in accordance with ReFuelEU requirements.
Area
Unit
F25
F26
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from the combustion or bio-
degradation of biomass not included in Scope 1 GHG
emissions
tCO₂eq
0
93,042
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from combustion or bio-
degradation of biomass not included in Scope 2 GHG
emissions
tCO₂eq
49
48
Biogenic emissions of CO2 from combustion or bio-
degradation of biomass that occur in value chain not
included in Scope 3 GHG emissions
tCO₂eq
62
1,692
Total Biogenic Emissions
tCO₂eq
111
94,782
(Excluded from the limited assurance engagement.)
The amount of carbon dioxide equivalents emitted per million euros of net revenue is detailed in the
following table.
GHG intensity by net revenue
Unit
F25
F26
Net revenue
€M
5,267.6
5,691.4
Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue
tCO2eq/mEUR
0.0023
0.0021
Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue
tCO2eq/mEUR
0.0023
0.0021
(Excluded from the limited assurance engagement.)
Description of relevant activities, methodologies, assumptions and emissions factors per scope and
energy consumption
△ Wizz Air has reported its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions since F21, covering Scope 1, Scope 2 and
Scope 3. The Corporate Carbon Footprint (CCF) for F26 is based on a 12-month reporting period and was
compiled retrospectively as relevant consumption data became available. △ No significant events or changes
affecting the emissions inventory were identified during the reporting period. A quantitative uncertainty
assessment has not been performed; however, uncertainty is considered immaterial across all categories.
Methodologies and definitions remain consistent with the previous year, ensuring comparability over time.
△ GHG emissions are calculated based on the Company’s consumption data. Primary data is used wherever
feasible; where data gaps exist, secondary data and estimation techniques are applied. Assumptions and
estimation methods are used to enhance completeness and accuracy. Supplier-specific emission factors are
prioritised where available; otherwise, emission factors are sourced from recognised databases, including
ecoinvent, DEFRA, Agrifootprint, Ökobaudat, AIB, ADEME, AGRIBALYSE, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and FCID. These sources are selected
for their credibility and alignment with the GHG Protocol.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 241
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Emission factors are assessed against key data quality criteria, including reliability, completeness as well as
technological, geographical and temporal representativeness. Emissions are calculated by applying the
relevant emission factors to activity data, resulting in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) values. This
standardised methodology supports consistency, transparency and comparability in emissions reporting, and
informs internal decarbonisation efforts.
▶ Scope 1 GHG emissions
Wizz Air’s Scope 1 GHG emissions arise from sources that are owned, leased or controlled by the Company,
with jet fuel representing the primary contributor. Scope 1 emissions are calculated by multiplying fuel and
energy consumption by the relevant conversion factors, in line with the UK Government’s latest GHG
conversion factors for company reporting (DEFRA 2025). It is estimated that the combustion of one tonne of
fuel results in approximately 3.15 tonnes of CO₂ emissions. It should be noted that Wizz Air’s carbon
emissions per passenger-kilometre metric is calculated using actual fuel consumption multiplied by 3.16,
which corresponds to the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) conversion factor, and then divided by
revenue passenger kilometres (RPK). This methodology ensures consistency with EU ETS reporting
requirements and reflects the Company’s operational carbon efficiency on a per-passenger basis.
For F26, Wizz Air reports total Scope 1 CO₂e emissions, including methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), in
accordance with these conversion factors. Compared to the previous year, the Company has expanded its
disclosures following the acquisition of its headquarters building during the reporting period. As a result,
emissions from stationary combustion (e.g. heating) are now included. In addition, under mobile
combustion, Wizz Air reports not only jet fuel consumption but also SAF usage, reflecting increased uptake
during the first full year of ReFuelEU implementation. SAF-related emissions are calculated based on
guidance from the Smart Freight Centre using the GLEC Framework.
Fugitive refrigerant emissions are currently excluded as they are not considered material; however, the
Company intends to collect and disclose these emissions in future reporting periods to enhance
completeness. △
CO2 with Radiative Forcing Index
Wizz Air has been incorporating the Radiative Forcing Index (RFI) in its CO2 emissions reporting since F24 as
per the recommendation of DEFRA 2023 methodology of GHG conversion factors for company reporting. The
RFI is a metric that considers not only CO2 but also non-CO2 emissions from aviation. It is utilised to
compute emissions related to air travel, reflecting the higher global warming potentials of these emissions,
including the impacts of contrails and other high-altitude emissions.
As outlined by DEFRA, this multiplier is exclusively applied to the CO2 component of direct emissions,
excluding other greenhouse gases like methane or nitrous oxide. This multiplier is uniformly applied to all
flights, irrespective of their distance or altitude, and to all flight phases, while recognising the inherent
approximations linked with this approach. Although these effects are widely acknowledged, the precise
mechanisms and their full extent remain under active scientific study. Current scientific research addresses
aviation emissions as an aggregate, without the capacity to distinguish between effects at different altitudes
or flight stages.
CO2 [t CO2e]
Total [t CO2e]
With RFI-Factor 1.7 (incl. SAF)
10,201,796
No RFI-Factor (incl. SAF)
6,001,057
△ Scope 1 emissions from the direct use of kerosene
18691697673223
for flight operations are tracked, documented and
assessed by Wizz Air’s internal systems. These robust
systems provide high-quality data on the Company’s
fuel emissions, thereby eliminating the need for
assumptions or benchmarking in Scope 1 emissions
accounting.
Regarding stationary combustion, we report the
heating consumption of the recently acquired
headquarters from 1 February 2026 onwards. The
heating consumption was calculated using both
primary data and secondary data derived from
primary consumption data collected by the Company.
For the first time, Wizz Air also calculated emissions
related to SAF consumption following the first full
year of compliance with the ReFuelEU Aviation
Regulation. As ReFuelEU reporting is based on the
calendar year (2025), while Wizz Air reports
emissions on a financial year basis, the differences
arising from the mismatch between reporting periods
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 242
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
were estimated using Wizz Air benchmark data from 2025 for the 2026 reporting year.
Wizz Air’s primary source of emissions is jet fuel, accounting for a substantial portion of the total emissions.
When considering both fuel production (Scope 3) and combustion in aircraft (Scope 1), jet fuel contributes to
92 per cent of Wizz Air’s overall GHG footprint.
▶ Scope 2 GHG emissions
Wizz Air’s Scope 2 emissions are indirect emissions resulting from the generation of electricity consumed in
ground facilities, including rented offices, crew rooms, the training centres and hangars. In F25, Wizz Air
revised its methodology for accounting for purchased electricity emissions in line with the latest research and
recommendations under the GHG Protocol. This updated approach has been consistently applied in the F26
reporting period. Under this methodology, electricity consumption in leased spaces is accounted for under
Scope 2 where Wizz Air exercises operational control. Operational control is deemed to exist where the
Company has decision-making authority over energy use, including responsibility for utility-related decisions
within the leased premises. Where Wizz Air does not have meaningful influence over energy consumption
and the criteria for operational control are not met, the associated emissions are reported under Scope 3,
Category 8 (upstream leased assets). In such cases, it is assumed that the landlord retains control over
energy use and is responsible for utility procurement and billing.
Wizz Air does not use contractual instruments in relation to Scope 2 emissions. Accordingly, no market-
based mechanisms, bundled electricity purchases, or unbundled energy attribute certificates were applied,
and these are reported as 0%.
In line with the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance, Wizz Air calculates and discloses both location-based and
market-based Scope 2 emissions without exclusions.
• Location-based emissions are calculated using the average emission intensity of the electricity grids in the
regions where consumption occurs. Emission factors are sourced from recognised databases such as
EcoInvent version 3.12.
• Market-based emissions are calculated using supplier-specific emission factors where available, reflecting
the emissions associated with the purchased electricity mix. In the absence of supplier-specific data,
residual mix factors are applied. Where residual mix factors are not available, location-based emission
factors are used as a proxy.
▶ Scope 3 GHG emissions
Scope 3 GHG emissions encompass all other indirect GHG emissions originating from a company’s value
chain. Scope 3 emissions occur from sources not directly owned or controlled by Wizz Air. These emissions
include activities upstream of Wizz Air’s operations, primarily from Tier 1 suppliers during the reporting year.
Wizz Air’s residual emissions, once jet fuel is excluded, primarily stem from two sectors: capital goods as
well as purchased goods and services. Although these other emissions – such as those from upstream
transportation, distribution, or employee commuting – constitute a minor share of total emissions, Wizz Air
considers their inclusion essential to our comprehensive long-term emissions reduction strategy due to their
absolute significance.
The Company applies a combination of activity-based and spend-based calculation methodologies. Where
feasible, primary data is prioritised to enhance the accuracy and reliability of reported emissions. In cases
where primary data is not available or accessible, secondary data sources are used.
Due to inherent limitations in data availability, certain emissions are estimated using appropriate
methodologies, including extrapolation and proxy data. These estimation techniques are applied in line with
recognised carbon accounting practices to ensure that the inventory provides a faithful representation of
emissions. The Company applies cut-off criteria to ensure a proportionate and efficient data collection
process. A threshold of 1% per emission category is applied, alongside a 95% coverage threshold of
purchasing value for Scope 3 Category 3.1 (Purchased Goods and Services). Emission sources falling below
these thresholds may be excluded where their impact is considered immaterial and where inclusion would
require disproportionate effort. Nevertheless, the Company aims to maintain a greenhouse gas inventory
that is as comprehensive and complete as possible.
The use of secondary data, estimation techniques, and cut-off criteria introduces a degree of uncertainty into
the reported emissions. The Company seeks to minimise these uncertainties over time by improving data
quality, increasing the use of primary data, and enhancing supplier engagement. △
Primary Data share for Scope 3
Unit
F25
F26
Percentage of GHG Scope 3 calculated using
primary [activity] data
%
57
64
Percentage of GHG Scope 3 calculated using
primary [intensity] data
%
0
0
(Excluded from the limited assurance engagement.)
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 243
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
△ Scope 3 GHG emissions by categories
▶ Category 1: Purchased Goods and Services
This category includes all emissions generated upstream of Wizz Air’s operations from Tier 1 suppliers during
the reporting year. GHG emissions attributable to purchased products and services are calculated using the
spend-based method. Wizz Air calculates this category based on the financial data and activities entered into
the general ledger to determine the associated emissions. The emissions factors are derived from suitable
databases such as Exiobase.
▶ Category 2: Capital Goods
This category encompasses all emissions generated from any capitalised expenditure within the reporting
year. Upstream emissions from aircraft manufacturing have been excluded as these assets are effectively
owned by a different company and not Wizz Air. The spend-based method was applied, with emissions
factors derived from suitable databases such as Exiobase.
▶ Category 3: Fuel- and Energy-Related Activities (Not Included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)
Emissions related to the extraction, production and transportation of jet fuel represent the most significant
indirect Scope 3 emission source for Wizz Air. This category includes emissions associated with the
extraction, production and transportation of fuels and energy purchased or acquired by the Company during
the reporting year that are not already included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions.
The activity-based method was applied for the calculation of these emissions. In addition, assumptions were
used in the calculation of Scope 2-related emissions within this category, and the same emission factors
were applied as those used for Scope 1 fuel-related emissions. Please refer to the Scope 1 and Scope 2
emissions methodology descriptions for further information.
▶ Category 4: Upstream Transportation and Distribution
This category includes shipping paid for and arranged by Wizz Air on behalf of buyers and sellers for the
transportation of goods and materials. For Wizz Air, this includes the transportation of materials,
maintenance assets or passenger-related transport activities, such as baggage delivery. Upstream
transportation emissions typically encompass various modes of transportation such as road, rail, air or sea
freight, as well as associated activities like loading, unloading and handling. The spend-based method was
applied, with emissions factors derived from suitable databases such as Exiobase.
▶ Category 5: Waste Generated in Operations
This category covers emissions from the disposal and treatment of solid waste at sites within Wizz Air’s
operational control, including waste generated on aircraft. Operational waste includes emissions from
transport to waste disposal sites as well as from the treatment of waste generated by Wizz Air. The
calculation method is activity-based, meaning Wizz Air uses primary data to calculate waste volumes and
associated emissions to the extent possible. However, internal assumptions were used to calculate the galley
and tank waste.
▶ Category 6: Business Travel
This category includes the transportation of employees for business-related activities during the reporting
year, in vehicles not owned or operated by the reporting company. A hybrid method was used, with primary
data available.
▶ Category 7: Employee Commuting
This category includes emissions arising from employee commuting to and from Wizz Air sites. An activity-
based methodology was applied to calculate these emissions.
Emissions are calculated based on country-specific average employee commuting emission factors for the
UK, Poland and Austria. A continent-specific average commuting emission factor for Europe was used and
assumed to be representative, except for the United Arab Emirates, where an average employee commuting
emission factor for the United States was applied. This adjustment was made because commuting patterns
in the UAE are considered similar to those in the U.S. Across all countries, the calculation assumes a total of
235 workdays per year, excluding weekends and the average number of leave days in the EU. Public
holidays are included, as airport and aircraft operations typically continue during those periods.
▶ Category 8: Upstream Leased Assets
The assumptions and calculations associated with Scope 3 category 8 are detailed within the Scope 2
section.
▶ Category 9: Downstream Transportation and Distribution
Wizz Air does not sell any physical products. Downstream transportation (i.e. from customers to end-users)
is excluded from Wizz Air’s organisational boundaries due to a lack of influence, limited risk (not core to
business operations), and the absence of reliable data for analysis.
▶ Category 10: Processing of Sold Product
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 244
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Wizz Air does not process sold intermediate products by third parties (e.g. manufacturers) subsequent to
sale.
▶ Category 11: Use of Sold Products
Wizz Air offers onboard retail services for our passengers, including products like small electronic devices
and other non-food items. In this category, use-phase-related emissions are calculated. Primary data is
available to some extent. Based on the electricity consumption and estimated lifespan of these products, as
well as the number of products sold, total electricity consumption was estimated.
The emission factor for the primary data of electricity consumption was sourced from the scientific database
Ecoinvent 3.8. The majority of the products sold onboard were described as other non-food products without
any indication that the use phase is relevant, and were therefore excluded from the calculation.
▶ Category 12: End-of-Life Treatment of Sold Products
This category includes emissions generated from the disposal of sold products. Since the end consumer is
responsible for disposal and no real data is usually available for this phase, there are challenges in assessing
the disposal of products and their packaging. Therefore, assumptions must be made for the calculation.
Electronic devices with available product specifications were categorised as electronic waste, and emissions
were calculated based on weight per piece and the number of products sold. The calculation of emissions
from waste treatment at the end of a product’s life cycle is done by allocating products to sales markets,
waste categories and disposal methods.
▶ Category 13: Downstream Leased Assets
Wizz Air does not have any downstream leased assets.
▶ Category 14: Franchises
Wizz Air does not have any franchises.
▶ Category 15: Financed Emissions
This category relates to financed emissions, which are emissions arising from financial services, investments
and loans provided to other companies. Wizz Air has two equity investments in the companies Firefly and
CleanJoule. Both companies focus on the production and development of sustainable aviation fuels. In F26,
no further investments were made in new or existing R&D projects. The spend-based calculation
methodology was applied using the Exiobase database. Additionally, in alignment with the investment-
related emission calculation framework of the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF), an asset
turnover ratio was defined for the business activity of the R&D project, and the emissions were adjusted
accordingly. △
[E1-8] INTERNAL CARBON PRICING
Internal carbon pricing
As 100 per cent of Wizz Air flights fall within the scope of emissions trading schemes, the EU ETS price
represents the most relevant carbon pricing benchmark for the Company and is therefore applied internally
in decision-making processes. Wizz Air applies a single, consistent internal carbon price across all operating
airlines and for all types of investment and operational decisions. Flights operating within Europe are subject
to the ETS framework, under which emissions are regulated through a cap-and-trade mechanism. The ETS
price is considered the most appropriate indicator of carbon cost and is therefore used as the internal
reference price for decision-making. Management and Controlling incorporate this input into short- and
medium-term budgets and business planning, while Treasury considers carbon price developments when
managing liquidity, market exposures and forward risk positions. Carbon pricing assumptions are also
incorporated into the Company’s climate risk assessment process. The internal carbon price applied by Wizz
Air is expected to evolve in line with developments in ETS and CORSIA market prices.
Carbon regulation frameworks and compliance markets
Wizz Air has participated in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) since 2012 and maintains processes
designed to ensure ongoing regulatory compliance. Over time, the Company has established structured
procedures for emissions data collection, monitoring, verification and reporting in line with applicable
regulatory requirements. These processes also support compliance with other relevant schemes, including
the Swiss ETS, which is reported in conjunction with the EU ETS and the UK ETS.
Responsibility for ETS-related compliance activities sits primarily within the Finance organisation, with
dedicated resources across the Tax, Treasury and Controlling functions. These teams collaborate closely with
internal stakeholders, including EU Affairs and Sustainability specialists, and engage external advisors where
appropriate to track regulatory developments and policy changes. Coordination across functions is supported
through the ETS reporting project structure and Sustainability Council working groups, which meet regularly
to review regulatory updates and implement any required adjustments to internal processes. Through these
governance and control mechanisms, Wizz Air maintains compliance with applicable carbon market
regulations and ensures a high standard of emissions data management and reporting. Emissions reports
are prepared by the relevant Finance teams and are subject to independent verification by Verifavia SAS, an
accredited third-party assurance provider.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 245
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The financial implications of carbon pricing are continuously monitored. To manage potential exposure to
carbon price volatility, the Company maintains a structured carbon allowance and offset purchasing strategy.
This is complemented by ongoing carbon price forecasting and scenario analysis to support financial planning
and risk management. In parallel, Wizz Air continues to advance its decarbonisation roadmap, supporting
the long-term transition of its operations.
In addition to its ETS obligations, Wizz Air reports emissions under the UN Carbon Offsetting and Reduction
Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). The Company became subject to offsetting requirements under
CORSIA in January 2024.
During F26, offsets funded by Wizz Air covered 100% of emissions subject to compliance obligations (ETS
and CORSIA, excluding free allowances). The average purchase price of EU and UK ETS allowances during
F26 was €74.81 for EU ETS and €59.73 for UK ETS, while the Company’s effective ETS unit cost was €75.76
and €64.35, respectively.
It should be noted that offsets are not included in Wizz Air’s F30 carbon intensity reduction glidepath or in its
long-term aspirational decarbonisation roadmap.
Tonnes of CO2 offset:
F25
F26
Scope 1 CO 2 emissions with EU/UK ETS offsets
2,385,443
3,899,857
Scope 1 CO 2 emissions with CORSIA offsets
2,162,878
2,194,521
Scope 1 CO 2 emissions without offset
1,238,761
454
Wizz Air's Controlling Department is responsible for managing ETS and CORSIA emissions reporting to the
competent authorities. It also oversees the surrender of the required allowance volume within the allotted
timeframe, while forecasting future ETS and CORSIA costs. Purchasing the ETS and CORSIA units is the
responsibility of the Treasury Department.
E2 - Pollution
[IRO-1] DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSES TO IDENTIFY AND ASSESS MATERIAL POLLUTION-RELATED
IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities have been identified and assessed through the Group’s
double materiality assessment process as described in Section [SBM-3].
The outcome of this assessment for pollution is detailed in Section [SBM-3], which describes the Group’s
material negative actual impact relating to non-CO₂ air pollutants and aircraft noise arising from own flight
operations.
As set out in SBM-3:
▶ The impact is negative and actual.
▶ It occurs primarily in own operations.
▶ It relates to local air quality and noise exposure, particularly affecting communities near airports.
▶ It is assessed over the short-term time horizon, with ongoing monitoring across medium- and long-term
horizons.
▶ Associated risks include increasing regulatory scrutiny and evolving stakeholder expectations.
Pollution of air through non-CO₂ emissions and aircraft noise arises from the Group’s flight operations and
may contribute to local air quality impacts and noise exposure, particularly in communities located near
airports. Given the geographic spread of operations and the nature of aviation activities, these impacts have
been assessed as material under Wizz Air’s double materiality assessment. The assessment is based on the
actual environmental impacts associated with flight operations and the potential effects on local
communities.
[E2-1] POLICIES RELATED TO AIR POLLUTION AND NOISE EMISSION
Wizz Air addresses pollution prevention and control through its Environmental Policy and its overarching
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Policy. These policies establish the Group’s commitments,
governance responsibilities and management approach in relation to material pollution-related impacts, risks
and opportunities. The material impact relates to non-CO₂ air pollutants and aircraft noise generated through
flight operations.
ESRS Requirement
Material Topic
Policy Coverage
E2 - Pollution
Air pollution and noise
emission
• ESG Policy
• Environmental Policy
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 246
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Environmental Policy
The Environmental Policy sets out the Group’s approach to managing environmental impacts arising from its
operations, including air emissions and aircraft noise. The policy recognises that flight operations generate
environmental impacts and commits the Group to minimising these impacts through operational efficiency
and fleet development. It also confirms the Group’s commitment to compliance with applicable
environmental legislation, regulations and international standards. Environmental performance is monitored
on an ongoing basis, and continuous improvement is supported through operational controls and fleet
planning. The policy applies to the Group’s own operations and forms part of its overall operational
management framework.
ESG Policy
The ESG Policy incorporates environmental matters, including pollution-related impacts, into the Group’s
governance and risk management processes. Environmental risks, including those related to air quality and
noise exposure, are considered within the enterprise risk management framework. Oversight of
environmental performance is exercised at Board and executive level.
[E2-2] ACTIONS AND RESOURCES RELATED TO POLLUTION
Wizz Air addresses pollution-related impacts primarily
medium-BAR-9567.jpg
through fleet strategy, operational efficiency
measures and regulatory compliance processes. Wizz
Air does not operate standalone pollution-specific
action programmes; rather, actions implemented to
address climate change and fuel efficiency also
contribute to reductions in non-CO₂ air pollutant
intensity and aircraft noise.
Fleet renewal represents the Company’s most
significant measure supporting both climate mitigation
and the reduction of aviation-related air pollutant
intensity and aircraft noise. The Company continues to
transition towards next-generation aircraft with
improved fuel efficiency, lower combustion-related
pollutant intensity and enhanced noise performance,
while progressively retiring older aircraft types in line
with fleet planning objectives. By investing in newer aircraft models, the Company supports lower aircraft
noise levels and improved environmental performance relative to previous-generation aircraft. The A321neo
delivers approximately a 50 per cent lower noise footprint compared with the A321ceo, reflecting the
benefits of newer aircraft technology.
Currently, all our aircraft comply with the ICAO Chapter 4 noise emissions standard, and 85 per cent also
meet the more stringent Chapter 14 standard. The only exceptions are the 40 A321ceo aircraft, which have
not yet achieved Chapter 14 compliance. However, we anticipate that by 2029, 100 per cent of our fleet will
comply with this standard. The ICAO Chapter 4 noise emissions standard applies to aircraft certified from 31
December 2005, while Chapter 14 applies to aircraft certified from 31 December 2017. Chapter 14 requires
aircraft to be at least 7 effective perceived noise decibels (EPNdB) quieter than those meeting the Chapter 4
standard.
1816
Data based on latest confirmed fleet plan.
For reference, the table below shows (in EPNdB) that Airbus neo aircraft deliver a strong margin versus the
Chapter 14 ICAO requirements. Our A321neo EPNdB levels are like those of the Boeing 737-8 with LEAP
engines’ EPNdB, even with the A321neo transporting 42 more passengers per trip.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 247
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
EPNdB
Lateral
Flyover
Approach
vs Chapter 4
vs Chapter 14
A320neo
86.6
79.7
92.3
-20
-13
A321neo
87.8
83.1
94.5
-15.6
-8.6
Boeing 737-8
88.5
82.6
94.2
-14.9
-7.9
In addition to fleet renewal, the Company implements a range of operational efficiency measures, including
optimised routing and flight planning, continuous descent operations where operationally feasible, weight
reduction initiatives and monitoring of fuel performance. These measures are primarily designed to improve
fuel efficiency and operational performance. To the extent that non-CO₂ air pollutants arise from fuel
combustion, improvements in fuel efficiency may also influence associated pollutant intensity per flight.
Noise exposure is primarily regulated at airport and national level through local noise abatement procedures,
operating restrictions, curfews and certification requirements. As an airline, Wizz Air operates within these
frameworks and ensures compliance with applicable airport-specific and regulatory noise standards.
Operational flexibility to influence noise exposure is therefore largely determined by airport infrastructure,
air traffic management procedures and regulatory constraints. Within these parameters, Wizz Air manages
noise exposure through fleet renewal, compliance with ICAO certification standards and adherence to local
operating requirements.
Spending on pollution‑related issues is mostly built into our regular operating and capital costs, rather than
managed as separate environmental programmes. Fleet renewal is a major part of our capital expenditure,
and lower emissions and noise performance are key reasons for investing in new aircraft. Over time, we
expect to continue allocating capital to newer aircraft with improved environmental performance.
At EU level, the regulatory framework for non-CO₂ aviation effects continues to develop. From 2025, Wizz Air
is subject to the EU Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) framework for non-CO₂ aviation effects and
collects the required operational data for the competent authorities in accordance with applicable legislation.
The accurate quantification of non-CO₂ aviation effects, including their effective radiative forcing, remains
subject to scientific uncertainty, and methodologies continue to evolve. The Company monitors regulatory
and scientific developments in this area and will assess potential mitigation measures as reporting
methodologies and policy frameworks become more clearly defined.
