
15 million are forecast to be drawn down
attheend of August and September 2022
respectively. The Bridge Loan Facility is
secured on the majority of the Group’s assets.
The Bridge Loan Facility is being made
available (i) to repay the ECI Facility described
above in full, which occurred on 4 August
2022; and (ii) to fund expenditures projected
to fall due after 21 July 2022, in accordance
with a schedule of expenditures agreed
between the parties. The Bridge Loan Facility
is repayable on the earlier of (i) the date falling
three months after the date on which the
Offer becomes wholly unconditional; or
(ii)the date falling three months after the date
onwhich the Offer lapses or is withdrawn.
Interest will accrue at the rate of 12 per cent
per annum. The Directors believe the Offer
and Bridge Loan Facility are the only viable
funding solutions available to the Group and
as a result this forms the basis of the forecast
cash flows used in performing their
assessment of going concern. The key
assumptions are detailed below:
_
The Offer proceeds to completion: The
Offer is subject to more than 50 per cent of
shareholders approving the Offer. Based on
the current shareholdings of Thunderball,
which in aggregate represent approximately
45.18% of the Company’s issued share
capital, and irrevocable undertakings by
certain other shareholders to vote in favour
of the Offer representing an additional
4.82% of issued share capital, the Directors
have forecast that the Offer will be accepted
by the Shareholders. The Offer is subject to
certain additional conditions precedent
which are considered usual and customary
for this type of transaction.
_
Sufficiency of the Bridge Loan Facility:
TheDirectors have assumed that the Bridge
Loan Facility will be timely paid following
draw-down requests and sufficient to cover
the funding requirements for the time
required to conclude the Offer. After
repayment of the ECI facility, USD 101
million of the Bridge Loan Facility remains
to pay the Group’s other creditors, which
amounted to USD 176 million as of 30 June
2022, and to partially meet the ongoing
funding requirements of the Group. A
significant proportion of the Group’s
creditors at 30 June 2022 were many
months overdue and, whilst it is anticipated
that the Bridge Loan Facility will enable a
number of these to be settled in the period
prior to the completion of the Offer, the
Directors expect payment to certain
overdue key suppliers on the IMI Rigs
projects (who were owed USD 51 million at
30 June 2022) will need to be extended in
line with the expected timing of milestone
receipts on these projects in late 2022 and
early 2023. The Directors have assumed
that the Group will be able to achieve this
based on its track record of doing so, but
it’s ability to dothis is critical and dependent
on the reaction of the key suppliers as the
payables are unsecured and contractual
credit terms are exceeded, which is outside
the Group’s control. The level of creditor
deferral in the period prior to completion of
the Offer is also dependent on the
outcome of contract claims and the extent
of new contract awards as discussed
below.
_
Post completion funding: The Directors do
not have visibility of Thunderball’s plans for
the business after the Offer is completed,
including the extent and terms of any
funding that will be provided post
completion. The intentions statement in
the 21 July announcement indicates that
Thunderball is aware that Lamprell must be
recapitalised and that this would be most
effectively undertaken after the Company’s
shares are de-listed such that Lamprell can
execute its strategy, with appropriate
support, capital and assistance from
Thunderball. The Directors have therefore
assumed that upon conclusion of the Offer,
Thunderball continues to support the
business, and in particular:
_
that Thunderball will extend or waive the
repayment of the Bridge Loan Facility as
the Group will be unable to repay the
loan when it falls due (which is forecast
to be in December 2022).
_
that significant additional funding will be
provided by Thunderball during the 15
months to October 2023 in order that
the business may continue to trade. The
level and timing of funding required will
depend on a number of factors,
including the outcome of Thunderball’s
review of the business, successful
execution of the Group’s ongoing
contracts, the speed with which they are
required to settle overdue creditors, and
(as discussed below) the outcome of
contract claims and extent of new
contract awards, but may be up to
approximately USD 100 million.
_
Contract claims: The Directors assume that
settlement of contract claims on certain
major contracts will result in significant
cash inflows in the forecast period. These
are not yet agreed and the amount and
timing of such settlements is not wholly
within the control of the Directors.
_
New contract awards: The Directors
assume conversion of a portion of the bid
pipeline in line with the expected timing of
awards, including achieving similar
historical levels of revenue for the
contracting services and rig refurbishment
businesses. These contract awards are not
committed and there is therefore some
uncertainty as to their commencement.
In preparing the forecasts, the Directors have
further considered broader economic factors
including the ongoing pandemic, conflict in
Ukraine and the effects of climate change.
Technological improvements or innovations
that support the transition to a lower carbon
economy, and customer preferences or
regulatory incentives that alter fuel or power
choices, could impact demand for oil & gas.
Financial review continued Viability statement
In accordance with provision 31 of the UK
Corporate Governance Code, the Directors
have assessed the prospects of the Company
over an appropriate period. The Directors
have previously determined that a period of
three years was the appropriate viability
assessment period, for the following reasons:
_
the Board considers the Group’s forecast
projections over a three-year period
_
the strategic review covers a period with
visibility on likely prospects for the coming
two to three years
_
most major projects undertaken by the
Group last for up to two years meaning that
the Company has a reasonable ability to
evaluate its likely backlog for a period of
two to three years
_
the long-term incentive awards for
management are structured around a
three-year performance period
Given the acute liquidity challenges faced
bythe Group and the material uncertainty
surrounding the successful and timely
execution of the assumptions as detailed
inthe going concern statement detailed
opposite (most notably the recommended
offer to acquire the Company and the
implementation of the Bridge Loan Facility),
inassessing viability the Directors are not able
to form a reasonable expectation that the
Group and Company will have the ability to
continue in operation and meet its liabilities
asthey fall due beyond the going concern
period. Therefore the Directors have
concluded that it is necessary to shorten the
viability assessment period to October 2023,
to align to the going concern period. While it
is not possible for the Directors to form a
reasonable assessment of the Company’s
longer-term ability to continue in operation,
the Directors believe in the quality and
attractiveness of the Company’s and Group’s
capabilities and credentials to take advantage
of the strong fundamentals in their
addressable markets in the coming years.
