
6. We have nothing to report on the other information
in the Annual Report
The directors are responsible for the other information
presented in the Annual Report together with the financial
statements. Our opinion on the financial statements does
not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not
express an audit opinion or, except as explicitly stated
below, any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in
doing so, consider whether, based on our financial
statements audit work, the information therein is materially
misstated or inconsistent with the financial statements or
our audit knowledge. Based solely on that work we have
not identified material misstatements in the other
information.
Strategic report and directors’ report
Based solely on our work on the other information:
— we have not identified material misstatements in the
strategic report and the directors’ report;
— in our opinion the information given in those reports for
the financial year is consistent with the financial
statements; and
— in our opinion those reports have been prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Directors’ remuneration report
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration
Report to be audited has been properly prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Disclosures of emerging and principal risks and longer-
term viability
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether
there is a material inconsistency between the directors’
disclosures in respect of emerging and principal risks and
the viability statement, and the financial statements and
our audit knowledge.
Based on those procedures, we have nothing material to
add or draw attention to in relation to:
— the directors’ confirmation within the viability statement
page 9 that they have carried out a robust assessment
of the emerging and principal risks facing the Group,
including those that would threaten its business model,
future performance, solvency and liquidity;
— the longer term viability statement disclosures
describing these risks and how emerging risks are
identified, and explaining how they are being managed
and mitigated; and
— the directors’ explanation in the viability statement of
how they have assessed the prospects of the Group,
over what period they have done so and why they
considered that period to be appropriate, and their
statement as to whether they have a reasonable
expectation that the Group will be able to continue in
operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the
period of their assessment, including any related
disclosures drawing attention to any necessary
qualifications or assumptions.
We are also required to review the viability statement, set
out on page 9 provided as if the Company were required to
comply with the Listing Rules in relation to this matter.
Based on the above procedures, we have concluded that
the above disclosures are materially consistent with the
financial statements and our audit knowledge.
Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the
context of only the knowledge acquired during our financial
statements audit. As we cannot predict all future events or
conditions and as subsequent events may result in
outcomes that are inconsistent with judgements that were
reasonable at the time they were made, the absence of
anything to report on these statements is not a guarantee
as to the Group’s and Company’s longer-term viability.
Corporate governance disclosures
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether
there is a material inconsistency between the directors’
corporate governance disclosures and the financial
statements and our audit knowledge.
Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each
of the following is materially consistent with the financial
statements and our audit knowledge:
— the directors’ statement that they consider that the
annual report and financial statements taken as a whole
is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the
Group’s position and performance, business model and
strategy;
— the section of the annual report describing the work of
the Audit Committee, including the significant issues
that the audit committee considered in relation to the
financial statements, and how these issues were
addressed; and
— the section of the annual report that describes the
review of the effectiveness of the Group’s risk
management and internal control systems.
In addition to our audit of the financial statements, the
directors have engaged us to review their Corporate
Governance Statement as if the Company were required to
comply with the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct
Authority in relation to this matter. Under the terms of our
engagement we are required to review the part of the
Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s
compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate
Governance Code specified for our review. We have
nothing to report in this respect.
Based solely on our work on the other information
described above:
— with respect to the Corporate Governance Report
disclosures about internal control and risk management
systems in relation to financial reporting processes and
about share capital structures:
− we have not identified material misstatements
therein; and
− the information therein is consistent with the
financial statements; and
— in our opinion, the Corporate Governance Statement
has been prepared in accordance with relevant rules of
the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the
Financial Conduct Authority.
We are also required to report to you if a corporate
governance statement has not been prepared by the
Company. We have nothing to report in these respects.
58