[E2-3] TARGETS RELATED TO POLLUTION
During the reporting period, Wizz Air did not set standalone quantitative targets relating specifically to non-
CO₂ air pollutants and/or noise emissions. Pollution mitigation is addressed primarily through compliance
with applicable regulatory standards and through fleet renewal and operational efficiency measures
described under [E2-2], rather than through dedicated quantitative pollutant-specific targets.
Wizz Air complies with all applicable international aviation requirements relating to air pollution and noise,
including ICAO noise certification standards. The progression towards full fleet compliance with ICAO
Chapter 14 standards by 2029 is aligned with evolving regulatory requirements and is supported through the
Company’s ongoing fleet renewal programme.
Wizz Air does not operate facilities that generate material emissions to water or soil within its own
operations. Aircraft maintenance is primarily carried out by certified external maintenance providers subject
to aviation safety and environmental regulation. The Company requires such providers to comply with
applicable regulatory standards.
Where environmental targets exist within the Company’s climate strategy (e.g. emissions intensity
reduction), these are disclosed under [E-1] Climate Change and are not presented as pollution-specific
targets under [E-2].
[E2-4] POLLUTION OF AIR
In addition to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, air transport activities also produce a variety of non-GHG
emissions, including Carbon Monoxide (CO), Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOCs), Nitrogen
Oxides (NOx), Sulphur Dioxide (SO₂), and Particulate Matter (PM).
The table below gives a metrics overview of Wizz Air’s non-GHG emissions:
Emissions sources
Unit
F25
F26
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
tCO₂eq
13,785
14,430
Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOC)
tCO₂eq
1,947
2,057
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
tCO₂eq
20,828
21,785
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
tCO₂eq
1,861
1,947
Particulate Matter (PM)
tCO₂eq
30
33
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 248
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Wizz Air applied the latest emission factors to calculate its non-GHG emissions, drawing data from 
international databases, including the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), ICAO
(International Civil Aviation Organization), and Ecoinvent 3.11.
Area
Unit
F25
F26
Noise regulation compliance
Chapt.14
82%
85%
[E2-6] ANTICIPATED FINANCIAL EFFECTS FROM POLLUTION-RELATED RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
The anticipated financial effects of pollution-related impacts and risks are described in section [SBM-3]. At
present, pollution mitigation requirements have limited direct impact on Wizz Air’s operating costs. No
material pollution-related fines, penalties or remediation provisions were recognised during the reporting
period. Over the medium and long term, pollution mitigation may influence capital expenditure through
continued investment in newer aircraft with improved noise and emissions performance. These investments
form part of Wizz Air’s broader fleet renewal strategy and are not driven solely by pollution-related
considerations. No separate quantification of pollution-related financial effects has been made, as no distinct
pollutant-specific pricing mechanisms or financial obligations beyond existing regulatory compliance
requirements were identified during the reporting period.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 249
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Optimized for Today. Mindful of Tomorrow. (3).png
People pillar
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 250
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
SOCIAL INFORMATION
[S1] OWN WORKFORCE
At Wizz Air, our workforce is central to the delivery of our strategy and long-term success. We recognise our
employees as a key stakeholder group and are committed to respecting and upholding their human and
labour rights across all our operations. We strive to provide safe and fair working conditions, promote equal
treatment and opportunities, and foster an inclusive environment where our people can grow and develop in
alignment with the Company’s objectives. The strength of our organisation lies in the professionalism,
dedication and talent of our employees, whose engagement supports our safety performance and customer
experience directly.
Compared to the previous year, minor refinements were made to the social pillar. In particular, training and
skills development was identified as a new financially material risk. Following reassessment, “working hours”
no longer meets the materiality threshold in accordance with paragraph 36 of the revised July 2025 ESRS 1
draft. Consequently, the work-life balance subsection and related metrics have been removed from this
year’s report.
[SBM-2] INTERESTS AND VIEWS OF STAKEHOLDERS
Recognising our workforce as a key group of stakeholders, Wizz Air places great emphasis on engaging with
them through several key pillars. We conduct regular surveys, including an annual employee engagement
survey, providing employees with the opportunity to share feedback from various perspectives freely.
Additionally, we hold town hall meetings to gather and share insights with employees, involving leadership
team members to ensure their perspectives are considered in shaping our business practices. Our regular
floor talks, hosted by the Chief Executive Officer, provide employees with valuable opportunities to receive
important updates on operations and strategy.
We have also implemented robust policies to protect and promote the human rights of our workforce,
including fair wages, safe working conditions, and opportunities for professional development. By fostering a
positive work environment and aligning our operations with the values and expectations of our employees,
we enhance overall business performance and maintain ethical and sustainable operations. For further
details please refer to [S1-2] Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about
impacts.
[SBM-3] MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH STRATEGY
AND BUSINESS MODEL
The Company’s material impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) and their interaction with Wizz Air’s strategy
and business model are described in [SBM-3]. All people in Wizz Air’s own workforce who could be materially
impacted have been included within the scope of that assessment and the related disclosures.
For the purposes of ESRS S1, Wizz Air’s own workforce comprises employees directly contracted under
employment agreements across operational and corporate functions, including pilots, cabin crew and office-
based employees, as well as non-employee workers engaged under contractual arrangements other than
employment contracts. Although non-employee workers engaged under contractual arrangements other
than employment contracts may also perform services within our operations, unless explicitly stated,
quantitative disclosures [S1‑6] relating to “employees of our own workforce” refer to directly employed
personnel.
Wizz Air’s business model is characterised by a low-cost structure, high aircraft utilisation and continued
network expansion supported by a standardised fleet. Its execution depends on the availability, engagement
and regulatory competence of licensed and skilled personnel. Accordingly, material impacts and risks related
to secure employment, occupational health and safety, training and skills development, and diversity arise
directly from the operational characteristics of aviation and the Company’s growth strategy.
The growth strategy also generates positive impacts through employment creation and workforce
development. At the same time, aviation activities inherently involve occupational health and safety risks,
particularly for operational crew, which are managed through structured safety, training and monitoring
systems.
The Company has not identified material workforce impacts arising from its environmental transition plans.
In assessing workforce-related risks, Wizz Air considers the specific characteristics of its workforce, including
employees in safety-critical roles and early-career regulated positions. No operations or geographic areas
were identified as being at significant risk of incidents of forced labour, compulsory labour or child labour
within the Company’s own workforce during F26.
Financial effects related to workforce matters primarily consist of ongoing operational expenditure for
training, certification, health and safety as well as workforce planning, as described in [SBM-3].
[S1-1] POLICIES RELATED TO OWN WORKFORCE
Wizz Air maintains a comprehensive policy framework governing its relationship with its own workforce.
These policies are designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, promote ethical
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 251
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
conduct, safeguard employee rights, and support a safe, inclusive and development-oriented working
environment across all jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
Oversight of workforce-related matters is exercised at Board level, with operational responsibility delegated
to senior management, including the General Counsel, Chief Corporate Officer and relevant functional
leaders. Workforce-related policies are reviewed periodically and approved in accordance with internal
governance procedures. The Company considers stakeholder feedback when developing and updating these
policies.
Wizz Air’s most important policies related to its own workforce are presented in the summary table below:
ESRS Requirement
Material topic
Related policies
S1 - Own workforce
Secure employment
Health and Safety
Diversity
Training and development skills
• Policy of Good Conduct (please see [G1-1]
Business conduct policies and corporate
culture)
• Whistleblowing Policy (please see [G1-1]
Business conduct policies and corporate
culture)
• Anti-Fraud Policy (please see [G1-1]
Business conduct policies and corporate
culture)
• Conflict of Interest Policy
• Health and Safety Policy and initiatives
• Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment
Policy
• Remote Working Location Policy
• Training and Development Policy
Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy, Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement
Modern slavery is a crime and a violation of fundamental human rights. It manifests in various forms,
including slavery, servitude, forced and compulsory labour as well as human trafficking. These practices
share a common thread: the deprivation of a person’s liberty by another for personal or commercial gain.
Wizz Air is committed to acting ethically and with integrity in all our business dealings and relationships. To
ensure modern slavery does not occur within our business or supply chains, we implement and enforce
effective systems and controls. Transparency is a key aspect of our approach, consistent with our disclosure
obligations under the Modern Slavery Act 2015.
We uphold high standards for all our employees, contractors, suppliers and business partners. Our
contracting processes include specific prohibitions against the use of forced, compulsory or trafficked labour,
and against holding anyone in slavery or servitude, whether adults or children. We expect our suppliers to
adhere to these standards and to ensure their own suppliers do the same. All employees must read,
understand and comply with this policy. They are encouraged to raise concerns about any issues or
suspicions of modern slavery within our business or supply chains. Concerns should be reported to the
relevant manager, the Senior Manager Group Security and Resilience, or through our Whistleblowing Policy
as soon as possible.
Wizz Air provides online compliance training related to its Code of Ethics to every staff member. Additionally,
anti-slavery training is included in the annual security training sessions for all crew members.
The Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy and the Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement are publicly
available on the Company’s official website.
Conflict of interest policy
Wizz Air's conflict of interest policy emphasises the importance of maintaining high personal ethics and
integrity among employees. The policy is designed to prevent situations where personal interests might
conflict with the Company’s interests. Employees are required to avoid any financial or other relationships
that could create a conflict of interest. Transparency is crucial, and employees should disclose any potential
conflicts to uphold integrity in business dealings. All employees are expected to act in accordance with Wizz
Air’s corporate culture, which values honesty, fairness and ethical behaviour.
For more detailed information please see Wizz Air’s conflict of interest policy extract on its website.
Health and Safety policy and initiatives
Wizz Air has established and operates a comprehensive Employee Health and Safety (EHS) management
system. This system provides the framework for tasks related to occupational health and safety, fire safety
and environmental protection. It ensures compliance with specified conditions and facilitates the fastest
possible intervention when necessary. The scope of the EHS Regulation encompasses all Wizz Air bases,
establishments, rented properties, subsidiaries, branches and commercial representations.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 252
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The EHS system ensures compliance with applicable requirements and supports timely intervention where
needed. Occupational health and safety requirements are continuously monitored, and corrective measures
are implemented when necessary.
Wizz Air established the Employee Emergency Funding initiative to provide financial support to employees in
medical emergencies. The Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) supports employees facing stress, mental
health issues or difficult life circumstances. These initiatives are further described in [S1-4].
Detailed health and safety metrics and systems are disclosed in [S1-14].
Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy
The Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy outlines how Wizz Air treats its employees, contractors
and business partners in all areas of its business. The purpose of the policy is to support our commitment to
creating a safe and respectful working environment for all stakeholders, based on mutual respect, fairness
and equality; to advocate diversity and to preserve an atmosphere free from any forms of discrimination,
victimisation, vilification, bullying or harassment (for example during employment, recruitment, selection,
contracting processes, marketing activities, training and promotions, working hours, leave, task allocations,
etc.).
The policy applies to all work-related activities, including recruitment, selection, contracting processes,
marketing activities, training, promotions, working hours, leave, task allocation and termination.
Decisions across the Company’s operations are based on merit, including skills, performance and abilities, in
line with the requirements of each role. Recruitment, placement, training and promotion are carried out
using objective criteria. The Company maintains records of recruitment and promotion processes to ensure
transparency and consistency, as reported under [S1-6].
The Company has been committed to providing equal opportunities regardless of race, national or ethnic
origin, social origin, gender, age, religion, political views, sexual or gender identity, marital status,
citizenship, disability, medical history, military status, employment status or other legally protected
characteristics.
Employees who experience or witness discrimination may raise concerns through management channels or
the Whistleblowing mechanism. Retaliation against individuals raising concerns in good faith is prohibited.
Detailed information about diversity at Wizz Air is included in chapter [S1-9] - Diversity metrics.
Training and Development Policy
At Wizz Air, we recognise the importance of investing in the continuous development and professional
growth of our employees. Our Training and Development Policy is designed to support and encourage the
development of skills, knowledge and capabilities that contribute to both individual and organisational
success. The objectives of this policy are providing personal and professional opportunities for growth to
enhance employee performance and promote a culture of continuous training at Wizz Air. There are several
development opportunities both for managers and for all Wizz Air employees. For more detailed information
on the training and development metrics please see [S1-13] - Training and skills development metrics.
Workforce-related policies are communicated through onboarding programmes, mandatory compliance
training, internal communication channels and access to internal policy repositories. Relevant policies are
also publicly available where appropriate. Employees are required to familiarise themselves with applicable
policies and confirm compliance where required.
Wizz Air prepares its workforce-related policies in accordance with applicable national and international legal
requirements. While the Company has not conducted a formal, standalone assessment of alignment with the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights or the ILO Core Conventions, its policies incorporate
principles consistent with fundamental labour rights, including non-discrimination, prohibition of forced
labour and protection of worker health and safety. The Company continues to monitor regulatory and
stakeholder expectations in this area.
No significant changes were made to the Company’s core workforce-related policies during F26. The
Company continued to implement and monitor its existing policy framework and supported workforce
capability development in line with operational and fleet transition requirements.
[S1-2] PROCESSES FOR ENGAGING WITH OWN WORKERS AND WORKERS’ REPRESENTATIVES ABOUT
IMPACTS
Wizz Air recognises that meaningful engagement with its own workforce is essential to understanding
impacts, identifying risks and opportunities, and informing decision-making processes. The Company has
established structured and recurring mechanisms to facilitate participation, consultation and information-
sharing with employees across its employees.
Oversight of workforce engagement is supported at Board level through a designated Board member
responsible for employee engagement. Operational responsibility for engagement processes is embedded
within the Human Resources, Organisational Development and Leadership functions. Engagement activities
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 253
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
are integrated into broader leadership and HR responsibilities rather than managed by a standalone
department.
Type and Frequency of Engagement
Engagement with the workforce takes place through multiple formats, including participation, consultation
and information-sharing. Engagement occurs:
• On an ongoing basis through direct management interaction and digital platforms;
• Monthly through structured meetings between the People Council and senior leadership;
• Annually through the employee engagement survey;
• Biannually through base visits and operational consultations;
• As required by law in jurisdictions where formal consultations are mandated.
Feedback gathered through these channels is documented, analysed and integrated into management
discussions and decision-making processes.
WIZZ People Council
At Wizz Air, the People Council plays a pivotal role in shaping and enhancing corporate culture by
representing the collective voice of employees.
The Council ensures that employees’ concerns, ideas and feedback are heard and considered in decision-
making processes, fostering inclusion and transparency. It brings together representatives from various
departments and countries to promote diverse perspectives across the network.
The Council is led by its President, nominated from among Council members and appointed by the
Leadership Team for a two-year term. In F26 the mandate of the People Council management – including
the President and Vice Presidents – was renewed for an additional two‑year term, ensuring continued
stability and operational continuity within the Council. The team has maintained the election model
established in 2024 and has since expanded to 26 members, with 80% of representatives directly elected by
their communities.
Insights gathered at local base level are consolidated through the Council’s monthly meetings and escalated
to senior leadership and, where relevant, to the Board. Outcomes of discussions are communicated back to
employees through appointed representatives and internal communication channels.
The Council structure includes:
• Monthly meetings with AOC Managing Directors;
• Monthly meetings with the Leadership Team;
• Separate meetings with the Chief Executive Officer;
• Oversight by a designated Board member.
The Council’s structure and ways of working are:
Council Pillars
Strategy
Term and continuity
The Representatives serve for two years. After their mandate expires they can continue their
term for another two-year period if re-elected by the local community.
Committees and
focus areas
The Council’s work revolves around two major areas: reward/recognition, and work patterns/
rosters. Two dedicated committees – each led by two chairs appointed by the President – delve
into a spectrum of topics, challenges and strategic initiatives. These committees convene twice
a month to deliberate and shape policies.
Facilitating effective
communication
Besides meetings with senior management, Wizz Air has a dedicated Board member, Dr
Anthony Radev, responsible for overseeing engagement with employees. These interactions
foster open dialogue, enabling the Council to fulfil its core objective, bridging the gap between
management and employees through robust two-way channels.
Informed decision
making and
transparency
The Council provides critical insights on matters impacting the entire Wizz Air community.
Every action and decision arising from monthly meetings is shared with employees by their
appointed representatives.
The Council serves as a forum for employee dialogue and consultation on a broad range of workplace-related
topics. Recurring agenda items include, among others:
▶ company policies and process changes;
▶ working environment improvements;
▶ salary principles and policies;
▶ company events;
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 254
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
▶ work-life balance;
▶ trends impacting safety; and
▶ initiatives enhancing employee diversity.
These topics reflect ongoing employee engagement and operational discussions and may extend beyond
those identified as material under the Company’s ESRS double materiality assessment.
Throughout the year, the People Council actively contributed to various projects, offering detailed insights
from specific employee groups to support other departments. To ensure effective communication with the
Wizz Air community, Council members frequently engage in face-to-face sessions with employees, organise
online meetings across all countries, and conduct regular base visits with the Wizz Air Leadership Team. In
2025, the People Council connected with employees in person or online several times to collect feedback,
and organised many events. These efforts aim to strengthen open communication between employees and
management across the airline’s network. Additionally, the People Council arranges regular meetings at the
Company headquarters, allowing employees to interact with the Secretary General and the local office
representative. Critical topics, such as sustainable work-life balance, fair reward structure and employee
engagement, are thoughtfully discussed and addressed.
Base visits, floor talks and management updates on Workvivo
Engaging directly with Company management through various events is crucial for fostering a strong
corporate culture at Wizz Air. These events provide a unique platform for local crews to voice their opinions,
ask questions about the business direction, and express their concerns. In addition to top management's
"fly-around events," line operation base visits occur biannually, with at least one representative from the
People Council present.
The People Council actively participates in these base visits, facilitating both formal and informal interactions
between the Leadership Team and employees. In the past year the People Council's President, Secretary
General and local Council representative took part in around 13 personal base visits. Issues raised during
these sessions are reviewed by relevant leadership functions. Where action is taken, updates are
communicated to employees via Workvivo (our internal social media channel available to all employees) or
through the People Council.
Regular floor talks hosted by the Chief Executive Officer offer valuable quantitative and qualitative insights
into employees’ work and life. These talks are live and accessible either in person or via Workvivo.
Additionally, regular live leadership updates are delivered to all Wizz Air employees via the Company’s
internal platform. The Chief Executive Officer and the Leadership Team also issue written updates on
Workvivo for significant events impacting Company operations or when key information needs direct
communication from management.
Wizz Air remains committed to engaging directly with its workforce, ensuring that all employees have direct
access to the Chief Executive Officer and senior management through these channels. Based on employee
feedback, the Company continuously implements relevant actions, as evidenced in the section discussing
employee engagement results. Moreover, Wizz Air complies with all applicable laws and regulations in every
country of operation, and actively participates in mandatory consultations where required. By maintaining
these practices, Wizz Air strengthens its corporate culture, ensuring a motivated, informed and cohesive
workforce.
Employee engagement survey results and follow-up actions
engagement survey.png
Annual engagement surveys are a critical tool for us, offering a structured way for employees to share
their feedback. This continuous feedback loop helps identify areas for improvement and implement
changes that enhance the work environment, boosting morale and job satisfaction.
In November 2025, Wizz Air conducted its ninth employee engagement survey, yielding 5,728 responses,
reflecting a participation rate of 63 per cent. Company-wide, the overall engagement score reached 7.5,
marking an increase of 0.5 compared to the previous year.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 255
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Specifically, office employees achieved an engagement score of 7.4, down by 0.1 from the previous year
and maintaining a positive trend in office employee engagement. Meanwhile, Flight Crew engagement
increased significantly by 0.5 from the previous year, reaching 7.7. Cabin Crew employees also
experienced an increase of 0.7 points, bringing their overall satisfaction rate to 7.2.
The satisfaction survey includes a range of key aspects that are addressed in the employee survey, serving
as a valuable tool to gain insights into the sentiments and perspectives of the workforce. These are related
to:
▶ Job satisfaction (e.g. satisfaction with daily tasks, workload and work environment)
▶ Engagement (e.g. motivation, commitment to the organisation)
▶ Stress (e.g. workload pressure, deadlines and ability to manage work-related demands)
▶ Reward (e.g. satisfaction with salary, benefits, recognition and career opportunities)
▶ Happiness (e.g. overall positive feelings about coming to work and workplace morale)
▶ Health and well-being (e.g. mental health support, work-life balance and positive social relationships at
work)
▶ Purpose (e.g. feeling that one’s work is meaningful and contributes to organisational goals)
During the 2025 survey round, two new drivers were introduced: Accomplishment and Meaningful Work.
Following detailed analysis and discussions of results, Executives, Officers and Heads of Function submitted
their action plans. Concurrently, the People Council conducted an exhaustive analysis, reviewing over 32,000
comments to propose additional action points.
Drawing from these insights, the Organisational Development department crafted a comprehensive action
plan slated for completion over F27, aimed at further enhancing employee engagement and satisfaction
across the organisation. Additionally, this year after the engagement survey round, Organisational
Development launched the Idea Board across the organisation, where employees could structurally suggest
solutions and suggestions for the identified concerns.
All employee engagement survey results are reviewed annually by the Board of Directors, which also
enables the Company’s highest decision-making body to assess and monitor progress towards cultural
objectives, identify priorities and set measurable goals for achieving the vision.
At the Company level, the focus areas to improve engagement and the work environment are:
• enhanced roster stability and flexibility (crew);
• improved change management process and communication;
• career progression (office);
• better workload management & well-being;
• fair and transparent reward practices.
The engagement and retention-focused actions already implemented are the following:
• introduced private pension across part of the network;
• implemented 85 EUR tax exemption for Wizz Air Hungary Ltd. network;
• rolled out LinkedIn Learning licences to crew members
Compensation and salary
In terms of compensation matters, Wizz Air designs its remuneration practices with a focus on base
salaries and performance-driven progression. While non-financial benefits such as access to Wizz Air’s
services for leisure travel at accessible, favourable and discretionary prices are available as a token of
appreciation for employees’ commitment and loyalty, these are considered supplementary to the core
compensation offering.
Pay is only part of the proposition to join and stay at Wizz Air. Whilst the annual salary reviews –
supported by recurring market benchmark processes – allow for regular adjustments, the most significant
opportunity to increase compensation lies in performance and internal career progression. This focus on
growth is embedded across all of Wizz Air’s HR processes, including recruitment, compensation and
organisational development.
In F26 Wizz Air introduced a new private pension package. With this benefit, the Company will contribute a
set percentage of employees’ annual gross salary to a private pension scheme for greater financial security
in the future, provided employees also contribute the same amount. Participation is entirely voluntary.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 256
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Company events supporting employee engagement
Corporate events play an important role in fostering a strong sense of community and belonging across the
organisation. These gatherings provide opportunities to celebrate achievements, recognise contributions and
strengthen connections between teams and departments. By bringing colleagues together in an inclusive
and engaging environment, we reinforce team spirit and promote a cohesive, motivated workforce. To this
end, we continue to organise corporate events and initiatives, including Christmas and Wizz Air birthday
celebrations, department away days, team-building activities and programmes such as the WIZZ Academy.
Employee engagement on sustainability
Sustainability is a core value at Wizz Air, and we actively involve our employees in advancing our
environmental objectives. This alignment of corporate and individual values empowers our workforce, fosters
innovation and promotes shared responsibility in support of our sustainability commitments.
We believe that cultivating a culture of environmental responsibility begins with education and awareness.
By equipping employees with relevant knowledge, practical tools and access to information on environmental
developments within the workplace, we continue to build a motivated and informed workforce prepared to
address future challenges.
Building on the success of the initial term of our Sustainability Ambassador Programme – a first-of-its-kind
initiative within the Company – Wizz Air has launched subsequent terms to further embed sustainability into
daily operations. Our Sustainability Ambassadors actively participate in local environmental and community
projects, promote eco-friendly practices and share insights with colleagues. These initiatives range from
recycling campaigns to charitable activities and community engagement efforts.
In November 2025, Wizz Air held its fourth annual internal “Sustainability Month.” As part of this campaign,
a four-week, network-wide competition encouraged employees to adopt environmentally responsible
behaviours and share their efforts to reduce their environmental footprint. The initiative aimed to inspire
sustainable daily routines across the organisation. Throughout the campaign, WIZZ Sustainability
Ambassadors demonstrated strong engagement by encouraging colleagues to purchase local products,
reimagine and upcycle items and clothing, prioritise well-being and reduce reliance on plastic-packaged
goods.
[S1-3] PROCESSES TO REMEDIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS AND CHANNELS FOR OWN WORKERS TO RAISE
CONCERNS
As identified in the Company’s double materiality assessment, occupational health and safety has been
assessed as a material impact area for Wizz Air’s own workforce. This materiality reflects the inherent
characteristics of aviation operations, which involve specific working environments and operational demands
that may present health and safety risks. It does not arise from identified systemic deficiencies or significant
adverse incidents during the reporting period. Rather, it reflects a risk-based assessment aligned with the
nature and scale of the Company’s activities. Accordingly, Wizz Air maintains structured processes to
prevent, identify, investigate and remediate potential adverse impacts on employees.