In coming to that belief, the Board has
considered and regularly reviews the Group’s
exposure to a variety of risks =>>48, and
related controls and mitigating actions.
Lamprell’s strategy and business model =>>8
are central to an understanding of its future
prospects and mitigation of risks. Its business
model has proven to be resilient in previous
project cycles but it remains under severe
pressure due to circumstances at the macro
and micro level. The global markets are
challenging in light of the potential impact of
the increased inflation rates and higher supply
chain costs, both of which may have a
detrimental effect on the broader economy
and capital investment decisions by clients.
Specific to Lamprell, the Directors believe the
offer and Bridge Loan Facility =>>43 are the
only viable funding solutions available to the
Group and as a result this forms the basis to
resolve the immediate funding obligations
and severe liquidity demands of the business.
The Directors recognise that future
assessment and assumptions are subject to
alevel of uncertainty that increases with time
and, therefore, future outcomes cannot be
guaranteed or predicted with certainty. As
such, they have considered the realistic
availability and likely effectiveness of
mitigating actions, some of which are severe,
that they could take to avoid or reduce the
impact or likelihood of a significant
deterioration in the cash flows which includes
the following assumptions:
_
the recommended offer to acquire the
Company will be accepted by our
shareholders and the Bridge Loan Facility
will be timely drawn and sufficient to cover
the Group’s operational requirements
_
on conclusion of the offer, while the
Directors do not have visibility of the
acquiror’s post-completion funding for the
Group, it is expected that the acquiror will
extend or waive the repayment terms of
thebridge loan facility and/or will provide
such additional capital as may be needed
by the business
_
payment to certain key suppliers on the
IMIrigs will need to be extended in line with
the expected timing of the final milestone
payments for the rigs
_
a portion of the bid pipeline is converted in
line with the expected timing of awards
assumed in the forecast cash flows
Further details of these and other key
assumptions are included in the going
concern statement opposite. The Board has
considered the risk mitigation strategies for
each of the above assumptions as well as
downside sensitivity cases and has concluded
that these actions would be inadequate
without the offer proceeding to successful
completion. If the offer does not proceed to
completion and the Bridge Loan Facility falls
due for repayment within its current terms,
there can be no guarantee that the Group
willbe able to implement alternatives in the
available timeframe and, the Group would
beunable to continue to operate as a going
concern, resulting in the appointment of
liquidators or administrators, as appropriate.
Accordingly, the Directors consider that
completion of the offer represents the only
executable funding solution available to the
Group and that is a fundamental assumption
for the continuing viability of the Company
and the Group.
Post balance sheet events
See Note 41 on =>> 149 for events that took
place post the balance sheet date.
Principal risks Base assumption Downside scenario
Ability to finance business
Offer to acquire Company is
successful and funding provided
Offer to acquire Company is
unsuccessful; funding not
provided
Economic conditions
Strong fundamentals in
addressable markets
Market conditions do not
improve
Counterparty risk
Short-term extended
credit terms by key suppliers
Prolonged extended
credit terms
Project execution Projects executed as planned
No reasonably plausible financial
exposure has been modelled
Depending on the nature and speed of any
such changes and our response, these
changes could increase costs, reduce our
profitability, reduce demand for certain
products, limit our access to new
opportunities, require us to write down
certain assets or curtail or cease certain
operations, and affect investor sentiment, our
access to capital markets, our competitiveness
and financial performance. On the contrary,
these risks provide a significant opportunity
toour Renewables segment which would
benefit from the increased demand and
accelerated award of projects to meet the net
zero emission targets. If the Offer does not
proceed and the Bridge Loan Facility falls due
for repayment within its current terms, there
can be no guarantee that the Group will be
able to implement any alternative funding in
the available timeframe. In such an event, the
Directors believe that the Group will be unable
to meet its financial commitments as they
falldue and consequently will be unable to
continue to operate as a going concern
resulting in the appointment of receivers,
liquidators or administrators. Accordingly, the
Directors consider that the Offer represents
the only executable funding solution available
to the Group given that Thunderball has
procured the Bridge Loan Facility and there
isno present viable alternative. The Directors
believe that: (1) the risk that the Offer does not
complete; (2) the requirement for significant
levels of ongoing creditor deferral during the
period prior to the completion of the Offer;
and (3) the lack of visibility of Thunderball’s
plans for the business after the Offer is
completed, all of which depend on factors
outside management’s control, constitute
inaggregate a material uncertainty that may
cast significant doubt upon the Group’s and
Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not
include the adjustments that would result
ifthe Group and Company were unable to
continue as a going concern.
Dividend
The Group made progress in delivering its
strategy in 2021, however, due to the current
financing requirements coupled with
prevailing COVID-19 uncertainties, the
Directors do not recommend the payment
ofa dividend for the period in relation to
financial year ending 31 December 2021.
TheDirectors will continue to review this
position in light of market conditions and
Group performance at the relevant time.
Tony Wright
Chief Financial Officer
Strategic report
44 Lamprell plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 Lamprell plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 45