Occupational health and safety matters are managed under the Company’s Employee Health and Safety
(EHS) management framework, which includes defined procedures for incident reporting, investigation, root
cause analysis and implementing corrective and preventive actions. Occupational health and safety
incidents, fatigue reports and other workforce-related risks are recorded and monitored through the
Company’s integrated reporting system (Intelex). The system enables employees to report concerns and
incidents relating to technical, engineering, health and safety and flight safety matters. Reported cases are
reviewed and investigated as appropriate, with corrective actions tracked through to closure.
Whistleblower processes
In addition to operational reporting mechanisms, Wizz Air maintains a Whistleblowing Policy (see section
[G1-1] Business Conduct), which enables employees and other eligible individuals to report suspected
misconduct, including unlawful acts, regulatory breaches or other inappropriate behaviour. The Policy sets
out reporting procedures, handling protocols and safeguards to ensure confidentiality and protection against
retaliation.
Reports of suspected misconduct can be submitted through multiple channels at Wizz Air, ensuring
confidentiality. Employees are encouraged to raise concerns with management, use the ticketing system for
complaints, or share opinions in the Employee Engagement Survey. Reports can be made in person at the
Office of the General Counsel or via the internal Intelex platform. Whistleblowers are protected from
retaliation and can report anonymously via Wizz Air’s external webmail site, which is regularly checked by
authorised personnel.
Every report must be investigated by the relevant Investigation Lead, who ensures whistleblower
confidentiality and informs the whistleblower of the investigation’s conclusions and actions taken. The
Investigation Lead reports to the Office of the General Counsel. Employees suspected of misconduct are only
considered guilty once proven. Wizz Air may take legal action against those who report in bad faith.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 257
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Whistleblowers can report suspected fraudulent acts personally or anonymously through established
channels:
▶ In person, via mail, or by phone, by contacting the Anti-Fraud and Investigations Manager.
▶ Through the whistleblowing platform referred to in the Policy of Good Conduct and Whistleblowing Policy,
where reports are directed to the General Counsel.
The General Counsel and Anti-Fraud Manager evaluate allegations involving Wizz Air personnel,
departments, systems or third parties. An Investigation Team is established with defined responsibilities.
The Anti-Fraud Manager determines measures and corrective actions, consulting other departments or
external experts if needed.
Employees can find information on reporting channels through internal folders, the intranet, or by contacting
their department’s Respective Officer. They can also share opinions in the annual Employee Engagement
Survey or use the EU and worldwide claim submission platform.
Wizz Air has implemented an Anti-Fraud Policy to address any concerns related to potential negative impacts
on employees. This policy, detailed in the [G1-1] Business conduct policies and corporate culture section,
outlines Wizz Air’s principles, restrictions and practical guidelines to prevent, detect and avoid fraudulent,
unethical or improper business practices. Adhering to this policy ensures that Wizz Air maintains the integrity
of its business and complies with all relevant anti-fraud laws, regulations, corporate policies and best
practices. Consequently, Wizz Air strictly prohibits any actions or omissions that contradict the values or
principles of this policy. The whistleblower and anti-fraud topics are integral components of Wizz Air’s
mandatory e-learning programme. This is designed to ensure that all employees are thoroughly educated on
the importance of ethical behaviour and the procedures for reporting any suspicious activities.
During F26, no material adverse impacts requiring formal remediation were identified in relation to the
Company’s own workforce. The Company nevertheless continues to monitor health and safety indicators,
reported concerns and investigation outcomes to ensure continuous improvement of its preventive and
remedial processes.
[S1-4] TAKING ACTION ON MATERIAL IMPACTS ON OWN WORKFORCE, AND APPROACHES TO
MITIGATING MATERIAL RISKS AND PURSUING MATERIAL OPPORTUNITIES RELATED TO OWN
WORKFORCE, AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THOSE ACTIONS
Aligned with the material impacts identified on our workforce, our efforts to mitigate material risks, and our
commitment to seizing material opportunities, Wizz Air presents various ongoing and planned key
programmes related to its own workforce. These initiatives include actions, metrics and targets. For detailed
information, please refer to the sections on diversity and inclusion, health, safety and well-being, social
protection, training and skills development as well as work-life balance under Chapter [S1] - Own workforce. 
The key programmes described below are implemented either as ongoing operational initiatives embedded
within the Company’s HR and safety management systems or as targeted programmes with defined annual
or multi-year objectives. Actions relating to employee engagement, remuneration reviews and training
programmes are reviewed annually. Initiatives aimed at improving diversity representation, leadership
development and workforce capability are implemented on a multi-year basis, aligned with the Company’s
strategic planning horizon. Progress is monitored continuously and evaluated at least annually.
Topic/subtopic
Key programmes and connected actions
Working conditions:
• Safety management initiatives aimed at maintaining a safe working environment
for employees.
• Employee engagement mechanisms, including the People Council, enabling
regular dialogue between employees and management.
• Annual remuneration reviews based on market benchmarks to ensure competitive
base salaries and benefits.
Secure employment
• Crew to Office Programme, enabling flight and cabin crew to transition to office
roles (19 employees participated during F26).
• Employee retention initiatives aimed at reducing attrition and improving workforce
stability.
• Continuous monitoring of employee engagement survey results and
implementation of improvement actions.
Health and safety
• Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) providing confidential support for mental
health and personal challenges.
• Employee Emergency Funding initiative providing financial assistance to
employees facing urgent medical or personal emergencies.
Equal treatment and
opportunities for all:
• Recruitment and talent development programmes designed to attract and retain
qualified employees.
• Diversity and inclusion initiatives aimed at promoting equal opportunities across
the organisation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 258
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Training and skills development
• Comprehensive training programmes supporting employee capability
development, including:
– Training for flight and cabin crew
– Wizz Air Pilot Academy (WAPA) Programme
– Office workforce development programmes
– Leadership training programmes
– Digital learning solutions.
• Regular performance and talent review processes supporting employee
development and career progression.
Diversity
• Implementation of diversity programmes aimed at increasing representation in
operational roles, including:
– She Can Fly Programme
– Internal Cadet Programme
– Cabin Crew to Captain Programme
– Self-Sponsored Cadet Programme.
– Initiatives supporting gender diversity and inclusive workplace culture.
• The Company’s objective of achieving 40% gender diversity in management was
achieved.
In addition to addressing impacts on employees, these initiatives mitigate material risks for the Company
arising from its dependence on a skilled, healthy and engaged workforce. Health and safety programmes,
training investments and engagement initiatives reduce the risk of operational disruption, workforce attrition
and capability gaps. Effectiveness is tracked through safety indicators, engagement survey results, retention
metrics and training completion rates.
As part of its fleet renewal and transition towards more fuel-efficient aircraft, Wizz Air ensures that all
required regulatory and type-rating training is provided to relevant crew and operational personnel. During
the reporting period, no material negative workforce impacts arose from this transition and no additional
mitigation measures were required.
Wizz Air has a whistleblowing system in place that provides channels for its own workforce to raise concerns
in relation to material negative impacts on them. Whistleblowing systems are described in detail in [S1-3]
and [G1-1].
Effectiveness of Actions
Wizz Air conducts an annual Employee Engagement Survey to assess the effectiveness of workforce-related
actions. Survey results, including identified development areas, are evaluated to create structured action
plans. The Organisational Development department, in collaboration with HR Operations, may modify
existing policies or develop new initiatives based on survey findings.
Compared to the previous reporting period, overall engagement scores remained stable at Company level.
Salary review processes were completed across all entities, and leadership development initiatives were
expanded. Diversity programmes continued to support the achievement of 40% gender diversity in
management. These developments demonstrate continued progress in implementing workforce-related
action plans.
Effectiveness is further assessed through regular performance reviews and goal-setting sessions. Feedback
from employees is shared across relevant business functions. The Compensation and Benefits Team
evaluates remuneration practices against market benchmarks to ensure fairness and competitiveness.
Resources and Governance
The programmes described above are primarily funded through the Company’s ongoing operational
expenditure relating to human resources, training, safety management and organisational development.
These costs are embedded within normal operating expenses and aligned with workforce planning.
These initiatives are managed by subject-matter experts within the Organisation Development,
Compensation, HR and Safety functions. They are responsible for implementation, tracking and continuous
review. The Company ensures compliance with EU regulations and applicable national legislation. Through
these measures and protective systems, Wizz Air seeks to prevent material negative impacts on its own
workforce and improve working conditions continuously.
[S1-5] TARGETS RELATED TO MANAGING MATERIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS, ADVANCING POSITIVE
IMPACTS, AND MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
The Company is in the process of developing structured, outcome-oriented targets further supported by
enhanced methodologies for measurable objectives related to the management of material workforce-
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 259
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
related impacts, risks and opportunities. Wizz Air has already defined key time-bound targets and
commitments in relation to safety, diversity and employee engagement, as presented below.
Wizz Air’s objectives within the people pillar:
Focus Area
Commitment
Target Year
Status
Process/commentary
Safety
Continue to put safety first, in
everything we do.
Ongoing
On target
Our Safety Review Board
meets four times a year.
Dedicated Safety, Security
and Operational Compliance
Committee of the Board. See
page 265.
Gender Diversity
Further improve gender
diversity in the Board,
management and flight deck
to achieve:
1. 33 per cent female
gender diversity in the
Board of Directors;
2. 40 per cent female
gender diversity in the
management team by
F26; and
3. 7 per cent female gender
diversity in the flight
deck by F30.
Board: target
achieved
Management:
target achieved
Flight deck: F30
Board:
Achieved
Management:
Achieved
Flight deck:
Ongoing
1. Board of Directors: 36
per cent – target
reached.
2. Management team: 41
per cent -target reached.
3. Flight deck: 6 per cent.
See [S1-9] - Gender
diversity metrics for more
details.
Employee
engagement
Improve employee
engagement survey
participation rate by 5%
annually. The target remains
ongoing.
Ongoing
Ongoing
In F26, participation
increased to 63% (F25:
55%). The KPI was refined in
F26 to focus specifically on
participation rate as a more
accurate measure of
employee engagement. More
on employee engagement
subchapter [S1-13].
Tracking and Effectiveness
Where comprehensive measurable target frameworks are still under development, Wizz Air tracks the
effectiveness of its workforce-related policies and actions through qualitative and quantitative indicators,
including engagement survey trends, diversity metrics, safety governance reviews and retention indicators.
Employee feedback mechanisms, including the engagement survey and internal dialogue structures, support
the identification of improvement areas and inform adjustments to action plans.
[S1-6] CHARACTERISTICS OF THE UNDERTAKING’S EMPLOYEES
Wizz Air is dedicated to recruiting talented, professional employees and providing them with essential tools,
offering dynamic development opportunities through a specially tailored programme for all levels within the
organisation, while promoting diversity and inclusion throughout the entire employee journey.
Informed by the ESRS S1, Wizz Air’s workforce consists of employees directly contracted by the Company
and non-employee workers. This section focuses on employees directly contracted by the Company, while
non-employee workers who are not classified under [S2] – Value Chain Workers are addressed separately in
[S1‑7] Characteristics of non‑employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce, according to the
categorisation of workforce types below.
▶ Our employees are individuals directly contracted by Wizz Air. They are fully covered by Company
policies, health and safety systems, receive all mandatory training, and are entitled to various leave and
benefits offered by the Company. Employment contracts are signed directly between Wizz Air and the
employee, with no involvement of agencies.
▶ Non-employee workers include self-employed individuals or those provided by agencies primarily
engaged in employment activities. These workers are covered by their respective companies’ health and
safety systems and employee-related policies. They receive essential training, such as fire safety and
security. Agreements are signed between the self-employed individuals or workforce agencies and Wizz
Air. The workforce agency or third party remains the employer.
Wizz Air’s employee base has grown significantly, increasing from 1,184 in 2010 to 9,668 as at the end of
March 2026. Despite operational challenges during F26, including the ongoing impacts of earlier aircraft
groundings related to Pratt & Whitney GTF engine inspections, as well as geopolitical developments in
Europe and the Middle East, the Company successfully recruited 2,775 employees.
As part of the ongoing Crew to Office Programme, 19 employees transitioned from crew to office roles during
F26, supporting career mobility and enabling flight and cabin crew to gain experience in a corporate
environment.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 260
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Wizz Air remains committed to continuous development and internal mobility, supporting career progression
across functions. In F26, 15% of office employees benefited from internal career advancement, including
both promotions and lateral moves.
40706
The data presented below encompasses own employees and provides information on employees categorised
by contract type, gender and country. The data reported uses the year-end headcount. However, the
attrition rate is calculated using the average headcount over 12 months and the total number of leavers
during that period.
Breakdown of Wizz Air’s own employees by gender
Gender
Number of employees (headcount)
Female
4,641
Male
5,027
Not reported
0
Total
9,668
Breakdown of Wizz Air’s own employees by country
Country
Number of employees (headcount)
Romania
1,776
Poland
1,693
Hungary
1,246
Italy
1,098
United Kingdom
582
Other (less then 10% of total headcount)
3,273
Total
9,668
During the reporting period, 1,934 employees left the Company, compared to 1,496 in the previous year.
Despite the increase in absolute departures, the employee turnover rate decreased from 18% to 13.4%.
This reflects the continued growth of the workforce and indicates improved employee retention relative to
the Company’s overall employee base.
[S1-7] CHARACTERISTICS OF NON-EMPLOYEE WORKERS IN THE UNDERTAKING’S OWN WORKFORCE
In reference to ESRS 1 Appendix C, Wizz Air has chosen to omit reporting on all datapoints in this Disclosure
Requirement for this reporting year.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 261
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[S1-9] DIVERSITY METRICS
Since its founding, Wizz Air has been committed to fostering an inclusive environment and ensuring equal
opportunities for all candidates, employees and partners. This commitment applies across all stages of the
employee lifecycle and is upheld regardless of personal characteristics, including race, national or ethnic
origin, gender, age, religion, disability, sexual orientation or any other legally protected status. Decisions
across the Company are based on merit, including skills, performance and role requirements. Wizz Air
expects all members of its workforce to uphold these principles, as reflected in “The Wizz Way”, the Policy
for Good Conduct, and the Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy, which together define the
standards of behaviour across the organisation. Further details are provided in [S1-1] Policies related to our
workforce.
Diversity metrics at Wizz Air: Age distribution
Age group
Headcount
Percentage
Distribution of employees under 30 years old
5,487
57%
Distribution of employees between 30 and 50 years old
3,411
35%
Distribution of employees over 50 years old
770
8%
Diversity metrics at Wizz Air: Gender distribution at top management level
Gender distribution at top management level
Headcount
Percentage
Female
6
32%
Male
13
68%
Not reported
0
0
Total
19
100%
At Wizz Air, the top management and leadership roles include all positions from Officer and above. The
management level encompasses positions from Head of Department and higher.
Nationalities
Wizz Air is an ethnically diverse and inclusive professional organisation with over 106 nationalities within its
employee base (82 in the cabin crew, 63 in the flight crew and 65 in the office). At Board level, eleven
current Directors are from 8 different countries, while the Company’s 40 Heads of Function and 19 Officers
and Executives represent 19 different nationalities. The following charts include detailed information on the
nationality breakdown according to various employee categories.
Cabin crew
National diversity ratio:
Romanian
23%
Polish
19%
Italian
11%
Hungarian
8%
Albanian
5%
Bulgarian
5%
Ukrainian
3%
British
5%
Others (with 3% share or less)
21%
Office
National diversity ratio:
Hungarian
59%
Romanian
4%
Indian
12%
Others (with 3% share or less)
25%
Management (Head and above)
National diversity ratio:
Hungarian
45%
British
7%
Romanian
7%
Bulgarian
3%
Irish
3%
Polish
3%
Portuguese
3%
Spanish
5%
Swedish
2%
Others (with 2% share or less)
22%
Flight crew
National diversity ratio:
Polish
18%
Hungarian
12%
Italian
14%
Romanian
12%
British
9%
Bulgarian
4%
Others (with 3% share or less)
31%
Gender diversity
At Wizz Air, we maintain a balanced male-to-female ratio organisation-wide, with females representing 48
per cent of our workforce. However, we acknowledge the need for further enhancements in gender diversity
within specific employee groups. As part of our ongoing commitment to diversity, we have set targets to
enhance female representation in critical areas such as the flight deck, Leadership Team and Boardroom;
the two latest targets have been achieved.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 262
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The chart below exhibits the male-to-female ratio within various employee groups at Wizz Air:
44116
Wizz Air emphasises that diverse leadership is a key driver of accelerated growth and a more inclusive
workforce. By the end of F26, the Company successfully met its target of achieving 40% gender diversity
within its management team (Heads of Function, Officers and CEO level), reaching 41%.
In F26, the Board maintained a gender diversity level of 36% female representation. Overall, company-wide
gender diversity improved slightly to 48%, up from 47% the previous year, with women representing 42%
of office-based employees. Representation across operational roles continues to vary. Female representation
among flight crew remained at 6%, with Wizz Air UK Limited reporting the highest proportion of female
pilots at 7.30% as at 31 March 2026. Female participation among cabin crew remained high at 68%.
To address the gender gap in the flight deck, Wizz Air has set a clear target and embedded a range of
initiatives under its “Women of WIZZ” programme. Recruitment practices are designed to ensure that at
least one female candidate is included on every shortlist, with diverse interview panels encouraged as
standard. These efforts are complemented by targeted development programmes aimed at increasing the
number of female pilots. Since 2014, female pilot representation has doubled from 3% to 6%, placing the
Company among the higher end of global aviation averages, with a further target of at least 7% by 2030.
Key initiatives supporting this ambition include the “She Can Fly Programme”, a dedicated stream within the
Wizz Air Pilot Academy (WAPA) focused on increasing female participation in pilot training; the Cabin Crew to
Captain Programme, which enables internal career progression into pilot roles; and both internal and self-
sponsored cadet programmes that broaden access to training opportunities. At the time of reporting, there
are 3 women in the Cabin Crew to Captain Programme and 15 women in the She Can Fly Programme. These
initiatives are underpinned by the Company’s Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy, which ensures
merit-based recruitment and equal access to career development.
In parallel, Wizz Air continues to foster inclusion and well-being through engagement initiatives such as the
“Women on Air” event, which promotes mental health, work-life balance and equality in aviation, reinforcing
its long-term commitment to diversity and sustainable career development.
[S1-11] SOCIAL PROTECTION
All employees of Wizz Air are covered by social protection against loss of income due to significant life
events, since the declaration of employment entails the obligation to pay taxes and contributions on
employee wages and employer contributions, which covers payment during sick leave, benefits in the event
of a work-related or travel accident, maternity leave and other parental leave benefits. Wizz Air operates in
multiple countries, ensuring social protection for all employees in accordance with local social security and
labour laws. This includes office staff, flight and cabin crew members.
Benefits related to unemployment and retirement are governed by local labour and social security laws in
each country where the Company operates. As a result, the Company adheres to these regulations and does
not implement additional rules, policies or processes for these benefits. However, the Company introduced a
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 263
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
new private pension fund system. This system allows employees to contribute a portion of their salaries,
with the Company matching these contributions. Additionally, tax benefits are available for these savings.
[S1-13] TRAINING AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT METRICS
Wizz Air is dedicated to fostering a culture of continuous
Wizz-573__3.jpg
learning and professional development. We have
developed a diverse array of training programmes, both
mandatory and optional, aimed at empowering
employees, enhancing their skills, and supporting their
career growth. Our comprehensive Training and
Development Policy clearly outlines the various
development opportunities available to our employees,
ensuring they have access to the resources needed to
thrive in their roles.
For non-employees and workers within our value chain,
we offer essential training programmes such as fire and
safety training to ensure a safe working environment.
Additionally, any specialised training required for specific
positions within business functions, such as maintenance
training, is provided. This approach ensures that all individuals, whether employed directly or as part of our
extended network, receive the necessary training to perform their duties effectively and safely.
The quantitative metrics disclosed in this section relate to own employees and are reported on a year-end
headcount basis for F26.
In the table below, Wizz Air discloses the training hours and performance review metrics for employees:
Female
Male
Total
Percentage of employees and (or) non-employees that participated in regular
performance and career development reviews
34%
73%
54%
Average number of training hours per employee and/or non-employee
Office employees
23.31
19.24
21.28
Cabin crew
99.9
94.2
97.05
Flight deck
101.1
111.1
106.1
Total
94.83
96.66
95.78
Training hours include both mandatory regulatory training and voluntary development programmes
completed during the reporting period.
Training our flight and cabin crew
Flight and cabin crew training is organised by a dedicated in-house training team, which consists of 460
flight deck and 494 cabin crew trainers across Wizz Air’s entire network.
In F26:
▶ more than 490 pilots and over 2300 cabin crew members joined the Company and had world-class initial
training,
▶ while 2,800 pilots and 5,500 cabin crew members completed recurrent training.
Most training is conducted in modern, state-of-the-art facilities in Budapest and Rome. These facilities are
equipped with two and three Airbus A320 CAE 7000XR Series full-flight simulators, respectively, a cutting-
edge Cabin Emergency Evacuation Trainer, and a V9000 Commander Next-Generation Fire Trainer. In the
eight years since the Budapest training centre opened, cadets and experienced pilots who take part in
recurrent training have completed a total of more than 100,000 flight hours, equivalent to over a decade of
continuous flying across three simulators.
In February 2024, Wizz Air inaugurated its second training centre in Rome, Italy. The facility spans over
2,500 square metres and accommodates three full-flight Airbus A320-family simulators. Each simulator can
train up to 270 pilots per month, ensuring recurrent training for up to 3,600 pilots per year.
Wizz Air’s crew training has successfully implemented a fully integrated digital Training Management
System, which enables us to manage and control the entire lifecycle of pilot and cabin crew learning and
qualifications in a single digital platform. The system will further enhance our training efficiency,
organisational flexibility and performance, while ensuring guaranteed compliance with regulations.
Wizz Air also organises dedicated “Foundations of People Management” leadership training upon request for
cabin and flight operations management. This training aims to enhance leadership self-awareness and to
equip managers with critical management skills and techniques such as constructive feedback, effective
delegation, conflict management and impactful communication.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 264
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Wizz Air Pilot Academy (WAPA) Programme
The Wizz Air Pilot Academy (WAPA) is a unique pilot training programme designed to develop a new
generation of pilots, even those with minimal prior aviation experience. It offers the opportunity to obtain a
Commercial Pilot’s Licence and pursue a career at Wizz Air through comprehensive, high-quality training
starting from the basics, supported by an experienced flight school and aligned with Wizz Air’s training
standards.
Wizz Air’s training programme is conducted in collaboration with one of Europe’s leading EASA-approved
flight training academies. Our integrated training scheme aims not only to meet EASA requirements but also
to develop cadets into proficient team players. Cadets are encouraged to support their peers and work
collaboratively towards their goals, a crucial skill in a multi-pilot environment such as airline operations. In
addition to investing in aircraft and equipment, we continuously enhance our training structure. Active airline
pilots contribute to the development of the syllabus and participate in progress checks, theoretical training
and multi-crew cooperation training.
Developing our office workforce
In line with our commitment to fostering a data‑driven approach to employee development, Wizz Air has
established a comprehensive soft‑skill competency framework for office employees. Based on these
competency matrices, employees receive tailored support through the LinkedIn Learning platform and
individual development opportunities. As part of our digitalisation efforts, we have extended LinkedIn
Learning access to our crew members as well, not only to office employees. The platform provides guided,
personalised learning paths designed to strengthen soft skills and support continuous professional growth.
This year, we developed 47 new Learning Paths aligned with our competency framework and key initiatives,
including Summer of Care. Summer of Care is a series of six interactive webinars designed to help
employees navigate turbulent times, addressing topics such as anxiety management, burnout prevention
and recovery, generational differences, and more. Approximately 300 participants engaged in the series.
Onboarding and Integration
We continue to deliver comprehensive onboarding sessions for new colleagues, led by senior leadership and
key internal stakeholders. These sessions offer insights into the Company’s culture, principles, policies and
procedures, helping new hires integrate quickly and become productive from day one. The onboarding
process is continuously refined based on new‑joiner feedback to ensure effectiveness and relevance. The
Company also conducts exit interviews with colleagues leaving the Company. These interviews help us
understand the reasons for employee departures, identify areas for improvement, and gather insights that
support the enhancement of employee experience, engagement and retention across the organisation.
WIZZ Academy
This year, we celebrated 269 WIZZ Academy alumni across seven semesters as at the end of F26. The
programme provides office employees and crew members with unique insights into the Company’s strategy
and objectives, presented by top executives, including the CEO.
WIZZ Academy serves as a platform for increased interaction with the Leadership Team, fostering a
community of potential internal culture and brand ambassadors, while expanding the internal talent pool
based on participants’ career aspirations. Each semester welcomes a diverse cohort of 40 employees who
attend eight bi‑weekly interactive lectures and training sessions with networking opportunities.
WIZZ Management Trainee Programme
Building on the success of previous years, the WIZZ Management Trainee Programme was further
expanded. The programme aims to create diverse talent‑growth opportunities from the bottom of the
organisation, enhance brand and culture awareness, strengthen our presence at top universities as well as
recruit and develop young professionals with the potential to become future Managers and Senior Managers
at Wizz Air. With new recruitment waves launched, the total number of selected management trainees
reached 34, of whom 16 were offered full‑time internal positions this fiscal year. Trainees join the office for a
“one plus one plus one” year, with annual departmental rotations and the possibility of full‑time employment
upon completion.
Leadership education
This year, 54 employees graduated from our one‑year Leadership Development Programme, designed to
enhance leadership capabilities for people managers below Head level. The programme begins with a
competency assessment followed by feedback from peers and direct managers to support development for
current and future roles. We emphasise personalised growth through tailored opportunities, including
coaching and mentoring.
Based on participant feedback, programme‑design evaluations and alignment with our long‑term training
strategy, we are piloting a renewed four‑month format at the end of the year for 52 participants, delivered in
partnership with a new provider to meet employee needs more effectively.
Wizz Air continued to support Heads and Officers through opportunities aimed at strengthening leadership
capabilities across multiple dimensions. The ongoing SEED Business Leadership Programme, available to all
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 265
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Heads, ensures a consistent leadership culture across departments. This year, six Heads completed the
programme in a dedicated in‑house format, alongside two high‑potential Senior Managers who progressed
into Head roles during the programme.
In addition, Wizz Air maintained its practice of offering partial scholarships for the Master of Business
Administration programme at Budapest Corvinus University.
This year, we offered an individual coaching programme primarily for Heads and Officers, structured into
three development tracks:
• Promotion‑Based Coaching for Senior Managers transitioning to Head roles, and Heads moving into Officer
roles.
• Performance‑Based Coaching for targeted development needs based on managerial input, performance
evaluations and qualitative feedback.
• Interest‑Based Coaching for leaders proactively seeking development, with a co‑designed coaching
agenda.
Following the people‑manager evaluation, the programme was extended to selected middle managers, both
high‑performing talents as a retention initiative and those requiring additional support. In total, 33 leaders
participated, completing approximately 200 hours of coaching across all tracks.
Regular performance and talent review
Wizz Air’s annual People Cycle process supports effective workforce planning and alignment with strategic
goals while ensuring continuous talent development for office employees and crew management. All internal
Wizz Air office employees and crew management are included in this process, which consists of a full
performance and talent review cycle, beginning with goal setting. Goals are collaboratively set with
managers to ensure full alignment with Wizz Air’s strategic objectives. These goals may be revised during
the mid‑year review to reflect any changes in business priorities. At the end of the fiscal year, office
employees and crew management have the opportunity to reflect on their results and define focus areas for
the upcoming year.
The process is facilitated digitally, promoting transparency, consistency and development across the
organisation. As an outcome, employees receive:
• a performance rating, reflecting achievement of goals, and
• a talent rating, indicating their potential for vertical or lateral career movement within the organisation.
To ensure fairness and transparency, Heads and Officers review and calibrate all ratings at both functional
and departmental levels. Final performance ratings and feedback are communicated to employees during
face‑to‑face discussions with their direct managers. In addition, managers develop succession plans based
on employees’ talent profiles. Crew employees also participate in regular performance review check‑ins with
their respective managers to support ongoing development and alignment.
[S1-14] HEALTH AND SAFETY METRICS
Safety is Wizz Air’s highest operational priority and the foundation of successful operations. Since August
2022, the Safety, Security and Operational Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors has supported
the Board with oversight of the Group’s policies, practices, objectives and performance in safety, security
and operational compliance.
Wizz Air’s safety governance covers both:
▶ Operational aviation safety (Safety Management System – SMS)
▶ Occupational Health and Safety of employees (HS)
The Company’s Health and Safety Policy applies to all employees and business partners, and is aligned
with all applicable legal requirements and recognised international and aviation industry standards. The
latest formally approved version dates back to 2004; however, the Policy was comprehensively reviewed
in F26 to ensure stronger integration, enhanced effectiveness and full alignment with the ongoing Health
& Safety Management System Improvement and Standardisation programme.
The data below relates to occupational health and safety of own employees during F26.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 266
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Health and Safety metrics
F25
F26
The number of employees who are covered by health and safety
management system in head count based on legal requirements and
(or) recognised standards or guidelines
8,816
9,668
Percentage of own workers who are covered by health and safety
management system based on legal requirements and (or)
recognised standards or guidelines
100%
100%
Number of fatalities in own workforce as result of work-related
injuries and work-related ill health
0
0
Number of fatalities as result of work-related injuries and work-
related ill health of other workers working on undertaking's sites
0
0
Number of recordable work-related accidents for own workforce
51
48
Rate of recordable work-related accidents for own workforce
3.83
3.62
Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health of own
workforce
0
0
Number of days lost to work-related injuries and fatalities from work-
related accidents, work-related ill health, and fatalities from ill health
493
425
Total hours worked by people in own workforce
13,304,943
17,396,846
All employees are covered by the Company’s Health and Safety Management System.
Health and Safety Policy and Commitments
Safety and responsibility remain the core values and guiding principles of our business. This commitment
extends to our passengers, employees, contractors and all individuals affected by our operations, ensuring
the safe and responsible operation of aircraft, facilities and installations, as well as the prevention of
work‑related accidents, injuries and ill health.
The updated Health & Safety Policy strengthens and clarifies these commitments by introducing a more
structured, transparent and forward‑looking approach to occupational health and safety. Compared to
previous versions, the revised policy places greater emphasis on proactive risk management, employee
involvement, wellbeing considerations and contractor oversight, ensuring a more comprehensive and
resilient H&S framework across the organisation.
In alignment with Wizz Air’s corporate safety objectives, we continuously monitor and strive to enhance our
performance based on clearly defined health and safety performance indicators. The updated policy also
aims to reinforce the cooperation and operational alignment between Health & Safety and the overarching
Safety Policy, establishing a stronger connection within the integrated Safety Management System (SMS).
By harmonising principles, processes and reporting channels, the revised policy supports a more unified,
collaborative and effective safety culture.
Our Health and Safety Policy is communicated throughout the organisation to promote shared responsibility
and to achieve the highest levels of performance. Compliance with all legal requirements and safety
standards is a prerequisite for all employees. Management ensures that adequate resources – staffing, time,
budget and training – are available to implement and enforce this policy effectively and to incorporate
necessary improvements as the organisation evolves.
Health and Safety Management System
Wizz Air remains committed to strengthening its Health and Safety Management System continuously via
proactive development of policies, systems and procedures that reflect the Company’s evolving operational
complexity and regulatory environment. The updated structure represents a significant advancement
compared to previous years, elevating H&S governance, strengthening system-wide consistency, and
ensuring deeper integration with the Safety Policy and the overarching Safety Management System (SMS).
Wizz Air regularly reviews and updates its Health and Safety objectives, key performance indicators (KPIs)
and performance metrics, ensuring that the SMS is supported by a robust, data-driven foundation. In recent
years, the Company has expanded and professionalised its Health & Safety organisation, introducing clearer
governance, strengthened internal interfaces and enhanced cooperation mechanisms with operational and
corporate stakeholders.
The enhanced HSMS places strategic focus on the following key areas:
• Maintaining and verifying high compliance levels with network-wide and local legal requirements across all
operational jurisdictions, ensuring that H&S controls remain consistent and auditable.
• Documenting essential H&S processes, standards and local instructions, creating transparent and
harmonised system architecture aligned with the SMS and OMM requirements.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 267
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
• Establishing a significantly strengthened H&S promotion system, incorporating structured communication
tools, tailored training programmes, and proactive awareness initiatives that reinforce safety culture at all
levels.
Recent improvements have greatly increased the efficiency and transparency of reporting and oversight.
Health and Safety reporting has been fully integrated into the Company’s management system software,
enabling standardised reporting, classification, investigation and action-tracking processes. Identified
hazards are incorporated into the Company’s risk register, where associated risks are managed under the
SMS framework by qualified experts. Significant H&S concerns are escalated into the relevant SMS forums to
ensure timely management attention and effective resolution.
Training and competence development remain fundamental pillars of the Health and Safety Management
System. All employees receive targeted education, guidance and practical support to meet their Health &
Safety responsibilities. Non-employees, including contractors and service providers, are required to
familiarise themselves with the Company’s Health and Safety requirements, which are available in the local
languages of all Wizz Air subsidiaries.
Employee Well-being and Support Measures
Our commitment to employee well‑being is supported by the Employee Assistance Programme (EAP), which
offers confidential psychological counselling and emotional support to all employees. The programme
provides access to trained mental‑health professionals both on‑site and online, ensuring flexibility and
availability regardless of location. The EAP is designed to support employees in managing work‑related
stress, personal challenges, crisis situations and general well‑being concerns. Services are accessible
throughout the entire Wizz Air network, and confidentiality is guaranteed to encourage open communication
and early intervention.
Complementing the EAP, Wizz Air also operates a Peer‑to‑Peer Support Programme, which provides  pilots
with an additional, informal and highly accessible source of support. Trained peer supporters offer a safe,
empathetic and non‑judgemental environment where colleagues can discuss concerns with someone who
understands the operational context, crew lifestyle, and unique pressures associated with aviation roles. This
programme strengthens community resilience, promotes early help‑seeking behaviour and fosters a
supportive organisational culture in line with the Company’s Just Culture principles.
WIZZ Aid provides financial support to employees requiring urgent medical treatment or affected by natural
or man-made disasters not covered by insurance. During F26, six applications were approved, in the amount
of €28,700, for life-saving medical surgery, disability treatment and funeral support.
Operational safety and compliance
Safety Policy Statement
Safety is the top priority in our work and the key to a successful business. It is through the personal
commitment of all our employees that we provide our customers with the highest level of safety possible.
Wizz Air’s safety philosophy is to create and maintain an organisation which is healthy, safe and successful,
while we are fully committed to supporting the continuous improvement of the organisation and
management system. We are committed to complying with all applicable laws, regulations and standards,
taking into consideration industry best practice including IATA Standards and Recommended Practices
(ISARPs).
At Wizz Air, we are deeply committed to upholding safety management by allocating ample resources to
ensure safe operations. Our senior leadership is dedicated to cultivating and endorsing an organisational
culture that promotes safe work practices, encourages robust safety reporting and proactively oversees
safety.
We firmly believe that safety is everyone’s responsibility, and all management levels and employees are held
accountable for delivering the highest level of safety performance. This commitment starts from the top,
with our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Wizz Air’s Operations Officers.
We implemented a comprehensive Safety Management System to manage the risks associated with our
operations and activities. Our safety objectives and performance standards are designed to facilitate
continuous improvement in our safety performance.
Our employees play a crucial role in maintaining a safe operation. It is vital that they report any actual or
potential safety issues or concerns. We encourage every employee to contribute to the Safety Management
System by reporting safety issues and concerns to the Safety and Compliance department.
To support our employees in maintaining their mental fitness, we have initiated an employee support
programme. We strive to foster an atmosphere of trust through our Just Culture, where individuals are
encouraged to report critical safety-related information. Our Just Culture Policy ensures that unintentional
errors and unsafe acts will not be penalised. However, those who act recklessly or take deliberate and
unjustifiable risks will be subject to disciplinary action. This will be determined through a fair and consistent
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 268
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
process that includes an independent review of the events, taking into account any human factors, human
behaviour and mitigating circumstances as outlined in the Organisation Management Manual.
Compliance Statement and Monitoring
As an airline, Wizz Air operates a comprehensive Safety Management System (SMS) to manage the risks
associated with operations and activities.
We are dedicated to operating consistently in accordance with applicable requirements, laws, regulations and
internal documentation. This commitment is supported by our Compliance Monitoring Function, which
continuously monitors the performance of systems and processes employed by Wizz Air.
The aims of the Compliance Monitoring System include:
– Ensuring safe operations and airworthy aircraft
– Continuous monitoring of operations for compliance with all applicable standards, requirements and
procedures
– Maintaining our Air Operator Certificate and Operating Licence
– Achieving timely implementation of corrective and preventive actions
– Meeting Safety Performance Indicators defined by the Accountable Manager
Wizz Air adheres to all relevant aviation regulations issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
and the respective national Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs). All standards are in compliance with EASA
regulations and associated decisions. Managers and operational personnel comply with all applicable laws,
regulations and procedures in every location where operations are conducted.
[S1-17] INCIDENTS, COMPLAINTS AND SEVERE HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
At Wizz Air, both employees and consumers have multiple channels to report complaints or incidents related
to harassment or discrimination. Employees can utilise the Intelex reporting system, which offers
comprehensive safety software to streamline safety protocols, incident reporting and compliance
management. Additionally, they can report incidents to their line management, even anonymously, submit
feedback to the HR department, or use the whistleblowing platform. Suppliers and customers can visit the
Company’s official website for information on lodging claims. The website provides email addresses,
telephone numbers, and online platforms for submitting complaints. Furthermore, they can send official
letters by post, and suppliers can contact their respective contract owner or contact person at Wizz Air.
For more information, please refer to subchapters [S1-3], [S2-3] and [S4-3]. In all cases, the reported
incidents and complaints are investigated within the specified deadline in accordance with local laws and
legislation (the most common deadline is within 30 days of the reporting). The sanctions applied so far have
been termination of the employment relationship and a written warning to the employee, no fines or
penalties were imposed, and there is no related amount in the Annual Report.
In F26, there were six incidents related to harassment or discrimination, and zero incidents related to severe
human rights.
Metrics related to working rights and human rights impacts
F25
F26
Number of incidents of discrimination
3
6
Number of complaints filed through channels for own workers to raise concerns
10
6
Number of complaints filed to National Contact Points for OECD Multinational
Enterprises
0
0
Amount of material fines, penalties, and compensation for damages as result of
violations regarding social and human rights factors
0
0
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own
workforce
0
0
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to own
workforce that are violations of UN Global Compact Principles and OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
0
0
Amount of material fines, penalties, and compensation for severe human rights
issues and incidents connected to own workforce
0
0
Number of severe human rights cases where undertaking played role securing
remedy for those affected
0
0
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 269
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[S2] WORKERS IN THE VALUE CHAIN
Wizz Air’s value chain encompasses a diverse range of workers who contribute to the Company's success,
such as outsourced service workers, in addition to upstream value chain workers who perform aircraft
maintenance and ground handling work for example. These individuals, although not directly employed by
the Company, play a crucial role in delivering professional services and supporting various operational
functions.
Beyond our own operations, upstream and downstream value chain activities are carried out by
subcontractors or entities to which the activity is outsourced. While the Company may not execute these
activities directly, it maintains oversight and ensures that services or products are delivered as specified in
the agreement.
[SBM-3] MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH STRATEGY
AND BUSINESS MODEL
As disclosed in [SBM-3], Wizz Air identified material risks and negative impacts relating to labour standards
and working conditions within its upstream and downstream value chain. These matters primarily relate to
supplier compliance with labour laws and fair employment practices, including health and safety, secure
employment, adequate wages and social dialogue. Wizz Air operates a business model that relies on
specialised third-party providers for critical operational functions, including aircraft maintenance, ground
handling, customer service and other operational support services. Most workers performing these activities
are employed and managed by suppliers rather than directly by the Company. As a result, the identified
impacts and risks arise through the value chain.
In the previous reporting period, no material negative impacts were identified. In the current year, the
material negative impact identified relates to the potential for inadequate working conditions or workforce
management practices within parts of the value chain, particularly in operationally sensitive areas such as
technical maintenance and ground handling. As these activities are performed by third-party providers,
working conditions are primarily managed at supplier level. However, Wizz Air recognises that its operational
model creates a dependency on these workforces and that variations in health and safety standards, fatigue
management practices or grievance mechanisms across providers may influence worker safety and
wellbeing. The Company therefore seeks to address these risks through its procurement framework,
contractual requirements as well as ongoing supplier engagement and oversight.
The material risks arising from these impacts and from Wizz Air’s dependency on supplier workforces include
reputational exposure, operational disruption, contractual challenges and potential compliance-related costs.
Disruptions affecting safety-critical or operational services could affect service reliability and business
continuity. These risks are concentrated in both upstream and downstream activities and are managed
through procurement governance, contractual requirements and oversight mechanisms as described in ESRS
2 and the Governance section of this report.
Although the double materiality assessment did not identify specific geographic areas or commodities with a
significant risk of child labour, forced labour or compulsory labour as material, Wizz Air recognises that
aviation supply chains can involve cross-border labour arrangements and layered subcontracting. The
Company therefore prohibits child labour, forced labour and human trafficking through its Supplier Code of
Conduct. Suppliers are required to comply with applicable labour laws, minimum age requirements and fair
employment standards, and may not withhold identity documents or wages. These requirements are
embedded in supplier onboarding and risk-based review processes.
Wizz Air’s procurement and supplier governance framework is designed not only to mitigate risk but also to
support positive impacts within the value chain. Through contractual requirements, labour standards
expectations and safety oversight, the Company seeks to promote fair working conditions, wage compliance,
health and safety protection and non-discrimination. Suppliers are expected to have appropriate grievance
mechanisms and keep workplace environments free from harassment and discrimination. By integrating
these expectations into procurement governance and oversight structures, Wizz Air contributes to
strengthening labour standards and workforce stability among its critical partners.
The interaction between the identified impacts, risks and the Company’s strategy is linked to operational
continuity and safety. Reliable flight operations depend on stable and compliant supplier workforces.
Managing these dependencies through responsible procurement and oversight therefore forms part of Wizz
Air’s broader risk management and business continuity approach and supports long-term value creation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 270
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[S2-1] POLICIES RELATED TO VALUE CHAIN WORKERS
ESRS Requirement
Material Topic
Policy Coverage
S2 - Workers in the value chain
Secure Employment
Adequate wages
Social dialogue
Health and Safety
• Supplier Code of Conduct
• Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement
• Sustainable Procurement Policy
• Purchasing Policy
• Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment
Policy (please see [S1-1] own workforce
policies)
• Anti-Fraud Policy (please see [G1-1]
business conduct policies and corporate
culture)
Supplier Code of Conduct
Wizz Air is dedicated to providing affordable travel while prioritising environmental, social and economic
responsibility. The Supplier Code of Conduct applies to all suppliers and their subcontractors, ensuring they
share Wizz Air’s commitments. Suppliers must adhere to environmental laws, ethical business practices as
well as health and safety standards. They are also required to maintain a workplace free from discrimination,
harassment and bullying, and comply with data protection laws. By upholding these standards, Wizz Air
fosters strong supplier relationships, enhances workforce stability, and maintains its reputation as a
responsible employer. The summary of the policy is available online at Wizz Air’s sustainability website.
Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement
Wizz Air is committed to acting ethically and with integrity in our business dealings. Wizz Air expects its
suppliers to conduct themselves in this manner too. Wizz Air is committed to improving its practices to
combat slavery and human trafficking and seek out where this exists in our dealings with third parties and
suppliers, and in our supply chain, to meet our commitments. As defined by the UK Modern Slavery Act
2015, “modern slavery” includes the offences of “slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour”, as
well as “human trafficking”.
Wizz Air expects its suppliers to adhere to the highest standards of business, internally and in relation to
their respective supply chains, and comply with their own human rights regimes and Modern Slavery Act
obligations. Our suppliers must conform to the necessary aviation safety standards and certification. We are
committed to assessing any instance of non-compliance regarding modern slavery or human trafficking on a
case-by-case basis.
We are committed to ensuring that collectively these measures will help us in combatting modern slavery
and human trafficking. We are looking to use indicators (KPIs) to measure effectiveness, such as vetting
procedures, supplier screening measures, sub-contractor inspections (particularly in known at-risk
countries), whistleblowing reports, percentage of staff trained, and any remedial action taken following
reports or incidents of slavery or human trafficking. For more information, please refer to the Modern
Slavery Act Disclosure Statement.
Sustainable Procurement Policy
The policy introduces the need for ongoing research and efforts for new sustainability practices,
implementing the sustainability criteria in tender evaluations with the appropriate weight and requiring
suppliers to include sustainability factors in their own procurement and daily operations. The policy applies to
all Wizz Air companies, and to all procurement activities. Please refer to subchapters [S2-4] and [S2-5] for
further information about sustainable procurement actions and targets.
Purchasing Policy
This Policy is designed to set the principles and to cover all critical phases of such activity. The purpose of
this policy is to define the rules and guidelines of the purchasing process to maximise the purchasing power
of the Company, make the purchasing procedure controlled and transparent, and keep cost at an optimum
level while maintaining quality in purchasing procedures. This Purchasing Policy applies to all Wizz Air Group
legal entities.
General approach to respect for labour and human rights standards
Wizz Air has established policies that set out expectations regarding labour standards and responsible
business conduct within its value chain. These policies are designed to support compliance with applicable
laws and to promote responsible practices among suppliers. Labour-related requirements are incorporated
into supplier contractual arrangements and procurement risk assessment mechanisms.
As most value chain workers are employed by third-party providers, labour-related engagement is primarily
undertaken through supplier relationships. Expectations are communicated and form part of contractual
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 271
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
requirements. Certain suppliers, particularly those considered operationally significant, may be subject to
additional review or monitoring within the Company’s procurement governance framework.
While we have not yet aligned these policies with third-party standards or initiatives, such as the UN Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights, the International Labour Organization's Declaration on
Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, we
continue to monitor and review our practices to maintain high standards of worker welfare.
The most senior level in the organisation that is accountable for the implementation of policies related to
suppliers and workers in the value chain is the General Counsel and the Chief Corporate Officer. Wizz Air
consistently considers stakeholder interests, incorporating their feedback into policy decisions through
various channels. The policies related to own workforce are available internally and on the Company’s official
website. Wizz Air prepares its policies in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, and the General
Counsel’s approval is requested in all cases.
[S2-2] PROCESSES FOR ENGAGING WITH VALUE CHAIN WORKERS ABOUT IMPACTS
Wizz Air has established a comprehensive process for purchasing products and services from its suppliers.
We are committed to collaborating with professional, financially independent and transparent organisations
that adhere to our Supplier Code of Conduct. Our suppliers are not exclusive to Wizz Air; they maintain
agreements with various other companies, allowing their workers to engage in multiple projects.
In developing our supplier policies and in performing the DMA, we considered the perspectives of workers
within the value chain. Our policies mandate that suppliers operate ethically and honestly, provide adequate
wages and ensure equal treatment for their employees. Any modifications to these policies are promptly
communicated to our suppliers, and if necessary, meetings are organised to negotiate the new terms. The
supplier processes, including those related to value chain workers, are outlined in our internal purchasing
documents.
Maintaining strong relationships with our suppliers and their workers is crucial for enhancing performance
quality. The contract owner is responsible for regular communication with suppliers, which may include
monthly meetings, project closure meetings, and contact via email or telephone.
Before selecting a provider, Wizz Air conducts a thorough financial and background due diligence. These
processes help us assess potential suppliers’ financial stability and business risks, protect our interests, and
ensure compliance with sanctions and legislation on money laundering, bribery and corruption. Due diligence
also allows us to verify that our partners operate responsibly and sustainably, determining whether or not to
proceed with contracting.
Other aspects of supplier selection at Wizz Air:
▶ Wizz Air has established an ESG risk assessment platform that uses cloud-based technology to monitor
its supply chain.
▶ Other criteria that assess whether the potential supplier’s proposal meets the needs of Wizz Air, such as
price, quality, geographical location, etc.
▶ The potential supplier must have a health and safety system and code of conduct and other policies
which define the rules and regulations of ethical business operation, appropriate working conditions,
respect of human rights, anti-slavery and human trafficking, and other work-related rights (for example
provide secure employment and adequate wages according to local labour laws).
Wizz Air is committed to respecting human rights through a range of robust policies and practices. While we
do not have a Global Framework Agreement (GFA) or any other formal agreement with workers'
representatives in the value chain specifically focused on human rights within the workforce, our dedication
to human rights remains strong.
[S2-3] PROCESSES TO REMEDIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS AND CHANNELS FOR VALUE CHAIN WORKERS
TO RAISE CONCERNS
Wizz Air has processes in place to address concerns and potential negative impacts connected to its
operations and value chain relationships. Where the Company identifies that it is connected to a negative
impact on value chain workers through its business relationships, it seeks to address the matter through
supplier engagement, contractual dialogue and, where appropriate, corrective action measures.
Remediation may include requesting corrective action plans from suppliers, monitoring implementation of
agreed measures, or reassessing the commercial relationship where concerns are not adequately addressed.
Regardless of their level or contractual relationship, all personnel – including employees, managers,
executives, business partners, suppliers, intermediaries, agents, representatives, advisors and other third
parties performing services for or on behalf of the Company – are expected to help prevent, deter and
detect fraud and misconduct. Wizz Air requires all employees to participate in fraud awareness events,
complete anti-fraud training, and report any concerns, suspicions or incidences of fraudulent acts to their
manager. Whistleblowers can report suspicions or occurrences of fraudulent acts personally or anonymously
through established channels:
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 272
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
▶ In person, via mail or phone by contacting the Anti-Fraud and Investigations Manager.
▶ Through the whistleblowing platform referenced in the Policy of Good Conduct and Whistleblowing Policy,
where reports are directed to the General Counsel.
For further information related to the Whistleblowing Policy and Anti-Fraud Policy, please refer to
subchapters [S1-1] and [S1-3].
Suppliers and workers in the value chain can also raise their concerns and claims using Wizz Air’s official
website. The Help Centre menu is easy to find and contains clear descriptions of potential issues, links to
relevant laws and regulations, email addresses, headquarters addresses, telephone numbers and links to
webpages of official EU, UK and worldwide representative offices related to claim handling. These channels
are available to value chain workers to raise concerns related to ethical conduct, labour practices or other
potential impacts connected to Wizz Air’s business relationships. In addition, Wizz Air has an ESG grievance
mechanism that is accessible to all stakeholders. This mechanism enables any stakeholder to report social
responsibility and environmental risks, as well as breaches of obligations related to these areas, arising from
the economic activities of Wizz Air, its subsidiaries, or its direct or indirect suppliers. These channels are also
indicated in subchapter [S4-3] Processes to Remediate Negative Impacts and Channels for Consumers and
End-Users to Raise Concerns.
Every supplier contract has a respective owner at the Company who is responsible for the quality of the
service and maintaining a good relationship with the given supplier. Suppliers can raise their concerns with
the respective contact person at the Company via telephone, email, during regular meetings, or in person.
[S2-4] TAKING ACTION ON MATERIAL IMPACTS ON VALUE CHAIN WORKERS, AND APPROACHES TO
MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS AND PURSUING MATERIAL OPPORTUNITIES RELATED TO VALUE CHAIN
WORKERS, AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THOSE ACTIONS
Wizz Air takes action to address material impacts and risks relating to value chain workers primarily through
supplier engagement, contractual requirements and risk-based monitoring processes.
Labour-related considerations form part of supplier evaluation and ongoing oversight. Through its ESG
supplier risk assessment processes, the Company reviews indicators relevant to labour practices, working
conditions and governance standards. Where potential or actual negative impacts on value chain workers
are identified, these findings inform decisions regarding supplier selection, contractual safeguards,
monitoring intensity or follow-up engagement.
When determining appropriate action in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact, Wizz Air
considers the severity of the impact, its connection to the Company’s operations or business relationships
and its ability to influence the relevant supplier. Based on this assessment, the Company may request
corrective action plans, enhance monitoring, engage in targeted dialogue with supplier management or
reassess the commercial relationship where concerns are not adequately addressed.
Significant ESG or labour-related risks identified through supplier risk assessments may be escalated to the
Company’s Compliance Council. The Compliance Council includes senior management representatives and
reviews the nature and severity of the matter, the Company’s connection to the impact and the appropriate
course of action. Where a matter is assessed as severe, decisions regarding corrective measures, enhanced
monitoring or potential reassessment of the commercial relationship are taken in coordination with
management.
As value chain workers are employed by independent suppliers, remediation is generally implemented at
supplier level. Where Wizz Air is connected to a negative impact through its business relationships, it seeks
to contribute to remediation by requiring suppliers to implement corrective measures within their workforce
structures and by monitoring the progress of agreed actions. To mitigate material risks arising from
dependencies on value chain workers, labour standards and responsible business conduct expectations are
embedded in contractual arrangements.
During the reporting period, no severe human rights issues connected to the Company’s upstream or
downstream value chain were identified as material through the Company’s established monitoring and
reporting processes.
Internal responsibility for actions relating to value chain workers rests primarily with the procurement
function, supported by legal and ESG functions and overseen by senior management.
[S2-5] TARGETS RELATED TO MANAGING MATERIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS, ADVANCING POSITIVE
IMPACTS AND MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Wizz Air monitors supplier-related labour risks and governance performance through its ESG supplier risk
assessment processes and procurement oversight mechanisms, as described in [S2-4] and [G1-2].
At the reporting date, the Company has not established standalone time-bound and outcome-oriented
targets specifically dedicated to reducing negative impacts or advancing positive impacts for value chain
workers. The current approach focuses on integrating labour-related expectations into supplier evaluation
processes and monitoring identified risks through structured assessment and follow-up procedures.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 273
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The Company tracks process-based indicators, including supplier participation in ESG assessments and the
identification and follow-up of risk findings. These monitoring activities support the management of material
risks related to value chain workers, although they do not constitute formal outcome-based targets at this
stage.
The Company continues to evaluate the development of more structured and outcome-oriented targets in
relation to value chain workers, informed by the results of its double materiality assessment and evolving
regulatory expectations.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 274
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[S4] CONSUMERS AND END-USERS
Wizz Air prioritises its customers, ensuring their needs remain central to all actions. Our Passenger Care
Centre provides timely and comprehensive support to consumers. Our commitment to soliciting and acting
upon customer feedback is demonstrated through maintaining a disruption-specific customer survey, which
enables us to refine our customer experience strategy continuously. Wizz Air operates in compliance with all
applicable laws and respects customer rights.
A customer is defined as the individual or company who books the flight and has a Wizz Air account; this
does not necessarily mean the passenger themselves. In Wizz Air’s view, the passenger is the end-user of
the service. The most significant category of customers is the “VFR” (Visiting Friends and Relatives), who
seek affordable travel solutions to reconnect with loved ones.
[SBM-3] MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES AND THEIR INTERACTION WITH STRATEGY
AND BUSINESS MODEL
Wizz Air conducted its first double materiality assessment in F25, identifying the material impacts, risks and
opportunities related to customers and end-users. In F26 Wizz Air completed a review of this assessment
with updated material topics identified. For detailed information, please refer to the summary table in the
chapter on Strategy, subchapter [SBM-3] and [IRO-1].
The reviewed assessment identified the following material impacts and risks related to consumers and end-
users: passenger health and safety, access to products and services and access to information, data privacy,
responsible marketing, safety compliance risks and the positive social impact of accessible consumer
complaints management. The identified material topics remained unchanged compared to the previous
assessment. All customers and end-users were considered in the assessment of material impacts, risks and
opportunities. As such, the prevention and effective management of these factors are top priorities for the
Company.
Following the enhancement of its double materiality assessment, Wizz Air identified passenger health and
safety (accidents) as an additional material negative impact on consumers and end-users. This resulted from
a reassessment of existing impacts using the same methodology and scoring approach, which led to a higher
score for the topic based on a refined evaluation of severity, likelihood and irremediability. Passenger health
and safety was assessed as material due to the inherent nature of airline operations, where aviation
accidents or serious safety incidents could result in passenger injury, long-term health impacts or, in
extreme cases, loss of life. The reassessment was undertaken in the context of heightened geopolitical
instability across certain regions within Wizz Air’s network, which increased stakeholder focus on passenger
health and safety risks associated with airline operations, despite no material safety incidents occurring
during the reporting period. Industry benchmarking also identified this topic as increasingly material and
further supported the reassessment outcome.
Wizz Air recognises this potential impact and is committed to maintaining the highest levels of safety for all
passengers. In line with this commitment, Wizz Air was recently recognised by Airline Ratings as one of the
world’s safest airlines for 2026 and ranked among the top 10 safest low-cost carriers.
Safety is our utmost priority and the cornerstone of our successful business. Through the personal
commitment of all our employees, we strive to provide our customers and end-users with the highest level
of safety possible. The Company adheres to all applicable laws, regulations and standards in the aviation
industry, incorporating industry best practices including IATA Standards and Recommended Practices
(ISARPs). Our Compliance Monitoring System persistently evaluates the effectiveness of our systems and
processes.
In times of unforeseen circumstances, our team promptly communicates with customers, enabling us to
uphold customer satisfaction and effectively manage crises. We have implemented a comprehensive Safety
Management System to manage the risks associated with our operations and activities. By adhering to strict
policies and making safety a priority organisation-wide, the Company is committed to ensuring safe travel
and the protection of consumers. Our flight crew employees participate in regular, recurring onboarding and
flight safety education, while customers and end-users receive reminder letters and messages about flight
safety rules.
Failure to address safety or security risks adequately could lead to severe reputational harm and regulatory
scrutiny. Wizz Air’s Crisis Emergency and Business Disruption Manual establishes procedures and processes
aimed at ensuring preparedness for responding to crisis emergencies and business disruptions. It defines the
roles and responsibilities necessary for a swift and effective response, laying down detailed measures and
responsibilities for recovery from such events.
In addition to operational safety risks, the Company also monitors risks related to regulatory and safety
compliance across its operations and value chain, including supplier and operational partner oversight.
Access to information and data security
Regarding information-related impacts, the Company is dedicated to providing the best experience for all
consumers and end-users and aims to enhance and automate its consumer-related operations, such as
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 275
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
reducing waiting times and eliminating extra costs associated with telephone communication. The Company
operates a consumer-focused complaints management system that provides accessible channels through
which consumers and end-users can express feedback, raise concerns and seek resolution. Effective
complaints handling supports consumer trust, transparency and service accessibility, while enabling Wizz Air
to identify service improvements.
Customer satisfaction surveys are provided after every journey, and regular customer research is conducted
to gather feedback on the Company’s performance. By analysing this feedback, the Company can identify
areas for improvement and incorporate these insights into action plans to enhance both operational
effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Wizz Air launched a new HUB centre and chatbot function to make
quick access to quality and transparent information for customers and end-users easier.
Cybersecurity and data protection are critical to Wizz Air’s operations and are regularly overseen by the
Board. Data breaches can result in reputational, legal and financial impacts. Ensuring accurate, compliant
information also carries operational costs. Wizz Air prioritises strong cybersecurity and data privacy
measures to maintain the highest regulatory standards. For more details on Wizz Air’s cybersecurity and
data protection measures, please refer to [G] Other governance information, in the subchapter on
cybersecurity and data protection.
Responsible marketing and accessibility of services
Wizz Air is committed to maintaining ethical marketing practices that respect customer autonomy and
provide accurate information prominently on our website. Ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of this
information is crucial, as failure to do so could lead to customer compensation claims, legal penalties or
reputational damage. Such outcomes could result in lost revenue and increased customer acquisition costs in
a competitive market. Therefore, the Company is dedicated to ensuring that all claims and product
information are accurate, evidence-based, transparent and not misleading.
Our transparent pricing model ensures that passengers pay only for the services they need, eliminating
unnecessary costs. Many students within our network rely on the Company to pursue their studies abroad,
and we facilitate seamless travel to universities and educational institutions across Europe. For those
working abroad, Wizz Air bridges the gap by providing affordable flights, helping families reunite more
frequently, strengthening bonds and creating lasting memories. By supporting access to affordable travel,
Wizz Air contributes to increased mobility, enabling individuals from diverse socio-economic backgrounds to
access employment, education and family connections across its network.
Wizz Air pays special attention to consumers and end-users who may be at greater risk of harm, such as
young people or those with mental or physical difficulties. People under the age of 16 cannot travel alone,
and we request that young people under 16 do not sign up for marketing materials or newsletters.
Consumers and end-users with mental or physical difficulties can request assistance, including bringing their
assistance dog on the flight. Additionally, our flight booking website features a “voice-to-text” function for
passengers with visual impairments.
[S4-1] POLICIES RELATED TO CONSUMERS AND END-USERS
While the Company does not maintain a single standalone policy dedicated exclusively to consumers and
end-users, the material impacts, risks and opportunities identified in the DMA are addressed through a set of
existing operational policies, regulatory compliance frameworks and customer-related procedures.
The aviation industry is strictly regulated by laws and industry standards. Therefore, when addressing key
topics related to consumers and end-users, such as safety, accessibility of services and data protection, Wizz
Air ensures full compliance with all applicable aviation, consumer protection and data privacy regulations. In
addition, the Company considers market trends, regulatory expectations and feedback from consumers and
business partners when developing and updating its internal policies and operational procedures.
ESRS Requirement
Material topic
Related policies
S4 -  Customers and end-users
Freedom of expression
Health and safety
Security of a person
Access to products and
services
Privacy
Access to quality
information
Responsible marketing
practices
• Internal Data Protection Regulation
and Customer Privacy Notice
• General Conditions of Carriage of
Passengers and Baggage
• Terms and conditions of services
offered
• Rules on delays, cancellations and
refunds
• Equal Opportunities and Fair
Treatment Policy (please see [S1-1]
Policies related to own workforce)
• Safety compliance
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 276
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
These policies define the principles and operational rules governing Wizz Air’s interactions with consumers
and end-users, including passenger safety requirements, service terms, consumer rights in cases of service
disruption, and the protection of personal data. The scope of these policies covers all passengers and
customers using Wizz Air services, including bookings made through the Company’s digital platforms and
customer service channels.
Responsibility for the implementation of these policies lies with the Company’s executive management and
relevant operational departments, including safety management, customer service, legal and compliance
functions. Oversight of safety, regulatory compliance and data protection is supported by internal monitoring
processes and governance structures. Where applicable, these policies reflect or incorporate international
aviation and regulatory standards, including requirements issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), national Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
The relevant policies are made available to stakeholders through publicly accessible documents, such as the
Customer Privacy Notice and General Conditions of Carriage published on the Company’s website, as well as
internal policies communicated to employees through internal governance and training frameworks. No
significant changes to the policies relevant to consumers and end-users were identified during the reporting
period.
Human rights commitments relevant to consumers and end-users
The Company has not identified any material risks related to the human rights of consumers and end-users
derived from its operations. Wizz Air’s policies in this area are based on universal human rights principles,
the Company’s Policy of Good Conduct, and the Anti-Slavery and Human Trafficking Policy, as detailed in the
Modern Slavery Act Disclosure Statement in [S1-1] and on page 34.
The Company’s general approach is to ensure that its operations respect the rights of passengers and
customers through transparent service terms, fair treatment and protection of personal data.
Communication with consumers and end-users is considered essential from an operational perspective to
maintain transparent and fair practices. The Company’s general approach to engagement with consumers
and end-users is further described in subchapters [S4-2] and [SBM-2].
Mechanisms for addressing concerns and enabling remedy
Wizz Air operates customer service and help centre functions that allow consumers and end-users to raise
concerns, submit complaints and request assistance. These channels are accessible through the Company’s
website and customer support services, enabling external stakeholders to report concerns or request
resolution. Each reported case is analysed and handled in accordance with the Company’s internal
procedures. These mechanisms support the identification and resolution of potential consumer-related issues
and contribute to service improvements.
Additional reporting channels are available through the Company’s whistleblowing mechanisms, which are
further described in subchapters [S4-3] and [G1-1].
Alignment with international standards
While the Company’s policies have not yet been formally mapped against the UN Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights, the International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles
and Rights at Work or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Wizz Air remains committed to
upholding high standards of human rights protection, ethical conduct and responsible business practices.
No cases were identified during the reporting period where these international frameworks involving
consumers or end-users were not respected.
Key policies
Internal Data Protection Regulation and Customer Privacy Notice
Wizz Air has established a robust data protection management framework that includes comprehensive
policies, procedures and controls to safeguard personal information. This framework ensures that all
aspects of data protection are meticulously managed, from the collection and processing of personal data
to its storage and eventual disposal. Our comprehensive Internal Data Protection Regulation and a set of
internal policies are designed to uphold the highest standards of confidentiality, authenticity, integrity,
availability and functionality of the personal data handled by Wizz Air, thereby safeguarding the privacy
of employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, while ensuring compliance with all relevant
regulations, including GDPR.
Additionally, we provide clear guidelines and training to all employees to ensure they understand their
responsibilities in maintaining data security. Our Customer Privacy Notice, available publicly, details how
we collect, process and retain personal data, offering transparency and reassurance to our customers.
For more information on Data Protection please visit [G] Other governance information, and the
subchapter on cybersecurity and data protection.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 277
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Terms and conditions of services offered by Wizz Air
Wizz Air has launched comprehensive terms and conditions documents for all its services and products.
These include, but are not limited to:
▶ General Conditions of Carriage of Passengers and Baggage (GCC): This document is publicly
available and details all rules and regulations for services offered by Wizz Air, including check-in
processes, reservations, seating, baggage allowance, tariffs, taxes and other fees. Customers must
read, understand and consent to the GCC before travelling with Wizz Air.
▶ WIZZ All You Can Fly Terms and Conditions: This 12-month membership allows passengers to
travel on Wizz Air flights by paying an initial voucher fee and a flat fee per flight. Bookings must be
made between 72 hours and 3 hours before departure, with a maximum of three one-way flights per
day.
▶ WIZZ MultiPass Terms and Conditions: This 12-month subscription plan allows passengers to
travel monthly on eligible Wizz Air flights by paying a fixed monthly fee, which includes all taxes and
additional fees. Subscribers receive electronic tokens each month to book flights.
▶ WIZZ Account Terms and Conditions: A WIZZ Account is required for making reservations on the
website or mobile app. Customers can use the balance of their WIZZ Account, which includes WIZZ
Credits, to purchase flight tickets and other services or modify existing reservations.
▶ WIZZ Discount Club Terms and Conditions: This club offers various membership types, both paid
and non-paid, providing benefits and discounts. Customers can join via the website, mobile app or
call centre. Non-paid memberships require a subscription to the special offers newsletter, which can
be unsubscribed from at any time.
▶ Rules on Delays, Cancellations and Refunds: These rules, available on Wizz Air's website and in
the GCC, outline options based on the duration of delays, cancellation policies and refund procedures.
Passengers can rebook or request refunds in WIZZ Credits or to the original payment method.
These documents define passenger rights and obligations, booking procedures, baggage rules, tariffs and
fees as well as consumer rights in the event of service disruption. They are publicly accessible on Wizz Air’s
website and must be accepted by customers when purchasing services.
Safety policy framework
Safety is Wizz Air’s top priority and forms the foundation of its operations. The Company is committed to
operating in full compliance with applicable aviation safety regulations and maintaining robust internal
monitoring processes to ensure safe and reliable operations.
Wizz Air adheres to aviation safety requirements issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and
the relevant national Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs). Compliance with these regulations is supported by
internal compliance monitoring and operational oversight systems designed to ensure that aircraft
operations, maintenance and operational processes meet the required safety standards.
[S4-2] PROCESSES FOR ENGAGING WITH CONSUMERS AND END-USERS ABOUT IMPACTS
Wizz Air actively engages with its consumers and end-users through various communication and feedback
channels. These include surveys, newsletters, push notifications, Wizz Air’s website, customer service
channels and social media platforms. Through these channels, the Company gathers insights on customer
experiences, expectations and potential impacts related to its services. The perspectives of consumers and
end-users are considered in the continuous improvement of services and customer experience initiatives.
Engagement occurs directly with consumers and end-users through customer surveys and digital
communication channels. In addition, insights from customer support interactions and complaints handling
processes contribute to understanding customer needs and expectations.
Customer feedback and survey processes
Wizz Air utilises systematic surveys to gather insights from customers and monitor customer satisfaction and
brand perception. Two key surveys are conducted on a regular basis: the Brand Health Tracker and
Competitor Benchmarking survey. These surveys measure overall brand awareness and customer
experience. The Brand Health Tracker focuses on Wizz Air’s image and brand perception compared to
competitors, while the Competitor Benchmarking survey evaluates customer experience and service
performance in relation to competitors. These surveys are conducted quarterly to ensure that the Company
remains informed about evolving customer expectations and market perceptions.
Additionally, Wizz Air engages directly with customers who have recently travelled with the airline. This
includes post-trip surveys, which measure the customer’s overall experience after completing their journey.
These surveys provide insights into multiple aspects of the travel experience. The Company also utilises real-
time surveys, where customers receive push notifications immediately after completing each stage of their
journey. This allows Wizz Air to collect feedback promptly and identify areas requiring improvement.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 278
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Furthermore, Wizz Air conducts a Cancellation Survey for passengers whose flights were cancelled. This
ongoing survey evaluates passenger satisfaction with how disruptions were managed, including the welfare
and compensation provided. The methodology of this survey is aligned with the Customer Satisfaction
Survey, with the main difference being the target audience.
The Customer Satisfaction Survey is distributed to a randomly selected group of customers, ensuring a
diverse, unbiased and representative sample. By allowing customers to evaluate their experience with Wizz
Air independently, the Company gains a comprehensive understanding of customer satisfaction levels and
areas for improvement.
Wizz Air closely monitors and tracks all engagement activities with its customers and end-users. Feedback
collected through these processes is analysed and integrated into the Company’s decision-making and
strategy development processes, supporting continuous improvements in service delivery and customer
experience.
The Company has established key performance indicators (KPIs) and brand awareness tracking for all focus
markets, with specific targets created for each. Wizz Air also measures and tracks its Net Promoter Score
(NPS) across its network as an indicator of customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Wizz Air has a dedicated Customer Insights and Research Manager who coordinates and harmonises
external and internal insights. The most senior functions within Wizz Air with operational responsibility for
the process include the Chief Commercial Officer and the Chief Operations Officer.
In addition, Wizz Air has established a Customer Council, which includes Heads of Function across the
Company. The council reviews customer insights and supports the integration of customer feedback into
operational and strategic decision-making.
[S4-3] PROCESSES TO REMEDIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS AND CHANNELS FOR CONSUMERS AND END-
USERS TO RAISE CONCERNS
By prioritising engagement and responsiveness, Wizz Air aims to address customer concerns effectively and
provide timely remedies. Customers and end-users can raise their claims or make complaints through
various channels, both in written and oral form. Wizz Air’s Help Centre on the Company’s website provides
comprehensive information on how consumers and end-users can raise concerns. Available options include
email contact details, telephone numbers and links to the official online complaint website. Customers may
also submit claims through the online claim form, contact Customer Service directly, use the Wizz Air
chatbot, or submit concerns by post. All complaints received are reviewed and handled on a case-by-case
basis by the relevant customer service teams. Wizz Air is committed to commence processing all claims and
written concerns within 30 days, in accordance with applicable legal requirements. The Company strives to
exceed these standards by providing shorter response times to enhance effectiveness and customer
satisfaction. On average, Wizz Air responds to claims within 5 days.
Once a claim or concern is assessed, the customer or end-user is informed by email whether the claim was
justified and which solutions or remedies are available. In cases of service disruption, such as delays or
cancellations, Wizz Air adheres to EU Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, offering assistance and compensation to
affected passengers where applicable. If a customer is not satisfied with the outcome of Wizz Air’s internal
complaint handling processes, they may escalate the issue to relevant national enforcement bodies or other
competent authorities responsible for passenger rights.
Wizz Air continuously monitors the effectiveness of its complaint handling processes and engagement
channels. A Customer Service Interaction Satisfaction Survey is conducted regularly to assess customer
satisfaction with the handling of claims and customer service interactions. The survey results help identify
opportunities for improvement and support enhancements in the Company’s approach to resolving customer
concerns. In the reporting period, results from these surveys showed a 5.89% improvement in overall
satisfaction with customer service compared to the previous year, indicating progress in the effectiveness of
the Company’s grievance handling processes.
All grievances and complaints are treated confidentially and in accordance with applicable data protection
and privacy regulations. Wizz Air ensures that personal data related to complaints and customer interactions
is handled in compliance with the Company’s data protection policies and applicable legal requirements. Wizz
Air also maintains a publicly accessible grievance reporting system available on our website, which is
continuously monitored by a dedicated team. The Company evaluates how well consumers and end‑users
are informed about and trust this channel for raising concerns. The use of grievance channels is supported
by Wizz Air’s Grievance Handling Policy, which includes safeguards to protect individuals who submit reports
from retaliation. Where relevant, these protections are aligned with the Company’s broader whistleblowing
and ethics frameworks described in section [G1-1] Business Conduct and Whistleblowing.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 279
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[S4-4] TAKING ACTION ON MATERIAL IMPACTS ON CONSUMERS AND END-USERS, AND APPROACHES
TO MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS AND PURSUING MATERIAL OPPORTUNITIES RELATED TO CONSUMER
AND END-USERS, AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THOSE ACTIONS
At Wizz Air, we prioritise our customers, ensuring that their needs remain central to all our actions. Based on
the results of the double materiality assessment, the Company implements actions aimed at preventing or
mitigating negative impacts on consumers and end-users, managing related risks, and enhancing positive
customer outcomes. During the reporting period, no severe human rights issues or incidents involving
consumers or end-users were identified.
In F26, our Passenger Care Centre remained unwavering in its commitment to providing timely and
comprehensive support to our customers. We implemented early notifications regarding various events,
including strikes and terminal changes, ensuring travellers were well prepared. Additionally, in times of
unforeseen circumstances such as a global IT-supplier outage, volcanic eruption or geopolitical conflict
escalation, our team communicated promptly with customers, enabling us to uphold customer satisfaction
and manage crises effectively.
In F26, Wizz Air continued to manage an elevated level of official claims. Our Customer Experience team
remained focused on operational efficiency, resolving 87% of cases within 30 days, 97% of cases within 90
days, while the rest are still open due to longer court or authority procedures. Enhancements to our
automated case allocation system supported the achievement of these key performance indicators.
Furthermore, technological advancements played a pivotal role, enabling a high level of automation.
Specifically, 34% of total official cases were handled automatically, while automation reached 49% for cases
managed by third-party claim handling. These improvements help ensure timely responses and appropriate
remedies for passengers affected by service disruptions.
During the reporting year, our customer service approach remained largely consistent, with ongoing efforts
to strengthen and refine existing tools. Our Help Centre page continues to function effectively, offering
customers clear and accessible guidance through an improved, user-friendly platform. To provide better
support to passengers with special needs, we maintained a dedicated webpage that brings all relevant
information together in one easily accessible location. We also upheld our commitment to more affordable
customer contact options by discontinuing premium-rate phone lines. Customers can now reach Wizz Air
through local-rate numbers or free of charge via our AI-powered chatbot. For more complex or exceptional
enquiries, passengers are directed to our complimentary Live Chat service, where a customer service agent
provides real-time assistance.
The Customer Experience Quality Assurance project, initiated in F24 Q3 and completed in F25 Q1, further
improved and standardised the quality of customer service, resulting in a 10-point improvement in Customer
Satisfaction (CSAT). To enhance the quality of passenger interactions with our contracted ground handling
partners, we also launched a recurring Conflict and Incident Management Workshop providing additional
training for effective passenger communication and assistance during disruptions. In addition, an AI-based
voice bot named Amelia was introduced to support passengers during mass disruptions. Since June 2024,
Amelia has proactively contacted passengers to provide relevant information and assist with problem
resolution.
Our dedication to soliciting and acting upon customer feedback is demonstrated through the maintenance of
a disruption-specific customer survey, which enables us to refine our customer experience strategy on an
ongoing basis. Customer feedback, operational indicators and customer satisfaction metrics are regularly
monitored to assess the effectiveness of these initiatives and identify areas for further improvement.
In F26, we launched the My Journey feature within our mobile app, providing passengers with
comprehensive real-time information on disruptions, available travel options and eligible vouchers. Further
enhancements are planned for F27 to continue improving the customer experience. Wizz Air also introduced
innovative subscription programmes such as WIZZ All You Can Fly, WIZZ MultiPass and the Café & Boutique
Voucher, catering to the diverse needs of our customers and enhancing their travel experiences. Expanding
our contact centre capacity significantly reduced response times, ensuring quality customer service during
peak periods. Building on these improvements, Wizz Air will continue to refine its operations, leveraging
digital solutions, automation and customer feedback to further enhance service quality and responsiveness.
Looking ahead to F27 and beyond, we continue building on the strong foundations laid in F26, when Wizz Air
invested €14 billion into the Customer First Compass initiative. This investment strengthens our ability to
maintain affordable fares while improving communication, products and services throughout the customer
journey. These initiatives aim to ensure that Wizz Air continues to deliver reliable, accessible and customer-
focused services.
Enhancing accessibility and customer satisfaction
By providing affordable air travel and improving accessibility, Wizz Air connects people from diverse
backgrounds and pays special attention to customers and end-users with physical and/or mental conditions.
Wizz Air is also committed to improving its services to make travel more accessible and convenient, for
example by reducing waiting times and terminating premium-rate phone numbers.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 280
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The Company conducts several customer satisfaction surveys to understand customer needs better and
identify areas for development. Key action areas include improving transparent and proactive
communication, disruption management and digital customer service solutions. To enhance effective
communication, the Company regularly reviews and updates customer communication templates and
provides real-time updates to passengers about flight schedules, delays and cancellations through push
notifications. Customer service channels, including the Company’s chatbot and Live Chat services, are
available 24/7 to assist customers with their queries.
Wizz Air continuously evaluates the effectiveness of its implemented actions using well-defined key
performance indicators. These include the percentage of customers who complete surveys, resolution time,
first-time resolution rate and the “one channel – one touch” KPI, which aims to resolve customer issues
through a single interaction on one platform.
The Company also considers external developments when assessing risks or dependencies related to
consumers and end-users. Tools such as an early warning system, risk management system and annual risk
assessment process support the identification of emerging issues and help the Company adapt its actions
accordingly. To manage material impacts and ensure the effectiveness of actions related to consumers and
end-users, Wizz Air maintains dedicated internal functions, including the Customer Experience Team and the
Crisis Management Centre, which coordinate responses to incidents that may affect customers. Moreover,
Wizz Air ensures the availability and effectiveness of its remediation processes through a whistleblowing
channel accessible to both internal and external stakeholders via the Company’s website. A dedicated team
oversees the management of reports, reviewing each submission and initiating appropriate investigative and
corrective actions where necessary.
Customer first - Our Customer Compass
In April 2025, Wizz Air launched the Customer First Compass, a transformative framework designed to place
customers at the forefront of every aspect of the Company’s operations. Over the next three years, €14
billion will be invested to enhance every touchpoint of the customer journey and ensure that punctuality,
innovation and service excellence are integrated throughout the travel experience.
The Customer First Compass is built around four key pillars:
▶ Product: Wizz Air is committed to delivering next-generation travel experiences. With more than 300
new aircraft on order featuring modern Airspace cabin interiors, the Company continues to operate one
of the youngest and most fuel-efficient fleets in the industry. Expanding its network across Europe,
Africa, Central Asia, East Asia and the Middle East, Wizz Air aims to provide affordable intercontinental
travel through the introduction of the Airbus A321XLR aircraft. The Company’s digital-first approach
supports seamless customer journeys from booking to boarding.
▶ Price: Low fares remain central to Wizz Air’s business model. The Company continues to promote
transparent pricing with no hidden fees while offering additional savings through programmes such as
the WIZZ Discount Club and other membership products, helping customers access affordable travel
options.
▶ Service: Wizz Air prioritises punctuality and operational resilience to minimise cancellations and delays.
Advanced AI-supported tools in the airline’s operations control centre help manage disruptions and
support rapid response to operational challenges. With a 99.5% flight completion rate, Wizz Air aims to
ensure passengers reach their destinations reliably. In the event of disruptions, the virtual assistant
Amelia provides updates and support, while claims are processed within seven days and ticket refunds
are issued within 24 hours.
▶ Communication: Effective communication is central to the Company’s relationship with its customers.
Wizz Air aims to ensure clear policies, transparent information and accessible support channels.
Customers can access assistance through digital channels, customer service platforms and in-flight
communication where necessary.
The Customer First Compass reflects Wizz Air’s long-term commitment to enhancing the travel experience,
investing in innovation and continuously improving customer service across the entire journey. To further
advance this initiative in F27 and beyond, Wizz Air continues to strengthen cross-functional collaboration
across departments involved in the customer journey. By systematically analysing customer feedback, the
Company identifies opportunities to improve the travel experience and address consumer needs. The
Customer Experience (CX) team leads the programme, with progress reviewed and reported to the
Executive Team on a six-week cycle.
[S4-5] TARGETS RELATED TO MANAGING MATERIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS, ADVANCING POSITIVE
IMPACTS AND MANAGING MATERIAL RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Wizz Air tracks and monitors a range of key performance indicators related to consumers and end-users,
reflecting the Company’s strong customer-centric strategy. While Wizz Air has not established standalone
outcome-oriented sustainability targets specifically under ESRS S4, the effectiveness of policies and actions
in this area is monitored through operational customer experience indicators and service performance
metrics. These indicators are based on internal operational objectives and customer experience goals rather
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 281
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
than on scientific environmental methodologies. Accordingly, targets related to consumers and end-users
are defined based on internal business objectives, customer expectations and operational performance
benchmarks.
Wizz Air continuously conducts customer satisfaction surveys and analyses their results to identify
development areas and good practices. These surveys support the monitoring of customer satisfaction,
service quality and customer loyalty. Through these surveys, Wizz Air also gathers feedback from consumers
and end-users that informs action planning, performance monitoring and service improvements. Customers
and end-users are therefore indirectly engaged in tracking performance and identifying improvements
through their participation in surveys and feedback mechanisms. The frequency of evaluations varies
depending on the survey type. A description of the main survey types is provided in subchapter [S4-2]
Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts.
Wizz Air applies several methods to assess and improve customer satisfaction and service performance:
▶ The Brand Health Tracker aims to build the brand and understand customer perception, with brand
awareness as the main KPI.
▶ Competitor Benchmarking compares customer experience and touchpoints with competitors, using
customer satisfaction (%) and NPS (Net Promoter Score).
▶ The Cancellation Survey cross-references operational data with customer feedback, focusing on
disruption journey touchpoints.
▶ The Post Trip Survey also cross-references operational data with customer feedback, measuring
customer satisfaction (%) and journey touchpoints.
▶ Real Time Surveys allow for quick interventions and mitigation of issues, with journey stage average
satisfaction scores.
▶ The "One channel-one touch" initiative aims to resolve customer issues with a single interaction via one
platform, tracking resolution time and first-time resolution rate.
Wizz Air has also defined clear customer satisfaction and loyalty targets, specifying both the measurement
approach and the time horizon. For Customer Satisfaction (CSAT), an absolute target of 75% has been set
for F27, reflecting the percentage of customers reporting satisfaction with their experience. For the Net
Promoter Score (NPS), the Company applies a differentiated approach: in markets where the current NPS is
below 0, the target is to achieve a score of at least 0 by F27. Where the NPS is already above 0, the
Company pursues a relative improvement target, using the First Response (FR) NPS as the key indicator to
track ongoing enhancement of customer loyalty and service quality. All targets currently apply to the F27
time horizon, with ongoing internal monitoring of progress through customer experience metrics and survey
results. Through these indicators, Wizz Air evaluates the effectiveness of its policies and actions related to
consumers and end-users and identifies opportunities for further improvements in customer experience,
service quality and accessibility.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 282
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Optimized for Today. Mindful of Tomorrow. (4).png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 283
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
GOVERNANCE INFORMATION
[G1] BUSINESS CONDUCT
Wizz Air is committed to conducting business with honesty and integrity, as outlined in our Policy of Good
Conduct. The Company emphasises the importance of ethical behaviour, transparency and accountability in
all its operations. Wizz Air’s governance structures ensure that we hold our Board of Directors and entire
workforce to the highest standards of integrity. It is our unwavering commitment to act in accordance with
all applicable laws and regulations at all times.
Through the double materiality assessment, Wizz Air has identified the following business conduct matters
as material: corporate culture; protection of whistleblowers; political engagement; corruption and bribery;
management of relationships with suppliers; and entity‑specific topics such as cybersecurity and data
protection as well as community programmes and charitable support. These matters are addressed through
internal policies, governance oversight and control mechanisms designed to prevent, detect and respond to
misconduct and regulatory non-compliance.
[GOV-1] THE ROLE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE, SUPERVISORY AND MANAGEMENT BODIES
At Wizz Air, the administrative, management and supervisory bodies play important roles in ensuring ethical
business conduct. The Board of Directors oversees the overall governance and strategic direction of the
Company, including matters relating to ethical standards and compliance with applicable laws and
regulations. Supervisory committees, such as the Audit and Risk Committee, focus on financial integrity,
compliance and risk management, providing oversight to support adherence to legal and ethical standards.
The Internal Audit function and the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board review compliance with business
ethics principles and related internal policies.
The Sustainability and Culture Committee supports the promotion of business ethics and corporate culture
within the organisation. It oversees initiatives related to sustainability, social responsibility and ethical
conduct, integrating these principles into Wizz Air’s strategic priorities and operations. Executive
Management is responsible for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Board and its
committees and for ensuring that ethical standards are applied in day-to-day operations. The members of
the Board of Directors collectively bring experience relevant to business conduct matters, including corporate
governance, regulatory compliance, financial oversight and risk management. The composition of the Audit
and Risk Committee reflects experience in financial reporting and internal control frameworks, while the
Sustainability and Culture Committee includes experience relevant to sustainability and organisational
culture. Further information on the professional background and qualifications of Board members is provided
in the Annual Report under the section entitled “Board Composition”, from page 47.
[IRO-1] DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESSES TO IDENTIFY AND ASSESS MATERIAL IMPACTS, RISKS AND
OPPORTUNITIES
Subchapter [IRO-1] of the Strategy chapter in the sustainability report details the procedures used in Wizz
Air’s double materiality assessment. This approach helps identify and evaluate impacts, risks and
opportunities, integrating legal compliance, ethical standards and sustainability. Furthermore, business
ethics and compliance across the value chain are assessed to ensure consistency in operations and
relationships.
During the reporting period, the double materiality assessment methodology was refined through a more in-
depth assessment of dependencies within the value chain. This refinement strengthened the identification
and evaluation of impacts and risks related to business conduct matters, but did not fundamentally alter the
overall assessment framework.
Our approach to identifying, assessing and prioritising impacts on people and the environment is based on
due diligence processes outlined in the Governance chapter, subsection [GOV-4]. These processes focus on
business conduct issues like human rights, labour practices and environmental compliance, as well as anti-
corruption, whistleblower protection, political engagement, supplier relationships including payment
practices, as well as cybersecurity and data protection aligned with policies such as the Policy of Good
Conduct, Whistleblowing Policy, Corporate Political Engagement Policy and Statement, Sustainable Code of
Conduct, Sustainable Procurement Policy, Anti-Fraud Policy and Anti-Corruption Policy.
In the context of business conduct, specific activities like cybersecurity and data protection, management of
supplier relationships, governance, business ethics and compliance were identified as having heightened
risks related to adverse impacts. Based on the value chain mapping, Wizz Air assessed its impacts in relation
to where they occurred (own operations, upstream, downstream).
In identifying and assessing risks and opportunities with financial implications, we integrated business
conduct issues, such as the risk of reputational damage from unethical practices or legal risks from non-
compliance with regulations. The process prioritises risks based on their potential to cause financial loss or
reputational harm. Opportunities are identified through ethical business practices, such as offering accessible
and safe travel services that meet growing passenger demand. Opportunities include EU ETS – phasing out
free allowances, sustainable aviation fuel investments, sustainability-conscious customers, industry
collaboration opportunities in various geographic areas as well as enhanced ESG supplier risk assessment
and management processes. In the Governance dimension, no opportunity was assessed as material.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 284
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
The assessment of impacts provides the necessary input to identify related dependencies and risks. This
process also enables the Company to recognise opportunities by analysing how business conduct-related
impacts and dependencies influence operational resilience, stakeholder relationships and regulatory
compliance.
Wizz Air’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework integrates sustainability-related risks alongside
other risk types, with biannual oversight by the Board of Directors. Risks are identified through stakeholder
engagement and market analysis, ensuring alignment with the Company’s risk universe and appetite.
Sustainability risks are continuously assessed by the Group’s ESG function, including annual climate scenario
analyses, and are evaluated using the same classification methods as other business risks to ensure
consistency. The Sustainability and Culture Committee oversees environmental, social and business conduct
risks, while the Audit and Risk Committee ensures alignment with the ERM framework. Climate-related risks
are also embedded in financial planning and forecasting. Risk management and internal controls over
sustainability reporting are detailed in the Governance chapter, subsection [GOV-5].
Our decision-making process involves an ethical governance framework that ensures all business decisions
are evaluated through the lens of compliance with ethical standards, corporate social responsibility and
sustainability. The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies – including the decision-
making process and related control procedures – are detailed in the Governance chapter, subsection
[GOV-2]. 
Our process for consulting with affected stakeholders to understand their potential impacts is detailed in the
chapters on Strategy and Impact, Risk and Opportunity Management, subsections [IRO-1] and [SBM-2].
This includes engaging with key stakeholders such as employees, suppliers and investors through surveys,
interviews and meetings to gather their perspectives and insights on potential impacts. These consultations
are integral to assessing risks and opportunities related to business conduct and sustainability.
The general basis for preparing sustainability statements and disclosures, including changes compared to the
previous reporting period, is detailed in the Basis for preparation chapter, subsections [BP-1] and [BP-2].
The enhanced dependency analysis resulted in refinements to certain governance-related impacts and risks
identified at sub-sub-topic level as described in [IRO-1] – Results of the DMA. These refinements reflect a
more granular assessment of business relationships and operational dependencies, but did not change the
overall materiality of governance as a topic.
[G1-1] BUSINESS CONDUCT POLICIES AND CORPORATE CULTURE
At Wizz Air, we are committed to establishing, developing and promoting a strong corporate culture based
on integrity, accountability and compliance. These include fostering open communication, recognising and
rewarding achievements, encouraging teamwork, and ensuring that employees feel valued and supported in
their roles. Additionally, the Company also implemented a comprehensive Code of Conduct that sets clear
ethical standards for all employees. Internal training programmes on business ethics, anti-corruption and
compliance ensure that our team understands and adheres to these values. There are multiple mandatory e-
learning training courses on business ethics and all relevant policies Wizz Air has introduced, including
conflict-of-interest training, the General Data Protection Regulation, competition law and information
security management, to ensure that our workforce is aware of the key principles that govern the ethical
and compliant conduct of Wizz Air.
Corporate culture is evaluated through employee engagement surveys, structured feedback mechanisms
and regular dialogue between leadership and employees. The Sustainability and Culture Committee of the
Board monitors corporate culture matters.
Our Core Values and WIZZ Culture
Wizz Air remains steadfast in its commitment to its employees, fostering an inclusive environment with
equal opportunities and providing tools that support professional aspirations, enabling all team members to
realise their full potential. Supported by strong policies against discrimination or harassment, everyone is
afforded equitable chances to excel, develop and thrive.
Our social agenda and progress towards our self-imposed targets are regularly discussed with Wizz Air’s
Leadership Team, led by our Group Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, the Sustainability and Culture
Committee of the Board actively monitors and discusses this critical topic, as outlined on page 188.
WIZZ VALUES 
Picture3.png
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 285
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
WIZZ Culture empowers our workforce to embody the five core values of Wizz Air, driving innovation and
problem-solving in our business endeavours. These values underpin our organisation’s identity and
ambition:
▶ Inclusivity – we embrace diversity, engaging and collaborating with all key stakeholders to achieve our
goals.
▶ Positivity – we are an inspired and inspiring team, passionate about what we offer, using a positive
mindset to unlock new ways to do things better and more efficiently.
▶ Integrity – doing what is right for passengers and stakeholders, holding ourselves to the highest
possible standards in everything we do.
▶ Dedication – we have an entrepreneurial “can-do” attitude, taking individual and collective ownership,
and are accountable for everything we do. 
▶ Sustainability – we are committed to reducing the environmental impact of our operations and
integrating sustainability considerations into our business decisions.
Wizz Air is committed to fostering WIZZ Culture through various initiatives. These include the annual
employee engagement survey, which provides employees with an opportunity to share their feedback and
insights. Additionally, the People Council serves as a representative body, ensuring the collective voice of our
employees is heard and considered in decision-making processes. Regular base visits and floor talks
facilitate open communication between leadership and staff, while company events promote team spirit and
foster a sense of community and belonging. Detailed information about these initiatives can be found under
[S1-2] Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts.
Our whistleblower protection programme encourages employees to report unethical behaviour without fear
of retaliation. The programme accommodates reporting from internal stakeholders and provides channels
accessible to external stakeholders where relevant. We engage with suppliers to ensure they align with our
ethical standards. Wizz Air’s partners and suppliers are expected to comply with our Supplier Code of
Conduct, which outlines requirements for ethical business practices, social and labour standards, legal
compliance as well as environmental and commercial sustainability. During the tendering phase, all supplier
candidates receive the Supplier Code of Conduct to ensure they are fully aware of the Company’s
expectations.
Existing policies are accessible to all employees via the Company’s systems, and new or revised policies are
shared through our internal digital channels to maintain awareness and compliance. The Internal Audit
function and the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board are responsible for reviewing compliance with these
business ethics principles. 
Policy of Good Conduct 
Our cornerstone policy for ethical business behaviour is the Policy of Good Conduct. This comprehensive
document outlines the precise expectations we have for all Wizz Air employees as they carry out their duties
within their business and professional relationships. It emphasises the importance of maintaining a
workplace characterised by mutual respect, integrity and fairness. It prohibits discrimination and
harassment, promotes a positive and professional work environment, and ensures the proper use of IT
systems. The policy also encourages clear and respectful communication, fostering a supportive and
inclusive workplace.
The Policy of Good Conduct applies to all employees and forms the foundation of Wizz Air’s business conduct
framework.
Wizz Air’s approach to training on business conduct is designed to ensure that all employees understand and
adhere to the Company’s standards of integrity, fairness and professionalism. The training is mandatory for
all employees, including new hires and existing staff, to ensure everyone is aligned with the Company's
values and ethical standards. Training sessions are conducted regularly, with new employees receiving initial
training during their onboarding process, and refresher courses provided periodically to keep all employees
updated on any changes in policies and regulations. The training covers a wide range of topics, including the
Company’s Code of Good Conduct, anti-discrimination and harassment policies, compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, and the proper use of Company resources. It also emphasises the importance of
reporting any unethical behaviour and provides guidance on how to do so. The training is designed to be
comprehensive and interactive, often involving case studies, role-playing scenarios and assessments to
ensure that employees fully understand and can apply the principles in their daily work. A summary of the
policy is available online at Wizz Air’s sustainability website. 
Our Key Business Conduct Policies
The policies listed below apply to all Wizz Air employees:
Equal Opportunities and Fair Treatment Policy
This policy underscores our dedication to fostering a secure and respectful workplace for all stakeholders.
Rooted in principles of mutual respect, fairness and equality, we actively champion diversity. Our aim is to
maintain an environment that remains untainted by any manifestations of discrimination, victimisation,
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 286
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
vilification, bullying or harassment. A summary of the policy is available online at Wizz Air’s sustainability
website.
Whistleblowing Policy
The Whistleblowing Policy enables employees of Wizz Air to report suspected misconduct, including
information about any unlawful or suspected unlawful act or omission or any other abuse in accordance with
the applicable laws.
This policy covers any report made via whistleblowing channels regarding any infringement of Wizz Air's
Code of Conduct or the laws of any jurisdiction where a Wizz Air entity is established. Wizz Air has
established a robust internal whistleblowing mechanism that includes multiple reporting channels such as
web, phone and email, allowing for anonymous reporting. Information about these channels is regularly
communicated through the Company’s website, internal communications and training sessions. The
comprehensive Code of Conduct training includes whistleblower processes. To protect whistleblowers from
retaliation, Wizz Air ensures that individuals who report suspected misconduct in good faith, particularly
concerning the laws of the European Union, are not subject to any form of discrimination. This is achieved
through strict confidentiality measures, robust internal policies, and well-defined reporting channels. The
Company enforces non-retaliation policies, and provides secure and anonymous reporting mechanisms. The
Company is committed to investigating business conduct incidents promptly and thoroughly, using
whistleblower reports to maintain high standards of integrity and compliance.
The reports are submitted to the Office of the General Counsel, who ensures that the competent
Investigation Lead receives the report based on the type of the issue reported. Every report filed in
accordance with the Policy must be investigated by the relevant Investigation Lead. A summary of the policy
is available online at Wizz Air’s sustainability website. 
Anti-Fraud Policy 
This policy defines Wizz Air’s principles, prohibitions and practical guidelines relating to fraud, with the aim of
preventing, detecting and mitigating fraudulent, unethical or otherwise improper business conduct. Wizz Air
strictly prohibits any act, omission or behaviour that contravenes the values and principles set out in its
Anti‑Fraud Policy. A summary of the policy is publicly available on Wizz Air’s sustainability website.
To establish a robust legal framework addressing the offence of Failure to Prevent Fraud, Wizz Air introduced
a revised Anti‑Fraud Policy in November 2025. The scope of the policy was expanded to apply to all
Associated Persons, including third‑party service providers, agents and subsidiaries. Among other key
provisions, the Anti‑Fraud Policy includes clear definitions of corruption and bribery.
Anti-Corruption Policy 
Wizz Air’s Anti-Corruption Policy prohibits corrupt, improper practices and bribery. It applies to interactions
between Wizz Air personnel and third parties. The policy aims to prevent improper inducements or rewards
related to relevant functions. Anti-corruption education and training are provided to Wizz Air personnel and
third parties involved in business operations. All Wizz Air personnel, regardless of their level, are expected to
help in preventing, deterring and detecting fraud and misconduct. The Policy is consistent with General
Assembly resolution 58/4 of 31 October 2003, the United Nations Convention against Corruption. A
summary of the policy is available online at Wizz Air’s sustainability website. 
The table below provides details on the functions within Wizz Air that are most at risk with respect to
corruption and bribery, with reference to the ESRS G1-1 disclosure requirement.
High-risk functions / business activities
Mitigating measures
Functions that select and do business with third-party
suppliers can be at a higher risk of corruption and bribery.
Supplier due diligence, contractual provisions on anti-
corruption principles, monitoring of third-party activities.
Functions with interactions with Government Officials and
Other Covered Parties. Aviation is a highly regulated
sector where interactions between Government Officials
and Other Covered Parties and market participants are
unavoidable.
To mitigate risks from interactions, two methods are
recommended:
▶ Long-term Relationships: Report these to the anti-
corruption compliance officer, who will document and
include them in the risk assessment process.
▶ Ad Hoc Relationships: Document meetings to ensure
transparency.
Group-level operation. Wizz Air established the
compliance framework at Group level; however, individual
member companies operate in different market
environments and face different corruption risks.
To ensure robust compliance at the Group level, we establish a
unified and effective compliance framework, including anti-
corruption measures based on consistent principles and
methods. Additionally, we tailor this framework to address the
specific corruption risks of each member company, ensuring
proper management both at the Group level and within each
individual company.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 287
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Supplier Code of Conduct
Wizz Air’s partners and suppliers are expected to comply with the Company’s Supplier Code of Conduct. The
Supplier Code of Conduct outlines requirements for ethical business practices, social and labour standards,
legal compliance as well as environmental and commercial sustainability. During the tendering phase, all
supplier candidates receive the Supplier Code of Conduct to ensure complete awareness of the Company’s
expectations. There are additional policies ensuring the ethical conduct of the Board of Directors and those in
leadership positions at Wizz Air. A summary of the policy is available online on Wizz Air’s sustainability
website.
Share Dealing Policy
The Company has adopted a Share Dealing Policy. Directors and designated employees must obtain
clearance from the Company’s Chairman of the Board before dealing in Company shares. During certain
periods, dealing in Company shares is strictly prohibited. Regular face-to-face training is provided to ensure
Directors and affected employees can manage insider information appropriately, and keep informed about
continuing obligations.
[G1-2] MANAGEMENT OF RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUPPLIERS
Wizz Air operates within a complex and international supply chain comprising approximately 2,500 suppliers
across categories including aircraft manufacturers and component providers, fuel suppliers, airports and
ground-handling services, maintenance providers, digital system providers, consultants and other service
partners.
Effective management of supplier relationships is essential to operational resilience, regulatory compliance
and sustainability performance.
Governance Framework for Supplier Management
Supplier relationships are governed by the Purchasing Policy, which establishes rules and guidelines to
ensure transparency, accountability and appropriate risk management throughout the procurement lifecycle.
The Policy covers all stages of purchasing, including tendering, contracting, invoicing and contract risk
assessment. Procurement processes are conducted through designated purchasing management platforms
to ensure traceability and control.
The Supplier Code of Conduct sets expectations regarding ethical business conduct, legal compliance, labour
standards and environmental responsibility. Suppliers receive the Code during the tendering phase and are
expected to adhere to its requirements throughout the contractual relationship.
Wizz Air does not currently maintain a specific policy aimed at preventing late payments to suppliers.
Information regarding payment practices, including average payment periods, is disclosed under [G1-6].
Governance Oversight – Compliance Council
Where significant ESG risks are identified, or where there is uncertainty at operational level regarding the
appropriate course of action, the matter is escalated to the Compliance Council.
The Compliance Council acts as the primary decision-making body for material supplier-related ESG risks
and has the authority to:
• Approve or reject new contractual engagements with suppliers presenting significant ESG risks
• Review and determine the continuation of existing supplier relationships where material ESG concerns
have been identified
• The Committee ensures that decisions are aligned with the Company’s ethical standards, financial integrity
requirements and sustainability objectives.
The Compliance Council is composed of senior executives, including the Chief Corporate Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Supply Chain Officer, the respective business owners, the ESG team and the Internal Audit
function. This composition ensures a balanced consideration of governance, financial and operational
perspectives.
During the reporting period, one supplier case was escalated to the Compliance Council following an elevated
ESG risk assessment. The Committee reviewed the matter, engaged with the supplier and agreed on
appropriate mitigation actions. Following this process, the identified concerns were addressed and the
supplier relationship was maintained subject to ongoing monitoring.
Supplier ESG risks are subject to continuous monitoring through periodic reassessment and review of
mitigation measures. The framework is aligned with applicable Hungarian ESG legislation and supports
preparedness for evolving European regulatory requirements, including CSRD and Corporate Sustainability
Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).
Through this governance framework, Wizz Air integrates sustainability considerations into procurement
decisions, manages value chain risks and supports responsible supplier relationships.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 288
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[G1-3] PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY
Policies and procedures
Wizz Air has had an Anti-Corruption Policy in place since July 2011, which reflects our company-wide
commitment to conducting business ethically and with integrity, to protect Wizz Air and our business
partners from engaging in any form of corruption and bribery. The Anti-Corruption Policy helps us to
maintain an effective compliance environment across our supply chain. The policy applies to all employees
and is communicated via onboarding processes, internal training programmes and the Company’s internal
communication channels. An extract of the policy is available on our website, while the full version is
available to employees through the Company’s intranet.
Before entering into any contracts, we require suppliers and service providers to commit to complying with
this policy. To minimise the risk of corruption and bribery, we conduct due diligence before engaging any
third party, and we continuously monitor these activities. Additionally, all employees and suppliers are able
to report any suspected incidents. To review each incoming case, investigators are appointed individually,
ensuring they are independent and not part of the management chain responsible for preventing and
detecting corruption or bribery.
Investigation, reporting and governance
The Company is dedicated to evaluating every potential fraudulent act; therefore, all Associated Persons and
departments are obliged to forward raised concerns of fraud directly to the Anti-Fraud and Investigations
Manager or by submitting the whistleblowing report through Intelex, immediately. Officers, Directors or
other Associated Persons who receive a report of fraud or misconduct are expected to forward the report
immediately through the whistleblowing platform, and the report is recorded and evaluated by the General
Counsel and Internal Audit.
As part of the initial assessment, it is determined whether the reported incident is a fraudulent act which
shall be subject to further investigation. If it is found that the incident raised by the whistleblower does not 
violate any applicable laws, regulations, corporate policies or best practices, the allegation will be dismissed,
and the decision communicated to the whistleblower. If the initial assessment proves that the concern is
related to fraud, the whistleblower, the Board, the Audit and Risk Committee (depending on materiality) and
other parties concerned about the outcome are notified, while if necessary, the Anti-Fraud and
Investigations Manager undertakes to investigate the concern further.
At least annually, the General Counsel together with the Anti-Fraud and Investigations Manager prepares a
general summary report and analysis regarding the outcomes of the investigations performed and the
allegations, and communicates the findings to the CFO and the CEO. The report shall be accurate, objective
and impartial, presenting only relevant facts (excluding, where appropriate, confidential information and
personal data) and the findings of the investigations in the timely manner stated above. Where relevant
based on materiality, the outcomes of investigations, including findings, remediation actions and any
disciplinary measures, are also reported to the Board and the Audit and Risk Committee on a case-by-case
basis or in periodic governance reports. The Anti-Fraud and Investigations Manager and the Investigation
Team act with the utmost care and diligence, and take overall responsibility for personal and other
confidential data while preparing the reports.
Risk assessment and control framework
Wizz Air conducts annual fraud risk assessments to identify, evaluate and mitigate fraud risks across all
levels of the organisation, including entities, subsidiaries, divisions, operating units and functions. These
assessments involve appropriate levels of management, analyse both internal and external risk factors,
estimate the likelihood and significance of identified risks, and document the results.
One particular area of focus is corruption and bribery risk. The assessments specifically consider the risk that
employees, agents, subsidiaries or other associated persons may commit fraud, corruption or bribery in
order to benefit the organisation or its clients.
In line with the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, the Company identifies specific fraud
and corruption schemes that could be committed in its name or on its behalf, including fraudulent trading,
false representation and corrupt practices.
The fraud risk assessment process also examines the risk of management override of controls and assesses
whether existing preventive and detective controls are sufficient to prevent corruption and bribery. This
includes reviewing organisational incentives, pressures and opportunities that could encourage misconduct,
as well as external risks arising from customers, suppliers and the wider business environment.
To strengthen anti-corruption and anti-bribery controls, the Fraud Risk Assessment Team gathers
information from interviews, brainstorming sessions, whistleblowing reports, analytical procedures and
external sources such as industry news. Existing controls are tested for effectiveness, and where gaps or
weaknesses are identified, additional control measures and improvements are recommended. Wizz Air also
performs an annual fraud, bribery and corruption self-assessment, supported by independent external
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 289
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
expert methodology, to evaluate our fraud risk exposure, classify the maturity of existing controls and
provide assurance on how effectively these risks are controlled and monitored across the organisation.
Training and awareness
As part of our comprehensive onboarding process, Wizz Air provides new employees with mandatory e-
learning courses on business ethics and all relevant policies, including our Anti-Corruption and Bribery Policy.
This training is also extended to third parties involved in business operations, ensuring a consistent
understanding of our ethical standards.
In addition to e-learning, Wizz Air organises various anti-corruption training courses. Employees who are
invited to individual training sessions or work in high-risk areas are required to attend these sessions,
especially those in direct contact with suppliers, subcontractors, customers or officials. The training is
tailored in terms of form and content to match the corruption exposure of the employees involved.
Affected employees must repeat the training at specified intervals or when there is a significant change in
the training material. All employees receive online training on the subject matter.
During F26, Wizz Air conducted its annual Anti-Fraud Training for all employees, with 1,275 participants
completing the programme. During F26, Wizz Air made its Anti-Fraud Training course mandatory for all
employees every year. This course provides a consistent foundation for fraud awareness throughout the
organisation, establishing a fundamental pillar of the Company’s fraud management efforts. All Wizz Air
personnel are required to participate and complete annual anti-fraud training sessions and e-learning
materials at given intervals. The training covers all employees, including all functions-at-risk. This ongoing
education helps reinforce fraud awareness and equips employees with the knowledge to recognise and
report potential misconduct (including corruption and bribery). The completion of training sessions is
documented, and affirmation is obtained from all Wizz Air personnel, confirming their awareness of Wizz
Air’s Fraud Risk Management Programme. Training programmes are standardised across the organisation
and are not differentiated by region or category.
The Anti-Fraud and Investigations Manager is responsible for monitoring, and every year evaluating, the
effectiveness of the anti-fraud training programmes. This oversight ensures that the training remains
relevant and effective in addressing emerging fraud risks.
[G1-4] INCIDENTS OF CORRUPTION OR BRIBERY
In F26, Wizz Air had no convictions for violations of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, and no fines were
imposed for any breaches of these regulations. Although the whistleblowing reporting system was actively
promoted throughout the year – particularly through the launching of revised policies and during
International Fraud Awareness Week, when employees were reminded about reporting channels – no reports
related to corruption or bribery were received.
Wizz Air has a zero-tolerance policy towards bribery. This means that employees, Officers, Directors and
business partners are strictly forbidden from offering, paying, authorising or accepting any unlawful bribe or
anything of value to or from anyone. Additionally, third parties performing services for Wizz Air must comply
with anti-corruption laws, as their actions can affect Wizz Air’s compliance. To ensure everyone understands
and adheres to these standards, Wizz Air provides comprehensive anti-corruption education and training to
its personnel and third parties involved in business operations. Any violations of this policy can result in
disciplinary actions, including termination of employment, and may lead to criminal and civil penalties.
[G1-5] POLITICAL INFLUENCE AND LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
At Wizz Air, it is crucial for us to build and maintain relationships with our stakeholders and effectively
communicate our corporate mission, values, goals and actions in a transparent manner. Our corporate
political engagement strategy is centred around building trust, transparency and engagement with
authorities, government officials and the communities in which we operate.
Wizz Air also established a Corporate Political Engagement Policy and Statement which outlines the
principles and guidelines for engaging with political stakeholders. This policy ensures that all interactions are
conducted transparently, ethically and in alignment with the Company’s values and regulatory requirements.
Political Donations and Advocacy Expenditures
Wizz Air has a dedicated Government and Public Affairs Team to manage corporate political engagement.
Employees interacting with political stakeholders receive guidance from this team to ensure consistency and
compliance. The Corporate & ESG Officer, who oversees this team, is responsible for monitoring and
ensuring adherence to Wizz Air’s lobbying activities, public interactions as well as the effectiveness of related
policies and procedures.
All employees must adhere to the Wizz Air Code of Conduct and Anti-Bribery Policy, which strictly prohibits
any improper influence on decisions by government officials, legislators, authorities or regulators. If there is
a significant risk of policy or procedural violations, the Corporate & ESG Officer will escalate the matter to
the Audit & Risk Committee of the Board of Directors. Non-compliance with these policies may result in
disciplinary action, termination of employment, or legal consequences, depending on the severity of the
violation.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 290
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Wizz Air maintains political neutrality and prohibits contributions to political parties, campaigns, political
think tanks and any equivalent political donations, either directly or indirectly, by its employees or
contractors acting on behalf of Wizz Air. Occasionally, the Company offers non-financial support to public
events intended to promote cultural exchange, community development as well as support issues important
to the Company and the aviation industry. From time to time, the Company provides non-financial support
to public events that align with its interests and those of the aviation industry. Any such expenditure
requires approval from an Officer of the Group.
Wizz Air engages in responsible lobbying and advocacy efforts by:
▶ Shaping public policy issues that impact the Company through active participation in public
consultations, industry forums and governmental initiatives concerning legitimate business interests.
▶ Advancing the Company’s mission, interests and goals by working with authorities, regulators,
embassies and government officials at all levels in relevant jurisdictions.
▶ Ensuring that any lobbying, advocacy or interaction with authorities, regulators, embassies and
government officials by Wizz Air employees is conducted with honesty, integrity, openness, and is in
compliance with local and international laws.
Wizz Air sometimes employs external third-party consultants to support its political engagement activities,
monitor legislative developments and engage government officials on industry matters. These consultants
are contractually committed to complying with the Corporate Political Engagement Policy and Statement.
Wizz Air maintains its profile on the EU Transparency Register, which lists meetings with representatives of
the European Commission and contributions to public consultations. These engagements are publicly
available.
Wizz Air maintains a constructive relationship with all levels of government within its network, irrespective of
political affiliation. The Company upholds the right of individuals to participate in the democratic process.
However, Wizz Air itself refrains from making political donations or incurring political expenditures.
Between 2021 and 2024, Wizz Air collaborated with Penta (formerly Hume Brophy) on EU‑level advocacy
matters related to climate and other aviation‑relevant regulations. In the current reporting year, Wizz Air did
not collaborate with any lobbying firm, and no financial information relating to such activities appears in the
EU Transparency Registry. Wizz Air has been registered in the EU transparency register since August 2022
under registration number 481429647259-30.
Climate Policy Positions and Advocacy
Wizz Air regularly engages in the public policymaking process and expresses our views on policies, laws and
regulations that govern various aspects of our business in the EU and internationally. The Company actively
engages in advocacy issues in the European Union, with a special focus on climate and other regulations
impacting on aviation.
European Union Climate and Aviation Policies
Wizz Air monitors and contributes to policy discussions related to the European Union’s Fit for 55 climate
package, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030. The Company has
engaged with policymakers on several aviation-related initiatives included in this package.
ReFuelEU Aviation
Wizz Air has followed and contributed to discussions on the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation, which entered into
force in 2023 and introduces gradually increasing requirements for the supply of sustainable aviation fuels
(SAF) within the EU. The Company considers SAF to be an important short- to medium-term pathway for
reducing aviation emissions and has supported measures aimed at developing SAF supply in Europe. Wizz
Air has also highlighted the importance of ensuring fair and equitable access to SAF across EU Member
States, given differences in regional supply and infrastructure.
EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) for Aviation
The EU ETS aviation legislation published in 2023 extends the carbon pricing framework for aviation within
the European Economic Area. Wizz Air has participated in policy discussions regarding the implementation of
the system, including the phase-out of free allowances and the introduction of incentives supporting SAF
uptake.
Energy Taxation Directive
The European Commission has proposed amendments to the Energy Taxation Directive that would introduce
taxation on aviation fuel for intra-EU flights over a transitional period. Wizz Air has contributed industry input
to consultations related to this proposal.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 291
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Sustainable Transport Investment Plan (STIP)
The European Commission unveiled STIP in November 2025, outlining a roadmap to accelerate the
energy transition in transport by unlocking EU funding for low‑carbon infrastructure. Wizz Air follows
these developments closely, as STIP‑supported measures – such as sustainable aviation fuel projects –
support our objectives across the network.
National Policy Engagement
In addition to EU-level engagement, Wizz Air contributes to policy discussions at national level where
aviation-related climate policies are being developed. During the reporting period, the Company provided
input to consultations related to national SAF strategies in Hungary and Poland.
Engagement in the United Kingdom
Wizz Air UK Limited engages with the UK government on aviation decarbonisation policies and the
development of the UK SAF mandate, which entered into force in January 2025. The Company provides
operational insights to support the aviation sector’s transition towards net-zero emissions. 
[G1-6] PAYMENT PRACTICES
The Company does not have a specific policy dedicated to preventing late payments. Instead, we prioritise
establishing mutually beneficial payment terms through negotiation with all our suppliers. This approach
ensures that both parties can meet their financial obligations in a timely manner. By fostering open
communication and collaboration, we aim to create a supportive and reliable business environment. This
strategy not only helps maintain strong relationships with our suppliers, but it also contributes to the overall
stability and efficiency of our supply chain operations.
Wizz Air’s average payment terms are 30-45 days, which encompass approximately 60% of its annual
invoices by value. It pays for services received within 15 days of receipt of the invoice, which accounts for
about 20% of its annual invoices. The remainder of its invoices are paid within 90 days of receipt. The
average time for Wizz Air to pay an invoice during the financial year was 41 days.
The calculation of the average time the Company takes to pay an invoice was based on an internal database.
Specifically, focusing on the AP KPI section where cycle times are listed. The total cycle time, which spans
from the invoice receipt to the payment date, was selected as the basis for this calculation. Additionally, the
average Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) was included. The DPO indicates the average time (in days) the
Company takes to pay its bills and invoices to its trade creditors, which includes suppliers, vendors or
financiers.
For F26, Wizz Air Holdings Plc did not have any known ongoing legal proceedings related to outstanding
contractual late payments.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 292
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
[G] OTHER GOVERNANCE INFORMATION
The double materiality assessment (DMA) identified charitable support, cybersecurity and data protection as
material, entity-specific topics for Wizz Air. The following sections provide further information on the
Company’s approach and disclosures in these areas.
Charitable support
Wish-granting partnerships
Wizz Air actively engages in regular initiatives that benefit the communities where we operate. Supporting
local communities and foundations allows Wizz Air to contribute to the well-being and development of the
regions we serve, creating a positive impact that extends beyond providing air travel services. Several
teams within the organisation, including members from the People Council and the Wizz Foundation, are
responsible for these initiatives.
For several years, the Wizz Foundation has been active in partnerships with multiple partners focused on
granting the wishes of children suffering from life-threatening diseases. As part of the cooperation, the Wizz
Foundation provides flight tickets and applicable services every year for children and their travelling
guardians to support the Foundations’ projects where the wish involves travelling to another destination by
plane.
In F26, the Foundation continued its partnerships with the Hungary-based partner Csodalámpa Foundation,
as well as the Polish Fundacja Mam Marzenie. On top of the continued support for these collaborations, three
new partnerships were established in the reporting year, expanding the scope of works to the Italian Make A
Wish foundation in June 2025, the UK-based When You Wish Upon A Star in January 2026, and the
Romanian Asociația Aripi pe pământ in March 2026. With these expansions, Wizz Air now has charitable
partnerships in all its core markets, fulfilling its objective of giving back to the communities it operates in.
In F26, the Wizz Foundation contributed to fulfilling 52 wishes, with a total of 146 flight tickets granted to
children and their families. This shows a marked increase from F25, with the Foundation almost doubling its
efforts from 28 wishes and 77 tickets.
Csodalámpa
Foundation
Fundacja Mam
Marzenie
When You Wish
Upon A Star
Total
Country of operation
Hungary
Poland
United Kingdom
Number of wishes granted
24
16
12
52
Number of flights impacted
11
10
11
32
Number of tickets gifted
63
40
43
146
The Wizz Foundation intends to continue its collaboration with existing partners, and we also plan to expand
our partnerships to Bulgaria and Albania in F27. As the UK and Romanian collaborations were established
toward the end of the financial reporting period, the partnership is expected to scale up with more significant
effects in F27. 
Donation of unused IT devices to charitable causes
The Foundation donated a total of 153 unused IT devices in F26, including 25 desktops, 126 tablets and 2
laptops. The devices were donated to the Foundation supporting the Heim Pál Children’s Hospital in
Budapest, and a nursery in Mátraverebély, Hungary.
Cybersecurity and Data Protection
As cyber threats continue to evolve in sophistication and scale, the importance of robust cybersecurity
measures cannot be overstated. Wizz Air recognises cybersecurity as a critical component of safe and
reliable operations and maintains strong governance structures and processes to protect its information
assets.
Cybersecurity Governance and Processes
Wizz Air’s Cybersecurity Programme is led by a Cybersecurity team made up of skilled professionals with
extensive experience in the field, focusing on the people, process and technology aspects of cybersecurity
by running multiple work streams. This includes regular risk assessments, compliance audits and
oversight of cybersecurity investments to align with industry best practices and regulatory requirements.
Comprehensive cybersecurity framework
Wizz Air has established a robust cybersecurity framework consisting of policies, procedures and controls
that address both internal and external risks. The most overarching policy regarding cybersecurity within the
Company is the Information Security Policy, with its most recent version in effect since October 2025. The
primary purpose of the policy is to establish a robust framework for protecting Wizz Air’s information assets
by ensuring confidentiality, integrity and availability, including the management of the potential impact of
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 293
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
information security risks on aviation safety. The framework includes regular risk assessments, compliance
audits and oversight of cybersecurity investments to ensure alignment with industry best practices and
regulatory requirements. The policy refers to multiple entity-specific IROs, including data leaks in the
Company’s own operations, cyber-attacks affecting both its own operations and the upstream and
downstream value chain, as well as platform outages and system failures.
Together with its referenced standards and supporting policies – many of which were updated during the
reporting period – it applies to all information obtained, created or maintained by Wizz Air. The policy does
not extend to physical security, background checks or HR processes; however, it defines IT support
responsibilities related to these areas. Procurement-related topics are also outside the scope of the policy;
however, the policy includes the assessment of suppliers from an information security perspective.
The Information Security Policy, its referenced standards, and supporting policies apply equally to all
personnel, including but not limited to Wizz Air employees, agents, consultants, contractors, and all other
authorised users who manage, handle, use or grant access to Information Resources. Since the policy refers
to all information obtained, created or maintained by Wizz Air, upstream and downstream actors across all
geographies are considered stakeholders, including but not limited to customers, suppliers, external partners
and employees.
The Policy supports the following third-party standards:
• ISO/IEC 27001:2022
• Cybersecurity Framework (NIST)
• Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NIS 2)
• PCI DSS v4.x
• UK CAA CAP 1753
• Hungarian Gov. Decree No. 169/2010
Additional support policies – such as the Account Management Policy, Password Policy, Acceptable Use
Policy, Vulnerability Management Policy and Cyber Incident Management Policy – ensure structured
coverage of all critical cybersecurity domains. These policies are reviewed and updated as needed,
communicated internally and made available through company platforms.
To ensure that the interests of key stakeholders are reflected in the policy, the Company takes into account
relevant international cybersecurity standards and regulatory requirements. The Information Security Policy
is available to all Wizz Air employees through internal platforms, and updates to the policy are
communicated internally when revisions are introduced. To reinforce the organisation’s commitment to
information security, the Chief Financial Officer has issued an Information Security Policy Statement,
formally articulating the importance of information security and its strategic relevance to Wizz Air.
Governance and Organisational Structure
Wizz Air’s Cybersecurity Programme is led by a dedicated Cybersecurity team with deep technical expertise.
The Digital Officer is responsible for overseeing cybersecurity processes and reports to the Chief Financial
Officer, who holds ultimate accountability. Through multiple work streams, the team focuses on
strengthening the people, processes and technology that collectively support the Company’s cyber resilience.
Security Controls, Testing and Operational Practices
Wizz Air applies a layered security model incorporating preventative controls as the first layer of security,
detection and response mechanisms as the second layer, and robust recovery procedures as the third. To
ensure the effectiveness of these controls, the Company maintains a comprehensive testing regime that
includes internal and external vulnerability assessments, penetration testing and red team exercises. These
simulated threat scenarios provide valuable insights and support the continuous enhancement of the
Company’s security position.
Employees can report issues – including cybersecurity concerns – through a well‑established IT service desk.
All reports feed into a centralised issue management platform, where incidents are investigated according to
risk management rules and integrated into the broader operational risk management process.
Training, Awareness and Workforce Preparedness
Recognising the vital role employees play in cybersecurity, Wizz Air maintains compulsory e‑learning for all
staff complemented by periodic training sessions, online modules and simulated phishing exercises. The
Cybersecurity team also operates an ongoing internal awareness campaign, sharing practical guidance to
further strengthen digital literacy.
Incident Management
Wizz Air operates a fully integrated end‑to‑end incident management framework covering third‑party, IT and
cybersecurity events. Escalation pathways are triggered based on predefined impact thresholds, ensuring
timely responses, appropriate mitigation and structured recovery.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 294
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Additional cybersecurity governance matters
During F26, Wizz Air implemented several updates to strengthen its cybersecurity compliance framework,
including preparations for the requirements of the EU Directive on measures for a high common level of
cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2). As part of its initial internal readiness assessment for the NIS2
framework, the Company conducted an audit to evaluate the maturity of its cybersecurity controls. The
assessment resulted in a score of 97%, corresponding to the rating “Compliant with Negligible Risk”. The
audit was completed ahead of the regulatory compliance deadline in December 2025. In line with the
requirements of the directive, Wizz Air will continue to be fully prepared for future audits and is committed
to strengthening and further enhancing its cybersecurity controls.
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) introduced the Part-IS regulation to strengthen
cybersecurity resilience in aviation by enhancing the integration of information security and aviation safety
requirements. Wizz Air completed its internal audit under the Part-IS framework in January 2026, with
external audits scheduled for May 2026.
During the reporting period, the Company also updated its digital internal control framework. The revised
framework includes enhanced controls to support the monitoring of employee access rights to digital
systems and to improve the transparency and documentation of digital processes.
In addition, Wizz Air updated its security awareness programme. Improvements included revisions to
onboarding training and the introduction of mandatory annual cybersecurity training for employees and
contractors, including personnel working across flight operations, cabin crew and office-based functions.
Data Protection Governance and Processes
Data protection is essential in all sectors, particularly in aviation, where digital systems support critical
functions such as flight operations, reservations and communication. Wizz Air prioritises data privacy and
ensures strict adherence to regulatory requirements and internal policies to protect the confidentiality,
integrity and availability of sensitive information. To manage risks and maintain stakeholder trust, the airline
operates a robust data protection framework encompassing clear policies, procedures and controls designed
to safeguard personal data. In the event of a data breach, Wizz Air follows and complies with international
and industry best practices and standards as well as its obligation to keep its data breach registry
continuously up to date. Whenever there is a suspected data breach, Wizz Air prepares a risk assessment
based on the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity’s (ENISA) scoring methodology guidelines to
determine the actions needed. Employees have a written obligation to report any suspected data breach to
the Group Data Protection Officer (DPO). To facilitate the identification of possible data breaches, breach
awareness is present throughout Wizz Air’s internal pages, as well as in training and onboarding materials.
Safeguarding personal data is the foundation of trustworthy business relationships, and the lawful and
proper processing of personal data is essential to the success of Wizz Air. To ensure this, the overarching
part of the data protection policy framework within Wizz Air is the Wizz Air Internal Data Protection Policy,
which underwent revisions and modernisation in the reporting period. Its objective is to ensure compliance
with the General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union (“GDPR”), the UK GDPR and globally
accepted fundamental principles of data protection. The policy applies to Wizz Air and all of its employees
across all operating entities, and governs the processing of personal data in all its forms. Data protection is
especially crucial for the operations of Wizz Air as it ties in directly to the material IROs of data leaks and
cyber-attacks relating to all sections of the value chain.
To provide a safe and secure environment for the data that flows through the organisation, Wizz Air has an
appointed Group Data Protection Officer (DPO) who oversees our data protection efforts, ensuring privacy by
design at all levels and compliance with EU standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) as well as with relevant international and national regulations and guidelines. Wizz Air also has a
Cybersecurity department that collaborates closely with the DPO. In accordance with the GDPR, the DPO
operates as an independent advising expert and cannot be penalised for performing their duties. The DPO
reports to the Chief Corporate Officer, ensuring that data protection is embedded in the highest levels of
leadership. Overall responsibility and accountability for data protection compliance remains with the Chief
Corporate Officer.
The main legislative backbone of the policy is the EU’s GDPR and the UK’s GDPR, as well as globally
accepted fundamental principles of data protection and ISO 27701. Everyone whose data is managed by
Wizz Air (e.g. passengers, application users, business partners, supplier contacts, complainants and
claimants as well as contact personnel from authorities) are key stakeholders of the policy, and protecting
their data is the main objective of the policy. Thus, their interests are represented throughout the policy.
The policy is available to all Wizz Air employees through internal platforms, and the changes were also
communicated when the updated version was published.
Additional data protection governance matters
Further changes to the data protection internal framework includes new training material and a manual for
the contact centre handling direct customer communications, as well as an update to the data access
management workflow for customers.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 295
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
A new Data Inquiry Manual was published for external customer service agents managing customer
communication, detailing guidelines for the proper handling of customer data, including cybersecurity threat
recognition, routes for escalating incidents and scripts to follow. This ensures all customer data is handled
with the utmost care, in line with international standards and legislation. Compliance with the updated
document is ensured by new mandatory training materials for all employees and external agents handling
customer data.
Customers can now also access their data through an automated portal, reducing workflow and ensuring
streamlined data governance. Through the portal, customers can now request the access, modification or
erasure of their personal data with a few clicks, instead of having to go through agent requests, which was
the previous practice.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 296
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS CONTENT INDEX
ESRS
Disclosure requirement
Page
Comment
ESRS 2
General Information
Basis for preparation
BP-1
General basis for preparation of
the sustainability statement
BP-2
Disclosures in relation to specific
circumstances
Governance
GOV-1
The role of the administrative,
management and supervisory
bodies
GOV-2
Information provided to and
sustainability matters addressed
by the undertaking’s
administrative, management and
supervisory bodies
GOV-3
Integration of sustainability-
related performance in incentive
schemes
GOV-4
Statement on due diligence
GOV-5
Risk management and internal
controls over sustainability
reporting
Strategy
SBM-1
Strategy, business model and
value chain
The disclosure requirement has not been
applied, as the relevant Commission
Delegated Act – which would specify the
application date for ESRS 2 SBM-1 paragraph
40(b) (breakdown of total revenue by
significant ESRS sector) and 40(c) (list of
additional significant ESRS sectors) – has not
yet been adopted pursuant to Article 29b(1),
third subparagraph, point (ii), of Directive
2013/34/EU.
SBM-2
Interests and views of
stakeholders
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and
opportunities and their
interaction with strategy and
business model
Impact, risk, and opportunity
management
Disclosures on the double
materiality assessment
IRO-1
Description of the processes to
identify and assess material
impacts, risks, and opportunities
IRO-2
Disclosure requirements in ESRS
covered by the undertaking’s
sustainability statement
E
Environmental information
E1
Climate change
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 297
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
GOV-3
Integration of sustainability-
related performance in incentive
schemes
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and
opportunities and their
interaction with strategy and
business model
IRO-1
Description of the processes to
identify and assess material
climate-related impacts, risks
and opportunities
E1-1
Transition plan for climate
change mitigation
E1-2
Policies related to climate
change mitigation and
adaptation
E1-3
Actions and resources in relation
to climate change policies
E1-4
Targets related to climate
change mitigation
E1-5
Energy consumption & mix
E1-6
Gross scopes 1, 2, 3, and total
GHG emissions - the
Consolidated GHG statement
E1-7
GHG removals and GHG
mitigation
projects financed through
carbon credits
-
Determined not material
E1-8
Internal carbon pricing
E1-9
Anticipated financial effects from
material physical and transition
risks and potential climate-
related opportunities
-
Determined not material
E2
Pollution
IRO-1
Description of the processes to
identify and assess material
pollution-related impacts, risks
and opportunities
E2-1
Policies related to pollution
E2-2
Actions and resources related to
pollution
E2-3
Targets related to pollution
E2-4
Pollution of air, water and soil
Air pollution is considered a material topic in
line with the outcomes of the double
materiality assessment (DMA).
E2-5
Substances of concern and
substances of very high concern
-
Determined not material
E2-6
Anticipated financial effects from
pollution-related impacts, risks,
and opportunities
EU Taxonomy
S
Social information
S1
Own workforce
SBM-2
Interests and views of
stakeholders
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and
opportunities and their
interaction with strategy and
business model
S1-1
Policies related to own workforce
S1-2
Processes for engaging with own
workers and workers’
representatives about impacts
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 298
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
S1-3
Processes to remediate negative
impacts and channels for own
workforce to raise concerns
S1-4
Taking action on material
impacts on own workforce, and
approaches to managing
material risks and pursuing
material opportunities related to
own workforce, and
effectiveness of those actions
S1-5
Targets related to managing
material negative impacts,
advancing positive impacts, and
managing material risks and
opportunities
S1-6
Characteristics of the
Undertaking’s Employees
S1-7
Characteristics of non-employee
workers in the undertaking’s
own workforce
In line with ESRS 1 Appendix C, Wizz Air has
chosen to omit reporting on all datapoints in
this Disclosure Requirement for this reporting
year.
S1-9
Diversity metrics
S1-11
Social protection
In accordance with the phase-in provisions
defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements,
Appendix C, Wizz Air has partly omitted the
following Disclosure Requirement in the
reporting period: S1-11 Social protection.
In applying the transitional relief available
under ESRS 1 on a voluntary basis, Wizz Air
provided a brief description for this topic
instead of the full set of disclosure
requirements outlined in the relevant ESRS.
This included the identification of these as
material matters, as well as a summary of
how its business model and strategy consider
the related impacts; any time-bound targets
and progress made; relevant policies and
actions taken; and, where available,
applicable metrics.
S1-13
Training and skills development
metrics
In accordance with the phase-in provisions
defined in ESRS 1 General Requirements,
Appendix C, Wizz Air has partly omitted the
following Disclosure Requirement during the
reporting period: S1-13 Training and skills
development metrics.
As part of the voluntary application of the
transitional provisions under ESRS 1, Wizz Air
provided a brief description for this topic
instead of the full disclosures required by the
relevant ESRS. This included the
identification of these as material matters,
together with a summary of related impacts,
strategy considerations, targets, actions,
policies and, where available, applicable
metrics.
S1-14
Health and safety metrics
S1-17
Incidents, complaints and severe
human rights impacts
S2
Workers in the value chain
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and
opportunities and their
interaction with strategy and
business model
S2-1
Policies related to value chain
workers
S2-2
Processes for engaging with
value chain workers about
impacts
S2-3
Processes to remediate negative
impacts and channels for value
chain workers to raise concerns
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 299
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
S2-4
Taking action on material
impacts on value chain workers,
and approaches to managing
material risks and pursuing
material opportunities related to
value chain workers, and
effectiveness of those actions
S2-5
Targets related to managing
material negative impacts,
advancing positive impacts, and
managing material risks and
opportunities
S4
Consumers and end-users
SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and
opportunities and their
interaction with strategy and
business model
S4-1
Policies related to consumers
and end-users
S4-2
Processes for engaging with
consumers and end-users about
impacts
S4-3
Processes to remediate negative
impacts and channels for
consumers and end-users to
raise concerns
S4-4
Taking action on material
impacts on consumers and end-
users, and approaches to
managing material risks and
pursuing material opportunities
related to consumers and end-
users, and effectiveness of those
actions
S4-5
Targets related to managing
material negative impacts,
advancing positive impacts, and
managing material risks and
opportunities
G
Governance information
G1
Business conduct
GOV-1
The role of the administrative,
supervisory and management
bodies
IRO-1
Description of the processes to
identify and assess material
impacts, risks and opportunities
G1-1
Business conduct policies and
corporate culture
G1-2
Management of relationships
with suppliers
G1-3
Prevention and detection of
corruption and bribery
G1-4
Incidents of corruption or bribery
G1-5
Political influence and lobbying
activities
G1-6
Payment practices
G
Other governance
information
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 300
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
Appendix B: List of datapoints in cross-cutting and topical standards derived from other EU legislation
Disclosure
Requirement and
related datapoint
SFDR reference
Pillar 3
reference
Benchmark 
regulation reference
EU Climate
Law
Reference
Page
Reference
ESRS 2 GOV-1 Board's
gender diversity
paragraph 21 (d)
Indicator
number 13 of
Table #1 of
Annex 1
Commission Delegated
Regulation (EU)
2020/1816, Annex II
Pg. 188
ESRS 2 GOV-1
Percentage of board
members who are
independent, paragraph
21 (e)
Commission Delegated
Regulation (EU)
2020/1816, Annex II
Pg. 188
ESRS 2 GOV-4
Statement on due
diligence, paragraph 30
Indicator
number 10,
Table #3 of
Annex 1
Pg. 190
ESRS 2 SBM-1
Involvement in activities
related to fossil fuel
activities, paragraph 40
(d) i
Indicators
number 4 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Article 449a of
Directive (EU)
No. 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453 (6),
Table 1:
Qualitative
information on
environmental
risk, and Table 2:
Qualitative
information on
social risk
Pg. 192
ESRS 2 SBM-1
Involvement in activities
related to chemical
production, paragraph
40 (d) ii
Indicator
number 9, Table
#2 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Not Material
ESRS 2 SBM-1
Involvement in activities
related to controversial
weapons, paragraph 40
(d) iii
Indicator
number 14,
Table #1 of
Annex 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818 (7),
Article 12, Paragraph 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Not Material
ESRS 2 SBM-1
Involvement in activities
related to cultivation
and production of
tobacco, paragraph 40
(d) (i)
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Article
12, Paragraph 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Not Material
ESRS E1-1 Transition
plan to reach climate
neutrality by 2050,
paragraph 14
Regulation
(EU)
2021/1119,
Article 2(1)
Pg. 226
ESRS E1-1 Undertakings
excluded from Paris-
aligned benchmarks
paragraph 16 (g)
Article 449a
Regulation (EU)
No 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453
Template 1:
Banking book
Climate Change
transition risk:
Credit quality of
exposures by
sector, emissions
and residual
maturity
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818,
Article12.1 (d) to (g),
and Article 12.2
Pg. 226
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 301
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS E1-4 GHG
emission reduction
targets, paragraph 34
Indicator
number 4 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Article 449a
Regulation (EU)
No 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453
Template 3:
Banking book –
Climate change
transition risk:
alignment metrics
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Article
6
Pg. 235
ESRS E1-5 Energy
consumption from fossil
sources disaggregated
by sources (only high
climate impact sectors),
paragraph 38
Indicator
number 5 Table
#1 and Indicator
number 5 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Pg. 237
ESRS E1-5 Energy
consumption and mix,
paragraph 37
Indicator
number 5 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Pg. 237
ESRS E1-5 Energy
intensity associated with
activities in high climate
impact sectors,
paragraphs 40 to 43
Indicator
number 6 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Pg. 237
ESRS E1-6 Gross Scope
1, 2, 3 and Total GHG
emissions, paragraph 44
Indicators
number 1 and 2
Table #1 of
Annex 1
Article 449a;
Regulation (EU)
No 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453
Template 1:
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Article
5(1), 6 and 8(1)
Pg. 238
ESRS E1-6 Gross GHG
emissions intensity,
paragraphs 53 to 55
Indicators
number 3 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Article 449a
Regulation (EU)
No 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453
Template 3:
Banking book –
Climate change
transition risk:
alignment metrics
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Article
8(1)
Pg. 238
ESRS E1-7 GHG
removals and carbon
credits, paragraph 56
Regulation
(EU)
2021/1119,
Article 2(1)
Not material
ESRS E1-9 Exposure of
the benchmark portfolio
to climate-related
physical risks,
paragraph 66
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Annex
II Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Not Material
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 302
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS E1-9
Disaggregation of
monetary amounts by
acute and chronic
physical risk, paragraph
66 (a)
ESRS E1-9 Location of
significant assets at
material physical risk,
paragraph 66 (c).
Article 449a
Regulation (EU)
No 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453
paragraphs 46
and 47; Template
5: Banking book -
Climate change
physical risk:
Exposures
subject to
physical risk.
Not Material
ESRS E1-9 Breakdown
of the carrying value of
its real estate assets by
energy efficiency
classes, paragraph 67
(c).
Article 449a
Regulation (EU)
No 575/2013;
Commission
Implementing
Regulation (EU)
2022/2453,
Paragraph 34;
Template 2:
Banking book –
Climate change
transition risk:
Loans
collateralised by
immovable
property –
Energy efficiency
of the collateral
Not Material
ESRS E1-9 Degree of
exposure of the portfolio
to climate-related
opportunities, paragraph
69
Commission Delegated
Regulation (EU)
2020/1818, Annex II
Not Material
ESRS E2-4 Amount of
each pollutant listed in
Annex II of the EPRTR
Regulation (European
Pollutant Release and
Transfer Register)
emitted to air, water
and soil, paragraph 28
Indicator  umber
8 Table #1 of
Annex 1 
Indicator
number 2 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Indicator
number 1 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Indicator
number 3 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E3-1 Water and
marine resources,
paragraph 9
Indicator
number 7 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E3-1 Dedicated
policy, paragraph 13
Indicator
number 8
Table 2 of Annex
1
Not Material
ESRS E3-1 Sustainable
oceans and seas,
paragraph 14
Indicator
number 12 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E3-4 Total water
recycled and reused,
paragraph 28 (c)
Indicator
number 6.2
Table #2 of
Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E3-4 Total water
consumption in m3 per
net revenue on own
operations, paragraph
29
Indicator
number 6.1
Table #2 of
Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4,
paragraph 16 (a) i
Indicator
number 7 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Pg. 199
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4,
paragraph 16 (b)
Indicator
number 10 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Pg. 199
ESRS 2- IRO 1 - E4,
paragraph 16 (c)
Indicator
number 14 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Pg. 199
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable
land / agriculture
practices or policies,
paragraph 24 (b)
Indicator
number 11 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 303
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS E4-2 Sustainable
oceans / seas practices
or policies, paragraph 24
(c)
Indicator
number 12 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E4-2 Policies to
address deforestation,
paragraph 24 (d)
Indicator
number 15 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E5-5 Non-recycled
waste, paragraph 37 (d)
Indicator
number 13 Table
#2 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS E5-5 Hazardous
waste and radioactive
waste, paragraph 39
Indicator
number 9 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk
of incidents of forced
labour, paragraph 14 (f)
Indicator
number 13 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 201
ESRS 2- SBM3 - S1 Risk
of incidents of child
labour, paragraph 14 (g)
Indicator
number 12 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 201
ESRS S1-1 Human
rights policy
commitments,
paragraph 20
Indicator
number 9 Table
#3 and Indicator
number 11 Table
#1 of Annex I
Pg. 250
ESRS S1-1 Due diligence
policies on issues
addressed by the
fundamental
International Labor
Organisation
Conventions 1 to 8,
paragraph 21
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Pg. 250
ESRS S1-1 Processes
and measures for
preventing trafficking in
human beings,
paragraph 22
Indicator
number 11 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 250
ESRS S1-1 Workplace
accident prevention
policy or management
system, paragraph 23
Indicator
number 1 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 250
ESRS S1-3 Grievance/
complaints handling
mechanisms, paragraph
32 (c)
Indicator
number 5 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 256
ESRS S1-14 Number of
fatalities and number
and rate of work-related
accidents, paragraph 88
(b) and (c)
Indicator
number 2 Table
#3 of Annex I
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Pg. 265
ESRS S1-14 Number of
days lost to injuries,
accidents, fatalities or
illness, paragraph 88 (e)
Indicator
number 3 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 265
ESRS S1-16 Unadjusted
gender pay gap,
paragraph 97 (a)
Indicator
number 12 Table
#1 of Annex I
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Not Material
ESRS S1-16 Excessive
CEO pay ratio,
paragraph 97 (b)
Indicator
number 8 Table
#3 of Annex I
Not Material
ESRS S1-17 Incidents of
discrimination,
paragraph 103 (a)
Indicator
number 7 Table
#3 of Annex I
Pg. 268
ESRS S1-17 Non-respect
of UNGPs on Business
and Human Rights and
OECD, paragraph 104
(a)
Indicator
number 10 Table
#1 and Indicator
number 14 Table
#3 of Annex I
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818 Art 12
(1)
Pg. 268
ESRS 2- SBM3 – S2
Significant risk of child
labour or forced labour
in the value chain,
paragraph 11 (b)
Indicators
number 12 and
n. 13 Table #3
of Annex I
Not Material
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 304
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
ESRS S2-1 Human
rights policy
commitments,
paragraph 17
Indicator
number 9 Table
#3 and Indicator
number 11 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Pg. 270
ESRS S2-1 Policies
related to value chain
workers, paragraph 18
Indicator
number 11 and
n. 4 Table #3 of
Annex 1
Pg. 270
ESRS S2- 1 Non-respect
of UNGPs on Business
and Human Rights
principles and OECD
guidelines, paragraph 19
Indicator
number 10 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Art 12
(1)
Pg. 270
ESRS S2-1 Due diligence
policies on issues
addressed by the
fundamental
International Labor
Organisation
Conventions 1 to 8,
paragraph 19
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II
Pg. 270
ESRS S2-4 Human
rights issues and
incidents connected to
its upstream and
downstream value
chain, paragraph 36
Indicator
number 14 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Pg. 272
ESRS S3-1 Human
rights policy
commitments,
paragraph 16
Indicator
number 9 Table
#3 of Annex 1
and Indicator
number 11 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS S3-1 Non-respect
of UNGPs on Business
and Human Rights, ILO
principles and/or OECD
guidelines, paragraph 17
Indicator
number 10 Table
#1 Annex 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Art 12
(1)
Not Material
ESRS S3-4 Human
rights issues and
incidents paragraph 36
Indicator
number 14 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Not Material
ESRS S4-1 Policies
related to consumers
and end-users,
paragraph 16
Indicator
number 9 Table
#3 and Indicator
number 11 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Pg. 275
ESRS S4-1 Non-respect
of UNGPs on Business
and Human Rights and
OECD guidelines,
paragraph 17
Indicator
number 10 Table
#1 of Annex 1
Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1816, Annex
II Delegated Regulation
(EU) 2020/1818, Art 12
(1)
Pg. 275
ESRS S4-4 Human
rights issues and
incidents, paragraph 35
Indicator
number 14 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Pg. 279
ESRS G1-1 United
Nations Convention
against Corruption,
paragraph 10 (b)
Indicator
number 15 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Pg. 284
ESRS G1-1 Protection of
whistleblowers,
paragraph 10 (d)
Indicator
number 6 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Pg. 284
ESRS G1-4 Fines for
violation of anti-
corruption and anti-
bribery laws, paragraph
24 (a)
Indicator
number 17 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Delegated
Regulation (EU)
2020/1816,
Annex II)
Pg. 289
ESRS G1-4 Standards of
anti-corruption and anti-
bribery, paragraph 24
(b)
Indicator
number 16 Table
#3 of Annex 1
Pg. 289
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 305
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
INDEPENDENT PRACTITIONER’S LIMITED ASSURANCE REPORT ON WIZZ AIR
HOLDINGS PLC’S CONSOLIDATED GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) STATEMENT
To the Management Board of Wizz Air Holdings Plc
We have undertaken a limited assurance engagement of the accompanying consolidated GHG statement
of Wizz Air Holdings Plc (hereinafter – the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (together – the “Group”) for
the twelve-month period ended 31 March 2026, comprising the emissions inventory and the explanatory
notes marked with triangle symbol (“△”) on pages 238 – 244 of the Company’s Annual Report
(hereinafter – the “Consolidated GHG Statement”). The information subject to limited assurance, framed
with triangle symbols, is marked with a blue triangle symbol at the beginning and with a pink triangle
symbol at the end. We have not performed any procedures with respect to information other than the
subject matter information described above and, accordingly, we do not express a conclusion on such
other information.
Responsibility of the Company’s Management Board for the Consolidated GHG Statement
The Company’s Management Board is responsible for the preparation of the Consolidated GHG Statement
in accordance with:
• GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
• GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance
• GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard and
• GHG Protocol Scope 3 Calculation Guidance (together hereinafter – the “Applicable Criteria”)
applied as explained on pages 238 - 244 of the Annual Report. This responsibility includes the design,
implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation of the Consolidated GHG
Statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
As discussed in section “[E1-6] GROSS SCOPES 1, 2, 3, AND TOTAL GHG EMISSIONS - THE
CONSOLIDATED GHG STATEMENT” of the Annual Report, GHG quantification is subject to inherent
uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the
values needed to combine emissions of different gases.
Our independence and quality management
We have complied with the applicable laws of Hungary, with the Hungarian Chamber of Auditors’ Rules on
ethics and professional conduct of auditors and on disciplinary process (hereinafter – the “Rules”) and, for
matters not regulated in the Rules, with the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
(including International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for
Accountants (IESBA Code), which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity,
professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour and we also comply
with further ethical requirements set out in these.
Our Firm applies international standard on quality management (ISQM) 1 (Quality management for firms
that perform audits or reviews of financial statements, or other assurance or related services
engagements), and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control including
documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional
standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Our responsibility
Our responsibility is to express a limited assurance conclusion on the Consolidated GHG Statement based
on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our limited
assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3410,
Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements ('ISAE 3410'), issued by the International
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. That standard requires that we plan and perform this
engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the Consolidated GHG Statement is free from
material misstatement.
A limited assurance engagement undertaken in accordance with ISAE 3410 involves assessing the
suitability in the circumstances of the Company’s use of the Applicable Criteria as the basis for the
preparation of the Consolidated GHG Statement, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the
Consolidated GHG Statement whether due to fraud or error, responding to the assessed risks as
necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating the overall presentation of the Consolidated GHG
Statement. A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance
engagement in relation to both the risk assessment procedures, including an understanding of internal
control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks.
The procedures we performed were based on our professional judgment and included inquiries,
observation of processes performed, inspection of documents, analytical procedures, evaluating the
appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling with
underlying records.
Given the circumstances of the engagement, in performing the procedures listed above we:
• Through inquiries, obtained an understanding of the Group’s control environment and information
systems relevant to emissions quantification and reporting, but did not evaluate the design of particular
control activities, obtain evidence about their implementation or test their operating effectiveness.
Wizz Air Holdings Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2026 306
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
• Evaluated whether the Group’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and had been
consistently applied. However, our procedures did not include testing the data on which the estimates
are based or separately developing our own estimates against which to evaluate the Group’s estimates.
• Conducted interviews of management and personnel responsible for the preparation of the consolidated
GHG statement and collection of underlying data.
• Performed limited substantive testing on a selective sample basis of the subject matter information to
check that data had been appropriately measured, recorded, collated and reported. and
• Evaluated whether disclosures meet the requirements of the Applicable Criteria.
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are
less in extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance
obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have
been obtained had we performed a reasonable assurance engagement. Accordingly, we do not express a
reasonable assurance opinion about whether the Company’s Consolidated GHG Statement has been
prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Applicable Criteria applied as explained on
pages 238 - 244 of the Annual Report.
Limited assurance conclusion
Based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained, nothing has come to
our attention that causes us to believe that the Company’s Consolidated GHG Statement for the twelve
month period ended 31 March 2026 is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the
Applicable Criteria applied as explained on pages 238 - 244 of the Annual Report.
Restriction on distribution and use
This report, including our conclusion, has been prepared solely for the Management Board of Wizz Air
Holdings Plc in accordance with the agreement between us, to assist the Management Board in reporting
on the Company’s key climate change related measures, performance and activities. We permit this
report to be attached to the Consolidated GHG Statement, which will be published on the Company’s
website, to assist the Management Board in responding to their governance responsibilities by obtaining
an independent limited assurance report in connection with the Consolidated GHG Statement.
The maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website is the responsibility of the management; the
work carried out by us does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, we accept no
responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the Consolidated GHG Statement when
presented on the Company’s website.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than
the Management Board of the Company for our work or this report except where the respective terms are
expressly agreed in writing and our prior consent in writing is obtained.
Budapest 11 June 2026
Anita Sávoly-Hatta
Partner                                   
PricewaterhouseCoopers Könyvvizsgáló Kft.
1055 Budapest, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky út 78.
Licence Number: 001464